Skip to main content
Orthopedic Reviews logoLink to Orthopedic Reviews
. 2024 Apr 23;16:116370. doi: 10.52965/001c.116370

Complications following surgical treatment of ankle fractures in the elderly: can they be avoided?

Lukas Welzel 1,2,3, Mohamed Omar 2, Christian Walter Müller 1
PMCID: PMC11043027  PMID: 38666190

Abstract

Background Following surgical treatment of ankle fractures, geriatric patients face high complication rates (CR) in literature. Commonly used diagnostic and treatment algorithms fail to consider requirements of ageing patients which increases the risk of postoperative complications. Objective Present study critically evaluated surgical management of ankle fractures in patients over 65 years old, with focus on identifying modifiable risk factors and effective comorbidity management strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center study on patients who underwent surgical treatment of an ankle fracture. Based on their age, participants were divided into non-geriatric patients (NGP<65y) and geriatric patients (GP≥65y). We analyzed overall CR and number of minor and major complications in relation to timing of surgery, biological sex, injury pattern, osteosynthesis, pre-existing medical conditions, and postoperative care. Results 402 patients were included. GP encountered significantly higher overall (p<0.001), minor (p<0.001) and major (p=0.003) complications. They presented more complex, displaced and open fractures. Predominant factor contributing to higher CR in NGP and markedly in GP was concomitant diseases, presenting a strong OR of 19,290 (p<0.001) and 17,022 (p<0.001). Delaying surgery and managing comorbidities preoperatively had a favorable impact. Conclusion We revealed a high significant correlation between pre-existing medical conditions and postoperative results. To ascertain viability of delayed surgery in facilitating additional diagnostics and treatment of comorbidities, further comparative trials with a larger cohort are imperative.

Keywords: ankle fracture, geriatric, surgery, complications, comorbidities

Introduction

Following surgical treatment of ankle fractures, geriatric patients face high complication rates (CR) up to 30%1 or even 40%2 in literature. Considering epidemiological, demographic trends3,4 and functional demands of ageing patients, current – almost standardized - concepts appear to be inadequate and need to be adapted to meet specific needs of geriatric patients.

Since the main treatment goal in GP is fast re-mobilization, conservative treatment is usually reserved for stable, undisplaced fractures or patients who cannot undergo surgery. But due to comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus,5 reduced peripheral blood supply,6 obesity,7 smoking,8 polypharmacy9 or poor soft tissues,10 surgical treatment can be challenging.

Reduced bone quality often results in complex fractures following low-energy traumas .11 To avoid long lasting cast immobilization and associated risk for redislocation or skin necrosis,12 operative treatment is often chosen for better functional results.13

This study critically evaluates surgical management of ankle fractures in patients over 65 years old, with focus on identifying modifiable risk factors and effective comorbidity management strategies.

Methods

Ethical considerations

For this article, none of the authors conducted studies involving human participants or animals in accordance with ethical standards. Retrospective data collection was anonymized. Institutional ethics committee approval has been obtained (protocol No. 9555_BO_K_2021; Hanover Medical School (MHH)).

Study design

In a retrospective single-centre data analysis, patients were evaluated, who underwent surgical treatment of an ankle fracture in a level-II trauma centre in 2015-2021. Pilon- and conservatively treated fractures were excluded.

Based on their age, patients were categorized into ‘NGP’ (non-geriatric patients; < 65 years at time of surgery) and ‘GP’ (geriatric patients; ≥65 years).

Complication rates (CR) were classified as ‘major complications’ (requiring further surgical intervention or leading to patient death) and ‘minor complications’ (requiring non-invasive treatment) – Figure 1.

Figure 1. Minor and Major Complications.

Minor complications Major complications
Impairment of Wound Healing Secondary Dislocation/Implant Failure
Irritation of Tendon Deep Infection
Delayed Fracture Healing Pseudarthrosis
Thrombosis Pulmonary Embolism
Death

CR were calculated for both, GP and NGP groups, considering biological sex, age, timing of surgery (immediate, within 24 hours, or delayed after closed reduction and immobilization), and injury pattern (simple or complex, with associated fractures of the medial malleolus, posterior malleolus, syndesmosis rupture, dislocation or luxation). Risk factors such as concomitant diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus, peripheral artery disease, chronic venous insufficiency, obesity, osteoporosis, prior history of cancer, alcoholism, heart failure etc.) were identified. We evaluated their influence in postoperative complications and examined type of osteosynthesis employed and the impact of weight-bearing (fully or partially) or non-weight-bearing mobilization on complication rates for NGP and GP patients, along with treatment procedures in postoperative care.

Statistics

Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation; Version 2401) and SPSS Statistics (IBM International Business Machines Corporation; Version 29 0.1.0) were used for statistical analysis. Considering data distribution, X2- and Mann-Whitney-U-test was employed for statistics. Logistic regression was used for regression analysis. Significance level was set to 5% (α=0.05).

Results

N=402 patients were included. N=253 (63%) were women, n=149 (37%) men. Mean age at time of surgery was 57,6 years (range 16-92 years).

N=237 (59%) were assigned to NGP-group, comprising n=122 (52%) women and n=115 (48%) men with a mean age of 44,5 years (range 16-64 years) - Figure 2.

Figure 2. Distribution of age, biological sex, injury pattern and complications in NGP and GP.

Total n=402 NGP < 65y. GP > 65y. Value p
Number n 237 (59%) 165 (41%) -
Ø Age 44,5 y. 76,4 y. -
Range 16 - 64 y. 65 - 92 y. -
Men 115 (48%) 34 (21%) -
Female 122 (52%) 131 (79%) -
Sex ratio 1:1 (m:f) 1:4 (m:f) -
Simple fracture 120 (51 %) 48 (29 %) p < 0,001
Complex fracture 117 (49 %) 117 (71 %) p < 0,001
Open fracture 4 (2%) 11 (7 %) p = 0,010
Displaced fracture 70 (30 %) 73 (44 %) p = 0,002
Overall complications 19 (8 %) 42 (26 %) p < 0,001
Major complications 13 (6 %) 23 (14 %) p = 0,003
Minor complications 6 (3 %) 19 (12 %) p < 0,001

N=165 (41%) patients were assigned to GP-group, comprising n=131 (79%) women and n= 34 (21%) men. Mean age was 76,4 years (range 65-92 years) - Figure 2.

Sex ratio was approximately equal (1:1) in NGP, whereas in GP it was about 4:1 in favor of women - Figure 2.

Injury pattern

While ratio of simple versus complex fractures, such as bi- or trimalleolar fractures, was about equal in the NGP group, GP displayed a marked increase in complex, open or dislocated fractures – Figure 2.

Surgical strategies

Surgical procedures performed in GP resulted in an overall CR of 26% (n=42) compared to 8% (n=19; p<0.001) observed in NGP. They exhibited higher number of major (n=23; 14%; p=0.003) and minor complications (n=19; 12%; p=0.001) in comparison to NGP – Figure 3.

Figure 3. Distribution of minor and major complications in NGP and GP.

NGP GP
Number n Number n
Overall CR 19 (8%) 42 (26%)
Minor complications 6 19
Impairment of wound healing 5 17
Irritation of tendon - 1
Delayed fracture healing - 1
Thrombosis 1 -
Major complications 13 23
Secondary dislocation 6 9
Deep infection 7 10
Pseudarthosis - 1
Pulmonary embolism - 1
Death - 2

Plate osteosynthesis was performed in n=151 (92%) GP using a standard lateral approach and plate positioning. N=128 (85%) received third tubular plates, n=23 (15%) were treated with locking implants. Different types of plates did not demonstrate significant differences in minor (p=0.673), major (p=0.067), or overall complication rates (p=0.248).

A minority of patients underwent other internal osteosynthesis procedures, including intramedullary screws (n=3), fibular nails (n=1), or arthrodesis (n=2). Primary stabilization using an external fixator was performed in n=22 (13%) cases.

Risk factors

Complications in younger patients had various causes. In contrast, high rates in GP were mainly due to displaced fractures and, to a significant extent, comorbidities – Figure 4.

Figure 4. Risk factors and their impact on complication rate.

Risk factor NGP GP
Simple/complex fracture p=0,027 p=0,205
Open fracture p=0,002 p=0,390
Displaced fracture p=0,021 p=0,021
Comorbidities p<0,001 p<0,001
Sex p=0,394 p=0,772

Regression analysis identified prior diseases as a primary risk factor for major (OR 19,290; 95% CI 7,623-48,818; p<0.001) and minor complications (OR 17,022; 95% CI 5,855-49,489; p<0.001) in NGP and GP. In all GP, prevalence of comorbidities was 32% (n=53), while comorbidities were present in 91% (n=38) of all GP with complications.

With concomitant diseases present, CR was 72% (n=38) compared to 4% (n=4) without (p<0.001). After additional preoperative screening and treatment for pre-existing conditions, which was received by 14 (26%) of comorbid GPs, overall complication rate was 43% (n=6/14), while CR was 82% (n=39) without. There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of overall (p=0.005) and minor complications (p=0.029) between those with and without it.

Timing of surgery

N=31 (19%) geriatric patients underwent surgery on day of trauma and the overall complication rate was 11/31 (36%) including 5/31 major and 6/31 minor complications.

Regression analysis couldn´t reveal any disadvantage between timing of surgery and major (OR 0,964; 95% CI 0,870-1,067; p=0,478) or minor complication rate (OR 0,982; 95% CI 0,873-1,104; p=0,757) – Figure 5.

In patients suffering from comorbidities, CR was 9/10 (90%) following immediate surgical treatment, while it was 21/31 (68%) with delayed surgical treatment between 3rd and 7th day following trauma (p=0.136).

However, delaying surgery to run diagnostic and treatment procedures for comorbidities corresponded with a reduced complication rate of 3/10 (30%; p=0.004).

Postoperative aftercare

In 99% of patients (n=164), rebound air walker was used for postoperative aftercare, including 75% (n=123) undergoing at least half- or fully-weight-bearing. 25% (n=42) were treated with non-weight-bearing mobilization according to the surgeon´s preference. Both groups had comparable overall (p=0.343), minor (p=0.077) and major (p=0.659) complications, with a rate of 24% (n=29) in the weight-bearing group and 31% (n=13) in the non-weight-bearing group. Most complications during weight-bearing mobilization were n=9 impairments of wound healing, n=9 cases of deep infections, and n=5 secondary dislocations. The number of subsequent surgical interventions was almost identical under non-weight-bearing (n=6; 14%) and weight-bearing (n=16; 13%; p=0,833) mobilization.

Discussion

Following surgical treatment of ankle fractures in the elderly, our data show massively higher overall, minor and major complications than in younger ones. This is congruent with existing international literature and reported outcomes of up to 30%1 or even 40% ,2 indicating that surgical intervention for ankle fractures presents a high-risk approach for elderly patients. Due to increasing demands of elderly patients, surgical treatment should be performed to achieve the best functional outcomes13 and to avoid cast immobilization.12

Risk factors

Although postoperative complications display a variety of factors in younger patients, in geriatric ones, in our findings, concomitant diseases, represent the most significant and potent risk factor with a remarkable odds ratio for minor and major complications. Previous studies identified various influential factors, such as multimedication with more than three drugs,9 smoking,8 diabetes,5 reduced blood supply,6 advanced age6,14 or heart failure,6 necessitating individualized perioperative management to prevent predictable complications.

Comorbidity strategies

Given the low percentage of 26% in our data, it appears that the number of comorbid GP receiving additional preoperative diagnostics and therapy for prior conditions is inadequate. Consequent assessment of blood glucose,15 evaluation of limb blood supply,16 and at a minimum, additional CT dignostics are recommended.17 Aigner et al.16 recently demanded a standardized pre-operative diagnostic algorithm to minimize complications. Pulse palpation and clinical assessment are naturally required, but due to the large number and varied nature of comorbidities, it is crucial to consider all concurrent medical conditions. Orthogeriatric co-management may be beneficial in improving outcomes18 by adressing concomitant diseases.

Timing of surgery

Due to the high incidence of dislocated fractures and compromised soft tissue in elderly patients, immediate definitive surgery may not be feasible. However, delaying surgery may not have negative consequences.19 Until soft tissue permits surgical intervention, instant reduction and immobilization should be considered as necessary regardless of timing of surgery. Given the risk of loss of reduction with cast immobilization,12 temporary fixation with an external fixator12 or K-wire transfixation20 as a temporary hindfoot arthrodesis may be used for primary stabilization. The time delay can be useful to conduct supplementary diagnostics for concomitant diseases.

Surgical strategies

Our data mainly presented one surgical approach to the ankle and plate positioning. It is important to note, that older patients may require more tailored procedures. Considering better soft tissue cover of implants, a posterolateral approach can be used for posterior malleolus fractures25,,21 as it allows simultaneous access to the fibular fracture, while antiglide plating of distal fibula appears to result in fewer hardware removal and reoperations than lateral plate positioning.22,23 Bariteau et al.24 found that locking implants in lateral position provide greater stability in comminuted fractures. However, other authors take a critical view,25,26 indicate higher costs and risk of wound complications.27 In particular, a posterolateral approach can be used for posterior malleolus fractures, as it provides simultaneous access to the fibular fracture and better soft tissue coverage of the implants.26,27 To increase stability of the osteosynthesis, various treatment options are available, such as the combination of two non-locking plates28 (posterior and lateral), the “K-Wire-Cage” technique29 or the “Tibia-Pro-Fibula” concept.30 In older patients with poor soft tissue conditions, it is recommended to consider less invasive techniques with small skin incisions, such as intramedullary fixation like retrograde percutaneous cannulated screw fixation31 of malleolus as well as intramedullary implants like fibular nails32 or Illuminoss.33 Primary nail arthrodesis with a hindfoot nail can provide favorable outcomes in cases of severely compromised soft tissue and in patients with lower functional demands, allowing for early weight-bearing mobilization.34

Limitations

The study has some limitations that need to be considered. Firstly, it is retrospective in nature, meaning that only data from patients and complications treated in the same hospital could be collected. The patients were not explicitly called. Secondly, it is difficult to create a viable and useful strategy for comorbidities, as the percentage of patients receiving additional diagnostics and treatment for concomitant diseases is low. Further trials with larger cohorts are necessary to determine viability, possibly in a prospective manner.

Conclusion

Our data clearly demonstrate that surgical treatment of ankle fractures in elderly patients is a challenging task. We have considered both patient-related and non-patient-related conditions during the high-volume data collection process. Our findings highlight the urgent need to identify individual risk factors, such as comorbidities, which are emphasized by a remarkable odds ratio. It is important to optimize any modifiable factor, especially diagnosis and treatment of concomitant diseases before entering the operating room. Considering their impact on postoperative complication rates, orthogeriatric co-assessment, like that used in management of hip fractures, may be helpful in pre- and post-operative course to manage risk factors. As our findings did not show any negative impact of delayed surgery, in patients with a comorbid high-risk profile immediate definitive surgical intervention should be avoided in favor of prior treatment of comorbidities. Perioperative strategies must consider specific needs of ageing patients. Tailored concepts regarding surgical approach, osteosynthesis procedures, considering any available system, timing of surgery, early weight bearing mobilization and particularly effective comorbidity strategies are warranted. It is imperative to conduct further comparative trials with a larger cohort to find a viable, adapted treatment regimen for handling these frequent but high-risk patients.

References

  1. Spek Reinier W.A., Smeeing Diederik P.J., van den Heuvel Linda, Kokke Marike C., Bhashyam Abhiram R., Kelder Johannes C., Verleisdonk Egbert J.M.M., Houwert Roderick M., van der Velde Detlef. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 4. Vol. 60. Elsevier BV; Complications After Surgical Treatment of Geriatric Ankle Fractures; pp. 712–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson Sarah A., Li Xinning, Franklin Patricia, Wixted John J. Foot & Ankle International. 12. Vol. 29. SAGE Publications; Ankle fractures in the elderly: initial and long-term outcomes; pp. 1184–1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rydberg Emilia Möller, Wennergren David, Stigevall Caroline, Ekelund Jan, Möller Michael. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 1. Vol. 18. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Epidemiology of more than 50,000 ankle fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register during a period of 10 years. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thur Charlotte K, Edgren Gustaf, Jansson Karl-Åke, Wretenberg Per. Acta Orthopaedica. 3. Vol. 83. Medical Journals Sweden AB; Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures in Sweden between 1987 and 2004: A population-based study of 91,410 Swedish inpatients; pp. 276–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt Tegan, Simske Natasha M., Audet Megan A., Benedick Alex, Kim Chang-Yeon, Vallier Heather A. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 16. Vol. 28. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health); Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on Functional Outcomes and Complications After Torsional Ankle Fracture; pp. 661–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pilskog Kristian, Høvding Pål, Fenstad Anne Marie, Inderhaug Eivind, Fevang Jonas Meling, Dale Håvard. Injury. 10. Vol. 54. Elsevier BV; Risk factors for fracture-related infection after ankle fracture surgery; p. 111011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benedick Alex, Audet Megan A., Vallier Heather A. Injury. 8. Vol. 51. Elsevier BV; The effect of obesity on post-operative complications and functional outcomes after surgical treatment of torsional ankle fracture: A matched cohort study; pp. 1893–1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sato Toshifumi, Takegami Yasuhiko, Sugino Takayuki, Bando Kosuke, Fujita Tomoki, Imagama Shiro. Injury. 7. Vol. 52. Elsevier BV; Smoking and trimalleolar fractures are risk factors for infection after open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fractures: A multicenter retrospective study of 1,201 fractures; pp. 1959–1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Valtola A., Honkanen R., Kröger H., Tuppurainen M., Saarikoski S., Alhava E. Bone. 1. Vol. 30. Elsevier BV; Lifestyle and other factors predict ankle fractures in perimenopausal women: a population-based prospective cohort study; pp. 238–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Halvachizadeh Sascha, Klingebiel Felix Karl Ludwig, Pfeifer Roman, Gosteli Martina, Schuerle Simone, Cinelli Paolo, Zelle Boris A., Pape Hans-Christoph. Injury. 6. Vol. 53. Elsevier BV; The local soft tissue status and the prediction of local complications following fractures of the ankle region; pp. 1789–1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee K. M., Chung C. Y., Kwon S. S., Won S. H., Lee S. Y., Chung M. K., Park M. S. Osteoporosis International. 11. Vol. 24. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Ankle fractures have features of an osteoporotic fracture; pp. 2819–2825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wawrose Richard A., Grossman Leonid S., Tagliaferro Matthew, Siska Peter A., Moloney Gele B., Tarkin Ivan S. Foot & Ankle International. 2. Vol. 41. SAGE Publications; Temporizing External Fixation vs Splinting Following Ankle Fracture Dislocation; pp. 177–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davidovitch Roy I., Walsh Michael, Spitzer Allison, Egol Kenneth A. Foot & Ankle International. 8. Vol. 30. SAGE Publications; Functional outcome after operatively treated ankle fractures in the elderly; pp. 728–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Danilkowicz Richard M., Grimm Nathan L., Kim Jaewhan, O’Donnell Jeffrey A., Allen Nicholas B., Adams Samuel B. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 1. Vol. 32. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Increasing age and modifiable comorbidities are associated with short-term complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures; pp. 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nash William J., Hester Thomas, Ha Joon. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 44. Vol. 17. Elsevier BV; Current concepts and challenges in managing ankle fractures in the presence of diabetes: A systematic review of the literature; pp. 44–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Aigner René, Lechler Philipp, Boese Christoph Kolja, Bockmann Benjamin, Ruchholtz Steffen, Frink Michael. International Orthopaedics. 2. Vol. 42. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Standardised pre-operative diagnostics and treatment of peripheral arterial disease reduce wound complications in geriatric ankle fractures; pp. 395–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jubel A., Faymonville C., Andermahr J., Boxberg S., Schiffer G. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. 01. Vol. 155. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; [Conventional X-Rays of Ankle Joint Fractures in Older Patients are Not Always Predictive] pp. 45–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schray D., Ehrnthaller C., Pfeufer D., Mehaffey S., Böcker W., Neuerburg C., Kammerlander C., Zeckey C. Injury. 8. Vol. 49. Elsevier BV; Outcome after surgical treatment of fragility ankle fractures in a certified orthogeriatric trauma center; pp. 1451–1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Naumann M.G., Sigurdsen U., Utvåg S.E., Stavem K. Injury. 7. Vol. 48. Elsevier BV; Associations of timing of surgery with postoperative length of stay, complications, and functional outcomes 3–6 years after operative fixation of closed ankle fractures; pp. 1662–1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier Christoph, Schefold Joerg C., Hug Urs, Trentz Otmar, Platz Andreas. European Journal of Trauma. 6. Vol. 30. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Temporary Kirschner Wire Ankle Transfixation and Delayed ORIF A Staged Operative Treatment for Closed Ankle Fractures with Tibiotalar Dislocations and Soft-Tissue Damage; pp. 371–377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi Jun Young, Kim Ji Hoon, Ko Hyeong Tak, Suh Jin Soo. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 4. Vol. 54. Elsevier BV; Single Oblique Posterolateral Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures With an Associated Lateral Malleolar Fracture; pp. 559–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. DeKeyser Graham J., Campbell Megan L., Kellam Patrick J., Haller Justin M., Rothberg David L., Higgins Thomas F., Marchand Lucas S. Injury. 3. Vol. 53. Elsevier BV; True antiglide fixation of Danis-Weber B fibula fractures has lower rates of removal of hardware; pp. 1289–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Deng Yi, Staniforth Thomas Lindsay, Zafar Mohammad Saqib, Lau Yeong Joe. Foot & Ankle International. 6. Vol. 43. SAGE Publications; Posterior Antiglide Plating vs Lateral Neutralization Plating for Weber B Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Biomechanical Studies; pp. 850–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bariteau Jason T., Fantry Amanda, Blankenhorn Brad, Lareau Craig, Paller David, DiGiovanni Christopher W. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 1. Vol. 20. Elsevier BV; A biomechanical evaluation of locked plating for distal fibula fractures in an osteoporotic sawbone model; pp. 44–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dingemans Siem A., Lodeizen Olivia A.P., Goslings J. Carel, Schepers Tim. Clinical Biomechanics. Vol. 36. Elsevier BV; Reinforced fixation of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients; A meta-analysis of biomechanical studies; pp. 14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gopireddy Rajesh, T Hafez Ahmed, Khan Muhammad J, Javed Omar, Omar Islam, Clint Simon. Cureus. 3. Vol. 15. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Comparison of Complications, Metalwork Removal and Cost Between Locking and Tubular Plates for Lateral Malleolus Fractures Fixation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schepers T., Lieshout E.M.M. Van, Vries M.R. De, Van der Elst M. Injury. 10. Vol. 42. Elsevier BV; Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures; pp. 1125–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Randall Rachel M., Nagle Tara, Steckler Andrew, Billow Damien, Berkowitz Mark J. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 5. Vol. 58. Elsevier BV; Dual Nonlocked Plating as an Alternative to Locked Plating for Comminuted Distal Fibula Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison Study; pp. 916–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Koval Kenneth J., Petraco Douglas M., Kummer Frederick J., Bharam Srino. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1. Vol. 11. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health); A new technique for complex fibula fracture fixation in the elderly: a clinical and biomechanical evaluation; pp. 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Okoro Tosan, Teoh Kar Hao, Tanaka Hiro. World Journal of Orthopedics. 8. Vol. 12. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.; Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model; pp. 548–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McClure Tanner T., Taylor Benjamin C., Huber Grant, Glazier Matthew, Myers Devon M., DeGenova Daniel T. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2. Vol. 62. Elsevier BV; Intramedullary Screw Fixation Versus Traditional Plating for Distal Fibula Fractures; pp. 355–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahmed Maryam, Barrie Andrew, Kozhikunnath Arun, Thimmegowda Abilash, Ho Sebastian, Kunasingam Kumar, Guryel Enis, Ahluwalia Raju, Ladha Nafisah, Horseman Laura, Fell Adam, Perera Edward, Bhadresha Ashwin, Qamar Mubasher, Bowyer Henry, Basma Zeinab, West Alexander, Bradbury Jack, Gajula Parthasaradhi, Mahmood Ansar, Ochogwu Joanna, Mcdonald Stephen, Bishop Kilanalei, Fung Amy. Foot & Ankle International. 5. Vol. 43. SAGE Publications; Fibula Nail Outcomes in Soft Tissue Compromised Ankle Fractures; pp. 595–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Osteosynthese einer distalen Fibulafraktur mithilfe von IlluminOss: Videobeitrag. Zyskowski M., Crönlein M., Heidt E., Biberthaler P., Kirchhoff C. 2017Unfallchirurg. 120(1):6–11. doi: 10.1007/S00113-016-0285-Y/FIGURES/2. doi: 10.1007/S00113-016-0285-Y/FIGURES/2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tan Yong Yao, Nambiar Mithun, Onggo James Randolph, Hickey Benjamin A., Babazadeh Sina, Tay Wei Han, Hsuan Janet, Bedi Harvinder. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 6. Vol. 61. Elsevier BV; Tibio-Talar-Calcaneal Nail Fixation for Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; pp. 1325–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Orthopedic Reviews are provided here courtesy of Open Medical Publishing

RESOURCES