Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2024 Feb 27;38(4):887–892. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02173-2

Germline variants in patients developing second malignant neoplasms after therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia—a case-control study

Stefanie V Junk 1,2,, Alisa Förster 3, Gunnar Schmidt 3, Martin Zimmermann 1, Birthe Fedders 4, Bernd Haermeyer 3, Anke K Bergmann 3, Anja Möricke 4, Gunnar Cario 4, Bernd Auber 3, Martin Schrappe 4, Christian P Kratz 1, Martin Stanulla 1,
PMCID: PMC10997515  PMID: 38413718

To the Editor:

Today, most children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be cured by the application of intensive combination chemotherapy regimens [1, 2]. However, within 20 years, up to 10% develop a second malignant neoplasm (SMN) with cure rates often being dismal [3, 4]. Therefore, strategies are needed for an early identification of patients at risk for SMN development, an improved understanding of the underlying pathobiology and, ideally, the development of preventive actions. In this study, we analyzed genetic variation in 159 selected cancer predisposition genes (CPG) to determine their potential association with SMN.

Patients included were 1–22 years of age at diagnosis of ALL and enrolled in the German part of the European AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 multicenter clinical trial for frontline treatment of pediatric ALL [5]. Median follow-up for the entire patient group was 14.8 (4.6–19.2) years as of November, 2020. Treatment details were described previously [6]. We identified 75 SMN patients with sufficient DNA available, representing 94% of all 80 SMN cases observed in the entire AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study population up to this follow-up date. In a matched case-control approach, we analyzed germline DNA obtained from remission bone marrow samples of 223 individuals (75 cases, 148 controls); see Supplementary Methods section for sequencing details and Supplementary Table 1 for clinical background information. Matching criteria were sex, age at diagnosis of ALL, immunophenotype, and treatment. Candidate genes included genes based on own work and/or genes recommended by Byrjalsen et al. 2021; [7] variant pathogenicity was assessed according to standard interpretation guidelines (see Supplementary Table 2 for details). Statistical analyses and plotting were conducted with SAS (SAS-PC, Version 9.1, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.), SPSS (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Ehningen, Germany) or R (4.0.5), and Rstudio (1.0.153); see Supplementary Methods section.

Overall we observed 31 conspicuous findings in 22 genes: 17 (6 likely pathogenic and 11 pathogenic) in 16 (21%) cases with ALL and subsequent SMN and 14 variants (9 likely pathogenic and 5 pathogenic) were detected in 14 (9%) control patients with ALL; for details see Table 1 and Fig. 1. While some variants were found in patients from both groups (e.g., rs28909982 in CHEK2, rs113993993 in SBDS and rs764079291 in NF1), certain genes were exclusively altered in SMN patients (e.g., ATM, TP53, A2ML1, MSH6 and PMS2).

Table 1.

(Likely) pathogenic variants determined in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with or without second malignancies.

Patients with ALL and subsequent SMN (n = 75) Gened Patients with ALL (n = 148)
GRCh37 (hg19)a Consequence Entityb Variant ID Classc GRCh37 (hg19)a Consequence Variant ID Classc
11-108188099-G-T NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6199-1G > T p.?e A rs1591788932 4 ATM
11-108115654-C-T NM_000051.4(ATM):c.802C > T p.(Gln268*)f A rs557012154 5
RECQL4 8-145738522-C-G NM_004260.4(RECQL4):c.2464-1G > C p.? rs398124117 4
CDH1h 16-68862112-A-T NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2200A > T p.(Arg734*) - 4
BRCA1h 17-41197784-G-A NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.5503C > T p.(Arg1835*) rs41293465 5
13-32907428--A NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1813dup p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) H rs80359306 5 BRCA2
FANCD2 3-10130147-C-T NM_033084.6(FANCD2):c.3481C > T p.(Gln1161*) rs369022159 4
3-10127560-C-T NM_033084.6(FANCD2):c.3289C > T p.(Arg1097*) - 4
17-7577539-G-A NM_000546.6(TP53):c.742C > T p.(Arg248Trp)f H rs121912651 5 TP53h
22-29121326-T-C NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.349A > G p.(Arg117Gly)f H rs28909982 4 CHEK2h 22-29121326-T-C NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.349A > G p.(Arg117Gly) rs28909982 4
2-48030647--C NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.3261dup p.(Phe1088Leufs*5) S rs267608078 5 MSH6h
7-6026988--AC NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.1408delins47 p.(Pro470Valfs*3)e, g A - 5 PMS2h
17-29528489-C-T NM_000267.3(NF1):c.1246C > T p.(Arg416*) A rs764079291 5 NF1h 17-29528489-C-T NM_000267.3(NF1):c.1246C > T p.(Arg416*)i rs764079291 5
NBN 8-90983445-GTTTT-- NM_002485.5(NBN):c.657_661delACAAA p.(Lys219Asnfs*16)g rs587776650 5
12-9007428-G-A NM_144670.6(A2ML1):c.2764+1G > A p.(?) S rs773034576 4 A2ML1h
12-25398285-C-G NM_004985.5(KRAS):c.34G > Cp.(Gly12Arg)j H rs121913530 5 KRASh
22-21344765-G-A NM_006767.4(LZTR1):c.742G > A p.(Gly248Arg)f H rs869320686 5 LZTR1h 22-21350154-C-T NM_006767.4(LZTR1):c.2062C > T p.(Arg688Cys) rs587777178 4
22-21342297-AG-- NM_006767.4(LZTR1):c.401-2_401-1del p.? H rs769200796 4
PTPN11h 12-112888157-A-G NM_002834.5(PTPN11):c.173A > G p.(Asn58Ser) rs751437780 4
16-3832811-G-A NM_004380.3(CREBBP):c.1447C > T p.(Arg483*) S rs1555484797 5 CREBBPh
7-66459273-T-A NM_016038.4(SBDS):c.184A > T p.(Lys62*) H rs120074160 5 SBDS 7-66459197-A-G NM_016038.4(SBDS):c.258 + 2T > C p.? rs113993993 5
7-66459197-A-G NM_016038.4(SBDS):c.258+2T > C p.? S rs113993993 5 7-66459197-A-G NM_016038.4(SBDS):c.258 + 2T > C p.? rs113993993 5
5-176638471-C-G NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.3071C > G p.(Ser1024*)f H - 4 NSD1h
ERCC2 19-45868093-CACT-- NM_000400.4(ERCC2):c.594 + 2_594 + 5del p.? rs762309206 4
6-43578333-C-T NM_006502.3(POLH):c.1117C > T p.(Gln373*) S rs121908564 4 POLH
MPL 1-43817975-G-- NM_005373.3(MPL):c.1653 + 1del p.? rs755257605 4

Abbreviations: ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, SMN second malignant neoplasm, Variant ID variant identifier.

aPhysical positions of the variants are according to the human genome assembly GRCh37 (hg19).

bCategorical entity of the SMN is given as: hematologic (H), astrocytoma (A) or other solid entities (S). The SMN entities of ALL patients affected by (likely) pathogenic variants were as follows: brain tumors (astrocytoma (n = 3)), hematologic neoplasms (myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 5), non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL, n = 2) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 1)) and other solid tumors (thyroid cancer (n = 2), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 1), melanoma (n = 1) and nerve sheath tumor (n = 1)); for detailed clinical and variant information see Supplementary Tables 3, 4.

cExplains the variant pathogenicity and is given by commonly used scores: “likely pathogenic” classification is referred to as class 4 and “pathogenic” as class 5.

dVariant pathogenicity was assessed according to standard interpretation guidelines (see Supplementary Tables 2, 4 for details).

eOne SMN patient who developed an astrocytoma carried two deleterious variants.

fThese 5 patients deceased within 10 years after the SMN.

gThese two variants were observed homozygous.

hCancer predisposition related to these genes may follow an autosomal dominant inheritance mode, implicating that even heterozygous germline variants may be causative, whereas heterozygous variants in the other genes (only recessively linked to cancer risk) imply only a carrier status for related conditions (see Supplementary Table 3 for details).

iPatient was previously diagnosed with Neurofibromatosis type 1.

jVariant was also detected in a DNA-sample from a subsequently developed second SMN (CMML), but not in hair follicle derived DNA of the affected patient, indicating the involvement of clonal hematopoiesis.

Fig. 1. Characteristics of second malignant neoplasms (SMN) in the 75 included patients from trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000.

Fig. 1

A Entities of SMN; (B) time from diagnosis of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to SMN development; median time to SMN was 3.36 ± 3.98 (0.57–13.37) years for patients with hematologic SMN, 8.61 ± 1.69 (5.12–11.43) years for patients with second brain tumors, and 8.45 ± 4.04 (1.92–15.91) years for patients with other second solid tumors. Black-bordered dots represent patients with a (likely) pathogenic variant (LP/P) in one of the candidate genes; the adjacent numbers correspond to the respective patient IDs (for further details, compare Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 3, 4). Abbreviations: MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, AML acute myeloid leukemia, CML chronic myeloid leukemia, PTLD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Among the SMN patients, (likely) pathogenic variants in one of the candidate genes were observed in 3 of 11 (27%) cases with brain tumors, 5 of 28 (18%) with other solid tumors, and 8 of 36 (22%) with hematologic SMN. Three individuals with hematologic SMN carried variants in Ras signaling pathway genes (LZTR1 and KRAS); for clinical details see Supplementary Table 3. One of these patients, determined with LZTR1 variant rs869320686 p.(Gly248Arg), developed a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) 2.1 years after undergoing hyperdiploid pre B-cell ALL. Revision of the clinical reports revealed that this patient was diagnosed with mild developmental delay, facial anomalies, and a short stature. Suspected clonal hematopoiesis was confirmed for KRAS variant rs121913530, by analyzing hair follicle-derived DNA. Two male patients, identified with astrocytoma at 9.2 and 9.7 years after diagnosis of ALL, harbored deleterious variants in ATM. Two SMN patients carried variants in mismatch repair genes: one patient with a mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MSH6) and one individual with an astrocytoma (PMS2); the later also carried an ATM variant. One male patient with a melanoma 16 years after his pre B-cell ALL carried a variant in A2ML1, rs773034576. While conducting this study, the clinical significance of A2ML1 variants related to the Noonan syndrome was refuted [8]. However, for this patient, this likely pathogenic variant was the only one we determined. The TP53 variant, rs121912651, was observed in a female patient developing MDS at 8.8 years after diagnosis of ALL. Two observations, Pro470Valfs*3 (PMS2) and rs587776650 (NBN) were homozygous. All other variants were detected with a variant allele fraction of approximately 50% (i.e., heterozygous); for further details see Supplementary Tables 3 and 4.

Excluding the variants KRAS rs121913530 and A2ML1 rs773034576, (likely) pathogenic variants in one of the CPG were 1.97-times more frequent in SMN patients (14/148 vs. 14/75 affected patients; P(Pearson’s X2) = 0.050). Conditional Cox-Regression analysis revealed that patients with a conspicuous finding in one of the candidate genes were at increased risk for SMN development (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 0.989–4.944), P = 0.053 compared to the remaining patients.

Within the last decade, it became increasingly obvious that germline genetic variation plays an important role in the development of childhood cancers, including pediatric ALL. Moreover, cases of ALL plus subsequent SMN were reported in the context of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) such as the Li-Fraumeni syndrome or the ETV6 deficiency [9, 10].

Previously published large-scale sequencing studies, including pediatric ALL patients, determined 4–5% of the patients with variants in CPG [11] or an underlying CPS [12]. In line, here we identified 14 (9%) of the ALL patients without SMN with unfavorable CPG variants, and in 6 of these cases (4% of the control patients) an underlying CPS may be suspected, either because the variant was determined to be homozygous (i.e. NBN) or due to an autosomal dominant inheritance mode of the associated phenotype (see Table 1 for details). Notably, this was also the case in 9 (12%) of the SMN patients in our study. It is important to note that patients with a monoallelic/heterozygous variant in a gene that is associated with an autosomal recessive disease only have a carrier status for this condition. Furthermore, the aim of this study was not to diagnose previously unrecognized CPS, but to describe the mutational landscape of variants in known CPGs and to identify potential indicators of increased SMN risk in pediatric ALL patients. Nevertheless, in addition to a specific variation, we identified some patients with additional characteristics consistent with features of suspected CPS: In particular, the male patient carrying the LZTR1 variant rs869320686 p.(Gly248Arg), previously described to be associated with the Noonan syndrome [13], presented several additional features [14]. In contrast, other variants we observed were previously reported in the context of SMN development, e.g., the mutational hotspot TP53 variant, rs121912651, which was previously observed in B-cell ALL patients with SMN [9]. Using remission bone marrow samples, we cannot completely exclude clonal hematopoiesis here. Hence, besides considering detailed individual clinical and familial information, an adequate diagnosis of CPS would require additional analyses to confirm our findings, e.g., sequencing of DNA derived from additional tissues. In the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study, CPS screening was not part of the routine diagnostic. As we were not able to re-contact families for research purposes, incomplete information (e.g., scarce non-cancer phenotype data) is a clear limitation of our study. To our knowledge, only one of the patients included here was diagnosed with a CPS prior to the current candidate gene study (see Table 1). Therefore, our results, together with previous studies [12, 15], demonstrate that systematic CPS gene screening in pediatric ALL reveals higher proportions of predisposing germline variants in ALL and SMN patients than previously anticipated. In our study population, SMN occurred up to 16 years after diagnosis of ALL, and only 46 of 75 (61%) SMN patients were alive within 10 years of the SMN diagnosis (compare Fig. 1A, B and Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, since variation in certain CPG confers a moderately to substantially increased lifetime risk for cancer development (e.g., CHEK2 vs. TP53), we cannot exclude that also patients in our control group may develop SMN in the future. Consistent with previous investigations [3], this underscores the importance of long-term follow-up and the development of novel treatment approaches – including specific preventive measures—through a better understanding of the underlying pathobiology in this specific patient group.

In conclusion, SMN patients in our study had a 2.0-fold higher frequency of (likely) pathogenic germline CPG variants, and the presence of such variants conferred a 2.2-fold increased risk of SMN in pediatric ALL patients. Nevertheless, the majority of SMN patients (>70%) had no deleterious alterations in any of the included candidate genes. In future studies, besides non-targeted exome-wide analyses, novel analytical approaches employing more collective use of genetic information may further enhance our understanding and improve the future profiling of SMN risk in ALL patients.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material (546.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all patients, parents, nurses, technicians, data managers, and doctors who participated in or contributed to AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000.

Author contributions

Drs Junk and Stanulla had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Junk, Stanulla, Möricke, Cario, Schrappe. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors. Variant assessment: Junk, Förster. Statistical analysis: Junk, Zimmermann. Drafting of the manuscript: Junk, Förster, Stanulla. Administrative, technical, or material support: Fedders, Haermeyer, Stanulla, Auber, Bergmann, Kratz, Cario, Schrappe. Study supervision: Stanulla, Cario, Schrappe. Accountable for all aspects of the work: Junk, Stanulla. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Funding

Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung, TRANSCALL2, ERA-NET TRANSCAN/European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (FP7), Madeleine-Schickedanz-Kinderkrebsstiftung, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Verein für krebskranke Kinder Hannover e.V., Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

All relevant information and data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Competing interests

None of the authors has a conflict of interest regarding the present study. Preliminary results of this study were presented in abstract and oral presentation form at the 13th Biennial Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma Symposium (CLLS) in Valencia, Spain, 7 May 2023.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, and informed consent was obtained from patients and/or their guardians. Related trial NCT00430118 was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Stefanie V. Junk, Email: stefanie.junk@med.uni-duesseldorf.de

Martin Stanulla, Email: stanulla.martin@mh-hannover.de.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41375-024-02173-2.

References

  • 1.Pui CH, Yang JJ, Hunger SP, Pieters R, Schrappe M, Biondi A, et al. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: progress through collaboration. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2938–48. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Möricke A, Zimmermann M, Reiter A, Henze G, Schrauder A, Gadner H, et al. Long-term results of five consecutive trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia performed by the ALL-BFM study group from 1981 to 2000. Leukemia. 2010;24:265–84. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmiegelow K, Levinsen MF, Attarbaschi A, Baruchel A, Devidas M, Escherich G, et al. Second malignant neoplasms after treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2469–76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.0500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hijiya N, Hudson MM, Lensing S, Zacher M, Onciu M, Behm FG, et al. Cumulative incidence of secondary neoplasms as a first event after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA. 2007;297:1207–15. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moricke A, Zimmermann M, Valsecchi MG, Stanulla M, Biondi A, Mann G, et al. Dexamethasone vs prednisone in induction treatment of pediatric ALL: results of the randomized trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000. Blood. 2016;127:2101–12. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-670729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Junk SV, Schaeffeler E, Zimmermann M, Möricke A, Beier R, Schütte P, et al. Chemotherapy-related hyperbilirubinemia in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a genome-wide association study from the AIEOP-BFM ALL study group. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:21. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02585-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Byrjalsen A, Diets IJ, Bakhuizen J, Hansen TVO, Schmiegelow K, Gerdes AM, et al. Selection criteria for assembling a pediatric cancer predisposition syndrome gene panel. Fam Cancer. 2021;20:279–87. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00254-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brinkmann J, Lissewski C, Pinna V, Vial Y, Pantaleoni F, Lepri F, et al. The clinical significance of A2ML1 variants in Noonan syndrome has to be reconsidered. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29:524–7. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00743-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qian M, Cao X, Devidas M, Yang W, Cheng C, Dai Y, et al. TP53 Germline Variations Influence the Predisposition and Prognosis of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:591–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moriyama T, Metzger ML, Wu G, Nishii R, Qian M, Devidas M, et al. Germline genetic variation in ETV6 and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic genetic study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1659–66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00369-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang J, Walsh MF, Wu G, Edmonson MN, Gruber TA, Easton J, et al. Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer. N. Engl J Med. 2015;373:2336–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bakhuizen JJ, Hopman SMJ, Bosscha MI, Dommering CJ, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hol JA, et al. Assessment of cancer predisposition syndromes in a national cohort of children with a neoplasm. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2254157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Motta M, Fidan M, Bellacchio E, Pantaleoni F, Schneider-Heieck K, Coppola S, et al. Dominant Noonan syndrome-causing LZTR1 mutations specifically affect the Kelch domain substrate-recognition surface and enhance RAS-MAPK signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;28:1007–22. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cavé H, Caye A, Strullu M, Aladjidi N, Vignal C, Ferster A, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the context of RASopathies. Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59:173–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Byrjalsen A, Hansen TVO, Stoltze UK, Mehrjouy MM, Barnkob NM, Hjalgrim LL, et al. Nationwide germline whole genome sequencing of 198 consecutive pediatric cancer patients reveals a high incidence of cancer prone syndromes. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1009231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material (546.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant information and data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from Leukemia are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES