Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Mar 6;16(3):e55669. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55669

A Case Report of Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor Presenting As Anterior Thigh Swelling: A Diagnostic Challenge

Jayashree Rey 1,, Samarth Shukla 1, Sourya Acharya 2, Pravin Gadkari 1, Sapna Sihag 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10997384  PMID: 38586762

Abstract

This case report describes the presentation, diagnostic challenges, and management of a 64-year-old male with a malignant mesenchymal tumor presenting as a swelling in the anterior thigh. Despite initial misdiagnosis and treatment at a local hospital, the swelling worsened, leading to referral to a specialized hospital. Further investigations, including blood tests, ultrasonography (USG), and MRI, revealed a large solid cystic lesion compressing adjacent muscles, indicative of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). A skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a malignant mesenchymal tumor. The patient, also suffering from hypertension and diabetes mellitus, was subsequently referred to the oncology department for further management. This case underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and histopathological confirmation for accurate diagnosis and management of STS, particularly in the context of atypical presentations and comorbidities.

Keywords: multidisciplinary management, histopathological confirmation, soft tissue sarcoma, diagnostic challenge, anterior thigh swelling, malignant mesenchymal tumor

Introduction

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignant tumors from mesenchymal cells, encompassing over 50 histological subtypes [1]. While they constitute less than 1% of all adult malignancies, STS can occur at any anatomical site and present with diverse clinical manifestations, posing diagnostic challenges [2].

The diagnosis of STS relies on a combination of clinical evaluation, imaging modalities, and histopathological analysis [3]. Imaging techniques such as ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play crucial roles in assessing tumor size, extent, and involvement of adjacent structures [4]. However, definitive diagnosis often requires histopathological confirmation through biopsy, which guides treatment planning and prognostication [5].

Treatment of STS typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy depending on tumor characteristics and patient factors [6]. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, the prognosis of STS remains variable, influenced by factors such as tumor histology, grade, size, and patient comorbidities [7].

Case presentation

A 64-year-old male presented to the outpatient department of the specialized hospital in Wardha district, reporting swelling in the front area of his left thigh for the past 20 days. During the history-taking, the patient disclosed that the swelling had gradually developed without any apparent trigger, and despite receiving treatment at a local private hospital two weeks prior, the swelling had worsened. This prompted a referral to the super-specialty hospital. Additionally, the patient mentioned a history of bypass surgery in Nagpur 2.5 years ago, as well as a diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes mellitus for the past 1.5 years, for which he was taking Telmisartan 40 mg and Metformin 500 mg twice daily.

Upon local examination, the medical team observed swelling and tenderness in the front area of the left thigh, initially measuring 2x1 cm and currently enlarged to 10x8 cm. Palpation revealed a soft, immobile lump with a temperature increase but no active discharge (Figure 1). Blood tests were recommended (Table 1).

Table 1. Laboratory investigation.

Hb, hemoglobin; RBC, red blood cell; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean cell hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RDW, red cell distribution width; TLC, total leukocyte count

Name of Test Patient Value Reference Value
Hb 11.4 11-15 mg/dL
Glucose plasma random (RBS) 96 140-199 mg/dL
RBC 4.74 3.8-5.8 per mcL
MCV 72.4 76-96 fL
MCH 23.9 27-32 pg
MCHC 33 31-35 gm/dL
Platelet count 258000 150,000 to 400,000 per mcL
RDW 18.1 1-15%
TLC 10100 4000-11,000/mcL
Differential leukocyte count
Granulocytes 75 40-75%
Lymphocytes 20 20-45%
Eosinophils 02 1-6%
Monocytes 03 2-10%
Basophils 00 0-1%
Kidney function test  
Serum sodium 137 135-145 mmol/L
Serum potassium 3.8 3.5-5.5 mmol/L
Serum urea 22 8 and 24 mg/dL
Serum creatinine 0.8 0.74 to 1.35 mg/dL
Liver function test
Alkaline phosphatase 79 30-130 IU/L
ALT (SGPT) 19 7-56 U/L
AST (SGOT) 20 8-48 U/L
Total protein 7.2 6.0-8.3 g/dL
Albumin 3.7 3.5-5.5 g/dL
Total bilirubin 0.8 0.2-0.8 mg/dL
Bilirubin conjugated 0.3 0-0.2 mg/dL
Bilirubin unconjugated 0.5 0.2-0.6 mg/dL

Figure 1. Shows an immobile lump with a temperature increase but no active discharge.

Figure 1

Further investigations included USG of the left thigh, revealing a well-defined encapsulated solid cystic heterogeneity hypercellular lesion compressing underlying muscles. Minimal internal vascularity suggested a benign nature. MRI with contrast confirmed a large ovoid mixed solid cystic lesion in the anterolateral aspect of the left thigh, causing displacement of adjacent muscles but no infiltration into surrounding tissues (Figure 2). Subchondral cysts were noted in the right femur. These findings were indicative of STS and neurogenic tumors.

Figure 2. Shows large ovoid mixed solid cystic lesion in the anterolateral aspect of the left thigh, causing displacement of adjacent muscles but no infiltration into surrounding tissues.

Figure 2

A soft tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a malignant mesenchymal tumor. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with a malignant mesenchymal tumor in the context of hypertension and diabetes mellitus and was referred to the oncology department for further treatment (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Shows malignant mesenchymal tumor (40×).

Figure 3

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) was used.

Discussion

STS represent a challenging group of tumors due to their diverse histological subtypes and variable clinical presentations. This case underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach and multidisciplinary management in a malignant mesenchymal tumor presenting as an anterior thigh swelling. The initial presentation of the patient with a gradually enlarging thigh swelling highlights the importance of considering malignant etiologies in the differential diagnosis, particularly in older individuals with risk factors such as prior surgeries and comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes mellitus [8]. While imaging modalities like USG suggested a benign lesion, MRI played a pivotal role in delineating the extent of the tumor and its relationship with adjacent structures [9]. Differential diagnoses of the malignant mesenchymal tumor include low-grade fibromyxoid sarcomas, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas, fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, and synovial sarcomas [9].

Histopathological confirmation through skin biopsy was crucial in establishing the diagnosis of malignant mesenchymal tumor, highlighting the significance of tissue sampling in guiding treatment decisions [10]. The presence of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, as these conditions may influence treatment selection, perioperative management, and overall prognosis [11]. The management of STS often involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy tailored to tumor characteristics and patient factors [12]. In this case, referral to the oncology department for further treatment emphasizes the need for specialized care and expertise in managing rare malignancies like STS. While diagnostic and therapeutic modalities advancements have improved outcomes for patients with STS, challenges remain in optimizing treatment strategies and prognostication. Tumor histology, grade, size, and patient-related variables influence treatment decisions and survival [13].

Conclusions

In conclusion, this case report of a malignant mesenchymal tumor presenting as an anterior thigh swelling emphasizes the critical role of a systematic diagnostic approach and multidisciplinary management in STS. Despite initial diagnostic challenges and the benign appearance on imaging, histopathological confirmation through skin biopsy was essential for accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning. The case underscores the importance of considering malignant etiologies in patients with soft tissue swellings, particularly in the context of relevant medical history and comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Moving forward, continued research efforts to refine diagnostic modalities, elucidate tumor biology, and develop personalized treatment strategies are essential for improving the prognosis of STS patients. Additionally, heightened awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the varied presentations of STS and the importance of early diagnosis is crucial for timely intervention and improved survival rates.

Acknowledgments

I want to express my deep appreciation for the integral role of artificial intelligence (AI) like Grammarly, Paperpal, and ChatGPT in completing this research paper. The ChatGPT language model (OpenAI, San Francisco, California) was employed to assist in the formulation of key arguments, structuring the content, and refining the language of our manuscript. It provided valuable insights and suggestions throughout the writing process, enhancing the overall coherence and clarity of the article. It was also utilized to assist in editing and rephrasing the work to ensure coherence and clarity in conveying the findings.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Jayashree Rey, Samarth Shukla, Sourya Acharya, Pravin Gadkari

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Jayashree Rey, Samarth Shukla, Sourya Acharya, Pravin Gadkari, Sapna Sihag

Drafting of the manuscript:  Jayashree Rey

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Jayashree Rey, Samarth Shukla, Sourya Acharya, Pravin Gadkari, Sapna Sihag

Supervision:  Samarth Shukla

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue: selected changes and new entities. Choi JH, Ro JY. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28:44–58. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cancer statistics, 2020. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, et al. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:0–67. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP Jr. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8446754/ Radiol Clin North Am. 1993;31:359–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Predictive value of grade for metastasis development in the main histologic types of adult soft tissue sarcomas: a study of 1240 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. Coindre JM, Terrier P, Guillou L, et al. Cancer. 2001;91:1914–1926. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010515)91:10<1914::aid-cncr1214>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Pervaiz N, Colterjohn N, Farrokhyar F, Tozer R, Figueredo A, Ghert M. Cancer. 2008;113:573–581. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Increasing incidence rates of soft tissue sarcomas? A population-based epidemiologic study and literature review. Wibmer C, Leithner A, Zielonke N, Sperl M, Windhager R. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1106–1111. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas of the hand and foot. Lin PP, Guzel VB, Pisters PW, et al. Cancer. 2002;95:852–861. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soft-tissue masses: optimal imaging protocol and reporting. Manaster BJ. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:505–514. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The 2020 WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: news and perspectives. Sbaraglia M, Bellan E, Dei Tos AP. Pathologica. 2021;113:70–84. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2758–2765. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(☆) Gronchi A, Miah AB, Dei Tos AP, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1348–1365. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Soft tissue sarcomas. Cormier JN, Pollock RE. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:94–109. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES