Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Apr 24;19(4):e0301830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301830

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on Covid-19 incidence and mortality in the United States

Fang Fang 1, John David Clemens 1,2,3, Zuo-Feng Zhang 1,4,5,*, Timothy F Brewer 1,6,*
Editor: Olatunji Matthew Kolawole7
PMCID: PMC11042718  PMID: 38656933

Abstract

Background

Given the waning of vaccine effectiveness and the shifting of the most dominant strains in the U.S., it is imperative to understand the association between vaccination coverage and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease and mortality at the community levels and whether that association might vary according to the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strains in the U.S.

Methods

Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate associations between U.S. county-level cumulative vaccination rates and booster distribution and the daily change in county-wide Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) risks and mortality during Alpha, Delta and Omicron predominance. Models were adjusted for potential confounders at both county and state level. A 2-week lag and a 4-week lag were introduced to assess vaccination rate impact on incidence and mortality, respectively.

Results

Among 3,073 counties in 48 states, the average county population complete vaccination rate of all age groups was 50.79% as of March 11th, 2022. Each percentage increase in vaccination rates was associated with reduction of 4% (relative risk (RR) 0.9607 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9553, 0.9661)) and 3% (RR 0.9694 (95% CI: 0.9653, 0.9736)) in county-wide COVID-19 cases and mortality, respectively, when Alpha was the dominant variant. The associations between county-level vaccine rates and COVID-19 incidence diminished during the Delta and Omicron predominance. However, each percent increase in people receiving a booster shot was associated with reduction of 6% (RR 0.9356 (95% CI: 0.9235, 0.9479)) and 4% (RR 0.9595 (95% CI: 0.9431, 0.9761)) in COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the community, respectively, during the Omicron predominance.

Conclusions

Associations between complete vaccination rates and COVID-19 incidence and mortality appeared to vary with shifts in the dominant variant, perhaps due to variations in vaccine efficacy by variant or to waning vaccine immunity over time. Vaccine boosters were associated with notable protection against Omicron disease and mortality.

Introduction

Since being recognized in December, 2019, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has caused more than 479 million cases and six million deaths worldwide [1]. The United States has been particularly affected, with almost 80 million Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infections and 972 thousand deaths reported as of March 25th, 2022 [2]. Though a number of non-pharmacologic prevention initiatives (NPIs) have been introduced to slow SARS-CoV-2 transmission [3], vaccines are now recognized as among the most effective means for preventing COVID-19 cases and deaths [4].

As of March 25, 2022, three vaccine preparations were authorized for use in the U.S. The BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer, Inc. and BioNTech) and the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine have full U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval [5, 6], while JNJ-78436735 (Janssen Pharmaceuticals) is available under an emergency use authorization. All three vaccines are effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 associated diseases, hospitalizations, and deaths [79], though vaccine effectiveness wanes over time and breakthrough infections occur [4, 10].

Numerous studies have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19 infections and disease in individuals outside of clinical trials, including among health care workers, first responders, individuals attending ambulatory clinics, veterans, and in nursing homes [1113]. However, vaccine waning has been reported, especially after 6 months being fully vaccinated [1416]. Vaccine effectiveness also varies by SARS-CoV-2 variant. Omicron, the most recent predominant variant, evades infection- or vaccination-induced immunity more effectively than Delta variant, and correspondingly has higher rates of breakthrough infections or disease reported compared with other variants [14, 1618]. With the previous recognition of waning vaccine immunity and the rise of Delta as the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the U.S., the FDA authorized the emergency use of one or two boosters for COVID-19 vaccines, including the use of a heterologous booster [1921]. Studies showed the effectiveness of vaccines improved after a booster dose, including against Omicron [16, 22, 23].

Despite the proven safety and effectiveness of these vaccines, a substantial minority of the adult U.S. population remains resistant to getting vaccinated [24]. To understand the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, it is imperative to evaluate the impact of vaccination on community-wide SARS-CoV-2 cases and COVID-19 disease, not just among those vaccinated—a concept popularly referred to as “herd immunity” [25]. Moreover, it is worth examining whether and by how much such an impact might differ corresponding to different dominant strains in the community. To investigate the impact of population percentages of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on community-wide COVID-19 case and mortality rates, we undertook an ecological analysis of U.S. county vaccination rates on reported county COVID-19 cases and deaths, controlling for socioeconomic, demographic, comorbid conditions, rural/urban, air pollution, hospital capacity, and related factors, the introduction of NPIs and the presence of most prevalent strain in the U.S.

Materials and methods

Poisson distribution with generalized linear models [26] were used to estimate associations between cumulative U.S. county-level vaccination rates of all age groups and the daily change in county-wide COVID-19 incidence and mortality between April 23rd, 2021, and March 25th, 2022. The dates represent when Delta was first recognized in the U.S. to the end of the study period. The analyses were divided into three periods to account for the most dominant strain in the U.S. during each period. The first period was from April 23rd to July 2nd, 2021 before the Delta predominance and when Alpha was the most prevalent strain. Delta was responsible for the majority of reported U.S. COVID-19 cases from July 3rd to December 1st, 2021. Between December 2nd, 2021 and March 25th, 2022, Omicron began circulating in the U.S. and replaced Delta to become the dominant strain.

All models were adjusted for the following potential confounders: annual average of ambient atmospheric particulate matter <2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) between 2000 and 2018, population density, poverty, education, proportions of White, proportions of male, proportion of population older than 65 years old, owner-occupied property, median house value, median household income, percentage of people without health insurance, proportion of people living in rural area, prevalence of tobacco smoking, and obesity. All covariates were measured at the county level. State-level variables for NPIs policies (facemask mandates, stay home orders) also were included in models. Table 1 summarizes data sources utilized in this study.

Table 1. Summary of data sources.

Sources Description
Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering Coronavirus Resource Center (CSSE) [2] Cumulative county-level confirmed cases and deaths up to March 25th, 2022
Covid Act Now [27] Cumulative county-level number of people completely vaccinated and number of completed vaccinated people receiving booster up to March 11th, 2022
Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group [28] Annual average PM2.5 concentration between 2000 and 2018
The US Census/American Community Survey County-level socioeconomic and demographic variables in 2020
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program [29] Country-level behavioral variables and rural/urban status in 2020
Boston University of Public Health [30] State-level policy of face masks mandates and stay home orders before July 2nd, 2022

County-level COVID-19 incidence and mortality data were obtained from the Johns Hopkins University, Center for Systems Science and Engineering Coronavirus Resource Center (CSSE). CSSE collects county-level confirmed numbers of cases and deaths of 3,342 counties across the U.S. from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as state departments of health since January 21st, 2020 [2].

County-level vaccine data were obtained from Covid Act Now. These data are derived from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the CDC, the New York Times, and official state and county dashboards. Data on vaccinations initiated, vaccination regimens completed and booster shots received were available for all 50 states [27]. To allow for the development of protective immunity after vaccination, a two-week lag was introduced after people were completely vaccinated (a person vaccinated on June 18th was considered fully protected by July 2nd). The two-week lag also was used to account for time between exposure and development of COVID-19 disease. To assess the impact of vaccination on COVID-19 mortality, a four-week lag was used (vaccinated by September 2nd to assess the impact on mortality on September 30th). In order to capture the immunity gained from the previous natural infection, county-level cumulative incidence was multiplied by the proportion of unvaccinated people among total infection during different stages of pandemic estimated by CDC [31]. A two-week and a four-week lags were applied to the cumulative incidence when assessing incidence and mortality outcomes, respectively. This was added to the fully vaccination rate and to the coverage of booster to estimate the holistic immunity in each county, by accounting for the immunity gained from both vaccination and from natural infection.

Covariates were selected based on previous publications [3, 32] and availability of publicly accessible data. Fig 1 shows the directed acyclic graph applied in this study. County-level annual average of PM2.5 between the years 2000 and 2018, as well as county-level covariates, were available from the Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group [28]. County-level socioeconomic and demographic variables for 2020 were available from the US Census/American Community Survey. 2020 data on the prevalence of adult tobacco smoking and adult obesity and the proportion of people living in rural area were accessible through the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program [29]. State averages were used to replace missing values for county-level prevalence for smoking and obesity. State-wide non-pharmacologic prevention policies, including facemask use and stay home orders, were obtained from the Boston University School of Public Health [30].

Fig 1. Directed acyclic graph.

Fig 1

County characteristics include annual PM2.5 concentration between 2000 and 2018, percentage of adults smokers, percentage of obese adults, percentage of people living under poverty, population density, percentage of owner occupied properties, percentage of adults with less than high school education, percentage of White population, median household income, median house value, percentage of population over 65 years old, percentage of male, percentage of population without an insurance, and percentage of population living in rural area. State policies include stay home orders and facemask mandates.

Counties with invalid Federal Information Processing Standards (n = 10), missing covariates (n = 98), missing vaccination status with a 2-week (n = 113) or a 4-week (n = 122) lag, and negative change in incidence (n = 48) or in mortality (n = 70) possibly due to data entry error were excluded. As a result, data from 3,073 counties in 48 states (excluding District of Columbia, Hawaii, and New Hampshire) were available to investigate the association between population vaccination rates and county-wide COVID-19 incidence and 3,042 counties in 48 states to investigate the association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 mortality. Among these eligible counties, 2,906 counties in 46 states and 2,876 counties in 46 states also reported percentage of people receiving a booster shot during the Omicron predominance and were utilized to assess the association between booster coverage and COVID-19 incidence and mortality, respectively. To assess the potential effect modification due to metropolitan status, stratified analyses by metropolitan status defined by Department of Agriculture [33] were performed. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Analyses were performed in SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC).

Results

Among the 3,073 counties across 48 states, the average county total population complete vaccination rate was 50.79% as of March 11th, 2022. Counties with complete vaccination rates above the national median (49.8%) had higher median house values, higher median household incomes, higher population density, and less population living in rural area compared with counties with vaccination rates below 49.8%. These counties also were more likely to be located in states where a facemask policy or a stay-home order was ever issued before July 2nd, 2021 (Table 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of counties (n = 3073) in 48 states as of 3/25/2022.

Mean (SD)
All Vaccination rate ≤ 49.8% as of 3/11/2022 Vaccination rate > 49.8% as of 3/11/2022
No. of county in No. of states 3073 in 48 states 1542 in 40 states 1531 in 48 states
Incidence of COVID-19 as of 3/25/2022a, % 24.22 (5.70) 24.35 (5.66) 24.08 (5.73)
Incidence of COVID-19 as of 12/1/2021a, % 15.96 (3.98) 16.67 (3.80) 15.24 (4.03)
Incidence of COVID-19 as of 7/2/2021a, % 10.22 (3.07) 10.54 (2.93) 9.92 (3.16)
Mortality of COVID-19 as of 3/25/2022b, % 0.36 (0.16) 0.41 (0.16) 0.31 (0.15)
Mortality of COVID-19 as of 12/1/2021b, % 0.28 (0.14) 0.32 (0.14) 0.24 (0.13)
Mortality of COVID-19 as of 7/2/2021b, % 0.20 (0.11) 0.22 (0.11) 0.18 (0.11)
Full vaccination rate as of 3/11/2022c, % 50.79 (11.90) 42.48 (6.00) 60.17 (8.54)
Full vaccination rate as of 2/25/2022c, % 50.45 (11.83) 41.19 (5.96) 59.77 (8.48)
Full vaccination rate as of 11/17/2021c, % 44.51 (12.13) 35.92 (7.87) 53.17 (9.13)
Full vaccination rate as of 11/3/2021c, % 43.85 (12.32) 35.03 (8.17) 52.26 (9.33)
Full vaccination rate as of 6/18/2021c, % 32.06 (11.06) 24.82 (7.67) 38.99 (9.21)
Full vaccination rate as of 6/4/2021c, % 30.24 (10.64) 23.46 (7.62) 36.81 (8.89)
Booster rate as of 3/11/2022c, % 22.41 (8.24) 17.07 (4.16) 28.18 (7.65)
Booster rate as of 2/25/2022c, % 21.91 (8.12) 16.68 (4.12) 27.57 (7.57)
Average ambient PM2.5d, μg/m3 7.86 (2.18) 7.92 (2.16) 7.80 (2.19)
Ever smokers, % 17.48 (3.56) 18.32 (3.36) 16.63 (3.54)
Adult obesity, % 32.90 (5.42) 33.94 (5.01) 31.85 (5.61)
Population living in poverty, % 14.66 (6.18) 15.82 (5.90) 13.49 (6.24)
Population density, No. per square mile 206.44 (916.43) 59.56 (111.88) 354.38 (1276.72)
Owner occupied properties, % 72.08 (8.22) 73.18 (7.23) 70.97 (8.98)
Adults with less than high school education, % 12.74 (5.80) 14.33 (5.60) 11.13 (5.55)
White Americans population, % 77.05 (17.58) 79.63 (15.88) 74.45 (18.78)
African Americans population, % 8.83 (14.21) 8.56 (13.96) 11.04 (14.45)
Hispanic population, % 9.72 (13.63) 8.41 (11.59) 9.11 (15.31)
Median house value, ×$1,000 25.22 (66.44) 8.56 (10.31) 42.00 (90.52)
Median household income, ×$1,000 68.30 (16.73) 62.19 (11.42) 74.46 (18.84)
Population over 65 years old, % 19.28 (4.72) 19.54 (4.34) 19.02 (5.07)
Male, % 50.05 (2.38) 50.27 (2.65) 49.82 (2.05)
Uninsured population, % 9.48 (5.04) 10.81 (4.96) 8.14 (4.76)
Population living in rural, % 58.53 (31.38) 69.28 (26.18) 47.67 (32.46)
State stay-home order before 7/2/2021, n (%)
 Ever issued 2192 (71.33) 1013 (65.69) 1179 (77.01)
 Never issued 881 (28.67) 529 (34.31) 352 (22.99)
State facemask policy before 7/2/2021, n (%)
 Ever issued 2299 (74.81) 991 (64.27) 1308 (85.43)
 Never issued 774 (25.19) 551 (35.73) 223 (14.57)

aCOVID-19 cases out of total population in each county

bCOVID-19 deaths out of total population in each county

cNumber of people fully vaccinated out of total population of all age groups in each county

dAnnual average of PM2.5 between 2000 and 2018

When Alpha was the dominant strain in the U.S., each percentage increase in a county’s total population complete vaccination rate was associated with a 4% decrease in county-wide COVID-19 cases (relative risk (RR) 0.9607 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9553, 0.9661)) and with a 3% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (RR 0.9694 (95% CI: 0.9653, 0.9736)). However, county-level complete vaccine coverage was not associated with decreases in COVID-19 cases during the Delta (RR 0.9988 (95% CI: 0.9964, 1.0011)) and Omicron (RR 0.9969 (95% CI: 0.9919, 1.0019)) predominance. The association between complete vaccination rates and COVID-19 mortality declined to less than 0.1% (RR 0.9934 (95% CI: 0.9889, 0.9980)) when Delta accounted for the majority of reported cases in the U.S. between July 3rd and December 1st, 2021. When Omicron began circulating, complete vaccination rate was associated with a slight increase of 0.6% in county-level COVID-19 mortality (RR 1.0061 (95% CI: 1.0022, 1.0101)). In contrast to the associations between complete vaccination rates and COVID-19 outcomes during the Omicron predominance, a 6% reduction in COVID-19 incidence (RR 0.9356 (95% CI: 0.9235, 0.9479)) and a 4% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (RR 0.9595 (95% CI: 0.9431, 0.9761)) were observed with each percentage increase in people receiving a booster shot at the county level. After accounting for the immunity gained from natural infection, the results remained similar (Table 3). Moreover, metropolitan status seems not to modify the association between vaccination and COVID-19 outcomes (Table 4).

Table 3. Adjusted relative risks of COVID-19 incidence and mortality associated with additional people fully vaccinated, with additional people receiving a booster dose, and with additional immunity per 100 population between April 23, 2021 and March 25, 2022 stratified by the most dominant variant.

RR (95% Confidence Interval)
Dominant variant Alpha (4/23/2021–7/2/2021) Delta (7/3/2021–12/1/2021) Omicron (12/2/2021–3/25/2022)
Incidencea
 Fully vaccinated 0.9607 0.9988 0.9969
  (n = 3,073 in 48 states) (0.9553, 0.9661) (0.9964, 1.0011) (0.9919, 1.0019)
 Booster N/A N/A 0.9356
  (n = 2,906 in 46 states) (0.9235, 0.9479)
 Fully vaccinated and natural immunity 0.9738 1.0001 0.9863
  (n = 3,073 in 48 states) (0.9677, 0.9799) (0.9978, 1.0025) (0.9795, 0.9931)
 Booster and natural immunity N/A N/A 0.9377
  (n = 2,906 in 46 states) (0.9268, 0.9488)
Mortalityb
 Fully vaccinated 0.9694 0.9934 1.0061
  (n = 3,042 in 48 states) (0.9653, 0.9736) (0.9889, 0.9980) (1.0022, 1.0101)
 Booster N/A N/A 0.9595
  (n = 2,876 in 46 states) (0.9431, 0.9761)
 Fully vaccinated and natural immunity 0.9712 0.9981 1.0035
  (n = 3,042 in 48 states) (0.9656, 0.9767) (0.9935, 1.0027) (1.0002, 1.0069)
 Booster and natural immunity N/A N/A 0.9660
  (n = 2,876 in 46 states) (0.9533, 0.9788)

aModel a adjusts for annual PM2.5 concentration between 2000 and 2018, percentage of adults smokers, percentage of obese adults, percentage of people living under poverty, population density, percentage of owner occupied properties, percentage of adults with less than high school education, percentage of White population, median household income, median house value, percentage of population over 65 years old, percentage of male, percentage of population without an insurance, percentage of population living in rural area, stay home orders before 7/2/2021 (ever/never) and facemask mandate before 7/2/2021 (ever/never); fully vaccination rate and booster rate were assessed two weeks prior the end of each period

bModel b adjusts for all covariates in model a; fully vaccination rate and booster rate were assessed four weeks prior the end of each period

Table 4. Adjusted relative risks of COVID-19 incidence and mortality associated with additional people fully vaccinated and with additional people receiving a booster dose per 100 population between April 23, 2021 and March 25, 2022 stratified by the most dominant variant and by metropolitan status.

RR (95% Confidence Interval)
Dominant variant Alpha (4/23/2021–7/2/2021) Delta (7/3/2021–12/1/2021) Omicron (12/2/2021–3/25/2022)
Incidencea
Metropolitan counties
Fully vaccinated 0.9597 0.9991 0.9946
(n = 1,148 in 47 states) (0.9536, 0.9658) (0.9961, 1.0021) (0.9881, 1.0010)
Booster N/A N/A 0.9324
(n = 1,063 in 45 states) (0.9184, 0.9465)
Non-metropolitan counties
Fully vaccinated 0.9623 0.9975 1.0049
(n = 1,924 in 45 states) (0.9584, 0.9663) (0.9957, 0.9993) (1.031, 1.0067)
Booster N/A N/A 0.9606
(n = 1,842 in 43 states) (0.9541, 0.9672)
Mortalityb
Metropolitan counties
Fully vaccinated 0.9673 0.9947 1.0087
(n = 1,134 in 47 states) (0.9627, 0.9720) (0.9886, 1.0008) (1.0044, 1.0130)
Booster N/A N/A 0.9569
(0.9374, 0.9768)
(n = 1,049 in 45 states)
Non-metropolitan counties
Fully vaccinated 0.9781 0.9936 0.9973
(n = 1,907 in 45 states) (0.9738, 0.9823) (0.9903, 0.9969) (0.9947, 0.9999)
Booster N/A N/A 0.9687
(n = 1,826 in 43 states) (0.9609, 0.9765)

aModel a adjusts for annual PM2.5 concentration between 2000 and 2018, percentage of adults smokers, percentage of obese adults, percentage of people living under poverty, population density, percentage of owner occupied properties, percentage of adults with less than high school education, percentage of White population, median household income, median house value, percentage of population over 65 years old, percentage of male, percentage of population without an insurance, percentage of population living in rural area, stay home orders before 7/2/2021 (ever/never) and facemask mandate before 7/2/2021 (ever/never); fully vaccination rate and booster rate were assessed two weeks prior the end of each period

bModel b adjusts for all covariates in model a; fully vaccination rate and booster rate were assessed four weeks prior the end of each period

Discussion

Data from 3,073 counties across 48 states demonstrates that the associations between county-level complete vaccination rate and COVID-19 incidence and mortality varied based on the most prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variant circulating in the U.S. between April 23rd, 2021 and March 25th, 2022 after adjusting for potential confounders. The protective associations between county-level complete vaccination rate and COVID-19 incidence and mortality were observed during the Alpha predominance, but such associations attenuated later when Delta or Omicron was the most prevalent strain in the U.S. However, after booster shots were available, the increase in the county percentage of people receiving a booster shot was associated with reduction in both COVID-19 incidence and mortality between December 2nd, 2021 and March 25th, 2022.

This study is among the first to show the population-wide association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate and COVID-19 incidence and mortality stratified by the predominant strain circulating in the country. The results show that county-level vaccination rate has different associations with COVID-19 incidence and mortality during different periods in the U.S. The protection was highest shortly after COVID-19 vaccines became widely available while Alpha was the predominant circulating strain and declined in later periods. This pattern might be due to the waning effect of the vaccines against infection over time within the community. A meta-analysis showed that though vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections was reduced, vaccine remained highly efficient in protecting people from severe diseases due to COVID-19 [15]. In addition, as vaccine uptake increased and cases declined, most states lifted their NPIs orders [30]. Without the protection of NPIs and given the waning of vaccine effectiveness, people became more susceptible to COVID-19 infection even when fully vaccinated. Besides the waning vaccine effectiveness, our results also suggest the association of vaccine coverage and COVID-19 incidence might depend on the most prevalent strain in the community. The protection of increased vaccination coverage against county-level COVID-19 incidence or mortality was not observed when Omicron circulation predominated, which has been shown to evade previous immunity more than Alpha or Delta [17]. However, the majority of COVID mortality occurred among unvaccinated people in the U.S. throughout our study period [34]. In the light of the waning vaccine effectiveness and breakthrough cases, a booster shot has been recommended. Individual-level and experimental data demonstrate that a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines increases vaccine efficacy [16, 17]. Similarly, our results also suggest that the increasing uptake of a booster shot is associated with the reduction in community COVID-19 cases and deaths. Moreover, this study considers the holistic immunity, not only gained from vaccination but also gained from the natural infection.

The study was subject to several limitations. First, ecologic study designs are vulnerable to the ecologic fallacy. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting the study results, especially when extrapolating population findings to the individual level. In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility of residual confounding even after controlling for numerous county-level and state-level covariates. Using COVID-19 reported cases may underestimate of the number of actual infections due to under-testing of asymptomatic patients, especially when self-tests became widely available. However, alternative estimates for cumulative incidence, such as seroprevalence [35], also have limitations including sampling bias, test sensitivity and specificity, and the progress of the pandemic [36]. Our analysis was not able to assess the impact of the three different vaccines currently available in the U.S. due to data availability, which likely had different efficacies. Although a detailed distribution of different variants in the U.S. was not available, we examined the associations stratified by the most dominant strain. Therefore, our results represent the associations between vaccine rates overall and COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the U.S. for vaccines as actually deployed and SARS-CoV-2 variants as they circulated during the period of our analysis.

Conclusions

Nevertheless, this study is the first to estimate the association between complete vaccination rates and COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the U.S. general population using county-level data. This nation-wide study covers 3,073 counties in 48 states across the entire country, showing the population-based impact of increasing complete vaccination rates, as well as increasing percentage of those receiving a booster shot. Our results agree with the observation of waning effectiveness over time and higher infection breakthrough rates due to the Omicron variant. However, increasing the coverage of booster shot appear to be an effective way to protect individuals in the community and to potentially to achieve herd immunity.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledged all organizations and groups collecting and maintaining the data sources listed in Table 1 and utilized in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are publicly accessible from the data sources listed in Table 1. All pooled data are available on a public repository via https://github.com/Clairyff/COVID_Vaccine.

Funding Statement

FF is supported by the NIH/NCI T32 CA009142. The funding source had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022. March 29, 2022. Report No. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533–4. Epub 2020/02/23. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7159018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fang F, Mu L, Zhu Y, Rao J, Heymann J, Zhang Z-F. Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5, Facemask Mandates, Stay Home Orders and COVID-19 Incidence in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6274. PubMed PMID: doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, Tyner H, Yoon SK, Meece J, et al. Prevention and Attenuation of Covid-19 with the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(4):320–9. Epub 2021/07/01. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107058 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8262622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine Silver Spring, MD2021 [updated August 23, 2021; cited 2021 August 26, 2021]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine.
  • 6.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. SPIKEVAX Silber Spring, MD2023 [updated September 21, 2023; cited 2024 March 5]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/spikevax.
  • 7.Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–15. Epub 2020/12/11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7745181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doria-Rose N, Suthar MS, Makowski M, O’Connell S, McDermott AB, Flach B, et al. Antibody Persistence through 6 Months after the Second Dose of mRNA-1273 Vaccine for Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2103916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sadoff J, Gray G, Vandebosch A, Cárdenas V, Shukarev G, Grinsztejn B, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):2187–201. Epub 2021/04/22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101544 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8220996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Keehner J, Horton LE, Pfeffer MA, Longhurst CA, Schooley RT, Currier JS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection after Vaccination in Health Care Workers in California. N Engl J Med. 2021. Epub 2021/03/24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2101927 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8008750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thompson MG, Stenehjem E, Grannis S, Ball SW, Naleway AL, Ong TC, et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines in Ambulatory and Inpatient Care Settings. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(15):1355–71. Epub 2021/09/09. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110362 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8451184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Butt AA, Omer SB, Yan P, Shaikh OS, Mayr FB. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Effectiveness in a High-Risk National Population in a Real-World Setting. Ann Intern Med. 2021. Epub 2021/07/20. doi: 10.7326/m21-1577 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8381771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cabezas C, Coma E, Mora-Fernandez N, Li X, Martinez-Marcos M, Fina F, et al. Associations of BNT162b2 vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission and death with covid-19 in nursing homes and healthcare workers in Catalonia: prospective cohort study. Bmj. 2021;374:n1868. Epub 20210818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1868 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8371258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosenberg ES, Holtgrave DR, Dorabawila V, Conroy M, Greene D, Lutterloh E, et al. New COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations Among Adults, by Vaccination Status—New York, May 3-July 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(34):1150–5. Epub 20210827. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7034e1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8389393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Araos R, Goldberg Y, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):924–44. Epub 20220223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8863502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Accorsi EK, Britton A, Fleming-Dutra KE, Smith ZR, Shang N, Derado G, et al. Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants. Jama. 2022;327(7):639–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0470 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8848203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoffmann M, Krüger N, Schulz S, Cossmann A, Rocha C, Kempf A, et al. The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cell. 2022;185(3):447-56.e11. Epub 20211224. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.032 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8702401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cele S, Jackson L, Khoury DS, Khan K, Moyo-Gwete T, Tegally H, et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature. 2022;602(7898):654–6. Epub 20211223. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8866126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Takes Additional Actions on the Use of a Booster Dose for COVID-19 Vaccines [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD; 2021; October 20, 2021 [cited October 21, 2021]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-takes-additional-actions-use-booster-dose-covid-19-vaccines
  • 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Variant Proportions Atlanta, GA2021 [cited 2021 July 3, 2021]. Available from: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions.
  • 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Recommends Additional Boosters for Certain Individuals Atlanta, GA2022 [updated March 29, 2022; cited 2024 March 5]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0328-covid-19-boosters.html.
  • 22.Ferdinands JM, Rao S, Dixon BE, Mitchell PK, DeSilva MB, Irving SA, et al. Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance—VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(7):255–63. Epub 20220218. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8853475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thompson MG, Natarajan K, Irving SA, Rowley EA, Griggs EP, Gaglani M, et al. Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance—VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(4):139–45. Epub 20220121. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Mazor KM. Attitudes Toward a Potential SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: A Survey of U.S. Adults. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(12):964–73. Epub 2020/09/05. doi: 10.7326/M20-3569 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7505019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson RM, Vegvari C, Truscott J, Collyer BS. Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination. Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1614–6. Epub 2020/11/08. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32318-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7836302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Covid Act Now API [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021]. Available from: https://apidocs.covidactnow.org.
  • 28.van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Li C, Burnett RT. Regional Estimates of Chemical Composition of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geoscience-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019;53(5):2595–611. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program. Health Behaviors 2020. Available from: https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings/measures-data-sources/county-health-rankings-model/health-factors/health-behaviors.
  • 30.COVID-19 US state policy database [Internet]. 2020. Available from: www.tinyurl.com/statepolicies.
  • 31.Johnson AG, Amin AB, Ali AR, Hoots B, Cadwell BL, Arora S, et al. COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates Among Unvaccinated and Fully Vaccinated Adults with and Without Booster Doses During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Emergence—25 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–December 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022. 2022;71:132–8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu X, Nethery RC, Sabath MB, Braun D, Dominici F. Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis. Science Advances. 2020;6(45):eabd4049. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.US Department of Agriculture. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 2020 [updated Octorber 17, 2022]. December 10, 2020:[Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx.]
  • 34.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rates of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Vaccination Status Atlanta, GA2022 [updated May 20, 2022; cited 2022 June 3, 2022]. Available from: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status.
  • 35.Byambasuren O, Dobler CC, Bell K, Rojas DP, Clark J, McLaws M-L, et al. Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: Systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0248946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Accorsi EK, Qiu X, Rumpler E, Kennedy-Shaffer L, Kahn R, Joshi K, et al. How to detect and reduce potential sources of biases in studies of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. European journal of epidemiology. 2021;36(2):179–96. Epub 2021/02/25. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00727-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are publicly accessible from the data sources listed in Table 1. All pooled data are available on a public repository via https://github.com/Clairyff/COVID_Vaccine.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES