Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Sep 7;143(37):15258–15270. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c06434

Overcoming Metastable CO2 Adsorption in a Bulky Diamine-Appended Metal–Organic Framework

Bhavish Dinakar a,b, Alexander C Forse a,c,d, Henry Z H Jiang a,b, Ziting Zhu b,e, Jung-Hoon Lee f, Eugene J Kim c, Surya T Parker a,b, Connor J Pollak a, Rebecca L Siegelman b,c,#, Phillip J Milner b,c,$, Jeffrey A Reimer a,b,*, Jeffrey R Long a,b,c,*
PMCID: PMC11045294  NIHMSID: NIHMS1984923  PMID: 34491725

Abstract

Carbon capture at fossil fuel-fired power plants is a critical strategy to mitigate anthropogenic contributions to global warming, but widespread deployment of this technology is hindered by a lack of energy-efficient materials that can be optimized for CO2 capture from a specific flue gas. As a result of their tunable, step-shaped CO2 adsorption profiles, diamine-functionalized metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) of the form diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) (dobpdc4− = 4,4′-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3′-dicarboxylate) are among the most promising materials for carbon capture applications. Here, we present a detailed investigation of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) (dmen = 1,2-diamino-2-methylpropane), one of only two MOFs with an adsorption step near the optimal pressure for CO2 capture from coal flue gas. While prior characterization suggested that this material only adsorbs CO2 to half capacity (0.5 CO2 per diamine) at 1 bar, we show that the half-capacity state is actually a metastable intermediate. Under appropriate conditions, the MOF adsorbs CO2 to full capacity, but conversion from the half-capacity structure happens on a very slow timescale, rendering it inaccessible in traditional adsorption measurements. Data from solid-state magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, coupled with van der Waals-corrected density functional theory, indicate that ammonium carbamate chains formed at half- and full-capacity adopt opposing configurations, and the need to convert between these states likely dictates the sluggish post-half capacity uptake. Using the more symmetric parent framework Mg2(pc-dobpdc) (pc-dobpdc4− = 3,3′-dioxidobiphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate), the metastable trap can be avoided and the full CO2 capacity of dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) accessed under conditions relevant for carbon capture from coal-fired power plants.

Graphical Abstract

Authors are required to submit a graphic entry for the Table of Contents (TOC) that, in conjunction with the manuscript title, should give the reader a representative idea of one of the following: A key structure, reaction, equation, concept, or theorem, etc., that is discussed in the manuscript. Consult the journal’s Instructions for Authors for TOC graphic specifications.

graphic file with name nihms-1984923-f0009.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion are driving global warming at a rate of 0.2 °C per decade,1 and a substantial two-thirds of these emissions derive from the power sector alone.2 Even as we transition to renewable energy sources in a critical thrust toward sustainability, the burning of fossil fuels is projected to continue for several decades. It is therefore essential to identify strategies for mitigating CO2 emissions in the short term.3 Additionally, industrial cement and steel plants produce CO2 as a byproduct of mineral conversion, which cannot be avoided by using renewable energy sources.4,5 Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is a potential mitigation strategy wherein CO2 is removed from point sources of production and injected underground for long-term storage.6 Current state-of-the-art carbon capture technologies rely on aqueous amine solutions that selectively absorb CO2 to form ammonium carbamate and ammonium bicarbonate species.7 However, these solutions suffer from significant drawbacks, including amine volatilization, thermal and oxidative degradation, and low CO2 adsorption capacities, the latter due to the high water content required to prevent equipment corrosion.8 Critically, the high energy cost needed to heat the amine solutions to desorb CO2 can reduce power plant output by 20–30%.9 As a result, energy-efficient CO2 separation materials with high selectivities and capacities are needed to catalyze the widespread implementation of CCS.9

Among the most promising materials studied to date for carbon capture are metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Composed of metal ions or clusters connected by organic linkers, these porous adsorbents possess large internal surface areas, low heat capacities, and are chemically and thermally robust.10 In particular, materials featuring diamines tethered to the coordinatively-unsaturated metal sites in Mg2(dobpdc) (dobpdc4− = 4,4′-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3′-dicarboxylate) (Figure 1a) have emerged as top performing materials for a range of CO2 separation applications.11–19 These frameworks exhibit step-shaped CO2 adsorption, which is associated with sudden uptake of one molecule of CO2 per diamine (hereafter referred to as full capacity) at a critical threshold pressure. This unique adsorption behavior originates from a cooperative chemisorption mechanism wherein CO2 inserts into the metal–diamine bonds to form chains of ammonium carbamate that run along the framework channels (Figure 1b).12,20 Importantly, these materials exhibit large working capacities with only moderate temperature and/or pressure swings, and the critical pressure or temperature threshold of co-operative adsorption can be controlled by altering the appended diamine,13–15,17–19 metal,12,15 and organic linker.16 A statistical mechanical model in tandem with van der Waals-corrected density functional theory (vdW-DFT) has suggested that cooperative CO2 uptake in diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) is induced by an abrupt increase in the mean ammonium carbamate chain length above a certain pressure of CO2.21 Recently, this class of materials has been extended to include tetraamine-appended variants of Mg2(dobpdc), which exhibit exceptional cycling stability under humid conditions and with steam regeneration.22

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Structure of activated Mg2(dobpdc) and expanded view of the coordinatively unsaturated metal sites, which can be post-synthetically functionalized with diamines to access diamine–Mg2(dobpdc). Green, red, gray, and white depict Mg, O, C, and H atoms, respectively. (b) Depiction of the formation of ammonium carbamate chains in diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) upon cooperative CO2 adsorption.

One potential application for diamine-appended MOFs is post-combustion carbon capture from coal-fired power plants, which are responsible for 30% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions.2 A typical coal flue gas is composed of N2 (70–75%), CO2 (15–16%), H2O (5–7%), O2 (3–4%), as well as trace amounts of SOx, NOx, HCl, CO, and hydrocarbons, and is released at ambient pressures and temperatures as low as 40 °C.23 Therefore, to achieve a target CO2 capture fraction of at least 90% with minimal required regeneration energy, a suitable cooperative adsorbent will exhibit a step pressure of 15 mbar.13,15 While most diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) materials studied to date display isotherm step pressures of less than 1 mbar or greater than 100 mbar, the frameworks dmpn–Mg2(dobpdc) and dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) (dmpn = 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine; dmen = 1,2-diamino-2-methylpropane)15 both exhibit intermediate step pressures close to the ideal pressure of 15 mbar at 40 °C suitable for energy-efficient CO2 capture from coal flue gas. The working capacity of dmpn–Mg2(dobpdc) is 2.42 mmol/g (9.1 g/100g) with a 60 °C temperature swing, and the material can be regenerated under humid CO2 at ambient pressures.15 However, dmpn–Mg2(dobpdc) adsorbs CO2 through a mixed adsorption mechanism involving gradual equilibration to a 1:1 ratio of ammonium carbamate chains and hydrogen-bonded carbamic acid pairs. As a result, the CO2 cycling capacity of this material is significantly lower than the theoretical capacity predicted from the formation of ammonium carbamate chains alone.24 The related framework material dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) has likewise been reported to exhibit an unusual adsorption profile under isobaric and isothermal conditions.15,17 For example, isothermal data collected at 40 °C revealed a single sharp adsorption step to approximately half capacity (2.5 mmol/g, corresponding to slightly more than 0.5 CO2/dmen), with minimal and gradual post-step adsorption indicative of CO2 physisorption.15,17 Preliminary isobaric data collected using a temperature ramp rate of 1 °C/min likewise revealed stepped adsorption to an apparent maximum capacity of ~0.5 CO2/dmen at 40 °C.15

We were interested in understanding the mechanism of CO2 uptake in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) and identifying the cause of this unusual adsorption behavior, which precludes its adoption for CO2 capture from coal flue gas, despite its ideal step pressure, high recyclability, and stability to O2, H2O, and SO2.17 Here, we show that that by carefully controlling the CO2 dosing method, it is possible to access the full capacity of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at 1 bar (1 CO2/dmen). Unexpectedly, the half-capacity structure represents a metastable trap that has not been encountered with any other diamine-appended Mg2(dobpdc) material studied to date. Characterization of the half- and full-capacity structures using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and vdW-DFT reveals the existence of a preferred ammonium carbamate chain direction in each case, likely dictated by steric interactions and favorable non-covalent interactions. By changing the base framework, it is possible to avoid the half-capacity trap, yielding a material that readily saturates with CO2 under conditions relevant to capture from a coal flue gas.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Uptake of CO2 in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc).

New CO2 adsorption data were collected for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) and compared with new data collected for the well-characterized frameworks e-2–Mg2(dobpdc) (e-2 = N-ethylethylenediamine)13 and nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) (nPr-2 = N-propylethylenediamine).16 These reference materials have previously been shown to adsorb CO2 to full capacity via the exclusive formation of ammonium carbamate chains, as characterized via detailed solid-state NMR studies.23 All materials were prepared and activated using a reported procedure,15 and optimal diamine loadings of 100% were achieved within error (Supporting Information, Table S1). Carbon dioxide adsorption isobars were obtained for all three frameworks using thermogravimetric analysis (Figure 2a). The CO2 adsorption isobar of e-2–Mg2(dobpdc) features a single adsorption step to full capacity (Figure 2a),13,24 while the isobar of nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) features a double step, with each step corresponding to half of the theoretical adsorption capacity. For both materials, the experimental capacities (Table S1) are consistent with those in the literature.13,16 As previously reported, the two steps observed for nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) (and related variants with primary,secondary alkylethylenediamines featuring bulky secondary amine substituents) suggest that the material cooperatively adsorbs CO2 in two stages, likely due to steric interactions between the propyl groups in the crystallographic ab plane.16 As expected, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves collected for e-2–Mg2(dobpdc) and nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) are characterized by one and two sharp CO2 adsorption exotherms, respectively (Figure S5). In contrast, the isobar of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) features only a single step to approximately half of the theoretical capacity at the lowest measured temperature of 30 °C (Figure 2a, Table S1), consistent with prior characterization of CO2 uptake in this material.15,17 Furthermore, there is only one peak in the DSC curve from 140 to −60 °C, indicating that no additional adsorption takes place after the step to half capacity (Figures S5 and S6).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Thermogravimetric isobars obtained for e-2–Mg2(dobpdc) (red), nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) (purple), and dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) (blue) under an atmosphere of pure CO2 using a temperature ramp rate of 1 °C/min. Adsorption and desorption curves are shown as solid and dashed lines, respectively. The samples were held isothermally at 30 °C for 5 min before desorption data were collected to allow the temperature to equilibrate. (b) Pure CO2 adsorption isotherms for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at various temperatures. The apparent decrease in pressure with increasing loading in the step region at low temperatures is not fully understood; however, it is a phenomenon that has been observed previously for diamine-appended MOFs14,16 and may arise due to the nature of how CO2 is dosed in adsorption isotherms (see Ref. 25 for a statistical mechanical analysis of a relevant model scenario). (c) Isobars of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) under an atmosphere of pure CO2 using the indicated temperature ramp rates. Adsorption and desorption isobars are shown using solid and dashed lines, respectively. Gray arrows indicate the direction of temperature change. (d) Time-dependent CO2 uptake in dmen–Mg2 (dobpdc) at 30 °C after isobars were obtained with ramp rates of 1 and 20 °C/min. Gray and black dashed lines indicate capacities of 0.5 CO2 per diamine (half capacity) and 1 CO2 per diamine (full capacity), respectively. For dmen–Mg2(dobpdc), 1 CO2 per diamine is 4.0 mmol/g, or 17.8 g/100g.

Volumetric adsorption isotherms were collected to further investigate the CO2 adsorption behavior of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) (Figure 2b). This measurement technique is designed to obtain equilibrated data, as defined by a pressure change of less than 0.01% over an average of 11 consecutive user-specified time intervals (here, 30 s). Similar to the isobar data, the adsorption isotherms feature a sharp step to half capacity (0.5 CO2/dmen), followed by only minor subsequent adsorption. This behavior stands in contrast with all other reported materials in the diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) family, in which the full chemisorption capacity can be accessed upon reaching sufficiently low temperatures or high pressures.13–19,26

Additional isobar data were collected for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) using temperature ramp rates between 0.1 and 20 °C/min (Figure 2c). Under ramp rates less than or equal to 1 °C/min, the material adsorbed CO2 to just slightly above half capacity, consistent with previous preliminary data collected for the material at a ramp rate of 1 °C/min.15 However, the use of faster ramp rates resulted in an unexpected increase in CO2 uptake. For example, at the fastest achievable ramp rate of 20 °C/min, the material adsorbed 0.70 CO2 per diamine (12.4 g/100 g) at 30 °C, compared with 0.60 CO2 per diamine (10.7 g/100 g) at the same temperature with a ramp rate of 1 °C/min. In contrast, the adsorption capacities of e-2–Mg2(dobpdc) and nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc) were not affected by changes in the temperature ramp rate (Figures S1 and S2). Notably, holding a sample of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at 30 °C after collecting the 20 °C/min adsorption isobar resulted in additional slow uptake of CO2 that stabilized at ~1.3 CO2 per diamine after ~15 h (Figure 2d, red data). Additional uptake was also observed when holding the sample at 30 °C after collecting an isobar with a 1 °C/min ramp rate, albeit at a much slower rate than for the 20 °C/min data (Figure 2d, blue data). After 21 h, the material had adsorbed only ~0.8 CO2 per diamine. These results suggest that at 30 °C, the equilibrium capacity of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) is much higher than that accessible from typical isobar and isotherm experiments (Figure 2a and b).

To further investigate this unusual sluggish adsorption behavior, kinetics data were collected using TGA after dosing activated dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) with 1 bar of pure CO2 at various temperatures (Figure 3a).27 Surprisingly, CO2 uptake in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at 30 °C is fairly rapid. After five min, the material adsorbs ~1 CO2 per diamine, and the uptake then plateaus at a capacity of 1.3 CO2 per diamine after only ~35 min. At 40 °C, the quantity of CO2 adsorbed is ~1.2 CO2 per diamine, which continues increasing after an hour. At 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C, the CO2 uptake plateaus in under 5 min at values less than 0.8 CO2 per diamine. We hypothesize that the endpoints of the adsorption curves in Figure 3a correspond to the equilibrium capacities of the material at the respective temperatures, and that the slow ramp rate isobars (Figure 2c) indicate the formation of a metastable intermediate, which slowly converts to the full-capacity state of the material (1 CO2 per diamine), with some additional CO2 physisorption. When the equilibrium capacities from these experiments are overlaid with the original 1 °C/min isobar from Figure 3a, it is clear that the isobar does not reflect the equilibrium adsorption capacity for temperatures below 70 °C (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) CO2 adsorption kinetics profiles at various temperatures obtained from TGA. For each data set, the activated sample was cooled to the temperature of interest at atmospheric pressure under flowing N2 and then dosed with flowing CO2 at 1 bar and held isothermally for 1 h. The oscillations at 30 °C are due to temperature fluctuations resulting from the TGA operating close to room temperature. (b) Overlay of the 1 °C/min adsorption/desorption isobars (solid and dashed lines, respectively) with the equilibrium adsorption capacities determined from the adsorption profiles in (a) (colored symbols). (c) CO2 desorption isobars collected under an atmosphere of pure CO2 with a ramp rate of 1 °C/min, starting from the equilibrated configuration at various temperatures as shown in (a). (d) Shock–desorption isotherms at various temperatures, with diamonds representing desorption data. Gray arrows indicate the direction of temperature or pressure change. Gray and black dashed lines indicate capacities of 0.5 CO2 per diamine (half capacity) and 1 CO2 per diamine (full capacity), respectively.

To investigate the discrepancy between the kinetics profiles and the slow-ramp adsorption data, we used TGA to measure the desorption of CO2 from the adsorbed, equilibrated states, rather than adsorption starting from the activated material. After the equilibrated states were achieved at the end of the adsorption kinetics experiments (Figure 3a), the gas flow was changed from CO2 to N2 and the sample was held under flowing N2 for 1 h at each temperature of interest (Figure S10). At 30 and 40 °C, the quantity of CO2 adsorbed in the material dropped sharply to ~1.0 CO2 per diamine within the first 3 min before decreasing more gradually over the remaining measurement period. This behavior indicates that CO2 uptake to 1.0 CO2 per diamine in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) is due to chemisorption, whereas subsequent uptake is a result of physisorption.

We next measured CO2 desorption isobars using a ramp rate of 1 °C/min, starting from the equilibrated states at various temperatures (Figure 3c). For states prepared at temperatures above 40 °C, loss of CO2 from the material occurred gradually until stepped desorption at 0.5 CO2 per dmen. For equilibrated states prepared at 30 and 40 °C, CO2 loss occurred gradually until 1.0 CO2 per diamine before clear double-step desorption, with each step corresponding to loss of approximately 0.5 CO2 per diamine. DSC data collected under conditions designed to mimic the 30 °C desorption isobar feature two clear sharp endothermic peaks corresponding to the two desorption steps, indicating that these steps result from cooperative desorption of CO2 (Figure S7). Overall, the TGA experiments suggest that it is possible to achieve a loading of 1.0 CO2 per diamine in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) under pure CO2 at 30 °C, in contrast to all previous reports. However, this full-capacity state is not accessible using typical adsorption measurements, due to the apparently slow kinetics involved in transitioning from half capacity (0.5 CO2 per diamine) to full capacity (1.0 CO2 per diamine). This is a phenomenon that has not been encountered with other diamine-appended materials exhibiting two-step adsorption, such as nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc),14,16 suggesting that the mechanism of CO2 uptake in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) is unique. Notably, CO2 isobars obtained for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) in the presence of water vapor suggest that humidity does not substantially change the adsorption behavior of this material (see Figure S38).

As further support for our hypothesis, we dosed a sample of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) directly with 1 bar of CO2 at temperatures ranging from 30 to 75 °C and then collected desorption data (Figure 3d), hereafter referred to as shock–desorption isotherms. This protocol should enable the material to avoid the half-capacity trap encountered upon gradually adsorption of CO2 from the activated state. Consistent with the TGA data, the 1-bar capacities determined from shock–desorption isotherms collected at 30 and 40 °C are 1.3 and 1.0 CO2 per diamine, respectively, significantly higher than the capacities determined under the same conditions from standard adsorption isotherm measurements.

NMR Spectra.

Solid-state magic-angle spinning (MAS) 13C and 15N NMR data were collected to elucidate the species formed upon CO2 adsorption in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) over a range of pressures as high as 1 bar. Each NMR sample was prepared by dosing the activated material with 13CO2 such that the target pressure would be achieved after a 48-h equilibration period (see the Experimental Section for details). The 13C spectrum collected at 24 °C under 1 bar of 13CO2 features two resonances at 163.5 and 124.8 ppm, which are assigned to chemisorbed and physisorbed CO2, respectively (Figure S21).24 The single chemical shift for chemisorbed CO2 suggests formation of a single carbamate environment and is similar to chemical shifts reported previously for ammonium carbamate chains formed in diamine–Mg2(dobpdc).24 Quantitative integration of both peaks yielded a chemisorbed:physisorbed ratio of 1.00:0.29, consistent with the TGA results (Figure S10).

The 13C NMR spectra of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) obtained under 13CO2 pressures of 480, 640, and 900 mbar also feature a single resonance for chemisorbed CO2 at 163.6, 163.5, and 163.5 ppm, respectively, consistent with the 1.0-bar data (Figure 4a). However, in the spectrum obtained under 385 mbar of 13CO2, two additional 13C resonances for chemisorbed CO2 are present at 162.4 and 164.7 ppm. Notably, the relative intensities of these three chemisorbed peaks are different at lower pressures approaching that associated with the half-capacity state (see Figure 3d). In particular, for a sample dosed with 150 ppm of 13CO2, the resonances at 164.7 and 162.4 ppm dominate, while at 30 ppm of CO2, the species at 164.7 ppm represents the major chemisorbed product. The 15N NMR spectrum of the activated framework (Figure 4b) features two resonances at 13 and 43 ppm, corresponding to the two ends of the appended diamine. Dosing with 30 mbar of 13CO2 resulted in the appearance of two new resonances at 52 and 77 ppm, assigned to carbamate and ammonium groups from a single ammonium carbamate chain conformation.17,24 The 15N spectra obtained under intermediate 13CO2 pressures of 150 and 385 mbar feature a mixture of resonances, indicative of multiple ammonium carbamate environments, while above 480 mbar of 13CO2, a single species is again present with peaks at 58 and 76 ppm. Overall, the 13C and 15N NMR data indicate that a single ammonium carbamate species exists at low CO2 pressures that is distinct from the species arising at high pressures.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) 13C MAS (15 kHz) NMR (16.4 T) spectra of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) dosed at 24 °C and various pressures of 13CO2. Spectra were acquired by direct excitation with continuous wave 1H decoupling and a recycle delay time of 128 s, which was sufficiently long to yield quantitative intensities. Deconvolution of the 150 and 385 mbar spectra yielded relative integrations of 0.35:0.41:0.24 and 0.16:0.56:0.28, respectively, for the resonances at 164.7, 163.5, and 162.4 ppm, respectively. (b) 15N MAS (10 kHz) NMR (16.4 T) spectra of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at various pressures of 13CO2 acquired by cross-polarization with a contact time of 2 ms.

Two-dimensional HETCOR data were collected for samples dosed with 30, 150, 385, and 480 mbar of 13CO2 (Figure 5) to gain insight into the nature of these two species. The HETCOR spectra obtained at intermediate pressures of 150 and 384 mbar feature a mixture of different correlation groups, while the spectra at 30 and 480 mbar each have one major correlation group, at 164.7 and 163.7 ppm, respectively. Additional HETCOR data collected for samples dosed with 13CO2 at 640 and 900 mbar feature correlations consistent with the 480-mbar spectrum (Figure S27). The observed correlations at all pressures are consistent with formation of ammonium carbamate chains, which are characterized by 1H resonances for the diamine backbone (<4 ppm), a strong resonance for the carbamate hydrogen (between 4 and 6.5 ppm), and weaker resonance for the ammonium hydrogens (>6.5 ppm).24

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

1H–13C MAS (15 kHz) NMR (16.4 T) HETCOR spectra of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) dosed with 13CO2 to achieve pressures of (a) 30 mbar, (b) 150 mbar, (c) 385 mbar, and (d) 480 mbar at 24 °C. The contact time for cross-polarization was 100 μs to probe 1H nuclei close to the carbamate carbon.

It is important to note here that ammonium carbamate chain formation in diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) can occur in two different directions. As a result of the linker inversion symmetry, in the parent framework, adjacent Mg2+ helices feature bound carboxylate and phenoxide groups oriented in opposite directions (Figure 6a).26 We define a direction for each helix based on a vector pointing from the carboxylate to phenoxide group on each linker, hereafter referred to as the carboxylate–phenoxide direction. As such, we can also define an inherent direction for the ammonium carbamate chains that form upon CO2 uptake, based on the orientation of the carbamate group relative to the carboxylate–phenoxide direction (Figure 6b). In particular, we refer to the scenario where the carbamate groups point along the carboxylate–phenoxide direction as ammonium carbamate chains in the forward direction, whereas when the NCOO− groups point against the carboxylate–phenoxide direction, we refer to this scenario as the reverse direction. We surveyed published single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for a number of diamine–Zn2(dobpdc) materials and found that, upon CO2 uptake, the vast majority form ammonium carbamate chains in the forward direction.13,15,26 Interestingly, the only exception is dmen–Zn2(dobpdc), which adsorbs CO2 to form ammonium carbamate chains in the reverse direction with an occupancy of 44%, with the remaining metal sites occupied by unreacted diamine.15 We considered that the different ammonium carbamate structures that form in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at low and high CO2 pressures, as characterized by solid-state NMR spectroscopy, might correspond to ammonium carbamates running in the reverse and forward directions, respectively, and therefore that a switch in chain direction is required to achieve CO2 uptake to full capacity.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) Illustration of the carboxylate–phenoxide direction in Mg2(dobpdc). Green, red, gray, and white spheres represent Mg, O, C, and H atoms, respectively. (b) Depiction of ammonium carbamate chain formation in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) occurring in the forward direction (NCOO− points along the carboxylate-phenoxide direction) and reverse direction (NCOO− points against the carboxylate-phenoxide direction).

Computational Modeling.

To investigate this possibility, we used vdW-DFT to calculate geometry-optimized structures for the activated framework as well as the half- and full-capacity structures with chains running in both the forward and reverse directions (Figure 7a–e). We also calculated a full-capacity mixed structure (Figure 7f), consisting of neighboring forward and reverse direction chains as a potential configuration at intermediate pressures. Calculated CO2 binding energies and NMR chemical shifts determined for these structures are given in Table 1, along with the experimental chemical shifts. Interestingly, the calculations revealed that at half capacity, CO2 binding is stronger in the reverse structure, whereas at full capacity it is stronger in the forward structure. At half capacity, the CO2 binding energy in the reverse direction is −105.0 kJ/mol, substantially larger than the value of −66.2 kJ/mol calculated for the half-capacity forward direction. The predicted added stabilization for the reverse structure at half capacity may be due in part to favorable hydrogen bonding interactions between the unreacted diamines and the ammonium groups in the adjacent chains (Figure 7c). The calculated binding energy in the reverse direction is also consistent with the adsorption enthalpy calculated from the CO2 adsorption isotherms (−93±7 kJ/mol) and the desorption enthalpy calculated from the CO2 shock–desorption isotherms (95±5 kJ/mol) at a loading of 0.25 CO2 per diamine, used to capture the half-capacity step region (Figures S16 and S18). The discrepancy of ~10 kJ/mol between the vdW-DFT binding energy and the experimental adsorption enthalpy is typical for diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) systems.28

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Geometry-optimized vdW-DFT structures of CO2 adsorbed in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc). Green, red, blue, gray, and white spheres represent Mg, O, N, C, and H atoms, respectively. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Table 1.

Experimental and Calculated NMR Chemical Shifts and Calculated CO2 Adsorption Energies

Structure ΔEads (kJ/mol) δ 13C (ppm) δ 15N (ppm) δ 1H (ppm) a
Activated — — Metal-Bound Amine: 7.3
Free Amine: 35.7
—
HC (30 mbar 13CO2) — Carbamate:164.7 Ammonium: 52
Carbamate: 76
Metal-Bound Amine: 13
Free Amine: 43
Ammonium: 8.1
Carbamate: 6.2
Calc. HC Reverse −105.0 Carbamate: 164.7 Ammonium: 50.6
Carbamate: 83.3
Metal-Bound Amine: 7.3
Free Amine: 32.6
Ammonium: 8.2
Carbamate: 6.8
Calc. HC Forward −66.2 Carbamate: 162.7 Ammonium: 58.7
Carbamate: 78.3
Metal-Bound Amine: 6.7
Free Amine: 39.1
Ammonium: 8.3
Carbamate: 4.8
FC (900 mbar 13CO2) — Carbamate: 163.5 Ammonium: 58
Carbamate: 77
Ammonium: 8.3
Carbamate: 4.7
Calc. FC Forward −71.2 Carbamate: 162.3 Ammonium: 57.3
Carbamate: 77.4
Ammonium: 8.3
Carbamate: 4.6
Calc. FC Reverse −60.3 Carbamate: 164.9 Ammonium: 55.0
Carbamate: 83.7
Ammonium: 7.7
Carbamate: 8.3
Calc. FC Mixed −65.2 Carbamate forward: 162.9
Carbamate reverse: 165.3
Ammonium forward: 57.1
Carbamate forward: 78.7
Ammonium reverse: 55.6
Carbamate reverse: 84.1
Ammonium forward: 8.2
Carbamate forward: 4.8
Ammonium reverse: 7.6
Carbamate reverse: 8.2
a

The ammonium group is assumed to rotate on the NMR timescale, and the reported shift is an average for the three H atoms. HC = half capacity and FC = full capacity.

Additionally, our experimental CO2 adsorption enthalpy is in reasonable agreement with the adsorption enthalpy of −82 kJ/mol previously determined for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) at a loading of 0.25 CO2 per diamine.17 In the full capacity structures, CO2 binding in the forward structure is more favorable than in the reverse and mixed structures (−71.2 kJ/mol versus −60.3 and −65.2 kJ/mol, respectively). Because only one ammonium carbamate resonance was characterized in the 15N NMR spectra at high 13CO2 pressures (Figure 4), we can rule out the possibility of a mixed structure at full capacity. We note that a previous study used vdW-DFT to evaluate CO2 adsorption in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) assuming the full-capacity reverse structure and reported a binding energy of −83.9 kJ/mol.29 However, that report used a different vdW-DFT functional (PBE30 + D331) than employed here (rPBE32 + D3), and a comparison of the two functionals using the reference material m-2-m–Zn2(dobpdc) revealed that our choice of functional may yield more accurate CO2 binding energies (see Table S4).

Based on these results, we assigned the resonances in the spectra collected under 480, 640, and 900 mbar of 13CO2 to the forward direction structure, and the resonances under 30 mbar of 13CO2 to the reverse direction structure. The distinct chemical shifts may arise due to hydrogen bonding interactions between the ammonium group and the linker in the forward direction structure, and the carbamate group and the linker in the reverse direction structure (Figure 7). We quantified the goodness of fit for each proposed structure using the parameter χv2=1n∑i=1n(δiexp−δicalcRMSDi)2 where δiexp and δicalc are the experimental and calculated chemical shifts, i indexes the ammonium hydrogen, carbamate hydrogen, carbamate carbon, ammonium nitrogen, and carbamate nitrogen, and RMSDi are the previously reported root mean squared deviations between experimental and calculated chemical shifts for the respective groups.24 A value of χv2<<1 is indicative of a good fit, whereas χv2≫1 is indicative of a poor fit relative to the expected deviation. At half capacity, the χv2 value is 0.64 for the forward direction and 0.25 for the reverse direction, whereas at full capacity, the χv2 value is 0.07 for the forward direction and 2.00 for the reverse direction. These values support the structural assignments at half and full capacity and the transition from a reverse to a forward direction ammonium carbamate chain as the material adsorbs CO2 to full capacity. At intermediate 13CO2 pressures, the NMR spectra feature resonances for the forward and reverse direction chains (163.5 and 164.7 ppm, respectively), as well as a third ammonium carbamate 13C resonance at 162.4 ppm, with a carbamate hydrogen correlation at 4.2 ppm. The correlation suggests this species also corresponds to chains in the forward direction. The slight difference between the two forward-direction 13C carbamate shifts could arise due to the presence of differing electronics at neighboring sites, which may feature unreacted diamine or forward direction chains (Table 1).

The proposed switching of the chain direction at different pressures ultimately explains the unusual adsorption kinetics observed for dmen–Mg2(dobpdc). The transition from the activated state to either the half-capacity or full-capacity state is rapid, because the only activation barrier is that associated with the formation of a single ammonium carbamate chain. However, transitioning from the half- to full-capacity state requires that all of the adsorbed ammonium carbamate chains switch direction to the equilibrium configuration, a transition that is likely associated with a large activation barrier.

Achieving Full Capacity with dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc).

The calculated structures for the full-capacity configurations (Figure 7d and e) provide some insight into a possible origin of the ammonium carbamate chain direction switching. In particular, the gem-dimethyl groups on the diamine backbone are oriented toward neighboring diamines in the reverse structure, whereas they are oriented away from neighboring diamines in the forward structure (Figure 7d and e), and thus steric interactions may in part influence the kinetics of CO2 uptake in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc). We have previously shown that unfavorable steric interactions in diamine–Mg2(dobpdc) and associated double-step CO2 uptake behavior can be avoided by using the isomeric framework Mg2(pc-dobpdc) (pc-dobpdc = 3,3′-dioxidobiphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate), which features a more symmetric hexagonal pore structure and a slightly longer distance between nearest neighbor diamines in the ab plane (Figure 8a).16 Importantly, diamine–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) exhibits a single CO2 adsorption step at a pressure that is approximately the same as the lower pressure step for the corresponding diamine–Mg2(dobpdc). We hypothesized that by removing any steric effects encountered using Mg2(dobpdc) while retaining the appended dmen, it might be possible to access a material exhibiting uninhibited CO2 adsorption to full capacity, in the optimal pressure region for coal flue gas capture.16,17

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

(a) Structures of the H4(pc-dobpdc) linker and a single pore of Mg2(pc-dobpdc). Green, blue, gray, and white spheres represent Mg, O, C, and H atoms, respectively. (b) Isobars obtained for dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) and dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) under pure CO2. Adsorption and desorption data are shown as solid and dashed lines, respectively. Gray and black dashed lines indicate capacities of 0.5 CO2 per diamine (half capacity) and 1 CO2 per diamine (full capacity), respectively, and gray arrows indicate the direction of temperature change. For dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) and dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc), 1 CO2 per diamine is 4.0 mmol/g, or 17.8 g/100g.

Gratifyingly, we found that dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) indeed exhibits single-step adsorption of CO2 to full capacity, with an adsorption step at approximately the same temperature as in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) (Figure 8b), suggesting that interactions between neighboring diamines in the ab plane are the cause of the unusual CO2 adsorption properties of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc). Additional isobar experiments revealed that dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) retains its step-shaped adsorption profile under various partial pressures of CO2 and humid conditions (Figures S48 and S49). Furthermore, CO2 uptake in the material under humid conditions is essentially unchanged following exposure to wet CO2 for 12 h at 140 °C (Figure S50). Overall, these results indicate that dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) is an exceptionally promising adsorbent for carbon capture from coal flue gas under industrially relevant conditions.

Conclusions

The foregoing results revealed that the unusual CO2 adsorption properties of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) arise due to the presence of a metastable state at half capacity that very slowly converts to the full-capacity structure corresponding to 1 CO2 per diamine. Using non-traditional CO2 dosing methods involving isothermal waiting periods and shock-desorption, it is possible to bypass the metastable trap at half-capacity and achieve saturation of dmen–Mg2(dobpdc). We propose that it may be beneficial for these alternative techniques to be adopted as part of the standard characterization regimen for new metal–organic frameworks, particularly those exhibiting non-traditional guest uptake, to verify that capacities determined using standard isobar and isotherm measurements accurately reflect equilibrated capacities.

Solid-state MAS NMR spectroscopy coupled with vdW-DFT calculations indicate that the barrier to CO2 saturation in dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) arises due to differing orientations of the ammonium carbamate chains in the half- and full-capacity structures. In particular, at low loadings when the half-capacity configuration is favored, alternating diamines react with CO2 to form ammonium carbamate chains along a direction that is opposite the carboxylate–phenoxide vector defined for a given metal helix. In contrast, the full-capacity configuration is accessed at high loadings and features ammonium carbamate chains oriented along the carboxylate–phenoxide vector. At intermediate CO2 loadings, both reverse and forward direction chains are present. These results mark the first reported instance of ammonium carbamate chains formed in diamine-functionalized MOFs altering their orientation as a function of CO2 loading. By alleviating steric interactions between diamines in dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc), it is possible to access the full material capacity in a single adsorption step, at a temperature suitable for CO2 capture from the flue gas of coal-fired power plants.

EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

General Procedures.

Reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers at reagent grade purity or higher and used without further purification. The linker H4(dobpdc) was purchased from Hangzhou Trylead Chemical Technology Co. Ultrahigh purity (99.999%) He and N2 and research grade (99.998%) CO2 were used for all adsorption experiments. Isotopically labeled 13CO2 used in solid-state NMR experiments was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (99 atom% 13C, < 3 atom% 18O). Solution-state 1H NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker AMX 300 MHz NMR spectrometer and referenced to residual dimethyl sulfoxide (2.50 ppm) or chloroform (7.26 ppm). The ligand H4(pc-dobpdc) and framework Mg2(pc-dobpdc) were prepared following previously reported procedures.16

Synthesis of Mg2(dobpdc).

The framework Mg2(dobpdc) was synthesized following a literature procedure, which is reproduced here with details relevant to this work.13 The ligand H4(dobpdc) (4.95 g, 18.1 mmol) and Mg(NO3)2·6H2O (5.77g, 22.5 mmol) were dissolved in 100 mL of a 55:45 (v:v) methanol:N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) mixture using sonication. The solution was filtered to remove any undissolved particulates and added to a 250 mL glass pressure vessel with a glass stir bar. The reactor was sealed with a Teflon cap and heated in a silicone oil bath at 120 °C for 20 h. The crude white powder was isolated by filtration and soaked three times in 100 mL of DMF for a minimum of 3 h per soak at 60 °C, followed by solvent exchange by soaking three times in 200 mL of methanol for a minimum of 3 h per soak at 60 °C. The framework was stored in methanol when not in use. The methanol-solvated framework was collected by filtration and heated under flowing N2 for 12 h at 180 °C to yield fully desolvated Mg2(dobpdc) as a white powder.

Synthesis of Diamine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks.

Diamine-appended MOFs were synthesized following the literature procedures for similar diamine–Mg2(dobpdc)13 and diamine–Mg2(pc-dobpdc)16 materials. Methanol-solvated materials (Mg2(dobpdc), Mg2(pc-dobpdc)) were filtered and washed five times with 10 mL toluene. The filtered framework was then added to a 20% (v:v) solution of diamine in toluene. After soaking for 24 h, the solid was obtained by filtration and washed five times with 10 mL of toluene to remove excess diamine before proceeding to activation. Diamine loadings were determined by obtaining quantitative 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra of the digested frameworks. All diamine loadings were between 120% and 200% before activation, and 100 ± 5% after activation (sample-specific activation temperatures specified below). For digestion, ~5 mg of material was dissolved in a solution containing 750 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 and 50 μL of deuterium chloride solution (35 g/100g in D2O, ≥ 99 atom% D).

Thermogravimetric Analysis.

Dry thermogravimetric analysis experiments were conducted using a TA Instruments TGA Q5000, and humid TGA experiments were conducted using a TA Instruments TGA Q50. Dry and humid isobar measurements were conducted following previously reported methods.16 Samples were measured at ambient pressures using a gas flow rate of 25 mL/min. For humid TGA experiments, the incident gas stream was passed through two room-temperature water bubblers before entering the furnace. As-synthesized samples of e-2–Mg2(dobpdc), nPr-2–Mg2(dobpdc), and dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) were activated at 130 °C under flowing N2 for 30 min, and dmen–Mg2(pc-dobpdc) was activated at 140 °C under flowing N2 for 30 min prior to TGA measurements, at which point the masses of all samples had stabilized. Masses are uncorrected for buoyancy effects. Custom CO2/N2 blends of 15% and 5% were purchased from Praxair.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry.

Differential scanning calorimetry experiments were conducted using a TA Instruments Q200 DSC. DSC samples were analyzed under ambient pressure using a gas flow rate of 25 mL/min. Samples were activated at 130 °C under flowing N2 for 30 min via TGA to determine the activated sample mass, at which point the masses of all samples had stabilized. The samples were then transferred from the TGA to DSC and reactivated at 130 °C under flowing He for 30 min prior to DSC measurements. The lid on the DSC pan is slightly ajar to allow for gas flow, contributing to potential heat loss and error.

Gas Adsorption Isotherms.

Isotherms for CO2 adsorption were collected on a Micromeretics 3Flex gas adsorption analyzer using previously detailed procedures.24 Shock–desorption isotherms were collected using the same experimental setup as used for collecting desorption isotherms. However, in contrast to the protocol for a standard desorption isotherm, wherein the first data point is taken directly after collecting an adsorption isotherm, in a shock–desorption isotherm the first data point is obtained after first directly dosing the evacuated sample with 1 bar of CO2. Approximately 100 mg of diamine-functionalized MOF was added to the sample tube for adsorption analysis. To account for fluctuations in temperature of the heating bath at different times, CO2 adsorption isotherms and shock–desorption isotherms were performed on two different aliquots of material using the same temperature bath at the same time. Samples were activated at 120 °C for 3 h in vacuo between measurements. Adsorption isotherms and shock–desorption isotherms used an equilibration interval of 30 s, where the sample is considered equilibrated when the pressure change per equilibration time interval is less than 0.01% of the average pressure in the time interval over 11 consecutive equilibration time intervals. Isosteric enthalpies and entropies of adsorption were calculated following reported procedures employing Clausius–Clapeyron relation.13–15 Langmuir surface areas were obtained from a N2 isotherm at 77 K using a liquid N2 bath. Langmuir surface areas of Mg2(dobpdc) and Mg2(pc-dobpdc) determined from the 77 K N2 isotherm were 4020 and 3470 m2/g, respectively.

Sample Preparation for Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy.

Sample preparation for solid-state MAS NMR analysis closely followed the literature procedure, reproduced here with minor changes.24 Activated diamine-appended framework samples were packed into 3.2 mm rotors inside a nitrogen-filled glovebag and subsequently evacuated inside a home-built gas-dosing manifold for 30 min. Samples were dosed with 13CO2 gas at room temperature (24 °C) and allowed to equilibrate for at least 48 h. Gas pressures were recorded immediately before closing the rotor inside the gas manifold at the end of the 48 h. For NMR spectra of wet samples, the sample was first dosed with 13CO2 in the same manner as the dry experiments. The rotor was then removed from the gas manifold, uncapped, exposed to a CO2 stream that passed through a water bubbler at 24 °C. After 1 h of exposure to the wet CO2 stream, the rotor was closed again. For the CO2 stream, we used 100% CO2 for the 1.0 bar of 13CO2 sample, and we used 15% CO2 (balance N2) for the 150 mbar of 13CO2 sample.

Solid-State NMR Experiments.

All solid-state NMR experiments were performed using a 16.4 T magnet. All 1H and 13C experiments were conducted with spinning at 15 kHz, and all 15N experiments were conducted with spinning at 10 kHz. The 1H NMR spectra were acquired with direct excitation and a delay time of 4 s, which was sufficiently long to yield quantitative results. Quantitative 13C NMR spectra were acquired by direct excitation, continuous wave 1H decoupling, and a delay time of 128 s, which was sufficiently long to yield quantitative results. Dmfit software was used to deconvolute the NMR peaks and quantify integrations.33 All other 13C NMR experiments, in addition to all 15N experiments, were acquired by cross-polarization from 1H. All cross-polarization experiments used continuous wave 1H decoupling at ~80 kHz radio-frequency field strength and with contact times of 1 ms for 13C and 2 ms for 15N. For 2D 1H–13C experiments, we used a HETCOR sequence 90° (1H) – t1 – cross-polarization – t2, again using cross-polarization from 1H and continuous wave 1H decoupling. 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR shifts were referenced respectively to 1.8 (adamantane), 38.5 (adamantane, tertiary carbon—left resonance), and 33.4 ppm (glycine)34. NMR experiments were performed at 24 °C without temperature control.

Computational Details.

We performed first-principles density functional theory calculations within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of revised Perdew-Burk-Ernzerhof (rPBE) with Pade approximation.32 We used a plane-wave basis and projector augmented-wave (PAW)35,36 psuedopotentials with the Vienna ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) code.37–40 To include the effect of the van der Waals dispersive interactions on binding energies, we performed structural relaxations with Grimme’s D3 method (Becke-Jonson damping)31 as implemented in VASP. For all calculations, we used (i) a 1 × 1 × 3 Monkhorst–Pack41 k-point grid centered at Γ-point of the Brillouin zone, (ii) a 900 eV plane-wave cutoff energy, and (iii) a 10−7 eV self-consistency criterion. We explicitly treated two valence electrons for Mg (3s2), six for O (2s22p4), five for N (2s22p3), four for C (2s22p2), and one for H(1s1). All structural relaxations were performed with a Gaussian smearing of 0.05 eV.42 The ions were relaxed until the Hellmann-Feynman forces are less than 0.01 eVÅ−1.

To compute CO2 binding energies, we optimized dmen–Mg2(dobpdc) prior to CO2 adsorption (Edmen−MOF), interacting with CO2 in the gas phase (ECO2) within a 20 Å × 20 Å × 20 Å cubic supercell, and dmen–Mg2 (dobpdc) with adsorbed CO2 molecule (ECO2− dmen–MOF) using vdW-corrected DFT. The binding energies (EB) are obtained via the difference EB=ECO2− dmen-MOF−(Edmen−MOF+ECO2). Starting structures for the activated and full-capacity reverse structures were obtained from single crystal X-ray structures of dmen–Zn2(dobpdc).15 The starting structure for the full-capacity forward structure was obtained from the calculated structure of a previous study.24 Following these geometry optimizations, starting points for the half-capacity and mixed structures were obtained by overlaying the activated and full-capacity structures and relaxing symmetry constraints to the P31 space group.

For NMR simulations, we determined a σref value by comparing experimental δiso values to calculated σiso values as the isotropic chemical shift (δiso) is obtained from δiso=−(σiso−σref) where σref is a reference value. The σref values for 1H (31.2 ppm) and 13C (172.4 ppm) were obtained by first computing σiso values for cocaine. The σref value for 15N (225.7 ppm) was determined by comparison of DFT-calculated σiso and the experimental δiso value for glycine.24 We compared the computed σiso values for the cocaine molecule with the published experimental values,43 with σref given as the y intercept of a linear fit with a fixed gradient of −1 in a plot of δiso (experimental) versus σiso (calculated) (see Figure S30).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award DE-SC0019992. We thank the NMR facility within the College of Chemistry for resources provided and Dr. Hasan Celik for his assistance with NMR experiments. Instruments within this NMR facility are supported in part by NIH S10OD024998. Solid-state NMR experiments were conducted using the 700 MHz magnet at the QB3 Berkeley NMR facility. Density functional theory calculations were conducted via the Molecular Graphics and Computation Facility (College of Chemistry, UC Berkeley) under NIH S10OD023532, and we thank Dr. Kathleen Durkin and Dr. Dave Small for assistance in running DFT calculations. Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected at Beamline 17-BM at the Advanced Photon Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, operated by Argonne National Laboratory under contract DE-AC02-06CH1135. We thank the Philomathia Foundation and Berkeley Energy and Climate Institute for a fellowship for A.C.F. We thank the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health for a postdoctoral fellowship for P.J.M. (F32GM120799). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. J.H.L.’s work was supported by the KIST Institutional Program (Project No. 2E30460). Computational resources provided by KISTI Supercomputing Centre (Project No. KSC-2019-CRE-0149) are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. David Halat, Dr. Alicia Lund, Dr. Wei-Chih Liao, Dr. Haiyan Mao, Hao Zhuang, and Rohit Rungta for guidance on NMR experiments. We thank Dr. Jeffrey Martell, Matthew Dods, and Kaitlyn Engler for helpful discussions. We further thank Dr. Julia Oktawiec for assistance in preparing DFT structures, Maria Paley for assistance with powder X-ray diffraction measurements, and Dr. Katie Meihaus for editorial assistance.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Full characterization of adsorbents and additional experimental and computational details (PDF)

Structure files generated by vdW-DFT calculations with the rPBE function and the D3 vdW correction (ZIP)

The authors declare the following competing financial interest: J.R.L. has a financial interest in Mosaic Materials, Inc., a start-up company working to commercialize metal–organic frameworks for gas separations.

REFERENCES

  • (1).IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5°C; Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T, Eds.; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; pp 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).International Energy Agency. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019; Paris, France., 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Blanco G; Gerlach R; Suh S; Barrett J; de Coninck HC; Diaz Morejon CF; Mathur R; Nakicenovic N; Ofosu Ahenkora A; Pan J; Pathak H; Rice J; Richels R; Smith SJ; Stern DI; Toth FL; Zhou P Drivers, Trends and Mitigation. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC, Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Pérez-Fortes M; Moya JA; Vatopoulos K; Tzimas E CO2 Capture and Utilization in Cement and Iron and Steel Industries. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 6534–6543. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Barker DJ; Turner SA; Napier-Moore PA; Clark M; Davison JE CO2 Capture in the Cement Industry. Energy Procedia 2009, 1 (1), 87–94. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Boot-Handford ME; Abanades JC; Anthony EJ; Blunt MJ; Brandani S; Dowell NM; Fernández JR; Ferrari M-C; Gross R; Hallett JP; Haszeldine RS; Heptonstall P; Lyngfelt A; Makuch Z; Mangano E; Porter RTJ; Pourkashanian M; Rochelle GT; Shah N; Yao JG; Fennell PS Carbon Capture and Storage Update. Energy Environ. Sci 2013, 7 (1), 130–189. 10.1039/C3EE42350F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Rochelle GT Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture. Science 2009, 325 (5948), 1652–1654. 10.1126/sci-ence.1176731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Wang M; Lawal A; Stephenson P; Sidders J; Ramshaw C Post-Combustion CO2 Capture with Chemical Absorption: A State-of-the-Art Review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des 2011, 89 (9), 1609–1624. 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Bourzac K. We Have the Technology. Nature 2017, 550 (7675), S66–S69. 10.1038/550S66a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Sumida K; Rogow DL; Mason JA; McDonald TM; Bloch ED; Herm ZR; Bae T-H; Long JR Carbon Dioxide Capture in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev 2012, 112 (2), 724–781. 10.1021/cr2003272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).McDonald TM; Lee WR; Mason JA; Wiers BM; Hong CS; Long JR Capture of Carbon Dioxide from Air and Flue Gas in the Alkylamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework mmen-Mg2(dobpdc). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134 (16), 7056–7065. 10.1021/ja300034j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).McDonald TM; Mason JA; Kong X; Bloch ED; Gygi D; Dani A; Crocellà V; Giordanino F; Odoh SO; Drisdell WS; Vlaisavljevich B; Dzubak AL; Poloni R; Schnell SK; Planas N; Lee K; Pascal T; Wan LF; Prendergast D; Neaton JB; Smit B; Kortright JB; Gagliardi L; Bordiga S; Reimer JA; Long JR Cooperative Insertion of CO2 in Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Frameworks. Nature 2015, 519 (7543), 303–308. 10.1038/nature14327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Siegelman RL; McDonald TM; Gonzalez MI; Martell JD; Milner PJ; Mason JA; Berger AH; Bhown AS; Long JR Controlling Cooperative CO2 Adsorption in Diamine-Appended Mg2(dobpdc) Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (30), 10526–10538. 10.1021/jacs.7b05858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Siegelman RL; Milner PJ; Forse AC; Lee J-H; Colwell KA; Neaton JB; Reimer JA; Weston SC; Long JR Water Enables Efficient CO2 Capture from Natural Gas Flue Emissions in an Oxidation-Resistant Diamine-Appended Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (33), 13171–13186. 10.1021/jacs.9b05567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Milner PJ; Siegelman RL; Forse AC; Gonzalez MI; Runčevski T; Martell JD; Reimer JA; Long JR A Diaminopropane-Appended Metal–Organic Framework Enabling Efficient CO2 Capture from Coal Flue Gas via a Mixed Adsorption Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (38), 13541–13553. 10.1021/jacs.7b07612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Milner PJ; Martell JD; Siegelman RL; Gygi D; Weston SC; Long JR Overcoming Double-Step CO2 Adsorption and Minimizing Water Co-Adsorption in Bulky Diamine-Appended Variants of Mg2(dobpdc). Chem. Sci 2017, 9 (1), 160–174. 10.1039/C7SC04266C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Jo H; Lee WR; Kim NW; Jung H; Lim KS; Kim JE; Kang DW; Lee H; Hiremath V; Seo JG; Jin H; Moon D; Han SS; Hong CS Fine-Tuning of the Carbon Dioxide Capture Capability of Diamine-Grafted Metal–Organic Framework Adsorbents Through Amine Functionalization. ChemSusChem 2017, 10(3), 541–550. 10.1002/cssc.201601203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Lee WR; Hwang SY; Ryu DW; Lim KS; Han SS; Moon D; Choi J; Hong CS Diamine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework: Exceptionally High CO2 Capacities from Ambient Air and Flue Gas, Ultrafast CO2 Uptake Rate, and Adsorption Mechanism. Energy Environ. Sci 2014, 7 (2), 744–751. 10.1039/C3EE42328J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Lee WR; Jo H; Yang L-M; Lee H; Ryu DW; Lim KS; Song JH; Min DY; Han SS; Seo JG; Park YK; Moon D; Hong CS Exceptional CO2 Working Capacity in a Heterodiamine-Grafted Metal–Organic Framework. Chem. Sci 2015, 6 (7), 3697–3705. 10.1039/C5SC01191D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Drisdell WS; Poloni R; McDonald TM; Pascal TA; Wan LF; Pemmaraju CD; Vlaisavljevich B; Odoh SO; Neaton JB; Long JR; Prendergast D; Kortright JB Probing the Mechanism of CO2 Capture in Diamine-Appended Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Measured and Simulated X-Ray Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2015, 17 (33), 21448–21457. 10.1039/C5CP02951A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Kundu J; Stilck JF; Lee J-H; Neaton JB; Prendergast D; Whitelam S Cooperative Gas Adsorption without a Phase Transition in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Phys. Rev. Lett 2018, 121 (1), 015701. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.015701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Kim EJ; Siegelman RL; Jiang HZH; Forse AC; Lee J-H; Martell JD; Milner PJ; Falkowski JM; Neaton JB; Reimer JA; Weston SC; Long JR Cooperative Carbon Capture and Steam Regeneration with Tetraamine-Appended Metal–Organic Frameworks. Science 2020, 369 (6502), 392–396. 10.1126/sci-ence.abb3976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Granite EJ; Pennline HW Photochemical Removal of Mercury from Flue Gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 2002, 41 (22), 5470–5476. 10.1021/ie020251b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Forse AC; Milner PJ; Lee J-H; Redfearn HN; Oktawiec J; Siegelman RL; Martell JD; Dinakar B; Porter-Zasada LB; Gonzalez MI; Neaton JB; Long JR; Reimer JA Elucidating CO2 Chemisorption in Diamine-Appended Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140 (51), 18016–18031. 10.1021/jacs.8b10203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Puibasset J; Kierlik E; Tarjus G Influence of Reservoir Size on the Adsorption Path in an Ideal Pore. J. Chem. Phys 2009, 131 (12), 124123. 10.1063/13236510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Martell JD; Porter-Zasada LB; Forse AC; Siegelman RL; Gonzalez MI; Oktawiec J; Runčevski T; Xu J; Srebro-Hooper M; Milner PJ; Colwell KA; Autschbach J; Reimer JA; Long JR Enantioselective Recognition of Ammonium Carbamates in a Chiral Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (44), 16000–16012. 10.1021/jacs.7b09983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Martell JD; Milner PJ; Siegelman RL; Long JR Kinetics of Cooperative CO2 Adsorption in Diamine-Appended Variants of the Metal–Organic Framework Mg2(dobpdc). Chem. Sci 2020. 10.1039/D0SC01087A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Lee J-H; Siegelman RL; Maserati L; Rangel T; Helms BA; Long JR; Neaton JB Enhancement of CO2 Binding and Mechanical Properties upon Diamine Functionalization of M2(dobpdc) Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Sci 2018, 9 (23), 5197–5206. 10.1039/C7SC05217K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Zhang H; Yang L-M; Ganz E Adsorption Properties and Microscopic Mechanism of CO2 Capture in 1,1-Dimethyl-1,2-Ethylenediamine-Grafted Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (16), 18533–18540. 10.1021/acsami.0c01927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Perdew JP; Burke K; Ernzerhof M Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett 1996, 77 (18), 3865–3868. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Grimme S; Ehrlich S; Goerigk L Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem 2011, 32 (7), 1456–1465. 10.1002/jcc.21759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Hammer B; Hansen LB; Nørskov JK Improved Adsorption Energetics within Density-Functional Theory Using Revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof Functionals. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (11), 7413–7421. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Massiot D; Fayon F; Capron M; King I; Calvé SL; Alonso B; Durand J-O; Bujoli B; Gan Z; Hoatson G Modelling One- and Two-Dimensional Solid-State NMR Spectra. Magn. Reson. Chem 2002, 40 (1), 70–76. 10.1002/mrc.984. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Bertani P; Raya J; Bechinger B 15N Chemical Shift Referencing in Solid State NMR. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson 2014, 61–62, 15–18. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Blöchl PE Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50 (24), 17953–17979. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Kresse G; Joubert D From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 1758–1775. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Kresse G; Hafner J Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47 (1), 558–561. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Kresse G; Furthmüller J Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54 (16), 11169–11186. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Kresse G; Furthmüller J Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Comput. Mater. Sci 1996, 6 (1), 15–50. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Kresse G; Hafner J Ab Initio Molecular-Dynamics Simulation of the Liquid-Metal--Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Germanium. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49 (20), 14251–14269. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Pack JD; Monkhorst HJ “Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations”---a Reply. Phys. Rev. B 1977, 16 (4), 1748–1749. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.1748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Elsässer C; Fähnle M; Chan CT; Ho KM Density-Functional Energies and Forces with Gaussian-Broadened Fractional Occupations. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49 (19), 13975–13978. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.13975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Baias M; Widdifield CM; Dumez J-N; Thompson HPG; Cooper TG; Salager E; Bassil S; Stein RS; Lesage A; Day GM; Emsley L Powder Crystallography of Pharmaceutical Materials by Combined Crystal Structure Prediction and Solid-State 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2013, 15 (21), 8069–8080. 10.1039/C3CP41095A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES