Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2023 Sep 25;145(39):21293–21302. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c05645

Constructing antiretroviral supramolecular polymers as long-acting injectables through rational design of drug amphiphiles with alternating ARV-based and hydrophobic residues

Han Wang 1, Maya Monroe 1, Feihu Wang 1, Mingjiao Sun 1, Charles Flexner 2, Honggang Cui 1,3
PMCID: PMC11044016  NIHMSID: NIHMS1969352  PMID: 37747991

Abstract

One of the main challenges in the development of long-acting injectables for HIV treatment is the limited duration of drug release, which results in the need for frequent dosing and reduced patient adherence. In this context, we leverage the intrinsic reversible features of supramolecular polymers and their unique ability to form a 3D network under physiological conditions to design a class of self-assembling drug amphiphiles (DAs) based upon Lamivudine, a water-soluble antiretroviral (ARV) agent and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). The designed ARV DAs contain three pairs of alternating hydrophobic valine (V) and hydrophilic lamivudine-modified lysine (K3TC) residues, with a varying number of glutamic acids (E) placed on the C-terminus. Upon dissolution in deionized water, all three ARV DAs were found to spontaneously associate into supramolecular filaments of several micrometers in length, with varying levels of lateral stackings. Addition of 1×PBS triggered immediate gelation of the two ARV DAs with 2 or 3 E residues, and upon dilution in an in vitro setting the dissociation from supramolecular state to monomeric state enabled a long-acting linear release of the ARV DAs. In vivo studies confirmed further their injectability, rapid in situ hydrogel formation, enhanced local retention, and long-acting therapeutic release over a month. Importantly, our pharmacokinetics studies suggest that the injected ARV supramolecular polymeric hydrogel was able to maintain a plasma concentration of lamivudine above its IC50 value for more than 40 days in mice and showed minimal systemic immunogenicity. We believe these results shed important light on the rational design of long-acting injectables using the drug-based molecular assembly strategy, and the reported ARV supramolecular hydrogels hold great promise for improving HIV treatment outcomes.

Table of Contents (TOC)

graphic file with name nihms-1969352-f0007.jpg

INTRODUCTION

The ability of supramolecular polymers (SPs) to percolate into a 3D network in aqueous solutions enables their important use as hydrogel materials for delivery of cells and various therapeutic compounds.15 Given their biodegradable and potentially bioactive features, peptides and peptide-based conjugates, as well as peptidomimetics, have been exploited as excellent molecular building units to develop a great diversity of supramolecular polymers.513 Importantly, these peptide-based supramolecular polymers can be designed to respond specifically to biological and biomolecular cues, solution pH, temperature, and ionic strengths, allowing their hydrogelations to occur under physiological conditions. 1421 In most cases, molecular and macromolecular therapeutics can be physically incorporated into the hydrogel, with the release rate depending upon the diffusivity of the therapeutic compounds (largely determined by the molecular weight and size) and its affinity to the hydrogel network (e.g. associative interactions). Recently, the design of self-assembling drug amphiphile allows for the creation of drug-based supramolecular polymers, introducing a new means to regulate therapeutic release.2226 In this case, the drug release rate is primarily determined by the dissociation kinetics from supramolecular state to monomeric state, and its consequent diffusion out of the hydrogel.22, 23 The intrinsically low dissociation rates of supramolecular polymeric systems—that are built upon strong, associative interactions—enable sustained release of low-molecular-weight anticancer drugs over an extended period of time.25, 27 We envision this sustained release feature could also be potentially utilized to create long-acting injectables for HIV treatment that would reduce the frequency of injections needed to maintain viral control and improve adherence to the treatment regimen.2830

Over the past few decades, potent antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed HIV infection into a clinically manageable chronic disease.31 Combinations of two or three antiretroviral drugs, known as cART, have proven effective in suppressing plasma viral loads and preventing the progression of HIV to AIDS. Yet, cART is not curative and requires life-long patient adherence. Long-acting injectable ARV regimens are highly desirable, however, most current ARV combinations rely on water-soluble nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), such as Lamivudine (2’,3’-Dideoxy-3’-Thiacytidine, a.k.a. 3TC), whose low-molecular-weight and hydrophilic characteristics pose a great challenge to achieving long-acting delivery.3234 In particular, 3TC is currently used in clinic as a monotherapy to treat hepatitis B virus infections,35 and in combination with several other drugs for HIV treatment.33, 36 In this context, we report the design and synthesis of self-assembling ARV drug amphiphiles (ARV DAs) by direct linkage of the hydrophilic 3TC to the lysine side chain. Through molecular engineering of the peptide structural motif, we have developed a class of antiviral supramolecular polymeric hydrogels for a sustained release of the hydrophilic ARV agent over 40 days in vivo (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular design and assembly of asymmetric antiretroviral (ARV) drug amphiphiles. (A) Chemical structures of the three studied ARV DAs: V-3TC-E1, V-3TC-E2, and V-3TC-E3. (B) The conjugation reaction to synthesize a Lamivudine prodrug containing three drug units and a hydrolysable succinate linker. (C) Schematic illustration of the self-assembly of antiretroviral drug amphiphiles into anti-parallel β-sheet tapes that further stack or entwine into filamentous nanostructures in aqueous solution. (D) Representative cryo-TEM micrograph of filaments formed by self-assembly V-3TC-E3 in water at a concentration of 1 mM, revealing filamentous nanostructures that measure 6.8±1.0 nm in diameter and up to several micrometers in length.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Molecular design and synthesis of ARV drug amphiphiles.

To create a series of supramolecular hydrogelators bearing hydrophilic ARV agents, we designed and synthesized three ARV DA molecules: V-3TC-E1, V-3TC-E2, and V-3TC-E3, each comprising a peptide segment with three hydrophilic 3TC moieties but differing in the number of E residue (Figure 1). We previously reported that the covalent linkage of hydrophobic drug moieties to various hydrophilic peptide segments creates a class of drug amphiphiles that can spontaneously associate into therapeutic supramolecular polymers in water.2325, 27, 3741 To adopt this drug amphiphiles design strategies to achieve long-acting release of hydrophilic therapeutic agents, we incorporated the drug 3TC onto the lysine sidechain through a hydrolysable linker to create a peptide-based self-assembling motif. As shown in Figure 1A, the key design feature is the alternating VKVKVK peptide sequence, highlighting the versatility of this design platform by revealing four different types of conjugation sites for both drug anchorage and assembly modulation. Site A leverages the primary amine group of the lysine side chains for 3TC conjugation. In our design, we incorporated three 3TC conjugation sites, a decision that strikes a balance between achieving substantial drug loading—an essential factor for designing an effective long-acting ARV DA—and maintaining synthesis efficiency. 3TC moieties were conjugated via a hydrolysable succinate linker, selected for its moderate stability to facilitate the long-acting release of the ARV DA and its straightforward synthesis. Valine was chosen for site B as the hydrophobic component here due to its tendency of forming β-sheet secondary structure (Figure 1B).42, 43 Nonetheless, this label is intentionally generalized to emphasize that other hydrophobic groups could be accommodated to broaden the versatility and applicability of our ARV DA design. Site C and Site D provide additional conjugation points, but in the current work site C was used to modulate the assembly and gelation behavior with oligo-glutamic acids, while site D was simply capped with an acetyl (-Ac) group. The peptide segment of Ac-VKVKVK-En (n = 1–3) was synthesized using a standard Fmoc solid-phase synthesis protocol. After introducing the tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) protecting group, the 3TC-succinate prodrug was first synthesized and characterized by conjugating with succinate anhydride (Synthesis details are in Method session, Scheme 1, also see Scheme S1, Figures S1-S2). The resulting prodrug was eventually grafted onto the lysine side chains (Figure 1B), followed by a cleavage reaction to obtain the ARV DAs from the peptide resin. The final product was then purified using reversed-phase HPLC, and their purity and molecular mass were confirmed using analytical HPLC and ESI mass spectrometry (Figure S3-S5). The structural motif with alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids, long known to favor β-sheet assemblies,44 were first used by Pochan and Schneider to devise a series of β-hairpin molecular hydrogelators to develop a range of biomaterials,6, 10, 16, 4547 and then adopted by Hartgerink to construct multidomain peptides for use in tissue engineering. 4851 In our case, it is hypothesized that the designed molecules dimerize through hydrophobic interactions between the three valine side chains before their propagation into one-dimensional assemblies via intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Figure 1C).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of the reactive 3TC prodrug

Nanostructure Characterization.

The three ARV DAs were directly dissolved at 1 mM in deionized water (final solution pH ~4.5) and aged for 24 h at room temperature to allow sufficient time for assembly. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and cryogenic TEM (cryo-TEM) imaging was then taken, revealing that all three conjugates formed one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures over several micrometers in length (Figure 2). Twisting can be clearly seen for V-3TC-E1 and V-3TC-2 assemblies by closer examination of their cryo-TEM images (Figures 2A-B). The width and height of V-3TC-E1 twisted ribbons were 21.2±1.2 nm and 6.3±1.0 nm, respectively, by measuring the widest and narrowest region in Figure 2A. V-3TC-E2 assemblies in Figure 2B had a similar height of 6.1±0.8 nm, but a reduced width of 12.4±0.8 nm. In contrast, for V-3TC-E3 filaments, the difference between their height and width can be hardly discernable, while cryo-TEM image in Figure 2C implies some levels of twisting. Thus, we used Figure 2F to assess the diameter of V-3TC-E3 filaments, measuring 6.8±1.0 nm. Clearly, the one-dimensionality of the observed assemblies is associated with the directional, intermolecular bonding among the peptide segment, as evidenced by the characteristic β-sheet absorptions around 210–216 nm in their respective circular dichroism (CD) spectra, FTIR and ThT assay (Figure S6). Given the charged nature of the E residues, all three ARV DAs are expected to assume an anti-parallel β-sheet conformation in a way to lower electrostatic repulsions (Figure 1C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Self-assembly of the three studied ARV DAs in deionized water. Cryo-(A, B, C) and conventional (D, E, F) TEM micrographs of filamentous nanostructures formed by V-3TC-E1 (A, D), V-3TC-E2 (B, E), 3TC-V-E3 (C, F) at a concentration of 1 mM. (G-I). All solutions were aged for at least 24 h before measurements were taken. All scale bars = 100 nm.

The observed morphological and dimensional differences among the three ARV DA assemblies reflect the important role that the terminal glutamic acids play in modulating the lateral association of the primitive β-sheet tape shown in Figure 1C. Notably, our Zeta potential measurements revealed that all three assemblies bear negative charges (Figure S7), suggesting that the lateral association and/or β-sheet intertwining occurred between the lysine-conjugated 3TC (K3TC) faces (not the terminal glutamic acid faces), likely through combined hydrophobic interactions and π-π stackings among the lysine side chain, the succinate linker and the 3TC moiety. Given that the pKa of the terminal cytosine of 3TC is around 7.2, 3TC is expected to be partially charged in deionized water (solution pH was around 4.5 at 1 mM), which would add some levels of electrostatic repulsions to counterbalance the associative interactions for β-sheet stacking. This cytosine-mediated stacking can be further manifested in the observed grooves for V-3TC-E1 twisted ribbons in Figure 2D, in which 2 or 3 parallel dark lines in the middle can be frequently seen, resulting from preferential deposition of uranyl acetate, the negative staining agent, during the TEM sample preparation. The distance between two neighboring dark lines is approximately ~6 nm, a value close to twice the length of the 3TC-modified lysine side chains. These grooves are reminiscent of those observed by the Stupp group in peptide nanobelts, where the formation of grooves and their TEM visualization were responsive to changes in solution pH.45 Indeed, when the solution pH was raised from 4.5 to the neural pH by addition of some NaOH, these grooves disappeared (Figure S8A), indicating a change in β-sheet lateral association—due to increased deprotonation percentage of cytosine amines—that disfavors deposition of uranyl ions. The reduced stacking from ~21 nm in width for V-3TC-E1 assemblies to ~12 nm for V-3TC-E2 ribbons is attributable to the increased repulsions caused by the extra E residue. Interestingly, a further increase in E residue constrains the lateral stacking, leading the V-3TC-E3 β-sheets to entwine into fibril-like assemblies.52 We also found that increasing the solution pH to 7 resulted in reduced length of all filamentous nanostructures (Figure S8), accompanied with much reduced CD signals of β-sheet absorption (Figure S6), further confirming the important role of electrostatic interactions in the studied system.52

Sol-gel transition and in vitro release.

