Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Apr 22;7(4):e247532. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7532

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Sleep Disturbances Among Puerto Rican Young Adults

Eudora L Olsen 1,, Ayana K April-Sanders 2, Hector R Bird 3,4, Glorisa J Canino 5, Cristiane S Duarte 4,6, Shakira F Suglia 7
PMCID: PMC11036138  PMID: 38648058

Key Points

Question

Are prospectively and retrospectively reported adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) associated with sleep disturbances among Puerto Rican young adults?

Findings

In this cohort study that included 813 Puerto Rican young adults, higher numbers of retrospectively reported ACEs were significantly associated with greater sleep disturbance, while prospectively reported ACEs were not significantly associated with greater sleep disturbance.

Meaning

This study suggests that retrospectively reported ACEs are significantly associated with sleep disturbances among Puerto Rican young adults, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors.

Abstract

Importance

Sleep quality is a known marker of overall health. Studies suggest that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep disturbances among children and adults.

Objective

To examine the association of retrospective and prospective ACEs with sleep quality among a cohort of Puerto Rican young adults from 2 sociocultural contexts.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study used data from the Boricua Youth Study (BYS), a population-based study representing Puerto Rican children from the South Bronx, New York, and Puerto Rico conducted from August 2000 to August 2003. Participants who were 5 to 9 years of age at enrollment in the BYS and who participated in wave 4 of the BYS took part in the Health Assessment (HA) when they were 18 to 29 years of age, from April 2013 to August 2017. Of the eligible 982 participants, 813 (82.8%) participated in the HA. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024.

Exposures

Prospective ACEs measured from parent and youth responses and retrospective ACEs measured among young adults using questions from the validated ACE questionnaire from the original ACEs study conducted by Kaiser Permanente and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and published in 1998. Analysis included 8 overlapping items from both questionnaires.

Outcomes

Sleep quality was assessed in the HA with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The summary score included 7 components of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection. Sleep quality information was gathered at the same time as retrospective ACEs in the HA.

Results

Of the 813 participants, 438 (53.9%) lived in Puerto Rico as children, 411 (50.6%) identified as female, and the mean (SE) age of participants was 22.9 (0.07) years. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, retrospective ACEs had a significant association with worse sleep outcomes (β [SE] = 0.29 [0.07]; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; P < .001). Prospective ACEs did not have a significant association with sleep quality, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (β [SE] = 0.05 [0.10]; 95% CI, –0.14 to 0.24; P = .59).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that there is a significant association between retrospective ACEs and sleep quality among Puerto Rican young adults, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Prospective ACEs were not significantly associated with sleep disturbances, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Addressing ACEs reported in young adulthood may help reduce sleep disorders.


This cohort study examines the association of retrospective and prospective adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) with sleep quality among a cohort of Puerto Rican young adults from 2 sociocultural contexts.

Introduction

Sleep quality is a known marker of overall health and is a chronic health issue in the US.1,2 In addition to the racial and ethnic disparities affecting sleep quality, studies suggest that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep disturbances and other chronic diseases among adults.3,4 ACEs are defined as stressful or traumatic life events that occur during the first 18 years of life.5 It is estimated that approximately 58% of youths in the US have experienced at least 1 or more ACE, with a higher prevalence of ACEs among Black and non-White Hispanic children.5,6,7 Our research group previously found a significant association between childhood adversity and poor sleep outcomes among Puerto Rican children.8 Although ACEs can be assessed both prospectively during childhood and retrospectively in adulthood, no previous study on ACEs and sleep quality has used both forms of reporting, to our knowledge. Despite the utility of retrospective ACEs and patient preference to be screened, both patients and physicians reported that fewer than 10% of adult patients were asked about ACEs.9,10 Furthermore, research has shown low agreement between prospective and retrospective ACEs, suggesting that these 2 forms of reporting may identify distinct groups of people with unique risk factors for various health outcomes.11,12

Compared with previous research on ACEs and sleep, our study introduces a new age group to consider: young adults. Young adults, defined as approximately 18 to 26 years of age, are an underrepresented population in research.13 Young adulthood is a critical period of complex cognitive and emotional maturation, including increased rates of risky behavior and accidental death.13 Despite the high incidence of mental and physical health issues among young adults, this population is less likely to seek health care or undergo routine screening compared with other age groups.14

Considering the disparities in research that exist for Puerto Rican young adults, as well as the promising importance of exploring both retrospective and prospective ACEs, our study examines the association of prospective and retrospective ACEs with sleep quality in a geographically diverse population of Puerto Rican young adults. Understanding this association has the potential to inform interventions to address ACEs, improve sleep quality, and reduce health disparities for Puerto Rican young adults.

Methods

Study Population

Study participants are from the Boricua Youth Study (BYS), a longitudinal cohort of Puerto Rican children living in the South Bronx, New York, and Puerto Rico from August 2000 to August 2003. Details on the study sampling, design, and procedures can be found elsewhere.15 In brief, 2491 Puerto Rican children and adolescents aged 5 to 13 years old were recruited at baseline from South Bronx, New York (n = 1138), and the standard metropolitan area of San Juan and Caguas, Puerto Rico (n = 1353). Eligibility criteria for the BYS included having at least 1 child in the household who was 5 to 13 years of age and at least 1 parent or primary caretaker of Puerto Rican descent. Participant ethnicity was assessed through a questionnaire. The BYS Health Assessment (HA) recruited a subsample of those who were 5 to 9 years of age at enrollment and participated in wave 4 from April 2013 to August 2017. Of the eligible 982 participants, 813 (82.8%) participated in the HA. Data for this study come from those who participated in the HA. The BYS was approved by the institutional review boards at the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus. Written informed consent was obtained from participants, and interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. This cohort study adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.16

Main Exposure: ACEs

Prospective ACEs are defined as those reported in childhood, and retrospective ACEs are defined as those reported in young adulthood. Prospective ACEs were reported by parents and youths using the 10 items outlined in the original ACEs study and collated from several other validated screening measures.17,18 Responses were characterized as binary variables: yes or no. ACEs were then reported retrospectively by young adults in the HA using a 10-item questionnaire from the original ACEs study.17 Because these surveys differed, we used the 8 overlapping items that were present in both surveys to conduct the analysis for this study. The number of ACEs was categorized into 4 groups (0 ACEs, 1 ACE, 2-3 ACEs, and ≥4 ACEs).

Main Outcome: Sleep Quality

Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in young adulthood at the same time that retrospective ACEs were collected in the HA study.19 A summary score was generated by summing the 7 components of the PSQI, which included subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medications, and daytime dysfunction. A binary variable was created to categorize scores greater than 5 as poor sleep and scores of 5 or lower as good sleep.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed from January 2023 to January 2024. Univariable analyses were conducted in the overall sample to examine the distribution of ACEs and sociodemographic factors. Sociodemographic information included self-reported age (in years), sex (male or female), receipt of public assistance (yes or no), highest education grade completed, and geographical location in childhood (South Bronx or Puerto Rico). Separate multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association of sleep quality with retrospective ACEs and prospective ACEs as both continuous and categorical variables, adjusting for covariates. Unstandardized β coefficients and 95% CIs were calculated from these models. A cross-product term between ACEs and the study site variable was included in the model to assess for interaction by site. Type III tests were used to examine statistical significance of the interaction term.

Similarly, log-binomial multivariable regression models were used to examine the association of retrospective and prospective ACEs with sleep quality as a dichotomous variable, adjusting for all covariates. Relative risks and 95% CIs were estimated from these models. All analyses included study sample weights to account for the unequal probability of selection into the study based on each site’s sampling design and to be representative of the age and sex distributions of the 2000 US Census. Nonresponse weights were calculated using a logistic regression model that included participant and parent characteristics associated with responding to the HA study. The final analysis weights were then calculated as a product of the HA nonresponse weights and the original BYS sampling weights to reflect the BYS reference population in each site. Analyses were conducted in SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). All P values were from 2-sided tests, and results were deemed statistically significant at P < .05.

Results

Participant characteristics in the overall sample and by study site are shown in Table 1. In the sample of 813 participants, 438 (53.9%) lived in Puerto Rico as children, 411 (50.6%) identified as female, and 226 (27.8%) reported receiving public assistance. The mean (SE) age of participants was 22.9 (0.07) years, and the most frequent highest education grade completed was 12th grade (276 [34.2%]). A total of 343 participants (42.2%) identified as having a PSQI score of higher than 5, indicating poor sleep. A total of 584 participants (71.8%) reported having at least 1 prospective ACE, and 544 participants (66.9%) reported having at least 1 retrospective ACE. Compared with participants from Puerto Rico, those from the Bronx had, on average, worse sleep quality (mean [SE] PSQI, 5.7 [0.2] in the Bronx and 4.8 [0.2] in Puerto Rico), higher mean (SE) levels of prospective ACEs (1.4 [0.1] in the Bronx and 1.2 [0.1] in Puerto Rico), and higher mean (SE) levels of retrospective ACEs (1.7 [0.1] in the Bronx and 1.0 [0.1] in Puerto Rico).

Table 1. Participant Characteristics by Study Site, Health Assessment Studya.

Variable All participants (N = 813) South Bronx (n = 375) Puerto Rico (n = 438)
Sex
Female 411 (50.6) 182 (48.5) 229 (52.3)
Male 402 (49.4) 193 (51.5) 209 (47.7)
Age, y
18-23 508 (62.5) 170 (45.3) 283 (64.6)
24-29 305 (37.5) 205 (54.7) 155 (35.4)
Highest education grade completed
6 2 (0.3) 0 2 (0.5)
7 5 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 4 (0.9)
8 6 (0.7) 4 (1.1) 2 (0.5)
9 17 (2.1) 12 (3.2) 5 (1.2)
10 33 (4.1) 31 (8.3) 2 (0.5)
11 46 (5.7) 42 (11.3) 4 (0.9)
12 276 (34.2) 129 (34.6) 147 (33.8)
College freshman 116 (14.4) 51 (13.7) 65 (14.9)
College sophomore 118 (14.6) 55 (14.8) 63 (14.5)
College junior 69 (8.5) 16 (4.3) 53 (12.2)
College senior 90 (11.1) 21 (5.6) 69 (15.9)
≥1 y of Graduate school 30 (3.7) 11 (3.0) 19 (4.4)
Receiving public assistance 226 (27.8) 70 (18.7) 156 (35.6)
Prospective ACEs
None 229 (28.2) 87 (23.2) 142 (32.4)
1 302 (37.2) 143 (38.1) 159 (36.3)
2-3 241 (29.6) 125 (33.3) 116 (26.5)
≥4 41 (5.0) 20 (5.3) 21 (4.8)
Retrospective ACEs
None 269 (33.1) 90 (24.0) 179 (40.9)
1 287 (35.3) 127 (33.9) 160 (36.5)
2-3 167 (20.5) 98 (26.1) 69 (15.8)
≥4 90 (11.1) 60 (16.0) 30 (6.9)
Individual prospective ACEs
Verbal abuse 106 (13.4) 57 (15.7) 49 (11.4)
Physical abuse 158 (20.0) 76 (21.0) 82 (19.2)
Sexual abuse 35 (4.5) 18 (5.1) 17 (4.0)
Neglect 131 (16.5) 59 (16.1) 72 (16.8)
Divorce or separation 369 (46.9) 213 (60.2) 156 (36.0)
Domestic violence 19 (2.4) 7 (1.9) 12 (2.8)
Substance use in home 125 (15.5) 52 (14.0) 73 (16.7)
Maternal mental health issues 212 (26.2) 84 (22.6) 128 (29.4)
Individual retrospective ACEs
Verbal abuse 122 (15.0) 80 (21.3) 42 (9.6)
Physical abuse 96 (11.8) 63 (16.8) 33 (7.5)
Sexual abuse 62 (7.6) 38 (10.2) 24 (5.5)
Neglect 24 (3.0) 21 (5.6) 3 (0.7)
Divorce or separation 464 (57.2) 248 (66.3) 216 (49.4)
Domestic violence 73 (9.0) 51 (13.6) 22 (5.1)
Substance use in home 140 (17.3) 92 (24.6) 48 (11.0)
Maternal mental health issues 120 (14.8) 56 (15.0) 64 (14.7)
PSQI score
Good sleep (≤5) 470 (57.8) 192 (51.2) 278 (63.5)
Poor sleep (>5) 343 (42.2) 183 (48.8) 160 (36.5)

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

a

Quality of evidence = 3, retrospective cohort study. Data are given as number (percentage) of participants.

A correlation analysis of retrospective and prospective ACEs showed a low but statistically significant correlation between these 2 measures (r = 0.134; P < .001). When prospective ACEs were examined as a categorical variable and adjusted for covariates, no level of ACEs was found to be significantly associated with sleep quality (Table 2). When examined as a continuous variable and adjusted for covariates, prospective ACEs were not found to have a significant association with sleep quality (β [SE] = 0.05 [0.10]; 95% CI, –0.14 to 0.24; P = .59) (Table 3).

Table 2. Association Between Prospectively Reported ACEs as a Categorical Variable and Sleep Qualitya.

Characteristic Unadjusted model Adjusted modelb
β (SE) [95% CI] P value β (SE) [95% CI] P value
No ACEs 0 [Reference] NA 0 [Reference] NA
1 ACE 0.17 (0.28) [−0.37 to 0.71] .55 0.07 (0.28) [−0.47 to 0.61] .80
2-3 ACEs 0.15 (0.29) [−0.42 to 0.72] .61 0.04 (0.29) [−0.53 to 0.61] .89
≥4 ACEs 0.36 (0.52) [−0.66 to 1.37] .49 0.37 (0.51) [−0.64 to 1.38] .47
From Puerto Rico NA NA −0.96 (0.23) [−1.42 to −0.50] <.001c
Female NA NA 0.44 (0.22) [−0.003 to 0.87] .05
Age, y NA NA 0.01 (0.05) [−0.09 to 0.11] .84
Highest education grade completed (3rd grade to graduate school) NA NA 0.02 (0.06) [−0.10 to 0.14] .73
Public assistance NA NA 0.05 (0.26) [−0.47 to 0.57] .85

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; NA, not applicable.

a

Quality of evidence = 3, retrospective cohort study.

b

Model controlled for site, sex, age, educational level, and receiving public assistance.

c

Significant at P < .05.

Table 3. Association Between Prospectively Reported ACEs as a Continuous Variable and Sleep Qualitya.

Characteristic Unadjusted model Adjusted modelb
β (SE) [95% CI] P value β (SE) [95% CI] P value
Total ACEs 0.07 (0.10) [−0.12 to 0.25] .49 0.05 (0.10) [−0.14 to 0.24] .59
From Puerto Rico NA NA −0.96 (0.23) [−1.41 to −0.50] <.001c
Female NA NA 0.43 (0.22) [−0.01 to 0.87] .05
Age, y NA NA 0.01 (0.05) [−0.09 to 0.11] .84
Highest education grade completed (3rd grade to graduate school) NA NA 0.02 (0.06) [−0.09 to 0.14] .71
Public assistance NA NA 0.06 (0.26) [−0.46 to 0.57] .83

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; NA, not applicable.

a

Quality of evidence = 3, retrospective cohort study.

b

Model controlled for site, sex, age, educational level, and receiving public assistance.

c

Significant at P < .05.

When retrospective ACEs were examined as a categorical variable and adjusted for covariates, higher levels of ACEs (≥2 ACEs) were significantly associated with worse sleep outcomes (2-3 ACEs: β [SE] = 1.25 [0.31]; 95% CI, 0.64-1.86; P < .001; ≥4 ACEs: β [SE] = 1.21 [0.38]; 95% CI, 0.47-2.0; P = .002) (Table 4). When retrospective ACEs were examined as a continuous variable and adjusted for covariates, they were found to be significantly associated with worse sleep outcomes (β [SE] = 0.29 [0.07]; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; P < .001) (Table 5). In addition, these results did not vary significantly by site.

Table 4. Association Between Retrospectively Reported ACEs as a Categorical Variable and Sleep Qualitya.

Characteristic Unadjusted model Adjusted modelb
β (SE) [95% CI] P value β (SE) [95% CI] P value
No ACEs 0 [Reference] NA 0 [Reference] NA
1 ACE 0.43 (0.26) [−0.08 to 0.95] .10 0.38 (0.26) [−0.14 to 0.89] .16
2-3 ACEs 1.46 (0.31) [0.86 to 2.06] <.001c 1.25 (0.31) [0.64 to 1.86] <.001c
≥4 ACEs 1.46 (0.37) [0.72 to 2.19] <.001c 1.21 (0.38) [0.47 to 1.96] .002c
From Puerto Rico NA NA −0.74 (0.24) [−1.20 to −0.27] .002c
Female NA NA 0.30 (0.22) [−0.13 to 0.74] .17
Age, y NA NA 0.008 (0.05) [−0.09 to 0.11] .88
Highest education grade completed (3rd grade to graduate school) NA NA −0.004 (0.06) [−0.12 to 0.11] .95
Public assistance NA NA 0.04 (0.26) [−0.48 to 0.55] .89

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; NA, not applicable.

a

Quality of evidence = 3, retrospective cohort study.

b

Model controlled for site, sex, age, educational level, and receiving public assistance.

c

Significant at P < .05.

Table 5. Association Between Retrospectively Reported ACEs as a Continuous Variable and Sleep Qualitya.

Characteristic Unadjusted model Adjusted modelb
β (SE) [95% CI] P value β (SE) [95% CI] P value
Total ACEs 0.36 (0.07) [0.21 to 0.50] <.001c 0.29 (0.07) [0.15 to 0.44] <.001c
From Puerto Rico NA NA −0.76 (0.24) [−1.22 to −0.30] .001c
Female NA NA 0.32 (0.22) [−0.12 to 0.76] .15
Age, y NA NA −0.005 (0.05) [−0.11 to 0.10] .92
Highest education grade completed (3rd grade to graduate school) NA NA 0.003 (0.06) [−0.11 to 0.12] .96
Public assistance NA NA 0.03 (0.26) [−0.48 to 0.54] .91

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; NA, not applicable.

a

Quality of evidence = 3, retrospective cohort study.

b

Model controlled for site, sex, age, educational level, and receiving public assistance.

c

Significant at P < .05.

When the PSQI was examined as a binary variable, participants with a greater number of retrospective ACEs were more likely to have poor sleep quality compared with those with fewer retrospective ACEs, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (adjusted risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42). Prospective ACEs were not found to have a statistically significant association with poor sleep quality as a binary variable.

Discussion

In this cohort of 813 Puerto Rican young adults, retrospective ACEs were significantly associated with poor sleep quality, and prospective ACEs were not significantly associated with poor sleep quality, after controlling for sociodemographic factors. There are several hypotheses that may explain these findings. Research suggests that ACEs are associated with a stress and fear response that can lead to disruption in regular routines and sleep and circadian dysregulation.17 The difference in associations seen with prospective and retrospective ACEs may be due to the fact that prospective ACEs were gathered over the first 11 years of the child’s life, resulting in a gap in reporting during the adolescent period. This gap could explain the appearance of overreporting in young adulthood, which may represent events that occurred during the adolescent period.20 Furthermore, research shows that retrospective ACEs are strongly associated with subjectively measured outcomes, such as the PSQI.21 Participants with retrospective ACEs could have demonstrated more enduring effects of ACEs, resulting in worse sleep outcomes in young adulthood compared with those who did not retrospectively report ACEs.

Strengths and Limitations

There are several strengths to this study. Most studies on ACEs and sleep quality focus on Asian and White populations, but our study diversified the Hispanic or Latino diaspora by focusing on Puerto Ricans. The geographical diversity of this cohort allowed us to examine whether social context may modify the association between ACEs and sleep quality. Furthermore, our study prioritized an understudied age group to highlight the specific circumstances of young adults, which has potential clinical relevance for supporting the pediatric-to-adult transition in medical care. Other strengths of this study include the large sample size, longitudinal design, and high compliance rate at follow-up. This study also contributes to the growing body of evidence that supports the utility of both retrospective and prospective ACEs when assessing overall health.11

Despite these strengths, there are some limitations of our study. Although the PSQI is a validated survey, it is a self-reported measure that has been shown to poorly correlate with objective measures of sleep quality, such as polysomnography.22,23,24 Retrospective ACEs do not capture the exact timing of an event, while prospective ACEs provide a more specific timeline. Recall bias is a consideration when observing the results from the retrospective measures, although research shows no evidence of recall bias in the retrospective assessment.25 There is also the possibility of reporter bias with retrospective ACEs, as the same informant is reporting on the exposure and outcome at the same time. However, reporter bias from retrospective ACEs has been shown to have the potential to both overestimate and underestimate subjective health outcomes, so the association of this bias in our study is indeterminant.21 It is also possible that prospective ACEs are underreported in cases of harm to a child.21 In addition, the ACE questionnaires used in this study give equal weight to each ACE, which does not take into account descriptive measures, such as frequency and chronicity of ACEs. Finally, because our study focused on a population of young adults in 2 urban settings, future studies should exercise caution when generalizing these findings to other demographics.

Conclusions

In this cohort study, Puerto Rican young adults who retrospectively reported higher numbers of ACEs were more likely to have worse sleep quality when controlling for sociodemographic factors, while no significant association was found between prospective ACEs and sleep quality. This study suggests that prospective and retrospective ACEs are important metrics of overall health and may be a useful screening tool for understanding sleep health among young adults. Subsequent studies should include objective measures of sleep quality and weighted ACE questionnaires and should examine specific pathways that may explain the association between ACEs and sleep disturbances.

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Lo K, Woo B, Wong M, Tam W. Subjective sleep quality, blood pressure, and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20(3):592-605. doi: 10.1111/jch.13220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Heart Association. American Heart Association adds sleep to cardiovascular health checklist. June 29, 2022. Accessed September 11, 2023. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/american-heart-association-adds-sleep-to-cardiovascular-health-checklist
  • 3.Kajeepeta S, Gelaye B, Jackson CL, Williams MA. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with adult sleep disorders: a systematic review. Sleep Med. 2015;16(3):320-330. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin L, Wang HH, Lu C, Chen W, Guo VY. Adverse childhood experiences and subsequent chronic diseases among middle-aged or older adults in China and associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2130143. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood: a convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;256(3):174-186. doi: 10.1007/s00406-005-0624-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mersky JP, Topitzes J, Reynolds AJ. Impacts of adverse childhood experiences on health, mental health, and substance use in early adulthood: a cohort study of an urban, minority sample in the U.S. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37(11):917-925. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Slopen N, Shonkoff JP, Albert MA, et al. Racial disparities in child adversity in the U.S.: interactions with family immigration history and income. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.April-Sanders A, Duarte CS, Wang S, et al. Childhood adversity and sleep disturbances: longitudinal results in Puerto Rican children. Int J Behav Med. 2021;28(1):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09873-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maunder RG, Hunter JJ, Tannenbaum DW, Le TL, Lay C. Physicians’ knowledge and practices regarding screening adult patients for adverse childhood experiences: a survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05124-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loveday S, Hall T, Constable L, et al. Screening for adverse childhood experiences in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2022;149(2):e2021051884. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baldwin JR, Reuben A, Newbury JB, Danese A. Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(6):584-593. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Naicker SN, Norris SA, Richter LM. Secondary analysis of retrospective and prospective reports of adverse childhood experiences and mental health in young adulthood: filtered through recent stressors. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;40:101094. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.1 Introduction. In: Committee on Improving the Health, Safety, and Well-Being of Young Adults; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council; Bonnie RJ, Stroud C, Breiner H, eds. Investing in the Health and Well-Being of Young Adults. National Academies Press; 2015. Accessed April 2, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284791/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Nelson MC, Popkin BM. Five-year obesity incidence in the transition period between adolescence and adulthood: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):569-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bird HR, Canino GJ, Davies M, et al. A study of disruptive behavior disorders in Puerto Rican youth, I: background, design, and survey methods. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(9):1032-1041. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000227878.58027.3d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guideline for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-258. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramos-Olazagasti MA, Bird HR, Canino GJ, Duarte CS. Childhood adversity and early initiation of alcohol use in two representative samples of Puerto Rican youth. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(1):28-44. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0575-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Charuvastra A, Cloitre M. Safe enough to sleep: sleep disruptions associated with trauma, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009;18(4):877-891. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reuben A, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, et al. Lest we forget: comparing retrospective and prospective assessments of adverse childhood experiences in the prediction of adult health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(10):1103-1112. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Buysse DJ, Hall ML, Strollo PJ, et al. Relationships between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and clinical/polysomnographic measures in a community sample. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008;4(6):563-571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bertocci MA, Dahl RE, Williamson DE, et al. Subjective sleep complaints in pediatric depression: a controlled study and comparison with EEG measures of sleep and waking. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(11):1158-1166. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000179057.54419.17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aili K, Åström-Paulsson S, Stoetzer U, Svartengren M, Hillert L. Reliability of actigraphy and subjective sleep measurements in adults: the design of sleep assessments. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(1):39-47. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hardt J, Vellaisamy P, Schoon I. Sequelae of prospective versus retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences. Psychol Rep. 2010;107(2):425-440. doi: 10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES