Table 1.
Best practices | Description |
---|---|
Clinical problem addressed with imaging is defined in consultation with clinical experts, AI/ML experts, and experts in ethics and patient engagement | Universal clinical adoption of AI/ML-based imaging tools needs proper definition of the clinical problem and needs alongside consideration of ethical issues with such use of these tools as well as a patient’s perspective on the utility and effect of these tools. |
Study design, methods, and resultant AI/ML techniques used in developing imaging solutions are defined a priori | Formulation of a priori hypothesis, study aims, and objectives and appropriate study designs and reporting measures are key when assessing algorithm quality and validity. |
Imaging data are adequate, representative, well characterized, and reusable | Data annotation uses well-defined rules (eg, medical imaging data readiness [MIDaR] and Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability [FAIR] principles) that also takes into consideration interrater variability. |
Gaps and challenges | Description |
Define disease states for which AI/ML-based image classification is validated | Diagnostic accuracy reflects pathophysiology, patient demographics, or technical issues with respect to data representation (ie, bias and lack of generalizability). |
Identify imaging systems that may detect stroke | AI/ML-based and computational imaging algorithms may predict stroke, using diverse imaging modalities such as cardiac MRI, strain, or nuclear imaging. |
Lack of representative imaging data sets | Imaging data from clinical repositories may have class imbalances and other biases (eg, data coming from highly selected centers). |
Lack of studies that test effect on clinical outcomes | Most AI/ML algorithms have been tested on retrospective data, with minimal prospective practical clinical workflow development and testing demonstrating utility. |
AI indicates artificial intelligence; ML, machine learning; and MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.