Skip to main content
Frontiers in Dentistry logoLink to Frontiers in Dentistry
. 2024 Feb 12;21:7. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i7.14888

Evaluation of the Relationship between Sublingual Varices and Hypertension

Zahra Jamali 1, Katayoun Katebi 1,*, Hamed Alibabaei 1, Ahmad Jamei Khosroshahi 2
PMCID: PMC10985508  PMID: 38571901

Abstract

Objectives: Sublingual varices are characterized by abnormally dilated veins. Some systemic conditions such as cardiovascular disease have been suggested to be associated with sublingual varices. Due to the convenience in examining the sublingual area, the present study aimed to assess the relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension.

Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, 500 patients were categorized into two groups: those with sublingual varices and those without. Two oral medicine specialists assessed the lesions, and the blood pressure of all patients was measured while they were in a relaxed sitting position. Age and gender data were recorded for all participants. Statistical analysis included t-test, chi-square, and logistic regression, with significance set at P<0.05.

Results: The frequency of sublingual varices was 21.8%. Mean systolic blood pressure was 139.68±19.01mmHg in patients with sublingual varices and 118.09±13.78mmHg in patients without the lesions (P=0.561). Mean diastolic blood pressure was 100.45±17.81mmHg and 80.31±12.08mmHg in patients with and without sublingual varices, respectively (P<0.001). Smoking was significantly more prevalent among patients who had the lesions (P<0.05). Gender (P=0.686) and age (P=0.875) showed no significant relationship with sublingual varices, while smoking and blood pressure levels were significantly associated with these varices (P<0.001).

Conclusion: It is advisable to monitor and manage blood pressure in patients with sublingual varices who may not be aware of their blood pressure status. Our results showed that smoking could be one of the predictive factors for sublingual varices.

Key Words: Mouth, Mouth Floor, Varicose Veins, Hypertension, Cigarette Smoking

Introduction

Generally, varices are defined as dilated tortuous veins, vessels, and lymphatic vessels. Although sublingual varices often occur in the ventral surface of the tongue, they may also be observed on lips and floor of the mouth. In very rare cases, they may occur in the buccal mucosa, lips commissure, hard palate, and soft palate [1]. Sublingual varices are clinically multi-dimensional, irregular, purple-blue, prominent, or bubble-shaped in the ventral or lateral border of the tongue. It is often extended to the tip of the tongue from the posterior part of the tongue bilaterally. These lesions are often asymptomatic and identified in the routine clinical examination [2]. These lesions may develop due to the weakening of the connective tissue of the vascular wall of the veins owing to elastic fiber degradation due to aging [3]. Sublingual varices are rare among children [4]. It commonly occurs in adults [2], affecting both genders equally [5]. Generally, sublingual varices do not require any treatment, and the patient should be reassured that these lesions are benign [5,6]. One of the systemic diseases considered to be a risk factor for sublingual varices is hypertension. Shivakumar et al. [7] reported a significant relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension among adults.

Hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure above 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg, is the most common cardiovascular disease [8]. It is estimated to affect 45% of the world’s population and is estimated to increase by age [9]. The complications of cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, sudden death, cardiac failure, peripheral vascular disease, and renal failure highly depend on hypertension [10,11]. Based on the report of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2014, hypertension is the cause of 51% of mortality due to stroke and 45% of death due to cardiovascular disease for all ages and all races [9]. Hypertension status is a critical factor in risk estimation for cardiovascular disease [12,13]. Hypertension is a complicated multifactorial disease that may not be explained by a simple mechanism [14]. Endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation are the involved factors in hypertension in the laboratory models and clinical studies, though the exact mechanism is not yet understood [15].

A study by Hedström and Bergh [16] showed an association between sublingual varices and smoking, aging, and cardiovascular diseases. Another investigation, similarly showed a relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension in patients above 40 years old [17]. Akkaya et al. [18] conducted a descriptive study in which they evaluated the risk factors of sublingual varices. Results of their study suggested a relationship between elevated blood pressure and using denture prosthesis and the development of sublingual varices.

