Abstract
Nylon-wool-eluted lymphocytes, isolated from a site of tumor rejection in Balb/c mice expressing concomitant tumor immunity, were examined for their ability to inhibit the growth of the EMT6 tumor. Tumor growth inhibition was monitored after co-inoculation of lymphocytes and tumor cells into naive mice in a Winn-type adoptive-transfer assay. A pre-implanted gelatin sponge was employed to capture the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Mice harboring primary tumors were implanted 8 days later with gelatin sponges. The pre-implanted sponges were then inoculated with a secondary tumor challenge 2 days after implantation of the sponge (i.e. 10 days after primary tumor challenge). On day 17 (7 days after secondary tumor challenge), the immune sponges were retrieved, digested in collagenase and the T lymphocytes were isolated using a nylon-wool column. Blank sponges (lacking tumor cells), obtained from primary-tumor-bearing or non-tumor-bearing animals, were included for comparison. The data showed that T lymphocytes isolated from immune sponges inhibited tumor growth while T lymphocytes recovered from blank sponges did not. At an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 10:1 the lymphocytes from the immune sponges were able to prevent totally the growth of tumors in all cases (100% inhibition). This ability was reduced (60% inhibition) at an E:T ratio of 1:1. Comparison of the antitumor activites of the immune-sponge-derived cells with those from the spleen of the same animal revealed the superiority of the former. Depletion of immune-sponge-derived cells with anti-Thy1.2, anti-Lyt2.2 or anti-L3T4 and complement resulted in a marked decrease in tumor-inhibitory activity. These results indicate that T lymphocytes, expressing Thy1.2, Lyt2.2 or L3T4 antigens, are involved in conferring protection to Balb/c mice against the EMT6 tumor.
Keywords: Primary Tumor, Tumor Growth, Gelatin, Collagenase, Inhibit Tumor Growth
References
- 1.Akporiaye ET, Stewart S, Stewart CC. Cultivation of murine bone marrow macrophages in sponges: a method that permits recovery of viable cultured cells. J Immunol Methods. 1984;75:149. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90234-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akporiaye ET, Stewart SJ, Stevenson AP, Stewart CC. A gelatin sponge model for studying tumor growth: flow cytometric analysis and quantitation of leukocytes and tumor cells in the EMT6 mouse tumor. Cancer Res. 1985;45:6457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Akporiaye ET, Kudalore M, Stevenson AP, Kraemer PM, Stewart CC. Isolation and reactivity of host effectors associated with the manifestation of concomitant tumor immunity. Cancer Res. 1988;48:1153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fuyama S, Yamamoto H, Fujii Y, Arai S. Mechanisms of in vivo generation of cytotoxic effector cells against tumor in tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 1986;46:5548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gorelik E, Kedar E, Sredni E, Heberman R. In vivo anti-tumor effects of local adoptive transfer of mouse and human cultured lymphoid cells. Int J Cancer. 1981;28:164. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910280208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hopt UT, Sullivan W. Migration and cell recruiting activity of specifically sensitized lymphocytes in sponge matrix allografts. Transplantation. 1980;30:411. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198012000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Julius MH, Simpson E, Herzenberg LA. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973;3:645. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.North RJ, Bursuker I. Generation and decay of the immune response to a progressive fibrosarcoma. I. Lyl+2− suppressor T-cells down regulate the generation of Lyl−2+ effector T-cells. J Exp Med. 1984;159:1295. doi: 10.1084/jem.159.5.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.North RJ, Kirstein DP. T-cell-mediated concomitant immunity to unrelated tumors and bacterial parasites. J Exp Med. 1977;145:275. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roberts PJ, Häyry P. Songe matrix allografts. A model for analysis of killer cells infiltrating mouse allografts. Transplantation. 1976;21:437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rockwell SC, Kallman RF, Fajordo LF. Characteristics of a serially transplanted mouse mammary tumor and its tissue-culture-adapted derivative. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972;49:735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Press Ames; 1980. p. 115. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stewart CC, Beetham KL. Cytocidal activity and proliferative ability of macrophages infiltrating the EMT6 tumor. Int J Cancer. 1978;22:152. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910220208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vallera DA, Mentzer SJ, Maizer SE. Tumor sponge implantation: an in vivo method for studying syngeneic, primary, antitumor lymphocyte responses. Cancer Res. 1982;42:1982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]