Abstract
The gut microbiota modulates response to hormonal treatments in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but whether it influences PCa progression remains unknown. Here, we show a reduction in fecal microbiota alpha-diversity correlating with increase tumour burden in two distinct groups of hormonotherapy naïve PCa patients and three murine PCa models. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from patients with high PCa volume is sufficient to stimulate the growth of mouse PCa revealing the existence of a gut microbiome-cancer crosstalk. Analysis of gut microbial-related pathways in mice with aggressive PCa identifies three enzymes responsible for the metabolism of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA). Supplementation with LCFA omega-3 MAG-EPA is sufficient to reduce PCa growth in mice and cancer up-grading in pre-prostatectomy PCa patients correlating with a reduction of gut Ruminococcaceae in both and fecal butyrate levels in PCa patients. This suggests that the beneficial effect of omega-3 rich diet is mediated in part by modulating the crosstalk between gut microbes and their metabolites in men with PCa.
Subject terms: Prostate cancer, Cancer
Here, using murine models of prostate cancer, the authors show that reduced fecal microbiota alpha-diversity correlates with increased prostate tumor burden, and that Omega-3 prebiotic supplementation reduces prostate cancer up-grading associated with a reduction of gut Ruminococcaceae and fecal butyrate levels.
Introduction
A limited number of correlative studies have reported differences in the gut microbiota of healthy versus prostate cancer (PCa) patients1–3. Interestingly, many of the tumour-derived bacteria sequences recently found in prostate cancer tissues are naturally present in human stool, suggesting that gut microbes could be directly or indirectly impacting tumour development. Furthermore, PCa treatments such as androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) are associated with gut microbiome imbalances4–6. Recent work showed that ADT could drive commensal bacteria, including species from the Ruminococcus genus to synthetize androgen from circulating precursors to fuel castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) development7. Treatment of CRPC patients with abiraterone acetate, a second-generation anti-androgen drug, was shown to be associated with an enrichment of Akkermansia muciniphila in patient’s gut microbiota4. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila was reported to have a beneficial impact on human health8 and to improve response to novel immunotherapies in some cancers9. Altogether, these studies support that the gut microbiota plays a role in response to hormonal treatments in PCa patients. However, the potential interplay between gut microbiota and PCa development in patients without ADT remains understudied.
PCa is the fourth most diagnosed cancer worldwide and second most common cancer in men10. PCa progression is most often slow over many years even under surveillance and the potential benefit of curative treatments such as radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy is offset by potential long-term detrimental impacts on patient’s quality of life. Likewise, cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy as detected by a rise of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood levels also has a highly variable course, often lasting many years before clinically manifest metastases are detected. Consequently, there are important long-term benefits associated with the development of new primary or secondary prevention therapies to delay the need for primary treatments or ADT for systemic recurrences. Numerous studies provided support for the involvement of modifiable factors, such as the diet, in PCa progression. For example, a diet rich in animal fat containing higher amount of saturated fat was associated with increased risk of lethal PCa compared to a diet enriched in polyunsaturated fat from plant11. Fatty acid assimilation in humans is regulated by the commensal gut bacteria12,13. Hypercaloric diets, such as high-fat diet (HFD), stimulate the proliferation and activity of gut microbes, increase intestinal permeability, and are associated with bacteria-derived molecule leakage (endotoxemia) ultimately contributing to chronic inflammation12–14. In addition, several immunocompetent genetically engineered mouse models of PCa develop more aggressive tumours when fed an HFD enriched in animal/saturated fat15–17. On the contrary, we and others showed that omega-3 rich diet was sufficient to reduce PCa progression in mouse models18–20, supporting the rationale for dietary interventions to hinder PCa development. How diet affects PCa growth and whether the gut microbiota is involved in the interaction remains, however, largely unknown.
Here, we found a reduced fecal microbiota alpha-diversity associated with increased PCa volume and aggressiveness in two distinct groups of ADT naïve PCa patients and three distinct syngeneic murine PCa models. Human fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from patients with PCa stimulated the growth of mouse PCa, supporting a microbiota-PCa crosstalk. The analysis of commonly altered fecal metabolic pathways in mouse models with high tumour volume identified three enzymes involved in the degradation of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA). We leveraged fecal samples provided by a subgroup of patients from a larger cohort of 130 men diagnosed with GG ≥ 2 prostate cancer and undergoing radical prostatectomy21. Participants from this phase II double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial were randomized to receive MAG-EPA omega-3 or placebo prior to radical prostatectomy21. In parallel, we treated a syngenic mouse model with the same omega-3 supplement prior to prostate tumour cell injection. Dietary supplementation with LCFA omega-3 reduced tumour growth in a mouse model and reduced cancer upgrades at prostatectomy in PCa patients and was associated with a decrease in fecal levels of Ruminococcaceae in both. Analysis of metabolites produced by the Ruminococcaceae family of bacteria in patients’ fecal samples treated with an omega-3 supplement identified a selective reduction of butyrate. On the other hand, fecal butyrate levels were increased in patients with early metastatic PCa. Butyrate is mainly produced by gut bacteria and may represent an important mediator of the gut microbiota-PCa crosstalk. It also identifies gut butyrate as one mechanism by which omega-3 rich diet exerts anti-PCa activity.
Results
PCa tumour volume and aggressiveness are associated with alterations of the gut microbiota
PCa patients
To test if changes in gut microbiota were associated with PCa tumour volume and aggressiveness, we profiled the microbial content of fecal samples collected from PCa patients without ADT at different stages of the disease. The first population of 62 patients with a localized PCa (ISUP Grade Group (GG) ≥2) provided a fecal sample 5.0 weeks (±0.5) on average before radical prostatectomy (Supplementary Table 1). Based on the surgical pathology report, fecal samples were separated in tertiles of low (3.2 ± 1.4 g), medium (7.4 ± 1.4 g) or high (18.7 ± 12.7 g) PCa tumour volume (% of cancer area multiplied by weight (g) of the radical prostatectomy specimen) (Fig. 1a). 16S rRNA profiling was performed and microbiota profiles were grouped in accordance with the tumour volume at the radical prostatectomy for each patient (Fig. 1b). 16S rRNA metataxonomic analysis did not show differences in the major phylum such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Fig. 1b). To further evaluate shifts in the whole-microbiota population, we used Shannon alpha diversity reference index22,23. The Shannon diversity index was reduced by 8.3 ± 2.6% for patients in the highest tumour volume compared to patients in the low tumour volume group (Fig. 1c, p = 0.02, two-sided Welch’s t-test). To test if patients with high tumour volume systematically displayed changes in their microbiota, we measured the beta diversity using the Bray-Curtis index for the whole cohort. Principal component analysis (PCA) did not show difference in beta diversity for those patients (Fig. 1d, p = 0.48, Permanova).
We next performed similar studies on fecal samples obtained from 47 PCa patients on average 5.2 ± 1.0 years post-prostatectomy (see Supplementary Table 2 for clinical and pathological characteristics at prostatectomy). At the time of fecal sample collection, 20 patients had undetectable PSA, i.e. no biochemical recurrence (BCR) for a minimum of 5 years post-surgery, 9 patients had very low PSA values (0.17 ± 0.02 ng/mL) and 18 patients had significantly high PSA values (2.96 ± 0.46 ng/mL) (Fig. 1e). Of note, patients with this high level of PSA after prostatectomy have systemic metastasis when tested with the most recent nuclear medicine procedures such as Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (TEP-PSMA) imaging24,25. Indeed, at prostatectomy 44% of patients with high PSA recurrence had high grade GG 4 or 5 cancer, 66% had tumour extension outside the prostate (pT3) and one third had micrometastasis in the lymph nodes (Supplementary Table 2), while none had received ADT prior to fecal sample collection. Accordingly, these patients have a more biologically aggressive cancer than those in the pre-prostatectomy group who have localized cancer or those with very low PSA who are more likely to only have a local recurrence in the surgical bed. The gut microbiota profiles of these three groups of patients were compared using high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing (Fig. 1f). First, we observed significant differences at the phylum level in the gut microbiota of patients with BCR compared to no BCR. Noticeably, Firmicutes relative abundance was 21.7 ± 1.5% and 18.1 ± 1.2% higher in patients with high PSA compared to patients with low or undetectable PSA, respectively (Fig. 1f, red bars, p = 0.04, two-sided Welch’s t-test). We also noted that Bacteroidetes relative abundance in BCR high PSA was 91 ± 11% lower compared to no BCR patients (Fig. 1f, green bars, p = 1.5e−6, two-sided Welch’s t-test). The Shannon alpha diversity index was also reduced by 17.9 ± 3.1% and 13.3 ± 4.1% in fecal samples from patients with high PSA compared to patients with undetectable or very low PSA levels, respectively (Fig. 1g, p = 0.02, two-sided Welch’s t-test). Beta-diversity analysis also showed a significant shift in the high PSA population compared to low PSA or no BCR patients (Fig. 1h, p = 0.03, Permanova), supporting that patients with high PSA or early metastatic PCa after prostatectomy display the strongest alterations in their gut microbiota.
PCa mouse models
To explore the functional connections between PCa and gut microbes, we recapitulated our observations from PCa patients in two different sets of experiments using syngeneic PCa mouse models to test the effect of tumour volume and cancer aggressiveness on fecal microbiota. In the first, we investigated the effect of tumour volume on the microbiota of the same mice at different time points corresponding to increasing tumour volumes of the SV40 large T antigen-transformed TRAMP-C2 PCa cells injected subcutaneously (s.c.) in the flanks of immunocompetent single-housed C57BL/6 N syngeneic mice. Fecal samples were harvested at minimal mass formation (palpable tumour), active growth phase and end point, i.e. 2 cm3 total tumour volume (Fig. 2A). When comparing fecal samples from actively growing and end point tumours to no tumour time point samples, 16S rRNA metataxonomic analysis revealed 74 ± 7% and 71 ± 8% increase in the Bacteroidetes phylum, respectively (Fig. 2b, p = 8e−4, two-sided Welch’s t-test). As in the human prostate cancer fecal samples, in the TRAMP-2 model we also noted a 14 ± 5% and 16 ± 7% reduction in alpha-diversity, measured by the Shanon Index, for the microbiota profiles collected during active growth and at end point compared to the baseline microbiota, respectively (Fig. 2c, p = 3e−4, p = 2e−4, respectively, two-sided Welch’s t-test). Principal component analysis using the Bray-Curtis beta-diversity index revealed similarities between the fecal microbiota of animals at the stage of active growth and end point (Fig. 2d). In contrast, the beta-diversity of both active growth and end point microbiota were also significantly distinct from those of animals at baseline or with minimal tumour mass (Fig. 2d, p = 0.001, Permanova).
In the second set of experiments, we tested the effect of increasing PCa aggressiveness on the gut microbiota collected at about 4 weeks post-injection in three groups of 8 mice each injected s.c. with murine PCa cell lines driven either by the loss of Pten (Pten−/−; Rb1+/+) or the loss of both Pten and Rb1 (Pten−/−; Rb1−/−)26,27 and control tumour-free mice (Fig. 2e). These experiments were performed in immunocompetent male C57BL/6 J syngeneic mice housed in an independent animal facility under similar diet conditions. The Pten−/−; Rb1−/− prostate cancer cells closely resemble the genetic makeup of metastatic prostate cancer cells and were therefore used to emulate our previous findings in patients with high PSA BCR28,29. As expected, Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumours grew significantly larger than Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ tumours at the 13-week time point (Fig. 3e). Compared to controls, at the phylum level, we observed a 20 ± 5% increase of Firmicutes relative abundance similar to PCa patients with high PSA BCR (p = 0.01, two-sided Welch’s t-test) and a 48 ± 14% reduction of Actinobacteria relative abundance (p = 0.001, two-sided Welch’s t-test) in fecal samples of animals with Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumours but not in the animals with Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ tumours (Fig. 2f). We observed that the Shannon index of the microbiota of Pten−/−; Rb1−/− mice was reduced by 19 ± 8% compared to mice without tumours (p = 0.02, two-sided Welch’s t-test), but not for Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ tumour bearing mice (Fig. 2g). In addition, the microbiota from animals with Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumours were significatively different from the microbiota of no tumour controls using the Bray-Curtis beta-diversity principal component analysis (Fig. 2h, p = 0.02, Permanova), similar to the same analysis in the TRAMP-C2 model (Fig. 2d). Hence, the strongest loss of gut microbiota alpha diversity was observed in the largest tumours within the same TRAMP-C2 model and the more aggressive Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumours. These results support our observations in the two PCa patient cohorts that tumour volume, and especially cancer aggressiveness, are linked to the strongest fecal microbiota alterations (Fig. 1c, g).
PCa patients gut microbiota drives TRAMP-C2 tumour growth
To test whether the gut microbiota influence PCa growth, we used fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of human feces collected pre-prostatectomy from 6 patients with Grade Group 2 to 5 PCa and distinct tumour volumes at surgery (Supplementary Table 3) in the syngeneic TRAMP-C2 mouse model. Animals were first depleted of their microbiota using antibiotics given orally. Antibiotics effectively depleted gut microbiota as measured by total DNA extracted from fecal samples (Fig. 3a) and Gifu anaerobic broth cultures from fecal samples (Fig. 3b). After a 48 h wash-out, mice were inoculated with the six different human fecal suspensions and a control mouse homologous tumour-free FMT that was harvested before the antibiotic regimen (n = 4/FMT except for FMT3 repeated once n = 8). After two series of FMT, TRAMP-C2 PCa cells were injected s.c. in both flanks of the mice and tumour mass (g) was assessed at 5 weeks. While human PCa FMT1 and FMT6 showed a trend to increase (734 ± 30% and 63 ± 22%, respectively) TRAMP-C2 tumour mass compared to autologous mouse FMT, FMT2, 3, 4 and 5 all led to bigger tumours (127 ± 4% p = 0.006, two-sided t-test, 199 ± 13% p = 0.007, two-sided t-test, 247 ± 26% p = 0.04, two-sided t-test and 166 ± 15% p = 0.01, two-sided t-test, respectively) in the recipient animals (Fig. 3c). However, there was no trend for increased TRAMP-C2 volume with FMTs from patients with increasing tumour volume (Fig. 3d). On the other hand, we observed 39 ± 16% less viable bacteria in fecal cultures of mice having received FMTs from patients with high tumour volume and low microbiota diversity (Fig. 1c) compared to medium tumour volume FMTs (Fig. 3e, p = 0.03, two-sided Welch’s t-test). This suggests that the low diversity of the microbiota could potentially impair fecal transplantation and thus explain the lack of increased TRAMP-C2 tumour volume for FMTs derived from high tumour volume patients. Overall, these results support a crosstalk by which the gut microbiota composition also influences PCa growth.
PCa alters microbiota-host metabolism by modulating specific microbes
We further explored if specific microbes were systematically altered in fecal samples of PCa-bearing mice. We observed that the levels of several genera were differentially affected in phases of end point tumour growth for TRAMP-C2 (Fig. 4a, Fig. S1A) and both Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− (Fig. 4b, Fig. S1B) mouse models. For the late-stage TRAMP-C2 and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumour bearing animals, we noted 6.3 ± 2.7% and 6.9 ± 3.0% increase in mean proportion difference of Bacteroides, together with 2.5 ± 1.0% and 3.8 ± 1.6% increase in the mean proportion difference of Parabacteroides fecal DNA sequences, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). Interestingly, we observed 3.5 ± 1.7% increase of fecal Ruminococcaceae_g_2 sequences in mice with TRAMP-C2 minimal masses compared to baseline samples (Fig. S1A). We also noted 0.7 ± 0.2% and 0.5 ± 0.2% Ruminococcaceae_g_2 increase in both Pten−/−; Rb−/− (Fig. 4b) and Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ fecal samples compared to no tumour controls (Fig. S1B). We next proceeded to validate a portion of the 16S rRNA sequencing results and selected two genera that were found either enriched or depleted from both TRAMP-C2 and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− fecal samples (Fig. 4c, d). The metataxonomic results matched the qPCR results for the two specific selected species corresponding to Parabacteroides and Lactobacillus genera; Parabacteroides distasonis and Lactobacillus murinus, respectively (Fig. S2C). Changes in SV40 large T antigen-driven tumour-associated microbiota were more resembling with Pten−/−; Rb1−/−-related microbiota than Pten−/−; Rb1+/+, again supporting that Rb1 loss of function is prompting the growth of larger tumours resulting in more significant gut microbiota alterations. Taken together, our results highlight common gut microbiome alterations in relation to tumour development in three independent mouse models of PCa, suggesting that specific gut microbes might drive the loss of alpha diversity and participate in the tumour development process.
To identify a molecular underpinning between the tumour-associated gut microbiota alterations and the host, we used Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt)30 to extrapolate functions associated with 16S rRNA sequencing data. PICRUSt analyses outlined 65, 43 and 74 functions altered in fecal samples from mice with end point TRAMP-C2 tumours, Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− tumours compared to their corresponding no tumour controls, respectively (Fig. 4e, Fig. S2A–E). We found only three different functions altered in fecal samples of TRAMP-C2 minimal mass animals compared to baseline (Fig. S2D). To the contrary and consistent with our observations with the 16S rRNA profiling data, we observed significantly more predicted functions shared between TRAMP-C2 tumours-associated microbiota and Pten−/−; Rb1−/−-related microbiota compared to Pten−/−; Rb1+/+-related microbiota. Interestingly, compared to the gut microbiota of tumour-free mice, we found that seven predicted Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathways were commonly altered in the gut microbiota of mice for all the end point PCa tumours TRAMP-C2, Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− mice models (Fig. 4f). We next manually screened the components of these seven KEGG pathways and pinpointed three enzymes common to three of these seven altered pathways: Enoyl-CoA hydratase (Paaf/echA), Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA (FadB). These enzymes are normally involved in the metabolism of fatty acids, namely aerobic and anaerobic degradation of long-chain Fatty Acids (LCFA) via beta-oxidation cycle. Overall, these results suggest that PCa alters microbiota-host metabolism by modulating distinct and common host fecal bacteria involved in the metabolism of LCFA.
Omega-3 FA supplementation modulates the gut microbiome and PCa growth and aggressiveness
PCa incidence and progression are noticeably affected by modifiable lifestyle factors including diet. For example, several studies have linked animal-derived saturated fat uptake with PCa incidence31,32 and development33,34. Diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids, such as the Mediterranean diet, was shown to reduce PCa death whereas diet rich in omega-6 such as the typical North-American diet increases the risk. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), such as omega-3 fatty acids, were previously reported to cause whole-body metabolic changes that were dependent on gut microbiota35,36. We hypothesized that a targeted PUFA dietary intervention could potentially alter the gut microbiota induced metabolism of fatty acid affecting PCa growth. To test this hypothesis, C57BL/6 N mice were supplemented with different purified monoglyceride (MAG) PUFAs: an omega-6 (MAG-AA), two omega-3 (MAG-DHA, MAG-EPA) and an omega-9 (HOSO) molecule commonly used as control in human clinical trials. After two weeks of gavage, animals were injected s.c. with TRAMP-C2 cells to test the impact of each single PUFAs on PCa growth. We observed a decrease of 45 ± 10% of the TRAMP-C2 tumour growth in MAG-DHA-fed animals compared to control HOSO-treated TRAMP-C2 tumours (p = 0.04, Student’s t test) (Fig. 5a), and a similar trend for MAG-EPA-fed mice. Next, we profiled the fecal microbiome of these animals at sacrifice using high throughput 16S rRNA metataxonomic analysis. Interestingly, the abundance of sequences related to the Ruminococcaceae family (Fig. 5b, c) in the two omega-3 PUFAs MAG-DHA- and MAG-EPA-treated animals were reduced by 52 ± 6% and 43 ± 9% respectively (p = 0.008, two-sided Welch’s t-test) compared to HOSO control. Of note, the baseline fecal microbiome profiles and Ruminococcaceae levels were not different between the four groups (Fig. S3A, B). These results, under strickly controlled experimental conditions, support an interplay between the dietary omega-3 PUFAs, the gut microbiota and PCa growth.
We further tested the potential effect of long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCn3) supplement on gut Ruminococcaceae and PCa aggressiveness in 41 PCa patients enrolled in a pre-radical prostatectomy trial21,37 who provided fecal samples before and after the intervention. These samples are a sub-cohort of the last 41 patients from a parental randomized clinical trial of 130 PCa patients where the effect of a purified MAG-EPA supplement was compared to placebo (HOSO) taken orally daily for an average of 7.2 weeks (±0.37) prior to radical prostatectomy (NCT02333435)21. The clinical and biopsy characteristics at baseline and the pathological characteristics at radical prostatectomy of the sub-cohort of 41 PCa patients who agreed to provide fecal samples for research are shown in Supplementary Tables 4, 5, respectively.
PCa grade is one of the most important determinants of PCa aggressiveness and risk of progression. However, PCa grading is complex due to the frequent multifocality of tumours with distinct aggressive potential within an individual prostate38. The new International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) system of five prostate cancer Group-Grades (GG) is based on the proportion of the three Gleason patterns 3, 4 or 539–41. GG 1 tumours have Gleason pattern 3 only, while GG 2, 3 and 4 are defined by the proportion of pattern 4 (<50%, >50% and 100% respectively), and GG 5 have pattern 5. This new classification showed less variation between the grade of the diagnostic biopsy and that of the prostatectomy specimen than the traditional Gleason score42,43. Previous studies showed that patients with up-graded disease exhibited more aggressive pathological features than concordant tumours and a higher risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy44.
When comparing the cancer grade on the diagnostic biopsy with the grade on the prostatectomy specimen in the 41 patients, we observed an up-grading in 8 patients, a down-grading in 5 patients and no change in the other 28 patients. We first compared the proportion of Ruminococcaceae in all fecal samples of patients before and after supplement treatment in relation with the PCa GG reclassification. Interestingly, we observed 27 ± 3% enrichment in Ruminococcaceae relative abundance for patients with PCa upgrade compared to patients with stable GG (p = 0.004, two-sided Welch’s t-test) (Fig. 5d). Fortunately, the sub-group of 41 patients who provided fecal samples were evenly distributed between the placebo and the MAG-EPA and also showed 71% less GG up-grading with MAG-EPA compared to HOSO (p = 0.016, Chi square test) (Fig. 5e). Noticeably, compared to HOSO, MAG-EPA was associated with 12 ± 5% reduction in the abundance of sequences corresponding to the Ruminococcaceae (p = 0.046, paired-Wilcoxon test) (Fig. 5f) between pre- and post-treatment microbiota.
Several microbiota-derived molecules are known to directly affect host’s metabolism45. For example, SCFA are produced by commensal bacteria, including members of the Ruminococcaceae family and interactions between SCFA and human cancers have been described before46,47. We therefore measured the fecal levels of a panel of SCFA in the 41 patients before and after MAG-EPA or HOSO treatment. Compared to placebo, MAG-EPA reduced fecal butyric acid levels by a factor of 1.5 on average (p = 0.04, two-sided Welch’s t-test). There was no effect on other SCFAs (Fig. 6a–f), except for a similar reduction trend of valeric acid levels (Fig. 6d). These observations were also supported by a qPCR analysis of the different enzymes responsible for the synthesis of SCFA including butyric acid (Fig. S4A, B). Patients with PCa downgrading at surgery displayed less enrichment on average by a factor of 2 of fecal butyric acid levels than patients with no change (p = 0.002, two-sided Welch’s t-test) (Fig. 6g). Of note, 4 of the 5 patients with downgrading received MAG-EPA pre-surgery. Patients with PCa upgrade showed a trend for higher butyrate fold change over time compared to downgraded patients (p = 0.07, two-sided Welch’s t-test) (Fig. 6g). To further explore the potential association of increase fecal butyrate with PCa aggressiveness we measured the fecal butyric content in the cohort of PCa patients with or without PSA failure after prostatectomy from Fig. 1e–h. Fecal butyric acid concentrations were 72 ± 14% higher in patients with early metastasis post-prostatectomy (high PSA BCR, p = 0.02, two-sided Welch’s t-test) corresponding to Fig. 6h, supporting that PCa aggressiveness also translate into an altered microbiota metabolism. Taken together, our results support that modifiable lifestyle factors such as diet, in particular LCn3, can modulate the crosstalk between gut microbes, their metabolites and PCa (Fig.7).
Discussion
Several research groups observed imbalances in the gut microbiota of patients with cancers including PCa compared to healthy individuals1–3, but most studies were in patients treated by immunotherapy or ADT in the case of PCa. Yet, the potential interplay between cancer development and changes in gut microbiota diversity has received little attention. In the present study we found a systematic reduction in gut microbiota diversity correlating with increasing PCa volume and aggressiveness in two distinct clinical scenarios of patients without ADT. The great majority of patients with an average PSA of 2.96 ng/ml after prostatectomy have metastases in lymph nodes and/or bones that can now be observed by highly sensitive TEP-PSMA imaging. Patients with the highest cancer volume in the prostatectomy specimen also had a significantly reduced gut microbiota diversity. These observations are reminiscent of the correlation found in pancreatic cancer patients between reduced gut microbiota alpha diversity and shorter-term patient’s survival48. We also observed reduced gut microbiota diversity in the two distinct mouse models that grew the largest tumours, in particular those with loss of both Pten and Rb1, an alteration frequently observed in metastatic PCa patients28,29.
It is not clear how PCa could cause steady-state changes in gut microbiota since the prostate and the intestine are anatomically separated. Moreover, the facts that a more important impact on gut microbiota was observed in patients with early metastasis (High PSA BCR) and no prostate, as well as in our mouse models of subcutaneously implanted PCa, point towards a mechanism involving prostate tumour-secreted molecules that could mediate changes in the gut microbiota homeostasis. For example, members of the kallikrein (KLK) family of peptidases produced by the prostate are known to participate in maturation and activation of antimicrobial peptides49–52. PSA (KLK3), is secreted by normal and PCa cells and its serum levels are increased with increasing PCa burden. While PSA is not expressed by murine prostate cells, different homologous proteins secreted by the murine prostate such as α-microseminoprotein (PSP94) have reported anti-bacterial activity53. Moreover, a correlation was observed between the number of culturable bacteria isolated from prostate samples and serum PSA levels in patients with prostate hyperplasia who underwent transurethral prostate resection54.
We used three mouse models, housed in separate animal facilities to identify common gut microbe alterations as a consequence of PCa development. Under these controlled conditions, we observed significant alterations in the composition of microbiota as a function of tumour growth stage. Interestingly, we found the most prominent changes in gut microbiota diversity and composition from fecal samples of animals with end point TRAMP-C2 tumours and tumours with combined Pten and Rb1 deletions. SV40 large T antigen transgenic expression in TRAMP-C2 prostate tumour cells alters the Trp53 and Rb1 signaling pathways leading to constitutive tumour cell growth55. Similarly, loss of Pten alone or in combination with Rb1 knockout also triggers PCa cell’s constitutive activation of cell division26. Interestingly, tumours with combined Pten and Rb1 deletion and TRAMP-C2 tumours caused greater changes in the gut microbiota of recipient animals compared to tumours characterized by the loss of Pten alone. Loss of both PTEN and RB1 are also common in patients’ metastatic PCa28,29. Several hypotheses could explain how the loss of Rb1 increases the crosstalk between prostate tumour cells and gut microbiota. The state of PCa cell division and metabolic activity could be important for the systemic effect of developing tumour cells towards the gut microbiota. The lesser loss of microbiota alpha diversity in Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ compared to the TRAMP-C2 and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− mouse models suggests that genetic alterations within incipient tumours cells could contribute to cancer-gut microbiota interaction. A significant loss of alpha diversity was also associated with greater tumour volume for human pre-radical prostatectomy samples. Although we observed a consistent loss of alpha diversity in patients and mouse models of PCa, we did not find a conserved set of taxa systematically altered in PCa samples, except for a significant increase in Firmicutes in fecal samples from early metastatic PCa (High PSA BCR) and in the Pten−/−; Rb1−/− mouse tumours. Patient-to-patient variability is a common feature of human gut microbiota studies and is not unique to our study56,57. As previously reported58, the baseline microbiota was also different between mouse models, which also possibly impaired our ability to identify consistent changes in gut taxa as a result of PCa development. Repeated measures, paired analysis and whole-genome sequencing could help improve our capacity to identify consistent changes in gut taxa as a result of PCa development. Overall, our results support that PCa growth and aggressiveness are linked to changes in the composition of gut microbiota and our work suggests that genetic alterations within incipient PCa cells might contribute to this gut microbiota-cancer interaction. Although the canonical function of Rb1 gene product is mainly associated with cell cycle regulation, it was recently found that Rb1 also regulates the expression of immune checkpoint inhibitors59,60 suggesting yet another potential immune-mediated mechanism.
Transplantation to mice of human fecal microbiota (FMT) from patients with high tumour volume promoted the growth of the TRAMP-C2 tumours suggesting a bi-directional PCa and gut microbiota crosstalk. Several microbiota-derived molecules are known to directly affect host’s metabolism45. To investigate further possible metabolic interactions between the tumour-driven gut microbiota alterations and the hosts, we used PICRUSt analyses to extrapolate functions associated with our 16S rRNA sequencing data of gut microbiota from two distinct mouse models at different time points. Compared to that of their tumour-free mice, we found seven predicted KEGG metabolic pathways commonly altered in all large tumours. Further manual screening of components of these KEGG pathways pinpointed three enzymes normally involved in the metabolism of fatty acids, namely aerobic and anaerobic degradation of LCFA. These results suggest that PCa alter microbiota-host metabolism by modulating distinct and common host fecal bacteria involved in LCFA metabolism.
Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), such as LCn3, were previously reported to cause whole-body metabolic changes that were dependent on the gut microbiota35,36. Previous work suggested that PUFA were capable of modulating PCa in human and similarly in mouse models61. PUFA also modulate whole-body metabolism by altering the composition of gut microbiota or via the production of metabolites derived from commensalism62–64. Importantly, FMT experiments showed that the transfer of PUFA-derived microbiota to recipient mice was sufficient to recapitulate the effects of PUFA on the host’s metabolism35. We hypothesized that a targeted PUFA dietary intervention could potentially alter the gut microbiota induced metabolism of fatty acid affecting PCa growth.
Indeed, our studies showed that TRAMP-C2 tumour growth was reduced in mice fed with LCn3 supplements MAG-DHA and MAG-EPA compared to LCn6 and controls. It was also associated with decreased fecal levels of Ruminococcaceae. In PCa patients treated by prostatectomy, high levels of fecal Ruminococcaceae were associated with cancer upgrading in the prostatectomy specimen compared to the diagnostic biopsy. Treatment of patients for 7 weeks on average before prostatectomy with a LCn3 MAG-EPA supplement compared to placebo was associated with a reduction of cancer upgrading and of fecal Ruminococcaceae levels. Clinical studies conducted on healthy individuals have reported different beneficial impacts of short-term omega-3 supplementation on the gut microbiota based on improved alpha diversity indexes or the transient augmentation of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus62,65,66. However, here we report the effect of omega-3 supplements on the gut microbiota of PCa patients and mouse models associated with potentially beneficial effect on cancer. Some studies have reported bactericidal activity for EPA omega-3 supplements towards opportunistic pathogens and bacteria responsible for periodontal disease67,68. Ruminococcaceae ecological niche is within the mucosal biofilm layer in the gut69. Therefore, by blocking biofilm-producing bacteria, MAG-EPA treatment could have indirectly dislodged endogenous Ruminococcaceae populations. Several reports underlined members of the Ruminococcaceae family that were associated with improved responses to cancer immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies9,70. The gut microbiota was shown to affect the dynamic of circulating immune cells independently of immunotherapy treatments71,72, supporting that commensal bacteria can educate the immune system and modulate its anti-cancer activity. Likewise, it is increasingly recognized that some bacterial groups produce metabolites that have systemic immune properties, notably the SCFA that play a pivotal role on immune modulation46. Here, we observed reduced fecal butyrate levels in the MAG-EPA-treated PCa patients in association with significantly less cancer upgrading at prostatectomy. Conversely, we also observed a significant increase in fecal butyrate levels in early metastatic PCa patients post-prostatectomy (High PSA BCR) compared to those without recurrence suggesting an association with increasing PCa aggressiveness. Butyrate can exert both tumour promotive and suppressive effects and these were more extensively studied in colorectal cancer. While gut epithelial cells rely on butyrate as a principal source of energy, butyrate exposure was shown to increase apoptosis, senescence and differentiation of colon cancer cells lines but promoted cancer development in colon cancer animal models73–75. More research is needed to untangle these conflicting effects of butyrate on cancer progression especially in non-intestinal cancers. Butyrate is also known to exert anti-inflammatory activities by affecting a number of cellular processes including immune cell migration and cytokine expression. However some studies suggest that the immune modulatory activities of butyrate are mainly through the induction of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells (Treg) and the prevention of dendritic cell (DC) maturation76,77. A recent study found that high serum butyrate levels produced by gut microbes were associated with resistance to anti-CTLA-4 blockage and a higher proportion of Treg cells in patients with metastatic melanoma46. The authors suggested that down modulating butyrate signaling pathway may be mandatory to restore anti-CTLA4 efficacy in patients with high butyrate and other SCFA serum levels. Our results showing reduced fecal butyrate levels after a short 7 weeks treatment with MAG-EPA supplement may represent a promising and simple opportunity to improve the clinical efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 treatments. While immunosuppression may be beneficial to control inflammatory diseases, it has detrimental effects in cancers. PCa micro-environment is mostly immune-suppressive and several studies have shown an association with high density intra-tumoural Foxp3+ Tregs and lethal PCa76,77. Lowering gut-produced butyrate levels could also potentially modulate the PCa immunosuppressive micro-environment to release an effective anti-tumoural immune response representing yet another mechanism of its activity. Accordingly, more studies are needed to identify the cellular targets of microbiota-derived SCFAs in PCa patients.
Overall, our studies revealed the existence of a crosstalk between PCa growth and the host gut microbes particularly those involved in the metabolism of LCFA. Supplementation with LCn3 resulted in a reduction of cancer growth in mouse models and reduction of upgrading in pre-prostatectomy patients associated with a reduction of gut Ruminococcaceae and fecal butyrate levels. It identifies one potential mechanism to explain the beneficial effect of diet rich in LCn3 in reducing the initial diagnosis and progression of PCa. This conceptual advance is important since targeting the microbiota via the diet is non-invasive, applicable to most cancer patients and could limit cancer progression in stages of the diseases where patients are not receiving other treatments.
Methods
Human samples
This research complies with all relevant ethical regulations, the study protocol was approved by the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval’s review board (#2012-1012) and the trial registered to clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02333435). Written informed consent were received for all clinical data and samples and was described in the published parental clinical trial21. A panel of 62 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason Grade Group ≥2 localized PCa agreed to provide fecal sample 5.0 ± 0.5 weeks (mean ± SEM) on average before they were treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) and on the day before the surgery. Briefly, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) agreed on a system of five prostate cancer Grade-Groups based on the proportion of the three Gleason patterns 3, 4 or 539–41, which are associated with prostate cancer progression risk. Grade group 1 tumours with only Gleason pattern 3 are indolent and most patients are recommended active surveillance. Grade Groups 2, 3 and 4 are defined by the proportion of pattern 4 (<50%, >50% and 100% respectively), and Grade Group 5 have pattern 5, which is the most aggressive cancer. We also collected fecal samples from 47 PCa patients that had their prostate surgically removed by RP on average 5.2 +/−1.0 years (mean ± SEM) before sample collection. These patients experienced different levels of cancer recurrence based on Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) serum levels; low PSA values (between 0.05–0.49 ng/mL) and 18 patients had clinically significantly high PSA values (above 0.50 ng/mL). Another set of 41 human fecal samples were obtained from a subgroup of men participating into a phase IIb double-blind randomized controlled trial testing 3 g/day of MAG-EPA versus placebo for 7.2 weeks (±0.37) on average before their radical prostatectomy21,37. All patients in the pre-prostatectomy group (Fig. 1a–d) received one dose of 500 mg Ciprofloxacin on the day of the prostate biopsy which was performed on average 22.8 ± 1.43 weeks prior to sample collection in all pre-prostatectomy patients. While antibiotics may affect the microbiota, all patients had a similar exposure. As for patients with or without PSA failure after radical prostatectomy (Fig. 1e–h), all patients received one dose of intravenous Cefazolin (2 g) at the beginning of surgery. All fecal samples from this cohort were collected several years after surgery. This clinical study was approved by our IRB from CHU de Québec–Université Laval (2012-1012) and registered to clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02333435) and recruited between February 2015 and June 2017. Clinical characteristics such as PSA and tumour volume (estimated using pathological report data) were extracted from patients’ chart. Tumour volume (in grams) was calculated by multiplying the percentage of the prostate covered by tumour tissue (evaluated by the pathologist) with the prostate mass documented (in grams) in the radical prostatectomy report. Herein, tumour burden refers to the estimated tumour volume and was assessed as low/medium/high based on tertiles. PCa grade at the study enrolment biopsy (clinical grade) and radical prostatectomy (pathological grade) was assessed using our usual institutional pathological procedures for PCa. Microbiota analyses were conducted on a subgroup of 41 patients that also consented to provide clinical data and fecal samples for microbiota high-throughput analysis (2012-671, 2017–3231). Patients were not involved in the design, conduct or reporting of our research and all were men. Stool samples were collected according to Human Microbiome Project protocol and patients were compensated 20 CAD for providing their fecal samples. The stool kit contained a primary container for a full bowel specimen and single tubes for aliquoting the stool sample. Patients were instructed to place the stool collection frame on the back of the toilet bowl, then to place the collection bowl in the frame and were specifically instructed to avoid any contact between the stool sample and urine. Stools were excreted directly into the 650 mL commode specimen collection system (Fisher scientific Company, ON, Canada). Subsequently, dedicated tubes (Norgen Biotek, Ontario, Canada) were used to scoop the stool sample into separate aliquots samples that will be used for DNA sequencing and stored in the biobank. Stool samples were immediately frozen and conserved at −20 °C and then at −80 °C for biobanking purposes.
16S rRNA metataxonomic analysis
For bacterial DNA extraction, fecal samples were homogenized using a minilys bead-beater apparatus (Bertin, Rockville, MD). Samples were lysozyme and proteinase-treated before phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Fecal DNA samples were further purified using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Missisauga, ON, Canada) before 16S library amplification. Libraries were amplified as described before78. Briefly, for each fecal DNA sample, a fragment of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with bar-coded primer. High-throughput sequencing of the bar-coded amplicons was performed on a MiSeq apparatus (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by the Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS-Université Laval, QC, Canada) services. Bioinformatic analysis of the reads was described before78 and began with the removal of low-quality reads with Mothur. Next, sequences were filtered based on the abnormal presence of uncertain bases (N), invalid DNA length, sequences that began with incorrect primer or that contained series of height homopolymers or more. Sequencing primers were trimmed out and Mothur was used to identify and eliminate chimeric reads and sequences considered contaminants. Remaining sequences were then aligned against SILVA reference alignments using the k size = nine parameters. To allow comparison, reads were normalized using the sample with the lowest total read number for rarefaction. Sequences that successfully passed the previous filtering steps were used in Mothur to generate a pairwise distance matrix to allow reads to cluster into OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) using the furthest-neighbor algorithm and specifying a distance cutoff value of 0.03. OTUs occurring from a single read were discarded at this step. Taxonomical classification of OTUs was carried out in Mothur with reference sequences based on the Greengenes database. The sequence identity threshold of 97% allows reasonable discrimination of sequences at the genus-level. The methods used to analyse the bacterial taxonomic profiles of the murine gut microbiota are described in78. All samples were rarified to the same sampling depth of 3676 reads. Before quality check, a mean of 65,720 raw reads were generated for each sample, whereas after merging, quality filtering, and mapping steps, the average number of reads per sample was 14,854. Alpha diversity indexes were calculated using PAleonto-logical STatistics software (PAST Version 3.18). For beta diversity analysis, the microbiota reads were analysed using MicrobiomeAnalyst79. We employed the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP v2.1.3) statistical probability model to identify biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities80. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt)30 was used to extrapolate functions associated with 16S rRNA sequencing data. STAMP was used to generate Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and to identify differentially abundant taxa and predicted functions determined by PICRUSt between groups. The datasets generated during/or analysed in the current study will be deposited in the sequence read archive from the national center for biotechnology information.
Murine models and treatments
TRAMP-C2 model
Immunocompetent C57BL/6 N male mice (Charles River 027) were injected with 2.0 × 106 TRAMP-C2 mouse PCa cells (subcutaneous) to measure changes in the gut microbiota associated with tumour growth. The TRAMP-C2 study protocol was approved by our Institutional Review Board (IRB) of CHU de Québec – Université Laval, Canada (#2015112). For the TRAMP-C2 model, twelve 6–8 weeks old C57BL/6 mice per group were fed with a low-fat diet (#D12450H, Research Diet Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) ad libitum and animals were single-housed throughout the experiment and under a 12 h day-night cycle with lights off at 18:00. Relative humidity was maintained between 40% and 60% and room temperature between 20 and 22 °C. 0.2% of the total fat in the low-fat diet was arachidonic acid (AA) but the diet contained no DHA or EPA. To evaluate the effect of specific fatty acids on TRAMP-C2 tumour growth, mice were daily supplemented by oral gavage with 618 mg/kg of body weight of purified MAG-EPA (SCF Pharma, Ste-Luce, Canada), MAG-DHA (SCF Pharma), MAG-AA (Nu-Check-Prep Inc, Elysian, MN) or HOSO (SCF Pharma) before tumour cell injection and until animal sacrifice. The dose supplemented mimicked the clinical dose used in the clinical trial (3 g/day of MAG-EPA, NCT02333435). Tumour size was measured every other day and the tumour volume was calculated using the following formula: (4/3) * 3.14159 * (longest diameter/2) * (shortest diameter/2) ^ 2. Tumour growth end point was reached at 2 cm3 total tumour volume (when both flanks were injected, end point is sum of both tumours). Tumours were collected from each mouse at sacrifice and stored at −80 °C. Fresh feces were collected throughout the study and immediately stored at −80 °C. For Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) experiments, C57BL/6 N 6–8 weeks old male mice, fed ad libitum chow diet (2018SX, Inotiv) under a 12 h day-night cycle with lights off at 18:00, were treated with 1 mg/mL of ampicilin in the drinking water that was changed every 2–3 days. In addition to the drinking antibiotic, mice were gavaged with 5 mg/mL of Streptomycin and 1 mg/mL of Colistin daily. Antibiotic treatments lasted for 8 consecutive days and animals had 48hrs to washout the antibiotics before being gavaged fecal samples from PCa patients or control. Control mice received their pre-antibiotic tumour-free PBS-resuspended feces. Receiver mice were given the PBS-resuspended feces from six independent PCa patients by intragastric gavage. Prior to the intragastric gavage into recipient mice, human fecal samples were culture tested for viability and FMTs were administered to the animals twice for two successive weeks and every time a drop of fecal suspension was added to the animal fur. Again, 2.0 × 106 TRAMP-C2 cells were injected into both flanks of animals after their last FMT. Tumour size was measured every other day and the tumour volume was calculated as described above.
Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− models
Experiments were conducted in the Animal Resources Facility at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC). The animal protocol followed the ethical guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and was approved by the RI-MUHC Glen Facility Animal Care Committee. Three weeks-old immunocompetent male C57BL/6 J mice (The Jackson Laboratories 000664) were fed a purified diet (TD.130838, Envigo) ad libitum under a 12 h day-night cycle with lights off at 18:00. Animals were injected subcutaneously with 50/50 mix of 1.5 × 106 Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ or Pten−/−; Rb1−/− murine PCa cells26,27 and phenol red-free Matrigel (CB-40234C, Corning) at 9 weeks of age. At about 13 weeks of age, tumour volume was recorded and feces from both tumour models and matched tumour-free animals were collected and stored at −80 °C (n = 8/group).
qPCR
Fecal DNA extracted from feces was tested by qPCR for the differential abundance of bacteria using the delta-delta Ct approach. Primers were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT Company, Coralville, IA) and sequences were; Ruminococcaceae (for- actgagaggttgaacggcca, rev-cctttacacccagtaawtccgga), Parabacteroides distasonis (for-gaacgctagcgacaggctta, rev- gatccctgcttcatgcggta), Lactobacillus ruminus (for-aagaccgcgaggtttagcaa, rev-tagacggctggctccaaaag) and control total 16S rRNA (for-tggagcatgtggtttaattcga, rev-tgcgggacttaacccaac). Catalase (for-tttYaaYcgagaRMgRgtNccNgaRMgNg, rev-gaatatgcaaaaaggcgNccYtgNaRNaKYttRtc). Butyrate kinase (for- tgctgtWgttggWagaggYgga, rev- gcaacIgcYttttgatttaatgcatgg). Butyryl CoA transferase (for- gacaagggccgtcaggtcta, rev- ggacaggcagatRaagctcttgc). The qPCR reactions were prepared using the Advanced qPCR mastermix with Supergreen Low-ROX (Wisent Inc., St-Bruno, QC), 2 units of FastStart Taq DNA polymerase, 500 µM of primers and 2 µl of genomic DNA in a total reaction volume of 20 µl. For the human fecal samples, a DNA-free Taq was used (cat#101005, Boca scientific) to amplify specific bacteria-related genes (Catalase, Butyrate kinase and Butyryl CoA transferase). The cycling conditions consisted of 1 cycle at 95 °C during 5 min for denaturation and hot start, followed by 40 three-segment cycles for amplification (94 °C for 30 s; 55–60 °C for 45 sec; 72 °C for 30 s). Melting curve was performed at the end of PCR amplification to verify the reaction specificity. Experiments were run on StepOneplus Real Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Short-chain fatty acid analysis
For short-chain fatty acid analysis, fresh frozen human fecal samples were resuspended at 100 mg/mL in water and later homogenized using a beadruptor apparatus (Omni international, Kennesaw, GA). After homogenization, fecal samples were low speed-centrifugated and the supernatant was used for acetic acid extraction. Purified samples were injected in a gaz chromatography-flame ionization detector along with standards for quantification. Samples were extracted and measured in duplicate and the mean of both separate SCFA quantifications were used for statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses
Difference of tumour growth between groups was performed by two-sided student’s t-test, two-sided Welch’s t-test, Wilcoxon test and other statistical analyses are described in the figure legends. Unless specified otherwise, the data is presented in the text as mean ± SEM. P-values below or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. NS or no asterisk = not significant, p ≥ 0.05, *p ≥ 0.05, **p ≥ 0.01, ***p ≥ 0.001.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
The authors first thank the participating men who made this work possible and the Banque de tissus et de données médicales pour la recherche sur les maladies prostatiques de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec biobank for providing feces samples and clinical data. The authors thank Dr. Samuel Fortin from SCF Pharma for having kindly provided MAG-EPA, MAG-DHA and placebo HOSO capsules for this clinical trial and for the mouse work. Authors also thank Hélène Hovington for clinical databases, Pierre-Luc Mercier for DNA extraction, Marie-Josée Bilodeau for patient recruitment, Perrine Feutry for SCFA analyses, IBIS team for all the next-generation sequencing, Dr. Aurélie Le Page, Serena Bou Dagher and Clara Blancfuney for technical assistance regarding the mouse work as well as Xavier-Philippe Légaré for revisions to the manuscript. This research was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and Movember Foundation (grant #400345/D2016-1336) to V.F., N.D. and A.M., by the W. Garfield Weston Foundation through Weston Family Microbiome Initiative awarded to V.F., Y.F., F.R. and A.M., and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research project grant awarded to C.A.P. (PJT-148821) and to D.P.L. (PJT-162246). A.M. was supported by a CIHR/Pfizer research Chair on the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and cardiometabolic complications. G.L. was supported by Diabetes Canada post-doctoral fellowship (NOD_PF-3-15-4764). J.L. was supported by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS) scholarship. N.G. was supported by PCa Canada Ph.D. scholarship. T.H. is a 100 Days Across Canada Bursary Award Recipient for PCa research. I.B.J. and F.R. are associated with the Canada excellence research chair on the microbiome-endocannabinoidome one axis in metabolic health. D.P.L. is a William Dawson Scholar of McGill University, a Lewis Katz – Young Investigator of the Prostate Cancer Foundation and is a Research Scholar – Junior 2 from the (FRQS). V.F. is a recipient of FRQS clinician-scientist career award.
Author contributions
G.L., N.G. and F.G. contributed to the design and laboratory experiments. A.F., T.H., N.B., C.A. and D.P.L. contributed to the design and laboratory experiments of the Pten/Rb1 PCa mouse models. L.E. provided the Pten−/−; Rb1+/+ and Pten−/−; Rb1−/− PCa cells lines. G.L., K.R., and J-F.P. collected clinical samples and data. H.W.X., S.B., N.D. and T.V. performed the bioinformatics and biostatistical analysis of the data. G.L., K.R, T.V., I.B.J., H.W.X., S.B., N.D., A.B., F.R., Y.F., D.P.L., A.M., and V.F. contributed to figure preparation, data interpretation and writing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All tools used for 16S metagenomic are available online; Greengenes [https://mothur.org/wiki/Greengenes-formatted_databases], RDP reference file [https://mothur.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/wiki/trainset9_032012.pds.zip], SILVA reference alignments [https://mothur.org/wiki/Silva_reference_files] and Mothur [https://mothur.org/].The raw sequence reads generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and are directly available under accession code PRJNA1047087. Source data are provided with this paper. Other information is available in supplementary information and otherwise available upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-45332-w.
References
- 1.Golombos DM, et al. The role of gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer: a prospective, pilot study. Urology. 2018;111:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liss MA, et al. Metabolic biosynthesis pathways identified from fecal microbiome associated with prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2018;74:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Porter CM, Shrestha E, Peiffer LB, Sfanos KS. The microbiome in prostate inflammation and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21:345–354. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Daisley BA, et al. Abiraterone acetate preferentially enriches for the gut commensal Akkermansia muciniphila in castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4822. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18649-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sfanos KS, et al. Compositional differences in gastrointestinal microbiota in prostate cancer patients treated with androgen axis-targeted therapies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21:539–548. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0061-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li, J. K. M. et al. A cross-sectional study on gut microbiota in prostate cancer patients with prostatectomy or androgen deprivation therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis10.1038/s41391-021-00360-1 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Pernigoni N, et al. Commensal bacteria promote endocrine resistance in prostate cancer through androgen biosynthesis. Science. 2021;374:216–224. doi: 10.1126/science.abf8403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cani PD. Human gut microbiome: hopes, threats and promises. Gut. 2018;67:1716–1725. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Routy B, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359:91–97. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for cancer research third expert report on diet, nutrition, physical activity, and cancer: impact and future directions. J. Nutr. 2020;150:663–671. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Richman EL, et al. Fat intake after diagnosis and risk of lethal prostate cancer and all-cause mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1318–1326. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martinez-Guryn K, et al. Small intestine microbiota regulate host digestive and absorptive adaptive responses to dietary lipids. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:458–469.e455. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Semova I, et al. Microbiota regulate intestinal absorption and metabolism of fatty acids in the zebrafish. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anhe FF, et al. Type 2 diabetes influences bacterial tissue compartmentalisation in human obesity. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:233–242. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0178-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chang SN, et al. High animal fat intake enhances prostate cancer progression and reduces glutathione peroxidase 3 expression in early stages of TRAMP mice. Prostate. 2014;74:1266–1277. doi: 10.1002/pros.22843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Labbé DP, et al. PTP1B deficiency enables the ability of a high-fat diet to drive the invasive character of PTEN-deficient prostate cancers. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3130–3135. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Labbé DP, et al. High-fat diet fuels prostate cancer progression by rewiring the metabolome and amplifying the MYC program. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12298-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gevariya N, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids decrease prostate cancer progression associated with an anti-tumor immune response in eugonadal and castrated mice. Prostate. 2019;79:9–20. doi: 10.1002/pros.23706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li J, et al. Dietary supplementation of alpha-linolenic acid induced conversion of n-3 LCPUFAs and reduced prostate cancer growth in a mouse model. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12944-017-0529-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Berquin IM, et al. Modulation of prostate cancer genetic risk by omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:1866–1875. doi: 10.1172/JCI31494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Robitaille K. A phase IIb randomized placebo-controlled trial testing a long-chain omega-3 fatty acid MAG-EPA dietary supplement on prostate cancer proliferation. Commun. Med. 2023;18:64. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00456-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morris EK, et al. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecol. Evol. 2014;4:3514–3524. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.DeJong T. A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness. Oikos. 1975;26:222–227. doi: 10.2307/3543712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hofman MS, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–1216. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klingenberg S, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary lymph node and distant metastasis nm staging of high-risk prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2021;62:214–220. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.245605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ku SY, et al. Rb1 and Trp53 cooperate to suppress prostate cancer lineage plasticity, metastasis, and antiandrogen resistance. Science. 2017;355:78–83. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Labbé DP, et al. TOP2A and EZH2 provide early detection of an aggressive prostate cancer subgroup. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:7072–7083. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nyquist MD, et al. Combined TP53 and RB1 loss promotes prostate cancer resistance to a spectrum of therapeutics and confers vulnerability to replication stress. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107669. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hamid AA, et al. Compound genomic alterations of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 tumor suppressors in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Langille MG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moussa, H. et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids Survey in Men under Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: from Intake to Prostate Tissue Level. Nutrients11, 10.3390/nu11071616 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Moreel X, et al. Prostatic and dietary omega-3 fatty acids and prostate cancer progression during active surveillance. Cancer Prev. Res (Philos.) 2014;7:766–776. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Watt, M. J. et al. Suppressing fatty acid uptake has therapeutic effects in preclinical models of prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med11, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5758 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Pelser C, Mondul AM, Hollenbeck AR, Park Y. Dietary fat, fatty acids, and risk of prostate cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2013;22:697–707. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1196-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bidu C, et al. The transplantation of omega3 PUFA-altered gut microbiota of fat-1 mice to wild-type littermates prevents obesity and associated metabolic disorders. Diabetes. 2018;67:1512–1523. doi: 10.2337/db17-1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kaliannan K, Wang B, Li XY, Kim KJ, Kang JX. A host-microbiome interaction mediates the opposing effects of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids on metabolic endotoxemia. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:11276. doi: 10.1038/srep11276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guertin MH, et al. Effects of concentrated long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation before radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer proliferation, inflammation, and quality of life: study protocol for a phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:64. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3979-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cooper CS, et al. Analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:367–372. doi: 10.1038/ng.3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA. Contemporary gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017;41:e1–e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Epstein JI, et al. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016;40:244–252. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Epstein JI, et al. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the gleason score. Eur. Urol. 2016;69:428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hennes D, et al. The modified International Society of Urological Pathology system improves concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy tumour grade. BJU Int. 2021;128:45–51. doi: 10.1111/bju.15556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.De Nunzio C, et al. The new Epstein gleason score classification significantly reduces upgrading in prostate cancer patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018;44:835–839. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Corcoran NM, et al. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence. BJU Int. 2011;108:E202–E210. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fan Y, Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:55–71. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Coutzac C, et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16079-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matsushita, M. et al. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote prostate cancer growth via IGF-1 signaling. Cancer Res10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-4090 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Riquelme E, et al. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell. 2019;178:795–806.e712. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Emami N, Diamandis EP. New insights into the functional mechanisms and clinical applications of the kallikrein-related peptidase family. Mol. Oncol. 2007;1:269–287. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yamasaki K, et al. Kallikrein-mediated proteolysis regulates the antimicrobial effects of cathelicidins in skin. FASEB J. 2006;20:2068–2080. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6075com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Edstrom AM, et al. The major bactericidal activity of human seminal plasma is zinc-dependent and derived from fragmentation of the semenogelins. J. Immunol. 2008;181:3413–3421. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Muytjens CM, Vasiliou SK, Oikonomopoulou K, Prassas I, Diamandis EP. Putative functions of tissue kallikrein-related peptidases in vaginal fluid. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2016;13:596–607. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Edstrom Hagerwall AM, et al. beta-Microseminoprotein endows post coital seminal plasma with potent candidacidal activity by a calcium- and pH-dependent mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002625. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heidler S, et al. The correlation of prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels with positive bacterial prostate tissue cultures. Urology. 2018;115:151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Foster BA, Gingrich JR, Kwon ED, Madias C, Greenberg NM. Characterization of prostatic epithelial cell lines derived from transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3325–3330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fassarella M, et al. Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate. Gut health Gut. 2021;70:595–605. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Costea PI, et al. Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:8–16. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ericsson AC, et al. Effects of vendor and genetic background on the composition of the fecal microbiota of inbred mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Manzano RG, Catalan-Latorre A, Brugarolas A. RB1 and TP53 co-mutations correlate strongly with genomic biomarkers of response to immunity checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:432. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08078-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jin X, et al. Phosphorylated RB promotes cancer immunity by inhibiting NF-kappaB activation and PD-L1 expression. Mol. Cell. 2019;73:22–35.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gevariya N, et al. Omega-3 eicosapentaenoic acid reduces prostate tumor vascularity. Mol. Cancer Res. 2021;19:516–527. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Menni C, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids correlate with gut microbiome diversity and production of N-carbamylglutamate in middle aged and elderly women. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:11079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10382-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Suzuki, T. A. & Ley, R. E. The role of the microbiota in human genetic adaptation. Science370, 10.1126/science.aaz6827 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 64.Miyamoto J, et al. Gut microbiota confers host resistance to obesity by metabolizing dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4007. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11978-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Watson H, et al. A randomised trial of the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements on the human intestinal microbiota. Gut. 2018;67:1974–1983. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vijay A, Astbury S, Le Roy C, Spector TD, Valdes AM. The prebiotic effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation: a six-week randomised intervention trial. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1–11. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1863133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ribeiro-Vidal, H. et al. Antimicrobial Activity of EPA and DHA against Oral Pathogenic Bacteria Using an In Vitro Multi-Species Subgingival Biofilm Model. Nutrients12, 10.3390/nu12092812 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Coraca-Huber, D. C., Steixner, S., Wurm, A. & Nogler, M. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids against periprosthetic joint infections-isolated multi-drug resistant strains. Biomedicines9, 10.3390/biomedicines9040334 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Motta JP, Wallace JL, Buret AG, Deraison C, Vergnolle N. Gastrointestinal biofilms in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:314–334. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00397-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gopalakrishnan V, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:97–103. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Akrami M, et al. Circulation of gut-preactivated naive CD8(+) T cells enhances antitumor immunity in B cell-defective mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:23674–23683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010981117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schluter, J. et al. An association between the gut microbiota and immune cell dynamics in humans. BioRxiv10.1101/618256 (2020).
- 73.Louis P, Hold GL, Flint HJ. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:661–672. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Irrazabal T, Belcheva A, Girardin SE, Martin A, Philpott DJ. The multifaceted role of the intestinal microbiota in colon cancer. Mol. Cell. 2014;54:309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Okumura S, et al. Gut bacteria identified in colorectal cancer patients promote tumourigenesis via butyrate secretion. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5674. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25965-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Davidsson S, et al. CD4 helper T cells, CD8 cytotoxic T cells, and FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells with respect to lethal prostate cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2013;26:448–455. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Flammiger A, et al. High tissue density of FOXP3+ T cells is associated with clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:1273–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Anhe FF, et al. A polyphenol-rich cranberry extract protects from diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance and intestinal inflammation in association with increased Akkermansia spp. population in the gut microbiota of mice. Gut. 2015;64:872–883. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, Xia J. Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat. Protoc. 2020;15:799–821. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0264-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3123–3124. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All tools used for 16S metagenomic are available online; Greengenes [https://mothur.org/wiki/Greengenes-formatted_databases], RDP reference file [https://mothur.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/wiki/trainset9_032012.pds.zip], SILVA reference alignments [https://mothur.org/wiki/Silva_reference_files] and Mothur [https://mothur.org/].The raw sequence reads generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and are directly available under accession code PRJNA1047087. Source data are provided with this paper. Other information is available in supplementary information and otherwise available upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.