At a concentration of 2 mM or higher, solutions containing V-3TC-E2 or V-3TC-E3 assemblies can be triggered to form a hydrogel upon the addition of 1×PBS. In contrast, V-3TC-E1 did not form a hydrogel at 2 mM but instead precipitated out, likely due to its limited water solubility in the presence of salts. Using a simple inversion test, we determined the critical gelation concentration (CGC) of V-3TC-E2 and V-3TC-E3 to be between 1.5 mM and 2 mM in PBS (Figure 3A). Next, we performed rheological measurements to further characterize their sol-gel transitions. Upon addition of PBS, we found that the storage modulus (G’) increased drastically to suppress the loss modulus (G’’) (Figure 3B). The resultant two hydrogels showed similar mechanical properties, whereas the V-3TC-E2 solution transitioned to the gel state slightly faster. We also used CD spectrometry to probe molecular packing of 3TC moiety within the resultant hydrogel networks. CD spectra of the three ARV DAs after PBS addition (Figure 3C) showed a broad negative band at 274 nm that can be ascribed to Lamivudine absorption (Figure S9), implying that the 3TC moieties are somehow packed in a chiral manner.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Gelation studies and materials characterization of Lamivudine-bearing supramolecular hydrogels. (A) photographs of solution-to-hydrogel transition of 3TC drug conjugates triggered by the addition of 1×PBS. (B) Rheological studies on the sol-gel transition process. (C) Normalized CD spectra collected between 200 nm and 360 nm of 3TC prodrug solutions of 200 μM after adding 1×PBS. (D) Release profile of 3TC prodrugs from ARV hydrogels taken every two days over a period of 1 month. Hydrogels were incubated at 37 °C. Data are given as mean ± SD (n= 3). (E) Nile Red assay to measure the CMCs of the three studied 3TC prodrugs. (F) Stability tests by HPLC and CD that demonstrate no noticeable in vitro chemical degradation observed for the 3TC conjugates over 30 days. All supramolecular hydrogels were formed at a concentration of 2 mM.

To demonstrate the long-term release behavior of the ARV-based supramolecular hydrogels, we conducted experiments to assess the in vitro release profiles of both V-3TC-E2 and V-3TC-E3 hydrogels at 2 mM using a previously reported method. 22, 40 This experiment was intended to assess the release rate of the drug conjugate, often in the form of monomers or short filaments, from the hydrogel depot by means of supramolecular dissociation, not to assess the release rate of the parent drug 3TC. TEM images (Figure S10) of the released supernatant revealed presence of some short filaments (< 1 micron in length). The collected medium solutions at different time points were then analyzed using HPLC to determine the amount of ARV DAs released from hydrogel over time. As shown in Figure 3D, both hydrogels displayed a sustained linear release profile until the termination of the experiments. No burst release was observed in either case. Notably, V-3TC-E2 hydrogel exhibited a relatively lower release rate than that of V-3TC-E3. The daily release rates were 1.0% and 1.9% for V-3TC-E2 and V-3TC-E3, releasing 29% and 52% of their respective conjugate over the studied period. Our previous studies suggested a strong correlation between the hydrogel in vitro release rate and the critical assembly concentration (CAC) value of the self-assembling constituents, with lower CAC values resulting in a slower release due to its smaller dissociation constant.22 To validate this, we measured the CACs of the three ARV DAs using Nile Red as a fluorescent probe. As shown in Figure 3E, the estimated CMC values are 5.3, 6.3, and 22.3 µM for V-3TC-E1, V-3TC-E2 and V-3TC-E3, respectively, corroborating our previous finding that CAC serves as a deterministic factor and important parameter to tune and predict the drug release rate, and further manifesting the role of glutamic acids in modulating their assembly in aqueous solution.

We next examined the chemical and structural stability of V-3TC-E3 when existing in the hydrogel state (Figure 3F). The chemical stability of V-3TC-E3 was assessed using HPLC to analyze its chemical composition changes over time, and the secondary structural stability was assessed using CD. As shown in Figure 3F, the conjugate peak areas and CD signals remained nearly a constant value over 30 days, suggesting that within the hydrogel depot, no detectable chemical degradation had occurred and that the antiviral supramolecular polymers did not transition into monomeric state over time. The observed long-term stability signifies that these ARV supramolecular hydrogels can maintain their chemical identity and structural integrity over a long period of time, potentially serving as drug depot for long-term 3TC release.

To assess the antiviral efficacy of ARV DAs, HepAD38 cells were treated with ARV DAs, and the cell culture supernatant was subsequently collected and analyzed using quantitative PCR to quantify the copies of HBV DNA released from the cells (Figure S11). The IC50 values extrapolated from the quantitative PCR results were 0.17 μM for 3TC, 0.12 μM for V-3TC-E2, and 0.08 μM for V-3TC-E3. The results indicate potent anti-HBV activity for the ARV DAs tested, with the peptide-conjugated derivatives V-3TC-E2 and V-3TC-E3 showing enhanced antiviral potency compared to unmodified 3TC, likely due to the improved cellular uptake associated with the conjugate design and assembled forms.

In vivo hydrogel breakdown and systemic immunogenicity.

We chose V-3TC-E3 for our in vivo gel retention study because it showed a higher daily release rate. Although a lower release rate may lead to prolonged release and retention in the injection site, we envision a higher daily drug release rate might be needed to achieve and maintain a plasma drug level above the minimum effective dose of Lamivudine, which could be important for drugs with a fast clearance rate. Adult Balb/cJ mice were injected subcutaneously with a solution containing 15 mM ARVDA, with PBS as a control. We observed that a hydrogel depot could be formed within 5 min after injection, while the PBS control dissipated in less than 1 h. The in-situ formed hydrogel gradually degraded over 5 weeks (Figure 4A). To quantitatively determine the extent of degradation over time, the amount of the remaining hydrogel was carefully scooped out and analyzed using analytic HPLC. The hydrogel exhibited roughly a linear release profile by mass, with ~22% gel remaining after 35 days (Figure 4A). The degradation rate appeared to be a bit faster at the beginning of the study, likely due to the diffusion of ARV filaments into surroundings prior to their hydrogelation. Compared to our in vitro release results in Figure 3D, the hydrogel appeared to break down faster in vivo, which we attribute to the possible chemical degradation by enzymes and proteases in addition to the well-expected drug release pathway involving supramolecular disassembly and subsequent diffusion out of the hydrogel network (Figure 4C). While detailed analyses of the local immune response against ARV DA administration were not included in this study, the negatively charged surface of ARV DAs (Figure S7) is not expected to create potential immune clearance that contributes significantly to the drug release rate, based upon previous literature on peptide assemblies 53, 54.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

In vivo studies of hydrogel formation, local retention and therapeutic release. (A) In vivo gel formation and retention assay after subcutaneous injection of a V-3TC-E3 aqueous solution in the backs of mice. (B) The long-acting release of ARV DAs is reflected in the gradual reduction of hydrogels in the injection site, as determined by the remaining weight. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). (C) Schematic illustration of the proposed in vivo hydrogel release process that involves filament dissociation and consequent diffusion of monomeric ARV DAs out of the hydrogel network.

To confirm the safety and tolerability of the 3TC hydrogel, we conducted experiments on complete blood counts and serum chemistry in mice after treatment. On day 28 and day 56 (the study ending time), plasma and tissues were collected for metabolic profiles studies. Age-matched untreated mice were used as control. Comprehensive serum chemistry profiles were quantified, revealing no noticeable differences between mice receiving 3TC hydrogel treatment and the untreated group (Figures S12-S13, Table S1). Liver and kidney metabolic profiles were unchanged, indicating that V-3TC-E3 hydrogel was well tolerated and did not adversely affect the functions of systemic organs. Total white cell, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts were also unchanged during the study period. Overall, these results confirm our in vitro findings that the in-situ formed 3TC hydrogel could function as an effective delivery system for the sustained release of 3TC in vivo, without eliciting undesired systemic immune responses.

In vivo long-acting release.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution profiles of the V-3TC-E3 hydrogel, male Balb/cJ mice were injected subcutaneously with a single dose of 75 mg/kg body weight (3TC equivalent of V-3TC-E3) (Figure 5A). Pharmaceutical standard, free 3TC, was administrated at the same dosage and used as a control. Whole blood and tissue samples were collected and analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) to determine parent and prodrug levels (Figure S14). In mice with free drug treatment, 3TC plasma concentration dropped rapidly, with no drug detectable after day 3 (Figure 5B). For the group with hydrogel treatment, the 3TC concentration in plasma was observed to increase initially, reaching a maximum concentration on day 7 before it started to drop gradually. We also devised and performed in vitro experiments to assess the conversion of the ARVDA into the parent 3TC free drug in mouse plasma (Figure S15). Figures 5 C-D suggest that V-3TC-E3 started to hydrolyze into the free drug as soon as mouse plasma was introduced. After 1 hour, the predominant species detected in plasma was free lamivudine, and after 3 hours, the ARVDA form was nearly undetectable.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Pharmacokinetics studies in Balb/cJ mice to demonstrate a high concentration of 3TC can be maintained in plasma (A) The experimental schedule. Mice were administered 75 mg/kg equivalents of 3TC using either the parent 3TC or V-3TC-E3 conjugate. Plasma was collected for drug analysis at days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49 after treatment. (B) Plasma drug levels measured from day 0 to day 49. Dotted line indicates the IC50 level of 3TC. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). (C) HPLC chromatogram of V-3TC-E3 in mice plasma from 0–3 h showing that ARVDA degrades to release free 3TC in the mouse plasma. (D) Kinetic measurement of free drug release upon degradation of V-3TC-E3 by incubation in mouse plasma for varied times before assessment with analytical RP-HPLC, showing that 3TC undergoes complete hydrolysis in plasma within 3 hours. Data presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (E) Drug levels in spleen, liver, kidney, lungs and lymph nodes (LN) on day 28 and day 49 after treatment. 3TC levels were determined by UPLC-MS. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5).

It is remarkable to note that for the ARV DA treated group the 3TC plasma concentrations were maintained at a level of 5-fold or higher than the IC50 of 3TC before day 25. Even on day 40, its plasma concentration was still above the IC50 level, whereas free 3TC was completely cleared after 3 days. PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental analysis for all treatment groups. The apparent 3TC half-life (t1/2) was 27 days, 15 times longer than those of 3TC. Similarly, the mean residence time (MRT) of ARVDA (38 days) was ten times longer than that of free 3TC (2.1 days). ARV DA also resulted in significantly higher tissue accumulation than the free drug (Figure 5E). 3TC was undetectable in all major organs after 3 days when administered in the free 3TC form. In stark contrast, for mice treated with V-3TC-E3 hydrogels, their 3TC tissue levels on day 28 were 2337, 3453 and 4560 ng/g in liver, spleen, lymph node, lungs, and kidney, respectively. On day 49, high tissue 3TC levels can still be detected.

CONCLUSION

In this work, we have designed and synthesized a series of self-assembling ARV DAs as self-formulating and self-delivering supramolecular hydrogelators for long-acting release of a hydrophilic antiretroviral agent. The peptide design motif of using alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues leverages the amine group of lysine side chains and the reactive C- and N-termini of short peptides to afford a versatile platform for possible conjugation of multiple types of therapeutic agents. Importantly, we demonstrated the feasibility of converting lamivudine into effective hydrogelators and their tunable assembly and gelation properties by varying the number of glutamic acid residues at the N-terminus. Upon addition of PBS or subcutaneous injection, the hydrogelator-containing solutions can be triggered to gel immediately, and the resultant hydrogels exhibited long-term release of the ARV DA both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, our results suggested that a single injection of V-3TC-E3 solution can maintain the 3TC plasma concentration above the IC50 level for up to 7 weeks, the ARV DA can be quickly converted to free 3TC in plasma. Our work showcases the high potential of using ARV DAs to extend the dosing intervals of antiretroviral agents to several months or even longer after further optimization in molecular design and injected dosage. Lastly, it should be noted that the reported ARV hydrogels can also be used to deliver other hydrophilic antiretroviral agents to create a combination antiretroviral therapy for both HIV/HBV treatment and prevention.

METHODS

Synthesis and characterization of Boc-3TC succinate

3TC (1, 2.00 g, 8.72 mmol) was mixed with Boc2O (2.60 g, 12.2 mmol) in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). The reaction was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. After concentrating the resulting solution in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in 100 mL dichloromethane (DCM), washed with 100 mL saturated NaHCO3, and then with 100 mL brine. After drying the organic layer with MgSO4 anhydrous, the solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator, affording 2 used for next reaction without further purification.

2 (2.68 g, 8.14 mmol), succinic anhydride (1.22 g, 12.21 mmol), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 74.5 mg, 0.60 mmol) were stirred in 40 mL anhydrous DCM. Diisopropylethylamine (DIEA, 2.10 mL, 12.2 mmol) were added to the reaction. The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 h. 40 mL of water was charged to the solution and stirred for 1 h. The solution was then acidified with 2 M HCl to pH = 2. The crude mixture was collected by filtration and purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel to give Boc-3TC-succinate (3) as a white solid (1.72 g, 46% yield for the two steps). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, ppm): 7.98 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (dd, J = 7.7, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (dd, J = 12.2, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (dd, J = 12.2, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (dd, J = 12.1, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (dd, J = 12.1, 4.3 Hz, 2H), 2.68 (s, 4H), 1.51 (s, 9H). ESI-MS calculated for [M+H]+ (C17H24N3O8S): m/z = 430.22, found: 430.30 (Figures S1-S2).

Synthesis and characterization of ARV DAs

ARV DAs were synthesized on Rink Amide MBHA resin (0.5 mmol) using standard Fmoc-solid phase peptide synthesis. Fmoc deprotections were performed using 20% piperidine in DMF, and the reaction vessel was shaken for 15 min on a Burrel wrist-action shaker. This procedure was repeated one more time, and the resulting resin was washed 3 times with 10 mL DMF and 10 mL DCM. The coupling reaction was carried out by shaking the resin in a solution of HBTU (0.758 g, 2.0 mmol), Fmoc-protected amino acid (2.0 mmol), and DIEA (0.90 mL, 5.0 mmol) in 15 mL DMF for 2 h. Acetylation was performed 2 times after N-terminal Fmoc deprotection using 15 mL 20% Ac2O in DMF and 100 μL DIEA. The 4-methyltrityl (Mtt) group on the side chain of Lys(Mtt) was selectively deprotected by shaking the resin in 20 mL TFA/TIS/DCM (3:5:92) for 3 times. Then 3 was conjugated onto the deprotected lysine using the same method as amino acid coupling reaction described earlier. The peptide was cleaved with a solution of TFA/TIS/H2O (92.5:5:2.5) for 3 h. The cleavage mixture was evaporated in vacuo reduced pressure and the crude peptide was precipitated in chilled dry diethyl ether. The crude peptide was purified using RP-HPLC with an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 Reverse-Phase column (5 µm, 150 × 21.2 mm). Product identity was analyzed using ESI-MS (Figure S3S5) and lyophilized to obtain final products as white powders. The products were re-dissolved, aliquoted, re-lyophilized, weighed and stored at −20 °C. The purity of ARV DAs was assessed using analytical RP-HPLC with an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 RP column (5 µm, 150 × 4.6 mm) with 20 μL injection volume. A linear ramping of 5–95% water/MeCN at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was used as the gradient condition.

Sol-Gel transition

The ARV supramolecular hydrogels for in vitro studies were prepared as follows: To 180 μl of a 2.2 mM ARVDA solution in deionized water, 20 μl of 10×PBS was added to attain a final ARV DA concentration of 2 mM in PBS. Rheological experiments were conducted using an Anton Paar MCR 302 rheometer with an 8 mm parallel-plate geometry. To perform the tests, the 2.2 mM ARV DA solution (180 µL) was positioned on the sample stage, and 20 µL of 10×PBS was pipetted onto the plate’s underside, situated above the material. The plate was gently lowered to the measuring position, and the storage and loss modulus (G’ and G’’) were recorded.

Antiviral Assay

For assessing the anti-HBV efficacy of ARV DAs, HepAD38 cells were cultured on collagen-coated 96-well flat-bottomed plates at a cell density of 6 × 104 per well. For three days, cells were maintained in 200 μL of Ham’s F-12K (Kaighn’s) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% of an antibiotic solution (penicillin and streptomycin), and 0.3 mg mL−1 tetracycline at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. The cells were treated with medium containing PBS, 3TC, V-3TC-E2, and V-3TC-E3. On the third day, the medium was replaced with fresh medium with the test compound at the appropriate concentration. On the fourth day, 150 μL of cell supernatant was collected, supplemented with 50 μL of nuclease-free H2O, and DNA was extracted and eluted in 50 μL of nuclease-free water using QIAamp DNA blood mini kits (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

HBV DNA was quantified by qPCR, using Integrated DNA Technologies PrimeTime Gene Expression Master Mix and HBV TaqMan primer/probe. A serial dilution of gBlocks Gene Fragments of known HBV copy number was used as the standard for the absolute quantification of DNA copy number from cycle threshold values. The amplification of 2 μL of aqueous DNA followed a preamplification cycle at 95 °C for 10 minutes, 50 cycles of 95 °C and 60 °C, and a melt curve in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The percentage of HBV production for each therapeutic concentration was determined based on the average number of copies of HBV DNA produced by water-treated cells and averaged across the three biological repeats of the assay.

In vitro Drug Release and Hydrogel Stability Test

The ARV supramolecular hydrogels were prepared as outlined in the previous section. For measuring the in vitro release profiles of ARV DAs, 60 μL of PBS was placed onto the surface of a 200 μL hydrogel with a 2 mM concentration, and the sample was incubated at 37 °C. At each time point, 50 μL of PBS was carefully drawn from the gel surface and replaced with the same volume of fresh buffer.

To test the stability of ARV DA in supramolecular hydrogels, a 200 μL hydrogel sample with a 2 mM concentration was incubated at 37 °C. At each predetermined time point, a 25 μL portion of hydrogel was extracted, diluted tenfold with PBS, and then prepared for CD and HPLC analysis.

The ARV DA concentration and purity were determined using RP-HPLC on an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 RP column (5 µm, 150 × 4.6 mm) with an injection volume of 20 µL. The gradient condition was a linear ramping of 5–95% water/MeCN at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.

V-3TC-E3 degradation in mice plasma

Drug release studies of V-3TC-E3 were performed at a concentration of 200 μM in PBS buffer with mouse plasma (10% v/v). Briefly, 400 μM stock solutions of V-3TC-E3 in PBS were prepared and aged overnight. Stock solutions of 10% v/v mouse plasma in PBS prepared 30 min before the experiment. Three replicates of V-3TC-E3 solutions were prepared by mixing the two stock solutions in a 1:1 ratio and were incubated at 37 °C. Samples were collected at 0 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2h, and 3 h, diluted with PBS by 10 folds, snap frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −30 °C. The release profile was determined by analytical RP-HPLC using the following conditions: RP-HPLC on an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 RP column (5 µm, 150 × 4.6 mm) with an injection volume of 20 µL. The gradient condition was a linear ramping of 5–95% wa-ter/MeCN at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.

In vivo hydrogel degradation

Five male Balb/cJ mice, aged between 8–10 weeks, were subcutaneously injected with 140μL of a 15mM V-3TC-E3 solution. This dosage equates to a 3TC equivalent of 75 mg/kg. We subcutaneously injected the V-3TC-E3 solution into the backs of mice, chosen for its larger surface area and minimal mechanical disruption, allowing for a more reliable assessment of the hydrogel’s long-term stability and drug release profiles. The mice were photographed and sacrificed at different time intervals (Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 28, 35, 42). The remaining hydrogel sample was photographed, and carefully collected and dissolved in water/MeCN 8:2. The concentration of the remaining drug was determined using HPLC to calculate the remaining weights of the undegraded hydrogel.

In vivo PK and biodistribution

Five male Balb/cJ mice, aged between 8–10 weeks, were subcutaneously injected with 140μL of a 15mM V-3TC-E3 solution. This dosage equates to a 3TC equivalent of 75 mg/kg. The whole blood sample was collected at 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days after administration. At day 28 and 56, Animals were humanely euthanized, and tissues (liver, lung, lymph nodes, kidneys and spleen) were collected for quantitative drug analysis.

For blood analysis, plasma was prepared by centrifugation of blood collected in heparinized tubes at 2000x g for 5 min. 3TC and V-3TC-E3 were extracted from plasma (20 μL) using 1 mL of acetonitrile. 10 µL of 500 ng/ml Emtricitabine solution was added to each sample as internal standard (IS), which gave a final IS concentration of 50 ng/mL after reconstitution. Samples were dried under a N2 stream, reconstituted in 100 μl of 80% v/v LC-MS grade MeOH/H2O. 10 μl of the sample solution was injected into Waters Acquity/Xevo-G2 UPLC/MS system (Milford, MA) for analysis.

For tissue analysis, an optimized amount of tissue sample was processed using a tissue homogenizer in 5 volumes of 90% v/v LC/MS grade MeCN/H2O. 100 µL Tissue homogenate was mixed with 90 µL of 90% v/v LC/MS grade MeCN/H2O, 10 µL of LC-MS-grade water, and 10 µL 500 ng/ml Emtricitabine solution (as IS). After extraction, 10 μl of the sample solution was injected into Waters Acquity/Xevo-G2 UPLC/MS system (Milford, MA) for analysis.

Standard curves of 3TC or V-3TC-E3 were prepared in blank mouse plasma in the range of 0.7–7000 ng/mL and 0.25–2500 ng/mL of corresponding compounds, respectively. Emtricitabine solution was added to each sample as internal standard (IS) to give a final IS concentration of 50 ng/mL. Quantitative analysis was performed based upon the ratio of 3TC peak area and IS peak area.

Supplementary Material

Suppl Material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work is supported by Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research (JHU CFAR) under NIH/NIAID P30AI094189. We acknowledge the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Integrated Imaging Center (IIC) for the use of the TEM facility, the JHU Department of Chemistry NMR facility, and the JHU Department of Chemistry MS facility.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at……

Materials, synthesis details and experimental methods; Chemical characterization and supporting figures (Scheme S1, Table S1 Figure S1-S15).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Aida T; Meijer EW; Stupp SI. Functional Supramolecular Polymers Science 2012, 335 (6070), 813–817. DOI: 10.1126/science.1205962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Webber MJ; Appel EA; Meijer EW; Langer R. Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat Mater 2016, 15 (1), 13–26. DOI: 10.1038/Nmat4474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Zhao F; Ma ML; Xu B. Molecular hydrogels of therapeutic agents. Chemical Society Reviews 2009, 38 (4), 883–891. DOI: 10.1039/b806410p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Lindsey S; Piatt JH; Worthington P; Sonmez C; Satheye S; Schneider JP; Pochan DJ; Langhans SA. Beta Hairpin Peptide Hydrogels as an Injectable Solid Vehicle for Neurotrophic Growth Factor Delivery. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (9), 2672–2683, Article. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Webber MJ; Matson JB; Tamboli VK; Stupp SI. Controlled release of dexamethasone from peptide nanofiber gels to modulate inflammatory response. Biomaterials 2012, 33 (28), 6823–6832. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Majumder P; Singh A; Wang Z; Dutta K; Pahwa R; Liang C; Andrews C; Patel NL; Shi J; Val N.d .; et al. Surface-fill hydrogel attenuates the oncogenic signature of complex anatomical surface cancer in a single application. Nat Nanotechnol 2021, 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-00961-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Batra R; Loeffler TD; Chan H; Srinivasan S; Cui H; Korendovych IV; Nanda V; Palmer LC; Solomon LA; Fry HC. Machine learning overcomes human bias in the discovery of self-assembling peptides. Nature chemistry 2022, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Cui H; Webber MJ; Stupp SI. Self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles: From molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Peptide Science: Original Research on Biomolecules 2010, 94 (1), 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Stern D; Cui H. Crafting Polymeric and Peptidic Hydrogels for Improved Wound Healing. Advanced healthcare materials 2019, 8 (9), 1900104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Schneider JP; Pochan DJ; Ozbas B; Rajagopal K; Pakstis L; Kretsinger J. Responsive Hydrogels from the Intramolecular Folding and Self-Assembly of a Designed Peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124 (50), 15030–15037. DOI: 10.1021/ja027993g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Nowak AP; Breedveld V; Pakstis L; Ozbas B; Pine DJ; Pochan D; Deming TJ. Rapidly recovering hydrogel scaffolds from self-assembling diblock copolypeptide amphiphiles. Nature 2002, 417 (6887), 424–428. DOI: 10.1038/417424a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Song JW; Yuan CQ; Jiao TF; Xing RR; Yang MY; Adams DJ; Yan XH. Multifunctional Antimicrobial Biometallohydrogels Based on Amino Acid Coordinated Self-Assembly. Small 2020, 16 (8), 1907309. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201907309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Black KA; Lin BF; Wonder EA; Desai SS; Chung EJ; Ulery BD; Katari RS; Tirrell MV. Biocompatibility and Characterization of a Peptide Amphiphile Hydrogel for Applications in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part A 2015, 21 (7–8), 1333–1342. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Acar H; Ting JM; Srivastava S; LaBelle JL; Tirrell MV. Molecular engineering solutions for therapeutic peptide delivery. Chemical Society Reviews 2017, 46 (21), 6553–6569. DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00536a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Tantakitti F; Boekhoven J; Wang X; Kazantsev RV; Yu T; Li J; Zhuang E; Zandi R; Ortony JH; Newcomb CJ; et al. Energy landscapes and functions of supramolecular systems. Nat Mater 2016, 15 (4), 469–476. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Haines-Butterick L; Rajagopal K; Branco M; Salick D; Rughani R; Pilarz M; Lamm MS; Pochan DJ; Schneider JP. Controlling hydrogelation kinetics by peptide design for three-dimensional encapsulation and injectable delivery of cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104 (19), 7791–7796, Article. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701980104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Hule RA; Nagarkar RP; Hammouda B; Schneider JP; Pochan DJ. Dependence of Self-Assembled Peptide Hydrogel Network Structure on Local Fibril Nanostructure. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (18), 7137–7145. DOI: 10.1021/ma9003242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Du XW; Zhou J; Shi JF; Xu B. Supramolecular Hydrogelators and Hydrogels: From Soft Matter to Molecular Biomaterials. Chemical Reviews 2015, 115 (24), 13165–13307. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Schiapparelli P; Zhang P; Lara-Velazquez M; Guerrero-Cazares H; Lin R; Su H; Chakroun RW; Tusa M; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Cui H. Self-assembling and self-formulating prodrug hydrogelator extends survival in a glioblastoma resection and recurrence model. Journal of Controlled Release 2020, 319, 311–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Li Z; Zhu YM; Matson JB. pH-Responsive Self-Assembling Peptide-Based Biomaterials: Designs and Applications. Acs Applied Bio Materials 2022, 5 (10), 4635–4651. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.2c00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Ding Y; Zheng D; Xie L; Zhang X; Zhang Z; Wang L; Hu ZW; Yang Z. Enzyme-Instructed Peptide Assembly Favored by Preorganization for Cancer Cell Membrane Engineering. J Am Chem Soc 2023, 145 (8), 4366–4371. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c11823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Chakroun RW; Wang F; Lin R; Wang Y; Su H; Pompa D; Cui H. Fine-Tuning the Linear Release Rate of Paclitaxel-Bearing Supramolecular Filament Hydrogels through Molecular Engineering. Acs Nano 2019, 13 (7), 7780–7790. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b01689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Cheetham AG; Zhang P; Lin Y.-a.; Lock LL; Cui H. Supramolecular Nanostructures Formed by Anticancer Drug Assembly. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135 (8), 2907–2910. DOI: 10.1021/ja3115983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Wang F; Su H; Xu D; Dai W; Zhang W; Wang Z; Anderson CF; Zheng M; Oh R; Wan F; et al. Tumour sensitization via the extended intratumoural release of a STING agonist and camptothecin from a self-assembled hydrogel. Nat Biomed Eng 2020, 4 (11), 1090–1101. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0597-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Wang H; Monroe M; Leslie F; Flexner C; Cui H. Supramolecular nanomedicines through rational design of self-assembling prodrugs. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Sis MJ; Ye Z; La Costa K; Webber MJ. Energy Landscapes of Supramolecular Peptide-Drug Conjugates Directed by Linker Selection and Drug Topology. Acs Nano 2022, 16 (6), 9546–9558. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c02804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Wang F; Xu D; Su H; Zhang W; Sun X; Monroe MK; Chakroun RW; Wang Z; Dai W; Oh R; et al. Supramolecular prodrug hydrogelator as an immune booster for checkpoint blocker–based immunotherapy. Sci Adv 2020, 6 (18), eaaz8985. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Monroe M; Flexner C; Cui H. Harnessing nanostructured systems for improved treatment and prevention of HIV disease. Bioengineering & translational medicine 2018, 3 (2), 102–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Monroe MK; Wang H; Anderson CF; Jia H; Flexner C; Cui H. Leveraging the therapeutic, biological, and self-assembling potential of peptides for the treatment of viral infections. Journal of Controlled Release 2022, 348, 1028–1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Monroe MK; Wang H; Anderson CF; Qin M; Thio CL; Flexner C; Cui HG. Antiviral supramolecular polymeric hydrogels by self-assembly of tenofovir-bearing peptide amphiphiles. Biomaterials Science 2023, 11 (2), 489–498. DOI: 10.1039/d2bm01649d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Palella FJ; Delaney KM; Moorman AC; Loveless MO; Fuhrer J; Satten GA; Aschman DJ; Holmberg SD; Investigators HIVOS. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1998, 338 (13), 853–860. DOI: 10.1056/nejm199803263381301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Cobb DA; Smith NA; Edagwa BJ; McMillan JM. Long-acting approaches for delivery of antiretroviral drugs for prevention and treatment of HIV: a review of recent research. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 2020, 17 (9), 1227–1238. DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1783233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Gallant JE; DeJesus E; Arribas JR; Pozniak AL; Gazzard B; Campo RE; Lu B; McColl D; Chuck S; Enejosa J; et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. New England Journal of Medicine 2006, 354 (3), 251–260. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Kulkarni TA; Bade AN; Sillman B; Shetty BLD; Wojtkiewicz MS; Gautam N; Hilaire JR; Sravanam S; Szlachetka A; Lamberty BG; et al. A year-long extended release nanoformulated cabotegravir prodrug. Nat Mater 2020, 1–11. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0674-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Liaw YF; Sung JJY; Chow WC; Farrell G; Lee CZ; Yuen H; Tanwandee T; Tao QM; Shue K; Keene ON; et al. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2004, 351 (15), 1521–1531. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa033364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Sax PE; Tierney C; Collier AC; Fischl MA; Mollan K; Peeples L; Godfrey C; Jahed NC; Myers L; Katzenstein D; et al. Abacavir-Lamivudine versus Tenofovir-Emtricitabine for Initial HIV-1 Therapy. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 361 (23), 2230–2240. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Su H; Zhang W; Wang H; Wang F; Cui H. Paclitaxel-Promoted Supramolecular Polymerization of Peptide Conjugates. J Am Chem Soc 2019, 141 (30), 11997–12004. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Su H; Wang F; Ran W; Zhang W; Dai W; Wang H; Anderson CF; Wang Z; Zheng C; Zhang P; et al. The role of critical micellization concentration in efficacy and toxicity of supramolecular polymers. Proc National Acad Sci 2020, 117 (9), 201913655. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913655117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Su H; Wang F; Wang Y; Cheetham AG; Cui H. Macrocyclization of a Class of Camptothecin Analogues into Tubular Supramolecular Polymers. J Am Chem Soc 2019, 141 (43), 17107–17111. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Chakroun RW; Sneider A; Anderson CF; Wang F; Wu PH; Wirtz D; Cui H. Supramolecular Design of Unsymmetric Reverse Bolaamphiphiles for Cell-Sensitive Hydrogel Degradation and Drug Release. Angewandte Chemie Int Ed 2020, 59 (11), 4434–4442. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201913087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Su H; Wang F; Wang H; Zhang W; Anderson CF; Cui H. Propagation-Instigated Self-Limiting Polymerization of Multiarmed Amphiphiles into Finite Supramolecular Polymers. J Am Chem Soc 2021, 143 (44), 18446–18453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Cui H; Cheetham AG; Pashuck ET; Stupp SI. Amino Acid Sequence in Constitutionally Isomeric Tetrapeptide Amphiphiles Dictates Architecture of One-Dimensional Nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136 (35), 12461–12468. DOI: 10.1021/ja507051w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Cui H; Muraoka T; Cheetham AG; Stupp SI. Self-Assembly of Giant Peptide Nanobelts. Nano Lett 2009, 9 (3), 945–951. DOI: 10.1021/nl802813f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Brack A; Caille A. Synthesis and Beta-Conformation of Copolypeptides With Alternating Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Residues. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1978, 11 (2), 128–139, Article. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Lamm MS; Rajagopal K; Schneider JP; Pochan DJ. Laminated morphology of nontwisting beta-sheet fibrils constructed via peptide self-assembly. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127 (47), 16692–16700, Article. DOI: 10.1021/ja054721f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Pochan DJ; Schneider JP; Kretsinger J; Ozbas B; Rajagopal K; Haines L. Thermally reversible hydrogels via intramolecular folding and consequent self-assembly of a de Novo designed peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125 (39), 11802–11803, Article. DOI: 10.1021/ja0353154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Salick DA; Kretsinger JK; Pochan DJ; Schneider JP. Inherent antibacterial activity of a peptide-based beta-hairpin hydrogel. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129 (47), 14793–14799, Article. DOI: 10.1021/ja076300z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Beniash E; Hartgerink JD; Storrie H; Stendahl JC; Stupp SI. Self-assembling peptide amphiphile nanofiber matrices for cell entrapment. Acta Biomater 2005, 1 (4), 387–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Dong H; Paramonov SE; Aulisa L; Bakota EL; Hartgerink JD. Self-assembly of multidomain peptides: Balancing molecular frustration controls conformation and nanostructure. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129 (41), 12468–12472, Article. DOI: 10.1021/ja072536r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Galler KM; Aulisa L; Regan KR; D’Souza RN; Hartgerink JD. Self-Assembling Multidomain Peptide Hydrogels: Designed Susceptibility to Enzymatic Cleavage Allows Enhanced Cell Migration and Spreading. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132 (9), 3217–3223, Article. DOI: 10.1021/ja910481t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Pogostin BH; Yu MH; Azares AR; Euliano EM; Lai CSE; Saenz G; Wu SX; Farsheed AC; Melhorn SM; Graf TP; et al. Multidomain peptide hydrogel adjuvants elicit strong bias towards humoral immunity. Biomaterials Science 2022, 10 (21), 6217–6229, Article. DOI: 10.1039/d2bm01242a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Hu Y; Lin R; Zhang P; Fern J; Cheetham AG; Patel K; Schulman R; Kan C; Cui H. Electrostatic-driven lamination and untwisting of β-sheet assemblies. Acs Nano 2016, 10 (1), 880–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Wen Y; Waltman A; Han H; Collier JH. Switching the Immunogenicity of Peptide Assemblies Using Surface Properties. Acs Nano 2016, 10 (10), 9274–9286. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03409 From NLM PubMed-not-MEDLINE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Fromen CA; Robbins GR; Shen TW; Kai MP; Ting JP; DeSimone JM. Controlled analysis of nanoparticle charge on mucosal and systemic antibody responses following pulmonary immunization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112 (2), 488–493. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422923112 From NLM Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl Material

RESOURCES