Abstract
The conventional intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test has been used to assess memory function in patients being considered for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery. Minimally invasive approaches that target the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and spare neocortex are increasingly used, but a knowledge gap remains in how to assess memory and language risk from these procedures. We retrospectively compared results of two versions of the Wada test, the intracarotid artery (ICA-Wada) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA-Wada) approaches, with respect to predicting subsequent memory and language outcomes, particularly after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH). We included all patients being considered for SLAH who underwent both ICA-Wada and PCA-Wada at a single institution. Memory and confrontation naming assessments were conducted using standardized neuropsychological tests to assess pre- to post-surgical changes in cognitive performance. Of 13 patients who initially failed the ICA-Wada, only one patient subsequently failed the PCA-Wada (p=0.003, two-sided binomial test with p 0 =0.5) demonstrating that these tests assess different brain regions or networks. PCA-Wada had a high negative predictive value for the safety of SLAH, compared to ICA-Wada, as none of the patients who underwent SLAH after passing the PCA-Wada experienced catastrophic memory decline (0 of 9 subjects, p <.004, two-sided binomial test with p 0 =0.5), and all experienced a good cognitive outcome. In contrast, the single patient who received a left anterior temporal lobectomy after failed ICA- and passed PCA-Wada experienced a persistent, near catastrophic memory decline. On confrontation naming, few patients exhibited disturbance during the PCA-Wada. Following surgery, SLAH patients showed no naming decline, while open resection patients, whose surgeries all included ipsilateral temporal lobe neocortex, experienced significant naming difficulties (Fisher’s exact test, p <.05). These findings demonstrate that (1) failing the ICA-Wada falsely predicts memory decline following SLAH, (2) PCA-Wada better predicts good memory outcomes of SLAH for MTLE, and (3) the MTL brain structures affected by both PCA-Wada and SLAH are not directly involved in language processing.
Full Text Availability
The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.