Abstract
Objective
Urolithiasis formation has been attributed to environmental and dietary factors. However, evidence is accumulating that genetic background can contribute to urolithiasis formation. Advancements in the identification of monogenic causes using high-throughput sequencing technologies have shown that urolithiasis has a strong heritable component.
Methods
This review describes monogenic factors implicated in a genetic predisposition to urolithiasis. Peer-reviewed journals were evaluated by a PubMed search until July 2023 to summarize disorders associated with monogenic traits, and discuss clinical implications of identification of patients genetically susceptible to urolithiasis formation.
Results
Given that more than 80% of urolithiases cases are associated with calcium accumulation, studies have focused mainly on monogenetic contributors to hypercalciuric urolithiases, leading to the identification of receptors, channels, and transporters involved in the regulation of calcium renal tubular reabsorption. Nevertheless, available candidate genes and linkage methods have a low resolution for evaluation of the effects of genetic components versus those of environmental, dietary, and hormonal factors, and genotypes remain undetermined in the majority of urolithiasis formers.
Conclusion
The pathophysiology underlying urolithiasis formation is complex and multifactorial, but evidence strongly suggests the existence of numerous monogenic causes of urolithiasis in humans.
Keywords: Gene, Genetic expression, Inheritance pattern, Urolithiasis
1. Introduction
The incidence of urolithiasis has been estimated to be 11% in males and 7% in females among the general population [1]. However, the incidence of urolithiasis in individuals with a family history of urolithiasis has been shown to be three-fold higher than in patients without a family history, suggesting that urolithiasis and its factors have a strong genetic predisposition [2,3]. Investigations have reported a familial history of urolithiasis in up to 37% of patients while the proportion is 4%–12% in the healthy cohort, suggesting a heritability of urolithiasis between 0.46 and 0.63 [4,5]. More recently, improvements in high-throughput sequencing technologies capable of sequencing multiple DNA molecules in parallel have detected causative mutations in 46.7% (14/30) of analyzed genes, with 11.4% of adult cases and 20.8% of pediatric cases identified as having a monogenic cause [6]. Moreover, genome-wide association and candidate gene studies regarding the contribution of polygenic influences from multiple loci have reported that multiple genes and molecular pathways contribute to stone formation. Overall, the pathophysiology of stone formation is currently accepted to have a complex etiology that can involve a monogenic disorder or polygenic traits, dietary and hormonal components, and environmental factors [[7], [8], [9], [10]].
In this review, it is our hope that improved diagnoses and better pathophysiological understanding of these disorders will lead to novel personalized diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic approaches for future recurrent urolithiasis formers.
2. Heritable features of urolithiasis
2.1. Non-urinary factors
The exact role of non-urinary factors associated with a genetic predisposition to urolithiasis is not entirely clear. To date, studies on heritability have mainly focused on abnormal calcium metabolism involving serum calcium and 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D. Investigations of the heritability of urolithiasis regarding non-urinary factors have focused on metabolic syndrome, with stone formation being considered a comorbid risk factor [11]. However, the underlying mechanisms linking urolithiasis risk and metabolic syndrome are unclear and are probably related to non-genetic common features associated with the two conditions.
2.2. Urinary factors
2.2.1. Calcium excretion
Evidence on the heritability of urinary traits is the strongest for excessive urinary calcium excretion, observed in up to 40% of adult patients with family history and in up to 10% of such pediatric patients [12]. Hypercalciuria can occur in isolation or in relation to metabolic disorders and can result from excessive intestinal absorption, impaired renal reabsorption, and/or excessive skeletal mobilization [13,14]. It is difficult to define the normal range of urine calcium excretion as this depends on patient age and dietary patterns; however, excess urine calcium excretion is widely defined as a 24 h excretion higher than 4 mg/kg or 0.1 mmol/kg [15].
Overall, the available evidence indicates that urinary calcium excretion has a strong heritable component. In terms of heritability, which reflects how much variation is due to underlying genetic factors, the heritability of primary hypercalciuria was initially reported by Coe et al. [16] to be 43% among first-degree relatives and 36% among all relatives. In a family-based study of metabolic phenotypes, metabolic risk factors and phenotypes were evaluated and compared in families with at least two siblings with a previous history of calcium-component urolithiasis [17]. Herein, urine calcium excretion was the only phenotype related to calcium-component urolithiasis. Moreover, daily urine calcium excretion was elevated in affected siblings relative to unaffected siblings, suggesting that hypercalciuria could be a hereditary trait. The Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) cohort data were analyzed to further investigate the heritability of urinary calcium excretion [18]. Supersaturation was measured in 811 members of families in Rochester, MN, USA. Based on 24 h urine samples, urine calcium excretion showed strong heritability, along with magnesium and citrate excretion. In addition, in a study involving 12 sets of healthy homozygous twins, excretion of urine calcium showed a heritability factor of 0.94 [19]. Overall, the available evidence indicates that urine calcium excretion is a heritable feature of urolithiasis formation.
2.2.2. Citrate excretion
Hypocitraturia plays an important role in the formation of kidney stones and is present in approximately 60% of patients who develop calcium oxalate urolithiasis [20]. Hypocitraturia is usually associated with distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) with decreased renal citrate excretion. Low vegetable and fruit intake, and high animal protein intake can also contribute to hypocitraturia [21]. Results from the GENOA cohort showed significant heritability of urine citrate excretion, with an estimated heritability of 0.36 [18]. In a healthy homozygous twin study, urine citrate excretion had a heritability of 0.95 [19].
2.2.3. Other factors
Urine oxalate and uric acid excretion also were heritable in the healthy homozygous twin study, whereas urine magnesium excretion was heritable in the GENOA cohort [19,22,23]. The GENOA cohort was used to systematically estimate heritability and genetic correlation of numerous urinary traits associated with the risk of kidney stones using variance component methods [18]. Herein, low urine volume, a well-established risk factor for urolithiasis formation and recurrence, was observed to be significantly heritable, implicating genetic regulation of thirst. The proposed mechanisms underlying these observations were genetic regulation of pathways that affect thirst, the release of vasopressins, and vasopressin receptors in the collecting duct [24].
2.3. Dietary factors
Numerous dietary components including oxalate, calcium, sodium, protein, and fluid consumption are strongly associated with the risk of urolithiasis formation as they influence the excretion of urinary lithogenic components [22,25]. Although diet is considered an environmental factor, increasing evidence suggests dietary preferences to be partially hereditary [22,26]. The heritability of dietary traits was explored in the Erasmus Rucphen Family Study, which included 1690 individuals and utilized self-report questionnaires to evaluate the duration in which each individual consumed vegetables, fruit, fruit juice, fish, unhealthy snacks, fast food, and soft drinks; principal component analysis showed a heritability of up to 0.32 for dietary traits, suggesting that specific dietary intake patterns are heritable [25]. Dietary traits were also shown to be associated with urolithiasis in the GENOA cohort, in which dietary intake is assessed using the Viocare Food Frequency Questionnaire; animal and dietary proteins, oxalate, calcium, fructose, and sucrose consumption are identified as relevant factors [18]. These study findings suggest the presence of a genetic predisposition for dietary and eating behaviors that increase the risk of urolithiasis in certain patients.
3. Monogenic disorders
Monogenic contributions to urolithiasis formation have been considered rare. However, improvements in high-throughput sequencing technologies have helped to identify new genetic causes of urolithiasis, and suggest that a considerable proportion of all causes of urolithiasis have these traits (Table 1). One prospective study revealed that a single-gene mutation accounted for 11.4% of adult and 20.8% of pediatric urolithiasis cases [27]. The prevalence of monogenic genes was explored by high-throughput exon sequencing in an international pediatric renal stone cohort of 143 patients. Likely causative mutations were detected in 46.7% (14/30) of analyzed genes, with a molecular diagnosis in 16.8% (24/143) of patients [28]. In a whole-exome sequencing study involving 51 families who presented with a least one kidney stone before the age of 25 years, a monogenic causative mutation was noted in 29.4% (15/51) of families [29]. In this study, younger age at the diagnosis of urolithiasis, presence of multiple affected family members, and consanguinity were factors associated with higher rates of monogenic mutations.
Table 1.
Monogenic disorders of urolithiasis.
| Disorder | Gene | Inheritance | Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autosomal dominant idiopathic hypercalciuria |
|
AD |
|
| Autosomal dominant hypocalcemia with hypercalciuria |
|
AD |
|
| Bartter syndrome | |||
| Type I |
|
AR |
|
| Type II |
|
AR |
|
| Type III |
|
AR |
|
| Type IVa |
|
AR |
|
| Type IVb |
|
AR |
|
| Type V |
|
XLR |
|
| Dent disease | |||
| Type 1 |
|
XLR |
|
| Type 2 |
|
XLR |
|
| Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria |
|
AR |
|
| Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis |
|
AR |
|
| Distal renal tubular acidosis |
|
AD |
|
| Primary hyperoxaluria |
|
AR |
|
| Infantile hypercalcemia |
|
AR |
|
| Cystinuria |
|
AR or AD |
|
| Hereditary hyperuricosuria |
|
XLR |
|
| Hereditary xanthinuria |
|
AR |
|
| Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency |
|
AR |
|
AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; LMW, low molecular weight; PTH, parathyroid hormone; XLR, X-linked recessive.
3.1. Disorders associated with calcium-component urolithiasis
More than 80% of urolithiases are associated with calcium components, and the majority of investigations into monogenic causes of urolithiases have focused mainly on disorders related to calcium component urolithiasis. Hypercalciuria is the most commonly observed metabolic abnormality in patients with urolithiasis [[30], [31], [32], [33]].
3.1.1. Autosomal dominant hypocalcemia (ADH) with hypercalciuria
ADH is attributed to heterozygous gain-of-function mutations within the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) signaling pathway. To date, more than 40 mutations associated with CaSR have been reported in patients with ADH, and over 50% of these were identified in the extracellular domain [34,35]. ADH type 1 is featured by mutations in the G protein-coupled protein CaSR, whereas ADH type 2 is characterized by mutations in the G protein subunit signaling partner Gα11, encoded by GNA11. The molecular aberrations involved in ADH are unidentified in approximately 30% of patients [36].
Patients with ADH have hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypomagnesemia. Most of the patients are asymptomatic; however, neurological symptoms such as carpopedal spasms or seizures have been reported [37]. The level of serum phosphate is increased or within the upper normal range and the level of serum magnesium is low or within the lower normal range in patients with hypoparathyroidism and pseudo-hypoparathyroidism [37]. However, patients with ADH with hypercalciuria have low to normal range of serum parathyroid hormone and are not hypoparathyroid or pseudo-hypoparathyroid [38].
Hypercalciuria is observed in approximately one-tenth of patients, predisposing these patients to urolithiasis. Therefore, administration of active vitamin D metabolites with the goal of adjusting for hypocalcemia can provoke hypercalciuria and subsequent risk of urolithiasis formation. Although cessation of vitamin D administration has shown to be partially reversible, it should be avoided in patients and family members with ADH whose hypocalcemia is due to a gain-of-function CaSR mutation [37].
3.1.2. Bartter syndrome
Bartter syndrome is an autosomal recessive renal tubulopathy associated with a defect in sodium chloride reabsorption in the loop of Henle. This results in extracellular fluid volume depletion with low to normal blood pressure [35]. Bartter syndrome comprises numerous electrolyte imbalances such as low potassium and chloride. The acid-base manifestation is metabolic alkalosis, with high renin, secondary hyperaldosteronism, and an increased level of prostaglandin E2 [39]. Hypercalciuria is usually evident, whereas nephrocalcinosis is mostly noted in Bartter syndromes I, II, and V [40]. Mutations in six genes are associated with Bartter syndrome.
Bartter syndrome type I is related to mutations in the gene that encodes the bumetanide-sensitive Na+–K+–2Cl- symporter (NKCC2). Bartter syndrome type II is exerted by a mutation in the ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 1 (ROMK). Bartter syndrome types I and II are frequently associated with nephrocalcinosis during the antenatal or postnatal period [40]. Bartter syndrome type II is characterized by hyperkalemia in infancy and hypokalemia in the postnatal period [41]. While the optimal management of metabolic imbalances observed in this disorder is unclear, the COX inhibitor indomethacin has shown efficacy in pediatric Bartter syndrome, while K-sparing diuretics or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to be efficacious in adult Bartter syndrome [42].
Bartter syndrome type III is a result of biallelic mutations in CLCNKB, encoding the voltage-gated Cl channel protein ClC-Kb. This type is characterized by onset during the pre-adult years or later due to hypokalemic alkalosis, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis [43]. Management of type III is focused on the replacement of electrolytes, especially magnesium and potassium.
Bartter syndrome type IVa is characterized by sensorineural hearing loss and early-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is attributed to biallelic mutations in the gene encoding Barttin (BSND), a chaperone protein for the chloride-channel proteins ClC-Ka and ClC-Kb [44]. The recognizable feature of deafness is provoked by the expression of Barttin in potassium-secreting marginal cells located in the scala media [45]. Uncommon biallelic mutations in CLCNKB and the adjacent CLCNKA encoding ClC-Ka result in the phenotype referred to as Bartter syndrome type IVb [46].
Bartter syndrome type V is referred to as a transient antenatal Bartter syndrome with an X-linked recessive trait. Type V is due to hemizygous mutations in MAGED2, encoding the melanoma-associated antigen D2, a protein that regulates the cell cycle [47]. While Bartter syndrome types I to IV show autosomally recessive inheritance, Bartter syndrome types V and VI are autosomal dominant and X-linked recessive traits, respectively [35,39].
Management strategies are mainly supportive and include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that reduce renal prostaglandin production and spironolactone that inhibits distal tubular Na+–K+ exchange to correct hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis [48].
3.1.3. Dent disease and Lowe syndrome
Dent disease is an X-linked recessive disorder expressed in males and is categorized into types 1 and 2. Type 1 is associated with loss-of-function mutations in CLCN5 (Xp11.22), whereas type 2 is associated with mutations in OCRL (Xq25) [49,50]. Lowe syndrome is a severe phenotype of Dent disease, characterized by hypercalciuria and cataracts, renal anomalies, and nephrocalcinosis [43,51,52]. The genetic underpinnings of Dent disease are unknown in 25% of patients. Dent disease is diagnosed by increased low-molecular-weight proteinuria, hypercalciuria, and at least one of the following features: nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, hematuria, hypophosphatemia, and/or gradual deterioration in renal function causing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [53,54]. Low-molecular-weight proteinuria is evident in most patients and can be detected by measuring the level of retinol-binding protein, α1-microglobulin, or β2-macroglobulin. Notably, the presence and magnitude of nephrocalcinosis are not associated with the risk of ESRD [52]. While the development of urolithiasis is considered to be regulated by hypercalciuria in Dent disease, how hypercalciuria develops in these patients is unclear [55]. Extrarenal manifestations of Dent disease include rickets and osteomalacia, which are commonly observed [54].
Dent disease type 1 is associated with mutations of CLCN5 encoding the electrogenic chloride-hydrogen exchange transporter 5. In turn, reabsorption of solute is decreased in the proximal tubule due to defective Cl− flow and subsequent disruption of endosomal acidification and trafficking to the apical surface [56]. In Dent disease type 2, OCRL encodes inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase and is involved in vesicle trafficking, phagocytosis, cell adhesion and migration, cytokinesis, cellular polarity, and intracellular signaling [57]. OCRL mutations can present as Dent disease type 2 if only the kidney is affected or as Lowe syndrome if there are other extrarenal phenotypes, including delayed development and cataracts. Among various renal manifestations, nephrocalcinosis is common (40%) in Dent disease type 2, while renal failure is more frequent in Lowe syndrome [58].
The management of Dent disease is mainly supportive, with the goals of decreasing hypercalciuria and relieving the risks of urolithiasis and renal function deterioration. Low-sodium dietary measures and thiazides are recommended with close monitoring of electrolyte levels [59]. In a retrospective study of 109 males with CLCN5 mutations and nine patients with a mutation of the OCRL gene, high-dose thiazide diuretics reduced the excretion of urine calcium [59]. Affected individuals may still develop kidney failure and require dialysis or kidney transplantation [58].
3.1.4. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria (HHRH)
HHRH is an uncommon disorder with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. It is exerted by biallelic mutations in SLC34A3, encoding the Na+-dependent phosphate transport protein 2C. Monoallelic SLC34A3 variants can induce urolithiasis with idiopathic hypercalciuria irrespective of a decrease in bone mineral density [27,60]. HHRH is characterized by rickets, hypophosphatemia, decreased reabsorption of renal phosphate, hypercalciuria with normocalcemia, and elevated renal production of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) [24]. Elevated 1,25(OH)2D induces hypercalciuria by increased absorption of calcium and phosphorus from the intestines, increased mobilization from bone, increased reabsorption of calcium, and reduced reabsorption of phosphorus due to inhibition of parathyroid hormone secretion [24]. Renal phosphate depletion and hypophosphatemia can inhibit fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), which stimulates catabolism of 1,25(OH)2D3. Low levels of FGF23 and hypophosphatemia decrease the expression of cytochrome P450 family 24 subfamily A member 1 and subsequently induce hypersensitivity to vitamin D [61]. Therefore, the management of HHRH should involve oral phosphorus supplementation and restraint of vitamin D analog supplementation. The efficacy of oral phosphorus in reducing the risk of urolithiasis and loss of bone density has not been elucidated [62].
3.1.5. Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis (FHHNC)
FHHNC is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in the CLDN16 or CLDN19 genes encoding the proteins claudin-16 and claudin-19, respectively [63]. More than 40 missense mutations in CLDN16 that affect the first extracellular loop of the protein have been characterized. Notably, a few of these mutations have been found to be associated with self-limited hypercalciuria without significant abnormalities of magnesium or renal function deterioration during childhood [64]. Biallelic CLDN16 (3q27) mutations induce FHHNC alone, while individuals carrying CLDN19 mutations commonly exhibit associated congenital ocular defects resulting in variable visual impairments [63,65]. A positional cloning study also reported that mutations in paracellin-1 (PCLN-1) induce renal magnesium wasting. PCLN-1 is found in tight junctions of the thick ascending limb of Henle and is associated with the claudin family of tight junction proteins [65].
FHHNC is featured by the wasting of calcium and magnesium, and subsequent hypercalciuria, hypomagnesemia, nephrocalcinosis, and progressive CKD [66]. Most individuals experience symptoms in young adulthood. Symptoms include seizures or tetany due to hypomagnesemia or hypocalcemia [65]. Other than hypomagnesemia, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis, which are always present, individuals can also present with polydipsia and polyuria, incomplete dRTA, hyperuricemia, hypocitraturia, and tooth enamel defects [[66], [67], [68]].
Renal biopsies are rarely useful for this disorder, and the diagnosis of FHHNC is challenging in pediatric patients presenting with a history of recurrent urolithiasis and renal insufficiency. Hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis is not evident in FHHNC, differentiating this disorder from Bartter syndrome. Usually, a diagnosis is based on the identification of biallelic CLDN16 or CLDN19 mutations.
While there is no definite management for FHHNC, supplementation with high-dose magnesium and administration of thiazide diuretics have been proposed as strategies to decrease the excretion of urine calcium. However, thiazides can not significantly decrease the excretion of urine calcium or postpone the onset and progression of CKD [13,68]. Indomethacin, which inhibits prostaglandin production, has also been suggested as a therapeutic as prostaglandin E2 suppresses the reabsorption of thick ascending limb of Henle. However, there is limited evidence concerning the efficacy of this management strategy [69]. Vitamin D supplements must be administered cautiously since they can exacerbate hypercalciuria [66].
3.1.6. Hereditary dRTA
Primary dRTA is commonly observed at a young age and is characterized by impairment of tubular secretion of hydrogen ions in the distal nephron and subsequent metabolic acidosis [70]. Hypokalemia resulting from renal potassium wasting, hypercalciuria with nephrocalcinosis, and metabolic bone disease are commonly associated with dRTA [13]. Hereditary dRTA is usually diagnosed during infancy based on growth delay. Late-onset presentations are more commonly related to monoallelic SLC4A1 mutations that induce red blood cell abnormalities [71].
Hereditary dRTA is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner when caused by pathogenic variants in ATP6V0A4, ATP6V1B1, FOXI1, or WDR72, or in an autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive manner when caused by pathogenic variants in SLC4A1. Biallelic mutations are noted in up to 80% of affected patients [72,73]. ATP6V1B1 and ATP6V0A4 encode subunits B1 and A4, respectively, of the hydrogen-ATPase pump in α-intercalated cells [74,75]. Although deafness is uncommon with ATP6V0A4 mutations, hearing loss is observed in some affected individuals during young adulthood [76,77]. SLC4A1 is present on chromosome 17q21.31 and encodes the chloride-bicarbonate exchanger AE1 that is expressed on the basolateral membrane of α-intercalated cells. AE1 also regulates chloride and bicarbonate exchange on erythrocyte membranes; polycythemia is occasionally noted in affected individuals [78]. While TP6V1B1 and FOXI1 mutations are seen in early-onset hearing loss, mutations in ATP6V0A4 can result in late-onset deafness [77,79].
The dRTA should be suspected in the presence of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis with normal renal function. Symptoms include polydipsia, polyuria, emesis, constipation, loose stool, loss of appetite, and nephrocalcinosis due to persistently alkaline urine [77,80]. Metabolic acidosis can result in bone calcium loss and subsequent hypercalciuria, which can induce nephrocalcinosis [71].
The management of dRTA is focused on the correction of metabolic acidosis with twice-daily oral potassium citrate. This can protect bone health by increasing urine citrate and decreasing urine calcium excretion. Nevertheless, persistent alkaline urine cannot be altered, and patients are at high risk for calcium phosphate urolithiasis as well as nephrocalcinosis [71].
3.1.7. Primary hyperoxaluria
Primary hyperoxaluria is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by aberrations in glyoxylate metabolism and subsequent hepatic overproduction and excretion of urine oxalate. Excess excretion of urine oxalate increases the risk of calcium oxalate crystal formation and nephrocalcinosis [81]. There are three distinct types of primary hyperoxaluria depending on the enzymes involved in the oxalate metabolic pathway [82].
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 is caused by biallelic mutations in the liver-specific alanine-glyoxylate and serine-pyruvate aminotransferase (AGXT) gene. Approximately 80% of all primary hyperoxaluria cases are due to mutations in AGXT, which produces the most severe form. ESRD occurs in approximately 60% of individuals by the age of 40 years [81]. Decreased activity of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase induces glyoxylate accumulation through impaired conversion of glyoxylate to glycine, resulting in increased oxalate and glycolate production [83]. The p.Gly170Arg mutation is the most common among the 200 AGXT mutations identified to date. Affected individuals that are heterozygous for the p.Gly170Arg mutation have a greater risk of having severe disease and respond less to pyridoxine (vitamin B6). In contrast, individuals that are homozygous for this mutation present with milder disease and usually respond well to pyridoxine [81,[84], [85], [86]]. Patients with other mistargeting mutations in AGXT, including p.Gly41Arg, are also candidates for treatment with pyridoxine [87]. For patients in whom renal transplantation is indicated, combined liver transplantation can be considered since this will help correct metabolic abnormalities [88].
Primary hyperoxaluria type 2 is due to mutations in the glyoxylate and hydroxypyruvate reductase gene (GRHPR), which encodes glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GR/HPR). Without GR/HPR, glyoxylate is metabolized to oxalate, and hydroxypyruvate is metabolized to l-glycerate; thus, affected individuals have increased oxalate and l-glycerate excretion [89,90]. Primary hyperoxaluria type 2 accounts for approximately one-tenth of all reported cases of primary hyperoxaluria. In general, individuals with primary hyperoxaluria type 2 have relatively lower urinary oxalate excretion than those with type 1, in addition to a milder phenotype. Type 2 is characterized by a slower progression to ESRD compared to type 1; still, progression to ESRD occurs in 18% of patients [81].
Primary hyperoxaluria type 3 is due to mutations in 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase 1 (HOGA1). HOGA1 catalyzes the cleavage of 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate (HOG) to pyruvate and glyoxylate; the consequent accumulation of HOG inhibits the function of GR/HPR [81]. Type 3 constitutes 10% of primary hyperoxaluria and is the least likely type to progress to ESRD [81]. Presentation is as early as 2.6 years; however, only 4% of affected individuals progress to ESRD.
Management of primary hyperoxaluria with oral oxalate restriction has limited efficacy. Urine calcium oxalate crystallization inhibitors in addition to sufficient fluid intake can be efficacious [91].
3.1.8. Infantile hypercalcemia
Infantile hypercalcemia type 1 is caused by biallelic mutations in CYP24A1, which have also been reported in families with severe hypercalcemia following vitamin D supplementation and in adults with hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria [24]. The inhibition of vitamin D synthesis with fluconazole or ketoconazole has been shown to be effective in patients with hypercalcemia and nephrolithiasis [92].
Infantile hypercalcemia type 2 is associated with biallelic SLC34A1 mutations, and renal phosphate wasting results in increased production of 1,25(OH)2D3 [24]. SLC34A1 encodes Na+-dependent phosphate transport protein 2A; its loss in patients with HCINF-2 results in proximal tubular renal phosphate wasting, hypophosphatemia, and compensatory increases in 1,25(OH)2D, which induce hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria. Such patients can be treated with phosphate supplementation in order to normalize serum phosphate levels and to prevent FGF23 suppression, which leads to disruptions in vitamin D and calcium metabolism [93].
3.2. Non-calcium nephrolithiasis disorders
3.2.1. Cystinuria
Cystinuria arises as a result of defective amino acid transport in the proximal tubule and is the most commonly identified hereditary disorder associated with urolithiasis formation, accounting for approximately 5%–10% of all pediatric cases and 1% of adult urolithiases cases [94,95]. Individuals with classical recessive cystinuria have inherited two mutations in the solute carrier family 3 member 1 (SLC3A1) gene located on chromosome 2, which encodes the heavy subunit rBAT of the transport mechanism. Individuals with the dominant form of cystinuria have inherited two mutations in the solute carrier family 7 member 9 (SLC7A9) gene on chromosome 19, which encodes the transport channel itself. Mutations of these proteins impair the reabsorption of cysteine and dibasic amino acids including arginine, lysine, and ornithine, resulting in increased excretion [96,97]. rBAT and b0,+AT proteins form heterodimers via a disulfide bridge to make up the b0,+AT amino acid transport system [1]. Cystinuria is characterized by frequent recurrences because cysteine is less soluble in urine [94]. Patients with cystinuria are prone to CKD progression due to recurrent urolithiasis and obstructive uropathy.
Management of individuals with cystinuria focuses mainly on prevention, as these patients are likely to receive multiple urological interventions. Management strategies include aggressive fluid intake and low sodium and protein intake, aimed at decreasing the consumption of the cystine precursor methionine. Urinary alkalinization can be performed to reduce cystine stone formation. The goal of sodium bicarbonate and/or potassium citrate treatment is to increase urinary pH to above 7.0 in order to maintain the solubility of the amino acid cystine. Acetazolamide has shown benefits in increasing urinary pH in patients on potassium citrate. However, precautious measures should be taken in regard to calcium phosphate stone formation. Thiol-binding agents including d-penicillamine and tiopronin can also be used to enhance the solubility of urinary cystine. These agents decrease cystine concentration through the formation of cysteine-agent dimers [98].
3.2.2. Hereditary hyperuricosuria
Hereditary hyperuricosuria is due to partial or complete deficiency of the enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase, which is encoded by HPRT1 [99]. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome is an X-linked recessive disorder due to complete deficiency of this enzyme and is characterized by hyperuricemia, hyperuricosuria, uric acid stones, and neurological deficits such as psychomotor deficit, intellectual disability, and childhood renal failure [99]. Partial loss-of-function mutations in HPRT1 can result in milder symptoms. The mildest phenotype, referred to as Kelley-Seegmiller syndrome, typically presents as uric acid urolithiasis. Mutations in PRPS1 cause hyperuricemia, hyperuricosuria, gout, hearing loss, uric acid urolithiasis, and intellectual disability [100,101]. Loss-of-function mutations in SLC22A12 or SLC2A9 encoding the proximal tubular uric acid reabsorption transporters urate anion exchanger 1 and glucose transporter type 9, respectively, are also related to excessive uric acid excretion and subsequent formation of nephrolithiasis [102].
Treatment with xanthine oxidase inhibitors, including allopurinol or febuxostat, has been shown to be promising by reducing hyperuricemia and hyperuricosuria. However, precautions should be taken since hyperxanthinuria and hypoxanthinuria can occur in patients with complete hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency [99]. Moreover, urine alkalinization can be performed to enhance the solubility of uric acid, along with aggressive fluid intake [103,104].
3.2.3. Hereditary xanthinuria
Hereditary xanthinuria has an autosomal recessive inheritance due to impairment of purine metabolism. Type 1 xanthinuria is associated with mutations in XDH, encoding xanthine dehydrogenase-oxidase (XDH), while type 2 xanthinuria is associated with mutations in MOCOS, encoding molybdenum cofactor sulfurase, a cofactor in XDH and aldehyde oxidase activation [105,106]. XDH or molybdenum cofactor sulfurase deficiency causes a decrease in serum uric acid concentration and high concentrations of xanthine and hypoxanthine, which are the precursors of oxypurine. Type 2 xanthinuria causes an elevated concentration of serum sulfite, allowing differential diagnosis from type 1 xanthinuria [107]. Type 1 xanthinuria can be silent or manifest as myopathy, while type 2 is featured by psychomotor deficits, growth delay, seizures, and hypotonia due to increased levels of sulfites [107,108]. Xanthine urolithiasis is observed in approximately one-third of affected individuals. Diets low in purine and aggressive fluid intake can help protect against the formation of xanthine stones [1].
3.2.4. Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency
APRT deficiency is a rare inborn error of purine metabolism due to homozygous or compound heterozygous biallelic APRT mutations. APRT deficiency leads to the accumulation of the compound 2,8-dihydroxyadenine (DHA), which causes DHA stone formation due to high insolubility. Urolithiasis is commonly observed in individuals with APRT deficiency. While secondary progressive CKD can result from crystalline nephropathy, approximately one-fifth of the individuals are known to present with ESRD due to tubulointerstitial injury caused by crystal deposition or obstruction [53,109,110].
Patients with APRT deficiency can be diagnosed by detection of DHA in stone analysis, elevated urine 2,8-DHA crystals, renal biopsy, or absence of red blood cell APRT activity [95]. Urinary DHA crystals are radiolucent, and caution is needed to differentiate this disorder from uric acid urolithiasis. Under light microscopy and polarized light microscopy, DHA crystals often feature a central Maltese cross pattern. Moreover, both calcium oxalate and DHA crystals are birefringent, and thus differential diagnosis should include APRT deficiency and primary hyperoxaluria [93,109,110].
Allopurinol or febuxostat, which is xanthine oxidase inhibitors, can decrease 2,8-DHA synthesis and reduce the risk of urolithiasis formation and progression of crystal nephropathy [110,111]. Of note, xanthine oxidase inhibitor therapy should be continued in renal allograft patients as APRT deficiency is prone to recurrence without maintenance [95].
4. Clinical implications
Monogenic causes of urolithiasis are commonly overlooked in recurrent stone-formers [[27], [28], [29]]. Moreover, classical phenotypes might not be evident in all stone-formers, hindering an appropriate diagnosis [29,112]. Underdiagnosis of monogenic disorders can result in suboptimal treatment strategies and lead to multiple surgical interventions that can decrease quality of life and renal function. Patients who present at an early age and those with recurrent and bilateral stones, familial history, or parental consanguinity should be suspected of a hereditary component of urolithiasis and be considered candidates for genetic counseling [6]. In these patients, a multidisciplinary approach between clinicians and geneticists that involves biochemical and genetic testing should be adopted to develop optimal management strategies. This is especially important in pediatric patients who have a higher likelihood of a monogenic diagnosis than adults; whole-exome sequencing should be considered [29]. Results from dietary studies have indicated that dietary intake patterns can be heritable, and prospective interventions should include dietary modifications. Unraveling hereditary traits in recurrent stone-formers remains a challenge; however, genome-guided precision medicine approaches can advance the development of optimal management strategies for these patients. Such advancements may facilitate the development of individualized medical therapies based on polygenic genotypes in recurrent idiopathic stone formers.
5. Conclusion
The pathophysiology underlying urolithiasis formation is complex and multifactorial, but evidence strongly suggests the existence of a genetic predisposition. Contemporary genomic techniques have identified numerous monogenic causes of urolithiasis in humans. However, the frequency of monogenic causes of urolithiasis relative to the total population remains undetermined. A better understanding of the genetic etiology of the disorder in terms of genome-guided precision medicine is needed, which will facilitate targeting of the relevant biological pathway. Moreover, it is unknown why affected patients with the same metabolic abnormalities exhibit more severe disease than other patients. Further comprehensive genetic studies using combined proteomic, chemistry, and biochemistry approaches are needed to clearly identify heritable causes of urolithiasis and establish centralized registries for future clinical studies. Such measures will allow for novel personalized diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic approaches for recurrent urolithiasis formers.
Author contributions
Study concept: Victor K.F. Wong.
Drafting of the manuscript: Kyo Chul Koo, Abdulghafour Halawani, Victor K.F. Wong, Dirk Lange.
Critical revision of the manuscript and supervision: Ben H. Chew.
Approval of the final manuscript: Kyo Chul Koo, Abdulghafour Halawani, Victor K.F. Wong, Dirk Lange, Ben H. Chew.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Tongji University.
References
- 1.Howles S.A., Thakker R.V. Genetics of kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17:407–421. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0332-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Curhan G.C., Willett W.C., Rimm E.B., Stampfer M.J. Family history and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:1568–1573. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V8101568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ware E.B., Smith J.A., Zhao W., Ganesvoort R.T., Curhan G.C., Pollak M., et al. Genome-wide association study of 24-hour urinary excretion of calcium, magnesium, and uric acid. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019;3:448–460. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Resnick M., Pridgen D.B., Goodman H.O. Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:1313–1318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196806132782403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McGeown M.G. Heredity in renal stone disease. Clin Sci. 1960;19:465–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rumsby G. Genetic defects underlying renal stone disease. Int J Surg. 2016;36:590–595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sayer J.A. Progress in understanding the genetics of calcium-containing nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:748–759. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016050576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim J.K., Song S.H., Jung G., Song B., Hong S.K. Possibilities and limitations of using low biomass samples for urologic disease and microbiome research. Prostate Int. 2022;10:169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ketha H., Singh R.J., Grebe S.K., Bergstralh E.J., Rule A.D., Lieske J.C., et al. Altered calcium and vitamin D homeostasis in first-time calcium kidney stone-formers. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wjst M., Altmüller J., Braig C., Bahnweg M., André E. A genome-wide linkage scan for 25-OH-D3 and 1,25-(OH)2-D3 serum levels in asthma families. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103:799–802. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Dongen J., Willemsen G., Chen W.M., de Geus E.J., Boomsma D.I. Heritability of metabolic syndrome traits in a large population-based sample. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2914–2923. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P041673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vezzoli G., Soldati L., Gambaro G. Update on primary hypercalciuria from a genetic perspective. J Urol. 2008;179:1676–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stechman M.J., Loh N.Y., Thakker R.V. Genetic causes of hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24:2321–2332. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0807-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moe O.W., Bonny O. Genetic hypercalciuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:729–745. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004100888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Butani L., Kalia A. Idiopathic hypercalciuria in children—how valid are the existing diagnostic criteria? Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:577–582. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coe F.L., Parks J.H., Moore E.S. Familial idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:337–340. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197902153000703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tessier J., Petrucci M., Trouvé M.L., Valiquette L., Guay G., Ouimet D., et al. A family-based study of metabolic phenotypes in calcium urolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1141–1147. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0600031141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lieske J.C., Turner S.T., Edeh S.N., Smith J.A., Kardia S.L. Heritability of urinary traits that contribute to nephrolithiasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:943–950. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08210813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Monga M., Macias B., Groppo E., Hargens A. Genetic heritability of urinary stone risk in identical twins. J Urol. 2006;175:2125–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00272-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nicar M.J., Skurla C., Sakhaee K., Pak C.Y. Low urinary citrate excretion in nephrolithiasis. Urology. 1983;21:8–14. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zuckerman J.M., Assimos D.G. Hypocitraturia: pathophysiology and medical management. Rev Urol. 2009;11:134–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lieske J.C., Turner S.T., Edeh S.N., Ware E.B., Kardia S.L., Smith J.A. Heritability of dietary traits that contribute to nephrolithiasis in a cohort of adult sibships. J Nephrol. 2016;29:45–51. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0204-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lieske J.C., Wang X. Heritable traits that contribute to nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:5–10. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1095-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Singh P., Harris P.C., Sas D.J., Lieske J.C. The genetics of kidney stone disease and nephrocalcinosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18:224–240. doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00513-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van den Berg L., Henneman P., Willems van Dijk K., Delemarre-van de Waal H.A., Oostra B.A., van Duijn C.M., et al. Heritability of dietary food intake patterns. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50:721–726. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0387-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martin L.J., Lee S.Y., Couch S.C., Morrison J., Woo J.G. Shared genetic contributions of fruit and vegetable consumption with BMI in families 20 y after sharing a household. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1138–1143. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Halbritter J., Baum M., Hynes A.M., Rice S.J., Thwaites D.T., Gucev Z.S., et al. Fourteen monogenic genes account for 15% of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:543–551. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014040388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Braun D.A., Lawson J.A., Gee H.Y., Halbritter J., Shril S., Tan W., et al. Prevalence of monogenic causes in pediatric patients with nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:664–672. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07540715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Daga A., Majmundar A.J., Braun D.A., Gee H.Y., Lawson J.A., Shril S., et al. Whole exome sequencing frequently detects a monogenic cause in early onset nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis. Kidney Int. 2018;93:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Coe F.L., Worcester E.M., Evan A.P. Idiopathic hypercalciuria and formation of calcium renal stones. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:519–533. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wolf M.T.F., Zalewski I., Martin F.C., Ruf R., Müller D., Hennies H.C., et al. Mapping a new suggestive gene locus for autosomal dominant nephrolithiasis to chromosome 9q33.2–q34.2 by total genome search for linkage. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:909–914. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scott P., Ouimet D., Valiquette L., Guay G., Proulx Y., Trouvé M.L., et al. Suggestive evidence for a susceptibility gene near the vitamin D receptor locus in idiopathic calcium stone formation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1007–1013. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1051007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mossetti G., Vuotto P., Rendina D., Numis F.G., Viceconti R., Giordano F., et al. Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and tubular citrate handling in calcium nephrolithiasis. J Intern Med. 2003;253:194–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hannan F.M., Nesbit M.A., Zhang C., Cranston T., Curley A.J., Harding B., et al. Identification of 70 calcium-sensing receptor mutations in hyper- and hypo-calcaemic patients: evidence for clustering of extracellular domain mutations at calcium-binding sites. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2768–2778. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vargas-Poussou R., Huang C., Hulin P., Houillier P., Jeunemaître X., Paillard M., et al. Functional characterization of a calcium-sensing receptor mutation in severe autosomal dominant hypocalcemia with a Bartter-like syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2259–2266. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000025781.16723.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hannan F.M., Babinsky V.N., Thakker R.V. Disorders of the calcium-sensing receptor and partner proteins: insights into the molecular basis of calcium homeostasis. J Mol Endocrinol. 2016;57:R127–R142. doi: 10.1530/JME-16-0124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pearce S.H., Williamson C., Kifor O., Bai M., Coulthard M.G., Davies M., et al. A familial syndrome of hypocalcemia with hypercalciuria due to mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1115–1122. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610103351505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yamamoto M., Akatsu T., Nagase T., Ogata E. Comparison of hypocalcemic hypercalciuria between patients with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism and those with gain-of-function mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor: is it possible to differentiate the two disorders? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4583–4591. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.12.7035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Watanabe S., Fukumoto S., Chang H., Takeuchi Y., Hasegawa Y., Okazaki R., et al. Association between activating mutations of calcium-sensing receptor and Bartter's syndrome. Lancet. 2002;360:692–694. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09842-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Oliveira B., Kleta R., Bockenhauer D., Walsh S.B. Genetic, pathophysiological, and clinical aspects of nephrocalcinosis. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2016;311:F1243–F1252. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00211.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gollasch B., Anistan Y.M., Canaan-Kühl S., Gollasch M. Late-onset Bartter syndrome type II. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:594–599. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huang L., Luiken G.P., van Riemsdijk I.C., Petrij F., Zandbergen A.A., Dees A. Nephrocalcinosis as adult presentation of Bartter syndrome type II. Neth J Med. 2014;72:91–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brochard K., Boyer O., Blanchard A., Loirat C., Niaudet P., Macher M.A., et al. Phenotype-genotype correlation in antenatal and neonatal variants of Bartter syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:1455–1464. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jeck N., Reinalter S.C., Henne T., Marg W., Mallmann R., Pasel K., et al. Hypokalemic salt-losing tubulopathy with chronic renal failure and sensorineural deafness. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E5. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Janssen A.G., Scholl U., Domeyer C., Nothmann D., Leinenweber A., Fahlke C. Disease-causing dysfunctions of barttin in Bartter syndrome type IV. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:145–153. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008010102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schlingmann K.P., Konrad M., Jeck N., Waldegger P., Reinalter S.C., Holder M., et al. Salt wasting and deafness resulting from mutations in two chloride channels. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1314–1319. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Laghmani K., Beck B.B., Yang S.S., Seaayfan E., Wenzel A., Reusch B., et al. Polyhydramnios, transient antenatal Bartter's syndrome, and MAGED2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1853–1863. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Seyberth H.W., Schlingmann K.P. Bartter- and Gitelman-like syndromes: salt-losing tubulopathies with loop or DCT defects. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:1789–1802. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1871-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lloyd S.E., Pearce S.H., Fisher S.E., Steinmeyer K., Schwappach B., Scheinman S.J., et al. A common molecular basis for three inherited kidney stone diseases. Nature. 1996;379:445–449. doi: 10.1038/379445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hoopes RR Jr, Shrimpton A.E., Knohl S.J., Hueber P., Hoppe B., Matyus J., et al. Dent disease with mutations in OCRL1. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:260–267. doi: 10.1086/427887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.De Matteis M.A., Staiano L., Emma F., Devuyst O. The 5-phosphatase OCRL in Lowe syndrome and Dent disease 2. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:455–470. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ehlayel A.M., Copelovitch L. Update on dent disease. Pediatr Clin. 2019;66:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Edvardsson V.O., Goldfarb D.S., Lieske J.C., Beara-Lasic L., Anglani F., Milliner D.S., et al. Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28:1923–1942. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2329-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Devuyst O., Thakker R.V., Dent's disease Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:28. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Blanchard A., Curis E., Guyon-Roger T., Kahila D., Treard C., Baudouin V., et al. Observations of a large Dent disease cohort. Kidney Int. 2016;90:430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gorvin C.M., Wilmer M.J., Piret S.E., Harding B., van den Heuvel L.P., Wrong O., et al. Receptor-mediated endocytosis and endosomal acidification is impaired in proximal tubule epithelial cells of Dent disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:7014–7019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302063110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mehta Z.B., Pietka G., Lowe M. The cellular and physiological functions of the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1. Traffic. 2014;15:471–487. doi: 10.1111/tra.12160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Levin-Iaina N., Dinour D. Renal disease with OCRL1 mutations: Dent-2 or Lowe syndrome? J Pediatr Genet. 2012;1:3–5. doi: 10.3233/PGE-2012-002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Blanchard A., Vargas-Poussou R., Peyrard S., Mogenet A., Baudouin V., Boudailliez B., et al. Effect of hydrochlorothiazide on urinary calcium excretion in Dent disease: an uncontrolled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:1084–1095. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dasgupta D., Wee M.J., Reyes M., Li Y., Simm P.J., Sharma A., et al. Mutations in SLC34A3/NPT2c are associated with kidney stones and nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:2366–2375. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013101085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schlingmann K.P., Ruminska J., Kaufmann M., Dursun I., Patti M., Kranz B., et al. Autosomal-recessive mutations in SLC34A1 encoding sodium-phosphate cotransporter 2A cause idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:604–614. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014101025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bergwitz C., Miyamoto K.I. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy. Pflügers Archiv. 2019;471:149–163. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2184-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Konrad M., Schaller A., Seelow D., Pandey A.V., Waldegger S., Lesslauer A., et al. Mutations in the tight-junction gene claudin 19 (CLDN19) are associated with renal magnesium wasting, renal failure, and severe ocular involvement. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:949–957. doi: 10.1086/508617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Müller D., Kausalya P.J., Claverie-Martin F., Meij I.C., Eggert P., Garcia-Nieto V., et al. A novel claudin 16 mutation associated with childhood hypercalciuria abolishes binding to ZO-1 and results in lysosomal mistargeting. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1293–1301. doi: 10.1086/380418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Simon D.B., Lu Y., Choate K.A., Velazquez H., Al-Sabban E., Praga M., et al. Paracellin-1, a renal tight junction protein required for paracellular Mg2+ resorption. Science. 1999;285:103–106. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5424.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Claverie-Martin F. Familial hypomagnesaemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis: clinical and molecular characteristics. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8:656–664. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yamaguti P.M., Neves F.A., Hotton D., Bardet C., de La Dure-Molla M., Castro L.C., et al. Amelogenesis imperfecta in familial hypomagnesaemia and hypercalciuria with nephrocalcinosis caused by CLDN19 gene mutations. J Med Genet. 2017;54:26–37. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Weber S., Schneider L., Peters M., Misselwitz J., Rönnefarth G., Böswald M., et al. Novel paracellin-1 mutations in 25 families with familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1872–1881. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1291872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Godron A., Harambat J., Boccio V., Mensire A., May A., Rigothier C., et al. Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis: phenotype-genotype correlation and outcome in 32 patients with CLDN16 or CLDN19 mutations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:801–809. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12841211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Karet F.E. Inherited distal renal tubular acidosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2178–2184. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000023433.08833.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Watanabe T. Improving outcomes for patients with distal renal tubular acidosis: recent advances and challenges ahead. Pediatr Health Med Therapeut. 2018;9:181–190. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S174459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rungroj N., Nettuwakul C., Sawasdee N., Sangnual S., Deejai N., Misgar R.A., et al. Distal renal tubular acidosis caused by tryptophan-aspartate repeat domain 72 (WDR72) mutations. Clin Genet. 2018;94:409–418. doi: 10.1111/cge.13418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jobst-Schwan T., Klämbt V., Tarsio M., Heneghan J.F., Majmundar A.J., Shril S., et al. Whole exome sequencing identified ATP6V1C2 as a novel candidate gene for recessive distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Int. 2020;97:567–579. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Karet F.E., Finberg K.E., Nayir A., Bakkaloglu A., Ozen S., Hulton S.A., et al. Localization of a gene for autosomal recessive distal renal tubular acidosis with normal hearing (rdRTA2) to 7q33-34. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1656–1665. doi: 10.1086/302679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Karet F.E., Finberg K.E., Nelson R.D., Nayir A., Mocan H., Sanjad S.A., et al. Mutations in the gene encoding B1 subunit of H+-ATPase cause renal tubular acidosis with sensorineural deafness. Nat Genet. 1999;21:84–90. doi: 10.1038/5022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vargas-Poussou R., Houillier P., Le Pottier N., Strompf L., Loirat C., Baudouin V., et al. Genetic investigation of autosomal recessive distal renal tubular acidosis: evidence for early sensorineural hearing loss associated with mutations in the ATP6V0A4 gene. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1437–1443. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Besouw M.T.P., Bienias M., Walsh P., Kleta R., Van't Hoff W.G., Ashton E., et al. Clinical and molecular aspects of distal renal tubular acidosis in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32:987–996. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3573-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Agroyannis B., Koutsikos D., Tzanatos-Exarchou H., Yatzidis H. Erythrocytosis in type I renal tubular acidosis with nephrocalcinosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1992;7:365–366. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a092145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Enerbäck S., Nilsson D., Edwards N., Heglind M., Alkanderi S., Ashton E., et al. Acidosis and deafness in patients with recessive mutations in FOXI1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:1041–1048. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017080840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Park E., Cho M.H., Hyun H.S., Shin J.I., Lee J.H., Park Y.S., et al. Genotype-phenotype analysis in pediatric patients with distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43:513–521. doi: 10.1159/000488698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hopp K., Cogal A.G., Bergstralh E.J., Seide B.M., Olson J.B., Meek A.M., et al. Phenotype-genotype correlations and estimated carrier frequencies of primary hyperoxaluria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2559–2570. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hoppe B. An update on primary hyperoxaluria. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:467–475. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Danpure C.J. Molecular etiology of primary hyperoxaluria type 1: new directions for treatment. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25:303–310. doi: 10.1159/000086362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Fargue S., Lewin J., Rumsby G., Danpure C.J. Four of the most common mutations in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 unmask the cryptic mitochondrial targeting sequence of alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase encoded by the polymorphic minor allele. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:2475–2484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.432617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Beck B.B., Hoyer-Kuhn H., Göbel H., Habbig S., Hoppe B. Hyperoxaluria and systemic oxalosis: an update on current therapy and future directions. Expet Opin Invest Drugs. 2013;22:117–129. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2013.741587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Monico C.G., Olson J.B., Milliner D.S. Implications of genotype and enzyme phenotype in pyridoxine response of patients with type I primary hyperoxaluria. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25:183–188. doi: 10.1159/000085411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Singh P., Chebib F.T., Cogal A.G., Gavrilov D.K., Harris P.C., Lieske J.C. Pyridoxine responsiveness in a type 1 primary hyperoxaluria patient with a rare (atypical) AGXT gene mutation. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5:955–958. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Dhondup T., Lorenz E.C., Milliner D.S., Lieske J.C. Combined liver-kidney transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria type 2: a case report. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:253–257. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lam C.W., Yuen Y.P., Lai C.K., Tong S.F., Lau L.K., Tong K.L., et al. Novel mutation in the GRHPR gene in a Chinese patient with primary hyperoxaluria type 2 requiring renal transplantation from a living related donor. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1307–1310. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.29229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cramer S.D., Ferree P.M., Lin K., Milliner D.S., Holmes R.P. The gene encoding hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR) is mutated in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type II. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2063–2069. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.11.2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cochat P., Hulton S.A., Acquaviva C., Danpure C.J., Daudon M., De Marchi M., et al. Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: indications for screening and guidance for diagnosis and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1729–1736. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Davidson Peiris E., Wusirika R. A case report of compound heterozygous CYP24A1 mutations leading to nephrolithiasis successfully treated with ketoconazole. Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2017;7:167–171. doi: 10.1159/000485243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hureaux M., Molin A., Jay N., Saliou A.H., Spaggiari E., Salomon R., et al. Prenatal hyperechogenic kidneys in three cases of infantile hypercalcemia associated with SLC34A1 mutations. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018;33:1723–1729. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3998-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Knoll T., Zöllner A., Wendt-Nordahl G., Michel M.S., Alken P. Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20:19–24. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1663-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Policastro L.J., Saggi S.J., Goldfarb D.S., Weiss J.P. Personalized intervention in monogenic stone formers. J Urol. 2018;199:623–632. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Calonge M.J., Gasparini P., Chillarón J., Chillón M., Gallucci M., Rousaud F., et al. Cystinuria caused by mutations in rBAT, a gene involved in the transport of cystine. Nat Genet. 1994;6:420–425. doi: 10.1038/ng0494-420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Feliubadaló L., Font M., Purroy J., Rousaud F., Estivill X., Nunes V., et al. Non-type I cystinuria caused by mutations in SLC7A9, encoding a subunit (bo,+AT) of rBAT. Nat Genet. 1999;23:52–57. doi: 10.1038/12652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Thomas K., Wong K., Withington J., Bultitude M., Doherty A. Cystinuria-a urologist's perspective. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:270–277. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Torres R.J., Puig J.G. Hypoxanthine-guanine phosophoribosyltransferase (HPRT) deficiency: Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:48. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zoref E., De Vries A., Sperling O. Mutant feedback-resistant phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase associated with purine overproduction and gout. Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate and purine metabolism in cultured fibroblasts. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:1093–1099. doi: 10.1172/JCI108183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Roessler B.J., Nosal J.M., Smith P.R., Heidler S.A., Palella T.D., Switzer R.L., et al. Human X-linked phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity is associated with distinct point mutations in the PRPS1 gene. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:26476–26481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Matsuo H., Chiba T., Nagamori S., Nakayama A., Domoto H., Phetdee K., et al. Mutations in glucose transporter 9 gene SLC2A9 cause renal hypouricemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:744–751. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ng N., Kaur A., Shenoy M. Recurrent kidney stones in a child with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome: answers. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34:425–427. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bhasin B., Stiburkova B., De Castro-Pretelt M., Beck N., Bodurtha J.N., Atta M.G. Hereditary renal hypouricemia: a new role for allopurinol? Am J Med. 2014;127:e3–e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ichida K., Matsumura T., Sakuma R., Hosoya T., Nishino T. Mutation of human molybdenum cofactor sulfurase gene is responsible for classical xanthinuria type II. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282:1194–1200. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ichida K., Amaya Y., Kamatani N., Nishino T., Hosoya T., Sakai O. Identification of two mutations in human xanthine dehydrogenase gene responsible for classical type I xanthinuria. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2391–2397. doi: 10.1172/JCI119421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zaki M.S., Selim L., El-Bassyouni H.T., Issa M.Y., Mahmoud I., Ismail S., et al. Molybdenum cofactor and isolated sulphite oxidase deficiencies: clinical and molecular spectrum among Egyptian patients. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20:714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Reiss J., Hahnewald R. Molybdenum cofactor deficiency: mutations in GPHN, MOCS1, and MOCS2. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:10–18. doi: 10.1002/humu.21390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Bollée G., Dollinger C., Boutaud L., Guillemot D., Bensman A., Harambat J., et al. Phenotype and genotype characterization of adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:679–688. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009080808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Runolfsdottir H.L., Palsson R., Agustsdottir I.M., Indridason O.S., Edvardsson V.O. Kidney disease in adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:431–438. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Edvardsson V.O., Runolfsdottir H.L., Thorsteinsdottir U.A., Sch Agustsdottir I.M., Oddsdottir G.S., Eiriksson F., et al. Comparison of the effect of allopurinol and febuxostat on urinary 2,8-dihydroxyadenine excretion in patients with Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency (APRTd): a clinical trial. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;48:75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Langman C.B. A rational approach to the use of sophisticated genetic analyses of pediatric stone disease. Kidney Int. 2018;93:15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
