Skip to main content
Chinese Medical Journal logoLink to Chinese Medical Journal
. 2024 Mar 6;137(9):1044–1053. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003022

Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in kidney disease: Insights from the cGAS-STING signaling pathway

Lu Li 1, Fei Liu 1, Chunyue Feng 1, Zhenjie Chen 2, Nan Zhang 2, Jianhua Mao 1,
Editors: Xiangxiang Pan, Peifang Wei
PMCID: PMC11062705  PMID: 38445370

Abstract

Over the past decade, mitochondrial dysfunction has been investigated as a key contributor to acute and chronic kidney disease. However, the precise molecular mechanisms linking mitochondrial damage to kidney disease remain elusive. The recent insights into the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate (GMP-AMP) synthetase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon gene (STING) signaling pathway have revealed its involvement in many renal diseases. One of these findings is that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) induces inflammatory responses via the cGAS-STING pathway. Herein, we provide an overview of the mechanisms underlying mtDNA release following mitochondrial damage, focusing specifically on the association between mtDNA release-activated cGAS-STING signaling and the development of kidney diseases. Furthermore, we summarize the latest findings of cGAS-STING signaling pathway in cell, with a particular emphasis on its downstream signaling related to kidney diseases. This review intends to enhance our understanding of the intricate relationship among the cGAS-STING pathway, kidney diseases, and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Keywords: Mitochondrial dysfunction, Mitochondrial DNA, cGAS-STING pathway, Kidney diseases, Chronic kidney disease

Introduction

The kidney requires a high density of functional mitochondria to maintain its normal function. It is known that mitochondrial dysfunction is linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury(AKI), and other kidney diseases.[1] Indeed, mitochondrial metabolic disorders in glomerular podocytes, mesangial cells, and endothelial cells can cause renal dysfunction.[2,3] The cellular stress response is associated with broad molecular changes that safeguard cells against short-term damage and enable them to survive in long-term adverse conditions.[4] Pathogens, tumorigenesis, and mechanical damage are distinct cellular stressors that can induce abnormal double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) localization within cells. Several compensatory mechanisms, such as repairing unstable genomes and degrading unfolded proteins, allow cells to respond appropriately to mitochondrial stress.[5] However, when these rescue measures fail, damaged mitochondria release mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into the cytoplasm, which is a significant source of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).

DAMPs are endogenous molecules released by damaged or dying cells, according to their original definition,[6] which in turn induce strong innate immune responses.[7] When sensing stress signals or responding to damage, mitochondria release their oxidized and cleaved mtDNA into the cytoplasm. Most organisms detect aberrant DNA via innate immune receptors. Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) as the first identified DNA sensor was discovered by Hemmi et al[8] in 2000. Since then, several cytosolic DNA sensors, including Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1), absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), interferon-inducible protein 16 (IFI16), and the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate (GMP-AMP) synthase (cGAS), have been identified.[9] Among the various DAMPs that can alert innate immune mechanisms to kidney damage, aberrant DNA recognition by the cGAS–stimulator of interferon gene (STING) signaling pathway is particularly crucial for the intrinsic sensing of cells.[10] In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying mtDNA leakage resulting from mitochondrial damage, with a specific focus on the correlation between mtDNA-mediated cGAS-STING signaling and the pathogenesis of kidney diseases. Furthermore, we present latest findings of cGAS-STING signaling pathway in cell, with a particular emphasis on its downstream signaling related to kidney diseases. Through this review, we hope to enhance our understanding of the intricate links among the cGAS-STING signal pathway, mitochondrial damage, and kidney diseases, and provide new perspectives and approaches for the prevention and treatment of kidney disease.

Immunogenicity of MtDNA

Under normal physiological conditions, mtDNA is located adjacent to the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM),[11] where distinct DNA repair mechanisms maintain genetic integrity by selectively amplifying intact copies of mtDNA.[12] Mitochondria are believed to have originated from eubacteria; thus, mtDNA is often unmethylated and differs from nuclear DNA.[13] Moreover, mitochondria lack the sophisticated mechanisms used to repair genomic DNA, making mtDNA more vulnerable to the effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and environmental toxins.[14] Environmental, genetic, and spontaneous damages, such as ionizing/non-ionizing radiation, alkylating agents, ROS, lipid peroxides, endogenous chemicals, and the chemical instability of DNA, constantly threaten the integrity of nuclear DNA and mtDNA.[15] Mitochondria respond to cellular stress and homeostatic imbalance by releasing DAMPs, including oxidized mtDNA, ROS, N-formyl peptide, and cardiolipin.[16] The recognition of aberrant DNA, particularly ectopic mtDNA, by the cGAS-STING signaling pathway plays a vital role in the innate immune response to kidney damage.[1721]

MtDNA Leakage

Mechanism of mtDNA leakage into cytoplasm

The mtDNA leakage is intrinsically linked to mitochondrial dynamics, as well as changes in mitophagy and apoptosis, all of which can be influenced by different levels of stress within the cell.[22] The primary factor leading to the release of mitochondrial components into the cytoplasm is the loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity.[23] Four major pore-forming complexes are thought to facilitate the release of mtDNA from damaged mitochondria, as described in the sections below [Figure 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mechanisms of mtDNA leakage. (A) Mechanisms of mtDNA leakage to the cytoplasm. Environmental and intrinsic genotoxic damage factors, including UV radiation, ionizing radiation, and alkylating agents, as well as ROS, lipid peroxides, endogenous chemicals, and genome instability, constantly threaten the integrity of the nucleus and mtDNA. As a response to cellular stress and homeostatic imbalance, mitochondria release DAMPs, including oxidized mtDNA. There are four major pore-forming complexes thought to facilitate the release of mtDNA from damaged mitochondria: VDAC pore, mPTP, BAK/BAX pore, and gasdermin pore. (B) ATP synthase-mediated mPTP opening. (C) Mechanisms of mtDNA leakage into the extracellular space. As a result of cell death and stress, mtDNA is released into the extracellular space via EVs or extracellular traps such as NETs. Subsequently, mtDNA is endocytosed by bystander cells and activates the cGAS-STING pathway to participate in intercellular interactions. ATP: Adenosine triphosphate; BAK: BCL2 antagonist/killer 1; BAX: BCL2 associated X; BCL2: B-cell lymphoma 2; cGAS-STING: Cyclic GMP-AMP synthetase stimulator of interferon genes; CypD: Cyclophilin D; DAMPs: Damage-associated molecular patterns; EVs: Extracellular vesicles; IMM: Inner mitochondrial membrane; IMS: intermembrane space; mPTP: Mitochondrial permeability transition pore; mtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA; NETs: Neutrophil extracellular traps; OMM: Outer mitochondrial membrane; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; UV: Ultraviolet; VDAC: Voltage-dependent anion channel.

Mitochondrial permeability transition pore and voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) oligomer pore

The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is a supramolecular structure located at the interface of the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) and outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), serving as a voltage- and Ca2+-sensitive channel.[24] Upon cells exposure to radiation, oxidative stress, or lipopolysaccharides (LPS), mitochondria release mtDNA fragments into the cytoplasm through the opening of mPTP.[2528] Recent evidence emphasizes the significant role of mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase in the formation of high-conductance mPTP [Figure 1B].[29] The VDAC is one of the most abundant proteins in the OMM, which has two conductive states, i.e., an open, anion-selective state, and a closed, microcation-selective state, and play critical roles in mitochondrial signaling and calcium homeostasis.[30] Recent studies have shown that oxidatively stressed mitochondria release short fragments of mtDNA through pores formed by VDAC1 in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).[31] Furthermore,VDAC may regulate mPTP formation or opening in response to mitochondrial stress.[32]

BAK/BAX pore

B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-associated X protein (BAX) and BCL2 antagonist/killer 1 (BAK), which are members of the Bcl-2 family, have been identified as key participants in the process of programmed cell death.[33] Studies have shown that the formation of pores in the OMM mediated by BAK and BAX is implicated in both pyroptosis and intrinsic apoptosis, resulting in the release of mitochondrial components into the cytosol.[34,35]

Gasdermin (GSDM) pore

GSDM proteins have been identified as a key executioner of pyroptosis.[36,37] Gasdermin D (GSDMD) forms pores in the plasma membrane, which leads to cytokine release from cells and inflammatory cell death.[38] However, GSDMD is also highly expressed in the mitochondrial membrane, where it induces the release of ROS and causes mitochondrial damage.[39] Recent research has revealed that the internalized bacterial endotoxin LPS activates GSDMD, which subsequently leads to the formation of mitochondrial pores and the release of mtDNA into the cytoplasm of endothelial cells. This process, in turn, triggers the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, which plays a pivotal role in modulating cellular responses to inflammation.[40]

Mechanisms of mtDNA leakage to extracellular space

As a result of cell stress and death, mtDNA is released into the extracellular space through two mechanisms: (1) the release of extracellular traps, such as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are composed of extracellular polymers produced by neutrophils; and (2) the formation of extracellular vesicles(EVs), which result from the fusion of mitochondria with vesicular structures, similar to those used in intracellular secretion. Subsequent endocytosis of extracellular mtDNA by bystander cells serves as a mode of horizontal information exchange, activating the cGAS-STING pathway.[4143] This pathway can activate a host of inflammatory factors and immune cells, thereby altering the immune status of neighboring tissues [Figure 1C].

Overview of the cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway

cGAS serves as a primary cytosolic DNA sensor, interacting with the adaptor STING, which is anchored as a transmembrane protein on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane.[9] On activation of the canonical cGAS-STING pathway by cytoplasmic dsDNA, the cGAS enzyme synthesizes cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) 2,3-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which functions as a second messenger and binds to its receptor STING. Upon activation, STING oligomerizes and translocates from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and recruits TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), leading to phosphorylation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3). Phosphorylated IRF3 forms dimers and enters the nucleus, resulting in transcription of IRF3 target genes and production of proinflammatory factors such as type 1 interferons. The oligomerization of STING also facilitates the activation of IκB kinase (IKK)/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and subsequently induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines [Figure 2].[44] Once STING fulfills its function, it is transported to the lysosome where it is degraded to attenuate pathway activation.[45]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overview of the cGAS-STING signaling. Various cellular stresses, such as pathogen infection, tumor development, and mechanical damage, can result in the mislocalization of dsDNA. Under these circumstances, the mtDNA, a significant endogenous DNA molecule, has the potential to be released into the cytoplasm. As a result of cytoplasmic dsDNA activation, cGAS synthesizes cGAMP to bind with receptor STING. Activated STING oligomerizes and translocates from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and recruits TBK1, leading to phosphorylation of IRF3 and IKK. Together, these cascade reactions initiate the transcription of proinflammatory cytokines, including type I IFNs.The oligomerization of STING also facilitates the activation of IKK/NF-κB, thereby inducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. ATP: Adenosine triphosphate; CDN: Cyclic dinucleotide; cGAMP: Cyclic GMP-AMP; cGAS: Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; dsDNA: Double-stranded DNA; ER: Endoplasmic reticulum; GTP: Guanosine triphosphate; IFN: Interferon; IKK: IκB kinase; IRF3: IFN regulatory factor 3; mtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA; NF-κB: Nuclear factor kappa B; STING: Stimulator of interferon genes; TBK1: TANK-binding kinase 1.

Activation and Regulation of the cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway

Initial models assumed that co-localization of cGAS and DNA in the cytosol defines the specificity of the pathway for recognizing non-self DNA. However, recent research has demonstrated that cGAS is also found in all cellular compartments (membrane, cytosol, and nucleus),[4648] and this subcellular compartmentalization has been associated with the signaling specificity of cGAS.[49] The precise mechanism by which cGAS dissociates from subcellular structures and senses ds-DNA, including mtDNA, is not yet clear. cGAS recognizes dsDNA regardless of its sequence and is capable of recognizing various types of dsDNA, including both foreign and self-DNA. Recent studies have shown that human cGAS exhibits a preference for longer dsDNA molecules, at least 45 base pairs or longer, for optimal activation.[50] Upon binding to dsDNA, cGAS undergoes dimerization, forming a complex with two dsDNA molecules and two cGAS molecules. This structural rearrangement allows cGAS to catalyze adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and guanosine triphosphate (GTP), resulting in the generation of cGAMP as a second messenger [Figure 2]. Notably, the cGAS product in metazoans forms a unique covalent linkage between the γ-phosphate of ATP and the 2′-hydroxyl group of GTP, creating a 2′,5′-phosphodiester bond. This bond is more effective in activating STING signaling compared to the canonical 3′,5′-phosphodiester bonds found in bacterial cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs).[51] Zn2+ has been found to facilitate cGAS activation by promoting its phase transition in the presence of cytosolic DNA,[52] while Mn2+ enhances dsDNA recognition by cGAS and promotes the recognition of cGAMP and other bacterial CDNs by STING, which is crucial for cGAS-STING activation in vivo.[53] Two substitutions in the cGAS DNA-binding surface, hcGAS Lysine187 and Leucine195, are necessary for enhancing the ability of cGAS to discriminate short and long DNAs.[50] Additionally, it has been demonstrated that interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) plays a crucial role in promoting effective activation of STING-mediated innate immune responses in monocytes, independent of its transcriptional function in monocyte differentiation.[54]

To prevent cGAS-mediated autoreactivity, it is crucial to continuously clear self-DNA originating from both intracellular and extracellular sources. The clearance is accomplished through the action of several factors including cytosolic 3′ repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1), lysosomal DNase II, and adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2).[55] In addition, the recognition of intact genomic DNA is inhibited by nucleosomes and chromatin architectural proteins like barrier-to-autointegration factor 1, which competitively bind to nucleosome-free DNA and suppress cGAS activity.[55] Mitochondrial DNA, lacking unique chromatin features, is physically separated to prevent its sensing.[56] ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C member 1(ABCC1) has been identified as a transporter that facilitates the ATP-dependent export of cGAMP, serving to modulate cellular STING responses and control cGAS-related autoimmunity in vivo.[57] The ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (ENPP1) is supposed to be the dominant 2′3′-cGAMP extracellular hydrolase, however, the mechanism by which cGAMP is transported to the extracellular space remains unknown.[58] When cGAMP binds with STING, STING undergoes a conformational change that facilitates the recruitment and activation of downstream signaling molecules, ultimately leading to the activation of STING-mediated immune responses. After STING accomplishes its signaling function, it is rapidly degraded, possibly through autophagy.[59] These safeguarding mechanisms ensure a balanced and transient innate immune response triggered by cGAS and STING. However, the malfunctioning of these safeguards can lead to constitutive or prolonged activation of innate immunity, contributing to acute and chronic kidney injury.[10]

Signaling Downstream of STING Activation Related to Kidney Diseases

STING-PERK-eIF2α signaling

A evolutionarily primitive STING-Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)-eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) signaling pathway has recently been discovered in the ER, which is completely independent of the traditional STING-TBK1-IRF3 signaling pathway.[60] Mechanistically, upon binding to cGAMP, STING associates with the ER membrane and interacts with PERK through its cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal domain, leading to PERK activation. Notably, the STING-PERK-eIF2α signaling pathway is rapidly activated within the ER, occurring earlier than the classical STING-TBK1-IRF3 pathway, which takes place in the Golgi apparatus. Functionally, STING-mediated PERK activation leads to robust phosphorylation of eIF2α, selectively regulating the translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) and facilitating translation programs associated with inflammatory and survival signaling [Figure 3A]. Moreover, further investigations have demonstrated that pharmacological interventions targeting this non-classical cGAS-STING pathway can effectively mitigate cellular senescence triggered by injury, and attenuate fibrotic processes in the lungs and kidneys. These findings provide valuable insights into the crucial role of the cGAS-STING-PERK-eIF2α signaling pathway in regulating cellular senescence and kidney fibrosis.[60]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Signaling downstream of STING activation related to kidney diseases. (A) After binding with cGAMP, STING undergoes a conformational alteration and associates with PERK, a protein kinase found in the ER. This interaction leads to robust activation of STING. Subsequently, PERK phosphorylates eIF2α, which initiates a selective mRNA translation program that plays a crucial role in cellular senescence and renal fibrosis. (B) The activation of STING leads to the initiation of the COPII complex assembly, resulting in the lipidation of LC3. This lipidation process is facilitated by the involvement of WIPI-2. Subsequently, the lipidized LC3 molecules encapsulate damaged DNA, bacteria, or viruses. In murine models of DKD and Alport syndrome, there is evidence suggesting that the activation of STING in podocytes is associated with increased apoptosis and autophagy. This is supported by elevated protein levels of LC3B and Beclin-1. (C) Upon activation, STING translocates from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and recruits TBK1, leading to phosphorylation of IRF3 and the activation of IKK/NF-κB and subsequently induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. cGAMP: Cyclic GMP-AMP; COPII complex: Coat protein complex II; DKD: Diabetic kidney disease; eIF2α: Eukaryotic initiation factor 2α; ER: Endoplasmic reticulum; ERGIC: ER-Golgi intermediate compartment; IRF3: IFN regulatory factor 3; IKK: IκB kinase; mtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA; mRNA: Messenger RNA; LC3: Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; NF-κB: Nuclear factor kappa B; PERK: Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; STING: Stimulator of interferon genes; TBK1: TANK-binding kinase 1; WIPI-2: WD repeat domain phosphoinositide interaction 2.

STING induces autophagy related signaling

Recent research has discovered that the induction of autophagy through STING trafficking represents a primordial function of the cGAS pathway.[61] The induction of autophagy through the cGAS-STING signaling cascade can be elucidated as follows: The activation of cGAS is triggered by dsDNA originating from either internal or external sources, resulting in the production of cGAMP. Subsequently, cGAMP binds to STING, thereby initiating the assembly of a complex involving secretion-associated Ras-related GTPase 1 (SAR1) and SEC24 homolog C (SEC24C), commonly known as the coat protein complex II (COPII complex). The COPII complex undergoes translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), where the process of lipidation of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) occurs. This lipidation process is facilitated by the involvement of WD repeat domain, phosphoinositide interacting 2 (WIPI-2). Subsequently, the lipidated LC3 molecules encapsulate damaged DNA, bacteria, or viruses, leading to the formation of autophagosomes [Figure 3B]. Ultimately, these autophagosomes merge with lysosomes, where their contents are degraded by various enzymes. In murine models of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and Alport syndrome, there is evidence indicating that the activation of STING in podocytes is linked to increased apoptosis and autophagy, as evidenced by elevated protein levels of LC3B and beclin 1.[62]

STING-TBK1/IKK-NF-κB

Research on mouse models of DKD and AKI has shown that mtDNA leakage mediated by BAX triggers the activation of the STING-TBK1/IKK-NF-κB pathway, which often leads to kidney cell damage and inflammation.[18,19] In the DKD mouse model, lipotoxicity-triggered mitochondrial damage in podocytes leads to the leakage of mtDNA into the cytosol via BAX.[19] Interestingly, this BAX-mediated cytosolic mtDNA leakage is found to activate the cGAS-STING pathway, thus inducing podocyte damage, even in the absence of lipotoxicity. Notably, this process is linked to the activation of STING downstream effectors TBK1 and NF-κB, but not IRF3 [Figure 3C].[19] Furthermore, in the cisplatin-induced AKI mouse model, it has been observed to induce mtDNA leakage into the cytosol of tubules, possibly via BAX pores in the mitochondrial outer membrane. This subsequently triggers the STING-TBK1/IKK-NF-κB signaling, leading to inflammation and the progression of AKI.[18] In mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) knockout (KO) mice, mitochondrial damage leads to the escape of mtDNA into the cytosol, which activates the STING-TBK1/IKK-NF-κB sensing pathway, mediating renal inflammation and fibrosis.[17]

MtDNA-cGAS-STING Pathway in Kidney Disease

cGAS-STING is a crucial innate immune pathway that acts as an early warning system against viral infections or other cellular stressors by initiating an immune response against foreign DNA or self-DNA. However, dysregulation of this pathway following the abnormal accumulation of mtDNA, as a result of various genetic or environmental factors, has a detrimental effect on the body, leading to various diseases and complications, including AKI, Lupus nephritis (LN), and CKD. Thus, exploring the role of the mtDNA-cGAS-STING axis in the pathogenesis of kidney disease may lead to the development of novel treatment strategies.

MtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway in AKI

AKI is a complex and rapidly progressive disorder often caused by damage to the renal parenchyma. It is believed that mitochondrial dysfunction is an early event in AKI and plays a key role in its pathogenesis.[63] A burst of ROS during reperfusion of ischemic tissues can trigger mPTP opening and, thus, theoretically, increased mtDNA release.[64] Recent studies have explored the mechanisms and consequences of mtDNA release in AKI. For instance, it has been shown that increased mtDNA levels in the plasma of patients with sepsis-induced AKI are a hallmark of renal mitochondrial injury.[65] Similarly, patients with severe sepsis-induced AKI have significantly elevated urine mtDNA levels, which are positively correlated with plasma creatinine, urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipid, and kidney injury molecule-1 levels.[66] Furthermore, a previous study found that the severity of AKI was reduced using cGMP-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors.[67] Feng et al[68] reported that the levels of receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3) in the cytosol were increased following ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) in mouse kidneys. Mechanistically, RIP3 translocates to the mitochondria, where it interacts with mitofilin (a mitochondrial inner membrane protein) and promotes its degradation, resulting in increased mitochondrial damage and mtDNA release into the cytosol in an mPTP-independent manner. As a result of mtDNA release, the cGAS-STING pathway is activated, leading to increased nuclear transcription of proinflammatory markers, which aggravate kidney I/R injury.[68] In an animal model of cisplatin-induced AKI, Maekawa et al[18] observed that cisplatin induced mtDNA leakage into the cytosol of tubule cells, leading to the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway, thereby triggering inflammation and AKI progression. Meanwhile, the cisplatin-induced inflammatory response was attenuated in STING-KO mice. In another animal study, H151, a small-molecule STING antagonist, alleviated cisplatin-induced kidney damage and inflammation.[69] Moreover, in human kidney cells (HKCs), triptolide (TPL) induced ROS production, leading to mtDNA leakage, while also activating cGAS-STING signaling in mouse kidney tubules; the use of STING inhibitors alleviated kidney damage in these TPL-treated mice.[70] The above studies illustrate that mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of the mtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway are major inducers of kidney damage.

MtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway in CKD

There appears to be a link between mtDNA-cGAS-STING and chronic inflammation.[71] During mitochondrial dysfunction, the communication between mitochondria and the ER is disrupted, resulting in kidney tubule inflammation and fibrosis; this causes the progression of AKI to CKD.[72] Compared with healthy kidneys, the kidneys of individuals with CKD have significantly defective mitochondrial dynamics[73] and high levels of mitochondrial oxidative stress.[74] In mouse models of renal fibrosis, mitochondrial loss and decreased ATP levels were observed in juvenile animals; however, renal fibrosis and azotemia did not develop until adulthood.[17] Urine mtDNA levels were inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) yet positively correlated with interstitial fibrosis[75] and may therefore serve as a surrogate marker for permanent kidney damage in patients with non-diabetic CKD.[76] In the TFAM-KO renal fibrosis mouse model, mtDNA leakage into the cytosol activated the DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway, resulting in cytokine expression and immune cell recruitment.[17] Consequently, the genetic depletion or inhibition of STING reduced the severity of kidney fibrosis in mouse models of CKD.[17] Zhang et al[60] identified the STING-PERK-eIF2α pathway as a critical and physiological factor contributing to the progression of renal fibrosis in a surgically-induced mouse model of unilateral ureteral obstruction.

Diabetes is a leading cause of kidney failure, and DKD (also known as diabetic nephropathy) is a major trigger for CKD. The progression of DKD is associated with excess ROS production, activation of apoptosis, and defects in hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial autophagy. It is well known that mitochondria play a central role in the pathogenesis of DKD.[7779] For instance, urinary mtDNA content is markedly elevated in both diabetic patients and mice. Moreover, the intravenous injection of mtDNA into mice induced inflammation and subsequent kidney injury in these animals.[80] Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with the severity of DKD.[81] When mesangial cells are exposed to high glucose concentrations, an increase in intracellular mtDNA content, accumulation of ROS, and increased mitochondrial damage can be observed.[82] In mice with DKD, kidney podocytes experience mitochondrial dysfunction and damage, which results in the leakage of mtDNA into the cytosol through BAX-mediated macropores. Cytosolic mtDNA in turn activates the cGAS-STING/TBK1/p65 pathway, leading to the production of inflammatory cytokines and podocyte injury.[19] It has been reported that activating STING in wild-type mice leads to albuminuria and podocyte loss, while the cGAS-STING signaling pathway is upregulated in mice with experimental DKD and Alport syndrome.[62] Both genetic depletion and inhibition of STING inhibit the progression of glomerular diseases and preserve renal function, demonstrating that the cGAS-STING pathway plays a vital role in mediating glomerular dysfunction.[62] Inflammatory cytokine production and podocyte damage occur as a result of the cytosolic-mtDNA-mediated activation of the cGAS-STING-TBK1-p65 pathway; consequently, the inhibition of STING can reduce podocyte injury in diabetic mice.[19] It has been reported that the sacubitril/valsartan combination or valsartan alone inhibits auto-DNA-activated cGAS-STING signaling in mice with DKD.[83]

These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of CKD, and suggest that targeting the cGAS-STING pathway may have therapeutic potential in CKD.

MtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway in SLE and LN

SLE is characterized by multi-organ inflammation and the presence of circulating antigen-autoantibody immune complexes. It was reported that mitochondrial genetic alterations are related to the occurrence of SLE,[84] and that novel mtDNA genetic variants are associated with SLE susceptibility and prognosis.[85] mtDNA deposits have been found in the NETs of LN kidney biopsy specimens.[86] Moreover, SLE patients have higher levels of anti-mtDNA antibodies than healthy individuals, which is associated with the disease activity index in patients with LN.[87] According to one study, ROS are an important inducer of oxidized mitochondrial DNA (Ox-mtDNA) production by neutrophils in response to ribonucleotide immune complex stimulation in SLE patients.[41] Simultaneously, the authors found that SLE pathogenesis was linked to the inadequate degradation of neutrophil Ox-mtDNA both in vitro and in vivo.[41] Importantly, a significant increase in the production of STING-pathway-associated inflammatory cytokines could be observed in cells stimulated with Ox-mtDNA.[41] Similarly, neutrophils in SLE have reduced levels of protein kinase A (PKA) activation and mitochondria transcription factor A (TFAM) degradation, leading to the expulsion of immunogenic Ox-mtDNA into the extracellular space.[43]

Recent studies have found a defect in the mechanism of programmed mitochondrial clearance in SLE, which results in the accumulation of mitochondria-positive (Mito+) red blood cells (RBCs) in SLE patients, a marker of disease activity.[88] By activating cGAS in macrophages, antibody-mediated internalization of Mito+ RBCs induces the production of type I IFNs.[88] In SLE monocytes, accumulated mtDNA escapes autophagy and acts as an autocytoplasmic DAMP. This results in the activation of STING, which leads to tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 secretion and the subsequent proliferation of autoreactive lymphocytes.[89] In addition, the cGAS-STING pathway is activated by apoptosis-derived membrane vesicles in the serum of patients with SLE.[90]

Overall, the above studies prove that Ox-mtDNA is not simply a disease biomarker but also contributes to the development of SLE and LN via the cGAS-STING pathway.

Therapeutic Targeting of the MtDNA-cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway in Kidney Disease

The role of the mtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway in kidney disease has sparked significant interest in developing drugs that target mtDNA leakage and cGAS-STING pathway proteins. Many potential drug candidates have been identified for mitigating palmitic acid (PA)-induced podocyte damage and improving kidney function, including low concentrations of ethidium bromide, which blocks the replication and transcription of mtDNA, and BAI1, an inhibitor of BAX, which blocks PA-induced cGAS-STING activation.[19] Cyclosporin A (CsA) is a commonly used immunosuppressant in kidney disease and an inhibitor of Cyclophilin D (CypD), which prevents mPTP opening. Bendavia inhibited mPTP opening in the porcine atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis model[91] by dislodging the bound DNA from cGAS, while suramin acts as an effective cGAS antagonist.[92] According to previous studies, mice exposed to ultraviolet light exhibited a cGAS-dependent blood and systemic type I IFN response, which could be inhibited using hydroxychloroquine.[93] The antimalarial drug X6, which has a similar structure to hydroxychloroquine, has also been shown to inhibit cGAS activity, thereby reducing cGAMP production and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) expression in Trex1/ mice, an autoimmune disorder model.[94] The use of low-dose aspirin is expected to treat autoDNA-induced autoimmune diseases by inhibiting cGAS activation through acetylation.[95] Researchers found that the STING antagonist H151 relieved inflammation and kidney damage induced by cisplatin treatment.[69] Meanwhile, the STING inhibitor C176 protected renal cells from TPL-induced damage,[70] prevented the progression of kidney disease in mice with DKD and Alport syndrome,[19,62] and extended the lifespan of mice with Alport syndrome.[62] Despite being potent inhibitors of mouse STING, C-176 and C-178 do not inhibit human STING.[96] However, their derivatives are effective in inhibiting human STING palmitoylation, with H-151 being the most potent agent.[97] It has been shown that UXT (a ubiquitously expressed prefoldin-like chaperone) specifically interacts with STING and promotes its degradation through selective macroautophagy/autophagy, contributing to the attenuation of the cGAS-STING signaling in SLE model mice.[98] Moreover, TBK1 inhibition with BX795 reduced the expression of ISGs in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of SLE patients.[99]

In summary, the present study of mtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway regulators in the field of nephrology mainly focuses on cGAS and STING inhibitors, as well as drugs affecting mitochondrial permeability.[100102]

Conclusions and Perspectives

The exploration of the mtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway’s role in kidney disease exhibits potential for the discovery of innovative therapeutic targets. Currently, the relationship among mitochondrial damage, cGAS-STING pathway, and development of kidney disease is an active area of research. However, there are still some issues that have not been addressed. First, because many factors affect cGAS-STING pathway activation, it is difficult to prove that mitochondrial dysfunction and mtDNA leakage are dominant factors. Second, the extent to which the cGAS-STING pathway is involved in different types of kidney disease and the specific mechanisms by which it contributes to disease development and progression are not yet clear. Thirdly, the potential off-target effects of drugs targeting the cGAS-STING pathway are still being evaluated, and further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of these drugs in treating kidney disease. Despite these challenges, the potential of targeting the cGAS-STING pathway for the treatment of kidney disease is considered promising. Future research should focus on developing drugs that specifically target the mtDNA-cGAS-STING pathway to reduce the risk of off-target effects, as well as on investigating the role of the pathway in other kidney diseases such as polycystic kidney disease, rejection after kidney transplantation, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, among others.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY22H050002).

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our gratitude to all collaborators, for their contributions to the publications referenced in this paper. Figures were created by Figdraw (ID:WWWRA54500; ID:RPORIf6ddf; ID:TSSUIdda4a).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Li L, Liu F, Feng CY, Chen ZJ, Zhang N, Mao JH. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in kidney disease: Insights from the cGAS-STING signaling pathway. Chin Med J 2024;137:1044–1053. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003022

References

  • 1.Tang C, Cai J, Yin XM, Weinberg JM, Venkatachalam MA, Dong Z. Mitochondrial quality control in kidney injury and repair. Nat Rev Nephrol 2021;17:299–318. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00369-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhou D Zhou M Wang Z Fu Y Jia M Wang X, et al. PGRN acts as a novel regulator of mitochondrial homeostasis by facilitating mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis to prevent podocyte injury in diabetic nephropathy. Cell Death Dis 2019;10:524. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1754-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Czajka A, Malik AN. Hyperglycemia induced damage to mitochondrial respiration in renal mesangial and tubular cells: Implications for diabetic nephropathy. Redox Biol 2016;10:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Welch WJ. How cells respond to stress. Sci Am 1993;268:56–64. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0593-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valera-Alberni M, Canto C. Mitochondrial stress management: a dynamic journey. Cell Stress 2018;2:253–274. doi: 10.15698/cst2018.10.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gong T, Liu L, Jiang W, Zhou R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 2020;20:95–112. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0215-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Riley JS, Tait SW. Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep 2020;21:e49799. doi: 10.15252/embr.201949799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hemmi H Takeuchi O Kawai T Kaisho T Sato S Sanjo H, et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 2000;408:740–745. doi: 10.1038/35047123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen C, Xu P. Cellular functions of cGAS-STING signaling. Trends Cell Biol 2023;33:630–648. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Skopelja-Gardner S, An J, Elkon KB. Role of the cGAS-STING pathway in systemic and organ-specific diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022;18:558–572. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00589-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Acín-Pérez R Bayona-Bafaluy MP Fernández-Silva P Moreno-Loshuertos R Pérez-Martos A Bruno C, et al. Respiratory complex III is required to maintain complex I in mammalian mitochondria. Mol Cell 2004;13:805–815. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00124-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alexeyev M, Shokolenko I, Wilson G, LeDoux S. The maintenance of mitochondrial DNA integrity--critical analysis and update. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5:a012641. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roger AJ, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Kamikawa R. The Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria. Curr Biol 2017;27:R1177–R1192. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee HC, Wei YH. Mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA maintenance of mammalian cells under oxidative stress. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005;37:822–834. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 2012;337:1062–1065. doi: 10.1126/science.1219855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kolmychkova KI, Zhelankin AV, Karagodin VP, Orekhov AN. Mitochondria and inflammation. Patol Fiziol Eksp Ter 2016;60:114–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chung KW Dhillon P Huang S Sheng X Shrestha R Qiu C, et al. Mitochondrial Damage and Activation of the STING Pathway Lead to Renal Inflammation and Fibrosis. Cell Metab 2019;30:784–799.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maekawa H Inoue T Ouchi H Jao TM Inoue R Nishi H, et al. Mitochondrial Damage Causes Inflammation via cGAS-STING Signaling in Acute Kidney Injury. Cell Rep 2019;29:1261–1273.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zang N Cui C Guo X Song J Hu H Yang M, et al. cGAS-STING activation contributes to podocyte injury in diabetic kidney disease. iScience 2022;25:105145. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feng Z Liao X Peng J Quan J Zhang H Huang Z, et al. PCSK9 causes inflammation and cGAS/STING pathway activation in diabetic nephropathy. FASEB J 2023;37:e23127. doi: 10.1096/fj.202300342RRR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Myakala K Wang XX Shults NV Krawczyk E Jones BA Yang X, et al. NAD metabolism modulates inflammation and mitochondria function in diabetic kidney disease. J Biol Chem 2023;299:104975. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pérez-Treviño P, Velásquez M, García N. Mechanisms of mitochondrial DNA escape and its relationship with different metabolic diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2020;1866:165761. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McGill MR, Yan HM, Ramachandran A, Murray GJ, Rollins DE, Jaeschke H. HepaRG cells: a human model to study mechanisms of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Hepatology 2011;53:974–982. doi: 10.1002/hep.24132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gil-Hernández A, Silva-Palacios A. Relevance of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria interactions in age-associated diseases. Ageing Res Rev 2020;64:101193. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Veres B Eros K Antus C Kalman N Fonai F Jakus PB, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition amplifies inflammatory reprogramming in endotoxemia. FEBS Open Bio 2021;11:684–704. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.García N, Chávez E. Mitochondrial DNA fragments released through the permeability transition pore correspond to specific gene size. Life Sci 2007;81:1160–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nakahira K Haspel JA Rathinam VA Lee SJ Dolinay T Lam HC, et al. Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat Immunol 2011;12:222–230. doi: 10.1038/ni.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tigano M, Vargas DC, Tremblay-Belzile S, Fu Y, Sfeir A. Nuclear sensing of breaks in mitochondrial DNA enhances immune surveillance. Nature 2021;591:477–481. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03269-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pinke G, Zhou L, Sazanov LA. Cryo-EM structure of the entire mammalian F-type ATP synthase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2020;27:1077–1085. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0503-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Varughese JT, Buchanan SK, Pitt AS. The Role of Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Human Disease. Cells 2021;10:1737. doi: 10.3390/cells10071737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim J Gupta R Blanco LP Yang S Shteinfer-Kuzmine A Wang K, et al. VDAC oligomers form mitochondrial pores to release mtDNA fragments and promote lupus-like disease. Science 2019;366:1531–1536. doi: 10.1126/science.aav4011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou B Kreuzer J Kumsta C Wu L Kamer KJ Cedillo L, et al. Mitochondrial Permeability Uncouples Elevated Autophagy and Lifespan Extension. Cell 2019;177:299–314.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pagliari LJ Kuwana T Bonzon C Newmeyer DD Tu S Beere HM, et al. The multidomain proapoptotic molecules Bax and Bak are directly activated by heat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:17975–17980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506712102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.White MJ McArthur K Metcalf D Lane RM Cambier JC Herold MJ, et al. Apoptotic caspases suppress mtDNA-induced STING-mediated type I IFN production. Cell 2014;159:1549–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McArthur K Whitehead LW Heddleston JM Li L Padman BS Oorschot V, et al. BAK/BAX macropores facilitate mitochondrial herniation and mtDNA efflux during apoptosis. Science 2018;359:eaao6047. doi: 10.1126/science.aao6047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ouyang X, Zhou J, Lin L, Zhang Z, Luo S, Hu D. Pyroptosis, inflammasome, and gasdermins in tumor immunity. Innate Immun 2023;29:3–13. doi: 10.1177/17534259221143216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burdette BE, Esparza AN, Zhu H, Wang S. Gasdermin D in pyroptosis. Acta Pharm Sin B 2021;11:2768–2782. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shi J Zhao Y Wang K Shi X Wang Y Huang H, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature 2015;526:660–665. doi: 10.1038/nature15514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Platnich JM Chung H Lau A Sandall CF Bondzi-Simpson A Chen HM, et al. Shiga Toxin/Lipopolysaccharide Activates Caspase-4 and Gasdermin D to Trigger Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Upstream of the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Cell Rep 2018;25:1525–1536.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang LS Hong Z Wu W Xiong S Zhong M Gao X, et al. mtDNA Activates cGAS Signaling and Suppresses the YAP-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation Program to Promote Inflammatory Injury. Immunity 2020;52:475–486.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lood C Blanco LP Purmalek MM Carmona-Rivera C De Ravin SS Smith CK, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps enriched in oxidized mitochondrial DNA are interferogenic and contribute to lupus-like disease. Nat Med 2016;22:146–153. doi: 10.1038/nm.4027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cheng AN Cheng LC Kuo CL Lo YK Chou HY Chen CH, et al. Mitochondrial Lon-induced mtDNA leakage contributes to PD-L1-mediated immunoescape via STING-IFN signaling and extracellular vesicles. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e001372. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Caielli S Athale S Domic B Murat E Chandra M Banchereau R, et al. Oxidized mitochondrial nucleoids released by neutrophils drive type I interferon production in human lupus. J Exp Med 2016;213:697–713. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Balka KR Louis C Saunders TL Smith AM Calleja DJ D’Silva DB, et al. TBK1 and IKKε Act Redundantly to Mediate STING-Induced NF-κB Responses in Myeloid Cells. Cell Rep 2020;31:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ritchie C, Carozza JA, Li L. Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Pathophysiology of the Innate Immune cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 2022;91:599–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-040320-101629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barnett KC Coronas-Serna JM Zhou W Ernandes MJ Cao A Kranzusch PJ, et al. Phosphoinositide Interactions Position cGAS at the Plasma Membrane to Ensure Efficient Distinction between Self- and Viral DNA. Cell 2019;176:1432–1446.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Qiu S Zhong X Meng X Li S Qian X Lu H, et al. Mitochondria-localized cGAS suppresses ferroptosis to promote cancer progression. Cell Res 2023;33:299–311. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00788-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gentili M Lahaye X Nadalin F Nader G Puig Lombardi E Herve S, et al. The N-Terminal Domain of cGAS Determines Preferential Association with Centromeric DNA and Innate Immune Activation in the Nucleus. Cell Rep 2019;26:2377–2393.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Joshi B, Joshi JC, Mehta D. Regulation of cGAS Activity and Downstream Signaling. Cells 2022;11:2812. doi: 10.3390/cells11182812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhou W Whiteley AT de Oliveira Mann CC Morehouse BR Nowak RP Fischer ES, et al. Structure of the Human cGAS-DNA Complex Reveals Enhanced Control of Immune Surveillance. Cell 2018;174:300–311.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gao P Ascano M Wu Y Barchet W Gaffney BL Zillinger T, et al. Cyclic [G(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′)p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase. Cell 2013;153:1094–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Du M, Chen ZJ. DNA-induced liquid phase condensation of cGAS activates innate immune signaling. Science 2018;361:704–709. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhu L Xu L Wang C Li C Li M Liu Q, et al. T6SS translocates a micropeptide to suppress STING-mediated innate immunity by sequestering manganese. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2103526118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103526118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Luo WW Tong Z Cao P Wang FB Liu Y Zheng ZQ, et al. Transcription-independent regulation of STING activation and innate immune responses by IRF8 in monocytes. Nat Commun 2022;13:4822. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32401-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Samson N, Ablasser A. The cGAS-STING pathway and cancer. Nat Cancer 2022;3:1452–1463. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00468-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.West AP Khoury-Hanold W Staron M Tal MC Pineda CM Lang SM, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature 2015;520:553–557. doi: 10.1038/nature14156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Maltbaek JH, Cambier S, Snyder JM, Stetson DB. ABCC1 transporter exports the immunostimulatory cyclic dinucleotide cGAMP. Immunity 2022;55:1799–1812.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li L Yin Q Kuss P Maliga Z Millán JL Wu H, et al. Hydrolysis of 2′3′-cGAMP by ENPP1 and design of nonhydrolyzable analogs. Nat Chem Biol 2014;10:1043–1048. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Konno H, Konno K, Barber GN. Cyclic dinucleotides trigger ULK1 (ATG1) phosphorylation of STING to prevent sustained innate immune signaling. Cell 2013;155:688–698. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang D Liu Y Zhu Y Zhang Q Guan H Liu S, et al. A non-canonical cGAS-STING-PERK pathway facilitates the translational program critical for senescence and organ fibrosis. Nat Cell Biol 2022;24:766–782. doi: 10.1038/s41556-022-00894-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gui X Yang H Li T Tan X Shi P Li M, et al. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 2019;567:262–266. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1006-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mitrofanova A Fontanella A Tolerico M Mallela S Molina David J Zuo Y, et al. Activation of Stimulator of IFN Genes (STING) Causes Proteinuria and Contributes to Glomerular Diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;33:2153–2173. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021101286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ishimoto Y, Inagi R. Mitochondria: a therapeutic target in acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31:1062–1069. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Szeto HH Liu S Soong Y Wu D Darrah SF Cheng FY, et al. Mitochondria-targeted peptide accelerates ATP recovery and reduces ischemic kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1041–1052. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010080808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sureshbabu A Patino E Ma KC Laursen K Finkelsztein EJ Akchurin O, et al. RIPK3 promotes sepsis-induced acute kidney injury via mitochondrial dysfunction. JCI Insight 2018;3:e98411. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hu Q Ren J Ren H Wu J Wu X Liu S, et al. Urinary Mitochondrial DNA Identifies Renal Dysfunction and Mitochondrial Damage in Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018;2018:8074936. doi: 10.1155/2018/8074936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Whitaker RM, Wills LP, Stallons LJ, Schnellmann RG. cGMP-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis and promote recovery from acute kidney injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013;347:626–634. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.208017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Feng Y, Imam Aliagan A, Tombo N, Draeger D, Bopassa JC. RIP3 Translocation into Mitochondria Promotes Mitofilin Degradation to Increase Inflammation and Kidney Injury after Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion. Cells 2022;11:1894. doi: 10.3390/cells11121894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gong W Lu L Zhou Y Liu J Ma H Fu L, et al. The novel STING antagonist H151 ameliorates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury and mitochondrial dysfunction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2021;320:F608–F616. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00554.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lu J Zhang Y Dong H Sun J Zhu L Liu P, et al. New mechanism of nephrotoxicity of triptolide: Oxidative stress promotes cGAS-STING signaling pathway. Free Radic Biol Med 2022;188:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bai J, Liu F. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway: A Molecular Link Between Immunity and Metabolism. Diabetes 2019;68:1099–1108. doi: 10.2337/dbi18-0052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang X, Agborbesong E, Li X. The Role of Mitochondria in Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease and Its Therapeutic Potential. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:11253. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Galvan DL, Green NH, Danesh FR. The hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2017;92:1051–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Oberg BP McMenamin E Lucas FL McMonagle E Morrow J Ikizler TA, et al. Increased prevalence of oxidant stress and inflammation in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2004;65:1009–1016. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wei PZ Kwan BC Chow KM Cheng PM Luk CC Li PK, et al. Urinary mitochondrial DNA level is an indicator of intra-renal mitochondrial depletion and renal scarring in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:784–788. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wei Z Kwan BC Chow KM Cheng PM Luk CC Lai KB, et al. Urinary mitochondrial DNA level as a biomarker of tissue injury in non-diabetic chronic kidney diseases. BMC Nephrol 2018;19:367. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1178-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wei PZ, Szeto CC. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic kidney disease. Clin Chim Acta 2019;496:108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Forbes JM, Thorburn DR. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018;14:291–312. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2018.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Flemming NB, Gallo LA, Forbes JM. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Oxidative Stress and Beyond. Semin Nephrol 2018;38:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cao H, Wu J, Luo J, Chen X, Yang J, Fang L. Urinary mitochondrial DNA: A potential early biomarker of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019;35:e3131. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Flemming N, Pernoud L, Forbes J, Gallo L. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Individuals with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review. Cells 2022;11:2481. doi: 10.3390/cells11162481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Al-Kafaji G, Golbahar J. High glucose-induced oxidative stress increases the copy number of mitochondrial DNA in human mesangial cells. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:754946. doi: 10.1155/2013/754946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Myakala K, Jones BA, Wang XX, Levi M. Sacubitril/valsartan treatment has differential effects in modulating diabetic kidney disease in db/db mice and KKAy mice compared with valsartan treatment. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2021;320:F1133–F1151. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00614.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jönsen A Yu X Truedsson L Nived O Sturfelt G Ibrahim S, et al. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility and phenotype of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2009;18:309–312. doi: 10.1177/0961203308097477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Teng Y Yan ZY Wang LL Wang YH Zhang TY Li Z, et al. Mitochondrial DNA genetic variants are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility, glucocorticoids efficacy and prognosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022;61:2652–2662. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wang H, Li T, Chen S, Gu Y, Ye S. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Mitochondrial DNA and Its Autoantibody in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and a Proof-of-Concept Trial of Metformin. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:3190–3200. doi: 10.1002/art.39296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Becker Y Loignon RC Julien AS Marcoux G Allaeys I Lévesque T, et al. Anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and their association with disease manifestations. Sci Rep 2019;9:4530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40900-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Caielli S Cardenas J de Jesus AA Baisch J Walters L Blanck JP, et al. Erythroid mitochondrial retention triggers myeloid-dependent type I interferon in human SLE. Cell 2021;184:4464–4479.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gkirtzimanaki K Kabrani E Nikoleri D Polyzos A Blanas A Sidiropoulos P, et al. IFNα Impairs Autophagic Degradation of mtDNA Promoting Autoreactivity of SLE Monocytes in a STING-Dependent Fashion. Cell Rep 2018;25:921–933.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kato Y Park J Takamatsu H Konaka H Aoki W Aburaya S, et al. Apoptosis-derived membrane vesicles drive the cGAS-STING pathway and enhance type I IFN production in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1507–1515. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-212988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Eirin A Li Z Zhang X Krier JD Woollard JR Zhu XY, et al. A mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibitor improves renal outcomes after revascularization in experimental atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Hypertension 2012;60:1242–1249. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.199919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang M, Sooreshjani MA, Mikek C, Opoku-Temeng C, Sintim HO. Suramin potently inhibits cGAMP synthase, cGAS, in THP1 cells to modulate IFN-β levels. Future Med Chem 2018;10:1301–1317. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2017-0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Skopelja-Gardner S An J Tai J Tanaka L Sun X Hermanson P, et al. The early local and systemic Type I interferon responses to ultraviolet B light exposure are cGAS dependent. Sci Rep 2020;10:7908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64865-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.An J Woodward JJ Lai W Minie M Sun X Tanaka L, et al. Inhibition of Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Using a Novel Antimalarial Drug Derivative in Trex1-Deficient Mice. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1807–1819. doi: 10.1002/art.40559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dai J Huang YJ He X Zhao M Wang X Liu ZS, et al. Acetylation Blocks cGAS Activity and Inhibits Self-DNA-Induced Autoimmunity. Cell 2019;176:1447–1460.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Haag SM Gulen MF Reymond L Gibelin A Abrami L Decout A, et al. Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors. Nature 2018;559:269–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Oduro PK Zheng X Wei J Yang Y Wang Y Zhang H, et al. The cGAS-STING signaling in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases: Future novel target option for pharmacotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 2022;12:50–75. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pan M Yin Y Hu T Wang X Jia T Sun J, et al. UXT attenuates the CGAS-STING1 signaling by targeting STING1 for autophagic degradation. Autophagy 2023;19:440–456. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2076192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bodewes I Huijser E van Helden-Meeuwsen CG Tas L Huizinga R Dalm V, et al. TBK1: A key regulator and potential treatment target for interferon positive Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis. J Autoimmun 2018;91:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tian X Xu F Zhu Q Feng Z Dai W Zhou Y, et al. Medicinal chemistry perspective on cGAS-STING signaling pathway with small molecule inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2022;244:114791. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ding C, Song Z, Shen A, Chen T, Zhang A. Small molecules targeting the innate immune cGAS–STING–TBK1 signaling pathway. Acta Pharm Sin B 2020;10:2272–2298. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Li Q, Tian S, Liang J, Fan J, Lai J, Chen Q. Therapeutic Development by Targeting the cGAS-STING Pathway in Autoimmune Disease and Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:779425. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.779425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES