Skip to main content
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII logoLink to Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII
. 1989 Apr;28(4):241–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00205232

Failure of specific adoptive immunotherapy owing to survival and outgrowth of variant cells

David L Hines 1
PMCID: PMC11038440  PMID: 2495177

Abstract

Adoptive immunotherapy, the transfer of spleen cells from immunized mice to mice with a small tumor, was usually curative for mice with the P815 mastocytoma provided that steps were taken to prevent the generation of tumor-induced suppressor cells in the recipient animal. However, failure of adoptive immunotherapy of the P815 tumor, resulting in regrowth of either the primary intradermal or a metastatic tumor, was observed in 10 out of 112 animals receiving graded doses of 7.5×107 to 3.0×108 immune spleen cells. Examination of the ten tumors in mice that failed to respond to therapy revealed that seven of them were significantly less susceptible than the original P815 tumor to rejection in vivo by transferred anti-P815-specific effector cells. In addition, nine of the ten therapy-failure tumors were also less susceptible than the original P815 tumor to lysis in vitro by P815-specific, but not DBA/2-specific, cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Sensitivity to lysis by tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells was not, however, strongly correlated with sensitivity to rejection in vivo by P815-specific effector spleen cells. Neither in vivo sensitivity to rejection, nor sensitivity to cytotoxic T cells, was correlated with alterations in class I major histocompatibility complex antigen expression. These results suggest that the survival and outgrowth of variant tumor cells was frequently the cause of failure of specific adoptive immunotherapy of the P815 tumor, and that selection for cells with a reduced sensitivity to killing by cytotoxic T cells was only one mechanism that might lead to an immunotherapeutic failure.

Keywords: Major Histocompatibility Complex, Effector Cell, Spleen Cell, Small Tumor, Antigen Expression

Footnotes

This work was supported by a grant from RJR Nabisco Inc., a grant from the J. M. Foundation, and by USPHS grant CA-40597 awarded by the National Cancer Institute

References

  • 1.Berendt MJ, North RJ. T-cell-mediated suppression of anti-tumor immunity. An explanation for progressive growth of an immunogeneic tumor. J Exp Med. 1980;151:69. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bosslet K, Schirrmacher V. Escape of metastasizing clonal tumor cell variants from tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1981;154:557. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheever MA, Greenberg PD, Fefer A. Specificity of adoptive chemoimmunotherapy of established syngeneic tumors. J Immunol. 1980;125:711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheever MA, Greenberg PD, Fefer A. Specific adoptive therapy of established leukemia with syngeneic lymphocytes sequentially immunized in vivo and in vitro and non-specifically expanded by culture with interleukin 2. J Immunol. 1981;126:1318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheever MA, Greenberg PD, Fefer A. Potential for specific cancer therapy with immune T lymphocytes. J Biol Response Mod. 1984;3:113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chou T, Chang AE, Shu S. Generation of therapeutic T lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice by in vitro sensitization. Culture requirements and characterization of immunologic specificity. J Immunol. 1987;140:1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Daily MO, Fathman CG, Butcher EC, Pillemer E, Weissman I. Abnormal migration of T lymphocyte clones. J Immunol. 1982;128:2134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dye ES, North RJ. T cell-mediated immunosuppression as an obstacle to adoptive immunotherapy of the P815 mastocytoma and its metastases. J Exp Med. 1981;154:1033. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.4.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dye ES, North RJ. Specificity of the T cells that mediate and suppress adoptive immunotherapy of established tumors. J Leukocyte Biol. 1984;36:27. doi: 10.1002/jlb.36.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dye ES, North RJ, Mills CD. Mechanisms of anti-tumor action of Corynebacterium parvum. I. Potentiated tumor-specific immunity and its therapeutic limitations. J Exp Med. 1981;154:609. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fahey JR, Hines DL. Progressive growth of immunogenic tumors: relationship between susceptibility of ascites P815 tumor cells to T-cell-mediated lysis and immune destructive in vivo . Cancer Res. 1987;47:4759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fernandez-Cruz E, Halliburton B, Feldman JD. In vivo elimination by specific effector cells of an established syngeneic rat Moloney virus-induced sarcoma. J Immunol. 1979;123:1772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979;63:1727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Greenberg PD, Kern DE, Cheever MA. Therapy of disseminated murine leukemia with cyclophosphamide and immune Lyt-1+, 2− T cells. Tumor eradication does not require participation of cytoxic T cells. J Exp Med. 1985;161:1122. doi: 10.1084/jem.161.5.1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hines DL. Differentiation of Abelson murine leukemia virus-infected promonocytic leukemia cells. Int J Cancer. 1985;36:233. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910360216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hines DL. Comparison of tumor-associated transplantation antigens of sublines of methylcholanthrene-induced murine tumors passaged separately for over a decade. Cancer Res. 1986;46:4921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kedar F, Weiss DW. The in vitro generation of effector lymphocytes and their employment in tumor immunotherapy. Adv Cancer Res. 1983;38:171. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60190-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lukacher AE, Morrison LA, Bracile VL, Malissen B, Braciale TJ. Expression of specific cytolytic activity by H-2I region-restricted, influenza virus-specific T lymphocyte clones. J Exp Med. 1985;162:171. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller FR. Intratumor immunologic heterogeneity. Cancer Methods Rev. 1982;1:319.20. doi: 10.1007/BF00124215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mills CD, North RJ. Expression of passively transferred immunity against an established tumor depends on the generation of cytolytic T cells in recipient. Inhibition by suppressor cells. J Exp Med. 1983;157:1448. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.5.1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mills CD, North RJ, Dye ES. Mechanisms of anti-tumor altion of Corynebacterium parvum. II. Potentiated cytolytic T cell response and its tumor-induced suppression. J Exp Med. 1981;154:621. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.North RJ. Cyclophosphamide-facilitated adoptive immunotherapy of an established tumor depends upon elimination of tumor-induced suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1982;155:1063. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.4.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.North RJ. Gamma-irradiation facilitates the expression of adoptive immunity against an established tumor by eliminating suppressor T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1984;16:175. doi: 10.1007/BF00205425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shu S, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive immunotherapy of newly-induced murine sarcomas. Cancer Res. 1895;45:1657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Skipper HE. The forty-year-old mutation theory of Luria and Delbruck and its pertinence to cancer chemotherapy. Adv Cancer Res. 1983;40:331. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60683-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smith HG, Hormel RP, Hanna MG, Jr, Zwilling BS, Zbar B, Rapp HJ. Regression of established intradermal tumors and lymph node metastases in guinea pigs after systemic transfer of immune lymphoid cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977;58:1315. doi: 10.1093/jnci/58.5.1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Urban JL, Schreiber H. Selection of macrophage-resistant progressor tumor variants by the normal host. Requirement for concomitant T cell immunity. J Exp Med. 1983;157:642. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.2.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Urban JL, Burton RC, Holland JM, Kripke ML, Schreiber H. Mechanisms of syngeneic tumor rejection. Susceptibility of host-selected progressor variants to various immunological effector cells. J Exp Med. 1982;155:557. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Uyttenhove C, Maryanski J, Boon T. Escape of mouse mastocytoma P815 after nearly complete rejection is due to antigen-loss variants rather than immunosuppression. J Exp Med. 1983;157:1040. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.3.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES