Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57322

Intrathecal Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Cancer of Unknown Primary Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Case Report

Kohei Oka 1,, Shun Futamura 1, Taishi Harada 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11060115  PMID: 38690464

Abstract

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) and leptomeningeal metastasis are difficult conditions with limited treatment options. We report a case of CUP leptomeningeal metastasis that was refractory to empirical chemotherapy but achieved a favorable response to intrathecal trastuzumab after the identification of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) amplification. A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with CUP with metastasis of a poorly differentiated carcinoma to the left axillary, anterior mediastinal, peritoneal, and bilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes. Leptomeningeal metastasis was confirmed shortly after she started empiric chemotherapy; empiric therapy with intrathecal methotrexate failed to relieve her symptoms. Meanwhile, the lymph node specimen tested positive for HER2 amplification. She underwent intrathecal trastuzumab, then her neurological symptoms resolved the following day. We suggest that intrathecal trastuzumab is an effective treatment for HER2-positive CUP leptomeningeal metastasis.

Keywords: leptomeningeal metastasis, her2-positive, intrathecal chemotherapy, chemotherapy, cancer of unknown primary

Introduction

Leptomeningeal metastasis, also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is a fatal manifestation of metastatic carcinoma with limited treatment options [1]. It frequently presents with neurological symptoms, including headaches, confusion, and seizures [2]. Its treatment options are limited because the blood-brain barrier restricts the penetration of chemotherapeutic agents into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [3]. Intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) remains a common treatment for leptomeningeal metastasis, despite the unfavorable prognosis and adverse events [4].

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP), defined as a histologically confirmed metastatic tumor with no identifiable primary site, also presents a poor prognosis, with limited therapeutic options [5]. Systemic chemotherapy combining taxane and platinum is a standard therapy for patients with CUP when the primary site cannot be estimated, however, its efficacy is limited [5]. Herein, we report a case of leptomeningeal metastasis in a patient with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive CUP treated with intrathecal trastuzumab, a monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old Japanese woman presented to our hospital with left supraclavicular and axillary masses. A core needle biopsy of the axillary mass revealed a poorly differentiated carcinoma (Figure 1a). Whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans indicated metastasis to the left axillary, anterior mediastinal, peritoneal, and bilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes (Figures 1b, 1c). Serum tumor marker analysis showed elevated levels of cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and National Cancer Center-Stomach-439 (NCC-ST-439) (Table 1).

Table 1. Serum tumor markers at cancer diagnosis.

HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; CYFRA, cytokeratin 19 fragment; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA15-3, carbohydrate antigen 15-3; CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; NCC-ST-439, National Cancer Center-Stomach-439

Tumor markers Value Reference range
HCG (mIU/mL) 0.6 ≤3.0
CYFRA (ng/mL) 17.0 ≤3.5
SCC (ng/mL) 0.5 ≤0.5
NSE (ng/mL) 14.7 ≤16.3
CEA (ng/mL) >100 ≤5.0
CA15-3 (U/mL) 211.3 <27.0
CA125 (U/mL) 16.0 ≤35.0
AFP (ng/mL) 5.0 ≤10.0
NCC-ST-439 (U/mL) 3054 <4.5

Figure 1. Histopathology of the biopsy specimen and CT/PET CT scan images.

Figure 1

(a) Histopathological examination of the core needle biopsy specimen for the axillary mass. Hematoxylin and eosin staining shows poorly differentiated carcinoma (magnification 40×). (b) CT scan shows the left axillary node swelling (arrows). (c) FDG-PET CT scan shows metastasis to the left axillary, anterior mediastinal, peritoneal, and bilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes (arrows).

CT, Computed tomography; FDG-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography

Immunohistochemical staining showed that the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3, CK7, and CK34βE12; partially positive for CK20; and negative for CK5/6, p40, TTF-1, Napsin-A, LCA, S-100, ER, and PgR. However, these analyses did not identify the specific primary site.

Thereafter, the patient underwent empiric systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin and nano-particle albumin-bound paclitaxel under the diagnosis of CUP, with simultaneous palliative radiotherapy for the left axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes (45Gy/15fr.); however, she developed headache and dizziness during the first course of chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain showed leptomeningeal enhancement around the cerebellum (Figure 2a). Lumbar puncture revealed a poorly differentiated carcinoma in the CSF. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis of CUP. She began empiric therapy with intrathecal MTX (15 mg, weekly) for leptomeningeal metastasis; however, her symptoms persisted. Additional histopathological examination of the core needle biopsy specimen revealed the metastasis was positive for HER2 amplification: IHC 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Therefore, she received intrathecal trastuzumab (60 mg, weekly) for suspected HER2-positive breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis. The patient’s neurological symptoms resolved the following day without any adverse effects.

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain.

Figure 2

(a) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain at the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis shows leptomeningeal enhancement around the cerebellum (yellow arrows). (b) Contrast-enhanced MRI one month after the initiation of intrathecal trastuzumab shows a decrease in enhancement around the cerebellum.

MRI; magnetic resonance imaging

Thereafter, the patient underwent systemic therapy with paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab with concomitant intrathecal chemotherapy. One month later, a contrast-enhanced MRI showed a decrease in leptomeningeal enhancement around the cerebellum (Figure 2b). Two months later, she discontinued intrathecal MTX because of MTX-related leukoencephalopathy. The level of CEA in the CSF decreased immediately after the initial administration of intrathecal trastuzumab, while the levels of serum CEA and CA15-3 decreased gradually and were controlled for more than half a year (Figures 3a, 3b). The CSF cytology showed the disappearance of cancer cells 2 months after the initial administration of intrathecal trastuzumab, although they reappeared later. Intrathecal trastuzumab was continued for 12 months until contrast-enhanced MRI suggested the progression of the meningeal dissemination.

Figure 3. The levels of serum CEA and CA15-3 and the levels of CEA in the CSF.

Figure 3

(a) The levels of serum CEA and CA15-3. (b) The levels of CEA in the CSF. The black arrow indicates the first administration of intravenous carboplatin and nano-particle albumin-bound paclitaxel, red arrow indicates that of intrathecal trastuzumab, and blue arrow indicates that of intravenous paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. “X” in X-axis indicates the date of cancer diagnosis.

CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA15-3, carbohydrate antigen 15-3; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid

Discussion

Leptomeningeal metastasis is a condition with progressive neurological symptoms and a poor prognosis of three to four months [1]. CUP also has a poor prognosis, except in patients with favorable subsets [5]. In patients with favorable subsets in which the primary site can be estimated, it is recommended that they be treated similarly to patients with cancers of an equivalent known primary site with metastatic dissemination. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guidelines, female patients with isolated axillary lymph node metastasis of unknown origin are recommended to be treated for breast cancer [6]. The NCCN guidelines also suggest that carcinomas of the mediastinal and supraclavicular nodes are also indicative of primary breast cancer.

Trastuzumab, an essential drug for HER2-positive breast cancer [7], is unable to penetrate the blood-brain barrier due to its high molecular weight (145 kDa) [8]; therefore, intrathecal administration of trastuzumab is anticipated to enhance bioavailability within the CSF. Several case reports have addressed the efficacy of intrathecal trastuzumab administration in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer leptomeningeal carcinomatosis [9-15]. Furthermore, a phase II study reported clinical neurological responses to intrathecal trastuzumab in this subset of patients [16]. According to the phase II study, headache, seizure, and allergic reaction were reported as adverse effects possibly related to intrathecal trastuzumab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report on intrathecal trastuzumab treatment for HER2-positive CUP leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Although the distribution of lymph node metastasis appears to suggest that the breast is the primary site, we could not identify the primary lesion using mammography, breast MRI, or ultrasound. In addition, we could not obtain comprehensive results for tumor markers before the IHC assay was reported. The patient was refractory to empiric therapy. If the primary site could not be estimated, the patient’s neurological symptoms would not be relieved.

It is possible that this result applies only to patients with CUP in whom the breast is suspected to be the primary site. A previous report described that overexpression of the HER2 protein occurred in 11% of poorly differentiated CUP [17]. However, it remains unclear whether intrathecal trastuzumab is effective in patients with HER2-positive CUP whose primary site is not indicated.

Conclusions

In summary, we encountered a case of HER2-positive CUP leptomeningeal metastasis. Leptomeningeal metastasis poses significant challenges due to its limited treatment options; therefore, we should continue to make an effort to estimate the primary site even after initiating empiric therapy for CUP. We suggest that intrathecal trastuzumab is an effective treatment for HER2-positive CUP leptomeningeal metastasis when the breast is considered the primary site.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Kohei Oka, Taishi Harada

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Kohei Oka, Shun Futamura, Taishi Harada

Drafting of the manuscript:  Kohei Oka

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Shun Futamura, Taishi Harada

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Intrathecal chemotherapy for treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of metastatic tumours. Beauchesne P. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:871–879. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leptomeningeal metastasis: a review of the pathophysiology, diagnostic methodology, and therapeutic landscape. Nguyen A, Nguyen A, Dada OT, et al. Curr Oncol. 2023;30:5906–5931. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30060442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carcinomatous meningitis: leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors. Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:0–88. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.111304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Intra-CSF administration of chemotherapy medications. Gabay MP, Thakkar JP, Stachnik JM, Woelich SK, Villano JL. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;70:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1893-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. Pavlidis N, Briasoulis E, Hainsworth J, Greco FA. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1990–2005. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00547-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cancer of unknown primary: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Krämer A, Bochtler T, Pauli C, et al. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:228–246. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Science. 1989;244:707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer patients administered trastuzumab. Duchnowska R, Szczylik C. Cancer Treat Rev. 2005;31:312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Intrathecal trastuzumab treatment of the neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Dumitrescu C, Lossignol D. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2013;2013:154674. doi: 10.1155/2013/154674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Intrathecal administration of trastuzumab for the treatment of meningeal carcinomatosis in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Bartsch R, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:13–22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2525-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Intrathecal trastuzumab: immunotherapy improves the prognosis of leptomeningeal metastases in HER-2+ breast cancer patient. Lu NT, Raizer J, Gabor EP, Liu NM, Vu JQ, Slamon DJ, Barstis JL. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:41. doi: 10.1186/s40425-015-0084-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Intrathecal trastuzumab treatment in patients with breast cancer and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Park WY, Kim HJ, Kim K, et al. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:843–847. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Intrathecal trastuzumab in the management of HER2+ breast leptomeningeal disease: a single institution experience. Figura NB, Long W, Yu M, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169:391–396. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4684-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clinical outcomes of breast leptomeningeal disease treated with intrathecal trastuzumab, intrathecal chemotherapy, or whole brain radiation therapy. Figura NB, Rizk VT, Mohammadi H, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175:781–788. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following treatment of cerebellar metastasis of HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive) breast cancer: case report and review of literature. Smith PD, Bhenderu LS, Kommuri S, Fleener EE, Hoover JM. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Phase II study of intrathecal administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis. Oberkampf F, Gutierrez M, Trabelsi Grati O, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25:365–374. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Overexpression of Her-2 in patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site. Hainsworth JD, Lennington WJ, Greco FA. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:632–635. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES