Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2024 Apr 17;10(16):eadi7302. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi7302

Perturbation-induced granular fluidization as a model for remote earthquake triggering

Kasra Farain 1, Daniel Bonn 1,*
PMCID: PMC11023513  PMID: 38630813

Abstract

Studying the effect of mechanical perturbations on granular systems is crucial for understanding soil stability, avalanches, and earthquakes. We investigate a granular system as a laboratory proxy for fault gouge. When subjected to a slow shear, granular materials typically exhibit a stress overshoot before reaching a steady state. We find that short seismic pulses can reset a granular system flowing in steady state so that the stress overshoot is regenerated. This feature is shown to determine the stability of the granular system under different applied stresses in the wake of a perturbation pulse and the resulting dynamics when it fails. Using an analytical aging-rejuvenation model for describing the overshoot response, we show that our laboratory-derived theoretical framework can quantitatively explain data from two fault slip events triggered by seismic waves.


Granular rheology explains how weak seismic waves can modify and activate some faults at large distances.

INTRODUCTION

Granular materials can be solid-like with the ability to resist imposed stresses up to a maximum value called the yield stress. Above this stress, the materials start flowing more or less like liquids, as seen in an hourglass (1, 2). The transition from solid to liquid-like state and the resulting rheological properties of granular materials are very sensitive to mechanical vibrations (3, 4). Dynamic stresses much smaller than the yield stress of the material can dramatically weaken it by reducing the stresses at the contacts between particles. Once weakened, the whole granular assembly can start moving under a smaller overall shear stress and experience a sudden fluidization. For instance, if the sand flowing through an hourglass jams, a small tap is enough to make it start flowing again. Such vibration-induced weakening of granular media evidently has important implications for avalanche and earthquake triggering; notably, it has been proposed as a mechanism by which seismic waves of some earthquakes can activate additional events at large distances where the static stress changes are negligible (5–9). A central question that remains unanswered, however, is whether the failure induced by vibrations can be described or predicted on the basis of the rheological properties of unperturbed granular media. In addition, a comprehensive theoretical framework of the fluidization process should account for the changes in the rheology of the granular system after the perturbation, leading to the eventual recovery of the system’s strength.

In this study, we investigate a granular medium’s responses under different loading conditions to a short-lived (about 20 ms) pulse perturbation. We show that when a granular material is under a constant shear rate, the perturbation pulse leads to an overshoot in the stress response of the material as the perturbed random granular configuration returns to a steady-state flow configuration again. The height of this stress overshoot varies depending on the magnitude of the perturbation pulse, suggesting that the (static) yield stress is not a constant material property and depends, in addition to existing environmental noise, on the perturbation history and specific granular configuration of the material. Furthermore, we find that a perturbation pulse must be of sufficient magnitude compared to the fault’s static shear stress to activate a frictional slip on it. In this case, the resulting dynamics are then determined by the relationship between applied stress and steady-state resistance: If the stress exceeds the steady-state resistance, the flow will accelerate indefinitely; otherwise, it will come to a halt after a jump in the shear deformation. Our model experiments are analogous to situations where faults in an aseismic slip or under constant static stresses are affected by seismic waves from far-field earthquakes.

RESULTS

Stress overshoot

We first study the yielding behavior of a non-agitated granular material by measuring its stress response in a quasi-stationary flow under a small imposed shear rate. We connect a rheometer to a thick cylindrical tube resting on a layer of hard, spherical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) particles (~40 μm diameter) (Fig. 1A). The rheometer applies a constant rotational speed to the tube while measuring the material’s friction F (Fig. 1B). As the granular layer under the tube begins to flow, the measured friction exhibits a long continuous overshoot with a peak Fpeak that is substantially higher than the resistance FSS that it maintains in steady state (t > 400 s). Under an applied stress Σ, in the absence of any external perturbation, the granular material yields to flow if Σ > Fpeak and remains stable perpetually for any Σ smaller than Fpeak (10).

Fig. 1. Experimental setup and the stress overshoot of the onset of granular flows.

Fig. 1.

(A) We use a rheometer to rotate a cylindrical tube that is resting on a granular layer around its symmetry axis. The rheometer can apply either a rotational torque or a rotational speed to the material while measuring the other as the granular media’s response. The inset shows an image of the microspheres taken by a Keyence optical profilometer. (B) The granular material starts from a random rest configuration (bottom left inset). Applying a constant shear rate causes it to start flowing. After a broad continuous stress overshoot, it arrives at a steady state with an aligned configuration (top right inset).

The stress overshoot of the onset of granular flow arises when the system transforms, under a constant applied shear rate, from a rest configuration to a steady-state flow configuration (Fig. 1B). These packing configurations cannot be the same as the stresses in each configuration are different. In the rest configuration, the resultant of the microscopic forces is a normal vector, equal and opposite to the external normal load on the granular material. However, in the flowing steady-state configuration, the granular material must also provide shear resistance FSS (see the Supplementary Materials for further discussion). The overshoot response can be mathematically understood by a simple first-order differential equation that reflects a competition between aging of the granular packing and a “rejuvenation” effect caused by shearing (10)

dFdt=at−αv (F−FSS) (1)

where a and α are material-dependent constants. Solutions are of the form

F(t)=ae−αvt∫t0teαvt′t′dt′+FSS(1−e−αvt) (2)

where the lower bound of the integral t0 denotes the initial configurational state of the granular pack that the evolution presented by Eq. 2 initiates from. The latter is similar to the state variable in the empirical rate-and-state friction equations that have extensively been used to study rock friction dynamics (11). However, the observed nonmonotonic evolution cannot be described by the usual rate-and-state friction model: In that model, all stress evolutions are monotonic.

Perturbations on sheared granular systems

A particular configuration of granular material can collapse when subjected to a mechanical perturbation pulse, resulting in a different random state. Essentially, this denotes that the aging and frictional sliding memory of the granular packing can be erased by mechanical perturbations. This is analogous to heating a polymer glass above the glass transition temperature and then cooling it down again to achieve a glassy state, which eliminates the thermal history of the polymer. In Fig. 2A, the first peak on the left shows the expected overshoot of granular friction during the transition from an initial rest configuration to steady-state flow under a constant applied shear rate. After the granular flow reaches a steady state, at t = 305 s (indicated by a black arrow in Fig. 2A), an elastic wave pulse (Fig. 2B) perturbs the granular flow, causing an instantaneous drop in frictional resistance at the sliding interface. The interface then exhibits friction dynamics similar to those observed during the rest-to-flow transition. The duration of the wave pulse is approximately 20 ms (Fig. 2B), substantially shorter than the timescale associated with the continuous transient dynamics. Nonetheless, the weakening effect of the wave pulse persists within the granular system long after the pulse has dissipated (Fig. 2C). This weakness is a consequence of structural imperfection of the granular packing following the perturbation, and its recovery under shear is a gradual process captured by the aging-rejuvenation dynamics. This enduring structural weakness arises in a preyielding solid-like state, setting it apart from the reduction of frictional strength of agitated granular media under continuous acoustic waves, which has been previously suggested as an explanation for certain weak faults (3, 4, 7–9). In our experiments, passing wave pulses cause momentary fluidization of the jammed state, leading to the reorganization of particles in a random configuration and removal of previous frictional aging and sliding memory. After the short perturbation pulse, the system will be in a quasi-static state again. The third and fourth peaks in Fig. 2A show that smaller-amplitude wave pulses result in smaller drops in friction, attributed to partial fluidization and removal of flow history. Establishing a direct relationship between the seismic pulse magnitude and friction drop is not straightforward (3, 4, 8). Nonetheless, in Fig. 2D, we plot the minimum friction reached by the granular system following the perturbation pulse as a function of the pulse amplitude based on a series of measurements conducted on our PMMA granular material. The duration of the continuous frictional dynamics depends on the sliding speed, as the aging-rejuvenation evolution proceeds with the sliding distance (10).

Fig. 2. Response of laboratory-scale granular fault under a constant shear rate to a pulse perturbation.

Fig. 2.

(A) Frictional resistance of the granular interface as a function of time. Pulse perturbations of two different amplitudes are applied at times indicated by arrows 1 to 4. After each pulse perturbation, the granular friction quickly drops followed by a slow transient overshoot before the system reaches steady state. (B) Large- and smaller-amplitude pulse perturbations (shifted to start at t = 0) as recorded by a piezo transducer. The colors correspond to those of the arrows in (A). (C) Enlarged view of the fourth applied perturbation (right axis) specified by the red arrow in (A) together with the subsequent friction drop and evolution (left axis). The black dashed line indicates the steady-state friction. Until about ~1.3 s after the perturbation pulse, the frictional strength is smaller than its steady-state value. This time increases with decreasing sliding speed (10). (D) Minimum friction experienced by the granular system following the perturbation pulse, as in the friction drops in (A), as a function of the pulse amplitude (millivolt reading on the piezo element) in a series of measurements conducted on our PMMA granular material.

Perturbations on stressed granular systems

In natural fault systems, the granular fault material is usually subjected to a constant static stress from the surrounding environment when a wave pulse affects the fault. During the passage of the pulse, the granular material can fluidize, and the friction overshoot is eliminated. If the static stress Σ is greater than the steady-state friction FSS, a flow that can accelerate unrestrictedly is initiated (Fig. 3A). However, if Fdrop < Σ < FSS (Fdrop for the minimum friction immediately after the perturbation), the deformations will not be large as the granular medium regains its strength after some time (Fig. 3B). In natural faults, the slip is also constrained by the amount of stored elastic energy on the fault that is available to be released. As slip occurs on a natural fault, the stored elastic energy that supports the motion decreases until it is insufficient to support further slip, eventually causing the fault to become locked again. However, not all seismic waves that impinge on a stressed fault are powerful enough to trigger an earthquake. The threshold intensity required to induce a fault gouge failure depends on the static stress acting on the fault. If the friction drop resulting from the wave pulse impact [which, in turn, can depend on the characteristics of the granular material (8)] does not fall below the applied static shear stress, the granular system remains stable, as shown in Fig. 3C. In such circumstances, the observed deformations are typically only a small fraction of a particle size (a few tens of nanometers, compared to 40 μm). These deformations do not represent a failure of the granular structure and should be comparable to the strain wave amplitude transferred by the seismic pulse.

Fig. 3. Typical responses of the granular fault under different shear forces Σ to pulse perturbations of different intensity.

Fig. 3.

(A) At an applied shear force of 11.3 mN, which is above FSS = 9.5 mN but below the peak friction FPeak = 12.8 mN, a perturbation takes place at time t = 600 s. This triggers an accelerating sliding motion (red). FPeak was determined through a shear test conducted on the granular sample before the experiment (10). In a second experiment (blue), the perturbation takes place at t = 4500 s to show that the unperturbed system is stable for a long time. (B) At an applied shear force of 9.1 mN, which is slightly below FSS, the perturbation pulse triggers a displacement jump of approximately 100 μm in the sliding direction. Following the pulse perturbation, the granular friction experiences a rapid drop. In a scenario where the granular system is subjected to constant shear rate, and the shear stress response is measured, one observes a slow friction overshoot before the system returns to a steady state. In contrast, when a constant shear stress is applied, with no shear rate constraint, the system undergoes a displacement jump. However, after a brief deformation of about 100 μm, the system’s frictional strength increases again (similar to the increasing part of the stress overshoot in Fig. 2C), enabling it to resist further motion. The perturbations in (A) and (B) are similar to black and red cases in Fig. 1. (C) At an applied shear force of 1.5 mN, at three times indicated by arrows, small perturbations similar to the green and cyan cases in Fig. 1 are applied. Since these perturbations are not powerful enough to reduce the frictional strength to below the applied static stress, no failure occurs.

Comparison to natural triggered events

Remote earthquake triggering was first documented after the 1992 magnitude 7.3 Landers earthquake (5). This event triggered additional earthquakes at distances up to 1250 km from the main shock. As both calculated and observed static stress changes at distances over 300 km were negligible (falling below the daily tidal stress changes), it was concluded that the propagating seismic waves must have caused the remote triggering. We now compare our laboratory-derived fault triggering and evolution principles with the post-Landers activity detected at the Long Valley caldera, which is the only site triggered by the Landers mainshock for which a continuous record of deformation exists (5). Strain changes measured using a borehole dilatometer displayed a small and immediate compression of about 3 × 10−9 between the Landers compressional (P) and shear (S) waves. Next, a slower-growing compressional strain developed, reaching about 2 × 10−7 within the first 5 days after the Landers event, gradually decaying to background level in the following weeks. This corresponds to the post-perturbation nonmonotonic friction evolution observed in our granular system (Fig. 4A). The measured dilatational strain θ is directly related to the stress σ by σ ≈ kθ, where k is the bulk modulus (5). A second real-world example of triggered nonmonotonic evolution is provided by pressure data from multiple levels in an offshore borehole drilled into Nankai subduction zone (site 808), southwestern Japan (Fig. 4B) (12). In July 2003, following some low-frequency seismic events, a pressure rise was observed at different levels of the borehole simultaneously. The high level of concurrency of the onset of pressure pulses over a 500-m vertical distance, and also in comparison with signals observed at a laterally distanced site, indicates that hydraulic diffusion cannot be the mechanism by which the signal transmission occurred (12). Instead, these observations are consistent with the seismic wave triggering described above. Furthermore, the maximum pressure at each level was reached after different times ranging from 6 hours to more than 1 day. When pressure pulses start off together, what defines this unharmony of their maxima? From Eq. 1, the maximum friction force Fm, where dFdt=0 , and the time between onset and maximum, tm, are related as

1tm=αvFSSa (FmFSS−1) (3)

Fig. 4. Comparison of the aging-rejuvenation model with borehole observations of strain and fluid pressure after earthquakes.

Fig. 4.

(A) Strain changes in Long Valley caldera after the 1992 magnitude 7.3 Landers earthquake [adapted from figure 6 in (5)]. The dashed line is the best fit of Eq. 2. (B) Pressure data from different monitoring levels at site 808 in the Nankai subduction zone following a swarm of small very-low-frequency earthquakes [adapted from figure 5 in (12)]. Pressure peaks 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were observed at depths D = 878, 833, 787, 533, and 371 m below seafloor, respectively. The inset shows the maximum pressure normalized by the screen depth PmD as a function of the inverse of the time between start of pulses (indicated by a dotted line) and when the maximum pressure was reached 1tm . The dashed line is a linear fit ignoring the first data point.

Our previous experiments with PMMA granular material have shown that a is linearly proportional to the normal load on the system, and α is a constant [see (10)]. This guarantees that Eq. 1 accurately conforms to Amontons’ law of friction, as FSS is similarly found to be proportional to the normal load (10, 13). These results indicate that αvFSSa is a constant value independent of the overhead load on the fault. The normal load at each level of the Nankai borehole is specified by the amount of the granular solid material on that level or the depth of the level below the seafloor D. The depth of the seafloor itself is not important for our purpose because the fluid just imposes a buoyant force that essentially reduces the density of the granular material to ρR − ρW, where ρR is the density of rock and ρW is the sea water density. In the inset of Fig. 4B, we plot the maxima of the pressure pulses Pm normalized by the depths D at which the corresponding monitoring screens are positioned as a function of 1tm . The result, excluding the largest pulse (measured at Nankai level 3; see Fig. 4B), confirms that the relation between the pressure maximum and its time of occurrence is determined by our aging-rejuvenation model, pointing also to similar material-dependent frictional properties at these levels.

DISCUSSION

In summary, our laboratory-scale granular fault experiments and analytical description provide insights into remote earthquake triggering. We demonstrated that a seismic pulse can activate a catastrophic failure on a fault that is under static stress, or initiate an aseismic nonmonotonic deformation on a fault that is undergoing sliding motion controlled by its surrounding environment. Since earthquakes and tectonic phenomena follow scale-invariant laws (14, 15), our laboratory-scale frictional model can reproduce the main characteristics of aseismic slip and failure processes in a crustal fault. These findings differ from other dynamic triggering interpretations (8, 9), highlighting the crucial role of aging of the granular packing after a perturbation-induced change of the granular configuration. Specifically, the nonmonotonicity described by Eq. 2 emerges because of this aging effect. Furthermore, our results suggest that granular material aging may offer an alternative explanation for quasi-static weak faults (16–19), as a fault gouge can remain weak for a long time after a seismic wave pulse due to the intrinsically slow aging process. The relevance of these slow evolution dynamics and distinct failure schemes, as presented in Fig. 3, to natural seismic phenomena warrants further investigation using continuous deformation data and aftershock occurrence statistics.

Future studies should elucidate the details concerning the randomization of granular configuration and the concomitant friction drop in terms of the magnitude and duration of the seismic pulse. The nature of the seismic pulse waveform, whether shear or compressional, may also influence this process. Moreover, while we have shown that the stress overshoot, and its reoccurrence in the wake of the seismic pulse, is due to the transition from a random rest configuration to steady-state flow configuration, a comprehensive understanding of the microscopic mechanisms underpinning the aging and rejuvenation processes leading to stress overshoot in the onset of granular flows is still lacking. This involves exploring how the evolution of the granular microstructure under shear gives rise to these responses, potentially through the utilization of jamming and shear-hardening interpretations (20, 21). Insight into this evolution may also be gained by studying the rearrangement of force chains within the granular network (22, 23).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental setup

Our experimental setup, as described in (10), comprises a thick cylindrical tube resting on a granular layer (~1 mm) of hard, spherical PMMA particles (~40 μm diameter) (Fig. 1A). The tube, made of aluminum, has an outer diameter of 29.7 mm, a wall thickness of 2.3 mm, and a height of 58 mm. The volume fraction of PMMA particles within a closed container, subjected to a pressure equivalent to the weight of the tube (0.33 kPa), is found to be 0.62 ± 0.03. The imposed rotational speed in our experiments is 10−5 s−1, which corresponds to a sliding velocity of 0.86 μm/s under the tube edge. The granular layer is around 1 mm thick; therefore, the shear rate is roughly 0.001 s−1. To prevent wall slip, we sandblast both the tube cross section and the bottom surface (also aluminum), resulting in a surface roughness of 2 to 3 μm (measured optically with a Keyence profilometer). We use a custom-made tool, connected to a rheometer (Anton Paar MCR 302), to rotate the tube around its symmetry axis. The rheometer is capable of moving the macroscopic tube with precision and uniformity down to 1 nm/s. This is crucial for capturing continuous instrumental dynamics, given the highly nonlinear nature of friction. Relative motion between tectonic plates occurs at very low speeds, as low as a few centimeters per year. Therefore, our experimental setup’s ability to simulate such slow, natural movements is particularly important for investigating the fundamental mechanics of fault motion. To ensure that the granular material experiences a constant load in the normal direction, we use low-friction bearings between the rheometer tool and the tube. This design feature mimics the natural fault scenario, where the granular fault zone material undergoes constant shearing under the weight of the overhead rock at depths of 10 to 20 km (9). In addition, the use of low-friction bearings allows the tube to settle quickly on the granular material after a perturbation, avoiding damped oscillations that may occur in constrained granular materials where the normal load is applied through a spring and feedback system. These oscillations can obscure the short timescale response of the granular system.

Perturbations

To induce seismic waves on our laboratory-sized fault system, we generate short elastic wave pulses by bouncing a rubber ball off the bottom surface at a location 10 cm from the edge of the tube. These pulses are then captured with a piezo element (SparkFun Electronics, SEN-10293), which is affixed to the bottom surface on the opposite side of the tube, 3 cm away from the edge. The piezo element is connected to a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix, DPO3014) to record the data.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 833240).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: K.F. and D.B. Methodology: K.F. and D.B. Investigation: K.F. and D.B. Visualization: K.F. and D.B. Supervision: D.B. Writing—original draft: K.F. and D.B. Writing—review and editing: K.F. and D.B.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Fig. S1

sciadv.adi7302_sm.pdf (211.7KB, pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Forterre Y., Pouliquen O., Flows of dense granular media. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 1–24 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonn D., Denn M. M., Berthier L., Divoux T., Manneville S., Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035005 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gnoli A., de Arcangelis L., Giacco F., Lippiello E., Pica Ciamarra M., Puglisi A., Sarracino A., Controlled viscosity in dense granular materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 138001 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giacco F., Saggese L., de Arcangelis L., Lippiello E., Pica Ciamarra M., Dynamic weakening by acoustic fluidization during stick-slip motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 128001 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hill D. P., Reasenberg P. A., Michael A., Arabaz W. J., Beroza G., Brumbaugh D., Brune J. N., Castro R., Davis S., dePolo D., Ellsworth W. L., Gomberg J., Harmsen S., House L., Jackson S. M., Johnston M. J. S., Jones L., Keller R., Malone S., Munguia L., Nava S., Pechmann J. C., Sanford A., Simpson R. W., Smith R. B., Stark M., Stickney M., Vidal A., Walter S., Wong V., Zollweg J., Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 260, 1617–1623 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Felzer K. R., Brodsky E. E., Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress. Nature 441, 735–738 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Melosh H. J., Dynamical weakening of faults by acoustic fluidization. Nature 379, 601–606 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson P. A., Jia X., Nonlinear dynamics, granular media and dynamic earthquake triggering. Nature 437, 871–874 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Johnson P. A., Savage H., Knuth M., Gomberg J., Marone C., Effects of acoustic waves on stick–slip in granular media and implications for earthquakes. Nature 451, 57–60 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farain K., Bonn D., Quantitative understanding of the onset of dense granular flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 108201 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marone C., Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 26, 643–696 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davis E. E., Becker K., Wang K., Obara K., Ito Y., Kinoshita M., A discrete episode of seismic and aseismic deformation of the Nankai trough subduction zone accretionary prism and incoming Philippine Sea plate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 242, 73–84 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fall A., Weber B., Pakpour M., Lenoir N., Shahidzadeh N., Fiscina J., Wagner C., Bonn D., Sliding friction on wet and dry sand. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 175502 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Arcangelis L., Lippiello E., Pica Ciamarra M., Sarracino A., Induced and endogenous acoustic oscillations in granular faults. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 377, 20170389 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lherminier S., Planet R., Dit Vehel V. L., Simon G., Vanel L., Måløy K. J., Ramos O., Continuously sheared granular matter reproduces in detail seismicity laws. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 218501 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Faulkner D. R., Mitchell T. M., Healy D., Heap M. J., Slip on 'weak' faults by the rotation of regional stress in the fracture damage zone. Nature 444, 922–925 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sleep N. H., Blanpied M. L., Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults. Nature 359, 687–692 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Collettini C., Niemeijer A., Viti C., Marone C., Fault zone fabric and fault weakness. Nature 462, 907–910 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moore D. E., Rymer M. J., Talc-bearing serpentinite and the creeping section of the San Andreas fault. Nature 448, 795–797 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Babu V., Pan D., Jin Y., Chakraborty B., Sastry S., Dilatancy, shear jamming, and a generalized jamming phase diagram of frictionless sphere packings. Soft Matter 17, 3121–3127 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vinutha H., Sastry S., Disentangling the role of structure and friction in shear jamming. Nat. Phys. 12, 578–583 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brodu N., Dijksman J. A., Behringer R. P., Spanning the scales of granular materials through microscopic force imaging. Nat. Commun. 6, 6361 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abed Zadeh A., Barés J., Brzinski T. A., Daniels K. E., Dijksman J., Docquier N., Everitt H. O., Kollmer J. E., Lantsoght O., Wang D., Workamp M., Zhao Y., Zheng H., Enlightening force chains: A review of photoelasticimetry in granular matter. Granul. Matter 21, 83 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Fig. S1

sciadv.adi7302_sm.pdf (211.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES