Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2024 Apr 23;24:431. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09189-0

Gut microbial features may influence antiviral IgG levels after vaccination against viral respiratory infectious diseases: the evidence from two-sample bidirectional mendelian randomization

Junlan Tu 1,#, Yidi Wang 1,#, Xiangyu Ye 1, Yifan Wang 2, Yixin Zou 1, Linna Jia 1, Sheng Yang 3, Rongbin Yu 1,, Wei Liu 1,4,, Peng Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC11036767  PMID: 38654203

Abstract

Background

Vaccination is effective in preventing viral respiratory infectious diseases through protective antibodies and the gut microbiome has been proven to regulate human immunity. This study explores the causal correlations between gut microbial features and serum-specific antiviral immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels.

Methods

We conduct a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data to explore the causal relationships between 412 gut microbial features and four antiviral IgG (for influenza A, measles, rubella, and mumps) levels. To make the results more reliable, we used four robust methods and performed comprehensive sensitivity analyses.

Results

The MR analyses revealed 26, 13, 20, and 18 causal associations of the gut microbial features influencing four IgG levels separately. ​Interestingly, ten microbial features, like genus Collinsella, species Bifidobacterium longum, and the biosynthesis of L-alanine have shown the capacity to regulate multiple IgG levels with consistent direction (rise or fall). The ​reverse MR analysis suggested several potential causal associations of IgG levels affecting microbial features.

Conclusions

The human immune response against viral respiratory infectious diseases could be modulated by changing the abundance of gut microbes, which provided new approaches for the intervention of viral respiratory infections.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-024-09189-0.

Keywords: Gut microbial features, Immunoglobulin G, Respiratory infectious disease, Two-sample mendelian randomization analysis, Immunity

Introduction

Respiratory infectious diseases are caused by pathogens like viruses, bacteria, mycoplasma, and chlamydia through respiratory secretions [1]. Pandemics of respiratory infectious diseases often affect many countries or regions and cause large numbers of deaths [2, 3]. Prevention of respiratory infectious diseases continues to be an important public health initiative and vaccines play a critical role in prevention [4]. However, the capacity of protection by vaccination varies among individuals [5, 6]. Vaccines mediate protection by inducing B cells which produce antigen-specific antibodies [7]. When the host contracts a virus or receives a virus-specific vaccine, Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies are secreted from B cells and bind to a variety of pathogens or antigens to avoid infection or provide protection [8, 9]. Previous studies showed that IgG level strongly correlated with the immune response to vaccination, and the IgG level could reflect the protective function of the specific vaccine [10, 11]. Therefore, finding and intervening factors that affect individual IgG levels can improve vaccine protection function and enhance herd immunity.

Several studies have illuminated important roles for the gut microbiota in modulating B cells response that perhaps have important implications for the effects of the microbiota on specific IgG levels [12]. Moreover, the gut microbiota also produces a large number of metabolites that have the potential to adjust immune responses. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) had been shown to increase acetyl-coenzyme A and regulate metabolic sensors to increase oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, and fatty acid synthesis in B cells to support antibody production, and had been shown to enhance the expression of genes involved in plasma cells (effector B cell) differentiation [7]. In addition, gut microbiota could be regulated in a convenient and harmless way through daily diet, probiotics, and prebiotics [13]. Thus, it is necessary to study the specific IgG level of immune response to vaccination against respiratory infectious diseases from the perspective of gut microbiota.

Influenza A, measles, rubella, and mumps caused by viruses are typical respiratory infectious diseases of concern worldwide. In European, the vaccination rates for the four infectious diseases were high, which contributed to the high seroprevalences of these four virus-specific IgG levels [14]. Based on the high seroprevalences, this research had enough sample sizes to explore the causal correlation between gut microbiota and virus-specific IgG levels.

Mendelian randomization (MR), regarding genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to explore the causal correlations between risk factors and diseases, has been widely used in causal inference [15]. Two-sample MR is an MR-based research method applicable to situations where exposure and outcomes are derived from two different populations [16]. Here, we used two-sample MR to illustrate the causal relationships between gut microbiota and serum virus-specific IgG levels of viral respiratory infectious diseases.

Methods

Data collection and processing

The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics of 412 gut microbial features (including 207 microbial taxa and 205 functional pathways) were collected from NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics), which originally came from the Dutch Microbiome Project (DMP), a sub-project of LifeLines in Netherlands, and it investigated feces and phenotype information to assess the impact of different exposures and lifestyles on gut microbial composition using 7738 LifeLines participants [17, 18]. Of these DMP participants, 58.1% were female, mean age was 48.5 years, and mean BMI value was 25.58.

Specifically, the gut microbial taxa were divided according to Taxonomy, using “s_”, “g_”, “f_”, “o_”, “c_”, “p_”, and “k_” to represent species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, and kingdom, respectively. The pathways were identified from the MetaCyc Metabolic Pathways Database (https://metacyc.org/ ), presenting in gut microbes and involving primary and secondary metabolism, as well as associated metabolites, reactions, enzymes, and genes [19]. ​Due to the lengthy names of functional pathways, we chose to use specific abbreviations, the full names of which were given in Supplementary Table S1. We regarded standard deviation (s.d.) as the unit of change of gut microbial features (Supplementary Table S2).

In addition, we estimated the heritability (h2) of all 412 gut microbiome features using linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) (v1.0.1), with the 503 European individuals from the 1000 Genome Project as the reference panel for analysis [20].

We collected four virus-specific immunoglobulins G (IgG) levels datasets (anti-IAV IgG, anti-measles virus IgG, anti-rubella virus IgG, and anti-mumps virus IgG levels) focusing on long-term immunity also from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, and the datasets originally were from 1,000 healthy individuals of the Milieu Interieur (MI) cohort in France [21]. This cohort consisted of 500 males and 500 females, with an age range between 20 and 70 years old. For the four mentioned IgG levels, Elisa or multiplex EIA techniques were used for quantitative detection, and the seroprevalence rate were 77.7%, 88.5%, 93.5%, and 91.2% separately [14]. ​We also used s.d. as the unit of change.

Then, we filtered the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the abovementioned 416 data for subsequent analyses [22, 23]. We retained the SNPs following: (i) on the autosomes (1–22); (ii) minimum allele frequency (MAF) larger than 0.001; (iii) more than 70% of observers had these specific SNPs.

MR analysis

Two-sample MR is a method to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome using only summary statistics from GWAS [24, 25]. We treated the gut microbial features as exposures and the four anti-virus IgG levels as outcomes to conduct a two-sample MR study. Based on the datasets, we followed a strict screening procedure to select IVs in other previous MR studies [26, 27] (Fig. 1). First, we used the suggestive threshold P < 1E-5 to select genetic variations associated with each particular gut microbial feature. Second, we performed the clumping process [linkage disequilibrium (LD) r2 < 0.1, sliding window of 1 Mb] in the reference panel and retained identified LD-independent SNPs. Third, for each respiratory infectious disease, we screened the GWAS database to exclude SNPs associated with a specific IgG level to avoid potential pleiotropy and removed palindromic SNPs. Specifically, if the number of IVs was three or less, we excluded the microbial feature.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The workflow diagram of this study. Plot A lists the detailed steps of two-sample MR in this study mentioned in the method, and Plot B shows how to do two-sample MR bidirectionally. X represents one of 412 microbial features, while Y represents one of 4 IgG levels

To explore the potential causal effects of gut microbial features on the four IgG levels, we performed two-sample MR analyses using the four methods including fixed-effects (IVW (fe)) and multiplicative random-effects inverse variance weighting (IVW (mre)), weighted median (WM), and MR-Egger regression methods in the TwoSampleMR (v0.5.6) R package [2830]. Importantly, we prefer to interpret the results based on the IVW (fe) model without heterogeneity or pleiotropy of IVs [31]. The MR-Egger regression model, where its intercept was used to evaluate the directional pleiotropy of instruments, is preferred in the presence of pleiotropy while the WM method is preferred to account for it in the presence of heterogeneity [32, 33]. As a result, IVW (fe) and MR-Egger regression methods were mainly used to estimate their causal effects with P < 0.05. We also performed false discovery rate (FDR) to adjust the false positive rate.

Sensitivity analysis

First, we used Cochran’s Q test to conduct a heterogeneity test to examine the differences between IVs. We used the P value of Q statistics < 0.05 as the significant level. Second, we performed a pleiotropy test. When there was a statistical difference between the intercept and zero (P < 0.05), horizontal pleiotropy existed. In addition, we performed Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier analysis (MR-PRESSO) to detect and correct the effects from outliers [34].

Reverse-direction MR analysis

We were also concerned about whether these four IgG levels affect the abundance of gut microbial features in humans. We used the same settings as the above-mentioned MR analysis (P = 1.0E-5, r2 = 0.1, and window size = 1 Mb) to select IVs of four antiviral IgG levels (Fig. 1). In addition, we computed the sum of values of variance in phenotype explained (PVE) to assess the explanatory power of IVs, and computed the F statistics following reference to judge whether IVs are strong instruments [35].

Results

Heritability of gut microbial features

Heritability is the proportion of variation in a given gut microbial feature that can be attributed to genetic factors. For all 412 gut microbial features, the median heritability of all features was 5.25%, for example, 22.29% of species Alistipes senegalensis and 19.48% of Aspartate superpathway, while only 0.02% of family Prevotellaceae (Supplementary Table S1). The relative abundance variance of five genera could be explained over 10.00% by their corresponding independent genetic variants, including genus Bifidobacterium (13.05%), Barnesiella (13.00%), Bacteroidales noname (12.08%), Oscillibacter (12.26%) and Subdoligranulum (10.39%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Heritability (h2) of each microbial feature. The bar chart shows the independent genetic variation for 27 common genera explaining their phenotypic variation. Genera are classified by their 5 respective phyla marked in different colors

MR analyses

We calculated the causal effects of the remained various gut microbial features with four anti-virus IgG levels respectively.

Anti-IAV IgG level

It was shown that diverse microbial taxa or functional pathways have different effects on a particular IgG, which manifested as positive or negative causal associations with different effect values. The number of gut microbial features causally associated with anti-IAV IgG level was the largest including 12 taxa and 14 pathways (P < 0.05). The taxa all belonged to the four phyla of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, which were consistent with the fact that these four phyla were the largest of the nine identified phyla of human gut microbiota [36].

Of these 12 microbial taxa, nine had the potential to elevate serum anti-IAV IgG concentration, including genus Bilophila (Inline graphic=0.081, P = 0.04), species Bilophila unclassified (Inline graphic=0.078, P = 0.013), genus Collinsella (Inline graphic=0.076, P = 0.026), genus Ruminococcus (Inline graphic=0.066, P = 0.049), family Veillonellaceae (Inline graphic=0.066, P = 0.010), species Bifidobacterium longum (Inline graphic=0.061, P = 0.035), phylum Bacteroidetes (Inline graphic=0.062, P = 0.023), class Bacteroidia (Inline graphic=0.062, P = 0.023), and order Bacteroidales (Inline graphic=0.062, P = 0.023). The results of the last three taxa were similar perhaps because of their affiliations. While three other taxa may decrease anti-IAV IgG level, including genus Lachnospiraceae noname (Inline graphic=-0.103, P = 0.013), genus Coprococcus (Inline graphic=-0.068, P = 0.022), and species Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3_1_46FAA (Inline graphic=-0.065, P = 0.035) (Fig. 3A; Supplementary Table S3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Causal effects of gut microbial features on anti-IAV IgG and anti-measles virus IgG levels. The forest plots represent the MR estimates beta and 95%CI values of the odds ratio of gut microbial features on different serum anti-IAV IgG (A, B) and anti-measles virus IgG levels (C, D), as estimated using the fixed effect (IVW) two-sample MR or MR-Egger methods

Similar to taxa, seven pathways had positive causal associations with anti-IAV IgG level, for example, the higher functional capacity for inosine 5’-phosphate degradation (PWY-5695) contributed to a higher level of anti-IAV IgG (Inline graphic=0.087, P = 0.007). Nevertheless, an increase functional capacity of seven pathways may lower anti-IAV IgG, such as the capacity of pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis (PANTOSYN-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.115, P = 0.020) with the largest negative effect (Fig. 3B; Supplementary Table S3).

Anti-measles virus IgG

The number of gut microbial features causally associated with anti-measles IgG level was 13, involving five taxa and eight pathways (Fig. 3, C-D; Supplementary Table S4). Not entirely consistent with anti-IAV IgG level, these five taxa did not belong to phylum Bacteroidetes. Four taxa including species Bifidobacterium longum (Inline graphic=0.117, P = 0.007), genus Collinsella (Inline graphic=0.105, P = 0.039), species Desulfovibrio piger (Inline graphic=0.104, P = 0.025), and genus Ruminococcaceae noname (Inline graphic=0.050, P = 0.028) had the potential to increase anti-measles virus IgG level. Only species Coprococcus catus may decrease the titer of anti-measles virus IgG (Inline graphic=-0.114, P = 0.041).

For pathways, the higher functional capacity for L-alanine biosynthesis (PWY0-1061, Inline graphic=0.098, P = 0.024), NAD salvage (PYRIDNUCSAL-PWY, Inline graphic=0.084, P = 0.036), and glycerol degradation to 1,3-propanediol (GOLPDLCAT-PWY, Inline graphic=0.069, P = 0.030) may elevate the level of anti-measles virus IgG. In addition, an increase functional capacity of five pathways could lower anti-measles virus IgG including ppGpp biosynthesis (PPGPPMET-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.744, P = 0.026), purine nucleobases degradation (P164-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.288, P = 0.042), N-acetylneuraminate degradation (P441-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.101, P = 0.031), hexitol fermentation to hexitol fermentation to lactate, formate, ethanol and acetate (P461-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.099, P = 0.022), and purine nucleotides de novo biosynthesis (PWY-841, Inline graphic=-0.092, P = 0.022). Considering the pleiotropy of IVs, the causal effects of P164-PWY (P = 0.031) and PPGPPMET-PWY (P = 0.026) with anti-measles virus IgG were explained by the results of MR-Egger regression method.

Anti-rubella virus IgG

MR analyses showed that three microbial taxa and 17 functional pathways had the potential to influence the anti-rubella virus IgG level (Fig. 4, A-B; Supplementary Table S5). These taxa only involving phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The species Bacteroides intestinalis (Inline graphic=0.116, P = 0.016) and genus Ruminococcaceae noname (Inline graphic=0.067, P = 0.045) perhaps had a positive impact on increasing anti-rubella virus IgG level while the species Eubacterium hallii (Inline graphic=-0.104, P = 0.024) had a negative impact on this IgG level.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Causal effects of gut microbial features on anti-rubella virus IgG and anti-mumps virus IgG levels. The forest plots represent the MR estimates beta and 95%CI values of the OR of gut microbial features on anti-rubella virus IgG (A, B) and anti-mumps virus IgG levels (C, D), as estimated using the fixed effect (IVW) or MR-Egger method

The pathways positively correlated with anti-rubella virus IgG were almost biosynthesis pathways, such as L-threonine biosynthesis (THRESYN-PWY,Inline graphic=0.142, P = 0.043), palmitate biosynthesis (PWY-5971,Inline graphic=0.130, P = 0.042), and L-glutamate and L-glutamine biosynthesis (PWY-5505,Inline graphic=0.111, P = 0.014). An increase functional capacity of other eight pathways may decrease anti-measles virus IgG level mainly about biosynthesis or degradation pathways, like purine nucleotides de novo biosynthesis (PWY-841,Inline graphic=-0.213, P = 0.002), and glycogen degradation (GLYCOCAT-PWY,Inline graphic=-0.130, P = 0.035). Given that there was pleiotropy of IVs (P = 0.048), we used MR-Egger regression method to show the causal effect between the capacity of a kind of heme biosynthesis (HEMESYN2-PWY) and the anti-rubella virus IgG level.

Anti-mumps virus IgG

Five taxa and 13 functional pathways may adjust anti-mumps virus IgG (Fig. 4, C-D; Supplementary Table S6). Similar to anti-rubella virus IgG, these taxa also belonged to phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. In which, the rise abundance of genus Subdoligranulum (Inline graphic=0.410, P = 0.015), species Bacteroides ovatus (Inline graphic=0.274, P = 0.025), family Lachnospiraceae (Inline graphic=0.083, P = 0.017) and species Eubacterium rectale (Inline graphic=0.077, P = 0.022) may contribute to a higher serum anti-mumps virus IgG. However, species Ruminococcus callidus (Inline graphic=-0.063, P = 0.028) perhaps decrease it.

Moreover, several pathways including L-methionine biosynthesis (PWY-5345, Inline graphic=0.464, P = 0.039), D-galactose degradation (PWY66-422, Inline graphic=0.084, P = 0.042), purine nucleobases degradation (P164-PWY, Inline graphic=0.073, P = 0.001), L-rhamnose degradation (RHAMCAT-PWY, Inline graphic=0.072, P = 0.027), and pyrimidine ribonucleosides degradation (PWY-7209, Inline graphic=0.065, P = 0.008) could up-regulate the concentrate of anti-mumps virus IgG in serum. On the contrary, a high capacity of several functional pathways like phospholipid biosynthesis in bacteria (PHOSLIPSYN-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.315, P = 0.044), purine nucleotides de novo biosynthesis (PWY-841, Inline graphic=-0.085, P = 0.008), L-arginine biosynthesis in archaebacteria (PWY-7400, Inline graphic=-0.077, P = 0.025), and enterobacterial common antigen biosynthesis (ECASYN-PWY, Inline graphic=-0.038, P = 0.020) played a role in lowering anti-mumps virus IgG. Since the pleiotropy of IVs presented, we selected MR-Egger regression method to access the causal relationships between Subdoligranulum (P = 0.022), Bacteroides ovatus (P = 0.029), L-methionine biosynthesis pathways (P = 0.046) and anti-mumps virus IgG.

Overlapping gut microbial features in the MR analyses

If we identify some common microbial traits that modulate different IgG levels, altering the abundance of specific microbial taxa or pathways was an excellent way to increase antiviral IgG levels simultaneously. Interestingly, ten certain microbial taxa or functional pathways were causally associated with multiple serum-specific antiviral IgG levels (Table 1). Both genus Collinsella and species Bifidobacterium longum were positively correlated with anti-IAV IgG and anti-measles virus IgG. The genus Ruminococcaceae noname was causally correlated with anti-measles virus IgG and anti-rubella virus IgG. In addition, seven pathways were positively or negatively associated with multiple anti-virus IgG levels, in which, a higher function capacity of purine nucleotides de novo biosynthesis (PWY-841) could decrease anti-measles virus IgG, anti-rubella virus IgG, and anti-mumps virus IgG levels at the same time. Moreover, the improvements in the L-alanine biosynthesis and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) salvage (PWY0-1061 and PYRIDNUCSAL-PWY) also could increase in these IgG levels.

Table 1.

Overlapping of forwarding causal associations between gut microbial features and antiviral IgG levels

Exposure Outcome Fixed-effect
IVW
Random-effect IVW Weighted median MR-Egger Heterogeneity Pleiotropy
P (IVW) P (MR Egger) P value
g_Collinsella anti-IAV IgG 1.079(1.009,1.153) 1.079(0.997,1.167) 1.048(0.954,1.152) 1.082(0.639,1.835) 0.197 0.131 0.99
anti-measles virus IgG 1.11(1.005,1.226) 1.11(1.067,1.155) 1.107(0.978,1.253) 0.969(0.521,1.801) 0.993 0.988 0.677
s_Bifidobacterium_longum anti-IAV IgG 1.063(1.004,1.125) 1.063(1.013,1.116) 1.063(0.987,1.145) 1.015(0.774,1.33) 0.69 0.605 0.741
anti-measles virus IgG 1.124(1.032,1.224) 1.124(1.019,1.24) 1.102(0.977,1.244) 1.269(0.781,2.063) 0.211 0.167 0.629
g_Ruminococcaceae_noname anti-measles virus IgG 1.051(1.005,1.099) 1.051(1.019,1.084) 1.06(1,1.124) 1.081(0.852,1.372) 0.862 0.792 0.82
anti-rubella virus IgG 1.069(1.001,1.142) 1.069(0.993,1.152) 1.034(0.944,1.133) 0.895(0.598,1.339) 0.258 0.245 0.412
PWY0-1061 anti-IAV IgG 1.062(1.003,1.125) 1.062(1.005,1.123) 1.073(0.996,1.156) 1.144(0.866,1.511) 0.462 0.381 0.615
anti-measles virus IgG 1.103(1.013,1.201) 1.103(1.042,1.167) 1.1(0.984,1.23) 1.208(0.809,1.804) 0.874 0.82 0.666
PWY-6690 anti-IAV IgG 0.956(0.919,0.994) 0.956(0.927,0.986) 0.97(0.923,1.02) 1.085(0.891,1.322) 0.689 0.841 0.268
anti-rubella virus IgG 0.909(0.83,0.995) 0.909(0.771,1.071) 0.973(0.838,1.13) 0.5(0.274,0.915) 0.01 0.125 0.142
PWY-841 anti-measles virus IgG 0.912(0.835,0.995) 0.912(0.838,0.992) 0.912(0.811,1.027) 0.633(0.428,0.938) 0.499 0.754 0.095
anti-rubella virus IgG 0.808(0.708,0.922) 0.808(0.689,0.948) 0.813(0.674,0.981) 0.651(0.322,1.318) 0.159 0.13 0.554
anti-mumps virus IgG 0.919(0.863,0.978) 0.919(0.869,0.972) 0.909(0.836,0.988) 1.034(0.779,1.371) 0.625 0.602 0.424
PYRIDNUCSAL-PWY anti-measles virus IgG 1.087(1.005,1.176) 1.087(1.02,1.159) 1.114(1.002,1.238) 0.836(0.555,1.259) 0.748 0.831 0.236
anti-rubella virus IgG 1.154(1.033,1.29) 1.154(1.048,1.272) 1.155(0.999,1.336) 1.713(0.873,3.36) 0.652 0.703 0.278
PWY-7446 anti-IAV IgG 0.952(0.919,0.986) 0.952(0.908,0.998) 0.937(0.89,0.985) 0.847(0.661,1.086) 0.101 0.108 0.39
anti-mumps virus IgG 0.963(0.929,0.998) 0.963(0.939,0.988) 0.974(0.933,1.018) 1.1(0.921,1.313) 0.82 0.966 0.184
P164-PWY anti-measles virus IgG 1.012(0.953,1.075) 1.012(0.949,1.079) 0.998(0.919,1.083) 0.75(0.59,0.952) 0.341 0.857 0.031
anti-mumps virus IgG 1.076(1.031,1.123) 1.076(1.038,1.116) 1.049(0.99,1.111) 1.029(0.867,1.22) 0.716 0.656 0.607
PWY-HEME-BIOSYNTHESIS-II anti-rubella virus IgG 0.867(0.777,0.968) 0.867(0.767,0.98) 0.831(0.713,0.969) 1.064(0.705,1.607) 0.267 0.275 0.335
anti-mumps virus IgG 0.934(0.886,0.985) 0.934(0.882,0.99) 0.946(0.874,1.024) 0.886(0.716,1.096) 0.273 0.225 0.624

As can be seen, the directions of associations of any microbial features with different IgG levels were consistent, contributing to the rise or fall of IgG levels, except a pathway of purine nucleobases degradation (P164-PWY). ​We suspected that the discordance may be caused by fewer IVs of this pathway and different choices of MR methods.

Reverse MR analysis

Using anti-IAV IgG, anti-measles virus IgG, anti-rubella virus IgG, and anti-mumps virus IgG as exposure, we extracted 12, 11, 10, and six SNPs as IVs. The sum of values of PVE was 10.6%, 6.6%, 7.7%, and 5.1%. ​The F statistics of the IVs screened for the four IgG levels were all above 10, indicating that these IVs are strong instruments (Supplementary Table S7).

After reverse MR analyses, we found 24, 16, 20, and 10 gut microbial features affected by these four IgG levels respectively (Supplementary File: Figure S1 and S2) In addition, we identified five taxa (phylum Verrucomicrobia, species Parabacteroides merdae, Alistipes finegoldii, Eubacterium eligens, and Bacteroides plebeius) without any pathway that could be affected by more than one IgG levels (Table 2).

Table 2.

Overlapping of potential reverse causal associations between antiviral IgG levels and gut microbial features

Exposure Outcome Fixed-effect
IVW
Random-effect IVW Weighted median MR-Egger Heterogeneity Pleiotropy
P(IVW) P (MR Egger) P value
anti-IAV IgG p_Verrucomicrobia 0.727(0.534,0.989) 0.727(0.614,0.861) 0.685(0.472,0.993) 1.332(0.219,8.094) 0.975 0.972 0.523
anti-rubella virus IgG 1.159(1.001,1.343) 1.159(0.993,1.353) 1.215(0.986,1.498) 0.869(0.43,1.754) 0.355 0.326 0.437
anti-IAV IgG s_Parabacteroides_merdae 1.385(1.028,1.865) 1.385(1.04,1.845) 1.189(0.802,1.763) 1.602(0.354,7.252) 0.505 0.415 0.851
anti-measles virus IgG 1.374(1.126,1.677) 1.374(1.059,1.783) 1.271(0.922,1.752) 1.683(0.625,4.535) 0.073 0.053 0.686
anti-IAV IgG s_Alistipes_finegoldii 1.413(1.071,1.865) 1.413(1.071,1.864) 1.279(0.861,1.9) 0.678(0.169,2.724) 0.443 0.451 0.318
anti-mumps virus IgG 1.544(1.07,2.229) 1.544(1.112,2.145) 1.462(0.904,2.365) 2.169(0.215,21.854) 0.524 0.374 0.789
anti-rubella virus IgG s_Eubacterium_eligens 1.205(1.045,1.389) 1.205(1.086,1.338) 1.167(0.968,1.407) 1.602(0.852,3.012) 0.829 0.837 0.395
anti-mumps virus IgG 1.523(1.043,2.225) 1.523(0.927,2.504) 1.193(0.684,2.081) 6.097(0.254,146.094) 0.142 0.138 0.45
anti-rubella virus IgG s_Bacteroides_plebeius 0.757(0.576,0.995) 0.757(0.63,0.911) 0.742(0.526,1.047) 0.401(0.119,1.349) 0.888 0.925 0.327
anti-mumps virus IgG 2.111(1.023,4.356) 2.111(0.985,4.525) 2.99(1.087,8.229) 0.063(0.001,5.133) 0.351 0.59 0.211

Discussion

This study performed comprehensive two-sample MR analyses to reveal the causal relationships between gut microbial features and antiviral IgG levels. Importantly, these inferred relationships were proved to be robust through various sensitivity analyses.

Previous studies have showed that some taxa influenced human immune system such as Bacteroidetes which could stimulate the innate immune system and Ruminococcus which contributed to upregulate immunity by producing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), supporting the results of these taxa had positive effect on anti-IAV IgG in this study [37, 38]. In addition, we found that species Desulfovibrio piger may increase serum anti-measles virus IgG level. In fact, Desulfovibrio piger was the most common sulfate-reducing bacteria in healthy adults, and positively associated with beneficial genera like Bacteroides and Ruminococcus [39, 40]. For another, species Coprococcus catus had a negative impact on anti-measles virus IgG level, and it has proved to generate propanoic acid (a SCFAs) which had immunomodulatory properties [41, 42]. Subdoligranulum has been proved to simulate TH17 cell expansion and serum specific IgG [43]. Bacteroides ovatus was not only previously reported to modulate intestinal immunity, but also correlated with the host genetic variant [44, 45]. Lachnospiraceae of gut bacteria are abundant in healthy humans, and influence the hosts by producing SCFAs, converting bile acids, and facilitating colonization resistance against specific pathogens [46].

Interestingly, we also found ten microbial features could simultaneously regulate multiple antiviral IgG levels, such as genus Collinsella, Ruminococcaceae noname, and species Bifidobacterium longum, which will provide a reference for preventing different respiratory infectious diseases by adjusting same gut microbial traits. Previous studies have shown that Collinsela was one of the core microbiotas in healthy people, and a lower abundance of Collinsela predicted a higher respiratory infectious disease mortality [47]. Bifidobacterium longum has also attracted considerable attention among gut bacteria. In a double-blind study, Bifidobacterium longum stimulated immune function in 45 elderly hospitalized patients who had received influenza vaccines [48]. These surveys supported our findings of a high abundance of Collinsela and Bifidobacterium longum could enhance human immunity by elevating antibody concentrations. Moreover, this study confirmed that the functional capacity of microbial pathways, especially those involved in nucleotide and amino acid synthesis, may also affect the long-term immunity levels against respiratory infectious diseases.

The reverse MR analyses illuminated that human immune capacity also had an impact on the abundance of gut microbial features. However, the specific mechanism under antiviral antibodies regulate microbes was still unclear.

While our data-driven approach highlighted the potential of MR to uncover associations between microbiota and immune indicators, we should be cautious about the causalities. There were some limitations of this study that should be considered. First, similar to other MR studies, we have assumed linear relationships between gut microbial features and antiviral IgG levels in the MR model [49]. Nonetheless, we could not rule out the possibility that the relationships between gut microbial features and IgG levels were actually non-linear. Second, gender and age are the most common confounding factors in epidemiology, but we were unable to use GWAS summary data for stratified analyses to estimate and validate specific causal effects by gender or age stage. Besides, although MR design used genetic variants as IVs to minimize the effects of environmental confounding factors, it still cannot completely remove the confounding bias. Third, part of the microbial features in this study utilized few SNPs as IVs, resulting in a limited ability to identify causal relationships. Fourth, we performed FDR correction for P values, and used a nominal significance level of 0.05. If there are larger sample GWAS data available in the future, the relationship between gut microbiome and IgG level may become more significant after correction.

Conclusions

This study has identified causal relationships between certain gut microbial features and serum-specific antiviral IgG levels. The results added new evidence for the influence of gut microbes on the human immune system, which provides a reference for enhancing population immunity to prevent respiratory infectious diseases after vaccination by adjusting gut microbes from a clinical and public health perspective.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (513.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (2.6MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

IAV

Influenza A virus

IgG

Immunoglobulin G

IVW

Inverse variance weighted

WM

Weighted-median

GWAS

Genome-wide association study

MR

Mendelian randomization

IVs

Instrumental variables

DMP

Dutch Microbiome Project

MI

Milieu Interieur

S/CO

Signal/cut-off ratio

IA

Index Antibody

H2

Heritability

LD

Linkage disequilibrium

LDSC

Linkage disequilibrium score regression

MAF

Minimum allele frequency

CI

Confidence interval

MR-PRESSO

Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum analysis

PVE

Variance in phenotype explain

FDR

False discovery rate

Author contributions

R.Y. and P.H. designed the study. Y.Z., L.J. and Y.W. (Yifan Wang) performed datasets download and quality control. J.T., S.Y. and X.Y. carried out data analyzing and interpretation. J.T. and Y.W. (Yidi Wang) wrote the draft manuscript. Y.W. (Yidi Wang), R.Y., W.L. and P.H. reviewed and revised the article. All the authors accepted the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82173585 and 82273741], the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [grant number 21KJB330005, 22KJB330007], the Nanjing Major Science and Technology Project [grant number 2021–11005], and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Data availability

The summary statistics of 412 gut microbial features (Study accession numbers: GCST90027446-GCST90027857) and four anti-viral IgG level (Study accession numbers: GCST006350-GCST006353) used in this article could be downloaded from NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics ). The main data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/ Supplementary File, and Supplementary Tables, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

This manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Junlan Tu, Yidi Wang authors contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Rongbin Yu, Email: rongbinyu@njmu.edu.cn.

Wei Liu, Email: liuwei@bmi.ac.cn.

Peng Huang, Email: huangpeng@njmu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Bourouiba L. Fluid Dynamics of Respiratory Infectious diseases. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;23:547–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-111820-025044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hübschen JM, Gouandjika-Vasilache I, Dina J, Measles Lancet. 2022;399(10325):678–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Winter AK, Moss WJ, Rubella Lancet. 2022;399(10332):1336–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02691-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Orenstein WA, Ahmed R. Simply put: Vaccination saves lives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(16):4031–3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704507114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flanagan KL, Fink AL, Plebanski M, Klein SL. Sex and gender differences in the Outcomes of Vaccination over the Life Course. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017;33:577–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Factors that influence the Immune response to vaccination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(2). 10.1128/CMR.00084-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Kim M, Qie Y, Park J, Kim CH. Gut microbial metabolites fuel host antibody responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(2):202–14. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valenzuela NM, Schaub S. The Biology of IgG subclasses and their clinical relevance to transplantation. Transplantation. 2018;102(1). 10.1097/TP.0000000000001816. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Wang TT, Ravetch JV. Functional diversification of IgGs through fc glycosylation. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(9):3492–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI130029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montoya JG, Adams AE, Bonetti V, Deng S, Link NA, Pertsch S, Olson K, Li M, Dillon EC, Frosch DL. Differences in IgG antibody responses following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(3):e0116221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01162-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miyazaki H, Yamanaka G, Furukawa K, Ichiki M. Effect of vaccine program on IgG antibody titers for measles, rubella, varicella, and mumps in young adults in Japan: survey between 2018 and 2021. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28(10):1410–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.New JS, Dizon BLP, Fucile CF, Rosenberg AF, Kearney JF, King RG. Neonatal exposure to commensal-Bacteria-derived antigens directs polysaccharide-specific B-1 B cell Repertoire Development. Immunity. 2020;53(1). 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Zmora N, Suez J, Elinav E. You are what you eat: diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(1):35–56. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scepanovic P, Alanio C, Hammer C, Hodel F, Bergstedt J, Patin E, Thorball CW, Chaturvedi N, Charbit B, Abel L, et al. Human genetic variants and age are the strongest predictors of humoral immune responses to common pathogens and vaccines. Genome Med. 2018;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0568-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu F, Huang Y, Hu J, Shao Z. Mendelian randomization study of inflammatory bowel disease and bone mineral density. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01778-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sanna S, van Zuydam NR, Mahajan A, Kurilshikov A, Vich Vila A, Võsa U, Mujagic Z, Masclee AAM, Jonkers DMAE, Oosting M, et al. Causal relationships among the gut microbiome, short-chain fatty acids and metabolic diseases. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):600–5. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0350-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lopera-Maya EA, Kurilshikov A, van der Graaf A, Hu S, Andreu-Sánchez S, Chen L, Vila AV, Gacesa R, Sinha T, Collij V, et al. Effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome in 7,738 participants of the Dutch Microbiome Project. Nat Genet. 2022;54(2):143–51. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00992-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scholtens S, Smidt N, Swertz MA, Bakker SJL, Dotinga A, Vonk JM, van Dijk F, van Zon SKR, Wijmenga C, Wolffenbuttel BHR, et al. Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1172–80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Torbica A, Radosavljević M, Belović M, Djukić N, Marković S. Overview of nature, frequency and technological role of dietary fibre from cereals and pseudocereals from grain to bread. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;290:119470. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Patin E, Hasan M, Bergstedt J, Rouilly V, Libri V, Urrutia A, Alanio C, Scepanovic P, Hammer C, Jönsson F, et al. Natural variation in the parameters of innate immune cells is preferentially driven by genetic factors. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(3):302–14. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang S, Zhou X. Accurate and scalable construction of polygenic scores in Large Biobank Data Sets. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(5):679–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang S, Zhou X. PGS-server: accuracy, robustness and transferability of polygenic score methods for biobank scale studies. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23(2). 10.1093/bib/bbac039. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Zeng P, Wang T, Zheng J, Zhou X. Causal association of type 2 diabetes with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: new evidence from mendelian randomization using GWAS summary statistics. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chauquet S, Zhu Z, O’Donovan MC, Walters JTR, Wray NR, Shah S. Association of Antihypertensive Drug Target genes with Psychiatric disorders: a mendelian randomization study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(6):623–31. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang P, Hou Y, Zou Y, Ye X, Yu R, Yang S. The Causal effects of primary biliary cholangitis on thyroid dysfunction: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2021;12:791778. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.791778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang P, Zou Y, Zhang X, Ye X, Wang Y, Yu R, Yang S. The Causal effects of Insomnia on Bipolar Disorder, Depression, and Schizophrenia: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2021;12:763259. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.763259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou H, Zhang Y, Liu J, Yang Y, Fang W, Hong S, Chen G, Zhao S, Zhang Z, Shen J, et al. Education and lung cancer: a mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(3):743–50. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gu X, Dou M, Cao B, Jiang Z, Chen Y. Peripheral level of CD33 and Alzheimer’s disease: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):427. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02205-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Burgess S, Foley CN, Allara E, Staley JR, Howson JMM. A robust and efficient method for mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):376. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14156-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013;37(7):658–65. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):512–25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some Invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Verbanck M, Chen C-Y, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(5):693–8. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang K, Shi X, Zhu Z, Hao X, Chen L, Cheng S, Foo RSY, Wang C. Mendelian randomization analysis of 37 clinical factors and coronary artery disease in east Asian and European populations. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01067-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martens EC, Neumann M, Desai MS. Interactions of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms with the intestinal mucosal barrier. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(8):457–70. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0036-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Du C-T, Gao W, Ma K, Yu S-X, Li N, Yan S-Q, Zhou F-H, Liu Z-Z, Chen W, Lei L-C, et al. MicroRNA-146a Deficiency protects against Listeria monocytogenes infection by modulating the gut microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4). 10.3390/ijms19040993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Xia T, Duan W, Zhang Z, Li S, Zhao Y, Geng B, Zheng Y, Yu J, Wang M. Polyphenol-rich vinegar extract regulates intestinal microbiota and immunity and prevents alcohol-induced inflammation in mice. Food Res Int. 2021;140:110064. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rey FE, Gonzalez MD, Cheng J, Wu M, Ahern PP, Gordon JI. Metabolic niche of a prominent sulfate-reducing human gut bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(33):13582–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312524110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen Y-R, Jing Q-L, Chen F-L, Zheng H, Chen L-D. Yang Z-C. is not always associated with adverse health effects in the Guangdong gut Microbiome Project. PeerJ. 2021;9:e12033. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.El Hage R, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Calatayud Arroyo M, Props R, Van de Wiele T. Propionate-Producing Consortium restores antibiotic-Induced Dysbiosis in a dynamic model of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1206. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Duscha A, Gisevius B, Hirschberg S, Yissachar N, Stangl GI, Eilers E, Bader V, Haase S, Kaisler J, David C, et al. Propionic Acid shapes the multiple sclerosis Disease Course by an Immunomodulatory mechanism. Cell. 2020;180(6). 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Chriswell ME, Lefferts AR, Clay MR, Hsu AR, Seifert J, Feser ML, Rims C, Bloom MS, Bemis EA, Liu S, et al. Clonal IgA and IgG autoantibodies from individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis identify an arthritogenic strain of. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(668):eabn5166. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn5166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang C, Mogno I, Contijoch EJ, Borgerding JN, Aggarwala V, Li Z, Siu S, Grasset EK, Helmus DS, Dubinsky MC, et al. Fecal IgA levels are determined by strain-level differences in Bacteroides ovatus and are modifiable by gut microbiota manipulation. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27(3). 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Cheng M, Ge X, Zhong C, Fu R, Ning K, Xu S. Micro-coevolution of host genetics with gut microbiome in three Chinese ethnic groups. J Genet Genomics. 2021;48(11):972–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sorbara MT, Littmann ER, Fontana E, Moody TU, Kohout CE, Gjonbalaj M, Eaton V, Seok R, Leiner IM, Pamer EG. Functional and genomic variation between human-derived isolates of Lachnospiraceae reveals Inter- and intra-species diversity. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(1). 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Hirayama M, Nishiwaki H, Hamaguchi T, Ito M, Ueyama J, Maeda T, Kashihara K, Tsuboi Y, Ohno K. Intestinal Collinsella may mitigate infection and exacerbation of COVID-19 by producing ursodeoxycholate. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0260451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Akatsu H, Iwabuchi N, Xiao J-Z, Matsuyama Z, Kurihara R, Okuda K, Yamamoto T, Maruyama M. Clinical effects of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on immune function and intestinal microbiota in elderly patients receiving enteral tube feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2013;37(5):631–40. doi: 10.1177/0148607112467819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zeng P, Zhou X. Causal effects of blood lipids on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a mendelian randomization study. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(4):688–97. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (513.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (2.6MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The summary statistics of 412 gut microbial features (Study accession numbers: GCST90027446-GCST90027857) and four anti-viral IgG level (Study accession numbers: GCST006350-GCST006353) used in this article could be downloaded from NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics ). The main data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/ Supplementary File, and Supplementary Tables, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES