Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
. 2024 Apr 9;13(1):2341968. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2341968

Unveiling the pathogenic mechanisms of Clostridium perfringens toxins and virulence factors

Anny Camargo a,b, Juan David Ramírez a,c, Raymond Kiu d,e, Lindsay J Hall d,e,f, Marina Muñoz a,g,CONTACT
PMCID: PMC11057404  PMID: 38590276

ABSTRACT

Clostridium perfringens causes multiple diseases in humans and animals. Its pathogenic effect is supported by a broad and heterogeneous arsenal of toxins and other virulence factors associated with a specific host tropism. Molecular approaches have indicated that most C. perfringens toxins produce membrane pores, leading to osmotic cell disruption and apoptosis. However, identifying mechanisms involved in cell tropism and selective toxicity effects should be studied more. The differential presence and polymorphisms of toxin-encoding genes and genes encoding other virulence factors suggest that molecular mechanisms might exist associated with host preference, receptor binding, and impact on the host; however, this information has not been reviewed in detail. Therefore, this review aims to clarify the current state of knowledge on the structural features and mechanisms of action of the major toxins and virulence factors of C. perfringens and discuss the impact of genetic diversity of toxinotypes in tropism for several hosts.

KEYWORDS: Clostridium perfringens; toxin type, genetic diversity, host, enteritis, toxinotypes

Introduction

Clostridium perfringens is a Gram-positive anaerobic bacterium that can form spores that are crucial during transmission. C. perfringens spores are exceptionally resistant to stressful environments, such as high temperatures, the presence of oxygen, or low nutrient levels [1]. These features facilitate its survival in different environmental niches, including soil, faeces, sewage, food, and the intestinal tract of humans and animals [2]. This “survivability” means that C. perfringens has been associated with many infections and diseases, including being the second leading cause of foodborne bacterial disease in the United States (causing one million illnesses yearly) and Europe's fourth leading cause [3–5]. In England, 8-13% of foodborne gastrointestinal outbreaks are estimated to be associated with this bacterium (90,000 cases of C. perfringens per year) [6].

The impact of C. perfringens infections is due in part to the bacterium’s potential to secrete multiple extracellular toxins, including alpha-toxin (CPA, cpa/plc gene), beta-toxin (CPB, cpb gene), epsilon-toxin (ETX, etx gene), iota-toxin (ITX, iap, and ibp binary genes), C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE, cpe gene) and Necrotic enteritis B-like toxin (NetB). These toxins correspond to essential toxin genes used in the current toxinotyping scheme (toxinotypes A-G) (Figure supplementary 1) [7].

Each toxinotype is associated with specific diseases. For example, toxinotype A, characterized by the presence of the cpa+ toxin genes, is linked to gas gangrene in humans and animals. Toxinotype B carries the cpa+, cpb+, and etx+ genes, and it is associated with haemorrhagic enteritis in calves, foals, and sheep, as well as dysentery in lambs. Toxinotype C, with the toxin genes, cpa+, cpb+, and cpe+/-, is linked to enterotoxaemia in sheep and necrotizing enteritis in humans (pigbel), pigs, calves, goats, and foals. Toxinotype D, featuring cpa+, etx+, and cpe+/-, is associated with enterotoxaemia in lambs (pulpy kidney disease), goats, and cattle. Toxinotype E, containing cpa+, itx+, and cpe+/- genes, is linked to enterotoxaemia in calves and lambs. Toxinotype F, with cpa+ and cpe+, is associated with food poisoning and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD). Finally, toxinotype G, presenting cpa+ and netB+, is associated with avian necrotic enteritis [7].

Additionally, C. perfringens produces other clinically relevant accessory toxins, such as Perfringolysin O or theta toxin (PFO) and C. perfringens beta 2 toxin (CPB2). Although not used for toxinotyping, these toxins can act synergistically with extracellular toxins, impacting other toxins’ expression, production levels, and virulence factors, thereby influencing overall disease progression [8].

The diversity of clostridial toxins and other virulence factors remains a critical study point. Therefore, in this review, we present a brief updated description of the structural and molecular characteristics, mechanisms of action, and genetic diversity of the main toxins and virulence factors associated with the tropism of C. perfringens toxinotypes across a diversity of hosts, including links to specific disease phenotypes.

C. perfringens toxins: biological properties, function, host tropism and diversity

Localization of toxins of C. perfringens and plasmids families

The virulence of C. perfringens largely depends on its ability to produce toxins, which can be encoded on plasmids, chromosomally, or both. So far, seven groups of plasmids have been described for C. perfringens: transfer of clostridial plasmids (Tcp), pCP13 C. perfringens (Pcp), pIP404, phage-like, small plasmids or an unclassified group [9], and recently the botulinum conjugation in C. perfringens (Bcp) group of plasmids encoding a new putative conjugation locus.

The first significant group of plasmids carries the Tcp conjugation locus and genes encoding clinically relevant toxins such as cpb2 and cpe, iota binary toxin genes iap and ibp, as well as antibiotic resistance genes, including chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, bacitracin, and lincomycin [10, 11]. Although a C. perfringens strain can carry up to five similar plasmids, it was recently demonstrated that the stability and inheritance of these plasmids are favoured by the ResP recombinase that catalyses the multimer resolution system [12] and by differences in the type II partitioning systems (ParMRC) [13].

A second major group of C. perfringens conjugative plasmids is the pCP13-like plasmid family, which shares a highly conserved sequence at the Pcp locus [14, 15]. These plasmids carry a cpb2 consensus variant associated with disease in horses and piglets [16]. They also have the novel C. perfringens binary enterotoxin (BEC/CPILE) [14], detected in the faeces of gastroenteritis patients, food [17], and healthy UK children [18].

The PiP404 plasmid family consists of small non-conjugative plasmids that encode a bacteriocin; however, they have not been identified to carry any toxin genes [19]. The newly identified Bcp plasmids contain a novel putative conjugation locus (Bcp) with a sequence like Clostridium botulinum plasmids and contigs that have the same plasmid mobilization gene, mobC and the same zeta toxin-encoding gene as pJGS1984_5. Additionally, these plasmids encode VirB4 homologous proteins and VirD4-like conjugation proteins distinct from the variants encoded by the Tcp and Pcp plasmids [20].

The presence of toxin-carrying plasmids and antibiotic-resistance genes in C. perfringens has been associated with its survival ability in multiple environments. Moreover, the high rate of plasmid transfer in this bacterium (2.9 × 10−1 to 3.8 × 10−2) also allows it to overcome fitness costs and segregation loss. This influences the transformation of toxinotypes in a given environment, especially within the gastrointestinal tract, implying impacts on disease outcomes [21].

However, in some cases, the metabolic load and additional energy resources required by plasmid replication, disruption of essential host genes by plasmid gene integration, and plasmid-encoded molecules may negatively impact native host proteins, leading to decreased fitness in bacterial cells [21, 22].

In addition to plasmid-localized toxins, other toxins genes such as cpa (also plc) and pfo are located only on chromosomes [9]. Furthermore, cpe can be located on the chromosome, as shown in food poisoning isolates or on a large plasmid, as observed in non-foodborne gastrointestinal disease and veterinary isolates.

The location of toxin-associated genes is expected to influence disease outcomes, as plasmid-encoded toxins can be transferred by conjugation to strains of C. perfringens toxinotype A that reside as part of the “normal” intestinal microbiota, giving rise to new strains with enhanced colonization and virulence traits. Conversely, chromosomal variants may be lost over evolutionary time due to mutation or deletion events and may cause shorter disease durations due to low colonization levels and spread [21].

Toxin structure

C. perfringens toxins are diverse and widely distributed. Structurally, clostridial toxins may have similar binding domains but different catalytic domains, suggesting possible recombination in toxin evolution. This recombination could occur through horizontal plasmid transfer or insertion-deletion processes, serving as adaptation, survival, and tropism mechanisms. This recombination could occur through horizontal plasmid transfer or insertion-deletion processes, serving as adaptation, survival, and tropism mechanisms [23]. As outlined below, some toxins are composed of different domains. In addition to allowing flexibility and dynamics in the toxin, these domains promote and facilitate the recognition of specific substrates in the target cell.

Major toxins of C. perfringens

CPA is composed of 370 amino acids (aa) and is divided into two domains: the catalytic N-domain (CP1-249) and the membrane-binding C-terminal domain (CP247-370) [24] (Figure 1a). It involves cell membrane colonization, haemolytic activity, and damaging action [24–27].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation showing domain structure of Clostridium pefringens main toxins (A). CPA toxin (B). CPB toxin (C). ETX toxin (D). ITX toxin (E). CPE toxin and (F). NetB toxin are shown. Numbers indicate amino acids that mark domain boundaries.

CPB toxin, a 336 aa protein (Figure 1b) in the alpha-haemolysing family, is suggested to bind to its receptor or form the oligomer via its C-terminus (although the exact structure–function relationship is still under study) [28].

ETX toxin is composed of three domains: i) the amino-terminal domain, involved in the receptor binding process; ii) the central region domain, responsible for membrane insertion plus channel formation; and iii) the carboxy-terminal domain, involved in the activation of proteolysis [29] (Figure 1c).

ITX is a binary toxin composed of two components: an enzymatic Ia (454 amino acids) and a binding Ib (875 amino acids), separated by 243 non-coding nucleotides. Both components, Ia and Ib, exhibit cytotoxic properties [30] (Figure 1d).

CPE is a single-chain polypeptide consisting of 319 amino acids and three domains: I, II, and III. Domain I binds to the claudin-specific receptor, while domains II and III constitute the N-terminal region associated with pore-forming activity [31] (Figure 1e).

NetB, a putative toxin gene encoding a 323 aa protein (Figure 1f), including a 30 aa secretion signal sequence, which has similarity to CPB toxin (38% identity), leading to its naming as necrotic enteritis β-like toxin, NetB [32].

Another clinically relevant accessory toxins

PFO has 500 aa residues and a 27-residue signal peptide. It is composed of four domains, with domain four (D4) mediating the toxin's binding to the eukaryotic cell's plasma membrane [33].

The structure and receptor of CPB2 remain unclear. It is suggested that only a small fraction of amino acid segments adopt an α-helix conformation in both beta toxins (atypical and consensus), which is insufficient to cross a membrane. However, in the case of consensus CPB2, some amino acid segments have been identified that could form transmembrane β-chains [34].

Mechanisms of action of C. perfringens toxins

C. perfringens is a pathogen of significant clinical and veterinary importance, attributed to its capacity to induce disease in various hosts by producing different toxins (Table 1. Section A, B).

Table 1.

Classification of toxins and other virulence factors of C. perfringens.

Virulence factor or toxin Gene Biological Properties and Function Associated disease Reference
Section A. Toxins used for C. perfringens typing
alpha-toxin plc, cpa
  • - Modifies cell membranes by enzymatic activity.

  • - Zinc-dependent phospholipase C which degrades phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin, in the eukaryotic cell membranes.

  • - Gas gangrene.

  • - Necrotic enteritis in chickens.

  • - Enteritis in calves and in piglets.

  • - Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

  • - Inflammatory diseases.

[35]
Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin cpe
  • - Intestinal damage, severe villus shortening, along with epithelial necrosis and desquamation.

  • - Human foodborne illness

  • - Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea

  • - Human enteritis necroticans

  • - Sporadic diarrhoea

  • - Enteric diseases in swine, cattle, horses, sheep and goats and wild animals such as deer and bears.

[36]
Alpha-clostripain ccp
  • - Processing of secreted proteins

  • - Potential to affect the levels of active extracellular toxins.

  • - Possible Clostridial myonecrosis-associated

[37]
Epsilon toxin etx
  • - Aerolysin-like b-pore-forming toxin family.

  • - Intestine: Epithelial cell detachment and cell necrosis, lamina propria haemorrhaging and polymorphonucleocyte infiltration.

  • - Affect renal system, brain, cardiorespiratory system, and pleura.

  • - Hemolysin.

  • - Blood pressure elevation, increased contractility of smooth muscle, vascular permeability increase.

  • - Enterotoxaemia in domestic ruminants (sheep and goats)

  • - Illness in humans related to the epsilon toxin?

[38]
Beta toxin cpb
  • - Beta-barrel pore-forming toxin family and forms oligomeric pores in several susceptible immune cell lines.

  • - Vascular necrosis and marked inflammatory reactions result from a direct interaction of CPB with vascular endothelial cells.

  • - Destruction of jejunal and ileal villous tip epithelium.

  • - Necrotizing enteritis (NE) in pigs, sheep, goats, calves, and humans.

[39]
Iota toxin itx
  • - Necrosis of the superficial epithelium with relative sparing of the crypt epithelium, and submucosal haemorrhage and transmural haemorrhage.

  • - Lethal necrotizing

  • - Enteritis and sudden death in beef calves.

[40]
Section B. Accessory toxins
Clostridium Perfringens beta 2 toxin cpb2
  • - Haemorrhage and necrosis of the small and large intestines.

  • - Degenerated and necrotic desquamated epithelial cells, cell debris, inflammatory cells.

  • - Enteric diseases in swine, cattle, horses, sheep and goats and wild animals such as deer and bears.

[41]
Perfringolysin O pfoA
  • - Tissue destruction and an anti-inflammatory response.

  • - Vascular accumulation of leukocytes within blood vessels and the extracellular matrix of host tissues.

  • - Disruption of endothelial, local edema and systemic shock and multiorgan failure.

  • - Myonecrosis (gas gangrene), haemorrhagic enteritis in calves and, septicaemia (intravascular haemolysis) in humans.

  • - Associated with Necrotizing Enterocolitis in human neonates.

[11]
Necrotic enteritis E-like toxin netE
  • - Pore-forming toxin within the Leukocidin/Hemolysin superfamily.

  [42]
Necrotic enteritis F-like toxin netF
  • - Putative beta-pore-forming toxin.

  • - Pore-forming toxin within the Leukocidin/Hemolysin superfamily.

  • - Canine haemorrhagic gastroenteritis.

  • - Foal necrotizing enteritis.

[43]
Necrotic enteritis G-like toxin netG
  • - Putative beta-pore-forming toxin.

  • - Cytotonic effects, such as proinflammatory effects.

  • - No confirmed association with disease.

[42]
Necrotic enteritis B-like toxin netB
  • - Pore-forming toxin.

  • - Necrotic enteritis of chickens.

[44]
Toxin C. perfringens large cytotoxin TpeL
  • - Ras-specific glucosyltransferase activity inactivating the Ras signalling pathway leading to apoptosis.

  • - Cytotoxic effects (morphological changes such as enlargement and the rounding of Vero cells).

  • - Associated with avian necrotic enteritis.

[45]
Collagenase ColA
  • - Degradation of the extracellular matrix due to their ability to digest native collagen.

  • - Associated with avian necrotic enteritis.

[46]
Binary enterotoxin of C. perfringens becA,becB
  • - Enterotoxic activity.

  • - Fluid accumulation in mice.

  • - Acute gastroenteritis in humans.

[17]
Neuramidases  
Secreted neuramidase nanJ
  • - Increase CPE-induced cytotoxicity and CH-1 pore formation in Caco-2 cells.

  • - Contribute to food poisoning caused by F-type c-cpe strains carrying the nanH and nanJ genes.

[47]
Secreted major neuramidase nanI
  • - Synergy with CPA toxin, ETX toxin, CPB-toxin and CPE toxin

  • - Sialidase activity.

  • - Promotes the colonization of C. perfringens in the intestinal tract and enhances the cytotoxic activity.

  • - Gas gangrene?

[47]
Non-secreted neuramidase nanH
  • - Enhance CPE cytotoxicity.

  • - Reducing host cell surface charge repulsion during CPE binding or removing sialic acid residues that sterically interfere with CPE binding.

  • - Intestinal pathology.

[48]
Hyaluronidases
Hyaluronidases nagI, nagJ, nagH, nagK nagL
  • - Facilitates the spread of the major tissue-damaging α-toxin, thereby potentiating its cytolytic activity.

  • - Degrade hyaluronate cell surface coatings.

  • - Act on connective tissue during gas gangrene.

  • - Increased permeability of the connective tissues.

  • - Gas gangrene

[49, 50]

Sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine degradation

CPA, a toxin in all toxinotypes, is the primary determinant of virulence in clostridial myonecrosis caused by toxinotype A. The process is initiated by the toxin binding to the ganglioside receptor GM1a [51] (Figure 2a). This binding results in the degradation of sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine in the cell's plasma membrane, triggering proinflammatory responses during the early phases of gas gangrene [52]. This inflammatory process may advance to aggravated tissue infection, accompanied by secondary gas crepitation in the tissue and the development of necrotic in humans [35] (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Action mechanisms of the primary C. perfringens toxins used for toxin typing. Molecular mechanism of action of the major toxins of C. perfringens. (A). CPA toxin: CPA toxin interacts with GM1a, hydrolysing phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sphingomyelin (SM), resulting in the formation of diacylglycerol (DAG) and ceramide (CER) with Tropomyosin kinase A receptor (TrKA) activation and triggers the activation of an intracellular signalling cascade with Interleukin - 8 (IL-8) release. The activation of phosphatidyl inositol 3 (IP3) promotes intracytoplasmic calcium (Ca+) entry (B). CPB toxin: CPB binds to platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) with subsequent release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and formation of pores that allow ion exchange to and from the cell (C). ETX toxin: ETX toxin interacts with protein “myelin and lymphocytes” (MAL), forming an active pore that induces ion transport and exchange across the cell membrane (D). ITX toxin: The binding of Ib to the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) receptor mediates its entry into the host cell, promoting the formation of channels for the entry of Ia by endocytosis with subsequent depolymerization of actin filaments, generating morphological changes and alteration of cell permeability (E). CPE toxin: the CPE toxin binds to claudin receptors, contributing to the formation of a pore on the cell surface with ion exchange and osmotic imbalance. (F). NetB toxin recognizes cholesterol-free regions in cell membranes by forming heptameric hydrophilic pores that allow the entry of ions such as Na+, Cl- y, and Ca 2+.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of principal hosts for each C. perfringens toxinotypes – each box representing a different toxinotype.

Formation of pores

Pore-forming toxins (CPB, ETX, ITX, CPE, and NetB) allow Ca2+, Na+, Cl- entry and K + loss with subsequent cellular electrochemical gradient depolarization, ionic homeostasis alteration, and cell death [43].

CPB is the primary virulence determinant in necrotizing human enteritis and enterotoxaemia caused by toxinotype C in sheep. It is also involved in haemorrhagic dysentery in sheep caused by toxinotype B (Figure 3). CPB binds with platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1, also known as CD31) to trigger the formation of pores in the endothelial cell membrane. This process causes damage to the endothelial cells that make up the vasculature of the intestinal mucosa (Figure 2b), resulting in haemorrhagic and necrotizing enteritis [53, 54].

The ETX toxin, found in toxinotypes B and D, is linked to enterotoxaemia in ruminants (Figure 3). It binds to receptors dependent on cholesterol and sphingomyelin present on the outer membranes of endothelial cells lining the intestine and vascular cells in organs such as the brain, kidneys, and liver in ruminants. While the exact identity of the receptor is unknown, it is confirmed that ETX forms active pores, causing direct damage to intestinal endothelial cells. This process increases vascular and intestinal wall permeability, leading to intestinal epithelial cell detachment and necrosis, triggering enterotoxaemia, especially in goats (Figure 2c) [38, 55].

For ITX, present only in toxinotype E and associated with haemorrhagic enteritis in cattle (Figure 3), it is described that the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) mediates the entry of toxin Ib into the host cell [56], allowing the formation of functional channels for ion movement and entry of Ia by endocytosis [57]. This interaction leads to degenerative changes in the mucosal epithelium of the small intestine, increased permeability of intestinal cell monolayers, and haemorrhagic lesions in the serosa and mucosa characteristic of enteritis (Figure 2d) [58].

The CPE toxin, found in toxinotype F, is recognized as the primary toxin causing food poisoning and gastrointestinal illnesses in humans, including AAD (Figure 3). Its mechanism of action involves binding to claudin receptors, crucial components of the tight junctions between epithelial or endothelial cells at the cell surface. This binding facilitates the formation of pores in the plasma membrane [59], removing claudins from the cell membrane and disrupting tight junctions between cells. Consequently, this disruption increases barrier permeability in the small intestine and colon, impairing absorption and diarrhoea (Figure 2e) [60, 61].

NetB, found in toxinotype G of C. perfringens and associated with avian necrotic enteritis (Figure 3), recognizes cholesterol-free regions in the membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. It forms heptameric hydrophilic pores that allow the entry of ions, resulting in increased permeability. This process leads to focal, multifocal, or coalescent necrosis of enterocytes and, in severe cases, coagulative necrosis of the entire superficial mucosa separating the intestinal lamina of birds (Figure 2f) [44].

PFOA is encoded in most disease-associated C. perfringens strains, except for strains carrying cpe on the chromosome [62]. PFOA interacts with cell membrane cholesterol to form pores [33]. It acts synergistically with CPA toxin to affect leukostasis [63] and promotes the expression of adhesion molecules and platelet-activating factors. These toxin-associated features contribute to developing myonecrosis (gas gangrene), haemorrhagic enteritis in calves, and septicaemia (intravascular haemolysis) in humans, including neonates [64–66]. Most recently, it was described that pfoA + strains were associated with preterm infants, including those with necrotizing enterocolitis, and were shown in vitro to cause significantly more intestinal cell damage than pfoA- strains [11].

CPB2 is an accessory toxin produced by C. perfrignens associated with porcine, equine, and bovine enteritis. While the structure of CPB2 and the identification of residues responsible for its antigenicity and association with the membrane of intestinal epithelial cells are under study [67], CPB2 has been reported as a pore-forming toxin. Its action mechanism involves forming cation-selective channels approximately 1.4 nm in diameter in lipid bilayers, leading to altered ion flux and increased intestinal permeability [34].

Genetic diversity and host specificity of C. perfringens toxins

Understanding the molecular patterns influencing interspecies transmission and host adaptation (Figure 3 and Table 1) is crucial for disease prevention and control.

The amino acid sequence diversity of the CPA toxin from 15 strains of C. perfringens suggests variation within the signal sequences (six positions), the N-domain (10 positions), C-domain (three positions), and the N- to C-domain linker peptide (one position), with most of these changes conserved potentially impacting the toxin’s resistance to degradation and biological activity [68]. The limited variability of the CPA toxin enhances its affinity for endothelial cells in the host, destroying the endothelial structure; this disruption in peripheral circulation results in myonecrosis [69].

The study of CPB diversity in isolates of toxinotypes B and C has identified that some isolates of type C have four conserved amino acid changes, resulting in two natural variants of the toxin. The sequence modifications in CPB found in toxinotype C isolates lead to increased toxin sensitivity to trypsin, a higher affinity phenotype for host endothelial cells, and increased cytotoxicity. As a result, the molecular diversity of CPB in toxinotype C may contribute to enterotoxaemia and necrotizing enteritis in hosts deficient in trypsin, such as neonatal animals, individuals with diets rich in trypsin inhibitors, and those with pancreatic dysfunction [70].

The genetic diversity of the ETX toxin still needs to be fully elucidated. It has been described that the N-terminal amino acid sequence of ETX is identical in all strains examined to date [71]. Amino acid mutations within domain II of ETX affect pore characteristics and result in changes in cytotoxicity on renal distal tubule cells, leading to pulpy kidney disease in ruminants [72].

The diversity analysis of the ITX components, Ia and Ib, obtained from E-type strains from a calf and a human in France, reveals a very high identity, above 99%, at the amino acid level [73]. Although both toxins show conserved sequences, studies on iota toxin diversity are limited, and a better understanding of their contribution to enterotoxaemia in lambs, rabbits, and calves is required.

The genetic diversity analysis of the CPE toxin gene located on the chromosome, associated with food poisoning, and on plasmids linked to AAD reveals identical nucleotide sequences with similar cytotoxic activity, suggesting a physiological basis for the genotype-disease relationship [74]. Strains harbouring the CPE toxin on the chromosome exhibit superior heat resistance compared to non-food human gastrointestinal disease strains carrying the plasmid CPE gene. This resistance favours their survival in food and contributes to the development of food poisoning [75].

Analysis of NetB sequence diversity in different avian isolates reveals a high degree of conservation despite the presence of an amino acid variant, A168 T, in some isolates. This variant does not significantly affect the physical properties of the encoded protein and does not differ in cytotoxicity. These genetic characteristics of the NetB toxin provide additional evidence that NetB constitutes an essential virulence factor in the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in birds [76].

Although the genetic diversity of the PFOA toxin and its influence on disease development is not well understood, the nucleotide sequence of the pfoA gene has been reported to exhibit approximately 86% identity with a membrane-damaging thiol-activated alveolysin detected in C. perfringens isolates IQ2 (type E) and IQ3 (BEC-positive) [18]. This toxin also shares a 60% identity with the streptolysin O gene and a 48% identity with the pneumolysin gene [77].

The expression of CPB2 toxin in C. perfringens strains varies according to host species, with two variants identified: consensus in porcine strains and atypical in non-porcine species. While the genotype-phenotype correlation is high in the consensus variant, the atypical variant shows only a 50% correlation. Furthermore, the atypical genes in types D and E are more similar to each other than isolates for non-porcine kinds A, B, and C, suggesting divergent evolution and a possible explanation for tropism by the host [78].

A detailed description of other accessory toxins is presented in Table 1 – section B.

Conclusions

In recent years, efforts have been made to understand how chemical structures underpin the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of bacterial toxins, including the regions involved in host cell recognition and the receptors that confer specificity to each toxin in different hosts, leading to the development of the pathological state. However, although C. perfringens is part of the “resident” microbiota, studies need to probe the genetic diversity of each toxin in healthy animals and humans. This is crucial in understanding whether changes in the toxins render them less toxic or lead to their deactivation, ultimately contributing to a more “commensal” lifestyle.

Future research could focus on additional sampling of isolates from healthy and diseased hosts and ecological niches to unravel broader evolutionary aspects, phylogenetic relationships, and genetic diversity of this bacterium, including a comprehensive examination of toxin-associated gene makeup. Further elucidation of the precise association between toxin-specific molecular and structural changes linked with host affinity will enhance knowledge about the diversity of this important pathogen.

In addition, gut microbiota studies are needed to understand how they may influence resistance to C. perfringens colonization, competition for space and specific nutrients, or toxin function.

Understanding the interactions, genetic diversity, precise targets, and selective toxicity mechanism of C. perfringens toxins may open new avenues for preventative and therapy development. This could involve the rational design of potent pharmacological inhibitors/compounds and identifying new vaccine targets to counteract the effects of toxins, ultimately improving human and animal health.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_1

