Adequate submucosal exposure and visibility are vital for effective and safe endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) 1 . For lesions located on the gravitational side, the mucosal flap tends to collapse as the dissection proceeds which hinders subsequent operation 2 . Position change for gravity assistance is usually preferred in this circumstance, but not always applicable 3 . In this case, we present use of the water pressure method (WPM) to facilitate ESD of a rectal tumor on the gravitational side close to the dentate line ( Video 1 ).
Case report
A 62-year-old man was referred with synchronous early esophageal cancer ( Fig. 1 a , Fig. 1 b ) and a rectal tumor ( Fig. 2 a , Fig. 2 b ). A strategy of ESD for two lesions at one session was selected. Under general anesthesia with intratracheal intubation, esophageal ESD was completed ( Fig. 1 c , Fig. 1 d ), followed by rectal ESD. A shallow incision in the mucosa was begun on the anal side. Because the tumor was close to the dentate line, a narrow anal lumen limited endoscopic maneuverability. Furthermore, the mucosal flap collapsed due to gravity ( Fig. 2 c ), making dissection difficult within the narrow submucosal space. Given the inconvenience of position change, WPM was adopted. The floating force exerted a natural countertraction against gravity, while active water pressure was appropriately applied as a complement ( Fig. 2 d , Fig. 2 e , Fig. 2 f ). En bloc resection was achieved without major bleeding or perforation ( Fig. 2 g , Fig. 2 h , Fig. 2 i ). Postoperative antibiotics were administered and no adverse events occurred other than transitory fever. Histopathology identified the rectal tumor as a tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and R0 resection ( Fig. 3 ).
Conclusions
Although various traction techniques have been proposed 4 5 , WPM requires no special devices and is easy to use; therefore, it may be an alternative option to facilitate difficult ESD, especially for lesions on the gravitational side in patients for whom position change is difficult ( Fig. 4 ). Furthermore, WPM could be combined with adjunctive traction devices as needed.
Funding Statement
Science and Technology Development Special Project of Jiangsu Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy. 2023;55:361–389. doi: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharma S, Hiratsuka T, Hara H et al. Antigravity ESD – double-balloon-assisted underwater with traction hybrid technique. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E739–E744. doi: 10.1055/a-0578-8081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee BI. Debates on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection – traction for effective dissection: Gravity is enough. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:467–471. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bordillon P, Pioche M, Wallenhorst T et al. Double-clip traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study of 599 consecutive cases (with video) Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;94:333–343. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagata M. Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction? World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1–22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]