Abstract
Higher biodiversity is often assumed to be a more desirable scenario for maintaining the functioning of ecosystems, but whether species‐richer communities are also more disturbance‐tolerant remains controversial. In this study, we investigated the bacterial communities based on 472 soil samples from 28 forests across China with associated edaphic and climatic properties. We developed two indexes (i.e., community mean tolerance breadth [CMTB] and community mean response asynchrony [CMRA]) to explore the relationship between diversity and community resistance potential. Moreover, we examined this resistance potential along the climatic and latitudinal gradients. We revealed that CMTB was significantly and negatively related to species richness, resulting from the changes in balance between relative abundances of putative specialists and generalists. In comparison, we found a unimodal relationship between CMRA and richness, suggesting that higher biodiversity might not always lead to higher community resistance. Moreover, our results showed differential local patterns along latitude. In particular, local patterns in the northern region mainly followed general relationships rather than those for the southern forests, which may be attributed to the differences in annual means and annual variations of climate conditions. Our findings highlight that the community resistance potential depends on the composition of diverse species with differential environmental tolerance and responses. This study provides a new, testable evaluation by considering tolerance breadth and response asynchrony at the community level, which will be helpful in assessing the influence of disturbance under rapid shifts in biodiversity and species composition as a result of global environmental change.
Keywords: ecological resistance, forest soil bacterial community, latitudinal gradient, specialist–generalist balance, species richness
Impact statement
The frequency and magnitude of extreme weather events and anthropogenic environmental changes have increased substantially. As a fundamental estimation of ecosystem functioning, biodiversity has long fascinated ecologists. However, whether higher biodiversity reflects higher tolerance is disputed. Here, we proposed two testable indexes by considering the species' environmental tolerance range and the asynchrony of their environmental responses. Our results suggested that the community resistance potential is not linearly related to the richness in species‐rich forest ecosystems. Instead, how coexisting species respond differentially to environmental changes may play a more important role in predicting the stability of community composition and ecosystem functioning under disturbance.
INTRODUCTION
Extraordinarily diverse below‐ground microbial communities drive the multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems 1 , 2 . Accumulating evidence has revealed a positive relationship between microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . Current studies in microbial ecology often assume that high diversity is, implicitly, a more desirable scenario for maintaining the functioning of ecosystems. Whether communities with higher diversity are more resistant to disturbance remains controversial 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . A larger number of coexisting species are expected to provide a greater buffering effect to insure ecosystems against declines in their functioning when different species respond differently to environmental changes 11 , 12 , 13 . However, more diverse microbial communities might not necessarily be composed of more distinct members that are capable of more differential responses. Hence, microbial diversity and the differential responses of species within the entire community are relevant for a large‐scale assessment of ecological resistance to rapid global changes. However, it remains largely unexplored, especially in species‐rich soil ecosystems.
Different species respond to climate changes at different rates and to varying degrees 14 . The average magnitude of environmental tolerance range 15 and the asynchrony 16 of species responses to a perturbation can substantially affect the strength of the buffering effect 13 . The environmental tolerance range partly defines an organism's niche (i.e., tolerance breadth), describing the set of conditions under which it can inhabit 15 , 17 (Figure 1A). Some microbial taxa that can tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions (“generalists”) are more likely to be ubiquitous; in contrast, other taxa with a narrow tolerance breadth (“specialists”) can only persist under more specific conditions 18 . Given that global climate changes can produce abiotic forces or constraints as environmental filters to limit the type of species with different tolerance breadth 9 , niche‐based modeling has been used to improve the prediction of species distributions under climate change scenarios 19 , 20 , 21 . Logically, the tolerance breadth can be extended to the community level as the mean tolerance breadth of species present in that community, reflecting community response to the environmental disturbance 22 . Although a community with higher community mean tolerance breadth (CMTB) is inferred to be more resistant to environmental disturbances, the relationship between biodiversity and CMTB depends on the community structure (e.g., relative abundance and composition) in terms of generalists/specialists (Figure 1B). Therefore, the compositional dynamics of generalists and specialists in the face of perturbations can also account for the persistence of microbially driven ecosystem services 23 .
Figure 1.
Conceptual diagrams showing different levels of community mean tolerance breadth (CMTB) and community mean response asynchrony (CMRA) along the gradient of microbial diversity. (A) Different species types have different tolerance breadths along the environmental gradient. (B) Communities with different species richness can result in a similar level of CMTB (horizontal panels) and the CMTB varies among communities with consistent biodiversity (vertical panels), suggesting that the relationship between biodiversity and CMTB depends on the community structure (e.g., relative abundance and composition) of different species with different ranges of environmental tolerance. (C) Similar to CMTB, more diverse communities might not necessarily be composed of species with more distinct environmental optima and less overlapped tolerance breadth, suggesting that the relationship between biodiversity and CMRA may vary among different ecosystems.
Alternatively, temporal and spatial synchrony have been widely studied to examine the correlated fluctuations of population dynamics over time and across geographically distant locations 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , which can play a significant role in ecosystem stability 13 , 29 , 30 . From the perspective of ecological resistance, asynchrony of species' responses to perturbations describes the niche differentiation of environmental tolerance (i.e., how different species respond differently to variations in their environment) 31 . If ecologically similar species in a community have more diverse environmental optima and less overlapped tolerance breadth along the environmental gradient, these asynchronous populations may compensate for each other when they encounter a disturbance and therefore limit the influence 26 , 32 . In contrast, high synchronization suggests that different species respond similarly to environmental changes. In an extreme case, when there is no asynchrony in the species responses, the entire community behaves like a single species 13 . Thus, higher community mean response asynchrony (CMRA) may enhance ecological resistance; yet, the relationship between biodiversity and CMRA may vary among different ecosystems (Figure 1C).
Collectively, the microbial biodiversity and the composition of diverse species with differential environmental tolerance and responses determine the magnitude of CMTB and CMRA. Communities with higher degrees of CMTB and/or CMRA may suffer less from a particular environmental change or extreme event with a lower risk of disruption for microbially driven ecosystem functions and are thus considered more resistant. Here, we present a study examining the large‐scale patterns of CMTB/CMRA and their relationships with richness among forest soil bacterial communities in China. Our goal was to refine and assess the potential of community resistance to environmental changes along a biodiversity gradient across space.
RESULTS
Large environmental gradient among forest ecosystems
Our soil samples from 28 natural forest reserves were characterized by a wide variety of annual mean temperature (AMT) (−5.69°C to –22.76°C) and annual precipitation (AP) (100–2214mm), as well as soil pH (3.67–7.05), moisture (5.74%–68.14%), and the contents of total organic carbon (TOC) (1.16–42.63 g kg−1) and total nitrogen (TN) (0.01–3.78 g kg−1) (Table S1). These forest ecosystems were mainly clustered into two groups (i.e., northern and southern regions) with significant differences in environmental conditions (PERMANOVA test, Df = 471, F = 176.32, p < 0.001; Figure 2). In particular, forests from the southern region were characterized by significantly (p < 0.001) higher AP and AMT and lower soil pH and TN content than those found in the northern region with non‐negligible effect sizes (Figure 2). In general, the investigated forest ecosystems across China revealed a large environmental gradient and captured the environmental tolerance/preference of soil bacterial organisms that they harbored and were suitable for addressing our questions in this study.
Figure 2.
Spatial distribution and the differences in the environmental properties of the 28 forest reserves. In this study, a total of 472 soil samples were used to represent the soil bacterial communities and environmental properties from 28 natural forest reserves across China. (A) The 28 forest reserves were mainly divided into two groups (i.e., the northern and southern regions) based on the six environmental variables by hierarchical cluster analysis. (B) The sample sizes and the location ranges of soil samples in each natural forest reserve are shown and ordered by latitudes. (C) The environmental conditions between these two regions were compared using a t‐test. The magnitude of the differences was estimated by Cohen's d effect size: N (negligible, |d| < 0.2), S (small, 0.2 ≤ |d| < 0.5), M (medium, 0.5 ≤ |d| < 0.8), and L (large, |d| ≥ 0.8). Negative values of Cohen's d effect size indicate higher mean values of environmental conditions for soil samples from the southern region. Detailed environmental conditions are shown in Table S1.
Bacterial diversity and their tolerance breadth
The bacterial species richness of our soil samples was significantly and unimodally related to latitudes and peaked at around 35°N–40°N (R 2 = 0.385, p < 0.001, quadratic regression model) (Figure S1), which is the boundary between southern and northern regions (i.e., subtropical and temperate zones) with distinct environmental conditions (Figure 2). Among all samples, the most dominant lineages were Acidobacteriota, Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Verrucomicrobiota, accounting for 23.5%, 17.3%, 15%, 12.5%, and 9.6% of the relative abundances, respectively. Some other phyla were less abundant, but still detected in most of the samples, including Planctomycetota (4.8%), Chloroflexi (4.1%), Bacteroidota (3.8%), Firmicutes (1.4%), Gemmatimonadota (1.3%), and Myxococcota (1.3%). The tolerance breadth (TB) of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was calculated to estimate their environmental adaptation, and a given bacterial OTU with a larger TB value was considered as a putative “generalist”. Our results showed that both environmental “generalist” and “specialist” were broadly distributed across the phylogenetic tree (Figure S2), implying that the habitat range of bacteria was phylogeny‐independent among our study sites.
Method independence of CMTB and CMRA
To test if the two indexes of CMTA and CMRA were comparable features among samples, they were calculated based on the bacterial OTUs that were selected using two approaches at four different levels. We found that the CMTB (or CMRA) values were strongly and significantly related irrespective of the approaches and levels that we used (Pearson r > 0.96, p < 0.001, Figure 3 and Table S2). These results indicated that the patterns of CMTB and CMRA among samples were method‐independent and reflected important features of bacterial communities. Therefore, we considered that the comparison of these indexes could be used to estimate the differential potential of community‐level resistance to environmental disturbances. We used the values based on the random selection of 900 bacterial OTUs for the subsequent analyses.
Figure 3.
Comparison of indexes of the 472 soil samples that were calculated by different approaches of bacterial OTUs' selection at different levels. (A) CMTB. (B) CMRA. For the approach based on a consistent abundance of bacterial communities, the bacterial OTUs of a sample were ranked by their relative abundances in descending order. The most abundant OTUs, representing the accumulated abundances at 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, and 0.9, were retained for the index calculation. For the approach based on a consistent number of bacterial richness, 300, 500, 700, and 900 bacterial OTUs of a sample were randomly selected and the OTUs' selection at each level was repeated 100 times. For each level, the indexes were calculated as the average values of these 100 sets of bacterial OTUs. OTU, operational taxonomic unit. CMRA, community mean response asynchrony; CMTB, community mean tolerance breadth.
Relationships between CMTB/CMRA and bacterial species richness
We observed that the CMTB was significantly and negatively (R 2 = 0.499, p < 0.001) related to the bacterial species richness (Figure 4A). In addition, our results revealed a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in the relative abundance of putative “generalists” along with an increase in microbial diversity (Figures 5A, S3 and S4A‐D). In contrast, we found an opposite trend for the relative abundance of putative “specialists” (Figures 5B and S4E‐H). These results indicated that bacterial communities with higher richness were composed of a larger proportion of putative “specialists” but less putative “generalists,” resulting in significantly lower values of CMTB.
Figure 4.
Relationships between bacterial species richness and different indexes. (A) CMTB. (B) CMRA. Linear and quadratic regressions were performed to examine these relationships. Quadratic regression models were selected owing to their lower values of the Akaike information criteria (AIC) index than those of linear models (CMTB: −887 vs. −868; CMRA: −1008 vs. −919; AIC values: quadratic vs. linear).
Figure 5.
Relationships between bacterial species richness and the relative abundances of different microbial groups. (A) Putative “generalists.” (B) Putative “specialists.” Putative “generalists” and “specialists” were defined based on the distribution of TB values among bacterial OTUs at five quantiles (“generalists”: 0.95, 0.90, 0.85, 0.80, and 0.75; “specialists”: 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25). Similar patterns for putative “generalists” at quantiles of 0.95, 0.90, 0.85, and 0.80 as well as for putative “specialists” at quantiles of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 are shown in Figure S2. Quadratic regression models were selected owing to their lower values of the Akaike information criteria (AIC) index than those of linear models. The distribution of TB values is shown in Figure S1. OTU, operational taxonomic unit; TB, tolerance breadth.
Compared to CMTB, we found a hump‐shaped relationship between CMRA and richness (R 2 = 0.218, p < 0.001) (Figure 4B). This pattern suggested that bacterial species in communities at a moderate biodiversity level had larger differences in environmental optima and a greater degree of response asynchrony. Together, by considering the patterns of both indexes along the biodiversity gradient (Figure 6A), we found a nonlinear relationship (R 2 = 0.256, p < 0.001) between richness and the resistance potential (Figure 6B), revealing that bacterial communities at a moderate biodiversity level tend to experience less influence from a disturbance.
Figure 6.
Relationships between species richness and resistance. (A) Distributions of CMTB/CMRA among 472 soil microbial communities. (B) Resistance potential along the gradient of bacterial species richness. Values of CMTB and CMRA were standardized with a range from 0 to 1. Resistance potential was calculated as the square root of the sum of and . Communities with higher degrees of both CMTB and CMRA (i.e., greater resistance potential) were expected to be more resistant to environmental changes.
Resistance potential along climatic and spatial gradients
Random forest analysis revealed that climate conditions (i.e., AMT and AP) were more important predictors of resistance potential than edaphic variables (Figure S5). Because AMT and AP were also strongly related to latitude (Figure S6), we visualized the distribution pattern of resistance potential along the climatic and spatial gradients (Figure 7A). We found a significant (R 2 = 0.148, p < 0.001) U‐shaped distribution of resistance potential along the latitudinal gradient (Figure 7B). This pattern revealed that the values of resistance potential were relatively low in environments under moderate temperature and precipitation levels (Figure 7A), with minimum values around 35°N–40°N (Figure 7B).
Figure 7.
Resistance potential along climatic and spatial gradients. (A) Relating resistance potential to annual precipitation (AP) and annual mean temperature (AMT). (B) Spatial distribution of resistance potential along latitudes.
Generality of resistance patterns at a local scale
Given that the climate conditions, including annual means (Figure 2) and annual variation (Figure S7), were distinct between the southern and northern regions in China, we further explored the generality of our observed patterns across different forest ecosystems along the latitudinal gradient. Our results revealed that the overall relationships of richness–CMTB (Figure 4A, negative) and richness–CMRA (Figure 4B, hump‐shaped) were more commonly found in the northern region (Figures S8 and S9). In comparison, in the southern region, we observed various relationships of richness–CMTB (Figure S8) but a consistent positive correlation of richness–CMRA (Figure S9) across different forests. The distinct climate conditions between the northern and southern regions reflect differential degrees of environmental stress and can act as strong forces regulating specialist–generalist balance and species interactions, thereby resulting in these observed local differential patterns.
DISCUSSION
Global climate changes are causing shifts in the richness, distribution range, and composition of species worldwide and affecting ecological stability and the sustainability of ecosystem functions 14 . How environmental disturbance influences microbial biodiversity has been broadly addressed 33 , 34 , 35 . Nevertheless, how biodiversity reflects the potential of community‐level resistance is far from clear. We argue that the resistance potential depends on the composition of diverse species with differential environmental tolerance and responses. In this study, we have defined CMTB and CMRA to estimate the community‐level tolerance breadth and responses asynchrony to perturbations, respectively. We have applied these indexes to explore the distribution pattern of resistance potential among species‐rich forest ecosystems along broad environmental and spatial gradients. By showing a clear unimodal pattern, our findings provide important insight into the controversy about the relationship between microbial biodiversity and community resistance to disturbance.
Specialist–generalist balance and community tolerance
Environmental specialists and generalists, which are identified based on their tolerance and survivability 36 , 37 , coexist in diverse habitats. However, their relative abundances (i.e., the specialist–generalist balance) vary markedly among environments 38 . In this study, we found that the tolerance breadth of bacterial communities was negatively associated with biodiversity, resulting from a decreasing ratio of generalists' to specialists' relative abundances when species richness increases (Figure S10). This result confirmed that high richness drives community‐level specialization 39 , highlighting that species‐richer communities can be composed of more members that are more specialized.
In addition, we found that the mean relative abundances of putative “specialists” were relatively higher than those of putative “generalists” (Figure S3B), which is likely because of their superior local adaptation (e.g., higher performance and niche preference) in the given environment 40 . However, compared with generalist microbes with persistence advantage, specialist species only adapt to a narrow range of environments 37 and are disadvantaged in more drastic changing environments 41 . Due to the synergistic effects of a narrow niche and small range size, the populations of specialists may be more vulnerable and rapidly decrease or even become extinct when they are at risk of intense global changes 15 , 42 .
In contrast, although specialists can outperform generalists owing to the higher efficiency of resource utilization under optimal conditions, habitat generalists are increasingly realized to be metabolically flexible and can become dominant in highly dynamic environments 36 . Thus, environmental disturbance and habitat heterogeneity are predicted to favor generalists 38 . As a result, communities with a higher proportion of generalists are expected to be more resistant to disturbances (Figure S11). Our findings suggest that the specialist–generalist balance plays an important role in the potential of community resistance to environmental disturbance.
Response asynchrony and community resistance
Previous studies have shown that species asynchrony promotes ecological resistance in fluctuating environments and enhances community stability 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 due to the complementarity of ecologically distinct species with large differences of species‐specific responses to environmental fluctuations 26 , 32 , 47 . Our results revealed a hump‐shaped relationship between response asynchrony and bacterial species richness. Communities with lower richness were found to be composed of a larger proportion of putative environmental “generalists,” which distribute ubiquitously across various environments. Thus, a larger overlap of tolerance breadth in these “generalists”‐dominated communities possibly accounted for a lower response asynchrony.
As species richness increases, specialization is assumed to enable the coexistence of more species and support high diversity, resulting in a greater number of habitat‐specialized species (i.e., environmental specialists) 39 . In addition, to coexist, specialists tend to interact with generalists, and the increasing richness is suggested to result in an increase of extreme specialists 48 . As a result, a decreasing overlap of tolerance breadth is expected, leading to an increase of response asynchrony when richness increases.
However, our results showed that the response asynchrony peaked at a moderate diversity level and declined when the richness kept increasing. This pattern suggested that the continuous increase in species richness (mainly “specialists”) decreased the overall differences in their environmental optima. This finding implies that higher biodiversity might not always lead to higher community resistance, especially when different species have synchronous responses to environmental changes.
Spatial pattern of resistance potential
Our results suggested that the resistance potential was non‐linearly correlated to latitude with minimum values around 35°N–40°N, implying that communities in this zone might be more sensitive to environmental changes. This region in China had experienced dramatic climate fluctuations during the last 20 ka BP (kiloyear Before Present) 49 and is a transition area between subtropical and temperate biomes 50 with a sharp shift in climate conditions (Figure 2). Although “Janzen's mountain passes hypothesis” assumes that tropical mountains have higher diversity due to the relatively stable climate regimes 51 , our results suggested that higher diversity could have resulted from more fluctuations in temperature in this mid‐latitude region (Figures S1 and S7A), which is expected in ecotone 52 . As shown above, communities with higher diversity were composed of a higher proportion of specialists (Figure S10) and were expected to be less resistant to disturbances in our studying forest ecosystems (Figure S11). Together, this observed pattern implied that the reduction of physiological tolerance may not necessarily limit the community biodiversity 53 , and higher diversity may not always lead to higher community resistance. However, the communities with a larger species pool might be more resilient because they are more likely to contain taxa with complementary response traits, which may facilitate ecosystems to recover without switching to a qualitatively different state 41 , 54 .
Differential local patterns along latitude
Our study captured wide gradients of climate conditions, including the annual means (Figure 2 and Table S1) and annual variations (Figure S7), possibly yielding the local differential patterns along latitude. Forests in the northern region are characterized by lower AMT and AP but higher annual variations than those in the southern region, representing relatively harsh, fluctuating environments for the growth of microorganisms. Under these relatively stressful conditions, generalists with persistence advantage and higher metabolic flexibility are more likely to competitively exclude habitat‐specialized species 36 , leading to a decrease in biodiversity. Furthermore, the dominance of generalists in species‐poor communities may result in the more apparent negative correlations between species richness and CMTB (Figure S8, negative relationship in the northern region).
Moreover, the distinct climate conditions between the northern and southern regions influence the outcome of the interaction among co‐occurring species. The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) suggests that positive interactions should be more prevalent in stressful environments, while permissive environments should favor competition 55 , 56 . In this study, forests in the northern region were relatively stressful and had fluctuating environments in terms of climate conditions, possibly promoting positive interactions among species. This may allow different species to coexist even though they have similar ecological traits with synchronous environmental responses (Figure S9, hump‐shaped relationship in the northern region). In contrast, according to the SGH, intensive competition is expected in communities in the southern region under relatively moderate and stable conditions, which can drive specialization 39 , 57 . As a result, species‐rich communities in southern region likely force co‐occurring species to have narrower niches and more specified traits, leading to the positive relationship between response asynchrony and richness (Figure S9, positive relationship in the southern region).
In summary, we propose two testable indexes for the evaluation of community resistance potential, which is regulated by the shifts in species composition. Our results have shown how the geographic pattern of community resistance is related to the biodiversity along the climatic and latitudinal gradients. Global changes, such as warming and eutrophication, have been demonstrated to mediate the microbial diversity, composition, functional traits, and species co‐occurrence networks 35 , 58 , 59 , 60 , which are also expected to affect the community resistance potential following the mechanisms that we have described. Future work is needed to predict how the long‐term effects of such environmental change influence the community resistance potential by mediating the temporal dynamics of communities and consequently impact ecosystem functioning. We believe that our work can inspire further analyses of the spatiotemporal patterns of community resistance, which can deepen our understanding of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem stability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study sites, environmental properties, and soil bacterial communities
We collected a total of 472 soil samples from 28 forest reserves located across a broad range of latitudes (21.88°N–53.45°N) and longitudes (100.01°E–129.65°E) in China in 2012 (Figure 2 and Table S1). The detailed information about soil sampling, soil property measurement, climate conditions, and the molecular characterization of soil bacterial communities has been previously described 50 , 61 , 62 . In brief, top layer soils (0–10 cm in depth) were collected from 3 to 14 sites in each forest reserve. The numbers of sites were determined approximately based on the sizes of forest reserves. We selected the locations of sites to represent the gradient of elevation for each forest reserve and recorded the coordinates using a portable GPS machine. In each sampling site, three soil samples were collected as biological replicates that were located about 5 m apart from each other. After the removal of vegetation litter, soils were sampled and stored in sterilized polyethylene bags and kept on ice immediately in the field, and then transported to the laboratory. We downloaded the daily records of temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) from 194 weather stations in the National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/en). In this study, we used the data from 2012 to represent the climate conditions. For temperature, we calculated the monthly means based on the daily data and then averaged the 12 monthly means as the AMT. For precipitation, we summed up the daily data to generate the monthly sums and then added up the 12 monthly sums as the AP. We estimated the AMT and AP for each site by applying the kriging interpolation method 63 using the “gstat” package in R and obtained the interpolated AMT and AP according to the site location.
To assess the bacterial environmental tolerance range in this study, we used four major variables of soil properties, including pH, moisture, TOC, and TN, as well as two variables of climate conditions, including AMT and AP (Table S1).
To characterize the soil bacterial communities, we amplified and sequenced the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene using the 515F (5'‐GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA‐3') and 806R (5'‐GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT‐3') primer pair. We clustered the qualified reads into OTUs at a 97% similarity threshold and rarefied 9736 bacterial reads for each soil sample. We aligned the representative bacterial OTUs using Mafft 64 and constructed the phylogenetic tree using FastTree 65 . Taxonomic classification of the representative bacterial OTUs was determined based on the pre‐trained Silva 138 Naive Bayes 515F/806R classifier 66 . The display and the annotation of phylogenetic tree were performed by iTOL 67 . The details of DNA extraction, library construction, sequencing, and data processing have been described previously 50 , 61 , 62 . The representative sequences of bacterial OTUs and their abundances in each sample are available in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17711495).
CMTB
We considered a given OTU as a putative environmental “generalist” if it occurs across habitats with distinct conditions. In this study, we used the measure of multivariate dispersion 68 , 69 based on the standardized data of six edaphic and climatic variables to estimate the difference of environments where a given OTU inhabits. A given bacterial OTU may occur in a wide range of habitats; yet, its abundance may vary among different samples under different environmental conditions. It is recognized that generalists with a larger tolerance breadth distribute more evenly across various environments, while specialists with a smaller tolerance breadth are only dominant in specific habitats 70 . Therefore, we calculated the tolerance breadth of a certain bacterial OTU m (TB m ) as the average distance of samples (i.e., environments where the target OTU is detected) to the centroid weighted by the relative abundances of OTU m in different samples according to Equations 1 and 2 (fdisp function, “FD” package in R) 69 .
For a target OTU m, the weighted centroid was calculated following Equation 1.
(1) |
where C is the weighted centroid in the i‐dimensional space, i is the number of environmental variables, a j is the abundance (i.e., number of sequencing reads) of OTU m in sample j, and x ij is the standardized value of environmental variable i in sample j. We then computed the TB m as the weighted mean distance Z to the weighted centroid C according to Equation 2.
(2) |
where a j is the abundance of OTU m in sample j and z j is the distance of sample j to the weighted centroid C.
A larger value of TB suggests that the bacterial OTU occurs across more distinct environments and is considered as a putative “generalist.” This index of multivariate dispersion has no upper limit and is unaffected by the number of samples (i.e., environments where OTU m is detected). More importantly, it can be computed from any distance or dissimilarity measure, it can handle any number and type of environmental variable (e.g., quantitative and categorical data), and it is not strongly influenced by outliers 68 , 69 .
We estimated the CMTB by calculating the abundance‐weighted mean of TB of bacterial OTUs present within a sample. Bacterial communities with higher values of CMTB suggest that they are composed of a larger proportion of putative “generalists” and are likely more resistant to environmental changes. In this study, we applied two different approaches to select bacterial OTUs for the CMTB calculation and tested if the CMTB was a comparable feature among samples.
First, we restricted the accumulated bacterial community abundance for each sample regardless of the number of bacterial OTUs. Therefore, the CMTB values were compared among samples based on a consistent abundance of bacterial communities. To do this, we ranked the bacterial OTUs of a sample by their relative abundances in descending order. For the subsequent CMTB calculation, we kept the most abundant OTUs, which represented the accumulated abundances at four different levels (i.e., 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, and 0.9). Second, we randomly selected a certain number of bacterial OTUs for each sample, irrespective of their accumulated abundances. Thus, the CMTB values were compared among samples based on a consistent number of bacterial species richness. For this purpose, we randomly selected a certain number of OTUs at four different levels (i.e., 300, 500, 700, and 900) and repeated the OTUs' selection 100 times at each level. For each level, we calculated the CMTB as the average value of these 100 sets of bacterial OTUs.
CMRA
In this study, we related the relative abundances of every pair of bacterial OTUs among all the samples to assess the differentiation of their responses along the environmental gradient. Specifically, the response asynchrony (RA ij ) was calculated as the opposite value of the coefficient (rho) of Spearman correlation between relative abundances of OTUs i and j with a range from −1 to 1 31 . A larger value of RA ij suggests that OTUs i and j have a greater difference in environmental optima and respond more asynchronously along the environmental gradient. In this case, OTUs i and j may be able to compensate for each one when the environment changes.
For a given sample, the CMRA was calculated as the mean of RA ij of all pairs of bacterial OTUs weighted by the products of their relative abundances (Equation 3).
(3) |
where a i and a j are the relative abundances of OTUs i and j.
Hence, a larger value of CMRA suggests that different bacterial OTUs within this community tend to respond more differentially to environmental changes and could broaden the range of environmental tolerance at the community level. Consistent with the CMTB mentioned above, the calculation of CMRA was conducted based on the bacterial OTUs that were selected using two approaches at four different levels.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 3.6.1 71 using various packages. We applied hierarchical cluster analysis to divide the 28 forest reserves into groups according to their edaphic and climatic conditions. We tested for the significant differences in environmental properties using the PERMANOVA test (Adonis function, Euclidean distance with permutations = 999, “vegan” package) 72 .
We conducted Pearson correlations to examine the relationships between the values of CMTB (or CMRA) that were calculated using different approaches at different levels. We related the bacterial species richness to CMTB (or CMRA) using linear and quadratic regressions. The best model was selected by identifying the model with the lowest Akaike information criteria (AIC) index. Moreover, we explored the relationships between the richness and the relative abundances of putative “generalists” (or “specialists”). For this purpose, we defined putative “generalists” and “specialists” at five quantiles (“generalists”: 0.95, 0.90, 0.85, 0.80, and 0.75; “specialists”: 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25) according to the distribution of TB values among bacterial OTUs (Figure S1A).
Given that communities with higher degrees of CMTB and CMRA were expected to be more resistant to environmental changes, we further assessed the potential of community‐level resistance by considering both indexes according to Equation 4.
(4) |
where CMTBstand and CMRAstand are the values of a given sample standardized with a range from 0 to 1.
In addition, we identified the relative importance of the six environmental variables for this resistance potential using random forest analysis (“randomForest” package) 73 . We used seasonal dynamics of climate conditions at the annual timescale to reflect the environmental fluctuation across 28 forest reserves along the latitudinal gradient. We downloaded public climate data sets (1952–2012) across China from the National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/en) 61 . For each forest ecosystem, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the monthly values of each year and then calculated the mean of CV values over the 60‐year period to estimate the annual climate variation.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed to the intellectual development of this study. Jialiang Kuang conceived the research. Jialiang Kuang and Daliang Ning constructed the conceptual framework. Jialiang Kuang, Dongmei Deng, and Shun Han performed data analyses and statistics. Jialiang Kuang, Dongmei Deng, and Shun Han drafted the manuscript with help from Colin T. Bates, Wensheng Shu, and Jizhong Zhou.
ETHICS STATEMENT
The authors acknowledge that they are scientifically and professionally involved with the interdependence of natural and technological systems. They are dedicated to the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge that advances the sciences and professions involving microbiology and ecology.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Supporting information
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The funding for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31600403, 31800422, 41673111, U1501232, 41622106, 31971553, and 31700470), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2016A030312003), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, China (No. 2017GXNSFBA198099), and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF A22‐0042).
Kuang J, Deng D, Han S, Bates CT, Ning D, Shu W, et al. Resistance potential of soil bacterial communities along a biodiversity gradient in forest ecosystems. mLife. 2022;1:399–411. 10.1002/mlf2.12042
Edited by Xiaolei Wu, Peking University, China
DATA AVAILABILITY
The representative sequences of bacterial OTUs and their abundances in each sample have been deposited in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17711495).
REFERENCES
- 1. Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature. 2014;515:505–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Delgado‐Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitan JJ, Encinar D, et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bell T, Newman JA, Silverman BW, Turner SL, Lilley AK. The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature. 2005;436:1157–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jing X, Sanders NJ, Shi Y, Chu H, Classen AT, Zhao K, et al. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above‐ and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wagg C, Bender SF, Widmer F, van der Heijden MG. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:5266–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Delgado‐Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Ochoa V, Gozalo B, Singh BK, Maestre FT. Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:1295–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pennekamp F, Pontarp M, Tabi A, Altermatt F, Alther R, Choffat Y, et al. Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature. 2018;563:109–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Roger F, Bertilsson S, Langenheder S, Osman OA, Gamfeldt L. Effects of multiple dimensions of bacterial diversity on functioning, stability and multifunctionality. Ecology. 2016;97:2716–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Shade A. Diversity is the question, not the answer. ISME J. 2017;11:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wertz S, Degrange V, Prosser JI, Poly F, Commeaux C, Guillaumaud N, et al. Decline of soil microbial diversity does not influence the resistance and resilience of key soil microbial functional groups following a model disturbance. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2211–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ives AR, Klug JL, Gross K. Stability and species richness in complex communities. Ecol Lett. 2000;3:399–411. [Google Scholar]
- 12. McCann KS. The diversity‐stability debate. Nature. 2000;405:228–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yachi S, Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1463–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Pecl GT, Araújo MB, Bell JD, Blanchard J, Bonebrake TC, Chen IC, et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well‐being. Science. 2017;355:eaai9214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:1104–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Loreau M, de Mazancourt C. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:106–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Okie JG, Van Horn DJ, Storch D, Barrett JE, Gooseff MN, Kopsova L, et al. Niche and metabolic principles explain patterns of diversity and distribution: theory and a case study with soil bacterial communities. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282:20142630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Barberán A, Ramirez KS, Leff JW, Bradford MA, Wall DH, Fierer N. Why are some microbes more ubiquitous than others? Predicting the habitat breadth of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:794–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ikeda DH, Max TL, Allan GJ, Lau MK, Shuster SM, Whitham TG. Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions. Global Change Biol. 2017;23:164–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2015;14:347–57. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M. Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biol. 2005;11:2234–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, et al. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:15–25. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Muller EE. Determining microbial niche breadth in the environment for better ecosystem fate predictions. mSystems. 2019;4:e00080‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Defriez EJ, Reuman DC. A global geography of synchrony for terrestrial vegetation. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2016;26:878–88. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Defriez EJ, Sheppard LW, Reid PC, Reuman DC. Climate change‐related regime shifts have altered spatial synchrony of plankton dynamics in the North Sea. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2016;22:2069–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gilbert B, MacDougall AS, Kadoya T, Akasaka M, Bennett JR, Lind EM, et al. Climate and local environment structure asynchrony and the stability of primary production in grasslands. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2020;29:1177–88. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sheppard LW, Bell JR, Harrington R, Reuman DC. Changes in large‐scale climate alter spatial synchrony of aphid pests. Nat Clim Chang. 2016;6:610–3. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Walter JA, Sheppard LW, Anderson TL, Kastens JH, Bjørnstad ON, Liebhold AM, et al. The geography of spatial synchrony. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:801–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hautier Y, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, et al. Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands. Nature. 2014;508:521–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wilcox KR, Tredennick AT, Koerner SE, Grman E, Hallett LM, Avolio ML, et al. Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:1534–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Blüthgen N, Simons NK, Jung K, Prati D, Renner SC, Boch S, et al. Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gonzalez A, Loreau M. The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40:393–414. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Maestre FT, Delgado‐Baquerizo M, Jeffries TC, Eldridge DJ, Ochoa V, Gozalo B, et al. Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15684–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Mancuso CP, Lee H, Abreu CI, Gore J, Khalil AS. Environmental fluctuations reshape an unexpected diversity‐disturbance relationship in a microbial community. eLife. 2021;10:e67175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Guo X, Zhou X, Hale L, Yuan M, Ning D, Feng J, et al. Climate warming accelerates temporal scaling of grassland soil microbial biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:612–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chen YJ, Leung PM, Wood JL, Bay SK, Hugenholtz P, Kessler AJ, et al. Metabolic flexibility allows bacterial habitat generalists to become dominant in a frequently disturbed ecosystem. ISME J. 2021;15:2986–3004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sriswasdi S, Yang CC, Iwasaki W. Generalist species drive microbial dispersion and evolution. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mills CG, Allen RJ, Blythe RA. Resource spectrum engineering by specialist species can shift the specialist‐generalist balance. Theor Ecol. 2020;13:149–63. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Granot I, Belmaker J. Niche breadth and species richness: correlation strength, scale and mechanisms. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2020;29:159–70. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Mariadassou M, Pichon S, Ebert D. Microbial ecosystems are dominated by specialist taxa. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:974–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hawkes CV, Keitt TH. Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:612–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Boulangeat I, Lavergne S, Van Es J, Garraud L, Thuiller W. Niche breadth, rarity and ecological characteristics within a regional flora spanning large environmental gradients. J Biogeogr. 2012;39:204–14. [Google Scholar]
- 43. de Mazancourt C, Isbell F, Larocque A, Berendse F, De Luca E, Grace JB, et al. Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:617–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wagg C, Hautier Y, Pellkofer S, Banerjee S, Schmid B, van der Heijden MG. Diversity and asynchrony in soil microbial communities stabilizes ecosystem functioning. eLife. 2021;10:e62813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yan Y, Connolly J, Liang M, Jiang L, Wang SP. Mechanistic links between biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and stability in a multi‐site grassland experiment. J Ecol. 2021;109:3370–8. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang Y, Loreau M, He N, Wang J, Pan Q, Bai Y, et al. Climate variability decreases species richness and community stability in a temperate grassland. Oecologia. 2018;188:183–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wang S, Isbell F, Deng W, Hong P, Dee LE, Thompson P, et al. How complementarity and selection affect the relationship between ecosystem functioning and stability. Ecology. 2021;102:e03347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Vázquez DP, Stevens RD. The latitudinal gradient in niche breadth: concepts and evidence. Am Nat. 2004;164:1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Shen Z, Fei S, Feng J, Liu Y, Liu Z, Tang Z, et al. Geographical patterns of community‐based tree species richness in Chinese mountain forests: the effects of contemporary climate and regional history. Ecography. 2012;35:1134–46. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wang P, Chen Y, Sun Y, Tan S, Zhang S, Wang Z, et al. Distinct biogeography of different fungal guilds and their associations with plant species richness in forest ecosystems. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:216. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Janzen DH. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am Nat. 1967;10:233–49. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Senft AR. Species diversity patterns at ecotones. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2009:1464569. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Currie DJ, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Field R, Guegan JF, Hawkins BA, et al. Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol Lett. 2004;7:1121–34. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, Bürgmann H, et al. Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ. Refining the stress‐gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol. 2009;97:199–205. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Piccardi P, Vessman B, Mitri S. Toxicity drives facilitation between 4 bacterial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:15979–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Armbruster WS. The specialization continuum in pollination systems: diversity of concepts and implications for ecology, evolution and conservation. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:88–100. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Guo X, Feng J, Shi Z, Zhou X, Yuan M, Tao X, et al. Climate warming leads to divergent succession of grassland microbial communities. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8:813–8. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Yuan MM, Guo X, Wu L, Zhang Y, Xiao N, Ning D, et al. Climate warming enhances microbial network complexity and stability. Nature Clim Chang. 2021;11:343–8. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Leff JW, Jones SE, Prober SM, Barberán A, Borer ET, Firn JL, et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:10967–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kuang J, Bates CT, Wan X, Ning D, Deng D, Shu W, et al. High historical variability weakens the effects of current climate differentiation on microbial community dissimilarity and assembly. Global Change Biol. 2021;27:5963–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Chen Y, Kuang J, Wang P, Shu W, Barberán A. Associations between human impacts and forest soil microbial communities. Elementa. 2020;8:005. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kilibarda M, Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Gräler B, Pebesma E, Perčec Tadić M, et al. Spatio‐temporal interpolation of daily temperatures for global land areas at 1 km resolution. J Geophys Res: Atmos. 2014;119:2294–313. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Katoh K, Standley DM. Mafft multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 ‐ approximately maximum‐likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker‐gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2‐feature‐classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:683–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Laliberté E, Legendre P. A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology. 2010;91:299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Lynch M, Gabriel W. Environmental tolerance. Am Nat. 1987;129:283–303. [Google Scholar]
- 71. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2019)
- 72. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5‐7; 2020.
- 73. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Jr. , Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 2007;88:2783–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Supporting information.
Data Availability Statement
The representative sequences of bacterial OTUs and their abundances in each sample have been deposited in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17711495).