Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2024 Feb 15;29(7):2400076. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.7.2400076

2023/24 mid-season influenza and Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness estimates from the Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network (SPSN)

Danuta M Skowronski 1,2, Yuping Zhan 1, Samantha E Kaweski 1, Suzana Sabaiduc 1, Ayisha Khalid 1, Romy Olsha 3, Sara Carazo 4, James A Dickinson 5, Richard G Mather 3,6, Hugues Charest 4, Agatha N Jassem 1, Inès Levade 4, Maan Hasso 3, Nathan Zelyas 7, Ruimin Gao 8, Nathalie Bastien 8
PMCID: PMC10986657  PMID: 38362622

Abstract

The Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network reports mid-season 2023/24 influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 63% (95% CI: 51–72) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, lower for clade 5a.2a.1 (56%; 95% CI: 33–71) than clade 5a.2a (67%; 95% CI: 48–80), and lowest against influenza A(H3N2) (40%; 95% CI: 5–61). The Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccine protected comparably well, with VE of 47% (95% CI: 21–65) against medically attended COVID-19, higher among people reporting a prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at 67% (95% CI: 28–85).

Keywords: Influenza, SARS-Co-V-2, Omicron, XBB.1.5, vaccine effectiveness, test-negative design, observational study


The 2023/24 influenza season in Canada has been characterised by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 predominance with co-circulation of influenza A(H3N2) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1,2]. The Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network (SPSN) reports mid-season 2023/24 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against both influenza and COVID-19, including detailed genetic characterisation of contributing viruses in relation to respective vaccine strains.

Epidemiological context

The SPSN enrolled consenting patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI), including new or worsening cough, who presented within 7 days of illness onset to designated community-based sentinel practitioners in Alberta, British Columbia (BC), Ontario and Quebec. The test-negative case–control design was used to estimate VE against medically attended outpatient ARI due to laboratory-confirmed influenza or SARS-CoV-2 [3]. For comparison with historical SPSN analyses, influenza VE was also explored among those presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI), requiring cough but additionally fever and one or more of sore throat, arthralgia, myalgia or prostration; fever was not required among patients ≥ 65 years. Mid-season analysis included specimens collected between 29 October 2023 (week 44) and 13 January 2024 (week 2), tested at accredited provincial laboratories by real-time RT-PCR and/or multiplex assays.

Updated 2023/24 multivalent influenza and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccines became available in Canada through universal publicly funded immunisation campaigns beginning October 2023, with their co-administration encouraged [4]. Of publicly funded influenza vaccines in SPSN provinces, > 98% were egg-based inactivated products. Compared with 2022/23, the 2023/24 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine component was updated to A/Victoria/4897/2022-like (clade 6B.1A.5a.2a.1, hereafter written as 5a.2a.1); the A(H3N2) component remained unchanged as A/Darwin/9/2021-like (clade 3C.2a1b.2a.2a, hereafter written as 2a) [5]. Community-dwelling adults ≥ 65 years in all provinces (except Quebec ≥ 75 years) were administered MF59-adjuvanted (BC, Ontario) or high-dose influenza vaccines (Alberta, Ontario, Quebec). The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccines included two mRNAs and one adjuvanted recombinant product, with a recommended interval of at least 3–6 months since receipt of the last non-XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine (6 months preferred) [4].

Influenza vaccine status was predicated on report by the participant or guardian via the sentinel practitioner, as per usual SPSN practice [6]. Provincial immunisation registries for COVID-19 were considered more complete than for influenza and more reliable than self-report. XBB.1.5 VE estimation was therefore restricted to provinces where these immunisation registries could be used (BC, Ontario and Quebec). Children < 12 years were excluded from XBB.1.5 VE analyses owing to more complex dosing requirements [4]. Primary XBB.1.5 VE analyses excluded recipients of non-XBB.1.5 vaccine within 6 months before the launch of the provincial XBB.1.5 immunisation campaign. We also explored this in sensitivity analyses excluding those who had received non-XBB.1.5 vaccine within 3 months before campaign launch and alternatively without any such exclusion applied. We also explored XBB.1.5 VE among participants who reported (or whose guardians reported) any SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time prior to the current illness that was confirmed by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or rapid antigen test (RAT), the latter including self-administered testing. Whereas in primary analyses an influenza test-positive case could contribute as a SARS-CoV-2 test-negative control (and vice versa), to explore bias due to the possible indirect confounding pathway of correlated influenza and COVID-19 vaccination, we excluded influenza cases from SARS-CoV-2 controls (and vice versa) [7]. Finally, to address sparse data issues, we applied Firth’s method of penalised logistic regression or modified covariate categories, as indicated [8-10].

Virological characterisation

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of influenza viruses was undertaken on original participant specimens by Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory [11]. Where WGS did not meet minimum inclusion criteria for haemagglutinin (HA) sequences as specified in Supplementary Table S2, Sanger sequencing was additionally undertaken. The HA clades were assigned as per Nextclade [12], specifying additional amino acid substitutions (beyond those that were clade-defining) and affected antigenic sites in parentheses, and annotating involvement of the receptor binding site (RBS) or gain/loss of glycosylation (e.g. +/− CHO). Influenza vaccine reference sequences accessed through the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) are acknowledged in Supplementary Table S1. Whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 case viruses from original patient specimens was undertaken per routine provincial or national laboratory protocols using contemporary Pango nomenclature [13], with other details provided in Supplementary Table S3.

Virological findings

Among 3,139 eligible specimens, 766 (24%) tested influenza-positive, including 722 (94%) influenza A and 44 (6%) influenza B (Figure 1). Of 696 (96%) subtyped influenza A viruses, 554 (80%) were A(H1N1)pdm09 and 142 (20%) were A(H3N2); we provide detailed influenza A virus HA sequencing findings in Supplementary Table S2. Of 554 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, 382 (69%) were HA-characterised and of these, 195 (51%) were vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1, whereas 187 (49%) were instead clade 5a.2a (Figure 1). Clade 5a.2a.1 contribution decreased over the study period, from 65% (33/51) of sequenced viruses in weeks 44–47 to 52% (127/246) in weeks 48–51 and 41% (35/85) in weeks 52–2 (p = 0.03). Across the analysis period approximately equal clade 5a.2a.1 vs 5a.2a contribution was observed in every province except BC, where 5a.2a.1 predominated overall (39/61; 64%). As appended in Supplementary Figure S1, clade 5a.2a.1 vs 5a.2a contribution by age group was also approximately equal except among participants 9-19 years for whom clade 5a.2a.1 appeared less frequent (16 of 42 sequenced viruses); age-related variation overall, however, was not significant (p = 0.49).

Figure 1.

Influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 test-positive and test-negative specimens, including genetic characterisation, by week of specimen collection, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, 29 October 2023–13 January 2024

SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Among eligible patients presenting with acute respiratory illness, the distribution of influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09 genetic sub-clades and subgroups and SARS-CoV-2 genetic lineages among characterised case viruses are also displayed by week of specimen collection, with an overlayed weekly tally of sequenced case viruses. For influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, noted within a square bracket is an affected antigenic site, and in parentheses are corresponding NextStrain influenza subclade nomenclatures. Genetic characterisation details are appended for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in Supplementary Table S2 and for SARS-CoV-2 case viruses in Supplementary Table S3.

Figure 1

Similar to the egg-adapted 5a.2a.1 vaccine strain and the associated high-growth reassortant (HGR) (called IVR-238), all SPSN 5a.2a.1 viruses bore the T216A substitution, most (144/195; 74%) with additional R45K. Conversely, few 5a.2a viruses (6/187; 3%) bore T216A, the remainder (181/187; 97%) instead had substitution I91V in the HA2 subunit. Among the latter, we identified two emergent T120A subgroups, one subgroup additionally including the K169Q(Ca1) substitution. Relative to the vaccine, circulating 5a.2a viruses also bore the S137P(Ca2) substitution. Both 5a.2a.1 and 5a.2a viruses further differed from the vaccine owing to a R223Q(RBS) mutation acquired by the vaccine virus during egg adaptation (Figure 2). Moreover, 5a.2a.1 (but not 5a.2a) viruses also differed from the vaccine due to a R142K(Ca2) reversion mutation in the HGR.

Figure 2.

Haemagglutinin substitutions present in circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 clade 5a.2a and 5a.2a.1 viruses detected by the Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, relative to the egg-adapted high-growth reassortant vaccine strain IVR-238, 2023/24 influenza season

HGR: high-growth reassortant; RBS: receptor binding site.

Representative influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 clade 5a.2a and 5a.2a.1 viruses were modelled in SWISS-MODEL [32] on A/Michigan/45/2015 (PDB 7knv.1) with substitutions highlighted in PyMOL relative to the egg-adapted HGR vaccine strain A/Victoria/4897/2022 IVR-238 [33]. The clade 5a.2a model shown in panel A depicts a combination of dominant T120A genetic clusters (Supplementary Table S2) rather than a single representative strain. The RBS is shown in red. Substitutions within the RBS are shaded brown. Substitutions in antigenic sites are shown in magenta and in cyan if non-antigenic. Amino acid numbering is based on A(H1)pdm09 numbering with the signal peptide removed. Vaccine-associated (vs circulating virus-associated) substitutions include Q223R, due to egg adaptation, and K142R, due to reversion in the HGR. Differences at position 216 may have an impact on glycosylation status as elaborated in the manuscript. Clade 5a.2a substitutions S137P (Ca2), E260D, A277T and HA2:D29E are clade-defining while other substitutions are new to one or more circulating 5a.2a subclades detected by the SPSN. The 5a.2a substitutions I96T (new) and HA2:H124N (clade-defining) are located inside the trimer interface and are therefore not visible in the structure.

Figure 2

Of the 142 influenza A(H3N2) viruses, 91 (64%) were HA-characterised. Most (88/91; 97%) were clade 2a.3a.1, of which most (77/88; 88%) additionally bore substitutions N122D(A)(−CHO) and K276E(C).

Among 2,176 specimens from participants in BC, Ontario and Quebec aged ≥ 12 years, 333 (15%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of 333 SARS-CoV-2 viruses, 236 (71%) were genetically characterised with lineage findings detailed in Supplementary Table S3. Numerous Omicron subvariants of interest were detected, including EG.5.1 (35/236; 15%), HV.1 (63/236; 27%) and JN.1 (90/236; 38%). Contribution by JN.1 increased across the analysis period from 11% (7/66) in weeks 44–47 to 34% (39/116) in weeks 48–51 and 81% (44/54) in weeks 52–2 (p < 0.001) (Figure 1).

Epidemiological findings

Participant profiles are shown in Table 1 (influenza A) and Table 2 (COVID-19). The median age of influenza A cases was about 5 years younger than controls, whereas the median age of COVID-19 cases was about 5 years older than controls. Among ARI participants, > 80% in either analysis met ILI criteria. Among participants in COVID-19 analyses, 61% (1,053/1,738) self-reported a prior NAAT- or RAT-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (excluding those for whom it was unknown) (Table 2), of whom 71% (750/1,053) reported that this had occurred ≥ 12 months prior to the current illness, 83% (871/1,053) ≥ 6 months prior and 88% (928/1,053) ≥ 3 months prior.

Table 1. Participant profile, influenza A analyses, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, 29 October 2023–13 January 2024 (n = 3,095).

Characteristics All ARI participants (column %) Influenza-vaccinateda (row %, unless otherwise specified)
Overall Influenza A cases Influenza controls p valueb Overall p valuec Influenza A casesd Influenza controlsd
n % n % n % n % n % n %
N (row %) 3,095 100 722 23 2,373 77 NA 823 27 NA 115 16 708 30
Age group (years)e
1–8 546 18 150 21 396 17 < 0.001 85 16 < 0.001 13 9 72 18
9–19 317 10 80 11 237 10 48 15 11 14 37 16
20–49 1,151 37 293 41 858 36 217 19 36 12 181 21
50–64 568 18 125 17 443 19 166 29 27 22 139 31
65–79 407 13 65 9 342 14 226 56 22 34 204 60
≥ 80 106 3 9 1 97 4 81 76 6 67 75 77
Median (IQR) 39 (16–58) 35 (13–52) 40 (17–60) < 0.001 57 (34–71) < 0.001 47 (26–64) 58 (35–71)
Sex
Female 1,868 60 410 57 1,458 61 0.044 527 28 0.007 72 18 455 31
Male 1,208 39 303 42 905 38 288 24 41 14 247 27
Unknown 19 1 9 1 10 0 NA 8 42 NA 2 22 6 60
Comorbidityf
No 2,055 66 520 72 1,535 65 < 0.001 428 21 < 0.001 66 13 362 24
Yes 693 22 129 18 564 24 294 42 37 29 257 46
Unknown 347 11 73 10 274 12 NA 101 29 NA 12 16 89 32
Meets ILI criteria
No 136 4 16 2 120 5 < 0.001 29 21 0.202 1 6 28 23
Yes 2,483 80 636 88 1,847 78 652 26 104 16 548 30
Unknown 476 15 70 10 406 17 NA 142 30 NA 10 14 132 33
Province
Alberta 369 12 120 17 249 10 < 0.001 98 27 < 0.001 23 19 75 30
BC 419 14 84 12 335 14 180 43 25 30 155 46
Ontario 1,502 49 371 51 1,131 48 386 26 58 16 328 29
Quebec 805 26 147 20 658 28 159 20 9 6 150 23
Specimen collection interval from onset of ARIg
≤ 4 days 2,090 68 548 76 1,542 65 < 0.001 534 26 0.059 94 17 440 29
5–7 days 1,005 32 174 24 831 35 289 29 21 12 268 32
Weeks of specimen collection, 2023/24g
44–47 816 26 84 12 732 31 < 0.001 142 17 < 0.001 11 13 131 18
48–51 1,466 47 405 56 1,061 45 409 28 68 17 341 32
52–2 813 26 233 32 580 24 272 33 36 15 236 41
XBB.1.5 vaccination (any, without regard to timing), restricted to BC, Ontario and Quebec only (all column %)h
Totali 2,726 88 602 83 2,124 90 NA 725 88 NA 92 80 633 89
Yes 428 16 61 10 367 17 < 0.001 373 51 < 0.001 45 49 328 52
No 2,142 79 503 84 1,639 77 311 43 39 42 272 43
Unknown 156 6 38 6 118 6 NA 41 6 NA 8 9 33 5

ARI: acute respiratory illness; BC: British Columbia; ILI: Influenza like illness; IQR: interquartile range; NA: not applicable; SPSN: Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network.

a Vaccination status based on participant or guardian report. Participants vaccinated < 2 weeks before onset of symptoms or with unknown vaccination status or timing were excluded.

b p values for comparison between cases and controls were derived by two-way chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

c p values for comparison between vaccinated and not vaccinated were derived by two-way chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The number not vaccinated can be derived by subtracting the number vaccinated from the total ARI participants, by row.

d Without regard to time before illness onset, 131 of 738 (18%) cases and 814 of 2,479 (33%) controls across the analysis period were vaccinated (p < 0.001).

e Children < 1 year excluded as per usual in prior SPSN analyses based on variability and/or uncertainty in their age-related vaccine eligibility over the course of the epidemic. Other age strata defined as per usual SPSN analyses predicated upon one- and two-dose recommendations for children ≥ 9 and < 9 years, respectively; higher likelihood of chronic comorbidity at ≥ 50 years; and higher age-associated risk among adults ≥ 65 years [31].

f Includes chronic comorbidities that place individuals at higher risk of serious complications from influenza as defined by Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization [31].

g Missing specimen collection dates were imputed as the date the specimen was received and processed at the laboratory minus 2 days.

h XBB.1.5 vaccination status based on provincial immunisation registry data from BC, Ontario and Quebec.

i Total participants from BC, Ontario and Quebec, including those with unknown XBB.1.5 vaccination status used in the derivation of percentages displayed in all succeeding rows.

Table 2. Participant profile, COVID-19 analyses, participants ≥ 12 years in BC, Ontario and Quebec, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, 29 October 2023–13 January 2024 (n = 2,176).

Characteristics All ARI participants (column %) XBB.1.5-vaccinateda (row %, unless otherwise specified)
Overall COVID-19 cases COVID-19 controls p valueb Overall p valuec COVID-19 casesd COVID-19 controlsd
n % n % n % n % n % n %
N (row %) 2,176 100 333 15 1,843 85 NA 367 17 NA 40 12 327 18
Age group (years)e
12–49 1,186 55 165 50 1,021 55 0.256 85 7 < 0.001 8 5 77 8
50–64 512 24 89 27 423 23 94 18 7 8 87 21
65–79 372 17 61 18 311 17 140 38 20 33 120 39
≥ 80 106 5 18 5 88 5 48 45 5 28 43 49
Median (IQR) 46 (32.5–63) 50 (36–64) 45 (32–62) 0.015 65 (52–74) < 0.001 68 (57.5–76) 64 (51–74)
Sex
Female 1,402 64 208 62 1,194 65 0.420 234 17 0.826 22 11 212 18
Male 762 35 123 37 639 35 130 17 18 15 112 18
Unknown 12 1 2 1 10 1 NA 3 25 NA 0 0 3 30
Comorbidityf
No 1,334 61 209 63 1,125 61 0.826 155 12 < 0.001 14 7 141 13
Yes 604 28 97 29 507 28 162 27 22 23 140 28
Unknown 238 11 27 8 211 11 NA 50 21 NA 4 15 46 22
Meets ILI criteria
No 92 4 18 5 74 4 0.320 9 10 0.091 2 11 7 9
Yes 1,779 82 279 84 1,500 81 292 16 29 10 263 18
Unknown 305 14 36 11 269 15 NA 66 22 NA 9 25 57 21
Province
British Columbia 308 14 20 6 288 16 < 0.001 94 31 < 0.001 5 25 89 31
Ontario 1,187 55 199 60 988 54 162 14 21 11 141 14
Quebec 681 31 114 34 567 31 111 16 14 12 97 17
Specimen collection interval from onset of ARIg
≤ 4 days 1,397 64 246 74 1,151 62 < 0.001 222 16 0.104 32 13 190 17
5–7 days 779 36 87 26 692 38 145 19 8 9 137 20
Week of specimen collection, 2023/24g
44–47 539 25 89 27 450 24 0.540 51 9 < 0.001 6 7 45 10
48–51 980 45 160 48 820 44 175 18 19 12 156 19
52–2 657 30 84 25 573 31 141 22 15 18 126 22
Self-reported prior NAAT- or RAT-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infectionh
None 685 31 132 40 553 30 < 0.001 132 19 0.035 22 17 110 20
At least one 1,053 48 128 38 925 50 162 15 9 7 153 17
Unknown 438 20 73 22 365 20 NA 73 17 NA 9 12 64 18
Type of XBB.1.5 vaccine received (all column %)
Spikevax i NA NA 165 45 0.053k 15 38 150 46
Comirnaty j 202 55 25 63 177 54
Nuvaxovid l 0 0 NA 0 0 0 0
Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in total, including XBB.1.5 (all column %)
0–1 113 5 16 5 97 5 0.028 0 0 < 0.001k 0 0 0 0
2 558 26 79 24 479 26 3 1 0 0 3 1
3–5 1,272 58 205 62 1,067 58 170 46 11 28 159 49
6–7 233 11 33 10 200 11 194 53 29 73 165 50
Seasonal 2023/24 influenza vaccination (all column %)m
Yes 636 29 91 27 545 30 0.447 320 87 < 0.001 39 98 281 86
No 1,448 67 226 68 1,222 66 38 10 0 0 38 12
Unknown 92 4 16 5 76 4 NA 9 2 NA 1 3 8 2

ARI: acute respiratory illness; BC: British Columbia; ILI: influenza like illness; IQR: interquartile range; NA: not applicable; NAAT: nucleic acid amplification; RAT: rapid antigen test; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SPSN: Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network.

a Vaccination status based on provincial immunisation registry data from BC, Ontario and Quebec. Participants vaccinated < 2 weeks before onset of symptoms or with unknown vaccination status or timing were excluded.

b p values for comparison between cases and controls were derived by two-way chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

c p values for comparison between vaccinated and not vaccinated were derived by two-way chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, unless otherwise specified. The number not vaccinated can be derived by subtracting the number vaccinated from the total ARI participants, by row.

d Without regard to timing before illness onset, 52 of 345 (15%) cases and 386 of 1,902 (20%) controls across the analysis period were vaccinated (p = 0.024).

e Children < 12 years excluded. Other age strata defined as per usual SPSN influenza analyses based upon higher likelihood of chronic comorbidity at ≥ 50 years; and higher age-associated risk among adults ≥ 65 years, notably those ≥ 80 years.

f Includes chronic comorbidities that place individuals at higher risk of serious complications from influenza as defined by Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization [31].

g Missing specimen collection dates were imputed as the date the specimen was received and processed at the laboratory minus 2 days.

h Previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (confirmed by NAAT or RAT), as reported by participant or guardian. NAAT testing for SARS-CoV-2 was broadly available in Canada until early 2022 when self-administered RATs became widely accessible through private purchase and/or publicly funded access.

i Andusomeran, monovalent mRNA COVID-19 (Spikevax XBB.1.5) vaccine manufactured by Moderna Biopharma Canada Corporation, authorised in Canada in September 2023. See: https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/spikevax-xbb15/product-details

j Raxtozinameran, monovalent mRNA COVID-19 (Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 subvariant) vaccine manufactured by BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, authorised in Canada in September 2023. See: https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/comirnaty-omicron-xbb15/product-details

k p values were derived by one-way chi-squared test.

l NVX-CoV2601, monovalent recombinant protein, adjuvanted COVID-19 (Nuvaxovid XBB.1.5 Omicron subvariant) vaccine manufactured by Novavax, authorised in Canada in December 2023. See: https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/nuvaxovid-xbb15/product-details

m Seasonal influenza vaccination status based on participant or guardian report (any, without regard to timing in relation to illness onset).

No exclusions based upon date of last non-XBB.1.5 vaccine dose have been applied to this table.

Among influenza A controls, 41% (236/580) were considered influenza-vaccinated during the latest epidemiological weeks 52–2, comparable to annual influenza vaccine coverage nationally (43% for the 2022/23 season among adults) [2]. Also comparable to national XBB.1.5 vaccine coverage estimates as of 3 December 2023 (15% among people ≥ 5 years) [14], 19% (30 of 162) of our SARS-CoV-2 controls in week 48 were considered vaccinated. Among participants considered influenza-vaccinated, a comparable proportion of cases and controls had also received the XBB.1.5 vaccine (45/84; 54% vs 328/600; 55%) (p = 0.85), whereas among participants considered XBB.1.5-vaccinated, all 39 of 39 SARS-CoV-2 cases vs 281 of 319 (88%) controls reported influenza vaccination (Fisher’s exact p = 0.02). Additional examination of the association between influenza and XBB.1.5 vaccine receipt and implications for VE estimation as per Doll et al. [6] are provided in Supplementary Table S4.

Adjusted influenza VE was 63% (95% CI: 51–72) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 40% (95% CI: 5–61) against A(H3N2) (Table 3). Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 VE was lower against vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1 viruses at 56% (95% CI: 33–71) than alternate clade 5a.2a viruses at 67% (95% CI: 48–80). Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) VE estimates were similar with restriction to ILI patients (61% and 46%, respectively); details of this subanalysis can be viewed in Supplementary Table S5. With age stratification, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 VE estimates were higher in children and in older adults than younger adults, but with overlapping CI.

Table 3. Vaccine effectiveness estimates against influenza A overall, by subtype and A(H1N1)pdm09 clade, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, 29 October 2023 (week 44)–13 January (week 2) 2024 (n = 3,095) .

Total Cases Controls Unadjusted VEa Adjusted VEa,b
N n vacc n % n vacc n % % 95% CI % 95% CI
Influenza Ad,e 3,095 115 722 16 708 2,373 30 55 45–64 59 48–68
1–19 yearsd 863 24 230 10 109 633 17 44 10–65 60 34–76
20–64 yearsd 1,719 63 418 15 320 1,301 25 46 27–60 54 38–66
≥ 65 years d,f 513 28 74 38 279 439 64 65 42–79 70 48–83
≥ 12 years, restricted to BC, Ontario, Quebece, g 2,143 77 449 17 551 1,694 33 57 44–67 59 45–69
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09d,e 2,927 81 554 15 708 2,373 30 60 48–69 63 51–72
1–19 yearsd 816 15 183 8 109 633 17 57 24–76 68 42–83
20–64 yearsd 1,617 46 316 15 320 1,301 25 48 27–63 56 38–69
≥ 65 years d,f 494 20 55 36 279 439 64 67 41–82 72 47–85
≥ 12 years, restricted to BC, Ontario, Quebece, g 2,020 52 326 16 551 1,694 33 61 46–71 63 48–74
Clade 5a.2a.1d 2,568 33 195 17 708 2,373 30 52 30–67 56 33–71
≥ 12 years, restricted to BC, Ontario, Quebece,g 1,802 21 108 19 551 1,694 33 50 18–69 51 18–71
Clade 5a.2ad 2,560 23 187 12 708 2,373 30 67 49–79 67 48–80
≥ 12 years, restricted to BC, Ontario, Quebece,f,g 1,799 12 105 11 551 1,694 33 73 51–85 73 48–86
Influenza A(H3N2)d,e,f 2,515 31 142 22 708 2,373 30 34 1–56 40 5–61
≥ 12 years, restricted to BC, Ontario, Quebece,f,g 1,802 23 108 22 551 1,694 33 44 10–65 44 5–67

ARI: acute respiratory illness; BC: British Columbia; CI: confidence interval; ILI: influenza-like illness; OR: odds ratio; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SPSN: Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network; vac: vaccinated; VE: vaccine effectiveness.

a VE was calculated as 1 − OR × 100%. ORs compared test positivity between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants by logistic regression with covariate adjustment as specified. Unless otherwise specified, analyses include participants aged ≥ 1 year.

b Adjusted for age group, province and calendar time, as specified.

c Vaccination status based upon participant or guardian report. Participants vaccinated < 2 weeks before acute respiratory illness onset or with unknown vaccine status or timing were excluded.

d Adjusted for age group (1–8, 9–19, 20–49, 50–64, 65–79, ≥ 80 years), province (Alberta, BC, Ontario, Quebec), and calendar time (single epidemiological weeks 44–2).

e Sensitivity analyses are appended in Supplementary Table S5 and include additional adjustment for sex and comorbidity; analysis of VE against ILI (vs ARI) for comparison with prior SPSN estimates; and exclusion of SARS-CoV-2 test-positive cases from influenza test-negative controls to explore confounding by correlated influenza and COVID-19 vaccine status [7].

f To address sparse data concerns, the use of Firth’s penalised logistic regression or collapsing of epidemiological weeks into biweekly categories for calendar time adjustment did not alter point estimates by more than 2%.

g Restricted to participants aged ≥ 12 years enrolled in the provinces of BC, Ontario or Quebec for comparison with XBB.1.5 VE. Adjusted for age group (12–49, 50–64, 65–79, ≥ 80 years), province (BC, Ontario, Quebec), and calendar time single epidemiological weeks 44–2).

With restriction to participants ≥ 12 years in BC, Ontario and Quebec, influenza VE estimates were similar for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (63%), A(H3N2) (43%), and for A(H1N1)pdm09 clades 5a.2a.1 (51%) and 5a.2a (73%) (Table 3). In COVID-19 analyses with the same restrictions, additionally excluding recipients of non-XBB.1.5 vaccine ≤ 6 months before the launch of the autumn campaign, XBB.1.5 VE against COVID-19 was 47% (95% CI: 21–65) (Table 4). Age-stratified estimates of XBB.1.5 VE against COVID-19 are provided in Supplementary Table S7 and were comparable among those 12–64 and ≥ 65 years, also with broadly overlapping CI.

Table 4. XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness estimates against COVID-19 among participants ≥ 12 years in BC, Ontario and Quebec, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network, 29 October 2023 (week 44)–13 January (week 2) 2024 (n = 2,176).

Exclusion based upon timing of last non-XBB.1.5 vaccine dose
No exclusion for last dose Receipt within 12 weeks priora Receipt within 24 weeks priorb
XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Not XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Total XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Not XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Total XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Not XBB.1.5 vaccinatedc Total
n % n N n % n N n % n N
Total participants 367 17 1,809 2,176 366 17 1,799 2,165 342 16 1,770 2,112
Weeks since XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA
Weeks since last non-XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 58 (51–64) 98 (67–115) NA 58 (51–64) 98 (68–115) NA 59 (53–65) 99 (70–115) NA
Case participants 40 12 293 333 39 12 293 332 33 10 290 323
Weeks since XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA
Weeks since last non-XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 58.5 (51–62) 97 (68–109) NA 59 (51–62) 97 (68–109) NA 61 (54–65) 97.5 (68–110) NA
Control participants 327 18 1,516 1,843 327 18 1,506 1,833 309 17 1,480 1,789
Weeks since XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA 5 (3–8) NA NA
Weeks since last non-XBB.1.5 dose, median (IQR) 58 (51–65) 99 (66–115) NA 58 (51–65) 99 (68–116) NA 59 (53–65) 99 (71–116) NA
Vaccine effectiveness % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI
Unadjustedd,e 37 10–55 39 13–57 45 20–63
Adjustede,f,g 38 10–58 41 13–60 47 21–65

BC: British Columbia; CI: confidence interval; IQR: interquartile range; NA: not applicable; OR: odds ratio.

a Excludes participants who received a non-XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine dose ≤ 12 weeks before provincial launch of the publicly funded XBB.1.5 vaccine campaign (i.e. receipt of non-XBB.1.5 vaccine on or after 19 July 2023 in BC, 7 August 2023 in Ontario and 18 July 2023 in Quebec).

b Primary analysis: excludes participants who received a non-XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine ≤ 24 weeks before provincial launch of the publicly funded XBB.1.5 vaccine campaign (i.e. receipt of non-XBB.1.5 vaccine on or after 26 April 2023 in BC, 15 May 2023 in Ontario and 25 April 2023 in Quebec).

c Vaccination status based upon provincial immunisation registry data from BC, Ontario and Quebec. Participants vaccinated < 2 weeks before acute respiratory illness onset or with unknown vaccination status or timing were excluded.

d VE was calculated as 1 − OR × 100%. ORs compared test positivity between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants by logistic regression with covariate adjustment as specified.

e Sensitivity analyses are appended in Supplementary Table S6 and include additional adjustment for sex and comorbidity; exclusion of influenza test-positive cases from COVID-19 controls to explore confounding by correlated influenza and COVID-19 vaccine status [7]; and restriction to participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by nucleic acid amplification test or rapid antigen test, as reported by participant or guardian.

f Adjusted for age group (12–49, 50–64, 65–79, ≥ 80 years), province (BC, Ontario, Quebec), and calendar time (single epidemiological weeks 44–2).

Primary influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) VE estimates (63% and 40%, respectively) were relatively unaffected after exclusion of COVID-19 cases from influenza test-negative controls (64% and 38%, respectively). Excluding influenza cases from SARS-CoV-2 test-negative controls increased the primary XBB.1.5 VE estimate (47%) to 54% (95% CI: 31–70); the results of these additional analyses are appended in Supplementary Tables S5 and S6. With restriction to participants reporting prior NAAT- or RAT-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, XBB.1.5 VE was higher at 67% (95% CI: 28–85) and when additionally excluding influenza cases from controls, it was 72% (95% CI: 39–87).

Discussion

From late October 2023 through mid-January 2024, the Canadian SPSN estimates that the 2023/24 multivalent influenza vaccine reduced the risk of medically attended outpatient ARI due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 by about 60% and the risk due to influenza A(H3N2) by 40%. The updated autumn 2023 monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine afforded a level of protection comparable to the seasonal influenza vaccine, reducing the risk of medically attended outpatient COVID-19 by about 50% overall. Among individuals reporting a prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, XBB.1.5 provided higher protection, reducing the COVID-19 risk by around 70% overall.

In mid-season analyses over the past decade, historical SPSN VE estimates against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 have ranged approximately 45–75%, placing our current season’s estimates of 61–65% (including sensitivity analyses) at roughly mid-range [6], albeit higher than for the most recent prior A(H1N1)pdm09 epidemic in 2019/20 as reported by the SPSN (44%) [15], or other similar outpatient networks in the United States (US) (30%) [16] or Europe (48%) [17]. Our 2023/24 VE estimate is similar to the 61% reported earlier from Alberta, Canada for the shorter period spanning 29 October to 30 December 2023 [18]. In general, however, summary estimates mask important underlying complexity relevant to VE interpretation and comparison. To understand and improve vaccine performance against highly changeable viruses, molecular-level examination of the dynamic and evolving relationship between circulating and vaccine strains and their impact on protection is needed, such as routinely undertaken in integrated analyses each year by the SPSN.

We report paradoxical clade-specific variation in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 VE, lower by 10% or more against vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1 than alternate clade 5a.2a viruses. While confidence intervals in VE comparisons overlapped and determinants of VE are multifactorial, unexpected mid-season findings inform hypotheses for further investigation. A predominant subset of clade 5a.2a.1 viruses, including vaccine and circulating strains, harbour the T216A substitution. This unique 5a.2a.1 substitution may have disrupted an important glycan within antigenic site Sa that has otherwise shielded all A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses from antibody binding since 2015 [19]. Selective loss of this protective glycan by 5a.2a.1 viruses (and the vaccine virus) may have influenced imprint-related effects, previously hypothesised to underpin age-specific variation in VE [20]. The Q223R substitution due to egg adaptation has affected every A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine strain since 2009, but would not explain particular clade-specific variation in 2023/24 [21,22]. We instead flag another vaccine mutation uniquely accrued by the 2023/24 clade 5a.2a.1 vaccine HGR, namely R142K(Ca2) reversion. Present only in representative egg-derived HGRs of both inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines (but not their respective egg-adapted wildtype strains), this vaccine mutation may have resulted from selective pressure post-reassortment. Consequently, circulating 5a.2a.1 viruses are mismatched at R142, whereas clade 5a.2a viruses are naturally K142 matched to 2023/24 clade 5a.2a.1 vaccine HGRs. Notwithstanding higher VE against them, circulating clade 5a.2a viruses have other substitutions distinguishing them from the vaccine, including S137P(Ca2) and K169Q(Ca1). While both Ca2 residues 137 and 142 are proximal to the RBS, position 142 is in a more exposed area of the HA surface protein, and therefore potentially more influential on antibody response and VE.

To date in 2023/24, influenza A(H3N2) viruses have comprised just 20% of SPSN influenza A detections, most clade-mismatched to the vaccine and harbouring potential loss of glycosylation in antigenic site A. In that context, our VE estimates against influenza A(H3N2) ranging 38–46% (including sensitivity analyses) are lower than in 2022/23 (54%) [23], also lower than the Alberta estimate for 2023/24 (49%) [18], but comparable to historical mid-season SPSN estimates, typically < 50% [6].

The SPSN has no historical record against which to compare the autumn 2023 XBB.1.5 VE estimates, ranging 47–54% and higher at 67–72% among participants reporting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the latter now comprising the majority of the general population in Canada as elsewhere [24]. This observation is consistent with earlier studies indicating higher protection among people with hybrid (vaccine plus infection-induced) SARS-CoV-2 immunity [25]. Because testing for influenza virus, notably self-administered, has not been as broadly available, we could not conduct similar restriction for influenza VE estimation. A recent preprint of a US test-negative study among outpatients ≥ 18 years between 11 October and 10 December 2023 reported a similar XBB.1.5 VE estimate (58%) [26], while a screening study among patients ≥ 60 years in the Netherlands between 9 October and 5 December 2023 reported higher XBB.1.5 VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation (71%) [27]. To date, all mid-season 2023/24 analyses of XBB.1.5 (and influenza) VE have spanned just 1–2 months post-vaccination [18,26,27]. In addition, Omicron variants continue to diversify, with increasing contribution of BA.2.86 lineages, most notably JN.1. While BA.2.86 harbours more than 30 spike mutations relative to XBB.1.5, evidence so far suggests that immune evasion is not substantially greater than other variants [28,29]. Compared with its parent BA.2.86 lineage, however, JN.1 carries an additional mutation that enhances antigenic distinction and the capacity for antibody escape [28-30]. The SPSN mid-season XBB.1.5 VE estimate we report is in the context of JN.1 comprising < 40% of sequenced viruses overall. Increased circulation of the JN.1 variant across the analysis period, as also observed elsewhere, warrants further virological and VE monitoring.

We identified slight underestimation (< 10%) of COVID-19 VE associated with differences in the proportion of XBB.1.5-vaccinated COVID-19 cases vs controls who had also received the influenza vaccine, reflecting a potential bias due to an indirect confounding pathway [7]. Conversely, a more comparable proportion of vaccinated influenza cases and controls had reported XBB.1.5 vaccine receipt, with influenza VE estimates less affected. As explained in Supplementary Table S4, among people who came for XBB.1.5 vaccination, receipt of influenza vaccine appeared more likely than the reverse scenario of XBB.1.5 vaccine receipt among those coming for influenza vaccination. Our data suggest that confounding due to correlated receipt of vaccines against conditions included in the control series of test-negative designs may not be of the same magnitude for each vaccine considered. Rather, the bias will vary as the extent of correlated receipt of other vaccines varies for each vaccine’s separate VE analysis. These VE methodological considerations may become more relevant to explore as influenza, COVID-19 and soon respiratory syncytial virus vaccines (not yet widely available in Canada) are administered annually to the same target groups.

Our study is limited by small sample size and wide CIs, especially in stratified analyses, and by the potential for residual bias and confounding. Overlap in vaccine roll-out and epidemic evolution during mid-season analyses warrant further evaluation of calendar time effects through end-of-season analyses. We subjected as many as possible of our mid-season case viruses to WGS, resulting in the successful genetic characterisation of more than two-thirds of our influenza and COVID-19 case viruses. This supported clade-specific analysis and VE interpretation; however, we cannot rule out different patterns among uncharacterised case viruses or at the end of the season. In the absence of reliable influenza immunisation registries across participating provinces, we compared the proportion of test-negative controls for whom vaccine status was reported by the participant or sentinel practitioner with other population survey sources of vaccine coverage, shown to be reassuringly similar. Varied histories of prior infection (including imprinting) and vaccination may affect both influenza and COVID-19 VE in ways that require more in-depth immuno-epidemiological consideration. Our estimates are best interpreted in relation to the prevention of medically attended outpatient influenza or COVID-19. We cannot comment on VE against other more severe acute (e.g. hospitalisation) or long-term (e.g. long COVID) outcomes, although vaccines effective against infection are also expected to mitigate their associated downstream sequelae.

Conclusions

In mid-season analysis, the 2023/24 influenza vaccine reduced the risk of medically attended outpatient ARI due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 by about 60%, paradoxically lower for vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1 than alternate clade 5a.2a viruses. Hypothesised contribution of mutations in circulating and vaccine strains warrants further biological, immunological and epidemiological investigation. Lower VE of 40% against influenza A(H3N2) is consistent with historical observations for that subtype. The updated autumn 2023 monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine protected comparably well, reducing the risk of medically attended COVID-19 by about half overall, and by about two-thirds among previously infected individuals. Ongoing VE monitoring with increased time since vaccination and evolution in variant contribution is warranted.

Ethical statement

Institutional review boards provided approval in Alberta: REB15-0587 and Ontario: 2017-057.07. In British Columbia both the University of British Columbia Clinical and Behavioural Research Ethics Board (REB)s waived review because such evaluations are considered within the core public health mandate of the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC). In Quebec, such evaluations are similarly considered part of core public health surveillance with the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec REBs providing waiver of review.

Funding statement

Funding was provided by the BC Ministry of Health, Alberta Health and Wellness, Public Health Ontario, the Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec and the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the view of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Funders had no role in data analysis, interpretation or the decision to publish.

Data availability statement

Accession numbers for SPSN influenza virus sequences described here and uploaded to GISAID by the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control are: EPI_ISL_ 18893887-18894338. Data for SPSN SARS-CoV-2 viruses meeting provincial and/or national criteria for upload and their submitting and contributing laboratories can be found on GISAID using the Epi_Set_ID: EPI_SET_240214wm (https://doi.org/10.55876/gis8.240214wm)

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of sentinel sites whose regular submission of specimens and data provide the basis of our analyses. We wish to acknowledge the administrative, coordination, data entry and/or management support in participating provinces including: Gabriel Canizares for provincial and national coordination at the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control; Chinyereadaeze Chukwu, and Dani Contreras for TARRANT in Alberta; Paule Clément for Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, France Bouchard, Josiane Rivard and Gabrielle Guilbault for Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval; and Mandy Kwok for Public Health Ontario. We thank Lea Separovic at British Columbia Centre for Disease Control for helpful manuscript review and input. We wish to thank those who provided additional laboratory and technical support in each province at the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, the Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (ProvLab), Public Health Ontario Laboratory and the Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec. We also gratefully acknowledge the authors and originating and submitting laboratories of the virus sequences used in this analysis from Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data’s EpiFlu and EpiCoV Databases (www.gisaid.org).

Supplementary Data

Supplement

Conflict of interest: DMS is Principal Investigator on grants received to her institution from the Public Health Agency of Canada in support of this work. She has received grants from the BCCDC Foundation for Public Health and Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research for unrelated work, also paid to her institution. SC received a grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada paid to her institution for unrelated work. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ contributions: Principal investigators (epidemiological): DMS (British Columbia); JAD (Alberta); RO and RM (Ontario) and SC (Québec). Principal investigator (laboratory): ANJ (British Columbia); NZ (Alberta); MH (Ontario); HC and IL (Québec); NB and RG (National). Genetic analyses: SS and SEK. Epidemiological data analysis: YZ, DMS and AK. Draft revision and approval: all.

References

  • 1.Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). FluWatch report: January 7, 2023 to January 13, 2024 (week 2). Ottawa: PHAC; 2024. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/fluwatch/2023-2024/week-2-january-7-january-13-2024.html
  • 2.Schmidt K, Ben Moussa M, Buckrell S, Rahal A, Chestley T, Bastien N, et al. National Influenza Annual Report, Canada, 2022-2023: Canada’s first fall epidemic since the 2019-2020 season. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2023;49(10):413-24. 10.14745/ccdr.v49i10a02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Serres G, Skowronski DM, Wu XW, Ambrose CS. The test-negative design: validity, accuracy and precision of vaccine efficacy estimates compared to the gold standard of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(37):20585. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.37.20585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Government of Canada. COVID-19 vaccines: Canadian immunization guide. Ottawa: Government of Canada. [Accessed: 29 Jan 2024]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-part-4-active-vaccines/page-26-covid-19-vaccine.html#t1
  • 5.World Health Organization (WHO). Recommended composition of influenza virus vaccines for use in the 2023-2024 northern hemisphere influenza season, Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/recommended-composition-of-influenza-virus-vaccines-for-use-in-the-2023-2024-northern-hemisphere-influenza-season
  • 6.Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network (SPSN). Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network (SPSN) influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates % (95% CI), 2004-05 to 2022-23 seasons. Vancouver: SPSN; 2023. Available from: http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Statistics%20and%20Research/Publications/Epid/Influenza%20and%20Respiratory/SPSN_VE_By_Year_Table.pdf [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Doll MK, Pettigrew SM, Ma J, Verma A. Effects of confounding bias in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccine effectiveness test-negative designs due to correlated influenza and COVID-19 vaccination behaviors. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(1):e564-71. 10.1093/cid/ciac234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80(1):27-38. 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2409-19. 10.1002/sim.1047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Devika S, Jeyaseelan L, Sebastian G. Analysis of sparse data in logistic regression in medical research: A newer approach. J Postgrad Med. 2016;62(1):26-31. 10.4103/0022-3859.173193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou B, Donnelly ME, Scholes DT, St George K, Hatta M, Kawaoka Y, et al. Single-reaction genomic amplification accelerates sequencing and vaccine production for classical and Swine origin human influenza a viruses. J Virol. 2009;83(19):10309-13. 10.1128/JVI.01109-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aksamentov I, Roemer C, Hodcroft EB, Neher RA. Nextclade: clade assignment, mutation calling and quality control for viral genomes. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(677):3773. 10.21105/joss.03773 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rambaut A, Holmes EC, O’Toole Á, Hill V, McCrone JT, Ruis C, et al. A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(11):1403-7. 10.1038/s41564-020-0770-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). COVID-19 vaccination: Vaccination coverage. Ottawa: PHAC. [Accessed: 12 Feb 2024]. Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccination-coverage/archive/2023-10-23/index.html
  • 15.Skowronski DM, Zou M, Sabaiduc S, Murti M, Olsha R, Dickinson JA, et al. Interim estimates of 2019/20 vaccine effectiveness during early-season co-circulation of influenza A and B viruses, Canada, February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(7):2000103. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.7.2000103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tenforde MW, Kondor RJG, Chung JR, Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Jackson ML, et al. Effect of Antigenic Drift on Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States-2019-2020. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):e4244-50. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rose A, Kissling E, Emborg HD, Larrauri A, McMenamin J, Pozo F, et al. European IVE group . Interim 2019/20 influenza vaccine effectiveness: six European studies, September 2019 to January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(10):2000153. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smolarchuk C, Ickert C, Zelyas N, Kwong JC, Buchan SA. Early influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates using routinely collected data, Alberta, Canada, 2023/24 season. Euro Surveill. 2024;29(2):2300709. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.2.2300709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Altman MO, Angel M, Košík I, Trovão NS, Zost SJ, Gibbs JS, et al. Human influenza A virus hemagglutinin glycan evolution follows a temporal pattern to a glycan limit. MBio. 2019;10(2):e00204-19. 10.1128/mBio.00204-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Skowronski DM, Chambers C, Sabaiduc S, De Serres G, Winter AL, Dickinson JA, et al. Beyond antigenic match: possible agent-host and immuno-epidemiological influences on influenza vaccine effectiveness during the 2015-16 season in Canada. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(12):1487-500. 10.1093/infdis/jix526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Raymond DD, Stewart SM, Lee J, Ferdman J, Bajic G, Do KT, et al. Influenza immunization elicits antibodies specific for an egg-adapted vaccine strain. Nat Med. 2016;22(12):1465-9. 10.1038/nm.4223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu F, Tzeng WP, Horner L, Kamal RP, Tatum HR, Blanchard EG, et al. Influence of immune priming and egg adaptation in the vaccine on antibody responses to circulating A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses after influenza vaccination in adults. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(10):1571-81. 10.1093/infdis/jiy376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Skowronski DM, Chuang ESY, Sabaiduc S, Kaweski SE, Kim S, Dickinson JA, et al. Vaccine effectiveness estimates from an early-season influenza A(H3N2) epidemic, including unique genetic diversity with reassortment, Canada, 2022/23. Euro Surveill. 2023;28(5):2300043. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.5.2300043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skowronski DM, Kaweski SE, Irvine MA, Chuang ESY, Kim S, Sabaiduc S, et al. Risk of hospital admission and death from first-ever SARS-CoV-2 infection by age group during the Delta and Omicron periods in British Columbia, Canada. CMAJ. 2023;195(42):E1427-39. 10.1503/cmaj.230721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bobrovitz N, Ware H, Ma X, Li Z, Hosseini R, Cao C, et al. Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(5):556-67. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00801-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tartof SY, Slezak JM, Frankland TB, Puzniak L, Hong V, Ackerson BK, et al. BNT162b2 XBB1.5-adapted vaccine and COVID-19 hospital admissions and ambulatory visits in US adults. medRxiv. 2023:2023.12.24.23300512. . 10.1101/2023.12.24.23300512 [DOI]
  • 27.van Werkhoven CH, Valk A-W, Smagge B, de Melker HE, Knol MJ, Hahné SJ, et al. Early COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness of XBB.1.5 vaccine against hospitalisation and admission to intensive care, the Netherlands, 9 October to 5 December 2023. Euro Surveill. 2024;29(1):2300703. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.1.2300703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.World Health Organization (WHO). Initial risk evaluation of JN.1, 19 December 2023. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/18122023_jn.1_ire_clean.pdf?sfvrsn=6103754a_3
  • 29.Wang Q, Guo Y, Bowen A, Mellis IA, Valdez R, Gherasim C, et al. XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine booster elicits robust neutralizing antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. bioRxiv. 2023:2023.11.26.568730. . 10.1101/2023.11.26.568730 [DOI]
  • 30.Yang S, Yu Y, Xu Y, Jian F, Song W, Yisimayi A, et al. Fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 to JN.1 under heavy immune pressure. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(2):e70-2. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00744-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Statement on seasonal influenza vaccine for 2023-2024 Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2023 [15 January 2024]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/vaccines-immunization/national-advisory-committee-immunization-statement-seasonal-influenza-vaccine-2023-2024.html#summary
  • 32.Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W296-303. 10.1093/nar/gky427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schrödinger LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Version 2.5.2.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES