Abstract
The development of ambient ionization mass spectrometry (AIMS) has transformed analytical science, providing the means of performing rapid analysis of samples in their native state, both in and out of the laboratory. The capacity to eliminate sample preparation and pre‐MS separation techniques, leading to true real‐time analysis, has led to AIMS naturally gaining a broad interest across the scientific community. Since the introduction of the first AIMS techniques in the mid‐2000s, the field has exploded with dozens of novel ion sources, an array of intriguing applications, and an evident growing interest across diverse areas of study. As the field continues to surge forward each year, ambient ionization techniques are increasingly becoming commonplace in laboratories around the world. This annual review provides an overview of AIMS techniques and applications throughout 2022, with a specific focus on some of the major fields of research, including forensic science, disease diagnostics, pharmaceuticals and food sciences. New techniques and methods are introduced, demonstrating the unwavering drive of the analytical community to further advance this exciting field and push the boundaries of what analytical chemistry can achieve.
List of Abbreviations
- AIMS
ambient ionization mass spectrometry
- APADI
atmospheric pressure arc desorption/ionization
- APCI
atmospheric pressure chemical ionization
- ASAP
atmospheric pressure solids analysis probe
- CBS
coated blade spray
- cVSSI
vibrating sharpedge spray ionization
- DART
direct analysis in real time
- DBD
dielectric barrier discharge
- DESI
desorption electrospray ionization
- EAPSI
electroactive polymer‐based spray ionization
- EESI
extractive electrospray ionization
- ESI
electrospray ionization
- FAPA
flowing atmospheric pressure afterglow
- FFO
fully formulated oil
- FFPE
formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded
- HCD
hollow cathode discharge
- HPD
heat pulse desorption
- iEESI
internal extractive electrospray ionization
- ILSA
inverted library search algorithm
- IMS
ion mobility spectrometry
- LAESI
laser ablation electrospray ionization
- LAMP
laser‐assisted micro‐pyrolysis
- LC
liquid chromatography
- LESA
liquid extraction surface analysis
- LMJ‐SSP
liquid micro junction‐surface sampling probe
- LOD
limit of detection
- LTP
low‐temperature plasma
- MALDI
matrix‐assister laser desorption ionization
- MS
mass spectrometry
- nano‐DESI
nanospray desorption electrospray ionization
- NPSs
new psychoactive substances
- PDA
polydopamine
- PESI
probe electrospray ionization
- PI
post‐photoionization
- PIRL
picosecond infrared laser desorption
- PLS‐DA
partial least squares‐discriminant analysis
- PS
paper spray
- REIMS
rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry
- SESI
secondary electrospray ionization
- sfPESI
sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionization
- TB‐ITP‐DESI
thread‐based isotachophoresis desorption electrospray ionization
- THC
tetrahydrocannabinol
- TNT
trinitrotoluene
- VOC
volatile organic compound
1. INTRODUCTION
Mass spectrometry (MS) has played a critical role in the scientific community for decades, finding utility in clinical diagnostics, forensic science, environmental testing, drug discovery, and more. Despite the importance of MS, traditional approaches have long since been hindered by method limitations, necessitating destructive and time‐consuming sample preparation and sometimes lengthy chromatographic separation, all whilst being confined to the laboratory bench. In the mid‐2000s, the field of MS was set to rapidly transform as the first ambient ionization techniques were introduced. Desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) 1 and direct analysis in real‐time (DART) 2 were unveiled somewhat simultaneously, and for the first time enabled the rapid desorption and ionization of native state samples under ambient conditions.
Since then, the field of ambient ionization MS (AIMS) has experienced impressive growth, evident through the dozens of novel AIMS techniques that have been developed, the increasing number of fields realizing and leveraging the power of AIMS, and the constant improvement of methods and technologies. Each year brings the introduction of new techniques aiming to fill a gap in a scientist's analytical toolbox. These advancements in AIMS technologies provide the opportunity to discover novel ways to solve problems, both in the laboratory and, in more recent years, by taking the instrument to the sample in real‐world arenas. AIMS is rapidly finding its place in clinical medicine to speed up diagnostics, forensic science to preserve evidence and solve crimes more quickly, food quality control to ensure the safety of consumer products, and pharmaceutical sciences to study the behaviour of drugs within the body.
This review will delve into the applications and developments of AIMS throughout 2022, continuing from our previous 2020 and 2021 editions. 3 , 4 Search terms used include ‘ambient ionization’ and individual AIMS technique names using the PubMed database in October and November 2022. The subsequent sections briefly introduce the reader to key AIMS techniques, followed by a detailed review of AIMS applications in several major fields of research, culminating in a look at recent developments and what the future may hold for AIMS.
2. AMBIENT IONIZATION MS
A comprehensive collection of AIMS techniques has been gradually developed over the past 20 years, each utilizing different ion source geometries and ionization mechanisms geared towards the desorption and ionization of different types of molecules. Despite the diversity of AIMS, the majority of techniques broadly fall into three primary classes of technique. Plasma‐based ionization techniques utilize an electrical discharge to produce reactive ions to achieve ionization, similar to traditional atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) techniques. Solid‐liquid extraction techniques involve the extraction or desorption of analytes directly from the surface of a sample, subsequently achieving ionization using mechanisms akin to electrospray ionization (ESI). Finally, laser‐based ionization techniques involve the ablation and desorption of analytes using infrared or ultraviolet lasers, albeit these techniques are perhaps lesser used than the plasma‐ and surface‐based approaches.
Plasma‐based ion sources are one of the primary classes of AIMS techniques, utilizing electrical discharges to produce a reactive plasma of electrons, radicals and excited state (metastable) species. Within this category, ion sources might be considered indirect in which the electrical discharge itself is physically separated from the sample, or direct where the sample makes direct contact with the excited species. 5 DART is undoubtedly the most commonly used indirect plasma‐based AIMS technique, developed in the mid‐2000s by Cody et al. 2 In DART, an inert gas, typically helium or nitrogen, enters the DART ion source where an electrical discharge occurs, resulting in the production of the ionizing plasma. Various ion‐molecule reactions then occur, resulting in the ionization of either atmospheric reagent ions that subsequently ionize the analyte molecules or, in some cases, the immediate ionization of analyte molecules. Due to the commercial availability of DART, its ease of operation, and its broad applicability to gases, liquids and solids, this technique has rapidly become one of the most widely used, particularly for the analysis of materials of forensic relevance. Another commercially‐available device is the atmospheric pressure solids analysis probe (ASAP), which utilizes a glass sampling tool that is directly exposed to the sample in order to collect material for analysis. 6 The probe is then inserted into the instrument where a stream of heated gas induces the rapid thermal desorption of volatile and semi‐volatile analytes, followed by ionization via APCI. The simplicity of ASAP has also made it a popular technique, with great potential for use by non‐experts, especially given the 2021 launch of the first dedicated AIMS mass spectrometer.
Despite the availability of commercialized plasma‐based AIMS devices, these ion sources can also be readily handmade at a relatively low cost. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) ionization consists of two electrodes, for instance, a copper strip and a stainless steel needle, with an insulating barrier (e.g. glass) placed in between. 7 A high voltage is applied between the electrodes, resulting in the formation of a plasma that can be applied directly to gaseous, liquid or solid samples. Other similar plasma‐based techniques include low‐temperature plasma (LTP), hollow cathode discharge (HCD), plasma‐assisted desorption ionization, and flowing atmospheric pressure afterglow (FAPA), which operate under similar principles but with modified geometries and mechanisms. 8 Although many plasma‐based ion sources are not commercially available, they do offer the advantage of being relatively cheap and simple to construct. For instance, DBD ion sources simply require a glass or quartz tube, two electrodes, and a high‐voltage power supply, which can subsequently be coupled with any open‐inlet mass spectrometer. Plasma‐based ion sources are amongst the few AIMS techniques that can be readily applied to gaseous, liquid and solid samples alike.
Solid‐liquid extraction AIMS techniques account for the largest proportion of publications in AIMS covered in this review (Figure 1), with DESI being the first to be introduced. DESI uses an electrically‐charged stream of microdroplets which, upon collision with the surface of a sample, results in the production of secondary droplets containing desorbed and ionized molecules. 1 The ions are then drawn directly into the nearby MS inlet for detection. Since its advent, numerous modified forms of DESI have emerged aiming to resolve some of the weaknesses of the initial technique and extend its capabilities. These include nanospray DESI (nano‐DESI), which utilizes two small capillaries to create a liquid microjunction with the surface of the sample for localized analyte extraction, 9 and air flow‐assisted DESI, which incorporates a high‐flow air stream to improve analyte extraction and transportation. 10 This collection of DESI‐based techniques has proven to be advantageous for the MS imaging of biological materials, particularly given its high spatial resolution. 11
FIGURE 1.

Distribution of papers detailed in this review using each ambient ionization mass spectrometry (AIMS) technique (above) and the relative contribution of papers to each field of research (below). Please see Table 1 for details on the abbreviations used for AIMS techniques.
Paper spray (PS) ionization is also amongst the most commonly utilized AIMS techniques, accounting for 15% of publications covered in this review. This technique consists of a triangular piece of paper substrate that is positioned directly in front of the MS inlet. 12 A small volume of the sample and a spray solvent is added, followed by the application of a high voltage. This results in electrospray occurring at the pointed tip of the paper, leading to the ionization of analytes with similar mechanisms to traditional ESI. PS‐MS has been rapidly adopted by many research laboratories worldwide due to its low cost, ease of use, and versatility in terms of the paper substrate used for the analysis. Each year novel paper treatments and variations are introduced, expanding the applicability of this technique to different challenges. A three‐dimensional version of PS, known as cone spray, has become a popular technique for the analysis of solids, 13 and the use of alternative substrates and paper treatments to target different molecule types and induce on‐paper reactions has vastly expanded the possibilities of analysis using PS. 14 Similar techniques have even been produced directly from the sample material itself, such as leaf spray ionization. 15 PS‐MS has rapidly become one of the most commonly utilized AIMS techniques, driven by its relatively low cost, versatility, and low detection limits, at times achieving impressive parts per trillion levels of detection. 16
Probe ESI (PESI) is another popular and now commercialized AIMS technique, first developed in the mid‐2000s shortly after the introduction of DESI and DART. 17 In PESI, a grounded solid needle is lowered onto the surface of a liquid, collecting a small amount of material on the end of the needle. The needle is then raised in front of the mass spectrometer inlet and a high voltage is applied, initiating the formation of an electrospray from the needle tip. As the original PESI technique was only applicable to liquids and soft solid samples, it was later modified to produce sheath‐flow PESI (sfPESI). 18 In sfPESI, the needle is housed in a plastic solvent‐filled capillary which protrudes from the base of the capillary to enable the liquid extraction of solid surfaces. This has greatly expanded the application of PESI to materials such as agricultural products 19 and dried blood spots. 20
Somewhat comparable to sfPESI is liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA), an AIMS technique that extracts analytes via a liquid microjunction created between the conductive pipette tip of a sampling probe and the sample surface. 21 Analytes are extracted from the sample into the liquid through repeated re‐aspiration of the liquid against the sample surface. The pipette tip is then repositioned in front of the instrument inlet and electrospray is induced. LESA has grown into a particularly promising technique for the imaging of biological tissues. Somewhat analogous to LESA is the MasSpec Pen, another technique which utilizes liquid‐solid extraction of analytes prior to analysis. 22 In particular, the MasSpec Pen has found its utility in the real‐time analysis of biological tissues, particularly in operating theatres, though in recent years more diverse applications have emerged. Techniques such as the MasSpec Pen have particular promise for real‐world deployment, requiring minimal expertise to operate. Extractive ESI (EESI) utilizes two colliding aerosols, one containing the nebulized sample solution and the other a spray solvent with a high voltage applied to produce charged microdroplets. 23 As the streams collide, charge transfer and ionization occur. Finally, although not a solid‐liquid extraction technique, secondary ESI (SESI) is a technique most akin to the aforementioned electrospray‐based techniques. 24 SESI incorporates a sprayer to produce charging agents which collide with gas‐phase analytes, after which charge transfer and ionization of analytes take place, with ions being drawn directly into the MS inlet for detection.
When considering laser‐based AIMS techniques, perhaps the most common is laser ablation ESI (LAESI). 25 In LAESI, the sample surface is ablated using an infrared laser, producing a plume of desorbed molecules which are subsequently ionized by electrospray. Laser ablation techniques are particularly suited to MS imaging due to their ability to achieve extremely focused ablation and sampling. A particular advantage of laser ablation is the potential to achieve extremely fast analysis times, with some authors demonstrating the analysis of dozens of samples per second. 26 , 27 Finally, some AIMS techniques utilize somewhat unique mechanisms and do not fall within the aforementioned classes. Rapid evaporative ionization MS (REIMS) is one such technique, which uses a surgical electrocautery knife to achieve vaporization of the sample. 28 The gaseous plume containing analyte ions is then drawn into the mass spectrometer for analysis. REIMS, sometimes referred to as the iKnife, was primarily developed for use in operating theatres by surgeons to guide the removal of cancerous tissue based on the respective chemical profiles of malignant and healthy tissue.
The selection of techniques discussed here, included in Table 1, is by no means exhaustive but encompasses the major AIMS techniques commonly encountered and those utilized in studies covered in this review. The subsequent sections describe the diverse uses of these techniques throughout 2022 across several key fields of research and highlight the development of new methodological and technological developments driving the field forward.
TABLE 1.
Summary of techniques covered throughout this review
| Technique | Abbreviation | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Atmospheric breath analysis probe | ABAP | Plasma |
| Air flow‐assisted desorption electrospray ionization | AFADESI | Liquid extraction |
| Air flow‐assisted ionization | AFAI | Liquid extraction |
| Atmospheric pressure arc desorption/ionization | APADI | Plasma |
| Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization | APCI | Plasma |
| Atmospheric pressure solids analysis probe | ASAP | Plasma |
| Coated blade spray | CBS | Liquid extraction |
| Cone spray ionization | CSI | Liquid extraction |
| Vibrating sharpedge spray ionization | cVSSI | Liquid extraction |
| Desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization | DAPCI | Plasma |
| Direct analysis in real time | DART | Plasma |
| Dielectric barrier discharge | DBD | Plasma |
| Desorption electro‐flow focusing ionization | DEFFI | Liquid extraction |
| Desorption electrospray ionization | DESI | Liquid extraction |
| Desorption, separation and ionization | DSI | Plasma |
| Electroactive polymer‐based spray ionization | EAPSI | Liquid extraction |
| Extractive electrospray ionization | EESI | Liquid extraction |
| Flowing atmospheric pressure afterglow | FAPA | Plasma |
| Heat‐assisted dual neutral spray ionization | HADSI | Liquid extraction |
| Hollow cathode discharge | HCD | Plasma |
| Handheld liquid microjunction‐surface sampling probe | hLMJ‐SSP | Liquid extraction |
| Heat pulse desorption | HPD | Plasma |
| Internal extractive electrospray ionization | iEESI | Liquid extraction |
| Laser ablation electrospray ionization | LAESI | Laser ablation |
| Liquid extraction surface analysis | LESA | Liquid extraction |
| Liquid micro junction‐surface sampling probe | LMJ‐SSP | Liquid extraction |
| Low‐temperature plasma | LTP | Plasma |
| MasSpec Pen | – | Liquid extraction |
| Nanospray desorption electrospray ionization | nano‐DESI | Liquid extraction |
| Plasma‐assisted desorption ionization | PADI | Plasma |
| Probe electrospray ionization | PESI | Liquid extraction |
| Picolitre pressure probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry | picoPPESI | Liquid extraction |
| Picosecond infrared laser desorption | PIRL | Laser ablation |
| Paper spray ionization | PS | Liquid extraction |
| Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry | REIMS | Other |
| Secondary electrospray ionization | SESI | Other |
| Sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionization | sfPESI | Liquid extraction |
| Thread‐based isotachophoresis desorption electrospray ionization | TB‐ITP‐DESI | Liquid extraction |
| Thread spray ionization | TSI | Liquid extraction |
3. APPLICATIONS OF AIMS
3.1. Forensics and security
The development of MS techniques suitable for rapid, on‐site analysis has naturally gained considerable interest in the forensic science community. Given the nature of forensic evidence, the ability to quickly characterize materials of potential forensic interest has the capacity to significantly enhance the timeline of criminal investigations. Furthermore, many ambient ion sources have the capability to be coupled with portable mass spectrometers, offering a technology that will be key to improving on‐site analysis at crime scenes.
One of the largest applications of AIMS is in the rapid detection of illicit drugs, both as bulk drug products and in body fluids. DART‐MS is amongst the leading AIMS techniques in forensic drug analysis, largely due to its commercial availability, rapid analysis time and non‐destructive nature. Furthermore, DART has been demonstrated to be capable of detecting low levels of drugs, often achieving low parts per billion limits of detection. 29 Ventura et al. developed a DART technique for the characterization of tryptamine‐based new psychoactive substances (NPSs). 30 The group created a library of neutral loss spectra acquired from 50 tryptamine structures under different fragmentation conditions. Upon training and validating a partial least squares‐discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) model, predictions of unknown compounds could be achieved with an accuracy of 100%. Given the variation in fragmentation, and thus mass spectral profiles, that can result from different ionization conditions, the development of libraries across diverse instrumental conditions is an important step in the implementation of AIMS technologies. To further drive AIMS in police laboratories, there are increased demonstrations of the use of DART for the analysis of seized samples. Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have been developing DART for forensic analysis for several years. In a recent study, they used the technique for the analysis of 92 drug samples seized by the Maryland State Police, implementing their recently developed DART‐MS Forensic Database and inverted library search algorithm (ILSA). 31 Using real case samples, they demonstrated their ILSA to be suitable for the analysis of both pure compounds and complex mixtures, which are often encountered by forensic laboratories and highlighted best practice for identifying samples using DART spectral libraries. In a recent study by Dubai Police, 188 e‐cigarette samples seized over a 4‐year period were analyzed for the presence of controlled substances. 32 In total, 84% of samples were positive for controlled substances, with 98% containing tetrahydrocannabinol (a psychoactive component of marijuana, THC) and the remaining samples containing other illicit drugs, including synthetic cannabinoids and amphetamines. Similarly, the US Food and Drug Administration used DART‐MS in a larger study of almost 3000 e‐cigarette samples as part of an investigation into the role of e‐cigarettes in a recent outbreak of vaping‐related lung injuries. 33 In this study, samples were dissolved in acetonitrile prior to analysis, demonstrating DART to be a powerful tool in the simultaneous detection of multiple target analytes. DART has also been utilized in the analysis of cannabidiol products which, although now legal in several countries, still require close analytical scrutiny to ensure product safety, 34 to differentiate isomeric novel psychoactive substances, 35 and for the analysis of psychoactive plant materials. 36
Whereas ambient ionization has a clear application in the identification of bulk and trace illicit substances, the ability to rapidly screen biological samples, such as blood and urine, is also of great interest. Kim et al. used sfPESI for the rapid detection of cocaine metabolites in dried blood spots. 37 Benzoylecgonine, cocaethylene and ecgonine methyl ester were all detected in blood spots aged for 48 h, with detection of metabolites achieved in less than 20 seconds per sample with no sample preparation. The study furthermore built upon previous iterations of the sfPESI probe, this time incorporating a continuous flow solvent system to prevent the need for refilling the probe. PS‐MS has additionally been applied to the detection of illicit substances in biofluids, specifically in urine. In a recent study, an automated plate‐based PS‐MS system coupled with a rapid glucuronide hydrolysis step was developed for the semi‐quantitative screening of 40 common drugs of abuse and metabolites in urine. 38 Up to 240 samples could be analyzed automatically with an analysis time of approximately 2 min per sample, demonstrating the potential of techniques such as PS‐MS to reduce the backlog of biological samples in drug screening labs. Similarly, Borden et al. used a reactive PS‐MS method for the detection of cannabinoids in urine and saliva. 39 An on‐paper derivatization method was used to increase the sensitivity of the technique, resulting in a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.8 ng/m for THC in saliva and 1.3 ng/ml for carboxy‐THC in urine, the primary metabolite of THC. Finally, Vejar‐Vivar et al. used a hypodermic needle with a polydopamine (PDA)‐coated inner wall as a microextraction and electrospray device to detect methamphetamine, methadone and cocaine in saliva. 40 The PDA film inside the needle allows for the rapid extraction of analytes at an alkaline pH, then eluted in a methanol‐based ESI solution for ionization. The study presents a cheap and disposable extraction/ionization probe with an overall analysis time of 3 min per sample. Though the detection of illicit substances in body fluids is more typical, Kong et al. presented an AIMS technique for the rapid analysis of drugs in hair samples. 41 In this technique, a single hair is placed on a metal ceramic heater and a high voltage and solvent are added to the sample. This results in the thermal desorption and ionization of drugs within the hair without the need for pulverization, extraction and chromatographic analysis typically used for hair‐based drug testing. Numerous other AIMS techniques have proven capable in the analysis of controlled substances, including coated blade spray (CBS), 42 PS‐MS, 43 and thermal desorption‐assisted DBD. 44 There is recent evidence of interest in the use of AIMS in anti‐doping, with ASAP being utilized for the analysis of anabolic steroids 45 and both DESI and PS‐MS for the rapid detection of stimulants and diuretics in urine. 46
The development of ambient ionization techniques for the analysis of explosives also constitutes a notable proportion of applications in forensic science. The rapid detection and identification of explosives are of crucial importance to national security, and the development of techniques that could feasibly be installed in airports and used on‐site at incident scenes are of particular interest. Li et al. developed a custom‐built simple‐to‐use thermal desorption sampler with a DBD ionization source coupled with a homemade miniature mass spectrometer for explosives analysis. 47 The technique was applied to the characterization of several common explosives including trinitrotoluene (TNT), octogen, hexogen, and pentaerythritol tetranitrate, achieving detection limits as low as 0.01 ng. Plasma‐based ionization techniques have been particularly popular in the analysis of explosives due to their solvent‐free nature and simple construction.
Gao et al. developed an atmospheric pressure arc desorption/ionization MS (APADI‐MS) technique for the analysis of 10 types of explosives. 48 In APADI‐MS, the sample is simply placed on a copper substrate over which a needle is positioned. These components make up the arc generator, with an arc plasma forming between the two electrodes. As the explosive samples are exposed to the arc discharge, instant vaporization and ionization occur. The explosives exhibit a high affinity for the nitrate ions produced by the plasma, resulting in the formation of characteristic adduct anions. Hong et al. also utilized a plasma‐based ion source for explosives detection. They developed a variable pressure HCD‐MS method to study gas phase ion‐molecule reactions of multiple nitroaromatic explosives, including TNT, trinitrobenzene, and several dinitrotoluenes. 49 The technique was validated using air as the gas, taking into consideration the need to use cheap and readily available resources when implementing such techniques in the field. Furthermore, the study specifically focused on the detection of trace levels of explosives, with LODs in the range of 1‐50 pg. Similarly, AIMS has also been used for the detection of smokeless powders, a class of low explosives typically used as a propellant in firearms but also utilized in the preparation of improvised explosive devices. DART‐MS was used in a pilot study of three nitrocellulose‐based smokeless powders. 50 The technique proved suitable for the detection of glucose trinitrate and cellulose hexanitrate, the monomeric and dimeric subunits of nitrocellulose, enabling the detection of both bulk and consumed smokeless powders.
Although AIMS techniques are primarily applied to drugs and explosives analysis in forensic research, the benefits of rapid MS analysis techniques have been recognized elsewhere. The need for non‐ or minimally‐destructive analysis techniques has become increasingly important in forensic document analysis, and Sun et al. have developed the use of DESI‐MS for this purpose. The use of fingerprints as personal signatures is a common custom in some countries, and as such could be open to fraud. DESI‐MS was used to characterize components in genuine and falsified stamped fingerprints, readily distinguishing the two based on the presence of sweat‐derived compounds. 51 The same group also applied this technique to the study of artificially aged inks, demonstrating potential time‐dependent changes in the ink and paper that could be beneficial in confirming the age of questioned documents. 52
DART‐MS has proven to be an advantageous technique across numerous areas of forensic research. Millbern et al. characterized 31 different disperse dyes in fabrics and single threads, comparing DART analysis with a liquid chromatography (LC)‐MS method to demonstrate DART as a suitable technique for dye differentiation. 53 DART was also recently used to evaluate the effectiveness of different common laboratory gloves in preventing contamination of materials by permeating human sweat. 54 The study evaluated the permeation of human sweat and chemical standards through nitrile, polyethylene and latex gloves, demonstrating polyethylene gloves exhibited the highest degree of permeation whereas double‐layered nitrile gloves offered the best protection. The study highlighted the importance of glove choice in both preventing contamination of forensic evidence but also protecting the wearer from hazardous materials encountered at crime scenes and in the laboratory.
3.2. Disease diagnostics
The timely detection of disease and infection is crucial in clinical diagnostics, ensuring medical problems can be identified and treated swiftly to achieve the best outcome for patients. The transportation and analysis of patient samples create a major bottleneck in current diagnostic workflows. As such, the development of techniques to supplement and even replace laborious laboratory analyses has led to a vast amount of research in the use of AIMS for disease diagnostics.
Given the significant burden of cancer on the worldwide population, the development of disease diagnostics is understandably dominated by cancer detection research, with a variety of AIMS techniques being applied to the detection of potential biomarkers for a range of cancer types. The development of a technique capable of detecting early‐stage cancer is a holy grail in cancer diagnostics, and ambient ionization may hold the key to making this a reality. PESI‐MS is a particularly popular choice for the analysis of potentially cancerous tissues, due to its simple operation and commercial availability. Wang et al. used PESI‐MS and machine learning to develop a method of detecting papillary thyroid carcinoma, demonstrating the ability to readily differentiate cancerous and benign thyroid nodules. 55 In this study, solvent extractions of biological material were used, but PESI‐MS has been widely used for the direct analysis of tissue samples in the past. Hakoda et al. also used PESI with machine learning, this time targeting liver tumours. 56 Through the analysis of almost 300 cancerous and healthy tissue samples, the authors demonstrated the technique to have a high sensitivity and specificity, with a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. PESI‐MS was also recently applied to the analysis of pulmonary tumors 57 and liver tumours across different populations, highlighting its versatility with different tissue types. 58 Although PESI has been widely applied to the analysis of cancerous tissues, it does still require tissue biopsy, as opposed to techniques such as REIMS which can be used in situ in the operating theatre and could feasibly be used for non‐invasive analysis.
Katz et al. used picosecond infrared laser MS (PIRL‐MS) with a handheld sampling probe in the analysis of 97 ex vivo skin samples, including healthy skin, melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma. 59 Constructing a principal component analysis‐linear discriminant analysis model, the three sample types could be readily distinguished within 10 s showing sensitivity and specificity as high as 95% and 98%, respectively. This protocol was capable of identifying a number of potential biomarkers for skin cancer. The authors furthermore evaluated the potential of using PIRL‐MS for in situ use through direct analysis of tumour, muscle and skin tissue of a murine model. The ability to use such a technique for the rapid analysis of skin in clinics would be a game‐changer for skin cancer diagnostics, enabling the screening of suspect growths prior to biopsy. SESI‐MS is particularly suited to the analysis of volatile compounds (VOCs) and was recently used to study the VOC profiles of different lung cancer cells (non‐small cell and small cell). 60 The authors sampled headspace from lung cancer tissue cultures, detecting 60 VOCs associated with the cancer cells and demonstrating variation in the VOCs produced by the two types of the cancer cell. They furthermore showed that the VOCs produced by cancer cells were altered after exposure to cisplatin, a common chemotherapy treatment. Although this proof‐of‐concept study sampled from cell cultures, the compounds detected could be beneficial biomarkers in the development of breath‐based cancer diagnostics. Numerous other AIMS techniques have been utilized in the study of cancerous cells and tissues, including CBS for the study of brain tumours, 61 PS‐MS to analyze urine samples from prostate cancer patients, 62 and internal extractive ESI (iEESI) for colorectal cancer tissue analysis. 63 Although cancer research accounts for the majority of AIMS‐based diagnostics development, there has been a focus on other diseases and conditions. Swiner et al. used reactive thread spray MS to study the serum metabolome of obese patients (Figure 2), 64 Sarkar et al. used PS‐MS coupled with ion mobility for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using sebum, 65 and Harkin et al. used LESA to image murine diabetic kidney tissue. 66
FIGURE 2.

Schematic of cellulose thread microsampling and reactive thread spray mass spectrometry setup. Reprinted with permission from Swiner et al. 64 Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
In recent years, there has been increased interest in moving MS‐based clinical diagnostics from the laboratory into the operating theatre, particularly for the real‐time characterization of healthy and malignant tissue during surgery. By rapidly establishing whether tissue is healthy or cancerous, surgeons have an additional tool to ensure damaged tissue has been sufficiently excised and healthy tissue is not being unnecessarily removed. REIMS is undoubtedly the most frequently used technique for this application. In recent months, REIMS has been applied to the analysis of tissue during glossectomy surgeries 67 and basal cell carcinoma resections 68 in the operating theatre, whereas a method for analyzing brain tumours was also developed outside of the operating theatre through the use of tissue biopsies. 69 Furthermore, REIMS has also been applied to the analysis of canine tissue samples for potential use in veterinary surgery. 70 In all of these studies, REIMS and the classification models developed enabled the characterization of malignant tissue with high accuracy. Similarly, Yau et al. validated a REIMS method for the analysis of skin, with the intention of developing a method that could be used during tissue excision in burn cases. 71 They compared REIMS lipidomics results with those obtained using LC‐MS/MS to confirm the agreement between the two techniques and demonstrated that both techniques could detect chemical differences between healthy and excised skin.
Finally, as novel clinical diagnostics are developed, there is a drive to create diagnostic methods that are rapid and non‐invasive, reducing the impact on patients. Exhaled breath is amongst the most attractive samples for this purpose, simply requiring the patient to exhale into a breath collection device or even directly into the analytical instrument. Numerous AIMS techniques have been applied to breath analysis, though SESI‐MS is by far the most common, with several applications in recent months. Wüthrich et al. applied the technique to study the effects of nutritional interventions on exhaled breath, performing real‐time analyses of participants’ breath before and after consuming a high‐energy shake. 72 Numerous features were found to change in response to the intervention, including fatty acids, amino acids and metabolites linked to gut microbiome activity, demonstrating the potential to use AIMS for nutritional studies and monitoring of medical conditions necessitating dietary interventions. Other groups have applied SESI‐MS to identify exhaled breath biomarkers relating to conditions such as sleep apnea 73 and cystic fibrosis, 74 further demonstrating the versatility of the technique to study breath biomarkers of different diseases and disorders. Although less commonly utilized for breath analysis, other AIMS techniques are applied in this area including DART‐MS to monitor changes in breath metabolites throughout the day 75 and LTP‐MS for the offline analysis of exhaled breath metabolites collected onto filter paper. 76
3.3. Food and agriculture
Quality control of food and agricultural materials is critical in the detection of contamination and adulteration to prevent the distribution of hazardous or otherwise compromised food products. Analytical testing plays a vital role in this process, with gas chromatography‐MS and LC‐MS being crucial in identifying contaminants in food products, studying the flavour profile to ensure the taste and consistency of products, and validating the authenticity of a product to detect food fraud, to name a few. Given the high demand in this area of analysis, the ability to speed up workflows and perform on‐site testing has resulted in food and agriculture becoming one of the major fields for AIMS applications.
Perhaps the largest application of AIMS in food science is in the field of product authentication. Certain specialized food and drink products can fetch a high price, inevitably leading to the production of adulterated or counterfeit food products, often achieved using a lower‐quality substitute. The adulteration of animal products has been a particular focus of AIMS research. Although initially developed for the analysis of biological tissues during surgeries, REIMS has been increasingly utilized in this field of study, likely due to its user‐friendly interface and ease of use by non‐experts. Cardoso et al. used REIMS for the rapid analysis of beer, successfully differentiating between different products and demonstrating the potential to use AIMS techniques for quality control, flavour profiling and authentication of alcohol products. 77 Zhang et al. used REIMS for the analysis of lamb products, demonstrating the detectable variation in products based on the sex of the animal, in addition to castration status, diet, and breed. 78 REIMS has also been used for the chemical prediction of beef palatability, studying the chemical variation associated with factors such as flavour, juiciness, and tenderness, all of which will be important in the authentication. 79 With similar efforts to improve the authenticity and quality of animal products, REIMS has similarly been used for the authentication of shrimp 80 and beef, 81 for the characterization of aged tuna products 82 and fish speciation, 83 and for milk authentication. 84 Numerous other AIMS techniques have been demonstrated as potential tools in the authentication of food products, including ASAP for the authentication of Manuka honey 85 and Chinese teas, 86 DART for the discrimination of milk products 87 and edible insects, 88 DESI for the characterization of plant and animal‐derived milk, 89 and desorption APCI for vanilla characterization. 90 Bertella et al. performed a comparison of multiple AIMS techniques for wine authentication, evaluating PS, DBD, and LTP‐MS whilst comparing the results to a standard ESI‐MS method. 91 Each technique had its own advantages, with plasma‐based techniques allowing for solvent‐free analysis but PS‐MS producing richer mass spectra with superior signal intensity.
Quality control is a critical step in the production and distribution of food products, particularly for identifying any potential contaminants or adulterants. The ability of AIMS techniques to achieve this in a rapid manner has obvious implications for the food production pipeline. In some regions, there has been an increase in the adulteration of herbal remedies and nutritional supplements, particularly in the illicit addition of pharmaceuticals such as weight loss drugs and blood pressure medication. In a recent study, ASAP was used for the rapid characterization of 42 illegal additives known to be added to plant‐based products, furthermore comparing the results against a standard LC‐MS/MS method. 92 The study demonstrated the potential of ASAP both with analytical standards and the drugs spiked into a coffee sample to simulate the detection of the target analytes within a complex matrix. All but one of the analytes were detected in the coffee, albeit with notably higher LODs compared to standard solutions. Another study by Lin et al. focused on the detection of aldehydes in food, which can accumulate during product storage and have potentially harmful effects on consumers. 93 They used reactive PS‐MS for the analysis of aldehydes in fifteen food samples, including fruit, meat and tofu products, demonstrating quantitation of four target compounds with good accuracy compared with an LC‐based method. Bisphenols are a group of molecules commonly found in plastics, dyes and resins and have known adverse effects on the human body, implicated in reproductive disorders, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The potential for bisphenols to leech from food packaging into consumer products has thus been a matter of concern for several years, necessitating the development of rapid and robust techniques to detect their presence in food. In a recent study, PS‐MS was utilized in the detection of bisphenol A and bisphenol S in both UHT milk and its packaging. 94 Milk was analyzed by application of the samples to the PS matrix whereas the packaging itself was cut into triangles and analyzed directly in lieu of the usual PS substrate. The bisphenols were readily detected in both the packaging and milk products, present as high as 151 ng/ml in milk samples. Other techniques have furthermore been utilized in the rapid detection of food and drink contaminants, including DART for animal feed analysis, 95 EESI for arsenic detection, 96 and CBS for the detection of food‐related mycotoxins. 97
AIMS has proven to be particularly popular in the analysis of fruit and vegetable products. Birse et al. used DART‐MS coupled with a compact low‐cost mass spectrometer for the differentiation of organic and non‐organic leeks. 98 The organic vegetables could be readily identified using an orthogonal PLS‐DA model with 94%–100% accuracy, demonstrating the potential for rapid authentication of organic products with semi‐portable instrumentation for on‐site analysis. The technique was furthermore applied to the analysis of agricultural products to characterize polyphenols, a group of compounds believed to be important in disease prevention. 99 , 100 iEESI‐MS has been used for the analysis of Panax notoginseng, a valuable herb used in traditional Chinese medicine whose quality and efficacy depend greatly on its growing conditions and thus its value. 101 Using iEESI‐MS, the authors identified a number of sugars, organic acids, and saponins differentiating between different types of the herb, indicating the potential for rapid analysis techniques to replace the traditional laborious methods used to authenticate the quality of valuable herbs. EESI has been used for the detection of the disease Huanglongbing in citrus fruits. 102 The authors were able to rapidly differentiate between healthy and diseased oranges, demonstrating the potential to use AIMS for rapid health monitoring of agricultural products. Other studies have used PS‐MS to study the effects of harvest time on the chemical composition of plant products, 103 DESI to image the distribution of target compounds in developing soybean seeds 104 and metabolites in traditional herbal medicine plants, 105 , 106 ASAP to chemically characterize different orange varieties, 107 CBS to study pesticides on fruit, 108 and air flow‐assisted ionization MS imaging to study the distribution of metabolites in different regions of the mango fruit. 109
3.4. Pharmaceuticals
Ambient ionization has also found utility in the analysis of pharmaceutical products, enabling the rapid characterization of drug products. In addition to the direct analysis of tablets and liquid medicines, AIMS has further utility in the identification and quantification of pharmaceuticals in biological fluids, such as blood, for therapeutic drug monitoring. This involves the real‐time measurement of drugs in the body in order to ensure appropriate concentrations of prescribed medicines are present in a patient's body to inform on dosage schedule and adherence, in addition to screening for instances of a drug overdose.
For the rapid characterization of pharmaceuticals, Ninomiya et al. developed heat pulse desorption MS. 110 In this technique, the liquid or solid sample is applied to a surface and a very brief (50 ms) pulse of heated N2 gas (350°C) is used to rapidly desorb analytes (Figure 3). Analytes are then immediately ionized by corona discharge and drawn directly into the mass spectrometer for analysis. In a recent study, numerous pharmaceutical tablets were directly analyzed (carbocysteine, etizolam, sildenafil, and erythromycin) in addition to a commercially available liquid anti‐fungal treatment, all of which were readily detected. The technique was also demonstrated to be suitable for the analysis of explosives and illicit substances. ASAP has also been utilized for the rapid characterization of medicinal products. A recent study demonstrated its utility in quantifying the amount of melatonin, a hormone commonly used to facilitate sleep, in over‐the‐counter medicines, comparing the results with a standard LC‐MS method with equivalent results. 111 The technique was similarly used to measure sildenafil, more commonly known as Viagra, in herbal medicines promising to treat erectile dysfunction, demonstrating the variation in the presence and abundance of the active ingredient in 12 different medicines purchased online. 112 Other AIMS techniques developed for direct pharmaceutical analysis include the coupling of a DBD ion source with ion mobility MS for the rapid analysis of several painkillers, allergy treatments and antibacterials, 113 and the use of DESI‐MS high‐throughput screening for drug discovery. 114
FIGURE 3.

Schematic of the heat pulse desorption system for the desorption and ionization of low‐volatility compounds. Reprinted with permission from Ninomiya et al. 110 Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
The analysis of pharmaceuticals in biological materials has gained more attention. Shamreva et al. developed a sampling probe for the collection, storage, and subsequent ambient ionization of body fluids containing drugs, with the specific aim of developing lightweight and compact sampling probes that could be used to collect and store specimens from astronauts during spaceflight. 115 Blood and saliva samples spiked with acetaminophen as a model drug were placed in the polypropylene sample probes and stored for different periods of time. The probe itself then becomes the ionization source, with the application of solvent and a high voltage to the probe resulting in the formation of an electrospray. The drug could be detected at concentrations below the lower therapeutic limit in human biofluids with good linear response, indicating its suitability for semi‐quantification. In terms of sample storage, the technique offers similar advantages to the use of dried blood spots, though in this study samples were only evaluated after storage for several days, far short of the several months that samples would likely be stored for monitoring during spaceflight. In a recent study by Rocca et al., a DESI‐MS method was developed for the detection and quantification of 11 ototoxic and narcoleptic drugs in dried blood spots. 116 Using an automated system to locate and ionize lines of multiple samples and replicates, the technique demonstrated the ability to rapidly target and detect multiple classes of drugs with high precision and accuracy in comparison to a standard LC‐MS/MS method. PS‐MS has also been used for the detection of pharmaceuticals in biological fluids, being used for the detection of remdesivir and its active metabolite in plasma 117 and coupled with a miniature MS for the detection of HIV drugs in whole blood. 118
The physical distribution of drugs in the body can also provide critical information and various MS imaging techniques have been developed for this purpose, typically utilizing DESI‐MS and animal models. Sanchez et al. used nano‐DESI to image the distribution of diclofenac, an anti‐inflammatory drug, in the kidney and liver of mice. 119 Despite challenges with low signal intensity and severe ion suppression, the authors were able to demonstrate the localization of drug metabolites in specific regions of the kidney and widespread distribution throughout liver tissue. DESI and matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) was also recently used to study the distribution of therapeutic peptides in a murine model. 120 The study imaged the immunosuppressant cyclosporine and its metabolites throughout the internal organs, demonstrating the drug itself was primarily detected in the pancreas and liver, whereas metabolites were primarily found in the intestines. Several other studies have used DESI‐MS imaging to study the distribution of drugs in tissues, including acetaminophen and its metabolites in the mouse liver 121 and extracellular signal‐regulated kinase inhibitors in mouse brain tissues. 122 Finally, another recent study utilized SESI‐MS for the real‐time detection of inhaled aerosols in exhaled breath for the purpose of studying the aerosolization performance of inhaled drug products. 123
The detection of pharmaceuticals in animals also has implications for environmental challenges. The presence of drug products in marine life can provide critical information regarding the contamination of water supplies and the effects of contaminating drugs in the body. Zhao et al. used DESI imaging to visualize the distribution of the anti‐anxiety drug Diazepam in Zebrafish through exposure to water, following reports of the contamination of water supplies with the drug and its byproducts. 124 In visualizing the distribution of the drug and metabolites in the body, the authors demonstrate the potential to use MS imaging to study how marine life can be affected by water contaminants and how these products could behave in the human body if the exposure occurred, either through consumption of the contaminated water or affected animals.
3.5. Biological materials
Due to the complexity of biological matrices, such as blood and tissue samples, traditional MS techniques typically require extensive analyte extraction and sample cleanup prior to analysis, rendering the analysis of biological materials time‐consuming and costly. The advent of AIMS has provided a means of enabling the direct analysis of biofluids, tissues, and even whole animals, providing high‐throughput, real‐time testing.
Methods for preparation‐free biofluid analysis have great utility in clinical diagnostics and forensic science. As such, numerous AIMS techniques have been evaluated for the direct analysis of raw or minimally‐prepared biological liquids. Chen et al. developed a technique called thread‐based isotachophoresis DESI‐MS (TB‐ITP‐DESI‐MS) for the analysis of alkaloids in biological fluids. 125 The technique used a fabric thread to act as an electrofluidic device for on‐thread separation, after which a DESI source scans along the thread for analyte desorption and ionization. In the analysis of raw urine spiked with a number of alkaloids, sensitivity was 5–11 times greater compared with standard DESI. Yang et al. developed a modified form of PS‐MS for the detection of miRNA in whole blood, incorporating an on‐paper DNA‐strand‐displacement reaction enabling the quantification of miRNAs in the sample. 126 Finally, a PS‐MS method utilizing surface‐modified hydrophobic paper to enable the collection of 3D spheroid blood droplets was developed with the intention of avoiding the volcano effect experienced when blood is collected onto DBS cards. 127 This was applied to the analysis of creatinine in whole blood, exhibiting comparable results to a standard LC‐MS/MS method.
The ability to desorb and ionize analytes in situ has naturally led to AIMS being a popular tool for the characterization of large molecules in complex biological matrices, thus a large number of studies have harnessed these techniques for peptide and protein analysis. Hale et al. recently applied both nano‐DESI and LESA for the analysis of protein assemblies in liver, kidney and brain tissues. 128 They demonstrated the ability to detect and identify intact endogenous protein assemblies across the range of 37 to 145 kDa in size. The same group have further utilized this combination of technologies to study protein‐ligand interactions, 129 to image ligand‐ and metal‐bound proteins in rat brains 130 and to study drug‐protein complexes in the liver of rats. 131 Another group developed a nano‐DESI imaging with an on‐tissue top‐down proteomics method for the proteoform‐selective imaging of rat brains, visualizing proteoform distribution across tissues. 132 Finally, both LESA‐ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)‐MS and MALDI imaging have been evaluated for the analysis of hormones in tissue. 133 Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissues are typically used by hospitals for histological analysis, however, this format of samples has traditionally been avoided in mass spectral imaging studies in favour of fresh or fresh frozen tissues. This study specifically focused on the analysis of FFPE tissues, developing workflows that could be applied to this material and demonstrating the utility of implementing multiple complementary techniques.
The ability to perform rapid tissue imaging has become one of the major applications in AIMS research, with DESI‐MS being the most popular technique for this purpose. The past 12 months have seen an abundance of studies harnessing DESI for imaging of biological tissues, particularly in murine models, such as imaging of alkaloids in rat brains, 134 visualizing the distribution of carcinogens in the kidneys of rats, 135 and imaging of mouse and rat brains with convolutional neural network‐based deep learning. 136 In addition, numerous modifications to the original DESI technique have emerged to improve mass spectral imaging capabilities. In a recent study, the use of desorption electro‐flow focusing ionization, a DESI variant, was demonstrated with biological tissues, incorporating an electro‐flow focusing nebulizer to achieve improved focusing of the spray solvent. 137 Wu et al. used imprint DESI with post‐photoionization (DESI/PI) to study plant metabolites, a technique in which, rather than imaging from the sample directly, the tissue metabolites are transferred to an imprinted substrate prior to analysis, maintaining the chemical composition and spatial distribution of the original sample. 138 In doing this, the authors were able to image a broad range of analytes, including terpenoids, amino acids, lipids, tannins and alkylphenols. The same group has also recently applied DESI/PI to image various endogenous metabolites and dopants in the brains of mice. 139 , 140 An increasing number of workflows are also being automated to reduce manpower hours and increase throughput. In a recent study, an automated DESI system was developed for the rapid analysis of tissue microarrays, which are often used for the large‐scale analysis of biological tissue samples. 141 In this study, the system was able to process a tissue microarray of over 6000 samples with a highly impressive analysis time of less than 1 s per sample. The more familiar DESI variant nano‐DESI is also frequently used for the imaging of biological materials. Mavroudakis et al. used nano‐DESI to study alkali metal ions by supplementing the solvent with crown ether molecules, which form complexes with alkali metal ions. 142 In doing so, they demonstrated the first use of crown ethers in MS imaging to enable the simultaneous detection of elemental and metabolite species. Hu et al. utilized a recently developed deep learning approach for dynamic sparse sampling with nano‐DESI for the imaging of mouse kidney tissue. 143 The technique reduces the number of mass spectral measurements required, thus improving the throughput of imaging experiments by at least 2‐fold. Li et al. used nano‐DESI with an integrated microfluidic probe designed to improve the stability of the liquid bridge used for analyte extraction, 144 demonstrating the effectiveness of this device through imaging mouse tissue sections.
AIMS has furthermore found utility in the study of plants and non‐human animals. Insects are known to secrete a complex blend of pheromones critical for communication, the analysis of which can be incredibly challenging due to their transient nature. DART‐MS in particular has proven to be a popular tool for the characterization of insect pheromones and metabolites. In a recent study, the technique was used for the analysis of pheromone glands in Drosophila melanogaster, more commonly known as the fruit fly. 145 Highly rich species‐specific lipid profiles could be measured, consisting of wax esters, fatty acids, diacylglycerides, and triacylglycerides. Morgan et al. applied REIMS to the direct analysis of mosquito larvae to study insecticide resistance, demonstrating distinct chemical variation between insecticide‐resistant and insecticide‐susceptible strains. 146 Furthermore, the ability of AIMS to achieve non‐destructive, in situ, analysis opens up the fascinating possibility of performing real‐time analysis on living animals. Kriger et al. used the MasSpec Pen, a device traditionally utilized for clinical diagnostics, for the analysis of poison frogs. 147 Poison frogs harness the ability to excrete different alkaloids as a chemical defence against predators. By applying the MasSpec Pen directly to the skin of the live frog, the authors achieved the measurement of target alkaloids throughout a month‐long feeding study, in addition to performing untargeted analysis of skin excretions. Other techniques have also been demonstrated in the analysis of plant metabolites, with Walton et al. using the liquid micro junction‐surface sampling probe (LMJ‐SSP) to study the spatial distribution of amino acids in plant material and bacterial biofilms 148 and Nakata et al. using picolitre pressure‐probe electrospray‐ionization MS to study the effects of salt stress in single plant cells. 149
The early identification of bacterial species is of crucial importance for rapid diagnostics in order to ensure appropriate and timely treatment of infections. As such, AIMS can provide the means to characterize microbial species in near‐real time. Bacteria and other microbes produce a variety of volatile metabolites which may be species‐specific and thus could provide a means of rapid identification from cell cultures. SESI‐MS was recently utilized for the rapid characterization of VOCs from S. aureus and S. pneumoniae cultures, demonstrating the ability to differentiate between the two within minutes. 150 Povilataitis et al. achieved similarly impressive results with the MasSpec Pen for the characterization of S. aureus, Streptococcus, and K. kingae. 151 PS‐MS has been used for the species determination of microbes, as a standalone technique to identify metabolites in fungi 152 and by coupling the AIMS technique with ion mobility to achieve separation of phospholipid isomers to provide improved differentiation of species. 153 In this PS‐IMS‐MS study, the technique was able to differentiate five different Bactillus species after only 4 h of cell incubation and a 2 min analysis time. Characterization of phospholipids in bacterial cultures has also been achieved with DESI‐MS, achieving an impressive sample analysis time of less than 10 s. 154 The analysis of bacterial species has primarily targeted smaller metabolites produced by microbes, though a recent study used LESA‐MS for the detection of proteins in E. coli colonies. 155 Through the combination of electroporation to release proteins from cells followed by LESA‐MS, intact protein assemblies up to 50 kDa could be detected directly from growing colonies. The analysis of biological materials is perhaps the largest area of research utilizing AIMS technology, and this section is by no means exhaustive. Nevertheless, additional biological applications worthy of note include the development of a high‐throughput DESI method for the exploration of enzymes as potential drug targets, 156 and the use of DART and ASAP to characterize the metabolome of lichens. 157
3.6. Miscellaneous applications
The majority of studies utilizing ambient ionization can be broadly categorized into the aforementioned fields of study. Nevertheless, the versatility of AIMS is increasingly demonstrated by the more niche areas of research in which these techniques are being utilized. The field of polymer chemistry has not seen many applications of AIMS, however, in recent months, the potential power of rapid analysis is becoming apparent. A recent study coupled ASAP with IMS and tandem MS to study thermoplastic elastomers, a type of copolymer with various industrial uses. 158 Given the complexity of these materials and the high molecular weight of the polymers, traditional analysis has been challenging and time‐consuming. In this study, the authors demonstrated that ASAP provided a simple means of studying the thermal degradation of the elastomers, enabling the study of degradation products as the samples were exposed to increasing temperatures. Furthermore, laser‐assisted micro‐pyrolysis with FAPA‐MS has been used for the 3D imaging of polymers and polymer additives, enabling the thermal separation of components prior to analysis. 159 DART and DESI have also been utilized in polymer analysis, for the study of the miscibility of polymer blends 160 and the analysis of sequence‐defined polymers, respectively. 161 In recent years, ambient ionization has also been recognized as a powerful tool for the rapid and real‐time study of chemical reactions. A class of compounds called phthalimides has huge potential in pharmaceuticals given their broad range of applications, however, their synthesis and analysis are traditionally extremely time‐consuming. In a recent study utilizing reactive PS ionization, the authors were able to quickly explore different experimental parameters and reaction products by performing in situ reactions on the PS substrate. 162
The use of AIMS in environmental sciences has also exhibited some slow but steady interest, with numerous techniques being evaluated for their utility. Sedimentary rocks are known to contain significant amounts of oil held within the many pores of the rock; however, the extraction of this oil is extremely challenging and inefficient. As such, there has recently been interest in understanding the surface chemistry of these materials to facilitate the development of improved extraction methods. A recent study leveraged both DESI‐MS and LAESI‐MS to spatially map both polar and non‐polar metabolites on the surface of two different types of mineral rock. 163 DESI revealed the distribution of fatty acids and a disaccharide across the rock surface, whereas LAESI revealed the presence of hydrocarbons. Although a somewhat niche area of study, the research demonstrates the versatility of AIMS for environmental applications and the power of combining techniques to target a broader range of analytes. Other studies have further evaluated AIMS for different applications to environmental samples, including the use of DART to detect anatoxin‐a, a neurotoxin produced by cyanobacteria, in field samples, 164 the use of iEESI to detect perfluorooctanoic acid contamination in fish, 165 and the use of a dual plasma ion source (incorporating both corona discharge and a microwave plasma torch) to detect trace sterols in urban water samples. 166
Plasma‐based AIMS techniques have also been utilized for the analysis of complex oil products. Fully formulated oil (FFO) is a substance frequently used in the automotive industry, but its high chemical complexity makes full characterization challenging and traditional techniques typically target specific analytes. In a recent study, DBD‐MS was developed for the rapid untargeted analysis of FFO, demonstrating the ability to detect a broad range of components within the oil in <1 min. 167 Finally, a recent study has seen DART‐MS utilized for the rapid quality control of cigars. Given the potentially high value of certain cigar brands, the product is inevitably at risk of fraud. The recent study used DART‐MS for the discrimination of different tobacco leaf products, to study the effects of different leaf pretreatments, to determine nicotine content, and to ascertain the geographic origin of the product, all of which could be achieved. The analysis was also compared with an LC‐MS method, but only DART could determine the geographic origin and pretreatments. 168
3.7. Technological and method developments
Despite the presence of AIMS for almost two decades, the field is still in its infancy and has a long way to go before achieving the same robust standards as traditional techniques. Still, each year brings a wealth of new research striving to drive the field forward. The introduction of entirely new AIMS techniques has perhaps slowed in recent years, as efforts are increasingly focused on the improvement and enhancement of the existing tried and tested technology, though some novel techniques and variants of existing techniques have nevertheless emerged.
Wang et al. introduced electroactive polymer‐based spray ionization (EAPSI), a technique aiming to improve the performance of PS ionization (Figure 4). 169 In EAPSI, an indium tin oxide‐coated glass slide is used as an electrode onto which the electroactive polymer and sample are applied, before the application of a high voltage to induce electrospray as in PS‐MS. Compared to PS‐MS, EAPSI achieved improved LODs and limits of quantitation for solvent‐based analytes, and similar performance for analytes in complex matrices (artificial saliva and urine). Pursell et al. developed vibrating sharpedge spray ionization (cVSSI) coupled with APCI to specifically target analytes susceptible to ion suppression and matrix effects. 170 The device consists of a glass emitter through which liquid samples are introduced and a piezoelectric transducer to induce the nebulization of samples. The technique can be used with or without the application of a high voltage depending on the target analytes. In a comparison of cVSSI with standard ESI, cVSSI appeared to reduce ion suppression effects and achieved an overall boost in the signal of all ions by approximately three orders of magnitude.
FIGURE 4.

Schematic of paper spray ionization in comparison to electroactive polymer‐based spray ionization. Reprinted with permission from Wang et al. 169 Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Li et al. developed desorption, separation and ionization MS (DSI‐MS), a tool which combines a heated sample holder for analyte desorption, a sand core filter to provide a porous surface area for differential analyte desorption, and an atmospheric pressure glow discharge source. 171 In a recent study they analyzed urine samples spiked with 2‐dimethylaminoethylamine to achieve the derivatization of analytes with carbonyl, ketone and aldehyde groups and subsequent differential desorption and ionization of urine metabolites, enabling the characterization of healthy and bladder cancer urine samples. In order to reduce ion suppression effects caused by salts, heat‐assisted dual neutral spray ionization was also recently introduced. 172 This technique incorporates a dual spray system and a heated plate onto which sample salts crystallize, enabling online desalination prior to analyte analysis.
Finally, some groups have endeavoured to create new sampling strategies that can feasibly be coupled with multiple types of ambient ion sources. R‐sniffing MS utilizes a Venturi pump for constant sampling, enabling either direct gas analysis or aspiration of a solvent droplet applied to a surface for the analysis of solids. 173 In this study, the device was coupled with ESI and APCI, but could feasibly be integrated with other AIMS techniques. Modifications of the ASAP probe have also been developed for improved sample delivery. Strong et al. developed a cost‐effective probe for the introduction of air‐ and moisture‐sensitive compounds, 174 whereas a separate study developed the atmospheric breath analysis probe to enable the direct introduction of exhaled breath into the ion source. 175
Other studies have focused on the improvement of existing techniques. Given the popularity of PS ionization, numerous studies have focused on enhancing the performance of this technique and resolving some of its deficiencies, for instance by evaluating the effects of different solvents, paper types and spray modes. 176 Brown et al. conducted a thorough evaluation of optimal parameters for cone spray ionization, a recently developed PS variant. 177 The study involved the evaluation of various solvents, conductive plastic materials, and cone geometries, in addition to the development of a custom‐built autosampler to improve sample throughput, solvent delivery, and the reproducibility of cone positioning. Frey et al. has focused on improving PS ionization for the analysis of dried blood spots. 178 In a recent study, they introduced pinhole PS ionization, a new modification of the technique developed to facilitate the analysis of dried blood spots. The technique involves the use of embossed hydrophobic paper strips onto which patient blood samples are applied and then stored, transported or immediately analyzed. For analysis, the dried blood spot is punched, inverted 180° and placed on a second piece of triangular hydrophobic paper. A hypodermic needle punctures the bottom of the well holding the DBS, creating a pinhole channel to guide the spray solvent through the blood spot. The application of solvent and high voltage then results in electrospray as per traditional PS‐MS, achieving sample analysis in less than 1 min, though with significantly lower sensitivity than the LC‐MS/MS method used for comparison. Finally, Foest 179 and Seró 180 et al. each respectively coupled PS‐MS with a flexible microtube plasma and atmospheric pressure photoionization to facilitate the ionization of less polar analytes, Wang et al. used carbon fibre as the PS substrate to enhance sensitivity and signal stability, 181 whereas Martínez‐Jarquín et al. introduced an aptamer‐functionalized paper substrate for the concentration and detection of small molecules. 182
Similar efforts have been made to improve the performance of other commonly used techniques. CBS ionization has been improved via studies examining the effects of spatial positioning on performance, 183 modifications to the CBS blade design to improve reproducibility, 184 and the development of blades coated with a monoclonal antibody layer to produce an immunoaffinity blade spray technique. 97 Lin et al. performed an evaluation of the effects of different solvent systems and extraction times on the extraction and detection of different molecules. 185 Chemical profiles were notably affected by the use of different solvent systems and extraction times, highlighting the importance of extensive optimization when developing solvent‐based AIMS techniques. Krenkel et al. developed an ultrahigh‐throughput liquid atmospheric pressure MALDI approach for the analysis of peptides and enzymatic assays, achieving the impressive analysis of up to 60 samples per second under some conditions. 27 Other studies aiming to improve existing techniques have introduced a plasma treatment step to the DESI pipeline to increase ion signal, 186 studied the effects of ion source geometry on the reproducibility of LAESI imaging, 187 incorporated the use of helium as a nebulizing gas into DESI and ESI, 188 and developed a post‐acquisition mass recalibration method to reduce mass drift in DESI analysis. 189 Others have built custom REIMS devices using a soldering iron to improve analysis of poorly conductive samples, 190 incorporated an online derivatization step into multiphase flow EESI for the analysis of reactive sulfur species, 191 and modified the DART source to reduce undesirable oxidation when using nitrogen gas in place of helium. 192 Some researchers have attempted to produce simpler and lower cost versions of AIMS techniques, such as using repurposed americium‐241 from smoke detectors as ion sources 193 and building miniaturized sample nebulizing devices using cheap piezoelectric materials. 194
Finally, other studies have coupled existing AIMS techniques with supplementary technologies. A handheld LMJ‐SSP was coupled to a miniature mass spectrometer via 50 cm flexible tubing to enable in situ surface analysis in the field. 195 The technique was evaluated for the analysis of illicit drugs on skin and pharmaceuticals in biological fluids achieving an analysis time of <2 min and LODs as low as 5 pg. Ismaili et al. coupled LTP‐MS with IMS for the analysis of liquid pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs. 196 In this setup, vaporized samples are exposed to the LTP ion source before immediately entering the drift tube of the IMS, with a reduced plasma gas to prevent interactions between the plasma and the IMS. In comparison to other techniques, such as LTP‐MS and ESI‐IMS, similar LODs could be achieved for a number of target analytes, including codeine, papaverine, and caffeine. In a similar vein, PS and leaf spray ionization techniques were also coupled with ion mobility and MS. 197 In coupling these techniques, the authors demonstrated the ability to separate isomeric pesticides and lipids, reduce the effects of matrix effects, and improve the signal‐to‐noise of target analytes.
4. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
The introduction of ambient ionization has transformed the way analytical chemists solve problems. No longer are analysts restricted by the costly and time‐consuming processes traditionally used, and the potential to take MS into the field holds exciting promise for the future. This review has merely scratched the surface of the achievements in ambient ionization over the past 12 months, briefly touching upon the novel techniques and many exciting new developments introduced by analytical scientists. Recent advancements have particularly focused on the improvements of existing techniques, either through minor modifications of ion sources or the novel coupling of different techniques. Furthermore, some studies have notably pushed the limits of how many samples can be analyzed in a short space of time, with one study achieving the analysis of up to 60 samples in a second. 27
The increasing enthusiasm surrounding AIMS is evident throughout the scientific community. MS societies in particular have demonstrated their interest in and support of AIMS in recent years, with the American Society for MS forming the Ambient Sampling and Ionization interest group and the British MS Society holding regular one‐day AIMS meetings as part of its Ambient Ionization Special Interest Group. In addition, both organizations have hosted ambient ionization sessions at their annual conferences. Instrument manufacturers have clearly recognized the need for ambient MS, with an increasing number of AIMS techniques being commercialized, the most recent addition being Waters RADIAN ASAP‐MS in 2021.
The recent novel applications and developments in AIMS indicate the future directions of the field and allude to the areas that could benefit from these techniques. The recent use of ASAP to analyze anabolic steroid esters, commonly used as performance‐enhancing drugs, introduces the potential of ambient ionization in anti‐doping. 45 The challenge of detecting controlled substances in athletes is a widespread problem, and yet ambient ionization has been surprisingly unexplored in this field, despite the large body of research demonstrating the utility of AIMS in bioanalysis in other fields. In terms of technological developments, an increasing number of studies have coupled AIMS with IMS. 65 , 113 , 153 , 197 Given the lack of analyte separation in ambient ionization techniques, the differentiation of isomeric species is a major challenge. An AIMS‐IMS combination has the power to mitigate one of the major weaknesses of AIMS whilst not severely impacting its potential as a portable analysis technique due to the simplicity and compact size of many IMS devices. Finally, the ability of AIMS to achieve non‐proximate sampling enables the possibility of analyzing whole organisms. AIMS has been demonstrated in the analysis of live bacterial colonies for several years, however, more recent studies have applied ambient ionization techniques to the direct analysis of much larger species, including mosquito larvae 146 and even living frogs. 147 The ability to perform in situ non‐destructive analysis offers the exciting potential to study the real‐time chemistry of living organisms and gain a fascinating insight into animal biology.
Despite the growing enthusiasm for ambient ionization, there is still extensive research needed before AIMS can be widely adopted. The coming years will undoubtedly see the expansion of direct analysis into further fields of research, the adoption of AIMS techniques by laboratories outside of exploratory research, and the overall expansion of this revolutionary branch of analytical chemistry.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Stephanie Rankin‐Turner: Writing—original draft (lead), Conceptualization (equal).
Patrick Sears: Writing—review and editing (equal).
Liam M Heaney: Writing—review and editing (equal), Conceptualization (equal).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rankin‐Turner S, Sears P, Heaney LM. Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2022: An annual review. Anal Sci Adv. 2023;4:133–153. 10.1002/ansa.202300004
Contributor Information
Stephanie Rankin‐Turner, Email: srankin8@jhmi.edu.
Liam M Heaney, Email: L.M.Heaney2@Lboro.ac.uk.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.
REFERENCES
- 1. Takáts Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science. 2004;306:471‐473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cody RB, Laramée JA, Durst HD. Versatile new ion source for the analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions. Anal Chem. 2005;77:2297‐2302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rankin‐Turner S, Heaney LM. Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2020: an annual review. Anal Sci Adv. 2021;2:193‐212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rankin‐Turner S, Reynolds JC, Turner MA, Heaney LM. Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2021: an annual review. Anal Sci Adv. 2022;3:67‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Javanshad R, Venter AR. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry: real‐time, proximal sample processing and ionization. Anal Methods. 2017;9:4896‐4907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. McEwen CN, McKay RG, Larsen BS. Analysis of solids, liquids, and biological tissues using solids probe introduction at atmospheric pressure on commercial LC/MS instruments. Anal Chem. 2005;77:7826‐7831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Na N, Zhao M, Zhang S, Yang C, Zhang X. Development of a dielectric barrier discharge ion source for ambient mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007;18:1859‐1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Meyer C, Müller S, Gurevich EL, Franzke J. Dielectric barrier discharges in analytical chemistry. Analyst. 2011;136:2427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Roach PJ, Laskin J, Laskin A. Nanospray desorption electrospray ionization: an ambient method for liquid‐extraction surface sampling in mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2010;135:2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Luo Z, He J, Chen Y, et al. Air flow‐assisted ionization imaging mass spectrometry method for easy whole‐body molecular imaging under ambient conditions. Anal Chem. 2013;85:2977‐2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yin R, Burnum‐Johnson KE, Sun X, Dey SK, Laskin J. High spatial resolution imaging of biological tissues using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2019;14:3445‐3470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wang H, Liu J, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z. Paper spray for direct analysis of complex mixtures using mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:877‐880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim P, Cha S. Paper cone spray ionization mass spectrometry (PCSI MS) for simple and rapid analysis of raw solid samples. Analyst. 2015;140:5868‐5872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mcbride EM, Mach PM, Dhummakupt ES, et al. Paper spray ionization: applications and perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2019;118:722‐730. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Liu J, Wang H, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z. Leaf spray: direct chemical analysis of plant material and living plants by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2011;83:7608‐7613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Basuri P, Baidya A, Pradeep T. Sub‐parts‐per‐trillion level detection of analytes by superhydrophobic preconcentration paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (SHPPSI MS). Anal Chem. 2019;91:7118‐7124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hiraoka K, Nishidate K, Mori K, Asakawa D, Suzuki S. Development of probe electrospray using a solid needle. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21:3139‐3144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rahman MdO, Mandal MK, Shida Y, et al. Development of sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionization (SF‐PESI). J Mass Spectrom. 2013;48:823‐829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hiraoka K, Rankin‐Turner S, Ninomiya S, et al. Component profiling in agricultural applications using an adjustable acupuncture needle for sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:3275‐3283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rankin‐Turner S, Ninomiya S, Reynolds JC, Hiraoka K. Sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionization (sfPESI) mass spectrometry for the rapid forensic analysis of human body fluids. Anal Methods. 2019;11:3633‐3640. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ. Fully automated liquid extraction‐based surface sampling and ionization using a chip‐based robotic nanoelectrospray platform. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45:252‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang J, Rector J, Lin JQ, et al. Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaan3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chen H, Venter A, Cooks RG. Extractive electrospray ionization for direct analysis of undiluted urine, milk and other complex mixtures without sample preparation. Chem Commun. 2006;2042. doi: 10.1039/b602614a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wu C, Siems WF, Hill HH. Secondary electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry/mass spectrometry of illicit drugs. Anal Chem. 2000;72:396‐403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nemes P, Vertes A. Laser ablation electrospray ionization for atmospheric pressure, in vivo, and imaging mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2007;79:8098‐8106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Radosevich AJ, Pu F, Chang‐Yen D, et al. Ultra‐high‐throughput ambient MS: direct analysis at 22 samples per second by infrared matrix‐assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:4913‐4918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Krenkel H, Brown J, Richardson K, Hoyes E, Morris M, Cramer R. Ultrahigh‐throughput sample analysis using liquid atmospheric pressure matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:4141‐4145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Schäfer K‐C, Dénes J, Albrecht K, et al. In vivo, in situ tissue analysis using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:8240‐8242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen T‐H, Hsu H‐Y, Wu S‐P. The detection of multiple illicit street drugs in liquid samples by direct analysis in real time (DART) coupled to Q‐orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;267:1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ventura MI, Beyramysoltan S, Musah RA. Revealing the presence of tryptamine new psychoactive substances using fused “neutral loss” spectra derived from DART high‐resolution mass spectra. Talanta. 2022;246:123417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sisco E, Appley MG, Tennyson SS, Moorthy AS. Qualitative analysis of real drug evidence using DART‐MS and the inverted library search algorithm. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1784‐1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Almazrouei ES, Bintamim AA, Khalil SEA, Alremeithi R, Gewily S. The identification of drugs of abuse in E‐cigarette samples seized in Dubai between 2016 and 2020. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;333:111233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Falconer TM, Morales‐Garcia F. Rapid screening of vaping liquids by DART‐MS. J AOAC Int. 2022:qsac103. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsac103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Huber S, Losso K, Bonn GK, Rainer M. Rapid quantification of cannabidiol from oils by direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. Anal Methods. 2022;14:3875‐3880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bonetti JL, Samanipour S, van Asten AC. Utilization of machine learning for the differentiation of positional NPS isomers with direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:5029‐5040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Appley MG, Chambers MI, Musah RA. Quantification of hordenine in a complex plant matrix by direct analysis in real time–high‐resolution mass spectrometry: application to the “plant of concern” Sceletium tortuosum . Drug Test Anal. 2022;14:604‐612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kim A, Kelly PF, Turner MA, Reynolds JC. Development of a rapid in‐situ analysis method using sheath‐flow probe electrospray ionisation‐mass spectrometry (sfPESI‐MS) for the direct identification of cocaine metabolites in dried blood spots. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Rydberg M, Dowling S, Manicke NE. Automated and high‐throughput urine drug screening using paper spray mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol. 2022:bkac053. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkac053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Borden SA, Saatchi A, Palaty J, Gill CG. A direct mass spectrometry method for cannabinoid quantitation in urine and oral fluid utilizing reactive paper spray ionization. Analyst. 2022;147:3109‐3117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Vejar‐Vivar C, Millán‐Santiago J, Mardones C, Lucena R, Cárdenas S. Polydopamine inner wall‐coated hypodermic needle as microextraction device and electrospray emitter for the direct analysis of illicit drugs in oral fluid by ambient mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2022;249:123693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kong R, Li L, Liu W, Xiang P, Zhao J. Rapid characterization of drugs in a single hair using thermal desorption ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Methods. 2022;14:806‐812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhou W, Nazdrajić E, Pawliszyn J. Rapid screening and quantitation of drugs of abuse by both positive and negative modes via coated blade spray–mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1187‐1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Miguita AGC, Augusti R, Nascentes CC, Sena MM. Screening method for the characterization of anabolic steroids seized in Brazil using paper spray mass spectrometry and chemometric tools. J Mass Spectrom. 2022;57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li D, Li Z, Xu B, et al. Thermal desorption bridged the gap between dielectric barrier discharge ionization and dried plasma spot samples for sensitive and rapid detection of fentanyl analogs in mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2022;147:4187‐4196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Arrizabalaga‐Larrañaga A, Zoontjes PW, Lasaroms JJP, Nielen MWF, Blokland MH. Simplified screening approach of anabolic steroid esters using a compact atmospheric solid analysis probe mass spectrometric system. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:3459‐3470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bressan C, Seró R, Alechaga É, Monfort N, Moyano E, Ventura R. Potential of desorption electrospray ionization and paper spray ionization with high‐resolution mass spectrometry for the screening of sports doping agents in urine. Anal Methods. 2023;15:462‐471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Li L, Zhang T, Ge W, et al. Detection of trace explosives using a novel sample introduction and ionization method. Molecules. 2022;27:4551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Gao Y, Chu F, Chen W, Wang X, Pan Y. Arc‐induced nitrate reagent ion for analysis of trace explosives on surfaces using atmospheric pressure arc desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:5463‐5468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hong H, Habib A, Bi L, Wen L. Gas phase ion‐molecule reactions of nitroaromatic explosive compounds studied by hollow cathode discharge ionization‐mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2022;236:122834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Schachel TD, Schulte‐Ladbeck R. Rapid and straight forward mass spectrometric determination of nitrocellulose in smokeless powder by DART‐Q‐ToF‐MS/MS. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;336:111326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sun Q, Luo Y, Sun N, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Yang X. Technical note: analysis of biological substances in ink fingerprint by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;336:111321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sun Q, Luo Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Yang X. Comparative analysis of aged documents by desorption electrospray ionization–Mass spectrometry (desi‐ms) imaging. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67:2062‐2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Millbern Z, Vinueza NR. The characterization of disperse dyes in polyester fibers using dart mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67:2291‐2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gauthier QT, Riley P, Simon AG. Permeation of human scent through laboratory examination gloves. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67:2308‐2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wang Y, Chen Z, Shima K, et al. Rapid diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma with machine learning and probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 2022;57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hakoda H, Kiritani S, Kokudo T, et al. Probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry‐based rapid diagnosis of liver tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022:jgh15976. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Shigeeda W, Yosihimura R, Fujita Y, et al. Utility of mass spectrometry and artificial intelligence for differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma and colorectal metastatic pulmonary tumor. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13:202‐209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Giordano S, Siciliano AM, Donadon M, et al. Versatile mass spectrometry‐based intraoperative diagnosis of liver tumor in a multiethnic cohort. Appl Sci. 2022;12:4244. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Katz L, Woolman M, Kiyota T, et al. Picosecond infrared laser mass spectrometry identifies a metabolite array for 10 s diagnosis of select skin cancer types: a proof‐of‐concept feasibility study. Anal Chem. 2022. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03918. acs.analchem.2c03918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Choueiry F, Zhu J. Secondary electrospray ionization‐high resolution mass spectrometry (SESI‐HRMS) fingerprinting enabled treatment monitoring of pulmonary carcinoma cells in real time. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1189:339230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bogusiewicz J, Gaca‐Tabaszewska M, Olszówka D, et al. Coated blade spray‐mass spectrometry as a new approach for the rapid characterization of brain tumors. Molecules. 2022;27:2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Pinto FG, Mahmud I, Rubio VY, et al. Data‐driven soft independent modeling of class analogy in paper spray ionization mass spectrometry‐based metabolomics for rapid detection of prostate cancer. Anal Chem. 2022;94:1925‐1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Zheng R, Su R, Xing F, et al. Metabolic‐dysregulation‐based iEESI‐MS reveals potential biomarkers associated with early‐stage and progressive colorectal cancer. Anal Chem. 2022;94:11821‐11830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Swiner DJ, Kulyk DS, Osae H, Durisek GR III, Badu‐Tawiah AK. Reactive thread spray mass spectrometry for localization of C═C bonds in free fatty acids: applications for obesity diagnosis. Anal Chem. 2022;94:2358‐2365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sarkar D, Sinclair E, Lim SH, et al. Paper spray ionization ion mobility mass spectrometry of sebum classifies biomarker classes for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. JACS Au. 2022;2:2013‐2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Harkin C, Smith KW, Mackay CL, et al. Spatial localization of β‐unsaturated aldehyde markers in murine diabetic kidney tissue by mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:6657‐6670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Vaysse P‐M, Demers I, Van Den Hout MFCM, et al. Evaluation of the sensitivity of metabolic profiling by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry: toward more radical oral cavity cancer resections. Anal Chem. 2022;94:6939‐6947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Fooladgar F, Jamzad A, Connolly L, et al. Uncertainty estimation for margin detection in cancer surgery using mass spectrometry. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17:2305‐2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Van Hese L, De Vleeschouwer S, Theys T, et al. Towards real‐time intraoperative tissue interrogation for REIMS‐guided glioma surgery. J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2022;24:80‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Mangraviti D, Abbate JM, Iaria C, et al. Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry‐based lipidomics for identification of canine mammary pathology. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Yau A, Fear MW, Gray N, et al. Enhancing the accuracy of surgical wound excision following burns trauma via application of rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS). Burns. 2022;48:1574‐1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wüthrich C, De Figueiredo M, Burton‐Pimentel KJ, et al. Breath response following a nutritional challenge monitored by secondary electrospray ionization high‐resolution mass spectrometry. J Breath Res. 2022;16:046007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Streckenbach B, Osswald M, Malesevic S, Zenobi R, Kohler M. Validating discriminative signatures for obstructive sleep apnea in exhaled breath. Cells. 2022;11:2982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Weber R, Perkins N, Bruderer T, Micic S, Moeller A. Identification of exhaled metabolites in children with cystic fibrosis. Metabolites. 2022;12:980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Xu L, Zhang K, Geng X, Li H, Chen DDY. High‐resolution mass spectrometry exhalome profiling with a modified direct analysis in real time ion source. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Gong X, Shi S, Zhang D, Gamez G. Quantitative analysis of exhaled breath collected on filter substrates via low‐temperature plasma desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1518‐1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kelis Cardoso VG, Sabin GP, Hantao LW. Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) combined with chemometrics for real‐time beer analysis. Anal Methods. 2022;14:1540‐1546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zhang R, Realini CE, Middlewood P, Pavan E, Ross AB. Metabolic fingerprinting using Rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry can discriminate meat quality and composition of lambs from different sexes, breeds and forage systems. Food Chem. 2022;386:132758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Zhai C, Schilling B, Prenni JE, et al. Evaluating the ability of rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry to differentiate beef palatability based on consumer preference. J Food Sci Technol. 2022;59:4134‐4140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Lu W, Wang P, Ge L, et al. Real‐time authentication of minced shrimp by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2022;383:132432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Robson K, Birse N, Chevallier O, Elliott C. Metabolomic profiling to detect different forms of beef fraud using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS). Npj Sci Food. 2022;6:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Shen Q, Song G, Zhao Q, et al. Detection of lipidomics characterization of tuna meat during different wet‐aging stages using iKnife rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Food Res Int. 2022;156:111307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. De Graeve M, Birse N, Hong Y, Elliott CT, Hemeryck LY, Vanhaecke L. Multivariate versus machine learning‐based classification of rapid evaporative Ionisation mass spectrometry spectra towards industry based large‐scale fish speciation. Food Chem. 2023;404:134632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Cui Y, Ge L, Lu W, et al. Real‐time profiling and distinction of lipids from different mammalian milks using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry combined with chemometric analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:7786‐7795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Loh LX, Lee HH, Stead S, Ng DHJ. Manuka honey authentication by a compact atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometer. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;105:104254. [Google Scholar]
- 86. Tan HR, Chan LY, Lee HH, Xu Y‐Q, Zhou W. Rapid authentication of Chinese oolong teas using atmospheric solids analysis probe‐mass spectrometry (ASAP‐MS) combined with supervised pattern recognition models. Food Control. 2022;134:108736. [Google Scholar]
- 87. Tata A, Massaro A, Riuzzi G, et al. Ambient mass spectrometry for rapid authentication of milk from Alpine or lowland forage. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Tata A, Massaro A, Marzoli F, et al. Authentication of edible insects’ powders by the combination of DART‐HRMS signatures: the first application of ambient mass spectrometry to screening of novel food. Foods. 2022;11:2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Hong Y, Birse N, Quinn B, et al. Identification of milk from different animal and plant sources by desorption electrospray ionisation high‐resolution mass spectrometry (DESI‐MS). Npj Sci Food. 2022;6:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Pitman CN, LaCourse WR. Rapid characterization of vanilla with molecular ionization desorption analysis source (MIDAS) for mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2022;479:116888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Bartella L, Bouza M, Rocío‐Bautista P, Di Donna L, García‐Reyes JF, Molina‐Díaz A. Direct wine profiling by mass spectrometry (MS): a comparison of different ambient MS approaches. Microchem J. 2022;179:107479. [Google Scholar]
- 92. Wang X, Huang M, Li X, Dai W, Liang J. Rapid screening of illegal additives in functional food using atmospheric pressure solids analysis probe coupled to a portable mass spectrometer. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022;214:114722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Lin Q, Sun J, Wang Y, Ye M, Cheng H. Rapid determination of aldehydes in food by high‐throughput reactive paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;114:104814. [Google Scholar]
- 94. Soares DDeA, Pereira I, Sousa JCP, et al. Bisphenol determination in UHT milk and packaging by paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2023;400:134014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. von Holst C, Chedin M, Kaklamanos G, Alonso Albarracín D, Vincent U. DART mass spectrometry: a rapid tool for the identification of feed additives containing coccidiostats as active substances. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2022;39:475‐487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Wu D, Li D, Dong L, et al. Sensitive online speciation analysis of arsenic in biological samples by ambient mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom. 2022;37:2103‐2110. [Google Scholar]
- 97. Geballa‐Koukoula A, Gerssen A, Blokland MH, Nielen MWF. Immunoaffinity plastic blade spray mass spectrometry for rapid confirmatory analysis of food contaminants. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:2038‐2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Birse N, Mccarron P, Quinn B, et al. Authentication of organically grown vegetables by the application of ambient mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry; The leek case study. Food Chem. 2022;370:130851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Domínguez‐Rodríguez G, Marina ML, Plaza M. Rapid fingerprinting of extractable and non‐extractable polyphenols from tropical fruit peels using direct analysis in real time coupled to orbitrap mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2022;371:131191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Domínguez‐Rodríguez G, Ramón Vidal D, Martorell P, Plaza M, Marina ML. Composition of nonextractable polyphenols from sweet cherry pomace determined by DART‐orbitrap‐HRMS and their in vitro and in vivo potential antioxidant, antiaging, and neuroprotective activities. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:7993‐8009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Zhang X, Chen Z‐Y, Qiu Z‐D, et al. Molecular differentiation of Panax notoginseng grown under different conditions by internal extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and multivariate analysis. Phytochemistry. 2022;194:113030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Xue A, Liu Y, Li H, et al. Early detection of Huanglongbing with EESI‐MS indicates a role of phenylpropanoid pathway in citrus. Anal Biochem. 2022;639:114511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. De Souza AH, De Oliveira Prata Mendonça H, De Paula ACCFF, et al. Influence of harvest time on the chemical profile of pereskia aculeate mill. Using paper spray mass spectrometry. Molecules. 2022;27:4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Enomoto H. Distribution analysis of jasmonic acid‐related compounds in developing glycine max L. (soybean) seeds using mass spectrometry imaging and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Phytochem Anal. 2022;33:194‐203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Liu Y, Yang X, Zhou C, et al. Unveiling dynamic changes of chemical constituents in raw and processed fuzi with different steaming time points using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging combined with metabolomics. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:842890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Tong Q, Zhang C, Tu Y, et al. Biosynthesis‐based spatial metabolome of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge by combining metabolomics approaches with mass spectrometry‐imaging. Talanta. 2022;238:123045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Pizzo JS, da Silva JM, Santos PDS, Visentainer JV, Santos OO. Fast and eco‐friendly method using atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry to characterize orange varieties. J Mass Spectrom. 2022;57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Kasperkiewicz A, Lendor S, Pawliszyn J. Impact of pesticide formulation excipients and employed analytical approach on relative matrix effects of pesticide determination in strawberries. Talanta. 2022;236:122825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Zhao D, Yu P, Han B, Qiao F. Study on the distribution of low molecular weight metabolites in mango fruit by air flow‐assisted ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Molecules. 2022;27:5873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Ninomiya S, Shimada H, Kinoshita K, Rankin‐Turner S, Hiraoka K. Heat pulse desorption of low‐volatility compounds by a heated N2 gas pulse with mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:2046‐2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Moser D, Hussain S, Rainer M, Jakschitz T, Bonn GK. A validated method for the rapid quantification of melatonin in over‐the‐counter hypnotics by the atmospheric pressure solid analysis probe (ASAP). Anal Methods. 2022;14:1603‐1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Moser D, Hussain S, Yaqoob M, Rainer M, Jakschitz T, Bonn GK. Fast and semiquantitative screening for sildenafil in herbal over‐the‐counter formulations with atmospheric pressure solid analysis probe (ASAP) to prevent medicinal adulteration. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022;214:114720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Chantipmanee N, Furter JS, Hauser PC. Ambient ionization source based on a dielectric barrier discharge for direct testing of pharmaceuticals using ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1195:339432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Huang K, Ghosh J, Xu S, Cooks RG. Late‐stage functionalization and characterization of drugs by high‐throughput desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. ChemPlusChem. 2022;87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Shamraeva MA, Pekov SI, Bormotov DS, et al. The lightweight spherical samplers for simplified collection, storage, and ambient ionization of drugs from saliva and blood. Acta Astronaut. 2022;195:556‐560. [Google Scholar]
- 116. Mainero Rocca L, L'Episcopo N, Gordiani A, Staderini A. Direct multiclass desorption electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of sleep inducers and ototoxic drugs in dried blood spots. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Skaggs C, Zimmerman H, Manicke N, Kirkpatrick L. Development and validation of a paper spray mass spectrometry method for the rapid quantitation of remdesivir and its active metabolite, GS‐441524, in human plasma. J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2022;25:27‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Pandey S, Hu Y, Bushman LR, Castillo‐Mancilla J, Anderson PL, Cooks RG. Miniature mass spectrometer–based point‐of‐care assay for cabotegravir and rilpivirine in whole blood. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:3387‐3395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Mesa Sanchez D, Brown HM, Yin R, et al. Mass spectrometry imaging of diclofenac and its metabolites in tissues using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1233:340490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Holm NB, Deryabina M, Knudsen CB, Janfelt C. Tissue distribution and metabolic profiling of cyclosporine (CsA) in mouse and rat investigated by DESI and MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) of whole‐body and single organ cryo‐sections. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:7167‐7177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Akakpo JY, Jaeschke MW, Etemadi Y, et al. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging allows spatial localization of changes in acetaminophen metabolism in the liver after intervention with 4‐methylpyrazole. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:2094‐2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Fresnais M, Liang S, Breitkopf M, et al. Analytical performance evaluation of new DESI enhancements for targeted drug quantification in tissue sections. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Zivkovic Semren T, Majeed S, Fatarova M, et al. Application of secondary electrospray ionization coupled with high‐resolution mass spectrometry in chemical characterization of thermally generated aerosols. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:2147‐2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Zhao X, Huang X, Zhang X, et al. Distribution visualization of the chlorinated disinfection byproduct of diazepam in zebrafish with desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Talanta. 2022;237:122919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Chen L, Ghiasvand A, Lam SC, Rodriguez ES, Innis PC, Paull B. Thread‐based isotachophoresis coupled with desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for clean‐up, preconcentration, and determination of alkaloids in biological fluids. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1193:338810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Yang Y, Wang W, Liu H, et al. Sensitive quantification of MicroRNA in blood through multi‐amplification toehold‐mediated DNA‐strand‐displacement paper‐spray mass spectrometry (TSD‐PS MS). Angew Chem Int Ed. 2022;61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Sham T‐T, Badu‐Tawiah AK, McWilliam SJ, Maher S. Assessment of creatinine concentration in whole blood spheroids using paper spray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2022;12:14308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Hale OJ, Hughes JW, Sisley EK, Cooper HJ. Native ambient mass spectrometry enables analysis of intact endogenous protein assemblies up to 145 kDa directly from tissue. Anal Chem. 2022;94:5608‐5614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Illes‐Toth E, Stubbs CJ, Sisley EK, et al. Quantitative characterization of three carbonic anhydrase inhibitors by LESA mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1168‐1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Sisley EK, Hale OJ, Styles IB, Cooper HJ. Native ambient mass spectrometry imaging of ligand‐bound and metal‐bound proteins in rat brain. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144:2120‐2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Illes‐Toth E, Hale OJ, Hughes JW, et al. Mass spectrometry detection and imaging of a non‐covalent protein–drug complex in tissue from orally dosed rats. Angew Chem. 2022;134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Yang M, Hu H, Su P, et al. Proteoform‐selective imaging of tissues using mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2022;61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Cintron‐Diaz YL, Gomez‐Hernandez ME, Verhaert MMHA, Verhaert PDEM, Fernandez‐Lima F. Spatially resolved neuropeptide characterization from neuropathological formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue sections by a combination of imaging MALDI FT‐ICR mass spectrometry histochemistry and liquid extraction surface analysis‐trapped ion mobility spectrometry‐tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:681‐687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Gao L, Zhang Z, Wu W, et al. Quantitative imaging of natural products in fine brain regions using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI‐MSI): uncaria alkaloids as a case study. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:4999‐5007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Ishii Y, Nakamura K, Mitsumoto T, et al. Visualization of the distribution of anthraquinone components from madder roots in rat kidneys by desorption electrospray ionization‐time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry imaging. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022;161:112851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Yamada H, Xu L, Eto F, et al. Changes of mass spectra patterns on a brain tissue section revealed by deep learning with imaging mass spectrometry data. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1607‐1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Wu V, Tillner J, Jones E, et al. High resolution ambient MS imaging of biological samples by desorption electro‐flow focussing ionization. Anal Chem. 2022;94:10035‐10044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Wu L, Qi K, Liu C, Hu Y, Xu M, Pan Y. Enhanced coverage and sensitivity of imprint DESI mass spectrometry imaging for plant leaf metabolites by post‐photoionization. Anal Chem. 2022;94:15108‐15116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Wu L, Qi K, Xu M, Liu C, Pan Y. Effects of dopants in the imaging of mouse brain by desorption electrospray ionization/post‐photoionization mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 2022;57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Zhan Li, Liu C, Qi K, et al. Enhanced imaging of endogenous metabolites by negative ammonia assisted DESI/PI mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2023;252:123864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Morato NM, Brown HM, Garcia D, et al. High‐throughput analysis of tissue microarrays using automated desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2022;12:18851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Mavroudakis L, Duncan KD, Lanekoff I. Host–guest chemistry for simultaneous imaging of endogenous alkali metals and metabolites with mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:2391‐2398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Hu H, Helminiak D, Yang M, et al. High‐throughput mass spectrometry imaging with dynamic sparse sampling. ACS Meas Sci Au. 2022;2:466‐474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Li X, Hu H, Yin R, et al. High‐throughput nano‐DESI mass spectrometry imaging of biological tissues using an integrated microfluidic probe. Anal Chem. 2022;94:9690‐9696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Cetraro N, Yew JY. In situ lipid profiling of insect pheromone glands by direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2022;147:3276‐3284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Morgan J, Salcedo‐Sora JE, Wagner I, Beynon RJ, Triana‐Chavez O, Strode C. Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): a potential and rapid tool for the identification of insecticide resistance in mosquito larvae. J Insect Sci. 2022;22:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Krieger AC, Povilaitis SC, Gowda P, O'Connell LA, Eberlin LS. Noninvasive detection of chemical defenses in poison frogs using the masspec pen. ACS Meas Sci Au. 2022;2:475‐484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Walton CL, Khalid M, Bible AN, et al. In situ detection of amino acids from bacterial biofilms and plant root exudates by liquid microjunction surface‐sampling probe mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1615‐1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Nakata K, Hatakeyama Y, Erra‐Balsells R, Nonami H, Wada H. Dynamics and stabilization mechanism of mitochondrial cristae morphofunction associated with turgor‐driven cardiolipin biosynthesis under salt stress conditions. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Gómez‐Mejia A, Arnold K, Bär J, et al. Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae by real‐time analysis of volatile metabolites. iScience. 2022;25:105080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Povilaitis SC, Chakraborty A, Kirkpatrick LM, Downey RD, Hauger SB, Eberlin LS. Identifying clinically relevant bacteria directly from culture and clinical samples with a handheld mass spectrometry probe. Clin Chem. 2022;68:1459‐1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. De Oliveira GP, Barreto DLC, Ramalho Silva M, et al. Biotic stress caused by in vitro co‐inoculation enhances the expression of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors by fungi. Nat Prod Res. 2022;36:4266‐4270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Olajide OE, Yi Y, Zheng J, Hamid AM. Species‐level discrimination of microorganisms by high‐resolution paper spray – Ion mobility – Mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2022;478:116871. [Google Scholar]
- 154. Szalwinski LJ, Gonzalez LE, Morato NM, Marsh BM, Cooks RG. Bacterial growth monitored by two‐dimensional tandem mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2022;147:940‐946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Du Y, May RC, Cooper HJ. Native ambient mass spectrometry of intact protein assemblies directly from Escherichia coli colonies. Chem Commun. 2022;58:6857‐6860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Kulathunga SC, Morato NM, Zhou Q, Cooks RG, Mesecar AD. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry assay for label‐free characterization of SULT2B1b enzyme kinetics. ChemMedChem. 2022;17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Ollivier S, Jéhan P, Lambert F, et al. ASAP‐MS and DART‐MS as ancillary tools for direct analysis of the lichen metabolome. Phytochem Anal. 2022;33:1028‐1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Alawani N, Barrère‐Mangote C, Wesdemiotis C. Analysis of thermoplastic copolymers by mild thermal degradation coupled to ion mobility mass spectrometry. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2022:2200306. doi: 10.1002/marc.202200306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Zhang D, Zeldes D, Gamez G. Three‐dimensional mass spectral imaging of polymers via laser‐assisted micro‐pyrolysis program with flowing atmospheric‐pressure afterglow ambient mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:3335‐3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. AlShehri MM, ALOthman ZA, Bedjah Hadj Ahmed AY, Aouak T. New method based on direct analysis in real‐time coupled with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (DART‐ToF‐MS) for investigation of the miscibility of polymer blends. Polymers. 2022;14:1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Youssef I, Carvin‐Sergent I, Konishcheva E, et al. Covalent attachment and detachment by reactive DESI of sequence‐coded polymer taggants. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2022;43:2200412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. de Paula CCA, Binatti I, Coelho Pimenta JV, Augusti R. Accelerated synthesis of phthalimide derivatives: intrinsic reactivity of diamines towards phthalic anhydride evaluated by paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Pereira I, Ramalho RRF, Maciel LIL, et al. Directly mapping the spatial distribution of organic compounds on mineral rock surfaces by DESI and LAESI mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Chem. 2022;94:13691‐13699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Beach DG, Bruce M, Lawrence J, McCarron P. Rapid quantitation of anatoxins in benthic cyanobacterial mats using direct analysis in real‐time–high‐resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:13837‐13844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Liu J, Lu H, Ning Y, et al. Internal extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for investigating the phospholipid dysregulation induced by perfluorooctanoic acid in Nile tilapia. Analyst. 2022;147:3930‐3937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Zhao G, Chu F, Zhou J. Dual ambient plasma source ionization mass spectrometry for the rapid detection of trace sterols in urban water: rapid detection of trace sterols in urban water. J Mass Spectrom. 2022;57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Basham V, Hancock T, McKendrick J, Tessarolo N, Wicking C. Detailed chemical analysis of a fully formulated oil using dielectric barrier discharge ionisation–mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Losso K, Cardini J, Huber S, et al. Rapid differentiation and quality control of tobacco products using direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2022;238:123057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Wang X, Hebert DD, Runsewe DO, Pohlman GE, Hoffmann WD, Irvin JA. Electroactive polymer‐based spray ionization for direct mass spectrometric analysis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1840‐1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Pursell ME, Sharif D, Debastiani A, et al. Development of cVSSI‐APCI for the improvement of ion suppression and matrix effects in complex mixtures. Anal Chem. 2022;94:9226‐9233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Li Y, Jiang L, Wang Z, et al. Profiling of urine carbonyl metabolic fingerprints in bladder cancer based on ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:9894‐9902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Chen W, Gao Z, Chu F, et al. Heat‐assisted dual neutral spray ionization for high‐performance online desalting in mass spectrometric analysis. Anal Chem. 2022;94:15002‐15009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Li X, Chen M‐M, Su H‐F, Zhang M‐L, Xie S‐Y, Zheng L‐S. Real‐time sniffing mass spectrometry aided by venturi self‐pumping applicable to gaseous and solid surface analysis. Anal Chem. 2022;94:13719‐13727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Strong KA, Stokes P, Parker D, et al. Versatile, cheap, readily modifiable sample delivery method for analysis of air‐/moisture‐sensitive samples using atmospheric pressure solids analysis probe mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:11315‐11320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Fabregat‐Safont D, Ibáñez M, Hernández F, Sancho JV. Development of a simple and low‐cost prototype probe fully‐compatible with atmospheric solids analysis probe for the analysis of human breath in real‐time. Microchem J. 2022;174:107086. [Google Scholar]
- 176. Nguyen TMH, Song W‐Y, Kim T‐Y. Characterization of spray modes and factors affecting the ionization efficiency of paper spray ionization. Front Chem. 2022;10:864184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Brown HM, Mcdaniel TJ, West CP, et al. Characterization and optimization of a rapid, automated 3D‐printed cone spray ionization‐mass spectrometry (3D‐PCSI‐MS) methodology. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2022;474:116781. [Google Scholar]
- 178. Frey BS, Damon DE, Badu‐Tawiah AK. The effect of the physical morphology of dried biofluids on the chemical stability of analytes stored in paper and direct analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2022;94:9618‐9626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Foest D, Knodel A, Brandt S, Franzke J. Coupling paper spray ionization with the flexible microtube plasma for the determination of low polar biomarkers in mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1201:339619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Seró R, Ayala‐Cabrera JF, Santos FJ, Moyano E. Paper spray‐atmospheric pressure photoionization‐high resolution mass spectrometry for the direct analysis of neutral fluorinated compounds in waterproof impregnation sprays. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1204:339720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Wang S, Bai J, Wang K, Guo Y. Carbon fiber paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1232:340477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Martínez‐Jarquín S, Begley A, Lai Y‐H, et al. Aptapaper─an aptamer‐functionalized glass fiber paper platform for rapid upconcentration and detection of small molecules. Anal Chem. 2022;94:5651‐5657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Rickert D, Gómez‐Ríos GA, Singh V, Pawliszyn J. Understanding the effect of spatial positioning of coated blade spray devices relative to the mass spectrometry inlet on different instrument platforms and its application to quantitative analysis of fentanyl and related analogs. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Zhou W, Pawliszyn J. Coated blade spray with a barrier: improving negative electrospray ionization and sample preparation. Anal Chem. 2022. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04003. acs.analchem.2c04003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Lin M, Blevins MS, Sans M, Brodbelt JS, Eberlin LS. Deeper understanding of solvent‐based ambient ionization mass spectrometry: are molecular profiles primarily dictated by extraction mechanisms? Anal Chem. 2022;94:14734‐14744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Baghernia H, Seyed Golestan SMJ, Hajiani S, Shokri B, Ghassempour A. Increasing DESI‐MS ion signal by plasma treatment. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:907‐916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Bartels B, Svatoš A. Influence of ion source geometry on the repeatability of topographically guided LAESI‐MSI. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:265‐272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Javanshad R, Panth R, Maser TL, Venter AR. Helium assisted desorption and spray ionization. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2022;479:116891. [Google Scholar]
- 189. Inglese P, Huang HX, Wu V, Lewis MR, Takats Z. Mass recalibration for desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging using endogenous reference ions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022;23:133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Liu T, Wang W, He M, et al. Real‐time traceability of sorghum origin by soldering iron‐based rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry and chemometrics. Electrophoresis. 2022;43:1841‐1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Yin Y, Zhen B, Sun J, Ouyang J, Na N. Detection of glutathione, cysteine, and homocysteine by online derivatization‐based electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2022;36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Cody RB. Aperture size influences oxidation in positive‐ion nitrogen direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:1329‐1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Xing D, Liang C, Yuan X, Zhang X. An 241am plasma desorption ionization (AmDI) source scavenged from smoke detectors for ambient mass spectrometry sampling. Anal Chem. 2022;94:8555‐8560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Wang W, Jin L, Hu F, Xu F, Ding C‐F. Nebulization swab assisted photoionization tandem miniaturized ion trap mass spectrometry for on‐site analysis of nonvolatile compounds. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:898‐906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Liu S, Xu Q, Li Y, Xu W, Zhai Y. Coupling handheld liquid microjunction‐surface sampling probe (hLMJ‐SSP) to the miniature mass spectrometer for automated and in‐situ surface analysis. Talanta. 2022;242:123090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Ismaili H, Jafari MT, Khayamian T. Analysis of liquid samples by low‐temperature plasma ionization source‐ion mobility spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2023;483:116970. [Google Scholar]
- 197. Olajide OE, Donkor B, Hamid AM. Systematic optimization of ambient ionization ion mobility mass spectrometry for rapid separation of isomers. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2022;33:160‐171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.
