Summary
Chemical modifications in mRNAs such as pseudouridine (psi) can regulate gene expression, although our understanding of the functional impact of individual psi modifications, especially in neuronal cells, is limited. We apply nanopore direct RNA sequencing to investigate psi dynamics under cellular perturbations in SH-SY5Y cells. We assign sites to psi synthases using siRNA-based knockdown. A steady-state enzyme-substrate model reveals a strong correlation between psi synthase and mRNA substrate levels and psi modification frequencies. Next, we performed either differentiation or lead-exposure to SH-SY5Y cells and found that, upon lead exposure, not differentiation, the modification frequency is less dependent on enzyme levels suggesting translational control. Finally, we compared the plasticity of psi sites across cellular states and found that plastic sites can be condition-dependent or condition-independent; several of these sites fall within transcripts encoding proteins involved in neuronal processes. Our psi analysis and validation enable investigations into the dynamics and plasticity of RNA modifications.
Keywords: Pseudouridine, RNA sequencing, mRNA modification, Nanopore DRS, plasticity, epitranscriptome
Introduction
RNA modifications are enzyme-mediated chemical changes to the canonical structure of RNA nucleotides. Over 170 types of RNA modifications have been discovered in all types of RNAs1 and play roles in diverse biological processes such as RNA metabolism23, translational control45,6, gene expression73, splicing3,8 RNA-protein interactions7, and immune response9. Of the total uridines in mammalian mRNA, 0.2% - 0.6% are pseudouridine (psi) 10,11, whereas 0.15–0.6% of all adenosines are estimated to bear the m6A modification12,13. Psi is an isomer of uridine14 in which a new hydrogen bond is available to base-pair with adenosine. However, it is known to base-pair with other nucleobases in a duplex and stabilize them15. Substitution of U with psi can stabilize the overall RNA structure3,16,17 and duplex formation, which is likely to modulate cellular interactions with proteins and other biomolecules3,8.
Various methods involving next-generation sequencing have recently been utilized for psi mapping in mRNAs6,10,18–21; however, these methods all require chemical mediators (i.e., CMC labeling and bisulfite conversion) combined with reverse transcription to cDNA before amplification and sequencing. We and others have recently developed algorithms to classify psi sites from nanopore direct RNA sequencing (DRS)22–25. Our method, Mod-p ID25, compares the frequency of systematic basecalling errors at the modification site to an in vitro transcribed (IVT) unmodified transcriptome26. Mod-p ID accounts for the sequence context surrounding individual psi modifications and coverage at a given site to determine a statistical probability of a modification and provides a low-limit occupancy value. However, a caveat of this and other nanopore-based methods for psi-calling is that systematic basecalling errors are insufficient to validate psi modifications, necessitating exhaustive orthogonal validation approaches such as synthetic controls27–29 or biochemical assays30. A suitable route for transcriptome-wide validation is to utilize knockdown/knockout of pseudouridine synthases (PUS) and measure changes in psi occupancies8,21 at the sites that match the motif of the respective PUS enzymes.
In this work, we aim to understand how psi occupancies in mRNAs of neurons respond to changes in cellular state. Dysregulation in genes that encode PUS enzymes has been associated with neuronal impairment.31,32 However, the environmental factors that affect the mRNA substrates of PUS enzymes (i.e., targets that get modified) in neurons are unknown. For our model system, we chose SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, which continuously express markers similar to immature catecholaminergic neurons while maintaining the ability to divide33. Upon retinoic acid (RA) differentiation, SH-SY5Y cells become morphologically similar to primary neurons; their proliferation rate is decreased (similar to mature neurons), and the activity of enzymes specific to neuronal tissues is increased34. First, we investigated how RA-induced differentiation affects the landscape of psi modifications, modeling a healthy change to the cellular state. Next, we focused on a very different change in cellular state and measured the impact of exposure to lead (Pb2+) on the psi landscape of SH-SY5Y cells. Pb2+ is an environmental toxin that has been shown to adversely affect neuron functionality, especially during the developmental stages of the human brain.35,36,37
We specifically focus on differential analysis, i.e., changes in psi levels at validated psi sites, by comparing our data with SH-SY5Y cells in which we have used siRNA to knock down two key PUS enzymes, TRUB1 (motif GUUCN)38 and PUS7 (motif UNUAR)39. Knockdowns were used as controls to validate that the uridine modification is psi. Differential analysis was then used to compare cell states at specific positions – this is a precise measurement of changes in psi occupancy at a given position. Our hypothesis is that by comparing 3 very different states we can understand the relative plasticity of psi sites at steady state (i.e., untreated SH-SY5Y cells) and in response to environmental cues for differentiation and Pb2+ exposure. Such plasticity has been observed with m6A, for which modification levels increase significantly throughout brain development, which is suggested as a mechanism to achieve higher-order brain function40.
Results
We used DRS to perform a transcriptome-wide survey of the impact of three types of perturbations on psi modifications: 1. siRNA-based knockdown of the predominant mammalian psi synthase (PUS) enzymes, TRUB1 and PUS7; 2. retinoic acid-induced differentiation into neuron-like cells, and 3. environmental toxin exposure. We use the siRNA knockdown to validate sites of psi modification, then quantify the differential occupancy of psi at validated sites for untreated and perturbed cells across Pb2+ treatment and differentiation to characterize plasticity.
Knockdown and nanopore sequencing of human psi synthases TRUB1 and PUS7
We generated siRNA knockdown (KD) sequencing libraries for the two prevalent PUS enzymes acting on mammalian mRNAs, TRUB138 and PUS741. We performed DRS to assign a specific enzyme to our detected psi positions (Fig. 1a). SH-SY5Y cells were treated with TRUB1 siRNA, PUS7 siRNA, and a scrambled siRNA control for three days (Supplementary Fig. 1). Subsequently, qPCR analysis was conducted to evaluate the extent of knockdown achieved by TRUB1 KD and PUS7 KD compared to the scrambled siRNA control. The results indicated substantial mRNA KD for TRUB1 (82.3% ± 5.6%) and PUS7 (57.1% ± 5.6%; Fig. 1b). Next, we stained the KD and scrambled control cells with anti-Pus7 and anti-Trub1 antibodies to evaluate protein expression following the knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 1). We observed a substantial fold-decrease in mean fluorescence intensity for Pus7 (0.56-fold ± 0.0275) as well as Trub1 (0.45-fold ± 0.0321) KD cells as compared to the scrambled siRNA control. We extracted polyA+ RNA and prepared libraries for each sample, including a scrambled siRNA control library for comparison.
RNA expression profiling for TRUB1 and PUS7 KD of SH-SY5Y cells
To assess the effects of TRUB1 and PUS7 KD on other psi-synthases, we evaluated mRNA expression levels for 13 different PUS enzymes from TRUB1 KD, PUS7 KD, and scrambled siRNA control libraries (Fig. 1c). For the PUS7 KD library we observed a 21.5-fold ± 0.07 (p = 0.0004) decrease in PUS7 mRNA (TPMs) compared to the scrambled control. For the TRUB1 KD library, we observed an 8.9-fold ± 0.11 (p = 0.00005) decrease in TRUB1 mRNA (TPMs) compared to the scrambled control. We also observed significant alterations in other PUS enzymes in response to PUS7 and TRUB1 KD: For the PUS7 KD library compared to the scrambled control library, we observed a 1.8 fold ± 0.35 ( p = 0.006) reduction in PUSL1 mRNA, a 3.4 fold ± 0.14 ( p = 0.0002) reduction in RPUSD1 mRNA, a 1.6 fold ± 0.50 (p = 0.03) decrease in TRUB1 mRNA, a 2.1 fold ± 0.14 reduction (p = 0.00001) in DKC1 mRNA, a 2.6 ± 0.35 fold (p = 0.0007) reduction in RPUSD4 mRNA, and a 3.3 fold ± 0.43 (p = 0.0001) reduction in RPUSD3 mRNA. For the TRUB1 KD library compared to the scrambled control library, we observed a 1.9-fold ± 0.39 (p = 0.007) reduction in RPUSD1 mRNA. To ensure the observed decrease in off-target PUS enzymes mRNA levels was not due to sequence similarity with TRUB1 and PUS7 enzymes, we performed a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of all the 13 enzymes nucleotide sequences. We found low similarity scores between the enzymes, which supports the absence of off-target silencing effects of the TRUB1 and PUS7 siRNAs used for the knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Transcriptome-wide mapping using Mod-p ID for TRUB1 and PUS7 KD libraries.
We generated a paired, unmodified transcriptome for SH-SY5Y cells to identify putative psi positions. All the positions with a high number of reads in the DRS sample and zero coverage in the paired IVT library were enriched using a pan human IVT. By enriching our dataset using the pan-human IVT, we were able to achieve sufficient coverage for an additional 22199 putative psi sites that were already detected by Mod-p ID. These sites would have been otherwise filtered out due to minimal coverage in the paired IVT. The pan-IVT merges IVT libraries from 5 other human cell lines. We apply a conditional approach to determine the baseline: we used the paired IVT when the number of reads was sufficient (>10), and we recovered sites with insufficient reads in the paired IVT by using the pan-human IVT26 as a baseline. Using this conditional IVT we compared the U-to-C basecalling error between the KD and scrambled siRNA control libraries. We identified putative psi sites based on significant differences in U-to-C basecalling error (p < 0.001) between the unmodified and modified (KD and scrambled (control) libraries using Mod-p ID25 (Supplementary Table 1).
First, we selected positions for which we had measured p < 0.001 in the scrambled control (indicating the presence of putative psi) that also had sufficient reads (>10) in the KD libraries (Supplementary Table 1). We needed to give more weight to samples with higher coverage or a more prominent U-to-C error signature indicative of a psi site. To this end, we computed the log marginal likelihood ratio of DRS and IVT modeled by separate distributions versus a single combined distribution (See Methods). This calculation modeled each state as a beta-binomial distribution using Jeffrey’s noninformative prior42–44. We used this metric as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Fig. 1d; Supplementary Table 2). According to Kass and Raftery’s model 45, we selected a value of SNR ≥ 1 to guarantee a strong DRS signal level as compared to the IVT. We observed that 10,636 sites exceeded this threshold. Of these sites, 232 fell within a TRUB1 motif sequence (GUUCN). For this step, we selected only the sites that showed a decrease in U-to-C error frequency in response to knockdown.
We defined sites as knocked down if they met the SNR ≥ 1 criteria and met a specific read count threshold (>10) and a specified % difference between U-to-C error in the KD sample and the control (Fig. 1e; Supplementary Table 3). For positions with more reads (>30 reads), we set the cutoff at a 15% difference between the samples. For positions with <30 reads, we set the cutoff at a 30% difference between the samples. These cutoffs are selected to be more stringent with sites that have fewer reads. We observed 74 sites that met these criteria and defined these as targets of TRUB1. We were able to cross-validate 82% of our TRUB1 knockdown with other, previously reported, chemical-based methods. Additionally, we uncovered several Trub1 substrates that have not previously been reported, including: BAIAP2 (chr17:81053684), DMAC1 (chr9:7796614), FAM120AOS (chr9:93451399), EFEMP2 (chr11:65866534), NKAIN1 (chr1:31181249), PPFIBP2 (chr11:7651750), RPUSD3 (chr:39841823), SLCO4A1 (chr20:62660502), SNX29 (chr16:12571888), SSUH2 (chr3:8630871), THY1 (chr11:119418679), YJEFN3 (chr19:19537445), ZCCHC8 (chr12:122478274), C2orf42 (chr2:70215492). A sequencing logo to identify the motifs that fell within the SNR ≥ 1 criteria (Fig. 1e) shows that sites assigned to TRUB1 were harbored by the expected GUUCN motif, while non-TRUB1 sites tended to be flanked by cytidine in the −2, −1 and +1 positions.
We performed the same analysis for PUS7 KD sites and observed that 6,070 sites exceeded the SNR ≥ 1 threshold, of which 120 sites fell within a PUS7 motif sequence (Fig. 1f–g; Supplementary Table 3). We observed nine sites that met the read and mismatch error cutoffs and defined these as targets of PUS7. Of these, four are not found by any other orthogonal method (TPM3 chr11:54158663, PIR chrX:15384850, HDGFL2 chr19:4502197, and NES chr1: 156669130). We derived a sequencing logo to identify the motifs that fell within the SNR≥ 1 criteria (Fig. 1g). We found that the sites assigned to PUS7 were harbored by the canonical UNUAR motif, while the sites with a different motif tended to be flanked by two cytidines in the −2 and −1 positions.
Modeling the cooperative effects of TRUB1 and PUS7 KD on mRNA substrates
We observed that the positive shift in U-to-C error of TRUB1 targets was matched by a positive shift of positions within PUS7 motifs (i.e., the TRUB1 KD determines higher expression of psi within PUS7 motifs (Fig. 1d). To explore this observation further, we first assessed the changes in PUS7 mRNA levels upon TRUB1 KD and observed a reduction in PUS7 mRNA compared to the scrambled control (Fig. 1c). To test the hypothesis that TRUB1 KD has a global effect on psi levels within PUS7 motifs, we compared the differences in positional occupancy for the TRUB1 KD with the PUS7 KD for the same positions to a random distribution model of positions that were constrained on the parameters of the observed sequencing data (Fig. 1h). We found that the data are inconsistent with a random model (Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001) in the region where the position shows a decreased positional occupancy for both conditions.
Steady-state enzyme-substrate model of pseudouridylation
Since DRS provides access to both transcript levels and relative occupancy of site-specific RNA modifications, we reason that changes in levels of a PUS enzyme specific to a U-site in a transcript would impact psi occupancies at that site. Since assigning psi levels based on U-to-C mismatch errors is semi-quantitative25, we can probe differential psi levels as cells change from conditions A to B for a given position. Despite the fact that enzyme-substrate action requires substantial correction when the enzyme and substrate are within small compartments (<0.1 μm),46 assuming an unconfined mRNA substrate and PUS enzyme distribution in the cell we tested the following first-order steady-state relationship:
where is the number of substrate transcripts in Condition is the value in transcripts per millions (TPMs) for a transcript that encodes for a PUS enzyme in Condition (used as a proxy for PUS levels in that cell line); is the number of transcripts in condition (Fig. 1i). We use TPMs as a proxy for enzyme expression. Here, we assume that the encoded protein levels are proportional to mRNA levels because 1. the cell types are similar (SH-SY5Y cells, perturbed and untreated), and 2. there is active protein degradation47. We applied our data (i.e., sequencing reads) to this model and compared it to the difference in psi occupancy (as determined by U-to-C error at a position of validated psi) and found a positive correlation for TRUB1 sites when using the TRUB1 enzyme levels (r = 0.89; Fig. 1j). As a control, we compared PUS7 sites to TRUB1 mRNA levels and found a decreased correlation (r = 0.38; Fig. 1j), as expected for sites not meant to interact with the TRUB1 enzyme.
Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells leads to a change in cell state
We differentiated SH-SY5Y cells into neuron-like cells by supplementing them with retinoic acid48, according to Kovalevich et al.49 (Fig. 2a). We compared the cellular morphology to assess the change in cell state from undifferentiated to differentiated and observed the elongation and branching of neurite-like processes from the differentiated cells (Fig. 2b). Total RNA was extracted, and poly-A selection was performed on differentiated and untreated SH-SY5Y cells (n = 3 biological replicates for each group). Subsequently, DRS libraries were prepared, sequenced on a MinION device using R9 flow cells and aligned to the human reference genome (hg38). Next, we performed a comparative analysis of mRNA expression using DESeq2. We observed differential mRNA expression when comparing the two groups, supporting a change in cell state (Fig 2c). Importantly, we observed the expected differential mRNA expression of known differentiation markers50–52. CRABP2, RARB, RGS2, RET, and DKK2 exhibited upregulation and ISOC1, MYC, SPRY2, and ASCL1 displayed decreased RNA expression in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells compared to the untreated counterparts (Supplementary Fig. 3). To assess the effects of retinoic-acid-mediated differentiation on psi machinery, we evaluated expression levels for 13 different PUS enzymes from untreated and differentiated libraries (Fig. 2d). We observed a significant difference in the RNA expression levels for PUS7L and RPUSD3 in response to differentiation (p < 0.05).
Transcriptome-wide mapping of psi-modifications before and after differentiation
We identified psi positions in differentiated and untreated SH-SY5Y cells by first generating a paired, unmodified transcriptome. Following the same approach described for KD libraries, we defined the baseline using the paired IVT when the number of reads was sufficient (>10), while we recovered sites with insufficient reads in the paired IVT by using the pan-human IVT26 as a baseline. We applied Mod-p ID to identify putative psi sites based on significant differences in U-to-C basecalling error (p < 0.001) in the untreated and differentiated libraries compared to the IVT control library. We selected positions that were represented in both the untreated and differentiated libraries and defined the SNR for each site by calculating the number of standard deviations separating the mismatch error for sites observed in both the untreated and differentiated libraries from that of the IVT control (Fig. 2e). We made a cutoff at SNR ≥ 1 as described earlier. We observed that 1,786 sites exceeded this threshold indicating that the signal-to-noise ratio was sufficient for analysis (Supplementary Table 4).
We defined differences in positional occupancy in response to differentiation if they met two significance criteria: SNR ≥ 1 and ≥ 10 reads in both libraries (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Table 4). Of the sites with ≥ 5% difference in U-to-C error between the untreated and differentiated samples, we identified several as psi sites based on the knockdown of their corresponding psi synthase (Supplementary Table 5). Among the Trub1 substrates, FBXO5 (chr6:152975604), HECTD1 (chr14:31101239), NKAIN1 (chr1:31181249), CCDC22 (chrX:49249707), EFEMP2 (chr11:65866534), IDI1 (chr10:1044099) showed decreased positional occupancy in response to differentiation. Among the Pus7 substrates, NES (chr11:56669130), MCM5 (chr22:35424407), RPL22 (chr1:6185970), and RHBDD2 (chr7:75888787) showed decreased positional occupancy in response to differentiation. HPS4 (chr22:26452838), TAF9B (chrX:78129969), CDC6 (chr17:40295391), TTYH3 (chr7:2663889), RNF167 (chr17:4944900), SCP2 (chr1:53027999), ZNF317 (chr19:9161020), THY1 (chr11:119418679), are all Trub1 substrates that each showed increased positional occupancy in response to differentiation. The most substantial changes were for ZNF317 (chr19:9161020), which increased from a 15% U-to-C error in the untreated sample to 52% in the differentiated sample. The next most substantial change was for THY1 (chr11:119418679), which increased from a 34% U-to-C error in the untreated sample to a 61% U-to-C error in the differentiated sample. ZNF317, known to play a role in brain development 53, is part of the zinc finger protein family, involved in transcriptional regulation, crucial for cellular adaptation to changes. THY1 encodes a cell surface glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion processes and modulates neurite outgrowth54. An example of a reduced psi occupancy upon differentiation (25% to 12%) is for NKAIN1, which encodes a protein involved in sodium-potassium transport in the brain55.
We exported the sequencing logo for positions categorized into three groups: those with higher U-to-C base-calling errors during differentiation, positions showing no difference between differentiated and untreated samples, and positions with lower U-to-C base-calling errors during differentiation (Fig. 2f). We observed that for the positions in which the positional occupancy decreased after differentiation, the +1-nucleotide neighboring the psi position was frequently uridine. We found 26 positions with differential expression of psi that were assigned to a specific PUS enzyme using our KD experiments (Fig. 1) and cross-validated these using orthogonal controls (Fig. 2g). We found that several positions (DMAC1 chr9:7796614, EFEMP2 chr11:65866534, NES chr1:56669130, NKAIN1 chr1:31181249, THY1 chr11:119418679) were validated by our knockdowns but have not been discovered by other orthogonal methods.
We calculated TPMs for each TRUB1 and PUS7 target with differences in psi levels to explore differences in mRNA expression for transcripts that harbor a psi. We found that only IDI1 (chr10:1044099; 15.3 TPM in the untreated sample and 58.9 TPM in the differentiated sample) showed a significant difference in mRNA expression between the two conditions (p < 0.001; Fig. 2h). This site has been reported by other methods as a substrate for Trub118. IDI1 encodes an enzyme that is involved in the synthesis of cholesterol metabolites. The other mRNA levels remained unchanged while having differences in psi occupancy. Furthermore, we examined the protein expression levels in cellular compartments for the two dominant PUS enzymes for humans, PUS7 and TRUB1, using immunofluorescence in untreated and differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. Our analysis revealed no significant differences in the subcellular distribution of these two PUS enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Testing the steady-state enzyme: substrate model (Figure 1i, j) as we have done for the PUS knockdowns, we find a positive correlation between the changes in U-to-C mismatches with the product of PUS enzyme and mRNA site concentrations (see Fig. 2i, r = 0.95). This further supports that TRUB1-mediated pseudouridylation of putative TRUB1 sites with the motif GUUCN follows a simple enzyme:substrate model. In contrast, for PUS7-mediated pseudouridylation of UNUAR motifs we find a weaker correlation (r = 0.63).
SH-SY5Y cell state changes in response to lead (Pb2+) exposure
We introduced the neurotoxicant Pb2+ to SH-SY5Y cells as an alternative change in cellular state. The cells were cultured in growth media for 24 hours before changing to growth media supplemented with 50 μM Pb2+ for six days (Fig. 3a). Previous studies have shown that 5 μM is close to the Pb2+ levels in human blood that can cause encephalopathy in children56; however, we chose to use a relatively high Pb2+ concentration (50 μM) because the in vitro tolerance for cytotoxicity is higher than in vivo57. RNA was extracted from the untreated and Pb2+-exposed cells, and each sample underwent library preparation and subsequent analysis. As anticipated, the cellular morphology remained unchanged following exposure to Pb2+ (Fig. 3b).
We conducted gene expression analysis to compare untreated and Pb2+-exposed libraries to demonstrate a change in cellular state (Fig. 3c). Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the genes that exhibit significant downregulation reveals an association with the TGF-beta signaling pathway (Supplementary Table 9). The upregulated gene PTN plays a role in Leukocyte Chemotaxis Involved In Inflammatory Response (GO:0002232) and Dendrite Arborization (GO:0140059); together with the gene ID2 PTN also shows an association with Positive Regulation Of Glial Cell Differentiation (GO:0045687). The upregulated genes CUX2 and PLXNA2 are associated with positive regulation of neurogenesis (GO:0050769). The genes CHGA and RAMP1 exhibit downregulation and are associated with the pathways ADORA2B Mediated Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Production (R-HSA-9660821) and Anti-inflammatory Response Favoring Leishmania Infection (R-HSA-9662851; Supplementary Table 9). The downregulated gene SPOCK1 is associated with Nervous System Development (GO:0007399), Neurogenesis (GO:0022008), and Central Nervous System Neuron Differentiation (GO:0021953). To assess the effects of Pb2+ exposure on other psi-synthases, we evaluated expression levels for 13 different psi-synthases from Pb2+ treated and untreated SH-SY5Y cell libraries, and we found no significant differences in expression levels (Fig. 3d).
Transcriptome-wide mapping of psi-modifications following Pb2+ exposure.
To explore changes in psi modification between untreated and Pb2+ treated cells, we generated a paired, unmodified transcriptome for untreated SH-SY5Y cells to identify putative psi positions. We applied Mod-p ID to identify putative psi sites based on significant differences in U-to-C basecalling error (p < 0.001 in at least two biological replicates) in the untreated and Pb2+ treated libraries compared to the IVT control library. We selected positions found in both the untreated and Pb2+ treated libraries and calculated the SNR for each site (Fig. 3e). We made a cutoff at SNR ≥ 1. We observed that 946 sites exceeded this threshold.
We defined sites as changed in response to Pb2+ treatment if they met the same criteria described for differentiated cells (Fig. 3f, Supplementary Table 6). We identified several of these sites as psi sites based on the knockdown of their corresponding psi synthase (Supplementary Table 7). SH2B1 (chr16:28872589), HECTD1 (chr14:31101239), FBXO5 (chr6:152975604), IDI1 (chr10:1044099), SLC30A5 (chr5:69123368), AK2 (chr1:33014553), PMPCB (chr7:103311810; Trub1 substrates), and CKAP5 (chr11:46743829), HDGFL2 (chr19:4502197), RPL22 (chr1:6185970), and MCM5 (chr22:35424407; PUS7 substrates) showed decreased positional occupancy in response to Pb2+ treatment. RAD21 (chr8:116863212), SPPL3 (chr12:120764051), ERH (chr14:69380270), SCP2 (chr1:53027999), PSMB2 (chr1:35603333), PABPC4 (chr1:39565149), CDC6 (chr17:40295391), AMFR (chr16:56362360), AMOTL1 (chr11:94874364), INSIG2 (chr2:118109417), ST13 (chr22:40824900), SCAF1 (chr19:49654781), PHF13 (chr1:6623607), THY1 (chr11:119418679), ASDHPPT (chr11:106090565), PSMB2 (chr1:35603333), and GTF3C2 (chr2:27326828; TRUB1 substrates) showed increased positional occupancy in response to Pb2+ treatment. The biggest change was for PHF13 (chr1:6623607), which increased from 26% U-to-C error in the untreated library to 56% U-to-C error following Pb2+ treatment.
Among these, six sites are found to be on genes involved in cellular processes that occur when cells are exposed to toxic molecules58,59. In particular, FBXO5 encodes a protein involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which is crucial for protein degradation and cellular response to various stresses, including exposure to toxic molecules such as chromium59. CKAP5 encodes a protein involved in microtubule organization and dynamics, which are crucial for various cellular processes, including cell division and response to cellular stressors, including oxidative stress60,61. MCM5 and RAD21 are involved in DNA repair mechanisms, which are common in cells exposed to toxic agents58,62. CDC6 plays a role in DNA replication initiation and is regulated in response to cellular stress induced by toxicants63. SCP2 is involved in lipid metabolism and may play a role in cellular responses to lipid-related toxins or oxidative stress64. PHF13, also known as SPOC1, has a functional role in cell differentiation and DNA damage response65–67.
We exported the sequencing logo for positions categorized into three groups: those with higher U-to-C base-calling errors following Pb2+ treatment, positions showing no difference between Pb2+ treated and untreated samples, and positions with lower U-to-C base-calling errors following Pb2+ treatment (Fig. 3f). We found that psi sites with increased positional occupancy following Pb2+ treatment tend to be flanked by two uridines, while those with decreased positional occupancy following Pb2+ treatment have uridine in the N+1 position. We found 28 positions with differential expression of psi that were assigned to a specific PUS enzyme using our KD experiments and cross-validated these using orthogonal controls (Fig. 3g). We were not able to orthogonally confirm two out of 28 psi sites on HDGFL2 (chr19:4502197) and THY1 (chr11:119418679) transcripts.
To test for differences in mRNA expression for the psi targets that change in response to Pb2+ treatment, we calculated transcripts per million for each TRUB1 and PUS7 target with differences in psi levels. We found that only ERH (chr14:69380270; 158 TPM in the untreated sample and 207 TPM in the Pb2+ treated sample) showed a significant difference in mRNA expression between the two conditions (p < 0.05 (Fig. 3h). We examined the protein expression levels in cellular compartments for the two dominant PUS enzymes for humans, PUS7 and TRUB1, using immunofluorescence in untreated and Pb2+ treated SH-SY5Y cells and found no significant differences in the subcellular distribution of these two PUS enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Finally, we tested the steady-state enzyme: substrate correlation with psi levels for Pb2+-treated and untreated cells (Fig. 3i). We found that the correlation of changes in U-to-C mismatches upon Pb2+ treatment is not as linear as in the case of SH-SY5Y differentiation. For TRUB1-mediated pseudouridylation of putative TRUB1 sites, we find a correlation of r = 0.79, whereas for PUS7-mediated pseudouridylation of UNUAR motifs, we observe a weak correlation (r = 0.48).
Plasticity of pseudouridylation of mRNAs in response to changes in the cellular state
We wanted to see which psi modification positions static and which psi modifications are are plastic. To assess differences in pseudouridylation at identified positions between differentiated and Pb2+-exposed samples, we compared the U-to-C basecalling errors for psi-modified positions across perturbations. We selected positions that met the following criteria to evaluate the changes to individual positions between the three conditions: 1. Detected by Mod-p ID as a psi position with p-value < 0.001 in at least one condition; 2. The U-to-C mismatch was >40% in at least one of the conditions. We rank-ordered these 65 positions based on a similarity score calculated as the rounded standard deviation over the three conditions (Fig. 4a). The most similar position between the three conditions is INTS1 (chr7:1476655), with a similarity score of 0 and >90% U-to-C error for each condition. INTS1 is a component of the integrator complex which has been linked to developmental delays and is involved in in RNA processing and transcriptional regulation68. We identify 39 sites with similarity scores below five, which we consider the most static positions. Interestingly, 17 out of 39 positions with similarity scores below five falls within a TRUB1 motif, and 1 out of 39 positions falls within a PUS7 motif. The least similar position is on SZRD1 (chr1:16396654), with a similarity score of 25.2 and U-to-C errors of 67.3%, 31,6%, and 53.8%, on untreated, differentiated, and lead-treated libraries respectively. Overexpression of SZRD1 (SUZ domain-containing protein 1), can arrest the cell cycle and can inhibit cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis69. Positions with a similarity score of >5 are considered to have higher plasticity. Among the positions detected as a psi with high plasticity we find YTHDF1 (chr20:63202504), which encodes a well-characterized m6A reader protein that promotes protein synthesis in response to neuronal stimuli70.
The abundance of psi synthase may account for some of the differences in psi percentage within that condition. Hence, we compared mRNA levels for 11 psi synthases across all three conditions and found no significant differences in mRNA expression (Fig. 4b). We also hypothesized that for the sites with higher plasticity, mRNA expression of the target may explain the discrepancy (Fig. 4c). However, we did not observe an association between mRNA expression levels and the percentage of U-to-C error for targets with >10 similarity score. For example, THY1 (chr11:119418679) has similar U-to-C error for the differentiated and Pb2+ treated conditions (61.3% and 45.1%, respectively) and 33.5% for the untreated; however, the mRNA expression levels for this target across each condition are not statistically different.
To assess which cell condition had the highest pseudouridylation, we calculated the number of significant pseudouridine sites (p-value < 0.001 in at least two biological replicates) with sufficient coverage (>10 reads in DRS and IVT libraries) detected by Mod-p ID across cell conditions and normalized it by the total number of reads in each of the three samples (see Methods). We found that the Pb2+-exposed sample has the higher normalized percentage of psi sites (0.14%), followed by the differentiated (0.13%) and untreated conditions (0.09%; Fig. 4d–g).
Finally, we divided the positions into different zones based on the relationship between the conditions: 1. Univariate positional occupancy whereby the relative occupancy of a given site changes for either differentiation or Pb2+ exposure (Pb2+↑↓ and Diff ≈ or Pb2+ ≈ and Diff↑↓), demonstrating the plasticity of a given site; 2. Bivariate uni/bidirectional positional occupancy whereby the positional occupancy changes for both differentiation and Pb2+ exposure (Pb2+ and Diff↑↓), demonstrating plasticity; 3. Condition-independent positional occupancy (Pb2+ and Diff ≈), whereby the positional occupancy does not change in response to the different conditions (these modifications are present and stable between different perturbations, i.e., static; Figure 4h). We found that 73% of these sites are static and 27% are plastic (Supplementary Table 10). Most of the Trub1 targets fell within condition 3 (static). Notably, we found two TRUB1 KD validated sites in the univariate group affected by differentiation and ten TRUB1 KD validated psi sites in the univariate lead-dependent group. These include sites within PHF13, CDC6 and RAD21, which are described as being linked to DNA repair mechanisms and cellular reponse to toxicants62,63,67.
Interestingly, we observed a cluster of targets (541 sites) that were decreased for both Pb2+ exposure and differentiation. We compared this distribution to a random distribution. We found that the two distributions were significantly different (Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001), meaning that the concomitant decrease in both libraries is inconsistent with a random effect. Among these plastic sites with a bivariate, unidirectional decrease in occupacy, we find sites within MCM5 and FBXO5, involved in cellular stress response; HECTD1, which is known to modulate retinoic acid signaling during the development of the aortic arch71 and RPL22, a ribosomal protein linked to common cancer-associated mutations and nucleolar stress response72.
Discussion
This study assessed the plasticity of psi modifications in SH-SY5Y cells in response to perturbation of cellular state. We first validated psi sites by siRNA knockdown of the predominant psi synthases acting on human mRNAs, TRUB1 and PUS7. Although the siRNA knockdown was not complete (known to be low efficiency in SH-SY5Y cells73,74), we were able to achieve a significant decrease in PUS protein expression and validate psi sites through a shift in occupancy levels within the expected PUS motifs. We found that TRUB1 and PUS7 knockdowns affect the psi machinery. This effect is stronger in PUS7 KD cells, as the other six PUS enzymes (RPUSD1, TRUB1, DKC1, PUSL1, RPUSD4, RPUSD3) have a significant reduction in their mRNA levels, while TRUB1 KD only affects the RPUSD1 enzyme. This finding suggests that the Pus7 protein may act as a transcription factor for the other psi synthase enzymes. Interestingly, in TRUB1 KD libraries, certain positions displaying TRUB1 motifs with high U-to-C basecalling errors did not exhibit changes following TRUB1 KD, and most of these positions have been validated through chemical-based methods. It is possible that, with only a partial knockdown, there were sufficient levels of enzyme available to modify the site. Alternatively, other PUS enzymes could compensate for the decrease in Trub1 enzyme.
We tested the validity of a steady-state mRNA site/PUS enzyme action model by correlating changes in PUS enzyme and mRNA U-site levels with the corresponding changes in U-to-C mismatch frequencies (i.e., psi levels for these validated motif sites). We observed a strong correlation between the enzyme-substrate levels and U-to-C mismatch frequencies for TRUB1 and PUS7 knockdown experiments, and expectedly, a weaker correlation when comparing PUS7 levels to TRUB1 mRNA targets and TRUB1 levels to PUS7 mRNA targets. These findings affirm the specificity of Trub1 and Pus7 to their consensus motifs (GUUCN for Trub1 and UNUAR for Pus7). While we observe a similar steady-state enzyme-substrate response for SH-SY5Y differentiation using retinoic acid, we find that for the Pb2+-treated undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells, there is a weaker correlation between enzyme-substrate product levels and psi levels. The lower number of PUS7 targets could partially explain this reduced correlation, although this can alternatively suggest that for Pb2+ treatment where the cells are under stress conditions, there are additional factors (e.g., a trans-acting factor or other PUS enzyme dysregulation mechanisms) that disrupt the simple steady-state enzyme-substrate pseudouridylation.
We confirmed the knockdown-validated sites found in the differentiated and Pb2+-exposed libraries with orthogonal chemical-based methods. We found that DMAC1, EFEMP2, NES, NKAIN1, THY1, and HDGFL2 transcripts carried a psi site that had not been discovered by other orthogonal methods in the differentiated sample. We found the same for four transcripts (TPM3, PIR, HDGFL2, and NES) in the Pb2+-exposed library. This could be explained by the use of the SH-SY5Y cell line, which has not been analyzed by any of the orthogonal methods available.
Our comparative analysis of the positional occupancy in multiple cellular conditions (untreated, differentiated, and Pb2+ treated) revealed various types of site responses: we found numerous positions with high variable occupancy across conditions, indicating plasticity at those sites. Interestingly, the most static psi positions were frequently targets of TRUB1, which suggests a high degree of conservation, independently of the cellular state. We also found that 3 out of 4 PUS7 sites were in the plastic group, which may indicate that PUS7 deposited sites are less conserved across conditions although this may be due to a low number of reads. Among these, NES (chr1:156669130) encodes the neuronal marker and cytoskeletal protein Nestin, which plays a role in differentiation and self-renewal. This NES psi site has decreased psi levels following differentiation, while it does not change upon Pb2+ treatment. Noteworthy, mRNA levels for NES are unchanged across conditions (Fig. 4e), suggesting a possible mechanism of psi-mediated translational control. In contrast, both THY1 (chr11:119418679) and NKAIN1(chr1:31181249) exhibit high upregulation of psi occupancy for both Pb2+ treatment and differentiation, and both encode for proteins that are involved in neuronal processes. Possible functions for sites highly sensitive to environmental factors include translational control in response to cellular stress and maintenance of cellular fitness.
Among the most static positions, some psi sites are found on genes linked to neuronal functions: SLC2A1 is associated with GLUT1 deficiency syndrome, a neurological disorder characterized by seizures, developmental delay, and movement disorders75. Dysregulation of UHRF1 has been implicated in various cancers and neurodevelopmental disorders76,77. EIF4EBP2 regulates translation initiation by binding to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and inhibiting its interaction with the mRNA cap structure. It plays a role in synaptic plasticity and memory formation, as well as in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders78,79. Other transcripts, although not relevant to neuronal functions, contain psi static sites. The biological function of these genes is general and related to basic functions and cellular mechanisms such as kinetic regulation of the ribosome during translation, formation of amino acid substitution at the protein level, or recruitment of essential RNA-binding proteins.
Finally, a global pseudouridylation level assessment of each cell condition (untreated, differentiated, and Pb2+ treated) showed that the Pb2+ libraries had a higher normalized percentage of psi sites compared to the untreated. We hypothesize that this upregulation of psi levels can be used by cells as a mechanism of protection/response to the treatment; however, further studies will be required to assess.
This study was the first to determine the plasticity of psi modifications across cellular states. Future analysis will determine whether static sites play critical roles in the cell’s biological function and whether the plastic sites are responses to external cues for fine-tuning gene expression.
Methods
Experimental Model and Subject Details
Cell culture
Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in EMEM/F12 (EMEM from Quality Biological Inc and Cytiva HyClone Ham’s Nutrient Mixture F12 Media) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FisherScientific, FB12999102). For untreated SH-SY5Y cells, the culture remained in this medium for seven days at 37C and 5% CO2, refreshed every three days. For differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, after 24h, the media changed to differentiation media, which is Neurobasal media (Gibco Neurobasal-A Medium, minus phenol red) supplemented with 10uM all-trans-retinoic acid (Fisher, AC207341000), 1X B27(Fisher, A3582801), and 1X Glutamax (Fisher, 35-050-061). The differentiation media was renewed every other day. For lead exposure SH-SY5Y cells, after 24 hours, the culture media was removed, and a 50 μM Pb2+-supplemented (Lead (II) acetate trihydrate, Sigma) untreated media was added to the cells. The media was replaced every three days.
Immunofluorescence (IF)
For fixing SH-SY5Y cells, half of the culture media was removed, and an equal volume of 4% formaldehyde (Fisher, F79500) in PBS was added to each well for the final of 2% formaldehyde. After 2 min incubation at room temperature, the solution was aspirated, replaced by 4% formaldehyde, and incubated for 10 mins. The cells were then washed with PBS and permeabilized by incubating in PBS-Triton (0.1%) for 10 min. The cultures were blocked by incubation in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in BS-Triton (0.1%) for one hour, followed by three times washed with PBS-Tween 20 (0.1%). The cells were then incubated with 1ug/ul primary antibody (For TRUB1 staining, TRUB1 Rabbit anti-human polyclonal, 50-172-8037, Protein tech; for PUS7 staining, PUS7 Rabbit anti-human, HPA024116, Sigma) in 1% BSA/PBS-Triton (0.1%) overnight at 4C. The following day, the cells were washed with PBS-Tween 20 (0.1%) and incubated for one hour in 1:1000 secondary antibody (Mouse anti-rabbit IgG-PE-Cy7, NC1569698, Fisher) in 1% BSA/PBS-Triton (0.1%) at room temperature, and stained using DAPI.
siRNA Knockdown (KD)
SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in untreated media for 24h for KD and control samples. The media was replaced with siRNA delivery media (Horizon, B-005000-500) with 1uM of Accell Non-targeting Control Pool (Horizon, D-001910-10-05), PUS7 siRNA (Horizon, E-015341-00-0050) or TRUB1 siRNA (Horizon, E-016391-00-0050) in delivery media for KD samples and cultured for 72h. Total RNA was extracted for qPCR KD confirmation or fixed for IF imaging.
Total RNA extraction
Total RNA was extracted from cells by combining a TRIzol (Invitrogen,15596026) RNA extraction and the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, 12183025). Cells were first washed with ice-cold PBS, followed by incubation for 5 min in TRIzol at RT (2ml for 10mm dishes and 300ul for 8-well plates). Then, the solution was transferred to Eppendorf tubes, and 200ul chloroform (Thermo Scientific Chemicals, AC423555000) was added to each 1ml of TRIzol. The solution was mixed by shaking it for 15 sec and incubated at RT for 3 min, followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 12000 × g at 4C. The aqueous supernatant was then transferred to a new tube, and the manufacturer’s recommended protocol was followed for PureLink RNA Mini Kit RNA extraction. RNA was quantified using the RNA Qubit assay.
Poly-A RNA isolation
According to the manufacturer’s protocol, poly-A mRNA was selected using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (E7490L). RNA was quantified using the RNA Qubit assay.
RT-qPCR
The extracted total RNA was treated with TURBO DNase (Fisher, AM2238) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA is then reverse transcribed using SuperScript III RT kit (Fisher,18080044) using the target primers and housekeeping gene HPRT. qPCR was performed using Luna qPCR master mix (NEB, M3004).
Direct RNA library preparation and sequencing
A direct RNA sequencing library (SQK-RNA002) was prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 500ng poly-A tailed RNA was ligated to ONT RT adaptor (RTA) using T4 DNA ligase (NEB, M0202M) and reverse transcribed by SuperScript III Reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18080044). The product was then purified using Agencourt RNAClean XP beads (Beckman, A63987) ligated to the RNA adaptor (RMX) and purified by Agencourt RNAClean XP beads, followed by washing with wash buffer (WSB) and eluted in elution buffer (ELB). The final product was mixed with an RNA running buffer and loaded into R9.4.1 FLO-MIN106D flow cells from ONT. For the KD samples and scrambled control, the samples were loaded onto PromethION flow cells (ONT, FLO-PRO004RA).
Base-calling and alignment
Fast5 files were basecalled using Guppy version 6.4.2 and aligned to the human reference genome (hg38) using Minimap2 version 2.17 with the “-ax splice -uf -k 14” option. The aligned .sam files were converted to .bam and indexed using samtools version 2.8.13.
Mod-p ID filtration criteria
We filtered the putative psi positions detected by the Mod-p ID tool according to multiple criteria. First, we defined a psi site to be significant if at least two biological replicates had a p-value<0.001. We then filtered all the significant sites for the number of reads in the DRS and IVT samples, to retain positions with at least 10 reads in both libraries. To account for the presence of SNVs, we filtered the significant sites with sufficient coverage to those with a U-to-C basecalling error < 10 in the IVT library.
SNR Calculation
We modeled the IVT and DRS data separately for each target position with a beta-binomial distribution and Jeffrey’s prior. We used U counts and C counts to parameterize the beta of the beta-binomial distribution and calculate the log marginal likelihood of the posterior distribution. Additionally, we modeled a combined distribution of IVT and DRS U and C counts with the same beta-binomial and Jeffrey’s prior. The ratio of these log marginal likelihoods approximates the degree to which the U to C mismatch at a position is better modeled with two independent distributions instead of a single joined distribution.
Resource availability
Lead contact.
Further information and requests for resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Sara H. Rouhanifard (s.rouhanifard@northeastern.edu).
Accessing Publicly Available Data Sets
All IVT Libraries used in this work were sourced from NIH NCBI SRA under BioProject accession PRJNA947135.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from the National Institutes of Health (R01HG011087, O.F., S.T., C.A.M, S.H.R., M.W.) and R01HG012856 (K.N., Y.Q., A.M., M.W., S.H.R).
Footnotes
Declaration of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data and code availability
All fast5 raw data for Direct Libraries generated in this work has been made publicly available in NIH NCBI SRA under the BioProject accession PRJNA1092333.
All code can be found at github.com/RouhanifardLab/NeuronalEpitranscriptomePlasticity.
REFERENCES
- 1.Roundtree I.A., Evans M.E., Pan T., and He C. (2017). Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. Cell 169, 1187–1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jia G., Fu Y., Zhao X., Dai Q., Zheng G., Yang Y., Yi C., Lindahl T., Pan T., Yang Y.-G., et al. (2011). N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 885–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Borchardt E.K., Martinez N.M., and Gilbert W.V. (2020). Regulation and Function of RNA Pseudouridylation in Human Cells. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 309–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Franco M.K., and Koutmou K.S. (2022). Chemical modifications to mRNA nucleobases impact translation elongation and termination. Biophys. Chem. 285, 106780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eyler D.E., Franco M.K., Batool Z., Wu M.Z., Dubuke M.L., Dobosz-Bartoszek M., Jones J.D., Polikanov Y.S., Roy B., and Koutmou K.S. (2019). Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 23068–23074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carlile T.M., Rojas-Duran M.F., Zinshteyn B., Shin H., Bartoli K.M., and Gilbert W.V. (2014). Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature 515, 143–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carlile T.M., Martinez N.M., Schaening C., Su A., Bell T.A., Zinshteyn B., and Gilbert W.V. (2019). mRNA structure determines modification by pseudouridine synthase 1. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 966–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martinez N.M., Su A., Burns M.C., Nussbacher J.K., Schaening C., Sathe S., Yeo G.W., and Gilbert W.V. (2022). Pseudouridine synthases modify human pre-mRNA co-transcriptionally and affect pre-mRNA processing. Mol. Cell 82, 645–659.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parr C.J.C., Wada S., Kotake K., Kameda S., Matsuura S., Sakashita S., Park S., Sugiyama H., Kuang Y., and Saito H. (2020). N 1-Methylpseudouridine substitution enhances the performance of synthetic mRNA switches in cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li X., Zhu P., Ma S., Song J., Bai J., Sun F., and Yi C. (2015). Chemical pulldown reveals dynamic pseudouridylation of the mammalian transcriptome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 592–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li X., Xiong X., and Yi C. (2016). Epitranscriptome sequencing technologies: decoding RNA modifications. Nat. Methods 14, 23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dominissini D., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Schwartz S., Salmon-Divon M., Ungar L., Osenberg S., Cesarkas K., Jacob-Hirsch J., Amariglio N., Kupiec M., et al. (2012). Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485, 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu J., Yue Y., Han D., Wang X., Fu Y., Zhang L., Jia G., Yu M., Lu Z., Deng X., et al. (2013). A METTL3–METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 93–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cortese R., Kammen H.O., Spengler S.J., and Ames B.N. (1974). Biosynthesis of pseudouridine in transfer ribonucleic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 1103–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kierzek E., Malgowska M., Lisowiec J., Turner D.H., Gdaniec Z., and Kierzek R. (2014). The contribution of pseudouridine to stabilities and structure of RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 3492–3501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arroyo J.D., Jourdain A.A., Calvo S.E., Ballarano C.A., Doench J.G., Root D.E., and Mootha V.K. (2016). A Genome-wide CRISPR Death Screen Identifies Genes Essential for Oxidative Phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 24, 875–885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bakin A., and Ofengand J. (1993). Four newly located pseudouridylate residues in Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA are all at the peptidyltransferase center: analysis by the application of a new sequencing technique. Biochemistry 32, 9754–9762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang M., Jiang Z., Ma Y., Liu W., Zhuang Y., Lu B., Li K., Peng J., and Yi C. (2023). Quantitative profiling of pseudouridylation landscape in the human transcriptome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1185–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lovejoy A.F., Riordan D.P., and Brown P.O. (2014). Transcriptome-wide mapping of pseudouridines: pseudouridine synthases modify specific mRNAs in S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 9, e110799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khoddami V., Yerra A., Mosbruger T.L., Fleming A.M., Burrows C.J., and Cairns B.R. (2019). Transcriptome-wide profiling of multiple RNA modifications simultaneously at single-base resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 6784–6789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dai Q., Zhang L.-S., Sun H.-L., Pajdzik K., Yang L., Ye C., Ju C.-W., Liu S., Wang Y., Zheng Z., et al. (2022). Quantitative sequencing using BID-seq uncovers abundant pseudouridines in mammalian mRNA at base resolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 10.1038/s41587-022-01505-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Begik O., Lucas M.C., Pryszcz L.P., Ramirez J.M., Medina R., Milenkovic I., Cruciani S., Liu H., Vieira H.G.S., Sas-Chen A., et al. (2021). Quantitative profiling of pseudouridylation dynamics in native RNAs with nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 10.1038/s41587-021-00915-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang S., Zhang W., Katanski C.D., Dersh D., Dai Q., Lolans K., Yewdell J., Eren A.M., and Pan T. (2021). Interferon inducible pseudouridine modification in human mRNA by quantitative nanopore profiling. Genome Biol. 22, 330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang S., Wylder A.C., and Pan T. (2024). Simultaneous nanopore profiling of mRNA m6A and pseudouridine reveals translation coordination. Nat. Biotechnol. 10.1038/s41587-024-02135-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tavakoli S., Nabizadeh M., Makhamreh A., Gamper H., McCormick C.A., Rezapour N.K., Hou Y.-M., Wanunu M., and Rouhanifard S.H. (2023). Semi-quantitative detection of pseudouridine modifications and type I/II hypermodifications in human mRNAs using direct long-read sequencing. Nat. Commun. 14, 334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCormick C.A., Akeson S., Tavakoli S., Bloch D., Klink I.N., Jain M., and Rouhanifard S.H. (2023). Multicellular, IVT-derived, unmodified human transcriptome for nanopore direct RNA analysis. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.04.06.535889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Makhamreh A., Tavakoli S., Gamper H., Nabizadehmashhadtoroghi M., Fallahi A., Hou Y.-M., Rouhanifard S.H., and Wanunu M. (2022). Messenger-RNA Modification Standards and Machine Learning Models Facilitate Absolute Site-Specific Pseudouridine Quantification. Preprint, 10.1101/2022.05.06.490948 10.1101/2022.05.06.490948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gamper H., McCormick C., Tavakoli S., Wanunu M., Rouhanifard S.H., and Hou Y.-M. Synthesis of Long RNA with a Site-Specific Modification by Enzymatic Splint Ligation. Preprint, 10.1101/2022.09.17.508400 10.1101/2022.09.17.508400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fleming A.M., Mathewson N.J., Howpay Manage S.A., and Burrows C.J. (2021). Nanopore Dwell Time Analysis Permits Sequencing and Conformational Assignment of Pseudouridine in SARS-CoV-2. ACS Cent. Sci. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang W., Eckwahl M.J., Zhou K.I., and Pan T. (2019). Sensitive and quantitative probing of pseudouridine modification in mRNA and long noncoding RNA. RNA 25, 1218–1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shaheen R., Han L., Faqeih E., Ewida N., Alobeid E., Phizicky E.M., and Alkuraya F.S. (2016). A homozygous truncating mutation in PUS3 expands the role of tRNA modification in normal cognition. Hum. Genet. 135, 707–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jung Y., and Goldman D. (2018). Role of RNA modifications in brain and behavior. Genes Brain Behav. 17, e12444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shipley M.M., Mangold C.A., and Szpara M.L. (2016). Differentiation of the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line. J. Vis. Exp., 53193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Påhlman S., Ruusala A.I., Abrahamsson L., Mattsson M.E., and Esscher T. (1984). Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of cultured human neuroblastoma cells: a comparison with phorbolester-induced differentiation. Cell Differ. 14, 135–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Santa Maria M.P., Hill B.D., and Kline J. (2019). Lead (Pb) neurotoxicology and cognition. Appl. Neuropsychol. Child 8, 272–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shih R.A., Hu H., Weisskopf M.G., and Schwartz B.S. (2007). Cumulative lead dose and cognitive function in adults: a review of studies that measured both blood lead and bone lead. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 483–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.D’souza H.S., Dsouza S.A., Menezes G., and Venkatesh T. (2011). Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of lead poisoning in general population. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 26, 197–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Safra M., Nir R., Farouq D., Vainberg Slutskin I., and Schwartz S. (2017). TRUB1 is the predominant pseudouridine synthase acting on mammalian mRNA via a predictable and conserved code. Genome Res. 27, 393–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schwartz S., Bernstein D.A., Mumbach M.R., Jovanovic M., Herbst R.H., León-Ricardo B.X., Engreitz J.M., Guttman M., Satija R., Lander E.S., et al. (2014). Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals widespread dynamic-regulated pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA. Cell 159, 148–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Meyer K.D., Saletore Y., Zumbo P., Elemento O., Mason C.E., and Jaffrey S.R. (2012). Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3’ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 149, 1635–1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Purchal M.K., Eyler D.E., Tardu M., Franco M.K., Korn M.M., Khan T., McNassor R., Giles R., Lev K., Sharma H., et al. (2022). Pseudouridine synthase 7 is an opportunistic enzyme that binds and modifies substrates with diverse sequences and structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2109708119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tuyl F., Gerlach R., and Mengersen K. (2008). A Comparison of Bayes–Laplace, Jeffreys, and Other Priors. Am. Stat. 10.1198/000313008X267839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jeffreys H. (1946). An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 10.1098/rspa.1946.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.GitHub - nanoporetech/modkit: A bioinformatics tool for working with modified bases GitHub. https://github.com/nanoporetech/modkit.
- 45.Kass R.E., and Raftery A.E. (1995). Bayes Factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 773. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Grima R. (2009). Investigating the robustness of the classical enzyme kinetic equations in small intracellular compartments. BMC Syst. Biol. 3, 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Raj A., Peskin C.S., Tranchina D., Vargas D.Y., and Tyagi S. (2006). Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Korecka J.A., van Kesteren R.E., Blaas E., Spitzer S.O., Kamstra J.H., Smit A.B., Swaab D.F., Verhaagen J., and Bossers K. (2013). Phenotypic characterization of retinoic acid differentiated SH-SY5Y cells by transcriptional profiling. PLoS One 8, e63862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kovalevich J., and Langford D. (2013). Considerations for the use of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in neurobiology. Methods Mol. Biol. 1078, 9–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Harasym E., McAndrew N., and Gomez G. (2017). Sub-micromolar concentrations of retinoic acid induce morphological and functional neuronal phenotypes in SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 53, 798–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Khazeem M.M., Casement J.W., Schlossmacher G., Kenneth N.S., Sumbung N.K., Chan J.Y.T., McGow J.F., Cowell I.G., and Austin C.A. (2022). TOP2B Is Required to Maintain the Adrenergic Neural Phenotype and for ATRA-Induced Differentiation of SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells. Mol. Neurobiol. 59, 5987–6008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Janesick A., Wu S.C., and Blumberg B. (2015). Retinoic acid signaling and neuronal differentiation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1559–1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Playfoot C.J., Duc J., Sheppard S., Dind S., Coudray A., Planet E., and Trono D. (2021). Transposable elements and their KZFP controllers are drivers of transcriptional innovation in the developing human brain. Genome Res. 31, 1531–1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rege T.A., and Hagood J.S. (2006). Thy-1 as a regulator of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in axon regeneration, apoptosis, adhesion, migration, cancer, and fibrosis. FASEB J. 20, 1045–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gorokhova S., Bibert S., Geering K., and Heintz N. (2007). A novel family of transmembrane proteins interacting with beta subunits of the Na,K-ATPase. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 2394–2410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Abadin H., Ashizawa A., Llados F., and Stevens Y.-W. (2007). Toxicological profile for lead. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gülden M., and Seibert H. (2006). In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of toxic potencies for hazard and risk assessment—problems and new developments. ALTEX 23, e225. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bekeschus S., Liebelt G., Menz J., Singer D., Wende K., and Schmidt A. (2022). Cell cycle-related genes associate with sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity. Redox Biol 50, 102234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Permenter M.G., Lewis J.A., and Jackson D.A. (2011). Exposure to nickel, chromium, or cadmium causes distinct changes in the gene expression patterns of a rat liver derived cell line. PLoS One 6, e27730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang Y., Chang F.-M., Huang J., Junco J.J., Maffi S.K., Pridgen H.I., Catano G., Dang H., Ding X., Yang F., et al. (2014). DSSylation, a novel protein modification targets proteins induced by oxidative stress, and facilitates their degradation in cells. Protein Cell 5, 124–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hedman Å.K., Zilmer M., Sundström J., Lind L., and Ingelsson E. (2016). DNA methylation patterns associated with oxidative stress in an ageing population. BMC Med. Genomics 9, 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xu H., Balakrishnan K., Malaterre J., Beasley M., Yan Y., Essers J., Appeldoorn E., Tomaszewski J.M., Vazquez M., Verschoor S., et al. (2010). Rad21-cohesin haploinsufficiency impedes DNA repair and enhances gastrointestinal radiosensitivity in mice. PLoS One 5, e12112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Borlado L.R., and Méndez J. (2008). CDC6: from DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis. Carcinogenesis 29, 237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kriska T., Pilat A., Schmitt J.C., and Girotti A.W. (2010). Sterol carrier protein-2 (SCP-2) involvement in cholesterol hydroperoxide cytotoxicity as revealed by SCP-2 inhibitor effects. J. Lipid Res. 51, 3174–3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mund A., Schubert T., Staege H., Kinkley S., Reumann K., Kriegs M., Fritsch L., Battisti V., Ait-Si-Ali S., Hoffbeck A.-S., et al. (2012). SPOC1 modulates DNA repair by regulating key determinants of chromatin compaction and DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11363–11379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Frohns A., Frohns F., Naumann S.C., Layer P.G., and Löbrich M. (2014). Inefficient double-strand break repair in murine rod photoreceptors with inverted heterochromatin organization. Curr. Biol. 24, 1080–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chung H.-R., Xu C., Fuchs A., Mund A., Lange M., Staege H., Schubert T., Bian C., Dunkel I., Eberharter A., et al. (2016). PHF13 is a molecular reader and transcriptional co-regulator of H3K4me2/3. Elife 5. 10.7554/eLife.10607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Krall M., Htun S., Schnur R.E., Brooks A.S., Baker L., de Alba Campomanes A., Lamont R.E., Gripp K.W., Care 4 Rare Canada Consortium, Schneidman-Duhovny D., et al. (2019). Biallelic sequence variants in INTS1 in patients with developmental delays, cataracts, and craniofacial anomalies. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 27, 582–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhao N., Zhang G., He M., Huang H., Cao L., Yin A., Wang P., and Wang L. (2017). SZRD1 is a Novel Protein that Functions as a Potential Tumor Suppressor in Cervical Cancer. J. Cancer 8, 2132–2141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shi H., Zhang X., Weng Y.-L., Lu Z., Liu Y., Lu Z., Li J., Hao P., Zhang Y., Zhang F., et al. (2018). m6A facilitates hippocampus-dependent learning and memory through YTHDF1. Nature 563, 249–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sugrue K.F., Sarkar A.A., Leatherbury L., and Zohn I.E. (2019). The ubiquitin ligase HECTD1 promotes retinoic acid signaling required for development of the aortic arch. Dis. Model. Mech. 12. 10.1242/dmm.036491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kang J., Brajanovski N., Chan K.T., Xuan J., Pearson R.B., and Sanij E. (2021). Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6, 323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Brum P.O., Viola G.D., Saibro-Girardi C., Tiefensee-Ribeiro C., Brum M.O., Gasparotto J., Krolow R., Moreira J.C.F., and Gelain D.P. (2022). Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1 ) Inhibition Impairs Retinoic Acid-Induced Differentiation in SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells, Leading to Reduced Neurite Length and Diminished Gene Expression Related to Cell Differentiation. Neurochem. Res. 47, 409–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xu J., Zhang X.-Z., Zhang Y.-J., Li X.-M., Cai Z.-L., and Li X.-M. (2015). Silencing of SIAH1 in SH-SY5Y affects α-synuclein degradation pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 12885–12892. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Messana T., Russo A., Vergaro R., Boni A., Santucci M., and Pini A. (2018). Glucose Transporter Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome: Developmental Delay and Early-Onset Ataxia in a Novel Mutation of the SLC2A1 Gene. J. Pediatr. Neurosci. 13, 496–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Reardon E.S., Shukla V., Xi S., Gara S.K., Liu Y., Straughan D., Zhang M., Hong J.A., Payabyab E.C., Kumari A., et al. (2021). UHRF1 Is a Novel Druggable Epigenetic Target in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 16, 89–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Komada M., and Nishimura Y. (2022). Epigenetics and Neuroinflammation Associated With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Microglial Perspective. Front Cell Dev Biol 10, 852752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Banko J.L., Poulin F., Hou L., DeMaria C.T., Sonenberg N., and Klann E. (2005). The translation repressor 4E-BP2 is critical for eIF4F complex formation, synaptic plasticity, and memory in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 25, 9581–9590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gkogkas C.G., Khoutorsky A., Ran I., Rampakakis E., Nevarko T., Weatherill D.B., Vasuta C., Yee S., Truitt M., Dallaire P., et al. (2013). Autism-related deficits via dysregulated eIF4E-dependent translational control. Nature 493, 371–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All fast5 raw data for Direct Libraries generated in this work has been made publicly available in NIH NCBI SRA under the BioProject accession PRJNA1092333.
All code can be found at github.com/RouhanifardLab/NeuronalEpitranscriptomePlasticity.