Skip to main content
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII logoLink to Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII
. 1983 Jul;15(2):101–107. doi: 10.1007/BF00199699

Increase in the effectiveness of melphalan therapy with progression of MOPC-315 plasmacytoma tumor growth

Shlomo Ben-Efraim 1, Robert C Bocian 1, Margalit B Mokyr 1, Sheldon Dray 1,
PMCID: PMC11039118  PMID: 6553510

Abstract

Following inoculation with 1×106 MOPC-315 tumor cells, a single injection of a very low dose of melphalan (l-PAM, l-phenylalanine mustard), 0.75 mg/kg, cured most of the mice bearing a day 11 large primary tumor (20 mm) and metastases, but failed to cure mice bearing a day 4 nonpalpable tumor. Treatment of mice bearing a nonpalpable tumor with the very low dose of drug compromised the ability of the mice to respond effectively to the same low dose of drug when the tumor became large (day 12). However, a nonpalpable tumor could be eradicated by treatment of tumor bearers with a low dose of l-PAM, if it was present concomitantly with a large tumor on the contralateral side. A high dose of l-PAM, 15 mg/kg, cured mice bearing either a nonpalpable or a large tumor. The eradication of the tumor induced by the high dose of l-PAM appeared to be due solely to the tumoricidal effect of the drug. On the other hand, the eradication of the tumor by the low dose of l-PAM also required the participation of antitumor immunity of the host, since subsequent injection of antithymocyte serum abrogated the curative effect of the drug in most mice. Mice cured by a high dose of l-PAM were not resistant to subsequent lethal tumor challenge. In contrast, mice cured by the low dose of l-PAM were able to reject a tumor challenge of 300 times the minimal lethal tumor dose. The results obtained with l-PAM therapy are similar to the results that we had previously reported with cyclophosphamide therapy. Thus, the timing of therapy with a low dose of drug for mice bearing a MOPC-315 tumor is critical for successful therapy. Moreover, the selection of a low dose rather than a high dose of drug to eradicate a large tumor offers the advantage that it results in long-lasting potent antitumor immunity as a consequence of the participation of host antitumor immunity in the eradication of the tumor.

Keywords: Antitumor Immunity, Plasmacytoma, Tumor Challenge, Cyclophosphamide Therapy, Large Primary Tumor

References

  • 1.Adler A, Altbaum I. Development of resistance of MOPC-315 plasmacytoma after intralesional and intraperitoneal melphalan therapy of tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. I. Enhancement of in vivo rejection responses by combined chemotherapy-immunotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982;68:963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arai K, Spencer JS, Sohn M, Wallace HW. Effect of hapten plus antihapten-tumor serum treatment on established rat fibrosarcoma. Cancer Res. 1979;39:6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bocian RC, Ben-Efraim S, Mokyr MB, Dray S. Melphalan-mediated immunomodulation of the antitumor cytotoxic response of spleens from mice bearing a large MOPC-315 plasmacytoma. Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 1983;42:681. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borsos T, Bast RC, Jr, Ohanian SH, Segerling M, Zbar B, Rapp HJ. Induction of tumor immunity by intratumoral chemotherapy. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1976;276:565. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb41683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chassoux DM, Gotch FM, MacLennan ICM. Analysis of synergy between cyclophosphamide therapy and immunity against a mouse tumor. Br J Cancer. 1978;38:211. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dray S, Mokyr MB. Immunomodulation by cyclophosphamide and its effect on eradication of established tumors. In: Fudenberg H, Ambrogi F, editors. Frontiers in immunomodulation. New York: Plenum Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fefer A, Einstein AB, Cheever MA. Adoptive chemoimmunotherapy of cancer in animals: A review of results, principles, and problems. Ann Acad Sci Fenn. 1976;277:492. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb41723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fuji H, Mihich E, Pressman D. Differential tumor immunogenicity of L1210 and its sublines. I. Effect of an increased antigen density on tumor cell surfaces on primary B cell responses in vitro. J Immunol. 1977;119:983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fuji H, Mihich E, Pressman D. Differential tumor immunogenicity of DBA/2 mouse lymphoma L1210 and its sublines. II. Increased expression of tumor-associated antigens on subline cells recognized by serologic and transplantation methods. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979;62:1503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Furner RL, Mellett LB, Brown RK, Duncan G. A method for the measurement of phenylalanine mustard in the mouse and dog by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Drug Metab Dispos. 1976;4:577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Greenberg PD, Cheever MA, Fefer A. Detection of early and delayed anti-tumor effects following curative adoptive chemoimmunotherapy of established leukemia. Cancer Res. 1980;40:4428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greenberg PD, Cheever MA, Fefer A. Eradication of disseminated murine leukemia by chemoimmunotherapy with cyclophosphamide and adoptively transferred immune syngeneic Lyt-1+2− lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1981;154:952. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hengst JCD, Mokyr MB, Dray S. Importance of timing in cyclophosphamide therapy of MOPC-315 tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 1980;40:2135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hengst JCD, Mokyr MB, Dray S. Cooperation between cyclophosphamide tumoricidal activity and host antitumor immunity in the cure of mice bearing large MOPC-315 tumors. Cancer Res. 1981;41:2163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kleinerman ES, Zwelling LA, Schwartz R, Muchmore AV. Effect of l-phenylalanine mustard, adriamycin, actinomycin D, and 4′-(9-acridinylamino) methanesulfon-m-anisidide on naturally occurring human spontaneous monocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol. 1982;42:1692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lubet RA, Carlson DE. Therapy of the murine plasmacytoma MOPC 104E: Role of the immune response. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1978;61:897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mathé G, Halle-Pannenko O, Bourut C. Effectiveness of murine leukemia chemotherapy according to the immune state. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1977;2:139. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-81174-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mokyr MB. Immunomodulation by cyclophosphamide and its effect on eradication of established tumors. Chicago, Illinois: Rush University; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moky MB, Braun DP, Usher D, Reiter H, Dray S. The development of in vitro and in vivo antitumor cytotoxicity in non-cytotoxic, MOPC-315 tumor-bearer, spleen cells “educated” in vitro with MOPC-315 tumor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1978;4:143. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mokyr MB, Hengst JCD, Przepiorka D, Dray S. Augmentation of antitumor cytotoxicity of MOPC-315 tumor bearer spleen cells by depletion of DNP-adherent cells prior to in vitro immunization. Cancer Res. 1979;39:3928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mokyr MB, Hengst JCD, Dray S. Role of antitumor immunity in cyclophosphamide-induced rejection of subcutaneous nonpalpable MOPC-315 tumors. Cancer Res. 1982;42:974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moore M, Williams DE. Contribution of host immunity to cyclophosphamide therapy of a chemically-induced murine sarcoma. Int J Cancer. 1973;11:358. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910110213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.North RJ. Cyclophosphamide-facilitated adoptive immunotherapy of an established tumor depends on elimination of tumor-induced suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1982;55:1063. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.4.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Osborne DP, Katz DH. The allogeneic effect on tumor growth. I. Inhibition of a murine plasmacytoma, MOPC-315, by graft-vs.-host reaction. J Immunol. 1977;118:1449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Preud'homme JL, Buxbaum J, Scharff MD. Mutagenesis of mouse myeloma cells with ‘Melphalan’. Nature. 1973;245:320. doi: 10.1038/245320a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Radov LA, Haskill SJ, Korn JH. Host immune potentiation of drug responses to a murine mammary adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1976;17:773. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910170613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Radov LA, Korn JH, Haskill JS. Host immune potentiation of drug responses to a murine mammary adenocarcinoma. II. Effect of melphalan therapy on the host immune system. Int J Cancer. 1976;18:630. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910180512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rollinghoff M, Rouse BT, Warner NL. Tumor immunity to murine plasma cell tumors. I. Tumor-associated transplantation antigens of NZB and BALB/c plasma cell tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973;50:159. doi: 10.1093/jnci/50.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sladek NE. Potentiation of the cytotoxic action of melphalan and ‘activated’ cyclophosphamide against cultured tumor cells by centrophenoxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1977;200:17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tribalto M, Arcese W, Colombo R, Franchi A. Chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Review of recent experience. Recenti Prog Med. 1981;71:141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamamura Y, Proctor JW, Fischer BC, Harnaha JB, Mahvi TA. Collaboration between specific anti-tumor immunity and chemotherapeutic agents. Int J Cancer. 1980;25:417. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910250317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES