Version Changes
Revised. Amendments from Version 2
All the comments by the reviewer were addressed and necessary changes have been done.
Abstract
Background
Dengue is an emerging global viral disease with an increase 30-fold in incidence in the past fifty years. In the past decade it was restricted to only few a states of South and Northern India but in the recent past it has affected almost all the states in India. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical profile, trends and outcome of dengue cases.
Methods
This retrospective record based cross-sectional study was conducted in tertiary hospital, Mangaluru in Southern India. The study population included all dengue positive cases diagnosed either by IgM Capture ELISA or Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen over a period of five years. Information from pre-recorded case sheets were used for data collection. The data was analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Results from the analysis have been expressed in percentages, means and graphs.
Results
The study included 401 dengue cases. Most cases were in the age range of 20-40 years with a male to female ratio of 3:2. Overall seropositivity rate was 23.94% with High IgM prevalence. Monthly distribution showed a maximum cases were in the months of June and July and minimum were in January and February. Among the study participants, 91.5% of patients recovered completely and 1.7% of patients had died. 6.8% of patients were discharged against medical advice.
Conclusions
Dengue continues to be major public health problem in this part of the globe affecting mainly the working age group. Low seropositivity with High IgM prevelance makes dengue an important differential for febrile illness of vague nature and invokes the need for robust public health response to curb the hyper-endemicity.
Keywords: Dengue, Record based Study, Tertiary care Hospital, South India
Introduction
Dengue is an emerging global viral disease with an increase in incidence of 30 times in the past fifty years. Nine countries were affected before the 1970s but now more than 100 counties have severely been affected with dengue epidemics with the Southeast Asian region and the Western Pacific region being the most severely affected. 390 million cases of dengue occur annually with 96 million showing clinical manifestation. 1
The first case of dengue was reported by Benjamin Rush in 1789. Up until the middle of 20 th century it was restricted to few geographical locations, but with the population movement during the Second World War there were recurrent epidemics with the re-emergence of the disease. 2
Even though the first epidemic of dengue was reported from Chennai in India, the virologically proven epidemic occurred in Kolkata in the 1950s. There were cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome in Delhi and Lucknow in the year 1996, thereafter with a cyclical pattern occurring every 2-3 years. 2
In the past 20-30 years it was mostly restricted to only a few states of South and Northern India but in the last decade it has affected almost all the states of India. 3
Dengue is viral vector borne disease spread by the day-biting endophilic Aedes mosquito. Its clinical features tend to be vague and nonspecific, ranging from fever to hemorrhage to shock with no specific treatment but supportive care. 4 , 5
Geographically, dengue is more prevalent in tropical countries like India. With that background understanding, we conducted our study in the coastal part of South India where developmental activities are on a rise with rapid urbanization where the study population is at a high risk of being affected with dengue. Our study was conducted to determine the socio-demographic and clinical profile along with the disease outcome of dengue patients. As information regarding the trend, burden and distribution of the disease is vital to plan disease control strategies and optimum utilization of the resources, our study aims to further contribute to the knowledge base regarding this disease.
Methods
Study design
Retrospective record-based Cross sectional study design
Study location
The study was conducted at Government Wenlock Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated to Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore.
Being a hospital which receives a confluence of patients from neighbouring districts of Karnataka and from northern parts of Kerala. However, this being a district hospital and suggest that the trend in this hospital could reflect what is happening in and around this location.
Study population
All dengue patients admitted to Government Wenlock Hospital within the time frame of five years from 2013 to 2017 were included in the present study. This includes patients from Dakshina Kannada district of Karnataka, northern Kerala districts such as Kasargod, Kannur and Wayanad with minimal number of patients from other districts of Karnataka as well.
Inclusion criteria: Clinically confirmed Dengue cases admitted at the above-mentioned time period. IgM Capture ELISA and Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen test which is a rapid test kit, were used for the diagnosis of Dengue in the study participants.
Exclusion criteria: All case sheets with inadequate or incomplete data were excluded from the study.
Ethics and consent
The IEC (Institutional Ethics Committee) of Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (Manipal Academy of Higher Education) has reviewed the study and has granted approval prior to the onset of the study. Owing to the nature of study design as retrospective record based study, informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee. Confidentiality of the present study data was maintained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Data collection
Case sheets of Dengue positive patients fitting the inclusion criteria were carefully analyzed. Relevant demographical, clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded onto the data collection sheet.
Analysis
Data collected was then analyzed with SPSS version 20. Results have been expressed in means, proportions and standard deviations.
Results
Demographic profile
Our study was able to reinforce the prevalence of certain demographic trends that has been observed among patients affected with Dengue. Out of the 401 patients studied, 245 (61%) were males with a male to female ratio of 3:2. Majority of the cases fell under the age bracket of 20-40 years (169 cases, 42.1%) ( Table 1). Certain demographic details such as occupation, marital status, place of residence were not available for all the patients and hence were not reported upon in our results.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of dengue patients (n=401).
Baseline characteristics | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Age group (years) | ||
< 20 | 116 | 28.9 |
20-40 | 169 | 42.1 |
40-60 | 097 | 24.1 |
>60 | 019 | 04.9 |
Gender | ||
Male | 245 | 61.0 |
Female | 156 | 39.0 |
Duration of stay (days) | ||
<5 | 247 | 61.6 |
6-10 | 113 | 28.2 |
>10 | 041 | 10.2 |
Clinical and laboratory findings
The most common and consistent clinical feature with which most of the patients presented with was fever (398, 99.3%) proceeded by chills and rigor (256, 63.8%) followed by myalgia (194, 48.4%) ( Table 2).
Table 2. Distribution pattern of the chief presenting complaints (n=401).
Clinical presentation | Number * | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Fever | 398 | 99.3 |
Chills and Rigor | 256 | 63.8 |
Myalgia | 194 | 48.4 |
Headache | 171 | 44.6 |
Vomiting | 152 | 37.9 |
Pain abdomen | 090 | 22.4 |
Arthralgia | 059 | 14.7 |
Diarrhoea | 031 | 07.7 |
Melena | 018 | 04.5 |
Breathlessness | 013 | 03.2 |
Rash | 012 | 02.9 |
Hematemesis | 012 | 02.9 |
Haematuria | 007 | 01.7 |
Multiple responses.
In line with expected trends, it was observed that most of our cases (n=368, 95.8%) had thrombocytopenia. 81.6% of patients had elevated SGOT and 48% had elevated SGPT enzyme levels indicating certain degree of hepatocyte injury during the acute phase of the infection.
However, a closer look at the seropositivity rate amongst the study population posed some interesting queries. Out of the 401 cases, only 96 cases showed elevated IgG or IgM (total seropositivity rate of 23.94%). Separately, seropositivity rate of IgM was 22.9% and of IgG was 2.7%. Sex wise distribution shows 25.7% seropositivity in males and 22.72% seropositivity among females. Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen test which is a rapid test kit, was used for the diagnosis in the remaining cases.
But amongst the seropositive patients 57.29% (55 cases) were female and 42.7% (41 cases) were male ( Table 3).
Table 3. Laboratory profile of dengue patients.
Lab parameter (n=384) | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Platelet Count (< 150000/micro litre) | 368 | 95.8 |
SGOT (>40 IU/L) | 298 | 81.6 |
SGPT( >56 IU/L) | 180 | 48.0 |
MCHC(<33 g/dl) | 204 | 91.4 |
Seropositivity (n=401) | ||
Overall seropositivity (IgM or IgG) | 96 | 23.94 |
IgM seropositivity | 92 | 22.90 |
IgG seropositivity | 11 | 02.70 |
Frequency distribution of seropositive cases with respect to age showed that most cases (36, 37.5%) were in the age group of 20-40yrs followed by <20yrs (32, 33.3%).
Clinical outcome
Our study revealed that regardless of the initial presentation and clinical progression, the majority tended to recover, with a recovery rate of 92%. (n=367). Case fatality rate was recorded to be 1.7% ( Table 4).
Table 4. Clinical outcome of dengue patients (n=401).
Outcome | Number of cases | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Recovery | 367 | 91.5 |
Death | 007 | 01.7 |
Discharge Against Medical Advice (DAMA) | 027 | 06.8 |
Seasonality
Dengue being a vector borne disease was expected to boom in accordance with the monsoon seasons and our study was able to confirm this. As depicted by Figure 1 [Month wise distribution of dengue cases (n=401)], most of the cases were found to have been admitted during the months of June and July with a declining trend both pre- and post-monsoons. The months of January to April were shown to have a consistently lower admitted case load. Figure 2 represents the year wise distribution of Dengue cases admitted in the hospital.
Figure 1. Month wise distribution of dengue cases (n=401).
Figure 2. Year wise distribution of dengue cases (n=401).
Discussion
Dengue is an upcoming and swiftly spreading vector borne disease that has taken strong hold in India. 4 Owing to the complicated interplay between the host, agent, vector, and environmental conditions, the number of cases in India has consistently increased substantially over the past ten years. 6 It is now even considered as a hyper endemic disease in certain parts of India. As Das et al. demonstrated in their study, the available data on dengue prevalence in India is just the tip of the iceberg and that further weighs down the preventive measures taken to reduce the brunt of the burden. 7 Having recognized the need for comprehensive stratified data on dengue prevalence and its trends to further the knowledge database in Indian population, we focused our study to assess the various clinical, sociodemographic and climactic factors.
Our study was able to demonstrate a significant male preponderance (male = 61%, females = 39%) in cases of dengue reporting to this hospital with a male to female sex ratio of 1.5:1. Similar observations have been made by a multitude of studies, yet a conclusive reasoning has not yet been attributed to this trend. 8 Doke and Pawar has attributed this finding to the nature of dressing among women which reduces the amount of skin exposure. 9 Other studies have explained this as a product of reporting bias among females as it has been seen that traditional practitioners are the first point of contact for the large majority of symptomatic female population. 10 A few studies even postulated that this disparity could be due to the skewed sex ratio leaning towards the side of males in the general population. 11
Apart from the male preponderance, our research found that the productive working class aged 20-40 years was the age group most affected. Owing to the declining rate of incidence with advancing age, it could be said that infants, adolescents and young adults are at higher risk of developing dengue. Similar trend has been observed in other studies wherein they found that dengue is a disease that primarily affects the children and the young adults. 3 , 12 – 15
Combined, the age and sex distribution findings could be attributed to the complex interplay between outdoor nature of work (among men), 9 dressing patterns (among women), skewed sex ratio and diurnal feeding habbits of Aedes aegypti. 4
Most of the cases were found to have occurred in the months of June and July, with the maximum being 120 cases. A study conducted by Kumar et al. in a coastal city of Karnataka revealed the maximum cases were found to have occurred in the month of September while a meta-analysis conducted by Ganeshkumar et al. found that most cases were seen in the monsoon and post monsoon seasons. 13 , 16 The peri-monsoon seasonality of dengue has also been promptly emphasized by a number of studies which implicates that there is a strong correlation that exists between temperature and humidity to the favourable breeding conditions for the mosquitoes. 3 , 13 , 14 During rainy season environmental changes such as artificial water stagnation, especially in low lying areas, labour settlements and small collection of water in tyres and flowerpots act as favourable breeding grounds for the vector which conclusively explains the precipitous climb of dengue cases during June to September. 14
The clinical picture of patients in our study revealed that fever was present in almost all cases (99.3%) followed by chills and rigor (63.8%). Haematological symptoms included hematemesis and haematuria which were present in 12% and 7% of cases respectively. A meta-analysis conducted on a global scale on dengue outbreaks came to an almost similar picture with fever (98.1), chills (65.3), myalgia (64.2), arthralgia (53.6), body pain (67.2), vomiting (39.8) etc. with similar haematological symptoms like haematuria and hematemesis which were seen in 5% and 13.4% of cases respectively. 17
Liver functions test showed abnormal rise in almost 99% of patients of SGPT and SGOT levels but SGOT levels were more prominent in most patients as compared to SGPT, similar research done in Punjab in 2007 had similar results with 98.9% of patients showing a rise in either of SGPT or SGOT levels indicating a strong heptic predeliction for dengue virus. 18 A dedicated study regarding dengue and hepatopathy also revealed similar results of elevated SGOT and SGPT with the former being more elevated than the latter. 19
Thrombocytopenia is the most common laboratory finding in dengue patients and is referred to as an early marker and prognostic factor for the management and recovery of dengue fever. 20 Of 384 dengue patients studied, 368 patients had thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000 per mm 3).
Our study revealed a seropositivity rate of 23.94% which is similar to another study conducted by Kalita et al. where they repoted a seropositivity of 14.85%. 21 Along with having a low seropositivity rate, it was seen that High IgM prevelance was noted in our study. As concluded by Eshetu et al., high IgM prevelance is indicative of active transmission of dengue which could account for the hyperendemic status of dengue in Southern India. 22
Our study included 401 serologically confirmed dengue cases out of which 367 cases (91.5%) were found to have recovered completely. Seven deaths were recorded (1.7%), and 27 cases (6.8%) were found to have been discharged against medical advice. A meta-analysis conducted in India, found that the pooled CFRs of the studies was 2.6% which was in line with findings of the present study. 16
Conclusion
Dengue remains to be a major public health problem in this part of the globe, affecting mainly the working age group. With vague nonspecific clinical features combined with low seropositivity rate, it is of paramount importance to keep dengue as a key differential when a patient presents with febrile illness of nonspecific nature. High IgM seropositivity also hints at the fact that a strong and robust vector control programme must be implemented to at least make a dent in the hyperendemic status of dengue especially during the monsoon seasons.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Data availability
Figshare: Data.xlsx (demographic and medical information of patients), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21257040.v1. 23
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
References
- 1. World Health Organization: Dengue Control.Dengue/severe Dengue. FAQ. 2017 [Updated on 2017 Jan 3; Cited 2018 April 26]. Reference Source
- 2. Gupta E, Dar L, Kapoor G, et al. : The changing epidemiology of dengue in Delhi, India. BioMed. Central Ltd. 2006;3:92. 10.1186/1743-422X-3-92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chakravarti A, Arora R, Luxemburger C: Fifty years of dengue in India. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2012 May;106(5):273–282. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. World Health Organization: Media Centre. Dengue and severe dengue. Fact sheet. 2017 [updated on 2017 Apr; cited 2018 Mar 9]. Reference Source
- 5. Wali JP, Biswas A, Handa R, et al. : Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever in Adults: A Prospective Study of 110 Cases. Trop. Dr. 1999 Jan;29(1):27–30. 10.1177/004947559902900110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mutheneni SR, Morse AP, Caminade C, et al. : Dengue burden in India: recent trends and importance of climatic parameters. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2017 Aug 9;6(8):e70. 10.1038/emi.2017.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Das S, Sarfraz A, Jaiswal N, et al. : Impediments of reporting dengue cases in India. J. Infect. Public Health. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):494–498. 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Agarwal R, Kapoor S, Nagar R, et al. : A clinical study of the patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever during the epidemic of 1996 at Lucknow, India. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 1999 Dec;30(4):735–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Doke P, Pawar S: Profile of Dengue fever outbreaks in Maharashtra. Indian J. Community Med. 2000;25(4):170–176. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Guha-Sapir D, Schimmer B: Dengue fever: new paradigms for a changing epidemiology. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 2005;2:1. 10.1186/1742-7622-2-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kumar A, Pandit VR, Shetty S, et al. : A profile of dengue cases admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka, southern India. Trop. Dr. 2010;40(1):45–46. 10.1258/td.2009.080376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shobha, Lokanath H, Lokanath H, et al. : A retrospective assessment of dengue fever outbreak in Bangalore urban district, Southern India. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health. 2014;3:845–849. 10.5455/ijmsph.2014.280420141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kumar A, Rao CR, Pandit V, et al. : Clinical manifestations and trend of Dengue cases admitted in a tertiary care hospital, Udupi district, Karnataka. Indian J. Community Med. 2010 Jul;35(3);389–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gunusekaran P, Kaveri K, Mohana S, et al. : Dengue disease status in Chennai (2006-2008): A Retrospective analysis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011;133:322–325. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rasul CH, Ahasan HA, Rasid AK, et al. : Epidemiological factors of dengue hemorrhagic Fever in bangladesh. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:369–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ganeshkumar P, Murhekar MV, Poornima V, et al. : Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12(7):e0006618. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Guo C, Zhou Z, Wen Z, et al. : Global epidemiology of Dengue outbreaks in 1990-2015: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:317. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Soni A, Patel PM, Malhi NS, et al. : Spectrum of liver dysfunction in patients with dengue infection and the markers of severe disease: study from a tertiary care centre in Punjab. J. Liver Res. Disord Ther. 2017;3(4):95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kumar S, Lakhiwal R, Aswal V, et al. : A study of dengue and hepatopathy. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017;5:2625–2628. 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172459 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Singh K, Lale A, Eong OE, et al. : A prospective clinical study on the use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the early diagnosis of Dengue fever. J. Mol. Diagn. 2006;8:613–616. 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kalita JM, Aggarwal A, Yedale K, et al. : A 5-year study of dengue seropositivity among suspected cases attending a teaching hospital of North-Western region of India. J. Med. Virol. 2021 Jun;93(6):3338–3343. 10.1002/jmv.26592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Eshetu D, Shimelis T, Nigussie E, et al. : Seropositivity to dengue and associated risk factors among non-malarias acute febrile patients in Arba Minch districts, southern Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):639. 10.1186/s12879-020-05370-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Holla R: Data.xlsx. figshare.[Dataset.]2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.21257040.v1 [DOI]