Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2024 Feb 28;12(4):e03012-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23

Genomic epidemiology of the primary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones causing invasive infections in Paraguayan children

Rosa Guillén 1, Claudia Salinas 1, Alejandro Mendoza-Álvarez 2, Luis A Rubio Rodríguez 3, Ana Díaz-de Usera 3, José M Lorenzo-Salazar 3, Rafaela González-Montelongo 3, Carlos Flores 2,3,4,5, Fátima Rodríguez 1,
Editor: Rafael Vignoli6
PMCID: PMC10986618  PMID: 38415665

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the major human pathogens. It could carry numerous resistance genes and virulence factors in its genome, some of which are related to the severity of the infection. An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was designed to molecularly analyze MRSA isolates that cause invasive infections in Paraguayan children from 2009 to 2013. Ten representative MRSA isolates of the main clonal complex identified were analyzed with short-read paired-end sequencing and assessed for the virulome, resistome, and phylogenetic relationships. All the genetically linked MRSA isolates were recovered from diverse clinical sources, patients, and hospitals at broad gap periods. The pan-genomic analysis of these clones revealed three major and different clonal complexes (CC30, CC5, and CC8), each composed of clones closely related to each other. The CC30 genomes prove to be a successful clone, strongly installed and disseminated throughout our country, and closely related to other CC30 public genomes from the region and the world. The CC5 shows the highest genetic variability, and the CC8 carried the complete arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), closely related to the USA300-NAE-ACME+, identified as the major cause of CA-MRSA infections in North America. Multiple virulence and resistance genes were identified for the first time in this study, highlighting the complex virulence profiles of MRSA circulating in the country. This study opens a wide range of new possibilities for future projects and trials to improve the existing knowledge on the epidemiology of MRSA circulating in Paraguay.

IMPORTANCE

The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a public health problem worldwide. The most frequent MRSA clones identified in Paraguay in previous studies (including community and hospital acquired) were the Pediatric (CC5-ST5-IV), the Cordobes-Chilean (CC5-ST5-I), the SouthWest Pacific (CC30-ST30-IV), and the Brazilian (CC8-ST239-III) clones. In this study, the pan-genomic analysis of the most representative MRSA clones circulating in invasive infection in Paraguayan children over the years 2009–2013, such as the CC30-ST30-IV, CC5-ST5-IV, and CC8-ST8-IV, was carried out to evaluate their genetic diversity, their repertoire of virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance determinants. This revealed multiple virulence and resistance genes, highlighting the complex virulence profiles of MRSA circulating in Paraguay. Our work is the first genomic study of MRSA in Paraguay and will contribute to the development of genomic surveillance in the region and our understanding of the global epidemiology of this pathogen.

KEYWORDS: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, genomic epidemiology, invasive infection, Paraguayan children

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a major human pathogen, can produce many types of infections, such as food poisoning, necrotizing pneumonia, endocarditis, or septicemia. Initially, MRSA was associated with hospital-acquired infections. However, there has been a considerable increase in cases of healthy individuals who were infected in the community (1, 2). These infections are particularly problematic due to their associated morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality (3). MRSA could carry numerous virulence factors, some of which explain the severity of the infections it causes, making it a “superbug” (4).

Nowadays, the complete genome of a microorganism, including the full set of resistance and virulence genes (resistome and virulome, respectively), can be simultaneously characterized by leveraging next-generation sequencing (5). In fact, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is instrumental in tracking the source and propagation of important MRSA clones. Furthermore, WGS is very useful to rapidly infer the emergence of resistance genotypes in the clinical setting to target widely available optimal therapeutic approaches, especially during invasive infection treatments (6).

Severe infections caused by methicillin-resistant strains acquired in the community (CA-MRSA) in the United States at the beginning of the century were reported. This strain is called USA300 and quickly dispersed geographically, displacing less virulent strains, and becoming the leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections in this country (79). The most frequent MRSA clones (including community and hospital-acquired) in South America are the Pediatric (CC5-ST5-IV), the Cordobes-Chilean (CC5-ST5-I), the SouthWest Pacific (CC30-ST30-IV), the Brazilian (CC8-ST239-III), and New York/Japan (CC5-ST5-II) clones (10). In Argentina, the main CA-MRSA clone related to invasive infections in the last decade has been CC30-ST30-IV-t019 PVL+, which became predominant, replacing the previously described CC5-ST5-IV-t311 PVL+ (1113). In Paraguay, the prevalence of CA-MRSA CC30-ST30-IV clone is the leading cause of S. aureus infections both at the regional level and in the pediatric population (11, 14, 15). The objective of this study was the deep characterization of the genomic features of MRSA isolates causing invasive infections in Paraguayan children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

An observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was designed to analyze representative MRSA isolates of the main clones identified between 2009 and 2013, from the Microbiology Department of the Health Sciences Research Institute, UNA, Paraguay Biobank (maintained at −80°C in BHI + 20% glycerol). Isolates were initially recovered from invasive infections of children under 16 years old attending any of the four reference hospitals from Asunción and the Central Department of Paraguay that collaborated in this study. Invasive infection was defined as a localized or systemic inflammatory response to the presence of S. aureus at otherwise sterile anatomical sites (16). Identification data, epidemiology files, and records of antimicrobial susceptibility were extracted from the epidemiological records of the isolates. Phenotypic identification of the isolates and the antimicrobial susceptibility tests were carried out following the criteria recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute from 2009 to 2013, according to the strain collection date or by automated systems using Vitek2 (BioMérieux, La Balme, France) following to the manufacturer’s instructions. Susceptibility to vancomycin was determined by E-test for all isolates.

These strains were sub-cultured in Tryptic Soy Agar (Difco, Le Pont de Claix, France) medium from primary cultures and incubated for 24 h at 35°C under 5% CO2 for further molecular characterization.

Genotyping and DNA extraction

Total bacterial DNA from MRSA samples (N = 39) was extracted from pure MRSA cultures using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Wizard Genomic, Promega, Madison, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. MRSA was molecularly typed by spa typing (17) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) (18). Detection of mecA and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-coding genes and PFGE (pulse field gel electrophoresis) were carried out as described previously (14, 19). The characterization by multi-locus variable analysis (MLVA) was carried out by a multiplex PCR as described elsewhere (20). The staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) element was typed using Kondo’s typing system (21).

Based on the data produced by these molecular analyses (Table S1) and due to budget limitations, we carefully selected the 10 most representative isolates of the main MRSA clones causing invasive infections in Paraguayan children that circulated in the studied period for whole-genome sequencing.

Library preparation and whole-genome sequencing

DNA samples for WGS were purified and concentrated for library preparation with DNA Clean & Concentrator (Zymo Research, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Dual index libraries were processed with Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc., CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations with manual library normalization. Paired-end sequencing was performed on a MiSeq Sequencing System (Illumina Inc., CA, USA) with 300 base reads to a theoretical sequencing throughput of 3 Mb/library (minimal expected coverage of 100×). The library concentration was loaded at 10 pM, and 5% of PhiX Control V3 (Illumina Inc., CA, USA) was used as the internal control. Sequencing was conducted in the Genomic Division of the Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER, Tenerife, Spain).

Bioinformatic analysis

BCL files were converted to demultiplexed FASTQ files using bcl2fastq v2.19 tool. Quality control was performed with FastQC v0.73 (22) to assess sequencing quality, read length, and the total number of reads. Taxonomic correspondence (species identification) was obtained with Kraken v2.1.1 (23). Then, the reads were subjected to a trimming process to improve their quality using the Trimmomatic software v0.38.1 (24). Subsequently, de novo genome assembly was carried out with Unicycler v0.4.8.0 (25) and with Quast Genome assembly Quality v5.0.2 (26, 27) to assess the quality of the assembly. A summary report was obtained with assembly metrics such as total genome size, total number of contigs, largest contig size, and contig with size greater than 1 kb, N50, and GC content. Finally, the assemblies were processed with Prokka (Prokaryotic Genome Annotation) v1.14.6 for bacterial annotation (28). All the analyses were conducted on the TeideHPC Supercomputing facility (http://teidehpc.iter.es).

Additional characterization of the isolates was carried out using the assemblies in combination with the software MLST (PubMLST database) v2.19.0 (29, 30) for detecting the sequence type, and the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) platform with spaTyper software v1.0 for spa type identification (31), and SCCmecFinder v1.2 for SCCmec typing and subtyping (32). ABRicate v1.0.1 was combined with different databases, such as ResFinder and Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance Reference Gene NCBI, to detect antibiotic resistance genes, the possible induction of resistance, and the detection of virulence factor genes with the Virulence Factor Data Base (33). For detecting the genes encoding virulence factors, we also analyzed the genomic assemblies in the CGE platform in combination with the VirulenceFinder software v2.0.3. We used the NG-CHM Builder: Cluster Matrix platform from the University of Texas (https://build.ngchm.net/NGCHM-web-builder/) to analyze the virulence factors profiles detected.

Finally, a phylogenetic analysis was performed from the assembled bacterial genomes using Roary v3.13.0, IQ-Tree v1.5.5, and FigTree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/), in order to establish the core genome of the clinical isolates analyzed (34, 35). The pan-genomic analysis was carried out using only the SNP alignment with SNP sites v2.5.1, and a Newick phylogenetic tree was derived to depict the relationships between each strain (36). The output files generated by Roary software were visualized in the online tool Microreact at https://docs.microreact.org/ (37), generating the Newick-based tree with the genotypes and demographic characteristics of the isolates.

In the pan-genomic analysis and to provide regional context to this study, the public genomic data from another 15 MRSA isolates that caused invasive infections in humans (isolated from the bloodstream) and collected in reference health centers of five countries in the southern cone of South America during 2019 by the StaphNet-SA Consortium were also included . A representative clone from each participating country (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) and from the main MRSA clonal complexes (CC30, CC5, and CC8) identified by Di Gregorio et al. (38) were included in the study (Table S2) under the project accession number PRJEB37318.

We also included data from the following public reference strains in the pan-genomic analysis: MRSA 252–MRSA CC30-ST36-IIA (NC_002952.2), TCH60–MRSA CC30-ST30-IV (NC_017342.1), NCTC8325–MSSA CC8-ST8 (NC_007795.1), N315 MRSA CC5-ST5-IIA (NC_002745.2), and USA300 MRSA CC8-ST8-IV (NZ_CP092052.1).

The rationale for this was to obtain a broader perspective on the genomic relationship of the isolates studied and improve the validity of the results obtained.

All the bioinformatics software used in this study was run using default parameters.

RESULTS

Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of the MRSA isolates studied

The Microbiology Department biobank currently has 622 isolates of S. aureus collected from 2009 to 2013, of which 148 (23.8%) are MRSA, and 39 of them have caused invasive infections in children. The latter were all isolated from a normally sterile body site such as blood, purulent discharge, tissue, or synovial fluid. Initially, antibiotic susceptibility testing, clonal identification, and molecular characterization of the 39 MRSA isolates causing invasive infections were carried out by MLST, spa typing, identification of the SCCmec cassette, MLVA, PFGE, and detection of the PVL coding gene (Table S1).

The main MRSA clonal complex causing invasive infections in Paraguayan children that circulated in the period studied (N = 39, 2009–2013) were CC30 53.8% (21/39), CC5 38.5% (15/39), and CC8 7.7% (3/39). We determined the resistant phenotypic rates for nine antibiotics in all the MRSA isolates, which were found to be sensitive to vancomycin (39/39), and the resistant levels found were 97.4% (38/39) penicillin, 25.6% (10/39) erythromycin, 20.5% (8/39) clindamycin, 12.8% (5/39) gentamicin, 5.1% (2/39) for tetracycline, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin, and 2.6% (1/39) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

The most important MRSA clonal complex, due to its abundance, was CC30 (21/39), mainly constituted by the clone CC30-ST30-MRSA-IV-t019 (20/21), pulsotype A and subtypes (13/21). All of them (21/21) were MLVA profile 1, resistant to penicillin, sensitive to gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin. Also, most of them were sensitive to tetracycline and rifampin (20/21), with resistance to macrolides found in four isolates (4/21), and 11/21 carried the PVL gene. The isolates of the CC30 were collected in all the hospitals participating in the study, in different periods of the time included in the study.

The second most frequent and the more variable clonal complex was the CC5 (15/39), which was composed of two sequence types (ST5 and ST100) and six different spa types (t311, t002, t149, t7078, t1791, and t1062).

The main clone that represents CC5 is CC5-ST5-MRSA-IV-t311-PVL+ (8/15), MLVA profile 2, pulsotype B, and subtypes (7/8), resistant to penicillin, sensitive to gentamicin, tetracycline, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin. Also, they were mostly sensitive to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7/8), with resistance to macrolides found in 2/8 isolates.

The other clones of the CC5 (7/15) were very variable, including one MRSA isolate, CC5-ST5-MRSA-I-t149, pulsotype B, MLVA profile 2, and resistant to penicillin, gentamicin, macrolides, and ciprofloxacin.

The molecular analysis also revealed 3/39 MRSA isolates from the CC8-ST8/72-IV, resistant to penicillin, sensitive to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin.

Using this molecular information and due to the budget limitations, we carefully selected the most representative isolates of the main MRSA clones causing invasive infections in Paraguayan children that circulated in the study period for WGS. The MRSA isolates selected for WGS are indicated in gray color in Table S1. Clinical, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics of MRSA selected are shown in Table 1. All MRSA isolates (10/10) came from patients of both sexes under 15 years of age. All these MRSA isolates (10/10) were resistant to penicillin and sensitive to vancomycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and have the mecA gene in the staphylococcal cassette SCCmec IV.

TABLE 1.

Features of MRSA that cause invasive infection in Paraguayan children (n = 10)a

Sample ID Collection date Sample Patient disease CC MLST Spa type MLVA SCCmec PFGE lukF/S-PV
SGP11 Dec 2009 Blood Pneumonia 30 30 t019 1 IV A +
SIP29 Jan 2010 Blood Osteomyelitis 30 30 t019 1 IV A +
SGP29 Feb 2010 Blood Sepsis 5 5 t311 2 IV B +
SGP63 Nov 2011 Blood Sepsis 8 8 t11770 4 IV C1 +
SGP102 Jan 2012 Blood Sepsis 30 30 t019 1 IV A +
SCM71 Feb 2012 Purulent discharge Sepsis 5 100 t002 3 IV B6
SCM77 Apr 2012 Purulent discharge Sepsis 5 5 t311 2 IV B +
SHN80 Nov 2012 Blood Sepsis 30 30 t021 1 IV A4
GIP4 Aug 2013 Blood Osteomyelitis 8 8 t400 5 IV E +
GIP64 Dec 2013 Blood Pneumonia 30 30 t019 1 IV A +
a

ID, identification; CC, clonal complex; and lukF/S-PV, Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene.

Resistome analysis

All the isolates that were subject to WGS carried the mecA-resistant gene, which confers resistance to methicillin. The susceptibility profile, the SCCmec IV subtyping, and the resistome to the most important antibiotics associated with the treatments of staphylococcal infections are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Susceptibility profile and resistome of MRSA that cause invasive infection in Paraguayan children (n = 10)a,b,c,f

Sample ID CC-ST-spa type FOX/β-lactamsd Cassette SCCmec PEN VANe GEN Macrolides genotypic/ERY,CLY Macrolides resistance phenotype TET CLO FOS RIF
SGP11 CC30-ST30-t019 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R /S −/S ermC/R, R iMLS tet (38)/S cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
SIP29 CC30-ST30-t019 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/S cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
SGP29 CC5-ST5-t311 mecA/R IVa (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S ermC/R, R iMLS tet (38)/S cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
SGP63 CC8-ST8-t11770 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/R cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND rphC/S
SGP102 CC30-ST30-t019 mecA/R IVc blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/S cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND rphC /S
SCM71 CC5-ST100-t002 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R −/S aac(6′)-aph(2″) /S −/S, S tet (38)/S −/ND fos-B-Saur/ND rphC/R
SCM77 CC5-ST5-t311 mecA/R IVa (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/S −/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
SHN80 CC30-ST30-t021 mecA/R IVa blaZ/R −/S ant (9)-la/S ermA/R, R iMLS tet (38)/R −/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
GIP4 CC8-ST8-t400 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/S cat(pC221)/ND fos-B-Saur/ND rphC /S
GIP64 CC30-ST30-t019 mecA/R IVc (2B) blaZ/R −/S −/S −/S, S tet (38)/S −/ND fos-B-Saur/ND −/S
a

Table S3 contains the precise information about each resistance gene identified in the MRSA isolates (n = 10), with the identity/coverage percentage, position in the reference/contig, data base, and accession number.

b

Database: Resfinder + National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) + Argannot.

c

Other antibiotic resistance genes looked at by WGS but not detected in the MRSA isolates analyzed were mupirocin, fusidic acid, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, quinupristin + dalfopristin, spiramycin, linezolid, telithromycim, teicoplanin, and tiamulin.

d

β-Lactams tested phenotypically: cefoxitin and oxacillin.

e

Susceptibility to vancomycin was determined by E-test.

f

(–), gene not detected by WGS; S, phenotypically sensitive; R, phenotypically resistant; ND, no data; ID, identification; ST, sequence type; FOX, cefoxitin; PEN, penicillin; VAN, vancomycin; GEN, gentamicin; ERY, erythromycin; CLY, clindamycin; TET, tetracycline; CLO, chloramphenicol; FOS, fosfomycin; and RIF, rifampin.

For all resistance genes identified, the sequence identity percentages ranged between 83.9% and 100% and had a breath of coverage between 81.7% and 100%, except the cat(pC221) gene for the SGP63 isolate, with a 100% identity and 60.6% coverage (Table S3).

The antibiotic susceptibility phenotype and genotype identified were 100% concordant for beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and macrolides (Table 2). Although we do not have phenotypic data on susceptibility to teicoplanin, tigecycline, ceftaroline, linezolid, fosfomycin, and chloramphenicol in the MRSA isolates studied, we did not find genetic evidence of antimicrobial determinants associated with the resistance to teicoplanin, tigecycline, ceftaroline, and linezolid in the WGS analysis. In this regard, the underlying databases used for genome annotation included the possibility to assess genes that confer resistance to the following antimicrobial classes: beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, glycopeptide, quinolone, amphenicol, macrolide, lincosamide, tetracycline, streptogramin a and b, fosfomycin, pseudomonic acid, steroid antibacterial, folate pathway antagonist, oxazolidinone, pleuromotulin, peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound, aminocyclitol, polymyxin, nitroimidazole, aldehyde, and rifampin.

Despite the phenotypic sensitivity to vancomycin, we did not find any of the gene variants associated with glycopeptide resistance in the studied MRSA isolates (note that the Van genes that could be assessed were VanA, VanH, VanX, VanHAX, VanE, VanXY, VanHBX, VanC1XY, VanC2XY, VanC3XY, VanC4XY, VanHDX, VanHFX, VanEXY, VanGXY, VanG2XY, VanLXY, VanHMX, VanNXY, VanHOX, and VanXmur). Table S4 includes all the point mutations associated with resistance genes found in the isolates.

Virulome analysis

The 87 virulence factor genes detected are shown in Fig. 1. The toxin and virulence gene contents were diverse and correlated with the typing characteristics (Fig. 1). The isolates were clustered based on their virulence factor profile, providing two dendrograms. According to the frequency of virulence factors in the isolates and the similarity in their virulence profile, SIP29, GIP64, SGP11, and SGP102 (CC30-ST30-t019-IVc) clustered together, while SHN80 (CC30-ST30-t021-IVa) located aside. In another cluster, SCM77 and SGP29 (both CC5-ST5-t311-IVc/a) were grouped as identical alongside SCM 71 (CC5-ST100-t002-IVc); SGP63 and GIP4, both CC8-ST8–IVc, clustered separately.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Virulence factors’ heat map and dendrogram from the de novo assembly of MRSA genomes from Paraguayan children (n = 10). Blue boxes indicate the presence of each one of the virulence factors encoding the genes analyzed (n = 87). The isolates were clustered hierarchically based on their virulence factor profile using Euclidean metric distance with complete linkage clustering in both rows and columns, thus providing two dendrograms. The top dendrogram (top) clusters virulence factor clustered according to their frequency in the isolates: the most frequent in the middle and the least frequent in the extremes. The left dendrogram (left) clustered the isolates in terms of their similarity in virulence profile; within the same cluster are SIP29, GIP64, SGP11, and SGP102, all CC30-ST30-t019-IVc and SHN80 clustering further away corresponding to CC30-ST30-t021-IVa. A separate cluster was composed of SCM77 and SGP29 (both corresponding to CC5-ST5-t311-IV), SCM71 (CC5-ST100-t002-IVc), SGP63 (CC8-ST8-t11770-IVc), and GIP4 (CC8-ST8-t400-IVc).

Considering how the virulome results cluster the MRSA isolates by clonal complex (Fig. 1), we conclude that CC30-ST30-t019-IV is characterized by genes that encode proteins involved in biofilm formation, coagulation and adherence, enterotoxin, pore-forming exotoxins, evasins, and few others proteins with antiphagocytic activity. The analysis of the CC5-ST5-t311-IV virulome revealed the presence of genes encoding enterotoxin A (seA), PVL (lukF/S-PV), and superantigens (SAgs) encoded in the EGC group (G, I, M, N, O, and U), and the more complete antiphagocytic protein profile, as a determinant of cytotoxic strain.

The CC8-ST8-lVc clones (t11770 and t400) carry the complete serine protease system (splA/B/E), as well as the PVL and the enterotoxins K and Q, characteristic of CC8. Both of them carried the complete arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), associated with an arginine deiminase (arcAa and arcA2), spermidine N (1)-acetyltransferase (speG), putative ATPase copper exporters (copB1 and copB2), and a putative lipoprotein (lipo). We also assessed the copper and mercury resistance (COMER) mobile element, associated with an abortive phage infection system (abi-α) and two main gene clusters, the mer operon composed of the merR/A/B genes and the cop operon composed of the copB/L/mco genes. However, we did not find abi-α or the mer operon in any of the MRSA genomes.

All the isolates studied carry the genes associated with biofilm formation. Only the CC5-ST5-t311-IV-PVL+ carried the edinA gene, encoding the epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor.

All isolates carried aureolysin (aur), gamma-hemolysin (hlg) A, B, and C components, iron-regulated surface determinant protein (isd) A, B, C, E, F, and G components, alpha-hemolysin (hly/hla), staphylokinase precursor (sak), cell surface elastin (ebp), and clumping factor A fibrinogen-binding protein (clfA). In addition, all of them carry the IgG- and IgA-binding protein (spa), complement inhibitor SCIN (scn), glycerol ester hydrolase (geh), the protein secretion system components (es) EsxA, EsaA/B, and EssA/B, and the type 8 capsular polysaccharide synthesis components (cap8) L/M/N/O/P, with antiphagocytic functions. The serine protease (sspA), staphopain, cysteine proteinase (sspB), staphostatin B (sspC), and NPQTN-specific sortase B (srtB) were also detected in all isolates. The differential presence of the virulence genes detected by WGS is shown in Table 3 for a better understanding and classification according to their functionality. None of the sequenced isolates carried enterotoxins (se) B, C, D, H, L, or the exfoliative toxins (et) A/B.

TABLE 3.

Virulome of the sequenced MRSA that causes invasive infection in Paraguayan children (n = 10)a

Protein type/function Antiphagocytic Pore-forming exotoxins Adherence Exoenzyme Toxins Evasins
ID sample
CC-ST-spatype
CP SSP SAPM CI ECDI PVL Hemolysin BFG SF CF TGD SA SP
SGP11
CC30-ST30-t019
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G/H/I/J/K
adsA Chp lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrE, cna,
fnbA, map
clfB, vWbp lip seg, sem, sen, seo,
seu
splE
SIP29
CC30-ST30-t019
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G/I/J/K
adsA lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrE, cna, fnbA, map clfB, vWbp lip seg, sem, seo splE
SGP29
CC5-ST5-t311
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G
esaC, essC, esxB adsA Chp edinA lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, fnbA,
fnbB, map
clfB lip sea, seg, sei, sem,
sen, seo, seu
splA, splB
SGP63
CC8-ST8-t11770
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G
esaC, essC, esxB adsA Chp lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld icaA, icaB, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, fnbA,
fnbB
clfB lip sek, seq splA, splB, splE
SGP102
CC30-ST30-t019
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G/H/I/J/K
adsA Chp lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, map clfB, vWbp lip seg, sei, sem,
sen, seo, seu
splE
SCM71
CC5-ST100-t002
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G
esaC, essC, esxB adsA lukF-PV hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, fnbA,
fnbB
clfB lip seg, sei, sen,
seo, seu
splA, splB
SCM77
CC5-ST5-t311
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G
esaC, essC, esxB adsA Chp edinA lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, fnbA,
fnbB, map
clfB lip sea, seg, sei, sem,
sen, seo, seu
splA, splB
SHN80
CC30-ST30-t021
cap8I/J/K adsA Chp hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
sdrE clfB, vWbp lip, sea, seg,sei, sem,
sen,
seo, seu, tsst-1
splE
GIP4
CC8-ST8-t400
cap8A/B/C/D/F/
G
esaC, essC, esxB Chp lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld sdrC, fnbA,
fnbB, map
coa, vWbp seg, sek, seq splA, splB, splE
GIP64
CC30-ST30-t019
cap8A/B/C/D/E/
F/G/H/I/J/K
adsA Chp lukF-PV,
lukS-PV
hlb, hld, hly/hla icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD,
icaR
fnbA vWbp lip seg, sei, sem,
sen, seo, seu
splE
a

(–), gene not detected by WGS; ID, identification; CC, clonal complex; ST, sequence type; CP, capsular polysaccharide; SSP, secretion system protein; SAPM, synthases of anti-phagocytic mediators; CI, chemotaxis-inhibiting; ECDI, epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor; PVL, Panton-Valentine leucocidin; BFG, biofilm formation genes; SF, surface proteins; CF, coagulation factors; TGD, triacylglycerol degradation; SA, superantigens; and SP, serine proteases.

Phylogenomic analysis

The sequence type and spa type detected by WGS were fully concordant with the results obtained by PCR (Table 1).

Whole genome phylogenetic analysis, including 15 selected samples from Di Gregorio et al. (38) and 5 S. aureus reference sequences, clustered the isolates into three distinct clades: CC30-ST30 (containing SGP11, SIP29, SGP102, GIP64, and SHN80), CC5-ST5/ST100 (containing SGP29, SCM71, and SCM77), and CC8-ST8 (containing SGP63 and GIP4). The geographical distribution and phylogenetic tree are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Phylogeny, molecular, and demographic characteristics of MRSA that cause invasive infection in Paraguayan children along with reference data sets and with representative sequences from South America. (A) Geographical distribution of samples collected in Paraguay (inset), together with selected samples from Di Gregorio et al. (38). (B) Midpoint-rooted phylogenetic tree inferred after aligning the 10 genomes of the study (CC30: SGP11, SIP29, SGP102, GIP64, and SHN80; CC5: SGP29, SCM77, and SCM71; CC8: SGP63 and GIP4), 15 samples from Di Gregorio et al. (38), and 5 reference sequences (shown in gray). Nodes are colored by clonal complex (CC) of strain as well as indicated in panel A: CC30 in red, CC5 in blue, and CC8 in green. Intercluster branches (shown as dotted lines) are not at scale to improve the intracluster resolution of relationships. Data are available at https://microreact.org/project/dzzEoQaWvAJzdHTxt75hdj-primary-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus-clones-causing-invasive-infections-in-paraguayan-children.

DISCUSSION

Despite the burden of MRSA infection in Paraguay, this constitutes the first WGS analysis of MRSA isolates from this country. MRSA clones represent a significant health concern worldwide. There is a clear need to better understand their genomic structure, transmission dynamics, and evolution in a geographic region over time (1). In this study, using conventional molecular methods, we characterized MRSA isolates that caused invasive infection between 2009 and 2013 in Paraguayan children. They were collected in four high-complexity reference hospital centers in the country, which provide health coverage to a large percentage of the population (39). All the genetically linked MRSA isolates were recovered from diverse clinical sources, patients, and hospitals at broad gap periods, reducing the probability of them being from an outbreak.

We identified three clonal complexes circulating, the most important being CC30, followed by CC5 and CC8. These data represent a change with respect to the first report of Paraguayan MRSA clones prior to that dates (40), where the predominant clonal complex was CC5 (85%), mainly CC5-ST5-I, followed by CC8 (17%), mainly CC8-ST239-IIIA collected in 2005 in one capital city hospital, and reinforce the results reported by Rodríguez et al. (14) in 2020, where CC30 was already reported as the main clonal complex in CA-MRSA isolates (80%), followed by CC5 (16%) and other minority clonal complexes such as CC8 (2%).

The most representative clone for its abundance is the CC30-ST30-IV-t019 (21/39), similar to other reports in Argentina and South America, which indicate that the most prevalent and geographically disseminated MRSA is the ARG-4: CC30-ST30-IVc-t019, characterized by specific mobile genetic elements and chromosomal mutations that might have contributed to its virulence and success (38, 41).

In this study and due to economic limitations, in the WGS analysis, we only included the most representative MRSA clones causing invasive infections circulating in Paraguayan children between 2009 and 2013, such as the CC30-ST30-IV (n = 5), CC5-ST5-IV (n = 3), and CC8-ST8-IV (n = 2), to evaluate their genetic diversity, virulence factor repertoire, and the antimicrobial resistance determinants.

The phylogenomic analysis revealed three major and different clonal complexes (CC30, CC5, and CC8), each composed of clones closely related to each other and to the public and reference genomes included in the study.

The CC30 proves to be a successful clone, strongly installed and disseminated throughout the country in this study and documented since 2009 in previous studies by our research group (14) and up to 2019 by recent studies carried out by the StaphNET-SA Consortium (38).

The CC30 genomes from this phylogenomic study (n = 5) demonstrate that they were closely related to the CC30 public genomes TCH60 (CC30-ST30-IV) and MRSA252 (CC30-ST36-IIA) and to MRSA genomes from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay, collected from the bloodstream in 2019 by the StaphNET-SA Consortium (38), providing stronger evidence that these clones, particularly the CC30-ST30-IV, are installed in the main hospital centers of Paraguay and in the region, and that it is not seasonal since it appears in any month of the year.

The presence of a new clone of the CC30-ST30-IV lineage, related to the most frequently reported CC30-ST30-IV-t019 but with spa type t021, shows that this clone begins to differentiate in the spA gene sequences, in this case, in three repetitions by insertion and deletion. This phenomenon generally appears in chronic or repeated infections, indicating that clone CC30-ST30-t019 is probably beginning to change, evolving to other spa types (15).

The main MRSA clones circulating in Paraguay show differences in their virulence profiles. CC30-ST30-t019-IV is characterized by having the largest number and diversity of genes encoding capsular polysaccharides, which express proteins with antiphagocytic activity and inhibit the interaction between C3b, immunoglobulin, and receptors. This clonal complex (CC30) has gained genes that encode the coagulation factor protein (vWbp) and superantigens (SAgs) encoded in the EGC cluster, all of which are involved in aggravating the infectious process (4244). The superantigens (SAgs) are currently considered the most prevalent staphylococcal toxins among clinical and colonizing isolates. They are present in 50%–70% of nasal carriers, and their expression may be crucial for the development and aggravation of some infections, such as respiratory and endocarditis (42, 45). It has been shown in animal models that the expression of the EGC cluster and tsst-1 genes together contributes to an increase in mortality and/or a more rapid and complicated progression of the infection, generally accompanied by lethal complications, such as heart failure and cerebrovascular accidents. Even so, clinical infections progress in the presence of EGC cluster toxins, even without the systemic or local effects of TSST-1. Therefore, it is postulated that the EGC cluster toxins are also responsible for the worsening of the infections, probably on a smaller scale than TSST-1 (46).

This well-known virulent strain caused skin lesions, sepsis, and pneumonia in children and young adults in hospitals and the community. In recent descriptive studies, this clone has been associated with an increased risk of infective endocarditis (47) and persistent bacteremia due to S. aureus (48).

The CC5-ST5-t311-IV clones studied here carried genes encoding some specific virulence factors as a signature of highly toxic strains, involved in CA-MRSA infections. This is even more significant because these isolates were from invasive infections. The SCM_71 strain, CC5-ST100-t002-IV and resistant to rifampin, known as the pediatric clone, is highly related to CC5-ST5-t311-IV and differs from it by a point mutation in the aroE gene (substitution of the aroE4 allele, characteristic of ST5, by the aroE65 characteristic of ST100), as well as by the insertion of a repeat r17 in the fifth position of the spA gene that differentiates it from t311 and converts it into spa type t002 (49). The CC5-ST100-t002-IV clone could be a pathway on the CC5-ST5-t311-IV evolution, allowing its adaptation to the sanitary conditions of the region (50).

The CC8-ST8-lVc-PVL+ clones carried the serine protease system complex (splA/B/E), a digestive system extracellular with a role in the pathogenesis of MRSA, PVL, and the enterotoxins K and Q, characteristics of the CC8 complex, among others, all of which contributing to their virulence profile (1). These strains carried the complete ACME, denoting that our isolates collected between 2009 and 2013 were closely related to the CC8-ST8-IVc-PVL+ (USA300-NAE-ACME+), identified as the major cause of CA-MRSA infections in North America, which have lately been increasingly reported worldwide (8). This situation has changed, and the USA300-NAE-ACME+ was displaced in Paraguay and in the region, based on the latest report by Di Gregorio et al. (38), in which USA300LV or USA300-SAE-COMER+ are currently found in the region and in Paraguay.

In the present study, almost all the MRSA analyzed (38/39) carried the cassette SCCmec IV, which is smaller than the others, has a simpler genetic makeup, and generally carries only the methicillin resistance genes (mecA) (1). This is probably the reason why our isolates still showed high phenotypic sensitivity levels to drugs used in serious MRSA infectious diseases, such as glycopeptides, ceftaroline, and linezolid, and do not present multiple drug resistance (as defined by Magiorakos; )51). However, the increasing levels of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides detected in this study, compared to previous reports in our country (14, 52), which exceed the cut-off point of 10% considered a reasonable limit for the use of clindamycin in the empirical treatment of mild or moderate skin and soft tissue infection caused by MRSA (53), highlight the possibilities of therapeutic failure when using it and may directly affect the empirical scheme that must be taken into account in daily pediatric practice.

Regarding the resistome analysis, most of the MRSA isolates showed phenotypic and genotypic concordance with the antibiotic susceptibility results. Similar findings were reported in other studies that showed a concordance in 76%–100% of isolates (54, 55). Our results showed differences between genotype and phenotype in isolates that carried resistant genes to tetracycline, rifampin, and gentamicin. This could be due to mutations in these resistance genes or defects in their expression that should be further explored experimentally in the future.

On the other hand, we assessed all genes and point mutations associated with the VISA and hVISA phenotypes of resistance in each of our samples (56, 57). However, the isolates lack any of the specific genes or mutations reported to date. Instead, we found other point mutations in these genes that have not been associated with the hVISA phenotype. This reconciles with the VSSA phenotype found in the MRSA strains analyzed.

We also obtained data for other antimicrobials that are not routinely tested in the laboratory, such as fosfomycin and chloramphenicol, detecting their potential resistance in 10/10 and 4/10 of MRSA isolates, respectively. Fosfomycin and chloramphenicol are not used to treat staphylococcal infections in Paraguay and Argentina. This is the reason why it was not included in the antibiotic panel (41).

Regarding the virulome of the isolates, we identified the co-existence of multiple virulence factor groups, such as the coding pore-forming exotoxins, cell wall-anchored surface proteins, exoenzyme, toxins, evasins, and some antiphagocytic functions proteins, showing that they all have a vital function for survival, reproduction, colonization, and bacterial spread, which could explain why they are part of the S. aureus core genome (49, 58, 59).

CC30-ST30-IV and CC8-ST8-IV clones win the serine protease splE genes, encoding evasins with possible cooperative and complementary activities with the other spl proteases (lost by CC30), and apparently constitute an extracellular digestive system with a role in the pathogenesis of S. aureus (46). In contrast, the loss of the secretion system proteins used by bacteria to interact and manipulate their environments is significant for adhesion and permanence in the host cell (60), as well as the epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor (edinA), which is involved in the bacterial dissemination process and hindering complement-mediated phagocytosis (61). This lack of genes could give these lineages (CC30 and CC8) better efficiency for propagation due to their smaller size and the lower fitness costs associated with carrying fewer genes, favoring those involved in the evasion of the immune response, infection expansion, and propagation process, and being an explanation of it displacing the other lineages (1).

We identified the potential ability for biofilm formation in almost all the MRSA isolates analyzed, except for the CC8-ST8-t400-IV clone. The biofilm is another crucial factor contributing to staphylococcal infections, implicated in various persistent human microbial infectious diseases, allowing them to evade multiple clearance mechanisms, such as antimicrobials and the host immune system leading to treatment failure and recurrent/chronic infections. MRSA biofilm and virulence factor production are closely linked since the primary biofilm regulator, the accessory gene regulator agr, is also vital for expressing numerous virulence factors. Therefore, many biofilm-related virulence factors have been the target of research on S. aureus therapeutics (62). Biofilm formation, especially in chronic infections, is crucial since it affects the choice of strategies for their elimination, such as surgical removal, given the ineffectiveness of traditional antibiotic therapies (63, 64).

In conclusion, the use of WGS in the present study added value to the classic isolate identification and molecular typing protocols. It offered precious and precise genomic data about the most prevalent MRSA clones identified in this study. Multiple virulence and resistance genes were identified for the first time in this study, indicative of the complex virulence profiles of MRSA that are circulating in Paraguay. This critical qualitative leap opened a wide range of new possibilities for future projects and trials to improve the existing knowledge on the epidemiology of MRSA circulating in Paraguay.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the support of the Freiburg Galaxy Server (Germany) funded by the Collaborative Research Centre 992 Medical Epigenetics (DFG grant SFB 992/1 2012) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF grant 031 A538A de.NBI-RBC. L.A.R.-R. and J.M.L.-S. acknowledge the University of La Laguna for training support during their PhD studies.

The present study was carried out through an R&D stay co-financed by CONACYT of Paraguay through the Program for Linking Scientists and Technologists, call 2018 (PVCT18-61) with FEEI resources; Cabildo Insular de Tenerife (CGIEU0000219140); the OA23/043 agreement with Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER) to strengthen scientific and technological education, training, research, development and innovation in Genomics, epidemiological surveillance based on massive sequencing, Personalized Medicine and Biotechnology; and the agreement between Consejería de Educación, Universidades, Cultura y Deportes and Cabildo Insular de Tenerife (AC0000014697).

A.M.-A. was supported by a fellowship from the Canarian Agency for Research, Innovation and Information Society (ACIISI, Grant No. TESIS2020010002) co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF).

Contributor Information

Fátima Rodríguez, Email: frodriguez@iics.una.py.

Rafael Vignoli, Instituto de Higiene, Montevideo, Uruguay.

FUNDING

FUNDING

ETHICS APPROVAL

This study was approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the Institute of Research in Health Sciences (P20/2011, P44/2012). The samples were anonymized and analyzed according to the local regulations and laws that apply to medical information.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All assemblies from this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject accession number PRJNA830493.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.

Supplementary Table S1. spectrum.03012-23-s0001.xlsx.

MRSA isolates that caused infections in Paraguayan children, N=39 (2009-2013).

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF1
Supplementary Table S2. spectrum.03012-23-s0002.xlsx.

MRSA public genomes from five countries of the southern cone of South America during 2019 by the StaphNet-SA Consortium (DiGregorio et al., 2023).

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF2
Supplementary Table S3. spectrum.03012-23-s0003.xlsx.

Resistance genes identified in the MRSA analyzed by NGS.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF3
Supplementary Table S4. spectrum.03012-23-s0004.xlsx.

Point mutations associated with resistance genes found in the MRSA isolates analyzed.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF4

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00020-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00020-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cheung GYC, Bae JS, Otto M. 2021. Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence 12:547–569. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fu J, Wang K, Ye C, Chen L, Liang Y, Mao Y, Chen J, Peng R, Chen Y, Shi F, Huang T-Y, Liu J. 2020. Study on the virulome and resistome of a vancomycin intermediate-resistance Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Pathog 145:104187. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Moreno Switt AI, Toledo V. 2015. Infectología en la era de la genómica. Rev chil infectol 32:571–576. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182015000600013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Giulieri SG, Holmes NE, Stinear TP, Howden BP. 2016. Use of bacterial whole-genome sequencing to understand and improve the management of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 14:1023–1036. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1233815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F. 2006. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367:731–739. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tenover FC, Goering RV. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300: origin and epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:441–446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, Limbago B, Albrecht V, Moran GJ, EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group . 2011. Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections in US emergency Department patients, 2004 and 2008. Clin Infect Dis 53:144–149. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rodríguez-Noriega E, Seas C, Guzmán-Blanco M, Mejía C, Alvarez C, Bavestrello L, Zurita J, Labarca J, Luna CM, Salles MJC, Gotuzzo E. 2010. Evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Latin America. Int J Infect Dis 14:e560–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fernandez S, de Vedia L, Lopez Furst MJ, Gardella N, Di Gregorio S, Ganaha MC, Prieto S, Carbone E, Lista N, Rotrying F, Stryjewski ME, Mollerach M. 2013. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST30-SCCmec IVc clone as the major cause of community-acquired invasive infections in Argentina. Infect Genet Evol 14:401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sola C, Paganini H, Egea AL, Moyano AJ, Garnero A, Kevric I, Culasso C, Vindel A, Lopardo H, Bocco JL, Study Group of CA-MRSA in Children, Argentina-2007 . 2012. Spread of epidemic MRSA-ST5-IV clone encoding PVL as a major cause of community onset staphylococcal infections in Argentinean children. PLoS ONE 7:e30487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Egea AL, Gagetti P, Lamberghini R, Faccone D, Lucero C, Vindel A, Tosoroni D, Garnero A, Saka HA, Galas M, Bocco JL, Corso A, Sola C, S. aureus Study Group-Argentina . 2014. New patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones, community-associated MRSA genotypes behave like healthcare-associated MRSA genotypes within hospitals, Argentina. Int J Med Microbiol 304:1086–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rodriguez F, Salinas C, Fernandez S, Haim S, Mollerach M, Basualdo W, Castro H, Quiñónez B, Arguello R, Rodriguez M, Grau L, Espínola C, Velázquez G, Samudio G, Gomez G, Campuzano A, Ortellado J, Almada P, Guillén R. 2020. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) clones from Paraguayan children. J Infect Dev Ctries 14:290–297. doi: 10.3855/jidc.12108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fernandez S, Ledo C, Lattar S, Noto Llana M, Bertelli AM, Di Gregorio S, Sordelli DO, Gómez MI, Mollerach ME. 2017. High virulence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST30-SCCmecIVc-spat019, the dominant community-associated clone in Argentina. Int J Med Microbiol 307:191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Grundmann H, Aanensen DM, van den Wijngaard CC, Spratt BG, Harmsen D, Friedrich AW, European Staphylococcal Reference Laboratory Working Group . 2010. Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular-epidemiological analysis. PLOS Med 7:e1000215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Shopsin B, Gomez M, Montgomery SO, Smith DH, Waddington M, Dodge DE, Bost DA, Riehman M, Naidich S, Kreiswirth BN. 1999. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 37:3556–3563. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.11.3556-3563.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38:1008–1015. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1008-1015.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Carpinelli Acevedo ML, Guillén Fretes RM, Fariña NJ, Basualdo W, Aquino R. 2012. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of mecA and pvl genes in Staphylococcus spp. Memorias del Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud 10:5–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rodríguez-Acosta F, Fernández S, Haim S, Mollerach M, Basualdo W, Castro H, Quiñónez † B, Guillén-Fretes RM. 2017. Estandarización del análisis multi-locus de número variable de repeticiones en tándem para el estudio de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes a meticilina aislados de la comunidad en Paraguay. Duazary 14:131. doi: 10.21676/2389783X.1971 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, Etienne J, Hiramatsu K. 2007. Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome MEC type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:264–274. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00165-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wingett SW, Andrews S. 2018. FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res 7:1338. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15931.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2016. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1101/096412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. 2018. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 34:i142–i150. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bartels MD, Petersen A, Worning P, Nielsen JB, Larner-Svensson H, Johansen HK, Andersen LP, Jarløv JO, Boye K, Larsen AR, Westh H. 2014. Comparing whole-genome sequencing with sanger sequencing for spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 52:4305–4308. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01979-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) . 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4961–4967. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00579-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Seeman T. 2016. ABRicate: mass screening of contigs for antiobiotic resistance genes. Internet. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
  • 34. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, Feil EJ, Holden MTG, Yeats CA, Grundmann H, Spratt BG, Aanensen DM. 2016. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb Genom 2:e000093. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Di Gregorio S, Vielma J, Haim MS, Rago L, Campos J, Kekre M, Abrudan M, Famiglietti Á, Canigia LF, Rubinstein G, Helena von Specht M, Herrera M, Aro C, Galas M, Yarhui NB, Figueiredo A, Lincopan N, Falcon M, Guillén R, Camou T, Varela G, Aanensen DM, Argimón S, Mollerach M, On Behalf Of StaphNET-Sa Consortium . 2023. Genomic epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bloodstream infections in South America during 2019 supports regional surveillance. Microb Genom 9:mgen001020. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. MSPyBS . 2019. Manual de Organización de los Servicios de Salud en el marco de las RIISS Paraguay - MSPyBS
  • 40. Mayor L, Ortellado J, Menacho C, Lird G, Courtier C, Gardon C, Meugnier H, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Etienne J. 2007. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in Asunción, Paraguay. J Clin Microbiol 45:2298–2300. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00040-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Di Gregorio S, Haim MS, Vielma Vallenilla J, Cohen V, Rago L, Gulone L, Aanensen DM, Argimón S, Mollerach M. 2021. Genomic epidemiology of CC30 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from Argentina reveals four major clades with distinctive genetic features. mSphere 6:e01297-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01297-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fischer AJ, Kilgore SH, Singh SB, Allen PD, Hansen AR, Limoli DH, Schlievert PM. 2019. High prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin gene cluster superantigens in cystic fibrosis clinical isolates. Genes (Basel) 10:1036. doi: 10.3390/genes10121036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Fetsch A, Johler S. 2018. Staphylococcus aureus as a foodborne pathogen. Curr Clin Micro Rpt 5:88–96. doi: 10.1007/s40588-018-0094-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tuffs SW, Herfst CA, Baroja ML, Podskalniy VA, DeJong EN, Coleman CEM, McCormick JK. 2019. Regulation of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 by the accessory gene regulator in Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by the repressor of toxins. Mol Microbiol 112:1163–1177. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Etter D, Corti S, Spirig S, Cernela N, Stephan R, Johler S. 2020. Staphylococcus aureus population structure and genomic profiles in asymptomatic carriers in Switzerland. Front Microbiol 11:1289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Stach CS, Vu BG, Merriman JA, Herrera A, Cahill MP, Schlievert PM, Salgado-Pabón W. 2016. Novel tissue level effects of the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin gene cluster are essential for infective endocarditis. PLoS One 11:e0154762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nienaber JJC, Sharma Kuinkel BK, Clarke-Pearson M, Lamlertthon S, Park L, Rude TH, Barriere S, Woods CW, Chu VH, Marín M, Bukovski S, Garcia P, Corey GR, Korman T, Doco-Lecompte T, Murdoch DR, Reller LB, Fowler VG, International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Microbiology Investigators . 2011. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis isolates are associated with clonal complex 30 genotype and a distinct repertoire of enterotoxins and adhesins. J Infect Dis 204:704–713. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Xiong YQ, Fowler VG, Yeaman MR, Perdreau-Remington F, Kreiswirth BN, Bayer AS. 2009. Phenotypic and Genotypic characteristics of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in vitro and in an experimental endocarditis model. J Infect Dis 199:201–208. doi: 10.1086/595738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Cheng AG, McAdow M, Kim HK, Bae T, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. 2010. Contribution of coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus disease and protective immunity. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001036. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sola C, Saka HA, Vindel A, Bocco JL, Cordoba MRSA Collaborative Study Group . 2008. Emergence and dissemination of a community-associated methicillin-resistant panton-valentine leucocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus clone sharing the sequence type 5 lineage with the most prevalent nosocomial clone in the same region of Argentina. J Clin Microbiol 46:1826–1831. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01949-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and Pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Guillén R, Basualdo W, Campuzano de A, Macchi M, Ortellado J, Almada P, et al. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus adquiridos en la comunidad: caracterización clínica, fenotípica y genotípica de aislados en niños que concurren a hospitales de referencia de Paraguay. Rev Inst Med Trop 49 [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Mensa J, Gatell J, García-Sánchez J, Letang E, López-Suñé E, Marco F. 2013. Guía de Terapeútica Antimicrobiana 2013. 23. ANTARES [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gordon NC, Price JR, Cole K, Everitt R, Morgan M, Finney J, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Young B, Wilson DJ, Llewelyn MJ, Paul J, Peto TEA, Crook DW, Walker AS, Golubchik T. 2014. Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 52:1182–1191. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03117-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Soliman MS, Soliman NS, El-Manakhly AR, ElBanna SA, Aziz RK, El-Kholy AA. 2020. Genomic characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by high-throughput sequencing in a tertiary care hospital. Genes (Basel) 11:1219. doi: 10.3390/genes11101219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Moller AG, Petit RA, Davis MH, Read TD. 2023. Development of an amplicon nanopore sequencing strategy for detection of mutations conferring intermediate resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0272822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02728-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. McGuinness WA, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. 2017. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Yale J Biol Med 90:269–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Skaar EP, Schneewind O. 2004. Iron-regulated surface determinants (Isd) of Staphylococcus aureus: stealing iron from heme. Microbes Infect 6:390–397. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sitkiewicz I, Babiak I, Hryniewicz W. 2011. Characterization of transcription within SDR region of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 99:409–416. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9476-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cao Z, Casabona MG, Kneuper H, Chalmers JD, Palmer T. 2016. The type VII secretion system of Staphylococcus aureus secretes a nuclease toxin that targets competitor bacteria. Nat Microbiol 2:16183. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Shettigar K, Murali TS. 2020. Virulence factors and clonal diversity of Staphylococcus aureus in colonization and wound infection with emphasis on diabetic foot infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39:2235–2246. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03984-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Vlaeminck J, Raafat D, Surmann K, Timbermont L, Normann N, Sellman B, van Wamel WJB, Malhotra-Kumar S. 2020. Exploring virulence factors and alternative therapies against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Toxins (Basel) 12:721. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Burgos-Edwards A, Franco S, Salinas C, Florentín M, García L, Guillén R, Alvarenga N. 2022. In vitro antibacterial activity, biofilm formation inhibition and chromatographic profile of methanolic extracts of two Pterocaulon species against MRSA. Nat Prod Res 36:6364–6368. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2022.2031185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Salinas C, Escobar F, Rodríguez F, de RA, Almada P, Canese JO, et al. 2017. Evaluación de la capacidad formadora de biofilm de cepas de S. aureus resistentes a meticilina que infectaron a niños paraguayos. Pediatría (Asunción) 44:233–238. doi: 10.18004/ped.2017.diciembre.233-238 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1. spectrum.03012-23-s0001.xlsx.

MRSA isolates that caused infections in Paraguayan children, N=39 (2009-2013).

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF1
Supplementary Table S2. spectrum.03012-23-s0002.xlsx.

MRSA public genomes from five countries of the southern cone of South America during 2019 by the StaphNet-SA Consortium (DiGregorio et al., 2023).

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF2
Supplementary Table S3. spectrum.03012-23-s0003.xlsx.

Resistance genes identified in the MRSA analyzed by NGS.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF3
Supplementary Table S4. spectrum.03012-23-s0004.xlsx.

Point mutations associated with resistance genes found in the MRSA isolates analyzed.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03012-23.SuF4

Data Availability Statement

All assemblies from this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject accession number PRJNA830493.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES