Skip to main content
PMC home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2024 Jan;28(6):1–94. doi: 10.3310/JKTY6144

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an adapted intervention for preschoolers with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities displaying behaviours that challenge: the EPICC-ID RCT.

Tamara Ondruskova, Rachel Royston, Michael Absoud, Gareth Ambler, Chen Qu, Jacqueline Barnes, Rachael Hunter, Monica Panca, Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Kate Oulton, Eleni Paliokosta, Aditya Narain Sharma, Vicky Slonims, Una Summerson, Alastair Sutcliffe, Megan Thomas, Brindha Dhandapani, Helen Leonard, Angela Hassiotis
PMCID: PMC11017145  PMID: 38329108

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stepping Stones Triple P is an adapted intervention for parents of young children with developmental disabilities who display behaviours that challenge, aiming at teaching positive parenting techniques and promoting a positive parent-child relationship.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P in reducing behaviours that challenge in children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

A parallel two-arm pragmatic multisite single-blind randomised controlled trial recruited a total of 261 dyads (parent and child). The children were aged 30-59 months and had moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Participants were randomised, using a 3 : 2 allocation ratio, into the intervention arm (Stepping Stones Triple P; n = 155) or treatment as usual arm (n = 106). Participants were recruited from four study sites in Blackpool, North and South London and Newcastle.

INTERVENTION

Level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P consists of six group sessions and three individual phone or face-to-face contacts over 9 weeks. These were changed to remote sessions after 16 March 2020 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measure was the parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist, which assesses the severity of behaviours that challenge.

RESULTS

We found a small non-significant difference in the mean Child Behaviour Checklist scores (-4.23, 95% CI -9.98 to 1.52, p = 0.146) in the intervention arm compared to treatment as usual at 12 months. Per protocol and complier average causal effect sensitivity analyses, which took into consideration the number of sessions attended, showed the Child Behaviour Checklist mean score difference at 12 months was lower in the intervention arm by -10.77 (95% CI -19.12 to -2.42, p = 0.014) and -11.53 (95% CI -26.97 to 3.91, p = 0.143), respectively. The Child Behaviour Checklist mean score difference between participants who were recruited before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was estimated as -7.12 (95% CI -13.44 to -0.81) and 7.61 (95% CI -5.43 to 20.64), respectively (p = 0.046), suggesting that any effect pre-pandemic may have reversed during the pandemic. There were no differences in all secondary measures. Stepping Stones Triple P is probably value for money to deliver (-£1057.88; 95% CI -£3218.6 to -£46.67), but decisions to roll this out as an alternative to existing parenting interventions or treatment as usual may be dependent on policymaker willingness to invest in early interventions to reduce behaviours that challenge. Parents reported the intervention boosted their confidence and skills, and the group format enabled them to learn from others and benefit from peer support. There were 20 serious adverse events reported during the study, but none were associated with the intervention.

LIMITATIONS

There were low attendance rates in the Stepping Stones Triple P arm, as well as the coronavirus disease 2019-related challenges with recruitment and delivery of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P did not reduce early onset behaviours that challenge in very young children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. However, there was an effect on child behaviours for those who received a sufficient dose of the intervention. There is a high probability of Stepping Stones Triple P being at least cost neutral and therefore worth considering as an early therapeutic option given the long-term consequences of behaviours that challenge on people and their social networks.

FUTURE WORK

Further research should investigate the implementation of parenting groups for behaviours that challenge in this population, as well as the optimal mode of delivery to maximise engagement and subsequent outcomes.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as NCT03086876 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03086876?term=Hassiotis±Angela&draw=1&rank=1).

FUNDING

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: HTA 15/162/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 6. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Plain language summary

Research shows that in children without learning disabilities, parenting groups which support parents to develop skills to manage behaviours that challenge in their child can be helpful. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recommended that more research was needed to strengthen the evidence for such interventions for children with moderate to severe learning disability who are more likely to display behaviours that challenge in England. In this study, we tested in real-world conditions a programme called level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P, which has shown positive results in trials outside of the United Kingdom. Trained therapists delivered six groups and three individual sessions over 9 weeks to parents of children aged 30–59 months with moderate to severe learning disabilities. Two hundred and sixty-one parents were allocated to one of two arms by chance (randomisation): one received Stepping Stones Triple P and treatment as usual and the other treatment as usual only. Treatment as usual included support and advice by general practitioners or community child development teams. Our primary outcome was parent-reported child behaviour at 12 months after randomisation. We also collected data on other outcomes and carried out interviews with parents, service managers and therapists to find out their views about Stepping Stones Triple P. We did not find that Stepping Stones Triple P reduces behaviours that challenge in the child more than treatment as usual at 12 months. However, when we looked at people who received more than half of the sessions, there was a larger reduction in behaviours which suggests that Stepping Stones Triple P works for families if they attend the full programme. Stepping Stones Triple P seems to be good value for money, as we found that at 12 months (covering 10 months of costs), the Stepping Stones Triple P cost £1058 less than treatment as usual from a health and social care perspective. As such, Stepping Stones Triple P is fairly cheap to deliver and a suitable early intervention for behaviours that challenge especially because of positive feedback from parents. Throughout the trial, we included a Parent Advisory Group that oversaw study materials, interview topic guides and promotion of the study.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Vol. 5. Washington, DC; 2013.
  2. Learning Disabilities and Behaviour That Challenges: Service Design and Delivery. NICE guideline. 2018. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng93 (accessed 14 June 2022).
  3. de Ruiter KP, Dekker MC, Verhulst FC, Koot HM. Developmental course of psychopathology in youths with and without intellectual disabilities. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 2007;48:498–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01712.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. McClintock K, Hall S, Oliver C. Risk Markers Associated with Challenging Behaviours in People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Meta-analytic Study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003 Sep; 47:405–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Emerson E, Blacher J, Einfeld S, Hatton C, Robertson J, Stancliffe RJ. Environmental risk factors associated with the persistence of conduct difficulties in children with intellectual disabilities and autistic spectrum disorders. Res Dev Disabil 2014;35:3508–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Parmenter TR, Einfeld SL, Tonge BJ, Dempster JA. Behavioural and emotional problems in the classroom of children and adolescents with intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil 1998;23:71–7.
  7. Molteno G, Molteno CD, Finchilescu G, Dawes ARL. Behavioural and emotional problems in children with intellectual disability attending special schools in Cape Town, South Africa. J Intellect Disabil Res 2001;45:515–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00368.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Emerson E, Kiernan C, Alborz A, Reeves D, Mason H, Swarbrick R, et al. The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study. Res Dev Disabil 2001;22:77–93. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00061-5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Cooper SA, Smiley E, Jackson A, Finlayson J, Allan L, Mantry D, Morrison J. Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence and remission of aggressive behaviour and related factors. J Intellect Disabil Res 2009;53:217–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01127.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Lundqvist LO. Prevalence and risk markers of behavior problems among adults with intellectual disabilities: a total population study in Örebro County, Sweden. Res Dev Disabil 2013;34:1346–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Davies L, Oliver C. The age related prevalence of aggression and self-injury in persons with an intellectual disability: a review. Res Dev Disabil 2013;34:764–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Challenging Behaviour: A Unified Approach. College Report CR144, 2007.
  13. Rydzewska E, Hughes-McCormack LA, Gillberg C, Henderson A, Macintyre C, Rintoul J, Cooper S-A. Prevalence of long-term health conditions in adults with autism: observational study of a whole country population. BMJ Open 2018;8:e023945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Farmer C, Butter E, Mazurek MO, Cowan C, Lainhart J, Cook EH, et al. Aggression in children with autism spectrum disorders and a clinic-referred comparison group. Autism 2015;19:281–91. doi: 10.1177/1362361313518995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Kiernan C, Kiernan D. Challenging Behaviour in Schools for Pupils with Severe Learning Difficulties. Ment Handicap Res 1994 Sep; 7:177–201.
  16. Hastings R, Allen D, Baker P, Gore N, Hughes C, McGill P, et al. A conceptual framework for understanding why challenging behaviours occur in people with developmental disabilities. Int J Posit Behav Support 2013;3:5–13.
  17. Totsika V, Hastings RP, Emerson E, Hatton C. Early years parenting mediates early adversity effects on problem behaviors in intellectual disability. Child Dev 2020;91:e649–64. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13273. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Woodman AC, Mawdsley HP, Hauser-Cram P. Parenting stress and child behavior problems within families of children with developmental disabilities: transactional relations across 15 years. Res Dev Disabil 2015;36:264–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Griffith GM, Hastings RP. ‘He’s hard work, but he’s worth it’. The experience of caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2014;27:401–19. doi: 10.1111/jar.12073. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Gallagher S, Phillips AC, Oliver C, Carroll D. Predictors of psychological morbidity in parents of children with intellectual disabilities. J Pediatr Psychol 2008;33:1129–36. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn040. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Most DE, Fidler DJ, LaForce-Booth C, Kelly J. Stress trajectories in mothers of young children with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res 2006;50:501–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00796.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Ramchandani PG, O’Farrelly C, Babalis D, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Byford S, Grimas ESR, et al. Preventing enduring behavioural problems in young children through early psychological intervention (Healthy Start, Happy Start): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2293-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Roberts C, Mazzucchelli T, Studman L, Sanders MR. Behavioral family intervention for children with developmental disabilities and behavioral problems. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2006;35:180–93. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Sanders MR. Development, evaluation, and multinational dissemination of the Triple P – Positive Parenting Program. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012;8:345–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143104. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Ruane A, Carr A, Moffat V, Finn T, Murphy A, O’Brien O, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the Group Stepping Stones Triple P training programme for parents of children with developmental disabilities. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2019;24:728–53. doi: 10.1177/1359104519827622. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Whittingham K, Sofronoff K, Sheffield J, Sanders MR. Stepping Stones Triple P: an RCT of a parenting program with parents of a child diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009;37:469–80. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9285-x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Furlong M, McGilloway S. The incredible years parenting program in Ireland: a qualitative analysis of the experience of disadvantaged parents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2012;17:616–30. doi: 10.1177/1359104511426406. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. McIntyre LL. Adapting Webster-Stratton’s incredible years parent training for children with developmental delay: findings from a treatment group only study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2008;52:1176–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01108.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Smith E, Koerting J, Latter S, Knowles MM, McCann DC, Thompson M, et al. Overcoming barriers to effective early parenting interventions for attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): parent and practitioner views. Child Care Health Dev 2015;41:93–102. doi: 10.1111/cch.12146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  30. Koerting J, Smith E, Knowles MM, Latter S, Elsey H, McCann DC, et al. Barriers to, and facilitators of, parenting programmes for childhood behaviour problems: a qualitative synthesis of studies of parents’ and professionals’ perceptions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013;22:653–70. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0401-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Sapiets SJ, Totsika V, Hastings RP. Factors influencing access to early intervention for families of children with developmental disabilities: a narrative review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2021;34:695–711. doi: 10.1111/jar.12852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Carr T, Lord C. A pilot study promoting participation of families with limited resources in early autism intervention. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2016;25:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  33. Hudson A, Cameron C, Matthews J. The wide-scale implementation of a support program for parents of children with an intellectual disability and difficult behaviour. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2008;33:117–26. doi: 10.1080/13668250802065885. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Patterson GR. The early development of coercive family process. In Reid JB, Patterson GR, Snyder J, editors. Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents: A Developmental Analysis and Model for Intervention. Washington, DC; 2002. pp. 25–44.
  35. Whittingham K, Sofronoff K, Sheffield JK. Stepping Stones Triple P: a pilot study to evaluate acceptability of the program by parents of a child diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. Res Dev Disabil 2006;27:364–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Roux G, Sofronoff K, Sanders M. A randomized controlled trial of group Stepping Stones Triple P: a mixed-disability trial. Fam Process 2013;52:411–24. doi: 10.1111/famp.12016. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Tellegen CL, Sanders MR. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a brief parenting program with children with autism spectrum disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 2014;82:1193–200. doi: 10.1037/a0037246. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Kasperzack D, Schrott B, Mingebach T, Becker K, Burghardt R, Kamp-Becker I. Effectiveness of the Stepping Stones Triple P group parenting program in reducing comorbid behavioral problems in children with autism. Autism 2020;24:423–36. doi: 10.1177/1362361319866063. [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Challenging Behaviour and Learning Disabilities: Prevention and Interventions for People with Learning Disabilities Whose Behaviour Challenges. NICE Guideline [NG11]. London: NICE; 2015. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11 (accessed 14 June 2022). [PubMed]
  40. Farris O, Royston R, Absoud M, Ambler G, Barnes J, Hunter R, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of a parent mediated intervention to reduce challenging behaviour in pre-schoolers with moderate to severe intellectual disability (EPICC-ID) study protocol: a multi-centre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2020;20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2451-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  41. Achenbach T, Rescorla LA. Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment. Retrieved from Mental Measurements Yearbook via EBSCOhost. 2007.
  42. Dekker MC, Nunn R, Koot HM. Psychometric properties of the revised developmental behaviour checklist scales in Dutch children with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 2002;46:61–75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  43. Wallander JL, Dekker MC, Koot HM. Risk factors for psychopathology in children with intellectual disability: a prospective longitudinal population-based study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2006;50:259–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Sanders MR, Waugh L, Tully L, Hynes K. The Revised Family Observation Schedule. 3rd edn. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Parenting and Family Support Centre; 1996.
  45. Sanders MR, Christensen AP. A comparison of the effects of child management and planned activities training in five parenting environments. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1985;13:101–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00918375. [DOI] [PubMed]
  46. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms and Profiles. Vol. 30. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2000.
  47. Plant KM, Sanders MR. Reducing problem behavior during care-giving in families of preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2007;28:362–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  48. Hankins M. The reliability of the twelve-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health 2008;8:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  49. Shevlin M, Adamson G. Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: a large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Assess 2005;17:231–6. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed]
  50. Rousey A, Best S, Blacher J. Mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of stress and coping with children who have severe disabilities. Am J Ment Retard 1992;97:99–110. [PubMed]
  51. Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. J Clin Child Psychol 1989;18:167–75.
  52. Ohan JL, Leung DW, Johnston C. The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale: Evidence of a Stable Factor Structure and Validity. Can J Behav Sci 2000 Oct; 32:251.
  53. Byford S, Barrett B, Roberts C, Wilkinson P, Dubicka B, Kelvin RG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and routine specialist care with and without cognitive-behavioural therapy in adolescents with major depression. Br J Psychiatry 2007;191:521–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.038984. [DOI] [PubMed]
  54. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQLTM: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 1999;37:126–39. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  55. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQLTM 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life InventoryTM Version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001;39:800–12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed]
  56. EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide. 2019.
  57. Mullen E. Mullen Scales of Early Learning. MInnesota MN: AGS, Circle Pines; 1995. pp. 58–64.
  58. Sanders MR. Triple P-positive parenting program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 1999;2:71–90. doi: 10.1023/a:1021843613840. [DOI] [PubMed]
  59. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Br Med J 2006;332:413–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  60. Roberts C, Roberts SA. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials with Clustering Effects due to Treatment. URL: www.SCTjournal.com (accessed 14 June 2022). doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn076oa. [DOI] [PubMed]
  61. Roberts C, Batistatou E, Roberts SA. Design and analysis of trials with a partially nested design and a binary outcome measure. Stat Med 2016;35:1616–36. doi: 10.1002/sim.6828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  62. Khan KA, Petrou S, Rivero-Arias O, Walters SJ, Boyle SE. Mapping EQ-5D utility scores from the PedsQLTM generic core scales. PharmacoEcon 2014;32:693–706. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0153-y. [DOI] [PubMed]
  63. Hernández Alava M, Pudney S, Wailoo A. Final report: estimating the relationship between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L: results from an English Population Study. PharmacoEcon 2023;41:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01218-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  64. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ 2005;14:487–96. doi: 10.1002/hec.944. [DOI] [PubMed]
  65. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2017.
  66. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The Manual Process and Methods. Health Technology Evaluations. NICE; 2022. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg36 (accessed 14 June 2022).
  67. Fenwick E, Byford S. A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:106–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.2.106. [DOI] [PubMed]
  68. Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 2016;16:S68–80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X98018002S09. [DOI] [PubMed]
  69. Wimo A, Gustavsson A, Jonsson L, Winblad B, Hsu MA, Gannon B. Application of resource utilization in dementia (RUD) instrument in a global setting. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9:429–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  70. Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and care excellence cost-effectiveness threshold. Health Technol Assess 2015;19(14):1–504. doi: 10.3310/hta19140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  71. INVOLVE. Briefing Notes for Researchers: Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2012.
  72. Hassiotis A, Poppe M, Strydom A, Vickerstaff V, Hall I, Crabtree J, et al. Positive behaviour support training for staff for treating challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities: a cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2018;22(15):1–110. doi: 10.3310/hta22150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  73. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:979–83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  74. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  75. Savaya R, Waysman M. The logic model: a tool for incorporating theory in development and evaluation of programs. Admin Soc Work 2005;29:85–103.
  76. Green J, Charman T, McConachie H, Aldred C, Slonims V, Howlin P, et al.; PACT Consortium. Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:2152–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60587-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  77. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101.
  78. Ruane A, Carr A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Stepping Stones Triple P for parents of children with disabilities. Fam Process 2019;58:232–46. doi: 10.1111/famp.12352. [DOI] [PubMed]
  79. Brian J, Tint A, Chiba Branson J, Pilkington M, Program D, Bloorview H. Effectiveness of Group Stepping Stones positive parenting program for children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behaviour: program evaluation from a large community implementation. JoDD J De Disabil 2021;26:1–9.
  80. Schrott B, Kasperzack D, Weber L, Becker K, Burghardt R, Kamp-Becker I. Effectiveness of the Stepping Stones Triple P group parenting program as an additional intervention in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: effects on parenting variables. J Autism Dev Disord 2019;49:913–23. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3764-x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  81. Sofronoff K, Jahnel D, Sanders M. Stepping Stones Triple P seminars for parents of a child with a disability: a randomized controlled trial. Res Dev Disabil 2011;32:2253–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed]
  82. NHS Digital. Waiting Times for Children and Young People’s Mental Health Services 2018–2019. 2019.
  83. Watson SL, Hayes SA, Radford-Paz E. ‘Diagnose me Please!’: a review of research about the journey and initial impact of parents seeking a diagnosis of developmental disability for their child. In International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2011. pp. 31–71.
  84. Morpeth L, Blower S, Tobin K, Taylor RS, Bywater T, Edwards RT, et al. The effectiveness of the Incredible Years pre-school parenting programme in the United Kingdom: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Child Care Pract 2017;23:141–61.
  85. Rogers G, Perez-Olivas G, Stenfert Kroese B, Patel V, Murphy G, Rose J, et al. The experiences of mothers of children and young people with intellectual disabilities during the first COVID-19 lockdown period. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2021;34:1421–30. doi: 10.1111/jar.12884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  86. Rose J, Willner P, Cooper V, Langdon PE, Murphy GH, Stenfert Kroese B. The effect on and experience of families with a member who has intellectual and developmental disabilities of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: developing an investigation. Int J Dev Disabil 2020;1:3. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1764257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  87. Paulauskaite L, Farris O, Spencer HM, Absoud M, Ambler G, Barnes J, et al. My son can’t socially distance or wear a mask: how families of preschool children with severe developmental delays and challenging behavior experienced the COVID-19 pandemic. J Mental Health Res Intellect Disabil 2021;14:225–36.
  88. Lee V, Albaum C, Tablon Modica P, Ahmad F, Gorter JW, Khanlou N, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health and wellbeing of caregivers of autistic children and youth: a scoping review. Autism Res 2021;14:2477–94. doi: 10.1002/aur.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  89. Hinton S, Sheffield J, Sanders MR, Sofronoff K. A randomized controlled trial of a telehealth parenting intervention: a mixed-disability trial. Res Dev Disabil 2017;65:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  90. Reese RJ, Slone NC, Soares N, Sprang R. Telehealth for underserved families: an evidence-based parenting program. Psychol Serv 2012;9:320–2. doi: 10.1037/a0026193. [DOI] [PubMed]
  91. Reese RJ, Slone NC, Soares N, Sprang R. Using telepsychology to provide a group parenting program: a preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Psychol Serv 2015;12:274–82. doi: 10.1037/ser0000018. [DOI] [PubMed]
  92. Gore N, Hastings R, Brady S. Early intervention for children with learning disabilities: making use of what we know. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev 2014;19:181–9.
  93. Roberts C, Mazzucchelli T, Taylor K, Reid R. Early intervention for behaviour problems in young children with developmental disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2003;50:275–92.
  94. Cooper V, Emerson E, Glover G, Gore N, Hassiotis A, Hastings R, et al. Early intervention for children with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges. Briefing paper. Challenging Behaviour Foundation; 2014.
  95. Aref-Adib G, Hassiotis A. Frontline 2020: the new age for telemental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2021;8:3–4. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30490-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  96. Sanders MR, Mazzucchelli TG. Mechanisms of change in population-based parenting interventions for children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2022;51:277–94. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2025598. [DOI] [PubMed]
  97. Meyer RD, Ratitch B, Wolbers M, Marchenko O, Quan H, Li D, et al. Statistical issues and recommendations for clinical trials conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stat Biopharm Res 2020;12:399–411. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1779122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  98. Office for National Statistics. Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales. 2011. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11 (accessed 14 June 2022).
  99. Absoud M, Wake H, Ziriat M, Hassiotis A. Managing challenging behaviour in children with possible learning disability. BMJ 2019;365:l1663. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1663 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1663. [DOI] [PubMed]
  100. Einfeld SL, Ellis LA, Doran CM, Emerson E, Horstead SK, Madden RH, Tonge BJ. Behavior problems increase costs of care of children with intellectual disabilities. J Mental Health Res Intellect Disabil 2010;3:202–9.
  101. Kennedy EMM, French L, Roberts C. Personalised interventions for subgroups of children with conduct problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012746 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012746.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

RESOURCES