Abstract
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) deposition seriously affects the function of carbon (C) and N cycling in terrestrial ecosystems by altering soil microbial communities, especially in desert steppe ecosystems. However, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of how microorganisms involved in each C and N cycle process respond to N deposition.
Methods
In this study, shotgun metagenome sequencing was used to investigate variations in soil C and N cycling-related genes in the desert steppe in northern China after 6 years of the following N deposition: N0 (control); N30 (N addition 30 kg ha−1 year−1): N50 (N addition 50 kg ha−1 year−1).
Results
N deposition significantly increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (P < 0.05) while significantly decreased the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria (P < 0.05). This significantly impacted the microbial community composition in desert steppe soils. The annual addition or deposition of 50 kg ha−1 year−1 for up to 6 years did not affect the C cycle gene abundance but changed the C cycle-related microorganism community structure. The process of the N cycle in the desert steppe was affected by N deposition (50 kg ha−1 year−1), which increased the abundance of the pmoA-amoA gene related to nitrification and the nirB gene associated with assimilation nitrite reductase. There may be a niche overlap between microorganisms involved in the same C and N cycling processes.
Discussion
This study provides new insights into the effects of N deposition on soil microbial communities and functions in desert steppe and a better understanding of the ecological consequences of anthropogenic N addition.
Keywords: metagenomics, soil microbiome, carbon cycle function, nitrogen cycle function, nitrogen deposition
1 Introduction
Desert steppe is a xeric grassland ecosystem representing the transition from grassland to desert (Guo et al., 2022). It is an important grassland type in the grasslands of Europe and Asia, accounting for comprising ~11% of Inner Mongolia's steppe area (Qiu et al., 2022). The inner Mongolian desert steppe is not only an ecological barrier in northern China but also one of the world's most sensitive types of semi-arid and arid ecosystems (Gong et al., 2022). Nitrogen (N) deposition has been an important component in the global N cycle with increasing anthropogenic reactive N emissions (Galloway et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2011). According to reports, the N deposition in desert steppe has been ~4 kg ha−1 year−1 since the 1980s (Liu et al., 2011). However, recent observations indicate that N deposition in the region is estimated to be 15.00–17.00 kg ha−1 year−1 (Zhang, 2021; Li, 2022). Moreover, N deposition will be maintained for a long time in developing countries like China due to its rapid agricultural, industrial, and urban development (Yin et al., 2022). Determining the response of desert steppe soil microbial communities to N deposition is crucial to accurately assess changes in the processes of semi-arid and arid ecosystems and to develop the strategies for the effective mitigation and maintenance of ecosystem health under future global climate change scenarios.
Changes in soil microbial communities may play a crucial role in regulating primary productivity and nutrient cycling (Van Der Heijden et al., 2008; Philippot et al., 2024). The increase in N deposition can enhance soil available N (NH-N and NO-N) and alter soil pH (Khalili et al., 2016; Stevens et al., 2022). These consequences may generate bottom-up cascading effects, leading to alterations in the composition and functionality of soil microbial communities (Widdig et al., 2020; Frey et al., 2023). A global study suggests that N addition alters microbial community structure, possibly due to microbial adaptation to N excess (Wang et al., 2023a). It has also been reported that sustained increases in N deposition have significant adverse effects on soil microorganisms and their functioning, and that the adverse effects of N application on soil microbial abundance and composition increase with the amount and duration of N deposition (Compton et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2018). However, desert steppe has long been subjected to N limitation, and further research is needed to investigate the impacts of N deposition on soil microbial composition and abundance (Zhang et al., 2023b).
Nitrogen addition typically enhances N cycling rates, such as gross and potential nitrification and potential denitrification, and can also alter the abundance of key microbial groups involved in N cycling, such as Actinobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria) (Barnard et al., 2006; Le Roux et al., 2016; Assémien et al., 2017). Microorganisms drive fundamental N transformation processes in various ecosystems, such as N fixation, N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification (Geisseler et al., 2010; Jansson and Hofmockel, 2020). N-related functional genes, such as pmoA-amoA, pmoB-amoB, and pmoC-amoC genes for nitrification, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes for denitrification, and narB and nirB genes for assimilative N reduction, are responsible for the synthesis of key enzymes in nitrogen transformation (Kuypers et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2022; Fudjoe et al., 2023). A meta-analysis showed that N deposition significantly increased nitrification-related functional genes and did not affect substantially denitrification narG genes (Song and Niu, 2022). Another study showed that N deposition significantly reduced the abundance of the functional genes nifH, a moA, and nirK, leading to suppression of N fixation, nitrification, and denitrification (Zhang et al., 2023a). Atmospheric N deposition leads to N enrichment in soil, inducing changes in plant growth and soil biological activity, thereby affecting global carbon (C) and N cycling (Püspök et al., 2023). Nitrogen deposition affects soil C cycle functional genes more than N cycle functional genes (Li et al., 2022b; Hagh-Doust et al., 2023). It is reported that N deposition increased the relative abundance of genes related to labile C degradation, on the contrary, the relative abundance of functional genes related to degradation of more recalcitrant C did not change or decrease (Ma et al., 2022). Nitrogen deposition may also increase the metabolic capacity for soil C stabilization by promoting the colonization of fast-growing bacteria and stimulating functional genes associated with C-degrading activity (Ma et al., 2022).
Nitrogen deposition has inconsistent effects on soil microbial community composition and C-N functions in different ecosystems. However, there are still many uncertainties about how N deposition interacts with biotic and abiotic factors to affect soil microbial communities in a desert steppe (Yu et al., 2023). Therefore, this study employed metagenomic sequencing technology to assess the effects of N deposition on soil microbial communities in the desert steppe in northern China. Our main questions were: (1) How does N deposition affect the composition of soil microbial communities and the abundance of functional genes related to C–N cycling in desert steppe ecosystems? (2) How do microorganisms involved in the same C–N cycling processes respond to N deposition and, (3) What environmental factors are associated with changes in their relative abundance? Our research findings can contribute to assessing and predicting the response of soil microbial communities in arid ecosystems to changes in N deposition.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study site
The field experiment was established at Siziwang Banner (41°46′43.6″N, 111°53′41.7″E, with an elevation of 1,456 m), an arid region in Inner Mongolia, northern China. The average annual precipitation is 280 mm, with cumulative precipitation falling during the growing season from May to October, constituting ~70% of the total precipitation throughout the year. The annual average temperature is 3.4°C. The soil at the study site is a sandy loam texture classified as a Haplic Calcisol based on the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) soil classification system. The plant communities are dominated by Stipa breviflora Griseb., Neopallasia pectinata (Pall.) Poljak., Artemisia scoparia Waldst. et Kit., Kochia prostrata (L.) Schrad., and Cleistogenes songorica (Roshev.) Ohwi.
2.2 Experimental design
The simulated N deposition experiments were established at the desert steppe site in December 2015. Three N-addition treatments were applied: (i) the control treatment (N0, no N addition), (ii) the first N addition treatment (N30, 30 kg ha−1 year−1), and (iii) the second N addition treatment (N50, 50 kg ha−1 year−1). NH4NO3 was mixed with purified water and sprinkled evenly on each plot using a sprayer to simulate wet deposition to mirror the natural seasonal N deposition pattern from May to September. From October of the same year to April of the following year, NH4NO3 was mixed with soil and broadcasted evenly by hand to simulate dry deposition (Supplementary Table S1). N was applied once per month at the beginning of the month. The monthly N application rate was determined by the percentage of the average monthly precipitation in the last 5 years relative to total annual precipitation (0.51%, 1.17%, 1.13%, 2.82%, 6.36%, 18.25%, 27.32%, 13.04%, 15.33%, 6.91%, 5.79%, and 1.37% from January to December, respectively). These experiments were planned using a randomized block design with four replicate blocks. Each plot measured 7 × 7 m, and 1 m walkways separated the plots.
2.3 Plant, soil, and soil microbial sampling
During the peak growing season (Mid-August) of vegetation in 2021, two randomly selected 0.5 × 0.5 m sample areas were chosen from each N treatment (four repetitions, with two sample squares per repetition. Take the average of two sample squares for each repeat). The aboveground parts of all plants within the sample squares were collected. Simultaneously, a core drill (diameter = 7 cm) was used to collect soil samples from the 0–10 cm depth, and the plant roots were collected. After collecting samples from each plot, the sampling apparatus was sterilized with 75% ethanol to prevent sample contamination. The collected aboveground parts and roots of plants were dried at 65°C for 48 h to measure the aboveground and belowground biomass. Soil samples were collected using a core drill to a depth of 10 cm. After removing roots and stones and gently mixing the soil, each sample was placed into a sterile plastic bag. One subsample was air-dried, sieved (2 and 0.15 mm), and used to assess soil physicochemical properties; one subsample was stored at −20°C to determine ammonium N (NH-N) and nitrate N (NO-N) concentrations. One subsample was immediately stored at −80°C to shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
2.4 Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
The total genomic DNA of the soil samples was extracted using the Mag-Bind® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, US) according to manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and purity of extracted DNA were determined with TBS-380 and NanoDrop2000, respectively. DNA extract quality was checked on 1% agarose gel. DNA extract was fragmented to an average size of about 400 bp using Covaris M220 (Gene Company Limited, China) for paired-end library construction. The paired-end library was constructed using NEXTFLEX Rapid DNA-Seq (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA). Adapters containing the full complement of sequencing primer hybridization sites were ligated to the blunt-end of fragments. Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using NovaSeq 6000 S4 Reagent Kit v1.5 (300 cycles) according to the manufacturer's instructions (www.illumina.com). Raw reads were found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive database (accession numbers: PRJNA979949).
The data were analyzed on the free online platform of Majorbio Cloud Platform (www.majorbio.com). Briefly, the paired-end Illumina reads were trimmed of adaptors, and low-quality reads (length < 50 bp or with a quality value < 20 or having N bases) were removed by fastp (Chen et al., 2018; https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp, version 0.20.0). These high-quality reads were then assembled to contigs using MEGAHIT (Li et al., 2015) (parameters: kmer_min = 47, kmer_max = 97, step = 10; https://github.com/voutcn/megahit, version 1.1.2), which makes use of succinct de Bruijn graphs. Contigs with a length ≥300 bp were selected as the final assembling result, and then the contigs were used for further gene prediction and annotation.
Open reading frames (ORFs) from each assembled contig were predicted using Prodigal (Hyatt et al., 2010)/MetaGene (Noguchi et al., 2006) (http://metagene.cb.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/). The predicted ORFs with a length ≥100 bp were retrieved and converted into amino acid sequences using the NCBI translation table (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/taxonomyhome.html/index.cgi?chapter=tgencodes#SG1).
A non-redundant gene catalog was constructed using CD-HIT (Fu et al., 2012) (http://www.bioinformatics.org/cd-hit/, version 4.6.1) with 90% sequence identity and 90% coverage. High-quality reads were aligned to the non-redundant gene catalogs to calculate gene abundance with 95% identity using SOAPaligner (Li et al., 2008) (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/, version 2.21).
Representative sequences of the non-redundant gene catalog were aligned to the Non-Redundant Protein Sequence (NR) database with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5 using Diamond (Buchfink et al., 2015) (http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) for taxonomic annotations. The KEGG annotation was conducted using Diamond (Buchfink et al., 2015; http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (http://www.genome.jp/keeg/) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5.
The calculation method of species and gene abundance is Reads Per Kilobase Million (RPKM) (Lawson et al., 2017):
Where Ri represents the abundance value of Genei in a given sample, i.e., the number of Reads compared to Genei in that sample; Li means the nucleotide length of Genei; and represents the sum of reads corresponding to all genes in that sample.
2.5 Data analyses
Microsoft Excel 2019 and R-4.2.3 were used for the statistical data analyses. The β-diversity values of the soil microbial community and function were visualized with nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to test the significance of changes in the soil microbial community under the N treatments. Differential relative abundance of KEGG Pathway (level-3) was detected by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with an adjusted P < 0.05 (corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg). Enrichment in controls or N treatment was determined according to the higher mean rank-sum. Pathways were considered significantly different if the |reporter score| > 1.65, corresponding to 95% confidence to a normal distribution. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess normality before testing for significance. One-way ANOVA was employed to analyze the effects of N treatments on aboveground biomass (AGB), belowground biomass (BGB), soil pH, soil organic C (SOC), dissolved organic C (DOC), total N (TN), NO-N and NH-N content, C cycling genes (cbbL, cbbS, accA, accB, accC, accD, bccA, acsA, nifj), and N cycling associated genes (pmoA-amoA, pmoB-amoB, pmoC-amoC, nosR, nosZ, nirB, nirK, norB, narB, narG, narH, P < 0.05). Carbon cycle functional gene selection was based on the Calvin-Benson-Basshamcycle (CBB), tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA), Reductive acetyl-CoA pathway (Wood-Ljungdahl pathway), 3-Hydroxypropionate bicycle (3-HP), 3-Hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutylate cycle (HP-HB), and Dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle (DC-HB), and the functional genes that were selected were detected in the results of the assay with high relative abundance (Evans et al., 1966; Ljungdhal, 1986; Holo, 1989; Berg et al., 2007; Huber et al., 2008; Frolov et al., 2019). Nitrogen cycle-related functional genes were selected based on the important pathways of the nitrogen cycle that could be detected in the test results with high relative abundance (Canfield et al., 2010; Kuypers et al., 2018). Relative abundances of functional categories and taxa were averaged for each treatment, and visualized as heat maps using the Origin 2021. The correlation between microbial taxa and soil properties was measured by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and visualized using the R package “ggplot.”
3 Results
3.1 Effects of N deposition on soil physical-chemical properties and plant biomass
AGB and BGB tended to increase with increasing N deposition but did not reach significant levels (Table 1). At the N50 treatment, NO-N, NH-N, and DOC content significantly increased after N addition (P < 0.05, Table 1). However, at the N30 treatment, no differences were detected between the N addition and control plots. No other soil properties changed significantly in response to the N30 and N50 treatment (Table 1). Soil pH and TN decreased with the increase in N concentration, while SOC increased with the increase of N concentration (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variable | N0 | N30 | N50 |
---|---|---|---|
AGB (g m−2) | 153.95a | 157.41a | 159.53a |
BGB (g m−2) | 1,612.01a | 1,702.3a | 1,842.09a |
pH | 8.38a | 8.36a | 8.30a |
SOC (g kg−1) | 18.84a | 20.64a | 20.91a |
DOC (mg kg−1) | 83.71b | 92.10ab | 100.75a |
TN (g kg−1) | 1.88a | 1.84a | 1.83a |
NON (mg kg−1) | 9.46b | 12.72b | 28.89a |
NHN (mg kg−1) | 1.38b | 2.36b | 5.93a |
Values are means (n = 4).
AGB, above-ground biomass; BGB, below-ground biomass; SOC, soil organic C; DOC, soil dissolved soil organic C; TN, total N; N0, control; N30, N addition 30 kg ha−1 year−1; N50, N addition 50 kg ha−1 year−1.
Lowercase letters indicate differences among the three N treatments (P < 0.05).
3.2 Effects of N deposition on microbial taxa and functions
PERMANOVA analysis showed that N deposition significantly affected the microbial β-diversity of desert steppe (Figure 1A, P < 0.05). However, N deposition did not significantly affect the β-diversity of functional genes (KEGG, level-3 paths; Figure 1B).
Compared with N0 treatments, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Uroviricota, Candidatus Firestonebacteria, Candidatus Komeilibacteria, and Kitrinoviricota increased significantly in N50 treatment (Table 2, P < 0.05). Compared with the N0 treatment, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Abditibacteriota, and Discosea in the N50 treatment decreased significantly (Table 2, P < 0.05). Compared with the N30 treatment, the relative abundance of Ascomycota, Chlamydiae, Apicomplexa, and Candidatus Brennerbacteria in the N50 treatment decreased significantly (Table 2, P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Thaumarchaeota, Candidatus Bathyarchaeota, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chlamydiae, Apicomplexa, and Candidatus Brennerbacteria showed an increasing trend followed by a decreasing trend with increasing N deposition, with the highest relative abundance observed in the N30 treatment (Table 2).
Table 2.
Microbial taxa | N0 | N30 | N50 |
---|---|---|---|
Actinobacteria | 61.84b | 61.91b | 63.44a |
Proteobacteria | 14.81a | 14.20a | 13.51b |
Acidobacteria | 4.84a | 4.66ab | 4.30b |
Thaumarchaeota | 4.14b | 4.59a | 4.32ab |
Firmicutes | 4.61E-01b | 4.67E-01ab | 4.81E-01a |
Bacteroidetes | 2.49E-01a | 2.50E-01a | 2.26E-01b |
Candidatus Bathyarchaeota | 1.66E-02b | 1.80E-02a | 1.76E-02ab |
Ascomycota | 8.63E-03ab | 9.24E-03a | 6.36E-03b |
Abditibacteriota | 6.98E-03a | 7.00E-03a | 6.41E-03b |
Uroviricota | 5.27E-03b | 5.93E-03ab | 7.17E-03a |
Basidiomycota | 4.03E-03b | 5.19E-03a | 4.34E-03ab |
Chlamydiae | 3.92E-03ab | 4.20E-03a | 3.37E-03b |
Apicomplexa | 1.08E-03ab | 1.21E-03a | 9.20E-05b |
Candidatus Komeilibacteria | 2.31E-04b | 2.43E-04b | 3.34E-04a |
Candidatus Firestonebacteria | 1.23E-04b | 1.28E-04ab | 1.82E-04a |
Kitrinoviricota | 3.34E-05b | 8.43E-05b | 1.73E-04a |
Discosea | 8.08E-05a | 2.65E-05b | 3.41E-05b |
Candidatus Brennerbacteria | 1.75E-05ab | 4.32E-05a | 9.62E-06b |
Value represents the means relative abundance (n = 4).
N0, control; N30, N addition 30 kg ha−1 year−1; N50, N addition 50 kg ha−1 year−1.
Lowercase letters indicate differences among the three N treatments (P < 0.05).
Enrichment analysis screened 16 metabolic pathways related to C and N cycling, which were significantly changed after N treatment (Figure 2). Genes of C metabolism, Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, Pentose phosphate pathway, C fixation in photosynthetic organisms, Inositol phosphate metabolism, Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, Arginine and proline metabolism, Phenylalanine metabolism, Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, Histidine metabolism, and Glycosaminoglycan degradation metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in N0 compared to N30 treatment (Figure 2; Reporter score < -1.65; Functions significantly enriched for reporter score absolute values ≥1.65). Genes of Arginine and proline metabolism and Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in the N0 treatment compared to the N50 treatment (Figure 2; Reporter score < -1.65). Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis metabolic pathway genes were significantly enriched in the N50 treatment compared to the N0 treatment (Figure 2; Reporter score >1.65). Genes of C metabolism, Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, Starch and sucrose metabolism, Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, Phenylalanine metabolism, Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, and Histidine metabolism metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in N50 compared to N30 treatment (Figure 2, Reporter score >1.65). Among them, compared to the N0 and N30 treatments, the N50 treatment significantly increased the relative abundance of the Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis module (Figure 2; Reporter score >1.65).
Compared with N0, N deposition (N30 and N50) did not significantly affect the abundance of functional genes related to the C cycle (cbbL, cbbS, accA, accB, accC, accD, bccA, acsA, nifJ; P < 0.05, Figure 3).
Compared to N0, the abundance of pmoA-amoA and nirB genes was significantly increased in the N50 treatment (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference observed in the N30 treatment (Figure 4). However, there was no significant difference in other genes related to the N cycle (pmoB-amoB, pmoC-amoC, nosR, nosZ, nirK, norB, narB, narG, narH; P < 0.05, Figure 4). Compared with N0, nosR, nirK, norB, and narB gene showed a downward trend in N50 treatment (Figure 4).
3.3 Correlation between C cycling-related microorganisms and environmental variables
Rubrobacter carries accA, accB, accC, accD, bccA, and acsA genes, and its abundance is the highest in the N30 treatment. It is also the highest relative abundance among microorganisms involved in the C cycle (Figure 5). The relative abundance of Pseudonocardia carrying cbbL, cbbS, accB, accC, bccA, and acsA increased with N deposition (Figure 5). Microvirga carried cbbL, accA, accB, accC, and accD genes, and its relative abundance decreased significantly compared with N0 in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 5). Methylobacterium carried accA and accD genes, and its relative abundance decreased significantly compared with N0 in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 5). Microvirga and Bosea carrying cbbL gene's relative abundance decreased significantly, while Amycolatopsis and Mycolicibacterium's relative abundance increased significantly in N50 treatments (P < 0.05, Figure 5). The relative abundance of Skermanella, Rhodovastum, and Labrys carrying the cbbS gene decreased significantly in the N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 5). The relative abundance of Zavarzinella carrying the nifJ gene decreased significantly, while the relative abundance of Rhodococcus, Phycicoccus, Propionibacterium, and Thermoflexus increased significantly in N50 treatments (P < 0.05, Figure 5).
The correlation between AGB and BGB and C cycling-related microorganisms is insignificant (Figure 5). Nitrospira was significantly negatively correlated with pH (P < 0.05, Figure 5). Solirubrobacter was significantly negatively correlated with SOC (P < 0.05, Figure 5). DOC has a significant negative correlation with eight genera of microorganisms: Microvirga, Methylobacterium, Roseomonas, Bosea, Skermanella, Rhodovastum, Labrys, and Zavarzinella (P < 0.05, Figure 5). TN was significantly negatively correlated with 13 genera of microorganisms, including Pseudonocardia (P < 0.05, Figure 5). NO-N was not significantly correlated with C cycle-related microorganisms (Figure 5). Nocardioides were significantly positively correlated with NH-N (P < 0.05, Figure 5).
3.4 Correlation between N cycling-related microorganisms and environmental variables
Rubrobacter and Pseudonocardia are important microorganisms in the C cycle and the N cycle, and they both carry nirB, norB, narG, and narH genes (Figure 6). Microvirga carried nosR, nosZ, nirB, and nirK genes (Figure 6). Nitrososphaera carried pmoB-amoB, pmoC-amoC, nosZ, and nirK genes, and its relative abundance increased significantly compared with N0 in N30 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6). Carbonactinospora carried pmoA-amoA, pmoB-amoB, and pmoC-amoC genes, and its relative abundance increased significantly compared with N0 in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6). The significant increase in the pmoA-amoA gene in N50 treatment is also related to the increase in the relative abundance of Carbonactinospora (P < 0.05, Figure 6). Nitrosopumilus carried pmoB-amoB and pmoC-amoC genes, and its relative abundance increased significantly compared with N0 in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6). The relative abundance of Microvirga, Siccirubricoccus, Bosea, Roseicella, and Falsiroseomonas carrying the nosR gene decreased significantly in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6). The relative abundance of Siccirubricoccus and Azospirillum carrying norB gene decreased significantly in N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6). The relative abundance of Segetibacter carrying the narB gene significantly reduced in the N50 treatment (P < 0.05, Figure 6).
AGB, BGB, and NO-N was likewise not significantly correlated to N-cycling microorganisms (Figure 6). Soil pH was not significantly correlated with N cycle-related microorganisms (Figure 6). Methylomagnum positively correlated with SOC (P < 0.05, Figure 5). DOC has a significant negative correlation with seven genera of microorganisms: Microvirga, Siccirubricoccus, Roseicella, Bosea, Falsiroseomonas, Azospirillum, and Segetibacter (P < 0.05, Figure 6).TN was significantly negatively correlated with eight genera of microorganisms, including Actinoplanes, Kribbella, Micromonospora, Mycobacterium, Nocardioides, Pseudonocardia, Solirubrobacter, and Streptomyces (P < 0.05, Figure 6). TN was significantly positively correlated with seven genera of microorganisms, including Candidatus Acidoferrum, Kallotenue, Methylocaldum, Methylococcus, Methylomagnum, Nitrosospira, and Sulfurirhabdus (P < 0.05, Figure 6). SOC and NH-N were consistent with C cycle microbial results.
4 Discussion
4.1 Effect of N deposition on the composition of soil microbial community
Several data suggest that N deposition significantly affects soil microbial community composition. Compared to N0, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria was increased dramatically in the N50 treatment, while there was no significant change in the N30 treatment. Actinobacteria were the microorganisms with the highest relative abundance in desert steppe. Most Actinobacteria were saprophytic heterotrophic bacteria that can utilize C sources in the soil, and N sources such as nitrate and ammonium N can also be used by them (Fierer et al., 2007; Araujo et al., 2020). Nitrogen deposition increases AGB and BGB in a desert steppe. This increase in biomass may provide a C source for the growth of Actinobacteria, which could be one of the main reasons for their relative abundance increase (Dai et al., 2018). A study of global grassland microbial communities showed that the relative abundance of copiotrophic soil bacterial groups such as Actinobacteria increased with N nutrient addition, confirming the results of this study (Leff et al., 2015).
Compared to N0, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was significantly decreased in the N50 treatment. Most microorganisms in Proteobacteria are known as copiotrophic life history strategies, and it is generally believed that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria increases with increasing N deposition (Noah et al., 2012; Grant et al., 2022; Ramotowski and Shi, 2022). Especially in the case of Alphaproteobacteria, its response to N addition is typically positive. However, in this study, Alphaproteobacteria was the most abundant group within Proteobacteria, and the decline reduction in the relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria caused the decline in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria. This inconsistency may be because bacteria are highly environment-dependent or selectively evolutionarily conserved in their response to N (Isobe et al., 2019). In another study conducted on a semiarid steppe, similar findings were observed where the relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria showed a decreasing trend with N addition. However, it did not reach statistical significance (Liu et al., 2020).
Compared to N0, the relative abundance of Acidobacteria was significantly decreased in the N50 treatment. Acidobacteria can adapt to soils with relatively low pH. Nitrogen deposition decreases the soil pH in the desert steppe, but the relative abundance of Acidobacteria does not increase with the decrease in pH (Wang et al., 2018). A global study has indicated that Acidobacteria is an oligotrophic bacteria, and N deposition inhibits its development rather than increasing with decreasing pH (Dai et al., 2018).
Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the fungi with the highest relative abundance, and their relative abundance was the highest in the N30 treatment. Compared with the N30 treatment, the relative abundance of Ascomycota decreased significantly in the N50 treatment. Nitrogen deposition has different effects on the relative abundance of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, which have both positive and negative effects (Weber et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2021; Taylor Andy et al., 2022). This is mainly due to fungi's high N conservative, meaning that they do not necessarily require large amounts of N to meet their growth needs (Allison et al., 2009). Therefore, the N addition rate does not have a linear relationship with the relative abundance of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota in this study.
4.2 The effect of N deposition on microbial functional genes for soil C-N cycling
The annual addition or deposition of 50 kg ha−1 year−1 for up to 6 years did not affect the C cycle gene abundance but changed the C cycle-related microorganism community structure. The microorganisms Rubrobacter, Pseudonocardia, and Microvirga play a crucial role in the C-cycling process in the desert steppe, often harboring various C-cycling functional genes. However, protein-coding genes typically undergo highly frequent horizontal gene transfer, which may lead to false positive results. Rubrobacter and Pseudonocardia both belong to the Actinobacteria. They are closely related to the C cycle (including C fixation and metabolism), and their relative abundance is relatively high, which increases with N deposition (Huang et al., 2022). Microvirga, which belongs to the Proteobacteria, is a major contributor to the Calvin cycle, and its relative abundance decreases progressively with increasing nitrogen deposition (Huang et al., 2022). It was replaced by Rubrobacter, an important participant in the Calvin cycle (Huang et al., 2022). Several microorganisms (Amycolatopsis, Propionibacterium, Rhodococcus, Phycicoccus, and Thermoflexus) of relatively low abundance increased with N addition. Meanwhile, Bosea, Labrys, Rhodovastum, Skermanella, Methylobacterium, Roseomonas, and Zavarzinella decreased with the N addition. Among them, most microorganisms (such as: Pseudonocardia and Amycolatopsis) showed a significant negative correlation with TN, which may be due to the increase in gross N transformations in alpine calcareous soil caused by N application, leading to increased N availability and subsequently promoting the growth of these microorganisms (Hao et al., 2020). The relative abundance of most microbial genera involved in the same C cycle process is correlated with TN, indicating niche overlap for C cycle taxa (Michalska-Smith et al., 2022). Nitrogen deposition leads to a decrease in the relative abundance of one type of C-cycling microorganisms while at the same time contributing to an increase in the abundance of a different kind of microorganisms with the same function, which may be another major reason why N deposition does not significantly reduce or increase the C-cycling function genes of the desert steppe.
Furthermore, Rubrobacter, Pseudonocardia, and Microvirga play crucial roles not only in C cycling but also in N cycling. In this study, N deposition (50 kg ha−1 year−1) significantly increased the relative abundance of pmoA-amoA and nirB genes. The pmoA-amoA is considered to be related to nitrification, and the increase in its abundance represents the enhancement of nitrification (Wang et al., 2023b). The study reported that autotrophic nitrification was mainly stimulated when N deposition was below 55 kg ha−1 year−1, thus contributing to the stimulation of nitrification (Song et al., 2021). This is mainly because autotrophic nitrifiers acquire energy from the process of ammoxidation. At the same time, the increase in soil NH also favors autotrophic nitrification, a conclusion that can be verified by the significant rise in NH-N content in this study (Wrage et al., 2001; Song et al., 2021). The nirB gene produces an assimilatory nitrite reductase that catalyzes the assimilatory uptake of NO for reduction to NH (Kuypers et al., 2018). This could also be another major reason for the increase in soil NH-N content, which is the main reason for the significant increase in both pmoA-amoA and nirB genes. Increased relative abundance of Nocardioides is one of the important factors in the increased abundance of pmoA-amoA and nirB genes. Nocardioides belong to Actinobacteria, known as inert communities, which can form endospores to resist environmental changes under drought stress (Li et al., 2022a). Increased relative abundance of Streptomyce is also an important reason for the increase in the nirB gene. Actinobacteria can secrete antibiotics and biosynthesize compounds such as geosmin and 2-MIB, and their production also contributes to the spread of Streptomyce in the soil using Springtail (Bei et al., 2023). Nitrososphaera belongs to Thaumarchaeota and carries pmoB-amoB, pmoC-amoC, nosZ, and nirK genes, important microorganisms in the N cycle process. Both increased their relative abundance with N deposition, a result that is consistent with previous studies (Bei et al., 2023). Nitrosopumilus also belongs to Thaumarchaeota and, in this study, mainly carries the pmoB-amoB, pmoC-amoC, and nirK genes, which also proved to be an important participant in the N cycle of the desert steppe (Wang et al., 2023b). There may also be niche overlap for microorganisms involved in N cycling processes.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, our study emphasizes the effects of 6 years of N deposition on soil microbial community composition and C and N cycling functions in desert steppe. This study suggests that N deposition significantly affected the composition of soil microbial community in desert steppe; Annual addition of 50 kg ha−1 year−1 for up to 6 years did not affect the C cycle gene abundance but changed the C cycle-related microorganism community structure; The process of the N cycle in desert steppe was affected by N deposition, which increased the abundance of pmoA-amoA gene related to nitrification and nirB gene related to assimilation nitrite reductase. Ecologically niche overlap between microorganisms involved in the same C and N cycling processes may exist. The research findings are crucial for assessing how N deposition affects the C and N function in arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems, and gaining a better understanding of the ecological consequences of anthropogenic N addition.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.
Author contributions
HY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. YZ: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. SH: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZW: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. MY: Data curation, Writing – original draft. MH: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Siziwang Research Station of Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences for providing access to the study site.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31860136), the basic Scientific Research Service Fee Project of Colleges and Universities directly under the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Graduate Scientific Research Innovation project (no. B20210158Z).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1369196/full#supplementary-material
References
- Allison S. D., LeBauer D. S., Ofrecio M. R., Reyes R., Ta A.-M., Tran T. M. (2009). Low levels of nitrogen addition stimulate decomposition by boreal forest fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 293–302. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Araujo R., Gupta V. V. S. R., Reith F., Bissett A., Mele P., Franco C. M. M., et al. (2020). Biogeography and emerging significance of Actinobacteria in Australia and Northern Antarctica soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 146:107805. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107805 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Assémien F. L., Pommier T., Gonnety J. T., Gervaix J., Le Roux X. (2017). Adaptation of soil nitrifiers to very low nitrogen level jeopardizes the efficiency of chemical fertilization in west african moist savannas. Sci. Rep. 7:10275. 10.1038/s41598-017-10185-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnard R., Le Roux X., Hungate B. A., Cleland E. E., Blankinship J. C., Barthes L., et al. (2006). Several components of global change alter nitrifying and denitrifying activities in an annual grassland. Funct. Ecol. 20, 557–564. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01146.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bei Q., Reitz T., Schnabel B., Eisenhauer N., Schädler M., Buscot F., et al. (2023). Extreme summers impact cropland and grassland soil microbiomes. ISME J. 17, 1589–1600. 10.1038/s41396-023-01470-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg I. A., Kockelkorn D., Buckel W., Fuchs G. (2007). A 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon dioxide assimilation pathway in archaea. Science 318, 1782–1786. 10.1126/science.1149976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchfink B., Xie C., Huson D. H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canfield D. E., Glazer A. N., Falkowski P. G. (2010). The evolution and future of earth's nitrogen cycle. Science 330, 192–196. 10.1126/science.1186120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Compton J. E., Watrud L. S., Arlene Porteous L., DeGrood S. (2004). Response of soil microbial biomass and community composition to chronic nitrogen additions at Harvard forest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 196, 143–158. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dai Z., Su W., Chen H., Barberán A., Zhao H., Yu M., et al. (2018). Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreases bacterial diversity and favors the growth of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in agro-ecosystems across the globe. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3452–3461. 10.1111/gcb.14163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans M. C., Buchanan B. B., Arnon D. I. (1966). A new ferredoxin-dependent carbon reduction cycle in a photosynthetic bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55, 928–934. 10.1073/pnas.55.4.928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fierer N., Bradford M. A., Jackson R. B. (2007). Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88, 1354–1364. 10.1890/05-1839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frey B., Moser B., Tytgat B., Zimmermann S., Alberti J., Biederman L. A., et al. (2023). Long-term N-addition alters the community structure of functionally important N-cycling soil microorganisms across global grasslands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 176:108887. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108887 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Frolov E. N., Kublanov I. V., Toshchakov S. V., Lunev E. A., Pimenov N. V., Bonch-Osmolovskaya E. A., et al. (2019). Form III RubisCO-mediated transaldolase variant of the Calvin cycle in a chemolithoautotrophic bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 18638–18646. 10.1073/pnas.1904225116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu L., Niu B., Zhu Z., Wu S., Li W. (2012). CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fudjoe S. K., Li L., Anwar S., Shi S., Xie J., Wang L., et al. (2023). Nitrogen fertilization promoted microbial growth and N2O emissions by increasing the abundance of nirS and nosZ denitrifiers in semiarid maize field. Front. Microbiol. 14:1265562. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1265562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galloway J. N., Townsend A. R., Erisman J. W., Bekunda M., Cai Z., Freney J. R., et al. (2008). Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892. 10.1126/science.1136674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geisseler D., Horwath W. R., Joergensen R. G., Ludwig B. (2010). Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms – a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 2058–2067. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gong J., Shi J., Zhu C., Li X., Zhang Z., Zhang W., et al. (2022). Accounting for land use in an analysis of the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecosystem services supply and demand in a desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Ecol. Indic. 144:109567. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grant T., Sethuraman A., Escobar M. A., Vourlitis G. L. (2022). Chronic dry nitrogen inputs alter soil microbial community composition in Southern California semi-arid shrublands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 176:104496. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104496 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo X., Zuo X., Yue P., Li X., Hu Y. (2022). Direct and indirect effects of precipitation change and nutrients addition on desert steppe productivity in Inner Mongolia, Northern China. Plant Soil 471, 527–540. 10.1007/s11104-021-05206-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hagh-Doust N., Mikryukov V., Anslan S., Bahram M., Puusepp R., Dulya O., et al. (2023). Effects of nitrogen deposition on carbon and nutrient cycling along a natural soil acidity gradient as revealed by metagenomics. New Phytol. 238, 2607–2620. 10.1111/nph.18897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao T., Zhang Y., Zhang J., Müller C., Li K., Zhang K., et al. (2020). Chronic nitrogen addition differentially affects gross nitrogen transformations in alpine and temperate grassland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 149:107962. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107962 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Holo H. (1989). Chloroflexus aurantiacus secretes 3-hydroxypropionate, a possible intermediate in the assimilation of CO2 and acetate. Arch. Microbiol. 151, 252–256. 10.1007/BF00413138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Q., Huang Y., Wang B., Dippold M. A., Li H., Li N., et al. (2022). Metabolic pathways of CO2 fixing microorganisms determined C-fixation rates in grassland soils along the precipitation gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 172:108764. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huber H., Gallenberger M., Jahn U., Eylert E., Berg I. A., Kockelkorn D., et al. (2008). A dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon assimilation cycle in the hyperthermophilic Archaeum Ignicoccus hospitalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 7851–7856. 10.1073/pnas.0801043105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyatt D., Chen G.-L., LoCascio P. F., Land M. L., Larimer F. W., Hauser L. J. (2010). Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isobe K., Allison S. D., Khalili B., Martiny A. C., Martiny J. B. H. (2019). Phylogenetic conservation of bacterial responses to soil nitrogen addition across continents. Nat. Commun. 10:2499. 10.1038/s41467-019-10390-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansson J. K., Hofmockel K. S. (2020). Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 35–46. 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalili B., Ogunseitan O. A., Goulden M. L., Allison S. D. (2016). Interactive effects of precipitation manipulation and nitrogen addition on soil properties in California grassland and shrubland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 107, 144–153. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kuypers M. M. M., Marchant H. K., Kartal B. (2018). The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 263–276. 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawson C. E., Wu S., Bhattacharjee A. S., Hamilton J. J., McMahon K. D., Goel R., et al. (2017). Metabolic network analysis reveals microbial community interactions in anammox granules. Nat. Commun. 8:15416. 10.1038/ncomms15416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Roux X., Bouskill N. J., Niboyet A., Barthes L., Dijkstra P., Field C. B., et al. (2016). Predicting the responses of soil nitrite-oxidizers to multi-factorial global change: a trait-based approach. Front. Microbiol. 7:628. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leff J. W., Jones S. E., Prober S. M., Barberán A., Borer E. T., Firn J. L., et al. (2015). Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 10967–10972. 10.1073/pnas.1508382112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D., Liu C.-M., Luo R., Sadakane K., Lam T.-W. (2015). MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R., Li Y., Kristiansen K., Wang J. (2008). SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24, 713–714. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W., Li Y., Lv J., He X., Wang J., Teng D., et al. (2022a). Rhizosphere effect alters the soil microbiome composition and C, N transformation in an arid ecosystem. Appl. Soil Ecol. 170:104296. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104296 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y. (2022). Dry Atmospheric Deposition of Nitrogen into Inner Mongolia. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Ma J., Yu Y., Li Y., Shen X., Huo S., et al. (2022b). Effects of multiple global change factors on soil microbial richness, diversity and functional gene abundances: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 815:152737. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu W., Jiang L., Yang S., Wang Z., Tian R., Peng Z., et al. (2020). Critical transition of soil bacterial diversity and composition triggered by nitrogen enrichment. Ecology 101:e03053. 10.1002/ecy.3053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Duan L., Mo J., Du E., Shen J., Lu X., et al. (2011). Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2251–2264. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ljungdhal L. G. (1986). The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 415–450. 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.002215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma X., Wang T., Shi Z., Chiariello N. R., Docherty K., Field C. B., et al. (2022). Long-term nitrogen deposition enhances microbial capacities in soil carbon stabilization but reduces network complexity. Microbiome 10:144. 10.1186/s40168-022-01349-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michalska-Smith M., Song Z., Spawn-Lee S. A., Hansen Z. A., Johnson M., May G., et al. (2022). Network structure of resource use and niche overlap within the endophytic microbiome. ISME J. 16, 435–446. 10.1038/s41396-021-01080-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noah F. L L. C., S R. K., Jesse Z., A B. M., Rob K. (2012). Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 6, 1007–1017. 10.1038/ismej.2011.159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noguchi H., Park J., Takagi T. (2006). MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids. Res. 34, 5623–5630. 10.1093/nar/gkl723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philippot L., Chenu C., Kappler A., Rillig M. C., Fierer N. (2024). The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 226–239. 10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Püspök J. F., Zhao S., Calma A. D., Vourlitis G. L., Allison S. D., Aronson E. L., et al. (2023). Effects of experimental nitrogen deposition on soil organic carbon storage in Southern California drylands. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1660–1679. 10.1111/gcb.16563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu X., Hou J., Guo N., Wang Z., Wang C. (2022). Seasonal variations and influencing factors of gross nitrification rate in desert steppe soil. Sustainability 14:4787. 10.3390/su14084787 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ramotowski D., Shi W. (2022). Nitrapyrin-based nitrification inhibitors shaped the soil microbial community via controls on soil pH and inorganic N composition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 170:104295. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104295 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Silva L. K., de Assis Costa O. Y., Heitor C., Eurya K. E. (2022). Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and fungal denitrifier diversity are associated with N2O production in tropical soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 166:108563. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108563 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song L., Li Z., Niu S. (2021). Global soil gross nitrogen transformation under increasing nitrogen deposition. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 35:e2020GB.006711. 10.1029/2020GB006711 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song L., Niu S. (2022). Increased soil microbial AOB amoA and narG abundances sustain long-term positive responses of nitrification and denitrification to N deposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 166:108539. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108539 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens C. J., Basto S., Bell M. D., Hao T., Kirkman K., Ochoa-Hueso R., et al. (2022). Research progress on the impact of nitrogen deposition on global grasslands. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. 9, 425–444. 10.15302/J-FASE-2022457 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor Andy F. S., Freitag Thomas E., Lucinda R., Duncan W., Peter H., Britton A. (2022). Nitrogen deposition and temperature structure fungal communities associated with alpine moss-sedge heath in the UK. Fungal Ecol. 60:101191. 10.1016/j.funeco.2022.101191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Heijden M. G. A., Bardgett R. D., Van Straalen N. M. (2008). The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 296–310. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C., Liu D., Bai E. (2018). Decreasing soil microbial diversity is associated with decreasing microbial biomass under nitrogen addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 120, 126–133. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Shi X., Zheng C., Suter H., Huang Z. (2021). Different responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to nitrogen deposition in a subtropical forest. Sci. Total Environ. 755:142449. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Feng J., Ao G., Qin W., Han M., Shen Y., et al. (2023a). Globally nitrogen addition alters soil microbial community structure, but has minor effects on soil microbial diversity and richness. Soil Biol. Biochem. 179:108982. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108982 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Tang K., Struik P. C., Ashraf M. N., Zhang T., Zhao Y., et al. (2023b). Alteration of microbial carbon and nitrogen metabolism within the soil metagenome with grazing intensity at semiarid steppe. J. Environ. Manage. 347:119078. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber C. F., Vilgalys R., Kuske C. R. (2013). Changes in fungal community composition in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen fertilization varies with soil horizon. Front. Microbiol. 4:78. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widdig M., Heintz-Buschart A., Schleuss P.-M., Guhr A., Borer E. T., Seabloom E. W., et al. (2020). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on microbial community composition and element cycling in a grassland soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 151:108041. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wrage N., Velthof G. L., van Beusichem M. L., Oenema O. (2001). Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1723–1732. 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00096-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R., Liu Q., Tian S., Potapov A., Zhu B., Yang K., et al. (2022). Nitrogen deposition stimulates decomposition via changes in the structure and function of litter food webs. Soil Biol. Biochem. 166:108522. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108522 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu H., Li L., Ma Q., Liu X., Li Y., Wang Y., et al. (2023). Soil microbial responses to large changes in precipitation with nitrogen deposition in an arid ecosystem. Ecology 104:e4020. 10.1002/ecy.4020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang K. (2021). Composition and Distribution of Bulk Nitrogen Deposition in Inner Mongolia. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S., Pei L., Zhao Y., Shan J., Zheng X., Xu G., et al. (2023a). Effects of microplastics and nitrogen deposition on soil multifunctionality, particularly C and N cycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 451:131152. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang T., Chen H. Y. H., Ruan H. (2018). Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes. ISME J. 12, 1817–1825. 10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Huo T., Wei B., Chen K., Liu N., et al. (2023b). Vegetation restoration constrained by nitrogen availability in temperate grasslands in northern China. J. Plant Ecol. 16:rtac087. 10.1093/jpe/rtac087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.