Abstract
In eukaryotes, protein kinase signaling is regulated by a diverse array of post-translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues and oxidation of cysteine (Cys) residues. While regulation by activation segment phosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues is well understood, relatively little is known about how oxidation of cysteine residues modulate catalysis. In this study, we investigate redox regulation of the AMPK-related Brain-selective kinases (BRSK) 1 and 2, and detail how broad catalytic activity is directly regulated through reversible oxidation and reduction of evolutionarily conserved Cys residues within the catalytic domain. We show that redox-dependent control of BRSKs is a dynamic and multilayered process involving oxidative modifications of several Cys residues, including the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds involving a pair of Cys residues near the catalytic HRD motif and a highly conserved T-Loop Cys with a BRSK-specific Cys within an unusual CPE motif at the end of the activation segment. Consistently, mutation of the CPE-Cys increases catalytic activity in vitro and drives phosphorylation of the BRSK substrate Tau in cells. Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that oxidation of the CPE-Cys destabilizes a conserved salt bridge network critical for allosteric activation. The occurrence of spatially proximal Cys amino acids in diverse Ser/Thr protein kinase families suggests that disulfide mediated control of catalytic activity may be a prevalent mechanism for regulation within the broader AMPK family.
Introduction
Protein kinases are crucial components in cellular signaling networks, functioning as reversible molecular switches that orchestrate various biological processes. There are over 500 protein kinases encoded in the human genome that coordinate a wide range of cellular processes by catalyzing the transfer of a phosphate group from ATP to a hydroxyl group on the amino acid side chains of serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues in protein substrates (Manning et al. 2002). By catalyzing the reversible post-translational phosphorylation of Ser/Thr and Tyr residues of substrate proteins, protein kinases serve as signaling integrators that govern most aspects of eukaryotic life. Consequently, there exists a biological imperative to tightly control the catalytic activities of protein kinases, through cyclical phosphorylation of conserved amino acids, protein-protein interactions, and other regulatory post-translational modifications (PTMs). One essential mechanism governing kinase activity is the reversible phosphorylation of conserved amino acid residues within the activation loop, henceforth referred to as the T-Loop (Nolen, Taylor, and Ghosh 2004). In the inactive, unphosphorylated state, the T-Loop adopts a wide range of conformations, including conformations that obstruct substrate binding (Engh and Bossemeyer 2001). Phosphorylation of the activation loop induces an active spatial conformation that is typically more amenable to both binding and enzymatic phosphorylation of protein substrates, and this modification is prevalent across the kinase superfamily (Faezov and Roland L. Dunbrack 2023). Conversely, the removal of phosphate groups in this region by phosphatases (dephosphorylation) usually reverts kinases to an inactive state, generating a reversible switch to turn “on” and “off” kinase-dependent signaling pathways. More recently we hypothesized that ~10% of the Ser/Thr human kinome may also be subject to a conserved form of redox-dependent regulation, including key members of the CAMK, AGC, and AGC-like families of kinases through reversible oxidation of an evolutionarily conserved Cys residue, which lies adjacent to the critical regulatory phosphorylation site on the activation loop (T-loop +2 position) (Byrne et al. 2020).
Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying kinase regulation by redox-active Cys residues is fundamental as it appears to be widespread in signaling proteins (Xiao et al. 2020; Corcoran and Cotter 2013; Cao et al. 2023) and provides new opportunities to develop specific covalent compounds for the targeted modulation of protein kinases (Weisner et al. 2015). Moreover, redox-active Cys are major sensors of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), such as superoxide and peroxide, which function as endogenous secondary messengers to regulate various cellular processes (Schieber and Chandel 2014; Wani et al. 2011). In particular, the high cell permeability of H2O2 relative to other ROS species allows it to be sensed intracellularly by reactive Cys, which can differentially impact protein function and cellular localization (Lennicke et al. 2015; Rhee et al. 2005). Chemically accessible and reactive Cys residues can transition through several redox states, such as the transient sulfenic acid species (Cys-SOH) and higher order, ‘irreversible’, sulfinic and sulfonic forms (Cys-SO2H and Cys-SO3H) (Forman et al. 2017; Gupta and Carroll 2014). Importantly, in the context of allosteric protein redox regulation, the sulfenic oxidized Cys species can form disulfide linkages with other reactive Cys residues, whilst a sulfenic derivative has also been observed to be stabilized through the formation of a cyclic sulfenamide for tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B (van Montfort et al. 2003; Salmeen et al. 2003). The chemical reactivity, and thus biological susceptibility, of an individual Cys residue to oxidative modification is contingent on the intrinsic pKa value (where Ka is the acid dissociation constant), which in turn is influenced by networks of interacting amino acids (including phosphorylated amino acids), solvent accessibility, protein-protein interactions, and protein structural dynamics (Poole 2015; Xiao et al. 2020; Soylu and Marino 2016). Unlike phosphorylation, which allosterically communicates with distal sites through positively charged residues that coordinate the phosphate group, it is largely unclear how the redox state of a T-loop localized Cys residue may alter the catalytic activity of a kinase (Garrido Ruiz et al. 2022), although a change in the activation segment conformation is a likely outcome, as demonstrated by careful analysis of Ser/Thr kinases, notably members of the AGC-family kinase AKT (Su et al. 2019).
The human AMPK-related kinase (ARK) family, consisting of 14 members (termed BRSK1–2, NUAK1–2, SIK1–3, MARK1–4, MELK, and AMPKα1 and AMPKα2) are fundamental regulators of cellular metabolism, growth, differentiation, and polarity (Shao et al. 2014; Byrne et al. 2020; Shirwany and Zou 2014; Zmijewski et al. 2010), and BRSK1/2 function upstream of redox-based signaling to the pleiotropic transcription factor Nrf2 (Tamir, Drewry, et al. 2020; Tamir, Bowman, et al. 2020). Like other ARK members, BRSK1/2 possess similar structural organization, consisting of an N-terminal serine/threonine catalytic (kinase) domain, which is followed by a ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, a C-terminal spacer, and in some members, a kinase-associated (KA1) domain (Bright, Thornton, and Carling 2009) (Fig 1a). In addition to sharing structural homology, all ARKs (except for MELK) are known to be activated by phosphorylation on their T-Loop by the common upstream regulator LKB1, which is constitutively catalytically active in cells (Lizcano et al. 2004). All of the ARKs contain an activation loop ‘T-loop + 2 Cys’ residue, which can be prognostic for redox regulation (Byrne et al. 2020), and the catalytic activities of several members have been demonstrated experimentally to be modulated by ROS, including the nominative member, AMPKα, which is both directly and indirectly regulated by redox-state (Auciello et al. 2014; Hinchy et al. 2018; Choi et al. 2001; Shirwany and Zou 2014; Shao et al. 2014). However, the precise mechanisms whereby various ARKs are regulated under redox conditions remain obscure and are likely to be context specific.
The Brain Specific Kinases (BRSKs, also termed Synapses of Amphids Defective [SAD] kinases), consist of two paralogs in vertebrates, termed BRSK1 and BRSK2, and are among the least well-studied of the ARK family (Nie et al. 2012). However, like all other members of the ARK family, BRSKs are downstream signaling targets of the Ser/Thr kinase LKB1 and also have the potential to be regulated ‘upstream’ by CAMKII, PAK1, and PKA, suggesting signal-dependent phosphorylation as a central regulatory mechanism (Alessi, Sakamoto, and Bayascas 2006; Lizcano et al. 2004; Nie et al. 2012; Bright, Carling, and Thornton 2008). BRSKs are highly expressed in the brain and central nervous system of model organisms, where they exhibit both distinct and redundant molecular functions (Kishi et al. 2005; Nakanishi et al. 2019); furthermore, they are implicated in several human pathologies, in particular neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (Saiyin et al. 2017; Li et al. 2020; Deng et al. 2022).
In the current study, we identify a new dominant mechanism for regulation of BRSKs through oxidative modification of conserved Cys residues within the kinase domain. We demonstrate that the catalytic activities of both BRSK1 and BRSK2 are fine-tuned through oxidative modification of the T-Loop +2 Cys residue, which communicates with a BRSK-specific Cys residue in the APE motif (CPE in BRSKs) within the activation segment. We provide evidence that the T-Loop Cys forms disulfide bonds with the ‘CPE’ motif Cys and that mutating the CPE-Cys to an alanine increases BRSK activity relative to the wild-type (WT) enzyme. Using a combination of biochemical analysis, structural modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations, we identify regulatory roles for these BRSK-conserved Cys residues and characterize novel intramolecular disulfide-links, providing new insights into BRSK1/2 regulation and the broader AMPK family regulation. Together, these findings highlight complex regulatory processes for BRSK1/2 that are dependent on both phosphorylation and Cys-redox modulation, with broad implications for the other dozen members of the ARK family.
Methods
Recombinant proteins and general reagents
All purchased biochemicals were of the highest purity available, and all recombinant proteins were analyzed by intact mass-spectrometry to confirm the species present. Active, recombinant full-length BRSK1 (2–778) and BRSK2 (2–674) proteins purified from insect Sf21 cells were purchased from MRC PPUU reagents (University of Dundee). Active recombinant LKB1/STRADα/MO25α was purchased from Merck. Gateway pENTR plasmids encoding full length human BRSK1 & BRSK2 were generated as part of the NIH common fund initiative to Illuminate the Druggable Genome (IDG) and was a gift from Dr. Ben Major (Washington University, St. Louis). Antibodies for BRSK1 (#5935), BRSK2 (#5460), DYKDDDDK Tag (D6WB5, #14793), Phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (#2535), HA-Tag (C29F4, #3724), 6XHiS tag (#2365) and GAPDH (#2118) were from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies for Phospho-Tau (rabbit, 44–750G) and GFP (mouse, MA5–15256) were from Invitrogen. The glutathione (ab9443) antibody was obtained from Abcam.
Cloning, Gateway Recombination and Site Directed Mutagenesis
BRSK1 and 2 were cloned into pDest vectors (to express N-terminal Flag or HA tagged proteins) using the Gateway LR Clonase II system (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. pENtR clones were obtained in the form of a Gateway-compatible donor vectors from the laboratory of Ben Major (Washington University in St. Louis). The Gateway LR Clonase II enzyme mixture mediates recombination between the attL sites on the Entry clone and the attR sites on the destination vector. BRSKs were also cloned into a pcDNA3 vector using a standard T4-ligase (NEB) protocol and expressed in frame with a 3C-protease cleavable N-terminal tandem STREP-tag. The catalytic domains of BRSK129−358 or BRSK214−341 were sub-cloned into pET28a (Novagen) to generate N-terminal hexa-His tagged plasmid constructs for expression of BRSK1/2 catalytic domains in E. coli. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using standard PCR-based mutagenic procedures with the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All plasmids were validated by complete sequencing of the protein coding region.
Recombinant BRSK expression and purification
Recombinant human BRSK129−358 or BRSK214−341 proteins, or each of the indicated amino acid substitutions, were produced in BL21 (DE3) pLysS E. coli cells (Novagen) and purified in the absence of reducing agents, unless stated otherwise. BRSK1/2 expression was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 18 h at 18°C and N-terminal His6-tag fusion proteins purified by step-wise affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, and 10% (v/v) glycerol. Where appropriate for redox assays, recombinant proteins were purified under reducing conditions in the presence of 1 mM DTT, as previously described (Byrne et al. 2020). BRSK proteins expressed from bacteria are unphosphorylated and catalytically inactive, and were activated by incubation with 10 ng of purified LKB1/STRADα/MO25α holoenzyme complex in the presence of 1 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl2 for 18 h at 4°C. Phosphorylation of BRSK proteins was verified by mass spectrometry and/or Western blotting analysis using a pThr172 AMPKα antibody, which demonstrates cross-reactivity for BRSK1/2 T-Loop phosphorylation (Tamir et al. 2020).
Detection of glutathionylated proteins by immunoblotting
Recombinant BRSK1 and 2 (0.5 μg) were incubated with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 100 mM NaCl, with 10 mM GSSG or GSH for 30 min at 20°C, and glutathione-protein complexes were detected by immunoblotting after nonreducing SDS-PAGE.
BRSK1/2 Kinase assays
BRSK activity assays were performed using microfluidic real-time mobility shift-based assays, as described previously (Byrne et al. 2020; Byrne et al. 2016; Mohanty et al. 2016), in the presence of 2 μM of the fluorescent-tagged BRSK1/2 peptide substrate (AMARA; 5-FAM- AMARAASAAALARRR -COOH) and 1 mM ATP. Optimal pressure and voltage settings were established to improve separation of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptides. All assays were performed in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.015% (v/v) Brij-35, and 5 mM MgCl2, and the real-time or end point degree of peptide phosphorylation was calculated by differentiating the ratio of the phosphopeptide:peptide. BRSK1/2 activity in the presence of different redox reagents was quantified by monitoring the generation of phosphopeptide during the assay, relative to controls. Data were normalized with respect to control assays, with phosphate incorporation into the peptide generally limited to <20% to prevent depletion of ATP and to ensure assay linearity. Recovery of BRSK activity from oxidative inhibition was assessed by incubating BRSKs with 1 mM hydrogen peroxide, followed by infusion of 2 mM DTT and substrate phosphorylation monitoring in real time. To account for potential variability in LKB1-dependent phosphorylation of BRSK proteins, rates of kinase activity (calculated as pmol phosphate incorporation per min) for each protein was normalized by densitometry to the activation site of phosphorylation signal (established with pThr172 AMPKα antibodies and ImageJ software).
Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
Thermal shift assays were performed with a StepOnePlus real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) machine (Life Technologies) using SYPRO Orange dye (Invitrogen) and thermal ramping (0.3°C in step intervals between 25° and 94°C). All proteins were diluted to a final concentration of 5 μM in 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 100 mM NaCl in the presence or absence of 10 mM DTT and were assayed as described previously (Foulkes et al. 2018). Normalized data were processed using the Boltzmann equation to generate sigmoidal denaturation curves, and average Tm/ΔTm values were calculated as previously described (Murphy et al. 2014) using GraphPad Prism software.
Human cell culture and treatment
HEK-293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), penicillin (50 U/ml), and streptomycin (0.25 μg/ml) (Lonza) and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. To examine the effects of oxidative stress on BRSK activity, cells were transiently co-transfected for 24 h with plasmids for expression of full-length, N-terminal tagged (Flag, HA or tandem Strep tag) BRSK1/2 (or Cys-Ala mutants) and EGFP-TAU (Addgene), using 3:1 polyethylenimine (average Mw, ~25,000 Da; Sigma-Aldrich) to total DNA ratio (4 μg BRSK and 2 μg TAU DNA) in a single well of a 24-well culture plate. To investigate inactivation of BRSK by peroxide, cells were incubated for 20 min with 10 mM H2O2, or buffer control. To establish reversibility of oxidative inhibition, cells were incubated for 20 min with 10 mM H2O2, or buffer control followed by a 15 min incubation with 20 mM reduced glutathione (GSH). In all assays, cells were subsequently washed 3x in PBS, harvested in bromophenol blue–free SDS sample buffer supplemented with 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail tablet, and a phosphatase inhibitor tablet (Roche), or in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA with 10 % (v/v) glycerol and 1 % (v/v) Triton X-100, with 1X protease inhibitor cocktail and 1X HALT phosphatase inhibitor). Lysates were sonicated briefly and clarified by centrifugation at 20 817×g for 20 min at 4°C, and supernatants were sampled and diluted 30-fold for calculation of the protein concentration using the Coomassie Plus Staining Reagent (Bradford) Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell lysates were normalized for total protein concentration and processed for immunoblotting or immuneprecipitation (IP).
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis BRSKs
48 h post-transfection, HEK-293T cells overexpressing BRSK1 and 2 (containing an N-terminal 3C cleavable tandem STREP-tag) were treated with 1 mM of the cell permeable chemical oxidant pervanadate for 30 min. Cells were resuspended in ice cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 1 % (v/v) NP-40, 100 mM iodoacetamide) and disrupted by passing the cell suspension through a 25-gauge needle 10 times. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 20 817×g for 20 min at 4°C, and recombinant proteins were affinity precipitated using Strep-TACTIN beads and physically eluted using 3C protease for subsequent MS analysis. Affinity precipitated BRSK1/2 and bacterially derived recombinant proteins (10 μg) were diluted (~4-fold and ~18-fold respectively) in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) containing 10 mM iodoacetamide and incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were subjected to an SP3-based trypsin digestion protocol (adapted from, (Daly et al. 2023)), using 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) and 0.5 μg of Trypsin gold (Promega). Digested fractions were split 50/50, and one half was treated with dithiothreitol and iodoacetamide as previously described by (Ferries et al. 2017). Samples were then subjected to in-house packed strong-cation exchange stage tip clean up, as described by (Daly et al. 2021). Dried peptides were solubilized in 20 μl of 3% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) TFA in water, sonicated for 10 min, and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C prior to reversed-phase HPLC separation using an Ultimate3000 nano system (Dionex) over a 60-min gradient, as described by (Ferries et al., 2017). For affinity precipitated BRSK preparations from human cells, all data acquisition was performed using a Thermo QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific), with higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) fragmentation set at 30% normalized collision energy for 2+ to 4+ charge states. MS1 spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (70K resolution at 200 m/z) over a range of 300 to 2000 m/z, AGC target = 1e6, maximum injection time = 250 ms, with an intensity threshold for fragmentation of 1e3. MS2 spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (17,500 resolution at 200 m/z), maximum injection time = 50 ms, AGC target = 1e5 with a 20 s dynamic exclusion window applied with a 10 ppm tolerance. For bacterially derived recombinant proteins, all data acquisition was performed using a Thermo Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific), with higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) fragmentation set at 32% normalized collision energy for 2+ to 5+ charge states. MS1 spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (120K resolution at 200 m/z) over a range of 400 to 2000 m/z, AGC target = 100%, maximum injection time = auto, with an intensity threshold for fragmentation of 2.5e4. MS2 spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (30k resolution at 200 m/z), maximum injection time = dynamic, AGC target = auto with a 20 s dynamic exclusion window applied with a 10 ppm tolerance. For disulfide analysis (regardless of sample type), raw data files were converted into mgf format using MSConvert, with peak picking filter set to “2- ” and searched with the MASCOT search engine (Perkins et al. 1999); searching the UniProt Human Reviewed database (updated weekly, accessed January 2023) (UniProt 2023) with variable modifications = carbamidomethylation (C), oxidation (M), phosphorylation (ST), instrument type = electrospray ionization–Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (ESI-FTICR) with internal fragments from 200–2000 m/z, MS1 mass tolerance = 10 ppm, MS2 mass tolerance = 0.01 Da. The crosslinking option was selected for the accessions Q8TDC3 or Q8IWQ3 with strategy set to Brute-force, for InterLink, IntraLink and LoopLink for the linker “Xlink: Disulfide (C)”. For the best MASCOT scoring peptide spectrum match (PSM) for a disulfide-containing peptide, the mgf file was extracted from the raw file and imported into a custom R script for re-drawing and manual annotation. Immunoprecipitated samples were additionally analyzed using PEAKS Studio (version XPro) using the same database, mass tolerances and modifications as previously described. PEAKS specific search settings: instrument = Orbi-Orbi, Fragmentation = HCD, acquisition = DDA, De Novo details = standard and a maximum of 5 variable PTMs possible. PEAKS PTM mode was enabled and filtering parameters of De Novo score >15, −log10P(value) >30.0, Ascore >30.0.
Phylogenetic Analysis
We identified and aligned diverse BRSK-related sequences from the UniProt reference proteomes database (downloaded on June 7, 2022) (UniProt 2023) using MAPGAPS (Neuwald 2009). From these hits, we manually curated a diverse set of sequences, then inferred a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree with IQ-TREE version 2.0.7 (Minh et al. 2020). Branch support values were generated using ultrafast bootstrap (Hoang et al. 2018) with 1000 resamples. The optimal substitution model was LG+R6 based on the Bayesian Information Criterion as determined by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). The consensus tree was used as our final topology. Subsequent analyses were performed using the ETE3 Toolkit (Huerta-Cepas, Serra, and Bork 2016).
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
The starting model for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was selected to provide an accurate representation of the protein kinase in its active-like conformation. To achieve this, we utilized an AlphaFold model of the BRSK2 kinase domain, corresponding to residues 14–267, in an active-like conformation. The average pLDDT score for the portion of the AlphaFold model employed in MD simulations was calculated to be 89.18%, indicating high confidence and accuracy (Jumper et al. 2021). Starting structures were prepared using the CHARMM-GUI interface which allowed for incorporation and parameterization of T-Loop phosphorylation, cysteine to alanine mutation, and oxidative cysteine modification (Brooks et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2016; Jo et al. 2014). Cysteine 176 (T+2) and 183 (CPE motif) were each mutated to alanine, sulfenic acid, or sulfonic acid forms. The protein was solvated in a cubic box of TIP3P water molecules, and counterions were added to maintain neutrality. The final systems contained ~ 54,000 atoms.
Prior to production runs, the system was subjected to minimization and equilibration protocols, using previously described parameters (Yeung et al. 2021; Venkat et al. 2023). Initially, a steepest descent energy minimization was performed to relax the system, followed by equilibration at constant volume and temperature (NVT) and constant pressure and temperature (NPT). Each equilibration stage was carried out for 125 ps with 1 fs time steps. Following equilibration, long-range electrostatics were calculated via particle mesh Ewald (PME) algorithms using the GROMACS MD engine (Van Der Spoel et al. 2005). Three 100 ns production molecular dynamics (MD) replicates were conducted at a 2fs time-step using the CHARMM36 forcefield for each starting model (Brooks et al. 2009). The resultant MDs were visualized with PyMOL (Schrodinger 2015) and analyzed in the python environment (Michaud-Agrawal et al. 2011).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Processed cell lysates and purified recombinant proteins were loaded onto 10% (v/v) SDS-PAGE gels, separated by electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using a semi-dry transfer system at 300 mA for 45 minutes. Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with 4% (w/v) Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Rockland) in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated primary antibodies. Protein was detected using specific secondary IRdye conjugated antibodies (Donkey anti Rabbit IRdye800cw or Goat anti Mouse IRdye680) and imaged using LI-COR Odyssey imaging system, or HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Pierce ECL Plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific). All antibodies were prepared in a solution of BSA dissolved in TBST and diluted according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reducing and non-reducing SDS-page for BRSK proteins was performed as previously described (Byrne et al, 2020).
Two-color Western blot detection method employing infrared fluorescence was used to measure the ratio of Tau phospho serine 262 to total Tau. Total EGFP Tau was detected using a mouse anti GFP antibody and visualized at 680 nm using goat anti mouse IRdye 680 while phospho-tau was detected using a Tau phospho serine 262 specific antibody and visualized at 800 nm using goat anti rabbit IRdye 800. Imaging was performed using a LI-COR Odyssey Clx with scan control settings set to 169 μm, medium quality, and 0.0 mm distance. Quantification was performed using Li-COR image studio on the raw image files. Total Tau to phospho Tau ratio was determined by measuring the ratio of the fluorescence intensities at 800 nm (pTau) to those at 680 nm (total tau) for each band. Statistical analysis was conducted in GraphPad Prism, to determine significant differences between experimental groups. Data is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Size Exclusion Chromatography with multi-angle Light scattering (SEC-MALS)
The oligomeric state of recombinant BRSKs was characterized by in-line Size Exclusion Chromatography-Multi-Angle Laser Light Scattering (SEC-MALS). Purified BRSK proteins (1 mg mL−1) were applied directly to a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 attached to an ÄKTA pure fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) system equilibrated in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. Eluted protein was detected by a MALLS detector and a differential refractive index (DRI) detector (DAWN HELEOS-II and Optilab TrEX; Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Data was analyzed using ASTRA v6.1 software (WYATT). The system was calibrated using BSA prior to data collection with BRSK1/2 proteins.
Results
Full-length BRSKs exhibit Redox-Sensitivity
Full length BRSK kinases share similar domain architecture to other ARK family members, including a ubiquitin associate domain (UBA) and kinase associated domain (KA1) following their kinase domain (Fig 1a). Due to the absence of known endogenous substrates selectively phosphorylated by BRSK1 or 2 (Tamir et al. 2020), we utilized a EGFP-Tau overexpression system in HEK-293T cells to assess BRSK activity (Yoshida and Goedert 2012). BRSK1 and 2, when co-expressed with EGFP-Tau, induced substantial phosphorylation of Tau at Ser 262, a modification lost in kinase-dead (KD) mutants with the catalytic aspartate in the ‘HRD’ motif mutated to alanine (D146BRSK1 or D141BRSK2), as shown in Figure 1b. The catalytic output of purified full length human BRSK1 & 2 purified from Sf21 cells was next monitored in real-time using a microfluidic kinase assays system and a generic ARK family substrate peptide AMARA (5-FAM-AMARAASAAALARRR -COOH), which is phosphorylated by BRSK1/2, but not the upstream kinase LKB1. In the absence of reducing agents (buffer alone), detectable peptide phosphorylation was extremely low for both kinases and ablated in the presence of H2O2 (Fig 1c). In contrast, inclusion of DTT enhanced BRSK1 & 2 activity by several orders of magnitude (Fig 1c). Moreover, H2O2-dependent inhibition of catalysis could be reversed, and even increased relative to basal activity, with the subsequent addition of a bolus of the reducing agent DTT (Fig 1c). BRSK proteins were rapidly activated by DTT in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting an obligate requirement of an appropriate reducing environment in order to enable catalytic activity (Fig 1d and Supp Fig 2a–b). Similarly, basal BRSK activity was inhibited by a gradient of H2O2 (Fig 1e, Supp Fig 2c–d). Western blotting revealed a dose-dependent and statistically significant decrease in BRSK-mediated pTau signal following incubation of HEK-293T cells with 10 mM peroxide for 10 minutes, with little alteration in total transfected Tau protein (Fig 1f). At the highest concentrations of peroxide treatment, we detected a reduction in total BRSK protein levels, suggesting a potential loss of stability for both kinases. Chronic oxidative stress was next stimulated by supplementing culture medium with (2 U/mL) glucose oxidase to facilitate constitutive steady-state generation of H2O2 (Askoxylakis et al. 2011, Mueller et al. 2009, Truong et all, 2016). This revealed a time dependent depletion of BRSK1 and 2 associated Tau phosphorylation (Supp Fig 2e–f). Importantly, H2O2-dependent loss of pTau could be reversed following exposure of the cells to the physiological antioxidant glutathione (GSH) (Fig 1g). These findings suggest that reversible oxidative modulation is relevant to BRSK1/2 kinase-dependent signaling in human cells, which can be recapitulated in vitro.
Mass spectrometric evidence that BRSK cysteine pairs can form intramolecular disulfide bonds
To identify residues that may contribute to redox regulation of BRSKs, we analyzed tryptic peptides derived from precipitated full-length cellular BRSK1 and BRSK2 by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). HEK-293T cells transiently over-expressing Strep-tagged BRSK proteins were lysed in the presence of the alkylating agent iodoacetamide to covalently block free thiol groups. LC-MS/MS revealed the presence of intramolecular bonds between C147BRSK1 - C153BRSK1 and C191BRSK1 - C198BRSK1 and C132BRSK2 - C138BRSK2 and C176BRSK2 - C183 BRSK2 (Fig 2a). Of note, all identified disulfide forming Cys residues were located in the kinase domains of the two proteins, in close proximity to known catalytic or regulatory motifs. C147BRSK1 - C153BRSK1 and C132BRSK2 - C138BRSK2 structurally link the HRD motif in the catalytic loop to the preceding E-helix, and C191BRSK1 - C198BRSK1 and C176BRSK2 - C183BRSK2 couple the T-loop Cys to the Cys residue of the CPE motif in BRSK1/2 (equivalent to the APE motif in most kinase activation segments) (Fig 2b). To study these reactive Cys residues in the context of catalysis, we purified the unphosphorylated catalytic domain of human BRSK129−358 (BRSK1cat) or BRSK214−341 (BRSK2cat) to homogeneity from E. coli. As expected, both truncated variants of BRSK were completely inactivate in our AMARA-based kinase assay, but could be ‘switched on’ following incubation with the physiological upstream regulator LKB1 (Fig 2c). Of note, despite sharing ~95% sequence identity within their kinase domain, LKB1-activated BRSK2 had higher catalytic activity compared to BRSK1 (Fig 2c). Moreover, and in support of our previous findings for full-length BRSK proteins (Fig 1), incubation of LKB1-activated WT BRSK1 or 2 with DTT greatly increased activity (Fig 2c). These data are consistent with regulatory Cys-based modification of the kinase domain under oxidative conditions, which can be reversed with a reducing agent in vitro.
Emergence and structural location of cysteines residues in BRSK proteins
Reversible redox regulation of signaling proteins typically requires sulfenyl derivatization of an exposed Cys residue(s) (Heppner, Janssen-Heininger, and van der Vliet 2017). Cys is the second least abundant amino acid in the vertebrate proteome, and conserved surface exposed Cys side chains can function as redox “hotspots” (Fomenko, Marino, and Gladyshev 2008; Su et al. 2019; Xiao et al. 2020). Previously, we established that all 14 members of the ARK family kinases, including BRSK1 and 2, contain a T-loop + 2 Cys residue. This residue is equivalent to the redox sensitive C199 found in PKA (Humphries, Juliano, and Taylor 2002) and is prognostic of redox regulation for multiple human Ser/Thr kinases (Byrne et al., 2020). Of the ARK family kinases that we previously analyzed, AMPKα1, SIK1–3 and MELK were all acutely inhibited by H2O2 in a reversible manner in vitro, which we attributed to sulfenylation of the activation segment Cys, based on biochemical and evolutionary analysis (Byrne et al., 2020). The T-loop + 2 Cys corresponds to C191BRSK1 and C176BRSK2 in BRSK1 and 2 respectively. This residue is located within the canonical activation segment, in close proximity to the regulatory site of LKB1 phosphorylation. Interestingly, mapping of Cys residues across the human ARK family reveals several conserved Cys located throughout their kinase domains (Fig 3a and b). However, these studies also reveal a distinguishing Cys residue that is unique to the catalytic domain of human BRSKs, which is located at the canonical alanine position of the “APE” motif, converting it to “CPE” (C198BRSK1/C183BRSK2 (Fig 3b). Of note, the unusual CPE Cys forms an intramolecular disulfide with the T-loop +2 Cys (Fig 2a). Intramolecular dimers incorporating T-loop Cys have also been identified in MELK and AKT2 (Cao et al. 2013; Huang et al. 2003). MELK is exceptional in that it possesses both a T-loop +1 as well as a T-loop +2 Cys, where the T-loop +1 Cys forms an intramolecular disulfide with a Cys proximal to the DFG motif and the T-loop +2 can form an intermolecular disulfide potentiating dimerization (Cao et al. 2013). In the case of AKT2, the T-loop +2 Cys forms an intramolecular disulfide with a Cys equivalent to that seen in MELK (Huang et al. 2003). In addition to the T+2 Cys, most human ARK family members (with the exception of MELK) contain an additional conserved Cys positioned 7 residues upstream of the HRD motif (HRD −7 Cys) located in the E-helix (Fig 3a and b). BRSKs share the HRD −7 Cys (C147BRSK1/ C132BRSK2), but further diverge from other ARK family members with the insertion of an additional potential disulfide bond-forming Cys residues preceding the HRD motif in the catalytic loop (CHRD-Cys, C153BRSK1/ C138BRSK2 in Fig 3a and b).
Phylogenetic analysis of BRSK protein sequences
A sequence-based analysis reveals the emergence of an early BRSK1 variant, which we term ‘proto-BRSK1’ that distinguishes it from the closely related AMPKs (Supp Fig 1a). This is followed by a subsequent expansion of BRSK1 and 2 sequences that coincides with the appearance of vertebrates (Fig 3c). Sequence alignment of BRSK catalytic domains from a diverse array of organisms, including the ancestral paralog and invertebrate specific proto-BRSK1, confirmed general sequence similarity and tight conservation of T-loop and HRD proximal Cys ‘pairs’ (Fig 3d). Interestingly, all BRSK domains also possess a Cys residue in the N-terminal β2-β3 loop (C54BRSK1/ C42BRSK2), and BRSK2 contains an additional residue at this site, C39BRSK2 (Fig 3d). The diversification of BRSKs from AMPKs also correlates with an increase in the total number of Cys residues in the kinase domain (Supp Fig 1a). Analysis of 2805 ARK-related sequences confirmed significant conservation of the T-loop + 2 and HRD −7 Cys, which were found respectively in ~18 % and ~10 % of ePKs across diverse eukaryotic species (Fig 3e). These Cys residues were invariant in vertebrate BRSK sequences, as were the BRSK specific CPE and HRD −1 Cys residues (Fig 3e). Unsurprisingly, substitution of the APE Ala (PKA position 206, found in ~65 % of ePKs) with a Cys is extremely uncommon (~1 %) in nearly all protein kinases, given the critical role of this motif in stabilizing the C-lobe and substrate interactions (Supp Fig 1b). The distribution of amino acids at HRD −1 position is much more variable in ePKs, with Ile and Val being most commonly conserved (~36 and 30 % respectively) and a Cys appearing with similar low frequency (~ 2% (Supp Fig 1b). The high degree of conservation observed for these Cys residues within vertebrate BRSKs indicates that they play critical functional or structural roles in these kinases (Fig 3e). This further suggests that diversification of the BRSKs in metazoans correlated with the accumulation of close proximity Cys ‘pairs’ with the potential to form regulatory disulfide bonds.
Cysteine residues within the kinase domain fine-tune BRSK activity
To assess the role of BRSK domain Cys residues in modulating catalytic activity, we expressed and purified wild-type (WT) and Cys-to-Ala variants of the BRSK1 and 2 kinase domains in E. coli. These Cys-to-Ala variants included T-loop +2 Cys mutants (C191ABRSK1 and C176ABRSK2), and T-loop CPE mutants (C198ABRSK1 and C183ABRSK2), expressed either in a WT or mutant T-loop +2 Cys background (C191/198ABRSK1 and C176/183ABRSK2). We also generated double mutants of the Cys residues upstream of the HRD motif (C147/153ABRSK1 and BRSK2 C132/138ABRSK2), and the unique N-terminal Cys pair in BRSK2 (C39/42ABRSK2). All recombinant BRSK proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified without DTT. Crucially, we were able to detect intramolecular disulfide bonds (C191BRSK1 - C198BRSK1 and C176BRSK2 - C183BRSK2) in the WT proteins by LC-MS/MS (Supp Fig 3). Interestingly, we could only identify an HRD proximal disulfide bond (C147BRSK1 - C153BRSK1) in BRSK1 under these specific experimental conditions (Supp Fig 3). We next probed for mixed disulfide formation in the presence of glutathione, using an antibody that recognizes glutathionylated proteins. We detected robust glutathionylation of both BRSK1 and BRSK2 in the presence of either reduced (GSH) or oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, and the signal strength inversely correlated with the presence of DTT (Supp Fig 4a). Of note, all of the BRSK Cys-to-Ala mutants studied here could be readily glutathionylated, which supports the existence of multiple reactive Cys residues within the kinase domains of BRSK1 and 2. To detect alterations in redox regulation, all BRSK proteins were first activated by incubation with LKB1, and T-loop phosphorylation was confirmed by immunoblotting (Supp Fig 4b). The active BRSK1/2 kinases were then assayed using the specific AMARA peptide in the presence or absence of fixed concentrations of DTT, and kinase activity was normalized to pBRSK signal derived from Supp Fig 4b. In agreement with our previous findings with full-length BRSKs, DTT was strongly activating for WT variants of both kinases, and this effect was severely blunted for the T-loop +2 Cys-Ala mutants, which exhibited lower basal rates of peptide phosphorylation. This is entirely consistent with our previous observations for Cys-based mutants of analogous residues in a range of distinct Ser/Thr kinases (Byrne et al. 2020) (Fig 4a and b). Of note, despite sharing ~95% sequence identity within their kinase domain, LKB1-activated BRSK2 demonstrated enhanced catalytic activity compared to BRSK1 (Fig 4b compared to a). Perhaps unsurprisingly, given their distant location on an N-lobe loop, mutation of the BRSK2 exclusive C39BRSK2 and C42BRSK2 residues had limited effect on the activity of BRSK2 (Fig 4b). In contrast, tandem mutation of the HRD proximal Cys residues resulted in pronounced abrogation of kinase activity, regardless of assay conditions for both kinases (Fig 4a and b). Given the near absolute conservation of the HRD −7 Cys in the ARK family of protein kinases, it is possible that this residue (C147BRSK1 and C132BRSK2) is functionally important for catalytic activity in some yet unidentified capacity. Interestingly, mutation of the CPE motif Cys (T-loop +9 Cys), and de facto restoration of the canonical APE motif, were insufficient to blunt DTT-dependent activation of either kinase. Moreover, this mutation, which would eliminate C191BRSK1 - C198BRSK1 and C176BRSK2 - C183BRSK2 disulfide bonds, increased basal (non-DTT stimulated) catalytic activity by 1.5–2-fold for both kinases. WT forms of BRSK2, and in particular BRSK1, were strongly inhibited by oxidative conditions, even when assays were preceded by DTT-dependent activation (Fig 4c and d). Unsurprisingly, the low levels of detectable C191ABRSK1 and C176ABRSK2 activity that could be measured following stimulation by DTT were completely abolished following the addition of H2O2. In contrast, CPE mutants (C198ABRSK1 and C183ABRSK2) were sharply activated by DTT but still exhibited further oxidative inhibition (Fig 4c and d), although to a lesser extent than their WT counterparts, particularly in the case of BRSK1.
To ensure that the observed variations in activity between variants of BRSK1/2 were not a consequence of structural impairment, we also performed differential scanning fluorometry (DSF) to assess protein folding and stability. Incubation of WT BRSK1 and 2 with DTT had no measurable effect on the thermal stability of either protein, suggesting that chemical disruption of pre-formed disulfide bonds had a minimal detectable impact on global protein stability, despite greatly increasing kinase activity (Supp Fig 4c). These assays also revealed only minor perturbations in protein thermal stability due to the incorporation of specified Cys-to-Ala mutants. Interestingly, we observed a consistent decrease in Tm values for C147/153ABRSK1 and C132/138ABRSK2 (ΔTm ~ −2 °C), suggesting a modest decrease in protein stability, and increased Tm values for CPE mutants (C198ABRSK1 and C183ABRSK2; ΔTm ~ +3 °C) (Supp Fig 4d).
Cellular analysis of BRSK Cys-based regulation
We next evaluated the relative contributions of the conserved T-loop Cys residues to BRSK redox sensitivity in a cellular context using our EGFP-Tau HEK-293T co-expression system and full length BRSK proteins. Mirroring our peptide-based kinase assays, loss of the T-loop +2 Cys residue evoked a marked decrease in BRSK-dependent Tau phosphorylation (Fig 5a and 5b). In contrast, mutation of the CPE Cys to an alanine consistently increased overall Tau phosphorylation (~1.5 and ~1.2 fold increase relative to WT BRSK1 and BRSK2 respectively) (Fig 5). Interestingly, the CPE mutations preserved BRSK redox sensitivity in cells treated with hydrogen peroxide, and inclusion of GSH was sufficient to restore BRSK-dependent pTau signals. Finally, we extended our analysis to consider the BRSK1 and 2 HRD motif proximal cysteines, and the BRSK2 exclusive C39/C42 pair. As predicted, Tau phosphorylation by BRSK2 C39/42A (which closely matched the activity profile of WT BRSK2 in our in vitro kinase assays (Fig 4)) was comparable to that observed for WT (but still less than hyper-active BRSK2 C183A) and was also similarly inhibited by the presence of H2O2 (Supp Fig 4e). Using the AMARA peptide as a substrate, we previously demonstrated that BRSK1 C147/153A and BRSK2 C132/138A were catalytically compromised (in a manner resembling the respective T-loop + 2 Cys-Ala mutants (Fig 4)). It is consistent that BRSK2 C132/138A was unable to increase pTau signal above background levels (Supp Fig 4e). Finally, we were unable to detect BRSK1 C147/153A protein expression in transfected cell lysates, which may indicate a loss of stability for this protein (Supp Fig 4e).
Cysteine modifications alter critical structural interactions required for kinase allosteric regulation
We next sought to investigate the structural basis for redox-dependent regulation of BRSK activity using molecular modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our in vitro analysis established that oxidative conditions inhibit the active, T-loop phosphorylated form of BRSKs, and so our simulations were performed on an ‘active’ conformation of BRSK2 generated using AlphaFold2 (see methods). Cysteine residues can undergo both reversible (sulfenic) and irreversible (sulfonic) oxidation, and so sulfenic acid or sulfonic acid forms of Cys were incorporated at the C176BRSK2 and C183BRSK2 positions. Additionally, the impact of a non-redox active ‘silent’ Ala residue was also modelled at these sites.
The T+2 C176BRSK2 is in close proximity to threonine T174BRSK2, phosphorylation of which stabilizes the kinase domain in an active conformation through salt bridge interactions with charged residues in the catalytic loop (Fig 6a). In particular, R140BRSK2 in the canonical HRD motif coordinates with the phosphate group of pT174BRSK2 (Nolen, Taylor, and Ghosh 2004). Simulations demonstrate that the R140BRSK2-pT174BRSK2 salt bridge is preserved across the entire MD simulation, as demonstrated by the contact map (Fig 6b). In the C176AlaBRSK2 simulations, the coordination between R140BRSK2 and pT174BRSK2 is partially attenuated due to an increase in the flexibility of pT174BRSK2 (Fig 6c). This predicted increase in flexibility may explain the loss of BRSK2 catalytic activity for C176ABRSK2 mutant (Fig 4). However, oxidative modification of C176BRSK2 did not result in a substantial disruption of the salt bridge interaction (Fig 6d,e). As such, it is unclear at this stage precisely how oxidation of the T+2 Cys exerts is regulatory effect on BRSK2 kinase activity.
In contrast to C176BRSK2, C183BRSK2 within the CPE motif is buried in the C-terminal lobe of the kinase domain, and the SH group of C183BRSK2 is pointed toward a canonical salt bridge that forms between the glutamate (E185BRSK2) in the APE/CPE motif and R259BRSK2 in the I-helix (Fig 6f). The E185-R259 salt bridge is a eukaryotic protein kinase (EPK)-specific interaction that is critical for maintaining the EPK fold and for allosterically coupling the T-Loop to distal substrate binding and regulatory sites (Yang et al. 2012; Oruganty and Kannan 2012). The selective conservation of Cys in place of Ala in the APE motif represents an interesting divergence of BRSKs from other ARK family kinases (Fig 3e, Supp fig 1). When C183BRSK2 is in a reduced form or mutated to an alanine, the E185-R259 is maintained throughout the MD simulation (Fig 6g/i) Remarkably, in simulations incorporating oxidative modification of C183BRSK2 we observed the immediate breaking of the E185-R259 salt bridge, and this contact remains broken throughout the simulation (Fig 6h,j). Oxidation of C183BRSK2 to either sulfenic or sulfonic acid rewires this salt bridge, with R259BRSK2 exclusively interacting with the oxidized C183BRSK2 while E185BRSK2 pivots outward and becomes more solvent-exposed. Thus, oxidized C183BRSK2 mediated disruption of E185-R259 BRSK2 salt bridge represents a unique inactive state in BRSKs which breaks the allosteric network that allows cross-communication between the T-loop and the C-Lobe.
Surprisingly, simulations incorporating intramolecular disulfide bonds identified in MS/MS experiments did not indicate any major changes in dynamics resulting from either the Cys132–138 or the Cys176–183 disulfide bond formation. Most of the fluctuations in these simulations were confined to the G-Loop and β3-αC loop, which are distal from the disulfide bonds (Supp. Fig 5)
Recombinant BRSK proteins form limited protein dimers
Several ARK family members form disulfide bond-dependent dimers (Nayak et al. 2006; Marx et al. 2010; Cao et al. 2013). To evaluate the formation of intermolecular disulfides, we subjected purified kinase domains of BRSK1 and 2 isolated from E. coli to non-reducing SDS-PAGE, followed by western blotting to probe for higher order BRSK structures (Fig 7). This revealed multiple species of each kinases possessing drastically decreased electrophoretic mobility compared to the major BRSK1/2 monomer bands. These species increased in abundance in the presence of H2O2 and were absent when DTT was included. Of particular significance was the appearance of a prominent oxidation-dependent species at ~70 kDa, the approximate molecular weight of a BRSK dimer. Consistently, all higher molecular weight species resolved into a single monomer band after reducing (+DTT) SDS-PAGE, which strongly implicates disulfide bond-dependent oligomerization. Curiously, mutation of the T+2 Cys had no discernable effect on the formation of BRSK oligomers, although this is consistent with our previous observation of multiple reactive Cys residues in BRSKs that may be capable of forming a broad variety of intermolecular disulfide bonds. However, it is noteworthy that even in the presence of peroxide, the majority of the BRSK1 and 2 proteins existed as a monomeric species, which suggests that oligomerization is unlikely to be the primary driver of oxidative inhibition that we detect in kinase-based peptide assays. Furthermore, we detected interactions between BRSK1 and BRSK2 (suggesting homo- and heterodimer formation) after co-immunoprecipitation of alternatively tagged variants of the full length proteins overexpressed in the HEK-293T system (Supp Fig 6a).
Using SEC-MALS, we confirmed that BRSK1 and 2 (purified in the absence of DTT) were near-uniformly monomeric in solution, but possessed the potential to self-associate and form dimers. The molar mass points across the monomer peak indicates a high degree of homogeneity (weight-average molar mass Mw = ~42 kDa ± 0.99 % and ~43 kDa ± 0.25 %, respectively Supp Fig 6b and c). Interestingly, the BRSK2 spectra included a high molecular weight shoulder of an approximate dimer size (Mw = ~75 kDa ± 2.1 %) that exhibited non-uniform molar mass points indicative of a heterogenous population (likely as a consequence of poor separation between the two peaks and higher order oligomers). SEC-MALS also confirmed the presence of a BRSK species of approximate dimer size (Mw = ~80 kDa) for C183BRSK2 that was noticeably absent for C176BRSK2 (Supp Fig 6d and e). Although the major species observed for both mutants was a monomer, the inability to detect dimer-like peaks for C176BRSK2 may suggest that the T-+2 Cys plays a role in dimerisation. Although we have searched for BRSK1/2 inter-molecular disulfide bonds in our LC-MS/MS data in an attempt to characterize the mechanism of dimer formation, we were unable to identify any inter-molecular linked peptides. This is likely due to the extremely low abundance of these dimeric species in this sample (thus yielding a very small proportion of inter-linked tryptic peptides) and/or because inter-molecular disulfide linked tryptic peptides are too large for identification using this analytical pipeline. Collectively these findings confirm that the isolated kinase domains of both BRSKs primarily occupy a largely monomeric conformation and can form limited higher order redox-sensitive oligomers via covalent S-S bonds in vitro. However, although reversible oxidation-based inactivation of BRSK1 and 2 is apparent in full-length BRSK1 and 2, it remains to be determined to what extent multimerization modulates BRSK catalytic activity (Fig 8) or how these mechanisms might contribute to signaling-based interactions in cells.
Discussion
Redox regulation of kinases and other signaling molecules is a rapidly expanding field of research, which has recently extended far beyond the early observations of oxidative inhibition in protein tyrosine phosphatases (Brandes, Schmitt, and Jakob 2009). More recent enquiries have provided strong evidence for direct regulative oxidative modification of Met and Cys residues across divergent protein kinase families, providing temporal and spatial control of their catalytic outputs (Corcoran and Cotter 2013; Truong and Carroll 2013; Jarvis, Hughes, and Ledgerwood 2012). However, despite the prevalence of this regulatory mechanism, the structural basis to explain how redox-active cysteines contribute to allosteric control of catalytic activity is still in its infancy. In this study, we demonstrate, for the first time, that two T-loop +2 Cys-containing members of the ARK family, BRSK1 and 2, are reversibly inactivated by oxidative-dependent mechanisms in vitro and in human cells. Moreover, we uncover a multifaceted redox-activity profile for human BRSKs, involving functional Cys-pairs that are conserved within the catalytic domains of these understudied enzymes. In contrast to Ser/Thr kinases such as Aurora A, where a single Cys residue is the dominant driver of redox-sensitivity (Byrne et al. 2020; Tsuchiya et al. 2020), BRSK1 and 2 possess multiple sulfenylation-prone Cys residues. Additionally, the close proximity of distinct Cys ‘pairs’ permits the formation of two intramolecular disulfide bonds: the first forming between two HRD-motif proximal sites, and the second bridging the conserved T-loop + 2 and unique ‘CPE’ motif Cys residues. We propose a model where disulfide bond formation can impose a steric block on kinase activity whilst structural perturbations, likely emanating from sulfenylation of conserved BRSK family Cys residues within critical kinase regulatory motifs, provides an additional layer of tunable regulation Validation of these reversibly oxidized Cys species is also of relevance as this may implicate a mechanistic role for ROS sensing in the largely obscure BRSK signaling pathways that operate in different cell types, including those that impact on canonical redox pathways that lead to NRF2 inactivation in cells (Tamir et al. 2020).
Multilayered redox regulation of BRSKs
The strategic positioning of Cys residues near key regulatory elements in the T-Loop suggests an evolutionary adaptation for ROS-based sensing in protein kinases (Beenstock, Mooshayef, and Engelberg 2016; Pearce, Komander, and Alessi 2010). Full kinase activity typically requires T-Loop phosphorylation, a process further modulated by mechanisms like allosteric activation in Aurora A (Eyers et al. 2003; Bayliss et al. 2003) and activation of CAMKs by CaM (Rellos et al. 2010). ARK family kinases, such as BRSK1 and 2, are primed by phosphorylation in the T-loop of a single Thr residue by the master regulatory kinase LKB1. However, our findings suggest that oxidation (or reduction) of key reactive Cys residues in the kinase domains of BRSK1 /2 might provide a ‘dominant’ regulatory oversight of enzyme output whose function in cells is likely controlled by subcellular compartmentalization and/or partner protein interactions.
The ARK family of protein kinases (typified by AMPKα), share a conserved structure with a notable conserved T-loop + 2 Cys residue, which is crucial for redox regulation, as evidenced in AMPK and other ARKs (Byrne et al. 2020). Mutational analysis of the T+2 Cys position in BRSKs confirms its critical role in supporting kinase activity. Interestingly, a second Cys residue (HRD −7), co-conserved in most ARKs with the exception of MELK, appears to add another regulatory dimension, with alanine substitution at this site significantly reducing BRSK1 and 2 activity (Fig 4 and Supp Fig 4d3d). This is paralleled by the redox-sensitive Cys 130 in AMPK (Shao et al. 2014). Moreover, the tendency of several ARKs to form disulfide bond-dependent dimers in solution (Nayak et al. 2006; Marx et al. 2010; Cao et al. 2013) is corroborated by crystal structures of MELK, MARK2, MARK3, and BRSK2 (Fig 8b), revealing asymmetric dimers linked by disulfide bridges at the T-loop + 2 Cys (Marx et al. 2010; Marx et al. 2006; Murphy et al. 2007; Cao et al. 2013)
BRSK-specific adaptations relevant to Cys-based signaling?
BRSKs are differentiated from other ARKs and ePKs through augmentation with two unique Cys residues at the HRD −1 and T-loop +9 positions, forming a novel distinguishing ‘CPE’ motif in place of the typical APE motif found in most human protein kinases. These Cys pairs facilitate intramolecular disulfide bond formation, influencing kinase activity and conformation. This mechanism is reminiscent of AKT and MELK, where intramolecular disulfide bonds regulate kinase activity (Murata et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2003; Byrne et al. 2020; Beullens et al. 2005). Deletion of the T-loop Cys in the CPE motif partially reduces BRSK1 and 2 auto-inhibition, suggesting multiple functional roles for these cysteines, which is supported by our molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
Comparative evolutionary analysis indicates that approximately 1.4% of all ePKs, including AKT and MELK, have cysteines at the DFG + 2 and T-loop + 2 positions capable of forming similar disulfide bridges (Byrne et al. 2020; Cao et al. 2013; Huang et al. 2003). MELK, despite lacking the typical HRD −7 Cys of ARKs, has compensatory activation loop Cys residues that form variable disulfide bonds (Beullens et al. 2005). A broader analysis across human protein kinases shows 273 unique Cys pairs capable of forming disulfide bonds, suggesting a widespread regulatory mechanism in the kinome (Supp. File 1). Our findings in BRSK1 and 2 highlight an extensive intramolecular disulfide network, serving as a reversible switch for kinase activity and interaction regulation. When considering the dominant regulative role of the T-loop available T+2 Cys, it is tempting to speculate that formation of intramolecular disulfides bonds with adjacent cysteines may be protective against deleterious hyper-oxidized species and enable rapid re-activation of the kinase after emergence from oxidative stress conditions by the disulfide reductase system (Krishnan et al. 2011; Barrett et al. 1999; Chen et al. 2008).
The identification and characterization of unique reactive Cys residues within the kinase domains of BRSK1 and 2 reveals sites of covalent-oxidative modification that may also provide an underexploited opportunity to develop targeted therapeutic strategies for BRSK-associated pathologies. Furthermore, mapping the spatial distribution of Cys across the AMPK-related kinase family provides valuable insights into potential redox hotspots that may underpin a tunable modulation of catalytic outputs with wider implications for cellular signaling. As a master regulator of metabolic homeostasis, AMPK activity is central to appropriate redox balance within cells (Ren and Shen 2019; Choi et al. 2001; Hawley et al. 2010; Zmijewski et al. 2010; Hinchy et al. 2018; Auciello et al. 2014; Shao et al. 2014), but until recently evidence of crosstalk between BRSKs and redox signaling has been less clear. However, BRSKs can indirectly modulate the cellular antioxidant response by orchestrating suppression of the transcription factor (and master regulator/sensor of the antioxidant response), NRF2, in an mTOR-dependent manner in HEK-293 cells (Tamir et al. 2020). NRF2 is targeted for proteasomal degradation by its inhibitor partner, KEAP1, and under conditions of elevated ROS, oxidation of sensor Cys residues in KEAP1 allows NRF2 to escape ubiquitination and induce transcription of the antioxidant machinery (Baird and Yamamoto 2020). Our discovery of redox regulation in BRSKs suggests that it may be part of a multi-protein Cys-based ‘relay’ network of ROS sensitive effectors upstream of NRF2, potentially constituting a new oxidative stress signaling mechanism. Uncoupling the specific role of BRSKs in this pathway will be critical in illuminating BRSK1 and 2 physiology and their roles in neuronal function and disease and may simultaneously provide an explanation for the appearance of two functional BRSK1/2 genes in vertebrates.
Supplementary Material
Funding and additional information
Funding from N.K. (grant no: R35 GM139656) is acknowledged. P.A.E. acknowledges funding from University of Liverpool BBSRC MRC/IAA awards. A.V. acknowledges funding from ARCS Foundation. D.P.B, L.A.D., S.O.O., P.A.E. and C.E.E. also acknowledge BBSRC grants BB/S018514/1, BB/N021703/1, BB/X002780/1 and North West Cancer Research (NWCR) grant CR1208. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Competing Interest Statement
The authors claim no competing interest.
Data Availability
All data generated in this study are included within the manuscript. All mass spectrometry data has been deposited at the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifiers PXD044990. Source data are provided for each figure. MD simulations and associated data may be accessed from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xtiwpjgyzxy1oz0/AACK6dS3ypzYXDih3wgKp9bla?dl=0.
References
- Alessi D. R., Sakamoto K., and Bayascas J. R.. 2006. ‘LKB1-dependent signaling pathways’, Annu Rev Biochem, 75: 137–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Askoxylakis V., Millonig G., Wirkner U., Schwager C., Rana S., Altmann A., Haberkorn U., Debus J., Mueller S., and Huber P. E.. 2011. ‘Investigation of tumor hypoxia using a two-enzyme system for in vitro generation of oxygen deficiency’, Radiat. Oncol., 6: 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auciello F. R., Ross F. A., Ikematsu N., and Hardie D. G.. 2014. ‘Oxidative stress activates AMPK in cultured cells primarily by increasing cellular AMP and/or ADP’, Febs Letters, 588: 3361–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baird L., and Yamamoto M.. 2020. ‘The Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the KEAP1-NRF2 Pathway’, Mol Cell Biol, 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrett W. C., DeGnore J. P., Konig S., Fales H. M., Keng Y. F., Zhang Z. Y., Yim M. B., and Chock P. B.. 1999. ‘Regulation of PTP1B via glutathionylation of the active site cysteine 215’, Biochemistry, 38: 6699–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayliss R., Sardon T., Vernos I., and Conti E.. 2003. ‘Structural basis of Aurora-A activation by TPX2 at the mitotic spindle’, Mol Cell, 12: 851–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beenstock J., Mooshayef N., and Engelberg D.. 2016. ‘How Do Protein Kinases Take a Selfie (Autophosphorylate)?’, Trends Biochem Sci, 41: 938–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beullens M., Vancauwenbergh S., Morrice N., Derua R., Ceulemans H., Waelkens E., and Bollen M.. 2005. ‘Substrate specificity and activity regulation of protein kinase MELK’, J Biol Chem, 280: 40003–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandes N., Schmitt S., and Jakob U.. 2009. ‘Thiol-based redox switches in eukaryotic proteins’, Antioxid Redox Signal, 11: 997–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bright N. J., Carling D., and Thornton C.. 2008. ‘Investigating the regulation of brain-specific kinases 1 and 2 by phosphorylation’, J Biol Chem, 283: 14946–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bright N. J., Thornton C., and Carling D.. 2009. ‘The regulation and function of mammalian AMPK-related kinases’, Acta Physiol (Oxf), 196: 15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks B. R., Brooks C. L. 3rd, Mackerell A. D. Jr., Nilsson L., Petrella R. J., Roux B., Won Y., Archontis G., Bartels C., Boresch S., Caflisch A., Caves L., Cui Q., Dinner A. R., Feig M., Fischer S., Gao J., Hodoscek M., Im W., Kuczera K., Lazaridis T., Ma J., Ovchinnikov V., Paci E., Pastor R. W., Post C. B., Pu J. Z., Schaefer M., Tidor B., Venable R. M., Woodcock H. L., Wu X., Yang W., York D. M., and Karplus M.. 2009. ‘CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program’, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30: 1545–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrne D. P., Shrestha S., Galler M., Cao M., Daly L. A., Campbell A. E., Eyers C. E., Veal E. A., Kannan N., and Eyers P. A.. 2020. ‘Aurora A regulation by reversible cysteine oxidation reveals evolutionarily conserved redox control of Ser/Thr protein kinase activity’, Sci Signal, 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrne D. P., Vonderach M., Ferries S., Brownridge P. J., Eyers C. E., and Eyers P. A.. 2016. ‘cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) complexes probed by complementary differential scanning fluorimetry and ion mobility-mass spectrometry’, Biochem J, 473: 3159–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao L. S., Wang J., Chen Y., Deng H., Wang Z. X., and Wu J. W.. 2013. ‘Structural basis for the regulation of maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase’, PLoS One, 8: e70031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao M., Day A. M., Galler M., Latimer H. R., Byrne D. P., Foy T. W., Dwyer E., Bennett E., Palmer J., Morgan B. A., Eyers P. A., and Veal E. A.. 2023. ‘A peroxiredoxin-P38 MAPK scaffold increases MAPK activity by MAP3K-independent mechanisms’, Mol Cell. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y. Y., Chu H. M., Pan K. T., Teng C. H., Wang D. L., Wang A. H., Khoo K. H., and Meng T. C.. 2008. ‘Cysteine S-nitrosylation protects protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B against oxidation-induced permanent inactivation’, J Biol Chem, 283: 35265–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi S. L., Kim S. J., Lee K. T., Kim J., Mu J., Birnbaum M. J., Soo Kim S., and Ha J.. 2001. ‘The regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by H(2)O(2)’, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 287: 92–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corcoran A., and Cotter T. G.. 2013. ‘Redox regulation of protein kinases’, Febs Journal, 280: 1944–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daly L. A., Brownridge P. J., Batie M., Rocha S., See V., and Eyers C. E.. 2021. ‘Oxygen-dependent changes in binding partners and post-translational modifications regulate the abundance and activity of HIF-1alpha/2alpha’, Sci Signal, 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daly Leonard A, Byrne Dominic P, Perkins Simon, Brownridge Philip J, McDonnell Euan, Jones Andrew R, Eyers Patrick A, and Eyers Claire E. 2023. ‘A bespoke analytical workflow for the confident identification of sulfopeptides and their discrimination from phosphopeptides’, bioRxiv: 2023.07. 15.549150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng J., Wang Y., Hu M., Lin J., Li Q., Liu C., and Xu X.. 2022. ‘Deleterious Variation in BR Serine/Threonine Kinase 2 Classified a Subtype of Autism’, Front Mol Neurosci, 15: 904935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engh R. A., and Bossemeyer D.. 2001. ‘The protein kinase activity modulation sites: mechanisms for cellular regulation - targets for therapeutic intervention’, Adv Enzyme Regul, 41: 121–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyers P. A., Erikson E., Chen L. G., and Maller J. L.. 2003. ‘A novel mechanism for activation of the protein kinase Aurora A’, Curr Biol, 13: 691–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faezov Bulat, and Dunbrack Roland L. Jr.. 2023. ‘AlphaFold2 models of the active form of all 437 catalytically-competent typical human kinase domains’, bioRxiv: 2023.07.21.550125. [Google Scholar]
- Ferries S., Perkins S., Brownridge P. J., Campbell A., Eyers P. A., Jones A. R., and Eyers C. E.. 2017. ‘Evaluation of Parameters for Confident Phosphorylation Site Localization Using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid Mass Spectrometer’, J Proteome Res, 16: 3448–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fomenko D. E., Marino S. M., and Gladyshev V. N.. 2008. ‘Functional diversity of cysteine residues in proteins and unique features of catalytic redox-active cysteines in thiol oxidoreductases’, Mol Cells, 26: 228–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forman H. J., Davies M. J., Kramer A. C., Miotto G., Zaccarin M., Zhang H., and Ursini F.. 2017. ‘Protein cysteine oxidation in redox signaling: Caveats on sulfenic acid detection and quantification’, Arch Biochem Biophys, 617: 26–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foulkes D. M., Byrne D. P., Yeung W., Shrestha S., Bailey F. P., Ferries S., Eyers C. E., Keeshan K., Wells C., Drewry D. H., Zuercher W. J., Kannan N., and Eyers P. A.. 2018. ‘Covalent inhibitors of EGFR family protein kinases induce degradation of human Tribbles 2 (TRIB2) pseudokinase in cancer cells’, Sci Signal, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrido Ruiz D., Sandoval-Perez A., Rangarajan A. V., Gunderson E. L., and Jacobson M. P.. 2022. ‘Cysteine Oxidation in Proteins: Structure, Biophysics, and Simulation’, Biochemistry, 61: 2165–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta V., and Carroll K. S.. 2014. ‘Sulfenic acid chemistry, detection and cellular lifetime’, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1840: 847–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawley S. A., Ross F. A., Chevtzoff C., Green K. A., Evans A., Fogarty S., Towler M. C., Brown L. J., Ogunbayo O. A., Evans A. M., and Hardie D. G.. 2010. ‘Use of cells expressing gamma subunit variants to identify diverse mechanisms of AMPK activation’, Cell Metab, 11: 554–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heppner D. E., Janssen-Heininger Y. M. W., and van der Vliet A.. 2017. ‘The role of sulfenic acids in cellular redox signaling: Reconciling chemical kinetics and molecular detection strategies’, Arch Biochem Biophys, 616: 40–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinchy E. C., Gruszczyk A. V., Willows R., Navaratnam N., Hall A. R., Bates G., Bright T. P., Krieg T., Carling D., and Murphy M. P.. 2018. ‘Mitochondria-derived ROS activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) indirectly’, J Biol Chem, 293: 17208–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang D. T., Chernomor O., von Haeseler A., Minh B. Q., and Vinh L. S.. 2018. ‘UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation’, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35: 518–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X., Begley M., Morgenstern K. A., Gu Y., Rose P., Zhao H., and Zhu X.. 2003. ‘Crystal structure of an inactive Akt2 kinase domain’, Structure, 11: 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huerta-Cepas J., Serra F., and Bork P.. 2016. ‘ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data’, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33: 1635–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphries K. M., Juliano C., and Taylor S. S.. 2002. ‘Regulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity by glutathionylation’, J Biol Chem, 277: 43505–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis R. M., Hughes S. M., and Ledgerwood E. C.. 2012. ‘Peroxiredoxin 1 functions as a signal peroxidase to receive, transduce, and transmit peroxide signals in mammalian cells’, Free Radic Biol Med, 53: 1522–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jo S., Cheng X., Islam S. M., Huang L., Rui H., Zhu A., Lee H. S., Qi Y., Han W., Vanommeslaeghe K., MacKerell A. D. Jr., Roux B., and Im W.. 2014. ‘CHARMM-GUI PDB manipulator for advanced modeling and simulations of proteins containing nonstandard residues’, Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 96: 235–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jumper J., Evans R., Pritzel A., Green T., Figurnov M., Ronneberger O., Tunyasuvunakool K., Bates R., Zidek A., Potapenko A., Bridgland A., Meyer C., Kohl S. A. A., Ballard A. J., Cowie A., Romera-Paredes B., Nikolov S., Jain R., Adler J., Back T., Petersen S., Reiman D., Clancy E., Zielinski M., Steinegger M., Pacholska M., Berghammer T., Bodenstein S., Silver D., Vinyals O., Senior A. W., Kavukcuoglu K., Kohli P., and Hassabis D.. 2021. ‘Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold’, Nature, 596: 583–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B. Q., Wong T. K. F., von Haeseler A., and Jermiin L. S.. 2017. ‘ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates’, Nat Methods, 14: 587–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kishi M., Pan Y. A., Crump J. G., and Sanes J. R.. 2005. ‘Mammalian SAD kinases are required for neuronal polarization’, Science, 307: 929–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan N., Fu C., Pappin D. J., and Tonks N. K.. 2011. ‘H2S-Induced sulfhydration of the phosphatase PTP1B and its role in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response’, Sci Signal, 4: ra86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., Cheng X., Swails J. M., Yeom M. S., Eastman P. K., Lemkul J. A., Wei S., Buckner J., Jeong J. C., Qi Y., Jo S., Pande V. S., Case D. A., Brooks C. L. 3rd, MacKerell A. D. Jr., Klauda J. B., and Im W.. 2016. ‘CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM Simulations Using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field’, J Chem Theory Comput, 12: 405–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lennicke C., Rahn J., Lichtenfels R., Wessjohann L. A., and Seliger B.. 2015. ‘Hydrogen peroxide - production, fate and role in redox signaling of tumor cells’, Cell Commun Signal, 13: 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R., He M., Wu B., Zhang P., Zhang Q., and Chen Y.. 2020. ‘SAD-B modulates epileptic seizure by regulating AMPA receptors in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and in the PTZ-induced epileptic model’, Braz J Med Biol Res, 53: e9175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lizcano J. M., Goransson O., Toth R., Deak M., Morrice N. A., Boudeau J., Hawley S. A., Udd L., Makela T. P., Hardie D. G., and Alessi D. R.. 2004. ‘LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1’, EMBO J, 23: 833–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manning G., Whyte D. B., Martinez R., Hunter T., and Sudarsanam S.. 2002. ‘The protein kinase complement of the human genome’, Science, 298: 1912–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marx A., Nugoor C., Muller J., Panneerselvam S., Timm T., Bilang M., Mylonas E., Svergun D. I., Mandelkow E. M., and Mandelkow E.. 2006. ‘Structural variations in the catalytic and ubiquitin-associated domains of microtubule-associated protein/microtubule affinity regulating kinase (MARK) 1 and MARK2’, J Biol Chem, 281: 27586–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marx A., Nugoor C., Panneerselvam S., and Mandelkow E.. 2010. ‘Structure and function of polarity-inducing kinase family MARK/Par-1 within the branch of AMPK/Snf1-related kinases’, FASEB J, 24: 1637–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michaud-Agrawal N., Denning E. J., Woolf T. B., and Beckstein O.. 2011. ‘MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations’, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32: 2319–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minh B. Q., Schmidt H. A., Chernomor O., Schrempf D., Woodhams M. D., von Haeseler A., and Lanfear R.. 2020. ‘IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era’, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37: 1530–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty S., Oruganty K., Kwon A., Byrne D. P., Ferries S., Ruan Z., Hanold L. E., Katiyar S., Kennedy E. J., Eyers P. A., and Kannan N.. 2016. ‘Hydrophobic Core Variations Provide a Structural Framework for Tyrosine Kinase Evolution and Functional Specialization’, PLoS Genet, 12: e1005885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morshed Nader, Lee Meelim J, Rodriguez Felicia H, Lauffenburger Douglas A, Mastroeni Diego, and White Forest M. 2021. ‘Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer’s disease’, Nature Aging, 1: 550–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller S., Millonig G., and Waite G.. 2009. ‘The GOX/CAT system: A novel enzymatic method to independently control hydrogen peroxide and hypoxia in cell culture’, Adv. Med. Sci., 54: 121–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murata H., Ihara Y., Nakamura H., Yodoi J., Sumikawa K., and Kondo T.. 2003. ‘Glutaredoxin exerts an antiapoptotic effect by regulating the redox state of Akt’, J Biol Chem, 278: 50226–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy J. M., Korzhnev D. M., Ceccarelli D. F., Briant D. J., Zarrine-Afsar A., Sicheri F., Kay L. E., and Pawson T.. 2007. ‘Conformational instability of the MARK3 UBA domain compromises ubiquitin recognition and promotes interaction with the adjacent kinase domain’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104: 14336–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy J. M., Zhang Q., Young S. N., Reese M. L., Bailey F. P., Eyers P. A., Ungureanu D., Hammaren H., Silvennoinen O., Varghese L. N., Chen K., Tripaydonis A., Jura N., Fukuda K., Qin J., Nimchuk Z., Mudgett M. B., Elowe S., Gee C. L., Liu L., Daly R. J., Manning G., Babon J. J., and Lucet I. S.. 2014. ‘A robust methodology to subclassify pseudokinases based on their nucleotide-binding properties’, Biochem J, 457: 323–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nayak V., Zhao K., Wyce A., Schwartz M. F., Lo W. S., Berger S. L., and Marmorstein R.. 2006. ‘Structure and dimerization of the kinase domain from yeast Snf1, a member of the Snf1/AMPK protein family’, Structure, 14: 477–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakanishi K., Niida H., Tabata H., Ito T., Hori Y., Hattori M., Johmura Y., Yamada C., Ueda T., Takeuchi K., Yamada K., Nagata K., Wakamatsu N., Kishi M., Pan Y. A., Ugawa S., Shimada S., Sanes J. R., Higashi Y., and Nakanishi M.. 2019. ‘Isozyme-Specific Role of SAD-A in Neuronal Migration During Development of Cerebral Cortex’, Cerebral Cortex, 29: 3738–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nayak V., Zhao K., Wyce A., Schwartz M. F., Lo W. S., Berger S. L., and Marmorstein R.. 2006. ‘Structure and dimerization of the kinase domain from yeast Snf1, a member of the Snf1/AMPK protein family’, Structure, 14: 477–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuwald A. F. 2009. ‘Rapid detection, classification and accurate alignment of up to a million or more related protein sequences’, Bioinformatics, 25: 1869–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nie J., Sun C., Faruque O., Ye G., Li J., Liang Q., Chang Z., Yang W., Han X., and Shi Y.. 2012. ‘Synapses of amphids defective (SAD-A) kinase promotes glucose-stimulated insulin secretion through activation of p21-activated kinase (PAK1) in pancreatic beta-Cells’, J Biol Chem, 287: 26435–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolen B., Taylor S., and Ghosh G.. 2004. ‘Regulation of protein kinases; controlling activity through activation segment conformation’, Mol Cell, 15: 661–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearce L. R., Komander D., and Alessi D. R.. 2010. ‘The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases’, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 11: 9–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkins D. N., Pappin D. J., Creasy D. M., and Cottrell J. S.. 1999. ‘Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data’, Electrophoresis, 20: 3551–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poole L. B. 2015. ‘The basics of thiols and cysteines in redox biology and chemistry’, Free Radic Biol Med, 80: 148–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rellos P., Pike A. C., Niesen F. H., Salah E., Lee W. H., von Delft F., and Knapp S.. 2010. ‘Structure of the CaMKIIdelta/calmodulin complex reveals the molecular mechanism of CaMKII kinase activation’, PLoS Biol, 8: e1000426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren Y., and Shen H. M.. 2019. ‘Critical role of AMPK in redox regulation under glucose starvation’, Redox Biol, 25: 101154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhee S. G., Kang S. W., Jeong W., Chang T. S., Yang K. S., and Woo H. A.. 2005. ‘Intracellular messenger function of hydrogen peroxide and its regulation by peroxiredoxins’, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 17: 183–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saiyin H., Na N., Han X., Fang Y., Wu Y., Lou W., and Yang X.. 2017. ‘BRSK2 induced by nutrient deprivation promotes Akt activity in pancreatic cancer via downregulation of mTOR activity’, Oncotarget, 8: 44669–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salmeen A., Andersen J. N., Myers M. P., Meng T. C., Hinks J. A., Tonks N. K., and Barford D.. 2003. ‘Redox regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B involves a sulphenyl-amide intermediate’, Nature, 423: 769–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schieber M., and Chandel N. S.. 2014. ‘ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress’, Curr Biol, 24: R453–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrodinger LLC. 2015. “The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8.” In.
- Shao D., Oka S., Liu T., Zhai P., Ago T., Sciarretta S., Li H., and Sadoshima J.. 2014. ‘A redox-dependent mechanism for regulation of AMPK activation by Thioredoxin1 during energy starvation’, Cell Metab, 19: 232–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shirwany N. A., and Zou M. H.. 2014. ‘AMPK: a cellular metabolic and redox sensor. A minireview’, Front Biosci (Landmark Ed), 19: 447–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soylu I., and Marino S. M.. 2016. ‘Cy-preds: An algorithm and a web service for the analysis and prediction of cysteine reactivity’, Proteins, 84: 278–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su Z., Burchfield J. G., Yang P., Humphrey S. J., Yang G., Francis D., Yasmin S., Shin S. Y., Norris D. M., Kearney A. L., Astore M. A., Scavuzzo J., Fisher-Wellman K. H., Wang Q. P., Parker B. L., Neely G. G., Vafaee F., Chiu J., Yeo R., Hogg P. J., Fazakerley D. J., Nguyen L. K., Kuyucak S., and James D. E.. 2019. ‘Global redox proteome and phosphoproteome analysis reveals redox switch in Akt’, Nat Commun, 10: 5486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamir T. Y., Drewry D. H., Wells C., Major M. B., and Axtman A. D.. 2020. ‘PKIS deep dive yields a chemical starting point for dark kinases and a cell active BRSK2 inhibitor’, Sci Rep, 10: 15826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamir T. Y., Bowman B. M., Agajanian M. J., Goldfarb D., Schrank T. P., Stohrer T., Hale A. E., Siesser P. F., Weir S. J., Murphy R. M., LaPak K. M., Weissman B. E., Moorman N. J., and Major M. B.. 2020. ‘Gain-of-function genetic screen of the kinome reveals BRSK2 as an inhibitor of the NRF2 transcription factor’, J Cell Sci, 133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Truong T. H., and Carroll K. S.. 2013. ‘Redox regulation of protein kinases’, Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 48: 332–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Truong T. H., Ung P. M.-U., Palde P. B., Paulsen C. E., Schlessinger A., and Carroll K. S.. 2016. ‘Molecular basis for redox activation of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase’, Cell Chem. Biol., 23: 837–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuchiya Y., Byrne D. P., Burgess S. G., Bormann J., Bakovic J., Huang Y., Zhyvoloup A., Yu B. Y. K., Peak-Chew S., Tran T., Bellany F., Tabor A. B., Chan A. E., Guruprasad L., Garifulin O., Filonenko V., Vonderach M., Ferries S., Eyers C. E., Carroll J., Skehel M., Bayliss R., Eyers P. A., and Gout I.. 2020. ‘Covalent Aurora A regulation by the metabolic integrator coenzyme A’, Redox Biol, 28: 101318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- UniProt Consortium. 2023. ‘UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023’, Nucleic Acids Res, 51: D523–D31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Spoel D., Lindahl E., Hess B., Groenhof G., Mark A. E., and Berendsen H. J.. 2005. ‘GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free’, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26: 1701–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Montfort R. L., Congreve M., Tisi D., Carr R., and Jhoti H.. 2003. ‘Oxidation state of the active-site cysteine in protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B’, Nature, 423: 773–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venkat A., Watterson G., Byrne D. P., O’Boyle B., Shrestha S., Gravel N., Fairweather E. E., Daly L. A., Bunn C., Yeung W., Aggarwal I., Katiyar S., Eyers C. E., Eyers P. A., and Kannan N.. 2023. ‘Mechanistic and evolutionary insights into isoform-specific ‘supercharging’ in DCLK family kinases’, bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wani R., Qian J., Yin L., Bechtold E., King S. B., Poole L. B., Paek E., Tsang A. W., and Furdui C. M.. 2011. ‘Isoform-specific regulation of Akt by PDGF-induced reactive oxygen species’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108: 10550–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weisner J., Gontla R., van der Westhuizen L., Oeck S., Ketzer J., Janning P., Richters A., Muhlenberg T., Fang Z., Taher A., Jendrossek V., Pelly S. C., Bauer S., van Otterlo W. A., and Rauh D.. 2015. ‘Covalent-Allosteric Kinase Inhibitors’, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 54: 10313–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J. X., Cheng Y. S., Wang J., Chen L., Ding M., and Wu J. W.. 2015. ‘Structural insight into the mechanism of synergistic autoinhibition of SAD kinases’, Nat Commun, 6: 8953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao H., Jedrychowski M. P., Schweppe D. K., Huttlin E. L., Yu Q., Heppner D. E., Li J., Long J., Mills E. L., Szpyt J., He Z., Du G., Garrity R., Reddy A., Vaites L. P., Paulo J. A., Zhang T., Gray N. S., Gygi S. P., and Chouchani E. T.. 2020. ‘A Quantitative Tissue-Specific Landscape of Protein Redox Regulation during Aging’, Cell, 180: 968–83 e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeung W., Kwon A., Taujale R., Bunn C., Venkat A., and Kannan N.. 2021. ‘Evolution of Functional Diversity in the Holozoan Tyrosine Kinome’, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38: 5625–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida H., and Goedert M.. 2012. ‘Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein tau by AMPK-related kinases’, J Neurochem, 120: 165–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zmijewski J. W., Banerjee S., Bae H., Friggeri A., Lazarowski E. R., and Abraham E.. 2010. ‘Exposure to hydrogen peroxide induces oxidation and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase’, J Biol Chem, 285: 33154–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated in this study are included within the manuscript. All mass spectrometry data has been deposited at the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifiers PXD044990. Source data are provided for each figure. MD simulations and associated data may be accessed from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xtiwpjgyzxy1oz0/AACK6dS3ypzYXDih3wgKp9bla?dl=0.