Skip to main content
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management logoLink to The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
. 2024 Mar 15;15(3):5782–5785. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15035

Impact of Sarcoidosis on In-hospital Outcomes Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis

Min Choon Tan 1,2,, Qi Xuan Ang 3, Yong Hao Yeo 4, Boon Jian San 5, Ramzi Ibrahim 6, Sze Jia Ng 7, Jian Liang Tan 8, Jasjit Walia 9, Addi Suleiman 9, Joaquim Correia 9
PMCID: PMC10994093  PMID: 38584749

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a disease that involves multiple organs, including the cardiovascular system. While cardiac sarcoidosis has been increasingly recognized, the impact of sarcoidosis on atrial fibrillation (AF) is not well established. This study aimed to analyze the impact of sarcoidosis on in-hospital outcomes among patients who were admitted for a primary diagnosis of AF. Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted for AF between 2017–2020. We stratified the cohort into two groups depending on the presence of sarcoidosis diagnosis. The in-hospital outcomes were assessed between the two groups via propensity score analysis. A total of 1031 (0.27%) AF patients with sarcoidosis and 387,380 (99.73%) AF patients without sarcoidosis were identified in our analysis. Our propensity score analysis of 1031 (50%) patients with AF and sarcoidosis and 1031 (50%) patients with AF but without sarcoidosis revealed comparable outcomes in early mortality (1.55% vs. 1.55%, P = 1.000), prolonged hospital stay (9.51% vs. 9.70%, P = .874), non-home discharge (7.95% vs. 9.89%, P = .108), and 30-day readmission (13.29% vs. 13.69%, P = .797) between the two groups. The cumulative cost of hospitalization was also similar in both groups ($12,632.25 vs. $12,532.63, P = .839). The in-hospital adverse event rates were comparable in both groups. Sarcoidosis is not a risk factor for poorer in-hospital outcomes following AF admission. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the current guideline for AF management in patients with concomitant sarcoidosis and AF.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, hospital outcomes, sarcoidosis

Background

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disorder that affects multiple organs.1 The deposition of granulomas in cardiac tissue may predispose an individual to atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, conduction system abnormalities, and heart failure.25 Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common type of supraventricular arrhythmia in patients with sarcoidosis, with a prevalence of 12%–18%.6,7 However, data on the impact of sarcoidosis on in-hospital outcomes among those with AF are not well established.

Methods

We queried the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database to analyze patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted for AF between January and November during each calendar year from 2017–2020. We stratified the cohort into two groups based on the presence or absence of sarcoidosis diagnosis using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis code D86. The main outcomes examined were: (1) in-hospital adverse events, (2) length of stay, (3) discharge disposition, (4) 30-day readmission rate, (5) early mortality (mortality during index hospitalization and readmission), and (6) cumulative cost of hospitalization. As the Nationwide Readmissions Database provides de-identified patient data and is publicly accessible, institutional review board approval was not required for this study.

Continuous data were summarized as mean with standard deviation values or median with interquartile range (Q1, Q3) values depending on their distribution; differences between groups were tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Categorical data were summarized as counts and percentages; differences between groups were tested using Pearson’s chi-squared test. All tests were two-sided with P ≤ .05, indicating statistical significance. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). To identify the association between sarcoidosis and in-hospital outcomes, weighted propensity score matching was first performed with a caliper of 0.2 with a nearest-neighbor ratio of 1:1 for each hospital outcome. Then, all variables outlined in Table 1, including sarcoidosis, were included in the univariable analysis to study their association with the outcome variables listed in Table 2. Those relevant variables with P < .1 were included in a multivariable model for conditional logistic regression analyses.

Table 1:

Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Cohort

AF Patients with Sarcoidosis
AF Patients Without Sarcoidosis
P Value
n % n %
No. of admissions 1031 0.3 387,380 99.7
Baseline characteristics
 Age, mean (SD), years 67.70 (11.43) 71.63 (12.45) <.01
 Female sex 630 61.1 200,145 51.7 <.01
 Anemia 45 4.4 16,178 4.2 .76
 Catheter ablation for AF 50 4.9 14,429 3.7 .06
 CHA2DS2-VASc score, points 3 (2) 3 (2) .14
 Chronic kidney diseases 266 25.8 76,206 19.7 <.01
 Chronic liver disease 45 4.4 12,604 3.3 .05
 Chronic pulmonary disease 376 36.5 94,541 24.4 <.01
 Coagulation disorder 58 5.6 18,700 4.8 .23
 Coronary artery disease 293 28.4 127,991 33.0 <.01
 Heart failure 205 19.9 55,560 14.3 <.01
 Hyperlipidemia 547 53.1 213,010 55.0 .21
 Hypertension 841 81.6 314,372 81.2 .73
 Malignancy 52 5.0 19,769 5.1 .93
 Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy 320 31.0 86,911 22.4 <.01
 Obstructive sleep apnea 266 25.8 70,398 18.2 <.01
 Peripheral vascular disease 131 12.7 39,930 10.3 .01
 Prior myocardial infarction 77 7.5 34,050 8.8 .13
 Prior coronary artery bypass graft 40 3.9 26,778 6.9 <.01
 Prior ICD 68 6.6 11,625 3.0 <.01
 Prior PPM 65 6.3 26,288 6.8 .54
 Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 88 8.5 41,436 10.7 .03
 Prior stroke/transient ischemic attack 100 9.7 49,395 12.8 <.01
 Pulmonary hypertension 172 16.7 33,450 8.6 <.01
 Valvular heart disease 203 19.7 82,869 21.4 .18
 Charlson Comorbidity Index (%), points <.01
  0 149 14.4 90,095 23.3
  1 236 22.9 98,240 25.3
  ≥2 646 62.7 199,045 51.4
 Elixhauser Comorbidity Score, points <.01
  <4 248 24.1 129,181 33.3
  ≥4 783 75.9 258,199 66.7

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PPM, permanent pacemaker; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2:

In-hospital Outcomes of AF Patients with Sarcoidosis Versus Without Sarcoidosis via Propensity Score Analysis

AF Patients with Sarcoidosis (n = 1031)
AF Patients Without Sarcoidosis (n = 1031)
P Value
% %
Hospital outcomes
 Early mortality 1.55 1.55 1.000
 Prolonged hospital stay 9.51 9.70 .874
 Non-home discharge 7.95 9.89 .108
 30-day readmission 13.29 13.69 .797
 Cost of hospitalization $12 632.25 $12 532.63 .839
In-hospital adverse events
 Acute heart failure 19.50 20.63 .456
 Cardiogenic shock 0.48 0.68 .566
 Cardiac arrest 0.48 0.48 1.000
 Cerebral infarction 0.57 0.45 .706
 Pulmonary edema 1.36 0.58 .082
 Acute kidney injury 12.71 12.42 .836
 Venous thromboembolism 0.97 0.78 .638

Abbreviation: AF, atrial fibrillation.

Results

We identified a total of 388,411 patients hospitalized with AF in the United States from 2017–2020. Our respective cohort consisted of 1031 (0.27%) AF patients with sarcoidosis and 387,380 (99.73%) AF patients without sarcoidosis. Table 1 depicts the baseline characteristics of our patient cohort. AF patients with sarcoidosis were younger and had greater prevalence rates of chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, heart failure, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, obstructive sleep apnea, peripheral vascular disease, prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement, and pulmonary hypertension. A propensity score analysis was performed, which yielded 1031 (50%) patients with AF and sarcoidosis and 1031 (50%) patients with AF but without sarcoidosis. There was no difference in early mortality (1.55% vs. 1.37%, P = 1.00), prolonged hospital stay ≥7 days (9.51% vs. 9.03%, P = .87), non-home discharge (7.95% vs. 11.18%, P = .11), or 30-day readmission (13.29% vs. 12.86%, P = .80) when compared among patients with and without sarcoidosis who were admitted for AF (Table 2). The cumulative cost of hospitalization was also similar in both groups ($12,632.25 vs. $12,532.63, P = .84). There was no significant difference in rates of in-hospital adverse events between both groups, including acute heart failure (16.68% vs. 17.05%, P = .46), cardiogenic shock (0.48% vs. 0.47%, P = .57), cardiac arrest (0.48% vs. 0.23%, P = 1.00), cerebral infarct (0.48% vs. 0.30%, P = .71), pulmonary edema (1.36% vs. 0.79%, P = .08), acute kidney injury (12.71% vs. 11.63%, P = .84), and venous thromboembolism (0.97% vs. 0.83%, P = .64). Further subgroup analysis revealed that sarcoidosis was not independently associated with greater odds for any in-hospital adverse events among patients with AF (Table 3). Additional subgroup analysis demonstrated decreases of 1.21% and 7.57% in the yearly AF-related admission among the sarcoidosis and non-sarcoidosis cohorts, respectively.

Table 3.

Analysis of Hospital Outcomes of AF Patients with Versus Without Sarcoidosis

OR Lower CI Upper CI P Value
Early mortality 1.00 0.48 2.10 1.000
Prolonged hospital stay (≥7 days) 0.98 0.71 1.33 .874
Non-home discharge 0.77 0.56 1.06 .108
30-day readmission 0.97 0.75 1.24 .797
Acute heart failure 0.89 0.67 1.20 .456
Cardiogenic shock 0.71 0.23 2.25 .566
Cardiac arrest 1.00 0.29 3.45 1.000
Ischemic stroke 1.33 0.30 5.96 .706
Pulmonary edema 2.33 0.90 6.07 .082
Acute kidney injury 1.03 0.78 1.35 .836
Venous thromboembolism 1.25 0.49 3.17 .638

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

This study is the first to provide insights on in-hospital adverse events and 30-day readmission rates among patients with and without sarcoidosis who were admitted for AF in a real-world setting. Despite an increased risk of AF and greater comorbidity burden among patients with sarcoidosis, our study suggests that patients with sarcoidosis and AF did not experience poorer in-hospital outcomes when compared to patients without sarcoidosis.6 AF in sarcoidosis was hypothesized to be caused by atrium granuloma leading to scarring and by sarcoid involvement of the lungs and left ventricle, resulting in increased end-diastolic pressure.6,8 The non-inferior outcomes observed in sarcoidosis provide a reflection of contemporary real-world data on the effectiveness of AF management in sarcoidosis by early diagnosis and treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis as well as early intervention, including rate control, rhythm control, or even catheter ablation, as per guideline in all AF patients regardless of the underlying etiology.5,9,10 Our study also demonstrates that sarcoidosis is not an independent risk factor of in-hospital adverse events during hospitalization.

Limitations

It is important to acknowledge a few main limitations of this study. First, as with most large administrative database studies, the main limitation includes potential miscoding in primary diagnoses and under-reporting of secondary diagnoses. Next, the out-of-hospital deaths that occurred prior to readmission were not recorded, which limits our early mortality to in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, clinical information, including the duration of AF, cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis, and anti-arrhythmic medications, was not available in the database, limiting our attempts to explore the impact of these clinical variables on hospital outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that sarcoidosis is not associated with poorer hospital outcomes among patients hospitalized for AF. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the current guideline for AF management in patients with concomitant sarcoidosis and AF.

References

  • 1.Rybicki BA, Major M, Popovich J, Jr, Maliarik MJ, Iannuzzi MC. Racial differences in sarcoidosis incidence: a 5-year study in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(3):234–241. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Birnie DH, Nery PB, Ha AC, Beanlands RS. Cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(4):411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cacoub P, Chapelon-Abric C, Resche-Rigon M, Saadoun D, Desbois AC, Biard L. Cardiac sarcoidosis: a long term follow up study. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chapelon-Abric C, Sene D, Saadoun D, et al. Cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis, therapeutic management and prognostic factors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;110(8–9):456–465. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(7):1305–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenthal DG, Fang CD, Groh CA, et al. Association between sarcoidosis and atrial fibrillation among californians using medical care. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(12):1620–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Viles-Gonzalez JF, Pastori L, Fischer A, Wisnivesky JP, Goldman MG, Mehta D. Supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis prevalence, predictors, and clinical implications. Chest. 2013;143(4):1085–1090. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mehta D, Willner JM, Akhrass PR. Atrial fibrillation in cardiac sarcoidosis. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015;8(4):1288. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weng W, Wiefels C, Chakrabarti S, et al. Atrial arrhythmias in clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis: incidence, burden, predictors, and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(17):e017086. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management are provided here courtesy of Mediasphere Medical

RESOURCES