Skip to main content
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII logoLink to Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII
. 2003 Jun 17;52(9):555–560. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0393-8

Life-prolonging effect of immunocell BAK (BRM-activated killer) therapy for advanced solid cancer patients: prognostic significance of serum immunosuppressive acidic protein levels

Takusaburo Ebina 1,, Naoko Ogama 1, Hiroko Shimanuki 1, Tomoka Kubota 1, Noriko Isono 1
PMCID: PMC11033013  PMID: 14627127

Abstract

We devised an innovative type of immunocell therapy called BRM (biological response modifier)-activated killer (BAK) therapy, which utilizes most of non-MHC (major histocompatibility complex) restricted lymphocytes, CD56+ cells including γδ T cells and NK cells. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were selected by immobilizing them with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, cultured for 2 weeks with serum-free medium containing IL-2, and then were reactivated by 1,000 U/ml of IFN-α for 15 min. The patients were infused with about 6×109 BAK cells by intravenous drip infusion at 1-month intervals. All advanced solid cancer patients who had received chemotherapy but for whom it was not effective or have refused chemotherapy were included in the present study. A good marker of impairment of host immune response by chemotherapy is an immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) level in serum above 580 μg/ml; survival rates were compared with the high (>580 μg/ml) and the low (≤580 μg/ml) serum IAP groups. We enrolled in this study 23 immunosuppressed patients whose IAP levels in serum were over 580 μg/ml, and 42 immunoreactive solid cancer outpatients whose IAP level in serum were under 580 μg/ml and whose performance statuses were over 80% on the Karnofsky scale. After giving informed consent, patients were treated with BAK therapy on an outpatient basis at our hospital. The ethical review board of the Miyagi Cancer Center approved this pilot study. Treated with BAK therapy, the mean survival of immunosuppressed patients was 4.6 months. On the other hand, survival for one of immunoreactive advanced postoperative patients (stage IV) and inoperable lung cancer patients (stage IIIb) was 24.7 months. The difference in survival between the 2 groups was significant (P<0.01). This shows that BAK therapy is not indicated for an advanced cancer patient whose serum IAP is over 580 μg/ml, perhaps due to extensive chemotherapy. Overall response to BAK therapy was complete response (CR) in 5 cases, partial response (PR) in 1 case, and prolonged no change (NC) in 26 cases, with an effectiveness rate at 76.2% in 42 advanced stage IIIb and IV cancer patients. BAK therapy has a life-prolonging effect without any adverse effects and maintains satisfactory quality of life (QOL) for advanced cancer patients.

Keywords: Immunocell therapy, CD56+ cells, Immunosuppressive acidic protein, Lung cancer, Quality of life

Introduction

Lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) therapy was developed as a means of providing cancer patients with adoptive immunotherapy [17]. From a pool of peripheral mononuclear cells obtained from a patient, a large quantity of LAK cells are isolated and incubated in a test tube with interleukin-2 (IL-2). The activated cells along with IL-2 are subsequently returned to the patient. Patients treated with LAK cells experience adverse effects, however, and the outcome of the treatment is not satisfactory.

In our previous report [9], we introduced a new type of immunocell therapy called BRM-activated killer (BAK) therapy, which uses lymphocytes cultured and activated by immobilized anti-CD3 antibody, IL-2, and IFN-α. We have shown that most of these activated and proliferated lymphocytes are CD56+ cells, which are found in about half of γδ T cells and NK cells (non-MHC-restricted killer cells). The CD56 antigen is identical to the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) [15], and was the first cell-cell adhesion molecule to be identified, isolated, and sequenced [6]. Structurally, the extracellular portion of NCAM comprises five IgG-like domains [22]. CD56 is expressed during embryonic development at a variety of sites in the nervous system and other tissues; its expression is more restricted in the adult brain. Our previous paper showed that CD56+ cells produced β-endorphin, which exhibits very potent analgesic and sedative activities. Studies by Gilman et al. [12] have shown that β-endorphin affects lymphocyte function, and suggest that β-endorphin may play an important role in the immune system [1, 4, 20]. It has also been shown that the immune system, the psychoneurological system, and the endocrine system interact in the body, and that CD56+ cells are multifunctional, integrated neuro-immune-endocrine (NIE) cells. As a QOL marker, we adopted the Face scale, a brief, nonverbal method for assessing patient mood, because QOL varies depending on each patient's subjective point of view [16]. Immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP), initially reported by Tamura et al. [21], was purified from the ascitic fluid of patients with advanced cancer. Sakamoto et al. have shown that IAP suppresses several immune responses in vivo as well as in vitro, and an IAP level above 580 μg/ml is a good marker of impairment of the host immune response [18, 19]. IAP, which is one of the human serum α1-acid glycoproteins, is also a good tumor-marker protein [7].

As all patients refused chemotherapy, we could not carry out a double-blind randomized controlled study based on chemotherapy. We performed this pilot translational study as evidence-based medicine (EBM) for the grouping of serum IAP levels. The present paper reports the comparison of the survival months with BAK therapy of 23 immunosuppressed patients whose IAP levels in serum were over 580 μg/ml and 42 stage IV and IIIb immunoreactive solid cancer patients whose IAP levels were under 580 μg/ml. This study shows that BAK therapy has a life-prolonging effect without any adverse effects and that it maintains satisfactory QOL for advanced cancer patients. Consequently, our goal is to provide such patients with immunotherapy that allows them to live with cancer without necessarily trying to completely eliminate the tumor tissue, so these patients can spend their last days as they wish.

Materials and methods

Patients

As we could not carry out a double-blind randomized controlled study for advanced cancer patients who had received chemotherapy but for whom it was not effective and who had refused further chemotherapy, all advanced solid cancer patients whose life expectancy was limited to several months were included in the present study. Twenty-three immunosuppressed terminal-stage patients whose IAP levels were over 580 μg/ml (Table 1) and 42 outpatients with solid cancer whose IAP levels were under 580 μg/ml and whose performance statuses were over 80% on the Karnofsky scale (Table 2) were enrolled in this translational pilot study. Patient characteristics of the two groups is shown in Table 3. The ethical review board of the Miyagi Cancer Center approved this pilot study in advance, and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Table 1.

Immunosuppressed solid cancer patients with BAK therapy (Serum IAP levels >580 μg/ml)

Patient number Gender Age IAP (μg/ml) Primary lesion Survival (months)
101 Female 54 742 Lung cancer 5
102 Male 54 630 Pancreatic carcinoma 9
103 Female 42 902 Uterus myosarcoma 3
104 Male 48 1,096 Colon cancer 4
105 Male 62 889 Rectum cancer 4
106 Male 68 714 Pancreatic carcinoma 2
107 Female 80 720 Lung cancer 2
108 Male 67 794 Lung cancer 1
109 Female 76 1,100 Lung cancer 10
110 Female 49 660 Ovarian cancer 8
111 Male 48 1,150 Gastric cancer 1
112 Female 58 730 Pharyngeal cancer 3
113 Male 50 740 Colon cancer 7
114 Female 51 770 Breast cancer 8
115 Female 47 1,010 Breast cancer 5
116 Male 59 720 Cholangio carcinoma 6
117 Female 51 720 Chorionic carcinoma 3
118 Male 70 1,000 Pharyngeal cancer 3
119 Female 43 1,445 Breast cancer 3
120 Female 58 1,200 Accinic cell carcinoma 5
121 Male 57 600 Lung cancer 4
122 Male 62 720 Gastric cancer 2
123 Male 38 600 Renal cell carcinoma 8

Table 2.

Immunoreactive advanced solid cancer patients with BAK immunocell therapy (serum IAP levels ≤580 μg/ml)

Patient number Gender Age Primary lesion Metastatic lesion Performance status (Karnofsky scale) IAP (μg/ml)
Postoperative cancer patients (stage IV)
  Metastatic or recurrent lung cancer
    1 Male 66 Renal cell carcinoma Lung 90% 415
    2 Male 45 Hemangiosarcoma of spleen Lung, Liver 80% 520
    3 Female 69 Renal cell carcinoma Lung 100% 470
    4 Male 53 Colon cancer Lung 90% 280
    5 Male 35 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Recurrence 80% 580
    6 Female 71 Rectum cancer Lung 90% 340
    7 Female 54 Colon cancer Liver, lung 80% 330
    8 Female 56 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Recurrence 80% 360
    9 Male 55 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) recurrence 80% 360
    10 Female 43 Renal cell carcinoma Lung 80% 580
    11 Male 67 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Brain 80% 450
    12 Male 67 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Lymph nodes 100% 520
    13 Female 80 Lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Recurrence 90% 410
    14 Male 65 Esophageal carcinoma Lung 100% 279
  Metastatic or recurrent, other cancers
    15 Female 50 Breast cancer Lymph nodes 100% 290
    16 Female 62 Thyroid carcinoma Neck 100% 360
    17 Female 43 Breast cancer Bone 80% 250
    18 Female 38 Breast cancer Bone 80% 350
    19 Male 57 Multiple liver tumor (endocrine cell carcinoma) - 90% 430
    20 Female 58 Breast cancer Recurrence 100% 190
    21 Female 52 Breast cancer Uterine 80% 420
    22 Male 63 Prostatic cancer Bone 90% 200
    23 Male 58 Gastric cancer Lymph nodes 90% 240
    24 Male 52 Colon cancer Liver 90% 370
    25 Male 61 Scirrhous gastric cancer Colon, Peritoneum 80% 130
    26 Male 71 Appendical carcinoma Abdominal wall 80% 280
    27 Male 60 Gastric cancer Lymph nodes 90% 250
    28 Female 30 Ovarial cancer Lymph nodes 80% 410
    29 Female 69 Ovarial cancer Lymph nodes 90% 580
    30 Female 51 Ovarial cancer Liver, Spleen 80% 300
    31 Male 71 Gastric cancer Colon 80% 417
    32 Female 51 Breast cancer Lymph nodes 90% 320
    33 Female 71 Colon cancer Liver 80% 580
    34 Female 50 Breast cancer Lymph nodes 100% 280
    35 Male 52 Penile cancer Lymph nodes 80% 490
    36 Female 54 Tubal cancer Recurrence 80% 570
    37 Male 54 Esophageal cancer Lymph nodes 100% 250
    38 Female 47 Ovarial cancer Recurrence 90% 279
Inoperable lung cancer patients (stage IIIb)
    39 Male 62 Squamous cell carcinoma Lymph nodes 100% 420
    40 Male 66 Adenocarcinoma Lymph nodes 80% 410
    41 Male 61 Adenocarcinoma Lymph nodes 80% 370
    42 Male 52 Squamous cell carcinoma Lymph nodes 100% 431

Table 3.

Patient characteristics of two groups

Characteristic Immunosuppressed patients (serum IAP Levels >580 μg/ml) Immunoreactive patients (serum IAP Levels ≦580 μg/ml)
Number 23 42
Gender
  Male 12 (52.2%) 22 (52.4%)
  Female 11 (47.8%) 20 (47.6%)
Age (years)
  <60 16 (69.6%) 24 (57.1%)
  ≥60 7 (30.4%) 18 (42.9%)
Stage
  IIIb 0 4
  IV 23 38
CD56+ cells (%) in PBL 19.0±9.93 18.4±6.45

Serum-free medium for BAK cell preparation

In our previous paper [9], the BAK cells were cultured with HyMedium (Nipro, Tokyo) plus 2% human serum in a 1l bag. However, we developed a new serum-free ALyS medium (Dr Takeshi Sato, Cell Science & Technology Institute, Sendai) containing ascorbate-2-glucose and 4 trace heavy metals [23]. As shown in Table 4, Artificial Lymphocyte Stimulation (ALyS) medium is superior to conventional medium with 2% serum on cell proliferating activity and increased activity for CD56+ cells. Therefore, a minor modification was made for preparation of BAK cells (Table 5).

Table 4.

Cell-proliferating activity of serum-free ALyS medium. Fresh peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) were cultured with immobilized anti-CD3 antibody and IL-2 for 2 weeks

Medium Total cells CD16+ cells CD56+ cells
ALyS 9.5×109/2 bags 6.7×109 (70.2%) 6.9×109 (72.2%)
HyMedium + 2% serum 3.2×109/2 bags 2.0×109 (61.7%) 2.0×109 (61.1%)
(Fresh PBL) 1.6×107 (15.3%) (17.2%)

Table 5.

Revised BRM activated killer (BAK) cell preparation

20 ml of patients' heparinized peripheral blood
Ficoll-Paque centrifugation at 350 g for 25 min
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, 3–5x107) in ALyS medium (CSTI, Sendai) containing 10% auto-serum plus rh IL-2 (700 U/ml)
The 225-cm2 culture flask was incubated with anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3, Ortho Diagnostics, 5 μg/ml) overnight at room temperature
30 ml of ALyS medium was added to the coated flask and cultured in CO2 incubator at 37°C for 2 days
60 ml of ALyS medium was added and cultured for 2–3 days
Split to 3 flasks and culture nonadherent cells for 1–2 days
Transfer into gas-permeable bag containing 1 l of ALyS medium with 175 U/ml of IL-2
Culture for 2–3 days and split 2 bags
Culture for 2–3 days and split 4 bags
Sterilization test and endotoxin assay
Reactivation by IL-2 (1,000 U/ml) and IFN-α (1,000 U/ml) for 15 min
Washed 2 times by centrifugation in saline with 0.1% human albumin
Harvest lymphocytes (0.6–1x1010) in transfusion bag containing 200 ml of saline with 2.5% human albumin

Evaluation of clinical effects of solid cancer therapy

Response to treatment was assessed in terms of the decrease in the total tumor area measured with radiological methods (CT and/or MRI). Complete response (CR) was defined as disappearance of all measurable disease for a minimum of 4 weeks. Partial response (PR) was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the tumor area for at least 4 weeks. No change (NC) was defined as a decrease of less than 50% or as an increase of less than 25% for at least 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as an increase of 25% or more in the tumor area. We propose a new criterion, prolonged no change (prolonged NC), defined as a less than 50% reduction or less than 25% increase in the tumor area for at least 6 months, to evaluate the effectiveness of therapy without tumor shrinkage. We proposed that all patients meeting criteria CR, PR, or prolonged NC be classified as responding to solid tumor therapy.

Face scale as a QOL marker

During the course of BAK therapy, we adopted the Face scale as a QOL indicator, a brief nonverbal assessment of patient mood [9]. The Face scale contains 10 drawings of faces, arranged in serial order by rows, with each face depicting a different mood. Subtle changes in the eyes, eyebrows, and mouth are used to represent slightly different levels of mood. The faces are arranged in order of worsening mood and numbered from 1 to 10, with 1 representing the most positive mood and 10 representing the most negative mood. As the examiner pointed at the faces, the following instructions were given to each patient: "The faces below range from very happy at the top to very sad at the bottom. Point to the face that best represents the way you felt today."

Results

Comparison of survival of the immunosuppressed high IAP and immunoreactive low IAP groups

As a marker of general immunological state of patients, serum IAP levels were assayed. Comparison of the survival curves in BAK therapy between the high IAP immunosuppressed terminal group (>580 μg/ml) and the low IAP immunoreactive stage IV and IIIb group (≤580 μg/ml) was performed. Overall survival time of patients correlated with the serum IAP levels using the Kaplan-Meier method as shown in Fig. 1. The difference in survival between the groups (4.6 vs 24.7 months) was significant (P<0.01). This shows that BAK therapy is not indicated for a terminal patient whose IAP is over 580 μg/ml, perhaps due to extensive chemotherapy. Other immunological paramenters, such as number of leukocytes, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and % of CD56+ cells (Table 3), were not different for the two groups.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the low IAP group (<580 μg/ml, n=42) versus the high IAP group (>580 μg/ml, n=23). The survival rate for patients in the low IAP group was significantly higher than that for patients in the high IAP group (P<0.01)

Prognosis of advanced cancer patients in low IAP group with BAK therapy

Thirty-eight advanced postoperative stage IV patients and 4 inoperable stage IIIb lung cancer patients whose life expectancy was estimated to be a few months and who had refused chemotherapy were included in this study. The patients were infused with about 6×109 BAK cells by intravenous drip infusion, at 1-month intervals at an outpatient clinic. As shown in Table 6, the proportion of CD56+ cells increased from 18.4±6.45% to 41.4±14.1% with culture. No adverse effects were observed during treatment. During the course of BAK therapy, we adopted the Face scale as a QOL indicator. The QOL of all patients either remained satisfactory or improved. The prognosis and clinical responses of all patients are shown in Table 6.

Table 6.

Prognosis of immunoreactive advanced solid cancer patients with BAK therapy

Patient number CD56+ cell (%) with culture Face scale (QOL marker) Time since BAK therapy started Course Response
Before Change After Start Change Latest
1 23 57 5 4 3 years 3 months Deceased Prolonged NC
2 25 61 4 2 3 years 1 month Deceased Prolonged NC
3 22 71 4 1 4 years Alive CR
4 22 43 7 7 1 year 10 months Deceased NC
5 30 39 2 2 1 year 6 months Deceased NC
6 13 33 7 7 1 year 4 months Deceased Prolonged NC
7 11 39 6 6 1 year 5 months Deceased Prolonged NC
8 15 29 6 6 1 year 3 months Deceased NC
9 30 35 7 6 1 year 6 months Deceased Prolonged NC
10 16 45 4 4 2 years 1 month Deceased Prolonged NC
11 37 55 3 2 1 year Deceased prolonged NC
12 18 38 2 2 1 year 4 months Alive Prolonged NC
13 18 18 2 2 1 year 4 months Alive Prolonged NC
14 25 80 3 3 1 year Alive Prolonged NC
15 18 37 6 3 4 years 8 months Deceased Prolonged NC
16 13 35 4 4 4 years 8 months Alive Prolonged NC
17 11 38 6 5 3 years Deceased Prolonged NC
18 10 26 7 3 2 years 7 months Deceased Prolonged NC
19 11 52 4 4 2 years 2 months Deceased PR
20 20 22 5 5 1 year 11 months Deceased Prolonged NC
21 22 46 6 5 1 year 8 months Deceased Prolonged NC
22 14 33 6 2 3 years Deceased Prolonged NC
23 16 28 7 5 1 year 4 months Deceased NC
24 15 25 ND ND 1 year 7 months Deceased Prolonged NC
25 22 35 4 4 1 year 5 months Deceased NC
26 12 40 4 3 1 year 1 month Deceased NC
27 14 36 5 4 2 years 7 months Alive Prolonged NC
28 11 43 4 4 1 year 8 months Deceased NC
29 24 41 4 4 2 years 5 months Alive Prolonged NC
30 11 33 6 6 2 years 6 months Alive Prolonged NC
31 11 37 6 2 2 years 2 months Alive Prolonged NC
32 20 46 3 2 2 years Alive Prolonged NC
33 22 56 3 2 1 year Deceased NC
34 16 35 6 5 1 year 8 months Alive Prolonged NC
35 29 58 4 3 1 year 8 months Alive NC
36 21 42 1 1 1 year 8 months Alive NC
37 14 31 5 4 1 year 5 months Alive Prolonged NC
38 18 30 1 1 1 year Alive CR
39 27 52 2 1 4 years 7 months Alive CR
40 23 79 4 4 2 years 2 months Alive Prolonged NC
41 11 22 3 2 2 years 1 month Alive CR
42 14 40 2 2 1 year Alive CR

If we insert the evaluation criterion of prolonged no change (prolonged NC) in tumor size during 6 months or longer that ranges from less than 50% shrinkage to 25% or less increase, between PR and NC, we see even more positive results. Overall response to BAK therapy was CR in 5 cases, PR in 1 case and prolonged NC in 26 cases with an effectiveness rate of 76.2% in 42 advanced stage IIIb and IV cancer patients. This shows that BAK therapy has a life-prolonging effect without any adverse effects for advanced cancer patients.

Discussion

It has been shown that, even with today's medical advances, systemic chemotherapy for patients with advanced stage (inoperable stage IIIb and IV) non–small cell lung cancer prolonged survival only by 5.8 months [5]. Treated with BAK therapy, however, mean survival duration of inoperable stage IIIb and stage IV recurrent and metastatic lung cancer was 23.8 months (n=18). All 4 inoperable stage IIIb lung cancer patients and 4 stage IV recurrent and metastatic lung cancer patients from our study are presently still living (Table 6). This favorable clinical response in lung cancer cases may be the result of the fact that the lungs are first exposed to BAK cells via the bloodstream using intravenous drip infusion.

In our previous study [10], BRM-activated γδ T cells were shown to produce antitumor cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α), which are the major cytotoxic cytokines of BAK cells, and we showed that CD56+ cells have stronger cytotoxic activity than CD56 cells. Bauer et al. [3] showed that a stress-inducible MICA (MHC class I chain-related A) protein on tumor cells was recognized by NKG2D, a MICA receptor, found in non–MHC-restricted killer, NK, and γδ T cells. Anti-CD3 antibody and IFN-α induce TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) on NK and γδ T cells and induce apoptosis on tumor cells via death receptor DR4 and DR5 [2]. Kato et al. showed that tumor cells were targeted by human γδ T cells via nonpeptide pyrophosphate [13]. Granulysin, another cytotoxic molecule present in NK cells and CTL, is able to induce apoptosis in tumor cells [11], and its expression in NK cells has been negatively correlated with cancer progression in human patients [14]. Therefore, we assayed granulysin in serum of solid cancer patients with BAK therapy. Responding cases have a tendency to higher granulysin level (over 7.0 ng/ml).

In conventional CTL (cytotoxic T lymphocyte) immunotherapy, potent αβ T (αβ CD8+ killer T) cells, which recognize tumor antigens and MHC class I antigens, are purified and multiplied for therapy. However, αβ T cells kill both cancer cells and normal leukocytes, thus increasing the risk of causing adverse reactions in patients [8]. Therefore, we devised the BAK therapy by utilizing a new class of lymphocytes (CD56+ cells containing NK cells and γδ T cells) that kill cancer cells only, regardless of MHC antigens. CD56 is a member of the Ig superfamily, and CD56+ cells produce β-endorphin, an intracerebral hormone thought to make patients feel well and help to maintain good QOL due to its potent analgesic and sedative effects. CD56+ cells are considered to be neuro-immune-endocrine (NIE) cells, and are potent killer cells that produce antitumor cytokine, IFN-γ and TNF-α [10].

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Ms Eiko Ohkubo of the Miyagi Cancer Center Research Institute for editorial help, and to Dr Masataka Suzuki, Dr Ryuichi Katakura, Dr Mitsutaka Okuda, Dr Sadahiro Koinumaru, Dr Takashi Matsuda, Dr Tsuneaki Fujiya, Dr Yoichiro Kakugawa, Dr Junichi Mikuni, and Dr Shigenori Ujiie of Miyagi Cancer Center Hospital for their generous assistance in carrying out the clinical trial. This translational research was supported in part by a grant from the Sendai Institute of Microbiology.

References


Articles from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES