Impact statement
Gut microbiota‐derived trimethylamine (TMA) is associated with cardiometabolic disorders and exemplifies a microbial involvement in the etiology of emerging, noncommunicable diseases, the leading causes of death worldwide. Three biochemical pathways taking dietary compounds as intake have been described with distinct taxa involved that are all present at low relative abundances. A recently discovered pathway is now considered to be the main route for TMA synthesis from l‐carnitine involving γ‐butyrobetaine as an intermediate product. By comprehensive (meta) genomic screening of publicly available data, namely, genomes of the UHGG catalog (n > 200,000) and 10 metagenomic (transcriptomic) data sets, we revealed bacteria synthesizing TMA via this pathway and specified their ecophysiology. Results will contribute to stratification of individuals based on their gut microbiota's potential to synthesize TMA and might aid in the development of strategies restricting TMA formation.
Trimethylamine (TMA) is formed by gut bacteria and subsequently oxidized by hepatic flavin‐containing monooxygenase 3 into trimethylamine N‐oxide (TMAO), which is associated with cardiometabolic and renal disorders, independent of traditional risk factors and in a dose‐dependent manner 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 (Figure 1A). TMAO acts via various pathomechanisms, such as the formation of foam cells 5 , enhancement of platelet hyperreactivity 6 and activation of proinflammatory cascades 7 . TMA is synthesized from diverse dietary precursors, mainly betaine, l‐carnitine and choline, via distinct biochemical routes involving a multitude of different taxa 8 . For l‐carnitine, which is primarily enriched in red meat 9 , 10 , a microbial‐encoded pathway catalyzing the reaction consisting of a two‐component Rieske‐type oxygenase/reductase (cntAB) was discovered in 2014 11 , which is primarily encoded on Enterobacteriaceae of human gut microbiota 12 . However, due to its oxygen requirement and lack of transcription of those genes in the colon, this pathway is now not considered to contribute to the TMA pool in anoxic gut environments 8 . In 2018, Koeth and colleagues indicated that l‐carnitine can be anaerobically converted into TMA via an alternative two‐step cascade with the intermediate γ‐butyrobetaine (γBB) 13 . While the initial step, that is, the formation of γBB, is performed by multiple taxa showing the cai operon, the subsequent conversion into TMA is catalyzed by enzymes encoded on the γBB utilization (bbu or gbu) gene cluster that has been recently discovered 14 , 15 . For investigating the latter step, Emergencia timonensis served as the model organism, and heterologous expression in Escherichia coli of four of the six genes, namely, bbuA, B, C, and E, was shown to be sufficient for the formation of TMA from γBB 15 . Screening of genomes for exhibiting bbu genes has revealed a few additional candidates, such as Agathobaculum desmolans that was isolated from cat feces 14 , 15 . Additionally, bbuA homologs were shown to be widely distributed in metagenomes of gut microbiota of publicly available data sets 14 and specifically enriched in subjects consuming red meat during a dietary intervention study 15 .
Figure 1.
Characterization of bacteria that contain the γ‐butyrobetaine utilization (bbu) gene cluster for the formation of trimethylamine (TMA). (A) An overview of TMA(O) generation and its association with disease. (B) A phylogenetic tree (based on housekeeping genes [HKGs]) of bacteria showing the bbu gene cluster from the UHGG catalog, along with their taxonomic affiliations. Numbers in brackets show the amount of genomes carrying the pathway and the total genomes of the species, respectively, and its nature, specified as metagenome‐assembled genome (MAG) or isolate, is given as well. The second tree in the middle of the panel is based on concatenated bbu gene sequences, and their arrangements are shown on the right. (C and D) Average overall abundances of bbu genes (black dash lines) and of pathways associated with individual species in healthy control subjects of 10 different metagenomic (mtg) (C) and two metatranscriptomic (mtx) (D) data sets; for detailed information on data sets, see Table S1. Numbers indicate the prevalence, that is, the percentage of samples, where total bbu genes (black) and those associated with individual pathway‐carrying taxa were detected. (E) Correlations of bbu pathway abundances with individual taxa abundances (based on HKGs) in those samples. (F and G) Average relative abundances and expression levels, respectively, of bbu genes and associated taxa carrying the pathway in subjects suffering from various diseases. Statistical analyses were performed (an asterisk marks significant (p < 0.05) abundance differences based on logistic regression analysis). (H) Carbohydrate‐active enzymes (CAZyme) repertoires of bbu pathway carriers along with related taxa from the same taxonomic families. Representative genomes of additional abundant species of the Bacteroidaceae and Ruminococcaceae were included in the analyses for comparison. (I) Enzyme family spectra (presence/absence) for glycoside hydrolases (GHs). Ab, relative abundance; Bact., Bacteroidaceae; CBM, carbohydrate‐binding module; CD, Crohn's disease; CE, carbohydrate esterases; CHN, China; Cir, cirrhosis; CRC, colorectal cancer; CVD, cardiovascular disease; EU, Europe; FMO3, flavin‐containing monooxygenase 3; GT, glycosyltransferases; Ob, obesity; Rumino., Ruminococcaceae; T1/2D, type 1/2 diabetes; UC, ulcerative colitis; US, the United States.
Detailed investigations on bacteria converting γBB into TMA and their distribution in human gut microbiota are lacking. To this end, we performed comprehensive pathway screenings on the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genome catalog (UHGG.v2.0) that comprises over 200,000 nonredundant genomes derived from isolates and metagenome‐assembled genomes (MAGs) of the gut environment 16 . We revealed 36 candidates that clustered into seven different species associated with five families of the Firmicutes (Figure 1B). Genomes of E. timonensis, E. sp900066695, and Agathobacter sp900291975 were derived from isolates, whereas bbu genes associated with other candidates were found on MAGs. Most candidates showed all six genes; JAGTTR01 sp018223385 (JAGTTR01) and A. sp900291975 were lacking bbuD, which is, however, not considered essential for the reaction 15 . Clustering of concatenated bbu genes reflected phylogenetic relatedness based on housekeeping genes (HKGs) (Figure 1B), which was also true when investigating bbu genes individually (Figure S1). These results suggest that genes have been transmitted laterally and not via horizontal gene transfer between taxa.
We screened 10 publicly available metagenomic data sets of subjects from three different regions—China, Europe, and North America—for abundances of the bbu gene cluster and associated taxonomies (Figure 1C–G). Data sets involved subjects diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D), obesity (Ob), colorectal cancer (CRC), cirrhosis (Cir), ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and respective healthy controls; two metatranscriptomic data sets were included as well (Table S1). In healthy controls, average relative abundances of the bbu genes were well below 0.1% of the total gut microbiota in all data sets (Figure 1C). It should be noted that low relative abundances of features of gut microbiota do not imply irrelevance. Many functions that play central roles for host health, such as the generation of secondary bile acids, the formation of hydrogen sulfide, and the other TMA‐synthesis pathways that act on choline and betaine, are all encoded on a small fraction of gut microbiota members 8 . Furthermore, in absolute terms, a relative abundance of 0.1% refers to 108–109 bacteria per gram stool, which can be considered fairly concentrated. Most of the bbu gene relative abundances were explainable by individual taxonomies, with bbu gene clusters from JAGTTR01 comprising the majority. Pathways associated with A. sp900291975, Dysosmobacter species, and E. timonensis were also detected, while those linked to other Emergencia species played a neglectable role in all data sets (Figure 1C). Metatranscriptomic data indicated low expression of bbu genes, relative to all HKGs, and those linked to JAGTTR01 (data set 10) and E. timonensis (data set 9) were dominating (Figure 1D). The prevalence, that is, the percentage of samples positive for bbu genes, ranged from 50% (data set 2) to 91% (data set 3). Sequencing depths between data sets were in a similar range for all studies (Table S1), and lower percentages of bbu‐positive samples in certain studies, especially in studies 2 and 8, cannot be attributed to sequencing depth. However, within studies, the absence of bbu genes did correlate with lower sequencing depth in five data sets (Figure S2), suggesting that the sequencing depth provided does not allow to prove the true absence of bbu genes, a common problem for low abundant features in bacterial communities. While relative abundances might, hence, be more homogeneous between samples if all were sequenced at high and equal depths, we think that the main trends on relative abundances and associated taxonomies of the bbu‐carrying community are reflected in the results of this study. The JAGTTR01‐associated gene cluster was the most prevalent (found in 38%–79% of all samples), whereas those associated with other taxa were found less frequently (Figure 1C). Correlation analyses between bbu gene relative abundances and respective taxa abundances (based on HKGs) showed strong associations for JAGTTR01 (R 2 = 0.72) and E. timonensis (R 2 = 0.96) (Figure 1E), reflecting the fact that all genomes of these taxa showed the pathway (Figure 1B). For A. sp900291975, a much weaker correlation (R 2 = 0.19) was found, and relative abundances of bbu genes linked to the two Dysosmobacter species were not associated with their overall relative abundances as they often comprised >1% of the total community (Figure 1E). Results agree with the discordant distribution of bbu genes in these species (Figure 1B) and strengthen function‐centric analyses over plain compositional investigations when assessing gut microbiota's potential to form TMA from l‐carnitine. Given that the main player, namely, JAGTTR01, was a MAG and the only representative of its genus, we took a closer look at this genome to exclude technical issues leading to misassembly/wrong binning. Relative abundances of all its individual HKGs were strongly correlating with each other, and with bbu genes, indicating that the constructed genome is real and carries the pathway (Figure S3). However, if the bacterium indeed converts γBB into TMA still needs to be biochemically verified, which applies also for other MAGs revealed in this study. The retrieval of only one genome for JAGTTR01 is most probably due to the fact that this taxon was consistently low abundant (only one sample showed the bacterium at a relative abundance >0.3% of the total community), providing too little coverage for assembly and binning. This was also true for A. sp900291975, where only three genomes were available (the one carrying the bbu cluster derived from an isolate), whereas several samples comprised Dysosmobacter species at higher relative abundances (>1% of the total community, Figure 1E), facilitating the construction of MAGs.
Bbu gene relative abundances in diseased individuals were similar to healthy controls in most data sets (Figure 1F). In data set 2, subjects suffering from T2D displayed higher relative abundances that were driven by Emergencia spp. associated pathways. T2D is indeed linked to higher TMAO plasma concentrations 17 . However, TMA‐generating pathways from betaine and choline are also increased in subjects suffering from T2D 8 , and the contribution of the bbu pathway to the total TMA pool still remains to be elucidated. Given its specific association with red meat intake, it seems likely that these bacteria play an important role in TMA generation in individuals fostering respective diets 9 , 10 , and its contribution to the total TMA pool and disease development thus needs to be assessed in a diet‐dependent manner. Bbu genes were less abundant in samples from cirrhotic patients and those suffering from CD, with JAGTTR01 showing lower concentrations, whereas bbu genes linked to the taxon were increased in T1D. For cases of CD and UC, lower expression levels of bbu genes were found that did, however, not reach significant thresholds (Figure 1F).
Little is known about the ecophysiology of revealed key players and we aimed to characterize their substrate spectra in more detail by applying carbohydrate‐active enzymes (CAZyme) analyses 18 . In the gut, bacteria do usually not grow on a single carbon source but feed on a multitude of substrates. This is exemplified by bacteria that form TMA from choline, which contain a multitude of CAZymes and whose abundances were associated with diets containing polysaccharide‐rich foods 12 , 19 . Bacteria under study feed on l‐carnitine, which does not, however, automatically imply that meat‐derived substances are solely defining their substrate spectra. Insights into the capacity to degrade complex polysaccharides, the main carbon/energy source in the colon, are thus crucial for understanding their ecophysiology. For comparison, we included related taxa from the same families as well as selected abundant key members of gut microbiota. In agreement with their low relative abundances, all bbu pathway carriers showed only a few CAZymes, especially the category glycoside hydrolases (GHs), which are key for degradation of complex carbohydrates (Figure 1H). While major gut members, such as Agathobacter spp., Bacteroides spp., and Faecalibacterium spp., displayed dozens to >100 genes assigned as GHs, none of the genomes under study displayed >10 enzymes from this category, similar to carbohydrate‐binding modules (CBMs) that play important roles in extracellular polysaccharide degradation 20 . Very few CBMs were found on bbu carriers, and Emergencia completely lacked these genes. With a few exceptions, the low capacity for degrading complex carbohydrates was conserved within Oscillospiraceae, Butyricicoccaceae, and Anaerovoracaceae, which was coherent with low abundances of most members of these families. In Lachnospiraceae, which includes JAGTTR0, several highly abundant members, such as Agathobacter and Blautia_A, displaying a multitude of GHs were detected. Two species that were most closely related to JAGTTR0 and that consisted of only one MAG showed >100 GHs, despite representing very low abundant members of gut microbiota (Figure 1H). Along with the low amounts of the total GHs for bbu‐displaying bacteria, their spectra of GH families were limited as well (Figure 1I). GH18, which is involved in chitin degradation, was found on all bbu‐displaying taxa, except for D. sp900544615. The widely distributed GH13 and the related GH77, which are both acting on α‐glucoside linkages and are involved in starch degradation, were found in all bbu carriers, except for Emergencia species. A. sp900291975 and Dysosmobacter species also carried GH3, a widely distributed exo‐acting enzyme with broad substrate specificities. The overall low abundance of GHs is in contrast to TMA‐producing bacteria acting on choline that show a multitude of GHs 12 .
In summary, our analyses suggest that revealed bacteria are ubiquitously present, however, at low relative abundances and with a limited potential to degrade complex carbohydrates. These characteristics indicate that these bacteria have narrow nutritional niches and the conversion of γBB into TMA might, hence, be an important part of energy generation. Our study enlarged the target spectrum of taxa forming TMA, aiding risk assessment, where individuals are stratified based on their potential to synthesize this toxic compound. This might further contribute to the development of precision strategies based on dietary interventions to restrict TMA formation from l‐carnitine.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Marius Vital: Conceptualization (lead); formal analysis (lead); funding acquisition (lead); investigation (lead); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); visualization (lead); writing—original draft (lead); writing—review and editing (lead). Ylenia Heinrich‐Sanchez: Conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting); validation (supporting); visualization (supporting); writing—original draft (supporting); writing—review and editing (supporting).
ETHICS STATEMENT
This study did not involve any human participants or animal subjects.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Supporting information
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by the DFG (project #456214861). Icons in Figure 1A were made by Vitaly Gorbachev, Freepik, and Eucalyp from www.flaticon.com. Chemical structures were retrieved from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
Vital M, Heinrich‐Sanchez Y. A small, polyphyletic group of Firmicutes synthesizes trimethylamine from l‐carnitine. mLife. 2023;2:267–271. 10.1002/mlf2.12079
Edited by Yunfeng Yang, Tsinghua University, China
DATA AVAILABILITY
All data are publicly available (see Table S1 for references of individual metagenomic data sets).
REFERENCES
- 1. Stubbs JR, House JA, Ocque AJ, Zhang S, Johnson C, Kimber C, et al. Serum trimethylamine‐N‐oxide is elevated in CKD and correlates with coronary atherosclerosis burden. JASN. 2016;27:305–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Li XS, Obeid S, Klingenberg R, Gencer B, Mach F, Räber L, et al. Gut microbiota‐dependent trimethylamine N‐oxide in acute coronary syndromes: a prognostic marker for incident cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:ehw582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Schiattarella GG, Sannino A, Toscano E, Giugliano G, Gargiulo G, Franzone A, et al. Gut microbe‐generated metabolite trimethylamine‐N‐oxide as cardiovascular risk biomarker: a systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2948–2956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Andrikopoulos P, Aron‐Wisnewsky J, Chakaroun R, Myridakis A, Forslund SK, Nielsen T, et al. Evidence of a causal and modifiable relationship between kidney function and circulating trimethylamine N‐oxide with implications for heart and kidney disorders. medRxiv. 2022. 10.1101/2022.11.08.22282073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Risk T, Zhu W, Gregory JC, Org E, Brown JM, Lusis AJ, et al. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO enhances platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis risk. Cell. 2016;165:111–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Seldin MM, Meng Y, Qi H, Zhu W, Wang Z, Hazen SL, et al. Trimethylamine N‐oxide promotes vascular inflammation through signaling of mitogen‐activated protein kinase and nuclear factor‐κb. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rath S, Rud T, Karch A, Pieper DH, Vital M. Pathogenic functions of host microbiota. Microbiome. 2018;6:174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L‐carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:576–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang Z, Bergeron N, Levison BS, Li XS, Chiu S, Jia X, et al. Impact of chronic dietary red meat, white meat, or non‐meat protein on trimethylamine N‐oxide metabolism and renal excretion in healthy men and women. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:583–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhu Y, Jameson E, Crosatti M, Schäfer H, Rajakumar K, Bugg TDH, et al. Carnitine metabolism to trimethylamine by an unusual Rieske‐type oxygenase from human microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4268–4273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta) genomic data. mBio. 2014;5:e00889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Koeth RA, Lam‐Galvez BR, Kirsop J, Wang Z, Levison BS, Gu X, et al. l‐Carnitine in omnivorous diets induces an atherogenic gut microbial pathway in humans. J Clin Invest. 2018;129:373–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rajakovich LJ, Fu B, Bollenbach M, Balskus EP. Elucidation of an anaerobic pathway for metabolism of l‐carnitine‐derived γ‐butyrobetaine to trimethylamine in human gut bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2101498118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Buffa JA, Romano KA, Copeland MF, Cody DB, Zhu W, Galvez R, et al. The microbial gbu gene cluster links cardiovascular disease risk associated with red meat consumption to microbiota L‐carnitine catabolism. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:73–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Almeida A, Nayfach S, Boland M, Strozzi F, Beracochea M, Shi ZJ, et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:105–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhuang R, Ge X, Han L, Yu P, Gong X, Meng Q, et al. Gut microbe‐generated metabolite trimethylamine N‐oxide and the risk of diabetes: a systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:883–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wardman JF, Bains RK, Rahfeld P, Withers SG. Carbohydrate‐active enzymes (CAZymes) in the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:542–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rath S, Rox K, Kleine Bardenhorst S, Schminke U, Dörr M, Mayerle J, et al. Higher trimethylamine‐N‐oxide plasma levels with increasing age are mediated by diet and trimethylamine‐forming bacteria. mSystems. 2021;6:e0094521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cerqueira FM, Photenhauer AL, Pollet RM, Brown HA, Koropatkin NM. Starch digestion by gut bacteria: crowdsourcing for carbs. TIM. 2020;28:95–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Data Availability Statement
All data are publicly available (see Table S1 for references of individual metagenomic data sets).