Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and its murine model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), is a neurodegenerative autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by T cell influx and demyelination. Like other autoimmune diseases, therapies can alleviate symptoms but often come with side effects, necessitating the exploration of new treatments. We recently demonstrated that the Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase 4b (CRL4b) aided in maintaining genome stability in proliferating T cells. In this study, we examined whether CRL4b was required for T cells to expand and drive EAE. Mice lacking Cul4b in T cells had reduced EAE symptoms and decreased inflammation during the peak of the disease. Significantly fewer CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were found in the CNS, particularly among the CD4+ T cell population producing IL-17A, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, and TNFα. Additionally, Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells cultured in vitro with their wild-type (WT) counterparts were less likely to expand and differentiate into IL-17A or IFN-γ producing effector cells. When WT CD4+ T cells were activated in vitro in the presence of the recently developed CRL4 inhibitor KH-4–43, they exhibited increased apoptosis and DNA damage. Treatment of mice with KH-4–43 following EAE induction resulted in stabilized clinical scores and significantly reduced numbers of T cells and innate immune cells in the CNS compared to control mice. Furthermore, KH-4–43 treatment resulted in elevated expression of p21 and cyclin E2 in T cells. These studies support that therapeutic inhibition of CRL4 and/or CRL4 related pathways could be used to treat autoimmune disease.
Keywords: T cells, Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis, Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase 4b, DNA Damage Response, CRL4 inhibitor
Introduction:
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a clinically relevant animal model of MS (1). It is estimated that up to three million people live with MS worldwide (2). Its onset is typically in adults with peak age at onset between 20–40 years. There is a female predominance of up to 3:1 (3, 4). Although there is no cure for MS, there are treatments that can slow the progression of the disease and also reduce the frequency and severity of relapses. The therapeutic efficacy of available drugs is variable and many are associated with risk for adverse events (1). Thus, there is a strong need to develop new therapeutic agents to manage MS and other autoimmune diseases.
EAE is an experimentally induced autoimmune model in which immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptides elicits a strong T cell response (1). Upon entering the CNS, T cells are reactivated by local and infiltrating antigen-presenting cells (APC) (5), resulting in pathogenic immune-mediated demyelination and axonal damage. T cells have been shown to drive these pathogenic events by direct mechanisms such as cytokine-induced damage, granzyme-mediated killing, and glutamate-induced neurotoxicity; or through indirect mechanisms such as activation of innate cells such as macrophages or neutrophils (6, 7). Considering the pathogenic role of T cells in MS and EAE, therapeutic targeting of T cells would likely be an effective strategy for improving symptoms. Indeed, two of the most commonly used drugs for treating MS, IFN-β and glatiramer acetate, can increase regulatory T cells (Treg) cells and IL-10, thereby suppressing proinflammatory T cell cytokine production (8). More deliberate strategies to manipulate T cells involve either targeting pro-inflammatory T cells or their effector function or boosting the function or numbers of Treg cells (9). Antigen-activated T cells have the most rapid division rates among all mammalian cell types and are thus predisposed to replication stress induced DNA damage (10, 11). Thus, therapeutic targeting of DNA damage response pathways could specifically result in the elimination of pathogenic T cells during autoimmune disease flares while having little or no effect on non-dividing T cells.
We recently revealed that the Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase 4b (CRL4b) promotes T cell proliferation, survival and differentiation (12, 13). Cullin 4b (Cul4b) functions as a scaffold to assemble the multi-subunit CRL4b complex that in addition to Cul4b contains the RING finger protein RBX1/ROC1, Damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1) as an adaptor, as well as DDB1- and CUL4 associated factor (DCAF) as a substrate receptor (13, 14). CRL4 is activated by Nedd8. Cul4b shares 82% sequence similarity with Cul4a (14). Given their high homology and usage of the same adaptor protein, Cul4a and Cul4b were initially thought to have mostly redundant functions. However, studies have revealed both distinct and overlapping functions (15). Loss-of-function mutations in Cul4b, but not Cul4a, have been identified in patients with cerebral cortical malformations and X-linked mental retardation (XLMR) (16–19) providing support that these two closely related proteins are not redundant. Both Cul4a and Cul4b are able to promote cancer progression (20). Elevated expression of these proteins has been observed in many types of tumors and high expression correlates with alterations in tumor suppressor and cell cycle regulator genes (21–23). In cancer cells, Cul4a and Cul4b have been shown to regulate proliferation, DNA damage and repair, cell cycle progression, DNA methylation and histone acetylation, as well as cell signaling (24–28). Cul4b-deficiency resulted in a nearly complete collapse in effector and memory differentiation of CD8+ T cells shortly after viral infection. This collapse was associated with a substantial increase in DNA damage. At the mechanistic level, Cul4b-deficient CD8+ T cells accumulated high levels of p21 and Cyclin E2 fueling replication stress and triggering genomic instability (13). In CD4+ T cells, Cul4b loss decreased their proliferation, survival and pathogenicity by inducing genomic instability (12). Manipulating the DNA damage-response signaling in lymphocytes has been shown to display therapeutic potential for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases (11). Based on this, we posited that inhibiting CRL4b in T cells would increase genomic stress, particularly in proliferating T cells and thus CRL4b inhibitors could be useful in treating autoimmune disease.
A selective small-molecule modulator of CRL4b function would allow us to address mechanistic and phenotypic questions about its potential to act as a DNA damage response modulator. To date, there are no reported small-molecule lead compounds specifically targeting the function of Cul4b. However, recent studies showed that binding of compound KH-4–43 to CRL4 inhibits its ability to support ubiquitination in vitro. KH-4–43 was shown to exhibit improved antitumor efficacy in an AML MV4–11 xenograft model (29). T cells express copious levels of Cul4b constituting about 95% of total Cul4 proteins (12, 13). Further, Cul4a did not rescue the Cul4b loss in T cells, thus Cul4b-deficient T cells were unable to maintain genome stability, proliferation or survival (12, 13). We posited that inhibition of CRL4b with KH-4–43 would be a logical strategy to manipulate the DNA damage response of lymphocytes for treatment of autoimmune diseases.
In this study, we employed the EAE model to investigate whether deleting Cul4b in T-cells impacted T-cell activation and autoimmune disease progression. We found that mice lacking Cul4b in T-cells showed lower clinical scores after EAE induction. Consistent with this, we observed a significant reduction in immune cells in the CNS. When the immune cell infiltrates were analyzed, we found fewer T cells, particularly cytokine producing T cells, as well as fewer innate immune cells such as neutrophils. These data supported our prior findings that Cul4b is required for T cell proliferation/expansion. We found that treatment of T cells in vitro with CRL4 inhibitor KH-4–43 resulted in the accumulation of DNA damage, increased apoptosis and reduced proliferation. To assess the therapeutic potential for CRL4b inhibition in autoimmune disease, we induced wild type mice with EAE and then treated them with KH-4–43. The inhibitor treatment stabilized symptoms of EAE and significantly decreased disease severity. These data highlight the requirement for CRL4b in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell expansion and effector function during the development of T cell mediated autoimmune disease and support that targeting CRL4 might be a viable treatment option for MS and other autoimmune diseases.
Material and Methods:
Mice
C57BL/6J (Strain #:000664), CD45.1 (Strain #:002014), and CD4-Cre (Strain #:022071) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Cul4bfl/fl mice were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 as described previously (12). Male and female mice with conditional deletion of Cul4b are referred to as Cul4bfl/flCD4Cre or Cul4bcKO. All mice were bred in-house under specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). The mice were housed at 18–23°C with 40–60% humidity, with 12-hr light and 12-hr dark cycles. All mice, if not stated otherwise, were 8–12 weeks of age, and both sexes were used without randomization or blinding. Animal housing, care, and experimental procedures were performed in compliance with the CHOP Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
EAE Induction
C57BL/6 mice (control and Cul4bcKO) were injected s.c. with 200 μg of MOG35–55 emulsified in 5 mg/ml complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (BD Bioscience). On days 0 and 2, animals received i.p. injections of 200 ng of pertussis toxin (Sigma). Mice were then examined daily for the clinical signs of EAE in a blinded fashion. The disease severity of EAE was scored using the standard clinical score as previously described (30): 0, no disease; 0.5, distal limp tail; 1, compete limp tail; 1.5, limp tail and hind limb weakness; 2, unilateral partial hind limb paralysis; 2.5, bilateral partial hind limb paralysis; 3, complete bilateral hind limb paralysis 3.5 complete bilateral hind limb paralysis and partial forelimb paralysis; 4, moribund (completely paralyzed); 5, death.
CNS Isolation and Preparation of Single-Cell Suspensions
Mice were humanely euthanized and perfused with PBS through the left ventricle of the heart using a 25-G butterfly needle attached to a 10 ml syringe. The spinal cord, brain and brain stem were removed by dissection. All the CNS tissues were then pooled and cut into small pieces using surgical blade in 5 ml of digestion medium (collagenase I and Ia (Sigma, catalogue number C0130 and C9891, respectively), and 20 μg/ml DNAse I (Roche, catalogue number 10104159001) and digested at 37 °C for 30 min. Enzymatic digestion was stopped by adding EDTA to a final concentration of 5 mM. To homogenize the tissue, the suspension was repeatedly sucked up and ejected using a 5 ml syringe with 18-G needle until a uniform milky homogenate was formed, avoiding excessive foaming. The homogenate was filtered through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer into a 50 ml Falcon tube which was then filled with media (RPMI with 1% FCS) and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 8 min at 4 °C to pellet the cells and myelin. The supernatant was discarded by pouring it off gently, and the pellet was resuspended in a final volume of 5 ml of 30% Percoll and mixed. The 30% Percoll containing CNS mixture was poured gently into a 15 ml tube containing 5 ml of 70% Percoll and then centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, without brakes. After centrifugation, a PBS-Percoll gradient will have formed, each layer containing a specific fraction of the homogenate. The myelin is carefully sucked off using a suction pump or pipette. The large middle layer containing the leukocytes was transferred without the bottom layer of red blood cells into a Falcon tube. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were resuspended in media (RPMI with 1% FCS).
Flow cytometry, T cell proliferation and antibodies
Single-cell suspensions were stained with a fixable viability dye (LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Blue Stain), then pretreated with unlabeled anti-CD16/CD32 (Fc Block, BD Pharmingen). Cells were then stained in FACS buffer (PBS containing 2.5% fetal calf serum and 0.1% sodium azide) with mixtures of directly conjugated antibodies. The following antibodies were used: CD8a [53–6.7], CD3 [17A2], CD3 [145–2C11], CD4 [GK1.5 and RM4–5], CD44 [IM7], B220 [RA3–6B2], TCRβ [H57–597], TNFα [MP6-XT22], IFN-γ [XMG1.2], GM-CSF [MP1–22E9], γ-H2AX [2F3], pATM [10H11.E12], CD45 [30-F11], CD11b [M1/70], Ly6G [1A8], F4/80 [BM8] from BioLegend; CD62L [RM4317] and Alexa Fluor™ 647 streptavidin conjugate from Invitrogen; CD3 [17A2], IL-17A [TC11–18H10], and Siglec F [E50–2440] from BD Bioscience, FoxP3-biotin [FJK-16s] from eBioscience.
For intracellular cytokine staining, a single cell suspension was incubated with PMA and Ionomycin (PMA (30 ng/ml, Calbiochem) and Ionomycin (1 μM, Abcam) in the presence of GolgiPlug and GolgiStop (1 μg/ml Golgi Plug (BD, cat. 555029), 1 μg/ml Golgi Stop (BD, cat. 554724) for 4 hr at 37°C and stained using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD). For FoxP3 staining, the FoxP3 staining kit (eBioscience) was used according to manufacturer’s instruction.
For the T cell proliferation assay, naïve CD4+ T cell were isolated from control mice were treated with DMSO or KH-4–43 for the last 20 hours of 3-day cultures. Briefly, CD4+ T cells (100,000/well) were incubated with Cell Trace Violet (CTV) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a final concentration of 5 μM for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed three times with ice-cold complete RPMI 1640 and stimulated with anti-CD3 [145–2C11; BioLegend]/CD28 [37.51; BioLegend] antibodies (5 μg/ml). After day 2 cell were treated with DMSO or KH-4–43 (in concentrations as indicated). On day 3 cells were harvested and the change in CTV intensity was measured. Samples were analyzed using a Fortessa (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer at the CHOP Flow Cytometry Core Facility. Data was analyzed using FlowJo software V10 (TreeStar Ashland). Results are expressed as the percentage of positive cells or median fluorescence intensity (MFI).
Naïve CD4+ T cell isolation and differentiation
Naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated by magnetic separation using the Miltenyi Naïve CD4+ T cell isolation kit. Briefly, cells were isolated from spleen and lymph nodes. Single cell suspensions were resuspended in MACS buffer and stained with antibody conjugated beads. For naïve CD4+ T cells isolation, a cocktail of biotin-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD8, CD11b, CD11c, CD19, CD25, CD45R (B220), CD49b (DX5), CD105, Anti-MHC class II, Ter-119, and TCRγ/δ was used. Microbeads conjugated to monoclonal anti-biotin antibodies and CD44 microbeads were added. After staining, cell suspensions were loaded onto a column and cells that flowed-through the column (unlabeled cells) were collected and used as naïve CD4+ T cells.
Naïve CD4+ T cells were stimulated in vitro in complete RPMI (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals), HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific), nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2 mM-Glutamine, antibiotics and 2-mercaptoethanol) with plate bound anti-CD3 (Clone 17A2 BioLegend) and anti-CD28 (Clone 37.51 BioLegend) antibodies. The tissue culture plates were coated with the antibodies overnight at 4°C (5 μg/ml). Cells were cultured at 37°C with 10% CO2. For Th1 differentiation, cells were stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (5 μg/ml each) as well as IL-2 (10 units/ml), IL12 (20 ng/ml) and anti-IL4 (5 μg/ml). For Th17 differentiation cells were cultured in IMDM media and stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml) together with TGF-β (0.5ng/ml), IL1β (20ng/ml), IL-6 (20 ng/ml), IL-23 (50 ng/ml) and anti-IL-2 (2 μg/ml). For iTreg differentiation, naïve CD4+ T cells were stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (5 μg/ml each) together with TGF-β (5ng/ml) and IL-2 (50 units/ml).
Apoptosis
Annexin staining was performed to determine cell viability under various in vitro conditions. In brief, naïve CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 (5 μg/ml) for 48 hr to generate an asynchronous population. Cells were then treated with DMSO (vehicle) or KH-4–43 (in concentration as indicated) for 20 hr. Cells were then harvested, resuspended in Annexin binding buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.25 mM CaCl2), and incubated with FITC-conjugated Annexin V (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the dark for 15 min at room temperature. After incubation, 400 μl Annexin binding buffer was added and cells were analyzed.
Histological Analysis
Brain was gently removed from the skull using curved forceps. 1–2 mm transverse sections of the brain were taken and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissues were then paraffin-embedded and sectioned to 5 μm thickness and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Images were obtained using a Leica DM4000B upright scope paired with a Spot RT/SE Slider camera with 10x objective lens.
Subcellular Fractionation and Western blotting
Prior to harvesting, cell cultures were supplemented with DMSO or Bortezomib (50 nM) for 2–4 hr. Subcellular fractionation was carried out as described (31) with some modifications. CD4+ T cells were stimulated with α-CD3/CD28 mAb for 40 hr and were then treated with either DMSO or KH-4–43 for 6 hr. Cells were harvested and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Ca2+ and Mg2+-free) and resuspended in solution A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.34 M sucrose, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na2VO3, EDTA free complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), deubiquitylase inhibitors PR-619 (LifeSensors) and Zn2+-chelator ortho-phenanthroline (o-PA) (LifeSensors). Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, and the cells were incubated for 30 min on ice. The soluble fraction (SF) was separated from the chromatin bound fraction by centrifugation (4 min, 1,800 × g). The chromatin bound fraction was washed once in solution A and the final chromatin pellet was resuspended in SDS sample buffer and sonicated to release chromatin-bound proteins. Samples were resolved on 4–12% Novex Tris-Glycine Gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The membrane was probed with the primary antibodies Cyclin E2 (Cell Signaling Technology), p21 (Santa Cruz;1:200). GAPDH (Millipore 1:5000) and Lamin B1 (Cell Signaling Technologies 1:1000) were used as loading controls. Immunostaining was performed using appropriate secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:5000 and developed with the LICOR Odyssey imaging system.
Dosing mice with KH-4–43
KH-4–43 was supplied by DeVita and Pan Labs and was prepared according to reported procedures (29). C57BL/6 mice at 8–10 weeks of age with body weight no less than 20 grams at study starting point were injected with KH-4–43. KH-4–43 (40mg/kg) was formulated in 100% DMSO and the injection volume was kept less than 50μl/mice. The first dose was given at day 9 and last dose on day 14. KH-4–43 was administrated by IP, daily from day 9–14. For vehicle control, 50 μl/mice of 100% DMSO was administered daily by IP.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as the mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M). Statistical analysis was performed using Prism software 7 and 9. p-value was calculated using the student two tailed t-test. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results:
Cul4b expression in T cells is required for clinical progression of EAE
Our prior studies showed that Cul4b deletion in T cells (Cul4bfl/flCD4Cre or Cul4bcKO) did not impact overall CD4+ and CD8+ T cell frequencies or numbers in the thymus, spleen or lymph nodes (LNs) of mice. However, reductions were seen, particularly among CD44+ (antigen experienced) T cells; particularly when Cul4b-deficient T cells were raised in a competitive setting with control/wild-type (WT) T cells (i.e., mixed chimera). Consistent with this, when CD4+ or CD8+ Cul4b-deficient T cells were co-cultured with WT T cells and activated using anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs, the Cul4b-deficient T cells quickly became outnumbered by the WT cells. Interestingly, when Cul4bfl/flCD4Cre mice were infected with LCMV, few LCMV-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells could be identified by day 7 after infection, supporting an important role for Cul4b in T cell expansion (13). However, it was not known if Cul4b might be required for T cell expansion or if this protein could be a good therapeutic target to treat T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. To test this, we employed the EAE model, as it is a well characterized T cell–mediated and induced (not genetic) autoimmune disease. We induced EAE in control and Cul4bcKO mice using MOG35–55 emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) at day 0 and pertussis toxin was provided at day 0 and day 2. Mice were then monitored for clinical scores for 14 days. Between days 7–10 following EAE induction, both control and Cul4bcKO mice showed an initial increase in clinical score. However, between days 11 and 14 the control mice showed a rapid progression of clinical score while the Cul4bcKO did not (Fig. 1a). Rather, Cul4bcKO mice maintained a very low clinical score for the duration of the analysis, with a mean disease score of 0.77. This was significantly lower than control mice, which showed a mean disease score of 2.3 (Fig 1b). The increased clinical score and onset of neurologic symptoms after EAE induction in control mice coincided with a reduction in their body weight (Fig. 1c) which was also not observed in Cul4bcKO mice. At day 14 we performed histopathological analysis of the CNS from control and Cul4bcKO mice. Inflammatory infiltration in brain parenchyma was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin staining and an influx of immune cells observed in control mice was higher than that observed in Cul4bcKO mice (Fig. 1d, e). Collectively, these results strongly suggested that when T cells lack Cul4b, they are much less likely to induce clinical disease following EAE induction.
Figure 1: Cul4b deficiency in T cells ablates EAE disease and reduces CNS pathology:
Control and Cul4bcKO mice (8–10 weeks of age, both male and female mice) were immunized with MOG35–55 peptide/CFA with pertussis toxin (days 0 and 2) for disease induction. a) Clinical score of EAE in control and Cul4bcKO mice. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent three independent experiments with control (n=21) and Cul4bcKO (n=22) mice. b) Mean clinical score of EAE in control and Cul4bcKO mice. c) The change in the body weight after EAE induction in control and Cul4bcKO mice. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent three independent experiments with control (n=21) and Cul4bcKO (n=22) mice average disease. d) CNS sections obtained from control and Cul4bcKO mice at day 15 postimmunization were analyzed by H&E staining for inflammation. e) Cells per mm2 parenchyma for control and Cul4bcKO mice. p-values were calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001
Cul4b-deficient T cells fail to accumulate and drive inflammation in the CNS
EAE is characterized by the invasion of autoreactive T cells into the CNS, leading to the recruitment of innate immune cells such as neutrophils, inflammation and demyelination (1). Immune cells in the brain and spinal cord on day 14 of MOG35–55-induced EAE were analyzed using flow cytometry. Cul4bcKO mice had decreased percentages and numbers of CD4+ T cells in the CNS (Fig. 2a–c). While CD4+ T cells are the primary drivers of EAE, CD8+ T cells have also been shown to promote EAE pathogenesis (32). In keeping with this, we found decreased percentages and numbers of CD8+ T cells in the CNS of Cul4bcKO mice compared to controls (Fig. 2A–C). Day 14 after immunization, the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleen of Cul4bcKO showed either no change or a decrease, respectively, compared to control mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a). However, the absolute number of CD4+ T cells was higher in Cul4bcKO compared to control mice while numbers of CD8+ T cells remained unchanged between the two groups (Supplementary Fig. 1b). These variations may be due to changes that occur in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells numbers as EAE progresses in the WT mice (33, 34).
Figure 2: CRL4b promotes accumulation of T cells and drive inflammation in the CNS:
Control and Cul4bcKO mice (8–10 weeks of age) were immunized with MOG35–55 peptide/CFA with pertussis toxin (days 0 and 2) for disease induction. a) Representative plots of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell staining of the CNS-infiltrating cells. b, c) Percentage and number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the CNS. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent two independent experiments with control (n=15) and Cul4bcKO (n=15) including both male and female mice. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.****p<0.0001. d) Representative plots of IL-17A, IFN-γ, GM-CSF and TNF-α staining of CNS-infiltrating CD4+ T cells. CNS cells were stimulated with MOG. e-k) Percentage and numbers of MOG35–55 specific IL-17A, IFN-γ, GM-CSF and TNF-α CD4+ in the CNS of control and Cul4bcKO. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M for control (n=8) and Cul4bcKO (n=9) mice. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. m-o) CD4+ T cells isolated from CNS of EAE mice at day 15 postimmunization were analyzed to determine percentage of cells expressing FoxP3+ Tregs. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M for control (n=7) and Cul4bcKO (n=6) mice. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. **p<0.01
Considering the importance of cytokine producing CD4+ effector T cells in triggering inflammatory disease, we sought to measure proinflammatory cytokine production in CD4+ T cells. We found that Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells showed little production of IFN-γ, IL-17A, TNF-α and GM-CSF production on day 14 (Fig. 2d–h). This was evident in both frequencies and numbers of cytokine producing T cells compared to control mice (Fig. 2i–l). Given the reduced clinical score in Cul4bcKO mice, we also assessed Treg cell numbers to determine whether these might be increased in frequency (among total CD4+ T cells) or number. We found that FoxP3+ Treg cell numbers in the CNS of Cul4bfl/flCD4Cre mice were reduced (Fig. 2m–o), although the frequencies of these cells were similar to those observed in controls as this reduction mirrored the reduction in conventional T cell numbers. These data support that the lack of clinical progression in the Cul4bcKO mice is likely due to decreased numbers of autoreactive effector T cells rather than an imbalance in the ratio of Treg to T effector cell.
Given that T cells can instruct myeloid cells to drive inflammation and trigger pathogenic changes during experimental EAE, we assessed the composition of different myeloid cell populations in the CNS in Cul4bcKO and control mice following EAE induction. Consistent with reduced T effector cell numbers, we found fewer neutrophils and macrophages in the Cul4bcKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 1c–h). Thus, Cul4b expression in T cells is required for autoreactive T cells to drive CNS inflammation and clinical progression of EAE.
Cul4b-deficient T cells are less likely to expand and produce cytokines
The inability of Cul4b-deficient T cells to produce IFN-γ and IL-17A in vivo could be due to a defect in the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th1 and Th17 effector cells. To evaluate this possibility, we differentiated naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from WT and Cul4bcKO mice under Th1 and Th17 conditions. Naïve CD4+ T cells from the spleen and lymph nodes were isolated using the Miltenyi Naïve CD4+ T cell isolation kit, following the procedure detailed in the materials and methods sections. Specifically, we co-cultured naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from control (CD45.1+) and Cul4bcKO (CD45.2+) mice in the presence of Th1 and Th17 differentiating conditions and assessed cells by flow cytometry after 5 days in culture. The relative proportions of Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells, following 5 days of culture, were lower than control cells (Fig. 3a). Further, cells from WT mice showed a robust induction of IL-17A following restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. By contrast, fewer Cul4b-deficient cells produced IL-17A+ following restimulation (Fig. 3b,c). In addition, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IL-17A, a reflection of the amount of cytokine produced per cell, was significantly higher in control cells compared to Cul4b-deficient cells (Fig. 3d). A similar defect in IFN-γ production was observed in Cul4b-deficient T cells following Th1 differentiation. Cul4b-deficient T cells were found at lower frequencies and were less likely to produce IFN-γ than control cells (Fig. 3e–h). Taken together, these data support that Th1 and Th17 differentiation is compromised in the absence of Cul4b. We next analyzed the ability of naïve CD4+ T cells to differentiate into induced Tregs (iTregs). Naïve CD4+ T cells from WT mice showed robust induction of FoxP3, signifying conversion into Tregs, while T cells from Cul4bcKO mice were less likely to show FoxP3 expression (Fig. 3i–k), and the MFI of FoxP3 was somewhat lower in Cul4b-deficient cells (Fig. 3l).
Figure 3: CRL4b promotes CD4+ T cell expansion and differentiation under in vitro condition.
Naïve WT and Cul4b deficient CD4+ T cells were cultured with plate-bound anti-CD3 anti-CD28 mAbs for 5 days under Th17 (TGF-β, IL-6, IL23, IL1β, and anti-IL-2 mAb), Th1-polarizing conditions (IL-2, IL-12 and anti-IL-4 mAb) or Treg-polarizing conditions (IL-2 and TGF-β). a) The relative proportions of Cul4b-deficient and control CD4+ T cells under Th17 polarizing conditions. b, c) The representative data showing the percentage of IL-17A+ CD4+ T cells following restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. d) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IL-17A in control and Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells. e) The relative proportions of Cul4b-deficient and control CD4+ T cells under Th1 polarizing conditions. f, g) The representative data showing the percentage of IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells following restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. h) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFN-γ in control and Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells. i) The relative proportions of Cul4b-deficient and control CD4+ T cells under Treg-polarizing conditions. j, k) The representative data showing the percentage of IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells following restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. l) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FoxP3 in control and Cul4b-deficient CD4+ T cells. Data from n=4–5 mice for each genotype is shown and each paired sample is connected with a line. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. The relative proportions were calculated by normalizing the percentages of day 5 to that of the day 0.
CRL4b inhibitor KH-4–43 induces genomic instability in activated T cells
Given that Cul4b-deficient T cells proliferated less and were much more likely to undergo apoptosis following anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation in vitro, we posited that CRL4 inhibition in WT T cells would drive apoptosis of recently activated lymphocytes. KH-4–43, a CRL4 inhibitor that was recently described, was able to induce cytotoxicity in a panel of 36 tumor cell lines by compromising the DNA damage response (DDR) (29). Thus, we tested this CRL4 inhibitor in activated CD4+ T cells. To evaluate whether KH-4–43 might inhibit CRL4 function in T cells, we used flow cytometry with Annexin V staining to detect cells undergoing apoptosis. We found that activated CD4+ T cells were much more likely to undergo apoptosis following treatment with KH-4–43 in a dose dependent manner (Fig 4a,b). Treatment of cells with 10 μM of KH-4–43 for 20 hr induced a 2-fold more apoptosis than with DMSO treated cells. Furthermore, CRL4 inhibition increased γ-H2AX and pATM levels (Fig 4c–f), in a manner reminiscent of that shown in Cul4b-deficient T cells (13). KH-4–43 treatment of WT cells also reduced proliferation in T cells following mitogenic stimulation (Fig. 4g,h). These data support that KH-4–43 inhibits CRL4 in T cells and KH-4–43 treatment of WT T cells shows substantial overlap with features of Cul4b-deficient T cells (12).
Figure 4: CRL4 inhibition induced the DNA damage response and cell death of activated T cells.
a, b) Naïve CD4+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs in vitro for 48 hr. After activation, CD4+ T cells were treated with different concentrations of KH-4–43 for 18–20 hr and analyzed for apoptosis using Annexin V staining. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent the three independent experiments with DMSO control (n=7) and KH-4–43 (n=7) group. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. c-f) Activated CD4+T cells were analyzed for the indicated intracellular phosphoproteins. The phospho-ser139 H2AX (γH2AX) and p-ATM, classic indicators of a DDR, were analyzed after KH-4–43 treatment. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent three independent experiments with DMSO control (n=8) and KH-4–43 (n=8 for each concentration) group. g, h) Naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from C57BL/6 mice and were labeled with Cell Trace Violet (CTV) and stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs (5 μg/ml) for 2 days. After day 2 cells were treated either with DMSO or different concentrations of KH-4–43. Representative flow cytometry histograms of CTV labeled CD4+ T cells under different treatment conditions is shown. Proliferation index was calculated with FlowJo software. Data of n=6 for each group is shown and p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test. ***p<0.001
CRL4 inhibition blocks progression of EAE in mice
We next sought to test whether CRL4 inhibition would prevent clinical progression following EAE induction. To test this, KH-4–43 was administered daily from day 9 (after the start of symptoms) until day 14 (peak of disease) after EAE induction at a dose of 40 mg/kg per day (ip). From day 9–14, vehicle treated control mice showed rapid progression to clinical disease (Fig. 5a,b). In contrast, KH-4–43 treated mice showed only modest progression following treatment and none of the mice advanced to full clinical disease (Fig. 5a,b). CRL4 inhibition by KH-4–43 also resulted in reduced immune cell infiltration in the CNS (Fig. 5c–h) following EAE induction. We found significantly fewer CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the CNS following treatment with KH-4–43 compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 5c,d). Consistent with this result, we also found reduced numbers of macrophages and neutrophils in KH-4–43 treated mice compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 5e–h). Given the reduced clinical score in KH-4–43 treated mice, we also assessed Treg cell numbers to determine whether these mice have increased frequency (among total CD4+ T cells) or number of Tregs. However, we found that FoxP3+ Treg cell numbers in the CNS of KH-4–43 treated mice were also reduced (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b), although the frequencies of these cells were similar to those observed in controls (Supplementary Fig. 2c). These data support that the lack of clinical progression in the KH-4–43 mice is likely due to decreased numbers of autoreactive T cells rather than an imbalance in the ratio of Treg to T effector cell. Further, at day 15 after immunization, the percentages and numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleen of KH-4–43 treated mice showed no significant change compared to vehicle control mice (Supplementary Fig. 2d,e). We have shown previously that Cul4b-deficient T cells are unable to repair DNA damage due to a protracted accumulation of p21 and Cyclin E2, known CRL4b substrates (13). Thus, we tested whether CRL4 inhibition by KH-4–43 resulted in a similar accumulation of p21 and Cyclin E2. To test this, we activated CD4+ T cells with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs for 40 hr then cells were treated with KH-4–43 for 6 hr and assessed for p21 and Cylin E2. We found that KH-4–43 treatment resulted in significant accumulation of both p21 and Cyclin E2 (Fig. 5i,j). These data support that KH-4–43 inhibits CRL4b in T cells and thus promotes the accumulation of DNA damage and hence cell death. Together, these data support that inhibiting CRL4 function could be an attractive therapeutic option for treating T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases such as MS.
Figure 5: CRL4 inhibitor KH-4–43 reduced the disease severity of EAE:
Mice were treated with KH-4–43 or vehicle on day 9 after EAE induction and scored. a) Clinical score of EAE in DSMO and KH-4–43 treated mice. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent two independent experiments with DMSO (n=12) and KH-4–43 (n=12) mice (both male and female mice). b) Mean clinical score of EAE in DMSO and KH-4–43 treated mice. c, d) Representative plots of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell staining of CNS-infiltrating cells. Numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the CNS are shown and data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent the one of two independent experiments with DMSO (n=7) and KH-4–43 (n=8) mice. p-values were calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001. e) Representative plot showing percentage of neutrophils among CNS-infiltrating cells of DSMO and KH-4–43 treated mice. f) Numbers of neutrophils characterized as CD11b+Ly6G+ cells. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent the one of two independent experiments with DMSO (n=7) and KH-4–43 (n=8) mice. p-values were calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05. g) Representative plot showing percentage of macrophages among CNS-infiltrating cells of DSMO and KH-4–43 treated mice. h) Numbers of macrophages characterized as CD11b+F4/80+CD45hi cells. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and represent the one of two independent experiments with DMSO (n=7) and KH-4–43 (n=8) mice. p-values were calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05. i, j) Analysis of p21 and Cyclin E2 levels in DMSO and KH-4–43 treated CD4+ T cells, stimulated for 48 hr with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs (5 μg/ml) and treated with either DMSO or KH-4–43 (5 and 10 μM) for the last 6 hr. Soluble fraction (SF) and chromatin bound fractions (CBF), were analyzed by immunoblot. Lamin B1 and GAPDH were used as loading controls. The data is the representative of four independent experiments. p-values were calculated using a paired two-tailed t-test and p<0.05 were considered significant. *p<0.05
Discussion:
In this study we show that Cul4b deletion in T cells reduced both CD4 and CD8 numbers in the brain and spinal cord of MOG35–55-immunized mice and prevented accumulation and pathogenic damage from myeloid cells. Supporting this, inflammation was reduced and CD4+ T cells isolated on day 15 post MOG35–55 immunization from the brain and spinal cord of Cul4bcKO mice produced negligible amounts of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, or GM-CSF upon in vitro stimulation with MOG35–55 peptide. Similarly, the administration of KH-4–43, a CRL4 inhibitor, ameliorated clinical signs of MOG-induced EAE. The attenuation of EAE pathogenesis by KH-4–43 was accompanied by reduced immune cell infiltration. However, it remains unclear whether CRL4b inhibits disease progression, or delays its onset. Future studies will include an extended observation period to better understand the long-term impacts of CRL4 inhibition. Despite this, CRL4 inhibitors represent novel drugs that could have therapeutic potential in autoimmune diseases due to its ability to affect cytokine production and proliferation of T cells
Th17 cells are involved in the onset and maintenance of EAE (35). IL-17+ T cells have been found in lesions in brain tissues from patients with MS, indicating that Th17 cells also play a crucial role in the human demyelinating disease (36). Our data showed that CRL4b promotes the expansion and differentiation of Th17. Additionally, we found that Cul4b deficiency inhibited Th1 and iTreg expansion and differentiation in vitro. IFN-γ secreting Th1 cells were reduced in the CNS of the MOG35–55 immunized Cul4bcKOmice. Thus, combined with the role of Th1 and Th17 in the development of EAE, the data indicated that CRL4b had potential regulatory functions in the activation and differentiation of CD4+ T subsets which may explain why KH-4–43 treatment might be efficient in the suppression of EAE. However, regulatory T cell (Treg) development was not affected after EAE induction but we did find significantly lower numbers of Tregs in the brains of Cul4bcKO mice 15 days after MOG35–55 immunization. This could be a reflection of overall fewer numbers of CD4+ T cell infiltration into the CNS of MOG35–55 immunized Cul4bcKO mice or could be due to the lower overall level of inflammation. Regulatory T cells are crucial in controlling various functions of effector T cells during EAE. The reduced severity in Cul4bcKO mice thus does not appears to be due to increased Treg numbers or function. Rather, CRL4b could be working in a cell intrinsic manner to regulate T cell proliferation and differentiation. Many factors such as strength of signal, cytokines, tissue specific factors and APCs can contribute to the generation of iTregs in vivo which may not closely reflect Tregs generated in vitro. Thus, any role for CRL4b in Treg differentiation and/or function will require further study.
Our data supports that inhibiting CRL4b could be an effective method for the treatment of autoimmune disease since deleting this protein in T cells inhibited the differentiation and proliferation of Th17 and Th1 cells. This may be advantageous over other approaches that target many immune cells or that impact the function of naïve T cells. On the other hand, although most of the effects of CRL4 inhibitor in our system have been attributed to T cell dysfunction, it is unclear whether this treatment affects B cells or other immune cells in which CRL4b may be active. Therefore, further studies in which Cul4b is conditionally deleted in specific cell types are warranted. In our study, we employed CRL4 inhibitor at the onset of the diseases when T cell activation has already been initiated but T cell expansion is ongoing as we were attempting to model treatment of symptomatic MS patients. Based on our results, CRL4 inhibition may qualify as a new treatment option to prevent the progression of autoimmune diseases like MS. However, assessing treatment options for patients at different stages of MS, as opposed to its onset will be important. Towards this, investigating how the CRL4 inhibitor affects disease outcomes when administered at later stages of EAE in mice could further clarify the full potential of CRL4 inhibition. Further, it is still unclear how CRL4 inhibition could impact the antigen presenting cells (APCs) required for the reactivation of the T cells in CNS. Therefore, using CRL4 inhibitors in the clinic requires further investigation to understand the potential impact on other immune cells or potential side effects.
The role of DDR signaling in the survival and function of mature T cells remains poorly understood. Multiple defects of the DDR, including mutations in ATM, ATR, DNA-PK, and other genes, are associated with immune deficiency (37). Cul4b deficiency in CD4+ T cells decreased their pathogenicity and also decreased the CD8+ T cell mediated antiviral immune responses. Dozens of small-molecule inhibitors targeting DDR pathways including CRL4 inhibitors have been developed, largely for the treatment of cancer (38). However, immune effects (or toxicities) of these drugs that modulate DDR signaling have not been previously reported. Our findings suggest that such effects should be examined in future clinical tests of DDR altering small molecules. High expression of p21 has also been implicated in replicative senescence (39), wherein cells that have repeatedly entered into the cell cycle become refractory to further stimulation and are irreversibly arrested at the G1 phase (40). The upregulation of p21 in T cells after KH-4–43 has the potential to induce replicative senescence in encephalitogenic CD4+ T cells that are found in abundance in EAE in mice and MS patients.
Overall, this study showed that KH-4–43 reduced inflammation in mice supporting the notion that CRL4 inhibition may be potential therapeutic treatment strategy for EAE. The effectiveness of specifically inhibiting activated and expanding T cells while leaving naïve T cells in tact would make this strategy ideal for the treatment of several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including graft rejection and type 1 diabetes as well as T cell malignancies. However, more studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which CRL4b works in T cells and identify the substrate receptors used by CRL4b in T cells and other immune cells. This may allow the discovery of CRL4b inhibitors that exert T cell specific therapeutic effects. While KH-4–43 may require further optimization to improve efficacy our results show promise for the continued development and the clinical testing of CRL4b inhibitors for the suppression of T cell mediated diseases.
Supplementary Material
Key Points:
Mice lacking Cul4b in T-cells showed lower clinical scores after EAE induction.
Cul4b inhibition in T cells induces DNA damage, apoptosis, & reduced proliferation.
Cul4b inhibition reduces CNS immune cell infiltration & halt disease progression.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Flow Cytometry Core and Department of Veterinary Resources at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for their technical support. No specific funding was received for this work.
Abbreviations:
- MS
multiple sclerosis
- EAE
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
- Cul4b
Cullin 4b
- CRL4b
Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase 4b
- CNS
central nervous system
- MOG
myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein
- APC
antigen-presenting cells
- Tregs
regulatory T cells
- H&E
Hematoxylin and Eosin
- DDR
DNA damage response
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O’Brien K, and Gran B. 2011. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol 164: 1079–1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, Kaye W, Leray E, Marrie RA, Robertson N, La Rocca N, Uitdehaag B, van der Mei I, Wallin M, Helme A, Angood Napier C, Rijke N, and Baneke P. 2020. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler 26: 1816–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Compston A, and Coles A. 2002. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 359: 1221–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harbo HF, Gold R, and Tintore M. 2013. Sex and gender issues in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 6: 237–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kivisakk P, Imitola J, Rasmussen S, Elyaman W, Zhu B, Ransohoff RM, and Khoury SJ. 2009. Localizing central nervous system immune surveillance: meningeal antigen-presenting cells activate T cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Ann Neurol 65: 457–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kurschus FC 2015. T cell mediated pathogenesis in EAE: Molecular mechanisms. Biomed J 38: 183–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wagner CA, Roque PJ, and Goverman JM. 2020. Pathogenic T cell cytokines in multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med 217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maier K, Kuhnert AV, Taheri N, Sattler MB, Storch MK, Williams SK, Bahr M, and Diem R. 2006. Effects of glatiramer acetate and interferon-beta on neurodegeneration in a model of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Am J Pathol 169: 1353–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fletcher JM, Lalor SJ, Sweeney CM, Tubridy N, and Mills KH. 2010. T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Exp Immunol 162: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoon H, Kim TS, and Braciale TJ. 2010. The cell cycle time of CD8+ T cells responding in vivo is controlled by the type of antigenic stimulus. PLoS One 5: e15423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McNally JP, Millen SH, Chaturvedi V, Lakes N, Terrell CE, Elfers EE, Carroll KR, Hogan SP, Andreassen PR, Kanter J, Allen CE, Henry MM, Greenberg JN, Ladisch S, Hermiston ML, Joyce M, Hildeman DA, Katz JD, and Jordan MB. 2017. Manipulating DNA damage-response signaling for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E4782–E4791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dar AA, Sawada K, Dybas JM, Moser EK, Lewis EL, Park E, Fazelinia H, Spruce LA, Ding H, Seeholzer SH, and Oliver PM. 2021. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Cul4b promotes CD4+ T cell expansion by aiding the repair of damaged DNA. PLoS Biol 19: e3001041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dar AA, Kim DD, Gordon SM, Klinzing K, Rosen S, Guha I, Porter N, Ortega Y, Forsyth KS, Roof J, Fazelinia H, Spruce LA, Eisenlohr LC, Behrens EM, and Oliver PM. 2023. c-Myc uses Cul4b to preserve genome integrity and promote antiviral CD8+ T cell immunity. Nature Communications 14: 7098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fouad S, Wells OS, Hill MA, and D’Angiolella V. 2019. Cullin Ring Ubiquitin Ligases (CRLs) in Cancer: Responses to Ionizing Radiation (IR) Treatment. Front Physiol 10: 1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hannah J, and Zhou P. 2015. Distinct and overlapping functions of the cullin E3 ligase scaffolding proteins CUL4A and CUL4B. Gene 573: 33–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isidor B, Pichon O, Baron S, David A, and Le Caignec C. 2010. Deletion of the CUL4B gene in a boy with mental retardation, minor facial anomalies, short stature, hypogonadism, and ataxia. Am J Med Genet A 152A: 175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Badura-Stronka M, Jamsheer A, Materna-Kiryluk A, Sowinska A, Kiryluk K, Budny B, and Latos-Bielenska A. 2010. A novel nonsense mutation in CUL4B gene in three brothers with X-linked mental retardation syndrome. Clin Genet 77: 141–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tarpey PS, Raymond FL, O’Meara S, Edkins S, Teague J, Butler A, Dicks E, Stevens C, Tofts C, Avis T, Barthorpe S, Buck G, Cole J, Gray K, Halliday K, Harrison R, Hills K, Jenkinson A, Jones D, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Perry J, Raine K, Richardson D, Shepherd R, Small A, Varian J, West S, Widaa S, Mallya U, Moon J, Luo Y, Holder S, Smithson SF, Hurst JA, Clayton-Smith J, Kerr B, Boyle J, Shaw M, Vandeleur L, Rodriguez J, Slaugh R, Easton DF, Wooster R, Bobrow M, Srivastava AK, Stevenson RE, Schwartz CE, Turner G, Gecz J, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, and Partington M. 2007. Mutations in CUL4B, which encodes a ubiquitin E3 ligase subunit, cause an X-linked mental retardation syndrome associated with aggressive outbursts, seizures, relative macrocephaly, central obesity, hypogonadism, pes cavus, and tremor. Am J Hum Genet 80: 345–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zou Y, Liu Q, Chen B, Zhang X, Guo C, Zhou H, Li J, Gao G, Guo Y, Yan C, Wei J, Shao C, and Gong Y. 2007. Mutation in CUL4B, which encodes a member of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complex, causes X-linked mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 80: 561–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee J, and Zhou P. 2010. Cullins and cancer. Genes Cancer 1: 690–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li Y, and Wang X. 2017. The role of cullin4B in human cancers. Exp Hematol Oncol 6: 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jia L, Yan F, Cao W, Chen Z, Zheng H, Li H, Pan Y, Narula N, Ren X, Li H, and Zhou P. 2017. Dysregulation of CUL4A and CUL4B Ubiquitin Ligases in Lung Cancer. J Biol Chem 292: 2966–2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Qi M, Hu J, Cui Y, Jiao M, Feng T, Li X, Pang Y, Chen X, Qin R, Su P, Zhang H, Wang Y, Gong Y, and Han B. 2019. CUL4B promotes prostate cancer progression by forming positive feedback loop with SOX4. Oncogenesis 8: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yi J, Lu G, Li L, Wang X, Cao L, Lin M, Zhang S, and Shao G. 2015. DNA damage-induced activation of CUL4B targets HUWE1 for proteasomal degradation. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 4579–4590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee JM, Lee JS, Kim H, Kim K, Park H, Kim JY, Lee SH, Kim IS, Kim J, Lee M, Chung CH, Seo SB, Yoon JB, Ko E, Noh DY, Kim KI, Kim KK, and Baek SH. 2012. EZH2 generates a methyl degron that is recognized by the DCAF1/DDB1/CUL4 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell 48: 572–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nakagawa T, and Xiong Y. 2011. X-linked mental retardation gene CUL4B targets ubiquitylation of H3K4 methyltransferase component WDR5 and regulates neuronal gene expression. Mol Cell 43: 381–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhong W, Feng H, Santiago FE, and Kipreos ET. 2003. CUL-4 ubiquitin ligase maintains genome stability by restraining DNA-replication licensing. Nature 423: 885–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Higa LA, Yang X, Zheng J, Banks D, Wu M, Ghosh P, Sun H, and Zhang H. 2006. Involvement of CUL4 ubiquitin E3 ligases in regulating CDK inhibitors Dacapo/p27Kip1 and cyclin E degradation. Cell Cycle 5: 71–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu K, Huynh KQ, Lu I, Moustakim M, Miao H, Yu C, Haeusgen MJ, Hopkins BD, Huang L, Zheng N, Sanchez R, DeVita RJ, and Pan ZQ. 2021. Inhibitors of cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase 4 with antitumor potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mrdjen D, Hartmann FJ, and Becher B. 2017. High Dimensional Cytometry of Central Nervous System Leukocytes During Neuroinflammation. Methods Mol Biol 1559: 321–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li J, and Stern DF. 2005. DNA damage regulates Chk2 association with chromatin. J Biol Chem 280: 37948–37956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wagner CA, Roque PJ, Mileur TR, Liggitt D, and Goverman JM. 2020. Myelin-specific CD8+ T cells exacerbate brain inflammation in CNS autoimmunity. J Clin Invest 130: 203–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barthelmes J, Tafferner N, Kurz J, de Bruin N, Parnham MJ, Geisslinger G, and Schiffmann S. 2016. Induction of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Mice and Evaluation of the Disease-dependent Distribution of Immune Cells in Various Tissues. J Vis Exp. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saligrama N, Zhao F, Sikora MJ, Serratelli WS, Fernandes RA, Louis DM, Yao W, Ji X, Idoyaga J, Mahajan VB, Steinmetz LM, Chien YH, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR, Garcia KC, and Davis MM. 2019. Opposing T cell responses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nature 572: 481–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Steinman L 2007. A brief history of T(H)17, the first major revision in the T(H)1/T(H)2 hypothesis of T cell-mediated tissue damage. Nat Med 13: 139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tzartos JS, Friese MA, Craner MJ, Palace J, Newcombe J, Esiri MM, and Fugger L. 2008. Interleukin-17 production in central nervous system-infiltrating T cells and glial cells is associated with active disease in multiple sclerosis. Am J Pathol 172: 146–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Slatter MA, and Gennery AR. 2010. Primary immunodeficiencies associated with DNA-repair disorders. Expert Rev Mol Med 12: e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hosoya N, and Miyagawa K. 2014. Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci 105: 370–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sayama K, Shirakata Y, Midorikawa K, Hanakawa Y, and Hashimoto K. 1999. Possible involvement of p21 but not of p16 or p53 in keratinocyte senescence. J Cell Physiol 179: 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Campisi J 1996. Replicative senescence: an old lives’ tale? Cell 84: 497–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





