Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Child Neurology
. 2024 Mar 12;18(2):9–22. doi: 10.22037/IJCN.V18I2.36632

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and its Effects on the Developing Cerebellum: A Narrative Review on Experimental Studies

Mohammad Javad SAEEDI BORUJENI 1, Pilar CODONER FRANCH 2, Eulalia ALONSO IGLESIAS 3, Marie GOMBERT 2
PMCID: PMC11015721  PMID: 38617398

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus during pregnancy is a common complication of gestation, but its effects on the offspring’s development are poorly understood. Recently, some studies reported that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) impairs cerebellar development, and some genetic alterations have been described as consequences. Cerebellum, one of the hindbrain derived structures in the posterior cranial fossa, plays a crucial role in cognition and behavioral functions. In recent years, some surveys stated that gestational diabetes has adverse effects on the fetus’s cerebellum. Disruption of cerebellar cortex morphogenesis, reduce the volume of the cerebellum, reduce the thickness of cerebellar cortex layers, and its neuronal cells and effects on the expression of synaptophysin, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor -1 receptors are some of the maternal diabetes effects on developing cerebellum. On other hand, GDM, as a neurotoxic agent, impaired cerebellar development and could be a cause for the behavioral, functional, and structural anomalies observed in pups of diabetic mothers. Based on the literature review, most studies have pointed out that administering insulin in patients with GDM decreased the cellular and molecular alterations that induced by GDM in the developing cerebellum. Undoubtedly, screening strategies for all pregnant women are necessary.

Key Words: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Neurotoxin Agents, Developing Cerebellum

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) stands as the most prevalent health complication during pregnancy, and the number of young women with undiagnosed GDM is rising globally. While the precise origin of GDM remains unclear, several factors are believed to contribute significantly to its development. These include maternal overweight and obesity, a prior history of GDM, advanced maternal age during pregnancy, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and specific ethnic backgrounds (1-3). Disturbed glucose hemostasis with beginning or first recognition during gestation is the main feature of GDM (4). This type of diabetes mellitus (DM) is described by insufficient pancreatic beta-cell performance to meet the increased insulin need due to pregnancy. Hyperglycemia, autoimmune diseases, monogenic causes, and chronic insulin resistance are some of the proposed factors associated with insufficient beta-cell function in GDM (4-6). In GDM, glucose, as a leading source of brain energy, is transported across the placental tissue utilizing facilitated diffusion. The results of the condition, as mentioned earlier, are hyperinsulinemia in the fetus, accelerated fetal growth, and possible neonatal hypoglycemia at delivery. The consequences and adverse effects of GDM on embryos may extend beyond the childhood period, but the issue is open to discussion (6-10).

GDM impairs the development of the Central Nervous System (CNS) in offspring, and learning disabilities, memory weakness, impaired language development, motor problems, and antisocial behaviors are some of the unwanted GDM consequences (6, 11-14). So far, many clinical studies investigated the performance of children born to mothers with GDM. Their surveys presented a negative correlation between the performance of these children on various cognition and behavioral tests (12, 15-17). GDM-induced fetal encephalopathy is a complex cascade of events involving cellular and molecular alterations related to neurogenesis, neuronal migration, differentiation, and cell survival (18-21). In recent years, investigation of GDM’s effects on the expression of brain regulatory genes that control brain development has been considered. Based on previous surveys, alterations of involved genes in CNS development are the basis of neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral abnormalities observed in children of diabetic mothers. Apoptosis is a form of cell death occurring in some physiological and non-physiological conditions (22). Many studies have shown experimental models of GDM-induced neuronal apoptosis in the CNS of offspring (23).

The cerebellum is one of the hindbrain-derived structures in the posterior cranial fossa involved in the coordination and control of voluntary movements (24). Moreover, the cerebellum plays a crucial role in cognition and behavioral functions (25-27). Cerebellar involvement has been reported in some psychiatric disorders such as autism (28), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (29, 30), dyslexia (29) and schizophrenia(31, 32). Recent studies have indicated that GDM can hinder cerebellum development, and genetic alterations have been identified as consequences of this condition. So far, limited studies have investigated the effect of GDM on the development of the fetal cerebellum, and most of them are in the category of experimental and animal studies. The present review summarizes the recent findings about maternal diabetes and its effects on the developing cerebellum.

Literature review

Many clinical and experimental studies have been conducted on the effect of GDM on developing the fetus and the occurrence of late-term disorders in the newborn. However, the studies that have explicitly been conducted on developing structures related to the nervous system, such as the cerebellum, hippocampus, and the like, are scarce and mostly limited to animal studies. In order to review of the literature, a search was made in Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the like, with the keywords GDM, cerebellum, development of CNS and nervous system defects, and articles related to the subject, i.e., the effects of GDM on the development of the nervous system and cerebellum were extracted.

Overview of gestational diabetes and molecular aspects

One of the central representations of pregnancy is a decrease in insulin sensitivity. This condition compensates with increased insulin secretion (4, 33). Diabetes during pregnancy occurs in subjects who are unable to compensate for insulin insensitivity with adequate insulin secretion and who have never had a positive history of DM prior to gestation. However, some surveys suggest the presence of susceptibilities prior to the disease, such as genetic mutations associated with energy homeostasis (34-36). A positive history of GDM in prior pregnancy is one of the main reported risk factors that increase the risk of diabetes in a subsequent pregnancy. Furthermore, some surveys reported a significant relation between increased maternal age and increased occurrence of GDM. Family history of DM, high body mass index (BMI), non-white ethnic background, polycystic ovary syndrome, smoking and gene polymorphism are some of the other proposed risk factors of GDM (37-39). The above factors are non-specific, and roughly 40–60% of pregnant women with DM have no noticeable risk factor; for this reason, many advocate screening all women (40). Usually, GDM exhibits no symptoms in women, but in some cases, it may exhibit increased thirst, increased urination, vomiting and nausea(41). DM during pregnancy increases the risk of short-and long-term complications for the offspring. Hyperinsulinemia/hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, Macrosomia and shoulder dystocia are some of the short term complications in offspring that are exposed to GDM (42-45). Increased risk of occurrence of DM, obesity and cardiovascular disease are some of the common long-term complications in neonates that are born to mothers with GDM (7, 8, 44-46). Routine treatments of DM during pregnancy are effective in preventing short-term complications in neonates, but it remains uncertain whether long-term complications can be prevented.

Recently, some studies proposed the crucial role of microRNA in the pathogenesis of GDM (47, 48). MicroRNAs are a class of non-coding RNAs known as epigenetic regulators (49-53). The placental tissue creates some types of microRNA that are released into the mother’s circulation. During pregnancy, the microRNA mentioned above genes are encoded into particular clusters and expressed specifically by placental tissue in a time-dependent manner (54). For the first time, Zhao et al. reported significant downregulations of miR-132, miR-29a, and miR-222 in the plasma of pregnant women who suffered from GDM (55). The microRNA above is associated with sufficient beta cell function, IS and glucose homeostasis(56, 57). The study by Shi et al. reported the upregulation of miR-222 in the omental tissue of GDM subjects (58). Other findings of their survey were a positive correlation of miR-222 levels with a concentration of maternal serum estradiol (increased in the GDM’s subjects) and a negative correlation with protein concentration of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) and estrogen receptor in the maternal omental tissue (58). The microRNAs derived from the placental tissue were released into maternal blood circulation and carried into plasma by exosomes (59-61). The exosomes containing microRNAs are released into mother circulation in the sixth of pregnancy and marked with the specific placental alkaline phosphatase enzyme, making their isolation and consequent representation possible during gestation(62). After Zhao et al.’s report, many studies aimed to analyze the microRNA alterations in GDM patients. So far, dysregulation of miR-518d, miR-101, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-19a-3p, miR-19b-3p and miR-20a-5p were reported following the occurrence of GDM (54).

As previously mentioned, genetic susceptibility plays a crucial role in GDM. The significantly higher occurrence of type 2 DM in subjects with a positive history of GDM, family history of type 2 DM and incidence of GDM and similarity in microRNA associated with type 2 DM and GDM raise the question to what degree of the genetic planning of Type 2 of DM and GDM are similar (36, 63, 64). Recently, some candidate genes were proposed associated with DM during pregnancy. TCF7L2, GCK, KCNJ11, KCNQ1, CDKAL1, IGF2BP2, MTNR1B, and IRS1 are related genes with GDM. The exciting topic is the similarity of the genes mentioned above in the pathogenesis of type 2 DM and GDM(36).

Gestational diabetes mellitus and central nervous birth defects

As previously mentioned, infant’s anomalies rates are significantly higher in neonates born to GDM mothers. The time of GDM onset and severity plays a critical role in the maldevelopment of the fetus. So far, the precise mechanisms associated with GDM’s effects on developing growing fetuses are not fully understood ; on the other hand, there are many ambiguous aspects about the mother’s diabetes effects on her child (65, 66). Some cellular and molecular alterations about the GDM effects on a fetus’s CNS have been proposed. The alterations above are associated with changes in patterns of development of neuronal integrity, synaptic membranes, neurotransmitter systems and neuronal growth factors expression (13, 23, 67-69). In this part, we summarize some of the proposed reasons involved in CNS pathogenesis following GDM.

Because of a disturbance in energy homeostasis, GDM is associated with fatty acid metabolism dysregulation (70). In this condition, the concentration of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in umbilical venous blood was reduced; this reduction of DHA reflects lower transportation of the aforementioned acid to the fetus (71, 72). DHA is the most abundant fatty acid in the brain and retina, so DHA includes 40% of the polyunsaturated fatty acids in the brain and 60% of the acids mentioned above in the retina. Furthermore, roughly half the weight of the neuron’s plasma membrane is composed of DHA (73-75). In prenatal life, DHA plays a crucial role in neurogenesis, neurotransmission and protection of CNS from oxidative stress(76, 77). Due to GDM, the availability of this acid is reduced in the fetus’s CNS and induces maldevelopment of the nervous system.

One of the adverse effects of GDM is the increased oxidative stress. Some animal studies indicated that oxygen radicals play a critical role in some neurodevelopmental processes, such as neuronal differentiation, neuroplasticity and timing of neuronal formation. Hence, any alterations or imbalances in the aforementioned signals can lead to the maldevelopment of the fetus’s CNS (78-80). In increased oxidative stress, free radicals inactivate some vital functions of the lipids and protein molecules, possibly leading to cell death. One of the other findings that proved the role of oxidative stress in central nervous birth defects in infants born to diabetic mothers is a significant reduction of anomalies mentioned above using antioxidant therapy (79). Based on the above information, oxidative stress is related to the pathophysiology of the fetal mal-development of the nervous system.

One of the other factors involved in diabetic neuropathies is inflammatory factors. Demonstratively, GDM increased the concentration of inflammatory molecules, and this condition is related to the maldevelopment of the fetus’s CNS. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL6) are two main proposed inflammatory factors that increase in infants born to diabetic mothers and have been concerned with neuronal impairment. Based on the results of some studies, the molecular immune changes that occur during fetal life may persist into the childhood period, so increased inflammatory factors formed by induction of GDM may be associated with poor mental performance of children born to diabetic mothers (81-86).

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a factor similar to the molecular architect of insulin. IGF-1 plays a crucial role in fetal development and continues to have anabolic effects in postnatal life. Both insulin and IGF-1 belong to the insulin superfamily and are involved in the normal development of CNS. Proposedly, the superfamily mentioned above influences many biological functions of CNS development, such as neuronal and glial cells proliferation, neuronal differentiation, neuronal reformation, and synaptogenesis. Insulin and IGF-1 apply their effects through binding to their receptor (insulin receptor and IGF-1 receptor) (87-89). Some surveys indicate defects in the receptors expression in the fetus’s CNS following GDM, as mentioned above (90).

Gestational diabetes mellitus and developing cerebellum

One part of the rat’s brains that experience morphogenetic alterations after birth is the cerebellum (91). The precise equivalence in age between rats and the human brain is not apparent, but proposedly, the neonatal period in rats matched the third trimester of pregnancy in humans (92). The cerebellar cortex is a dynamic structure in which neuronal proliferation, migration, and granule cell differentiation occur (93). Regarding embryology, roughly during the first week after birth, neuronal generation in the external granule layer of the cerebellar cortex was performed. Then, after rapid cell proliferation in the layer mentioned above , numerous granule cells were formed that migrate with the help of radial glial cells through the molecular layer to reach their destination within the internal granule layer and differentiate into mature cerebellar neurons (91, 94). Unlike granular cells, all of the purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex are generated before birth on embryonic days thirteen to sixteen, and dendritic outgrowth of them and synaptogenesis occur during the first weeks after birth (95). Any alteration in the above critical period may affect the cerebellar cortex development. Delayed cerebellar cortex development has been observed after prenatal exposure to GDM (90, 96, 97).

Hami et al. investigated the effects of maternal diabetes on stereological parameters of the developing cerebellum of a rat’s fetus (96). In their study, they analyzed the GDM impacts on cerebellar volume, the thickness, and the number of cells in the different layers of the cerebellar cortex on postnatal days 0, 7, and 14. The study’s results mentioned earlier indicated that GDM disrupted the cerebellar cortex morphogenesis. Based on their study, the cerebellar volume and the thickness of all three layers of the cerebellar cortex, including internal granule, molecular, and external granule layers, were reduced significantly. Moreover, the densities of granular and purkinje cells were increased at postnatal day 0. The other finding from their study was a reduction of granular and purkinje cell numbers in the cerebellar cortex of neonates born to diabetic mothers at postnatal days 7 and 14 (96). In another study, Mirarab Razi et al. surveyed the effects of GDM on the neuronal cells of neonates’ cerebellum (98, 99). Their study performed on day 7 of postnatal life was agreed with the study done by Hami et al. previously mentioned.

As stated in the previous paragraph, insulin superfamily members (specifically insulin and IGF-1) play a crucial role in brain development during prenatal life. Haghir et al., in an animal study, examined the effects of diabetes mellitus during pregnancy on the expression of insulin and IGF-1 receptors in the developing cerebellum of rat neonates(90). Their investigation on postnatal days 0, 7, and 14 showed that GDM powerfully influences insulin and IGF-1 receptors in the developing cerebellum. Another significant finding from their study was the neuroprotective effects of administered insulin on regulating receptors mentioned above expression (90). Taken together, based on the above-mentioned study, it can be concluded that maternal hyperglycemia and neonatal hyperinsulinemia may disrupt the development of offspring’s cerebelli by dysregulation of expression of the insulin and IGF-1 receptors in both at mRNA and protein levels. In the most recent study, Hami et al. investigated the difference in the distribution of IGF-1 receptors in the developing cerebellar cortex of rats born to diabetic mothers (97). Their study showed that GDM markedly influences the localization of IGF-1 receptors in the developing cortex of the cerebellum. They stated that GDM, as a neurotoxic agent, impaired cerebellar development and could be a cause for the structural and functional anomalies observed in pups of diabetic mothers.

Synaptophysin, or significant synaptic vesicle protein p38, is one of the crucial proteins involved in the normal development of CNS, and its presence is associated with synaptogenesis and synaptic density (100, 101). This protein was one of the first recognized proteins in the synaptic vesicle, accounting for roughly seven to ten percent of whole synaptic vesicle proteins. In an excellent experimental study, Hami et al., investigated the effects of maternal diabetes during pregnancy on the expression of synaptophysin in the cerebellum of pups (102). Their survey revealed that GDM adversely affected synaptophysin gene expression in the offspring’s cerebellum. The study mentioned earlier stated that most subjects’ blood glucose control during pregnancy could be normalized to these adverse effects. On the other hand, the researcher mentioned above suggested that gestational hyperglycemia accompanied by neonatal hyperinsulinemia was able to decrease the synaptogenesis process in the pup’s cerebellar cortex.

In conclusion

The occurrence of some disorders in offspring that are born to diabetic mothers is more common in comparison to offspring of non-diabetic mothers. The significant role that GDM plays in causing the disorders mentioned above has prompted considerable efforts from clinical and experimental researchers. The final aim of all studies was to find the biomarkers or factors that may enable measures to be taken in GDM. GDM, as a neurotoxic agent, impaired cerebellar development and could be a cause for the behavioral, functional, and structural anomalies observed in pups of diabetic mothers. Based on the literature review, most studies have pointed out that insulin administration in patients with GDM decreased the cellular and molecular alterations induced by GDM in the developing cerebellum. Undoubtedly, screening strategies for all pregnant women are necessary.

Author’s Contribution

MJ.SB: Designing the project, collecting articles and preparing the manuscript.

P.CF and E.AI: Revising manuscripts and giving comments to improve the manuscript. MG: collecting data and appropriate articles, editing draft

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Acknowledgment

None

References

  • 1.Saeedi Borujeni MJ, Esfandiary E, Ghanadian M, Valiani A, Baradaran A, Yazdani A. Alterations in lipid peroxidation, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, and hepatic histopathological changes in diabetic rats following the treatment with Salvadora persica. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2019 Mar;120(3):3696–708. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadeghi A, Hami J, Razavi S, Esfandiary E, Hejazi Z. The effect of diabetes mellitus on apoptosis in hippocampus: Cellular and molecular aspects. International journal of preventive medicine. 2016:7. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.178531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hami J, Shojae F, Vafaee-Nezhad S, Lotfi N, Kheradmand H, Haghir H. Some of the experimental and clinical aspects of the effects of the maternal diabetes on developing hippocampus. World journal of diabetes. 2015;6(3):412. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barbour LA, McCurdy CE, Hernandez TL, Kirwan JP, Catalano PM, Friedman JE. Cellular mechanisms for insulin resistance in normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Diabetes care. 2007;30(Supplement 2):S112–S9. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baz B, Riveline J-P, Gautier J-F. ENDOCRINOLOGY OF PREGNANCY: Gestational diabetes mellitus: definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. European journal of endocrinology. 2016;174(2):R43–R51. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anderson JL, Waller DK, Canfield MA, Shaw GM, Watkins ML, Werler MM. Maternal obesity, gestational diabetes, and central nervous system birth defects. Epidemiology. 2005;16(1):87–92. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147122.97061.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mitanchez D, Burguet A, Simeoni U. Infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus: mild neonatal effects, a long-term threat to global health. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014;164(3):445–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Damm P, Houshmand-Oeregaard A, Kelstrup L, Lauenborg J, Mathiesen ER, Clausen TD. Gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term consequences for mother and offspring: a view from Denmark. Diabetologia. 2016;59(7):1396–9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3985-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Amin M. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hernandez TL, Van Pelt RE, Anderson MA, Reece MS, Reynolds RM, Becky A, et al. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus randomized to a higher–complex carbohydrate/low-fat diet manifest lower adipose tissue insulin resistance, inflammation, glucose, and free fatty acids: a pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(1):39–42. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Denison F, Macnaught G, Semple S, Terris G, Walker J, Anblagan D, et al. Brain Development in Fetuses of Mothers with Diabetes: A Case-Control MR Imaging Study. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2017;38(5):1037–44. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Babiker O. Long-term effects of maternal diabetes on their offspring development and behaviours. Sudanese J Ped. 2007;8:133–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Georgieff MK. The effect of maternal diabetes during pregnancy on the neurodevelopment of offspring. Minnesota medicine. 2006;89(3):44–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Persaud OD. Maternal diabetes and the consequences for her offspring. J Develop Disab. 2007;1:101–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nelson CA, Wewerka S, Thomas KM, deRegnier R-a, Tribbey-Walbridge S, Georgieff M. Neurocognitive sequelae of infants of diabetic mothers. Behavioral neuroscience. 2000;114(5):950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ornoy A. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of children born to mothers with pregestational and gestational diabetes. Pediatric endocrinology reviews: PER. 2005;3(2):104–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ratzon N, Greenbaum C, Dulitzky M, Ornoy A. Comparison of the motor development of school-age children born to mothers with and without diabetes mellitus. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2000;20(1):43–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carrapato M, Marcelino F. The infant of the diabetic mother: The critical developmental windows. Early pregnancy (Online). 2001;5(1):57–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dheen ST, Tay SS, Boran J, Ting LW, Kumar SD, Fu J, et al. Recent studies on neural tube defects in embryos of diabetic pregnancy: an overview. Current medicinal chemistry. 2009;16(18):2345–54. doi: 10.2174/092986709788453069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao Q, Gao Y-M. Hyperglycemic condition disturbs the proliferation and cell death of neural progenitors in mouse embryonic spinal cord. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2007;25(6):349–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Delascio Lopes C, Sinigaglia-Coimbra R, Mazzola J, Camano L, Mattar R. Neurofunctional evaluation of young male offspring of rat dams with diabetes induced by streptozotocin. ISRN endocrinology. 2011:2011. doi: 10.5402/2011/480656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.BORUJENI MJS, Javad H, Haghir H, Rastin M, Sazegar G. Evaluation of Bax and Bcl-2 proteins expression in the rat hippocampus due to childhood febrile seizure. Iranian journal of child neurology. 2016;10(1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lotfi N, Hami J, Hosseini M, Haghir D, Haghir H. Diabetes during pregnancy enhanced neuronal death in the hippocampus of rat offspring. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2016;51:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruigrok T, Sillitoe RV, Voogd J. Cerebellum and cerebellar connections. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klein A, Ulmer J, Quinet S, Mathews V, Mark L. Nonmotor functions of the cerebellum: an introduction. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2016;37(6):1005–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Buckner RL. The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging. Neuron. 2013;80(3):807–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lange I, Kasanova Z, Goossens L, Leibold N, De Zeeuw CI, van Amelsvoort T, et al. The anatomy of fear learning in the cerebellum: A systematic meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015;59:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang SS-H, Kloth AD, Badura A. The cerebellum, sensitive periods, and autism. Neuron. 2014;83(3):518–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stoodley CJ. Distinct regions of the cerebellum show gray matter decreases in autism, ADHD, and developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2014:8. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stoodley CJ. The cerebellum and neurodevelopmental disorders. Cerebellum (London, England). 2016;15(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0715-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fatemi SH, Folsom TD. GABA receptor subunit distribution and FMRP–mGluR5 signaling abnormalities in the cerebellum of subjects with schizophrenia, mood disorders, and autism. Schizophrenia research. 2015;167(1):42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim D-J, Kent JS, Bolbecker AR, Sporns O, Cheng H, Newman SD, et al. Disrupted modular architecture of cerebellum in schizophrenia: a graph theoretic analysis. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2014;40(6):1216–26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kirwan JP, Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Lepercq J, Challier J-C, Huston-Presley L, Friedman JE, et al. TNF-α is a predictor of insulin resistance in human pregnancy. Diabetes. 2002;51(7):2207–13. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robitaille J, Grant AM. The genetics of gestational diabetes mellitus: evidence for relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Genetics in Medicine. 2008;10(4):240–50. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b8710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang C, Bao W, Rong Y, Yang H, Bowers K, Yeung E, et al. Genetic variants and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Human reproduction update. 2013;19(4):376–90. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lowe Jr WL, Scholtens DM, Sandler V, Hayes MG. Genetics of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Maternal Metabolism. Current diabetes reports. 2016;16(2):15. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0709-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xiong X, Saunders L, Wang F, Demianczuk N. Gestational diabetes mellitus: prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2001;75(3):221–8. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00496-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):e290–e6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Di Cianni G, Volpe L, Lencioni C, Miccoli R, Cuccuru I, Ghio A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for gestational diabetes assessed by universal screening. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2003;62(2):131–7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;144(7):768–73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ural SH, Repke JT. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;1(3):129. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kamana K, Shakya S, Zhang H. Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature review. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2015;66(Suppl. 2):14–20. doi: 10.1159/000371628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mumm H, Glintborg D, Sorensen JA, Andersen LLT, Ravn P, Andersen M. Pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, but not of other adverse obstetric outcomes. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mitanchez D, Yzydorczyk C, Siddeek B, Boubred F, Benahmed M, Simeoni U. The offspring of the diabetic mother–short-and long-term implications. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;29(2):256–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Solà I, Roqué M, Gich I, Corcoy R. Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2015:350:h102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ruchat SM, Hivert MF, Bouchard L. Epigenetic programming of obesity and diabetes by in utero exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutrition reviews. 2013;71:S1. doi: 10.1111/nure.12057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fornes D, White V, Heinecke F, Capobianco E, Jawerbaum A. microRNA-130 and microRNA-122 alteration are related to lipid metabolic impairments in the foetal liver of rats with gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2017;51:123. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Floris I, Descamps B, Vardeu A, Mitić T, Posadino AM, Shantikumar S, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus impairs fetal endothelial cell functions through a mechanism involving microRNA-101 and histone methyltransferase enhancer of zester homolog-2. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. . 2015:114–304730. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mirzaei H, Gholamin S, Shahidsales S, Sahebkar A, Jaafari MR, Mirzaei HR, et al. MicroRNAs as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in melanoma. European journal of cancer. 2016;53:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Salarinia R, Sahebkar A, Peyvandi M, Reza Mirzaei H, Reza Jaafari M, Matbou Riahi M, et al. Epi-drugs and Epi-miRs: moving beyond current cancer therapies. Current cancer drug targets. 2016;16(9):773–88. doi: 10.2174/1568009616666151207110143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Reza Mirzaei H, Sahebkar A, Mohammadi M, Yari R, Salehi H, Hasan Jafari M, et al. Circulating microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Current pharmaceutical design. 2016;22(34):5257–69. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160303110838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mirzaei H, Khataminfar S, Mohammadparast S, Shahid Sales S, Maftouh M, Mohammadi M, et al. Circulating microRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. Current medicinal chemistry. 2016;23(36):4135–50. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160818093854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mirzaei H, Momeni F, Saadatpour L, Sahebkar A, Goodarzi M, Masoudifar A, et al. MicroRNA: Relevance to stroke diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. 2017 doi: 10.1002/jcp.25787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Poirier C, Desgagné V, Guérin R, Bouchard L. MicroRNAs in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Emerging Role in Maternal Metabolic Regulation. Current Diabetes Reports. 2017;5(17):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0856-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao C, Dong J, Jiang T, Shi Z, Yu B, Zhu Y, et al. Early second-trimester serum miRNA profiling predicts gestational diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Deiuliis J. MicroRNAs as regulators of metabolic disease: pathophysiologic significance and emerging role as biomarkers and therapeutics. International journal of obesity. 2016;40(1):88–101. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Slusarz A, Pulakat L. The two faces of miR-29. Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md). 2015;16(7):480. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shi Z, Zhao C, Guo X, Ding H, Cui Y, Shen R, et al. Differential expression of microRNAs in omental adipose tissue from gestational diabetes mellitus subjects reveals miR-222 as a regulator of ERα expression in estrogen-induced insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2014;155(5):1982–90. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-2046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chim SS, Shing TK, Hung EC, Leung T-y, Lau T-k, Chiu RW, et al. Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clinical chemistry. 2008;54(3):482–90. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.097972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Miura K, Miura S, Yamasaki K, Higashijima A, Kinoshita A, Yoshiura K-i, et al. Identification of pregnancy-associated microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clinical chemistry. 2010;56(11):1767–71. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.147660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luo S-S, Ishibashi O, Ishikawa G, Ishikawa T, Katayama A, Mishima T, et al. Human villous trophoblasts express and secrete placenta-specific microRNAs into maternal circulation via exosomes. Biology of reproduction. 2009;81(4):717–29. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mitchell MD, Peiris HN, Kobayashi M, Koh YQ, Duncombe G, Illanes SE, et al. Placental exosomes in normal and complicated pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;213(4):S173–S81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Radha V, Kanthimathi S, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Genetics of gestational diabetes mellitus. Journal Of Pakistan Medical Association. 2016:s11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shaat N, Groop L. Genetics of gestational diabetes mellitus. Current medicinal chemistry. 2007;14(5):569–83. doi: 10.2174/092986707780059643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Styrud J, Thunberg L, Nybacka O, Eriksson UJ. Correlations between maternal metabolism and deranged development in the offspring of normal and diabetic rats. Pediatric research. 1995;37(3):343–53. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199503000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Eidelman AI, Samueloff A. Seminars in perinatology. Elsevier; 2002. The pathophysiology of the fetus of the diabetic mother. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hami J, Sadr-Nabavi A, Sankian M, Balali-Mood M, Haghir H. The effects of maternal diabetes on expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin receptors in male developing rat hippocampus. Brain Structure and Function. . 2013:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0377-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hami J, Kerachian M-A, Karimi R, Haghir H, Sadr-Nabavi A. Effects of streptozotocin-induced type 1 maternal diabetes on PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the hippocampus of rat neonates. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction. 2016;36(3):254–60. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2015.1086884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hami J, Karimi R, Haghir H, Gholamin M, Sadr-Nabavi A. Diabetes in Pregnancy Adversely Affects the Expression of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 [beta] in the Hippocampus of Rat Neonates. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2015;57(2):273. doi: 10.1007/s12031-015-0617-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Butte NF. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in pregnancy: normal compared with gestational diabetes mellitus. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2000;71(5):1256s–61s. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1256s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pagán A, Prieto-Sánchez MT, Blanco-Carnero JE, Gil-Sánchez A, Parrilla JJ, Demmelmair H, et al. Materno-fetal transfer of docosahexaenoic acid is impaired by gestational diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2013;305(7):E826–E33. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00291.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Larqué E, Krauss-Etschmann S, Campoy C, Hartl D, Linde J, Klingler M, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid supply in pregnancy affects placental expression of fatty acid transport proteins. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2006;84(4):853–61. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Innis SM. Dietary (n-3) fatty acids and brain development. The Journal of nutrition. 2007;137(4):855–9. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.4.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Uauy R, Dangour AD. Nutrition in brain development and aging: role of essential fatty acids. Nutrition reviews. 2006;64:s2. doi: 10.1301/nr.2006.may.s24-s33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McNamara RK, Carlson SE. Role of omega-3 fatty acids in brain development and function: potential implications for the pathogenesis and prevention of psychopathology. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 2006;75(4):329–49. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kawakita E, Hashimoto M, Shido O. Docosahexaenoic acid promotes neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Neuroscience. 2006;139(3):991–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tokuda H, Kontani M, Kawashima H, Kiso Y, Shibata H, Osumi N. Differential effect of arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on age-related decreases in hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuroscience research. 2014;88:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zein S, Rachidi S, Hininger-Favier I. Is oxidative stress induced by iron status associated with gestational diabetes mellitus? Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2014;28(1):65–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lappas M, Hiden U, Desoye G, Froehlich J, Mouzon SH-d, Jawerbaum A. The role of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2011;15(12):3061–100. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chen X, Scholl TO. Oxidative stress: changes in pregnancy and with gestational diabetes mellitus. Current diabetes reports. 2005;5(4):282–8. doi: 10.1007/s11892-005-0024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lavie L. Oxidative stress in obstructive sleep apnea and intermittent hypoxia–revisited–the bad ugly and good: implications to the heart and brain. Sleep medicine reviews. 2015;20:27–45. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Deverman BE, Patterson PH. Cytokines and CNS development. Neuron. 2009;64(1):61–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bo S, Signorile A, Menato G, Gambino R, Bardelli C, Gallo M, et al. C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in gestational hyperglycemia. Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2005;28(9):779–86. doi: 10.1007/BF03347566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Coughlan M, Oliva K, Georgiou H, Permezel J, Rice G. Glucose‐induced release of tumour necrosis factor‐alpha from human placental and adipose tissues in gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine. 2001;18(11):921–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kuzmicki M, Telejko B, Szamatowicz J, Zonenberg A, Nikolajuk A, Kretowski A, et al. High resistin and interleukin-6 levels are associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecological endocrinology. 2009;25(4):258–63. doi: 10.1080/09513590802653825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.MORISSET AS, DUBÉ MC, Cote JA, Robitaille J, WEISNAGEL S, Tchernof A. Circulating interleukin‐6 concentrations during and after gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011;90(5):524–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hami J, Sadr-Nabavi A, Sankian M, Haghir H. Sex differences and left–right asymmetries in expression of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors in developing rat hippocampus. Brain Structure and Function. 2012;217(2):293–302. doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0358-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hami J, Kheradmand H, Haghir H. Gender differences and lateralization in the distribution pattern of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in developing rat hippocampus: an immunohistochemical study. Cellular & Molecular Neurobiology. 2014;34:2. doi: 10.1007/s10571-013-0005-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Haghir H, Rezaee A-A-R, Nomani H, Sankian M, Kheradmand H, Hami J. Sexual dimorphism in expression of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I receptors in developing rat cerebellum. Cellular & Molecular Neurobiology. 2013;33:3. doi: 10.1007/s10571-012-9903-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Haghir H, Sankian M, Kheradmand H, Hami J. The effects of induced type-I diabetes on developmental regulation of insulin & insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors in the cerebellum of rat neonates. Metabolic brain disease. 2013;28(3):397. doi: 10.1007/s11011-013-9386-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Yong Y, Meng Y, Ding H, Fan Z, Tang Y, Zhou C, et al. PACT/RAX regulates the migration of cerebellar granule neurons in the developing cerebellum. Scientific reports. 2015:5. doi: 10.1038/srep07961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Clancy B, Finlay BL, Darlington RB, Anand K. Extrapolating brain development from experimental species to humans. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28(5):931–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Engelkamp D, Rashbass P, Seawright A, van Heyningen V. Role of Pax6 in development of the cerebellar system. Development. 1999;126(16):3585–96. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.16.3585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhu Y, Yu T, Rao Y. Temporal regulation of cerebellar EGL migration through a switch in cellular responsiveness to the meninges. Developmental biology. 2004;267(1):153–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Altman J. Development of the cerebellar system. Relation to its Evolution, Structure, and Functions. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hami J, Vafaei-nezhad S, Ghaemi K, Sadeghi A, Ivar G, Shojae F, et al. Stereological study of the effects of maternal diabetes on cerebellar cortex development in rat. Metabolic brain disease. 2016;31(3):643. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9802-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hami J, Vafaei-Nezhad S, Haghir D, Haghir H. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor Is differentially distributed in developing cerebellar cortex of rats born to diabetic mothers. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2016;58(2):221. doi: 10.1007/s12031-015-0661-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Razi EM, Ghafari S, Golalipour MJ. Effect of gestational diabetes on purkinje and granule cells distribution of the rat cerebellum in 21 and 28 days of postnatal life. Basic and clinical neuroscience. 2015;6(1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Razi EM, Ghafari S, Hojati V, Golalipour MJ. Effect of gestational diabetes on neuronal cells in rat cerebellum in early postnatal life. International Journal of Morphology. 2014;32(2):420–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wei S, Soh SLY, Xia J, Ong WY, Pang ZP, Han W. Motor neuropathy‐associated mutation impairs Seipin functions in neurotransmission. Journal of neurochemistry. 2014;129(2):328–38. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Adams DJ, Shen C, Levenga J, Basta T, Eisenberg SP, Mapes J, et al. Synaptophysin is a β-Amyloid Target that Regulates Synaptic Plasticity and Seizure Susceptibility in an Alzheimer9s Model. bioRxiv. 2017:129551. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hami J, Vafaei-Nezhad S, Ivar G, Sadeghi A, Ghaemi K, Mostafavizadeh M, et al. Altered expression and localization of synaptophysin in developing cerebellar cortex of neonatal rats due to maternal diabetes mellitus. Metabolic brain disease. 2016;31(6):1369–80. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9864-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Child Neurology are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES