ABSTRACT
Seven bacteriophages were isolated from soil in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin using the host Microbacterium foliorum. These bacteriophages range in the number of predicted genes encoded, from 25 to 91, and are distributed across actinobacteriophage clusters EB, EC, EE, and EK.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, genomics, cluster, DNA sequencing
ANNOUNCEMENT
Bacteriophages are incredibly abundant and genetically diverse. To expand our knowledge of bacteriophage evolution and diversity, we report here the characteristics of seven bacteriophages newly isolated using Microbacterium foliorum NRRL B-24224 (1, 2).
All seven bacteriophages were isolated from soil in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin using standard methods as previously described (Table 1) (3, 4). These soil samples were incubated in peptone-yeast extract-calcium (PYCa) liquid medium for 2 hours at 30°C with shaking to suspend phage particles. The suspension was then filtered through a 0.22-µm filter. The filtrate was either directly plated in PYCa soft agar containing M. foliorum or “enriched” by inoculation with M. foliorum and incubation at 30°C for 2–3 days before being filtered and plated (Table 1), yielding phages Albedo, Kenzers, Swervy, Cranjis, JaimeB, Fullmetal, and Stormbreaker. All phages were purified through three rounds of plating. All plates were incubated at 30°C for 24–48 hours.
TABLE 1.
Phage name | Soil sample collection site | Isolation method | Plaque morphology | Plaque Sizea (mm) | Approx. shotgun coverage (fold) | No. of 150-bp single-end reads | Genome length (bp) | Genome end characteristic | G + C content (%) | No. of ORFsb | No. of tRNAs | Clusterc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albedo | Hudson, WI, 44.984533 N, 92.7545 W | Enriched | Clear with halod | 0.1–1 | 83 | 862,002 | 41,813 | 3′ single-stranded overhang 5′-TCTCCCGGCA-3′ | 66.6 | 71 | 1 (Gln) | EB |
Kenzers | Greenville, PA, 41.4124 N, 80.3813 W |
Enriched | Clear | 1 | 3,293 | 960,944 | 41,261 | 3′ single-stranded overhang 5′-TCTCCCGGCA-3′ | 66.8 | 70 | 1 (Gln) | EB |
Swervy | Aston, PA, 39.8657 N, 75.4279 W | Direct | Turbid | 0.5–1 | 325 | 93,814 | 41,510 | 3′ single-stranded overhang 5′-TCTCCCGGCA-3′ | 66.7 | 71 | 1 (Asn) | EB |
Cranjis | Upper Chichester, PA, 39.856232 N, 75.443149 W | Direct | Turbid | 3.5–4 | 99 | 40,843 | 53,222 | Circularly permutated | 68.9 | 91 | 0 | EC |
JaimeB | Aston, PA, 39.875331 N, 75.440021 W |
Direct | Clear | 3–4 | 14,635 | 1.8 million | 17,445 | 3′ single-stranded overhang 5′-CCCGCCCCA-3′ | 68.7 | 25 | 0 | EE |
Stormbreaker | Aston, PA, 39.5215 N, 75.260806 W | Direct | Clear | 1 | 1,073 | 74,440 | 54,050 | Circularly permutated | 60 | 54 | 0 | EKe |
Fullmetal | Aston, PA, 39.876667 N, 75.441667 W | Direct | Clear | 1–1.5 | 197 | 410,171 | 54,438 | Circularly permutated | 59.8 | 55 | 0 | EKf |
Plaque size is based on the measurements of three plaques.
ORFs, open reading frames.
Clusters were identified using sequence similarities to other Microbacterium phage (5).
Indicates a clear middle of the plaque with a diffuse or cloudy edge.
Subcluster EK2.
Subcluster EK1.
"ND” indicates that the TEM was not performed.
The Wizard DNA Cleanup Kit (Promega) was used to extract genomic DNA from phage lysates, as previously described (4). Some lysates were concentrated using ZnCl2 precipitation prior to genomic DNA extraction (6). The genomic DNA libraries were prepared using a NEBNext Ultra II FS Kit (New England BioLabs) followed by sequencing using Illumina MiSeq (v3 reagents), yielding at least 40,000 150-base single-end reads (Table 1). Raw reads were assembled and then checked for completeness using Newbler v2.9 (7) and Consed v29 (8), respectively (9). Sequencing results and genome characteristics of each bacteriophage are listed in Table 1.
The genomes were autoannotated using DNA Master v5.23.6 (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu), Glimmer v3.02b (10), GeneMark v4.28 (11) and were refined using PECAAN v20221109 (https://pecaan.kbrinsgd.org/index.html), Starterator v462 (https://github.com/SEA-PHAGES/starterator), and Phamerator v539 (12). Transmembrane helices were predicted using SOSUI v1.11 (13), TOPCONS v2.0 (14), TMHMM v2.0 (15), and DeepTMHMM v1.0.24 (16). tRNAs were predicted using ARAGORN v1.2.41 (17) and tRNAscanSE v2.0 (18). Putative functions for other predicted genes were made using HHPRED v3.2 (against the PDB_mmCIF70, NCBI_Conserved_Domains, Pfam-A, and UniProt-SwissProt databases) (19) and BlastP v2.10.0 (against the PhagesDB and NCBI nonredundant databases) (20). All annotations were performed with default parameters.
Phages were assigned to clusters based on gene content similarity (GCS) of at least 35% to sequenced genomes in the Acinobacteriophage database (https://phagesdb.org/) using the GCS tool at phagesDB (5, 21). All seven phages reported here are consistent with features previously described for their respective clusters; the EB cluster phages, Albedo, Kenzers, and Swervy encode for <3 tRNAs; the EC cluster phage Cranjis has all its genes transcribed rightward; the EE cluster phage JaimeB shares all 25 predicted genes including a capsid maturation and protease fusion protein with the other EE cluster members; the EK cluster phages Stormbreaker and Fullmetal have the first ~30 predicted genes transcribed leftward and all the remaining genes transcribed rightward, and they also encode for the largest actinobacteriophage gene product, over 4,400 amino acids (1, 22).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dan Russell for sequencing and assembly of the bacteriophages in this study. We also thank Steven Cresawn, Debbie Jacobs-Sera, Graham Hatfull, Viknesh Sivanathan, and other members of the SEA-PHAGES and Howard Hughes Medical Institute for their expertise and support of our research.
Contributor Information
Matthew D. Mastropaolo, Email: mastropm@neumann.edu.
Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All genomes, Albedo, Kenzers, Swervy, Cranjis, JaimeB, Fullmetal, and Stormbreaker are available at GenBank with Accession No. OR475283, OP172875, MZ747513, OP297543, OR195050, OP297538, MT657334 and the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) No. SRX22868877, SRX14483228, SRX14485092, SRX22853654, SRX22853656, SRX22853655, SRX22853658, respectively.
REFERENCES
- 1. Mastropaolo MD, Fallest-Strobl PC, Sequira DM, Campbell DD, Negro CJ, Tuang KS, Sigmund-Hamre IM, Womack CL, Mansbridge T, Metzler AL, Sasher EG, Collins C, Crowley NK, Dower VR, Bates M, Bjorkelo C, Johnson H, Salvitti LR, Neumann University Phage Discovery Group . 2023. Genome sequences of five Microbacterium foliorum phages, GaeCeo, NeumannU, Eightball, Chivey, and Hiddenleaf. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0110622. doi: 10.1128/mra.01106-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hatfull GF. 2020. Actinobacteriophages: genomics, dynamics, and applications. Annu Rev Virol 7:37–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-122019-070009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, et al. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull G. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD. Available from: https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home [Google Scholar]
- 5. Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Santos MA. 1991. An improved method for the small scale preparation of bacteriophage DNA based on phage precipitation by zinc chloride. Nucleic Acids Res 19:5442. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Miller JR, Koren S, Sutton G. 2010. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics 95:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Bio 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Besemer J. Borodovsky M. 2005. Genemark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. 1998. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14:378–379. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A. 2015. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W401–W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hallgren J, Tsirigos KD, Pedersen MD, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Marcatili P, Nielsen H, Krogh A, Winther O. 2022. Deeptmhmm predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609 [DOI]
- 17. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pope WH, Mavrich TN, Garlena RA, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Jacobs-Sera D, Montgomery MT, Russell DA, Warner MH, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) . 2017. Bacteriophages of Gordonia spp. display a spectrum of diversity and genetic relationships. mBio 8:e01069-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01069-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Jacobs-Sera D, Abad LA, Alvey RM, Anders KR, Aull HG, Bhalla SS, Blumer LS, Bollivar DW, Bonilla JA, Butela KA, et al. 2020. Genomic diversity of bacteriophages infecting Microbacterium spp. PLoS One 15:e0234636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All genomes, Albedo, Kenzers, Swervy, Cranjis, JaimeB, Fullmetal, and Stormbreaker are available at GenBank with Accession No. OR475283, OP172875, MZ747513, OP297543, OR195050, OP297538, MT657334 and the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) No. SRX22868877, SRX14483228, SRX14485092, SRX22853654, SRX22853656, SRX22853655, SRX22853658, respectively.