Skip to main content
Brain logoLink to Brain
. 2023 Oct 3;147(4):1377–1388. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad338

Noradrenergic alterations in Parkinson’s disease: a combined 11C-yohimbine PET/neuromelanin MRI study

Chloé Laurencin 1,2, Sophie Lancelot 3,4, Sarah Brosse 5, Inés Mérida 6, Jérôme Redouté 7, Elise Greusard 8, Ludovic Lamberet 9, Véronique Liotier 10, Didier Le Bars 11, Nicolas Costes 12, Stéphane Thobois 13,14, Philippe Boulinguez 15, Bénédicte Ballanger 16,
PMCID: PMC10994534  PMID: 37787503

Abstract

Degeneration of the noradrenergic system is now considered a pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease, but little is known about its consequences in terms of parkinsonian manifestations. Here, we evaluated two aspects of the noradrenergic system using multimodal in vivo imaging in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls: the pigmented cell bodies of the locus coeruleus with neuromelanin sensitive MRI; and the density of α2-adrenergic receptors (ARs) with PET using 11C-yohimbine.

Thirty patients with Parkinson’s disease and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were included. The characteristics of the patients’ symptoms were assessed using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Patients showed reduced neuromelanin signal intensity in the locus coeruleus compared with controls and diminished 11C-yohimbine binding in widespread cortical regions, including the motor cortex, as well as in the insula, thalamus and putamen. Clinically, locus coeruleus neuronal loss was correlated with motor (bradykinesia, motor fluctuations, tremor) and non-motor (fatigue, apathy, constipation) symptoms. A reduction of α2-AR availability in the thalamus was associated with tremor, while a reduction in the putamen, the insula and the superior temporal gyrus was associated with anxiety.

These results highlight a multifaceted alteration of the noradrenergic system in Parkinson’s disease since locus coeruleus and α2-AR degeneration were found to be partly uncoupled. These findings raise important issues about noradrenergic dysfunction that may encourage the search for new drugs targeting this system, including α2-ARs, for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, noradrenaline, PET/MRI, locus coeruleus, α2-adrenergic receptors


Laurencin et al. use hybrid PET/MRI to simultaneously assess α2-adrenoceptor availability and locus coeruleus cell density in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The results reveal widespread noradrenergic alterations that are associated with non-motor symptoms as well as with bradykinesia, motor fluctuations and tremor.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized mostly by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. However, the neurodegenerative process also extends to other neurotransmission systems such as those for serotonin or acetylcholine and noradrenaline, which contribute to motor and non-motor symptoms.1-4

The modulations and interactions of the complex interconnected non-dopaminergic networks with dopaminergic circuits are far from being fully understood, and the cascade of perturbations in these interconnected systems and associated circuits is still a central issue. Among these neurotransmitter networks, the noradrenergic system is probably the least well-known.5,6-8 The direct roles of the noradrenergic system in various cognitive functions are well documented.9 These include specific functions like vigilance, attention and executive control, as well as more transversal functions like learning, cognitive flexibility and working memory,8 or even more general roles in adaptive adjustments in gain that serve to optimize performance.10 It is important to point out that there is a major gap in our understanding of how these modulations apply to the motor circuits.11 The alteration of these functions might contribute to various parkinsonian manifestations.8 However, this is often under-recognized, and the association with specific symptoms, in particular with the motor manifestations of PD, is still unclear.

The effect of noradrenergic dysfunction in the manifestations of PD might also be related to its antiparkinsonian and neuroprotective properties.12 The loss of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC), the sole source of noradrenaline to the neocortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and thalamus (see Benarroch13 for a review), which is estimated to be between 20% and 90%, precedes and exceeds the characteristic loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.14 There is evidence mainly based on animal studies that noradrenergic loss may enhance neurotoxic damage to nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons,15,16 and that, conversely, restoration of the damaged LC system positively influences the recovery of degenerated dopaminergic neurons.17,18 Taken together, these observations suggest that enhancing noradrenergic neurotransmission may facilitate both specific functions affected by the disease and the recovery of dopaminergic neurons.19 Yet, therapeutic strategies targeting this system in PD are currently limited.7,20

The use of α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists has recently been considered a major possible target21 as it might potentiate noradrenaline availability by blocking presynaptic α2-ARs whose normal function is to regulate noradrenaline release.22-24 However, direct in vivo evidence of α2-AR alteration in parkinsonian manifestations is still lacking. This critical lack of knowledge, accompanied by substantial controversies about the neurofunctional bases of the noradrenergic system and its alteration in PD,25,26 is mainly due to the lack of specific in vivo molecular imaging tools in humans. To date, in vivo imaging studies have only used presynaptic noradrenergic tracers of noradrenergic transporters with 11C-MeNER. These studies have shown reduced tracer uptake, suggesting a diminished density of noradrenergic terminals, mainly in the thalamus, hypothalamus, LC and raphe nuclei.2,27 Regarding α2-ARs, most of our knowledge derives from animal studies or post-mortem samples of human brains.28,29 Autoradiography studies suggest an alteration in α2-ARs in different brain regions (thalamus,30 cerebellum,31 hypothalamus32 and prefrontal cortex33). Here, we take advantage of recent methodological developments, allowing in vivo imaging of the noradrenergic system in humans with the novel PET radiotracer 11C-yohimbine,34-36 now available for use in large samples of human subjects to map differences in α2-AR distribution between parkinsonian patients and matched controls. 11C-yohimbine binds with high selectivity to all α2-AR subtypes.37 It is displaced when there is competition at the receptor with endogenous noradrenaline as shown by preclinical studies reporting reduced receptor binding under unlabelled yohimbine challenge, amphetamine administration or acute vagus nerve stimulation in preclinical studies37-39 and human studies reporting increased receptor binding after clonidine administration.34

The objectives of this study were to assess two aspects of noradrenergic neurodegeneration in PD using hybrid MRI/PET imaging: lesions of pigmented cell bodies of the LC with neuromelanin-sensitive MRI and alterations in α2-AR density with 11C-yohimbine PET. Simultaneously assessing noradrenergic terminals (with PET) and LC cell bodies (with MRI) is of primary importance given that their respective deficits may be uncoupled.40 To inform the disputed pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease, correlations between the observed noradrenergic dysfunctions and the standard clinical measures of PD have been tested systematically.

Materials and methods

Participants

The demographics and clinical characteristics of the participants are listed in Table 1. We enrolled 30 PD patients and 30 healthy controls matched for age, gender and global cognitive functioning using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Patients had been diagnosed with PD for at least 1 year in accordance with Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria.41 The MDS Revised Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) was used to assess PD symptoms, including separate assessments of non-motor symptoms (UPDRS-I), daily activity (UPDRS-II), motor symptoms (UPDRS-III) and motor complications (UPDRS-IV).42 In addition, the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) was used to evaluate quality of life.43 All patients were assessed in the ‘ON’ state with their usual antiparkinsonian medication. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was calculated according to previously published conversion rules.44 Most of the patients with PD were in the early and middle stage of their disease with a mean Hoehn and Yahr score of 1.8 and MDS-UPDRS-III score in the ‘ON’ state of 17.7 (±12.3). Exclusion criteria were medications that interfere with the noradrenergic system, a diagnosis of other neurological or psychiatric disorders and the presence of major dyskinesia or tremor for technical imaging purposes. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local Ethical Committee in Biomedical Research (No. CPP 19_01_02/No. EudraCT 2018-003999-13). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of participants

Healthy controls Parkinsonian patients Statistics
n 30 30
Sex, female/male 12/18 12/18
Age, years 60.3 ± 8 60.1 ± 7.5 nsa
MoCA 27.9 ± 1.5 27.9 ± 2 nsb
Parkinson’s disease characteristics
Disease duration, years 6.5 ± 4
LEDD, mg/day 1006 ± 703
Hoehn and Yahr 1.8 ± 0.4
PDQ39 39.6 ± 22.1
MDS-UPDRS I 8.5 ± 5.1
MDS-UPDRS II 7.1 ± 4.3
MDS-UPDRS III 17.7 ± 12.3
MDS-UPDRS IV 2.3 ± 3

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. LEDD = levodopa equivalent daily dose; MDS = Movement Disorder Society; MoCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ns = not significant; PDQ = Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

aParametric test (Student’s t-test).

bNon-parametric test (Wilcoxon test).

MRI

MRI data were acquired on a Biograph mMR (hybrid MRI/PET) including a whole brain high-resolution anatomical 3D T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence in the sagittal plane (matrix size 256 × 256 × 176, voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm3) and a 2D axial turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence (in plane resolution 0.4 × 0.4 mm2, slice thickness 3 mm, matrix size 464 × 512 × 15), which provided a neuromelanin-sensitive MRI.

Voxel-based morphometry analysis

To exclude the possibility that structural degeneration affects the results of 11C-yohimbine binding, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was conducted. The standard VBM preprocessing protocol of the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT12, http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/) running on Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12; Welcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London, UK) was employed. Briefly, each 3D T1-weighted image was bias-corrected and segmented into grey matter, white matter and CSF tissue classes using SPM’s unified segmentation function. The grey matter segmentation probability maps were spatially transformed to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space using the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM)-152 template according to the Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra (DARTEL) approach with default settings in 1.5 mm cubic resolution and then smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 8 mm full-width at half-maximum. Lastly, to correct for individual differences in brain size, total intracranial volume (TIV) was estimated for each subject using a Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT)12 interface (Statistical Analyses—Estimate TIV) as the sum of the grey matter, white matter and CSF volumes.

Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI analysis

To calculate signal intensity in the LC, an approach similar to that published by García-Lorenzo and colleagues6 was implemented. First, two regions were drawn manually on the T1 MRI high-resolution MNI template using FSLeyes (FSL v5.0.11, FMRIB, Oxford, UK). These two regions (one for each side) were defined as large 3D bounding boxes and placed around the hyperintense voxels at the lateral border of the fourth ventricle so that they included the LC but excluded the substantia nigra, which also contains neuromelanin.45 In addition, we used the central reference mask freely available to normalize the intensity of the LC.46 These three regions were then wrapped and resampled onto the subject’s neuromelanin-sensitive T1 image using SPM12. Using FSL functions, the LC was defined as the area of the 10 voxels with the brightest intensity within each bounding box. We considered the intensity of the LC as the average of the intensities of the 10-voxel region (Fig. 1). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for each LC (right and left) as CNRLC = (SLC − SREF) / SREF, where SLC and SREF correspond to the mean signal intensity of the LC and the reference region, respectively. Normalization of the LC signal to a central reference region (pons) to calculate the CNR by relative difference has been the most commonly used and recommended method in previous studies.47

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Data pipeline. 11C-yohimbine and locus coeruleus (LC) neuromelanin data were acquired simultaneously from hybrid PET/MRI. Left: 11C-yohimbine non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) parametric maps were used for contrasting the healthy control and Parkinson’s disease groups. The outcome of the voxel-based analysis allowed the identification of four significant clusters that provided the region of interest (ROI) for analysing the links between 11C-yohimbine BPND and clinical scores in patients. Right: LC identification was performed for each individual from neuromelanin-sensitive T1 images with a three-step procedure. First, the ROIs were drawn manually as large 3D bounding boxes in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, then wrapped and resampled onto the subject’s native space. Finally, the clusters of connected voxels with the highest signal intensity were selected to define LC areas. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the LC and the reference region was calculated to estimate LC signal intensity, and these values were referred to the clinical scores of the PD patients.

11C-yohimbine PET

Radiosynthesis of 11C-yohimbine was performed as previously described.37 The radiochemical purities of syntheses used for the study were greater than 95%, with molar activities of 85 ± 30 GBq/μmol at the end of synthesis. All subjects received an intravenous bolus injection of 370 MBq ± 10% of 11C-yohimbine. List-mode PET data were acquired over the 90 min from the injection of the tracer. MRI data were acquired simultaneously.

Raw PET data were corrected for motion48 and then rebinned into 24 time-frame (variable length frames: 8 × 15 s, 3 × 60 s, 5 × 120 s, 1 × 300 s, 7 × 600 s) sinograms for dynamic reconstruction. Sinograms were corrected for scatter, randoms, normalization and attenuation.49 Images were reconstructed using 3D ordinary Poisson-ordered subsets expectation maximization (OP-OSEM 3D), incorporating the system point spread function using three iterations of 21 subsets. Reconstructions were performed with a zoom of 2 in a matrix of 172 × 172 voxels, yielding a voxel size of 2.03 × 2.03 × 2.08 mm3, with 4 mm 3D post-reconstruction Gaussian filtering. Regional time activity curves were extracted based on labelling of structural brain regions obtained with multi-atlas propagation with enhanced registration (MAPER)50 methodology and the 83-region Hammers atlas.5111C-yohimbine non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) parametric maps were then generated using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM), with the corpus callosum as reference region.34 PET parametric images were spatially normalized to the MNI space with parameters derived from the individual T1 MRI.

Statistics

Statistical analyses of demographic data were performed using Rstudio (https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio). All data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Levene test for homogeneity of variance. Independent samples t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, as appropriate, were used to compare demographic group mean differences. We assessed group differences in the CNRLC with an analysis of covariance accounting for age and sex as covariates. A two-tailed t-test was generated in the SPM12 toolbox to assess between-group differences in grey matter concentration using family-wise error (FWE) correction with a threshold of P < 0.05. The extend threshold was set to 100 voxels and total intracranial volume was used as covariate of no interest.

SPM12 in MATLAB 2020a was used for between-group comparisons of 11C-yohimbine BPND at the voxel level (two-sample t-test) controlling for age and gender. Spatially normalized parametric images were smoothed with an 8-mm Gaussian filter, and an average cortical grey-matter mask was used for explicit masking within the SPM software. The voxel-level analysis threshold was P < 0.001 (uncorrected), and subsequently a FWE cluster-level correction at P < 0.05 was applied.

We assessed the association of MRI and PET signals and interrogated non-parametric (partial) correlations between CNRLC and 11C-yohimbine BPND values extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) employing the Spearman correlation test adjusted for age and sex.

We assessed the links between both noradrenergic markers and specific clinical characteristics within our group of PD patients using partial correlation coefficients adjusted for age and sex. Indeed, it is known that both variables influence the phenotypic expression of PD,52 that healthy ageing influences neuromelanin accumulation in the LC53 and 11C-yohimbine BPND might be influenced by gender.36 All correlations were two-sided and significance was set to P < 0.05.

Results

Altered locus coeruleus integrity in patients with Parkinson’s disease

PD patients had lower CNRLC than healthy controls [0.29 ± 0.04 versus 0.31 ± 0.04, respectively; F(1,99) = 5.72, P = 0.019]. The CNR was higher in the left than right LC [0.32 ± 0.03 versus 0.28 ± 0.04, respectively; F(1,99) = 22.02, P < 0.001]. No significant effect of gender and no interaction were found (P > 0.3). Because of the effect related to side, all other analyses were conducted for both sides separately.

Reduced 11C-yohimbine binding in Parkinson’s disease patients

Reduced binding of 11C-yohimbine was observed in the PD group compared with the healthy controls and found in four significant clusters, including mainly cortical regions across all lobes and the insula, the putamen and the thalamus (Table 2 and Fig. 2). VBM was additionally employed to assess grey matter volume loss in PD patients compared with controls as a potential confounding factor within the ROI. No significant effect was found between the two groups using FWE with a corrected P-value <0.05 in the t-test.

Table 2.

Statistical parametric mapping results of the two samples t-test on 11C-yohimbine binding

Areas BA Side MNI coordinates t-value P corr cluster Cluster size
x y z
Reduced 11C-yohimbine binding in Parkinson’s disease patients versus healthy controls
Angular gyrus 40 R 46 −38 52 5.37 0.000 3775
Superior temporal gyrus 22 R 52 −12 0 5.08
Postcentral gyrus (opercular) 48 R 50 −8 16 5.06
Inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis) 44 R 46 14 10 4.22
Insula 13 R 36 −12 6 4.18
Precentral gyrus 4 R 40 −26 58 3.97
Putamen R 30 −10 6 3.90
Postcentral gyrus 3 R 52 −14 30 3.73
Thalamus (PuM) R 6 −24 4 5.18 0.000 1354
Insula 13 L −32 −6 16 4.59
Precentral gyrus (premotor cortex) 6 L −48 −4 12 3.84
Posterior cingulate cortex (dorsal) 31 R 2 −36 40 4.95 0.000 3836
Superior parietal cortex 7 R 18 −76 40 4.55
Lateral occipital cortex 19 L −10 −82 36 4.43
Cuneus 18 R 4 −80 34 4.41
Posterior cingulate cortex (ventral) 23 R 8 −52 10 4.37
Posterior cingulate cortex (mid cingulate) 23 R 8 −20 46 4.28
Lateral occipital cortex 19 R 32 −80 26 4.27
Lingual gyrus 18 L −6 −72 0 4.07
Precentral gyrus 6 R 4 −22 60 3.89
Lingual gyrus 17 R 4 −66 12 3.87
Precuneus 31 L −6 −52 38 3.80
Precuneus 31 R 2 −56 42 3.80
Superior parietal cortex 7 L −32 −50 56 4.41 0.013 614
Angular gyrus 40 L −42 −52 46 4.23
Postcentral gyrus 3 L −50 −14 38 3.76
Postcentral gyrus 4 L −36 −28 56 3.66

BA = Brodmann area; L = left; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; PuM = medial pulvinar nucleus; P corr = corrected P-value; R = right.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Statistical parametric maps comparing Parkinson’s disease patients to control subjects. A decrease in 11C-yohimbine binding was observed in patients with Parkinson’s disease compared with healthy control subjects. M1 = primary motor cortex; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; SMA = supplementary motor area; STG = superior temporal gyrus.

Correlation between α2-adrenergic receptor availability and locus coeruleus MRI data

No significant correlation was found between regional 11C-yohimbine BPND values and CNRLC (all P > 0.1).

Correlation of neuromelanin MRI data with clinical scores in Parkinson’s disease

Clinical characteristics

CNRLC correlated negatively with LEDD (right: r = −0.52, P = 0.011 and left: r = −0.49, P = 0.017).

Non-motor scores

CNRLC correlated negatively with UPDRS-I total score (right: r = −0.43, P = 0.035 and left: r = −0.47, P = 0.02). Within this scale, we investigated which items mostly drove this effect and found that the apathy sub-score was negatively correlated with the right and left CNRLC (r = −0.48, P = 0.018 and r = −0.46, P = 0.025, respectively), constipation and light-headedness on standing sub-scores correlated negatively with the left CNRLC (r = −0.52, P = 0.008 and r = −0.47, P = 0.02, respectively), and the fatigue sub-score showed significant negative correlation with the right CNRLC (r = −0.48, P = 0.017).

Motor scores

Although we did not observe any significant correlation between CNRLC and UPDRS-II and -III total scores (all P > 0.1), we also specifically explored the relationship between CNRLC and rest tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Those were calculated using the following items for MDS-UPDRS-III: rest tremor, 3.17; rigidity, 3.3; bradykinesia, 3.4–3.8. Interestingly, the left CNRLC correlated negatively with the bradykinesia sub-score (r = −0.42, P = 0.043), while a trend in the right side was also observed (r = −0.39, P = 0.056) and the right CNRLC correlated positively with the tremor sub-score (r = 0.45, P = 0.026). Finally, we also found that the left CNRLC correlated negatively with the UPDRS-IV score (r = −0.44, P = 0.03) with a trend in the right side (r = −0.38, P = 0.069). Interestingly, this effect was driven mostly by the motor fluctuation sub-score (sum of items 4.3 and 4.4), which showed a significant negative correlation with the left and right CNRLC (r = −0.43, P = 0.035 and r = −0.41, P = 0.044, respectively), while such correlations were not observed for the dyskinesia sub-score (sum of items 4.1 and 4.2) (all P > 0.1).

Correlation of α2-adrenergic receptor PET data with clinical scores in Parkinson’s disease

We found no correlation between 11C-yohimbine BPND values in the ROI derived from the between-group SPM contrast and the total scores of the MDS-UPDRS scales. However, significant correlations were found with sub-scores within the different sections of the scale.

Non-motor scores

The item assessing anxiety in the UPDRS-I part correlated negatively with 11C-yohimbine BPND values in three regions within the right hemisphere: the putamen (r = −0.50, P = 0.008), the insula (r = −0.44, P = 0.02) and the superior temporal gyrus (r = −0.41, P = 0.034).

Motor scores

The item assessing rest tremor in the UPDRS-III part correlated negatively with 11C-yohimbine BPND values in the right thalamus (r = −0.46, P = 0.015). In other words, the lower the binding in the thalamus, the more the patients suffered from tremor.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated two aspects of the noradrenergic system using multimodal in vivo imaging in PD patients and healthy controls with hybrid MRI/PET: the density of pigmented cell bodies of the LC with neuromelanin sensitive MRI and the availability of the α2-ARs with 11C-yohimbine PET. Both show marked reductions in signal intensity in patients, confirming that noradrenergic damage is profound and widespread in PD. Clinical, behavioural and anatomical data suggest, however, that noradrenergic dysfunction is multifaceted and may involve different circuits underlying specific motor and non-motor symptoms.

Noradrenergic system integrity in Parkinson’s disease

The reduction in signal intensity within the LC in PD patients confirmed previous MRI studies2,40,54-57 and provided a robust and replicable in vivo indication of the loss of pigmented LC neurons previously suggested in post-mortem histological studies.58-60 On the contrary, there has been only very sparse evidence about the loss of α2-ARs in PD patients reported, including only one in vitro autoradiography study reporting a decrease in density of the prefrontal cortex33 and one preliminary in vivo study using 11C-yohimbine in a small group of PD patients reporting a global reduction in 11C-yohimbine distribution volume in the temporal, parietal and occipital cortices, the insula and the cingulate gyrus.61 Our data provide a precise mapping of 11C-yohimbine binding reduction in PD patients (Fig. 2). Within the parietal lobe, the angular gyrus, the superior parietal lobule and the postcentral gyrus are especially affected. The occipital cortex also shows multiple sources of binding differences both in the primary and associative visual cortices. In the frontal lobe, only motor structures (primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area and premotor cortex) and the inferior frontal gyrus revealed binding reduction in patients. The temporal lobe seems also to be relatively preserved, since only one region in the superior temporal gyrus showed group differences. Medially, the posterior cingulate/precuneus region is particularly affected. Finally, binding reduction in PD also concerns the insula, the putamen and the thalamus (Fig. 2). This latter observation was in good agreement with previous post-mortem and animal studies showing severe reductions of noradrenaline levels in almost all subregions of the thalamus.30,62

Interpreting 11C-yohimbine binding reduction is not straightforward. Indeed, as α2-ARs are located both pre- and postsynaptically,63,64 the decrease in 11C-yohimbine binding could reflect both a reduction of presynaptic α2-ARs due to the diminished innervation caused by the degeneration of noradrenergic neurons and/or a reduction in the availability of postsynaptic α2-ARs, which can be relatively independent of the degeneration of noradrenergic neurons (as observed for the dopaminergic system).65 The former hypothesis predicted strong correlations between neuromelanin MRI and 11C-yohimbine PET signals. Our results were not consistent with this prediction. They were rather reminiscent of the conclusion obtained from 11C-MeNER—a marker of noradrenaline transporter availability—PET studies that deficits in noradrenergic terminals and LC cell bodies are partly uncoupled.2,40 It seems that the number of noradrenergic cells in the LC would be a major determinant of α2-AR density only in the LC itself.66 Our data are in line with the overall hypothesis according to which monoaminergic receptors undergo adaptive changes in PD that make the availability of their receptors non-proportional to the extent of neuronal death of the corresponding cell bodies.65,67 It is therefore essential to disentangle, within the global clinical picture, the symptoms that might be more related to the loss of α2-ARs and/or to the loss of noradrenergic cells in the LC.

Non-motor symptoms

Fatigue

Fatigue was found to be associated with LC neuronal loss. This is in line with the idea that fatigue results from the disruption of nondopaminergic pathways, including the noradrenergic system.68-70 This is not incompatible with the hypothesis that fatigue in PD is also associated with serotoninergic dysfunction in prefrontal-basal ganglia and limbic circuits.71 Indeed, it is well known that there are strong interactions between the noradrenergic and serotoninergic systems (mainly through the LC-dorsal raphe nucleus connection),72-74 suggesting that both are likely to contribute to the appearance of the symptom. However, the argument that fatigue characterizes a specific serotoninergic phenotype of PD is based on associations between fatigue and other non-motor symptoms related to the degeneration of serotoninergic pathways (apathy, anxiety, sleep problems and daytime sleepiness)75 that are most often moderate69 and that are not all reported in the present study, as only apathy was also found to be associated with LC neuronal loss. Anxiety was associated with a reduction of α2-AR availability in the putamen, insula and superior temporal gyrus but not with a reduction in signal intensity within the LC. Yet, neither LC neuronal loss nor α2-AR availability was found to account for sleep disorders. This observation is in line with several pharmacological studies of physical exercise in healthy humans suggesting that the role of the serotoninergic system in central fatigue might be overestimated,76 while the role of the noradrenergic system might conversely be underestimated.77 In addition, given that fatigue is a non-dopaminergic symptom, the fact that methylphenidate—a reuptake inhibitor of dopamine and noradrenaline—is proposed as a treatment for fatigue in PD78,79 is also consistent with the idea that the pathophysiological mechanism leading to fatigue involves the degeneration of the noradrenergic system. Beyond PD, the association of fatigue with a loss of noradrenergic cells in the LC but not with a loss of α2-ARs in other specific brain regions is not trivial. It relates the global perception of an internal state of energy to the general function of the noradrenergic system, which is to mobilize the whole brain and body for action from a unique but widely distributed source. This association has not been put forward in current biological theories of fatigue.69

Apathy

Apathy is a complex and multifactorial alteration of the internal and external drives of goal-directed behaviour.80 It has been associated with dysfunctions of different neural networks supporting emotional/affective, cognitive and auto-activation circuits,3,81,82 for which meso-cortico-limbic dopaminergic and serotoninergic lesions are thought to play a major role. The present study provides new insight into apathy pathophysiology and suggests that there is a role for noradrenergic alteration since we found a correlation between apathy and LC neuronal loss. This observation is reminiscent of a recent study using pharmacological MRI and testing more specifically predictive processing (i.e. executive functions) of goal-directed behaviour.83 Although we cannot disentangle cognitive from motivational apathy in the present study, it is tempting to speculate that the noradrenergic dysfunction identified in our empirical observations may be more closely associated with cognitive apathy (which includes dysfunction of a set of executive mechanisms required for achieving a goal) than with motivational apathy.84 Our results also strengthen the idea that fatigue is associated with apathy (both relying on the general activation function of the LC-noradrenergic system, not on specific losses of α2-ARs) but not with anxiety85 (which does not involve LC neuronal loss in the present study).

Anxiety

Anxiety is commonly associated with apathy and depression to constitute a behavioural ‘non-motor triad’ in PD governed by serotonergic and dopaminergic degeneration.3,86 However, while anxiety symptoms are clearly linked to alterations of limbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, several studies have proposed that basal ganglia and brainstem nuclei could be at the root of such disorders,87,88 including a loss of noradrenaline innervation in the LC and the limbic system.87,89 Our data are consistent with the involvement of noradrenergic dysfunction in anxiety, as its severity is associated with a reduction of α2-AR availability in a brain network including the putamen, insula and superior temporal gyrus (but not with a loss of noradrenergic cells in the LC). However, we found no evidence for a common noradrenergic dysfunction of the ‘non-motor triad’ as they all seem to have different origins: anxiety was associated with alteration of noradrenergic terminals and apathy with alteration of LC cell bodies, while depression was not linked to any of these dysfunctions.

Constipation

Constipation is one of the most common non-motor symptoms that emerge from the very early phase.90,91 The underlying mechanisms of constipation in PD are still unknown, but neurodegeneration of autonomic centres of both the enteric and central nervous systems are likely.92 Our observation that constipation is associated with a reduction of signal intensity in the LC fits with the general idea that dysfunction of the noradrenergic system is closely linked to numerous premotor symptoms of PD.93-96 Most importantly, it is also consistent with rodent studies providing specific evidence that: (i) the LC participates in the regulation of colorectal motility (via activation of α1-ARs in the lumbosacral defecation centre)97; (ii) noradrenaline plays a major role in regulating colon immune homeostasis98; and (iii) the reduction of noradrenaline levels in the intestine causes colon inflammation, α-synuclein pathology, neuronal loss and ultimately constipation.98,99

Motor symptoms

LC neuronal loss in PD has been associated with the disease but not directly with motor symptoms.6,100 Here, we provide evidence for a direct link with bradykinesia, rest tremor and motor fluctuations. In contrast, while noradrenergic denervation of the motor areas101 and noradrenergic transporter density decrease in the motor cortex102 have been associated with motor cortical dysfunction in PD,103,104 the substantial reduction of α2-AR availability in the motor cortices of PD patients found in the present study revealed no direct relationship with a global motor dysfunction (i.e. neither with the UPDRS-II nor UPDRS-III scores). However, the potential consequences of cortical α2-AR loss may be more indirect and specific. Indeed, as α2-ARs would be located on inhibitory interneurons, reduced availability could contribute to the broad reduction of intracortical inhibition at rest and to the increase in cortical excitation frequently observed in PD.105-107 Future studies are needed to clarify this possibly masked relationship.

Bradykinesia

Bradykinesia is a multifaceted concept including potentially distinct motor abnormalities with discrete pathophysiological backgrounds mixed under a single clinical term.108 Here, we did not find specific correlates of bradykinesia as assessed by means of UPDRS-III in the 11C-yohimbine binding data but report a significant association with a global alteration of LC integrity. Although this observation does not address the problem of the ‘bradykinesia complex’,108 it contributes to the debate about its incomplete response to dopaminergic drugs. Indeed, levodopa improves overall bradykinesia but does not normalize all other abnormal movement parameters.109 Our data support the suggestions of several studies promoting the role of noradrenaline in the control of motor behaviour11 and the fact that its depletion results in motor deterioration in PD.16,19,30,102 It can be assumed that the role of noradrenaline is indirect: first, because it would facilitate nigro-striatal dopamine transmission110; and second, because the noradrenergic system would play a major role in executive functions like response inhibition, the alteration of which might lead to movement control disorders.111-114 Future work on the noradrenergic bases of movement disorders in PD should include a more detailed clinical evaluation of bradykinesia and its related features.108

Motor fluctuations

The present study pinpoints a correlation between the decrease in LC signal intensity and the severity of levodopa-induced motor complications (UPDRS-IV total score). However, we did not find any relationship with the change in α2-AR availability despite previous studies having reported a potent effect of α2-AR antagonists on dyskinesia in a monkey model of PD115-118 as well as in patients with PD when given in combination with levodopa.119 In addition, although there have been very few investigations into the role of the LC in motor fluctuations, LC denervation in rodents was not found to potentiate levodopa-induced motor complications.120 These contradictions clearly require further investigation comparing notably PD patients with and without motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Nevertheless, the present data bring back to the forefront the issue of the links between motor and non-motor fluctuations121 and suggest that alteration of LC integrity might be a common denominator.

Rest tremor

Tremor in PD does not closely correlate with nigrostriatal dopaminergic deficits122 and is not fully restored by dopaminergic medication.123 Increasing evidence also involves the noradrenergic system in the network dynamics of parkinsonian tremor.27,122,124 Our data are consistent with this view. Both the amount of neuronal loss in the LC inferred from neuromelanin MRI and α2-AR availability in the thalamus inferred from 11C-yohimbine binding have been associated with tremor level in the present dataset. The direction of the relationship between neuromelanin MRI and clinical data indicated that tremor is higher in patients for whom LC integrity is better preserved, as previously observed in post-mortem analyses comparing tremor-dominant to akinetic-rigid patients125,126 or in in vivo investigations using 11C-MeNER PET.124 This relationship was also predicted by prior observations linking the presence of tremor to a more benign course of disease127 or to a relatively preserved LC-noradrenergic system.27,124 Our data are in line with a group of studies implicating a cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit in the genesis of tremor128-132 as they provide evidence that α2-AR availability in the thalamus decreases with the severity of rest tremor. This is particularly consistent with the recent observation that the distribution volume ratio of noradrenaline transporters in the thalamus correlates with resting tremor amplitude in patients with PD, suggesting that noradrenaline transporter density is relatively preserved in this region for patients with tremor-dominant PD.124

Limitations

Some limitations to this study should be acknowledged. First, due to ethical reasons and the need to reduce movements within the scanner for imaging small brainstem structures like the LC, patients with PD were scanned in the ON medication state. There is evidence from animal studies that administration of levodopa might foster the accumulation of neuromelanin.133 However, these effects are expected to be relatively long-lasting rather than fluctuating between medication states. In the present study, LEDD in patients did correlate with CNRLC, indicating that PD patients with higher dose of dopaminergic treatment were those with lower signal in the LC. This was observed for both sides of the LC. A second possible effect of the ON medication state is that postsynaptic α2-ARs may be downregulated.134,135 However, we did not find any correlation between LEDD and 11C-yohimbine BPND at least in the regions sampled.

Second, it was not possible to distinguish the pre- and postsynaptic locations of the α2-ARs with 11C-yohimbine. Future studies should consider multitracer approaches with a specific presynaptic tracer (such as 11C-MeNER) to assess whether changes in α2-ARs with PD occur mainly at the pre- or postsynaptic level (or both). Furthermore, it is also worth mentioning that 11C-yohimbine does not differentiate between the different subtypes of α2-ARs that have been characterized pharmacologically (α2A, α2B, α2C).136 Therefore, there is still a strong need in the future to pursue the development of specific radiotracers to further investigate this noradrenergic system in vivo.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this work is the first multimodal comparative in vivo imaging study to assess the association between PD symptoms and the integrity of two aspects of the noradrenergic system: the distribution of α2-ARs in the brain and the density of cell bodies in the LC. Our results highlight the substantial and multimodal alteration of the noradrenergic system in humans and its possible role in the pathophysiology of PD, not only in terms of non-motor impairments (supporting the noradrenergic phenotype recently proposed by Ray Chaudhuri and colleagues7) but also with regard to some motor aspects of the disease (bradykinesia, motor fluctuations and rest tremor). Overall, our findings may encourage the search for new drugs targeting the α2-AR system for the treatment of PD. However, future studies are warranted to shed more light on the specific role of α2-ARs and their different subtypes in the pathophysiology of the disease. In particular, further research is needed to sharpen the clinical picture and better characterize the different phenotypes of this heterogeneous and multisystem disease.

Acknowledgements

We thank all study participants.

Contributor Information

Chloé Laurencin, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France; Department of Neurology C, Expert Parkinson Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological Hospital, NS-Park/F-CRIN, 69500 Bron, France.

Sophie Lancelot, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France; CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Sarah Brosse, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France.

Inés Mérida, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Jérôme Redouté, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Elise Greusard, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Ludovic Lamberet, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Véronique Liotier, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Didier Le Bars, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Nicolas Costes, CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, PET-MRI Department, 69500 Bron, France.

Stéphane Thobois, Department of Neurology C, Expert Parkinson Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological Hospital, NS-Park/F-CRIN, 69500 Bron, France; Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, UMR 5229, CNRS, 69500 Bron, France.

Philippe Boulinguez, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France.

Bénédicte Ballanger, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France.

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research was funded by the French National Research Agency (Grant no. ANR-16-CE37-0014 to B.B.) and by France Parkinson (Grant no. LSP 182437 to B.B.).

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

References

  • 1. Politis M, Wu K, Loane C, et al. Depressive symptoms in PD correlate with higher 5-HTT binding in raphe and limbic structures. Neurology. 2010;75:1920–1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sommerauer M, Fedorova TD, Hansen AK, et al. Evaluation of the noradrenergic system in Parkinson’s disease: An 11C-MeNER PET and neuromelanin MRI study. Brain. 2018;141:496–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Maillet A, Krack P, Lhommée E, et al. The prominent role of serotonergic degeneration in apathy, anxiety and depression in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 9):2486–2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bohnen NI, Kaufer DI, Hendrickson R, Constantine GM, Mathis CA, Moore RY. Cortical cholinergic denervation is associated with depressive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonian dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:641–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Malatt C, Tagliati M. The role of the locus coeruleus/norepinephrine system in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders: An update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2022;35:220–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. García-Lorenzo D, Longo-Dos Santos C, Ewenczyk C, et al. The coeruleus/subcoeruleus complex in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 7):2120–2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ray Chaudhuri K, Leta V, Bannister K, Brooks DJ, Svenningsson P. The noradrenergic subtype of Parkinson disease: From animal models to clinical practice. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19:333–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Holland N, Robbins TW, Rowe JB. The role of noradrenaline in cognition and cognitive disorders. Brain. 2021;144:2243–2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sara SJ. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10:211–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. J Comp Neurol. 2005;493:99–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Waterhouse BD, Predale HK, Plummer NW, Jensen P, Chandler DJ. Probing the structure and function of locus coeruleus projections to CNS motor centers. Front Neural Circuits. 2022;16:895481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. O’Neill E, Harkin A. Targeting the noradrenergic system for anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects: Implications for Parkinson’s disease. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13:1332–1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Benarroch EE. The locus ceruleus norepinephrine system: Functional organization and potential clinical significance. Neurology. 2009;73:1699–1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Braak H, Del Tredici K. Neuropathological staging of brain pathology in sporadic Parkinson’s disease: Separating the wheat from the chaff. J Parkinsons Dis. 2017;7(s1):S71–S85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fornai F, Torracca MT, Bassi L, D’Errigo DA, Scalori V, Corsini GU. Norepinephrine loss selectively enhances chronic nigrostriatal dopamine depletion in mice and rats. Brain Res. 1996;735:349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mavridis M, Degryse AD, Lategan AJ, Marien MR, Colpaert FC. Effects of locus coeruleus lesions on parkinsonian signs, striatal dopamine and substantia nigra cell loss after 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in monkeys: A possible role for the locus coeruleus in the progression of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 1991;41(2–3):507–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Paredes-Rodriguez E, Vegas-Suarez S, Morera-Herreras T, De Deurwaerdere P, Miguelez C. The noradrenergic system in Parkinson’s disease. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cui K, Yang F, Tufan T, et al. Restoration of noradrenergic function in Parkinson’s disease model mice. ASN Neuro. 2021;13:17590914211009730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Delaville C, Deurwaerdère PD, Benazzouz A. Noradrenaline and Parkinson’s disease. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011;5:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Laurencin C, Timestit N, Marques A, et al. Efficacy and safety of clonidine for the treatment of impulse control disorder in Parkinson’s disease: A multicenter, parallel, randomised, double-blind, phase 2b clinical trial. J Neurol. 2023;270:4851–4859. Published online June 20, 2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Espay AJ, LeWitt PA, Kaufmann H. Norepinephrine deficiency in Parkinson’s disease: The case for noradrenergic enhancement. Mov Disord. 2014;29:1710–1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yssel JD, O’Neill E, Nolan YM, Connor TJ, Harkin A. Treatment with the noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor atomoxetine alone and in combination with the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan attenuates loss of dopamine and associated motor deficits in the LPS inflammatory rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;69:456–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. van Veldhuizen MJ, Feenstra MG, Heinsbroek RP, Boer GJ. In vivo microdialysis of noradrenaline overflow: Effects of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists measured by cumulative concentration-response curves. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;109:655–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Srinivasan J, Schmidt WJ. Treatment with alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, 2-methoxy idazoxan, protects 6-hydroxydopamine-induced parkinsonian symptoms in rats: Neurochemical and behavioral evidence. Behav Brain Res. 2004;154:353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Borghammer P. The brain-first vs. body-first model of Parkinson’s disease with comparison to alternative models. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023;130:737–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Rietdijk CD, Perez-Pardo P, Garssen J, van Wezel RJA, Kraneveld AD. Exploring Braak’s hypothesis of Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2017;8:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nahimi A, Sommerauer M, Kinnerup MB, et al. Noradrenergic deficits in Parkinson disease imaged with 11C-MeNER. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:659–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Probst A, Cortés R, Palacios JM. Distribution of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the human brainstem: An autoradiographic study using [3H]p-aminoclonidine. Eur J Pharmacol. 1984;106:477–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pazos A, González AM, Pascual J, Meana JJ, Barturen F, García-Sevilla JA. Alpha 2-adrenoceptors in human forebrain: Autoradiographic visualization and biochemical parameters using the agonist [3H]UK-14304. Brain Res. 1988;475:361–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pifl C, Kish SJ, Hornykiewicz O. Thalamic noradrenaline in Parkinson’s disease: Deficits suggest role in motor and non-motor symptoms. Mov Disord. 2012;27:1618–1624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kish SJ, Shannak KS, Rajput AH, Gilbert JJ, Hornykiewicz O. Cerebellar norepinephrine in patients with Parkinson’s disease and control subjects. Arch Neurol. 1984;41:612–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shannak K, Rajput A, Rozdilsky B, Kish S, Gilbert J, Hornykiewicz O. Noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin levels and metabolism in the human hypothalamus: Observations in Parkinson’s disease and normal subjects. Brain Res. 1994;639:33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cash R, Ruberg M, Raisman R, Agid Y. Adrenergic receptors in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 1984;322:269–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Laurencin C, Lancelot S, Gobert F, et al. Modeling [11C]yohimbine PET human brain kinetics with test-retest reliability, competition sensitivity studies and search for a suitable reference region. Neuroimage. 2021;240:118328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nahimi A, Jakobsen S, Munk OL, et al. Mapping α2 adrenoceptors of the human brain with 11C-yohimbine. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:392–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Laurencin C, Lancelot S, Merida I, et al. Distribution of α2-adrenergic receptors in the living human brain using [11C]yohimbine PET. Biomolecules. 2023;13:843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jakobsen S, Pedersen K, Smith DF, Jensen SB, Munk OL, Cumming P. Detection of alpha2-adrenergic receptors in brain of living pig with 11C-yohimbine. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:2008–2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Landau AM, Dyve S, Jakobsen S, Alstrup AKO, Gjedde A, Doudet DJ. Acute vagal nerve stimulation lowers α2 adrenoceptor availability: Possible mechanism of therapeutic action. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:702–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Landau AM, Doudet DJ, Jakobsen S. Amphetamine challenge decreases yohimbine binding to α2 adrenoceptors in landrace pig brain. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;222:155–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Doppler CEJ, Kinnerup MB, Brune C, et al. Regional locus coeruleus degeneration is uncoupled from noradrenergic terminal loss in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2021;144:2732–2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, et al. MDS Clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1591–1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008;23:2129–2170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bushnell DM, Martin ML. Quality of life and Parkinson’s disease: Translation and validation of the US Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Qual Life Res. 1999;8:345–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE. Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2649–2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zucca FA, Bellei C, Giannelli S, et al. Neuromelanin and iron in human locus coeruleus and substantia nigra during aging: Consequences for neuronal vulnerability. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2006;113:757–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Dahl MJ, Mather M, Werkle-Bergner M, et al. Locus coeruleus integrity is related to tau burden and memory loss in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2022;112:39–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Liu KY, Marijatta F, Hämmerer D, Acosta-Cabronero J, Düzel E, Howard RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human locus coeruleus: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;83:325–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Reilhac A, Merida I, Irace Z, et al. Development of a dedicated rebinner with rigid motion correction for the mMR PET/MR scanner, and validation in a large cohort of 11C-PIB scans. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1761–1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mérida I, Reilhac A, Redouté J, Heckemann RA, Costes N, Hammers A. Multi-atlas attenuation correction supports full quantification of static and dynamic brain PET data in PET-MR. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:2834–2858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Heckemann RA, Keihaninejad S, Aljabar P, et al. Improving intersubject image registration using tissue-class information benefits robustness and accuracy of multi-atlas based anatomical segmentation. Neuroimage. 2010;51:221–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hammers A, Allom R, Koepp MJ, et al. Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003;19:224–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Prange S, Danaila T, Laurencin C, et al. Age and time course of long-term motor and nonmotor complications in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2019;92:e148–e160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Shibata E, Sasaki M, Tohyama K, et al. Age-related changes in locus ceruleus on neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:197–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Li Y, Wang C, Wang J, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in de novo Parkinson’s disease: A neuromelanin MRI study in locus coeruleus. Mov Disord. 2019;34:884–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Prasuhn J, Prasuhn M, Fellbrich A, et al. Association of locus coeruleus and substantia nigra pathology with cognitive and motor functions in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2021;97:e1007–e1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sasaki M, Shibata E, Tohyama K, et al. Neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging of locus ceruleus and substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport. 2006;17:1215–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ohtsuka C, Sasaki M, Konno K, et al. Differentiation of early-stage parkinsonisms using neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:755–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Chan-Palay V, Asan E. Alterations in catecholamine neurons of the locus coeruleus in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type and in Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia and depression. J Comp Neurol. 1989;287:373–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. German DC, Manaye KF, White CL, et al. Disease-specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss. Ann Neurol. 1992;32:667–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Zarow C, Lyness SA, Mortimer JA, Chui HC. Neuronal loss is greater in the locus coeruleus than nucleus basalis and substantia nigra in Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:337–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Nahimi A, Kinnerup MB, Ostergaard K, et al. In-vivo imaging of a2 adrenoceptors in Parkinson’s disease with 11C-yohimbine. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(S1):594–595.28322006 [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Pifl C, Hornykiewicz O, Blesa J, Adánez R, Cavada C, Obeso JA. Reduced noradrenaline, but not dopamine and serotonin in motor thalamus of the MPTP primate: Relation to severity of parkinsonism. J Neurochem. 2013;125:657–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Civantos Calzada B, Aleixandre de Artiñano A. Alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes. Pharmacol Res. 2001;44:195–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Timmermans PB, van Zwieten ZP. Mini-review. The postsynaptic alpha 2-adrenoreceptor. J Auton Pharmacol. 1981;1:171–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Kaasinen V, Vahlberg T, Stoessl AJ, Strafella AP, Antonini A. Dopamine receptors in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis of imaging studies. Mov Disord. 2021;36:1781–1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Klimek V, Ordway GA. Distribution of alpha 2-adrenoceptors in the human locus coeruleus. Brain Res. 1996;741(1–2):263–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Quentin E, Belmer A, Maroteaux L. Somato-dendritic regulation of raphe serotonin neurons; a key to antidepressant action. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Herlofson K, Kluger BM. Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2017;374:38–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Siciliano M, Trojano L, Santangelo G, De Micco R, Tedeschi G, Tessitore A. Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2018;33:1712–1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:435–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Pavese N, Metta V, Bose SK, Chaudhuri KR, Brooks DJ. Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease is linked to striatal and limbic serotonergic dysfunction. Brain. 2010;133:3434–3443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Mongeau R, Blier P, de Montigny C. In vivo electrophysiological evidence for tonic activation by endogenous noradrenaline of alpha 2-adrenoceptors on 5-hydroxytryptamine terminals in the rat hippocampus. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1993;347:266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Aston-Jones G, Akaoka H, Charléty P, Chouvet G. Serotonin selectively attenuates glutamate-evoked activation of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons. J Neurosci. 1991;11:760–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Baraban JM, Aghajanian GK. Suppression of firing activity of 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe by alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists. Neuropharmacology. 1980;19:355–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Chaudhuri A, Behan PO. Fatigue and basal ganglia. J Neurol Sci. 2000;179(S 1–2):34–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Meeusen R, Watson P, Hasegawa H, Roelands B, Piacentini MF. Central fatigue: The serotonin hypothesis and beyond. Sports Med. 2006;36:881–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Klass M, Roelands B, Lévénez M, et al. Effects of noradrenaline and dopamine on supraspinal fatigue in well-trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:2299–2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Mendonça DA, Menezes K, Jog MS. Methylphenidate improves fatigue scores in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2007;22:2070–2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Lou JS. Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease and potential interventions. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Strafella AP, Krack P. Apathy in Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features, neural substrates, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:518–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. D’Iorio A, Maggi G, Vitale C, Trojano L, Santangelo G. “Pure apathy” and cognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analytic study. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. De Waele S, Cras P, Crosiers D. Apathy in Parkinson’s disease: Defining the park apathy subtype. Brain Sci. 2022;12:923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Hezemans FH, Wolpe N, O’Callaghan C, et al. Noradrenergic deficits contribute to apathy in Parkinson’s disease through the precision of expected outcomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18:e1010079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Béreau M, Van Waes V, Servant M, Magnin E, Tatu L, Anheim M. Apathy in Parkinson’s disease: Clinical patterns and neurobiological basis. Cells. 2023;12:1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Béreau M, Castrioto A, Lhommée E, et al. Fatigue in de novo Parkinson’s disease: Expanding the neuropsychiatric triad? J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12:1329–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Thobois S, Ardouin C, Lhommée E, et al. Non-motor dopamine withdrawal syndrome after surgery for Parkinson’s disease: Predictors and underlying mesolimbic denervation. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 4):1111–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Thobois S, Prange S, Sgambato-Faure V, Tremblay L, Broussolle E. Imaging the etiology of apathy, anxiety, and depression in Parkinson’s disease: Implication for treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17:76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Carey G, Görmezoğlu M, de Jong JJA, et al. Neuroimaging of anxiety in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Mov Disord. 2021;36:327–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Remy P, Doder M, Lees A, Turjanski N, Brooks D. Depression in Parkinson’s disease: Loss of dopamine and noradrenaline innervation in the limbic system. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 6):1314–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Postuma RB, Berg D. Advances in markers of prodromal Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:622–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Chaudhuri KR, Healy DG, Schapira AHV. National institute for clinical excellence. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: Diagnosis and management. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Cersosimo MG, Benarroch EE. Neural control of the gastrointestinal tract: Implications for Parkinson disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23:1065–1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:197–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Taylor TN, Caudle WM, Shepherd KR, et al. Nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease revealed in an animal model with reduced monoamine storage capacity. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8103–8113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Butkovich LM, Houser MC, Chalermpalanupap T, et al. Transgenic mice expressing human α-synuclein in noradrenergic neurons develop locus ceruleus pathology and nonmotor features of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2020;40:7559–7576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Braak H, Ghebremedhin E, Rüb U, Bratzke H, Del Tredici K. Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318:121–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Nakamori H, Naitou K, Horii Y, et al. Roles of the noradrenergic nucleus locus coeruleus and dopaminergic nucleus A11 region as supraspinal defecation centers in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;317:G545–G555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Song S, Tu D, Meng C, et al. Dysfunction of the noradrenergic system drives inflammation, α-synucleinopathy, and neuronal loss in mouse colon. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1083513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Song S, Jiang L, Oyarzabal EA, et al. Loss of brain norepinephrine elicits neuroinflammation-mediated oxidative injury and selective caudo-rostral neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:2653–2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Ye R, O’Callaghan C, Rua C, et al. Locus coeruleus integrity from 7T MRI relates to apathy and cognition in parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2022;37:1663–1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Gaspar P, Duyckaerts C, Alvarez C, Javoy-Agid F, Berger B. Alterations of dopaminergic and noradrenergic innervations in motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:365–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Sommerauer M, Hansen AK, Parbo P, et al. Decreased noradrenaline transporter density in the motor cortex of Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord. 2018;33:1006–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Pasquereau B, DeLong MR, Turner RS. Primary motor cortex of the parkinsonian monkey: Altered encoding of active movement. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 1):127–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Lindenbach D, Bishop C. Critical involvement of the motor cortex in the pathophysiology and treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(10 Pt 2):2737–2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Andrews GD, Lavin A. Methylphenidate increases cortical excitability via activation of alpha-2 noradrenergic receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:594–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Strafella AP, Valzania F, Nassetti SA, et al. Effects of chronic levodopa and pergolide treatment on cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1198–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Ridding MC, Inzelberg R, Rothwell JC. Changes in excitability of motor cortical circuitry in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1995;37:181–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Bologna M, Espay AJ, Fasano A, Paparella G, Hallett M, Berardelli A. Redefining bradykinesia. Mov Disord. 2023;38:551–557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bologna M, Paparella G, Fasano A, Hallett M, Berardelli A. Evolving concepts on bradykinesia. Brain. 2020;143:727–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Lategan AJ, Marien MR, Colpaert FC. Suppression of nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopamine release in vivo following noradrenaline depletion by DSP-4: A microdialysis study. Life Sci. 1992;50:995–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Criaud M, Laurencin C, Poisson A, et al. Noradrenaline and movement initiation disorders in Parkinson’s disease: A pharmacological functional MRI study with clonidine. Cells. 2022;11:2640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Spay C, Albares M, Lio G, et al. Clonidine modulates the activity of the subthalamic-supplementary motor loop: Evidence from a pharmacological study combining deep brain stimulation and electroencephalography recordings in parkinsonian patients. J Neurochem. 2018;146:333–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Ye Z, Altena E, Nombela C, et al. Improving response inhibition in Parkinson’s disease with atomoxetine. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:740–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Xu B, He T, Lu Y, et al. Locus coeruleus integrity correlates with inhibitory functions of the fronto-subthalamic “hyperdirect” pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;36:103276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Henry B, Fox SH, Peggs D, Crossman AR, Brotchie JM. The alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonist idazoxan reduces dyskinesia and enhances anti-parkinsonian actions of L-dopa in the MPTP-lesioned primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 1999;14:744–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Grondin R, Hadj Tahar A, Doan VD, Ladure P, Bédard PJ. Noradrenoceptor antagonism with idazoxan improves L-dopa-induced dyskinesias in MPTP monkeys. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;361:181–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Fox SH, Henry B, Hill MP, Peggs D, Crossman AR, Brotchie JM. Neural mechanisms underlying peak-dose dyskinesia induced by levodopa and apomorphine are distinct: Evidence from the effects of the alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan. Mov Disord. 2001;16:642–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Savola JM, Hill M, Engstrom M, et al. Fipamezole (JP-1730) is a potent alpha2 adrenergic receptor antagonist that reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the MPTP-lesioned primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2003;18:872–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Rascol O, Arnulf I, Peyro-Saint Paul H, et al. Idazoxan, an alpha-2 antagonist, and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2001;16:708–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Marin C, Aguilar E, Bonastre M. Effect of locus coeruleus denervation on levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in hemiparkinsonian rats. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115:1133–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Martínez-Fernández R, Schmitt E, Martinez-Martin P, Krack P. The hidden sister of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: A review on nonmotor fluctuations. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1080–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Isaias IU, Benti R, Cilia R, et al. [123i]FP-CIT striatal binding in early Parkinson’s disease patients with tremor vs. akinetic-rigid onset. Neuroreport. 2007;18:1499–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Eggers C, Kahraman D, Fink GR, Schmidt M, Timmermann L. Akinetic-rigid and tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease patients show different patterns of FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography. Mov Disord. 2011;26:416–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Kinnerup MB, Sommerauer M, Damholdt MF, et al. Preserved noradrenergic function in Parkinson’s disease patients with rest tremor. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;152:105295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Paulus W, Jellinger K. The neuropathologic basis of different clinical subgroups of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1991;50:743–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Jellinger KA. Post mortem studies in Parkinson’s disease–is it possible to detect brain areas for specific symptoms? J Neural Transm Suppl. 1999;56:1–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. Parkinson Disease subtypes. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:499–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Antonini A, Moeller JR, Nakamura T, Spetsieris P, Dhawan V, Eidelberg D. The metabolic anatomy of tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1998;51:803–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Deiber MP, Pollak P, Passingham R, et al. Thalamic stimulation and suppression of parkinsonian tremor. Evidence of a cerebellar deactivation using positron emission tomography. Brain. 1993;116(Pt 1):267–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Mure H, Hirano S, Tang CC, et al. Parkinson’s disease tremor-related metabolic network: Characterization, progression, and treatment effects. Neuroimage. 2011;54:1244–1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Helmich RC, Hallett M, Deuschl G, Toni I, Bloem BR. Cerebral causes and consequences of parkinsonian resting tremor: A tale of two circuits? Brain. 2012;135(Pt 11):3206–3226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Ni Z, Pinto AD, Lang AE, Chen R. Involvement of the cerebellothalamocortical pathway in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:816–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Sulzer D, Bogulavsky J, Larsen KE, et al. Neuromelanin biosynthesis is driven by excess cytosolic catecholamines not accumulated by synaptic vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11869–11874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Zhang XL, Wang GB, Zhao LY, et al. Clonidine improved laboratory-measured decision-making performance in abstinent heroin addicts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Wang Y, Wang HS, Wang T, Huang C, Liu J. L-DOPA- induced dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease is associated with the fluctuational release of norepinephrine in the sensorimotor striatum. J Neurosci Res. 2014;92:1733–1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Bylund DB. Pharmacological characteristics of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;763:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.


Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES