ABSTRACT
The wobble bases of tRNAs that decode split codons are often heavily modified. In bacteria, tRNAGlu, Gln, Asp contains a variety of xnm5s2U derivatives. The synthesis pathway for these modifications is complex and fully elucidated only in a handful of organisms, including the Gram-negative Escherichia coli K12 model. Despite the ubiquitous presence of mnm5s2U modification, genomic analysis shows the absence of mnmC orthologous genes, suggesting the occurrence of alternate biosynthetic schemes for the conversion of cmnm5s2U to mnm5s2U. Using a combination of comparative genomics and genetic studies, a member of the YtqA subgroup of the radical Sam superfamily was found to be involved in the synthesis of mnm5s2U in both Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus mutans. This protein, renamed MnmL, is encoded in an operon with the recently discovered MnmM methylase involved in the methylation of the pathway intermediate nm5s2U into mnm5s2U in B. subtilis. Analysis of tRNA modifications of both S. mutans and Streptococcus pneumoniae shows that growth conditions and genetic backgrounds influence the ratios of pathway intermediates owing to regulatory loops that are not yet understood. The MnmLM pathway is widespread along the bacterial tree, with some phyla, such as Bacilli, relying exclusively on these two enzymes. Although mechanistic details of these newly discovered components are not fully resolved, the occurrence of fusion proteins, alternate arrangements of biosynthetic components, and loss of biosynthetic branches provide examples of biosynthetic diversity to retain a conserved tRNA modification in Nature.
IMPORTANCE
The xnm5s2U modifications found in several tRNAs at the wobble base position are widespread in bacteria where they have an important role in decoding efficiency and accuracy. This work identifies a novel enzyme (MnmL) that is a member of a subgroup of the very versatile radical SAM superfamily and is involved in the synthesis of mnm5s2U in several Gram-positive bacteria, including human pathogens. This is another novel example of a non-orthologous displacement in the field of tRNA modification synthesis, showing how different solutions evolve to retain U34 tRNA modifications.
KEYWORDS: rSAM, sequence similarity network, comparative genomics, mnm5s2U, tRNA modification, YtqA, YtqB, MnmM, MnmL
INTRODUCTION
Post-transcriptional modifications of the first position of the anticodon of tRNA molecules (position 34, also called “wobble” position, Fig. 1A) are critical for accurate decoding of mRNAs (1). These modifications are often complex and can expand or decrease the wobble capacity that allows one given tRNA molecule to decode codons differing just by their third base (2). For example, bacterial tRNAs that decode NNA/NNG codons, particularly in split codon boxes, generally harbor xnm5(s2)U derivatives where nm5 stands for aminomethylene (3). The presence of the xnm5 side chain increases pairing to G-ending codons, while the s2 group may be the major contributor to restricting pairing with U- and C-ending codons. In addition, some tRNAs carry ribose methylation at the 2′-OH and/or the mnm5 base modification, which may induce restrictive wobbling (4). The enzymes involved in introducing xnm5(s2)U derivatives are well characterized in the model Gram-negative E. coli K12 (Fig. 1B) (see reference (5) for review). The insertions of the s2 and xnm5 moieties involve two separate biosynthetic branches, both requiring multiple enzymes (4, 5). Structural analysis of the E. coli MnmA-tRNA complex suggests that a partially modified xnm5 intermediate species may not fit into the active site, meaning that thiolation of C2 precedes modification of C5 at U34 of tRNA (6).
The first step in the synthesis of the xnm5 moiety is catalyzed by a heterodimeric 5-carboxymethylaminomethyluridine-tRNA synthase complex MnmGE that can use glycine or ammonium as substrates to produce the cmnm5U or nm5U derivatives, respectively (7, 8) (Fig. 1B). The cmnm5U derivative can be subsequently converted into mnm5U by the bifunctional enzyme MnmC which contains two independent catalytic domains. The C-terminal domain of MnmC, also known as MnmC/MnmC1 or MnmC(o), promotes the FAD-dependent oxidoreduction of cmnm5s2U34 to form nm5U. Whereas the N-terminal MnmC domain, MnmD/MnmC2 or MnmC(m), harbors the tRNA 5-(aminomethyl)−2-thiouridylate-methyltransferase (EC:2.1.1.61 domain), which catalyzes the methylation of nm5s2U to mnm5s2U using S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor (9) (Fig. 1B). Some organisms such as Aquifex aeolicus only encode a stand-alone MnmC2 protein and lack the MnmC1 ortholog as their MnmGE enzymes only use ammonium to directly produce nm5(s2)U (10). Other bacteria, such as Mycoplasma capricolum, only encode the MnmEG genes and no MnmC1 or MnmC2 genes and harbor cmnm5(s2)U in their tRNAs (11).
Environmental and nutritional conditions affect the relative levels of tRNA modifications, including xnm5(s2)U derivatives (12), leading to varying translation efficiency and cellular viability. In general, media, growth phase, and tRNA identity influence the proportions of the different routes, leading to different xnm5(s2)U derivatives (13). It is also known that additional enzymes are involved in ribose methylation (TrmL)(14) or in producing tRNALysUUU and tRNAGlu UUC with U34 modified with selenium instead of sulfur (MnmH) [see reference (4) for review]. The MnmH enzyme is also involved in the geranylation of the same tRNAs in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium (4). The presence of xnm5(s2)U modifications is critical for fitness as it has been shown in E. coli that mutations in mnmE and mnmA are synthetic lethal (15, 16). Mutations in mnmE, mnmG, and mnmA confer a wide range of phenotypes, including defects in virulence in diverse bacteria, including species from Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups (3, 17). Their orthologs are also important for modification of mitochondrial tRNAs and their absence leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and disease (3, 18).
E. coli K12 is one of the rare organisms where all the tRNA modification genes have been identified (19). Even in the well-studied Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis sp subtilis strain 168, the functional assignment of genes involved in mnm5s2U synthesis remains incomplete (20). While the accumulation of cmnm5s2U was anticipated, given the presence of phylogenetically conserved mnmEG orthologs in this organism, the presence of mnm5s2U was initially unexpected since B. subtilis lacks mnmC-like gene or sequences coding for MnmC1 and MnmC2 domains. This intriguing finding suggested that a non-orthologous replacement must have occurred for the last steps of the pathway (Fig. 1C) (21). The existence of alternate biosynthetic schemes for tRNA thiolation in this organism is further supported through the occurrence of an abbreviated pathway for s2U tRNA modification involving only two enzymes YrvO-MnmA, bypassing the Tus sulfur relay system required in E. coli (Fig. 1C) (6).
Foundational studies from the Armengod group showed that cell extracts of B. subtilis were competent to promote mnm5s2U synthesis from precursor cmnm5s2U tRNA isolated from E. coli ΔmnmC strain) (21). Interestingly, these reactions also formed the nm5s2U intermediate, which was consumed in reactions supplemented with S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM), but not FAD. More recently, YtqB (MnmM) was identified as the enzyme responsible for the conversion of nm5s2U into mnm5s2U, performing an MnmC2-like reaction (22). This assignment was attributed to the depletion of mnm5s2U accompanied by the accumulation of nm5s2U tRNA in the B. subtilis ΔmnmM strain. Trans-complementation of not only B. subtilis mnmM but also Staphylococcus aureus and Arabidopsis thaliana mnmM orthologs restored mnm5s2U levels (22). Furthermore, according to Cho and collaborators, B. subtilis mnmM expression in E. coli ΔmnmC shows detectable levels of mnm5s2U but at levels significantly lower than those of the wild type. While MnmM is competent in catalyzing methylation of nm5s2U to yield mnm5s2U, it remains unanswered if additional components participate in this biosynthetic scheme in B. subtilis and other species lacking MnmC. For instance, although experimentally demonstrated in crude extracts, the identity of an MnmC1-like enzyme catalyzing the conversion of cmnm5s2U into nm5s2U tRNA is unknown.
Comparative genomic methods combining phylogenetic distribution, gene fusion, and physical clustering analyses have been powerful tools in identifying many missing tRNA modification genes, particularly for complex modification pathways that require many enzymes (23–27). Now that many tRNA modification genes have been identified in different organisms, it is clear that different evolutionary solutions have emerged to catalyze the insertion of the same modifications (28). In this work, we used comparative genomic methods combined with genetic studies to better understand the last steps in mnm5s2U synthesis in microbes lacking MnmC and identified the versatile radical SAM superfamily family protein YtqA as a key player. These combined approaches reveal the occurrence of alternate pathways leading to hypermodification of U34 tRNAGlu, Gln, Lys in bacterial species.
RESULTS
Phylogenetic distribution analysis of the mnm5s2U pathway suggests MnmC1 has been replaced by non-orthologous enzymes in a number of firmicutes
Analysis of the distribution of the known mnm5s2U34 synthesis protein family members in the bacterial genomes covered in the COG database revealed a patchy distribution for the latter part of the pathway (Fig. 2; Fig. S1; Data S1 and S2). Of the 968 organisms that encode the three proteins required for cmnm5s2U biosynthesis—MnmA (COG0482/K00566), MnmE (COG0486/K03650), and MnmG (COG0445/K03495)—22% (216/968) encode bifunctional MnmC1/MnmC2 (or MnmC, COG4121/K15461) proteins like E. coli, while ~24% (232/968) encode only MnmC2 proteins without MnmC1 domains like A. aeolicus. Finally, over half (520/968) of the analyzed organisms lack both MnmC1 and MnmC2 homologs. Thus, the occurrence of MnmC1 is sparse and matches the distribution of MnmC1 and MnmC2 sequences recently reported by Cho et al. (22) for a smaller data set. The absence of MmnC1 can be, however, associated with distinct biochemical scenarios. First, in the subset of organisms that only use the ammonia pathway to directly synthesize nm5s2U, no MnmC1 is required, and the subsequent methylation to mnm5s2U can be performed by MnmC2 family proteins, like in A. aeolicus (10) or possibly by YtqB/MnmM proteins (22). Second, some organisms such as Lactococcus lactis sub lactis Il1403 (29) or M. capricolum (11) harbor only cmnm5s2U and, therefore, do not require any enzymes beyond MnmEG. Third, in species that accumulate both cmnm5s2U and mnm5s2U, as in the case of B. subtilis and possibly in many other Firmicutes (30, 31) (Fig. 2; Fig. S1), a non-orthologous replacement of MnmC1 must be present and is yet to be identified.
Comparative genomic analyses led to the identification of a radical SAM family subgroup as a candidate for the missing mnm5s2U synthesis enzyme in Firmicutes
Protein fusions and physical clustering analysis are powerful methods to identify missing genes (32, 33) and both led to the identification of a subgroup of the YtqA/YhcC family as a strong candidate for an enzyme involved in the synthesis of nm5s2U in Firmicutes. A domain analysis of the COG4121 family, which encompasses both MnmC1 and MnmC2 domains, across the 968 bacterial genomes of the COG Database (34) that also encode the three MnmA, MnmG, and MnmE proteins, led to the identification of at least four other types of MnmC2 fusions, in addition to the well-characterized MnmC1/MnmC2 examples: fusions with the queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase (TGT) (COG0343, PF01702); the DNA modification methylase YhdJ (PF01555, COG0863); the menaquinone biosynthesis MqnA superfamily subgroup MqnD (PF02621, cd13634); and with a radical SAM family domain of the YtqA/YhcC subgroup (COG1242, PF16199, cd01335, PF04055) (Data S3; Fig. S1). The YtqA name comes from the subfamily member found in B. subtilis (BSU30480) and the YhcC name comes from the subfamily member found in E. coli (b3211). Three examples of YtqA/MnmC2 fusion proteins were identified in the genomes present in the COG database and 70 more in the InterPro database (Fig. 3A; Fig. S1; Data S4A). Genomic synteny analyses show that ytqA is often in an operon or in a close physical neighborhood with the mnmM gene encoding the recently identified nm5s2U methyltransferase, including in the model Gram-positive B. subtilis where the two genes are co-expressed (Fig. 3B and 4B; Fig. S2) (35). Both YtqA/YhcC and MnmM are part of superfamilies that are currently not well separated in most protein family databases (see below and discussion), but when analyzing the distribution of ytqA-mnmM clusters (Fig. 2; Data S5), these are prevalent in organisms that are missing MnmC1 and MnmC2 such as the Firmicutes and the deltaproteobacteria (Fig. 2; Data S6 and S7).
YhcC/YtqA sequences display signature motifs of members of the radical SAM superfamily of enzymes, known to facilitate a wide range of chemistries. First, these sequences were located in the sequence similarity network (SSN) analysis of the whole radical SAM family generated by the Gerlt group using the searchable web resource RadicalSAM.org (36). The YtqA/YhcC subgroup was identified as part of the Elongator Protein-like mega cluster 2–4.1 (Fig. 4A). Proteins of this subgroup are members of the KEGG orthology group K07139 and the InterPro family IPR005911 (Protein YhcC-like). YtqA unique functional motifs and genomic synteny of its coding sequence make it a candidate for replacing MnmC1 in many organisms. Proteins within the YhcC sub-group would not be isofunctional since the E. coli genome encodes for YhcC, and MnmC1 is the only protein catalyzing the cmnm5s2U to nm5s2U reaction in this organism (9). We, therefore, constructed SSNs of 10,896 IPR005911 proteins, which allowed differentiation of the E. coli YhcC subgroup (group four in Fig. 4B) from the B. subtilis YtqA subgroup (group one in Fig. 4B). Mapping of additional data such as gene neighborhood, fusion, and gene presence/absence data onto this network suggests that in addition to YtqA proteins from subgroup 1, homologs from subgroups 3, 5, 7, and 8 are most likely linked to mnm5s2U synthesis. Collectively, bioinformatic analysis showing the physical clustering, gene fusion, and taxonomic distribution data strongly suggests a role of the YtqA protein subfamily in Firmicutes in mnm5s2U synthesis in tRNA.
Genetic analysis in S. mutans confirms the involvement of YtqA in mnm5s2U synthesis
To validate the predicted role of YtqA in mnm5s2U synthesis, we constructed deletion mutants of the ytqA and mnmM genes in Streptococcus mutans. Like in B. subtilis, the two genes are in an operon in S. mutans (Fig. 3). A non-polar deletion of the ytqA (smu_1699 c) was constructed by inserting an Erythromycin Resistance (EryR) cassette lacking a terminator. The same cassette was used to delete the mnmM (ytqB, smu_1697 c) gene as well as to delete both genes. As expected, tRNA extracted from a Streptococcus mutans strain containing a deletion of the ytqA-mnmM genes (smu_1699 c and smu_1697 c) lacks mnm5s2U and accumulates increased relative levels of nm5s2U and cmnm5s2U intermediates (Fig. 5). Inactivation of only mnmM confirms the involvement of the methyltransferase in mnm5s2U formation and also showed an accumulation of nm5s2U, compatible with its proposed role in catalyzing the final methylation step in mnm5s2U. Inactivation of ytqA led to higher levels of cmnm5s2U and no nm5U accumulation, a phenotype that supports the involvement of ytqA in this pathway. Notably, the distinct phenotypes of ytqA-mnmM and ytqA deletions demonstrate the absence of polar effects on the ytqA knockout strain.
Genetic analysis of B. subtilis YtqA shows its involvement in mnm5s2U pathway
The genomic co-localization of ytqA and mnmM observed in S. mutans is also observed in B. subtilis (20, 22). Recent functional studies in B. subtilis showed that the inactivation of mnmM led to a loss of mnm5s2U (22). Two research groups participating in this study independently analyzed the relative levels of tRNA modifications in B. subtilis ytqA and mnmM mutants and have not been able to reproduce these results. Collectively, our analyses showed the absence of mnm5s2U modification in the DytqA strain and the presence of this modification in the ΔmnmM strain from LB cultures isolated at mid and late lag phase (OD 0.5–1) (Fig. 6; Fig. S3). The results reported here are in contrast with the recent Cho et al. report on the analysis of mnmM knockout strain using tRNA samples isolated from overnight cultures that showed no detectable levels of mnm5s2U (22) but in agreement with earlier analysis of B. subtilis IC6779 strain containing mnmM inactivation that retained detectable levels of the fully modified base (21). In our hands, tRNA samples extracted from B. subtilis cultured beyond log phase (OD = or > 2) led to inconsistent results (Fig. S3B), likely associated with cells entering sporulation. Remarkedly, tRNA isolated from B. subtilis ΔytqA showed high levels of the pathway intermediate nm5s2U that is not detectable in tRNA extracted from the wild-type strain. Therefore, ytqA inactivation resulted in the accumulation of nm5s2U and no detection of mnm5s2U (20, 22). Overall, these analyses showed the involvement of ytqA and mnmM in mnm5s2U synthesis. It is worth noting that cells lacking YtqA or MnmM do not display any growth phenotype when compared to the wild type, suggesting that the intermediate cmnm5s2U modification may already provide the proper conformation of s2U34 to guarantee fidelity in base pairing with cognate tRNAs.
The ability of B. subtilis YtqA and MnmM to functionally replace E. coli MnmC was then assessed through heterologous trans-complementation experiments as a probe for MnmC1 and MnmC2 equivalent reactions. As previously reported, E. coli DmnmC accumulates cmn5s2U and completely lacks mnm5s2U (21). Co-expression of B. subtilis YtqA-MnmM restored the synthesis of mnm5s2U to 1/3 of wild-type levels, confirming their involvement in this pathway (Fig. 6B). Expression of B. subtilis MnmM alone also resulted in mnm5s2U formation, albeit at much lower levels (~5% of E. coli MG1655 levels) and similar to residual levels reported by Cho et al. (22).
Altered pathway for the mnm5s2U synthesis in S. pneumoniae
Genomic analysis of YtqA and MnmM orthologs showed the presence of an altered pathway for mnm5s2U in some Gram-positive such as Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. This organism harbors truncated copies of ytqA coding the N-terminal and C-terminal sequences of YtqA (spd_0565 and spd_0566) upstream of mnmM (spd_0567) (Fig. 3; Fig. S4), raising the question of whether these species represent evolutionary representatives in the process of losing the last step of this pathway. In fact, analysis of modified nucleosides from S. pneumoniae showed much-reduced levels of mnm5s2U (approximately 10-fold lower than B. subtilis or E. coli, Fig. 6) and confirmed the involvement of spd_565 to spd_567 gene region in this pathway (Fig. 7). Interestingly, a spontaneous nonsense mutation within mnmM generating a Q152stop was identified within the unencapsulated S. pneumoniae D39 genetic background (IU1824) (Fig. S4). Analysis of modified nucleosides showed that this truncation near the C-terminal end of the protein affects MnmM activity and results in loss of mnm5s2U synthesis like the deletion of the whole mnmM gene (IU19966) (Fig. 7). These phenotypes were complemented by repairing the mutation (strain IU19835) or expressing the mnmM ectopically under a zinc inducible promoter. The lack of an apparent growth defect upon elimination of mnm5s2U was also observed in S. pneumoniae, reinforcing the proposal that the cmnm5s2U modification is sufficient to fulfill functional requirements. Nevertheless, out of 242 complete S. pneumoniae genomes in the BV-BRC database at the time of the analysis (version 3.32.13a), all harbored truncated copies of ytqA (examples given in Fig. S5), suggesting this truncation must have occurred just before the S. pneumoniae speciation. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the closest species with a common ancestor, Streptococcus mitis (37) has a full copy of the gene (Fig. S5). To investigate the possible impacts of the truncated spd_0567(mnmM)(Q152stop) on pneumococcal physiology, we performed the following experiments and detected no differences between IU1824 (spd_0567(mnmM)(Q152stop) and IU19835 (mnmM+) (data not shown). The conditions tested were growth in BHI broth at 30°C, 37°C, 42°C, and in BHI broth containing 0.3 M NaCl at 37°C. There were no differences between cell widths and lengths of cells grown at 37°C, or survival rates after 30-min treatment with 20 mM hydrogen peroxide. In addition, antibiotic disk-diffusion assays showed no differences in the diameter of the zones of inhibition using discs containing fosfomycin, cefotaxime, penicillin, and tetracycline between IU1824 (spd_0567 (mnmM) (Q152stop) and IU19835 (mnmM+).
DISCUSSION
Bioinformatic analysis shows the occurrence of diverse biochemical strategies for hypermodification of U34 in tRNAGlu, Gln, Lys in bacteria. Our results from the S. mutans and S. pneumoniae ΔmnmM strains confirm the functional assignment of Cho et al. (22) that MnmM is required in the SAM-dependent methylation reaction nm5s2U to form mnm5s2U. Our analysis from B. subtilis ΔmnmM, however, did not show the same requirement, suggesting that, in this organism, other methylases may provide functional replacement under certain growth conditions. Previous analysis of single knockout strains of several methylases in B. subtilis, including MnmM also failed to show inactivation of mnm5s2U synthesis (21). We believe that the differences in the observed phenotypes of the mnmM knockout strain between ours and other studies may be associated with the functionality of the NH4+ and glycine-dependent routes with varying growth conditions and stages. The NH4+ route could be the major route to mnm5s2U in the stationary phase (conditions used in the Cho et al. analyses). Hence, MnmM would be the major player in these conditions. However, the glycine route may be the major route in exponential growth and another enzyme or pathway would be required to synthesize mnm5s2U from cmnm5s2U. Physical clustering and gene fusion data point to YtqA as a candidate to complete this pathway in B. subtilis. Indeed, the B. subtilis ΔytqA mutant is devoid of mnm5s2U and accumulates nm5s2U, supporting the occurrence of the NH4+ pathway in this organism. This phenotype cannot be due to a polar effect on mnmM, as we found that deleting this gene did not lead to nm5s2U accumulation and retained mnm5s2U modification. In addition, co-expression of ytqA-mmnM allowed partial complementation of the E. coli ΔmnmC mnm5s2U deficiency, whereas expression of mnmM alone only led to minimal mnm5s2U accumulation. The expression of ytqA alone did not increase nm5U nor mnm5U levels in the same mnmC strain compatible with the model that thiolation of C2 of U34 precedes the installation of the C5 modification route (data not shown).
The exact role of YtqA is still not fully understood and will require further biochemical and genetic characterization. Nevertheless, experimental evidence provided in this study shows the involvement of YtqA in the biosynthesis of mnm5s2U; therefore, we propose renaming this enzyme as MnmL (Fig. 8). Our current model is that MnmL-MnmM can promote the conversion of cmnm5s2U into mnm5s2U. MnmL (YtqA) is classified as a member of the radical SAM enzyme superfamily, known to catalyze diverse chemical transformations triggered by the generation of a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (dAdo●) from SAM (38). This dAdo● could abstract an H-atom from cmnm5s2U, causing oxidative decarboxylation by forming an xnm5s2U intermediate that could further react to yield mnm5s2U. Potential sites for the dAdo●-catalyzed H-atom abstraction include the glycine alpha carbon, the amide nitrogen, or the 5U-methylene carbon (Fig. S6). Experimental determination of the site of H-atom abstraction would require isotope labeling studies. However, the viability of this chemistry can be probed using density functional theory (DFT) geometry optimizations to predict the outcome of H-atom abstraction from each of these sites within the cmnm5s2U substrate—these results are summarized in Table S2. For example, H-atom abstraction from the amide nitrogen promotes oxidative decarboxylation and the formation of a terminal imine that could be hydrolyzed to give nm5s2U. This chemistry is very similar to that catalyzed by radical SAM enzymes HydG and ThiH, which abstract hydrogen from the amino group of an exogenous L-tyrosine, leading to the formation of p-cresol and dehydroglycine (39). However, the observation made in the present work that both YtqA and MnmM are required to produce the maximal amount of mnm5s2U suggests some interplay between the two enzymes. Sequence homology (cf. Fig. 4) suggests that MnmL (YtqA) possesses a (β/α)6 three-quarter TIM barrel fold, like 75% of all radical SAM enzymes (40). Often, an additional protein subunit occupies the gap in the TIM barrel and is integral in the catalyzed chemistry, as is the case in the tRNA-modifying MiaB (41). MnmL is a quite small radical SAM enzyme (sequence length ≈330 amino acids), and no additional subunit is predicted by AlphaFold {https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/entry/O35008}. Therefore, it is possible that tRNA binding may mediate the formation of a ternary complex with MnmM, which enables the conversion of cmnm5s2U to mnm5s2U. This model is compatible with the observation that no nm5s2U is accumulated in S. mutans, B. subtilis, and S. pneumoniae wild-type strains. The requirement of a MnmL-MnmM-tRNA ternary complex for completion of the two consecutive steps also helps to explain the lack of mnm5s2U when MnmL (YtqA) is absent and the accumulation of nm5s2U which is likely derived from the NH4+ pathway. In this model, it is possible that another yet-unidentified methylase(s) can provide a functional replacement when MnmM is absent in B. subtilis. Nevertheless, biochemical validation of these proposed biosynthetic schemes will be tested in subsequent studies.
The occurrence of alternate pathways for the synthesis of mnm5s2U cannot be simply explained by the existence of an optimized single enzyme catalyzing two consecutive reactions as in the case of MnmC or by the recruitment of a proposed MnmL-MnmM complex. In fact, nature has found multiple combinations to promote hypermodification of U34 tRNA involving both C2 and C5 positions, which guarantees fidelity in translation. Distinct pathways have been ascribed for s2U in prokaryotes, as well as distinct cytosolic and mitochondrial eukaryotic systems (6, 42, 43). As discussed in the introduction, for modifications in the C5 position, some species do not synthesize mnm5s2U and only accumulate cmnm5s2U with apparent no metabolic penalties. At the same time, other species have bypassed the cmnm5s2U intermediate by utilizing only the ammonia route through the direct formation of nm5s2U intermediate and an MnmC2 enzyme to complete the pathway, as in the case of A. aeolicus (10). Phylogenetic distribution and fusion analyses (Fig. 2 and 3; Fig. S1 and S8 of Cho et al. (22)) revealed the patchwork of enzymatic solutions that have evolved in bacteria for the synthesis of the x5s2U34 modifications (summarized Fig. 8). Some of these solutions have been experimentally validated (in bold in Fig. 8), while others are predicted from the fusions analysis (annotated with a + sign in Fig. 8) or from phylogenetic distribution data (annotated with a * sign in Fig. 8). For example, Chlamydiae trachomatis encodes an MnmM but no MnmL(YtqA) nor MnmC1 (Table S6 of Cho et al. (22) and Data S4B). We predict that, like A. aoelicus, this organism only uses the ammonium route to produce nm5s2U but then uses MnmM (instead of MnmC2 in A. aoelicus) to perform the last step (Fig. 8). Similarly, the MnmL/MnmC2 and MnmC1/MnmM fusions (Data S4A) suggest these two combinations of enzymes can be used to convert cmnm5s2U into nm5s2U in addition to the known E. coli MnmC1/nmC2 combination. These predictions await experimental validation as one cannot rule out that other yet-unidentified enzymes are present in some organisms. Also, in organisms that only harbor MnmAGE, it is impossible to predict without experimental data if the glycine route or the NH4 route is used alone or in combination, even if to date no organisms seem to stop at the nm5s2U intermediate. It is also clear that the genes encoding enzymes involved in the late steps of the mnm5s2U synthesis pathway can be quite easily lost in specific clades, as shown here in the S. pneumoniae clade.
Functional assignment solely based on sequence similarities is not a suitable approach for computational prediction of the mnm5s2U pathways. Both YtqA/MnmL and YtqB/MnmM proteins are members of protein superfamilies that have many paralog subgroups and one must be very cautious in transferring functional annotations from the experimentally validated members to homologs to avoid mis-annotation of paralogs. The experimentally validated B. subtills MnmM is a member of the SAM-dependent methyltransferase superfamily (IPR029063) that contains hundreds of families and cannot be used to propagate the annotation. A more specific profile has been recently created, which places MnmM in the methyltransferase MnmM-like family (IPR010719), and it has been used to propagate the annotation in Interpro and Uniprot databases and experimentally validates for several members of the family (22). For the transfer of the MnmL/YtqA functional annotation, one can confidently propagate within the proteins in Group 1 of the SSN generated in Fig. 4. Proteins of subgroups 3, 7, and 8 also have a high probability of isofunctionality with proteins of subgroups 1 based on fusion and physical clustering (Fig. 4). For all other subgroups, experimental testing is required before any annotation transfer can occur. One subgroup that is most certainly not isofunctional with MnmL/YtqA is group 4, which contains the E. coli YhcC protein. As discussed above, there is no cmnm5s2U to mnm5s2U transformation activity when the mnmC gene of E. coli that encodes the MnmC1/MnmC2 fusion is deleted. In addition, physical clustering data of the larger YtqA/YhcC family never links members of E. coli YhcC subgroups with any protein of the nm5s2U pathway (Data S5). The genes that cluster most frequently with genes encoding proteins of the YhcC subgroup (group 4 in Fig. 4) are genes involved in anaerobic/aerobic growth conditions and oxidative stress resistance such as gltB, gtlD, arcB, ptsN, and elbB (Data S5). It has also been shown that yhcC expression is regulated by the anaerobic transition regulator FNR (44). At this stage, further studies will be required to elucidate the function of members of the YhcC subgroup.
Overall, this study shows the diversity of pathways involving the synthesis of xnm5s2U tRNA in bacteria. Genomic analysis guided the computational assignment of alternate pathways and led to the identification of MnmL/YtqA as a component of this pathway. The occurrence of fusion proteins containing alternate arrangements of MnmC1/MnmL and MnmC2/MnmM supports the proposed role of MnmL in catalyzing the conversion of cmnm5s2U into nm5 s2U in a reaction that is coupled to the final methylation by MnmM. Experimental validation of such computational assignments was completed for both S. mutans and B. subtilis. Interestingly, analysis of S. pneumoniae-modified tRNA suggests that the arrangement of MnmL as two polypeptides spanning the N- and C- halves of the enzyme leads to loss of function. Thus, S. pneumoniae likely represents an evolutionary intermediate in route to losing this branch of the pathway. The accumulation of cmnm5s2U appears to compensate for the deficiency of the fully modified mnm5s2U, as strains lacking this modification do not display a growth phenotype or any other metabolic defects. Validation of functional assignments for alternate biosynthetic pathways awaits experimental demonstration. Nevertheless, the examples reported in this study provide direction for these investigations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General bioinformatic resources
For literature and sequence retrievals, the resources at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (45), UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org) (46), and BV-BRC (https://www.bv-brc.org) (47) were routinely used. PaperBlast was used to find published papers on members of a given family (papers.genomics.lbl.gov/) (48). SSNs were generated with the Enzyme Function Initiative (EFI) suite of web tools (https://efi.igb.illinois.edu/) (49). SSNs were visualized using Cytoscape (50). Species phylogenetic trees were usually constructed using phyloT v2 (data version 2023.2). Both species and protein phylogenetic trees were visualized and annotated using iTOL v6 (version 6.8.1; https://itol.embl.de) (51). The tree building and visualization tools of BV-BRC were also used. Absence-presence data were retrieved from the Database of Clustered Orthologous Genes (COG Db) (https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/COG/COG2020/data/, accessed 22 August 2022) (34). Physical clustering data were retrieved from the KEGG Database (via the protein sequence entry option, ”Gene Cluster”). Metabolic pathway and gene symbol/family name annotations were retrieved from KEGG (release 108.0; https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/)(52) and UniProtKB (release 2023_04; https://www.uniprot.org) (46). Gizmogene (http://www.gizmogene.com/) was used to create gene cluster figures. SubtiWiki was used to explore coexpression data in B. subtilis (53). Protein sequences were aligned using MultiAlin (54).
Absence-presence data extraction, benchmark genome filtration for encoding of MnmAGE homologs, and MnmC1-/MnmC2fusion analysis
The MnmAGE families (COG0482, COG0445, and COG0486, respectively) absence-presence data were extracted from the Database of Clustered Orthologous Genes (COG) (https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/COG/COG2020/data/, accessed 22 August 2022) (34). This set was used to create a benchmark set of 968 bacterial genomes encoding MnmAGE homologs (Data S1) that was used to then analyze the presence/absence of MnmC protein family members (COG4121). Because COG does not distinguish between the different subgroups of MnmC (i.e., MnmC1, MnmC2, MnmC1/C2 fusion), CDD Search (batch search, standard view) was used to determine MnmC1 domain-containing proteins, MnmC2 domain-containing proteins, MnmC1/C2 fusions, and other fusions with MnmC2 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi, accessed 22 August 2022) (55). The specific hits per CDD Search results provided the labels of sequences used in data tables and figures (Data S3). Batch CDD search results also supplied respective sequence lengths.
Physical clustering analyses
Using the COG database for the 968 bacterial benchmark genomes filtered for MnmAGE, YtqA family sequences were acquired (ordered locus names per assembly) (Data S4). For each identified YtqA homolog, the KEGG Database “Gene Cluster” protein entry feature was used to extract physical clustering data. Each set of genes per “Gene Cluster” varied in number, determined by KEGG. These data were expanded into a tabular format per respective cluster YtqA sequence (UniProt Accession ID) (Data S5). All gene cluster proteins were mapped to their respective UniProt Accession IDs and investigated for methyltransferase (i.e., MnmM-/YtqB-like) domains using three different methods, one BLAST-driven and two HMM-driven (Data S5C through E): (1) traditional BLASTp (release, ncbi-blast-2.14.1+-win64; e-value = 0.0001; UniProtKB derived FASTA sequences as inputs) (56); (2) CDD sequence search (output format, Standard; RefSeq identifiers as inputs) (57); and (3) InterProScan sequence search (UniProtKB derived FASTA sequences as inputs) (58). All MnmM-/YtqB-like absence-presence data were managed and curated, and the outputs of the three different retrieval methods were merged using Microsoft Office Excel (Data S5C and 5D). The same was true for the YtqA-containing gene cluster data and subsequent data transformations required for calculating absence-presence proportions/percentages across various genome subgroups within phylum-level defined taxonomic groups (taxonomic groups derived from those included in the COG absence-presence data; representative taxonomic group tax IDs were manually curated) (Data S6). These mapped percentages would be the source data mapped to the phylogenetic trees of Fig. 2. Trees were generated, mapped, and edited using phyloT v2 (https://phylot.biobyte.de/index.cgi) and iToL (51). UniProt IDs for all genes of each cluster were mapped. Metabolic categories were assigned to each cluster member using KEGG and UniProt pathway category assignments (Data S8). Gene symbol/family names were assigned per their respective annotations (Data S8). Using this data, annotations were subsequently mapped to a tree using iTOL or to SSNs using Cytoscape.
Sequence similarity and gene neighborhood networks
SSNs were generated with the Enzyme Function Initiative (EFI) suite of web tools (https://efi.igb.illinois.edu/) (49). SSNs were visualized using Cytoscape (50). A network was generated using the InterPro identifier IPR005911 (Protein YhcC-like), the taxonomy restricted to include only bacterial sequences. Sequences annotated as fragments by UniProt were excluded. Three preliminary networks were generated for alignment scores (AS) of 90, 97, and finally 100 (“repnode” percentages of 95, 95, and 55, respectively). AS100, repnode 55 was selected for figure generation. After acquiring UniProt accession IDs for all sequences possible, fusions and absence-presence data for MnmC and YtqA (see preceding subsection) were mapped to each preliminary network and then to the final colorized network (Fig. 4). The AS100 network was colorized by cluster and with all singletons and 2-node clusters removed (see Data S9 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25403692.v1).
Density functional theory (geometry optimizations)
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using Orca 5.0 (59). The set of cmnm5s2U molecular models was generated with a variety of protonation states and sites for the initial H-atom abstraction (summarized in Fig. S6) using Chem3D (PerkinElmer). The ribose moiety and the rest of the tRNA were approximated with a methyl group, but all other atoms of the 2-thiouracil were kept as shown in Fig. S6A. Geometry optimization was done in Orca with the BP86 functional (60, 61) and def2-SVP basis set (62) with def2/J auxiliary functions (63) and using the conductor-like polarizable continuum model for water (dielectric constant = 80.4, refractive index = 1.33) (64).
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table S3. Strains of S. mutans were routinely cultured statically at 37°C in 5% CO2 in BHI medium (BD Biosciences) with 10 µg/mL erythromycin (Sigma) when appropriate. Strains of B. subtilis were routinely cultured with shaking at 200 rpm in LB media (Fisher) at 37°C with 50 mg/mL of kanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich) or 10 µg/mL erythromycin when appropriate. E. coli strains were cultured with shaking at 200 rpm on LB agar at 37°C supplemented with 100 µg/mL ampicillin (Acros) or 50 µg/mL kanamycin when appropriate. S. pneumoniae cells were cultured statically in BHI medium at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. S. pneumoniae were strains grown on plates containing trypticase soy agar II (modified; Becton-Dickinson), and 5% (vol/vol) defibrinated sheep blood (TSAII-BA). Plates were incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. TSAII-BA plates for selections contained antibiotics at concentrations described previously (65).
Genetic construction methods
E. coli
The B. subtilis ytqA-mnmM gene region was amplified from B. subtilis CU1065 genomic DNA prepared using a DNA extraction kit (QuickExtract, Epicentre). PCR amplification was performed using primers YtqA_F and YtqB_R (Table S3) and the resulting fragment was digested with NcoI and BamHI prior to ligation into NcoI/BglII sites of pBAD, the resulting plasmid was named pDS358. The coding sequence for ytqA and ytqB was amplified with restriction sites NcoI and XhoI/BamHI and NcoI and BamHI from pDS358 using primers YtqA_NcoI_F and YtqA_XhoIBamHI_R and YtqB_NcoI_F and YtqB_BamHI_R, respectively. The resulting amplicons were digested and ligated into pBAD to create pDB359 and pDS365, respectively. The sequences of these constructs were verified through DNA sequence (Azenta). pBAD expression plasmids containing ytqA-mnmM, ytqA, and mnmM were transformed into E. coli ∆mnmC and cultured in 500 mL of LB medium containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL) and arabinose (2 mg/mL) up to OD600 nm of ~1.0. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and stored at −20°C prior to further analysis.
S. mutans
Mutations in S. mutans UA159 were constructed by a PCR ligation mutagenesis method (66)). Different sets of primers (listed in Table S4) were used to amplify regions directly upstream and downstream from the gene targeted for deletion and to introduce complementary ligation sites to a non-polar erythromycin resistance cassette. The upstream, downstream, and resistance markers were digested and ligated into a linear piece of DNA, which was subsequently used to transform S. mutans cells in the presence of competence stimulating peptide (67), and double-cross-over recombination events were selected by plating on BHI agar supplemented with 10 µg/mL erythromycin. The correct deletion of the gene was confirmed by PCR with external primers and amplicon length comparison.
S. pneumoniae
Streptococcus pneumoniae strains used in this study are listed in Table S3. Strains were derived from unencapsulated strain IU1824 (D39 Δcps rpsL1), which were derived from the encapsulated serotype-2 D39W progenitor strain IU1690 (68). Compared with the progenitor strain IU1690, a spontaneous mutation (Q150STOP) was found in spd_0567 (mnmM) during the construction of IU1824 (69). The mnmM (Q150STOP) mutation in IU1824 was repaired to mnmM+ in strain IU19835. No growth or microscopic differences were observed between IU1824 and IU19835 (spd_0567+) in BHI broth. Strains containing antibiotic markers were constructed by transformation of CSP1-induced competent pneumococcal cells with linear DNA amplicons synthesized by overlapping fusion PCR (65). Strains containing markerless alleles in native chromosomal loci were constructed using allele replacement via the Pc-[kan-rpsL+] (70). Primers used to synthesize different amplicons are listed in Table S4. TT1519 and TT1522 are outside forward primers and TT1520 is the outside reverse primer for strains IU19964, IU19966, and IU19968. Fusion primers for IU19964, IU19966, and IU19968 are TT1618/TT1619, TT1623/TT1624, and TT1621/TT1622, respectively. D39 genomic DNA was used as a template. For the construction of IU19974, the 5′ fragment was obtained using IU11077 (69) which contains the 5′ fragment of ΔbgaA::kan-t1t2-PZn and primers TT657 and TT1577. Middle fragment and 3′ fragments were obtained using D39 gDNA as templates and primer pairs TT1578/TT1579 and TT1580/CS121. Mutant constructs were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing of chromosomal regions corresponding to the amplicon regions used for transformation. Ectopic expression of mnmM was achieved with a PZn zinc-inducible promoter in the ectopic bgaA site. 0.2 mM Zn2+ and 0.02 mM Mn2+ were added to BHI broth for inducing conditions. Mn2+ was added with Zn2+ to prevent zinc toxicity (71).
B. subtilis
The B. subtilis mnmM and ytqA mutant were obtained from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (https://bgsc.org/index.php) and verified by PCR using Oligos BSU_ytqB_VF and BSU_ytqB_VR or BSU_ytqA_VF and BSU_ytqA_VR (see Table S2).
Growth, cell width and length measurements, hydrogen peroxide, and antibiotic sensitivity tests of Streptococcus pneumoniae
Growth in BHI broth containing 0.3 M NaCl was performed by the addition of 0.21 M NaCl to BHI broth, which contained 0.09 M NaCl. Cell width and length measurements were performed as described in reference (65). Hydrogen peroxide sensitivity assays were performed on bacterial cells grown exponentially in BHI to OD620 ~0.2 as described in reference (72). Cells were treated with 20 mM H2O2 for 30 min, samples were serially diluted in physiological saline solution [0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl] at room temperature and 5 µL were spotted on TSAII-BA plates. Antibiotic disk-diffusion assays were carried out with the antibiotic Sensi-Disc (Becton Dickinson Pty Ltd., Fosfomycin; cat# 231709, Cefotaxime; cat# 231606, Tetracycline; cat# 230998, and penicillin; cat# 230918) as described in (69).
Bulk tRNA extraction
Samples of bacterial culture were used to prepare bulk tRNA extracts for E. coli, S. mutans, S. pneumoniae, and B. subtilis. As the LC-MS analyses were done by three laboratories and utilized different methods to prepare tRNA samples were used. In the PDS method, 0.5 L cultures of E. coli and B. subtilis were harvested by centrifugation, and the cell pellets were treated as previously described to obtain the bulk tRNA samples (73) that were stored at −20°C until LC-MS analysis. In the VDCL1 method, B. subtilis cell pellets were prepared by diluting overnight (16–18 h) liquid cultures to an initial OD600nm of 0.02, allowed to grow at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm until a final OD600nm of ~1.0 or another specified value as indicated, and 5 mL of cells were centrifuged. For B. subtilis samples, each cell pellet was re-suspended in a solution containing 10 mg/mL lysozyme and sodium acetate (pH5.3, 50 mM sodium acetate) and transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube followed by an incubation at 37°C for 1 h. The resulting lysate was then used to isolate bulk tRNA as previously described (74).
S. mutans tRNA samples were prepared using the VDCL2 method. Using this method, each sample was prepared by first diluting overnight (16–18 h) liquid cultures to an initial OD600nm of 0.02 and allowed to grow statically at 37°C in 5% CO2 until a final OD600nm of ~0.6 was achieved, and 5 mL were centrifuged. Each S. mutans cell pellet was re-suspended in a solution of 5 mg/mL lysozyme (lysozyme from chicken egg white, Sigma Aldrich—6876) and TE Buffer (pH 8, 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube. Each sample was then incubated on wet ice for 30 min. After the cold incubation, a solution of 10% SDS in water was added to each sample tube to reach a final concentration of 1% SDS, followed by an incubation at 95°C for 5 min. The resulting S. mutans lysate was then used to isolate bulk tRNA as previously described (74).
S. pneumoniae tRNA samples were prepared using the MW method. Each sample processed by the MW was prepared by diluting overnight cultures (12–15 h) to an initial OD620nm 0.005 and allowed to grow until an OD620nm of 0.1–0.3 was achieved. For induction of mnmM in the merodiploid strain IU19974, 0.2 mM Zn2+, and 0.02 mM Mn2+ were added to BHI broth during day growth. For each tRNA preparation, two 40 mL of culture grown to OD620 ≈0.19 to 0.22 were centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 7 min at 4°C. Each pellet was added with 100 µL of lytic buffer (1.2% triton, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris, pH 8.3), vortexed, and followed by the addition of 500 µL of Trizol. The bacteria Trizol mixtures from the two pellets were combined and added to a 2 mL tube containing lysing matrix B (MP biomedical, 116911-500), and processed with a FastPrep-24 machine (MP biomedical) three times for 40 s at setting 6 with a 24 × 2 holder at 4°C. The tubes were centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 7 min at 4°C, and the upper layers (~900 µL) were transferred to new microfuge tubes and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Chloroform (450 µL) was added to the transferred sample, vortexed for 10 s, and incubated for 5 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Approximately 450 µL of the upper phase was transferred to microfuge tubes, added with 0.5 x volume (225 µL) of 100% room temperature ethanol, and inverted 10 times to mix. The mixture was added to a PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit Spin Columns, followed by centrifugation at 1 min at 12,000 x g. The flow through (~600 µL) was transferred to a new microfuge tube and mixed with 700 µL of 100% ethanol. The mixture was added in two runs to a new PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit Spin Column, centrifuged for 1 min at 12,000 x g, and the flow-through discarded. Wash buffer W5 from the PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit (500 µL) was added to the column and centrifuged for 1 min at 12,000 x g. The wash step was performed three times, followed by a final centrifugation of 3 min. The spin column was transferred to a new microfuge tube, and 62 µL of RNase-free water was added and incubated for 1 min. The sample was eluted by centrifugation for 1 min at 21,000 × g. Samples were quantified with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer, showing typical 260/280 readings of ~2 and 260/230 readings of 2.0 to 2.2. Typical yields from this protocol were 40 to 70 µg from 80 mL of cell culture collected at OD620 ≈0.19 to 0.22. The purified samples were stored at −80°C until further analysis.
Mass spectrometric analysis of modified ribonucleosides in tRNA from B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. pneumoniae
LC-MS Method #1
tRNA modifications were analyzed by two chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry methods (LC-MS). In LC-MS Method #1, total RNA (40 µg) was heat-denatured at 100°C for 5 min, chilled on ice for 5 min, and allowed to come to room temperature. The RNA was digested in 20 mM TMA-acetate pH 5.3 containing 5 µL P1 nuclease, 10 µL alkaline phosphatase (RSAP), and 20 µL CutSmart buffer. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, centrifuged at 12,800 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was spiked with 5 µL of methanol-formic acid (80:4) before mass spectrometry analysis. Digested total RNA samples were analyzed by HPLC using a Polaris C-18 column (Agilent), coupled with a mass spectrometer (Orbitrap) in positive ion mode, as described in Edwards et al. (75). Optima LC-MS grade solvents were 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in methanol (solvent B). The column was pre-equilibrated with 2% Solvent B for 15 column volumes at 300 µL min−1. Tune file parameters used during runs were as follows: Voltage (kV): 4.01; Sheath Gas Flow Rate (arb): 47.00; Auxiliary Gas Flow Rate (arb): 30.00; Sweep Gas Flow Rate (arb): 0.00; Capillary Voltage (V): 2.00; Capillary Temperature (C): 350; and Tube Lens Voltage (V): 49.89. Digested nucleosides were separated and detected over the course of a 39 min run using the gradient of solvent B as follows: 0–4 min, hold at 2% B (vol/vol); 4–25 min, increase B from 2% to 100%; 25–33 min, hold at 100% B; and 33–39 min switch from 100% B to 2% B to allow column re-equilibration at 2% B. Standards of dihydrouridine (Dalton) and pseudouridine (Barry & Associates) were run as controls for normalizing data as they are present in lower abundance, similar to the modifications analyzed in this study (76). The desired analytes D ([M + H]+:247.0925), nm5s2U ([M + H]+: 290.0805), cmnm5s2U ([M + H]+: 348.086), mnm5s2U ([M + H]+:304.096), where the masses were determined within 5 ppm accuracy.
LC-MS Method #2
tRNA from each sample (B. subtilis: 1 µg; S. mutans 2 µg) was hydrolyzed in a 50 µL digestion cocktail containing 12.5 U (B. subtilis) or 8 U (S. mutans) benzonase, 5 U CIAP (calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase), 0.15 U PDE I (phosphodiesterase I), 0.1 mM deferoxamine, 0.1 mM BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene), 5 ng coformycin, 50 nM [15N]5-deoxyadenosine ([15N]-dA; internal standard), 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM Tris-Hcl buffer pH 8.0. The digestion mixture was incubated at 37°C for 6 h. After digestion, all samples were analyzed by chromatography-coupled triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For each sample, 200 ng (B. subtilis) or 600 ng (S. mutans) of hydrolysate was injected in two technical replicates. Using synthetic standards, HPLC retention times of RNA modifications were confirmed on a Waters Acuity BEH C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm inner diameter, 1.7 µm particle size) coupled to an Agilent 1290 HPLC system and an Agilent 6495 triple-quad mass spectrometer. The Agilent sample vial insert was used. The HPLC system was operated at 25°C and a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min in a gradient (Table S5) with Buffer A (0.02% formic acid in double distilled water) and Buffer B (0.02% formic acid in 70% acetonitrile). The HPLC column was coupled to an Agilent 6495 triple quad mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source in positive mode with the following parameters: Dry gas temperature, 200°C; gas flow, 11 L/min; nebulizer, 20 psi; sheath gas temperature, 300°C; sheath gas flow, 12 L/min; capillary voltage, 3,000 V; and nozzle voltage, 0 V. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was used for detection of product ions derived from the precursor ions for all the RNA modifications with instrument parameters including the collision energy (CE) optimized for maximal sensitivity for the modification. Based on synthetic standards (synthesized as noted) with optimized collision energies, the following transitions and retention times were monitored: cmnm5s2U (77), m/z 348 → 141, 2.3 min; mnm5s2U (Biosynth), m/z 304 → 172, 1.6 min; nm5s2U (Granlen), m/z 290 → 158, 1.2 min; D, and m/z 115, 0.864 min. Signal intensities for each ribonucleoside were normalized by dividing by the sum of the UV signal intensities of the four canonical ribonucleosides recorded with an in-line UV spectrophotometer at 260 nm.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Chelsey Bomar for identifying the first YtqA_MnmD fusion during the MCB6318 Spring 2022 class and Scott Dawson, Brystol Habermacher, and Mira Baki for assistance in the cloning of B. subtilis genes.
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM70641 to V.D.C.L., R35 GM131767 to M.E.W., and ES026856, ES024615, and ES031529 to Thomas Begley), the National Research Foundation of Singapore through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Antimicrobial Resistance Interdisciplinary Research Group (P.C.D.S.), and the National Science Foundation (MCB-1716535 to P.C.D.S.).
Contributor Information
Patricia C. Dos Santos, Email: dossanpc@wfu.edu.
Valérie de Crécy-Lagard, Email: vcrecy@ufl.edu.
Tina M. Henkin, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00452-23.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Agris PF, Eruysal ER, Narendran A, Väre VYP, Vangaveti S, Ranganathan SV. 2018. Celebrating wobble decoding: half a century and still much is new. RNA Biol 15:537–553. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1356562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Grosjean H, Marck C, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2007. The various strategies of codon decoding in organisms of the three domains of life: evolutionary implications. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf) 51:15–16. doi: 10.1093/nass/nrm008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Armengod ME, Meseguer S, Villarroya M, Prado S, Moukadiri I, Ruiz-Partida R, Garzón MJ, Navarro-González C, Martínez-Zamora A. 2014. Modification of the wobble uridine in bacterial and mitochondrial tRNAs reading NNA/NNG triplets of 2-codon boxes. RNA Biol 11:1495–1507. doi: 10.4161/15476286.2014.992269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Björk GR, Hagervall TG. 2014. Transfer RNA modification: presence, synthesis, and function. EcoSal Plus 6. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0007-2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Armengod ME, Meseguer S, Villarroya M, Prado S, Moukadiri I, Ruiz-Partida R, Garzón MJ, Navarro-González C, Martínez-Zamora A. 2014. Modification of the wobble uridine in bacterial and mitochondrial tRNAs reading NNA/NNG triplets of 2-codon boxes. RNA Biol 11:1495–1507. doi: 10.4161/15476286.2014.992269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Black KA, Dos Santos PC. 2015. Abbreviated pathway for biosynthesis of 2-thiouridine in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 197:1952–1962. doi: 10.1128/JB.02625-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Armengod M-E, Moukadiri I, Prado S, Ruiz-Partida R, Benítez-Páez A, Villarroya M, Lomas R, Garzón MJ, Martínez-Zamora A, Meseguer S, Navarro-González C. 2012. Enzymology of tRNA modification in the bacterial MnmEG pathway. Biochimie 94:1510–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bommisetti P, Young A, Bandarian V. 2022. Elucidation of the substrate of tRNA-modifying enzymes MnmEG leads to in vitro reconstitution of an evolutionarily conserved uridine hypermodification. J Biol Chem 298:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bujnicki JM, Oudjama Y, Roovers M, Owczarek S, Caillet J, Droogmans L. 2004. Identification of a bifunctional enzyme MnmC involved in the biosynthesis of a hypermodified uridine in the wobble position of tRNA. RNA 10:1236–1242. doi: 10.1261/rna.7470904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kitamura A, Nishimoto M, Sengoku T, Shibata R, Jäger G, Björk GR, Grosjean H, Yokoyama S, Bessho Y. 2012. Characterization and structure of the Aquifex aeolicus protein DUF752: a bacterial tRNA-methyltransferase (MnmC2) functioning without the usually fused oxidase domain (MnmC1). J Biol Chem 287:43950–43960. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.409300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. de Crécy-Lagard V, Marck C, Brochier-Armanet C, Grosjean H. 2007. Comparative RNomics and modomics in mollicutes: prediction of gene function and evolutionary implications. IUBMB Life 59:634–658. doi: 10.1080/15216540701604632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Edwards AM, Addo MA, Dos Santos PC. 2020. Extracurricular functions of tRNA modifications in microorganisms. Genes (Basel) 11:907. doi: 10.3390/genes11080907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Moukadiri I, Garzón M-J, Björk GR, Armengod M-E. 2014. The output of the tRNA modification pathways controlled by the Escherichia coli MnmEG and MnmC enzymes depends on the growth conditions and the tRNA species. Nucleic Acids Res 42:2602–2623. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Benítez-Páez A, Villarroya M, Douthwaite S, Gabaldón T, Armengod ME. 2010. YibK is the 2’-O-methyltransferase TrmL that modifies the wobble nucleotide in Escherichia coli tRNALeu Isoacceptors. RNA 16:2131–2143. doi: 10.1261/rna.2245910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nilsson K, Jäger G, Björk GR. 2017. An unmodified wobble uridine in tRNAs specific for glutamine, lysine, and glutamic acid from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium results in nonviability-due to increased missense errors? PLoS One 12:e0175092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhou J, Lénon M, Ravanat J-L, Touati N, Velours C, Podskoczyj K, Leszczynska G, Fontecave M, Barras F, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B. 2021. Iron-sulfur biology invades tRNA modification: the case of U34 sulfuration. Nucleic Acids Res 49:3997–4007. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Shippy DC, Fadl AA. 2014. tRNA modification enzymes GidA and MnmE: potential role in virulence of bacterial pathogens. Int J Mol Sci 15:18267–18280. doi: 10.3390/ijms151018267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Suzuki T. 2021. The expanding world of tRNA modifications and their disease relevance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22:375–392. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00342-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. de Crécy-Lagard V, Jaroch M. 2021. Functions of bacterial tRNA modifications: from ubiquity to diversity. Trends Microbiol 29:41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. de Crécy-Lagard V, Ross RL, Jaroch M, Marchand V, Eisenhart C, Brégeon D, Motorin Y, Limbach PA. 2020. Survey and validation of tRNA modifications and their corresponding genes in Bacillus subtilis sp subtilis strain 168. Biomolecules 10:977. doi: 10.3390/biom10070977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Moukadiri I, Villarroya M, Benítez-Páez A, Armengod M-E. 2018. Bacillus subtilis exhibits MnmC-like tRNA modification activities. RNA Biol 15:1167–1173. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1517012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cho G, Lee J, Kim J. 2023. Identification of a novel 5-aminomethyl-2-thiouridine methyltransferase in tRNA modification. Nucleic Acids Res 51:1971–1983. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Waas WF, de Crécy-Lagard V, Schimmel P. 2005. Discovery of a gene family critical to wyosine base formation in a subset of phenylalanine-specific transfer RNAs. J Biol Chem 280:37616–37622. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506939200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Reader JS, Metzgar D, Schimmel P, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2004. Identification of four genes necessary for biosynthesis of the modified nucleoside queuosine. J Biol Chem 279:6280–6285. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310858200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. El Yacoubi B, Hatin I, Deutsch C, Kahveci T, Rousset J-P, Iwata-Reuyl D, Murzin AG, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2011. A role for the universal Kae1/Qri7/YgjD (COG0533) family in tRNA modification. EMBO J 30:882–893. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. El Yacoubi B, Lyons B, Cruz Y, Reddy R, Nordin B, Agnelli F, Williamson JR, Schimmel P, Swairjo MA, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2009. The universal YrdC/Sua5 family is required for the formation of threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37:2894–2909. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zallot R, Brochier-Armanet C, Gaston KW, Forouhar F, Limbach PA, Hunt JF, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2014. Plant, animal, and fungal micronutrient queuosine is salvaged by members of the DUF2419 protein family. ACS Chem Biol 9:1812–1825. doi: 10.1021/cb500278k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kimura S. 2021. Distinct evolutionary pathways for the synthesis and function of tRNA modifications. Brief Funct Genomics 20:125–134. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elaa027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Puri P, Wetzel C, Saffert P, Gaston KW, Russell SP, Cordero Varela JA, van der Vlies P, Zhang G, Limbach PA, Ignatova Z, Poolman B. 2014. Systematic identification of tRNAome and its dynamics in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Microbiol 93:944–956. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Antoine L, Wolff P, Westhof E, Romby P, Marzi S. 2019. Mapping post-transcriptional modifications in Staphylococcus aureus tRNAs by nanoLC/MSMS. Biochimie 164:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wittwer AJ, Tsai L, Ching WM, Stadtman TC. 1984. Identification and synthesis of a naturally occurring selenonucleoside in bacterial tRNAs: 5-[(methylamino)methyl--2-selenouridine. Biochemistry 23:4650–4655. doi: 10.1021/bi00315a021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Enright AJ, Ouzounis CA. 2001. Functional associations of proteins in entire genomes by means of exhaustive detection of gene fusions. Genome Biol 2:RESEARCH0034. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-9-research0034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Henry CS, Lerma-Ortiz C, Gerdes SY, Mullen JD, Colasanti R, Zhukov A, Frelin O, Thiaville JJ, Zallot R, Niehaus TD, Hasnain G, Conrad N, Hanson AD, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2016. Systematic identification and analysis of frequent gene fusion events in metabolic pathways. BMC Genomics 17:473. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2782-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Vera Alvarez R, Landsman D, Koonin EV. 2021. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D274–D281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Park SC, Song WS, Yoon S. 2014. Structural analysis of a putative SAM-dependent methyltransferase, YtqB, from Bacillus subtilis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 446:921–926. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Oberg N, Precord TW, Mitchell DA, Gerlt JA. 2022. RadicalSAM.org: a resource to interpret sequence-function space and discover new radical SAM enzyme chemistry. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 2:22–35. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.1c00048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Thompson CC, Emmel VE, Fonseca EL, Marin MA, Vicente ACP. 2013. Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses. F1000Res 2:67. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Booker SJ, Lloyd CT. 2022. Twenty years of radical SAM! tTe genesis of the superfamily. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 2:538–547. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.2c00078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Amara P, Saragaglia C, Mouesca JM, Martin L, Nicolet Y. 2022. L-tyrosine-bound ThiH structure reveals C–C bond break differences within radical SAM aromatic amino acid lyases. Nat Commun 13:2284. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29980-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Dowling DP, Vey JL, Croft AK, Drennan CL. 2012. Structural diversity in the AdoMet radical enzyme superfamily. Biochim Biophys Acta 1824:1178–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Forouhar F, Arragain S, Atta M, Gambarelli S, Mouesca JM, Hussain M, Xiao R, Kieffer-Jaquinod S, Seetharaman J, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Mulliez E, Hunt JF, Fontecave M. 2013. Two Fe-S clusters catalyze sulfur insertion by radical-SAM methylthiotransferases. Nat Chem Biol 9:333–338. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Čavužić M, Liu Y. 2017. Biosynthesis of sulfur-containing tRNA modifications: a comparison of bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic pathways. Biomolecules 7:27. doi: 10.3390/biom7010027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Noma A, Sakaguchi Y, Suzuki T. 2009. Mechanistic characterization of the sulfur-relay system for eukaryotic 2-thiouridine biogenesis at tRNA wobble positions. Nucleic Acids Res 37:1335–1352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Myers KS, Yan H, Ong IM, Chung D, Liang K, Tran F, Keleş S, Landick R, Kiley PJ. 2013. Genome-scale analysis of Escherichia coli FNR reveals complex features of transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet 9:e1003565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Coordinators NR. 2016. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D7–D19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Consortium U. 2021. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D480–D489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Price MN, Arkin AP. 2017. PaperBLAST: text mining papers for information about homologs. mSystems 2:e00039-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00039-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Zallot R, Oberg N, Gerlt JA. 2019. The EFI web resource for genomic enzymology tools: leveraging protein, genome, and metagenome databases to discover novel enzymes and metabolic pathways. Biochemistry 58:4169–4182. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. 2021. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D545–D551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Flórez LA, Roppel SF, Schmeisky AG, Lammers CR, Stülke J. 2009. A community-curated consensual annotation that is continuously updated: the Bacillus subtilis centered wiki SubtiWiki. Database (Oxford) 2009:bap012. doi: 10.1093/database/bap012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Corpet F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. 2015. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D222–D226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zhang D, Zheng C, Lanczycki CJ, Marchler-Bauer A. 2020. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D265–D268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Blum M, Chang H-Y, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Kandasaamy S, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Paysan-Lafosse T, Qureshi M, Raj S, et al. 2021. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D344–D354. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Neese F. 2022. Software update: the ORCAprogram system—version 5.0. WIRE Comput Mol Sci 12:e1606. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1606 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Becke AD. 1988. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev A Gen Phys 38:3098–3100. doi: 10.1103/physreva.38.3098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Perdew JP. 1986. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev A 38:3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Weigend F, Ahlrichs R. 2005. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3297–3305. doi: 10.1039/b508541a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Weigend F. 2006. Accurate coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8:1057–1065. doi: 10.1039/b515623h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Barone V, Cossi M. 1998. Quantum calculation of molecular energies and energy gradients in solution by a conductor solvent model. J Phys Chem A 102:1995–2001. doi: 10.1021/jp9716997 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Tsui HCT, Zheng JJ, Magallon AN, Ryan JD, Yunck R, Rued BE, Bernhardt TG, Winkler ME. 2016. Suppression of a deletion mutation in the gene encoding essential PBP2B reveals a new lytic transglycosylase involved in peripheral peptidoglycan synthesis in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 100:1039–1065. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Lau PCY, Sung CK, Lee JH, Morrison DA, Cvitkovitch DG. 2002. PCR ligation mutagenesis in transformable streptococci: application and efficiency. J Microbiol Methods 49:193–205. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00369-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Li YH, Hanna MN, Svensäter G, Ellen RP, Cvitkovitch DG. 2001. Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Streptococcus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms. J Bacteriol 183:6875–6884. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.23.6875-6884.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lanie JA, Ng WL, Kazmierczak KM, Andrzejewski TM, Davidsen TM, Wayne KJ, Tettelin H, Glass JI, Winkler ME. 2007. Genome sequence of avery’s virulent serotype 2 strain D39 of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with that of unencapsulated laboratory strain R6. J Bacteriol 189:38–51. doi: 10.1128/JB.01148-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Tsui HCT, Joseph M, Zheng JJ, Perez AJ, Manzoor I, Rued BE, Richardson JD, Branny P, Doubravová L, Massidda O, Winkler ME. 2023. Negative regulation of MurZ and MurA underlies the essentiality of GpsB- and StkP-mediated protein phosphorylation in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 120:351–383. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sung CK, Li H, Claverys JP, Morrison DA. 2001. An rpsL cassette, janus, for gene replacement through negative selection in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5190–5196. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5190-5196.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Jacobsen FE, Kazmierczak KM, Lisher JP, Winkler ME, Giedroc DP. 2011. Interplay between manganese and zinc homeostasis in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Metallomics 3:38–41. doi: 10.1039/c0mt00050g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Ramos-Montañez S, Tsui H-CT, Wayne KJ, Morris JL, Peters LE, Zhang F, Kazmierczak KM, Sham L-T, Winkler ME. 2008. Polymorphism and regulation of the spxB (pyruvate oxidase) virulence factor gene by a CBS‐HotDog domain protein (SpxR) in serotype 2 Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 67:729–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06082.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Edwards AM, Addo MA, Dos Santos PC. 2021. tRNA modifications as a readout of S and Fe-S metabolism. Methods Mol Biol 2353:137–154. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1605-5_8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zallot R, Yuan Y, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2017. The Escherichia coli COG1738 member YhhQ is involved in 7-cyanodeazaguanine (preQ₀) transport. Biomolecules 7:12. doi: 10.3390/biom7010012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Edwards AM, Black KA, Dos Santos PC. 2022. Sulfur availability impacts accumulation of the 2-thiouridine tRNA modification in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 204:e0000922. doi: 10.1128/jb.00009-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Zheng C, Black KA, Dos Santos PC. 2017. Diverse mechanisms of sulfur decoration in bacterial tRNA and their cellular functions. Biomolecules 7:33. doi: 10.3390/biom7010033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bartosik K, Leszczynska G. 2015. Synthesis of various substituted 5-methyluridines (xm5U) and 2-thiouridines (xm5s2U) via nucleophilic substitution of 5-pivaloyloxymethyluridine/2-thiouridine. Tetrahedron Lett 56:6593–6597. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.10.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.