Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2024 Mar 7;10(3):001211. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001211

Genomic analysis of clinical Aeromonas isolates reveals genetic diversity but little evidence of genetic determinants for diarrhoeal disease

Elizabeth J Klemm 1,, Muhammad Imran Nisar 2,, Matt Bawn 3,4, Dilruba Nasrin 5, Farah Naz Qamar 2, Andrew Page 3, Farheen Qadri 2, Sadia Shakoor 2, Anita KM Zaidi 2,6, Myron M Levine 4,, Gordon Dougan 7,, Robert A Kingsley 3,8,*,
PMCID: PMC10999740  PMID: 38451244

Abstract

Aeromonas spp. are associated with a number of infectious syndromes in humans including gastroenteritis and dysentery. Our understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, virulence determinants and antimicrobial resistance of the genus has been limited by a lack of sequenced genomes linked to metadata. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the whole genome sequences of 447 Aeromonas isolates from children in Karachi, Pakistan, with moderate-to-severe diarrhoea (MSD) and from matched controls without diarrhoea that were collected as part of the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). Human-associated Aeromonas isolates exhibited high species diversity and extensive antimicrobial and virulence gene content. Aeromonas caviae, A. dhankensis, A. veronii and A. enteropelogenes were all significantly associated with MSD in at least one cohort group. The maf2 and lafT genes that encode components of polar and lateral flagella, respectively, exhibited a weak association with isolates originating from cases of gastroenteritis.

Keywords: Aeromonas, AMR, diarrhoea, genomics, GEMS, Pakistan, virulence


Impact Statement

Aeromonas has been linked to diarrhoea in humans, but little is known about how it causes disease. We present the first large-scale genomic analysis of Aeromonas collected from children with moderate-to-severe diarrhoea (MSD) and case-matched controls. Understanding how Aeromonas causes disease is important as its prevalence may rise due to climate change increasing the exposure of humans to contaminated water sources where Aeromonas resides. We report the species diversity and variation in gene content between Aeromonas species, and between strains from MSD and controls. We find little evidence for genes that influence the disease phenotype, although two flagella-associated genes may play a role. Aeromonas isolates harboured a substantial number of antimicrobial resistance genes that have the potential to transfer to other human pathogens, which may further fuel the antimicrobial resistance crisis. This analysis provides a significant advance in our understanding of Aeromonas genomics that provides context for future genomic studies and hypotheses for mechanistic studies. Future studies are needed to elucidate the potential role of specific genes and host factors associated with Aeromonas infection.

Data Summary

The authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Sequence data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under project accession numbers PRJEB15489 and PRJEB1611.

Introduction

Aeromonas are facultatively anaerobic Gram-negative Gammaproteobacteria and the genus consists of multiple species, some of which can cause disease in humans and animals [1,2]. This genus is predominantly associated with aquatic environments, including surface water, sewage and drinking water [3]. Aeromonas form biofilms that contribute to persistence in water systems [1] and there is growing concern that climate change may increase the exposure of humans to contaminated water sources [3]. Aeromonas is globally ubiquitous and has also been isolated from many other sources including fish, soil and food products [4]. Aeromonads have been shown to encode multiple putative virulence genes including secreted haemolytic toxins [5] and can harbour genes conferring antibiotic resistance, making these bacteria of broader interest for public health [4]. However, relatively little is known of the genetic diversity and population structure of aeromonads in human stool, the distribution of putative virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes, and how these may contribute to disease.

Humans typically acquire Aeromonas through ingestion of water or food, or exposure of a wound to contaminated water [4]. Aeromonas have been associated with necrotizing fasciitis, septicaemia, gastroenteritis and dysentery in humans [2]. The causal relationship between Aeromonas and diarrhoeal illness is unclear, in part because of frequent asymptomatic carriage [6]. Moreover, human challenge data showed a low incidence of diarrhoea after oral administration of large inocula of viable Aeromonas hydrophila to healthy adult North American volunteers [7]. The prevalence of Aeromonas in the human gastrointestinal tract varies based on age, geographical location, hygiene, socioeconomic conditions and nutritional status (for children) [1]. Colonization by Aeromonas is more common in children under 5 years of age and in areas with a tropical climate that lack improved water and sanitation facilities. A coordinated case-control study, known as the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS), of children under 5 years of age with moderate-to-severe diarrhoea (MSD) and matched controls without diarrhoea was undertaken across seven sites over a 4 year period [8]. Whereas Aeromonas was identified in <1 % of the children in four African sites, it was markedly more prevalent in the Karachi (Pakistan) and Mirzapur (Bangladesh) GEMS sites, identified as a significant pathogen in 22.2 % of MSD cases [9]. Aeromonas has also been identified as the second most commonly isolated candidate enteric bacterial pathogen in children below 18 months with gastroenteritis in Australia [10].

Advances in molecular biology and sequencing technologies have led to an improved understanding of the population structure of Aeromonas [2]. Aeromonas was originally assigned to the family Vibrionaceae, but 16S rRNA gene sequencing later established Aeromonadaceae as a distinct family [11]. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) of concatenated sequences of sets of housekeeping genes enabled more accurate typing and improved differentiation between closely related species. At least three MLST schemes have been proposed for Aeromonas [12,15]. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) provides even more accurate species delineation based on pairwise whole genome sequence comparisons, much like an in silico substitute for DNA–DNA hybridizations [16,17]. Such analyses have shown that many isolates of Aeromonas dhakensis were historically misidentified as A. hydrophila based on low-resolution typing techniques. These and other sequence-based approaches have shown that Aeromonas is an extremely diverse genus comprising many distinct species. To date, over 30 Aeromonas species have been identified with some species showing evidence of host and environmental preferences. Isolates from humans predominantly belong to just four species: A. hydrophila, A. dhakensis, Aeromonas caviae and Aeromonas veronii [1]. The first complete genome sequence of an Aeromonas isolate was published in 2006 of the type strain A. hydrophila ATCC 7966T [18]. Since then, multiple Aeromonas strains have been sequenced and comparative genomics has been used to identify gene differences with attempts made to link these to phenotypes [19,21].

In this study, we present the genomic analysis of Aeromonas samples from children enrolled in the GEMS study in Karachi, Pakistan. These samples were taken from children under 5 years of age with MSD along with their matched controls without diarrhoea [8]. Our analysis of this large sample set linked to detailed metadata enabled us to perform a comprehensive high-resolution characterization of human-associated Aeromonas spp.

Methods

Bacterial isolates, genome sequencing, assembly and annotation

Aeromonas isolates were obtained from stool samples as previously described [8]. A full list of sample names and dates of isolation can be found in Table S1. Libraries for genome sequencing were prepared from genomic DNA and sequenced to generate 150 bp paired-end reads using the Illumina HiSeq System. Sequence data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena); accession numbers are indicated in Table S1. The genome data were de novo assembled using the pipeline described [22] and annotated with Prokka (v1.5) [23], using default parameters. Reference sequences were downloaded from the PATRIC database (www.patricbrc.org/). Strains JTBH, JTBG and JTBK were re-assembled to correct for pseudogenes. Pacbio read-data were downloaded and assembled using the Pacbio SMRT analysis pipeline (v2.3) (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/SMRT-Analysis/wiki/SMRT-Pipe-Reference-Guide-v2.2.0)https://smrt-analysis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/SMRT-Pipe-Reference-Guide-v2.2.0/. Following first-stage unfinished assembly, JTBH had two polished contigs totalling 4 572 25 bp, JTBG had six contigs totalling 4 906 303 bp and JTBK had one contig with a length of 4 534 321 bp. The assemblies were then checked using Miniasm [24], re-orientated to begin at the thrA gene, circularized using Minimus [25] and annotated using Prokka [23], using default parameters.

Comparison of average nucleotide identity

ANI was calculated using the ANIm (MUMmer) method with pyANI, https://github.com/widdowquinn/pyani. Scores above 96 % were classed as indicating the same species. As has been previously reported, we found some discrepancies in the species designations in the databases (such as A. dhakensis samples labelled as A. hydrophila). For these discrepencies, we used the predominant species labelling within each group. We additionally found a sample labelled A. veronii AMC34 that is classified as A. veronii but meets the cutoff for classification as a distinct species.

Pan-genome and phylogenetic analyses

A pan-genome was created using Roary (v3.7.0) [26] with an identity of 80 %, which resulted in 27 119 gene clusters and otherwise default settings. There were 2520 core genes covering 1 868 773 bases out of approximately 4.5 Mb for Aeromonas on average. The core gene alignment consisted of 714 947 SNP sites, calculated using SNP-sites (v2.3.2) [27]. The core gene multi-FASTA alignment was used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree with fasttree using the GTRGAMMA model, 100 bootstraps and otherwise default settings. Phylogenetic trees were visualized with iTOL (v3) [28]. Principal component analysis of presence and absence of genes in the accessory genome was performed with the prcomp function in R.

Gene identification from short-read sequence data

To identify virulence genes, a manually curated list of known virulence genes from Aeromonas was constructed consisting of entries in the Virulence Factors Database [29] supplemented with other genes identified from the literature (File S1). A single representative nucleotide sequence from each cluster in the pan-genome was compared to the manually curated list of virulence genes using blastn (v2.4.0) [30]. The results were filtered to include only hits where the query coverage was >70 % and the identity of the match was >90 %, which removed low-quality partial matches. This gave the presence and absence of each virulence gene in each isolate. To identify antibiotic resistance genes in Illumina short-read sequence data, ARIBA software was run on the FASTQ files with the CARD database [31] using a maximum divergence cut-off of 30 % and coverage >90 %. Data were visualized using phandango [32].

Statistical analysis of association of Aeromonas species candidate virulence genes and MSD

The workflow and exclusion of samples is summarized in Fig. S5. Of 3096 enrolments from Pakistan (1258 cases and 1838 controls), Aeromonas was detected in 493 samples. Genomic data were available for 447 (244 cases and 203 controls). We performed logistic regression analysis to test for an association of 226 candidate virulence genes with MSD. We excluded genes that were universally present or had a frequency of less than five from the analysis. For 136 genes we performed a chi square test of association. Multivariate analysis was then performed for 34 genes with a P-value of ≤0.2. Four models were constructed using a backward elimination process in which genes that had a P-value >0.05 were removed in a stepwise fashion in order to arrive at the best fitting model with the fewest variables. A multivariate model adjusted for the presence of all other genes, a model additionally adjusted for presence of all other pathogens detected in the original study, a model adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally a model adjusted for all other genes, sociodemographic factors and presence of other pathogens. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Whole genome sequencing of Aeromonas samples isolated from children in Karachi, Pakistan, reveals a high level of species diversity with an open accessory genome

In GEMS, stool samples were taken from children aged 0–59 months with MSD and from age- and gender-matched controls without diarrhoea [8]. The whole genome sequences of 447 Aeromonas isolated in Karachi, Pakistan during GEMS, were determined (accession numbers in Table S1, available in the online version of this article), revealing an average genome size of approximately 4.5 Mb. To determine the species of each isolate, we calculated the ANI score and compared each isolate from this study and Aeromonas whole genome sequences in available databases. We used a stringent cut-off of 96 % to delineate species (Table S2) and found 287 A. caviae, 86 A. veronii, 44 A. dhakensis, 22 A. enteropelogenes (also called A. trota), and eight from other Aeromonas species including one isolate representing a novel species with <96 % ANI compared to genomes of previously described species (Table S3). Diversity was greatest within A. veronii with an average ANI value of 96.43 %. The species observed generally concur with those previously suggested as being associated with human disease, with the notable exception of the general absence of A. hydrophila.

The pangenome of this set comprised 27 119 gene families at ≥80 % amino acid sequence identity. Of these, 2520 are identified as core genes present in all isolates, constituting a concatenated coding sequence length of 1 868 773 bp. The pangenome is ‘open’ in that additional genomes are predicted to increase the size of the pangenome (Fig. 1a). Groups of genes in the accessory genome clustered with the different species (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1. Pan-genome of Aeromonas species isolated from children in Pakistan. (a) Cumulative number of genes plotted against the number of Aeromonas genomes. (b) Gene content of Aeromonas isolates (rows), and presence of individual genes (columns) indicated by grey coloration. Plot at the bottom represents percentage of isolates encoding a specific gene.

Fig. 1.

A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the 714 947 SNPs present in the core genome. Long branches in the tree distinguished the isolates according to species inferred from ANI (Fig. 2a). Moreover, the topology of the tree was highly supported with over 90 % of the nodes having high (>70 %) bootstrap confidence. Most of the lower bootstrap confidence nodes were in the shorter branch nodes. The majority of the terminal branch lengths were long, indicating that even the nearest neighbours were genetically diverse. This indicated that these Aeromonas samples did not represent outbreaks of infection, but were more probably acquired by the children from a diverse Aeromonas population in the sample region environment. Only a few lineages had short terminal branches, indicating closer genetic similarity (Fig. 2b). Most of the closely related isolates were of A. caviae.

Fig. 2. Population structure of Aeromonas isolates from human stool samples in Pakistan. (a) An unrooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 447 Pakistan isolates and 24 reference genomes inferred from 714 947 SNPs in the core genome. (b) Midpoint-rooted tree with species (inner ring) colours from (a) and disease status (outer ring) with red branches indicating internal nodes with <70 % bootstrap confidence. (c) Number of Aeromonas isolates from diarrhoea cases and controls for each species.

Fig. 2.

Little evidence of disease causality associated with specific species

Overall, 244 of the 447 Aeromonas isolates were from cases of MSD, equating to ~55 %, and the rest were isolated from matched controls without diarrhoea. Within each significantly represented species (>20 isolates), we found approximately the same percentage (53–59 %) derived from MSD cases as from isolates from control group children, suggesting that there is not an association between particular species and MSD (Table S3 and Fig. 2c). Isolates associated with MSD were distributed across the tree and did not appear in greater frequency among any of the different lineages (Fig. 2b). Moreover, even in a limited number of cases where isolates were very closely related and isolated over a similar timeframe (June to August 2009), there was commonly a lack of concordance in diarrhoeal status of the child (Fig. S1). We performed principal component analysis (PCA) on isolates from the most common species to determine whether the composition of the accessory genome correlated with disease status, but found no such association (Fig. S2).

Previously, an association of MSD with the presence of Aeromonas was investigated using conditional logistic regression analyses at the genus level, since species of isolates was not determined [8]. We therefore extended this analysis to investigate the association of A. caviae, A. dhankensis, A. veronii and Aeromonas enteropelogenes species with MSD in three age strata in Pakistan (Table 1). A. caviae, A. dhakensis and A. veronii were each associated (P<0.05) with MSD in at least one age stratum, while A. enteropelogenes was not in any age strata. For A. caviae, MSD cases had two times the odds [odds ratio (OR): 2.0, confidence interval (CI): 1.31–3.03] in the 0–11 months age range and three times the odds (3.0, CI: 1.85–4.96) in the 24–59 month age range of carrying this species than control cases. For A. dhakensis, in the 24–59 months age range MSD cases had three times the odds (OR: 3.0, CI: 1.85–4.96) of carrying A. caviae than control cases. For A. veronii, in the 24–59 months age range MSD cases had over three times the odds (OR: 3.2, CI: 0.94–3.63) of carrying A. caviae than control cases. In the 12–23 months age range, no specific species was significantly associated (P<0.05) with MSD over control isolates.

Table 1. Association of Aeromonas species with moderate and severe diarrhoea in Pakistan.

Controls Cases Total
Age strata0–11 months N=630 N=615 N=1245 OR (CI) P -value
Aeromonas spp. No 574 (91.1 %) 516 (83.9 %) 1090 (87.5 %) 2 (1.39, 2.86) 0.000
Yes 56 (8.9 %) 99 (16.1 %) 155 (12.4 %)
A. caviae No 591 (93.8 %) 545 (88.6 %) 1136 (91.2 %) 2 (1.31, 3.03) 0.001
Yes 39 (6.2 %) 70 (11.4 %) 109 (8.8 %)
A.dhakensis No 621 (98.6 %) 606 (98.5 %) 1227 (98.5 %) 1 (0.39, 2.52) 1.000
Yes 9 (1.4 %) 9 (1.5 %) 18 (1.5 %)
A.veronii No 625 (99.2 %) 599 (97.4 %) 1224 (98.3 %) 3.2 (1.17, 8.73) 0.023
Yes 5 (0.8 %) 16 (2.6 %) 21 (1.7 %)
A.enteropelogenes No 628 (99.7 %) 612 (99.5 %) 1240 (99.6 %) 1.5 (0.25, 8.97) 0.657
Yes 2 (0.3 %) 3 (0.5 %) 5 (0.4 %)
Age strata 12–23months N=672 N=394 N=1066
Aeromonas spp. No 589 (87.6 %) 316 (80.2 %) 905 (84.9 %) 1.9 (1.34, 2.73) 0.000
Yes 83 (12.4 %) 78 (19.8 %) 161 (15.1 %)
A.caviae No 619 (92.1 %) 353 (89.6 %) 972 (91.2 %) 1.4 (0.93, 2.25) 0.095
Yes 53 (7.9 %) 41 (10.4 %) 94 (8.8 %)
A.dhakensis No 666 (99.1 %) 384 (97.5 %) 1050 (98.5 %) 2.7 (0.97, 7.57) 0.055
Yes 6 (0.9 %) 10 (2.5 %) 16 (1.5 %)
A.veronii No 654 (97.3 %) 376 (95.4 %) 1030 (96.7 %) 1.8 (0.94, 3.63) 0.070
Yes 18 (2.7 %) 18 (4.6 %) 36 (3.4 %)
A.enteropelogenes No 666 (99.1 %) 389 (98.7 %) 1055 (99 %) 1.4 (0.39, 5.08) 0.585
Yes 6 (0.9 %) 5 (1.3 %) 11 (1 %)
Age strata 24–59months N=524 N=215 N=739
Aeromonas spp. No 460 (87.8 %) 148 (68.8 %) 608 (82.3 %) 3.2 (2.15, 4.88) 0.000
Yes 64 (12.2 %) 76 (31.2 %) 131 (17.7 %)
A.caviae No 482 (92 %) 173 (80.5 %) 655 (88.6 %) 3.0 (1.85, 4.96) 0.000
Yes 42 (8 %) 42 (19.5 %) 84 (11.4 %)
A.dhakensis No 521 (99.4 %) 208 (96.7 %) 729 (98.7 %) 4.7 (1.19, 19.22) 0.027
Yes 3 (0.6 %) 7 (3.3 %) 10 (1.3 %)
A.veronii No 507 (96.8 %) 203 (94.4 %) 710 (96.1 %) 1.7 (0.79, 3.70) 0.167
Yes 17 (3.24 %) 12 (5.6 %) 29 (3.9 %)
A.enteropelogenes No 522 (99.6 %) 211 (98.1 %) 733 (99.2 %) 4.4 (0.80, 25.12) 0.087
Yes 2 (0.4 %) 4 (1.9 %) 6 (0.8 %)

Limited evidence that virulence-associated gene presence was associated with moderate and severe diarrhoea

Although overall accessory genome composition was not associated with disease causality in these samples, we explored the possibility that individual genes could be responsible for differences in clinical outcome. We tested the hypothesis that the isolates from children with MSD were enriched with known virulence-associated factors. We compiled a list of 136 genes that have been previously implicated with virulence in Aeromonas and related species, including those encoding toxins, secretion systems (type 2, T2SS; type 3, T3SS; type 6, T6SS), effector proteins, proteases, siderophore transport, quorum sensing, lateral and polar flagella biosynthesis, pili and fimbriae. A database of a representative sequence of each of the genes was constructed (File S1) and used to query their presence in the isolates (Table S4). The results were plotted and mapped to the phylogeny (Fig. S3). There was generally no significant difference in the numbers of genes from the different functional classes observed between diarrhoea and control isolates from the same species (Fig. 3). The only exception was for A. veronii, for which the control isolates had significantly greater numbers of T3SS, T6SS and toxin genes compared to the diarrhoea isolates (P<0.005, Tukey test). We did, however, observe differences in gene content based on species, with A. dhakensis harbouring more toxin, T6SS and fimbriae genes compared to the other species. Indeed, by mapping the virulence-associated gene presence to the phylogenetic tree, it was clear that several gene sets were inherited along specific branches, for example T3SS genes in A. dhakensis and A. veronii, Flp pili genes in A. veronii (Fig. S3B) and lateral flagellum genes in A. caviae, A. dhakensis and A. veronii (Fig. S3C).

Fig. 3. Inter- and intra-species variation in gene content. Number of genes belonging to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), toxin, protease, siderophore, quorum sensing, type II secretion systems, type III secretion systems, type VI secretion systems, polar flagella, lateral flagella, pili and fimbria functional classes for isolates from diarrhoea cases (red circles) and control cases (grey circles). The mean (horizontal lines) and standard deviation (vertical lines) are indicated.

Fig. 3.

We next carried out a logistic regression analysis to test for an association with MSD of 136 candidate virulence genes that were not universally present or had a frequency of five or more, using a chi square test of association (Table S5). Genes with P≤0.2 were further subjected to multivariate analysis. Three models were used to adjust for the presence of all other candidate virulence genes, presence of all other pathogens detected in the GEMS study and sociodemographic characteristics, and finally a model adjusted for all these factors (Table S6). Two genes, lafT and maf2, encoding products affecting lateral or polar flagella biogenesis [33,34] were significantly associated (P<0.05) with MSD in all models considered. The lafT gene was present within multiple subclades of all four major species with an overall representation in A. caviae (31 %), A. dhakensis (43 %), A. enteropelogenes (100 %) and A. veronii (70 %). In contrast, the maf2 gene was limited to A. dhakensis (100 %) and A. veronii (5 %) (Fig. S3C). Four genes, ascB encoding a putative chaperone protein of the T3SS [35], AHA1843 and AHA2456 encoding putative components of a T6SS, and vgrG encoding a T6SS toxin, were significantly negatively associated (P<0.05) with MSD after adjusting using at least one of the models (Table S6). The acsB gene was only present in isolates of A. dhakensis and A. veronii while the T6SS genes had similar distribution with the notable absence of AHA184 in A. veronii isolates (Fig. S3B). The vgrG gene was present in all isolates of A. dhakensis and A. enteropelogenes, and in a minority of A. caviae (31 %) and A. veronii (42 %) (Fig. S3A).

Aeromonads harbour a high level of AMR genes

Aeromonads occupy environmental niches known for antibiotic exposure and we explored the possibility that they could be a potential reservoir for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants. We screened the isolates to identify their repertoire of AMR genes. In total, 96% of the isolates (429 out of 447) encoded at least one AMR gene and, on average, each isolate harboured 2.5 AMR genes (Fig. S4). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of AMR genes distributed between isolates from MSD cases compared to isolates from control group children, with respect to each species. Eight isolates had ten or more individual AMR genes, showing the potential for Aeromonas spp. to acquire a large number of AMR genes. Indeed, 114 out of 447 isolates (26 %) can be classified as multi-drug resistant (MDR) because they have the genotypic potential for resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials. A. caviae had the greatest percentage of predicted MDR isolates with 103 out of 287, or 36 %, whilst A. enteropelogenes had 18 % and A. dhakensis had 11 %; A. veronii had only one predicted MDR isolate out of 86. The most common genes were β-lactamases, with A. caviae frequently harbouring mox (251 out of 287 isolates, 87 %), and A. dhakensis and A. veronii frequently harbouring oxa-12 (59 and 95 %, respectively) and cphA2 (95 and 99 %, respectively). The cphA gene has been previously reported to be intrinsically harboured by A. veronii and A. dhakensis [36]. Some AMR genes were associated with specific lineages. For example, aac(6')-lld, blaCMY-1 and sul1 are carried by most isolates within a specific lineage of A. caviae and could indicate the presence of the same mobile genetic element carrying these genes. Similarly, another specific lineage of A. caviae is associated with the carriage of tetE (Fig. S4).

Discussion

Herein we describe a comprehensive genomic analysis of a large number of Aeromonas isolates from children with or without diarrhoea in Karachi, Pakistan, isolated as part of GEMS [8]. The large genetic diversity observed in these geographically restricted Aeromonas isolates and paucity of closely related isolates suggest that they represent a subset of aeromonads present in the local environment. While only a few Aeromonas species are associated with humans, multiple lineages within the different species can colonize the human gut. Contrary to previous reports, we observed very few A. hydrophila and many A. dhakensis isolates in these human-derived samples [37]. This discrepancy may be due to the use of whole genomes as part of the species assignment methodology, which has higher accuracy and resolution than other typing techniques. Consistent with a report of Aeromonas-associated gastroenteritis in Brazil [38], the largest proportion of isolates were of A. caviae and A. veronii.

Aeromonas spp. were previously found to be associated with MSD in Pakistan and Bangladesh, particularly in the presence of Shigella and stunting of the patient [8]. Nonetheless, the association with MSD remained following adjustment for the presence of other pathogens and socioeconomic factors [9]. We found that the odds of the main four Aeromonas species, except A. enteropelogenes, had a statistically significant increase in at least one of the age strata when MSD was present. The relatively low frequency of detection of some species may have limited our ability to detect some associations. We also observed some possible evidence of differential association of species within different age strata. For example, the OR for A. caviae, A. dhakensis and A. enteropelogenes was greatest in the oldest cohort (24–59 months) and the OR for A. veronii was greatest in the youngest cohort (0–11 months). The significance of these differences requires further investigation, but may reflect a distinct ability of Aeromonas species to exploit the metabolic niche in the intestine of each age stratum cohort due to differences in gut microbiota or nutrient availability [39].

Many bacteria considered pathogenic are associated with specific lineages or have specific genetic elements that are believed to be responsible for the virulent phenotype. For example, pathogens may fall into defined phylogenetically distinct lineages or encode clusters of virulence-associated factors such as adhesins, effectors or toxins [40]. Two genes, maf2 and lafT, were associated with MSD after adjusting for the presence of all other candidate virulence genes or socioeconomic factors in a multivariate analysis. The maf2 and lafT genes encode non-structural components associated with polar or lateral flagella function or biogenesesis, and LafT has been implicated in lateral flagella-mediated adhesion of A. hydrophila to enterocytes [33,34]. The function of the Maf-2 protein is not known but mutants failed to develop both polar and lateral flagella, although unglycylated flagellin subunits could still be detected [33]. LafT has been proposed to function as a flagella motor protein [34], implicating lateral flagella-mediated motility in infection. The maf2 gene was restricted to A. dhakensis and just six isolates of A. veronii, and lafT was only sporadically present within the genus Aeromonas, and many Aeromonas strains isolated from cases of MSD did not encode either of these genes. These data provide the rationale for further investigation of the role of these genes in the pathogenesis of Aeromonas in suitable models of infection. In contrast to maf2 and lafT, two genes encoding components of a T6SS and a gene encoding a component of a type III secretion system [35] were moderately but statistically significantly negatively associated with MSD. This is perhaps surprising since similar macromolecular structures play important roles in the pathogenesis in other enteric bacteria, and the T6SS spike-like trimer protein VgrG of A. hydrophila has been reported to have toxin activity [41]. One possibility to account for this difference is that these virulence genes could be associated with other disease presentations associated with Aeromonas outside of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Other factors beyond the genotype may also contribute to diarrhoeal disease associated with Aeromonas. For example, we cannot rule out differences in expression of Aeromonas virulence factors or other genes under epigenetic control and therefore not detectable by DNA sequencing. The status of the host including genetic background, malnutrition level, immunity and microbiota composition may also determine the disease outcome. Co-infections with other bacteria or viruses may also account for why some Aeromonas isolates are associated with MSD and others are not. For example, blooms of Proteobacteria have been observed in the inflamed gut [42]. In this way, Aeromonas may be an opportunistic pathogen or incidental to dysbiosis, infection or inflammation. Thus, more studies are needed if we are to understand the association of Aeromonas with diarrhoea in children.

Genomic sequencing of Aeromonas from these samples revealed an ability to carry large number of antibiotic resistance genes, with a small number of isolates in this study carrying over ten AMR genes. The presence of Aeromonas in environmental niches shared by other enteric pathogens is troubling as they may serve as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes that could be transferred to pathogenic bacteria. More work is thus required to assess the content of AMR genes in Aeromonas samples from the environment and the possibility for their transfer to other bacterial species, especially if they are carried on plasmids or mobile elements. Plasmid types and the genomic context of the AMR genes were not investigated in this study.

In summary, this genome analysis of an important sample set from a defined setting provides the most comprehensive insight into the population structure of Aeromonas bacteria in children to date. These data should help direct further investigations either in the field or in the laboratory. For example, investigation of the relationship between the gut microbiota, Aeromonas colonization and diarrhoea may shed further light on the aetiology of this disease.

supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-10-01211-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001211
Uncited Table S1.
mgen-10-01211-s002.xlsx (5.8MB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001211

Abbreviations

AMR

antimicrobial resistance

ANI

average nucleotide identity

CI

confidence interval

GEMS

Global Enteric Multicenter Study

MLST

multi-locus sequence typing

MSD

moderate-to-severe diarrhoea

OR

odds ratio

PCA

principal components analysis

rRNA

Ribosomal RNA

T2SS

type II secretion system

Footnotes

Funding: R.K. was supported by BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Microbes in the Food Chain BB/R012504/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10348 and BBS/E/F/000PR10349, and Microbes and Food Safety BB/X011011/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR13635 and BBS/E/F/000PR13636.

Accession No: Sequence data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under project accession numbers PRJEB15489 and PRJEB1611.

Author contributions: E.J.K., R.A.K., M.M.L. and G.D. designed the study. F.N.Q., S.S., F.Q. and A.M.K.Z. acquired data. E.J.K., M.I.N., J.L., A.P. and R.A.K. carried out analysis. E.J.K., M.I.N., R.A.K., J.L., M.M.L. and G.D. interpreted the analysis. E.J.K., M.I.N., R.A.K., M.M.L. and G.D. drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Elizabeth J. Klemm, Email: elizabeth.klemm@gmail.com.

Muhammad Imran Nisar, Email: imran.nisar@aku.edu.

Matt Bawn, Email: Matt.Bawn@earlham.ac.uk.

Dilruba Nasrin, Email: dnasrin@som.umaryland.edu.

Farah Naz Qamar, Email: farah.qamar@aku.edu.

Andrew Page, Email: andrewjpage@gmail.com.

Farheen Qadri, Email: farheenquadri123@yahoo.com.

Sadia Shakoor, Email: sadia.shakoor@aku.edu.

Anita KM Zaidi, Email: anita.zaidi@aku.edu.

Myron M. Levine, Email: Mlevine@som.umaryland.edu.

Gordon Dougan, Email: gd312@cam.ac.uk.

Robert A. Kingsley, Email: Rob.Kingsley@quadram.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Janda JM, Abbott SL. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:35–73. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00039-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fernández-Bravo A, Figueras MJ. An update on the genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. Microorganisms. 2020;8:129. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sadique A, Neogi SB, Bashar T, Sultana M, Johura F-T, et al. Dynamics, diversity, and virulence of Aeromonas spp. in homestead pond water in Coastal Bangladesh. Front Public Health. 2021;9:692166. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.692166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Igbinosa IH, Igumbor EU, Aghdasi F, Tom M, Okoh AI. Emerging Aeromonas species infections and their significance in public health. Sci World J. 2012;2012:625023. doi: 10.1100/2012/625023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rasmussen-Ivey CR, Figueras MJ, McGarey D, Liles MR. Virulence factors of Aeromonas hydrophila: in the wake of reclassification. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1337. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Teunis P, Figueras MJ. Reassessment of the enteropathogenicity of mesophilic Aeromonas species. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1395. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morgan DR, Johnson PC, DuPont HL, Satterwhite TK, Wood LV. Lack of correlation between known virulence properties of Aeromonas hydrophila and enteropathogenicity for humans. Infect Immun. 1985;50:62–65. doi: 10.1128/iai.50.1.62-65.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382:209–222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qamar FN, Nisar MI, Quadri F, Shakoor S, Sow SO, et al. Aeromonas-associated diarrhea in children under 5 years: the GEMS experience. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:774–780. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yuwono C, Wehrhahn MC, Liu F, Zhang L. Enteric Aeromonas infection: a common enteric bacterial infection with a novel infection pattern detected in an Australian population with Gastroenteritis. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e0028623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00286-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Colwell RR, Macdonell MT, De Ley J. Proposal to recognize the family Aeromonadaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1986;36:473–477. doi: 10.1099/00207713-36-3-473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martinez-Murcia AJ, Monera A, Saavedra MJ, Oncina R, Lopez-Alvarez M, et al. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis of the genus Aeromonas. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011;34:189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martino ME, Fasolato L, Montemurro F, Rosteghin M, Manfrin A, et al. Determination of microbial diversity of Aeromonas strains on the basis of multilocus sequence typing, phenotype, and presence of putative virulence genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4986–5000. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00708-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roger F, Marchandin H, Jumas-Bilak E, Kodjo A, Lamy B, et al. Multilocus genetics to reconstruct aeromonad evolution. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Navarro A, Martínez-Murcia A. Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Aeromonas based on housekeeping gene sequencing and its influence on systematics. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125:622–631. doi: 10.1111/jam.13887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L, Lamy B, Gogarten JP, et al. Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. mBio. 2014;5:e02136. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02136-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Beaz-Hidalgo R, Agüeria D, Latif-Eugenín F, Yeannes MI, Figueras MJ. Molecular characterization of Shewanella and Aeromonas isolates associated with spoilage of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:1–8. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnu029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beatson SA, das Graças de Luna M, Bachmann NL, Alikhan N-F, Hanks KR, et al. Genome sequence of the emerging pathogen Aeromonas caviae. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:1286–1287. doi: 10.1128/JB.01337-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grim CJ, Kozlova EV, Ponnusamy D, Fitts EC, Sha J, et al. Functional genomic characterization of virulence factors from necrotizing fasciitis-causing strains of Aeromonas hydrophila. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:4162–4183. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00486-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grim CJ, Kozlova EV, Sha J, Fitts EC, van Lier CJ, et al. Characterization of Aeromonas hydrophila wound pathotypes by comparative genomic and functional analyses of virulence genes. mBio. 2013;4:e00064-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00064-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pang M, Jiang J, Xie X, Wu Y, Dong Y, et al. Novel insights into the pathogenicity of epidemic Aeromonas hydrophila ST251 clones from comparative genomics. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9833. doi: 10.1038/srep09833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Page AJ, De Silva N, Hunt M, Quail MA, Parkhill J, et al. Robust high-throughput prokaryote de novo assembly and improvement pipeline for Illumina data. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000083. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2103–2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sommer DD, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Pop M. Minimus: a fast, lightweight genome assembler. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000056. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D694–D697. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, et al. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hadfield J, Croucher NJ, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM, et al. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:292–293. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Canals R, Vilches S, Wilhelms M, Shaw JG, Merino S, et al. Non-structural flagella genes affecting both polar and lateral flagella-mediated motility in Aeromonas hydrophila. Microbiology. 2007;153:1165–1175. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/000687-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gavín R, Rabaan AA, Merino S, Tomás JM, Gryllos I, et al. Lateral flagella of Aeromonas species are essential for epithelial cell adherence and biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:383–397. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vilches S, Urgell C, Merino S, Chacón MR, Soler L, et al. Complete type III secretion system of a mesophilic Aeromonas hydrophila strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6914–6919. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6914-6919.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu C-J, Chen P-L, Wu J-J, Yan J-J, Lee C-C, et al. Distribution and phenotypic and genotypic detection of a metallo-β-lactamase, CphA, among bacteraemic Aeromonas isolates. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61:712–719. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.038323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen PL, Lamy B, Ko WC. Aeromonas dhakensis, an increasingly recognized human pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:793. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Silva LCA da, Leal-Balbino TC, Melo BST de, Mendes-Marques CL, Rezende AM, et al. Genetic diversity and virulence potential of clinical and environmental Aeromonas spp. isolates from a diarrhea outbreak. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:179. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1089-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsolis RM, Bäumler AJ. Gastrointestinal host-pathogen interaction in the age of microbiome research. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2020;53:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Strauss EJ, Falkow S. Microbial pathogenesis: genomics and beyond. Science. 1997;276:707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sha J, Rosenzweig JA, Kozlova EV, Wang S, Erova TE, et al. Evaluation of the roles played by Hcp and VgrG type 6 secretion system effectors in Aeromonas hydrophila SSU pathogenesis. Microbiology. 2013;159:1120–1135. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.063495-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Litvak Y, Byndloss MX, Tsolis RM, Bäumler AJ. Dysbiotic proteobacteria expansion: a microbial signature of epithelial dysfunction. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;39:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-10-01211-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001211
Uncited Table S1.
mgen-10-01211-s002.xlsx (5.8MB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001211

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES