ABSTRACT
Initially recognized zoonoses, streptococci belonging to Lancefield group C (GCS) and G (GGS) were subsequently recognised as human pathogens causing a diverse range of symptoms, from asymptomatic carriage to life threatening diseases. Their taxonomy has changed during the last decade. Asymptomatic carriage is <4% amongst the human population and invasive infections are often in association with chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases or chronic skin infections. Other clinical manifestations include acute pharyngitis, pneumonia, endocarditis, bacteraemia and toxic-shock syndrome. Post streptococcal sequalae such as rheumatic fever and acute glomerulonephritis have also been described but mainly in developed countries and amongst specific populations. Putative virulence determinants for these organisms include adhesins, toxins, and other factors that are essential for dissemination in human tissues and for interference with the host immune responses. High nucleotide similarities among virulence genes and their association with mobile genetic elements supports the hypothesis of extensive horizontal gene transfer events between the various pyogenic streptococcal species belonging to Lancefield groups A, C and G. A better understanding of the mechanisms of pathogenesis should be apparent by whole-genome sequencing, and this would result in more effective clinical strategies for the pyogenic group in general.
INTRODUCTION
The pyogenic streptococci of Lancefield groups C and G were initially recognized as a cause of animal infections long before they were even considered as agents of human disease, even though they are widely distributed in animals and humans. They comprise a heterogeneous complex of streptococcal species that act as causative agents of a spectrum of diseases ranging from mild pharyngitis to skin infection to life-threatening systemic infections associated with high mortality rates. In this article we provide an overview of the various group C and group G streptococcal species, the diseases they cause, and the major pathogenicity factors that contribute to their virulence (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Pathogenenicity factors | Organism | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Fibronectin binding proteins | ||
FnbA | S. dysgalactiae | 59 |
FnbB | S. dysgalactiae | 60 |
GfbA | S. dysgalactiae | 64 |
FNZ/FNE | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 61, 65 |
FNZ2/FNEB | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 66, 69 |
SFS | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 70 |
M-like proteins | S. dysgalactiae S. equisimilis | 91, 105 |
FOG | S. dysgalactiae | 93, 94 |
DemA | S. dysgalactiae | 105 |
SzM/SeM | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 76, 95–97, 101 |
SzPSe/SzP | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 102 |
Se18.9 | S. equi | 76, 100 |
ScM | S. canis | 104 |
Others | ||
C5a peptidase | S. dysgalactiae | 108 |
SeCEP/SzoCEP | S. zooepidemicus, S. equi | 112 |
Immunoglobulin binding proteins | ||
Protein G | S. dysgalactiae | 116 |
MIG | S. dysgalactiae | 120 |
MAG | S. dysgalactiae | 122 |
ZAG | S. zooepidemicus | 123 |
IgG-endopeptidases | ||
IdeE/IdeE2 | S. equi, S. zooepidemicus | 129 |
IdeE2/IdeZ2 | S. equi, S. zooepidemicus | 130 |
IdeP | S. phocae | 133 |
Toxins | ||
Streptokinase | S. dysgalactiae, S. equisimilis | 134 |
Streptolysin O | S. dysgalactiae, S. equisimilis | 145 |
Streptolysin S | S. dysgalactiae, S. equisimilisS. equi, S. zooepidemicus | 152, 154 |
Superantigens | ||
SpeGdys/Spegg/SpeG | S. equisimilis, S. canis | 158, 159 |
SpeH | S. equi | 167 |
SpeI | S. equi | 167 |
SpeK | S. equi, S. zooepidemicus, S. equismilis | 158, 168, 169 |
SpeL | S. equi, S. zooepidemicus, S. equismilis | 158, 168, 169 |
SpeM | S. equisimilis | 173 |
ssa | S. equisimilis | 173 |
SDM/SpeM | S. dysgalactiae | 171 |
SpeA | S. equismilis | 170 |
SpeC | S. equismilis | 170 |
SzeN | S. zooepidemicus | 170 |
SzeP | S. zooepidemicus | 170 |
SzeF | S. zooepidemicus | 170 |
TAXONOMY AND IDENTIFICATION
Taxonomic classification of group C streptococci (GCS) and group G streptococci (GGS) has always proven to be a complex issue. However, extensive taxonomic studies over the past few years have distinguished most of the veterinary pathogens belonging to Lancefield groups C and G from the human pathogens. Previously, GCS and GGS were divided into the following species: Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (only GCS, human pathogen), Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae (GCS, animal pathogen), Streptococcus equi (animal GCS), Streptococcus zooepidemicus (animal and human GCS), Streptococcus canis (animal GGS), the Streptococcus anginosus group, and Streptococcus phocae (1). GCS and GGS of human origin are now considered to constitute a single subspecies, S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Therefore, the current taxonomy characterizes the species as follows: S. dysgalactiae is divided into the subspecies S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis and S. dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae (hereafter referred to in this article as S. equisimilis and S. dysgalactiae). S. equi is divided into the subspecies S. equi subsp. equi, S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus, and S. equi subsp. ruminatorum (hereafter referred to as S. equi, S. zooepidemicus, and S. ruminatorum). However, it has been suggested that S. equi may simply be regarded as a subclone of S. zooepidemicus (2). On the basis of genetic evidence, S. dysgalactiae, S. equi, and S. canis are more closely related to each other than to the S. anginosus group and constitute species with the “large-colony” colony phenotype. S. phocae is a new species expressing the group C antigen thus far only isolated from seals (3, 4). Some of these species may also contain strains which express the Lancefield group A or group F antigens (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Species | Known sources | Lancefield group |
---|---|---|
S. dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae | Animals | C |
S. dygalactiae subsp. equisimilis | Humans, animals (rare) | C, G |
S. equi subsp. equi | Animals | C |
S. canis | Animals, humans (rare) | G |
S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus | Animals, humans | C |
S. phocae | Animals (seal) | C |
S. anginosus group | Humans | A, C, F, G |
From reference 1.
HUMAN DISEASE AND DIAGNOSIS
GCS and GGS can cause a wide range of diseases from mild to severe, among both human and animal populations. GCS and GGS generally colonize the human respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tracts, with an estimated <4% asymptomatic pharyngeal carriage rate in adults (5–7). Human invasive infections caused by GCS and GGS have been associated with underlying conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic skin conditions (8–10). While S. dysgalactiae is considered an animal pathogen, S. equisimilis is almost exclusively a human pathogen, with increasing prevalence and overlaps in clinical manifestations with group A Streptococcus (GAS). S. equisimilis infections include acute pharyngitis, pneumonia, endocarditis, cellulitis, peritonitis, septic arthritis, bacteremia, and toxic shock syndrome (11–23). Like GAS, S. equisimilis has also been linked to the poststreptococcal sequelae rheumatic heart disease, and in high endemic areas of rheumatic fever, carriage rates of GCS/GGS have been found to be higher than those of GAS (24, 25).
Infections with S. zooepidemicus and S. canis, normally considered zoonotic species, have also been reported in humans (26–29), including severe infective endocarditis (30).
Generally, person to person transmission of GCS/GGS occurs via respiratory droplets or skin contacts, but other zoonotic vehicles of transmission such as unpasteurized milk products are also possible (26, 27, 31).
S. dysgalactiae predominantly resides in domestic animals such as cattle, sheep, cats, and dogs that are either healthy carriers of the bacterium or go on to develop diseases such as pneumonia, arthritis, septicemia, and abscesses, particularly bovine mastitis. S. equi, a pathogen primarily restricted to horses and donkeys, causes strangles, which is a highly contagious disease characterized by purulent discharges from the respiratory tract and the development of abscesses (32). This organism is not considered to be part of the normal flora, because of its close association with disease. In contrast, S. zooepidemicus is an opportunistic commensal that colonizes mucosal surfaces and causes rhinopharyngitis, pneumonia (33), endometritis, neonatal septicemia, and wound infections in horses (34) as well as disease in other domestic animals such as cattle, sheep, pigs, and chickens. Although uncommon, S. zooepidemicus is also responsible for a range of zoonotic infections in humans (26, 27).
The small-colony phenotype of group C and G streptococci is expressed by the S. anginosus group, formerly known as Streptococcus milleri. The group contains three species, S. anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus intermedius (1), and forms a distinct subclade by phylogenomic analysis (35).
Strains belonging to the S. anginosus group express group antigens F, C, A, and G or no antigen. These strains are also likely to be non-beta-hemolytic. Members of these species are recognized as common commensal organisms of the human oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary tract. They are also associated with abscess formation in the mouth and other body sites (36, 37) as well as pharyngitis (38) and endocarditis (39, 40). It has also been reported that S. anginosus, along with Streptococcus mitis and Treponema denticola, can be isolated from esophageal cancer tissue and by initiating inflammation in the cancerous tissue has a role in the development or progression of these cancers (41, 42).
Several assays are available to detect, classify, and genetically describe GCS and GGS. Routine microbiological diagnosis follows the same guidelines that are in use for the identification of the other beta-hemolytic streptococci (43). The beta-hemolytic streptococci isolates are divided into large and small colonies forming groups based on the growth on sheep blood agar: the large-colony-forming group is “pyogenic.” The small-colony-forming species make up the anginosus group and are not referred to as GCS or GGS, even though they may cross-react with C or G sera. Lancefield agglutination tests are still used to group beta-hemolytic streptococci into the Lancefield groups. Fermentation tests are used to classify GCS as S. equisimilis or S. zooepidemicus and are based on a spectrum of biochemical tests which are now available commercially (44). More recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry has been described as a rapid alternative for the identification of streptococci (45). In addition, multilocus sequence analysis of seven housekeeping genes (46) and other sequence-based assays are performed to analyze the streptococcal phylogenies. In particular, sequencing of the emm gene, which encodes the hyper-variable surface protein M, and 16s rRNA genes is undertaken for phylogenetic analysis of these streptococci based on sequence similarities (47, 48).
Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being used for genetic characterization, phylogenetic analyses, virulence and pathogenicity profiles, and antibiotic resistance analyses (22, 49). S. equisimilis and Streptococcus pyogenes (or GAS) share a high genetic similarity (∼72%) and similar virulence genes, suggesting a common evolutionary origin and genetic exchange (22, 25, 50).
MECHANISMS FOR ADHERENCE
S. equisimilis causes a spectrum of disease in humans similar to that caused by S. pyogenes, and molecular studies have demonstrated virulence determinants that are almost identical. Putative virulence determinants of S. equisimilis include adhesins, toxins, and factors that are essential for dissemination in human tissues and for interference with the host immune responses.
Adhesion of microorganisms to host tissues represents a critical phase in the development of infection. It is therefore unsurprising that microorganisms have evolved dedicated mechanisms for attachment and adherence to extracellular matrix components of the host (51, 52). Of these components, the high-molecular-weight glycoprotein fibronectin appears to be the major attachment target of Gram-positive cocci, including GGS and GCS. Fibronectin itself is responsible for substrate adhesion of eukaryotic cells via specific cell surface factors of the integrin family. It also specifically interacts with other matrix components, such as collagen, fibrin, and sulfated glycosaminoglycans, demonstrating that this molecule fulfills multifunctional roles within the extracellular network (53). Being present in the extracellular matrix of most tissues, as well as in plasma and other body fluids in its soluble form, fibronectin represents an exquisite target for bacteria to exploit the cell attachment properties of this molecule by linking the pathogen to specific target cells. Epithelial cells of the human upper respiratory tract are bathed in secretions containing fibronectin in its soluble form. Once bound to the bacterial surface, it enables the pathogen to attach and subsequently colonize the primary site of infection.
Fibronectin binding proteins (FBPs) were first identified in Staphylococcus aureus and S. pyogenes (54), and approximately 11 have been defined in S. pyogenes, highlighting their importance for this pathogen (55). Binding by these bacteria to eukaryotic cells via fibronectin is also an important preliminary event prior to the invasion of these cells (56–58). The FBPs from streptococci and staphylococci share a common architecture, with a putative signal sequence at the N terminus and a wall- and membrane-spanning region. The major fibronectin binding domains are located within the C-terminal part of the proteins and are composed of 3 to 5 repetitive units that consist of 35 to 37 amino acid residues and bind to the 29-kDa N-terminal fragment of fibronectin. Further binding studies of PrtF/SfbI from S. pyogenes and FnBPA in S. aureus also indicate the presence of a secondary fibronectin binding site upstream of the repeat regions (54).
The first FBPs to be identified in group C and G streptococci were FnbA and FnbB from S. dysgalactiae (59). FnbA can opacify serum and bind fibrinogen, like the serum opacity factor of S. pyogenes (60). Both FnbA and FnbB bind fibronectin through C-terminal repeat regions (51).
Three FBPs have been defined in S. zooepidemicus: FNZ, FNZ2, and SFS. Although the modular organization of FNZ, an S. zooepidemicus FBP, is similar to those from other species, homology at the amino acid level is weak (61). Fibronectin binding is mediated through a repeat region and a second upstream region containing the amino acid motif LAGESGET. This motif is also present in the secondary binding domain of SfbI (62), where it acts independently of the repeat region in binding to fibronectin (63). This domain is also present in GfbA, the homologue of SfbI in S. dysgalactiae (64). fne is the homologous gene to fnz in S. equi (65). However, FNE is unique in that a single nucleotide deletion in the fne gene has resulted in the truncation of the protein, so with the loss of the cell-wall binding motif, it is secreted into the surrounding environment. The truncated FNE also lacks the classic fibronectin binding repeats found in the C-terminal region of FNZ but is able to bind fibronectin through the amino-half domain, also found in FNZ. Consequently, fibronectin binding at the bacterial surface is much lower for S. equi than S. zooepidemicus, although both have an additional cell wall-anchored FBP: FNEB and FNZ2 (66). FNE also binds to collagen, and the protein affects the interstitial fluid pressure in vivo (67). The molecular structure of the interaction between FNE and fibronectin has been reported (68). FNZ2 also has both collagen and fibronectin binding properties (69). SFS of both S. equi and S. zooepidemicus strains contains a signal peptide but no cell wall binding motifs or traditional fibronectin binding motifs. SFS inhibits binding between fibronectin and collagen. If SFS were to bind fibronectin attached to the bacterial surface through FNEB/FNZ/FNZ2, this might inhibit binding of fibronectin to collagen, which could have several physiological consequences (70). The molecular interaction between SFS and fibronectin has been reported (71).
Some of the FBPs and collagen binding proteins identified in S. pyogenes are chromosomally located within the fibronectin and collagen binding proteins and T antigen encoding (FCT) locus. There are at least nine types of FCT regions in S. pyogenes that vary by gene content and order, but within this region are the genes required to make the pili. The pilus has been shown to contribute to the formation of biofilm and mediate adherence to host cells (72–75). Whole-genome sequence analysis of group C and G streptococci has also identified potential FCT regions. One putative pilin locus, FimI, exists within the genome of S. equi strain 4047 (76). Although no pili structures have been identified for S. equi, the proteins of FimI are expressed during growth and have the potential to affect adherence in vivo (77). The gene encoding the collagen binding protein CNE of S. equi (78) is present in this FimI locus. A homologous locus was also found in S. zooepidemicus isolates, as well as an additional one or two potential pili loci (76, 79). Two FCT regions were also found in S. equisimilis, which share high levels of genetic identity to FCT regions from different S. pyogenes genotypes, suggesting multiple horizontal gene transfer events (22, 80).
An alternative way for group C and G streptococci to adhere to host cells is via binding to other extracellular matrix molecules, including fibrinogen, vitronectin, laminin, collagen, and plasminogen (81, 82). The M-protein-like fibrinogen binding protein of G streptococci (FOG) can act as an adhesin by binding collagen IV (83) and has been shown to also bind collagen I fibrils in dermis in vivo (84).
Vitronectin is a multifunctional serum protein that affects the humoral immune system by binding to and inhibiting the complement membrane attack complex (85) and is also a major matrix-associated adhesive glycoprotein that regulates blood coagulation. The ability of group C and G streptococci specifically to interact with vitronectin (86) and mediate the adherence to both epithelial and endothelial cells (87, 88) was demonstrated some time ago. However, a specific vitronectin binding protein has never been identified in streptococci.
ANTIPHAGOCYTIC FACTORS
A major requirement of pathogenic streptococci is to be able to resist phagocytosis. The streptococcal M protein, first identified and characterized in S. pyogenes, is the major antiphagocytic factor (89). It is a multidomain surface-exposed molecule that forms a coiled-coil secondary structure with significant irregularities that in the B-repeat region are essential for the fibrinogen binding properties (90). Binding of complement factors, fibrinogen, and inhibition of C3b deposition on the bacterial surface are mechanisms by which the M-protein can inhibit opsonization of the organism by the alternative complement pathway, thus evading the host’s nonspecific immune defense mechanism.
Several M-like proteins have been identified in group C and G streptococci. Protein MG1, the first group G streptococcal M-like protein characterized on the molecular level (91), exhibits typical structural and biological features of M proteins, such as coiled-coil structure and the ability to generate type-specific opsonizing antibodies. Protein MG1 shares highly homologous sequences with the C-terminal repeat region of class I M proteins, which are frequently associated with rheumatic fever. M proteins of GGS are also responsible for conferring resistance to phagocytosis (92).
In human strains of GGS, FOG is critical for bacterial pathogenesis through its antiphagocytic action of binding fibrinogen (93). It also has the ability to bind IgG subclasses IgG1 and IgG2, although FOG-bound IgG1 can trigger the complement cascade through C1/C1q activation. It is unclear whether this is detrimental to the bacteria, because FOG remains protective against phagocytosis (94).
The antiphagocytic protein SeM (FgBP) appears to be the predominant M-like protein on the surface of S. equi, capable of binding fibrinogen and IgG4 and IgG7 subclasses (95–97). SeM confers resistance to phagocytosis, but this also requires the presence of the hyaluronic acid capsule (98). Like the M protein of S. pyogenes, SeM is variable at the N-terminal region, suggesting selective pressure (99). Interestingly, this does not appear to be the case for two other M-like proteins expressed by S. equi: Se18.9 and SzPSe (99). The antiphagocytic protein Se18.9 is commonly found in strains of S. equi, but rarely in strains of S. zooepidemicus (76), and acts by binding to fibrinogen and the complement regulatory protein, factor H (100). SzP proteins are also antiphagocytic and are expressed by both S. equi and S. zooepidemicus. Whole-genome sequence analysis of S. zooepidemicus strain H70 identified a potential M-protein homologue in SzM that resembles SeM in its secondary structure, which consists of a predicted C-terminal coiled-coil (76, 101). The N-terminal of SeM is unique to S. equi and binds fibrinogen (97, 102). SzM can also bind fibrinogen but cannot bind IgG (103). The M protein of S. canis specifically binds the Fc region of IgG in a nonopsonic manner (104).
DemA is an S. dysgalactiae protein with homology to FgBP identified by screening of a phagemid expression library (105). The mature DemA protein is 54 kDa in size, contains a signal sequence and a cell wall binding domain, and is predicted to have a coiled-coil secondary structure. DemA shows greatest homology to the FgBP at the C-terminal end in a region that does not participate in fibrinogen binding. The amino acid motif VSKDLADKL present with the repeat units of both DemA and FgBP suggests that the sequence may have an important biological function. DemA is able to bind IgG from various animal sources, reminiscent of type IIa Ig-binding proteins of S. pyogenes in a domain distinct from the fibrinogen binding domain. Nucleotide sequencing of the demA locus identified an open reading frame upstream of demA that is homologous to mga, a positive regulator of M-protein expression in S. pyogenes (105).
C5a peptidase of S. pyogenes (ScpA) is well known to specifically cleave and inactivate the chemoattractant C5a, but it has also recently been shown to cleave the complement factor C3 and the chemoattractant C3a (106), expanding its impact on immune evasion. ScpA has also been identified as an adhesion factor enabling bacteria to adhere to endothelial and epithelial cells (106). Homologues of ScpA have been identified in group B streptococci (ScpB) and group C and G streptococci isolated from humans but not from GGS from animals (107, 108). Both S. equi and S. zooepidemicus also carry homologous C5a peptidase genes (scpE and scpZ, respectively). However, the C5a peptidase gene in S. equi is reported to be a pseudogene (76). Unlike in S. pyogenes, where scpA is located in the mga regulon that includes the emm-gene, the scp genes of group B, C, and G streptococci are associated with a transposon, suggesting that lateral genes transfer between these species (107, 109).
The S. pyogenes cell wall envelope proteinase, SpyCEP, is another protease that contributes to the prevention of phagocytosis through the specific cleavage of interleukin-8 and other chemokines to prevent the activation and migration of neutrophils (110, 111). Similar enzymes have been identified in S. equi (SeCEP) and S. zooepidemicus (SzoCEP) which share 98% identity to each other and 59% identity to SpyCEP (108). SeCEP has been shown to cleave both human and equine IL-8, and vaccination with a recombinant portion of SpyCEP prevented bacterial dissemination in a murine model of S. equi invasive infection, suggesting an important contribution to disease (112).
IMMUNOGLOBULIN BINDING AND INACTIVATING PROTEINS
Streptococcal protein G is a surface molecule associated with the majority of group C and G streptococcal isolates of human origin. Protein G interactions with immunoglobulins and other host proteins have been the subject of detailed reviews (113–115). Protein G is defined as a type III IgG Fc receptor and interacts with a wide species range of immunoglobulins, as well as human serum albumin, kininogen, and α2-macroglobulin. Protein G exhibits a modular structure in which the binding sites for IgG are located in the C-terminal repeat region (114–116). The central A/B-repeat region constitutes the binding domain for serum albumin, and the N-terminal E region is responsible for interacting with the native form of α2-macroglobulin (82). In contrast to human pathogenic strains of GGS that exclusively bind to the native (slow) form of α2-macroglobulin via protein G, animal-derived isolates of bovine and equine origin bind the proteinase-complexed (fast) form of the molecule. The B1 domain of protein G involved in immunoglobulin binding consists of an α-helix and four β-strand sheets. This domain has been used as a model structure in numerous biochemical studies examining protein folding, protein interaction, and synthetic protein design (117–119).
Two protein G-related proteins, MIG and MAG, from two mastitis-causing S. dysgalactiae strains (120) and MAG (121, 122) and ZAG (123) from S. zooepidemicus have been characterized on the molecular level. Like protein G, MAG and ZAG exhibit serum albumin and type III Fc receptor activity, whereas the protein MIG lacks albumin-binding activity. However, MAG is able to bind to immunoglobulins from a greater number of animal sources than protein G. MAG, ZAG, and MIG also bind to the fast form of α2-macroglobulin. The α2-macroglobulin binding region in MIG is not homologous to those of protein G, MAG, ZAG, and GRAB. In phagocytosis assays a MIG isogenic mutant strain of S. dysgalactiae was not as resistant to opsonization by bovine neutrophils as the parental strain (124). MIG has also been shown to bind to bovine immunoglobulin A (125) and can inhibit bacterial internalization into host cells (126).
As well as IgG binding proteins, group C and G streptococci can express variants of the S. pyogenes IdeS and EndoS, which are IgG-degrading enzymes. While IdeS cleaves the hinge region of IgG (127), EndoS removes core IgG glycans (128). Both S. equi and S. zooepidemicus express two forms of IgG-endopeptidases, IdeE/IdeE2 and IdeZ/IdeZ2, respectively, that are capable of cleaving IgG from several mammalian species (129, 130), although IdeE2/IdeZ2 cleave horse IgG with greater efficiency than IdeE/IdeZ (130). EndoS homologues have also been identified in S. equi (EndoSe) and S. zooepidemicus (EndoSz), and they share 86 to 89% sequence identity to each other and 70% identity to EndoS of S. pyogenes (131). EndoSd has also been found in S. equisimilis with IgG hydrolyzing activity (132), and IdeP was identified in the group C S. phocae subsp. phocae that affects marine animals, although its function has not been confirmed (133).
ENZYMES AND TOXINS
After colonization, adherence, and evasion of host immune responses, the dissemination of pathogenic streptococci in tissues is regarded to be an important step for the onset and development of an invasive disease. One of the factors involved in this process is streptokinase, a protein found in groups C, G, and A streptococci (134). The formation of a streptokinase/plasminogen complex results in the exposure of the plasminogen active site, which then catalyzes the conversion of other plasminogen molecules into plasmin (135). Plasmin is a key serine protease in the fibrinolytic system that is able to break down tissue barriers, thereby enabling the dissemination of streptococci. M proteins coordinately interact with the secreted streptokinase by binding either fibrinogen (136) or plasminogen (137). A high level of variation exists within the streptokinase gene, ska, and alleles of ska have been associated with tissue tropisms and differing levels of plasminogen activation (138). There is some overlap of alleles between human strains of group C and G streptococci and GAS (139). Streptokinases have been isolated from both human and animal group C and G isolates and have specificity for the plasminogens of their respective hosts (140). Thus, streptokinases from human group A, C, and G streptococci isolates have greater homology to each other than to animal isolates of group C and G streptococci. A study by Caballero et al. (58) found the amino acid homology between streptokinases from human and animal S. equisimilis isolates to be only 35%. Homology between the streptokinase from S. equisimilis of equine and porcine origins was only 21%. The ability of streptokinases to cleave plasminogen from specific species may therefore be a critical factor in determining the host range of individual streptococcal strains (141). Invasive human strains of S. equisimilis have been found to express higher levels of streptokinase, and this can drive virulence in a murine model of invasive necrotizing fasciitis, suggesting an important role for streptokinase in disease (142, 143).
Streptolysin O (SLO) is the prototype of a family of thiol-activated cytolysins produced by the genus Streptococcus and by other Gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus, Clostridium, and Listeria species (144). The genes coding for SLO of group C and G streptococci (S. dysgalactiae) are almost identical to that of S. pyogenes (145). SLO homologues have not been described in S. equi. SLO is able to disrupt the cytoplasmic membrane of several eukaryotic cell types that include erythrocytes, leukocytes, macrophages, platelets, and epithelial cells. Separate from its pore-forming activity, SLO also acts to translocate NADase into host cells (146), which contributes to cytotoxicity by depleting energy stores. Other functions of these two streptococcal toxins include limiting neutrophil responsiveness and potentiating bacterial survival, replication, and persistence inside keratinocytes, epithelial cells, and macrophages, which may protect GAS from the immune response and antimicrobial therapy (147–151).
Streptolysin S (SLS) is another cytolysin secreted by groups A, C, and G streptococci, including the animal-pathogenic S. equi species (152). SLS belongs to a distinct group of hemolytic toxins that are characterized by their resistance to oxidation and sensitivity to trypan blue. SLS activity results in damage to membranes of various cell types as well as subcellular organelles (153). In contrast to the 57-kDa SLO, SLS is a small, 57-amino acid protein. The gene encoding SLS, sagA, is part of a locus containing nine open reading frames which contain significant homology with genes from bacteriocin loci (154, 155). In S. equisimilis, SLS expression is under the control of both the covRS and fasCAX two-component regulatory systems, which in S. pyogenes have been shown to be involved in the regulation of multiple virulence factors (156). In a mouse infection model, S. equisimilis expressing SLS proliferates and induces necrotic lesions at the site of infection, whereas SLS-negative strains do not, suggesting that SLS is an important factor in the development of necrotizing fasciitis (154).
Streptococcal pyogenic toxins (spes) are superantigen genes capable of cross-linking the major histocompatibility complex class II on antigen-presenting cells to the T cell receptor, leading to proliferation of T cells and substantial release of inflammatory cytokines. Eleven superantigen genes have been identified in S. pyogenes, and they are thought to drive the development of scarlet fever and toxic shock syndrome, the latter contributing to high mortality rates following necrotizing fasciitis. Recent work has also identified a role for superantigens in upper respiratory tract infection (157). Homologues of the GAS superantigens have been identified in group C and G streptococci (158). The most commonly found superantigen in S. equisimilis is speG (spegg or speGdys) (159, 160), and genomic analysis indicates that S. pyogenes and S. equisimilis speG genes are orthologues that are direct descendants from a common ancestor gene (161). The gene for speG can also be found in S. canis (158). The role of S. equisimilis speG in humans is unclear because the presence of this gene does not correlate with disease severity and it does not confer mitogenic activity toward human mononuclear cells, although it can stimulate bovine T cells (160, 162, 163). The streptococcal superantigens speA, speC, speJ, speK, speH, speL, speM, and ssa are found infrequently in S. equisimilis and other human group C and G streptococci (160, 164–166).
Homologues of S. pyogenes superantigens speH and speI can be carried by strains of S. equi (167), and homologues of speK and speL can be carried by both S. equi and S. zooepidemicus, although because of confusion with the nomenclature, speK homologues were originally termed speLse/seeL/szeL, and speL homologues were termed speMse/seem/szeM (160, 167–169). Three additional superantigen genes, termed szeN, szeP, and szeF, have been identified in S. zooepidemicus only and are capable of stimulating equine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (170). S. dysgalactiae-derived mitogen shows homology to speM of S. pyogenes and can stimulate human mononuclear cells (160, 171). The majority of the superantigens found in S. pyogenes and group C and G streptococci are associated with prophages which may drive the lateral transfer of these virulence factors between streptococcal species (76, 172, 173).
CONCLUSIONS
Many recent studies have highlighted the increasing number of systemic infections caused by S. equisimilis, particularly among immunocompromised individuals and specific populations, and this therefore suggests that this species will gain even more clinical importance in the future. High nucleotide similarities among virulence genes and their association with mobile genetic elements support the hypothesis of extensive horizontal gene transfer events between streptococcal species of the pyogenic group. A better understanding of the mechanisms of pathogenesis will hopefully be revealed by whole-genome sequencing, and this may result in more effective clinical strategies for the pyogenic group of streptococci in generally.
Contributor Information
Claire E. Turner, Department of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, The Florey Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Laura Bubba, Reference Microbiology Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom; European Programme for Public Health Microbiology Training (EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Androulla Efstratiou, Reference Microbiology Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Vincent A. Fischetti, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY
Richard P. Novick, Skirball Institute for Molecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY
Joseph J. Ferretti, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK
Daniel A. Portnoy, Department of Molecular and Cellular Microbiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Miriam Braunstein, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Julian I. Rood, Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
REFERENCES
- 1.Facklam R. 2002. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:613–630 10.1128/CMR.15.4.613-630.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chanter N, Collin N, Holmes N, Binns M, Mumford J. 1997. Characterization of the Lancefield group C Streptococcus 16S-23S RNA gene intergenic spacer and its potential for identification and sub-specific typing. Epidemiol Infect 118:125–135 10.1017/S0950268896007285. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vossen A, Abdulmawjood A, Lämmler C, Weiss R, Siebert U. 2004. Identification and molecular characterization of beta-hemolytic streptococci isolated from harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) of the German North and Baltic Seas. J Clin Microbiol 42:469–473 10.1128/JCM.42.1.469-473.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Skaar I, Gaustad P, Tønjum T, Holm B, Stenwig H. 1994. Streptococcus phocae sp. nov., a new species isolated from clinical specimens from seals. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:646–650 10.1099/00207713-44-4-646. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gunnarsson RK, Holm SE, Söderström M. 1997. The prevalence of beta-haemolytic streptococci in throat specimens from healthy children and adults. Implications for the clinical value of throat cultures. Scand J Prim Health Care 15:149–155 10.3109/02813439709018506. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Siljander T, Karppelin M, Vähäkuopus S, Syrjänen J, Toropainen M, Kere J, Vuento R, Jussila T, Vuopio-Varkila J. 2008. Acute bacterial, nonnecrotizing cellulitis in Finland: microbiological findings. Clin Infect Dis 46:855–861 10.1086/527388. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bélard S, Toepfner N, Arnold B, Alabi AS, Berner R. 2015. β-Hemolytic streptococcal throat carriage and tonsillopharyngitis: a cross-sectional prevalence study in Gabon, Central Africa. Infection 43:177–183 10.1007/s15010-014-0709-y. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Broyles LN, Van Beneden C, Beall B, Facklam R, Shewmaker PL, Malpiedi P, Daily P, Reingold A, Farley MM. 2009. Population-based study of invasive disease due to beta-hemolytic streptococci of groups other than A and B. Clin Infect Dis 48:706–712 10.1086/597035. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rantala S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Vuento R, Huhtala H, Syrjänen J. 2009. Clinical presentations and epidemiology of beta-haemolytic streptococcal bacteraemia: a population-based study. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:286–288 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02672.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ekelund K, Skinhøj P, Madsen J, Konradsen HB. 2005. Invasive group A, B, C and G streptococcal infections in Denmark 1999-2002: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:569–576 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01169.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bradley SF, Gordon JJ, Baumgartner DD, Marasco WA, Kauffman CA. 1991. Group C streptococcal bacteremia: analysis of 88 cases. Rev Infect Dis 13:270–280 10.1093/clinids/13.2.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brandt CM, Spellerberg B. 2009. Human infections due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis. Clin Infect Dis 49:766–772 10.1086/605085. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bruun T, Oppegaard O, Kittang BR, Mylvaganam H, Langeland N, Skrede S. 2015. Etiology of cellulitis and clinical prediction of streptococcal disease: a prospective study. Open Forum Infect Dis 3:ofv181 10.1093/ofid/ofv181. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carmeli Y, Ruoff KL. 1995. Report of cases of and taxonomic considerations for large-colony-forming Lancefield group C streptococcal bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 33:2114–2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dubost JJ, Soubrier M, De Champs C, Ristori JM, Sauvezie B. 2004. Streptococcal septic arthritis in adults. A study of 55 cases with a literature review. Joint Bone Spine 71:303–311 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Freitas DM. 2017. Group G Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis, the clinical significance of a rare infection: endocarditis, polyarteritis, septic bursitis and pneumonia with complicated parapneumonic effusion. BMJ Case Rep 2017:2017. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.González Terán B, Roiz MP, Ruiz Jimeno T, Rosas J, Calvo-Alén J. 2001. Acute bacterial arthritis caused by group C streptococci. Semin Arthritis Rheum 31:43–51 10.1053/sarh.2001.21405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Keiser P, Campbell W. 1992. ‘Toxic strep syndrome’ associated with group C Streptococcus. Arch Intern Med 152:882, 884 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400160162042. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Korman TM, Boers A, Gooding TM, Curtis N, Visvanathan K. 2004. Fatal case of toxic shock-like syndrome due to group C Streptococcus associated with superantigen exotoxin. J Clin Microbiol 42:2866–2869 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2866-2869.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lother SA, Jassal DS, Lagacé-Wiens P, Keynan Y. 2017. Emerging group C and group G streptococcal endocarditis: a Canadian perspective. Int J Infect Dis 65:128–132 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.10.018. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Naik TB, Nadagir SD, Biradar A. 2016. Prevalence of beta-hemolytic streptococci groups A, C, and G in patients with acute pharyngitis. J Lab Physicians 8:45–49 10.4103/0974-2727.176235. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shimomura Y, Okumura K, Murayama SY, Yagi J, Ubukata K, Kirikae T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T. 2011. Complete genome sequencing and analysis of a Lancefield group G Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis strain causing streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). BMC Genomics 12:17 10.1186/1471-2164-12-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zaoutis T, Attia M, Gross R, Klein J. 2004. The role of group C and group G streptococci in acute pharyngitis in children. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:37–40 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00732.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Haidan A, Talay SR, Rohde M, Sriprakash KS, Currie BJ, Chhatwal GS. 2000. Pharyngeal carriage of group C and group G streptococci and acute rheumatic fever in an Aboriginal population. Lancet 356:1167–1169 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02765-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bramhachari PV, Kaul SY, McMillan DJ, Shaila MS, Karmarkar MG, Sriprakash KS. 2010. Disease burden due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (group G and C streptococcus) is higher than that due to Streptococcus pyogenes among Mumbai school children. J Med Microbiol 59:220–223 10.1099/jmm.0.015644-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kittang BR, Pettersen VK, Oppegaard O, Skutlaberg DH, Dale H, Wiker HG, Skrede S. 2017. Zoonotic necrotizing myositis caused by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in a farmer. BMC Infect Dis 17:147 10.1186/s12879-017-2262-7. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pelkonen S, Lindahl SB, Suomala P, Karhukorpi J, Vuorinen S, Koivula I, Väisänen T, Pentikäinen J, Autio T, Tuuminen T. 2013. Transmission of Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus infection from horses to humans. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1041–1048 10.3201/eid1907.121365. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galpérine T, Cazorla C, Blanchard E, Boineau F, Ragnaud JM, Neau D. 2007. Streptococcus canis infections in humans: retrospective study of 54 patients. J Infect 55:23–26 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.12.013. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takeda N, Kikuchi K, Asano R, Harada T, Totsuka K, Sumiyoshi T, Uchiyama T, Hosoda S, Norihiko Takeda, Ken Kikuchi, Ryuta. 2001. Recurrent septicemia caused by Streptococcus canis after a dog bite. Scand J Infect Dis 33:927–928 10.1080/00365540110076903. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lacave G, Coutard A, Troché G, Augusto S, Pons S, Zuber B, Laurent V, Amara M, Couzon B, Bédos JP, Pangon B, Grimaldi D. 2016. Endocarditis caused by Streptococcus canis: an emerging zoonosis? Infection 44:111–114 10.1007/s15010-015-0809-3. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bordes-Benítez A, Sánchez-Oñoro M, Suárez-Bordón P, García-Rojas AJ, Saéz-Nieto JA, González-García A, Alamo-Antúnez I, Sánchez-Maroto A, Bolaños-Rivero M. 2006. Outbreak of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infections on the island of Gran Canaria associated with the consumption of inadequately pasteurized cheese. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25:242–246 10.1007/s10096-006-0119-x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Harrington DJ, Sutcliffe IC, Chanter N. 2002. The molecular basis of Streptococcus equi infection and disease. Microbes Infect 4:501–510 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01565-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yoshikawa H, Yasu T, Ueki H, Oyamada T, Oishi H, Anzai T, Oikawa M, Yoshikawa T. 2003. Pneumonia in horses induced by intrapulmonary inoculation of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. J Vet Med Sci 65:787–792 10.1292/jvms.65.787. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Welsh RD. 1984. The significance of Streptococcus zooepidemicus in the horse. Equine Pract 6:6–16. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Patel S, Gupta RS. 2018. Robust demarcation of fourteen different species groups within the genus Streptococcus based on genome-based phylogenies and molecular signatures. Infect Genet Evol 66:130–151 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.09.020. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Claridge JE III, Attorri S, Musher DM, Hebert J, Dunbar S. 2001. Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus (“Streptococcus milleri group”) are of different clinical importance and are not equally associated with abscess. Clin Infect Dis 32:1511–1515 10.1086/320163. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruoff KL. 1988. Streptococcus anginosus (“Streptococcus milleri”): the unrecognized pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:102–108 10.1128/CMR.1.1.102. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Whiley RA, Hall LM, Hardie JM, Beighton D. 1999. A study of small-colony, beta-haemolytic, Lancefield group C streptococci within the anginosus group: description of Streptococcus constellatus subsp. pharyngis subsp. nov., associated with the human throat and pharyngitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1443–1449 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1443. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kitada K, Inoue M, Kitano M. 1997. Infective endocarditis-inducing abilities of “Streptococcus milleri” group. Adv Exp Med Biol 418:161–163 10.1007/978-1-4899-1825-3_39. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kitada K, Inoue M, Kitano M. 1997. Experimental endocarditis induction and platelet aggregation by Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus and Streptococcus intermedius. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 19:25–32 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1997.tb01069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Morita E, Narikiyo M, Yano A, Nishimura E, Igaki H, Sasaki H, Terada M, Hanada N, Kawabe R. 2003. Different frequencies of Streptococcus anginosus infection in oral cancer and esophageal cancer. Cancer Sci 94:492–496 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01471.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Narikiyo M, Tanabe C, Yamada Y, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H, Muto M, Montesano R, Sakamoto H, Nakajima Y, Sasaki H. 2004. Frequent and preferential infection of Treponema denticola, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus anginosus in esophageal cancers. Cancer Sci 95:569–574 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02488.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Public Health England. 2013. Group C and group G Streptococcus: guidance, data and analysis. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/group-c-and-group-g-streptococcus-guidance-data-and-analysis#diagnosis-and-treatment.
- 44.Efstratiou A. 1997. Pyogenic streptococci of Lancefield groups C and G as pathogens in man. Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser 26(S1):72S–79S 10.1046/j.1365-2672.83.s1.8.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schulthess B, Brodner K, Bloemberg GV, Zbinden R, Böttger EC, Hombach M. 2013. Identification of Gram-positive cocci by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: comparison of different preparation methods and implementation of a practical algorithm for routine diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol 51:1834–1840 10.1128/JCM.02654-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bishop CJ, Aanensen DM, Jordan GE, Kilian M, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. 2009. Assigning strains to bacterial species via the Internet. BMC Biol 7:3 10.1186/1741-7007-7-3. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lal D, Verma M, Lal R. 2011. Exploring internal features of 16S rRNA gene for identification of clinically relevant species of the genus Streptococcus. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 10:28 10.1186/1476-0711-10-28. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Centre disease and control (CDC). 2008. Introduction to emm typing: M protein gene (emm) typing Streptococcus pyogenes. https://www.cdc.gov/streplab/groupa-strep/emm-background.html. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang X, Zhang X, Zong Z. 2016. Genome sequence and virulence factors of a group G Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis strain with a new element carrying erm(B). Sci Rep 6:20389 10.1038/srep20389. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davies MR, McMillan DJ, Beiko RG, Barroso V, Geffers R, Sriprakash KS, Chhatwal GS. 2007. Virulence profiling of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis isolated from infected humans reveals 2 distinct genetic lineages that do not segregate with their phenotypes or propensity to cause diseases. Clin Infect Dis 44:1442–1454 10.1086/516780. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Joh D, Speziale P, Gurusiddappa S, Manor J, Höök M. 1998. Multiple specificities of the staphylococcal and streptococcal fibronectin-binding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules. Eur J Biochem 258:897–905 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2580897.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Höök M. 1994. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:585–617 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.003101. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hynes RO, Yamada KM. 1982. Fibronectins: multifunctional modular glycoproteins. J Cell Biol 95:369–377 10.1083/jcb.95.2.369. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schwarz-Linek U, Höök M, Potts JR. 2004. The molecular basis of fibronectin-mediated bacterial adherence to host cells. Mol Microbiol 52:631–641 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04027.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ryan PA, Juncosa B. 2016. Group A streptococcal adherence. In Ferretti JJ, Stevens DL, Fischetti VA (ed), Streptococcus pyogenes: Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cue D, Dombek PE, Lam H, Cleary PP. 1998. Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M1 encodes multiple pathways for entry into human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 66:4593–4601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Molinari G, Talay SR, Valentin-Weigand P, Rohde M, Chhatwal GS. 1997. The fibronectin-binding protein of Streptococcus pyogenes, SfbI, is involved in the internalization of group A streptococci by epithelial cells. Infect Immun 65:1357–1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caballero AR, Lottenberg R, Johnston KH. 1999. Cloning, expression, sequence analysis, and characterization of streptokinases secreted by porcine and equine isolates of Streptococcus equisimilis. Infect Immun 67:6478–6486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lindgren PE, McGavin MJ, Signäs C, Guss B, Gurusiddappa S, Höök M, Lindberg M. 1993. Two different genes coding for fibronectin-binding proteins from Streptococcus dysgalactiae. The complete nucleotide sequences and characterization of the binding domains. Eur J Biochem 214:819–827 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17985.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Courtney HS, Hasty DL, Li Y, Chiang HC, Thacker JL, Dale JB. 1999. Serum opacity factor is a major fibronectin-binding protein and a virulence determinant of M type 2 Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol Microbiol 32:89–98 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01328.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lindmark H, Jacobsson K, Frykberg L, Guss B. 1996. Fibronectin-binding protein of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Infect Immun 64:3993–3999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Talay SR, Valentin-Weigand P, Jerlström PG, Timmis KN, Chhatwal GS. 1992. Fibronectin-binding protein of Streptococcus pyogenes: sequence of the binding domain involved in adherence of streptococci to epithelial cells. Infect Immun 60:3837–3844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sela S, Aviv A, Tovi A, Burstein I, Caparon MG, Hanski E. 1993. Protein F: an adhesin of Streptococcus pyogenes binds fibronectin via two distinct domains. Mol Microbiol 10:1049–1055 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00975.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kline JB, Xu S, Bisno AL, Collins CM. 1996. Identification of a fibronectin-binding protein (GfbA) in pathogenic group G streptococci. Infect Immun 64:2122–2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lindmark H, Nilsson M, Guss B. 2001. Comparison of the fibronectin-binding protein FNE from Streptococcus equi subspecies equi with FNZ from S. equi subspecies zooepidemicus reveals a major and conserved difference. Infect Immun 69:3159–3163 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3159-3163.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lannergård J, Flock M, Johansson S, Flock JI, Guss B. 2005. Studies of fibronectin-binding proteins of Streptococcus equi. Infect Immun 73:7243–7251 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7243-7251.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lidén A, van Wieringen T, Lannergård J, Kassner A, Heinegård D, Reed RK, Guss B, Rubin K. 2008. A secreted collagen- and fibronectin-binding streptococcal protein modulates cell-mediated collagen gel contraction and interstitial fluid pressure. J Biol Chem 283:1234–1242 10.1074/jbc.M704827200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tiouajni M, Durand D, Blondeau K, Graille M, Urvoas A, Valerio-Lepiniec M, Guellouz A, Aumont-Nicaise M, Minard P, van Tilbeurgh H. 2014. Structural and functional analysis of the fibronectin-binding protein FNE from Streptococcus equi spp. equi. FEBS J 281:5513–5531 10.1111/febs.13092. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hong K. 2005. Identification and characterization of a novel fibronectin-binding protein gene from Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus strain VTU211. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 45:231–237 10.1016/j.femsim.2005.04.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lindmark H, Guss B. 1999. SFS, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus equi, inhibits the binding between fibronectin and collagen. Infect Immun 67:2383–2388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ma W, Ma H, Fogerty FJ, Mosher DF. 2015. Bivalent ligation of the collagen-binding modules of fibronectin by SFS, a non-anchored bacterial protein of Streptococcus equi. J Biol Chem 290:4866–4876 10.1074/jbc.M114.612259. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Abbot EL, Smith WD, Siou GP, Chiriboga C, Smith RJ, Wilson JA, Hirst BH, Kehoe MA. 2007. Pili mediate specific adhesion of Streptococcus pyogenes to human tonsil and skin. Cell Microbiol 9:1822–1833 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00918.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Crotty Alexander LE, Maisey HC, Timmer AM, Rooijakkers SH, Gallo RL, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Nizet V. 2010. M1T1 group A streptococcal pili promote epithelial colonization but diminish systemic virulence through neutrophil extracellular entrapment. J Mol Med (Berl) 88:371–381 10.1007/s00109-009-0566-9. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Manetti AG, Zingaretti C, Falugi F, Capo S, Bombaci M, Bagnoli F, Gambellini G, Bensi G, Mora M, Edwards AM, Musser JM, Graviss EA, Telford JL, Grandi G, Margarit I. 2007. Streptococcus pyogenes pili promote pharyngeal cell adhesion and biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol 64:968–983 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05704.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Smith WD, Pointon JA, Abbot E, Kang HJ, Baker EN, Hirst BH, Wilson JA, Banfield MJ, Kehoe MA. 2010. Roles of minor pilin subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370. J Bacteriol 192:4651–4659 10.1128/JB.00071-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Holden MT, Heather Z, Paillot R, Steward KF, Webb K, Ainslie F, Jourdan T, Bason NC, Holroyd NE, Mungall K, Quail MA, Sanders M, Simmonds M, Willey D, Brooks K, Aanensen DM, Spratt BG, Jolley KA, Maiden MC, Kehoe M, Chanter N, Bentley SD, Robinson C, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Waller AS. 2009. Genomic evidence for the evolution of Streptococcus equi: host restriction, increased virulence, and genetic exchange with human pathogens. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000346 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000346. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Steward KF, Robinson C, Maskell DJ, Nenci C, Waller AS. 2017. Investigation of the Fim1 putative pilus locus of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi. Microbiology 10.1099/mic.0.000506. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lannergård J, Frykberg L, Guss B. 2003. CNE, a collagen-binding protein of Streptococcus equi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 222:69–74 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Beres SB, Sesso R, Pinto SW, Hoe NP, Porcella SF, Deleo FR, Musser JM. 2008. Genome sequence of a Lancefield group C Streptococcus zooepidemicus strain causing epidemic nephritis: new information about an old disease. PLoS One 3:e3026 10.1371/journal.pone.0003026. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Oppegaard O, Mylvaganam H, Skrede S, Lindemann PC, Kittang BR. 2017. Emergence of a Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis stG62647-lineage associated with severe clinical manifestations. Sci Rep 7:7589 10.1038/s41598-017-08162-z. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Allen BL, Höök M. 2002. Isolation of a putative laminin binding protein from Streptococcus anginosus. Microb Pathog 33:23–31 10.1006/mpat.2002.0510. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Müller HP, Rantamäki LK. 1995. Binding of native alpha 2-macroglobulin to human group G streptococci. Infect Immun 63:2833–2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dinkla K, Nitsche-Schmitz DP, Barroso V, Reissmann S, Johansson HM, Frick IM, Rohde M, Chhatwal GS. 2007. Identification of a streptococcal octapeptide motif involved in acute rheumatic fever. J Biol Chem 282:18686–18693 10.1074/jbc.M701047200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nitsche DP, Johansson HM, Frick IM, Mörgelin M. 2006. Streptococcal protein FOG, a novel matrix adhesin interacting with collagen I in vivo. J Biol Chem 281:1670–1679 10.1074/jbc.M506776200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Preissner KT. 1991. Structure and biological role of vitronectin. Annu Rev Cell Biol 7:275–310 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.001423. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chhatwal GS, Preissner KT, Müller-Berghaus G, Blobel H. 1987. Specific binding of the human S protein (vitronectin) to streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 55:1878–1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Filippsen LF, Valentin-Weigand P, Blobel H, Preissner KT, Chhatwal GS. 1990. Role of complement S protein (vitronectin) in adherence of Streptococcus dysgalactiae to bovine epithelial cells. Am J Vet Res 51:861–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Valentin-Weigand P, Grulich-Henn J, Chhatwal GS, Müller-Berghaus G, Blobel H, Preissner KT. 1988. Mediation of adherence of streptococci to human endothelial cells by complement S protein (vitronectin). Infect Immun 56:2851–2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fischetti VA. 1991. Streptococcal M protein. Sci Am 264:58–65 10.1038/scientificamerican0691-58. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.McNamara C, Zinkernagel AS, Macheboeuf P, Cunningham MW, Nizet V, Ghosh P. 2008. Coiled-coil irregularities and instabilities in group A Streptococcus M1 are required for virulence. Science 319:1405–1408 10.1126/science.1154470. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Collins CM, Kimura A, Bisno AL. 1992. Group G streptococcal M protein exhibits structural features analogous to those of class I M protein of group A streptococci. Infect Immun 60:3689–3696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Campo RE, Schultz DR, Bisno AL. 1995. M proteins of group G streptococci: mechanisms of resistance to phagocytosis. J Infect Dis 171:601–606 10.1093/infdis/171.3.601. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Johansson HM, Mörgelin M, Frick IM. 2004. Protein FOG: a streptococcal inhibitor of neutrophil function. Microbiology 150:4211–4221 10.1099/mic.0.27269-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nitsche-Schmitz DP, Johansson HM, Sastalla I, Reissmann S, Frick IM, Chhatwal GS. 2007. Group G streptococcal IgG binding molecules FOG and protein G have different impacts on opsonization by C1q. J Biol Chem 282:17530–17536 10.1074/jbc.M702612200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lewis MJ, Meehan M, Owen P, Woof JM. 2008. A common theme in interaction of bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins with immunoglobulins illustrated in the equine system. J Biol Chem 283:17615–17623 10.1074/jbc.M709844200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Meehan M, Lynagh Y, Woods C, Owen P. 2001. The fibrinogen-binding protein (FgBP) of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi additionally binds IgG and contributes to virulence in a mouse model. Microbiology 147:3311–3322 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3311. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Meehan M, Muldowney DA, Watkins NJ, Owen P. 2000. Localization and characterization of the ligand-binding domain of the fibrinogen-binding protein (FgBP) of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. Microbiology 146:1187–1194 10.1099/00221287-146-5-1187. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Timoney JF, Suther P, Velineni S, Artiushin SC. 2014. The antiphagocytic activity of SeM of Streptococcus equi requires capsule. J Equine Sci 25:53–56 10.1294/jes.25.53. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ijaz M, Velineni S, Timoney JF. 2011. Selective pressure for allelic diversity in SeM of Streptococcus equi does not affect immunoreactive proteins SzPSe or Se18.9. Infect Genet Evol 11:1159–1163 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.01.011. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tiwari R, Qin A, Artiushin S, Timoney JF. 2007. Se18.9, an anti-phagocytic factor H binding protein of Streptococcus equi. Vet Microbiol 121:105–115 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.11.023. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kelly C, Bugg M, Robinson C, Mitchell Z, Davis-Poynter N, Newton JR, Jolley KA, Maiden MC, Waller AS. 2006. Sequence variation of the SeM gene of Streptococcus equi allows discrimination of the source of strangles outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 44:480–486 10.1128/JCM.44.2.480-486.2006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Timoney JF, Artiushin SC, Boschwitz JS. 1997. Comparison of the sequences and functions of Streptococcus equi M-like proteins SeM and SzPSe. Infect Immun 65:3600–3605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Velineni S, Timoney JF. 2013. Characterization and protective immunogenicity of the SzM protein of Streptococcus zooepidemicus NC78 from a clonal outbreak of equine respiratory disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 20:1181–1188 10.1128/CVI.00069-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bergmann S, Eichhorn I, Kohler TP, Hammerschmidt S, Goldmann O, Rohde M, Fulde M. 2017. SCM, the M protein of Streptococcus canis binds immunoglobulin G. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:80 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00080. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Vasi J, Frykberg L, Carlsson LE, Lindberg M, Guss B. 2000. M-like proteins of Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Infect Immun 68:294–302 10.1128/IAI.68.1.294-302.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lynskey NN, Reglinski M, Calay D, Siggins MK, Mason JC, Botto M, Sriskandan S. 2017. Multi-functional mechanisms of immune evasion by the streptococcal complement inhibitor C5a peptidase. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006493 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006493. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Franken C, Haase G, Brandt C, Weber-Heynemann J, Martin S, Lämmler C, Podbielski A, Lütticken R, Spellerberg B. 2001. Horizontal gene transfer and host specificity of beta-haemolytic streptococci: the role of a putative composite transposon containing scpB and lmb. Mol Microbiol 41:925–935 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Cleary PP, Peterson J, Chen C, Nelson C. 1991. Virulent human strains of group G streptococci express a C5a peptidase enzyme similar to that produced by group A streptococci. Infect Immun 59:2305–2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sriprakash KS, Hartas J. 1996. Lateral genetic transfers between group A and G streptococci for M-like genes are ongoing. Microb Pathog 20:275–285 10.1006/mpat.1996.0026. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kurupati P, Turner CE, Tziona I, Lawrenson RA, Alam FM, Nohadani M, Stamp GW, Zinkernagel AS, Nizet V, Edwards RJ, Sriskandan S. 2010. Chemokine-cleaving Streptococcus pyogenes protease SpyCEP is necessary and sufficient for bacterial dissemination within soft tissues and the respiratory tract. Mol Microbiol 76:1387–1397 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07065.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Edwards RJ, Taylor GW, Ferguson M, Murray S, Rendell N, Wrigley A, Bai Z, Boyle J, Finney SJ, Jones A, Russell HH, Turner C, Cohen J, Faulkner L, Sriskandan S. 2005. Specific C-terminal cleavage and inactivation of interleukin-8 by invasive disease isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Infect Dis 192:783–790 10.1086/432485. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Turner CE, Kurupati P, Wiles S, Edwards RJ, Sriskandan S. 2009. Impact of immunization against SpyCEP during invasive disease with two streptococcal species: Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus equi. Vaccine 27:4923–4929 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.042. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Malke H. 2000. Genetics and pathogenicity factors of group C and group G streptococci, p 163–176. In Fischetti VA, Novick RP, Ferretti JJ, Portnoy DA, Rood JI (ed), Gram-Positive Pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Navarre WW, Schneewind O. 1999. Surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:174–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sjöbring U, Björck L, Kastern W. 1991. Streptococcal protein G. Gene structure and protein binding properties. J Biol Chem 266:399–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Guss B, Eliasson M, Olsson A, Uhlén M, Frej AK, Jörnvall H, Flock JI, Lindberg M. 1986. Structure of the IgG-binding regions of streptococcal protein G. EMBO J 5:1567–1575 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04398.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Byeon IJ, Louis JM, Gronenborn AM. 2003. A protein contortionist: core mutations of GB1 that induce dimerization and domain swapping. J Mol Biol 333:141–152 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00928-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ding K, Louis JM, Gronenborn AM. 2004. Insights into conformation and dynamics of protein GB1 during folding and unfolding by NMR. J Mol Biol 335:1299–1307 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.042. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gronenborn AM, Filpula DR, Essig NZ, Achari A, Whitlow M, Wingfield PT, Clore GM. 1991. A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. Science 253:657–661 10.1126/science.1871600. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Jonsson H, Müller HP. 1994. The type-III Fc receptor from Streptococcus dysgalactiae is also an alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor. Eur J Biochem 220:819–826 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18684.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jonsson H, Burtsoff-Asp C, Guss B. 1995. Streptococcal protein MAG: a protein with broad albumin binding specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1249:65–71 10.1016/0167-4838(95)00065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Jonsson H, Frykberg L, Rantamäki L, Guss B. 1994. MAG, a novel plasma protein receptor from Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Gene 143:85–89 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90609-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Jonsson H, Lindmark H, Guss B. 1995. A protein G-related cell surface protein in Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Infect Immun 63:2968–2975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Song XM, Perez-Casal J, Bolton A, Potter AA. 2001. Surface-expressed Mig protein protects Streptococcus dysgalactiae against phagocytosis by bovine neutrophils. Infect Immun 69:6030–6037 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6030-6037.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Song XM, Perez-Casal J, Fontaine MC, Potter AA. 2002. Bovine immunoglobulin A (IgA)-binding activities of the surface-expressed Mig protein of Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Microbiology 148:2055–2064 10.1099/00221287-148-7-2055. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Song XM, Perez-Casal J, Potter AA. 2004. The Mig protein of Streptococcus dysgalactiae inhibits bacterial internalization into bovine mammary gland epithelial cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231:33–38 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00923-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.von Pawel-Rammingen U, Johansson BP, Björck L. 2002. IdeS, a novel streptococcal cysteine proteinase with unique specificity for immunoglobulin G. EMBO J 21:1607–1615 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1607. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Collin M, Olsén A. 2001. EndoS, a novel secreted protein from Streptococcus pyogenes with endoglycosidase activity on human IgG. EMBO J 20:3046–3055 10.1093/emboj/20.12.3046. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Lannergård J, Guss B. 2006. IdeE, an IgG-endopeptidase of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:230–235 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00404.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Hulting G, Flock M, Frykberg L, Lannergård J, Flock JI, Guss B. 2009. Two novel IgG endopeptidases of Streptococcus equi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 298:44–50 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01698.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Flock M, Frykberg L, Sköld M, Guss B, Flock JI. 2012. Antiphagocytic function of an IgG glycosyl hydrolase from Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and its use as a vaccine component. Infect Immun 80:2914–2919 10.1128/IAI.06083-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Shadnezhad A, Naegeli A, Sjögren J, Adamczyk B, Leo F, Allhorn M, Karlsson NG, Jensen A, Collin M. 2016. EndoSd: an IgG glycan hydrolyzing enzyme in Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae. Future Microbiol 11:721–736 10.2217/fmb.16.14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Rungelrath V, Wohlsein JC, Siebert U, Stott J, Prenger-Berninghoff E, von Pawel-Rammingen U, Valentin-Weigand P, Baums CG, Seele J. 2017. Identification of a novel host-specific IgG protease in Streptococcus phocae subsp. phocae. Vet Microbiol 201:42–48 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.01.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ben Nasr A, Wistedt A, Ringdahl U, Sjöbring U. 1994. Streptokinase activates plasminogen bound to human group C and G streptococci through M-like proteins. Eur J Biochem 222:267–276 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18865.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Lottenberg R, Minning-Wenz D, Boyle MD. 1994. Capturing host plasmin(ogen): a common mechanism for invasive pathogens? Trends Microbiol 2:20–24 10.1016/0966-842X(94)90340-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Wang H, Lottenberg R, Boyle MD. 1995. A role for fibrinogen in the streptokinase-dependent acquisition of plasmin(ogen) by group A streptococci. J Infect Dis 171:85–92 10.1093/infdis/171.1.85. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Tewodros W, Karlsson I, Kronvall G. 1996. Allelic variation of the streptokinase gene in beta-hemolytic streptococci group C and G isolates of human origin. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 13:29–34. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.McArthur JD, McKay FC, Ramachandran V, Shyam P, Cork AJ, Sanderson-Smith ML, Cole JN, Ringdahl U, Sjöbring U, Ranson M, Walker MJ. 2008. Allelic variants of streptokinase from Streptococcus pyogenes display functional differences in plasminogen activation. FASEB J 22:3146–3153 10.1096/fj.08-109348. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Keramati M, Roohvand F, Eslaminejad Z, Mirzaie A, Nikbin VS, Aslani MM. 2012. PCR/RFLP-based allelic variants of streptokinase and their plasminogen activation potencies. FEMS Microbiol Lett 335:79–85 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02640.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.McCoy HE, Broder CC, Lottenberg R. 1991. Streptokinases produced by pathogenic group C streptococci demonstrate species-specific plasminogen activation. J Infect Dis 164:515–521 10.1093/infdis/164.3.515. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Schroeder B, Boyle MD, Sheerin BR, Asbury AC, Lottenberg R. 1999. Species specificity of plasminogen activation and acquisition of surface-associated proteolytic activity by group C streptococci grown in plasma. Infect Immun 67:6487–6495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Andreoni F, Ugolini F, Keller N, Neff A, Nizet V, Hollands A, Marques Maggio E, Zinkernagel AS, Schuepbach RA. 2017. Immunoglobulin attenuates streptokinase-mediated virulence in Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis necrotizing fasciitis. J Infect Dis 217:270–279. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Siemens N, Kittang BR, Chakrakodi B, Oppegaard O, Johansson L, Bruun T, Mylvaganam H, Svensson M, Skrede S, Norrby-Teglund A, INFECT Study Group. 2015. Increased cytotoxicity and streptolysin O activity in group G streptococcal strains causing invasive tissue infections. Sci Rep 5:16945 10.1038/srep16945. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Billington SJ, Jost BH, Songer JG. 2000. Thiol-activated cytolysins: structure, function and role in pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 182:197–205 10.1016/S0378-1097(99)00536-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Okumura K, Hara A, Tanaka T, Nishiguchi I, Minamide W, Igarashi H, Yutsudo T. 1994. Cloning and sequencing the streptolysin O genes of group C and group G streptococci. DNA Seq 4:325–328 10.3109/10425179409020859. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Magassa N, Chandrasekaran S, Caparon MG. 2010. Streptococcus pyogenes cytolysin-mediated translocation does not require pore formation by streptolysin O. EMBO Rep 11:400–405 10.1038/embor.2010.37. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Barnett TC, Liebl D, Seymour LM, Gillen CM, Lim JY, Larock CN, Davies MR, Schulz BL, Nizet V, Teasdale RD, Walker MJ. 2013. The globally disseminated M1T1 clone of group A Streptococcus evades autophagy for intracellular replication. Cell Host Microbe 14:675–682 10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.O’Neill AM, Thurston TL, Holden DW. 2016. Cytosolic replication of group A Streptococcus in human macrophages. MBio 7:e00020-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.O’Seaghdha M, Wessels MR. 2013. Streptolysin O and its co-toxin NAD-glycohydrolase protect group A Streptococcus from xenophagic killing. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003394 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003394. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sharma O, O’Seaghdha M, Velarde JJ, Wessels MR. 2016. NAD+-glycohydrolase promotes intracellular survival of group A Streptococcus. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005468 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005468. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Uchiyama S, Döhrmann S, Timmer AM, Dixit N, Ghochani M, Bhandari T, Timmer JC, Sprague K, Bubeck-Wardenburg J, Simon SI, Nizet V. 2015. Streptolysin O rapidly impairs neutrophil oxidative burst and antibacterial responses to group A Streptococcus. Front Immunol 6:581 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00581. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Flanagan J, Collin N, Timoney J, Mitchell T, Mumford JA, Chanter N. 1998. Characterization of the haemolytic activity of Streptococcus equi. Microb Pathog 24:211–221 10.1006/mpat.1997.0190. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Nizet V. 2002. Streptococcal beta-hemolysins: genetics and role in disease pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 10:575–580 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02473-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Humar D, Datta V, Bast DJ, Beall B, De Azavedo JC, Nizet V. 2002. Streptolysin S and necrotising infections produced by group G streptococcus. Lancet 359:124–129 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07371-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Nizet V, Beall B, Bast DJ, Datta V, Kilburn L, Low DE, De Azavedo JC. 2000. Genetic locus for streptolysin S production by group A streptococcus. Infect Immun 68:4245–4254 10.1128/IAI.68.7.4245-4254.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Steiner K, Malke H. 2002. Dual control of streptokinase and streptolysin S production by the covRS and fasCAX two-component regulators in Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Infect Immun 70:3627–3636 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3627-3636.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zeppa JJ, Kasper KJ, Mohorovic I, Mazzuca DM, Haeryfar SMM, McCormick JK. 2017. Nasopharyngeal infection by Streptococcus pyogenes requires superantigen-responsive Vβ-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:10226–10231. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Commons RJ, Smeesters PR, Proft T, Fraser JD, Robins-Browne R, Curtis N. 2014. Streptococcal superantigens: categorization and clinical associations. Trends Mol Med 20:48–62 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.10.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Sachse S, Seidel P, Gerlach D, Günther E, Rödel J, Straube E, Schmidt KH. 2002. Superantigen-like gene(s) in human pathogenic Streptococcus dysgalactiae, subsp equisimilis: genomic localisation of the gene encoding streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin G (speG(dys)). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 34:159–167 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Brandt CM, Schweizer KG, Holland R, Lütticken R, Freyaldenhoven BS. 2005. Lack of mitogenic activity of speG- and speG(dys)-positive Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis isolates from patients with invasive infections. Int J Med Microbiol 295:539–546 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.07.013. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Okumura K, Shimomura Y, Murayama SY, Yagi J, Ubukata K, Kirikae T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T. 2012. Evolutionary paths of streptococcal and staphylococcal superantigens. BMC Genomics 13:404 10.1186/1471-2164-13-404. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Korem M, Hidalgo-Grass C, Michael-Gayego A, Nir-Paz R, Salameh S, Moses AE. 2014. Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin G gene in blood and pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis has a limited role in pathogenesis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 47:292–296 10.1016/j.jmii.2012.12.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Zhao J, Hayashi T, Saarinen S, Papageorgiou AC, Kato H, Imanishi K, Kirikae T, Abe R, Uchiyama T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T. 2007. Cloning, expression, and characterization of the superantigen streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin G from Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Infect Immun 75:1721–1729 10.1128/IAI.01183-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Kalia A, Bessen DE. 2003. Presence of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A and C genes in human isolates of group G streptococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett 219:291–295 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Traverso F, Blanco A, Villalón P, Beratz N, Sáez Nieto JA, Lopardo H, National Collaborative Group for the Study of Streptococci and Related Bacteria. 2016. Molecular characterization of invasive Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Multicenter study: Argentina 2011-2012. Rev Argent Microbiol 48:279–289 10.1016/j.ram.2016.07.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Anand TD, Rajesh T, Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P. 2012. Superantigen profiles of emm and emm-like typeable and nontypeable pharyngeal streptococcal isolates of South India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 11:3 10.1186/1476-0711-11-3. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Artiushin SC, Timoney JF, Sheoran AS, Muthupalani SK. 2002. Characterization and immunogenicity of pyrogenic mitogens SePE-H and SePE-I of Streptococcus equi. Microb Pathog 32:71–85 10.1006/mpat.2001.0482. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Alber J, El-Sayed A, Estoepangestie S, Lämmler C, Zschöck M. 2005. Dissemination of the superantigen encoding genes seeL, seeM, szeL and szeM in Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Vet Microbiol 109:135–141 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.05.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Proft T, Webb PD, Handley V, Fraser JD. 2003. Two novel superantigens found in both group A and group C Streptococcus. Infect Immun 71:1361–1369 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1361-1369.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Paillot R, Darby AC, Robinson C, Wright NL, Steward KF, Anderson E, Webb K, Holden MT, Efstratiou A, Broughton K, Jolley KA, Priestnall SL, Marotti Campi MC, Hughes MA, Radford A, Erles K, Waller AS. 2010. Identification of three novel superantigen-encoding genes in Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, szeF, szeN, and szeP. Infect Immun 78:4817–4827 10.1128/IAI.00751-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Zhao J, Kato H, Kikuchi K, Totsuka K, Kataoka Y, Katsumi M, Uchiyama T. 2003. Streptococcus dysgalactiae-derived mitogen (SDM), a novel bacterial superantigen: characterization of its biological activity and predicted tertiary structure. Mol Microbiol 47:1589–1599 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03411.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Lefébure T, Richards VP, Lang P, Pavinski-Bitar P, Stanhope MJ. 2012. Gene repertoire evolution of Streptococcus pyogenes inferred from phylogenomic analysis with Streptococcus canis and Streptococcus dysgalactiae. PLoS One 7:e37607 10.1371/journal.pone.0037607. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Igwe EI, Shewmaker PL, Facklam RR, Farley MM, van Beneden C, Beall B. 2003. Identification of superantigen genes speM, ssa, and smeZ in invasive strains of beta-hemolytic group C and G streptococci recovered from humans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229:259–264 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00842-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]