Mesoporous metal oxide materials have attracted significant interest due to their porous frameworks and large surface areas, finding applications in sensors, catalysis and energy storage [1]. The performance of these materials is influenced by both their porous structures and the crystal phase of the frameworks [2]. In lithium-ion storage, the utilization of bulk single-crystal electrode materials enhances ionic conductivity but may trade off diffusion distance, impacting rate capability and cycle stability. Designing a mesoporous single-crystal microparticle is crucial for achieving high-performance lithium storage by combining microstructure and nanostructure advantages [3].
The two primary synthesis routes, hard-templating and soft-templating approaches, offer distinct advantages, with the latter being more straightforward, controllable and suitable for mass production [4]. Nevertheless, challenges persist in extending the soft-template approach to the synthesis of metal oxide single crystals comprising more than three components [5]. The challenge arises due to several factors, including rapid hydrolysis and condensation rate leading to macroscopic phase separation, the decomposition of surfactants at low temperatures inducing structural collapse, and the high temperature which is often needed for the crystallization of multi-metal oxides.
In a recent study led by Prof. Li, mesoporous Li2TiSiO5 exhibiting a single-crystal-like structure was fabricated using soft micelles as templates [6]. Rather than merely combining commercial precursors, Li et al. synthesized stoichiometric citrate Ti4+/Li+ chelate precursors. The coordination of Ti4+ and Li+ ions by carboxyl groups in citric acid not only prevented uncontrollable hydrolysis but also facilitated stable atomic dispersion. Subsequently, the conversion of citrate and silicates into rigid carbon and SiO2 frameworks effectively prevented structural collapse. Also, an in-depth investigation was conducted into the structural evolution of mesoporous Li2TiSiO5 exhibiting a single-crystal-like composition, correlating with escalating pyrolytic temperatures. As the temperature rose, the framework underwent a fascinating crystallization sequence, progressing from the Li2TiO3 phase, through a mixed phase of polycrystalline Li2TiO3 and Li2TiSiO5 phase, to single-crystalline Li2TiSiO5 phase (Fig. 1). The gradual decrease of pore size and volume provided evidence of the fabrication of a highly crystalline metal oxide.
Figure 1.
Fabrication process of single-crystal-like mesoporous Li2TiSiO5, utilizing a micelle-directed self-assembly strategy.
Then, to explore the impact of metal oxide shape and crystallinity on lithium storage, single-crystal-like mesoporous Li2TiSiO5 was employed as the anode material for lithium-ion batteries. This material exhibited outstanding electrochemical performance, surpassing its counterparts, including bulk Li2TiSiO5 and polycrystalline Li2TiSiO5. Advantages included high-capacity retention, superior rate capability and long-term cycling performance. This result was attributed to the nanosized crystal frameworks and short Li+ ion diffusion lengths inherent in the single-crystal-like mesoporous Li2TiSiO5.
This leading study provides a novel method for fabricating highly crystalline mesoporous multicomponent metal oxides. This pioneering study introduces an innovative approach that has established a new standard in the fabrication of highly crystalline mesoporous multicomponent metal oxides. With its superior performance and potential for widespread applications, this discovery represents a significant leap forward in the quest for efficient energy storage solutions.
Contributor Information
Minkyeong Ban, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea.
Jinwoo Lee, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Edward JWC, Nakita N, Varun S et al. Nature 2013; 495: 215–9.23467091 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lee J, Orilall MC, Warren SC et al. Nat Mater 2008; 7: 222–8. 10.1038/nmat2111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jin X, Han Y, Zhang Z et al. Adv Mater 2022; 34: 2109356. 10.1002/adma.202109356 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Warren SC, Messina LC, Slaughter LS et al. Science 2008; 320: 1748–52. 10.1126/science.1159950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brezesinski T, Wang J, Tolbert SH et al. Nat Mater 2010; 9: 146–51. 10.1038/nmat2612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wan Y, Wang C, Zhang X et al. Natl Sci Rev 2024; 11: nwae054. 10.1093/nsr/nwae054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