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación (Minciencias), within the framework of the project 722289684653 contract. 613–2021. A.C. was supported by the Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia and by the Scholarships for doctoral students Universidad del Rosario. L.J.H. was supported by Wellcome Trust Investigator Award 220876/Z/20/Z; the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme, Gut Microbes and Health BB/R012490/1, and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10353 and BBS/E/F/000PR10356; and the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Microbiome and Health BB/X011054/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10353 and BBS/E/F/000PR10356; and the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Microbiome and Health BB/X011054/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR13631.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Li J, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR, et al. Clostridium perfringens sporulation and sporulation-associated toxin production. Microbiol Spectr. 2016: 331–347. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kiu R, Hall LJ.. An update on the human and animal enteric pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0144-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grass JE, Gould LH, Mahon BE.. Epidemiology of foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Clostridium perfringens, United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis.1998–2010. 2013;10(2):131–136. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):7, doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mahamat Abdelrahim A, Radomski N, Delannoy S, et al. Large-scale genomic analyses and toxinotyping of Clostridium perfringens implicated in foodborne outbreaks in France. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:777, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bhattacharya A, Shantikumar S, Beaufoy D, et al. Outbreak of Clostridium perfringens food poisoning linked to leeks in cheese sauce: an unusual source. Epidemiol Infect. 2020: 148, doi: 10.1017/S095026882000031X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rood JI, Adams V, Lacey J, et al. Expansion of the Clostridium perfringens toxin-based typing scheme. Anaerobe. 2018;53:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gohari IM, Navarro AM, Li J, et al. Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium perfringens. Virulence. 2021;12(1):723–753. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Adams V, Bannam TL, et al. Toxin plasmids of Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(2):208–233. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00062-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adams V, Han X, Lyras D, et al. Antibiotic resistance plasmids and mobile genetic elements of Clostridium perfringens. Plasmid. 2018;99:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kiu R, Shaw AG, Sim K, et al. Particular genomic and virulence traits associated with preterm infant-derived toxigenic Clostridium perfringens strains. Nat Microbiol. 2023: 1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01385-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Revitt-Mills S, Lao C, Archambault M, et al. The Tcp plasmids of Clostridium perfringens require the resP gene to ensure stable inheritance. Plasmid. 2020;107:102461, doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2019.102461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Watts TD, Traore DA, Atkinson SC, et al. The Specificity of ParR Binding Determines the Incompatibility of Conjugative Plasmids in Clostridium perfringens. mBio. 2022;13(4):e01356-22, doi: 10.1128/mbio.01356-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ueda K, Kawahara K, Kimoto N, et al. Analysis of the complete genome sequences of Clostridium perfringens strains harbouring the binary enterotoxin BEC gene and comparative genomics of pCP13-like family plasmids. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08453-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watts TD, Vidor CJ, Awad MM, et al. pCP13, a representative of a new family of conjugative toxin plasmids in Clostridium perfringens. Plasmid. 2019;102:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2019.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gibert M, Jolivet-Reynaud C, Popoff MR.. Beta2 toxin, a novel toxin produced by Clostridium perfringens. Gene. 1997;203(1):65–73. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00493-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yonogi S, Matsuda S, Kawai T, et al. BEC, a novel enterotoxin of Clostridium perfringens found in human clinical isolates from acute gastroenteritis outbreaks. Infect Immun. 2014;82(6):2390–2399. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01759-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kiu R, Sim K, Shaw A, et al. Genomic analysis of Clostridium perfringens BEC/CPILE-positive, toxinotype D and E strains isolated from healthy children. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(9):543, doi: 10.3390/toxins11090543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garnier T, Cole ST.. Complete nucleotide sequence and genetic organization of the bacteriocinogenic plasmid, pIP404, from Clostridium perfringens. Plasmid. 1988;19(2):134–150. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(88)90052-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gulliver EL, Adams V, Marcelino VR, et al. Extensive genome analysis identifies novel plasmid families in Clostridium perfringens. Microb Genom. 2023;9(4), doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brynestad S, Sarker MR, McClane BA, et al. Enterotoxin plasmid from Clostridium perfringens is conjugative. Infect Immun. 2001;69(5):3483–3487. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3483-3487.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carroll AC, Wong A.. Plasmid persistence: costs, benefits, and the plasmid paradox. Can J Microbiol. 2018;64(5):293–304. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2017-0609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kumar R, Feltrup TM, Kukreja RV, et al. Evolutionary features in the structure and function of bacterial toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(1):15, doi: 10.3390/toxins11010015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oda M, Terao Y, Sakurai J, et al. Membrane-binding mechanism of Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin. Toxins (Basel). 2015;7(12):5268–5275. doi: 10.3390/toxins7124880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nagahama M, Mukai M, Morimitsu S, et al. Role of the C-domain in the biological activities of Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin. Microbiol Immunol. 2002;46(10):647–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2002.tb02748.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Naylor CE, Eaton JT, Howells A, et al. Structure of the key toxin in gas gangrene. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5(8):738–746. doi: 10.1038/1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu C, She Y, Lin Y, et al. Molecular structure and function of the carboxy-terminus of the alpha-toxin from Clostridium perfringens type A. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), doi: 10.1111/jpn.13274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sakurai J, Duncan CL.. Some properties of beta-toxin produced by Clostridium perfringens type C. Infect Immun. 1978;21(2):678–680. doi: 10.1128/iai.21.2.678-680.1978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stiles BG, Barth G, Barth H, et al. Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin: a malevolent molecule for animals and man? Toxins (Basel). 2013 Nov 12;5(11):2138–2160. doi: 10.3390/toxins5112138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Perelle S, Gibert M, Boquet P, et al. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens iota-toxin genes and expression in Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1993;61(12):5147–5156. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.12.5147-5156.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kitadokoro K, Nishimura K, Kamitani S, et al. Crystal structure of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin displays features of β-pore-forming toxins. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(22):19549–19555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.228478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rood JI, Keyburn AL, Moore RJ.. NetB and necrotic enteritis: the hole movable story. Avian Pathol. 2016;45(3):295–301. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2016.1158781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verherstraeten S, Goossens E, Valgaeren B, et al. Perfringolysin O: the underrated Clostridium perfringens toxin? Toxins (Basel). 2015;7(5):1702–1721. doi: 10.3390/toxins7051702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Benz R, Piselli C, Hoxha C, et al. Clostridium perfringens Beta2 toxin forms highly cation-selective channels in lipid bilayers. Eur Biophys J. 2022;51(1):15–27. doi: 10.1007/s00249-021-01577-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garcia NM, Cai J.. Aggressive soft tissue infections. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(5):1097–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Uzal FA, Freedman JC, Shrestha A, et al. Towards an understanding of the role of Clostridium perfringens toxins in human and animal disease. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(3):361–377. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chakravorty A, Awad MM, Hiscox TJ, et al. The cysteine protease α-Clostripain is not essential for the pathogenesis of Clostridium perfringens-mediated myonecrosis. PLoS One. 2011; 6(7):e22762, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alves GG, de Ávila RAM, Chávez-Olórtegui CD, et al. Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin: the third most potent bacterial toxin known. Anaerobe. 2014;30:102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roos S, Wyder M, Candi A, et al. Binding studies on isolated porcine small intestinal mucosa and in vitro toxicity studies reveal lack of effect of C. perfringens beta-toxin on the porcine intestinal epithelium. Toxins (Basel). 2015;7(4):1235–1252. doi: 10.3390/toxins7041235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Songer JG, Miskimins DW.. Clostridial abomasitis in calves: case report and review of the literature. Anaerobe. 2005;11(5):290–294. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Uzal FA, Vidal JE, McClane BA, et al. Clostridium perfringens toxins involved in mammalian veterinary diseases. Open Toxinology J. 2010;2:24, doi: 10.2174/1875414701003020024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Revitt-Mills SA, Rood JI, Adams V.. Clostridium perfringens extracellular toxins and enzymes: 20 and counting. Microb. Australia. 2015;36(3):114–117. doi: 10.1071/MA15039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gohari IM, Parreira VR, Nowell VJ, et al. A novel pore-forming toxin in type A Clostridium perfringens is associated with both fatal canine hemorrhagic gastroenteritis and fatal foal necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122684, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Keyburn AL, Bannam TL, Moore RJ, et al. NetB, a pore-forming toxin from necrotic enteritis strains of Clostridium perfringens. Toxins (Basel). 2010;2(7):1913–1927. doi: 10.3390/toxins2071913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Coursodon C, Glock R, Moore K, et al. TpeL-producing strains of Clostridium perfringens type A are highly virulent for broiler chicks. Anaerobe. 2012;18(1):117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Van Damme L, Cox N, Callens C, et al. Protein truncating variants of colA in Clostridium perfringens type G strains. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021: 11, doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.645248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang YH. Sialidases from Clostridium perfringens and their inhibitors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;9:462, doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li J, McClane BA.. NanH Is Produced by Sporulating Cultures of Clostridium perfringens Type F Food Poisoning Strains and Enhances the Cytotoxicity of C. perfringens Enterotoxin. mSphere. 2021;6(2):e00176–21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00176-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hynes WL, Walton SL.. Hyaluronidases of Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;183(2):201–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08958.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Canard B, Garnier T, Saint-Joanis B, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of the nagH gene encoding a hyaluronidase of Clostridium perfringens. Mol Gen Genet. 1994;243(2):215–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00280319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oda M, Kabura M, Takagishi T, et al. Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin recognizes the GM1a-TrkA complex. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(39):33070–33079. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.393801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Takagishi T, Oda M, Kabura M, et al. Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin induces Gm1a clustering and Trka phosphorylation in the host cell membrane. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0120497, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lencer WI. Everything Illuminated-Clostridium perfringens β-toxin. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(1):5–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bruggisser J, Tarek B, Wyder M, et al. CD31 (PECAM-1) serves as the endothelial cell-specific receptor of clostridium perfringens β-toxin. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(1):69–78. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Goldstein J, Morris WE, Loidl CF, et al. Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin increases the small intestinal permeability in mice and rats. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7065, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schmidt G, Papatheodorou P, Aktories K.. Novel receptors for bacterial protein toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;23:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Richard JF, Mainguy G, Gibert M, et al. Transcytosis of iota-toxin across polarized CaCo-2 cells. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(4):907–917. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02806.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Redondo LM, Redondo EA, Dailoff GC, et al. Effects of Clostridium perfringens iota toxin in the small intestine of mice. Anaerobe. 2017;48:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Freedman JC, Shrestha A, McClane BA.. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin: action, genetics, and translational applications. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(3):73, doi: 10.3390/toxins8030073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eichner M, Augustin C, Fromm A, et al. In colon epithelia, Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin causes focal leaks by targeting claudins which are apically accessible due to tight junction derangement. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(1):147–157. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sonoda N, Furuse M, Sasaki H, et al. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin fragment removes specific claudins from tight junction strands: evidence for direct involvement of claudins in tight junction barrier. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(1):195–204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.1.195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Deguchi A, Miyamoto K, Kuwahara T, et al. Genetic characterization of type A enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens strains. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5598, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ellemor DM, Baird RN, Awad MM, et al. Use of genetically manipulated strains of Clostridium perfringens reveals that both alpha-toxin and theta-toxin are required for vascular leukostasis to occur in experimental gas gangrene. Infect Immun. 1999;67(9):4902–4907. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.9.4902-4907.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bryant AE, Chen RY, Nagata Y, et al. Clostridial Gas Gangrene. II. Phospholipase C-Induced Activation of Platelet gpIIbIIIa Mediates Vascular Occlusion and Myonecrosis in Clostridium perfringens Gas Gangrene. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(3):808–815. doi: 10.1086/315757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bryant AE, Stevens DL.. Clostridial myonecrosis: new insights in pathogenesis and management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010;12(5):383–391. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0127-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bryant A, Bayer C, Aldape M, et al. Clostridium perfringens phospholipase C-induced platelet/leukocyte interactions impede neutrophil diapedesis. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(5):495–504. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46390-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gurjar AA, Yennawar NH, Yennawar HP, et al. Expression, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of recombinant Clostridium perfringens β2-toxin. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2007;63(6):484–487. doi: 10.1107/S1744309107020313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Titball RW, Naylor CE, Basak AK.. The Clostridium perfringens α-toxin. Anaerobe. 1999;5(2):51–64. doi: 10.1006/anae.1999.0191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Takehara M, Bandou H, Kobayashi K, et al. Clostridium perfringens α-toxin specifically induces endothelial cell death by promoting ceramide-mediated apoptosis. Anaerobe. 2020;65:102262, doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Theoret JR, Uzal FA, McClane BA, et al. Identification and characterization of Clostridium perfringens beta toxin variants with differing trypsin sensitivity and in vitro cytotoxicity activity. Infect Immun. 2015;83(4):1477–1486. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02864-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Freedman JC, Li J, Uzal FA, et al. Proteolytic processing and activation of Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin by caprine small intestinal contents. mBio. 2014;5(5):e01994–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01994-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dorca-Arévalo J, Gómez de Aranda I, Blasi J.. New mutants of epsilon toxin from Clostridium perfringens with an altered receptor-binding site and cell-type specificity. Toxins (Basel). 2022;14(4):288, doi: 10.3390/toxins14040288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Diancourt L, Sautereau J, Criscuolo A, et al. Two Clostridium perfringens type E isolates in France. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(3):138, doi: 10.3390/toxins11030138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Collie RE, Kokai-Kun JF, McClane BA.. Phenotypic Characterization of Enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens Isolates from Non-foodborne Human Gastrointestinal Diseases. Anaerobe. 1998;4(2):69–79. doi: 10.1006/anae.1998.0152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sparks SG, Carman RJ, Sarker MR, et al. Genotyping of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens fecal isolates associated with antibiotic-associated diarrhea and food poisoning in North America. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(3):883–888. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.883-888.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Keyburn AL, Yan XX, Bannam TL, et al. Association between avian necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens strains expressing NetB toxin. Vet Res. 2010;41(2), doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tweten RK. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for perfringolysin O (theta-toxin) from Clostridium perfringens: significant homology with the genes for streptolysin O and pneumolysin. Infect Immun. 1988;56(12):3235–3240. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.12.3235-3240.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jost BH, Billington SJ, Trinh HT, et al. Atypical cpb2 genes, encoding beta2-toxin in Clostridium perfringens isolates of nonporcine origin. Infect Immun. 2005;73(1):652–656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.1.652-656.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_1

Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES