Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300307

Spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade, factors influencing it, and its implications for developing countries’ trade

Haisong Wang 1,#, Yuhuan Wu 1,*,#, Ning Zhu 2,#
Editor: Rita Yi Man Li3
PMCID: PMC11025959  PMID: 38635850

Abstract

This study constructed a multidimensional indicator system to evaluate spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade of 31 provinces from 2000 to 2022. This study describes the distribution of China’s import and export trade by using location Gini coefficient and exploratory spatial analysis. Additionally, Multiple linear regression was used to ascertain the extent of contribution by various factors on the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of import and export trade. The simulation results show that inter-provincial import and export trade displayed distinct spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics with a prominent east-to-west disparity from 2000 to 2022. The trade links between various regions of the country have gradually strengthened, with a corresponding high correlation to the level of economic development. GDP, financial expenditure, freight transportation volume, technology market turnover, foreign investment, and disposable income of all residents, significantly influence the per capita export and import volume. In general, it is suggested that China and developing countries should take effective measures to promote balanced trade development, strengthen regional cooperation and coordination, and promote green trade and sustainable development.

Introduction

In the context of global economic integration, China has experienced rapid development over the last few decades, emerging as one of the world’s leading trading nations [1]. Instead of advancing in a linear fashion, China’s import and export trade is, nonetheless, influenced by various temporal and spatial factors [2]. The growth rate of China’s import and export trade displays significant variations across different periods. While China’s import and export trade experienced a significant impact which resulted in a sharp decline in both export and import during the global financial crisis [3], it rapidly recovered and continued to grow after that. This temporal heterogeneity indicates that various factors have driven China’s import and export trade at different times. Furthermore, China’s import and export trade exhibit inter-regional differences [4, 5]. For instance, China’s import and export trade is predominantly dominated by the eastern coastal region, while the western inland region comparatively plays less roles in import and export activities. This spatial distribution disparity is primarily caused by factors such as location, transportation and communication infrastructure, and industrial structure [6].

Further research on the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade needs to focus on a number of factors. First, China’s monetary and exchange rate policies have an important impact on import and export trade [7, 8]. Changes in the exchange rate of the RMB may result in fluctuations in import and export prices, which could impact China’s international trade competitiveness [9]. Additionally, foreign direct investment (FDI) significantly influences China’s import and export trade [10, 11]. FDI brings capital, technology, and management experience, which in turn promotes China’s import and export trade growth. Furthermore, trade friction is another significant factor affecting China’s import and export trade. Trade disputes may result in elevated tariffs and greater trade barriers, which could have a negative impact on China’s import and export business [1214].

In addition to the aforementioned factors, commodity quality and technology also have a great impact on China’s import and export trade [15]. In the current competitive global market, it is crucial for China to enhance its product quality and technological level in order to improve its overall competitiveness [16]. Moreover, the significance of financial development in relation to China’s import and export trade should not be underestimated [17]. The stability and sound development of the financial system are vital for trade financing and risk management [18]. Additionally, trade liberalization plays a significant role in China’s import and export trade [19]. By reducing trade barriers and expanding market access, trade liberalization promotes the development of China’s import and export trade [20].

Existing researches has predominantly utilized econometric methods, including gravity models, spatial econometric models, and panel data models, in analyzing spatio-temporal divergence. The selection of research methods is contingent upon the particular study’s research topics and data availability. However, existing research are limited in the following ways: (1) Some studies focus solely on the global or international level of analysis, neglecting details at the provincial or regional level. (2) Some studies only implement a single econometric method for analysis, lacking multi-perspective comparison and validation.

The study contributes to the body of knowledge, influences public policy and has an economic and commercial impact. By thoroughly analysing the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade and the various factors affecting its development, the study helps to better understand the internal mechanism and dynamic changes of international trade. This not only enriches the theory of international trade, but also provides us with a more comprehensive perspective to observe and explain the phenomenon of international trade. By revealing the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade and the factors influencing it, companies can better understand market changes and predict future trends. This helps companies formulate more scientific and effective trade strategies and improve market competitiveness. Meanwhile, the study sheds light on developing countries’ trade, helping them to better understand and exploit international trade opportunities, optimise resource allocation and promote economic development. At the same time, it provides the international community with a new way of thinking about cooperation that will help promote balanced and sustainable development of the global economy.

The following section presents our Theoretical analysis, which is followed by Research Methodology and Data Sources, Results of the study. The final section is the Conclusions and recommendations, divided into two subsections, the first subsection introduces Conclusions and recommendations of the study, the second subsection conducts Implications for developing countries. (Fig 1) illustrates the research path of this article.

Fig 1. Technical route.

Fig 1

This figure illustrates the research path of this article.

Theoretical analysis

Core and periphery theory

Based on this theory, if in a region’s product production there are scale economies and transportation costs such as the premise, there is a “∼” type three-curve relationship between the region’s distance to economic center and its market potential, that is, increase in the distance of the region to economic center, will lead to the region’s market potential first decline and then increase, but when the distance reaches a certain threshold value, the market potential will begin to decline with the increase in distance [21, 22]. At present, China’s “East—Central—West” regional economic development is imbalance [23]. According to the “center—periphery” theory, regional big cities have a radiation driving effect on the development of the surrounding areas, by promoting the economic development of the West and other inland areas, and can improve the production capacity and resource supply capacity for foreign trade. According to the theory of “center-periphery”, regional big cities have a radiation-driven effect on the development of the surrounding areas by promoting the economic development of the West and other inland areas, it can also improve the production capacity and resource supply capacity of the western region, and provide more products and resources for foreign trade exports. At the same time, this will also help to strengthen consumer demand in the inland market, providing a potential market for China’s imports. In addition, realizing the coordinated development of import and export trade in various regions can also improve China’s international competitiveness and its position in the global value chain. At present, the global trade environment is facing uncertainties and great challenges, and international competition is becoming increasingly fierce. The coordinated development of import and export trade internally and externally can optimize China’s industrial structure and the layout of the value chain [24], improve the quality and added value of the products, which is conducive to improving the competitiveness of Chinese enterprises in the international market, further consolidating and expanding China’s position in the world economy, as well as providing reference for developing countries.

Economies of scale theory

Economies of scale utilize production efficiencies to lower the average cost per unit of product [25]. China’s labor resources enable to reduce cost per unit through scale effects, creating a competitive edge in manufacturing. China can achieve cost savings and offer these products at competitive international prices by concentrating on labor-intensive processing manufacturing and leveraging economies of scale. In recent years, China has redirected its export attention to technology-intensive and knowledge-intensive commodities from traditional labor-intensive ones. This change indicates China’s endeavor to improve its industrial procedures to meet the alterations in global market demand, leading to higher value-added and augmented market competitiveness of its products.

Classical trade theory

The English classical economist Adam Smith put forth the proposal in his 1776 volume “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of National Wealth” that the reason for international trade is the absolute cost disparity between countries [26]. If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a commodity at lower costs than other countries, then it can export that commodity; otherwise, it will import it. Due to its lower labor costs and abundant human resources, China has an advantage in human resources and labor expenses, enabling it to manufacture vast quantities of commodities at a reasonable price in the manufacturing industry, thereby acquiring a competitive edge in the global market. David Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, published in 1817, introduced the Law of Comparative Advantage. The theory suggests that international trade is based on the relative difference in production technology, not the absolute difference. As a result, there is a difference in relative costs. Each country should focus on producing and exporting commodities with a comparative advantage, while importing those with a comparative disadvantage, following the principle of “taking the greater of the two advantages and the lesser of the two disadvantages”. Additionally, the principle of “choosing the lesser of two evils” should be applied [27]. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade is changing with the rapid development of China’s economy and industrial upgrading. China is transitioning from exporting traditional, labor-intensive, and low-value-added products to exporting high-tech and high-value-added products. This shift is attributed to China’s continuous efforts in scientific and technological innovation [28], talent development, and industrial upgrading.

Research methodology and data sources

Our paper uses quantitative research methods, including the Gini coefficient of location, exploratory spatial analysis methods, and multiple linear regression.

Locational Gini coefficient

The Gini coefficient is a tool used to quantify income distribution within a given region or country. It has since been extended to analyze the uneven distribution of other factors. The Locational Gini coefficient (LGC) quantifies the disparity in the geospatial distribution of economic activities. By providing insights into discrepancies in trade flows between regions, LGC can help to develop a coordinated inter-regional development plan. The formula for LGC is fundamental:

Ginis=12n2μi=1nj=1n|xis-xjs| (1)

Where the number of samples is n, the sample mean is μ, and xis and xjs indicate the proportion of import or export s in i and j regions to the total import and export trade of the country. To conveniently calculate the geospatial distribution imbalance of import and export trade, the absolute locational Gini coefficient is used, as per the study of Wu Aizhi (2013) [29]. The calculation formula for this coefficient is:

Ginis=12(n-1)i=1nj=1n|xis-xjs| (2)

The Location Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1.

Exploring spatial data analysis

Exploratory spatial data analysis is a technique utilized to research the distribution and spatial correlation of geographic occurrences. The spatio-temporal heterogeneity regarding China’s import and export trade, which is influenced by various factors such as geographical location, regional economic development level, foreign investment, and market demand for consumption, produces divergent effects on import and export trade. Exploratory analysis of spatial data delves into the spatial laws and correlations behind import and export trade data through visual display and statistical analysis, which is crucial to uncovering and explaining the corresponding laws, patterns, and trends. This method plays a significant role in revealing spatial relationships. Spatial correlation indicators are categorized into global spatial autocorrelation indicators and local spatial autocorrelation indicators. Moran index [30] is used to test for global spatial autocorrelation indicators, while local indicators such as LISA cluster plot and Moran scatter plot are used to test for local spatial autocorrelation indicators. The calculation of the global is as follows:

Morans·I=i=1nΣj=1nwij(xi-x¯)(xj-x¯)S2i=1nΣj=1nwij (3)

Where S2=1nΣi=1n(xi-x¯)2, x¯=1ni=1nxi. xi and xj represent observations in regions i and j. n denotes the total number of regions, while wij represents the element at the intersection of the i row and j column of the spatial weights matrix. wij utilizes a basic binary adjacency matrix.

Local MoransIi is defined as

MoransIi=(xi-x¯)S2j=1nwij(xj-x¯) (4)

A positive value for MoransIi indicates that the spatial cell shares similar attributes with its neighboring cells (“high-high” or “low-low”), while a negative value for MoransIi indicates that the spatial cell doesn’t share similar attributes with its neighboring cells (“high-low” or “low-high”).

Multiple linear regression

Multiple linear regression is a statistical tool utilized to establish a linear association between several independent variables and a dependent variable. The regression coefficients are estimated through the method of least squares, which seeks to determine the combination of coefficients that minimizes the difference between the predicted and actual observed values. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we can ascertain the extent of contribution by various factors on the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of import and export trade. We can also identify the positive and negative relationships between independent and dependent variables. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis proves an effective tool in discerning future spatio-temporal heterogeneity of import and export trade trends. This provides policymakers the necessary reference basis for informed decision- making. Hence, multiple linear regression analysis emerges as among the more reasonable methodologies to analyze the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China’s import and export trade and the factors influencing it. The following is the multiple linear regression model expressed:

Y=β0+β1X1++βnXn+ε (5)

Where Y represents the dependent variable’s value, X1, X2, …, Xn stand for the independent variables’ values, β0, β1, β2, …, βn denote the regression coefficients, and ε refers to the error term.

Considering the data availability, the sample interval of the multiple linear regression is selected as panel data of 31 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) from 2010 to 2021. The dependent variables included per capita exports and imports, while the independent variables comprised of GDP, fiscal expenditure, freight volume, technology market turnover, the rate of cell phone penetration, foreign investment, and disposable income of all residents.

Data sources

The data utilized in this paper derive from the Department of Statistical Analysis of the General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China (http://stats.customs.gov.cn/) and the National Bureau of Statistics of China (http://www.stats.gov.cn/), covering the period from 2000 to 2022. It is worth mentioning that, due to data constraints, the time span for multiple linear regression is from 2010 to 2021.

Results of the study

Overview of spatial and temporal variation in China’s import and export trade

Observing the total import and export commodities of 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in China’s interior from 2000 to 2022 (refer to Fig 2), significant differences are apparent in both temporal and spatial dimensions. Since 2000, the total import and export trade volume of China’s provinces has shown an upward trend, mainly due to the following reasons: China’s active participation in international economic cooperation and competition and its continuous expansion of the international market have provided a wider space for the development of provincial import and export trade. At the same time, the government has introduced a series of policies to promote the development of foreign trade, such as export tax rebate, export credit, export insurance, etc., to encourage enterprises to expand their international market and improve their export competitiveness. Meanwhile, local governments have also actively introduced relevant policies to support local enterprises in import and export trade. Together with China’s continuous strengthening of infrastructure construction and improvement of safety capacity in the fields of transportation, communication and energy, this has provided more convenient and efficient logistic support for import and export trade in various provinces.

Fig 2. Total import and export commodities by province in China, 2000–2022 (in millions of dollars).

Fig 2

A shows the statistical changes in China’s import volume by province, 2000–2022;B shows the statistical changes in China’s export value volume by province, 2000–2022. Source: China National Bureau of Statistics.

(Fig 3) illustrates the spatial distribution of China’s per capita import trade in 2000 and 2022. In 2000, China’s per capita import trade demonstrated a Eastern Regional of China > Center Regional of China > Western Regional of China. This is attributed to the fact that the eastern coastal regions possess relatively developed economies, advanced ports and infrastructure, and a more established foreign trade environment. As the primary hubs for China’s import and export trade, these areas have the capability to draw in additional foreign investment and international trade. In contrast, the average import trade per person in the central and western regions is lower, primarily because of the underdeveloped economy in these regions and the inadequate infrastructure and foreign trade support system.

Fig 3. China’s import trade per capita, 2000, 2022 (in dollars).

Fig 3

A shows China’s import trade per capita in 2000;B shows China’s import trade per capita in 2022. The map is obtained from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/).

In 2022, there are significant changes in the geographic distribution of China’s per capita import trade. The eastern coastal region continues to exhibit the highest per capita import trade value in China. Although, the map demonstrates a gradual reduction in the disparity of the per capita import trade value through the darker and lighter color distribution throughout the country, the per capita value of imported commodities in the central and western regions has notably increased, particularly in the west. This suggests significant advancements in trade development within those areas, which are now playing a more substantial role in driving China’s overall import trade growth.

Several factors account for this shift in geographic distribution. Initially, the Chinesegovernment has implemented a range of policies aimed at promoting development and exposing the central and western regions. Specifically, the “Western Development” policy has enhanced infrastructure construction and improved trade environments in these regions, thereby attracting more foreign investment and imports. Secondly, China is participating in the globalization process by promoting the Belt and Road Initiative and bolstering economic and trade collaboration with neighboring and Eurasian nations. This has created new possibilities and momentum for trade cooperation between central and western China and other countries.

In addition, the focus on economic restructuring and industrial upgrading in China has affected how import trade is distributed per capita. In recent decades, China’s economy has gradually shifted from being export-oriented to driven by domestic demand, leading to an increase in demand for imported commodities among Chinese consumers. Due to China’s rapidly growing economy and rising income levels among its people, the country’s consumption patterns have evolved with an increase in demand for high-quality and specialty imported commodities. This has resulted in a further increase in China’s per capita import trade volume.

(Fig 4) shows the spatial distribution of China’s export trade per capita in 2000 and 2022. As can be seen from Fig 4, the spatial distribution of China’s per capita export trade in 2000 and 2022 is still characterized by Eastern Regional of China > Center Regional of China > Western Regional of China. The reasons for this are the same as those explained in Fig 3 and will not be repeated here. The previous analysis suggests that China’s per capita import and export trade has undergone substantial geographical alterations. Even though the eastern coastal area remains the central hub for import and export trade, the central and western regions have witnessed considerable improvement in per capita import and export trade, leading to a gradual reduction in the gap between per capita import and export trade. The shifting geographical distribution of China’s per capita import and export trade suggests a growing role for the central and western regions in its development. This change is due to government policy support, improvements in infrastructure construction, and efforts to increase China’s global participation. Despite progress, regional disparities persist and further policy measures are necessary.

Fig 4. China’s export trade per capita, 2000, 2022 (in dollars).

Fig 4

A shows China’s export trade per capita in 2000;B shows China’s export trade per capita in 2022. The map is obtained from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/).

Locational Gini coefficient

By utilizing Eqs (1) and (2), we conducted an analysis of the Gini coefficient regarding China’s import and export commodity locations (as illustrated in (Fig 5). The data displayed in Fig 5 clearly portrays a decline in the Gini coefficient, indicating a gradual balancing of spatial distribution for China’s import and export commodities. The primary reason for this is that China is constantly promoting the development of trade liberalization and globalization, constantly optimizing the structure and layout of inter-regional trade, and reducing the imbalance in the flow of commodities between different regions.

Fig 5. Locational Gini coefficient of imported and exported commodities in China, 2000–2022.

Fig 5

The black line shows locational Gini coefficient of exported commodities in China, 2000–2022;The red line shows locational Gini coefficient of imported commodities in China, 2000–2022. Source: Department of Statistical Analysis, General Administration of Customs, People’s Republic of China.

In the period of 2000 and 2010, China’s Locational Gini coefficient for imported and exported commodities decreased at a slower pace, likely due to the unbalanced economic development and trade policies of certain regions. Nevertheless, since 2010, China has introduced a set of opening-up policies, actively advocating for trade liberalization and facilitation, as well as strengthening trade cooperation with external regions. Driven by policies and measures, the regional Gini coefficient for China’s import and export commodities has declined swiftly, indicating a more balanced distribution of regional trade.

Furthermore, the Gini coefficient of imported and exported commodities is impacted by variations in the levels of economic development and infrastructure construction across regions. Coastal areas and some inland provinces with advanced economic development have a competitive edge in trade, which affects the flow and distribution of imported and exported commodities to a certain degree.

Moran index

From 2000 to 2022, China’s per capita import and export global Moran index has undergone significant changes and developments, as presented in Table 1. Specifically, the index shows a clear upward trend, highlighting the strengthening trade connections among diverse regions within China. Further, these findings indicate a high correlation between the level of economic growth and trade development. This trend is primarily attributable to China’s growing economy and expanding import and export trade.

Table 1. Global Moran index of China’s per capita imports and exports, 2000–2022.

Export Import
Variables Global Moran index p-value* Global Moran index p-value*
2000 0.2050** 0.0240 0.1860** 0.0350
2001 0.2280** 0.0140 0.1950** 0.0270
2002 0.2390** 0.0120 0.1960** 0.0240
2003 0.2480*** 0.0080 0.1970** 0.0150
2004 0.2610*** 0.0040 0.2320*** 0.0060
2005 0.2890*** 0.0020 0.2550*** 0.0040
2006 0.3060*** 0.0010 0.2730*** 0.0030
2007 0.3210*** 0.0010 0.2840*** 0.0020
2008 0.3410*** 0.0000 0.3110*** 0.0010
2009 0.3650*** 0.0000 0.3080*** 0.0010
2010 0.3860*** 0.0000 0.3040*** 0.0010
2011 0.3760*** 0.0000 0.3100*** 0.0010
2012 0.3530*** 0.0000 0.2890*** 0.0010
2013 0.3300*** 0.0010 0.2760*** 0.0030
2014 0.3370*** 0.0010 0.2750*** 0.0030
2015 0.3660*** 0.0000 0.2540*** 0.0030
2016 0.3860*** 0.0000 0.2380*** 0.0050
2017 0.4030*** 0.0000 0.2450*** 0.0030
2018 0.4180*** 0.0000 0.2470*** 0.0040
2019 0.4230*** 0.0000 0.2260*** 0.0060
2020 0.4190*** 0.0000 0.2300*** 0.0030
2021 0.4380*** 0.0000 0.2330*** 0.0020
2022 0.4840*** 0.0000 0.2480*** 0.0020

Note:

***, **, * indicate significant at 1%, 5%, 10% level, respectively.

In addition, China’s per capita import and export global Moran index has exhibited some instability over time. From 2000 to 2008, China’s per capita import and export global Moran index witnessed a relatively stable upward trend. During this period, China’s economy maintained a high growth rate, with an expanding import and export trade. Nevertheless, impacted by the global financial crisis in 2008, China’s per capita import and export global Moran index experienced a certain decline. Subsequently, China’s economy experienced a gradual recovery due to the government’s proactive stimulus policies and internal and external demand. As a result, the per capita import and export global Moran Index rose once again. Since 2012, China’s per capita import and export global Moran index has continued to grow, reaching a peak in 2020.

During this phase, growth is primarily attributable to the transformation and upgrade of the Chinese economy, as well as the structural adjustment of import and export trade. As China’s manufacturing sector experiences rapid expansion, its import and export trade has transitioned from traditional labor-intensive products to technology-intensive and high-value-added products. The correlation between China’s trade links and economic development with other countries has been further strengthened. However, after 2020, China’s per capita global Moran index for import/export declined somewhat due to the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic. The epidemic resulted in a global economic slowdown and supply chain disruption, which had an impact on China’s import and export trade as well as its economic development. However, as the epidemic is gradually brought under control and international trade begins to recover, China’s per capita global Moran Index for imports and exports has started to rebound.

In summary, the per capita global Moran index for imports and exports in China demonstrates a rising trend, indicating trade connections between various regions of the country and an enhancement in economic development. While some fluctuations may occur due to external factors, overall, the trend reflects consistent growth. In the future, as China’s economy continues to grow and the import and export trade expands, there is an expectation that the country’s per capita import and export global Moran Index will increase further, resulting in improved trade links and increased economic development.

(Fig 6) shows the LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Autocorrelation) agglomeration map of China’s per capita imports in 2000 and 2022. In 2000, regions with higher per capita imports in China were close to each other, forming a spatial agglomeration patterns. The clustered regions are situated in the eastern coastal areas, specifically in Guangdong, Shanghai, and Zhejiang. These regions typically boast a more advanced economy, with accessible transportation, a varied industrial composition, and a relatively elevated import demand.

Fig 6. LISA clustering of China’s imports per capita, 2000, 2022.

Fig 6

A shows the LISA clustering of China’s imports per capita, 2000;B shows the LISA clustering of China’s imports per capita, 2022. The map is obtained from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/).

In 2022, the clustered regions in China with higher per capita imports will be further strengthened. Over the past two years, these regions have seen increased imports per capita due in part to the rapid development of the global economy and the further opening of the Chinese economy to the world. Additionally, new agglomeration areas have emerged. These new agglomerations may arise from several factors, including heightened levels of economic growth, policy reforms, or the establishment of new special economic zones.

The clustering characteristics of per capita imports are influenced by several factors. Among them, geographic location holds significant influence. Coastal and adjacent developed regions generally record higher per capita imports due to the favorable transport and logistics conditions which promote the growth of import trade. Secondly, economic development level represents a crucial factor that impacts the per capita import volume. Regions that are economically developed typically have a diversified industrial structure, leading to a high dependence on import demand. Furthermore,government policies and regulatory measures influence the agglomeration characteristics of imports per capita. The government’s open immigration policy and preferential trade policies have the potential to increase the volume of imported commodities and stimulate the concentration of imports per person.

It is noteworthy that the presence of agglomeration does not necessarily entail dominance. Areas characterized by agglomeration and high per capita imports may suggest a greater degree of import dependence, while the absence of agglomeration in other regions may not necessarily point to economic underdevelopment, but rather reflect a diverse range of economic structural and policy-related factors. Consequently, a detailed and comprehensive analysis of relevant data, coupled with in-depth studies, is required to evaluate the true level of economic development and competitiveness of regions that exhibit agglomeration.

(Fig 7) displays the LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Autocorrelation) agglomeration map illustrating China’s per capita export value in 2000 and 2022. Spatial distribution of China’s per capita export value still exhibits obvious agglomeration. Notably, the eastern coastal region features significantly higher per capita export value than other regions, specifically Guangdong and Zhejiang. Conversely, per capita export value in the central and western regions is comparatively lower.

Fig 7. LISA clustering of China’s exports per capita, 2000, 2022.

Fig 7

A shows the LISA clustering of China’s exports per capita, 2000;B shows the LISA clustering of China’s exports per capita, 2022. The map is obtained from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/).

The comparison between 2000 and 2022 reveals an expansion in the scope of agglomeration. This expansion can be attributed to China’s increasing openness to the outside world, which has accelerated economic growth in the central and western regions. Additionally, the scale of export trade has expanded, resulting in an increase in per capita export value. Furthermore, it is evident that the per capita export value of certain inland regions, including Chongqing and Sichuan, has risen. This is primarily attributed to the accelerated economic growth within these regions in recent years, resulting in an expansion of export trade.

Overall, the spatial distribution of China’s exports per capita has gradually become more uniform from 2000 to 2022. This indicates an improvement in the balance of China’s economic development, and a reduction in the disparity between the economic development levels and openness of different regions. Meanwhile, it indicates that China’s approach to opening its economy is transitioning from coastal to inland areas and all regions are actively engaged in expanding their global reach to facilitate China’s economic advancement.

Multiple linear regression results

Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted using Eviews10, and Tables 2 and 3 display the results. The data indicates that the six independent variables, namely GDP, financial expenditure, freight transportation, technology market turnover, foreign investment, and disposable income of all residents, have a statistically significant impact on both the per capita amount of exports and imports. The penetration rate of cell phone usage has a notable impact only on the per capita amount of imports, while it does not have a significant effect on the per capita amount of exports.

Table 2. Results of the analysis of factors affecting the value of exports per capita.

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -2732.1780*** 279.8754 -9.7621 0.0000
?GDP 0.0273*** 0.0049 5.5969 0.0000
?FINANCE 0.2796*** 0.0204 13.6954 0.0000
?HUOYUN -0.0053*** 0.0008 -6.4156 0.0000
?JISHU -1.0099*** 0.0818 -12.3448 0.0000
?TEL 0.3887 3.6837 0.1055 0.9160
?INVEST 0.0007*** 0.0002 4.2151 0.0000
?INCOME 0.1308*** 0.0094 13.9901 0.0000
R-squared 0.7588 Mean dependent var 1332.5530
Adjusted R-squared 0.7541 S.D. dependent var 1881.0580
S.E. of regression 932.7142 Akaike info criterion 16.5354
Sum squared resid 317000000.0000 Schwarz criterion 16.6196
Log likelihood -3067.5740 Hannan-Quinn criter. 16.5688
F-statistic 163.5675 Durbin-Watson stat 0.1532
Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000

Note:

***, **, * indicate significant at 1%, 5%, 10% level, respectively.

Table 3. Results of the analysis of factors affecting the value of imports per capita.

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -2538.2060*** 353.7439 -7.1753 0.0000
?GDP -0.0277*** 0.0062 -4.4987 0.0000
?FINANCE 0.3838*** 0.0258 14.8753 0.0000
?HUOYUN -0.0058*** 0.0011 -5.5518 0.0000
?JISHU -0.6183*** 0.1034 -5.9795 0.0000
?TEL -16.2375*** 4.6559 -3.4875 0.0005
?INVEST 0.0010 *** 0.0002 4.9793 0.0000
?INCOME 0.2234*** 0.0118 18.9007 0.0000
R-squared 0.7406 Mean dependent var 1402.3890
Adjusted R-squared 0.7357 S.D. dependent var 2292.9000
S.E. of regression 1178.8890 Akaike info criterion 17.0038
Sum squared resid 506000000.0000 Schwarz criterion 17.0881
Log likelihood -3154.7070 Hannan-Quinn criter. 17.0373
F-statistic 148.4936 Durbin-Watson stat 0.1636
Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000

Note:

***, **, * indicate significant at 1%, 5%, 10% level, respectively.

Discussion

The unique aspects and contributions of this study

The results of this study have numerous important explanations and implications. Firstly, through the in-depth study of the causes and influence mechanisms of spatio-temporal heterogeneity, it can provide new perspectives and methods for understanding the laws of trade development in depth, and provide theoretical support for the formulation and adjustment of trade policies. Secondly, this study examines the spatio-temporal variations in international trade and its contributing factors using provincial panel data. This analysis can assist future research indeveloping a more profound comprehension of the distribution patterns of international trade and its influencing factors at the provincial and regional levels. Thirdly, understanding the characteristics and influencing factors of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of import and export trade can assist the government in enhancing its trade strategy, optimizing its trade structure, improving trade efficiency, carrying out diversified trade activities and market diversification, developing a scientifically formulated trade policy, strengthening inter-regional economic cooperation, and promoting balanced trade development. Finally, this paper provides significant inspiration and guidance for the trade development of other developing countries. To cope with challenges and obstacles in international trade, developing countries should improve cooperation with other countries and international organizations. Strengthening cooperation increases access to technology, capital, and market resources, which ultimately improves international competitiveness and trade levels.

Limitations of this study

This study has limitations. Due to data availability and processing difficulties, only select indicators were used to measure import/export trade in various regions of China. In the future, more comprehensive data can provide a more accurate portrayal of the import/export trade situation. Secondly, this study only analyzes a select few major factors affecting import and export trade, other potential influencing factors need to be further studied in the future. Furthermore, while this study delves extensively into the functioning mechanisms of each of these influencing factors, additional empirical research is necessary to confirm their actual impact.

Conclusions and recommendations

Conclusions and recommendations of the study

The study in this paper concludes that there are significant spatial and temporal differences in China’s import and export trade, which are influenced by factors such as GDP, fiscal expenditure, freight transport, technology market turnover, foreign investment and residents’ disposable income. The results of the study show that these factors have a significant impact on per capita import and export volumes. The study also found that from 2000 to 2022, China’s export trade centre will gradually shift to inland regions, and the regions will actively expand their foreign trade, which will promote the development of China’s economy. The results based on multiple linear regression analyses show that six independent variables, including GDP, fiscal expenditure, freight volume, technology market turnover, foreign investment and residents’ disposable income, have a significant impact on the amount of per capita imports and exports. The penetration rate of mobile phone use only has a significant effect on the amount of imports per capita, and has no significant effect on the amount of exports per capita. Therefore, it is recommended that China and other developing countries take effective measures to promote balanced trade development, strengthen regional cooperation and coordination, and promote green trade and sustainable development. The specific findings are as follows:

  • (1) From 2000 to 2022, the per capita import and export values exhibited varying degrees of growth trends for each province. However, inter-provincial import and export trade displayed distinct spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics with a prominent east-to-west disparity.

  • (2) Due to the influence of Chinese government policies, there is a declining Gini coefficient for China’s import and export locations, resulting in a more balanced spatial distribution of these commodities.

  • (3) From 2000 to 2022, China’s per capita import and export trade demonstrated an overall upward trend in fluctuation, as evidenced by the global Moran index. In addition, the trade links between various regions of the country have gradually strengthened, with a corresponding high correlation to the level of economic development.

  • (4) The spatial distribution of China’s foreign trade has resulted in an agglomeration pattern focused in the eastern coastal region. Meanwhile, economic development has been accelerating in the central and western regions, leading to a more balanced regional development overall.

  • (5) The six independent variables, including GDP, financial expenditure, freight transportation volume, technology market turnover, foreign investment, and disposable income of all residents, significantly influence the per capita export and import volume. To ensure sustainable growth of China’s import and export trade and regional balance, these factors can be targeted.

The following recommendations are made accordingly:

  • (1) Prioritizing the development of regions with competitive advantages. Based on spatial and temporal distribution characteristics and trade advantages, priority should be given to selecting and developing regions with competitive advantages. To this end, efforts should be made to optimize the industrial structure, increase technological innovation and the development of high value-added industries, improve product quality and added value, and enhance competitiveness. On the other hand, the government should enhance transportation infrastructure construction in the central and western regions and bolster regional connectivity to enhance their connection with external markets. This could facilitate the growth of import and export trade in the central and western regions and improve their competitiveness.

  • (2) Strengthening regional strategies for openness and promoting industrial structure upgrades. Regions with clear geographic advantages, such as coastal cities and border areas, need to strengthen their connections to the larger world and create a more open economic system, ultimately increasing the per capita import and export value of the region. To achieve these goals, measures such as expanding exports and attracting foreign investment will be necessary. Guiding the internationalization of businesses, Increasing support for exporting by small and medium-sized enterprises, promoting overseas market expansion, establishing overseas sales networks and production bases, bolstering international competitiveness, and elevating the region’s per capita import and export value. By implementing policies and strategies, leveraging geographic and industrial advantages, boosting the growth of distinctive industries and favorable products, enhancing trade conditions, improving workforce skills, and increasing international partnerships, the per capita import and export value of each region can be significantly increased.

  • (3) Encouraging regions to bolster trade relationships and promote collaboration among companies across regions by organizing trade shows, exchanges, and other activities to achieve complementarity of advantages. Increase in investment in transportation, communication, and infrastructure is need to enhance trade efficiency and facilitation, thus reducing trade expenses even further.

  • (4) Increasing investment and support for the central and western regions to enhance economic development and competitiveness. It is necessary to strengthen infrastructure construction and talent training in these regions in order to raise their economic strength. And it is also necessary to promote coordinated regional development, facilitate economic exchanges and collaboration among the eastern, central, and western regions, and achieve optimal resource allocation.

  • (5) Sustaining China’s import and export trade and regional balance, the following areas deserve attention: enhancing economic and trade competitiveness, streamlining fiscal expenditure structure, improving logistics and transportation infrastructure efficiency, promoting technological innovation and scientific achievements transformation, optimizing foreign investment environment, and elevating income levels of the population to bolster consumer demand.

Implications for developing countries

  • (1) emphasizing balanced regional development. Developing countries must recognize the spatial and temporal characteristics of import/export trade and endeavor to promote a balanced regional development. Through strengthening economic ties and cooperation between regional areas, it is possible to promote a balanced distribution of trade and reduce inter-regional disparities.

  • (2) Optimizing the policy environment. Policies significantly impact trade development. Developing countries should adjust policies to reduce the geographical Gini coefficient of imports and exports and promote a balanced trade distribution. They should also establish a policy environment that fosters trade development by offering support and incentives, reducing trade barriers, and facilitating trade.

  • (3) Strengthening Economic Ties and Cooperation. The ongoing upward trend in the global Moran Index of per capita import and export trade indicates a gradual strengthening of trade links between various regions. Developing countries must actively engage in international trade cooperation, strengthen economic ties with other countries, and promote the diversification of trading partners in order to realize greater market access and trade opportunities.

  • (4) Promoting sustainable development. Developing countries need to prioritize sustainable development in their foreign trade development. In order to achieve this objective, they should strengthen the balance between environmental protection, social responsibility, and economic development. Furthermore, they should encourage the promotion of green trade and sustainable development practices, enhance the quality and competitiveness of their products, and foster long-term sustainable trade development.

Supporting information

S1 Table

(XLSX)

pone.0300307.s001.xlsx (11.9KB, xlsx)
S2 Table

(CSV)

pone.0300307.s002.csv (937B, csv)
S3 Table

(CSV)

pone.0300307.s003.csv (939B, csv)
S1 Data

(XLSX)

pone.0300307.s004.xlsx (46.9KB, xlsx)
S1 File

(PDF)

pone.0300307.s005.pdf (43.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Supported by Ministry of Education, Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education Project(230825052507181). -Funded by Science Research Project of Hebei Education Department (BJS2024097). -Supported by Hebei Province Social Science Development Research Project (20230303051).

References

  • 1. Shen Jue. Research on the influencing factors of cross-border service trade between China and the United States[D]. Institute of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, Ministry of Commerce, 2022. 10.27054/d.cnki.ggjms.2022.000019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Li Xia-Ling, Shen Zhi-Feng, Chen Li-Fu. Analysis of nonlinear dynamic effects of China’s outward foreign direct investment and import and export trade[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Technology, 2022, 28(01):65–73. 10.19831/j.cnki.2095-7394.2022.01.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. SUN Zhiyi, NI Sweet, LI Ruohan. Challenges and Countermeasures of China’s Foreign Trade in Stabilizing and Improving Quality[J]. Price Monthly, 2020(08):29–33. 10.14076/j.issn.1006-2025.2020.08.06 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. GUO Shuai, YIN Luanyu. Differential analysis of China’s inter-regional foreign trade development level[J]. Economic Research Reference, 2014(14):87–91. 10.16110/j.cnki.issn2095-3151.2014.14.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. He Li. Spatial statistical analysis of inter-provincial differences in China’s foreign trade development[J]. Statistics and Decision Making, 2019, 35(18):125–129. 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2019.18.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. JIANG Hui, CHA Weihua. Research on the spatial difference and formation mechanism of China’s interprovincial export growth[J]. Exploration of Economic Issues, 2014(05):128–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. ZHAO Lexin, PENG Gang. Money supply, exchange rate changes and foreign trade[J]. Statistics and Decision Making, 2022, 38(01):136–140. 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.01.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yaqin Wang. Research on the synergy of monetary policy, fiscal policy and industrial policy–an empirical analysis based on TVP-VAR model[J]. Price Theory and Practice, 2020(09):107–110+ 179. 10.19851/j.cnki.CN11-1010/F.2020.09.413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Xu Can. A study on the time-varying impact of U.S. interest rate adjustment on China’s foreign trade and GDP under the U.S.-China spread channel[J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 49(03):136–144. 10.14182/j.cnki.j.anu.2021.03.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wang Shaoping, Feng Fuyu. The effect of foreign direct investment on China’s trade and regional differences:An analysis based on a dynamic panel data model[J]. World Economy, 2006(08):23–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yang Yi. A correlation analysis of the impact of foreign direct investment on China’s import and export[J]. World Economy, 2000(02):44–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liang Weihao. Research on high-quality development of China’s foreign trade under the perspective of Chinese-style modernization[J/OL]. Price Monthly:1-12[2023-11-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/36.1006.F.20231009.1736.002.html.
  • 13. Yuan Pengfei, Wang Yingxue. Changes in the global trade system and China’s response strategy[J]. China National Condition and National Strength, 2023(05):62–68. 10.13561/j.cnki.zggqgl.2023.05.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhen Zhang, Yue Gao. Impact of China’s tariffs on U.S. agricultural products-an analysis based on the GTAP model[J]. World Agriculture, 2020(07):42–52+ 114. 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2020.07.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zeng Li-Fei, Jiang K, Cao W. Product quality, exchange rate pass-through and export pricing power in China’s exports–Based on the perspective of income distribution of export destination countries[J]. Financial Research, 2023(06):75–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li Huaijian, Shen Kunrong. Analysis of influencing factors of export product quality—a test based on cross-country panel data[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2015(06):62–72. 10.13269/j.cnki.ier.2015.06.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Xia Shiyuan. Financial assistance to build a new development pattern of “double cycle”[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2021, 43(05):92–97. 10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2021.05.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hu Sai. Playing the financial promotion effect to realize the growth of foreign trade–Review of Case Study on International Settlement and Trade Finance[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 42(11):129–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. CHEN Wenzhi, ZHAO Wei, ZHANG Suzhen. Change in the center of gravity of the double cycle, trade liberalization and productivity enhancement in China—Based on the perspective of resource reallocation efficiency[J]. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 2022, 42(07):16–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. HAN Shuang, WU Haiquan, LIU Yi. The impact of trade liberalization on China’s forest products export–an empirical study based on microgravity model[J]. Study and Exploration, 2019(09):143–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman, and Venables Anthony J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade[J]. Southern Economic Journal. Volume 67, Issue 2. 2000. pp 491–493. 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2000.tb00353.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lu M, Kuanhu Xiang, Pengfei Li et al. Division of labor and coordination: new pattern, new theory and new path of regional development [J]. China Industrial Economy, 2023, (08): 5–22. 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2023.08.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. WU Shuang, LI Hongmei, LI Jianing. Spatial econometric analysis of regional differences in China’s foreign trade[J]. Foreign Trade and Economics, 2023, (07): 11–14+ 140. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chen Jinling. Research on the impact of China’s foreign trade structure optimization on industrial structure upgrading[J]. Business Times, 2014(10):25–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. HAN Zhenxing, CHANG Xiangyang. Rising labor costs, advantages of main production areas and changes in soybean acreage in China—based on provincial panel data from 1991-2019[J]. Research on Modernization of Agriculture, 2022, 43(02):296–305. 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2022.0027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Machado Pedro S., Trigg Andrew B. On absolute and comparative advantage in international trade: Pasinetti A pure labour approach. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Volume 59, 2021, Pages 375–383, ISSN 0954-349X. 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Copeland Brian R., Kotwa Ashok. Product quality and the theory of comparative advantage. Structural European Economic Review, Volume 40, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1745–1760, ISSN 0014-2921. 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00061-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chi M, Muhammad S, Khan Z, et al. Is centralization killing innovation? The success story of technological innovation in fiscally decentralized countries[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168(1):120731. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120731 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. WU Aizhi, SUN Tieshan, LI Guoping. Spatial agglomeration and regional transfer of China’s textile and garment industry[J]. Structural Journal of Geography, 2013, 68 (06):775–790. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Du H, Chen Z, Mao G, et al. A spatio-temporal analysis of low carbon development in China’s 30 provinces: A perspective on the maximum flux principle[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 90:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Rita Yi Man Li

30 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-33006Analysis of the Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Divergence of China's Import and Export TradePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 14 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Rita Yi Man Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please amend either the title on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the title in the manuscript so that they are identical.

5. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author  Zhu Ning.

6. We note that Figures 3, 4, 6 and 7 in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (a) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (b) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 3, 4, 6 and 7 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments:

1. Originality:

• The paper lacks significant new information to justify publication. It mainly summarizes and analyzes existing literature without providing novel insights or findings.

2. Relationship to Literature:

• Many paragraphs have missing citations.

• Regarding technological innovation, citation and more details are needed: Is centralization killing innovation? The success story of technological innovation in fiscally decentralized countries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change Volume 168, July 2021, 120731

• The paper demonstrates a limited understanding of the relevant literature in the field. It relies heavily on a few sources and neglects to cite a broader range of literature that could provide a more comprehensive context for the research.

3. Methodology:

• The paper's argument is not adequately built on an appropriate base of theory or concepts. The theoretical framework is unclear, and it would benefit from a more robust foundation to support the research.

• The design of the research or intellectual work is not well-described. The methods employed are not clearly explained, and it is difficult to assess their appropriateness for the research objectives.

• Mutltiple regression needs citation: Comparative Study of Factors Contributing to Land Surface Temperature in High-Density Built Environments in Megacities Using Satellite Imagery, Sustainability 2021, 13(24), 13706

4. Results:

• The presentation of results lacks clarity and coherence. The data are not effectively analyzed or interpreted, making it challenging to draw meaningful conclusions from them.

• The conclusions do not adequately tie together the other elements of the paper. They appear disjointed and unsupported by the evidence presented.

5. Implications for research, practice, and/or society:

• The paper fails to clearly identify any implications for research, practice, and/or society. It does not bridge the gap between theory and practice, and there is a lack of discussion on how the research findings can be practically applied or have an impact on economic, commercial, or public policy aspects.

• The paper does not adequately discuss the potential contributions to the body of knowledge in the field. It does not position the research within the existing published work, and the referencing and introductory discussion are insufficient.

6. Quality of Communication:

• The paper's clarity of expression and readability need improvement. The sentence structure is often convoluted, and there is excessive use of technical jargon and acronyms that may hinder understanding for readers outside the specific field.

• The paper is not written concisely. There is unnecessary repetition of information and a lack of focus on the key points, making it challenging for readers to grasp the main ideas.

• The organization of the paper could be enhanced. The flow of information is disjointed in some sections, and the logical progression of the argument is not always clear.

• Some figures and tables lack clear explanations or citations to support the data presented. This compromises the overall clarity and reliability of the visual representations.

General Comments:

• The research question in the introduction is not clearly stated. It should be refined to provide a concise and focused overview of the study's objective.

• The introduction section exceeds the recommended length. It would be beneficial to shorten it by eliminating unnecessary background information and focusing on the specific research problem and objectives.

• There are several citation errors throughout the paper. Inconsistent referencing styles and missing or incorrect citations undermine the credibility and academic rigor of the work.

• The interpretations and conclusions drawn in the paper are not consistently supported by the evidence presented. There are instances where assumptions are made without sufficient justification, and the logical connection between the evidence and conclusions is weak.

• The title of the paper does not adequately represent the content. It should be revised to accurately reflect the scope and focus of the research.

• The abstract provides a brief summary of the paper but lacks clarity and conciseness. It should be revised to clearly state the main results and provide a more accessible overview of the study.

• The keywords chosen do not accurately reflect the content of the paper. They should be carefully selected to align with the main themes and concepts addressed in the research.

• The length of the paper is appropriate for the level of detail and analysis presented.

• The key messages conveyed in the paper should be shortened, ensuring they are accurate, clear, and succinct to effectively communicate the main findings.

• There are no concerns about plagiarism identified in the paper.

These comments aim to provide constructive feedback to improve the paper's quality, coherence, and impact.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,

Thank You for so relevant and exciting Article.

Please consider the Sustainability concept concerning the Article topic. I'd recommend considering ESG-goal achievement in the Discussion section.

Reviewer #2: Your topic is very interesting Title: " Analysis of the Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Divergence of China's Import and Export Trade ". I have some comments on your scripture which help you to update your manuscript.

Introduction

The introduction section doesn’t present clear picture what we need to need to learn, why we need to learn. Problem statement, research objectives or significance of the study should be clearly stated.

Literature Review

The literature review section lacks theoretical underpinnings. In my opinion the whole section needs to overhaul. The researcher need to read past relevant studies and also make sure that you attempt to identify the gaps in the existing literature such that it becomes easy to justify and trace the contribution of your study. Moreover, scant studies helps you to identify the appropriate theory on which your relationship will be based.

Methodology

The study has critical deficiencies from a methodological standpoint. How the researcher determined the sample size? Where is the justification? In the current study there is no reference (Few but not related) to any sort of information about generating an item pool and receiving expert opinions for the scale. Moreover, what are the sources of scales? How it was developed? Unfortunately, it is a doubt whether the scales are valid. No information exits about a validity test for scales. Furthermore, How to overcome the common method bias as data has been collected from single method ? where is CFA ? THERE IS NO THEORETICAL GROUNDING..

Discussion

The tests and presentation of findings are much more complicated. Again, I had difficulties in understanding the how findings of the study are connected to results of the analyses. Hypotheses testing is not well stated. The same applies to conclusion section

Contribution

The study's contribution is not written (a few of their but theoretical contribution is missing). Who will benefit from this research, both practically and theoretically? What role will it play in the existing literature? What's the latest/new?

Reviewer #3: The core claims are clearly expressed in abstract and conclusion part of the research paper. The empirical findings are cohere with each other and theorical framework of this work. The literature review is quite extensive and completed using up-to-date sources on the subject. The methods applied and the variables used in the methodology section of the article provided the required results. The findings of the article contributed to the literature as well. The findings and novelty of the manuscript contributes the existing literature. The English language of the article is clear and understandable, and the terminology used is compatible with the subject of the study. The article is very well-written and it is easy to follow. In addition, the article well discusses the topic of interest, and deals with a topic with many applications in practice. The quality of literature review and the aim of the paper is pretty well. The quality of the research is acceptable as well as the contribution of the paper. The quantitative research is very well conducted and the methodology described in the specific chapter is followed by current data processing. The methodology used is also very well described. The research fills a gap both by focusing on China's trade capacity and the influencing factors by considering the characteristics of spatial and temporal divergence to conduct exhaustive research on the influencing factors and temporal-spatial divergences in China's import and export trade. The researchers of the article recommend ensuring the optimization of trade channel layout. To enhance transportation efficiency, accessibility of goods, and decrease trade expenses, trade channel layout must be rationalized according to the spatial and temporal distribution traits of import and export trades. Firstly, upgrading of seaports and inland ports is essential for ameliorating goods' loading, unloading and transportation capacities, and accelerating trade transport times. On the other hand, diversifying and improving trade channels can be achieved through developing logistics networks, including highways and railroads. Additionally, facilitating faster and more convenient trade channels can be achieved by promoting the advancement of air freight and logistics technology. Strengthening trade cooperation and communication is also essential. This can be accomplished by actively expanding international trade partners and enhancing trade cooperation and communication with major trading partner countries and regions. Strengthening trade cooperation with developed economies is one approach to enhancing our trade level by learning advanced trade concepts and management experience. Additionally, our trade activities can be diversified and economic complementarity can be strengthened by focusing on trade cooperation with emerging market and developing countries. Furthermore, there is a need to establish and expand free trade zones and regional economic cooperation mechanisms to enhance trade facilitation and increase the scope of trade. Upgrading Trade Technology: Enhancing trade-related technological research and innovation to analyze and forecast trade data more effectively. Utilize innovative technologies, such as big data analysis and artificial intelligence, to gain deeper insights into trade potential and predict trade demand and market fluctuations accurately. Additionally, strengthen trade information sharing and platform development to ensure timely and precise trade information. Furthermore, the emphasis should be on developing trade talent by enhancing training and exchange programs, as well as improving the technical capabilities and professional quality of practitioners. In my opinion, the article has its merit and is of interest for the PLOS One readership. Consequently, the article is acceptable...

Reviewer #4: Your work contains multiple analyses, is remarkable as such, and is gripping to read. My suggestions and editing requests for the study were sent to the editor as a pdf. I wish you success in your future manuscripts.

Reviewer #5: Although the subject of the article is attractive, there are many issues that need to be corrected in the article.

1-) The purpose of the article is not fully described in the introduction part of the article. What is the purpose of the article? Why is the topic of the article important? What is the article's contribution to the literature?

2-) Gini coefficient needs more detailed explanation.

3-) ESA and MLR also need more explanation.

4-) Conclusion section is too short.

5-) Is there no discussion section? The authors need to add a discussion section in the article.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sergey Barykin

Reviewer #2: Yes: RASHIDN MD SALAMUN

Reviewer #3: Yes: Salih Kalaycı

Reviewer #4: Yes: M. Esra Atukalp (Assoc. Prof. Dr.)

Reviewer #5: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Report.pdf

pone.0300307.s006.pdf (11.4KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300307.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Dec 2023

Reviewer #1

Dear Authors,

Thank You for so relevant and exciting Article.

Please consider the Sustainability concept concerning the Article topic. I'd recommend considering ESG goal achievement in the Discussion section.

The author’s response 1.1

We have revised the Conclusions and Recommendations section to include the ESG objective under Implications for Developing Countries, and have adjusted the topic accordingly.

Reviewer #2

Your topic is very interesting Title: " Analysis of the Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Divergence of China's Import and Export Trade ". I have some comments on your scripture which help you to update your manuscript.

Introduction

The introduction section doesn’t present clear picture what we need to need to learn, why we need to learn. Problem statement, research objectives or significance of the study should be clearly stated.

The author’s response 2.1

We expand the Introduction to emphasize the importance of studying the spatial distribution of China's import and export trade and provide a reference for other developing countries; at the same time, the research content of this article is described in detail.

Literature Review

The literature review section lacks theoretical underpinnings. In my opinion the whole section needs to overhaul. The researcher need to read past relevant studies and also make sure that you attempt to identify the gaps in the existing literature such that it becomes easy to justify and trace the contribution of your study. Moreover, scant studies helps you to identify the appropriate theory on which your relationship will be based.

The author’s response 2.2

We rewrote the literature review as requested.

Methodology

The study has critical deficiencies from a methodological standpoint. How the researcher determined the sample size? Where is the justification? In the current study there is no reference (Few but not related) to any sort of information about generating an item pool and receiving expert opinions for the scale. Moreover, what are the sources of scales? How it was developed? Unfortunately, it is a doubt whether the scales are valid. No information exits about a validity test for scales. Furthermore, How to overcome the common method bias as data has been collected from single method ? where is CFA ? THERE IS NO THEORETICAL GROUNDING.

The author’s response 2.3

Based on the availability of data, the sample size of panel data and the selection of multiple linear regression data are determined, and some related references are added. The data come from the General Administration of Customs of China and the National Bureau of Statistics of China, so the data are real and reliable. Structural equation model is not used in this article. we have made some corrections, tests are carried out in exploratory spatial analysis and multiple linear regression, such as P-value test and R2 test.

Discussion

The tests and presentation of findings are much more complicated. Again, I had difficulties in understanding the how findings of the study are connected to results of the analyses. Hypotheses testing is not well stated. The same applies to conclusion section.

The author’s response 2.4

We have revised the conclusions based on the results of the model analysis and added conclusions for other developing countries.

Contribution

The study's contribution is not written (a few of their but theoretical contribution is missing). Who will benefit from this research, both practically and theoretically? What role will it play in the existing literature? What's the latest/new?

The author’s response 2.5

In the Introduction section, we add to the research contributions of this article.

Reviewer #3 

The core claims are clearly expressed in abstract and conclusion part of the research paper. The empirical findings are cohere with each other and theorical framework of this work. The literature review is quite extensive and completed using up-to-date sources on the subject. The methods applied and the variables used in the methodology section of the article provided the required results. The findings of the article contributed to the literature as well. The findings and novelty of the manuscript contributes the existing literature. The English language of the article is clear and understandable, and the terminology used is compatible with the subject of the study. The article is very well-written and it is easy to follow. In addition, the article well discusses the topic of interest, and deals with a topic with many applications in practice. The quality of literature review and the aim of the paper is pretty well. The quality of the research is acceptable as well as the contribution of the paper. The quantitative research is very well conducted and the methodology described in the specific chapter is followed by current data processing. The methodology used is also very well described. The research fills a gap both by focusing on China's trade capacity and the influencing factors by considering the characteristics of spatial and temporal divergence to conduct exhaustive research on the influencing factors and temporal-spatial divergences in China's import and export trade. The researchers of the article recommend ensuring the optimization of trade channel layout. To enhance transportation efficiency, accessibility of goods, and decrease trade expenses, trade channel layout must be rationalized according to the spatial and temporal distribution traits of import and export trades. Firstly, upgrading of seaports and inland ports is essential for ameliorating goods' loading, unloading and transportation capacities, and accelerating trade transport times. On the other hand, diversifying and improving trade channels can be achieved through developing logistics networks, including highways and railroads. Additionally, facilitating faster and more convenient trade channels can be achieved by promoting the advancement of air freight and logistics technology. Strengthening trade cooperation and communication is also essential. This can be accomplished by actively expanding international trade partners and enhancing trade cooperation and communication with major trading partner countries and regions. Strengthening trade cooperation with developed economies is one approach to enhancing our trade level by learning advanced trade concepts and management experience. Additionally, our trade activities can be diversified and economic complementarity can be strengthened by focusing on trade cooperation with emerging market and developing countries. Furthermore, there is a need to establish and expand free trade zones and regional economic cooperation mechanisms to enhance trade facilitation and increase the scope of trade. Upgrading Trade Technology: Enhancing trade-related technological research and innovation to analyze and forecast trade data more effectively. Utilize innovative technologies, such as big data analysis and artificial intelligence, to gain deeper insights into trade potential and predict trade demand and market fluctuations accurately. Additionally, strengthen trade information sharing and platform development to ensure timely and precise trade information. Furthermore, the emphasis should be on developing trade talent by enhancing training and exchange programs, as well as improving the technical capabilities and professional quality of practitioners. In my opinion, the article has its merit and is of interest for the PLOS One readership. Consequently, the article is acceptable.

The author’s response 3.1

Thank you for your review and appreciation.

Reviewer #4

Your work contains multiple analyses, is remarkable as such, and is gripping to read. My suggestions and editing requests for the study were sent to the editor as a PDF file. I wish you success in your future manuscripts.

The author’s response 4.1

Thank you for your review and appreciation. We have revised the paper according to the PDF file you sent us.

Reviewer #5 

Although the subject of the article is attractive, there are many issues that need to be corrected in the article.

1-) The purpose of the article is not fully described in the introduction part of the article. What is the purpose of the article? Why is the topic of the article important? What is the article's contribution to the literature?

The author’s response 5.1

We expand the introduction to emphasize the importance of studying the spatial distribution of China's import and export trade and provide a reference for other developing countries; at the same time, the research content of this article is described in detail.

2-) Gini coefficient needs more detailed explanation.

The author’s response 5.2

We provide a more detailed explanation of the Gini coefficient.

3-) ESA and MLR also need more explanation.

The author’s response 5.3

We provide a more detailed explanation of ESA and MLR.

4-) Conclusion section is too short.

The author’s response 5.4

We have expanded the Conclusion section of this article.

5-) Is there no discussion section? The authors need to add a discussion section in the article.

The author’s response 5.5

We add references to the import and export trade of other developing countries at last of this article.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0300307.s007.docx (18.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Rita Yi Man Li

8 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-33006R1Spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China's import and export trade, factors influencing it, and its implications for developing countries' tradePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 22 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Rita Yi Man Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Title: "Determinants of carbon emission: Province level evidence from China"

Abstract:

The abstract provides a concise summary of the paper's content. It clearly states the research question and the methodology used. However, it can be improved by including the main findings and conclusions of the study. Additionally, there are a few grammatical errors that need to be addressed.

Introduction:

The introduction adequately presents the research question and provides background information on the topic. However, it is overly lengthy and could be condensed to provide a more concise overview of the existing literature. Shortening the introduction to under 2 pages would improve its readability and focus.

Relationship to Literature:

The paper demonstrates a moderate understanding of the relevant literature in the field. However, there are some notable omissions of significant work that should be addressed. The authors should expand their literature review to encompass a wider range of sources and incorporate recent developments in the field: A study on public perceptions of carbon neutrality in China: has the idea of ESG been encompassed? Frontiers in Environmental Sciences, 2023

Additionally, there are a few citation errors that need to be corrected. Section 3 has missing citation.

Methodology:

The paper's argument is built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts, and ideas. The research design and methodology employed are suitable for addressing the research question. However, there is room for improvement in terms of providing more details on the specific methods used in the study. Additionally, the authors should clarify any potential limitations or biases in the methodology. 4.2 why 27 sectors were selected?

Results:

The results are presented clearly and analyzed appropriately. The findings are discussed in relation to the research question and are supported by the evidence presented. However, there are a few instances where the interpretations and conclusions could be further strengthened by providing additional evidence or analysis. Line 355, “it can be seen that outflow’s contribution to carbon emission is the highest, accounting for 56.0%, 53.6% and 45.9% of the emission in 2007, 2012”? What do you mean by outflow? Figure 2 is unclear what it meant.

Implications for research, practice, and/or society:

The paper identifies some implications for research, practice, and/or society. It discusses the potential economic and commercial impact of the research, as well as its relevance to public policy and the body of knowledge. However, these implications could be further elaborated upon and linked more explicitly to the findings and conclusions of the paper.

Quality of Communication:

The paper generally expresses its case clearly, but there are areas where improvements can be made. Attention should be paid to sentence structure, jargon use, and acronyms to ensure clarity and readability. The paper should be written in a clear and concise manner, with key points accurately reflecting the main arguments.

Conclusion:

The conclusions and potential impacts of the paper are generally clear. However, they could be further strengthened by providing a more comprehensive summary of the main findings and their significance. Additionally, the authors should ensure that the conclusions logically follow from the evidence presented.

Title, Abstract, and Keywords:

The title adequately represents the content of the paper. The abstract provides a summary of the paper's key elements but could be improved by including the main results and conclusions. The keywords accurately reflect the content and topic of the study.

Length and Organization:

The paper is an appropriate length, but could benefit from some organizational improvements. The introduction should be condensed, and the main body of the paper should be organized in a logical and coherent manner to enhance readability and flow.

Overall, the paper has potential but requires revisions and improvements in several areas. Addressing the identified weaknesses, such as expanding the literature review, providing more details on the methodology, strengthening the interpretations and conclusions, and improving the clarity of communication, will significantly enhance the quality and impact of the paper.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,

Thank You for enhancing the manuscript by following the Reviewers' comments.

I can see that You have made all requested changes to the manuscript. I suggest the authors add some sentences to the Discussion section regarding ESG-goals achievement.

Reviewer #4: The manuscript has changed a lot from its original version. This happened because you took other referee suggestions into consideration.

You made my suggestions. Thank you

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sergey Barykin

Reviewer #4: Yes: M. Esra ATUKALP

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300307.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


8 Feb 2024

Dear Rita Yi Man Li:

Thank you very much for your letter and advice. We have revised the paper. The specific modification situation is summarized as follows:

1. I uploaded the latest version of the manuscript, making sure there are no tracking changes or highlighting.

2. Financial Disclosure Statement:

-Supported by Ministry of Education, Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education 

Project(230825052507181).

-Funded by Science Research Project of Hebei Education Department (BJS2024097).

-Supported by Hebei Province Social Science Development Research Project (20230303051).

3. I uploaded "title_authors_affiliations", including bdf and LaTeX files.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely

Corresponding author: 

Name: Wu Yuhuan

E-mail: wuyuhuan@hbwe.edu.cn

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0300307.s008.docx (18.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Rita Yi Man Li

27 Feb 2024

Spatio-temporal heterogeneity of China's import and export trade, factors influencing it, and its implications for developing countries' trade

PONE-D-23-33006R2

Dear authors,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Rita Yi Man Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Some references need standardisation.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,

Thank You for submitting the relevant research.

I can see that You improved the manuscript by following the Reviewers' comments.

Reviewer #4: The manuscript has changed a lot from its original version.This happened because you took other referee suggestions into consideration.

You made my suggestions. Thank you.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sergey Barykin

Reviewer #4: Yes: M. Esra ATUKALP

**********

Acceptance letter

Rita Yi Man Li

22 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-33006R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Rita Yi Man Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table

    (XLSX)

    pone.0300307.s001.xlsx (11.9KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table

    (CSV)

    pone.0300307.s002.csv (937B, csv)
    S3 Table

    (CSV)

    pone.0300307.s003.csv (939B, csv)
    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    pone.0300307.s004.xlsx (46.9KB, xlsx)
    S1 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0300307.s005.pdf (43.2KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Report.pdf

    pone.0300307.s006.pdf (11.4KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0300307.s007.docx (18.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0300307.s008.docx (18.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES