Abstract
Background
Racial disparities in oncological outcomes resulting from differences in social determinants of health (SDOH) and tumour biology are well described in prostate cancer (PCa) but similar inequities exist in bladder (BCa) and renal cancers (RCCs). Precision medicine (PM) aims to provide personalized treatment based on individual patient characteristics and has the potential to reduce these inequities in GU cancers.
Objective
This article aims to review the current evidence outlining racial disparities in GU cancers and explore studies demonstrating improved oncological outcomes when PM is applied to racially diverse patient populations.
Evidence acquisition
Evidence was obtained from Pubmed and Web of Science using keywords prostate, bladder and renal cancer, racial disparity and precision medicine. Because limited studies were found, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were not applied but rather related articles were studied to explore existing debates, identify the current status and speculate on future applications.
Results
Evidence suggests addressing SDOH for PCa can reverse racial inequities in oncological outcomes but differences in incidence remain. Similar disparities in BCa and RCC are seen, and it would be reasonable to suggest achieving parity in SDOH for all races would do the same. Research applying a PM approach to different ethnicities is lacking although in African Americans (AAs) with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCa) better outcomes have been shown with androgen receptor inhibitors, radium‐223 and sipuleucel. Exploiting the abscopal effect with targeted radiation therapy (RT) and immunotherapy has promise but requires further study, as does defining actionable mutations in specific patient groups to tailor treatments as appropriate.
Conclusion
For all GU cancers, the historical underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in clinical trials still exists and there is an urgent need for recruitment strategies to address this. PM is a promising development with the potential to reduce inequities in GU cancers, however, both improved understanding of race‐specific tumour biology, and enhanced recruitment of minority populations into clinical trials are required. Without this, the benefits of PM will be limited.
Keywords: genito‐urinary cancers, precision medicine, racial disparity, social determinants of health, trial recruitment, tumour biology
1. INTRODUCTION
According to CDC statistics, in the United States, over 300 000 urological cancers have been diagnosed each year since 2013, and 1 in 3 cancers in all men are urological in origin. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most common in all racial groups as well as having the highest overall incidence in non‐Hispanic Black men, whereas bladder (BCa) and renal cancers (RCC) are the second and third most common cancers, respectively, in Asian, Pacific Islander and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) men. 1 With these figures in mind, there are concerning and significant ethnic and racial disparities in quality of care and treatment outcomes for all GU cancers. Several factors contribute to these inequities, including unequal access to care, poor clinical trial recruitment, socioeconomic and cultural factors in the generation of treatment plans and ethnic differences in tumour biology. In recent years, precision medicine (PM) has emerged as a promising approach to cancer care, aiming to provide individualized treatment to patients based on the genetic and molecular characteristics of their tumours. This paper will explore the potential role of PM in addressing racial disparities in GU cancers and discuss its implications for improving patient outcomes.
2. RACIAL DISPARITIES IN GENITOURINARY CANCERS
(See Figure 1 illustrating factors influencing oncological outcomes in ethnic minorities, and the potential benefit of a PM approach).
FIGURE 1.

Illustrating factors influencing oncological outcomes in ethnic minorities, and the potential benefit of a precision medicine approach (African American [AA], Hispanic American [HA], Native American [NA], social determinants of health [SDOH]).
2.1. Prostate cancer
2.1.1. Epidemiology
Nearly 1 in 5 men in America will be diagnosed with PCa in their lifetime. Black men are 60% more likely than White men to be diagnosed with PCa and are 200% more likely than White men to die of the disease. In the United States, the lifetime risk for African American (AA) men of dying from PCa is twice that of NHW men. Hispanic men have increased odds of high‐risk localized PCa than White men but are less likely to receive treatment. By contrast, Hispanic Black men are less likely to have high‐risk localized disease than non‐Hispanic Black men but are more likely to receive treatment. 2 These racial disparities are believed to result from differences in social determinants of health (SDOH) (for example, lifestyle and diet, social and cultural networks, healthcare access issues and comorbidities) and tumour biology.
2.1.2. Lifestyle factors
Diet, obesity and lifestyle are increasingly regarded as important factors in PCa incidence and treatment outcomes, although there is a paucity of research relating these factors to race. Epidemiological study shows men migrating to the West, with long‐term exposure to a Western diet (including fat, red meat, alcohol and dairy products), may increase the risk of PCa. However, studies focused on specific food items in western AA populations such as processed meats, poultry, fatty acids or plant‐based foods have been inconclusive. 3 Obesity has been linked to PCa risk and disease progression 4 and although AA men have a higher prevalence of obesity than Caucasian (CA) men, the difference is small. 5 Nevertheless, a retrospective analysis of obesity as a predictor of adverse outcomes found it was linked to aggressive PCa in both AA and CA populations. 6
2.1.3. Healthcare access
Relatively recently, two landmark epidemiological studies found once socioeconomic issues were equalized, differences in treatment outcomes were eradicated. One examined 306 100 patients with localized or locally advanced PCa from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER), Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System, and four pooled National Cancer Institute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase 3 randomized controlled trial databases, over 55 482 (18.1%) of whom were AA men, and the other a cohort of 60 035 PCa patients from the VA Health System, 30.3% of whom were AA. Once treatment was standardized and healthcare access issues resolved, stage for stage PCa mortality in AA men was not significantly different from NHW men in both studies. 7 , 8 Another SEER study found that AA men with localized PCa were significantly less likely to receive definitive therapy compared with NHW men, regardless of tumour grade or risk group. Hispanic men with intermediate or high‐risk diseases were also less likely to receive definitive treatment. 9 A subsequent metanalysis evaluating the impact of SDOH on PCa outcomes in Black and White patients studied over 1 million patients from 47 studies and confirmed a significant link between race, SDOH and PCa outcomes, and reiterated the importance of addressing SDOH to achieve equitable treatment outcomes. 10
2.1.4. Clinical trial recruitment
Patients from minority backgrounds are underrepresented in PCa clinical trials. 11 , 12 An analysis of enrollment in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018 reported just 3.1% of enrolled patients were Black; worse, the proportion of enrolled Black patients had declined from 3.6% to 2.9% over the decade. Hispanic enrollment is also underrepresented, making up just 6.1% of the enrolled patient population over the examined decade. Several issues must be overcome to improve trial recruitment for minority populations including eligibility criteria ruling out minorities with certain comorbidities, institutional locations that may favour more affluent populations, insurance problems and travel costs. There is a paucity of research into developing recruitment strategies to overcome these problems although one recurring theme is the importance of trust between minority communities and research institutions, as well as identifying leading community advocates to facilitate communication and understanding. 3
2.1.5. Tumour biology
Although PCa genetic risk may be offset with a healthy lifestyle across all ethnic groups, 13 there is also evidence Black, Hispanic American (HA) and White populations may have fundamental differences in PCa tumour biology that influence a ‘precision’ treatment approach. In one of the largest comparative studies on this topic, data from a cohort of 1152 men (596 AA and 556 NHW) undergoing surgery for localized PCa at a single centre by a single surgeon were examined retrospectively. 14 On post‐surgical pathology specimens, AA men had significantly higher genomic scores for low‐risk Gleason grade groups (GGGs) (GGG 1 and 2), whereas NHW men had significantly higher genomic scores for high‐risk GGGs (GGG 4 and 5). Additionally, NHW men were found to have increased ETS‐related gene (ERG) and E26 transformation‐specific (ETS) expression, reduced serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) expression and a predominance of basal‐type molecular genes. Conversely, AA men had increased expression of glutathione S‐transferase mu 3 (GSTM3), beta‐crystallin B2 (CRYBB2) and inflammatory genes (chemokine ligands 4 [CCL4], interleukin 33 [IL33], cluster of differentiation 3 [CD3], interferon gamma [IFNG], inducible T‐cell costimulator ligand [ICOSLG]) but lower mismatch repair gene expression (mutS homolog 6 [MSH6], mutS homolog 2 [MSH2]).
Examining molecular pathway activity for pathways implicated in PCa development and progression, NHW men have increased activity in DNA repair, fatty acid and glycolytic metabolism and WNT/beta‐catenin gene signalling, whereas AA men have higher activity in immune response, hypoxia, reactive oxygen and apoptosis‐related genes. Based on their increased expression of inflammatory genes, their findings advocate the use of immunotherapy in AA men, which supports the findings of a subanalysis of the Provenge Registry for the Observation, Collection, and Evaluation of Experience Data (PROCEED) trial demonstrating a survival advantage in AA men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCa) treated with sipuleucel‐T. 14 Other studies examining tumour mutations by race have shown Black men have higher mutation frequency in actionable genes (e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], v‐erb‐b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 [ERBB2], breast cancer gene 1/2 [BRCA1/2] and phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase [PIK3CA]) in primary and metastatic PCa and in androgen receptor and DNA repair genes in metastatic PCa compared with White and Asian men. 15 , 16 Using genomic analysis of tumour tissue to plan PM has promise, but once again incorporating genomic analysis into clinical trials has been highly Eurocentric. As research in genomic prognostic models expands, it is crucial that the data from which these algorithms are developed includes minority populations, or even better, prognostic models are developed that are themselves ethnic‐specific.
2.2. Bladder cancer
2.2.1. Epidemiology
Black race has been found to be an independent predictor of delayed diagnoses and treatment for BCa and inferior quality of care. 17 , 18 A National Cancer Database (NCDB) study of BCa found AA patients have a higher proportion of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and higher grade disease. 19 A SEER database study showed Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo radical cystectomy (RC), which is strongly associated with overall survival, and another analysis from the NCDB reported that Black patients with MIBC undergoing RC were less likely to undergo pelvic lymph node dissections (PLNDs) and among those who underwent PLND, fewer lymph nodes were removed, both of which have been associated with improved outcomes. 17 , 20 Similarly AA race is independently associated with a higher risk of recurrence post RC and worse overall survival for metastatic disease. 21 , 22
A SEER study collecting data from the 1970s to 1990s found a disproportionately higher rate of delayed diagnosis and treatment among AAs for BCa, and despite a recognition of these disparities, more contemporary real‐world data from the last two decades has shown no improvement. In fact, the most recent NCDB analysis revealed, except for uninsured patients, Black race was the strongest independent predictor of BCa diagnosis at a later stage, and this discrepancy only widened as the stage advanced. 23
2.2.2. Tumour biology
An understanding of any differences in tumour biology is crucial to PM initiatives. Regardless of ethnicity, current PM bladder cancer research has focused on personalizing treatment based on P53 status, fibroblast growth factor (FGFR) expression and alterations, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) targeting, PIK3CA alterations, mutations in DNA damage response and repair genes and BCa molecular subtypes. 24 However, any racial differences based on the above proposed categories for personalized therapies or the differences in higher grade disease in AA populations found in the NCDB study are poorly understood. Studies focused on identifying specific genomic subtypes of bladder cancer unique to AA patients have found, for example, EGF containing fibrulin‐like extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1), S100 calcium binding protein A16 (S100Ar16), and myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) may be overexpressed in AA patients. 25 EFEMP1 overexpression is a plausible mechanism contributing to muscle invasion and elevated S100A16 protein has been shown to inhibit apoptosis via the alpha serine/threonine‐protein kinase/B‐cell lymphoma 2 (AKT/Bcl‐2) pathway in mitomycin C (MMC) resistant cell lines, whereas suppression of S100A16 may restore MMC sensitivity. 26 MCL1 is an anti‐apoptotic protein of the B‐cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) family and its downregulation is linked to tumour necrosis factor‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand (TRAIL) sensitization such that therapeutic MCL1 inhibition may potentially enhance the effect of Bacillus Calmette‐Guerin (BCG) in non‐MIBC. 25
The same study also found an aggressive genetic subtype, known as C3, is associated with a worse response to surgery and a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Given that AA patients have reduced transcription levels of the genes associated with this aggressive C3 subtype, they may have better outcomes with surgical treatment as opposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors. 25 , 27
2.3. Renal cancer
2.3.1. Epidemiology
RCC has an incidence of 2%–3% per year which is rising. 28 Although RCC research in minority populations is generally lacking, AA, Native American (NA) and HA men have an increased risk of RCC, 29 , 30 and NAs and HAs are more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age. AA men have a higher incidence of localized disease at diagnosis although studies indicate AA men have increased mortality compared with age and stage‐matched controls. 31 Another study came to the same conclusion in a cohort of patients from the International Marker Consortium for RCC database which showed AA patients who recur had an increased risk of cancer‐specific death and that the cause of this is likely multifactorial resulting from both SDOH and differences in tumour biology. 32
2.3.2. Tumour biology
RCC classification is closely linked to its tumour biology and as our understanding of RCC molecular biology has improved, molecular subtypes have been added, including the most recent WHO classification in 2022. 33 As well as the histologically defined RCCs (clear cell, papillary, oncocytic and chromophobe, collecting duct and histological variants), there are now 11 categories of molecularly defined renal cancers, for example, TFE3‐rearranged RCC, TFEB‐altered RCC, ELOC (formerly TCEB1)‐mutated RCC, fumarate hydratase‐deficient RCC, succinate dehydrogenase‐deficient RCC, ALK‐rearranged RCC and three categories of SWI/SNF‐related matric associated actin‐dependent regulator of chromatic subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1) (INI1)‐deficient RCC.
Similarly, in recent years, RCC driver mutations have been investigated, most notably, the loss of heterozygosity of the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) suppressor gene. This has led to the development of therapeutic targets for the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway with drugs such as Pazopanib and Sunitinib, providing viable alternatives to the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) targeting agents. 34 Subsequently genomic studies have shown intrinsic differences in RCC between AA and White patients, focusing specifically on the nine most common mutations: VHL, protein polybromo‐1 human (PBRM1), SET domain containing 2 (SETD2), lysine‐specific demethylase 5C (KDM5C), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), BRCA1‐associated protein 1 (BAP1), mTOR, tumor protein p53 (TP53) and phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3KC). Finding, for example, AAs have less frequent VHL mutations suggesting VEGF targeted therapy may be less efficacious.
On the basis of an additional classification of clear cell RCC into CC‐e.1, CC‐e.2 and CC‐e.3, where ‘e’ stands for ‘enriched’ on genomic analysis with clustering on a heat map, 35 the same study found AAs have a higher frequency of CC‐e.3 subtype compared with EAs, less PBRM1 mutations in those AAs with CC‐e.1 and CC‐e.2 subtypes compared with EAs and higher frequency of BAP1 mutations in those AAs with CC‐e.3 subtype compared with EAs. 36 By contrast, the frequencies of different molecular subtypes in HAs and NAs remain poorly investigated, despite, for example, HAs and NAs having a higher incidence of RCC along the US–Mexico border, as well as a higher prevalence of risk factors such as chronic renal disease and obesity. 30 The use of PM is unlikely to be available for these populations until such time as their recruitment to clinical trials is improved.
3. PRECISION MEDICINE AND ITS POTENTIAL BENEFITS IN ALLEVIATING RACIAL DISPARITIES
(See Table 1 listing current GU cancer clinical trials focused on PM with illustration of their inclusion of racial diversification in recruitment or outcomes and Figure 1 illustrating factors influencing oncological outcomes in ethnic minorities, and the potential benefit of a PM approach).
TABLE 1.
GU clinical trials focused on precision medicine in GU cancers.
| Trial name | Trial location | Cancer type | Type | Primary outcome(s) | Planned # pts | Plan for racial equity in recruitment | Status | Projected completion date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate cancer | ||||||||
|
Patient Decision‐making About Precision Oncology in Veterans With Advanced Prostate Cancer |
University of California, San Francisco | Advanced prostate cancer | Interventional |
To evaluate patient‐participants' decisional conflict about precision oncology and develop a Decision Support Intervention (DSI) to improve decision‐making |
117 |
Secondary objectives include evaluation of patient‐participants', caregiver‐participants' and provider decisional needs, potential solutions, and potential disparities about precision oncology |
Recruiting | 7/31/27 |
| NCT04706663. A Multi‐Center Natural History Study of Precision‐Based Genomics in Prostate Cancer | La Jolla, California | Histologically conformed prostate cancer | Observational |
To assess the influence of specific gene mutations on disease course (germline and/or somatic variants in PIK3 and/or AKT, PALB2, BRIP1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD54, RB1, SPOP, Wnt/B‐catenin pathway, CDK12, and MMR genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM as well as subjects with tumour mutational burden‐high (TMB‐H) prostate cancer |
2000 | No | Recruiting | 6/30/26 |
| NCT03327675 An AI Platform Integrating Imaging Data and Models, Supporting Precision Care Through Prostate Cancer's Continuum |
Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia, Turin, Italy |
Histological confirmed PCa or suspicion of PCa (abnormal PSA values and/or positive DRE) | Observational (patient registry) | To develop vendor‐specific and vendor neutral AI models exploiting the prospective data that will be uploaded to the Prostate‐NET platform. | 17 000 | No | Recruiting | 9/30/24 |
| NCT04763317 Precision Medicine in the Prostate Cancer Care Pathway: an Evaluation of Integrating Germline Genetic Testing Into the Management of Men at Risk of/Living With Prostate Cancer |
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust |
Prostate cancer and those with a genetic predisposition to prostate cancer | Observational | To determine the prevalence of prostate cancer (PrCa) specific genetic variation in men with: (a) young onset PrCa; (b) metastatic PrCa; (c) men with PrCa and a family history of PrCa compared with controls. | 2000 | No | Recruiting | 12/2025 |
| NCT04340024 Discovery of Biomarkers for Intrinsic Radiation Sensitivity in Cancer Patients | National Cancer Centre, Singapore | Prostate (and nasopharyngeal cancers) | Observational | To identify genes or molecular pathways that are associated with radiation sensitivity in blood and tissue samples | 5000 | No | Recruiting | 12/31/26 |
| NCT05496959 177‐Lutetium‐PSMA Before Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer, The LUNAR Study | Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA | Oligometastatic prostate cancer | Interventional | PSMA PET/CT‐based PFS for patients with oligoprogressive prostate cancer treated with SBRT to all known sites of disease on PSMA PET/CT versus patients treated with 177Lu‐PNT2002 prior to SBRT to all known sites of disease. | 100 | No | Recruiting | 9/1/25 |
| NCT05885009 Feasibility and Impact of Liquid Biopsy Genomic Profiling on Treatment Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Spain (SOLTI‐2102) | Barcelona, Spain | Metastatic prostate cancer | Observational | Percentage of patients for whom a liquid biopsy result can be obtained. | 240 | No | Recruiting | 3/28/28 |
| NCT05513638 Safety and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence‐aided Precision MRI Assessment for the Optimization of Prostate Biopsy in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. | Nanjing, China | Prostate Cancer | Observational | Biopsy or surgery confirmed newly‐diagnosed prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer | 2000 | No | Recruiting | 8/22/26 |
| NCT05697198 PRospective rEgistry OF Advanced Stage cancER (PREFER) Patients to Assess Prevalence of Actionable Biomarkers and Driver Mutations Using the OmniSeq Test and Creation of a Biobank from Community Cancer Clinics in the USA to Address Disparities in Precision Medicine | North Carolina, USA | Nine cancers including prostate cancer | Observational | The percent adoption of the OmniSeq next generation sequencing (NGS) testing platform in an advanced cancer patient population compared with baseline over a 2‐year period | 2500 | Yes | Recruiting | 9/2024 |
|
A Randomized, Phase II Study of Apalutamide +/− Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Oligometastatic Disease on PSMA‐PET Imaging |
University of California, San Francisco | Metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer | Interventional | The primary endpoint for the study is the proportion of patients with undetectable serum PSA (< 0.2 ng/mL) at 6 months following completion of apalutamide therapy (18 months from date of randomization). | 60 | No | Recruiting | 12/31/24 |
| NCT04067570 Post‐Prostatectomy Linac‐Based Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Treatment Feasibility and Outcomes Study | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada | Localized prostate cancer | Interventional | Acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities | 30 | No | Recruiting | 10/2024 |
| Bladder cancer | ||||||||
| NCT05096533 Prospective Multi‐center Clinical Study on the Application Value of Artificial Intelligence in MRI Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Bladder Cancer | Nanjing, China | Bladder cancer | Observational | To explore the application value of artificial intelligence in the precise diagnosis and treatment of bladder tumour, and to improve the accuracy of MRI diagnosis of bladder cancer stage and grade through artificial intelligence. | 150 | No | Recruiting | 8/2023 |
| NCT05767528 Clinical Study of neoadjuvant FDA‐approved drugs Outcome Prediction of Muscle‐invasive Bladder Cancer Based on Patient‐derived tumour‐like cell clusters (PTC) Drug Sensitivity Detection | Bejing, China | Muscle invasive bladder cancer | Observational | Treatment response eg Complete Response (CR) or partial response (PR) – CR defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non‐target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Length is measured in millimetres, refers to RECIST 1.1. | 40 | No | Recruiting | 12/8/24 |
| NCT04412070A Pilot Study to Assess the Concordance of Genomic Alterations Between Urine and Tissue to Develop Precision Medicine‐Based Immunotherapy Approaches in High‐Risk NMIBC Patients | Paris, France | High NMIBC | Observational | Agreement rate between urine cell‐free DNA and tumour tissue mutation profile | 40 | No | Recruiting | 7/2025 |
|
Augmented Bladder Tumour Detection Using the Bladder‐Portable Artefact Detection System: A Multicentric Prospective Analytic Study Using Real Time Based Artificial Intelligence (IA). |
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens, France | Bladder cancer | Observational | Tumour detection rate of white light cystoscopy and Bladder‐PAD cystoscopy | 500 | No | Recruiting | 5/2029 |
|
University of California Minority Patient‐Derived Xenograft (PDX) Development and Trial Center (UCaMP) to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities |
University of California, Davis | Bladder and other solid tumours | Observational | To establish and characterize at least 200 PDXs, and utilize these PDXs in preclinicial testing of single agents and drug combinations that help guide future clinical decision‐making emphasizing the largest racial/ethnic minority populations residing in California: Hispanic/Latino Americans ([HLAs), Asian Americans/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (AANHIPIs), and African Americans (AAs) compared with non‐Hispanic Whites (NHWs). | 500 | Yes | Recruiting | 1/2024 |
|
An Open, Dose‐escalation Clinical Study of Chimeric Exosomal Tumour Vaccines for Recurrent or Metastatic Bladder Cancer |
Shanghai Pudong Hospital, China | Recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer | Interventional | The percentage of patients with CR and PR in the total number of patients in the same period, as well as OS and adverse effects | 9 | No | Recruiting | 9/1/23 |
|
A Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Limited Progression on Immune Checkpoint Blockade |
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA | Metastatic cancers including Bladder and Renal cancer | Interventional | In non‐irradiated lesions during the first 24 weeks after treatment initiation as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 criteria in patients with limited progression receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. ORR rate is defined as the number of patients treated to a given arm with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of patients. | 60 | No | Recruiting | 10/2023 |
| Renal cancer | ||||||||
|
A Phase I Clinical Study of CD70‐targeted CAR‐T Therapy for Advanced/Advanced Renal Cancer |
Jinan, China | Metastatic Renal Cancer | Interventional | Incidence of Adverse events after CD70 CAR‐T cells infusion, obtain the maximum tolerated dose of CD70 CAR‐T cells and Disease control rate of CAR‐T cell preparations in CD70 positive advanced malignancies | 24 | No | Recruiting | 12/31/2024 |
|
Randomized Phase II Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Metastatic Unresected Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Receiving Immunotherapy (SAMURAI) |
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer center, Duarte, California | Advanced Renal Cancer | Interventional | Nephrectomy and radiographic progression‐free survival and percentage of participants with complete or partial response | 240 | No | Recruiting | 6/15/28 |
|
A Phase I Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of CD70‐targeting CAR‐T in the Treatment of CD70‐positive Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumours |
Zhengzhou, Henan, China |
Metastatic solid tumours including renal cell carcinoma | Interventional | Incidence of Adverse events after CD70 CAR‐T cells infusion, obtain the maximum tolerated dose of CD70 CAR‐T cells and Disease control rate of CAR‐T cell preparations in CD70 positive advanced malignancies | 48 | No | Recruiting | 7/17/25 |
|
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled Study of Pazopanib With or Without Abexinostat in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RENAVIV) |
Dover, Delaware | Renal Cell Carcinoma | Interventional | To compare the PFS between treatment arms | 413 | No | Recruiting | 6/30/23 |
|
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs Single Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis Patients on Immunotherapy (HYPOGRYPHE) |
Bronx, New York, USA | Brain metastases patients including those with primary renal cell carcinoma | Interventional | Occurrence of a Grade 2 or higher Adverse Radiation Effect and comparison of time to local failure and mortality | 244 | No | Recruiting | 3/2028 |
|
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Biologically Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligoprogressive Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma |
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer center, Duarte, California | Non small cell lung, Melanoma and renal cell carcinoma | Interventional | Feasibility and safety of positron emission tomography (PET) adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), time to progression, overall survival and quality of life | 32 | No | Recruiting | 6/1/26 |
| Multiple cancer trials including GU cancers | ||||||||
|
A Phase 2, Multi‐Center Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of ENV‐101 (Taladegib) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours Harbouring PTCH1 Loss of Function Mutations |
Endeavour Clinical Trials, San Antonio, Texas | Solid tumours including GU Cancers | Interventional | ORR is comprised of Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR), measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as determined by an independent review (confirmed CR or PR will be defined as a repeat assessment performed no less than 28 days after the criteria for response is first met). | 44 | No | Recruiting | 5/2024 |
| NCT03896958 The PIONEER Initiative: Precision Insights On N‐of‐1 Ex Vivo Effectiveness Research Based on Individual Tumour Ownership (Precision Oncology) | Georgia and Washington, USA | All cancers including all GU Cancers | Observational | The primary mission of our team is to assess benefit of patient tissue ownership and functional testing to the standard of care process. We will calculate this as a % of patients. | 1000 | No | Recruiting | 3/12/24 |
| NCT03452774 SYNERGY‐AI: Artificial Intelligence Based Precision Oncology Clinical Trial Matching and Registry | New York, USA | All cancers including all GU Cancers | Observational | International registry for cancer patients evaluating the feasibility and clinical utility of an Artificial Intelligence‐based precision oncology clinical trial matching tool and its clinical impact on pts with advanced cancer to facilitate clinical trial enrollment (CTE). | 50 000 | Although not a specific race diverse initiative, the trial will aim to identify barriers to accruals to clinical trials, as measured and reported by a questionnaire | Recruiting | 6/2025 |
| NCT05786716 DETERMINE Trial Treatment Arm 4: Trastuzumab in Combination With Pertuzumab in Adult, Teenage/Young Adult and Paediatric Patients With Cancers With HER2 Amplification or Activating Mutations | Cancer Research UK, Manchester, UK | Solid cancers including all GU cancers | Interventional | Objective disease response and durable clinical benefit | 30 | No | Recruiting | 10/2029 |
| NCT04354064 Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Early Treatment Response Assessment of Solid Tumours | Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis USA | Solid tumours including GU cancers | Observational | Freedom from progression ‐Defined as RECIST 1.1 based radiographic or clinical progression, with non‐progressors censored at last radiographic follow‐up | 3362 | No | Recruiting | 12/31/25 |
An early definition of PM took into consideration various patient characteristics, including age, family history and performance status, but has now expanded to include molecular, pathological, lifestyle or genomic factors when available. 37 The future vision for PM aims to include integrated ‘omics’ data which may reveal insights into tumour biology through study not only of genomics but also transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, immune pathways and the microbiome. Our increasing understanding of these cellular pathways and their mechanistic links to the pathogenesis of cancer has led to the creation of many targeted systemic agents for a variety of cancers, including GU cancers. 38 , 39
3.1. Prostate cancer
Molecular tumour profiling and the identification of targetable mutations are a prime focus for PM PCa research, and there are, for example, several androgen receptor pathway inhibitors available that have traditionally been mainstays of treatment.
3.1.1. PTEN‐Pl3K‐AKT pathway inhibitors
For example, increasingly these medications are employed earlier in the disease course making castrate resistance more likely to develop, 40 , 41 and mutations in the PTEN‐PI3K‐AKT pathway are often seen in mCRPCa. 42 In an analysis of castrate‐resistant patients treated with abiraterone after docetaxel, patients with PTEN mutations experienced worse overall survival (OS). Further studies, including the randomized phase III IPATential150 trial, may more clearly define the role of AKT inhibitors but, as the authors have found is a common problem in PM research, the protocol does not seem to include active recruitment for racially diverse patients. 43 , 44 Table 2 summarizes the trials found in the literature focused on mCRPC with cohorts including AA men.
TABLE 2.
Clinical trials in Black men with metastatic prostate cancer.
| Reference | Study design | Cohort size | Drug(s) | Endpoint | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George et al., 2023 | Phase 2 non randomized prospective comparative trial | 93 men (43 [44%] Black men) with mCRPC | Combination apalutamide and abiraterone with prednisone | Radiographic progression free survival (rPFS), overall mortality (OM) and PSA response | Better rPFS in Black men (30 months) compared with White men (15 months). OM at 2 years 14% for Black men compared with 33% in White men. 93% of Black men had a >50% decline compared with 68% of White men |
| Shore et al., 2022 | Subanalysis of the phase 3 randomized controlled ARAMIS trial | 1509 men (52 [3.4%] Black men) with non metastatic CRPC | Darolutamide | Metastasis free survival (MFS) and overall survival | Black men demonstrated improved MFS and OS consistent with the overall ARAMIS trial cohort |
| Zhao et al., 2020 | Retrospective analysis | 318 men (87 [27%] Black men) with mCRPC | Radium 223 | Overall mortality | Compared with White men, Black men had a 25% lower risk of mortality from the time of starting radium 223 (HR 0.75, CI 0.57–0.99; p < 0.045) |
| Sartor et al., 2020 | Retrospective analysis of a cohort from PROCEED FDA‐requested registry | 1902 men (221 [12%] Black men) with mCRPC | Sipuleucel‐T | Overall survival (OS) | Compared with White men, Black men had improved OS especially in the group with lower baselines PSAs (54.3 months vs. 33.4 months) (HR 0.52, CI 0.37–0.72; p < 0.001). |
| Halabi et al., 2019 | Metanalysis of nine phase 3 Trials | 8820 men (500 [6%] Black men) with mCRPC | Docetaxel | Overall survival (OS) | Adjusting for known negative prognostic indicators, multivariable analysis showed a significantly reduced risk of death for Black men compared with White men (HR 0.81, CI 0.72–0.91; p < 0.001) |
| McNamara et al., 2019 | Retrospective analysis | 2910 men (787 [27%] Black men) with mCRPC | Abiraterone or Enzalutamide | Overall survival (OS) | Compared with White men, Black men had better OS (918 days vs. 781 days) (HR 0.826, CI 0.732–0.933; p < 0.002) |
| Ramalingham et al., 2017 | Prospective case control study | 135 men (45 [33%] Black men) with mCRPC | Abiraterone | PSA response | Compared with White men, a higher proportion of Black men had >50% and >30% PSA responses at 68.9% versus 48.9% (p < 0.028)) and 77.8% versus 54.4% (p < 0.008), respectively. |
| Efstathiou et al., 2014 | Randomized double blind phase 3 trial | 1088 men (28 (2.6%) Black men with mCRPC | Abiraterone | PSA response and time to PSA progression (TPP) | Compared with White men, a higher proportion of Black men had >90% PSA response and TPP with 53.3% versus 31% and 16.6 months versus 11.1 months, respectively |
3.1.2. Antiandrogen agents
Trials using the novel oral antiandrogen abiraterone in a prospective cohort of prechemotherapy mCRPCa patients demonstrated an enhanced PSA response in Black men (greater than 90% drop in PSA in over 50% of patients compared with only 30% of White patients), 45 as did a similar study with equitable access for Black men with nearly 70% of Black men halving their PSA compared with 49% of White men. 46 Survival rates for Black men with mCRPCa are similarly more favourable than for White men treated with novel oral antiandrogens, with studies showing 918 versus 781 days OS, respectively, using either enzalutamide or abiraterone 47 and 16.6 versus 11.5 months PSA progression free survival, respectively, with abiraterone. 48 More recently, early results from the PANTHER trial, suggest Black men with mCRPCa also have a better response to combined abiraterone and apalutamide [an AR receptor inhibitor] with prednisolone than White men. 49 The efficacy of these treatments in other racial groups requires further study.
3.1.3. Autologous cellular immunotherapy
In general, immunotherapies have been less successful in PCa with the notable exception of the Sipuleucel‐T vaccine. Data from several studies examining patients with advanced PCa found enhanced OS with the addition of Sipuleucel‐T. 50 , 51 , 52 Moreover, some data suggest that AA patients with PCa may respond better to Sipuleucel‐T than CAs. A registry study of PSA‐matched patients receiving Sipuleucel‐T found an OS of 35.3 months for AAs versus 25.8 months for CAs. 53
3.1.4. Checkpoint inhibitors
These results are consistent with other studies that suggest that AAs with PCa exhibit a more pronounced upregulation of immune signalling pathways. 54 As discussed above, several genes involved in inflammatory pathways and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), such as IFN‐G, CCL4 and IL33, and immune biomarkers, including CD3, ICOSLG and PDL2, are expressed at significantly higher levels in tumours from AAs, 14 which may underlie their improved efficacy with carefully chosen chemo‐ and immuno‐therapy regimes. A large metanalysis also found improved survival in Black men with mCRPCa with Docetaxel on multivariable analysis pooling 9 phase 3 trials with nearly 9000 men, 500 of whom were Black. 55
3.1.5. Abscopal effect
Lastly, there has been increased interest in combining immunotherapies with radiation therapy (RT) to utilize ‘the abscopal effect’ resulting from RT‐induced immune activation and upregulation of inflammatory chemokines resulting in tissue‐ and tumour‐infiltration by antigen‐presenting and cytotoxic lymphocytes to reduce disease burden at distant sites. 56 , 57 Immunotherapy may then leverage the immune system via a myriad of mechanisms, including anti‐tumour vaccination and ICI to prevent the apoptosis of cytotoxic T‐cells. 58 , 59 Intuitively, racial differences in tumour biology resulting in enhanced immune signalling discussed above may have synergy with this abscopal effect and combination therapy with other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy, which has been most extensively studied, may thus yield better results. 60 , 61 , 62
In clinical settings, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used to trigger antitumour immunity in patients on immunotherapy based on the rationale that combining these treatment modalities may increase their collective efficacy as they both reduce regulatory T cells and increase tumour infiltration by lymphocytes. 63 A recent study combined SBRT and immunotherapy in men with mCRPC with at least one bone metastasis who had progressed after receiving docetaxel. The subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive bone‐directed RT followed by either ipilimumab or placebo. While the primary endpoint of OS was not improved, reductions in PSA and an improvement in progression‐free survival were noted. 64 The use of radiopharmaceuticals in combination with targeted immunotherapy has also been studied, and a retrospective analysis of over 300 men with mCRPCa receiving radium‐223 confirmed improved survival for Black men. 65 Nevertheless, further studies exploring the effects of combining immunotherapy and SBRT across different racial groups are urgently needed.
3.2. Bladder cancer
As mentioned above, PM BCa initiatives have targeted actionable mutations in several genes, including TP53, PIK3CA, CDKN1A, ERBB 2 and FGFR. 66 This has led to therapeutic tools with promise, but in reality, there is a paucity of study across different racial groups.
3.2.1. FGFR targeting agents
For example, FGFR has been the focus of several studies with numerous putative targeted agents 67 and although the results of a phase II trial with 90 patients showed response rates of nearly 70% to an agent targeting FGFR2 and FGFR3, the ethnicity of patients in the cohort was not published. 68 Additionally, a study comparing the efficacy of erdafitinib versus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in patients with advanced BCa harbouring selected FGFR aberrations who have progressed after 1 or 2 prior therapies is currently accruing patients, but the protocol does not include an initiative for racially diverse recruitment. 69
3.2.2. Checkpoint inhibitors
Similarly in KEYNOTE‐052, first‐line pembrolizumab in cisplatin‐ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCa can lead to a durable clinical response and a prolonged OS. 70 More recently, maintenance therapy with Avelumab has been shown to lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS over best supportive care in patients with unresectable or metastatic BCa who did not progress after first‐line chemotherapy. 71 Neither of these important studies published racial demographics in their findings further supporting the sentiment that racially diverse PM research to offset racial inequities is underrepresented.
3.3. Renal cancer
The situation is somewhat different for RCC, where research has yielded useful insights for AA men, although NA and HA populations remain underrepresented.
3.3.1. Checkpoint inhibitors
In addition to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF pathways, studies have shown that a combination of targeted therapeutics plus immunotherapy agents can nearly double the survival of patients with RCC. 72 These findings were confirmed when Checkmate 025 and 214 helped cement the role of ICIs in the management of RCC. 73 , 74 This is a particularly important finding in the treatment of AA patients, because, as has been discussed, they are less likely to have VHL mutations thus rendering agents that act on the VEGF pathway less effective.
3.3.2. Abscopal effect
Knowing that certain systemic treatments may not be as effective in AA patients makes exploring the possible role of SBRT more significant. Current studies investigating the role of SBRT in RCC suggest that exploiting the abscopal effect in combination with immunotherapy may improve efficacy for oligometastatic disease in combination with VEGF targeting agents. 75 Once again, more study is required.
4. CONCLUSION
In the realm of GU cancers, both SDOH and cytogenetic factors play a pivotal role in determining patient outcomes. Unfortunately, AA, HA and NA patients have suffered from a lack of access to quality healthcare, in part due to socioeconomic factors such as lower rates of health insurance, racial biases and geography. 76 Adding to this issue is their historical underrepresentation in clinical trials, despite the Food and Drug Administration's attempts to diversify enrollment. 77 Nevertheless, as our understanding of differences in how social, biological and genetic factors influence treatment responses in racially diverse groups improves, clinicians have increasingly been able to direct novel treatments to these populations in an efficacious manner, narrowing the gap in outcomes between AA patients and other races.
As PM becomes increasingly incorporated into treatment planning in the future, underrepresented populations must also be included in all research efforts. PM can be a valuable tool in narrowing the gap in outcomes across ethnic groups. Although further studies are needed, by promoting minority enrollment in trials we will be able to further substantiate the role of PM in this setting.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Kunal S. Sindhu wrote the manuscript with contributions from Zachary Dovey, Marcher Thompson, Anthony D. Nehlsen, Karin A. Skalina, Beata Malachowska, Shaakir Hasan, Chandan Guha, Justin Tang and Lucas Resende Salgado.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
Dr. Zach Dovey is Medical Director and stock owner (with certificate of shares) of Medtech Holdings Ltd. No other authors have any conflicts to declare.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
No acknowledgements.
Sindhu KK, Dovey Z, Thompson M, Nehlsen AD, Skalina KA, Malachowska B, et al. The potential role of precision medicine to alleviate racial disparities in prostate, bladder and renal urological cancer care. BJUI Compass. 2024;5(4):405–425. 10.1002/bco2.323
Funding information No outside funding was utilized in the writing of this research article.
REFERENCES
- 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Male Urologic Cancers. 2020. Accessed August 26, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/about/data-briefs/no21-male-urologic-cancers.htm [Google Scholar]
- 2. Swami N, Baez YA, Franco I, Nguyen T, Meiyappan K, Ton M, et al. Localized prostate cancer disparities in risk group at presentation and access to treatment for Hispanic men. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26(2):309–316. 10.1038/s41391-022-00526-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lewis DD, Cropp CD. The impact of African ancestry on prostate cancer disparities in the era of precision medicine. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(12):1471. 10.3390/genes11121471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Adesunloye BA. Mechanistic insights into the link between obesity and prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):3935. 10.3390/ijms22083935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. 2020. Accessed July 8, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jayachandran J, Bañez LL, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Presti JC Jr, Amling CL, et al. Obesity as a predictor of adverse outcome across black and white race: results from the shared equal access regional cancer hospital (SEARCH) database. Cancer. 2009;115(22):5263–5271. 10.1002/cncr.24571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dess RT, Hartman HE, Mahal BA, Soni PD, Jackson WC, Cooperberg MR, et al. Association of Black Race with Prostate Cancer‐Specific and Other‐Cause Mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):975–983. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Riviere P, Luterstein E, Kumar A, Vitzthum LK, Deka R, Sarkar RR, et al. Survival of African American and non‐Hispanic white men with prostate cancer in an equal‐access health care system. Cancer. 2020;126(8):1683–1690. 10.1002/cncr.32666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Moses KA, Orom H, Brasel A, Gaddy J, Underwood W. Racial/ethnic disparity in treatment for prostate cancer: does cancer severity matter? Urology. 2017;99:76–83. 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vince RA, Jiang R, Bank M, et al. Evaluation of social determinants of health and prostate cancer outcomes among black and white patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(1):e2250416. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Loree JM, Anand S, Dasari A, Unger JM, Gothwal A, Ellis LM, et al. Disparity of race reporting and representation in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(10):e191870. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Balakrishnan AS, Palmer NR, Fergus KB, Gaither TW, Baradaran N, Ndoye M, et al. Minority recruitment trends in phase III prostate cancer clinical trials (2003 to 2014): Progress and critical areas for improvement. J Urol. 2019;201(2):259–267. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Plym A, Zhang Y, Stopsack KH, Delcoigne B, Wiklund F, Haiman C, et al. A healthy lifestyle in men at increased genetic risk for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):343–351. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rayford W, Beksac AT, Alger J, Alshalalfa M, Ahmed M, Khan I, et al. Comparative analysis of 1152 African‐American and European‐American men with prostate cancer identifies distinct genomic and immunological differences. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):670. 10.1038/s42003-021-02140-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cackowski FC, Mahal B, Heath EI, Carthon B. Evolution of disparities in prostate cancer treatment: is this a new Normal? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021;41(41):1–12. 10.1200/EDBK_321195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mahal BA, Alshalalfa M, Kensler KH, Chowdhury‐Paulino I, Kantoff P, Mucci LA, et al. Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(11):1083–1085. 10.1056/NEJMc2000069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gild P, Wankowicz SA, Sood A, von Landenberg N, Friedlander DF, Alanee S, et al. Racial disparity in quality of care and overall survival among black vs. white patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy: a national cancer database analysis. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(10):469.e1–469.e11. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Vince RA, Jamieson S, Mahal B, Underwood W. Examining the racial disparities in prostate cancer. Urology. 2022;163:107–111. 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mallin K, David KA, Carroll PR, Milowsky MI, Nanus DM. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: racial and gender disparities in survival (1993 to 2002), stage and grade (1993 to 2007). J Urol. 2011;185(5):1631–1636. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Williams SB, Huo J, Kosarek CD, Chamie K, Rogers SO Jr, Williams MA, et al. Population‐based assessment of racial/ethnic differences in utilization of radical cystectomy for patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28(7):755–766. 10.1007/s10552-017-0902-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Paluri RK, Morgan CJ, Mooney DJ, Mgbemena O, Yang ES, Wei S, et al. Effect of African‐American race on tumor recurrence after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13(5):469–475. 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chierigo F, Borghesi M, Würnschimmel C, Flammia RS, Horlemann B, Sorce G, et al. Life expectancy in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer patients according to race/ethnicity. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(7):1521–1527. 10.1007/s11255-022-03221-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hasan S, Lazarev S, Garg M, Mehta K, Press RH, Chhabra A, et al. Racial inequity and other social disparities in the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer. Cancer Med. 2023;12(1):640–650. 10.1002/cam4.4917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guercio BJ, Iyer G, Rosenberg JE. Developing precision medicine for bladder cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North am. 2021;35(3):633–653. 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. You S, Kim M, Widen S, Yu A, Galvan GC, Choi‐Kuaea Y, et al. Characterizing molecular subtypes of high‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in African American patients. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(9):410.e19–410.e27. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wang C, Zhu X, Li A, Yang S, Qiao R, Zhang J. S100A16 regulated by snail promotes the chemoresistance of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer through the AKT/Bcl‐2 pathway. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2449–2456. 10.2147/CMAR.S196450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gouin KH, Ing N, Plummer JT, et al. An N‐cadherin 2 expressing epithelial cell subpopulation predicts response to surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4906. 10.1038/s41467-021-25103-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Znaor A, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):519–530. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Vaishampayan UN, Do H, Hussain M, Schwartz K. Racial disparity in incidence patterns and outcome of kidney cancer. Urology. 2003;62(6):1012–1017. 10.1016/j.urology.2003.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Batai K, Harb‐De la Rosa A, Lwin A, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of clinical characteristics. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):e195–e202. 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.10.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lipworth L, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Blot WJ. Renal cancer paradox: higher incidence but not higher mortality among African‐Americans. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(4):331–333. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328345f9b3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Meagher MF, Patil D, Saito K, Javier‐Desloges JF, Bradshaw AW, Patel SH, et al. Disparities in cancer specific and overall survival outcomes in African Americans with renal cell carcinoma: analysis from the international marker consortium for renal cancer (INMARC). Urology. 2022;163:164–176. 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Moch H, Amin MB, Berney DM, Compérat EM, Gill AJ, Hartmann A, et al. The 2022 World Health Organization classification of Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs‐part a: renal, penile, and testicular Tumours. Eur Urol. 2022;82(5):458–468. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network . Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013;499(7456):43–49. 10.1038/nature12222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen F, Zhang Y, Şenbabaoğlu Y, Ciriello G, Yang L, Reznik E, et al. Multilevel genomics‐based taxonomy of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2476–2489. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Krishnan B, Rose TL, Kardos J, Milowsky MI, Kim WY. Intrinsic genomic differences between African American and white patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(5):664–667. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Garraway LA, Verweij J, Ballman KV. Precision oncology: an overview. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15):1803–1805. 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.4799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ciccarese C, Santoni M, Massari F, Cheng L, Lopez‐Beltran A, Scarpelli M, et al. Present and future of personalized medicine in adult genitourinary tumors. Future Oncol. 2015;11(9):1381–1388. 10.2217/fon.15.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sindhu KK, Nehlsen AD, Stock RG. Radium‐223 for metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022;12(4):312–316. 10.1016/j.prro.2022.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Noonan KL, North S, Bitting RL, Armstrong AJ, Ellard SL, Chi KN. Clinical activity of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer progressing after enzalutamide. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(7):1802–1807. 10.1093/annonc/mdt138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bluemn EG, Coleman IM, Lucas JM, Coleman RT, Hernandez‐Lopez S, Tharakan R, et al. Androgen receptor pathway‐independent prostate cancer is sustained through FGF signaling. Cancer Cell. 2017;32(4):474–489.e6. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Robinson D, Van Allen EM, Wu YM, et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015;161(5):1215–1228. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ferraldeschi R, Nava Rodrigues D, Riisnaes R, Miranda S, Figueiredo I, Rescigno P, et al. PTEN protein loss and clinical outcome from castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):795–802. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. US National Library of Medicine . CIinicalTrialsgov 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03072238 [Google Scholar]
- 45. Efstathiou E, Deshpande H, George D, Joshua AM, Taplin ME, Griffin TW, et al. Abstract CT313: an exploratory analysis of efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) in black patients (pts) with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) without prior chemotherapy (ctx). Cancer Res. 2014;74(19_Supplement):CT313. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT313 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ramalingam S, Humeniuk MS, Hu R, Rasmussen J, Healy P, Wu Y, et al. Prostate‐specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(6):418–424. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. McNamara MA, George DJ, Ramaswamy K, et al. Overall survival by race in chemotherapy‐naïve metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. JCO. 2019;37(7_suppl):212. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. George DJ, Heath EI, Sartor AO, Sonpavde G, Berry WR, Healy P, et al. Abi race: a prospective, multicenter study of black (B) and white (W) patients (pts) with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP). JCO. 2018;36(18_suppl):LBA5009. 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.18_suppl.LBA5009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. George DJ, Halabi S, Fleming MT, Heath EI, Tutrone RF, Sutton L, et al. A prospective trial of apalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in black and white men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer. JCO. 2023;41(16_suppl):5015. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Small EJ, Schellhammer PF, Higano CS, Redfern CH, Nemunaitis JJ, Valone FH, et al. Placebo‐controlled phase III trial of immunologic therapy with sipuleucel‐T (APC8015) in patients with metastatic, asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3089–3094. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Higano CS, Schellhammer PF, Small EJ, Burch PA, Nemunaitis J, Yuh L, et al. Integrated data from 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel‐T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(16):3670–3679. 10.1002/cncr.24429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, Berger ER, Small EJ, Penson DF, et al. Sipuleucel‐T immunotherapy for castration‐resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411–422. 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sartor O, Armstrong AJ, Ahaghotu C, McLeod DG, Cooperberg MR, Penson DF, et al. Survival of African‐American and Caucasian men after sipuleucel‐T immunotherapy: outcomes from the PROCEED registry. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;23(3):517–526. 10.1038/s41391-020-0213-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Yuan J, Kensler KH, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Jiang J, et al. Integrative comparison of the genomic and transcriptomic landscape between prostate cancer patients of predominantly African or European genetic ancestry. PLoS Genet. 2020;16(2):e1008641. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Halabi S, Dutta S, Tangen CM, Rosenthal M, Petrylak DP, Thompson IM Jr, et al. Overall survival of black and white men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(5):403–410. 10.1200/JCO.18.01279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Turgeon GA, Weickhardt A, Azad AA, Solomon B, Siva S. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a synergistic effect in cancer care. Med J Aust. 2019;210(1):47–53. 10.5694/mja2.12046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Dar TB, Henson RM, Shiao SL. Targeting innate immunity to enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3077. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lim M, Xia Y, Bettegowda C, Weller M. Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(7):422–442. 10.1038/s41571-018-0003-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Farkona S, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? BMC Med. 2016;14(1):73. 10.1186/s12916-016-0623-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. O'Donnell JS, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting and resistance to T cell‐based immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(3):151–167. 10.1038/s41571-018-0142-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Liu Y, Dong Y, Kong L, Shi F, Zhu H, Yu J. Abscopal effect of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):104. 10.1186/s13045-018-0647-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Levy A, Chargari C, Marabelle A, Perfettini JL, Magné N, Deutsch E. Can immunostimulatory agents enhance the abscopal effect of radiotherapy? Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:36–45. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Sharabi AB, Nirschl CJ, Kochel CM, Nirschl TR, Francica BJ, Velarde E, et al. Stereotactic radiation therapy augments antigen‐specific PD‐1‐mediated antitumor immune responses via cross‐presentation of tumor antigen. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(4):345–355. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kwon ED, Drake CG, Scher HI, Fizazi K, Bossi A, van den Eertwegh AJM, et al. Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184‐043): a multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):700–712. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70189-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhao H, Howard LE, De Hoedt A, et al. Racial discrepancies in overall survival among men treated with 223Radium. J Urol. 2020;203(2):331–337. 10.1097/JU.0000000000000524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Rodriguez‐Vida A, Lerner SP, Bellmunt J. The cancer genome atlas project in bladder cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;175:259–271. 10.1007/978-3-319-93339-9_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. di Martino E, Tomlinson DC, Williams SV, Knowles MA. A place for precision medicine in bladder cancer: targeting the FGFRs. Future Oncol. 2016;12(19):2243–2263. 10.2217/fon-2016-0042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, Garcia‐Donas J, Huddart R, Burgess E, et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338–348. 10.1056/NEJMoa1817323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Liow E, Tran B. Precision oncology in urothelial cancer. ESMO Open. 2020;5(Suppl 1):e000616. 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Vuky J, Balar AV, Castellano D, O'Donnell PH, Grivas P, Bellmunt J, et al. Long‐term outcomes in KEYNOTE‐052: phase II study investigating first‐line Pembrolizumab in cisplatin‐ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(23):2658–2666. 10.1200/JCO.19.01213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1218–1230. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hsieh JJ, Le V, Cao D, Cheng EH, Creighton CJ. Genomic classifications of renal cell carcinoma: a critical step towards the future application of personalized kidney cancer care with pan‐omics precision. J Pathol. 2018;244(5):525–537. 10.1002/path.5022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell MT, et al. Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for advanced renal‐cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1103–1115. 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Rini BI, Powles T, Atkins MB, Escudier B, McDermott D, Suarez C, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2404–2415. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30723-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Cheung P, Thibault I, Bjarnason GA. The emerging roles of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014;8(3):258–264. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Bulatao RA, Anderson NB, National Research Council (US) Panel on Race E. Health Care . In: Understanding Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life: A Research Agenda. National Academies Press (US); 2004. Accessed May 9, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK24693/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Green AK, Trivedi N, Hsu JJ, Yu NL, Bach PB, Chimonas S. Despite the FDA's five‐year plan, black patients remain inadequately represented in clinical trials for drugs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(3):368–374. 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