Limited studies conducted to evaluate the relationship between sublingual varices and cardiovascular disease have reported controversial results [19,20]. Therefore, more accurate and expanded investigations are required to explain the relationship between sublingual varices and systemic diseases. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension. Findings of this study may be helpful in identifying the undiagnosed hypertensive patients in dental setting and early referral to physicians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present descriptive-analytic study was conducted on 500 patients referring to the Faculty of Dentistry of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Subjects aged 25 years and above were enrolled, and those with systemic diseases other than hypertension, removable prosthesis, and pregnant/breastfeeding women were excluded [18]. Informed consent was obtained from each of the participants after an explanation of the study design and objectives. The research proposal was approved by the research ethics committee of the university (code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.559).

The patients were asked if they were smokers and smoking was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as individuals who reported any type of smoking on a daily or occasional basis during the last 30 days [21].

The subingual region and floor of the mouth of all patients were examined by two oral medicine specialists who were not previously informed of the patient’s history and health status. In case of disagreements, a third specialist was consulted. Moreover, to assess screening reliability, 50 images of the floor of the mouth with varying degrees of sublingual varices were shown to the two oral medicine specialist and Cohen’s kappa coefficient was assessed as 0.84. Based on the clinical examinations, patients were grouped into those with and those without sublingual varices.

After documenting the variceal status, patients were instructed to rest and relax for a minimum of 5 minutes. Subsequently, their blood pressure was measured twice at five-minute intervals while the patient was seated, with the arm positioned at heart level. The readings were obtained using the Korotkoff-Riva-Rocci method, employing a sphygmomanometer and stethoscope. An average systolic blood pressure of 140mmHg or higher or a diastolic pressure of 90mmHg or higher was considered hypertensive [22]. In patients without previous history of hypertension, if the measured systolic blood pressure was above 140mmHg or the diastolic blood pressure was above 90 mmHg, they were referred to a cardiologist to confirm their diagnosis to avoid inclusion of pseudohypertension cases. Among the initial 500 examined patients, 19 had high blood pressure, but were not aware of their condition. These participants were referred to a cardiologist and the result was reported back to the study team. Eleven of these patients didn’t visit a cardiologist, and were therefore excluded from the study and replaced by new participants. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics (frequency, percent, and mean± standard deviation). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between the sublingual varices and hypertension while controlling confounding factors. P-values below 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Five hundred patients were examined in this study. There were 232 (46.4%) male and 268 (53.6%) females with a mean age of 42.74±12.23 years. In the group of patients with and without sublingual varices, 55% and 44% were men, respectively. A total of 109 (21.8%) patients had sublingual varices. Of these, 84 had hypertension and of the 391 without sublingual varices only 58 were hypertensives. The frequency of hypertension in patients with sublingual varices was 77%, compared with 14.8% for individuals without the condition. The frequency of hypertension was significantly higher in patients with sublingual varices compared to those without the lesion (P<0.001).

Table 1, shows the mean and standard deviation of systolic blood pressure in patients with and without sublingual varices. There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure between the two groups, while the diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in patients with sublingual varices.

Table 1.

Mean blood pressure (mmHg) and age (years) ± standard deviation in patients with and without sublingual varices

Sublingual varices P *
Yes (N=109) No (N=391)
Age 43.34±11.39 42.74±12.23 0.561
Systolic BP 139.68±19.01 118.09±13.78 0.056
Diastolic BP 100.45±17.81 80.31±12.08 <0.001

BP: blood pressure

*

Independent t-test

Evaluation of smoking using the chi-square test demonstrated that smoking was significantly more prevalent among patients with sublingual varices (Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency (percentage) of smoking in patients with and without sublingual varices

Sublingual varices P *
Yes No
Smoking 33(30.3) 25(6.4) <0.001
Non-smoking 76(69.7) 366(93.6)
Total 109(100) 391(100)
*

Chi-square

Results of the logistic regression analysis showed that gender and age were not significantly associated with sublingual varices, while smoking and blood pressure levels had a significant relationship with these lesions (Table 3). The identification of sublingual varices as an indicator of hypertension had a sensitivity of 58.7, and a specificity of 92.1.

Table 3.

Bivariate logistic regression for determining the effect of age, gender, smoking and blood pressure on sublingual varices

B Odds ratio Standard error P 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Gender -0.12 0.87 0.31 0.686 -0.75 0.49
Smoking 2.6 13.46 0.42 <0.001 1.77 3.42
Age 0.02 1.02 0.14 0.875 -0.05 0.51
Blood pressure -1.85 0.15 0.17 <0.001 -2.19 -1.51

Discussion

In the present study, 500 patients were examined to evaluate the relationship between sublingual varices and hyper-tension. We found the prevalence of these lesions to be 21.8%, which was close to the 28.1% reported by Accardo et al. [23], but much lower than the 46% found by Lazos et al. [24]. The difference in these percentages may be attributed to the difference of study populations, i.e., different age groups and races.

Our findings indicated that the frequency of hypertension was significantly higher in patients with sublingual varices, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [7,17] and with those who established a significant association between sublingual varices and elevated blood pressure [16,18,24,25]. However, Ettinger and Manderson [19] did not find a significant link between sublingual varices and cardiovascular or any systemic diseases, which was in contrast to our findings.

Systolic blood pressure was higher in patients with sublingual varices but, the difference was not statistically significant. On the other hand, diastolic blood pressure showed significantly higher numbers in patients with sublingual varices (P<0.001).

Smoking has also been suggested as a risk factor for sublingual varices [16,18]. We found a significant relationship between smoking and these lesions. Hedström and Bergh [16] reported the relationship between sublingual varices in non-smoker patients with hypertension as 44.7% and in smokers with hypertension as 64.7%. Their results corroborate our findings.

Lazos et al. [24] showed a significant relationship between sublingual varices and aging, lower limb varices, tobacco consumption, familial history of varices, hypertension, and diabetes type 2. Their results are consistent with the present study in terms of hypertension and smoking, whereas aging did not have a relationship with sublingual varices in the present study. Lynge Pedersen et al. [25] and Al-Shayyab et al.[20] suggested that aging has a relationship with sublingual varices. A possible explanation for the lack of a significant relationship in our study was the relatively low frequency of patients above 50 years (15.2%). In participants above 55 years with sublingual varices, 66.7% had hypertension, and only 13.3% had normal blood pressure. The process of aging and hypertension leads to morphological changes of the connective tissue and blood vessels, which eventually lead to disorders of blood circulation and the development of varices.

Consistent with the outcomes reported by Accardo et al. [23], our study did not reveal a significant association between sublingual varices and gender. Additionally, the results of our logistic regression analysis identified hypertension and smoking, but not gender and age, as predictive factors influencing the prevalence of sublingual varices.

Accardo et al. [23] found a significant relationship between the prevalence of sublingual varices and different stages of hypertension. The accuracy of their regression model using hypertension stage, age, and smoking was 0.75, while it was 0.84 in the current investigation.

Screening for hypertension using identification of sublingual varices in the present study would identify 58.7% of hypertensive patients, with a high specificity of 92%. In the study by Hedström et al [17] the sensitivity and specificity were 48% and 82% respectively.

Examining the sublingual areas in dental visit is simple, and it does not consume much time Therefore sublingual varices may be a good clinical sign to identify hypertensive patients in dental setting. Based on the results of the present study it seems rational to measure blood pressure in patients with sublingual varices who are not aware of their blood pressure status before dentistry procedures and refer them to a cardiologist. Further prospective studies on this subject are suggested.

CONCLUSION

Our study points to blood pressure and cigarette smoking as the primary predicting factors influencing the occurrence of sublingual varices. However, gender and age did not exhibit a significant relationship with the presence of these lesions.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

Notes:

Cite this article as: Jamali Z, Katebi K, Alibabaei H, Jamei Khosroshahi A. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Sublingual Varices and Hypertension. Front Dent. 2024:21:07.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

References

  • 1.Lazos JP, Piemonte ED, Panico RL. Oral varix: a review. Gerodontology. 2015 Jun;32(2):82–9. doi: 10.1111/ger.12074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nevalainen MJ, Närhi TO, Ainamo A. Oral mucosal lesions and oral hygiene habits in the home-living elderly. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 May;24(5):332–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.d01-298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fernandes DT, Elias RA, Santos-Silva AR, Vargas PA, Lopes MA. Benign oral vascular lesions treated by sclerotherapy with ethanolamine oleate: A retrospective study of 43 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Mar 1;23(2):e180–e187. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ugar-Cankal D, Denizci S, Hocaoglu T. Prevalence of tongue lesions among Turkish schoolchildren. Saudi Med J. 2005 Dec;26(12):1962–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Corrêa L, Frigerio ML, Sousa SC, Novelli MD. Oral lesions in elderly population: a biopsy survey using 2250 histopathological records. Gerodontology. 2006 Mar;23(1):48–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Viswanath V, Nair S, Chavan N, Torsekar R. Caviar tongue. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011 Jan-Feb;77(1):78–9. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.75002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shivakumar KM, Raje V, Kadashetti V. Assessing the correlation between sublingual varices and hypertension among the adults of Satara district, Maharashtra: An observational study. J Int Oral Health. 2020 Jul 1;12(4):349. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953–2041. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redón J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2013 Jul;31(7):1281–357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bath P, Chalmers J, Powers W, Beilin L, Davis S, Lenfant C, et al. International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. International Society of Hypertension (ISH): statement on the management of blood pressure in acute stroke. J Hypertens. 2003 Apr;21(4):665–72. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000052489.18130.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Burnier M, Caulfield MJ, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. Blood Press. 2009;18(6):308–47. doi: 10.3109/08037050903450468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bangalore S, Toklu B, Gianos E, Schwartzbard A, Weintraub H, Ogedegbe G, et al. Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6):707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bundy JD, Li C, Stuchlik P, Bu X, Kelly TN, Mills KT, et al. Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):775–81. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Czopek A, Moorhouse R, Guyonnet L, Farrah T, Lenoir O, Owen E, et al. A novel role for myeloid endothelin-B receptors in hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):768–84. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Drummond GR, Vinh A, Guzik TJ, Sobey CG. Immune mechanisms of hypertension. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019 Aug;19(8):517–32. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hedström L, Bergh H. Sublingual varices in relation to smoking and cardiovascular diseases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;48(2):136–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hedström L, Albrektsson M, Bergh H. Is there a connection between sublingual varices and hypertension? BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jul;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0054-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Akkaya N, Ölmez D, Özkan G. Evaluation of the factors associated with sublingual varices: a descriptive clinical study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2019;78(2):325–30. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ettinger RL, Manderson RD. A clinical study of sublingual varices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Oct;38(4):540–5. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(74)90084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al-Shayyab MH, Baqain ZH. Sublingual varices in relation to smoking, cardiovascular diseases, denture wearing, and consuming vitamin rich foods. Saudi Med J. 2015 Mar;36(3):310–5. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.3.10429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sychareun V, Hansana V, Choummanivong M, Nathavong S, Chaleunvong K, Durham J. Cross-sectional survey: smoking among medical, pharmacy, dental and nursing students, University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 30;3(8):e003042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206–52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Accardo A, Pascazio L, Costantinides F, Gorza F, Silveri G. Influence of hypertension and other risk factors on the onset of sublingual varices. BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 4;21(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01604-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lazos J, Marco ER, Panico R, Romero JC, Cámara L, Brunotto M, et al. Oral Varicose Veins: Clinical Characterization and Association with Medical Conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Jan;129(1):e150. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lynge Pedersen AM, Nauntofte B, Smidt D, Torpet LA. Oral mucosal lesions in older people: relation to salivary secretion, systemic diseases and medications. Oral Dis. 2015 Sep;21(6):721–9. doi: 10.1111/odi.12337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES