Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is symptomatically worse in the evening but the mechanism driving nocturnal eczema remains elusive. Our objective was to determine the circadian rhythm of skin barrier function measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in AD, and explore the molecular underpinnings. A pilot study was performed on a diverse group of AD (n=4) and control (n=2) young patients, we used an inpatient tightly controlled modified constant routine protocol. TEWL was measured at least every 90 minutes in the antecubital fossa (lesional) and forearm, while whole blood samples were collected every 4 hours. Results show a significant difference in the antecubital fossa TEWL in AD versus controls. TEWL in control skin decreases starting a few hours prior to bedtime, both in the antecubital fossa and forearm, while in the AD forearm skin pre-bedtime TEWL increases. We identified 1576 differentially expressed genes using a time dependent model. The top 20 upregulated gene ontology pathways included neuronal pathways, while the downregulated functional terms included innate immune signaling and viral response. Similar pathways positively correlated with forearm TEWL in controls and inversely with AD group. Upregulation in sensory perception pathways correlated with increases in lesional (antecubital fossa) TEWL in the evening. Results show skin barrier function worsens in the evening in AD group, at a time when barrier is normally rejuvenating in healthy skin. This timing and the detection of transcriptomic signatures of sensory perception, and diminished viral response might correspond to the nocturnal itch. Larger studies are needed to evaluate these associations in the skin.
Keywords: atopic dermatits, barrier function, epidermal water loss, transcriptomics, circadian rhythms
INTRODUCTION
Atopic dermatitis (AD), popularly known as eczema, is the most common chronic skin disease of early childhood afflicting ~10% of US children (Fishbein, Silverberg, Wilson, & Ong, 2020), with a nocturnal predominance of symptoms (Fishbein et al., 2015). AD is a disease of skin barrier and systemic immune dysregulation. Previously considered to be a local skin problem, it is now clear that AD is a systemic inflammatory condition which responds well to systemic treatment (Guttman-Yassky et al., 2019). Blood biomarkers reflect skin-directed inflammation (Esaki et al., 2016), and whole blood RNA-seq has been used to explore relevant disease pathways (Suárez-Fariñas et al., 2015). In addition to systemic inflammation, skin barrier disruption is central to atopic dermatitis disease flares (Fishbein et al., 2020). In fact, the gold standard measure of skin barrier function, Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL), is one of the most notable objective biomarkers differentiating AD versus control patients (Alexander, Brown, Danby, & Flohr, 2018). In more detail, TEWL is a measurement that represents the amount of water that escapes from the stratum corneum (the outermost layer of the epidermis) per area of skin, which reflects the integrity of skin water barrier. The increase in the TEWL value is interpreted as disruption of the barrier, while decrease in TEWL value is linked to the restoration of the skin barrier. It is important to note that TEWL varies between the individuals and across the anatomical locations (Alexander et al., 2018). AD is symptomatically worse in the evening, with increased patient self-report of pruritus (itchy skin) (Cheng et al., 2022) and sleep disturbance (Fishbein et al., 2020). Beyond general reports of upregulated nocturnal inflammatory cytokines measured in whole blood (such as IL-6) (Bender, Ballard, Canono, Murphy, & Leung, 2008), the mechanism driving “nocturnal eczema” remains elusive. In healthy control patients, skin barrier function has a clear circadian (~24-hour) rhythm that remains stable, even after barrier disruption following tape stripping or the application of topical steroids (Yosipovitch et al., 2004). However, the circadian rhythm of TEWL in diseased skin has not been evaluated.
Given the nocturnal worsening of AD, we hypothesize that nocturnal eczema is, at least in part, driven by nocturnal worsening of TEWL. In this pilot study, we sought to explore AD versus control TEWL rhythms and potential molecular underpinnings from whole blood biomarkers.
METHODS
We recruited AD patients ages 15–25 years and age/sex-matched controls. Patients were admitted for a modified constant routine protocol (Alexander et al., 2018). After an adaptation night and intravenous line placement, lighting (<20 lux), humidity, and temperature were kept constant with isocaloric snacks provided every two hours during wake time. There were 28-hours of continuous monitoring with 9 hours of sleep opportunity at habitual bedtime. Measurement of skin barrier function, TEWL, was performed using the closed chamber Aquaflux device in triplicates at each location, right non-dominant arm antecubital fossa (lesional) or forearm (non-lesional), taken hourly during the day and every 90 minutes overnight. Antecubital fossa refers to the elbow crease, which is typically where the AD lesions are, whereas the forearm is generally lesion-free. The existence of lesional skin in the antecubital fossa was an inclusion criterion for our study. Patients were prompted to hold their arm out for 20 minutes prior to measurements to acclimate. Overnight, a nurse would quietly enter the room and help hold their arm out. Multiple skin biopsies are not practical, so we collected whole blood every 4 hours in PAXgene tubes to explore potential mechanisms underlying TEWL circadian rhythm (Braun et al., 2018). All subjects had samples for Zeitgeber Time (ZT) 9, 13, 21 and 25. ZT 0 was determined to be lights on based on 9 hours after habitual bedtime. RNA-seq was performed using the Illumina platform.
Detailed methods for RNA-seq processing and TEWL rhythm detection can be found in the Supplemental Methods. Raw fastq files were aligned to hg38 assembly. To correct for batch and unwanted variation we utilized an R package RUVSeq v1.20.0, specifically the RUVr method which considers the residuals from a first-pass GLM regression of the counts on the covariates of interest. Resulting weights were passed to DESeq2 as parameters of the model. Genes with FDR adjusted p-values of less than 0.05 and |log2FC|≥0.584 were considered as differentially expressed unless otherwise specified. Functional analysis was carried out using R package clusterProfiler v.3.16.0.
Subject-centered TEWL rhythm analysis was performed using a non-parametric algorithm called Rain, which is implemented as R library (details in Supplemental Methods) which can work with outliers and is optimized for small-size time series. The Subject’s TEWL rhythm was assumed to be significant if the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value was less than 0.05. Pearson correlation coefficients between the subject calibrated TEWL and gene expression profiles were calculated in R and were deemed significant if correlation coefficient was greater than 0.3.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics and Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) Measures
In this pilot study we recruited AD (n=4) and control patients (n=2), for details see Supplemental Table 1. TEWL measurements taken over 24 hours (Figure 1) show the relative change in TEWL over time, represented as a subject-centered, log2-transformed TEWL. In control group, the group-averaged rhythm is more pronounced in the antecubital fossa rather than forearm skin barrier when comparing to AD. Notably, phase estimation using RAIN algorithm (Thaben & Westermark, 2014) predicted differences in phase estimates of the AD versus control TEWL, showing a coordinated oscillation profile in controls, and lack of synchronization and flattening of the oscillations among AD subjects (Supplemental Table 2). Consistent with previous publications (Yosipovitch et al., 2004; Yosipovitch et al., 1998), TEWL in control skin, both in antecubital fossae and forearm, decreases (improves) starting a few hours prior to bedtime (ZT15, ~22 local time). However, during this time in AD, TEWL does not improve and, in fact, in forearm skin appears to worsen (TEWL increases). Absolute values for TEWL by group are plotted in Supplemental Figure 1, with subject-specific profiles in Supplemental Figure 2. Patient groups were similar in terms of their hormonal melatonin and cortisol profiles (Supplemental Figure 3) demonstrating the controlled modified constant routine protocol.
Figure 1. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) across 24 hours.


in A) lesional (antecubital fossa) and B) non-lesional (forearm skin) in atopic dermatitis versus control patients, group-averaged profiles. Plotted with local time on the x-axis and TEWL in g/m2/hr on the y-axis, expressed as a log2 (subject-calibrated TEWL) then averaged across subjects. Plot of model predicted values (smoothed lines) and individual patient values at each time point denoted. Shaded region denotes sleeping time range across all patients, which varied by patient but was set at 9 hours per subject with bedtime at habitual bedtime from 7 days prior to admission.
Differential Gene Expression and Gene Ontology (GO) pathways
Differential gene expression in whole blood samples (principal components analysis plots in Supplemental Figure 4) identified 1576 differentially expressed genes in AD (Figure 2a) as compared to controls using a time dependent model (Supplemental Methods). We evaluated these 1576 genes for significant gene ontology pathways in AD versus control patients, including time as a factor in the model. The top 20 upregulated GO pathways in AD versus controls demonstrated several neuronal pathways, including myelination, ensheathment of neurons, and axon ensheathment (Figure 2b).
Figure 2. Transcriptional differences between atopic dermatitis and control subjects.



A) Heat Map Displaying Differential Gene Expression in a time dependent model. Atopic dermatitis patients have a distinct transcriptome. B) Top 20 GO Terms in upregulated genes in AD patients compared to controls in a time dependent model of differential gene expression. C) Top 20 GO Terms in downregulated genes in AD patients compared to controls in a time dependent model of differential gene expression.
The top 20 GO terms downregulated in AD included innate immune signaling pathways (such as positive regulation of neutrophil chemotaxis and I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB signaling), as well as viral response pathways (such as viral transcription and viral gene expression) (Figure 2c). These similar pathways also appeared in GO terms enriched in genes positively correlated with TEWL in the forearm of controls and correlated inversely with the forearm TEWL in AD (Supplemental Figure 5).
TEWL and Molecular Correlations
We explored correlations between lesional TEWL rhythms with the whole blood transcriptome (at ZT9,13,21,25) in AD versus control (Supplemental Table 2 and Supplemental Methods correlation thresholds used). We identified the top 10 GO pathways that were correlated with antecubital fossa TEWL in AD and inversely correlated with control antecubital fossa, which included several pathways of sensory perception (Supplemental Figure 6).
DISCUSSION
In this pilot study, we found that skin barrier function (measured by transepidermal water loss, TEWL rhythm) in AD skin worsens in the evening in AD, at a time when barrier is normally rejuvenating in healthy, control skin. The lack of synchronization and flattening of the TEWL rhythm in AD skin contrasts with robust and consistent melatonin and cortisol profiles. By averaging TEWL across the AD patients we noted a flatter curve which could be due to the phase (Supplemental Figure 2). Regardless, the conclusion is that TEWL profile is similar amongst the controls but is quite different between the AD subjects.
TEWL rhythm worsening before bed in AD, corresponds with timing of patient/parent-proxy report of itch worsening before bedtime (Cheng et al., 2022). To our knowledge, this is the first paper to suggest the potential mechanistic link between nocturnal scratching with worsening TEWL rhythms. This is further supported by correlation of this timing with the transcriptomic signature of upregulation in sensory perception. Indeed, AD skin is noted to be hyperinnervated (Tominaga & Takamori, 2014), a finding that can be detected systemically with serum factors such as nerve growth factor (Toyoda et al., 2002).
This is further supported by upregulated GO pathways we identified in AD versus control, which have been shown in mouse models of itch. This suggests the potential relevance of our barrier dysfunction findings and itch. Specifically, in TRPA1 expressing mice treated with acetone to induce chronic itch, skin biopsies demonstrate pathways of neurogenesis and axonogenesis pathways, not present in TRPA1 knockout mice [8]. Additionally, similar GO pathways in neonatal mouse skin are noted when the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is constitutively expressed [9]. Likely these pathways were previously undiscovered in humans due to only daytime collection of samples.
With regards to downregulated pathways, our study is the first to discover the relevance of time as a factor in poor viral immunity in AD. It is known that AD patients are at risk for viral infections in the skin, such as eczema herpeticum (Berdyshev et al., 2022), and even other systemic viruses, such as influenza (Jalbert et al., 2020). Although none of our patients reported a history of eczema herpeticum, a previous paper identified a poor innate immune response RNA-seq signature in PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) of AD patients with a history of eczema herpeticum after invitro HSV stimulation (Bin et al., 2014). AD patients experience significant sleep disturbance, also known to suppress viral immunity in healthy individuals (Prather, Janicki-Deverts, Hall, & Cohen, 2015).
Although it might be a bit far reaching, these findings suggest consideration of sleep disturbance and circadian health in AD patients as one strategy to strengthen viral immunity.
Limitations to this pilot study include the small sample size and lack of skin-derived molecular samples. Further work will focus on increasing sample size, including inflammatory circadian rhythms and exploring whether these similar transcriptomic pathways are noted in skin and skin homing cells.
Supplementary Material
Supplemental Figure 1. TEWL raw data profiles in atopic dermatitis versus control (absolute values). Plot of model predicted values (smoothed lines) with 95% confidence intervals in shaded region and individual patient values at each time point denoted. Zeitgeber Time (ZT) refers to 0 as wake, 15 is bedtime for all subjects. A) Antecubital fossa. B) Forearm.
Supplemental Figure 2: Individual patient TEWL data. Plotted of model predicted values (smoothed lines) based on log2-transformed and subject-centered TEWL data in atopic dermatitis versus control. Scale in local time, shaded region denotes nighttime/sleep time which varied by patient but was set to be 9 hours with bedtime set at habitual bedtime. A) Forearm TEWL by subject status, subject-specific profiles (subject-centered data). B) Antecubital Fossa TEWL by subject status, subject-specific profiles (subject-centered data).
Supplemental Figure 3. Hormonal profiles. Plot of model predicted values (smoothed lines) with 95% confidence intervals in shaded region and individual patient values at each time point denoted. A) Melatonin profiles in atopic dermatitis (AD) versus controls. B) Cortisol profiles in atopic dermatitis (AD) versus controls.
Supplemental Figure 4. Principal Components Analysis after residuals-based normalization of whole blood transcriptome by subject and time. CT denotes circadian time, a nomenclature synonymous in this study with Zeitgeber time.
Supplemental Figure 5. Top GO pathway from whole blood correlation with TEWL, in which forearm TEWL values are A) correlated in controls and anticorrelated correlated in AD. B) Top GO pathway from whole blood in which antecubital fossa TEWL values are anticorrelated in controls and positively correlated in AD.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was funded, in part, by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant number K23AR075108 to AF), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, and Northwestern University Illumina Pilot Grant, and the National Cancer Institute R50 (grant number CA265372 to MI).
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
RNA-seq data were deposited as GEO repository. Gene lists and TEWL values are available upon request.
References
- Alexander H, Brown S, Danby S, & Flohr C (2018). Research Techniques Made Simple: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurement as a Research Tool. J Invest Dermatol, 138(11), 2295–2300.e2291. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bender BG, Ballard R, Canono B, Murphy JR, & Leung DY (2008). Disease severity, scratching, and sleep quality in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 58(3), 415–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berdyshev E, Goleva E, Bronova I, Bronoff AS, Streib JE, Vang KA, … Leung DYM (2022). Signaling sphingolipids are biomarkers for atopic dermatitis prone to disseminated viral infections. J Allergy Clin Immunol. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.02.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bin L, Edwards MG, Heiser R, Streib JE, Richers B, Hall CF, & Leung DY (2014). Identification of novel gene signatures in patients with atopic dermatitis complicated by eczema herpeticum. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 134(4), 848–855. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braun R, Kath WL, Iwanaszko M, Kula-Eversole E, Abbott SM, Reid KJ, … Allada R (2018). Universal method for robust detection of circadian state from gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(39), E9247–E9256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800314115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng BT, Patel MS, Xu M, Tilley CC, Zee PC, Paller AS, & Fishbein AB (2022). Timing of itch among children with atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 128(5), 603–605. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.01.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esaki H, Brunner PM, Renert-Yuval Y, Czarnowicki T, Huynh T, Tran G, … Guttman-Yassky E (2016). Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is T(H)2 but also T(H)17 polarized in skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 138(6), 1639–1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fishbein AB, Silverberg JI, Wilson EJ, & Ong PY (2020). Update on Atopic Dermatitis: Diagnosis, Severity Assessment, and Treatment Selection. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 8(1), 91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fishbein AB, Vitaterna O, Haugh IM, Bavishi AA, Zee PC, Turek FW, … Paller AS (2015). Nocturnal eczema: Review of sleep and circadian rhythms in children with atopic dermatitis and future research directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 136(5), 1170–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guttman-Yassky E, Bissonnette R, Ungar B, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ardeleanu M, Esaki H, … JD DH (2019). Dupilumab progressively improves systemic and cutaneous abnormalities in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 143(1), 155–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jalbert E, Lussier S, Johnson MJ, Jepson B, Calatroni A, David G, … Weinberg A (2020). Lower influenza-specific cell-mediated immune responses in individuals with atopic dermatitis compared with healthy controls. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 16(11), 2727–2735. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1747374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prather AA, Janicki-Deverts D, Hall MH, & Cohen S (2015). Behaviorally Assessed Sleep and Susceptibility to the Common Cold. Sleep, 38(9), 1353–1359. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suárez-Fariñas M, Ungar B, Correa da Rosa J, Ewald DA, Rozenblit M, Gonzalez J, … Guttman-Yassky E (2015). RNA sequencing atopic dermatitis transcriptome profiling provides insights into novel disease mechanisms with potential therapeutic implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 135(5), 1218–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thaben PF, & Westermark PO (2014). Detecting rhythms in time series with RAIN. J Biol Rhythms, 29(6), 391–400. doi: 10.1177/0748730414553029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tominaga M, & Takamori K (2014). Itch and nerve fibers with special reference to atopic dermatitis: therapeutic implications. J Dermatol, 41(3), 205–212. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toyoda M, Nakamura M, Makino T, Hino T, Kagoura M, & Morohashi M (2002). Nerve growth factor and substance P are useful plasma markers of disease activity in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 147(1), 71–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04803.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yosipovitch G, Sackett-Lundeen L, Goon A, Yiong Huak C, Leok Goh C, & Haus E (2004). Circadian and ultradian (12 h) variations of skin blood flow and barrier function in non-irritated and irritated skin-effect of topical corticosteroids. J Invest Dermatol, 122(3), 824–829. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yosipovitch G, Xiong GL, Haus E, Sackett-Lundeen L, Ashkenazi I, & Maibach HI (1998). Time-dependent variations of the skin barrier function in humans: transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and skin temperature. J Invest Dermatol, 110(1), 20–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00069.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Figure 1. TEWL raw data profiles in atopic dermatitis versus control (absolute values). Plot of model predicted values (smoothed lines) with 95% confidence intervals in shaded region and individual patient values at each time point denoted. Zeitgeber Time (ZT) refers to 0 as wake, 15 is bedtime for all subjects. A) Antecubital fossa. B) Forearm.
Supplemental Figure 2: Individual patient TEWL data. Plotted of model predicted values (smoothed lines) based on log2-transformed and subject-centered TEWL data in atopic dermatitis versus control. Scale in local time, shaded region denotes nighttime/sleep time which varied by patient but was set to be 9 hours with bedtime set at habitual bedtime. A) Forearm TEWL by subject status, subject-specific profiles (subject-centered data). B) Antecubital Fossa TEWL by subject status, subject-specific profiles (subject-centered data).
Supplemental Figure 3. Hormonal profiles. Plot of model predicted values (smoothed lines) with 95% confidence intervals in shaded region and individual patient values at each time point denoted. A) Melatonin profiles in atopic dermatitis (AD) versus controls. B) Cortisol profiles in atopic dermatitis (AD) versus controls.
Supplemental Figure 4. Principal Components Analysis after residuals-based normalization of whole blood transcriptome by subject and time. CT denotes circadian time, a nomenclature synonymous in this study with Zeitgeber time.
Supplemental Figure 5. Top GO pathway from whole blood correlation with TEWL, in which forearm TEWL values are A) correlated in controls and anticorrelated correlated in AD. B) Top GO pathway from whole blood in which antecubital fossa TEWL values are anticorrelated in controls and positively correlated in AD.
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq data were deposited as GEO repository. Gene lists and TEWL values are available upon request.
