Skip to main content
Journal of Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Surgical Case Reports
. 2024 Apr 1;2024(4):rjae195. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae195

Actinomyces as a rare cause of appendicitis: a case report

Yijun Gao 1,, Shaurya Jhamb 2, Raymond Hayler 3, Chloe Trickett 4, Allan Kwok 5
PMCID: PMC10984727  PMID: 38572291

Abstract

Actinomycosis remains a rare and often underdiagnosed cause of appendicitis with only 10% of cases diagnosed prior to surgery. It is an important cause to consider particularly in the setting of an indolent infection with nonspecific symptoms. We present a 22 years old male who presented with 3 weeks history of lower abdominal pain who underwent laboratory investigations and imaging studies suggestive of acute appendicitis. He underwent an emergency laparoscopic caecectomy with histopathology of the specimen suggestive of actinomycosis. He recovered well postoperatively and was discharged home with a prolonged course of oral penicillins. Preoperative diagnosis of actinomycosis is uncommon and accounts for ~10% of cases. Definitive diagnosis is usually through histopathology or tissue/fluid culture. Treatment usually involves a combination of surgical resection and antibiotic therapy with a success rate of >90%.

Introduction

Actinomyces is a gram-positive anaerobic bacteria that are normal commensals of the oral cavity, the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts and the female genital tract [1]. Actinomycosis is an indolent, slowly progressive infection caused by the bacteria and often presents with nonspecific symptoms which can mimic inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulitis. The appendix and ileocaecal region are most commonly involved however cases of hepatic, retroperitoneal, and adrenal actinomycosis have also been reported [2]. Actinomycosis is rare with an incidence between 1 in 300 000 and 1 in 1 000 000 and occurs when the normal mucosal barrier is breached. It is estimated to represent ~0.02% of causes of acute appendicitis [3]. Predisposing factors include recent abdominal surgery, bowel perforation, neoplasia, poor oral hygiene, and intrauterine contraceptive devices [2].

Acute appendicitis is the most common indication in the world for emergency abdominal surgery and carries a lifetime incidence of 10%. The pathophysiology of appendicitis involves luminal obstruction with common causes including lymphoid hyperplasia and faecal stasis with faecoliths. Carcinoid tumors, eosinophilic appendicitis, granulomas and actinomycosis are rarer causes.

Here we present a case of subacute appendicitis secondary to Actinomyces diagnosed after surgery, as well as a literature review of this rare entity.

Case

A 22 years old male with no prior medical or surgical history presented to the emergency department with 3 weeks history of lower abdominal pain and rectal discomfort. The pain was noted to be more suprapubic rather than the right iliac fossa but his abdomen was soft with no features of peritonism. He denied fevers, nausea or vomiting, or changes to bowel habits. There was no family history of bowel cancers or inflammatory bowel disease. His observations on admission were unremarkable. Pathology testing revealed a white cell count of 8.30 x 109/L and a c-reactive protein of 22 mg/L. An initial ultrasound of the abdomen visualized a non-compressible tubular structure measuring 9 mm in the right iliac fossa with 4.4 ml of surrounding free fluid and prominent lymph nodes. Given the atypical history for appendicitis, a computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis was performed which demonstrated significant inflammatory change close to the terminal ileum extending to the right pelvic side wall with a calcific focus possibly representing an appendicolith (Fig. 1). The actual appendix was not seen as a distinct entity and the actual terminal ileum itself was not thickened.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A). Axial slice of a CT abdomen/pelvis in the portovenous phase demonstrating an inflammatory mass in the pelvis associated with the right pelvic side wall, with a calcific focus. (B). Coronal slice of the CT demonstrating the relation of the inflammatory mass within the pelvis.

He underwent an emergency laparoscopic stapled caecectomy. Intraoperatively, the appendix was firmly adherent to the terminal ileum and right pelvic side wall, forming a dense fibrotic mass. This was bluntly dissected and given the appearance of an oedematous appendiceal base, the decision was made for a stapled caecectomy. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well and was discharged 3 days later. Interestingly, the histopathology of the specimen was reported as acute appendicitis with acute on chronic inflammation in the appendiceal mucosa and a luminal faecolith surrounded by actinomyces-like organisms (Fig. 2). There was no mention of sulfur granules on the pathology report. Advice was sought from the infectious diseases specialists and the patient was placed on a course of oral penicillins. The patient has ongoing follow up to ensure no recurrence of disease.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microscopy slides demonstrating a luminal faecolith surrounded by Actinomyces.

Discussion

Actinomycosis occurs commonly in three distinct forms—cervicofacial presentation in 50% of cases, abdominopelvic in 20%, and intrathoracic in 15% [3]. Actinomyces israelii is the most common aetiologic organism of actinomycosis. In abdominal actinomycosis, the appendix is perforated in ~75% of cases as Actinomyces requires injury to the mucosa to penetrate and cause disease and hence an inflamed but intact appendix is a rare find [4]. In our case, the appendix remained intact without histopathological features of perforation.

The clinical presentation is often indolent with non-specific symptoms and <10% of cases of actinomycosis is discovered prior to surgery. Laboratory investigations offer little value in diagnosis and imaging is useful in determining the location and extent of disease but remain nonspecific. On CT imaging, actinomycosis often resembles a solid mass with prominent contrast enhancement [5]. Small rim-enhancing lesions are sometimes found in the solid portion of the mass which are thought to represent small abscesses. A definitive diagnosis is usually obtained via visualization of characteristic sulfur granules or culture of Actinomyces obtained from a collection or surgical specimen on selective agar medium under anaerobic conditions for a minimum of 7 days [2]. Acute Actinomyces infection of the appendix can be differentiated from ileocaecal actinomycosis by Actinomyces granules that are detected in the appendiceal lumen [6].

The mainstay of treatment is with prolonged course penicillin via either an oral or intravenous route depending on severity of infection. Currently no guideline exists on the duration of treatment and that determination relies on clinical and radiological response to treatment [2]. Preceding surgical resection may allow for a shorter antibiotic duration [7]. A combination of antibiotics and surgical resection results in >90% success rate in treatment. Insufficient treatment may result in long-lasting disease, frequently seen as local dissemination or metastatic abscesses [6].

Conclusion

Actinomycosis is a rare cause for acute appendicitis and should be consider when a patient presents with atypical symptoms but radiological features of appendicitis. Surgery remains a valuable tool in definitive diagnosis as well as an adjunct in therapy.

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the infectious diseases and pathology departments, in particular, Dr Theocharous.

Contributor Information

Yijun Gao, Department of Surgery, The Sutherland Hospital, The Kingsway, Caringbah 2229, NSW, Australia.

Shaurya Jhamb, Department of Surgery, The Sutherland Hospital, The Kingsway, Caringbah 2229, NSW, Australia.

Raymond Hayler, Department of Surgery, St George Public Hospital, Gray Street, Kogarah 2217, NSW, Australia.

Chloe Trickett, Department of Surgery, The Sutherland Hospital, The Kingsway, Caringbah 2229, NSW, Australia.

Allan Kwok, Department of Surgery, The Sutherland Hospital, The Kingsway, Caringbah 2229, NSW, Australia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grants from public, commercial or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Consent

Informed consent for publication was provided by both the patient as well as her parent.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval and consent were waived by the Human Research and Ethics Committee as the nature of the article did not appear to raise any ethical risks.

References

  • 1. Yiğiter M, Kiyici H, Arda İS, et al. Actinomycosis: a differential diagnosis for appendicitis: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:e23–6. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Liu K, Joseph D, Lai K, et al. Abdominal actinomycosis presenting as appendicitis: two case reports and review. Journal of Surgical Case Reports 2016;2016:rjw068. 10.1093/jscr/rjw068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gómez-Torres GA, Ortega-Gárcia OS, Gutierrez-López EG, et al. A rare case of subacute appendicitis, actinomycosis as the final pathology reports: a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017;36:46–9. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Garner JP, Macdonald M, Kumar PK. Abdominal actinomycosis. Int J Surg 2007;5:441–8. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sung HY, Lee IS, Kim SI, et al. Clinical features of abdominal actinomycosis: a 15-year experience of a single institute. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:932–7. 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.7.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hakan Yardimci V, Hande YA. Is appendectomy always the adequate treatment? Clinical manifestations of isolated actinomycosis in appendix. Turk J Surg 2021;37:403–7. 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.4015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lisa-Gracia M, Martín-Rivas B, Pajarón-Guerrero M, et al. Abdominal actinomycosis in the last 10 years and risk factors for appendiceal actinomycosis: review of the literature. Turk J Med Sci 2017;47:98–102. 10.3906/sag-1511-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES