Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0301528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301528

Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt

Chenyu Feng 1, Chunhua Hu 1,2,*, Zhaobin Sun 1, Hao Zhang 1, Zhaozhao Xu 1
Editor: Mayank Sukhija3
PMCID: PMC11025964  PMID: 38635694

Abstract

An inexpensive and high-performing solid Coumarone resin was added to Styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) copolymer-modified asphalt to enhance its storage stability and road performance. To assess the effect of Coumarone resin dosage on the SBS-modified asphalt, a series of laboratory tests were conducted. The composite modified asphalt’s segregation test was used to evaluate its storage stability, Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) and Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) tests were employed to investigate its high-temperature performance and permanent deformation resistance, and the Bending Beam Rheology (BBR) test was utilized to measure its low-temperature performance. Fluorescence microscopy was used to observe the composite modified asphalt’s microstructure, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was conducted to study the changes in chemical structure during the modification process. The results showed that Coumarone resin can improve the compatibility of SBS and asphalt, improve the high-temperature performance and deformation resistance of SBS-modified asphalt, and adding an appropriate amount of Coumarone resin can help enhance the low-temperature cracking resistance of modified asphalt. The optimal dosage of Coumarone resin recommended for SBS-modified asphalt performance enhancement is 2% under the test conditions, as determined by comparing the test results of samples with various dosages.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of China’s economy, asphalt pavements play an increasingly important role in the road network [1]. Although asphalt pavements have the advantages of excellent load-bearing capacity, fast construction speed and high reparability, they are also prone to cracks, depressions and rutting in service, leading to a reduction in life expectancy [2]. Asphalt is crucial for road pavement, therefore improving its performance is a major issue. It comprises four fractions: saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, resins, and asphaltenes, collectively known as SARA fractions [3]. Modifiers are typically used to alter the SARA component and structure of asphalt to improve its viscoelastic properties and overall performance.

Styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) copolymers are commonly used to enhance the performance of asphalt due to their superior high-temperature, low-temperature, and aging resistance properties [46]. When SBS and asphalt are mixed together, due to the relatively large differences in their respective structures and compositions, there are bound to be compatibility problems. The compatibility of SBS with asphalt refers to the ability of the two to accommodate each other and form a macroscopically homogeneous modified asphalt [7]. Moreover, modified asphalt is prone to phase separation, leading to poor storage stability during transportation and storage. Additionally, an increase in SBS content during mixing and construction can result in elevated asphalt viscosity, making it difficult for pumping and mixing, which is not beneficial for construction [8]. This is because SBS is more compatible with aromatic hydrocarbons and colloids in asphalt, but less compatible with saturated hydrocarbons and asphaltenes. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate aromatic-rich materials as a compatibilizer to enhance the compatibility of SBS with the matrix asphalt. Currently, there are more studies on oil substances as compatibilizers, such as furfural extraction oil, aromatic oil, shale oil, etc. However, the addition of oil substances will reduce the consistency of matrix asphalt, which ultimately affects the rutting resistance of SBS-modified asphalt [911]. Petroleum resin with nine carbon atoms (C9 petroleum resin), as a malleable hydrocarbon resin made by polymerization of petroleum cracking products, has some double bonds and aromatic rings in its structure, which makes it compatible with other resins, rubbers, SBS and matrix bitumen [12]. Existing research indicates that C9 petroleum resin enhances the compatibility between SBS and asphalt without compromising the high-temperature performance of the asphalt. It serves as an optimal compatibility modifier for SBS-modified asphalt [1316]. Nevertheless, petroleum resources are finite, and the continuous escalation of petroleum prices erodes the cost advantage of related products.

Coumarone resin to Ethylene tar, carbon nine, and other heavy aromatic hydrocarbon components by the high-temperature polymerization reaction of the resin, the composition is mainly a short side chain necking thick ring aromatic hydrocarbons. It exhibits excellent compatibility with rubber, SBS, and SIS while offering advantages such as cheapness, sustainability, heat resistance, and aging resistance [17]. Yang SQ et al. demonstrated that the use of Coumarone resin as an activator significantly improved the compatibility of rubber powder and asphalt [18]. Huang WD et al. developed a high-viscosity asphalt modifier based on Coumarone resin and oleic acid amide as raw materials [19]. Pyshyev S et al. added gumarone resin to base bitumen, the softening point of bitumen was increased from 47°C to 52°C, and the bonding property was also significantly improved, but meanwhile, the Coumarone resin also reduced the plastic properties of bitumen, especially the needle penetration [20, 21]. In a subsequent study, Pyshyev S suggested the use of tar with Coumarone resin as a modifier for bitumen [22]. Shved M et al. investigated the effect of Coumarone resins containing methacrylic fragments on the main properties of bitumen and showed that Coumarone resin doped at 1% had little effect on the ductility of bitumen but doubled the adhesion of bitumen [23]. Lin X et al. separately employed solid Coumarone resin and liquid Coumarone resin as modifiers for asphalt, with the findings indicating that solid Coumarone resin notably enhances the high-temperature performance of asphalt, while liquid Coumarone resin enhances its low-temperature performance [24]. Current scholars have mostly studied the effect of Coumarone resin on base asphalt, but the effect of Coumarone resin on SBS-modified asphalt has not been reported. For this reason, this experiment will be Coumarone resin added to SBS-modified asphalt, to explore the effect of Coumarone resin on the physical properties and high and low temperature performance of SBS-modified asphalt. This is achieved through the preparation of Coumarone resin/SBS composite-modified asphalt. In comparison to SBS-modified asphalt, a battery of tests encompassing fundamental performance evaluations, temperature-frequency scanning tests, multiple stress creep recovery tests (MSCR), and low-temperature beam bending rheological tests (BBR) are employed to investigate the physical properties, rheological behavior, and storage stability of the composite-modified asphalt. Additionally, fluorescence microscopy tests and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) are employed to examine the microstructure and modification mechanisms of the composite-modified asphalt. This study is geared towards enhancing the storage stability, high-temperature stability and low-temperature crack resistance of SBS-modified asphalt while expanding the application of Coumarone resin in the realm of asphalt.

2. Materials and tests

2.1 Materials

The asphalt used in this study is a 70# matrix asphalt produced by domestic refineries, as detailed in Table 1 for its performance indicators. SBS adopts linear SBS791 from Shenzhen Jitian Chemical Co., Ltd., its performance indicators are shown in Table 2; Coumarone resin adopted C-140 of Shanghai Xingxu Industrial Co.,Ltd., its performance indicators are shown in Table 3. Based on the results of preliminary pre-tests and existing references [2527], SBS dosage based on engineering commonly used dose, that is 4% of the dosage of asphalt (mass fraction, the same below), indicating that the ordinary roads modified asphalt [28], and the dosage of the Coumarone resin was 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% of the asphalt mass, which were denoted as CR0, CR1, CR2, CR3, and CR4, respectively (the same below).

Table 1. Main performance indexes of matrix asphalt.

Test items Test results standardized value
Dissolution rate (%) 99.7
Penetration (25°C, 0.1mm) 62 60–80
Softening point (°C) 47.8 ≥45
Ductility (15°C /cm) 102 ≥100
Flash point (°C) 310

Table 2. Main performance indices of linear SBS791.

Test items Test results
Block ratio (S/B) 30/70
Tensile strength (MPa) 18
Stretch elongation (%) 815
Shore hardness (A) 75
Melt Flow Index (g/10min) 4

Table 3. Technical indices of Coumarone resin.

Test items Test results
Softening point (°C) 146
Color number 12~18
Acid value (%) ≤0.5
Ash (%) ≤0.1
Bromine value (mg) ≤30

2.2 Sample preparation

Method for preparing Coumarone resin/SBS-modified asphalt: Initially, the asphalt underwent heating to a temperature range of 175°C to 185°C. Following this, the asphalt was introduced to the SBS modifier, constituting 4% of the asphalt mass. The ensuing process involved slow stirring, subsequent addition of varying quantities of Coumarone resin, and high-speed shearing at a shear rate of 5,000 r/min. Stirring was consistently maintained throughout the entire preparation procedure, with the temperature carefully controlled within the range of 175°C to 185°C. The overall shear duration encompassed 40 minutes, measured from the moment Coumarone was introduced until the completion of shearing [29]. Following shearing, the asphalt temperature was maintained within the range of 150°C to 160°C for about 2 hours. Stirring was consistently applied during this duration to aid in the full expansion of the SBS modifier.

2.3 Testing program

To investigate and characterize the basic properties, rheological properties and microstructure of the modified asphalt prepared above, the tests including penetration, softening point, ductility, temperature frequency scanning, bending beam rheometer (BBR), fluorescence microscopy and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were performed in this study. The flowchart of testing program is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Flowchart of testing program.

Fig 1

2.3.1 Basic performance test

To investigate the impact of Coumarone resin on the efficacy of SBS-modified asphalt, we conducted assessments on the physical characteristics of Coumarone resin-altered SBS-modified asphalt. These evaluations adhered to the specifications outlined in the "American Society of Testing Materials" (ASTM), specifically D5-06, D36-95, D113-99, and D5329. The parameters examined encompassed penetration, softening point, ductility at 5°C, and elastic recovery at 25°C. Among them for the warm areas of SBS modified asphalt penetration should be in the range of 35~55 (0.1mm), the softening point should be greater than 60°C, ductility at 5°C should be greater than 200 mm, the elastic recovery rate of not less than 70%.

2.3.2 Temperature frequency test

In order to investigate the rheological properties of the modified asphalt prepared above under high and medium temperatures, a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR, Malvern Kinexus Pro+, Malvern Panalytical Ltd, UK) was used in this study and testing procedures provided in AASHTO T315-12 [34] were followed.

The frequency scanning tests on asphalt samples, aiming to quantify the complex shear modulus (G*) and phase angle (δ) of the modified asphalt, were executed using a DSR. The chosen configuration involved parallel plates with a 25 mm diameter and a 1 mm spacing between the axial plate and the bottom plate. The examination was carried out across a temperature spectrum of 40~100°C with a temperature gradient of 5°C. Strain loading at 0.5% was applied, and the scanning frequency ranged from 0.1 to 100 rad/s.

2.3.3 Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test

The MSCR test is a widely employed method for assessing the resistance to permanent deformation in polymer-modified asphalt. To characterize the high-temperature performance of the modified asphalt, parameters such as Elastic Recovery (R) and Unrecoverable Creep Flexibility (Jnr) are employed. The test adhered to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D7405) protocol. Firstly, the asphalt was aged, and a rotating film oven (RTFOT) was often used to simulate short-term ageing in the experiments [30]. 35g of unaged asphalt was packed into glass bottles, which were placed into the turntable inside the RTFOT equipment, and the turntable was rotated at a speed of 15±0.2r/min for 85min at 163±0.5°C to obtain the short-term aged asphalt. Modified asphalt specimens, subjected to short-term aging, underwent ten intermittent creep stress cycles at 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa sequentially at 64°C, with a cycling period comprising 1s of creep and 9s of recovery. The Jnr-diff, indicative of stress sensitivity in asphalt, was derived by calculating Jnr(0.1) and Jnr(3.2) using the formula outlined in Eq 1.

Jnrdiff=[(Jnr(3.2)Jnr(0.1))/Jnr(0.1)]×100% (1)

Where: Jnr (0.1) and Jnr (3.2) are the unrecoverable creep flexibility at standard stress levels of 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa, respectively. Jnr-diff is an indicator of stress sensitivity.

2.3.4 Bending beam rheometer (BBR) test

According to AASHTO T313, BBR tests were conducted on SBS-modified asphalt with different Coumarone dosages to evaluate the low-temperature performance of the binder [31]. The creep rate (m) and creep stiffness (S) of the asphalt binders at different temperatures (-12°C and -18°C) were obtained by placing the beams (127 mm×12.7 mm×6.35 mm) in a water bath at a certain temperature for 60 min, and then applying a constant load of 980±50 mN for 240s in the beams. Two replicate tests were performed for each sample and the average value was taken as the test result.

2.3.5 Fluorescence microscope test

The mechanism of SBS-modified asphalt reinforced with Coumarone resin was investigated by fluorescence microscopy test, a small amount of specimen was placed on a slide, covered with a coverslip, and gently pressed on a hot stage at 163°C, then observed and photographed with a Nikon AIR-type laser confocal microscope [32]. Through the different transmittance between the modifier and asphalt, the distribution state of the SBS modifier in asphalt can be observed, thus evaluating the compatibility between the SBS modifier and asphalt.

2.3.6 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis

In this study, the functional groups of the modified bitumen were analyzed using attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR) as a way to investigate whether there is a chemical reaction during the modification of SBS bitumen by Coumarone resin. The specimens were first dissolved in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for no less than 2 h. The mass ratio of asphalt to CCl4 was 1:10, and after the asphalt was completely dissolved, the solution was dripped onto a potassium bromide (Kbr) slide with a micro-syringe, and then the CCl4 solution was evaporated with an infrared lamp. The scanning frequency was set at 32 times/min for this test, and the wavelength of the infrared spectrum was 500~4000 cm-1.

2.3.7 Segregation test

Assess the storage stability of modified asphalt through a segregation test following the specifications outlined in ASTM D7173-14: (1)Dispense 50g of the asphalt specimen into an aluminum tube with a diameter of 25.4mm and a height of 140mm. Position the tube vertically in an oven at 163°C for 48 hours. (2)Promptly remove the aluminum tube from the oven and transfer it to a refrigerator set at -5°C for a cooling period of 4 hours. (3)Remove the aluminum tube, and put it onto a flat plate. The specimen was evenly divided into three sections for assessing the softening point at both the top and bottom. The smaller the variation in softening points between the upper and lower ends, the higher the storage stability of the modified bitumen.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 physical property

The physical property data of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt at different dosages of Coumarone resin are shown in Fig 2. The figure illustrates that the addition of Coumarone resin led to a 21% decrease in the penetration of the modified asphalt. The reason is that in SBS, the PS segment determines the strength of the material, the resin molecules into the PS segment in SBS can increase the force between PS segment and asphalt [15], thereby enhancing the consistency of SBS modified asphalt.

Fig 2. Influence of Coumarone resin dosage on the physical properties of SBS asphalt.

Fig 2

(a) Penetration, (b) Softening point, (c) Ductility.

The softening point of the asphalt modified with Coumarone resin/SBS composite showed an escalation corresponding to the increase in Coumarone resin dosage. Specifically, SBS-CR4 experienced an 11% elevation in its softening point. This is attributed to the inherent high softening point of C-140 Coumarone resin and its property to enhance polymer cohesion, reinforcing the bond between SBS and asphalt. Consequently, this creates a mesh structure within the asphalt, ultimately improving the high-temperature performance of the modified asphalt.

The 5°C ductility of the Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt demonstrates a pattern of initially increasing and subsequently decreasing with the elevation of Coumarone resin dosage. Notably, the ductility of SBS-CR2 experiences a remarkable improvement of 48%. This occurrence arises from the polymer with unsaturated double bonds present in the Coumarone resin. Consequently, SBS assimilates an ample amount of lightweight components, thereby augmenting the low-temperature flexibility of the modified asphalt. It’s important to note that excessive use of Coumarone resin, being a brittle material with poor low-temperature performance, can diminish the modified asphalt’s resistance to low-temperature cracking, leading to reduced ductility.

3.2 High-temperature performance

Temperature-frequency scanning of various asphalts using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) yields complex shear modulus (G*) and phase angle (δ), which can be used to reflect the viscoelastic properties of asphalt materials.

G* represents the ratio of maximum shear stress to maximum shear strain and indicates a material’s resistance to deformation under specific shear loads [33]. A higher G* value in asphalt signifies better deformation resistance, particularly at high temperatures. Fig 3 illustrates the temperature-dependent variation in the G* value for Coumarone resin/SBS composite-modified asphalt. The observed trend indicates a decline in G* for each asphalt sample as the temperature rises. This reduction in G* is attributed to heightened internal asphalt temperatures, which lead to the attenuation of intermolecular forces. Consequently, the asphalt undergoes a transition from a highly elastic state to a more viscous flow state, resulting in diminished resistance to deformation [34]. Furthermore, at the same temperature, the G* of the modified asphalt increases progressively with higher dosages of Coumarone resin. For instance, at 64°C, the G* of SBS-CR4 is approximately 2.3 times that of SBS-CR0. The substantial improvement in stress resistance of SBS-modified asphalt is attributed to the inclusion of Coumarone resin. This is achieved through the role of Coumarone resin in reducing the size of SBS particles during the preparation of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt. Smaller particles are more effectively dissolved in the asphalt, resulting in a denser mesh structure between SBS and asphalt. Consequently, this improves the resistance of the modified asphalt to deformation.

Fig 3. Complex shear modulus(G*).

Fig 3

δ reflects the change of the viscous and elastic components in the asphalt material, which holds significance in comprehending asphalt behavior. Asphalt as an elastic-plastic material, a smaller δ value indicates a higher proportion of elasticity, signifying greater deformability recovery. Conversely, a larger δ value indicates the presence of a significant amount of irreversible deformation within the asphalt. δ is more sensitive to changes in the internal physical and chemical structure of asphalt than the G* value and more accurately reflects changes in the viscoelasticity of asphalt materials with temperature [35]. In Fig 4, the temperature-dependent variation curve of the δ-value for Coumarone resin/SBS composite-modified asphalt is depicted. Notably, the incorporation of Coumarone resin results in a conspicuous reduction in the phase angle of the modified asphalt. This implies a decreased temperature sensitivity of the modified asphalt, particularly in the elevated temperature range spanning from 50°C to 85°C. It is also observed that the phase angle of the modified bitumen reaches its minimum at 2% of Coumarone resin dosage and thereafter increases with the increase in Coumarone resin dosage. This phenomenon is credited to the capability of Coumarone resin, when employed at an optimal dosage, to modify the proportion of viscoelastic components within the modified asphalt. That is, the proportion of saturated fraction and gelatine in the modified asphalt is reduced, resulting in the largest relative molecular mass of asphaltene as the centre, around which adsorbed the most polar gelatine, the asphalt formed at this time for the gel-type asphalt, with excellent elasticity. Nonetheless, it should be noted that Coumarone resin inherently exhibits polymer-like viscosity characteristics, and an excessive application in the modified asphalt can have adverse effects on viscosity and elasticity.

Fig 4. Phase angle (δ).

Fig 4

Rutting resistance factor (G*/sinδ) is used to evaluate the ability of asphalt materials to resist deformation under repetitive loading. The U.S. SHRP study introduced the G*/sinδ value to indicate the high-temperature performance of asphalt mixtures [36]. A larger G*/sinδ value indicates greater stability at high temperatures, signifying stronger rutting resistance. As illustrated in Fig 5, the rutting resistance factor G*/sinδ of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt exhibits a trend parallel to that of G*. Specifically, G*/sinδ in modified asphalt increases as the dosage of Coumarone resin rises within the temperature range of 40~100°C. For instance, SBS-CR4 displays a significant increase of 2950 Pa at 64°C when compared to SBS-CR0. This can be attributed to the fact that Coumarone resin reduces the particle size of the SBS particles, thereby increasing the contact area with the asphalt. This, in turn, enhances the cohesion of the modified asphalt, leading to improved rutting resistance [37].

Fig 5. Rutting resistance factor (G*/sinδ).

Fig 5

3.3 Low-temperature performance

The susceptibility of asphalt to low-temperature cracking can be assessed through the Bending Beam Rheology (BBR) test. Test outcomes provide values for creep strength (S) and creep coefficient (m). The S value serves as an indicator of the asphalt’s flexibility at low temperatures, while the m value signifies the stress relaxation capacity of the asphalt. Enhanced low-temperature cracking resistance is indicated by a smaller S-value and a larger m-value in modified asphalt. Adhering to the AASHTO T313-04 specification, optimal performance is achieved when S is less than 300 MPa, and m-values exceed 0.3. This study delves into the low-temperature performance of various modified asphalts at -12°C and -18°C, with the findings presented in Fig 6.

Fig 6. Variation of S and m with temperature.

Fig 6

It’s apparent that, as the temperature decreases, the same modified asphalt exhibits an increase in the S value and a decrease in the m value. This trend indicates a deterioration in the cracking resistance of the modified asphalt at lower temperatures [38]. And with the increase of Coumarone resin blending, the S-value of SBS-CR2 decreased by 33% at -12°C and 54% at -18°C; the m-value of SBS-CR2 increased by 0.028 at -12°C and 0.027 at -18°C. This suggests that the inclusion of Coumarone resin improved the low-temperature cracking resistance of SBS-modified bitumen. The rationale behind this enhancement lies in the abundance of lightweight components in Coumarone resin, which enhances the compatibility between SBS and asphalt. As a result, more effective crosslinking occurs between SBS and asphalt phases, forming a robust three-dimensional mesh structure that enhances the resistance to low-temperature cracking performance. This reduces or avoids stress concentration due to SBS particle aggregation under external loading, which can lead to cracks in the asphalt and low-temperature damage. However, when the Coumarone resin dosage reaches 3%, the Coumarone resin adversely affects the low-temperature performance of its composite modified asphalt with SBS. This correlation aligns with the findings from the earlier 5°C ductility test. It implies that while Coumarone resin has a positive impact on the low-temperature performance of asphalt by promoting the formation of a new structure, an overuse of Coumarone resin may contribute to heightened asphalt brittleness due to the inherent brittleness of the resin itself. This, in turn, diminishes asphalt’s stress relaxation properties, resulting in a decline in low-temperature cracking resistance.

3.4 Resilience against deformation

The SHRP program proposed the Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) test to further evaluate the deformation recovery of asphalt. The MSCR test examines the viscoelastic deformation of asphalt under various stress levels. Asphalt deforms under stress loading, where elastic deformation is recoverable creep deformation and viscous deformation is unrecoverable creep deformation and accumulates to the next creep loading stage, the test can more realistically simulate the process of asphalt pavement subjected to loads in service [39]. The MSCR test employs a stress-control model to examine the unrecoverable flexibility (Jnr) of the modified asphalt, focusing on stress levels of 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa. A smaller Jnr value signifies a heightened capability of the asphalt to rebound from deformation at the specified temperature. The test commenced by applying a stress of 0.1 kPa, followed by the execution of 10 recovery cycles. Subsequently, the stress was increased to 3.2 kPa, and an additional 10 cycles were conducted, concluding the test after a total duration of 200 seconds. This sequence of steps was executed at the outset of the testing procedure.

The results of the MSCR test are presented in Fig 7. As the temperature gradually increases, the Jnr of the modified asphalt exhibits a consistent upward trend. For example, when subjected to stresses of 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa, the Jnr of SBS-CR0 experienced increments of 198% and 199%, respectively. This underscores the parallel impact of temperature and stress, indicating that alterations in either factor can result in deformation damage in modified asphalt. The maximal damage to the modified asphalt occurs when both high temperature and high stress are concurrently present. As the concentration of Coumarone resin doping increased, there was a notable decrease in both Jnr(0.1) and Jnr(3.2) at various temperatures, where the Jnr(0.1) and Jnr(3.2) of SBS-CR4 at 64°C decreased by 25% and 26%, respectively, comparing with that of SBS-CR0. This is attributed to the augmentation of the elastic component in the modified asphalt facilitated by the presence of Coumarone resin. As a result, the modified asphalt exhibits improved resistance to permanent deformation at elevated temperatures. This is due to the fact that the lightweight component provided by the Coumarone resin meets the absorption of the SBS polymer and can reach saturation. The SBS particles in this state are in contact with each other to form an elastic whole, which enables the modified asphalt to recover better from the deformation caused by the load after deformation.

Fig 7. Jnr-value of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt.

Fig 7

The Jnr-diff-value serves as a metric to mirror the extent of stress sensitivity in asphalt. This parameter is a crucial indicator for assessing the distinct stages of rheological properties in asphalt [40]. Jnr-diff-values in the range of ≤5.0%, 5.0% to 75.0%, >75.0%, corresponding to the linear region, non-linear region (has not yet occurred creep damage), and creep damage stage. Solving for Jnr-diff provides a comprehensive understanding of asphalt deformation across different temperature ranges. The stress sensitivity of the Coumarone resin/SBS composite-modified asphalt is shown in Fig 8. Notably, only the Jnr-diff of SBS-CR4 at 58°C surpasses 75%, while its Jnr-diff at 70°C gradually decreases with increased Coumarone resin dosage. This suggests that Coumarone resin effectively alleviates the stress sensitivity of the modified asphalt, particularly at elevated temperatures. Regarding the AASHTO MP-19 specification, the Jnr(3.2) and Jnr-diff are used as indicators to classify into four classes, namely Extremely Heavy Traffic (E), Very Heavy Traffic (V), Heavy Traffic (H), and Standard Traffic (S), as shown in Table 4.

Fig 8. Jnr-diff test results of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt.

Fig 8

Table 4. MSCR test grading criteria.

Traffic classification Jnr (3.2)/kPa-1 Jnr-diff /%
S(Standard Traffic) ≤4.0 ≤75%
H(Heavy Traffic) ≤2.0 ≤75%
V(Very Heavy Traffic) ≤1.0 ≤75%
E(Extremely Heavy Traffic) ≤0.5 ≤75%

At 58°C, modified asphalts with more than 1% Coumarone resin were able to achieve extra heavy traffic (V), and at high temperatures up to 70°C, modified asphalts with 3% and 4% Coumarone resin were still able to achieve heavy traffic (H). This implies that incorporating Coumarone resin into SBS asphalt enhances the applicability of the modified asphalt to various traffic classifications. The main reason is due to the better compatibility of Coumarone resin with petroleum asphalt and thermoplastic rubber. This compatibility helps to promote crosslinking between the SBS polymer and asphalt. Coumarone resin also has excellent aging resistance, weathering resistance, acid and alkali resistance, and a high softening point. These characteristics greatly enhance the modified asphalt’s elastic component at high temperatures, improving its resistance to permanent deformation and ability to recover from deformation.

3.5 Microstructure

The interplay between the SBS polymer and asphalt significantly influences the performance of SBS-modified asphalt. Investigating the microstructure of Coumarone resin/SBS composite-modified asphalt is instrumental in elucidating the mechanism through which Coumarone resin enhances the performance of SBS-modified asphalt. Fig 9 shows fluorescence micrographs (magnified 200 times) at different Coumarone resin dosages. In the images, SBS polymers appear as bright spots with yellow fluorescence, while Coumarone resin and asphalt present a dark background. From Fig 9(A), it can be observed that there is a significant difference in particle sizes between SBS particles, ranging from 10 to 100μm and unevenly dispersed. The reason for this is that there are differences in relative molecular mass, density, polarity, and solubility parameters between SBS polymers and bitumen, and both of them just have weak van der Waals forces, and it is difficult to form a stable mixed system by conventional physical dispersion. Therefore the different physical properties and molecular numbers cause incomplete mutual solubility between the two [7]. From Fig 9(B), it can be found that the introduction of 1% Coumarone resin results in a notable reduction in SBS particle size, with particles below 50μm and a more uniform distribution. In Fig 9(C), the SBS particle size continues to decrease, resembling the distribution in Fig 9(B), but with more SBS particles appearing at the same scale. It is shown that the increase in Coumarone resin blending provides more lightweight components and significantly improves the compatibility and dispersion of SBS polymers in asphalt. Finally, in Fig 9(D) and Fig 9(E) the SBS particles are in the form of uniformly sized scattering points, all of which have a particle size of less than 20μm, and form a reticulated structure with the SBS particles as the backbone. This is because the Coumarone resin increases the asphaltene content in the asphalt, condensing more and larger agglomerates of asphaltene wrapped by gelatine in the bitumen, thus increasing the force between the bitumen and SBS to prevent agglomeration between SBS particles, so that SBS can be sheared to a smaller particle size.

Fig 9. Fluorescence microscope images of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt.

Fig 9

(a) SBS-CR0, (b) SBS-CR1, (c) SBS-CR2, (d)SBS-CR3, (e)SBS-CR4.

The fluorescence microscope test demonstrates that in the preparation of composite modified asphalt, Coumarone resin effectively enhances the shearing efficiency of SBS particles, resulting in the absorption and dissolution of smaller SBS particles in the asphalt, forming a closely linked structure. This explains how Coumarone resin enhances the high-temperature performance and deformation resistance of SBS-modified asphalt [41].

3.6 Modification mechanism

Infrared spectroscopy is capable of capturing transmittance (or absorbance) change curves across various wavelengths for material molecules. Observing differences in the positions of absorption peaks can provide information about chemical bonds or relevant functional groups within material molecules. This analytical technique helps ascertain whether a chemical reaction occurs during the modification process [42]. In this study, FTIR tests were conducted on virgin asphalt, SBS-CR0, and SBS-CR2 to explore and analyze their molecular compositions.

Different asphalt infrared spectroscopy results are shown in Fig 10. It can be seen that the infrared spectra of SBS-CR0, SBS-CR2 and base asphalt are very similar. Some of the absorption peaks are only slightly different in intensity, there are no new characteristic absorption peaks or the original characteristic peaks disappeared. It was observed that the absorption peaks at 2923cm-1 and 2855cm-1 increased after the addition of the Coumarone resin, which was caused by the -CH2 antisymmetric and symmetric telescoping vibration. This suggests that the addition of the Coumarone resin enhanced the bonding energy of the methylene group and thus the molecular force between the asphalt and the SBS. There is a less obvious absorption peak at 1599cm-1, which is generated by the stretching vibration of the C = C aromatic ring, due to the high bond energy of the C = C double bond, and its rise indicates that the mechanical properties of the Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt are enhanced, This corresponds to the high resistance to deformation of the Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt in the rheological performance tests; The absorption peak at 1458cm-1, on the other hand, is caused by the shear vibrational absorption of -CH3; The wavelength range of 910–650 cm-1 corresponds to the benzene ring substitution region of asphalt. Within this range, several weak absorption peaks arise from the vibration of the C-H bond on the benzene ring. The infrared spectroscopy test indicates that there are no additional absorption peaks in the Coumarone resin/SBS-modified asphalt composite compared to the base asphalt. This observation indicates that the process of preparing modified asphalt, accomplished by blending Coumarone resin and SBS, represents a physical modification instead of introducing novel chemical reactions.

Fig 10. Infrared spectra of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt and base asphalt.

Fig 10

3.7 Storage stability

The storage stability of modified asphalt holds substantial importance in its practical application. The thermodynamic incompatibility between the SBS polymer and asphalt, coupled with the restricted presence of lightweight components in the matrix asphalt, impedes the effective solubilization of SBS. Therefore, during storage at high temperatures, SBS particles will float and aggregate, while heavier components, such as asphaltenes, will sink, ultimately resulting in the phenomenon of segregation [43]. The segregation test was used to evaluate the storage stability of the modified asphalt and the results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Results of segregation test of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt.

Test Asphalt location Softening point/°C ΔTR&B/°C
SBS-CR0 Top 65.9 10.5
bottom 55.4
SBS-CR1 Top 66.5 3.9
bottom 62.6
SBS-CR2 Top 65.7 2.3
bottom 63.4
SBS-CR3 Top 67.8 1.5
bottom 66.3
SBS-CR4 Top 69.4 1.2
bottom 68.2

Clearly, as the dosage of Coumarone resin increased from 0% to 4%, there was a significant and observable rise in the softening point for both the upper and lower sections of the aluminum tubes. Moreover, the softening point values for the upper sections of the aluminum tubes exhibited an increase compared to the values measured prior to the segregation test. This is due to the fact that there is an upwelling of the SBS polymer in the asphalt, causing SBS particles to aggregate at the top of the aluminum tube. In addition, the difference between the softening point of the top and the bottom (ΔTR&B) was significantly reduced with the addition of the Coumarone resin. This results from the incorporation of Coumarone resin, an aromatic hydrocarbon polymer, into the asphalt. It provides a lightweight component so that the chain segments of the SBS polymer can be stretched, reducing the free energy of its own surface, which can prevent the SBS polymer from agglomerating again, thus promoting the compatibility of the SBS polymer with the asphalt. The formation of SBS and asphalt two interpenetrating network structure, which restricts the mobility of the asphalt. The segregation test proved that the co-blended structure of the Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt is stable and not vulnerable to segregation under hot storage, which is in line with the results of the fluorescence microscopy test.

4. Conclusions

Through the preparation of Coumarone resin/SBS composite modified asphalt, using SBS-modified asphalt as a control group, this study aims to explore the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt and the role of the mechanism, the test results are analyzed to obtain the following conclusions:

  1. An appropriate quantity of Coumarone resin proves effective in enhancing the fundamental properties of SBS asphalt. In the baseline measurements, the incorporation of Coumarone resin led to a reduction in the penetration of SBS-modified asphalt. Specifically, SBS-CR4 demonstrated a 6.5°C increase in softening point, a 20% improvement in elastic recovery, and a noteworthy 68mm expansion in 5°C ductility.

  2. Findings from temperature frequency scanning tests indicate that the addition of Coumarone resin enhances the high-temperature deformation resistance of SBS-modified asphalt. The findings of the BBR test show diverse levels of enhancement in the low-temperature cracking resistance of SBS-modified asphalt, depending on the varying quantities of Coumarone resin. Nevertheless, it’s noteworthy that when the Coumarone resin content surpasses 2%, the rheological properties of SBS-modified asphalt experience adverse effects.

  3. The results of the separation test reveal that Coumarone resin effectively mitigates the floating and aggregation of SBS within the asphalt, thereby enhancing the storage stability of asphalt modified with SBS. This improvement is attributed to the ability of Coumarone resin to supply a considerable number of lightweight components, subsequently increasing the compatibility between SBS and asphalt.

  4. Through the fluorescence microscope can be found, that the Coumarone resin greatly reduces the particle size of SBS, makes its distribution more uniform, and forms a tight network structure, which is the important reason that the Coumarone resin on SBS asphalt properties have a variety of effects. FTIR analysis showed that the modification mechanism of Coumarone resin with SBS was through physical blending.

  5. In summary, the recommended amount of Coumarone resin is 2% when combining all the properties as well as microanalysis. Finally, research on the pavement properties of Coumarone resin/SBS-modified asphalt composite aggregates needs to be further carried out. The dosage of SBS in this experiment was 4% to comply with the index of asphalt used in ordinary roads, and thus the dosage and preparation conditions of the obtained Coumarone resin are only suitable for pavements under ordinary conditions. In the advanced pavement and complex conditions, the mixing amount of SBS and reference index should be adjusted appropriately. In addition, since Coumarone resin is mostly used as a viscosity builder in the rubber field, there should be a great potential for future research in the preparation of high-viscosity asphalt.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(ZIP)

pone.0301528.s001.zip (84.2KB, zip)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Liu FQ, Qin YQ, Wu WP, et al. Comprehensive Benefit Analysis of National Highway Maintenance Based on the Whole Life Cycle. Highway, 2023, 68(05):336–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang ZH, Deng YX, Zhang XX, et al. Asphalt Pavement Disease Extraction and Classification Method Based on Improved SegNet. Transportation Information and Safety, 2022, 40(03):127–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu Q, Fang R, Wu J, et al. Effect of SARA fractions on the physical, structural and dynamic properties of bitumen using molecular dynamics simulation. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 392: 132097. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132097 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tan YQ, Guo M, Cao LP, et al. Effect of commonly used modifiers on the viscoelastic properties of asphalt. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(04):7–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li C, Yuan YF, Jiang T, et al. Study on the effect of different types of SBS modifiers on the performance of composite modified asphalt. New Chemical Materials, 2023, 51(S1): 184–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dong F, Yang P, Yu X, et al. Morphology, chemical reaction mechanism, and cross-linking degree of asphalt binder modified by SBS block co-polymer. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 378: 131204. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ji YH, Guo SH, Li R. Compatibility and Stability Mechanisms of SBS Modified Asphalt. Journal of Petroleum (Petroleum Processing), 2002, 18(3): 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang J, Wang H, Liang M. Molecular simulation and experimental analysis of interaction and compatibility between asphalt binder and Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 342: 128028. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nie X, Li Z, Yao H, et al. Waste bio-oil as a compatibilizer for high content SBS modified asphalt. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2020, 38(4): 316–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li JQ. Study on the Modification Mechanism of Oil Shale/SBS Modified Asphalt and its Road Performance. Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shu S, Chen G, Yan J, et al. Combined Use of Polyurethane Prepolymer and Aromatic Oil in Physicochemical Rejuvenation of Aged SBS Modified Bitumen for Performance Recovery. Polymers, 2023, 15(5): 1120. doi: 10.3390/polym15051120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shi J, Zhao P, Fan W, et al. Facile preparation and application performance evaluation of SBS/C9 petroleum resin blends as modifier for high viscosity asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 120073. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Z, Nie XY, Yao HR, et al. Study on the Performance of C9 Petroleum Resin/SBS Composite Modified Asphalt. Journal of Building Materials, 2019, 22(05): 764–770. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cong YF, Xu L, Huang W, et al. Research on SBS-C9 petroleum resin modified asphalt. Journal of Building Materials, 2016, 19(03): 602–605. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nie XY, Yao HR, Li Z, et al. Effect of C9 petroleum resins on the properties of high viscosity modified bitumen. Journal of Petroleum (Petroleum Processing), 2019, 35(01): 176–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang W, Qiu L, Liu J, et al. Modification mechanism of C9 petroleum resin and its influence on SBS modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 306: 124740. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124740 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jun X. Coumarone resin. World Rubber Industry, 2011, 38(09): 47. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang SQ, Wang GQ, Run MT, et al. Experimental study on compatibility improvement of asphalt modified by high dosage of waste rubber powder. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 38(06): 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang WD, Sun LJ. High viscosity asphalt modifier and its preparation method: CN200810207297. 3.
  • 20.Pyshyev S, Grytsenko Y, Danyliv N, et al. Production of indene-coumarone resins as bitumen modifiers. Petroleum and Coal, 2015, 57(4): 303–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pyshyev S, Gunka V, Grytsenko Y, et al. Oil and gas processing products to obtain polymers modified bitumen. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2017, 10(4): 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pyshyev S, Gunka V, Grytsenko Y, et al. Polymer modified bitumen. Chemistry and Chemical Technology, 2016, 10(4): 631–636. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shved M, Prysiazhnyi Y, Zubal O. Study of the Possibility of Using Indene-Coumarone Resin with Methacrylate Fragments as Polymer Applications for Petroleum Road Bitumen. Litteris et Artibus: proceedings. Lviv Polytechnic Publishing Company, 2018: 234–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin X, Wang M, Yan K. Comparison on the performance of solid coumarone-indene resin and liquid coumarone-indene resin modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 400: 132629. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132629 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pyshyev S, Prysiazhnyi Y, Borbeyiyong G I, et al. Effect of raw material composition on the properties of road asphalt modifier obtained from liquid coal coking products. Przemysl Chemiczny, 2021, 100(7): 680–684. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li G, Gu Z, Tan Y, et al. Research on the phase structure of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 326: 126933. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126933 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang W, Zou L, Chen F, et al. Evaluation method of storage stability of SBS modified bitumen based on dynamic rheological properties. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 323: 126615. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126615 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yuan JA, Ji D, Zhu ZG. Effect of SBS dosage on the properties of modified bitumen. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2005(03): 19–22+48. doi: 10.19721/j.cnki 1671–8879. 2005.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tang D, Cong YF, Zhao YL, et al. Effect of C9 petroleum resin on the properties of rubber powder modified asphalt. New Chemical Materials, 2019, 47(10): 255–258+263. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang W, Bahadori A, Shen S, et al. Comparison of laboratory and field asphalt aging for polymer-modified and warm-mix asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(7): 04018150. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xia PY, Hu LQ, Yan J, et al. Evaluation index of low temperature performance of high viscosity modified asphalt. China Sciencepaper, 2020, 15(12). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong F, Yu X, Liu S, et al. Rheological behaviors and microstructure of SBS/CR composite modified hard asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 115: 285–293. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.057 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Walubita L F, Mahmoud E, Fuentes L, et al. Correlating the asphalt-binder high-temperature properties (DSR) to HMA permanent deformation (RLPD) and field rutting: A laboratory-field study. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 120761. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiang WT, Hao PW, Zhao ZC, et al. Effect of PVP-modified graphene on the rheological properties of SBS-modified asphalt. Journal of Building Materials, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Airey G D. Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens. Fuel, 2003, 82(14): 1709–1719. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meng YJ, Fan LP, Chen Q, et al. Microscopic Characteristics and Properties of Asphalt Modified by Waste Battery Powder. China Highway Journal, 2021, 34(10): 34–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liang JK, Okumura Toshiaki, Yuan WJ, et al. Study on the Enhancement Effect of C9 Petroleum Resin on the Performance of SBS Modified Asphalt. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Edition), 2022, 43(02): 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xie ZA, Zhang D, Li S, et al. Study on the Performance of Graphene/SBS Composite Modified Asphalt. New Chemical Materials, 2022, 50(03): 290–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang T, Jiang W, Ruan C, et al. The rheological properties of high-viscosity modified reclaimed asphalt binder at multiple application temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 372: 130758. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130758 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang K, Lv DW, Yao LY. Preparation and performance evaluation of C9 petroleum resin/SBS high viscosity bitumen. New Chemical Materials, 2021, 49(01): 259–263+268. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen LQ, Zhang ZP, Huang T, et al. Preparation and application properties of HVM-TSR high viscosity modifier. China Science and Technology Papers, 2022, 17(12): 1408–1414. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou Z, Chen G. Preparation, Performance, and modification mechanism of high viscosity modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 310: 125007. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen Y, Huang J, Muhammad Y, et al. Study on the performance and mechanism of carbon nanomaterials incorporated SBS composite modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 389: 131795. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131795 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mayank Sukhija

23 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-42395Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphaltPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 08 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Sukhija

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: "All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files."

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please upload a copy of Supporting Information (S1 DATE) which you refer to in your text on page 24 (in PDF format).

Additional Editor Comments:

Overall, the manuscript require major revision.

Appropriate reasoning is missing throughout the manuscript. Kindly provide the reasoning to support the results with suitable references.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have presented an experimental study to evaluate the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt. The paper topic is relevant and interesting. The following comments are made to improve the paper:

1. Throughout the manuscript, the author shall use the same font for mentioning Degree Celsius.

2. L55: The authors used the abbreviation "C9", it is suggested to provide the full form for first time.

3. In Table 1, 2, and 3, it is recommended to provide all units in brackets '()', instead of using '/'

4. It is recommended to cite all the ASTM, AASHTO, and JTE specifications in proper reference style.

5. Section 2.8: Please provide chemical terms in proper form, i.e. In CCl4, 4 should be subscripted.

Reviewer #2: 1. Please check the manuscript again.

2. Add an experimental plan for the manuscript

3. Please add statistical comparison if possible, and error bars for all the bar charts in the manuscript.

4. The reasoning for the results is missing throughout the manuscript please add them.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Vipul Chitnis

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0301528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301528.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Feb 2024

Sincerely thank you for your letter and reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt” (PONE-D-23-42395). These valuable comments are very helpful for us to revise and improve the quality of the paper. We have studied comments carefully and made corrections which we hope meet with approval. Since the article underwent major changes, we have revised the Introduction, test program and Discussion section. Also, Some of the tables, figures and acknowledgment have also been updated.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0301528.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Mayank Sukhija

5 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-42395R1

Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please do the needful as per the comments of the Reviewers. There are still chances of improvement in the paper.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 19 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Sukhija

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

********** 

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

********** 

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Although all the comments are addressed carefully, kindly read the manuscript once again and fix the formatting discrepancies in the article. Eg: Please capitalize the word flowchart in figure 1. The heading numbers are not formatted according to the journal requirements, Section 3.1.

Reviewer #3: This study investigated the effect of Coumarone resin and SBS-modified asphalt’s performance using DSR, MSCR, BBR, and FTIR. In its current state, the paper has several shortcomings and needs reworks before it can be considered for publication. My primary concerns are as follows:

1. The introduction section should be revised: More literature on coumarone resin-modified asphalt is required.

2. LN 44 requires reference – “However, the compatibility between SBS and asphalt is limited”. In addition, what did the authors mean by “compatibility”. Please further elaborate.

3. LN 74-77: The research gap is unclear. Some studies already assess the coumarone resin performance when used in conjunction with asphalt. What does this study do differently?

4. LN85-87: what is road performance? Did you mean cracking resistance of flexible pavements? Or the rutting performance of AC? Please reframe the sentence for further clarity.

5. LN95: Why did the authors select 4% SBS ratio?

6. LN 126-127: Please provide the standards in references as well.

7. LN 145: Could you please provide details of short-term aging?

8. LN 156: Please provide references.

9. LN 191-194: How did authors conclude that the decrease in penetration is evidence of improvement in compatibility?

10. LN 221, please provide some references. Similarly, LN240-245. Also, to LN264.

11. Please also include limitations and future work in the manuscript.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Vipul Chitnis

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0301528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301528.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Mar 2024

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Sincerely thank you for your letter and reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt” (PONE-D-23-42395). These valuable comments are very helpful for us to revise and improve the quality of the paper. We have studied comments carefully and made corrections which we hope meet with approval.We have uploaded the specific modification details and look forward to your review again, Thank you!

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

pone.0301528.s003.docx (16.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Mayank Sukhija

18 Mar 2024

Experimental study on the effect of Coumarone resin on the performance of SBS-modified asphalt

PONE-D-23-42395R2

Dear Dr. Hu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® , click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mayank Sukhija

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The paper is now in perfect shape and flow.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mayank Sukhija

8 Apr 2024

PONE-D-23-42395R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mayank Sukhija

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (ZIP)

    pone.0301528.s001.zip (84.2KB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0301528.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0301528.s003.docx (16.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES