Abstract
Bacterial protein toxins are secreted by certain bacteria and are responsible for mild to severe diseases in humans and animals. They are among the most potent molecules known, which are active at very low concentrations. Bacterial protein toxins exhibit a wide diversity based on size, structure, and mode of action. Upon recognition of a cell surface receptor (protein, glycoprotein, and glycolipid), they are active either at the cell surface (signal transduction, membrane damage by pore formation, or hydrolysis of membrane compound(s)) or intracellularly. Various bacterial protein toxins have the ability to enter cells, most often using an endocytosis mechanism, and to deliver the effector domain into the cytosol, where it interacts with an intracellular target(s). According to the nature of the intracellular target(s) and type of modification, various cellular effects are induced (cell death, homeostasis modification, cytoskeleton alteration, blockade of exocytosis, etc.). The various modes of action of bacterial protein toxins are illustrated with representative examples. Insights in toxin evolution are discussed.
Keywords: bacteria, toxins, mechanism of action, superantigen, enterotoxin, neurotoxin, pore-forming toxin
1. Introduction
Among the huge number of bacterial species, only a few of them are pathogenic for humans and animals and are responsible for mild to severe diseases. Bacterial pathogenicity is mediated by various factors. Two main types of pathogenicity factors can be considered, those that promote bacterial colonization and invasion of the host leading to infection and disease such as virulence factors involved in adhesion to host cells, invasion of non-phagocytic cells, intracellular motility, resistance to host defenses, and those which cause host cell damages, notably toxins. Bacterial toxins include protein toxins (exotoxins), which are secreted mainly through the Sec pathway in the external medium and endotoxins, which are bacterial wall constituents, mainly lipopolysaccharides. Thus, toxigenic bacteria secrete specific poisons, called toxins, which are responsible for specific lesions and symptoms. Bacterial protein toxins diffuse locally at the bacterial colonization site and are transported to various sites or organs. In contrast to toxigenic bacteria, invasive bacteria first adhere to host target cells and then inject directly into cells virulence factors (also called effectors), which trigger an endocytosis mechanism and modify other cellular functions, thus facilitating the entry of the pathogen into the cell and subsequent persistence. Bacteria exploit various secretion pathways to export macromolecules. The type III secretion system, also called injectisome, is the most common secretion system used by Gram-negative invasive pathogens to deliver virulence factors directly into host cells [1,2,3]. Although bacterial protein toxins and virulence factors of invasive bacteria might share similar enzymatic activities, bacterial protein toxins retain the unique properties to diffuse in the extracellular space and to recognize specific cell surface receptors. Bacterial protein toxins are either active at the cell surface or enter cells and interact with the intracellular target(s) (Figure 1). This review is focused on the various action mechanism types of bacterial protein toxins through representative examples.
2. Interaction of Toxigenic Bacteria with the Host
The habitat of most toxigenic bacteria is the environment. The first line of host defense is the integrity of tegument and mucosa which line the compartments exposed to the environment (digestive, respiratory, and uro-genital compartments). The oral-gastro-intestinal tract is the most exposed compartment to environmental bacteria and pathogenic bacteria have developed multiple modes of interaction with the host barriers. Interactions of bacterial pathogen–host with the intestinal mucosa and gas gangrene pathogenesis are schematically presented (Figure 2).
2.1. Cross Talk between Bacterial Toxins/Toxigenic Bacteria and the Intestinal Mucosa
Bacteria from the environment, notably those ingested with food, usually do not colonize the digestive tract of a healthy host since the resident microflora (gut microbiota) prevents the growth of exogenous bacteria. The intestinal tract is a complex ecosystem that contains up to 1011 bacteria per gram in the colon of humans and several hundreds of species. A crucial function of the gut microbiota is the barrier effect against non-established bacteria [4,5,6,7]. Pathogens use various strategies to overcome the host defenses.
Certain toxigenic bacteria can grow and produce toxins in food. The ingestion of preformed toxins in food, referred to as intoxination, induces specific diseases such as food-borne botulism, staphylococcal food poisoning, and Bacillus cereus emetic syndrome (Figure 2A).
Alteration of the gut microbiota (dysbiosis) is an appropriate condition for growth and toxin production in the intestinal content by some enteric pathogens. A well-documented example is antibiotic-associated diarrhea due to Clostridioides (previously Clostridium) difficile. Antibiotics perturb the gut microbiota composition and function inhibiting the barrier effect against C. difficile. Thus, this pathogen can grow and synthesize potent toxins (toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB)) and the additional binary toxin (C. difficile transferase) according to the strains), leading to intestinal lesions and inflammation [8,9,10,11]. In Clostridium perfringens food poisoning, massive ingestion of bacteria allows the colonization resistance of the gut microbiota to be overcome and facilitates the multiplication and sporulation of C. perfringens in the content of the small intestine. Indeed, foods at risk of food poisoning contain at least 105 enterotoxigenic C. perfringens per gram but rarely preformed C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE). CPE is synthesized during the sporulation phase, which occurs in the intestinal tract and not in food and it is released subsequently to bacterial wall lysis in the intestinal content. Thus, the symptoms of C. perfringens food poisoning (diarrhea and abdominal pain) occur 8–24 h after the ingestion of contaminated food by C. perfringens, later than in the intoxination process of staphylococcal food poisoning (2–6 h), which is due to ingestion of preformed staphylococcal enterotoxins in food [12,13,14]. Another example of toxigenic bacteria growing in the intestinal content is provided by infant botulism. This disease occurs in newborns and infants up to one year old. A not fully developed or non-yet fully functional gut microbiota is a prerequisite condition for the growth of Clostrium botulinum and toxin production in the intestine, the contamination of which is mainly from the environment (Figure 2A) [15,16,17].
Colonizing bacteria express specific attachment factors to enterocytes and colonize the intestinal mucosa surface, which is one of the escape mechanisms to the colonization resistance mediated by the microbiota mainly localized in the gut lumen [6,18]. Some of them (Vibrio cholerae, enterotoxic Escherichia coli, …) produce potent enterotoxins responsible for intestinal disorders. Enteroinvasive bacteria use VFs injected into cells by type 3 secretion system (Shigella, enteroinvasive E. coli, Salmonella, …) or associated with the bacterial wall (Listeria) to promote their uptake into intestinal cells [19,20]. Salmonella typhi and Salmonella typhimurium invade the intestinal mucosa via M cells, epithelial cells, and macrophages and then can disseminate in lymph nodes and subsequently to various organs such as the liver and spleen (Figure 2A) [21,22]. The intracellular lifestyle of these pathogens facilitates their resistance to the host immune defenses.
2.2. Bacterial Toxins/Toxigenic Bacteria and Gas Gangrene
A characteristic model of bacterial gangrene pathogenesis is provided by clostridia such as C. perfringens. Clostridia are not invasive bacteria for healthy cells, they can enter a host through a wound. Local tissue destruction and hypoxia consecutive to the wound facilitates clostridium growth and subsequent toxin production such as C. perfringens α-toxin, perfringolysin (PFO), and hydrolytic enzymes (proteases, collagenases, hyaluronidases, etc.) (see below). Extension of tissue degradation by toxins allows the progression of bacterial growth and additional production of toxins. PFO and α-toxin induce a leucostasis and impair macrophage phagocytosis, resulting in the absence of tissue inflammatory response. Moreover, α-toxin causes platelet aggregation, obstruction of blood vessels, and subsequent tissue hypoxia. When higher amounts of toxins are produced, they are absorbed in the blood circulation and cause toxic shock and multi-organ failure [23,24,25] (Figure 2B).
3. Diversity in Bacterial Protein Toxins
Bacterial protein toxins exhibit a very wide diversity in molecules regarding their size, amino acid sequence, structure, and mode of action. They are single-chain proteins or multiproteins resulting from the non-covalent assembly of several proteins (binary, ternary, or more complex structures) with sizes ranging from small peptides (18–19 amino acids, Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxins (STs)) to large proteins (2710 amino acids for C. difficile toxin A (TcdA), 3500–5300 amino acids for multifunctional-autoprocessing repeats-in toxins (MARTX)) [26,27,28] (Figure 3). Single-chain protein and binary toxins are mostly produced by Gram-positive bacteria, while the other more complex multiprotein toxins are largely synthesized by Gram-negative bacteria.
Bacterial protein toxins contain distinct functional domains that drive their successive steps of activity in target cells. The first step of all bacterial protein toxins is the recognition of a cell surface receptor, which is mediated by a receptor binding domain, termed B domain or B subunit or component. Diverse cell membrane molecules are used as toxin receptors, proteins, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, which determine the toxin tropism such as neurotoxins for neuronal cells, enterotoxins for intestinal epithelial cells, leucotoxins for lymphocytes, hemolysins for red blood cells, and cytotoxins for a wide range of target cells. Many bacterial protein toxins are active through enzymatic activity and contain an enzymatic (A) domain or subunit. These toxins are referred to as AB toxins [29]. Intracellularly active toxins have additional domains, namely the translocation (T) domain, which facilitates the passage of the A domain into the cytosol, and the autoprocessing domain involved in the release of the A domain from the B domain. Most of the multiprotein AB toxins retain a complex structure, for example, one A subunit and five B subunits assembled in a pentamer (AB5: cholera toxin (CT), shiga toxin (ST)), two distinct A subunits and five B subunits (A2B5, typhoid toxin (TyT)), one A, and two B subunits (AB2, cytolethal distending toxin (CDT)). Pertussis toxin (PTX) has an AB5 structure with four distinct proteins in the B pentamer [29] (Figure 3).
Once bound to cell surface receptor(s), two main classes of bacterial protein toxins can be distinguished: those active on the cell membrane (signal transduction, membrane damage by pore formation, or hydrolysis of membrane compound(s)) and those active intracellularly. According to the intracellular target recognized by the A subunit of intracellularly active toxins and the type of modification, various cellular effects are observed (apoptosis, homeostasis, cytoskeleton alteration, blockade of exocytosis, etc.) (Figure 4).
Bacterial toxins exploit cellular mechanisms to enter the target cells. Two main endocytic pathways are used: a short pathway through early endosomes (EEs) and upon endosomal acidification translocation of the A subunit into the cytosol and a long pathway including EE/late endosomes (LEs), Golgi, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and ER secretion system such as Sec61/63 (Figure 4) [29,30]. Most single-chain protein toxins and binary toxins deliver their enzymatic domain or enzymatic component through the endosomal membrane of acidified EEs, whereas AB5 toxins, the B pentamer of which recognizes gangliosides or other glycoconjugates as receptors, use a long endocytic pathway through EE, LE, Golgi, and ER [29].
Interaction between bacterial toxin and cell receptor not only drives the cell specificity of toxins but also promotes membrane curvature that is required for membrane invagination and formation of endocytic vesicles. Most toxins that enter cells via a short pathway recognize cell membrane proteins as a receptor and use clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Polymerization of clathrin associated with the activity of accessory proteins triggers membrane invagination and the formation of clathrin-coated vesicles. Bacterial toxins, which use a long pathway such as cholera toxin (CT) and Shiga toxin (ST), interact with glycosphingolipids as receptors, namely GM1 and globotriaosylceramide, respectively (see below). Their pentameric structure of B components binds to multiple receptor molecules leading to membrane lipid reorganization and clustering of toxin–receptor complexes, which promote curvature and tubular membrane invagination [31,32,33].
4. Bacterial Protein Toxins Active at the Cell Membrane
4.1. Toxins Transducing a Transmembrane Signal and Hormone-Like Toxins
A typical example of bacterial toxin acting as a hormone-like is the thermostable enterotoxin type A (STa) of enterotoxigenic E. coli. STa is responsible for diarrhea in children and adults, such as travelers’ diarrhea and endemic diarrhea in developing countries, as well as in animals. Mature STa from human E. coli strains comprises 19 amino acids including 6 cysteines forming 3 intramolecular disulfide bonds. This compact structure confers heat resistance. STa shares a similar structure and 50% amino acid sequence homology with the hormone guanylin, which is produced in the intestine and regulates water and electrolyte fluxes in the gut. STa recognizes the intestinal guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C), a membrane enzyme of epithelial cells of small intestine and colon, as a receptor. Binding of STa to the extracellular domain of GC-C leads to GC-C dimerization and subsequent activation of the intracellular catalytic domain. This results in hydrolysis of guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP) and excessive formation of cyclic GMP (cGMP), which stimulates the protein kinase II and subsequently the phosphorylation of the Cl− channel called cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). In addition, cGMP inhibits the phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) leading to the accumulation of cAMP, activation of protein kinase A (PKA), additional activation of CFTR, and inhibition of the Na+ channel (Na+/H+-exchanger 3, NHE3), impairing the reabsorption of Na+ (Figure 5). Thus, STa mimics the role of guanylin by activating Cl− HCO3− and fluid secretion in the intestinal lumen but in contrast to guanylin, the effects of STa are irreversible and more potent. The studies of STa allowed the development of novel drugs modulating Cl− channels and novel strategies for the treatment of diarrheal diseases and colorectal cancer [28,34,35].
4.2. Toxins Superantigens
Superantigens (SAgs) are a family of potent mitogenic toxins produced mainly by Streptococcus spp. (notably S. pyogenes) and Staphylococcus aureus. They are 20–30 kDa single-chain proteins. Staphylococcal SAgs encompass staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs, at least 25 types SEA to SElZ and multiple variants), which are responsible for food-borne poisoning and the toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST). Eleven SAgs have been identified in S. pyogenes, which is involved in skin and soft tissue infections as well as in toxic shock syndrome. Additional SAgs have been reported in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Mycoplasma arthritidis [36].
SAgs bind simultaneously to two cell surface receptors on immune cells, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) type-II molecules on antigen-presenting cells and the T cell receptor (TCR) on lymphocytes T. SAgs retain a conserved structure, which consists of two domains containing binding sites separated by a central α-helix [36]. Thus, SAgs bypass the conventional antigen presentation, which consists of antigen phagocytosis, processing and peptide expression with MHC class II molecules on the antigen-presenting cell surface. Since SAgs recognize variable regions of TCR, up to 25% of T cells are activated compared to 0.001–0.0001% T cell activation in the conventional peptide presentation (Figure 6). The intense proliferation of both CD4 and CD8 T cells lead to massive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1-β, interleukin-2, and tumor necrosis factor α, which are responsible for fever and shock [36,37,38,39].
Staphylococcal food poisoning is characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and diarrhea occurring within 3–9 h after ingestion of food containing preformed SEs. The potent emetic activity of SEs is due to their ability to pass across the intestinal epithelium and to interact with mast cells in the lamina propria or in submucosa through unknown receptors and unknown mechanisms, leading to the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin), which activates the vagus nerve and subsequently the emetic center of the central nervous system [40,41,42].
4.3. Membrane-Damaging Toxins
Bacterial membrane-damaging toxins encompass pore-forming toxins (PFTs) and enzymatically active toxins against membrane compounds. They are the main toxins of bacteria involved in gangrene/myonecrosis and soft tissue infections. Certain PFTs interact specifically with the intestinal or lung epithelial barrier leading to specific diseases.
4.3.1. Bacterial Pore-Forming Toxins
Pore formation through the cell membrane is the most common mechanism of bacterial toxins. About 30% of bacterial toxins are PFTs [43]. PFTs can be divided into two main classes, α-PFTs and β-PFTs, according to their structure-based interaction with the lipid bilayer (Table 1). PFTs are secreted as soluble monomers, which bind to specific receptors on cell membranes, oligomerize, and form transmembrane pores. α-PFTs are rich in α-helices and use a bundle of amphipathic α-helices to build the transmembrane pore (Figure 7A and Figure 8). Cytolysin A (or hemolysin E) from E. coli is the prototype of the Cytolysin A family, which encompasses related hemolysins from Salmonella enterica and Shigella flexneri. Cytolysin A monomers show two domains, a head domain containing a small β-hairpin (β-tongue) and a tail domain consisting of five α-helices. Cytolysin A spontaneously oligomerizes into pore complexes in solution in the presence of detergent or in membrane. Assembly of the monomers in the dodecamer pore induces a conformational change. Notably, the β-tongue adopts an α-helical structure and the N-terminal helix swings upward. The bundle of the dodecameric N-terminal helices inserts into the membrane forming a mainly hydrophilic pore [44,45].
Repeat-in-ToXin (RTX) toxins constitute a vast toxin family that is produced by numerous Gram-negative bacteria. Representative RTX toxins are E. coli α-hemolysin (HlyA), Actinobacillus leucotoxins, Pasteurella leucotoxins, and Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase (CyaA) (Table 1). RTX toxins are single-chain proteins of 100–200 kDa, which contain glycine- and aspartate-rich nonapeptide repeated sequences in the C-terminal part. Calcium binding to the nonapeptide repeats is required for the acquisition of a functional conformation of RTX toxins. In addition, RTX toxins are activated through acylation at one or two lysines in the central region of the toxins. After binding to cell surface receptor(s), RTX toxins oligomerize and insert amphipathic N-terminal α-helices in the cell membrane that form a pore [46,47,48,49]. CyaA is distinct from the other RTX toxins by containing an N-terminal catalytic domain, which is an adenylate cyclase. CyaA is a major toxin of B. pertussis that contributes to its colonization by impairing the phagocytosis function in neutrophils and macrophages. CyaA uses the pore formed by the RTX domain to internalize the catalytic domain. Thus, CyaA promotes massive levels of cAMP and pores through the plasma membrane leading to inhibition of cellular functions and apoptosis [47,49,50,51]. A subfamily of the RTX toxins encompasses the MARTX toxins. MARTXs have been first identified in Vibrio sp. (V. cholerae and V. vulnificus) and then in numerous bacterial genera of Gram-negative bacteria such as Aeromonas, Chromobacterium, Photorhabdus, Proteus, Xenorhabdus, and Yersinia. They are very large single-chain proteins of 3500 to 5300 amino acids, which contain four regions: N-terminal repeats, central effector domains, cysteine protease domain, and C-terminal repeats. The repeat regions are involved in pore formation, which can lead to membrane disorganization and cell lysis. Pores also mediate the translocation into the cytosol of the central effector domains, which are processed by the cysteine protease domain. MARTX contains up to five cytopathic effectors such as alpha-beta hydrolase, actin crosslinking domain, adenylate cyclase, Rho-inactivating domain, Ras/Rap1 specific peptidase, and VIP2 (vegetative insecticidal protein2)-like protein, which impair cellular key functions leading to actin cytoskeleton alteration and cell rounding, inhibition of phagocytosis, inhibition of cell proliferation, and apoptosis [26,52,53,54].
Bacillus thuringiensis produces multiple insecticidal toxins including the three-domain parasporal crystal (3d-Cry) toxins, which are α-PFTs. Cry toxins are synthesized as 130 or 70 kDa proteins, which are solubilized and activated in the insect gut by proteolytic cleavage of N- and C-terminal parts. The Cry active form (65 kDa) is composed of three domains: domain II and III are involved in binding to receptors on insect intestinal cells and domain I, which contains seven a-helices, oligomerizes, and forms a channel through the cell membrane [55,56,57,58] (Figure 7A).
β-PFTs are divided into several families based on their structural conformation but they share a general mechanism of pore formation (Figure 7B and Figure 8). They contain at least three structural domains, namely receptor-binding, oligomerization, and pore-forming domains such as rim, cap, and stem domains of S. aureus α-toxin and related toxins. Most aerolysin family PFTs such as C. perfringens ε-toxin (ETX) retain a similar structure, except aerolysin, which contains an additional N-terminal domain (D1) involved in receptor binding with residues from domains 2 and 4 (Figure 7B). Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs) and binding components of binary toxins show also four domains.
Secreted β-PFTs soluble monomers bind to cell membrane receptor(s) through the C-terminal domain in CDCs, hemolysin, or S. aureus α-toxin family, binding components of binary toxins and N- or C-terminal domains in the PFT aerolysin family. Mobility of monomers bound to receptors on the membrane facilitates the interaction between monomers and subsequent oligomerization. Indeed, the main receptors of β-PFTs (cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins) are localized in membrane microdomains such as lipid rafts capable of lateral mobility [59]. Oligomerization through interactions between the other domains leads to the formation of prepore, which extends on the membrane surface. Binding to receptor and oligomerization trigger a conformational change in the central domain leading to the unfolding of a short α-helix into an amphipathic β-strand. The amphipathic β-strands from each monomer assemble into an amphipathic β-barrel. The prepore collapses and the amphipathic β-barrel inserts into the membrane forming a transmembrane pore (Figure 8) [60,61,62,63,64].
CDCs recognize cholesterol as a receptor, assemble in large oligomers (30–50 monomers), and use two transmembrane hairpins from each monomer to form large pores (Table 1) (Figure 7) [60,65,66]. CDCs are essentially produced by Gram-positive bacteria and PFO is the prototype of the CDC family [60,66,67,68]. PFO causes cell lysis and is a major toxin involved in C. perfringens gangrene and myonecrosis [25]. In contrast to most CDCs, which are active at neutral and acidic pH and act extracellularly, Listeriolysin O (LLO) has an optimal pH of activity at 5.5 and thus LLO preferentially lyses the membrane of host acidified phagosome, leading to the escape of Listeria into the cytosol. Moreover, LLO-specific N-terminal sequences (proline, glutamic acid, serine, and threonine (PEST)-like sequence) contribute to the toxin compartmentalization in phagosomes [69,70]. In addition to their direct cytotoxic effects by creating large pores and membrane alteration, CDCs can translocate specific effectors into cells through permeabilized membranes. Thereby, streptolysin O (SLO) mediates the internalization of S. pyogenes NAD-glycohydrolase, which contributes to the cytotoxicity and to the induction of inflammatory response [71].
β-PFTs from the aerolysin and hemolysin or S. aureus α-toxin families generate small pores by forming small oligomers (hepta- or octamers) in which each monomer contributes by only one amphipathic β-hairpin in the structure of the β-barrel (Figure 7B). Staphylococcal leucocidins are bicomponent toxins that use two distinct classes of proteins, S and F proteins, to form hetero-octameric pores in a 1:1 stoichiometry [72]. Recognition of receptors via the receptor binding domain drives the cell specificity of β-PFTs (Table 1). For example, S. aureus α-toxin, which interacts with various cell types including epithelial cells, as well as leucocidins, which target leukocytes, play a major role in S. aureus infections [72,73]. C. perfringens enterotoxin specifically recognizes the enterocytes and is responsible for C. perfringens foodborne poisoning [74,75], whereas C. perfringens ε-toxin, which is produced in the intestine, passes through the intestinal barrier without significant alteration of intestinal cells, transits in the blood circulation, targets kidney cells, crosses the blood–brain barrier, and interacts with neurons and oligodendrocytes leading to glutamate release and subsequent neurological symptoms of excitation [76].
β-PFTs induce membrane permeabilization leading to multiple effects in target cells. Early events consist of massive loss of intracellular K+ and ATP and entry of Na+ and Ca++. Changes in ion composition trigger multiple cellular responses such as activation of certain proteases and phosphatases, activation of signaling cascades such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and the inflammasome, changes in expression of certain genes, and cell death via necrosis or apoptosis (reviewed in [77,78,79]). For example, efflux of K+ by aerolysin triggers the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and activation of caspase-1 [80]. C. perfringens ε-toxin induces rapid depletion in K+ and ATP, leading to necrosis of renal cells [81,82]. High concentrations of C. perfringens enterotoxin promote Ca++ influx in intestinal cells and death by necrosis via activation of calpain and receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase-1 and -3 (RIP1 and RIP3) and assembly of mixed-lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL) [83].
Binding components of binary toxin such as the protective antigen (PA) of B. anthracis toxins share a similar four-domain structure with those of CDCs. However, they form small heptameric or octameric pores with only one amphipathic β-hairpin from each monomer in the β-barrel, similarly to aerolysin and S. aureus α-toxin (Figure 7B). Binding components play a major role in the internalization of the corresponding enzymatic components. Thereby, PA binds to cell surface receptors (capillary morphogenesis 2 (CMG2) and tumor endothelial marker 8 (TEM8)), which are localized in lipid rafts, oligomerizes, and traps either the edema factor (EF) or the lethal factor (LF), with one to five EF/LF molecules per heptamer or octamer. The whole assembled toxin is endocytosed in clathrin-coated vesicles. Upon acidification of EEs, the PA prepore inserts into the endosomal membrane, leading to a functional pore that allows the translocation of partially unfolded LF or EF into the cytosol [84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. The binding components, Ib and C2-II, of C. perfringens iota toxin and C. botulinum C2 toxin, respectively, recognize distinct cell surface receptors (Table 1) and use a similar mechanism as PA to translocate their enzymatic components, Ia and C2-I, respectively, into the cytosol from acidified endocytic vesicles [91,92].
Table 1.
Toxin Family | Toxins | Toxin Producing Organism | Receptor | Oligomers (Number of Monomers) | Pore Size | Disease/Activity | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-Pore-Forming Toxins | |||||||
Cytolysin A | Hemolysin E (or ClyA) | Escherichia coli | CD11/CD18 integrin | 12 | 3.5 nm | [44] | |
Non-hemolytic enterotoxin (NHeA) (tripartite toxin: NheA, NheB, NheC) | Bacillus cereus | cholesterol | ? | ~2 nm | food poisoning | [93,94,95] | |
hemolysin BL (Hbl-B) (tripartite toxin: Hbl-B, Hbl-L1, Hbl-L2) | Bacillus cereus | LITAF, CDIP1 | 7–8 | 1–2 nm | hemolysis, enterotoxicity | [96,97,98] | |
RTX | α-hemolysin (HlyA) |
Escherichia coli | CD11/CD18 integrin, glycophorin | ? | 1.1–2 nm | virulence factor associated with CNF in uropathogenic E. coli | [46,99,100] |
Adenylate cyclase (CyaA) | Bordetella pertussis | CD11b/CD18 integrin | variable 12? |
0.6–0.8 nm | Translocation of the catalytic domain, whooping cough |
[50,101,102,103] | |
MARTX |
Vibrio vulnificus
Aeromonas hydrophila |
? | 1.8 nm | delivery of effector domains, intestinal tissue destruction | [26,53,104] | ||
3d-Cry Toxins | Three domain Crystal (Cry) Toxins | Bacillus thuringiensis | cadherin, ABC transporter subfamily C2, aminopeptidase, alkaline phosphatase | 4 | 4–5 nm | insecticidal activity | [55,56,57,58] |
β-Pore-Forming Toxins | |||||||
Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs) | Perfringolysin O (PFO) | Clostridium perfringens | cholesterol, glycans | 40–50 | 25–45 nm | myonecrosis, gangrene | [66,105,106] |
Botunolysin | Clostridium botulinum | cholesterol | 30–50 | hemolysis | [65] | ||
Tetanolysin | Clostridum tetani | cholesterol | 30–50 | hemolysis | [65] | ||
Streptolysin O (SLO) | Streptococcus pyogenes | cholesterol, glycans | 50–80 | 30 nm | hemolysis | [106,107] | |
Listeriolysin O (LLO) | Listeria monocytogenes | cholesterol, glycans | 30–50 | 30 nm | Listeria vacuolar escape | [106,108] | |
Intermedilysin (ILY) | Streptococcus intermedius | cholesterol, CD59, N-linked glycan | 30–50 | 25–30 nm | tissue destruction | [106,109,110] | |
Pneumolysin (PLY) | Streptococcus pneumoniae | cholesterol, glycans | 44 | 26 nm | pneumonia, meningitis, otitis | [106,111] | |
Anthrolysin (ALO) | Bacillus anthracis | cholesterol, glycans | 30–50 | [65,106] | |||
Aerolysin | Aerolysin | Aeromonas sp. | GPI-anchored proteins | 7 | 0.7–1.7 nm | [112,113,114,115] | |
ε-toxin (ETX) | Clostridium perfringens | HAVCR1, MAL | 7 | 1–2.4 nm | animal enterotoxemia | [116,117,118] | |
Enterotoxin (CPE) | Clostridium perfringens | Claudins | 7 | 1.4 nm | food poisoning | [119,120,121,122] | |
α-toxin | Clostridium septicum | GPI-anchored proteins | 6, 7 | 1.2–1.6 nm | myonecrosis, gangrene | [123,124,125] | |
Cry toxins of ETX-MTX subfamily, Mosquitocidal toxin (MTX) |
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus sphaericus |
insect gut receptor | insecticidal activity | [126] | |||
Hemolysin or S. aureus α-toxin | α-toxin | Staphylococcus aureus | Phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, ADAM10 disintegrin |
6, 7 | 1.4–3 nm | skin necrosis, soft tissue infections | [127] |
Panton-Valentine leucocidin LukS-LukF | Staphylococcus aureus | C5aR | 8 | 1.9–2.1 nm | necrotizing pneumonia | [72,128,129,130] | |
γ-hemolysin (HlgA/HlgB-HlgC) | Staphylococcus aureus | CXCR1, CXCR2, CCR2, C5aR | 8 | 2.5–3 nm | skin, soft tissue infections | [72,131,132,133] | |
Leucocidin LukA-LukB (LukGH) |
Staphylococcus aureus | CD11b, HVCN1 | 8 | 3 nm | soft tissue infections | [134,135,136] | |
Leucocidin LukE-LukD | Staphylococcus aureus | CCR2, CCR5, CXCR1, CXCR2, DARC | 8 | 1.9–2.1 nm | soft tissue infections | [137,138,139,140] | |
Beta-toxin | Clostridium perfringens | Platelet endotheial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD31) | 8 | 1.2–2.0 nm | necrotic enteritis | [141,142] | |
Net-B | Clostridium perfringens | cholesterol | 7 | 1.6 nm | necrotic enteritis | [143] | |
Delta-toxin | Clostridium perfringens | monosialo-ganglioside (GM2) | 7 | 4 nm | [144,145] | ||
CctA | Clostridium chauvoei | myonecrosis, blackleg | [146] | ||||
Vibrio cholerae cytolysin (VCC) | Vibrio cholerae | Glycoconjugates | 7 | 2.5 nm | hemolysis enterotoxicity |
[147,148,149] | |
Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin | Vibrio vulnificus | gangliosides, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, N-acetyl-D-lactosamine | 7 | apoptosis | [150,151] | ||
Binding components of binary toxins | Protective Antigen (PA) | Bacillus anthracis | capillary morphogenesis protein 2 (CMG2), tumor endothelial marker 8 (TEM8) | 7 | 1.2 nm | Translocation of the enzymatic components EF, LF | [89,90,152,153,154] |
Iota toxin B component (Ib) | Clostridium perfringens | lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor | 7 | 1 nm | Translocation of Ia | [92,155,156] | |
C2 toxin B component (C2-II) | Clostridium botulinum C and D | 7 | 1–2 nm | Translocation of C2-I necrotic enteritis |
[116] | ||
Clostridium difficile transferase (CDTb) | Clostridioides difficile | lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor | 7 | Translocation of CDTa pseudomembranous colitis |
[155,157] | ||
Vegetative insecticidal protein B component (VIP1) | Bacillus thuringiensis | insect midgut membrane receptor | 7? | Translocation of enzymatic component | [158,159] |
MARTX, multifunctional autoprocessing repeats-in-toxin 10; CctA, Clostridium chauvoei toxin A; DARC, Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines; LITAF, LPS-induced TNF-α factor; CDIP1, cell death involved p53 target 1; HVCN1, human voltage-gated channel 1.
4.3.2. Enzymatically Active Toxins against Membrane Compound(s)
Bacteria, notably fermentative bacteria such as clostridia, secrete various hydrolytic enzymes (proteases, phospholipases, carbohydrases, nucleases, hyaluronidases, sialidases, urease, etc.). These enzymes degrade environmental organic substrates into smaller size compounds such as peptides, monosaccharides, and nucleotides, which are transported into bacteria for their metabolism. Certain hydrolytic enzymes are potent toxins involved in tissue degradation, colonization, and dissemination of pathogens in the host [161].
Bacterial Phospholipases and Sphingomyelinases
Phospholipases are the most predominant bacterial toxins active on cell membranes through enzymatic activity. A representative toxin of this class of toxins is the C. perfringens α-toxin, which is a 43 kDa single-chain protein containing two structural domains. The α-helical N-terminal domain contains the active site and the β-sandwich C-terminal domain is the receptor binding domain [162] (Figure 9). C. perfringens α-toxin is the major toxin involved in C. perfringens gangrene and acts synergistically with PFO [25,163,164]. The C-terminal domain binds to packed phospholipids of intact membranes in a Ca++-dependent manner. This induces conformational changes of loops 1 and 2, which are on each side of the zinc-binding enzymatic site, thus leading to an active conformation of the toxin [162,165]. C. perfringens α-toxin is a zinc phospholipase C that preferentially cleaves phosphatidylcholine, yielding phosphorylcholine and diacylglycerol. In addition, sphingomyelin is cleaved into phosphorylcholine and ceramide. C. perfringens α-toxin is the first bacterial toxin that has been identified to display an enzymatic activity [166]. At high concentrations, C. perfringens α-toxin degrades membrane phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin leading to membrane disruption and cell lysis. Thereby, C. perfringens α-toxin induces myonecrosis and hemolysis. Moreover, diacylglycerol and ceramide, which are released by sublytic doses of C. perfringens α-toxin, activate various signal transduction pathways including activation of endogenous phospholipases A2, C, and D as well as protein kinase C, thus leading to multiple cellular effects. Upregulation of the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 (ELAM-1) causes the accumulation of neutrophils in blood vessels and subsequent thrombosis. Impaired neutrophil migration to infected tissues facilitates the growth and dissemination of C. perfringens. Indeed, C. perfringens gangrene is characterized by the absence of neutrophil infiltration in infected tissues. In addition, activation of the arachidonic cascade generates thromboxane A2, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins, which promote local inflammation and vasoconstriction. Increased production of interleukin-8, TNFα, and platelet-activating factor (PAF) are responsible for local inflammation with increased vascular permeability, edema, and platelet aggregation [167,168,169,170]. Passage of C. perfringens α-toxin and PFO in the blood circulation causes intravascular hemolysis, cardiovascular collapse, shock, and organ failure [171,172,173].
Various bacterial pathogens produce either bacterial wall-associated or secreted phospholipases/sphingomyelinases, which contribute to their pathogenicity (Table 2) [174,175,176,177].
Table 2.
Bacteria | Toxin/Enzyme | Enzyme Class | Substrate Specificity | Role in Pathogenicity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bacillus anthracis | SMase PI-PLC | SMC, PLC | SM, PI, PC | macrophage associated growth of B. anthracis, bacterial escape from phagosome |
Bacillus cereus | SMase | SMC | SM | evasion of macrophage |
PLC | PLC | PC, PE, PS | hemolysis | |
Clostridium novyi | γ-toxin | PLC | PC, PE, PI, LPC, PG, SM | myonecrosis |
Clostridium perfringens | α-toxin | PLC, SMC | PC, PE, PI, PG, PS, SM | gas gangrene |
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis | SMD | SM, LPC | platelet aggregation, intravascular coagulation, endothelial hyperpermeability, bacterial spreading | |
Helicobacter pylori | SMC | SM | apoptosis in gastric cells | |
PldA1 | PLA2 | PC | hemolysis, bacterial survival and growth at low pH | |
Legionella pneumophila | PlaB | PLA2 | PC, PG | hemolysis, destruction of lung surfactant |
VipD/PatA | PLA2 | PC, LPC | establishment of bacterial niche | |
Listeria monocytogenes | PLC-B | PLC, SMC | PC, PE, PS, SM | bacterial escape from phagosome bacterial cell to cell spreading |
PLC-A | PLC | PI | ||
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | PLC-A, PLC-B, PLC-C, PLC-D | acid phosphatases | PC, SM | pulmonary infection, necrosis of alveolar macrophages |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | PLC-H | acid phosphatases | PC, LPC, PE, PG, SM | cytotoxic to human monocytes and endothelial cells, hemolysis, platelet aggregation and thrombosis |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ExoU | PLA2 | PC, PE, PA, PI | focal adhesion disruption, cytoskeleton alteration, inflammatory response |
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium | SseJ | PLA1 and GCATase | endosomal tabulation and establishment of bacterial intracellular niche | |
Staphylococcus aureus | β-toxin | SMC | SM, LPC | bacterial survival in neutrophils, cytotoxic to neutrophils and monocytes |
PI-LPI | PLC | PI, LPI | bacterial survival in neutrophils | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | SlaA | PLA2 | PC, PE, PS, LPC | bacterial adherence to host cells, cytotoxicity |
PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidylserine; PLC, phospholipase C; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositol; SM, sphingomyelin; SMC sphingomyelinase C; SMD, sphingomyelinase D; GCATase, cholesterol acyl transferase.
Collagenases and Proteases
Certain pathogens secrete potent and specific collagenases and proteases, which contribute to their pathogenesis. Thereby, Clostridium histolyticum is responsible for severe myonecrosis and gangrene and secrete collagenases as major toxins. C. histolyticum produces at least seven forms of collagenases (68 to 130 kDa), which process from two protein precursors encoded by two distinct genes. C. histolyticum collagenases are generated by proteolytic removal of C-terminal fragments and belong to two classes, namely class I (ColG) and class II (ColH). Despite the low level of amino acid sequence identity, C. histolyticum collagenases share a common structural organization with a C-terminal receptor-binding domain and an N-terminal enzymatic domain containing the zinc-dependent protease motif HExxH. C. histolyticum attacks all collagen types and gelatin through multiple cleavages at PxGP motifs in the collagen triple helix, thus causing severe destruction of connective tissue [178,179,180,181,182,183,184].
C. perfringens secretes a collagenase, ColA (or κ-toxin) related to ColG, hyaluronidase, and sialidase, which likely contribute to the gangrene lesions [183,185].
Certain Bacteroides fragilis strains secrete an enterotoxin and are responsible for acute and chronic intestinal diseases in children and adults as well as in young animals. In addition, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis plays a role in colorectal cancer [186,187]. B. fragilis enterotoxin (BFT) is a 21 kDa zinc-dependent protease that exists in three closely related isoforms. BFT is secreted as an inactive protoxin, which is activated by proteolytic removal of an N-terminal 170 amino acid domain. The catalytic C-terminal domain (190 amino acids) contains the zinc protease motif HExxH and shows structural similarity with the adamalysin/ADAM protease family from eukaryotes [188]. BFT cleaves the extracellular domain of E-cadherin leading to impaired intercellular junctions, morphological changes of intestinal epithelial cells, and increased mucosal permeability [189,190]. Cleavage of the E-cadherin extracellular domain induces the release of β-catenin, which links the E-cadherin intracellular domain to actin filaments. Nuclear translocation of β-catenin upregulates the c-myc pathway leading to cell proliferation. BFT-induced E-cadherin cleavage stimulates signaling pathways such as MAPKs and subsequently NF-κB, resulting in increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines (IL-8), increased fluid secretion, and inflammatory responses. However, BFT promotes host defenses in the late period after exposure including activation of autophagy and delayed apoptosis, as well as negative regulation of the NF-κB pathway by accumulation of β-catenin in nuclei in the late period. Thus, long-term carriage of enterotoxigenic B. fragilis exposes to the risk of chronic intestinal disease and oncogenic transformation mediated by activation of pro-carcinogenic and inflammatory cascades including c-myc, NF-κB, and IL-17 [187,188,189,191,192,193,194].
5. Bacterial Protein Toxins Active Intracellularly
Bacterial protein toxins, which are active intracellularly, contain at least three functional domains: a receptor binding domain, translocation domain, and catalytic domain, which is released into the cytosol. Single-chain protein toxins such as DT and clostridial neurotoxins are cleaved between the catalytic domain (A) and the rest of the molecule by bacterial or eukaryotic proteases in the external medium. Both toxin fragments remain linked by a disulfide bridge, which is reduced by the thioredoxin–thioredoxin reductase system for the passage through the endosomal membrane [195,196]. Single-chain protein toxins from the large clostridial glucosylating toxins (LCGTs) such as C. difficile TcdA and TcdB contain a cysteine protease domain (CPD), which cleaves the catalytic domain from the rest of the molecule during the translocation of A through the endosomal membrane. The C-terminal part of LCGTs contains repetitive sequences (combined repetitive oligopeptides, CROPs), which in closed conformation prevent CPD-dependent autoprocessing, whereas the open conformation is suitable for toxin binding to the receptor and CPD interaction [197,198,199]. In the AB5 toxins, the A fragment is proteolytically cleaved into A1 and A2, which are linked by a disulfide bridge. AB5 toxins use a long endocytic pathway and the A1 fragment translocates into the cytosol through the ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway. Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) dissociates the A1 domain from A2, which links A1 to the B pentamer, and unfolds A1 for its transport to the cytosol [200,201]. Binary toxins translocate the enzymatic component into the cytosol through channels formed by the oligomerized binding components in the endosomal membrane (see above). Thereby, bacterial protein toxins use different strategies to protect and transport the intracellularly active domain into the cytosol: toxin activation by proteolytic cleavage in the external medium and a disulfide bridge between catalytic and transport domains, which are reduced in the cellular translocation compartment, or autoproteolytic cleavage of the catalytic domain under control by a dynamic C-terminal domain. Thus, translocation of the A domain either through pores in the endosomal membrane (binary toxins), T domain-mediated chaperone mechanism (single-chain protein toxins), or using the ER secretion pathway (AB5 toxins) requires protein unfolding. This is achieved by acidic pH and/or host cell chaperones such as heat shock proteins Hsp70 and disulfide bridge-reducing proteins. Then, refolding into the active A domain conformation in the cytosol is assisted by host cell chaperones such as Hsp90, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase of the cyclophilin, and FK506-binding protein families [196,200,202,203]. Structures of representative bacterial protein toxins that are active intracellularly are shown in Figure 10.
5.1. Toxins Inducing Cell Death
Cell killing is a major effect of bacterial toxins. Various strategies are used by bacterial toxins to induce cell death.
Diphtheria toxin (DT) is one of the most potent cytolethal toxins. DT is produced by Corynebacterium diphtheriae, the causative agent of a pharyngeal infection called diphtheria. DT is a single-chain protein of 58 kDa. The C-terminal receptor binding domain interacts with the transmembrane glycoprotein, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor precursor (proHB EGF), and drives DT into endocytic vesicles. DT is cleaved between the A and T domains by the cell protease, furin. Both fragments remain linked by a disulfide bridge. Acidification of EEs induces a conformational change in DT, allowing insertion of the central T domain, which is constituted of 10 α-helices, into the endosomal membrane and subsequent translocation of the N-terminal catalytic (A) domain into the cytosol. The A domain catalyzes the ADP-ribosylation of the elongation factor-2 (EF-2). Thus, DT cleaves NAD and transfers the ADP(adenine diphosphate)-ribose to a diphthamide (post-translationally modified histidine) at position 699 of EF-2 (Figure 11 and Figure 12), leading to inactive EF-2 and subsequent inhibition of protein synthesis and cell death. It is assumed that a single DT molecule can kill one cell [204,205,206,207].
Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A (ExoA) shares a similar mechanism of action with DT despite a different structure organization. ExoA is a single-chain protein of 68 kDa with three functional domains: A, T, and B. In contrast to DT, the receptor-binding domain (B) is in the N-terminal region and the A domain is in the C-terminal position. ExoA receptor is the α2-macroglobulin receptor/low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein (LRP). ExoA enters cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis, is activated by furin, and is transported from EEs to the Golgi and then ER. The A domain is delivered into the cytosol through Sec63. Similarly to DT, ExoA ADP-ribosylates diphthamide 699 of EF-2 and blocks the protein synthesis [208,209,210].
Shiga toxin (ST) is produced by Shigella dyssenteriae and ST-like toxins (STLs) by enterohemorrhagic E. coli such as E. coli O157. ST and STLs retain an AB5 structure. The ST pentamer of B subunits recognizes globotriaosylceramide Gb3 as a receptor on target cells. ST is endocytosed and transits through the EE, Golgi, and ER. In the trans-Golgi network, the A domain is proteolytically cleaved into A1 (27.5 kDa), which contains the enzymatic site and the linker A2 (4.5 kDa); both domains remain linked by a disulfide bridge. In the ER, the disulfide bond is reduced and A1 is translocated into the cytosol through the ERAD pathway. The ST domain A1 is an RNA N-glucosidase that cleaves 28S ribosomal RNA, leading to inhibition of protein synthesis and cell death [211,212] (Figure 12).
Anthrax lethal toxin is a binary toxin constituted of PA and LF (see above). The LF structure shows four domains, the N-terminal domain 1 binds to PA oligomers, domains 2 and 3 are involved in substrate recognition, and domain 4 contains the zinc-dependent metalloprotease site. PA mediates the internalization of LF into the cytosol (see above). LF cleaves MAPKKs resulting in decreased gene transcription and subsequent cell death. Notably, LF induces apoptosis of macrophages and dendritic cells [85,213,214,215,216,217].
Cytolethal distending toxins (CDTs), also called genotoxins, are tripartite toxins including two binding components (CdtA, 25 kDa, and CdtC, 20 kDa) and one enzymatic domain (CdtB, 30 kDa). The CDT nomenclature does not correspond to “A” enzymatic domain and “B” receptor-binding domain. CDTs are produced by more than 30 bacterial pathogens, mostly Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Haemophilus ducreyi, S. dyssenteriae, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The three proteins assemble in the bacterial periplasm and are secreted as a mature holotoxin. CdtA and CdtC interact with glycan structures harbored by a broad range of gangliosides and N-linked glycoproteins and mediate the toxin endocytosis. CdtB undergoes a retrograde transport through the Golgi and ER. CdtB probably uses the ERAD pathway to exit from the ER and enter the nucleus thanks to its nuclear localization sequences. CdtB shares a similar structure with DNase I and cuts DNA but with a lower efficiency than DNase I. This results in cell cycle arrest and cell death by apoptosis, notably in lymphocytes and monocytes, which are highly susceptible to CDT intoxication. Certain cells can survive by activating DNA repair mechanisms. However, this can induce genomic instability with enhanced mutation frequency and capacity to grow in an anchorage-independent manner leading to carcinogenesis [218,219,220,221] (Figure 12).
Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium responsible for chronic gastritis which can evolve into severe diseases such as peptic ulcer, lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. One of the main virulence factors is the vacuolating toxin VacA. VacA is synthesized as a 140 kDa prototoxin that undergoes proteolytic N- and C-terminal cleavages and is secreted as a mature 88 kDa protein. VacA is further cleaved into N-terminal 33 kDa and C-terminal 55 kDa fragments, which remain non-covalently linked. VacA oligomerizes in solution and disassembles at acidic pH. It is proposed that VacA monomers bind to cell membrane unknown receptor(s), oligomerize, insert into the membrane, and accumulate intracellularly. VacA develops multiple cellular effects such as vacuolation, autophagy, activation of p38 MAPK, increased cell membrane permeability, and paracellular permeability. A prominent effect consists of cell death by apoptosis through alteration of the mitochondria membrane. VacA targets mitochondria and forms channels in the mitochondrial membrane stimulating the release of cytochrome c and other mitochondrial proteins into the cytosol leading to apoptosis. In addition, VacA activates the proapoptotic factors BAX and BAK [222,223,224] (Figure 12).
5.2. Toxins Perturbing Cell Homeostasis
Certain bacterial toxins modulate host cell signaling pathways without inducing cell death. This is the case notably for various bacterial enterotoxins which induce active secretion of water and electrolytes from enterocytes.
Cholera toxin (CT) is synthesized by Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera. CT and heat-labile (LT) enterotoxins from enterotoxigenic E. coli, which induce cholera-like diarrheas, share a similar AB5 structure with that of ST. The B pentamer of CT and LTs binds to GM1 gangliosides that are localized in lipid rafts of cell membranes such as in enterocytes. The interaction of CTB subunits with multiple GM1 molecules with particular ceramide structures induces membrane curvature and further toxin endocytosis via clathrin-dependent or clathrin-independent pathways according to the cell type. CTA1 is the catalytic domain and is linked to the CTB pentamer through the CTA2 polypeptide by non-covalent bonds. CTA is activated by proteolytic cleavage between CTA1 and CTA2, with both chains remaining linked by a disulfide bridge. The C-terminal sequence, KDEL of CTA2, enhances the retrograde transport from EE, through the trans-Golgi network, and then to the ER. The disulfide bond between CTA1 and CTA2 is reduced and the ER chaperone protein disulfide isomerase facilitates the CTA1 dissociation from the rest of the toxin. Dissociated CTA1 spontaneously unfolds and uses the ERAD pathway with both Sec61 and Hrd1 translocons to enter the cytosol. CTA1 refolds with the help of the cytosolic chaperone Hsp90 and binds to the ADP-ribosylation factor ARF6, which activates CTA1 by inducing an active conformational change. Then, CTA1 ADP-ribosylates (Figure 11 and Figure 13) the α subunit of the stimulatory heterotrimeric G-protein (Gsα) at Arg201 leading to inhibition of the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gsα, which remains bound to GTP and thus in permanently in an active conformation. Continuous stimulation of adenylate cyclase by CT ADP-ribosylated Gsα results in a massive increase in intracellular cAMP levels and subsequent activation of protein kinase A, which phosphorylates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). This leads to the active secretion of Cl− and water (Figure 13) [225,226,227,228].
Pertussis toxin (PTX) is one of the main toxins produced by B. pertussis, which is responsible for whooping cough. PTX belongs to the AB5 toxin family with one catalytic subunit (S1, 28 kDa) and five B subunits. However, in contrast to CT and ST, the PTX B pentamer consists of four distinct proteins: S2 (23 kDa), S3 (22 kDa), S4 (11.7 kDa, two copies), and S5 (9.3 kDa). PTX recognizes glycoconjugates as receptors and thus targets a wide variety of cells. PTX undergoes receptor-mediated endocytosis and follows a retrograde transport from EE to ER through the Golgi similarly to CT and ST. In the ER, S1 dissociates from the B pentamer and translocates into the cytosol through the ERAD pathway. PTX is an ADP-ribosyltransferase that targets the inhibitory heterotrimeric G-protein Giα at Cys-351 in the C-terminus. ADP-ribosylation (Figure 13) of Giα in its C-terminal domain impairs the interaction with its effectors, thus yielding inactive Giα. Adenylate cyclase, which no longer receives negative signals, massively catalyzes the formation of cAMP leading to stimulation of cAMP-dependent signaling pathways through PKA. In addition, PTX mediates ADP-ribosylation-independent effects through the interaction of the B pentamer with receptors such as lymphocytosis, inhibition of chemotaxis, modulation of innate and adaptive immune response including stimulation of dendritic cells and T cells, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Figure 13) [229,230].
Anthrax edema toxin uses the same mechanism for cell entry as anthrax lethal toxin. PA internalizes the edema factor (EF) through pores in the membrane of acidified endosomes. EF (89 kDa) is an adenylate cyclase, which, as the intrinsic eukaryotic adenylate cyclase, promotes the elevation of cAMP levels. This results in the stimulation of regulatory pathways controlled by cAMP through PKA and exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac). A prominent effect in the host is the production of edema and vascular dysfunctions (Figure 13) [214,217].
5.3. Toxins Targeting the Actin Cytoskeleton
Actin is one of the most abundant proteins in all cells. Actin is in a dynamic equilibrium between monomers and filaments, which polymerize at one end and disassemble at the opposite extremity. The actin cytoskeleton contributes to cell morphology and various cell functions such as locomotion, endocytosis, exocytosis, trafficking of intercellular organelles, and maintenance of intercellular junctions. Various bacterial toxins target the actin cytoskeleton directly or indirectly.
5.3.1. Actin ADP-Ribosylating Toxins
Clostridial binary toxins (C. perfringens Iota toxin, C. botulinum C2 toxin, C. difficile binary toxin or transferase, and C. spiroforme toxin) and related binary toxins of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensis (vegetative insecticidal proteins) share a similar organization with B. anthracis toxins consisting of binding and enzymatic components. Binding components recognize a cell surface receptor (lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor, LSR, for Iota toxin and C. difficile transferase, and asparagine-linked carbohydrates for C2 toxin), form heptamers, and trap the corresponding enzymatic components. Binary toxins are receptor-mediated endocytosed. Acidification of EE triggers the insertion of oligomers into the EE membrane and the formation of functional pores allowing the transfer of the enzymatic components into the cytosol. Translocation of the enzymatic component also requires cytosolic chaperones [158,231,232,233,234]. The intracellular activity of clostridial and related Bacillus binary toxins consists of monoADP-ribosylation of actin monomers at Arg177 that is located in the interface between actin monomers. This results in the inhibition of actin polymerization at the plus or growing end of actin filaments while the depolymerization at the minus end is preserved. Whereas C. perfringens Iota toxin, C. difficile transferase, and C. spiroforme toxin ADP-ribosylates all actin isoforms, C2 toxin only modifies β/γ non-muscle and γ-smooth muscle actin isoforms. Thereby, intoxicated cells show a complete disorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, with actin being totally in its monomeric form. The impairment of the cytoskeleton alters the integrity of endothelial and epithelial barriers leading to an increased permeability. These toxins induce necrotic and hemorrhagic enteritis in animals. C. difficile transferase is an additional virulence factor in C. difficile infections in humans [158].
Photorhabdus luminescens is a Gram-negative entomopathogenic bacterium that colonizes the gut of nematodes and produces several toxins targeting the actin cytoskeleton. PTC3 is a toxin complex containing the binding component TcdA1 that retains a pentameric structure, the linker TcdB2 component, and the enzymatic TccC3 component. TccC3 is an ADP-ribosyltransferase that modifies all isoforms of actin at Thr148, as well as in the monomeric form and assembled in filaments. ADP-ribosylation at Thr148 impairs the binding to thymosin-β4, which is a sequestering actin protein, and prevents actin polymerization. Therefore, ADP-ribosylation at Thr148 induces an opposite effect to that of Arg177 by promoting actin polymerization instead of inhibition of actin filament assembly [235] (Figure 14).
5.3.2. Toxins Modifying Rho-Family GTPases
C3 exoenzyme is the pioneer molecule that was found to target Rho-GTPases and allowed to unravel their important role in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton [236,237,238]. C3 is produced by C. botulinum types C and D strains in addition to the neurotoxins C1 and D, respectively, and C2 toxin. C3 is also synthesized by Clostridium limosum, Bacillus cereus, and S. aureus (C3stau or EDIN, epithelial differentiation inhibitor) strains. C3 exoenzymes are 25–28 kDa proteins that share a similar structure with the enzymatic components of clostridial binary toxins. In contrast to the clostridial binary toxins that target monomeric actin, C3 exoenzymes specifically modify Rho GTPases. No binding component has been associated to C3 exoenzymes. These proteins have been designated exoenzymes instead of toxins since they cannot efficiently enter cells. However, C3 proteins are efficiently internalized into macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells via EE and acidification by a non-yet-determined receptor(s) and endocytic mechanism [239,240,241]. C. botulinum C3 ADP-ribosylates RhoA, B, and C at Asn41 are located in the switch I region that undergoes conformational changes between the active and inactive state. When activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), Rho translocates to the membrane where it interacts with the downstream effectors stimulating actin filament polymerization. ADP-ribosylated Rho remains in the cytosol in complex with guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). Thus, the signaling of actin polymerization is blocked by C3 ADP-ribosylation of Rho. C3 induces cell rounding, loss of actin stress fibers, and inhibition of various cell functions linked to the actin cytoskeleton such as locomotion, endocytosis/phagocytosis, exocytosis, and cell-cycle progression [242,243] (Figure 14).
C. difficile toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) are part of the large clostridial glucosylating toxin (LCGT) family that also encompasses Paeniclostridium sordellii (previously Clostridium sordellii) toxins (hemorrhagic toxin, TcsH, and lethal toxin, TcsL), Clostridium novyi α-toxin (TcnA), and toxin C. perfringens large cytotoxin (TpeL). C. difficile is responsible for antibiotic-associated diarrhea, enteritis, and pseudomembranous colitis, whereas P. sordellii and C. novyi are mainly associated with gas gangrene in humans and animals. In addition, P. sordellii causes toxic shock syndrome, notably in women, and enterotoxemia in cattle [244,245,246]. LCGTs are 250–300 kDa single-chain proteins that contain four functional domains: a C-terminal receptor binding domain characterized by combined repetitive oligopeptide sequences (CROPS), an N-terminal glucosyltransferase domain, an autoprotease domain, and a central translocation domain (Figure 3). Receptors have been identified for TcdB as frizzled receptors in epithelial colonocytes and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 on other cell types such as myofibroblasts, sulfated glucosaminoglycans and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) for TcdA and TcnA, semaphorins (promoting angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cells) for TcsL, and LDL receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) for TpeL [247,248,249,250,251,252,253]. LCGTs enter cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis and the catalytic domain, which is processed by autoproteolytic cleavage, is released into the cytosol from acidified EEs [254]. LCGTs inactivate small GTP-binding proteins by monoglucosylation at Thr35/37 using UDP-glucose as a sugar donor (Figure 10) [8,255,256,257,258]. Glucosylation at Thr35/37, which is located in the switch I, impairs the interaction with the downstream effectors of the small GTP-binding proteins. TcdB and TcdA glucosylate Rho family proteins (RhoA, B, C, Rac, and Cdc42), whereas TcsL modifies mainly Rac from the Rho family and in addition Ras proteins. TcnA catalyzes the transfer of glucosamine from UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. The major consequences are an alteration in the actin cytoskeleton and disorganization of the intercellular junctions [8,259,260]. Moreover, TcdB and TcdA induce a strong inflammatory response through inactivation of RhoA and activation of pyrin inflammasome [261], whereas TcsL triggers apoptosis of immune and phagocytic cells through inactivation of Ras. TcsL causes drastic disorganization of focal adhesions, actin cytoskeleton, and intercellular junctions leading to massive edema [262,263,264,265].
Another class of bacterial toxins modifies Rho family proteins but in their active conformation. Cytotoxic necrotizing factors (CNF1, 2, and 3) from E. coli, mainly uropathogenic strains, CNFγ from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and dermonecrotic toxin from Bordetella bronchiseptica are part of the deamidating toxin group. CNF1 is the prototype of this toxin family. CNF1 is a 115 kDa single-chain protein with an N-terminal receptor binding domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain. CNF1 interacts with the laminin receptor and the Lutheran adhesion glycoprotein/basal cell adhesion molecule (Lu/BCAM) and enters the cell via receptor-mediated endocytosis [266,267]. The acidification of endosomes promotes the translocation of the proteolytically cleaved C-terminal domain into the cytosol [268]. CNF1 catalyzes the deamidation of Gln61/63 of Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 into glutamic acid (Figure 10). The conserved Gln61/63 is located in the GTPase domain and deamidation of Gln61/63 results in an irreversible GTP-bound conformation of Rho proteins and thus permanent active molecules. A major consequence of Rho GTPases is a drastic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton with increased formation of stress fibers and lamellipodia and increased phagocytosis and cell migration but destabilization of epithelial barrier integrity. CNF1 induces additional multiple cellular effects such as the induction of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and IL-6 and the inflammatory response, cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, blockade of apoptosis, or induction of apoptosis according to the cell type and toxin concentration. However, the effects of CNF are transient since activated Rho GTPases are ubiquitinylated and degraded by the proteasome [268,269,270] (Figure 14).
P. luminescens TccC5 also activates Rho GTPases by targeting Gln61/63 but through ADP-ribosylation instead of deamidation [271].
A comparison of the mode of action of bacterial toxins that alter the actin cytoskeleton by targeting either the actin or Rho-GTPase molecules is shown in Figure 14.
5.4. Neurotoxins Impairing Neurotransmitter Release
A particular class of bacterial toxins are the clostridial neurotoxins, which specifically target neuronal cells and impair the release of neurotransmitters, namely botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT). BoNTs are responsible for botulism, which is characterized by flaccid paralysis, whereas TeNT induces spastic paralysis, the tetanus. BoNTs are divided into eight toxinotypes (A to H) and are produced by diverse Clostridium species (C. botulinum groups I, II, III, Clostridium argentinense, neurotoxigenic strains of Clostridium butyricum, and Clostridium baratii), while TeNT is a more homogenous group of toxins produced by Clostridium tetani [272,273]. Clostridial neurotoxins are synthesized as single-chain proteins of 150 kDa that are activated by a proteolytic cleavage between the light chain (LC) N-terminal 50 kDa domain containing the enzymatic site and the 100 kDa heavy chain (HC) that consists of two C-terminal receptor binding domains and a N-terminal translocation domain. LC and HC remain linked by a disulfide bridge. As receptors, BoNTs and TeNT recognize both a ganglioside, notably GT1b and GD1a, and a specific membrane protein of neuronal cells, synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) for BoNT/A, E, D, F, and TeNT, which also uses the basal lamina protein nidogen and synaptotagmin for BoNT/B, D/C, and G. In contrast to TeNT, BoNTs associate with non-toxic proteins (non-toxic non-hemagglutinin (NTNH) protein, hemagglutinins, or OrfX proteins) to form botulinum complexes that are resistant to acidic pH and protease degradation. Thus, BoNT complexes are stable through their passage in the digestive tract. BoNTs and TeNT enter motor neuron endings via receptor-mediated endocytosis. BoNTs act in the peripheral nervous system, whereas TeNT undergoes a retrograde transport to the central nervous system and targets inhibitory interneurons. LC is released from acidified endosomes and through disulfide bond reduction. BoNTs and TeNT are zinc-dependent metalloproteases that cleave SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) complex proteins including SNAP25, synaptobrevin, and syntaxin, which have a crucial role in docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles containing neurotransmitters with the presynaptic membrane. Thus, BoNTs block the release of acetylcholine from motor neuron endings and TeNT inhibits that of glycine and GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) from central inhibitory interneurons [274,275,276,277].
6. Insights into the Evolution of Bacterial Protein Toxins
Bacterial protein toxins are unique molecules secreted by certain bacteria that are able to recognize specific target eukaryotic cells and to act at the cell membrane or to deliver an intracellularly active domain. They are among the most powerful molecules and are active at very low concentrations. Thereby, bacterial toxins are responsible for severe diseases such as botulism, diphtheria, and tetanus. Striking characteristics of bacterial protein toxins are their wide diversity regarding their size, structure, and mode of action. The edition of bacterial toxins is a dynamic process. Most bacterial toxins are part of toxin families that contain multiple isoforms or variants according to the bacterial strains. Bacteria exploit various genetic mechanisms such as gene duplication, mutation, insertion/deletion, and recombination to generate novel or modified proteins. Toxin genes are located on diverse genetic support chromosomes, phages, plasmids, and transposons, which facilitate horizontal gene transfer between bacteria [161,278]. For example, 695 protein sequences have been identified for CDT subunits from at least 32 Gram-negative bacterial species. Based on phylogenetic analysis, CDT sequences show a high level of diversity, the catalytic subunit CdtB being the most conserved. It has been speculated that Yersinia CDTs represent the most ancestral lineage with subsequent horizontal transfer to other bacterial species [279]. It is noteworthy that the main habitat of toxigenic bacteria is the environmental soil, dust, and sediments, including the intestinal tract of healthy humans and animals where these bacteria can transit. The high density and diversity in bacteria in the intestinal tract (microbiota) facilitate genetic exchanges between bacteria. Horizontal gene transfer might also concern exchanges between bacteria and host eukaryotic cells. Indeed, sequences of cdtB and gene-encoding STB subunits have been found in the genome of gall midge. Phylogenetic analysis supports gene transfer from bacteria to insects. It is suggested that toxin genes might confer a protective function in developing larvae and pupae against other insect predators such as wasps [280].
Intriguing questions concern the origin of bacterial toxins and their evolution. Single-chain protein toxins represent the simplest structures and might represent the first bacterial toxins. Some of these toxins could originate from hydrolytic enzymes, which are secreted by certain bacteria such as fermentative bacteria. While hydrolytic enzymes have a broad spectrum of activity, toxins have developed an enzymatic activity for specific substrate(s). For example, BoNTs, B. anthracis LF, and B. fragilis BFT retain the enzymatic site HExxH, which is common in many metalloproteases. However, they target specific substrates, SNARE proteins for BoNTs, MAPKKs for LF, and E-cadherin for BFT. Another possibility is that certain bacterial toxins could have been horizontally transferred from mammalian cells to bacteria as it has been suggested for BFT based on structure similarity [188].
For optimal activity, bacterial toxins have acquired a modulable structure by differentiation, recombination, insertion, and/or deletion of specific domains (catalytic, translocation/delivery, autoprocessing, and receptor-binding domains) involved in the different steps of intoxication. For example, modular recombination has been documented for CNFs, Bordetella dermonecrotic toxins, and related toxins [278]. In C. difficile, the extensive diversification of TcdB seems to be mainly based on recombination events, with independent evolution of the four functional domains [281,282]. Kumar and Singh suggest that molecular flexibility and dynamics of protein toxins drive the evolutionary processes. Protein plasticity is an important aspect of toxins, including the transition from a disordered structure that facilitates toxin transport through cell membranes to an ordered structure required for specific interaction with receptor/substrate. Co-evolution of bacterial toxins and substrates as well as induced folding from disordered to ordered structures that enhances adaptation and affinity to substrate or receptor could be a crucial step in bacterial toxin evolution [283].
More intriguing is the emergence of complex structures resulting from the combination of distinct proteins to form a functional toxin. Multiprotein toxins are essentially intracellularly active toxins. Separation of the receptor-binding/delivery module from the catalytic subunit provides the advantage of long-lasting internalization process of the toxin, since the receptor-binding/delivery module can be recycled to the cell membrane to trap additional catalytic subunits. For example, binding components of C. perfringens iota-toxin are re-exposed to the cell surface, even to the opposite cell side of administration, and internalize the enzymatic component [284]. A similar transcytotic pathway has been found for cholera toxin [285]. The assembly of multiprotein toxins is achieved through the insertion of domain or linker sequences in the enzymatic components that interact with the oligomerized receptor-binding components. A typical example is provided by C3 enzyme and clostridial binary toxins such as C2 and Iota toxins. C3 is a 25 kDa protein with core β-strands containing the ADP-ribosylation site surrounded by α-helices (Figure 14). The C2 enzymatic component (C2-I) is a 50 kDa protein that is divided into two structural subdomains of 25 kDa. Both C2-I subdomains share a similar folding that is related to that of the C3 enzyme despite a low amino acid sequence identity. The C-terminal C2-I subdomain retains the ADP-ribosylation activity towards actin monomers instead of Rho GTPase for C3 and the N-terminal subdomain is required for interaction with C2 oligomerized binding components and internalization into the cytosol. It is conceivable that the C2 gene is derived from an ancestral C3 gene by duplication and adaptation to substrate or interacting molecule(s) [161]. In contrast, AB5 toxins (CT, ST, and PTX) use a short peptide (A2 peptide) located in the C-terminal part of the A fragment as a linker between the A1 subunit and B pentamer (see above).
7. Concluding Remarks
Recurrent questions are still how and for which purpose bacteria have developed such diverse and such potent toxin molecules. Indeed, bacterial toxins are powerful pathogenicity factors. A relevant example is provided by toxigenic bacteria involved in gangrene, such as clostridia. The production of potent toxins that induce massive tissue destruction and a blockade of host defenses allows a rapid progression of bacteria in host tissues. The habitat of these bacteria is usually the environment where they can grow and survive for long periods. They do not need to attack and kill a host to survive. Rather, they have a role in the decomposition of cadavers. Thus, bacterial gangrenes likely emerge as accidental events of the interaction of environmental bacteria and a host. Regarding the high diversity in bacterial enterotoxins, is it the result of the coevolution of bacteria and host intestines that benefits bacteria? It has been suggested that, by modulating bacterial and host metabolism, CT facilitates fecal–oral transmission of V. cholerae [286]. However, the emergence and evolution of toxigenic bacteria not only occurs in human or animal host environments but also in soil, aquatic, or plant environments under various selective pressures and genetic exchanges between bacterial populations and phages [278]. More enigmatic are the bacterial neurotoxins that recognize specific neuronal cells and target the specialized machinery of neurotransmission. The origin and benefit for bacteria to produce such neurotoxins are unclear. Indeed, non-toxigenic counterparts of C. botulinum or C. tetani survive and spread in the environment as well as toxigenic strains indicating that toxin production is not essential for the regular life of these bacteria [287,288]. In addition to being harmful factors, bacterial toxins are the basis of various useful applications. Their modular structure enables the engineering of recombinant efficient and specific tools, notably for therapeutic purposes. The receptor binding domain can be adapted to interact with a specific cell population and can be combined with a catalytic domain able to kill the target cells or to modulate a cellular process. Currently, the most widely used therapeutic toxin is the native BoNT/A, which is used for an increasing number of applications from neurological disorders, ophthalmology, gastro-enterology, urology, dermatology, pain, depression, and cosmetics [275,289]. Another relevant toxin application concerns insecticidal toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis and related Bacillus sp. including parasporal crystal protein toxins (Cry), cytotoxins (Cyt), and vegetative insecticidal proteins (VIP). B. thuringiensis is widely used as spores to control insect proliferation in agriculture [159,290].
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Key Contribution
The diversity in bacterial protein toxins based on size, structure, and mode of action is presented through representative examples. Bacterial protein toxins are among the most active molecules.
Funding Statement
This review received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Green E.R., Mecsas J. Bacterial Secretion Systems: An Overview. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016;4:213–239. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0012-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rapisarda C., Fronzes R. Secretion Systems Used by Bacteria to Subvert Host Functions. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2018;25:1–42. doi: 10.21775/cimb.025.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Galan J.E. Common themes in the design and function of bacterial effectors. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doré J., Corthier G. The human intestinal microbiota. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 2010;34:S7–S15. doi: 10.1016/S0399-8320(10)70015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thriene K., Michels K.B. Human Gut Microbiota Plasticity throughout the Life Course. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023;20:1463. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yurist-Doutsch S., Arrieta M.C., Vogt S.L., Finlay B.B. Gastrointestinal microbiota-mediated control of enteric pathogens. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014;48:361–382. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ducarmon Q.R., Zwittink R.D., Hornung B.V.H., van Schaik W., Young V.B., Kuijper E.J. Gut Microbiota and Colonization Resistance against Bacterial Enteric Infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2019;83:e00007-19. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00007-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aktories K., Schwan C., Jank T. Clostridium difficile Toxin Biology. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;71:281–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Perelle S., Gibert M., Bourlioux P., Corthier G., Popoff M.R. Production of a complete binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosylating toxin) by Clostridium difficile CD196. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:1402–1407. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.4.1402-1407.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Theriot C.M., Young V.B. Interactions Between the Gastrointestinal Microbiome and Clostridium difficile. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;69:445–461. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buddle J.E., Fagan R.P. Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridioides difficile. Virulence. 2023;14:2150452. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2150452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Freedman J.C., Shrestha A., McClane B.A. Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin: Action, Genetics, and Translational Applications. Toxins. 2016;8:73. doi: 10.3390/toxins8030073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lindstrom M., Heikinheimo A., Lahti P., Korkeala H. Novel insights into the epidemiology of Clostridium perfringens type A food poisoning. Food Microbiol. 2011;28:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heredia N.L., Labbé R.G. Clostridium perfringens. In: Labbé R.G., Garcia S., editors. Guide to Foodborne Pathogens. Wiley Inter-Science; New York, NY, USA: 2001. pp. 133–141. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rasetti-Escargueil C., Lemichez E., Popoff M.R. Public Health Risk Associated with Botulism as Foodborne Zoonoses. Toxins. 2020;12:17. doi: 10.3390/toxins12010017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shirey T.B., Dykes J.K., Lúquez C., Maslanka S.E., Raphael B.H. Characterizing the fecal microbiota of infants with botulism. Microbiome. 2015;3:54. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nesil P., Erbas O. Foodborne and Infant Botulism Linkage with the Gut Microbiome’s Impact on the Immune System and Mental Function. J. Exp. Basic Med. Sci. 2021;2:365–374. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khan I., Bai Y., Zha L., Ullah N., Ullah H., Shah S.R.H., Sun H., Zhang C. Mechanism of the Gut Microbiota Colonization Resistance and Enteric Pathogen Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:716299. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.716299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Belotserkovsky I., Sansonetti P.J. Shigella and Enteroinvasive Escherichia Coli. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018;416:1–26. doi: 10.1007/82_2018_104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pizarro-Cerdá J., Cossart P. Listeria monocytogenes: Cell biology of invasion and intracellular growth. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018;6 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0013-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li Q. Mechanisms for the Invasion and Dissemination of Salmonella. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2022;2022:2655801. doi: 10.1155/2022/2655801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luk C.H., Enninga J., Valenzuela C. Fit to dwell in many places—The growing diversity of intracellular Salmonella niches. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12:989451. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.989451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bryant A.E., Bayer C.R., Hayes-Schroer S.M., Stevens D. Activation of platelet gpIIIa by phospholipase C from Clostridium perfringens involves store-operated calcium entry. J. Infect. Dis. 2003;187:408–417. doi: 10.1086/367964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stevens D.L., Aldape M.J., Bryant A.E. Life-threatening clostridial infections. Anaerobe. 2012;18:254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stevens D.L., Bryant A.E. The role of Clostridial toxins in the pathogenesis of gas gangrene. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;35:S93–S100. doi: 10.1086/341928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gavin H.E., Satchell K.J. MARTX toxins as effector delivery platforms. Pathog. Dis. 2015;73:ftv092. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftv092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jank T., Aktories K. Structure and mode of action of clostridial glucosylating toxins: The ABCD model. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dubreuil J.D. Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 874–910. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Song J. Bacterial AB toxins and host-microbe interactions. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2022;81:67–109. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2022.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Piot N., van der Goot F.G., Sergeeva O.A. Harnessing the Membrane Translocation Properties of AB Toxins for Therapeutic Applications. Toxins. 2021;13:36. doi: 10.3390/toxins13010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johannes L., Parton R.G., Bassereau P., Mayor S. Building endocytic pits without clathrin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;16:311–321. doi: 10.1038/nrm3968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pezeshkian W., Gao H., Arumugam S., Becken U., Bassereau P., Florent J.C., Ipsen J.H., Johannes L., Shillcock J.C. Mechanism of Shiga Toxin Clustering on Membranes. ACS Nano. 2017;11:314–324. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pezeshkian W., Nåbo L.J., Ipsen J.H. Cholera toxin B subunit induces local curvature on lipid bilayers. FEBS Open Bio. 2017;7:1638–1645. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin J.E., Valentino M., Marszalowicz G., Magee M.S., Li P., Snook A.E., Stoecker B.A., Chang C., Waldman S.A. Bacterial heat-stable enterotoxins: Translation of pathogenic peptides into novel targeted diagnostics and therapeutics. Toxins. 2010;2:2028–2054. doi: 10.3390/toxins2082028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weiglmeier P.R., Rösch P., Berkner H. Cure and curse: E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin and its receptor guanylyl cyclase C. Toxins. 2010;2:2213–2229. doi: 10.3390/toxins2092213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Langley R.J., Fraser J.D., Proft T. Bacterial superantigens and superantigen-like toxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 4th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 911–974. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Proft T., Fraser J.D. Streptococcal Superantigens: Biological properties and potential role in disease. In: Ferretti J.J., Stevens D.L., Fischetti V.A., editors. Streptococcus pyogenes: Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: 2016. pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahmad-Mansour N., Loubet P., Pouget C., Dunyach-Remy C., Sotto A., Lavigne J.P., Molle V. Staphylococcus aureus Toxins: An Update on Their Pathogenic Properties and Potential Treatments. Toxins. 2021;13:677. doi: 10.3390/toxins13100677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Noli Truant S., Redolfi D.M., Sarratea M.B., Malchiodi E.L., Fernández M.M. Superantigens, a Paradox of the Immune Response. Toxins. 2022;14:800. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fisher E.L., Otto M., Cheung G.Y.C. Basis of Virulence in Enterotoxin-Mediated Staphylococcal Food Poisoning. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:436. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Etter D., Schelin J., Schuppler M., Johler S. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin C-An Update on SEC Variants, Their Structure and Properties, and Their Role in Foodborne Intoxications. Toxins. 2020;12:584. doi: 10.3390/toxins12090584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hu D.L., Nakane A. Mechanisms of staphylococcal enterotoxin-induced emesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014;722:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alouf J.E. Molecular features of the cytolytic pore forming bacterial protein toxins. Folia Microbiol. 2003;48:5–16. doi: 10.1007/BF02931271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Roderer D., Glockshuber R. Assembly mechanism of the α-pore-forming toxin cytolysin A from Escherichia coli. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017;372:20160211. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wallace A.J., Stillman T.J., Atkins A., Jamieson S.J., Bullough P.A., Green J., Artymiuk P.J. E. coli hemolysin E (hlyE, ClyA, SheA): X-ray crystal structure of the toxin and observation of membrane pores by electron microscopy. Cell. 2000;100:265–276. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81564-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Benz R. Channel formation by RTX-toxins of pathogenic bacteria: Basis of their biological activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1858:526–537. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Linhartová I., Bumba L., Mašín J., Basler M., Osička R., Kamanová J., Procházková K., Adkins I., Hejnová-Holubová J., Sadílková L., et al. RTX proteins: A highly diverse family secreted by a common mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010;34:1076–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00231.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ostolaza H., González-Bullón D., Uribe K.B., Martín C., Amuategi J., Fernandez-Martínez X. Membrane Permeabilization by Pore-Forming RTX Toxins: What Kind of Lesions Do These Toxins Form? Toxins. 2019;11:354. doi: 10.3390/toxins11060354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chenal A., Sotomayor Perez A.C., Ladant D. Structure and function of RTX toxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 677–718. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chenal A., Ladant D. Bioengineering of Bordetella pertussis Adenylate Cyclase Toxin for Antigen-Delivery and Immunotherapy. Toxins. 2018;10:302. doi: 10.3390/toxins10070302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Knapp O., Benz R. Membrane Activity and Channel Formation of the Adenylate Cyclase Toxin (CyaA) of Bordetella pertussis in Lipid Bilayer Membranes. Toxins. 2020;12:169. doi: 10.3390/toxins12030169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim B.S. The Modes of Action of MARTX Toxin Effector Domains. Toxins. 2018;10:507. doi: 10.3390/toxins10120507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Satchell K.J. Structure and function of MARTX toxins and other large repetitive RTX proteins. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;65:71–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim B.S., Gavin H.E., Satchell K.J. Distinct roles of the repeat-containing regions and effector domains of the Vibrio vulnificus multifunctional-autoprocessing repeats-in-toxin (MARTX) toxin. mBio. 2015;6:e00324-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00324-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Endo H. Molecular and Kinetic Models for Pore Formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry Toxin. Toxins. 2022;14:433. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pacheco S., Gómez I., Soberón M., Bravo A. A major conformational change of N-terminal helices of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab insecticidal protein is necessary for membrane insertion and toxicity. FEBS J. 2023;290:2692–2705. doi: 10.1111/febs.16710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pacheco S., Quiliche J.P.J., Gómez I., Sánchez J., Soberón M., Bravo A. Rearrangement of N-Terminal α-Helices of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab Toxin Essential for Oligomer Assembly and Toxicity. Toxins. 2020;12:647. doi: 10.3390/toxins12100647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Torres J., Surya W., Boonserm P. Channel Formation in Cry Toxins: An Alphafold-2 Perspective. [(accessed on 15 February 2024)];Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24:16809. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316809. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/23/16809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nicolson G.L. The Fluid-Mosaic Model of Membrane Structure: Still relevant to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of biological membranes after more than 40 years. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1838:1451–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Christie M.P., Johnstone B.A., Tweten R.K., Parker M.W., Morton C.J. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: From water-soluble state to membrane pore. Biophys. Rev. 2018;10:1337–1348. doi: 10.1007/s12551-018-0448-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dal Peraro M., van der Goot F.G. Pore-forming toxins: Ancient, but never really out of fashion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:77–92. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dunstone M.A., Tweten R.K. Packing a punch: The mechanism of pore formation by cholesterol dependent cytolysins and membrane attack complex/perforin-like proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012;22:342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Iacovache I., Bischofberger M., van der Goot F.G. Structure and assembly of pore-forming proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010;20:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Popoff M.R. Clostridial pore-forming toxins: Powerful virulence factors. Anaerobe. 2014;30:220–238. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Heuck A.P., Moe P.C., Johnson B.B. The cholesterol-dependent cytolysin family of gram-positive bacterial toxins. Subcell. Biochem. 2010;51:551–577. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8622-8_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tweten R.K., Hotze E.M., Wade K.R. The Unique Molecular Choreography of Giant Pore Formation by the Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins of Gram-Positive Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;69:323–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Johnstone B.A., Joseph R., Christie M.P., Morton C.J., McGuiness C., Walsh J.C., Böcking T., Tweten R.K., Parker M.W. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: The outstanding questions. IUBMB Life. 2022;74:1169–1179. doi: 10.1002/iub.2661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rossjohn J., Polekhina G., Feil S.C., Morton C.J., Tweten R.K., Parker M.W. Structures of perfringolysin O suggest a pathway for activation of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;367:1227–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nguyen B.N., Peterson B.N., Portnoy D.A. Listeriolysin O: A phagosome-specific cytolysin revisited. Cell. Microbiol. 2019;21:e12988. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Quereda J.J., Morel C., Lopez-Montero N., Ziveri J., Rolland S., Grenier T., Aulner N., Danckaert A., Charbit A., Enninga J., et al. A Role for Taok2 in Listeria monocytogenes Vacuolar Escape. J. Infect Dis. 2022;225:1005–1010. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Madden J.C., Ruiz H., Caparon M. Cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT): A functional equivalent of type III secretion in Gram-positive bacteria. Cell. 2001;104:143–152. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Prévost G., Tawk M.Y., Zimmermann-Meise G., Jover E. The staphylococcal alpha-toxin and leucotoxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 739–772. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Oliveira D., Borges A., Simões M. Staphylococcus aureus Toxins and Their Molecular Activity in Infectious Diseases. Toxins. 2018;10:252. doi: 10.3390/toxins10060252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Shrestha A., Uzal F.A., McClane B.A. The interaction of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin with receptor claudins. Anaerobe. 2016;41:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Shrestha A., McClane B. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. In: Alouf J., Ladant D.R.P.M., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 4th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 815–838. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Popoff M.R., Stiles B., Poulain B. Clostridium perfringens Epsilon Toxin: Structural and Mechanistic Insights. In: Gopalakrishnakone P., Stiles B., Alape-Giron A., Dubreuil J.D., Mandal M., editors. Microbial Toxins. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2018. pp. 53–72. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bischofberger M., Iacovache I., van der Goot F.G. Pathogenic pore-forming proteins: Function and host response. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bouillot S., Reboud E., Huber P. Functional Consequences of Calcium Influx Promoted by Bacterial Pore-Forming Toxins. Toxins. 2018;10:387. doi: 10.3390/toxins10100387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fennessey C.M., Ivie S.E., McClain M.S. Coenzyme depletion by members of the aerolysin family of pore-forming toxins leads to diminished ATP levels and cell death. Mol. BioSystems. 2012;8:2097–2105. doi: 10.1039/c2mb25142f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gurcel L., Abrami L., Girardin S., Tschopp J., van der Goot F.G. Caspase-1 activation of lipid metabolic pathways in response to bacterial pore-forming toxins promotes cell survival. Cell. 2006;126:1135–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chassin C., Bens M., de Barry J., Courjaret R., Bossu J.L., Cluzeaud F., Ben Mkaddem S., Gibert M., Poulain B., Popoff M.R., et al. Pore-forming epsilon toxin causes membrane permeabilization and rapid ATP depletion-mediated cell death in renal collecting duct cells. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2007;293:F927–F937. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00199.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Petit L., Maier E., Gibert M., Popoff M.R., Benz R. Clostridium perfringens epsilon-toxin induces a rapid change in cell membrane permeability to ions and forms channels in artificial lipid bilayers. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:15736–15740. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010412200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Shrestha A., Mehdizadeh Gohari I., McClane B.A. RIP1, RIP3, and MLKL Contribute to Cell Death Caused by Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin. mBio. 2019;10:e02985-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02985-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Krantz B.A., Finkelstein A., Collier R.J. Protein translocation through the anthrax toxin transmembrane pore is driven by a proton gradient. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;355:968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Machen A.J., Fisher M.T., Freudenthal B.D. Anthrax toxin translocation complex reveals insight into the lethal factor unfolding and refolding mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:13038. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91596-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Neumeyer T., Tonello F., Dal Molin F., Schiffler B., Benz R. Anthrax edema factor, voltage-dependent binding to the protective antigen ion channel and comparison to LF binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:32335–32343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606552200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kintzer A.F., Thoren K.L., Sterling H.J., Dong K.C., Feld G.K., Tang I.I., Zhang T.T., Williams E.R., Berger J.M., Krantz B.A. The protective antigen component of anthrax toxin forms functional octameric complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;392:614–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Neumeyer T., Tonello F., Dal Molin F., Schiffler B., Orlik F., Benz R. Anthrax lethal factor (LF) mediated block of the anthrax protective antigen (PA) ion channel: Effect of ionic strength and voltage. Biochemistry. 2006;45:3060–3068. doi: 10.1021/bi0524316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bradley K.A., Mogridge J., Mourez M., Collier R.J., Young J.A.T. Identification of the cellular receptor for anthrax toxin. Nature. 2001;414:225–229. doi: 10.1038/n35101999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Scobie H.M., Rainey G.J., Bradley K.A., Young J.A. Human capillary morphogenesis protein 2 functions as an anthrax toxin receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:5170–5174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0431098100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Blocker D., Pohlmann K., Haug G., Bachmeyer C., Benz R., Aktories K., Barth H. Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin: Low pH-induced pore formation is required for translocation of the enzyme component C2I into the cytosol of host cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:37360–37367. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305849200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Knapp O., Benz R., Gibert M., Marvaud J.C., Popoff M.R. Interaction of Clostridium perfringens iota-toxin with lipid bilayer membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:6143–6152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103939200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Fagerlund A., Lindbäck T., Storset A.K., Granum P.E., Hardy S.P. Bacillus cereus Nhe is a pore-forming toxin with structural and functional properties similar to the ClyA (HlyE, SheA) family of haemolysins, able to induce osmotic lysis in epithelia. Microbiology. 2008;154:693–704. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/014134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhu K., Didier A., Dietrich R., Heilkenbrinker U., Waltenberger E., Jessberger N., Märtlbauer E., Benz R. Formation of small transmembrane pores: An intermediate stage on the way to Bacillus cereus non-hemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe) full pores in the absence of NheA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;469:613–618. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ganash M., Phung D., Sedelnikova S.E., Lindbäck T., Granum P.E., Artymiuk P.J. Structure of the NheA component of the Nhe toxin from Bacillus cereus: Implications for function. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e74748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Jessberger N., Dietrich R., Schauer K., Schwemmer S., Märtlbauer E., Benz R. Characteristics of the Protein Complexes and Pores Formed by Bacillus cereus Hemolysin BL. Toxins. 2020;12:672. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Madegowda M., Eswaramoorthy S., Burley S.K., Swaminathan S. X-ray crystal structure of the B component of Hemolysin BL from Bacillus cereus. Proteins. 2008;71:534–540. doi: 10.1002/prot.21888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Liu J., Zuo Z., Sastalla I., Liu C., Jang J.Y., Sekine Y., Li Y., Pirooznia M., Leppla S.H., Finkel T., et al. Sequential CRISPR-Based Screens Identify LITAF and CDIP1 as the Bacillus cereus Hemolysin BL Toxin Host Receptors. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:402–410.e405. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Menestrina G., Moser C., Pellet S., Welch R. Pore-formation by Escherichia coli hemolysin (HlyA) and other members of the RTX toxins family. Toxicology. 1994;87:249–267. doi: 10.1016/0300-483X(94)90254-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wiles T.J., Mulvey M.A. The RTX pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Progress and perspectives. Future Microbiol. 2013;8:73–84. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Vojtova-Vodolanova J., Basler M., Osicka R., Knapp O., Maier E., Cerny J., Benada O., Benz R., Sebo P. Oligomerization is involved in pore formation by Bordetella adenylate cyclase toxin. FASEB J. 2009;23:2831–2843. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-131250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Benz R., Maier E., Ladant D., Ullmann A., Sebo P. Adenylate cyclase toxin (CyaA) of Bordetella pertussis. Evidence for the formation of small ion-permeable channels and comparison with HlyA of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:27231–27239. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)46973-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.González-Bullón D., Uribe K.B., Largo E., Guembelzu G., García-Arribas A.B., Martín C., Ostolaza H. Membrane Permeabilization by Bordetella Adenylate Cyclase Toxin Involves Pores of Tunable Size. Biomolecules. 2019;9:183. doi: 10.3390/biom9050183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kim Y.R., Lee S.E., Kook H., Yeom J.A., Na H.S., Kim S.Y., Chung S.S., Choy H.E., Rhee J.H. Vibrio vulnificus RTX toxin kills host cells only after contact of the bacteria with host cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2008;10:848–862. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Shepard L., Shatursky O., Johnson A., Tweten R. The mechanism of pore assembly for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: Formation of a large prepore complex precedes the insertion of the transmembrane β-hairpins. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10284–10293. doi: 10.1021/bi000436r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Shewell L.K., Day C.J., Jen F.E., Haselhorst T., Atack J.M., Reijneveld J.F., Everest-Dass A., James D.B.A., Boguslawski K.M., Brouwer S., et al. All major cholesterol-dependent cytolysins use glycans as cellular receptors. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaaz4926. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Palmer M., Harris R., Freytag C., Kehoe M., Tranum-Jensen J., Bhakdi S. Assembly mechanism of the oligomeric streptolysin O pore: The early membrane lesion is lined by a free edge of the lipid membrane and is extended gradually during oligomerization. EMBO J. 1998;17:1598–1605. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Köster S., van Pee K., Hudel M., Leustik M., Rhinow D., Kühlbrandt W., Chakraborty T., Yildiz Ö. Crystal structure of listeriolysin O reveals molecular details of oligomerization and pore formation. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3690. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Giddings K.S., Zhao J., Sims P.J., Tweten R.K. Human CD59 is a receptor for the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin intermedilysin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:1173–1178. doi: 10.1038/nsmb862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Polekhina G., Giddings K.S., Tweten R.K., Parker M.W. Insights into the action of the superfamily of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins from studies of intermedilysin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:600–605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403229101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Tilley S.J., Orlova E.V., Gilbert R.J., Andrew P.W., Saibil H.R. Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin. Cell. 2005;121:247–256. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Abrami L., Fivaz M., Glauser P.E., Parton R.G., van der Goot F.G. A pore-forming toxin interacts with a GPI-anchored protein and causes vacuolation of the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 1998;140:525–540. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.3.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Parker M.W., Buckley J.T., Postma J.P., Tucker A.D., Leonard K., Pattus F., Tsernoglou D. Structure of the Aeromonas toxin proaerolysin in its water-soluble and membrane-channel states. Nature. 1994;367:292–295. doi: 10.1038/367292a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Tsitrin Y., Morton C.J., el-Bez C., Paumard P., Velluz M.C., Adrian M., Dubochet J., Parker M.W., Lanzavecchia S., van der Goot F.G. Conversion of a transmembrane to a water-soluble protein complex by a single point mutation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002;9:729–733. doi: 10.1038/nsb839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chakraborty T., Schmid A., Notermans S., Benz R. Aerolysin of Aeromonas sobria: Evidence for formation of ion-permeable channels and comparison with alpha-toxin of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 1990;58:2127–2132. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.7.2127-2132.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Knapp O., Maier E., Benz R., Geny B., Popoff M.R. Identification of the channel-forming domain of Clostridium perfringens Epsilon-toxin (ETX) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788:2584–2593. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Rumah K.R., Ma Y., Linden J.R., Oo M.L., Anrather J., Schaeren-Wiemers N., Alonso M.A., Fischetti V.A., McClain M.S., Vartanian T. The Myelin and Lymphocyte Protein MAL Is Required for Binding and Activity of Clostridium perfringens ε-Toxin. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004896. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Savva C.G., Clark A.R., Naylor C.E., Popoff M.R., Moss D.S., Basak A.K., Titball R.W., Bokori-Brown M. The pore structure of Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2641. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10645-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Katahira J., Inoue N., Horiguchi Y., Matsuda M., Sugimoto N. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of the receptor for Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. J. Cell Biol. 1997;136:1239–1247. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.6.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Benz R., Popoff M.R. Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin: The Toxin Forms Highly Cation-Selective Channels in Lipid Bilayers. Toxins. 2018;10:341. doi: 10.3390/toxins10090341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Briggs D.C., Naylor C.E., Smedley J.G., 3rd, Lukoyanova N., Robertson S., Moss D.S., McClane B.A., Basak A.K. Structure of the food-poisoning Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin reveals similarity to the aerolysin-like pore-forming toxins. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;413:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kitadokoro K., Nishimura K., Kamitani S., Fukui-Miyazaki A., Toshima H., Abe H., Kamata Y., Sugita-Konishi Y., Yamamoto S., Karatani H., et al. Crystal structure of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin displays features of beta-pore-forming toxins. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19549–19555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.228478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Knapp O., Maier E., Mkaddem S.B., Benz R., Bens M., Chenal A., Geny B., Vandewalle A., Popoff M.R. Clostridium septicum alpha-toxin forms pores and induces rapid cell necrosis. Toxicon. 2010;55:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Gordon V.M., Nelson K.L., Buckley J.T., Stevens V.L., Tweten R.K., Elwood P.C., Leppla S.H. Clostridium septicum alpha-toxin uses glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:27274–27280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.38.27274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Melton J.A., Parker M.W., Rossjohn J., Buckley J.T., Tweten R.K. The identification and structure of the membrane-spanning domain of the Clostridium septicum alpha toxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:14315–14322. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313758200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Palma L., Munoz D., Berry C., Murillo J., Caballero P. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: An overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins. 2014;6:3296–3325. doi: 10.3390/toxins6123296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Song L., Hobaugh M.R., Shustak C., Cheley S., Bayley H., Gouaux J.E. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science. 1996;274:1859–1866. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Spaan A.N., Henry T., van Rooijen W.J.M., Perret M., Badiou C., Aerts P.C., Kemmink J., de Haas C.J.C., van Kessel K.P.M., Vandenesch F., et al. The staphylococcal toxin Panton-Valentine Leukocidin targets human C5a receptors. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:584–594. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Guillet V., Roblin P., Werner S., Coraiola M., Menestrina G., Monteil H., Prévost G., Mourey L. Crystal structure of leucotoxin S component: New insight into the Staphylococcal beta-barrel pore-forming toxins. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:41028–41037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406904200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Pédelacq J.D., Maveyraud L., Prévost G., Baba-Moussa L., González A., Courcelle E., Shepard W., Monteil H., Samama J.P., Mourey L. The structure of a Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin component (LukF-PV) reveals the fold of the water-soluble species of a family of transmembrane pore-forming toxins. Structure. 1999;7:277–287. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80038-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Yamashita K., Kawai Y., Tanaka Y., Hirano N., Kaneko J., Tomita N., Ohta M., Kamio Y., Yao M., Tanaka I. Crystal structure of the octameric pore of staphylococcal γ-hemolysin reveals the β-barrel pore formation mechanism by two components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:17314–17319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110402108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Sugawara-Tomita N., Tomita T., Kamio Y. Stochastic assembly of two-component staphylococcal gamma-hemolysin into heteroheptameric transmembrane pores with alternate subunit arrangements in ratios of 3:4 and 4:3. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:4747–4756. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.17.4747-4756.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hodille E., Plesa A., Bourrelly E., Belmont L., Badiou C., Lina G., Dumitrescu O. Staphylococcal Panton-Valentine Leucocidin and Gamma Haemolysin Target and Lyse Mature Bone Marrow Leucocytes. Toxins. 2020;12:725. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Perelman S.S., James D.B.A., Boguslawski K.M., Nelson C.W., Ilmain J.K., Zwack E.E., Prescott R.A., Mohamed A., Tam K., Chan R., et al. Genetic variation of staphylococcal LukAB toxin determines receptor tropism. Nat. Microbiol. 2021;6:731–745. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00890-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Badarau A., Rouha H., Malafa S., Logan D.T., Håkansson M., Stulik L., Dolezilkova I., Teubenbacher A., Gross K., Maierhofer B., et al. Structure-function analysis of heterodimer formation, oligomerization, and receptor binding of the Staphylococcus aureus bi-component toxin LukGH. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:142–156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.598110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Trstenjak N., Milić D., Graewert M.A., Rouha H., Svergun D., Djinović-Carugo K., Nagy E., Badarau A. Molecular mechanism of leukocidin GH-integrin CD11b/CD18 recognition and species specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:317–327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913690116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Nocadello S., Minasov G., Shuvalova L., Dubrovska I., Sabini E., Bagnoli F., Grandi G., Anderson W.F. Crystal structures of the components of the Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2016;72:113–120. doi: 10.1107/S2059798315023207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Lubkin A., Lee W.L., Alonzo F., 3rd, Wang C., Aligo J., Keller M., Girgis N.M., Reyes-Robles T., Chan R., O’Malley A., et al. Staphylococcus aureus Leukocidins Target Endothelial DARC to Cause Lethality in Mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:463–470.e469. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Gravet A., Colin D.A., Keller D., Girardot R., Monteil H., Prévost G. Characterization of a novel structural member, LukE-LukD, of the bi-component staphylococcal leucotoxins family. FEBS Lett. 1998;436:202–208. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Reyes-Robles T., Alonzo F., 3rd, Kozhaya L., Lacy D.B., Unutmaz D., Torres V.J. Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED targets the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 to kill leukocytes and promote infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Bruggisser J., Iacovache I., Musson S.C., Degiacomi M.T., Posthaus H., Zuber B. Cryo-EM structure of the octameric pore of Clostridium perfringens β-toxin. EMBO Rep. 2022;23:e54856. doi: 10.15252/embr.202254856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Tarek B., Bruggisser J., Cattalani F., Posthaus H. Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (CD31) Is Essential for Clostridium perfringens Beta-Toxin Mediated Cytotoxicity in Human Endothelial and Monocytic Cells. Toxins. 2021;13:893. doi: 10.3390/toxins13120893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Savva C.G., Fernandes da Costa S.P., Bokori-Brown M., Naylor C.E., Cole A.R., Moss D.S., Titball R.W., Basak A.K. Molecular architecture and functional analysis of NetB, a pore-forming toxin from Clostridium perfringens. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:3512–3522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.430223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Huyet J., Naylor C.E., Savva C.G., Gibert M., Popoff M.R., Basak A.K. Structural Insights into Delta Toxin Pore Formation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Manich M., Knapp O., Gibert M., Maier E., Jolivet-Reynaud C., Geny B., Benz R., Popoff M.R. Clostridium perfringens delta toxin is sequence related to beta toxin, NetB, and Staphylococcus pore-forming toxins, but shows functional differences. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Frey J., Johansson A., Burki S., Vilei E.M., Redhead K. Cytotoxin CctA, a major virulence factor of Clostridium chauvoei conferring protective immunity against myonecrosis. Vaccine. 2012;30:5500–5505. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.De S., Olson R. Crystal structure of the Vibrio cholerae cytolysin heptamer reveals common features among disparate pore-forming toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:7385–7390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017442108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Levan S., De S., Olson R. Vibrio cholerae cytolysin recognizes the heptasaccharide core of complex N-glycans with nanomolar affinity. J. Mol. Biol. 2013;425:944–957. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Olson R., Gouaux E. Crystal structure of the Vibrio cholerae cytolysin (VCC) pro-toxin and its assembly into a heptameric transmembrane pore. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;350:997–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kaus K., Lary J.W., Cole J.L., Olson R. Glycan specificity of the Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin lectin outlines evolutionary history of membrane targeting by a toxin family. J. Mol. Biol. 2014;426:2800–2812. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Kashimoto T., Sugiyama H., Kawamidori K., Yamazaki K., Kado T., Matsuda K., Kodama T., Mukai T., Ueno S. Vibiro vulnificus hemolysin associates with gangliosides. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01755-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Blaustein R.O., Finkelstein A. Voltage-dependent block of anthrax toxin channels in planar phospholipid bilayer membranes by symetric tetraalkylammonium ions. J. Gen. Physiol. 1990;96:905–919. doi: 10.1085/jgp.96.5.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Jiang J., Pentelute B.L., Collier R.J., Zhou Z.H. Atomic structure of anthrax protective antigen pore elucidates toxin translocation. Nature. 2015;521:545–549. doi: 10.1038/nature14247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Nassi S., Collier R.J., Finkelstein A. PA63 channel of anthrax toxin: An extended beta-barrel. Biochemistry. 2002;41:1445–1450. doi: 10.1021/bi0119518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Papatheodorou P., Carette J.E., Bell G.W., Schwan C., Guttenberg G., Brummelkamp T.R., Aktories K. Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) is the host receptor for the binary toxin Clostridium difficile transferase (CDT) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:16422–16427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109772108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Yamada T., Yoshida T., Kawamoto A., Mitsuoka K., Iwasaki K., Tsuge H. Cryo-EM structures reveal translocational unfolding in the clostridial binary iota toxin complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020;27:288–296. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0388-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Anderson D.M., Sheedlo M.J., Jensen J.L., Lacy D.B. Structural insights into the transition of Clostridioides difficile binary toxin from prepore to pore. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:102–107. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0601-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Barth H., Aktories K., Popoff M.R., Stiles B.G. Binary bacterial toxins: Biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004;68:373–402. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.373-402.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Gupta M., Kumar H., Kaur S. Vegetative Insecticidal Protein (Vip): A Potential Contender from Bacillus thuringiensis for Efficient Management of Various Detrimental Agricultural Pests. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:659736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.659736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Degiacomi M.T., Iacovache I., Pernot L., Chami M., Kudryashev M., Stahlberg H., van der Goot F.G., Dal Peraro M. Molecular assembly of the aerolysin pore reveals a swirling membrane-insertion mechanism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013;9:623–629. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Popoff M.R., Bouvet P. Genetic characteristics of toxigenic Clostridia and toxin gene evolution. Toxicon. 2013;75:63–89. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Naylor C.E., Eaton J.T., Howells A., Justin N., Moss D.S., Titball R.W., Basak A.K. Structure of the key toxin in gas gangrene. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998;5:738–746. doi: 10.1038/1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Awad M.M., Ellemor D.M., Boyd R.L., Emmins J.J., Rood J.I. Synergistic effects of alpha-toxin and perfringolysin O in Clostridium perfringens-mediated gas gangrene. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:7904–7910. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7904-7910.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Awad M.M., Bryant A.E., Stevens D.L., Rood J.I. Virulence studies on chromosomal alpha-toxin and theta-toxin mutants constructed by allelic exchange provide genetic evidence for the essential role of alpha-toxin in Clostridium perfringens-mediated gas gangrene. Mol. Microbiol. 1995;15:191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Eaton J.T., Naylor C.E., Howells A.M., Moss D.S., Titball R.W., Basak A.K. Crystal structure of the C. perfringens alpha-toxin with the active site closed by a flexible loop region. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;319:275–281. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00290-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.MacFarlane M.G., Knight B.C.J.G. The biochemistry of bacterial toxins. I. Lecithinase activity of C. welchii toxins. Biochem. J. 1941;35:884–902. doi: 10.1042/bj0350884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Sakurai J., Nagahama M., Oda M. Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin: Characterization and mode of action. J. Biochem. 2004;136:569–574. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvh161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Titball R.W., Naylor C.E., Basak A.K. The Clostridium perfringens α-toxin. Anaerobe. 1999;5:51–64. doi: 10.1006/anae.1999.0191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Takehara M., Takagishi T., Seike S., Ohtani K., Kobayashi K., Miyamoto K., Shimizu T., Nagahama M. Clostridium perfringens α-Toxin Impairs Innate Immunity via Inhibition of Neutrophil Differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28192. doi: 10.1038/srep28192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Flores-Diaz M., Alape-Giron A. Role of Clostridium perfringens phospholipase C in the pathogenesis of gas gangrene. Toxicon. 2003;42:979–986. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2003.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Bryant A.E., Stevens D.L. Clostridial toxins in the pathogenesis of gas gangrene. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 4th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 977–994. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Suzaki A., Hayakawa S. Clinical and Microbiological Features of Fulminant Haemolysis Caused by Clostridium perfringens Bacteraemia: Unknown Pathogenesis. Microorganisms. 2023;11:824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Suzaki A., Ohtani K., Komine-Aizawa S., Matsumoto A., Kamiya S., Hayakawa S. Pathogenic Characterization of Clostridium perfringens Strains Isolated from Patients with Massive Intravascular Hemolysis. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:713509. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.713509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Titball R.W. Bacterial phospholipases C. Microbiol. Rev. 1993;57:347–366. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.347-366.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Flores-Diaz M., Monturiol-Gross L., Alape-Giron A. Membrane-damaging and cytotoxic sphingomyelinases and phospholipases. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 627–676. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Monturiol-Gross L., Villalta-Romero F., Flores-Díaz M., Alape-Girón A. Bacterial phospholipases C with dual activity: Phosphatidylcholinesterase and sphingomyelinase. FEBS Open Bio. 2021;11:3262–3275. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Songer J.G. Bacterial phospholipases and their role in virulence. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5:156–161. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Matsushita O., Koide T., Kobayashi R., Nagata K., Okabe A. Substrate recognition by the collagen-binding domain of Clostridium histolyticum class I collagenase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:8761–8770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003450200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Bauer R., Wilson J.J., Philominathan S.T., Davis D., Matsushita O., Sakon J. Structural comparison of ColH and ColG collagen-binding domains from Clostridium histolyticum. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:318–327. doi: 10.1128/JB.00010-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Eckhard U., Schönauer E., Brandstetter H. Structural basis for activity regulation and substrate preference of clostridial collagenases G., H, and T. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:20184–20194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.448548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Hu Y., Webb E., Singh J., Morgan B.A., Gainor J.A., Gordon T.D., Siahaan T.J. Rapid determination of substrate specificity of Clostridium histolyticum beta-collagenase using an immobilized peptide library. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:8366–8371. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111042200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Philominathan S.T., Koide T., Matsushita O., Sakon J. Bacterial collagen-binding domain targets undertwisted regions of collagen. Protein Sci. 2012;21:1554–1565. doi: 10.1002/pro.2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Matsushita O., Jung C.M., Katayama S., Minami J., Takahashi Y., Okabe A. Gene duplication and multiplicity of collagenases in Clostridium histolyticum. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:923–933. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.3.923-933.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Matsushita O., Jung C.M., Minami J., Katayama S., Nishi N., Okabe A. A study of the collagen-binding domain of a 116 kDa Clostridium histolyticum collagenase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:3643–3648. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Matsushita O., Yoshihara K., Katayama S., Minami J., Okabe A. Purification and characterization of a Clostridium perfringens 120-kilodalton collagenase and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J. Bacteriol. 1994;176:149–156. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.1.149-156.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Haghi F., Goli E., Mirzaei B., Zeighami H. The association between fecal enterotoxigenic B. fragilis with colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:879. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6115-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Valguarnera E., Wardenburg J.B. Good Gone Bad: One Toxin Away from Disease for Bacteroides fragilis. J. Mol. Biol. 2020;432:765–785. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Goulas T., Arolas J.L., Gomis-Rüth F.X. Structure, function and latency regulation of a bacterial enterotoxin potentially derived from a mammalian adamalysin/ADAM xenolog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:1856–1861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012173108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Sears C.L. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis: A rogue among symbiotes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009;2009:349–369. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00053-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Wu S., Lim K.C., Huang J., Saidi R.F., Sears C.L. Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin cleaves the zonula adherens protein, E-cadherin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:14979–14984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Ko S.H., Choi J.H., Kim J.M. Bacteroides fragilis Enterotoxin Induces Autophagy through an AMPK and FoxO3-Pathway, Leading to the Inhibition of Apoptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Toxins. 2023;15:544. doi: 10.3390/toxins15090544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Jeon J.I., Ko S.H., Kim J.M. Intestinal Epithelial Cells Exposed to Bacteroides fragilis Enterotoxin Regulate NF-κB Activation and Inflammatory Responses through β-Catenin Expression. Infect. Immun. 2019;87:e00312–e00319. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00312-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Wu S., Rhee K.J., Zhang M., Franco A., Sears C.L. Bacteroides fragilis toxin stimulates intestinal epithelial cell shedding and gamma-secretase-dependent E-cadherin cleavage. J. Cell Sci. 2007;120:1944–1952. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Chung L., Thiele Orberg E., Geis A.L., Chan J.L., Fu K., DeStefano Shields C.E., Dejea C.M., Fathi P., Chen J., Finard B.B., et al. Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Coordinates a Pro-carcinogenic Inflammatory Cascade via Targeting of Colonic Epithelial Cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:203–214.e205. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Murphy J.R. Mechanism of diphtheria toxin catalytic domain delivery to the eukaryotic cell cytosol and the cellular factors that directly participate in the process. Toxins. 2011;3:294–308. doi: 10.3390/toxins3030294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Pirazzini M., Azarnia Tehran D., Zanetti G., Rossetto O., Montecucco C. Hsp90 and Thioredoxin-Thioredoxin Reductase enable the catalytic activity of Clostridial neurotoxins inside nerve terminals. Toxicon. 2018;147:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Chen B., Basak S., Chen P., Zhang C., Perry K., Tian S., Yu C., Dong M., Huang L., Bowen M.E., et al. Structure and conformational dynamics of Clostridioides difficile toxin A. Life Sci. Alliance. 2022;5:e202201383. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Chumbler N.M., Rutherford S.A., Zhang Z., Farrow M.A., Lisher J.P., Farquhar E., Giedroc D.P., Spiller B.W., Melnyk R.A., Lacy D.B. Crystal structure of Clostridium difficile toxin A. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:15002. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Zhou Y., Zhan X., Luo J., Li D., Zhou R., Zhang J., Pan Z., Zhang Y., Jia T., Zhang X., et al. Structural dynamics of the CROPs domain control stability and toxicity of Paeniclostridium sordellii lethal toxin. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:8426. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44169-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Kenworthy A.K., Schmieder S.S., Raghunathan K., Tiwari A., Wang T., Kelly C.V., Lencer W.I. Cholera Toxin as a Probe for Membrane Biology. Toxins. 2021;13:543. doi: 10.3390/toxins13080543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Wernick N.L., Chinnapen D.J., Cho J.A., Lencer W.I. Cholera toxin: An intracellular journey into the cytosol by way of the endoplasmic reticulum. Toxins. 2010;2:310–325. doi: 10.3390/toxins2030310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Ernst K. Requirement of Peptidyl-Prolyl Cis/Trans isomerases and chaperones for cellular uptake of bacterial AB-type toxins. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12:938015. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.938015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Ernst K., Schnell L., Barth H. Host Cell Chaperones Hsp70/Hsp90 and Peptidyl-Prolyl Cis/Trans Isomerases Are Required for the Membrane Translocation of Bacterial ADP-Ribosylating Toxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017;406:163–198. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Lemichez E., Bomsel M., Devilliers G., vanderSpek J., Murphy J.R., Lukianov E.V., Olsnes S., Boquet P. Membrane translocation of diphtheria toxin fragment A exploits early to late endosome trafficking machinery. Mol. Microbiol. 1997;23:445–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1997.tb02669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Collier R.J. Diphtheria toxin: Mode of action and structure. Bacteriol. Rev. 1975;39:54–85. doi: 10.1128/br.39.1.54-85.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Chenal A., Prongidi-Fix L., Perier A., Aisenbrey C., Vernier G., Lambotte S., Haertlein M., Dauvergne M.T., Fragneto G., Bechinger B., et al. Deciphering membrane insertion of the diphtheria toxin T domain by specular neutron reflectometry and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;391:872–883. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Gillet D., Barbier J. Diphtheria toxin. In: Alouf J., Ladant D.R.P.M., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 111–132. [Google Scholar]
- 208.Jørgensen R., Wang Y., Visschedyk D., Merrill A.R. The nature and character of the transition state for the ADP-ribosyltransferase reaction. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:802–809. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Michalska M., Wolf P. Pseudomonas Exotoxin A: Optimized by evolution for effective killing. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:963. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Rolsma S., Frank D.W., Barbieri J.T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 133–160. [Google Scholar]
- 211.Johannes L. Shiga Toxin-A Model for Glycolipid-Dependent and Lectin-Driven Endocytosis. Toxins. 2017;9:340. doi: 10.3390/toxins9110340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Liu Y., Tian S., Thaker H., Dong M. Shiga Toxins: An Update on Host Factors and Biomedical Applications. Toxins. 2021;13:222. doi: 10.3390/toxins13030222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Collier R.J. Membrane translocation by anthrax toxin. Mol. Aspects Med. 2009;30:413–422. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Liu S., Moayeri M., Leppla S.H. Anthrax lethal and edema toxins in anthrax pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.van der Goot G., Young J.A. Receptors of anthrax toxin and cell entry. Mol. Aspects Med. 2009;30:406–412. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Marchesi J., Shanahan F. The normal intestinal microbiota. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2007;20:508–513. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282a56a99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Young J.A., Collier R.J. Anthrax toxin: Receptor binding, internalization, pore formation, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007;76:243–265. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Frisan T. Bacterial genotoxins: The long journey to the nucleus of mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1858:567–575. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Martin O.C.B., Frisan T. Bacterial Genotoxin-Induced DNA Damage and Modulation of the Host Immune Microenvironment. Toxins. 2020;12:63. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Taieb F., Petit C., Nougayrède J.P., Oswald E. The Enterobacterial Genotoxins: Cytolethal Distending Toxin and Colibactin. EcoSal Plus. 2016;7 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0008-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Du L., Song J. Delivery, structure, and function of bacterial genotoxins. Virulence. 2022;13:1199–1215. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2097417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Caso G.C., McClain M.S., Erwin A.L., Truelock M.D., Campbell A.M., Leasure C.S., Nagel M., Schey K.L., Lacy D.B., Ohi M.D., et al. Functional Properties of Oligomeric and Monomeric Forms of Helicobacter pylori VacA Toxin. Infect. Immun. 2021;89:e0034821. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00348-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Foegeding N.J., Caston R.R., McClain M.S., Ohi M.D., Cover T.L. An Overview of Helicobacter pylori VacA Toxin Biology. Toxins. 2016;8:173. doi: 10.3390/toxins8060173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Ricci V., Sommi P., Boquet P. Helicobacter pylori vacuolating toxin. In: Alouf J., Ladant D.R.P.M., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 515–557. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Sanchez J., Holmgren J. Cholera toxin structure, gene regulation and pathophysiological and immunological aspects. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:1347–1360. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-7496-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kabbani A.M., Raghunathan K., Lencer W.I., Kenworthy A.K., Kelly C.V. Structured clustering of the glycosphingolipid GM1 is required for membrane curvature induced by cholera toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:14978–14986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001119117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.White C., Bader C., Teter K. The manipulation of cell signaling and host cell biology by cholera toxin. Cell. Signal. 2022;100:110489. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Heggelund J.E., Bjornestad V.A., Krengel U. Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins and beyond. In: Alouf J.E., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 195–229. [Google Scholar]
- 229.Locht C., Antoine R. The History of Pertussis Toxin. Toxins. 2021;13:623. doi: 10.3390/toxins13090623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Locht C., Coutte L., Mielcarek N. The ins and outs of pertussis toxin. FEBS J. 2011;278:4668–4682. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Takehara M., Takagishi T., Seike S., Oda M., Sakaguchi Y., Hisatsune J., Ochi S., Kobayashi K., Nagahama M. Cellular Entry of Clostridium perfringens Iota-Toxin and Clostridium botulinum C2 Toxin. Toxins. 2017;9:247. doi: 10.3390/toxins9080247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Ernst K., Sailer J., Braune M., Barth H. Intoxication of mammalian cells with binary clostridial enterotoxins is inhibited by the combination of pharmacological chaperone inhibitors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2021;394:941–954. doi: 10.1007/s00210-020-02029-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Stiles B.G., Pradhan K., Fleming J.M., Samy R.P., Barth H., Popoff M.R. Clostridium and Bacillus binary enterotoxins: Bad for the bowels, and eukaryotic being. Toxins. 2014;6:2626–2656. doi: 10.3390/toxins6092626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Papatheodorou P., Aktories K. Receptor-Binding and Uptake of Binary Actin-ADP-Ribosylating Toxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017;406:119–133. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Aktories K., Schmidt G., Lang A.E. Photorhabdus luminescens Toxins TccC3 and TccC5: Insecticidal ADP-Ribosyltransferases that Modify Threonine and Glutamine. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015;384:53–67. doi: 10.1007/82_2014_382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Aktories K., Weller U., Chhatwal G.S. Clostridium botulinum type C produces a novel ADP-ribosyltransferase distinct from botulinum C2 toxin. FEBS Lett. 1987;212:109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81566-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Chardin P., Boquet P., Madaule P., Popoff M.R., Rubin E.J., Gill D.M. The mammalian G protein rhoC is ADP-ribosylated by Clostridium botulinum exoenzyme C3 and affects actin microfilaments in Vero Cells. EMBO J. 1989;8:1087–1092. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03477.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Rubin E.J., Gill D.M., Boquet P., Popoff M.R. Functional modification of a 21-kilodalton G protein when ADP-ribosylated by exoenzyme C3 of Clostridium botulinum. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1988;8:418–426. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.1.418-426.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Barth H., Fischer S., Möglich A., Förtsch C. Clostridial C3 Toxins Target Monocytes/Macrophages and Modulate Their Functions. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:339. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Fellermann M., Huchler C., Fechter L., Kolb T., Wondany F., Mayer D., Michaelis J., Stenger S., Mellert K., Möller P., et al. Clostridial C3 Toxins Enter and Intoxicate Human Dendritic Cells. Toxins. 2020;12:563. doi: 10.3390/toxins12090563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Rohrbeck A., Höltje M., Adolf A., Oms E., Hagemann S., Ahnert-Hilger G., Just I. The Rho ADP-ribosylating C3 exoenzyme binds cells via an Arg-Gly-Asp motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:17668–17680. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.798231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Genth H., Gerhard R., Maeda A., Amano M., Kaibuchi K., Aktories K., Just I. Entrapment of Rho ADP-ribosylated by Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme in the Rho-guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor-1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:28523–28527. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301915200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Wilde C., Aktories K. The Rho-ADP-ribosylating C3 exoenzyme from Clostridium botulinum and related C3-like transferases. Toxicon. 2001;39:1647–1660. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Orrell K.E., Melnyk R.A. Large Clostridial Toxins: Mechanisms and Roles in Disease. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2021;85:e0006421. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00064-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Popoff M.R., Bouvet P. Clostridial toxins. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:1021–1064. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Uzal F.A., Navarro M.A., Li J., Freedman J.C., Shrestha A., McClane B.A. Comparative pathogenesis of enteric clostridial infections in humans and animals. Anaerobe. 2018;53:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.LaFrance M.E., Farrow M.A., Chandrasekaran R., Sheng J., Rubin D.H., Lacy D.B. Identification of an epithelial cell receptor responsible for Clostridium difficile TcdB-induced cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:7073–7078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500791112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Tao L., Zhang J., Meraner P., Tovaglieri A., Wu X., Gerhard R., Zhang X., Stallcup W.B., Miao J., He X., et al. Frizzled proteins are colonic epithelial receptors for C. difficile toxin B. Nature. 2016;538:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature19799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Yuan P., Zhang H., Cai C., Zhu S., Zhou Y., Yang X., He R., Li C., Guo S., Li S., et al. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 functions as the cellular receptor for Clostridium difficile toxin B. Cell Res. 2015;25:157–168. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Lee H., Beilhartz G.L., Kucharska I., Raman S., Cui H., Lam M.H.Y., Liang H., Rubinstein J.L., Schramek D., Julien J.P., et al. Recognition of Semaphorin Proteins by P. sordellii Lethal Toxin Reveals Principles of Receptor Specificity in Clostridial Toxins. Cell. 2020;182:345–356.e316. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Tao L., Tian S., Zhang J., Liu Z., Robinson-McCarthy L., Miyashita S.I., Breault D.T., Gerhard R., Oottamasathien S., Whelan S.P.J., et al. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans and low-density lipoprotein receptor contribute to Clostridium difficile toxin A entry into cells. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1760–1769. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0464-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Tian S., Liu Y., Wu H., Liu H., Zeng J., Choi M.Y., Chen H., Gerhard R., Dong M. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Identifies Semaphorin 6A and 6B as Receptors for Paeniclostridium sordellii Toxin TcsL. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:782–792.e787. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Schorch B., Song S., van Diemen F.R., Bock H.H., May P., Herz J., Brummelkamp T.R., Papatheodorou P., Aktories K. LRP1 is a receptor for Clostridium perfringens TpeL toxin indicating a two-receptor model of clostridial glycosylating toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:6431–6436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323790111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Papatheodorou P., Minton N.P., Aktories K., Barth H. An Updated View on the Cellular Uptake and Mode-of-Action of Clostridioides difficile Toxins. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2024;1435:219–247. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Aktories K. Bacterial protein toxins that modify host regulatory GTPases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:487–498. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Aktories K. From signal transduction to protein toxins-a narrative review about milestones on the research route of C. difficile toxins. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2023;396:173–190. doi: 10.1007/s00210-022-02300-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Genth H., Pauillac S., Schelle I., Bouvet P., Bouchier C., Varela-Chavez C., Just I., Popoff M.R. Haemorrhagic toxin and lethal toxin from Clostridium sordellii strain VPI9048: Molecular characterization and comparative analysis of substrate specificity of the large clostridial glucosylating toxins. Cell. Microbiol. 2014;16:1706–1721. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Pruitt R.N., Lacy D.B. Toward a structural understanding of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012;2:28. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Aktories K., Just I. Clostridial Rho-inhibiting protein toxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005;291:113–145. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27511-8_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Kordus S.L., Thomas A.K., Lacy D.B. Clostridioides difficile toxins: Mechanisms of action and antitoxin therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:285–298. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00660-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Zhao Y., Shao F. Diverse mechanisms for inflammasome sensing of cytosolic bacteria and bacterial virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016;29:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Genth H., Just I. Functional implications of lethal toxin-catalysed glucosylation of (H/K/N)Ras and Rac1 in Clostridium sordellii-associated disease. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011;90:959–965. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Geny B., Grassart A., Manich M., Chicanne G., Payrastre B., Sauvonnet N., Popoff M.R. Rac1 inactivation by lethal toxin from Clostridium sordellii modifies Focal Adhesions upstream of actin depolymerization. Cell. Microbiol. 2010;12:217–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Geny B., Khum H., Fitting C., Zarantonelli L., Mazuet C., Cayet N., Szatanik M., Prevost M.C., Cavaillon J.M., Huerre M., et al. Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin kills mice by inducing a major increase in lung vascular permeability. Am. J. Pathol. 2007;170:1003–1017. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Popoff M.R., Geny B. Rho/Ras-GTPase-dependent and -independent activity of clostridial glucosylating toxins. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011;60:1057–1069. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.029314-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Piteau M., Papatheodorou P., Schwan C., Schlosser A., Aktories K., Schmidt G. Lu/BCAM adhesion glycoprotein is a receptor for Escherichia coli Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1) PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003884. doi: 10.1371/annotation/6eec6403-e090-4283-aa34-34cc58ca0bbb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Kim K.J., Chung J.W., Kim K.S. 67-kDa laminin receptor promotes internalization of cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1-expressing Escherichia coli K1 into human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:1360–1368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410176200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Lemichez E., Munro P., Boyer L. Deamidase toxins. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensice Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 4th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 499–514. [Google Scholar]
- 269.Chaoprasid P., Dersch P. The Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factors (CNFs)-A Family of Rho GTPase-Activating Bacterial Exotoxins. Toxins. 2021;13:901. doi: 10.3390/toxins13120901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Ho M., Mettouchi A., Wilson B.A., Lemichez E. CNF1-like deamidase domains: Common Lego bricks among cancer-promoting immunomodulatory bacterial virulence factors. Pathog. Dis. 2018;76:fty045. doi: 10.1093/femspd/fty045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Lang A.E., Schmidt G., Schlosser A., Hey T.D., Larrinua I.M., Sheets J.J., Mannherz H.G., Aktories K. Photorhabdus luminescens toxins ADP-ribosylate actin and RhoA to force actin clustering. Science. 2010;327:1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1184557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Chapeton-Montes D., Plourde L., Bouchier C., Ma L., Diancourt L., Criscuolo A., Popoff M.R., Bruggemann H. The population structure of Clostridium tetani deduced from its pan-genome. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:11220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47551-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Peck M.W., Smith T.J., Anniballi F., Austin J.W., Bano L., Bradshaw M., Cuervo P., Cheng L.W., Derman Y., Dorner B.G., et al. Historical Perspectives and Guidelines for Botulinum Neurotoxin Subtype Nomenclature. Toxins. 2017;9:38. doi: 10.3390/toxins9010038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Dong M., Masuyer G., Stenmark P. Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2019;88:811–837. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Pirazzini M., Montecucco C., Rossetto O. Toxicology and pharmacology of botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: An update. Arch. Toxicol. 2022:03271–03279. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03271-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Poulain B., Lemichez E., Popoff M.R. Neuronal selectivity of botulinum neurotoxins. Toxicon. 2020;178:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Rummel A. Two Feet on the Membrane: Uptake of Clostridial Neurotoxins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017;406:1–37. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Wilson B.A., Ho M. Evolutionary aspects of toxin-producing bacteria. In: Alouf J., Ladant D., Popoff M.R., editors. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 4th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 3–39. [Google Scholar]
- 279.Gargi A., Reno M., Blanke S.R. Bacterial toxin modulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: Are all cytolethal distending toxins created equally? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012;2:124. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Verster K.I., Tarnopol R.L., Akalu S.M., Whiteman N.K. Horizontal Transfer of Microbial Toxin Genes to Gall Midge Genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2021;13:evab202. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Janezic S., Dingle K., Alvin J., Accetto T., Didelot X., Crook D.W., Lacy D.B., Rupnik M. Comparative genomics of Clostridioides difficile toxinotypes identifies module-based toxin gene evolution. Microb. Genom. 2020;6:mgen000449. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Mansfield M.J., Tremblay B.J., Zeng J., Wei X., Hodgins H., Worley J., Bry L., Dong M., Doxey A.C. Phylogenomics of 8,839 Clostridioides difficile genomes reveals recombination-driven evolution and diversification of toxin A and B. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1009181. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Kumar R., Feltrup T.M., Kukreja R.V., Patel K.B., Cai S., Singh B.R. Evolutionary Features in the Structure and Function of Bacterial Toxins. Toxins. 2019;11:15. doi: 10.3390/toxins11010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Richard J.F., Mainguy G., Gibert M., Marvaud J.C., Stiles B.G., Popoff M.R. Transcytosis of iota toxin across polarized CaCo-2 cell monolayers. Mol. Microbiol. 2002;43:907–917. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Lencer W.I., Constable C., Moe S., Jobling M.G., Webb H.M., Ruston S., Madara J.L., Hirst T.R., Holmes R.K. Targeting of Cholera Toxin and Escherichia coli Heat Labile Toxin in polarized epithelia: Role of COOH-terminal KDEL. J. Cell Biol. 1995;131:951–962. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.4.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Chapman C.M.L., Kapinos A., Rivera-Chávez F. Modulation of Host-Microbe Metabolism by Cholera Toxin. Infect. Immun. 2023;91:e0043522. doi: 10.1128/iai.00435-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Mansfield M.J., Doxey A.C. Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins. Pathog. Dis. 2018;76:4978416. doi: 10.1093/femspd/fty040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Montecucco C., Rasotto M.B. On botulinum neurotoxin variability. mBio. 2015;6:e02131-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02131-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin: State of the art. Mov. Disord. 2017;32:1131–1138. doi: 10.1002/mds.27072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Valtierra-de-Luis D., Villanueva M., Berry C., Caballero P. Potential for Bacillus thuringiensis and Other Bacterial Toxins as Biological Control Agents to Combat Dipteran Pests of Medical and Agronomic Importance. Toxins. 2020;12:773. doi: 10.3390/toxins12120773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.