Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2024 Apr 4;68(5):e01348-23. doi: 10.1128/aac.01348-23

Efflux pump effects on levofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus

Tianlu Teng 1,2,#, Suting Chen 2,#, Fengmin Huo 2, Junnan Jia 2, Liping Zhao 2, Guanglu Jiang 2, Fen Wang 2, Naihui Chu 3,, Hairong Huang 2,
Editor: Sean Wasserman4
PMCID: PMC11064541  PMID: 38572960

ABSTRACT

Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) inherently displays resistance to most antibiotics, with the underlying drug resistance mechanisms remaining largely unexplored. Efflux pump is believed to play an important role in mediating drug resistance. The current study examined the potential of efflux pump inhibitors to reverse levofloxacin (LFX) resistance in M. abscessus. The reference strain of M. abscessus (ATCC19977) and 60 clinical isolates, including 41 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and 19 M. abscessus subsp. massilense, were investigated. The drug sensitivity of M. abscessus against LFX alone or in conjunction with efflux pump inhibitors, including verapamil (VP), reserpine (RSP), carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), or dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), were determined by AlarmarBlue microplate assay. Drug-resistant regions of the gyrA and gyrB genes from the drug-resistant strains were sequenced. The transcription level of the efflux pump genes was monitored using qRT-PCR. All the tested strains were resistant to LFX. The drug-resistant regions from the gyrA and gyrB genes showed no mutation associated with LFX resistance. CCCP, DCC, VP, and RSP increased the susceptibility of 93.3% (56/60), 91.7% (55/60), 85% (51/60), and 83.3% (50/60) isolates to LFX by 2 to 32-fold, respectively. Elevated transcription of seven efflux pump genes was observed in isolates with a high reduction in LFX MIC values in the presence of efflux pump inhibitors. Efflux pump inhibitors can improve the antibacterial activity of LFX against M. abscessus in vitro. The overexpression of efflux-related genes in LFX-resistant isolates suggests that efflux pumps are associated with the development of LFX resistance in M. abscessus.

KEYWORDS: efflux pump, levofloxacin, antibacterial activity, M. abscessus

INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) is a rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) that has been increasingly isolated in clinical settings in recent years. This rapidly growing microorganism consists of three subspecies, namely subsp. abscessus, subsp. bolletii, and subsp. massiliense (1). Pulmonary disease caused by M. abscessus is considered one of the hardest to treat successfully among all known mycobacteria-related diseases, with a cure rate of about 25–58% (2). Therefore, M. abscessus lung disease is known as an “antibiotic nightmare” (3). The major underlying reason is that the bacilli is one of the most drug-resistant mycobacterial species, displaying inherent resistance to most antibiotics (4, 5). The mechanisms of intrinsic drug resistance mainly include low permeability of cell wall or barrier effect (6, 7), antibiotic inactivation caused by antibiotic hydrolase or modifying enzyme (8), and the drug efflux pump system (9, 10). Despite great efforts, the mechanism underlying the intrinsic resistance of M. abscessus toward different drugs is not well deciphered. Research has shown that the extensive drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is related to elevated expression of the efflux pump (11). Furthermore, using efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) could enhance the bactericidal activity, reverse the resistance of Mtb, and produce synergy with first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs (12). Efflux pump-associated research has mainly focused on Mtb, and there are also relatively limited studies on M. abscessus. Researchers have found that, EPI verapamil improves the efficacy of bedaquiline and spectinomycin activity against M. abscessus clinical isolates (13, 14). Quinoxaline-based efflux pump inhibitors such as 2-aryl-3-phenoxymethyl-quinoxaline derivatives also could restore drug susceptibility in drug-resistant M. abscessus (15).

Fluoroquinolones constitute a diverse group of synthetic broad-spectrum antibiotics. Currently, fluoroquinolones are prescribed to treat various diseases caused by Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, and several gastrointestinal tract infections (16, 17). Levofloxacin (LFX) was recommended as the second-line agent for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), mainly for drug-resistant cases or for cases who cannot tolerate the first-line anti-TB therapy (18). LFX displayed effective antibacterial activity against most commonly isolated NTM species, except for M. abscessus. The major mycobacterial resistance mechanism against quinolones involves mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes, especially in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR). Our previous study found no intra-species variation in QRDR of gyrA and gyrB in M. abscessus isolates despite the significant variation in MIC values to LFX (19). The role of the efflux pump in mediating drug resistance of M. abscessus to LFX is yet to be established.

This study investigated the effect of four EPIs on the LFX resistance of M. abscessus reference strain and 60 clinical isolates which were collected from patients with lung diseases. The transcription levels of these efflux pump-encoding genes were also monitored. Our results showed that efflux pumps render LFX resistance in M. abscessus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture

The M. abscessus reference strain and 60 clinical strains were collected from the Tuberculosis Biobank in the National Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis located in Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China). The clinical M. abscessus isolates were identified at the subspecies level by sequencing and comparison of the 16S rRNA, rpoB, and hsp65 genes. Bacterial strains were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth and on the Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium. The growth phenotypes of the clinical strains on the L-J medium were recorded.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The in vitro susceptibility of M. abscessus isolates to LFX (CAS#100986-85-4, St Louis, MO, USA) was tested according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (20). The tested concentrations of LFX were serially diluted 2-fold in Mueller-Hinton broth ranging from 0.0125 to 64 µg/mL. The 0.5 McFarland standard bacterial suspension, prepared with freshly grown M. abscessus, was diluted 200-fold. Then, 100 µL of diluted inoculum was pipetted to each well of the plate that contained 100 µL of corresponding LFX at concentrations as previously prepared. The final concentration of M. abscessus in each well reached 105 CFU/mL. After 3 days of incubation at 37°C, 20 µL of AlamarBlue (Invitrogen) (in an amount equal to 8–10% of the volume) and 50 µL of 5% Tween 80 were added to each well. The plates were re-incubated at 37°C for an additional 24 h before assessing color change. A blue color in the well indicated no mycobacterial growth, while a pink color indicated growth. Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent preventing the color change from blue to pink. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The MIC ≥4 µg/mL was used as the LFX-resistant breakpoint (21): MIC ≤1 µg/mL, susceptible; MIC = 2 µg/mL, moderate; and MIC ≥4 µg/mL, resistant.

Monitoring the transcription of efflux pump genes

Four clinical isolates with MIC ratio ≤2 and MIC ratio ≥8 were selected, respectively. Four clinical isolates with MIC ratio ≤2 and four clinical isolates with MIC ratio ≥8 were randomly selected. Due to the MIC ratio of the reference strain being variable in different EPIs (2–8), only clinical strains with more uniform or consistent effects were randomly selected for qRT-PCR experiments. The isolate suspensions were inoculated in the Mueller-Hinton broth in the presence of half its MIC of LFX. RNA extraction from the isolates was performed by following the protocols described by Trizol Reagent (Thermo Fisher, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and stored at –80℃ until used. By reviewing the literature, a total of 10 efflux pump genes were selected, among which MAB_2355, MAB_1846, and MAB_1560 belong to the ABC superfamily, MAB_2301, MAB_1134, and MAB_4382 belong to the RND superfamily, and MAB_3142, MAB_1409, MAB_2807, and MAB_0970 belong to the MFS superfamily (22, 23). Primer pairs (shown in Table 1) were used for amplification and were synthesized by Ruibo BioTech Company (Beijing, China). 16S rRNA was chosen as the endogenous reference gene. RT-PCR was performed using the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix kit (Thermo Biotech, USA) on a Roche LightCycler 480 II Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Shanghai, China). All the RT-PCR reactions were performed in quadruplicate.

TABLE 1.

Primer sequences used for efflux pump gene expression

Gene Sequence 5′−3′
Forward primer Reverse primer
MAB_2301 CCGATTCTCGATACCCATTCTC GTGCTGCTTGATCACTGTTTC
MAB_1134 CCGGAAGGTCTTTCGCATATC CGAGTTCGATCTTGGCATCTT
MAB_4382 GGGCTATCACACCACCTAT CGGGTTCATCTTGGCTTTA
MAB_3142 GTGAGAGTGAAGAGCACCCC GCTGCTGATCGCCTTCCTAT
MAB_1409 GTCCTGGTCCAATTCTCGCA TCGCCACAACTCTGGTCATC
MAB_2355 CTGGCCAGCTCATACGGAAT ACTCATGGAGTGCGACAGTG
MAB_1846 CCCACCAACAACCTGGACTT ATTACCGGATCGGGTCTCCA
MAB_1560 AACGTCTGGGAGGTCGTTTC CGAAACATATGCCCGCGAAG
MAB_2807 TCATTCTCTGGGAATCGCGG GACAAGGGTCACCATCAGGG
MAB_0970 CGCGCGTAAGGAAATTGGAG TCACCCTCATCGTGCAGAAC

Detection of antimicrobial susceptibility of EPIs combined with LFX against M. abscessus

Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (CAS#555-60-2), N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (CAS#538-75-0), verapamil (VP) (CAS#52-53-9) and reserpine (RSP) (CAS#50-55-5) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA) or Solarbio (Beijing, China). The MIC of LFX was determined in the presence of CCCP, DCC, VP, and RSP, respectively. First, the MICs of four EPIs against M. abscessus were detected according to the method described above in the antimicrobial susceptibility test. The tested concentrations of each EPIs ranged from 0.23 to 768 µg/mL by serially diluted twofold in Mueller-Hinton broth. Then, each EPI was added to respective wells in a final concentration of 1/2 of the MIC (24). All the experiments were performed in triplicate. For the sake of presentation, we defined the reduction of MIC values of LFX decreased in the presence of an efflux inhibitor as MIC ratio = LFX MIC/(LFX + EPI) MIC. The MIC ratio was considered significant when the MIC ratio >2 (twofold reduction) (25).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v24.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. For the MIC of LFX combined with EPIs or not against M. abscessus, a paired t test was used to determine significant differences between groups. A one-way ANOVA test followed by a post hoc test was used to determine significant differences between the different groups' transcription of efflux pump genes. The difference was declared significant if P was less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Phenotype of the M. abscessus isolates

A total of 60 M. abscessus isolates, including 41 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and 19 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates, were investigated. Among the 41 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus isolates, 22 had smooth morphotypes and 19 had rough morphotypes. Among the 19 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates, 11 had smooth morphotypes, and 8 had rough morphotypes (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

MICs of LFX for 60 M. abscessus clinical isolates

M. abscessus subspecies Morphotype No. of isolates sensitive to the indicated LFX conc (µg/mL) MIC50 (µg/mL) MIC90 (µg/mL)
2 4 8 16 32 64
abscessus
(n = 41)
Smooth 0 1 10 11 0 0 8 16
Rough 0 2 10 5 2 0 8 16
massiliense
(n = 19)
Smooth 0 0 2 5 4 0 16 32
Rough 0 0 3 0 4 1 32 32

LFX susceptibility against M. abscessus isolates

The MICs of LFX ranged from 4 to 64 μg/mL for the 60 clinical isolates. All isolates were resistant to LFX; however, no mutation associated with high-level LFX resistance was found in the QRDR of gyrA and gyrB genes. The MIC50 for LFX against subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense were 8 and 16 µg/ mL, respectively. The MIC90 for LFX against subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense were 16 and 32 µg/mL, respectively. M. abscessus subsp. massiliense showed relatively higher MIC than M. abscessus subsp. abscessus to LFX. For subsp. abscessus, no difference was found in the MICs of LFX between the smooth and rough morphotypes. For subsp. massiliense, the MIC50 of LFX against the rough morphotype was slightly higher than that of the smooth morphotype (Table 2).

MIC values of LFX in the presence of efflux pump inhibitors

The efflux pump inhibitors CCCP, DCC, VP, and RSP can all reduce the MIC level of LFX, with CCCP having the most potent effect and RSP having a relatively weak effect. Specifically, the MIC levels of LFX were significantly reduced in more than half of the 60 strains in the presence of EPI (P < 0.05), except RSP (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1). The effect of each EPI in combination with LFX and the MIC change ratio is shown in Table 3. After the combined use of CCCP or DCC, the MIC value of LFX in 58.5–63.3% of the strains decreased more than two times. After combining VP or RSP, the MIC value of LFX decreased more than two times in nearly 43.3% of the strains. In the presence of CCCP, DCC, VP, and RSP, 21.7% (13/60), 13.3% (8/60), 10% (6/60), and 6.7% (4/60) of LFX-resistant strains reversed to sensitive, respectively. Specifically, the MIC value was lower than 1 µg/mL. Additionally, 15% (9/60), 21.7% (13/60), 5% (3/60), and 16.7% (10/60) of the resistant strain recovered to moderate sensitivity (i.e., MIC = 2 µg/mL). Among the four efflux pump inhibitors, CCCP manifested the most potent efflux pump inhibitory effect, followed by DCC, and the effects of VP and RSP were relatively weak.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

MIC changes of LFX after being combined with different efflux pump inhibitors.

TABLE 3.

Fold decrease in LFX MIC of M. abscessus isolates in the presence of efflux pump inhibitors

Efflux pump inhibitors No. of isolates showed decreased fold change in LFX MIC
≤2-fold 4-fold 8-fold ≥16-fold
CCCP 22 20 10 8
DCC 25 20 10 5
VP 34 14 7 5
RSP 34 20 2 4

Transcription level of efflux pump genes

Ten efflux pump genes have been selected by reviewing the literature, including the ABC superfamily (MAB_2355, MAB_1846, and MAB_1560), RND superfamily (MAB_2301, MAB_1134, and MAB_4382), and MFS superfamily (MAB_ 3142, MAB_ 1409, MAB_ 2807, and MAB_ 0970). The transcription of the above efflux pump genes was investigated in four isolates with MIC of LFX reduced less than two times, and four strains with MIC reduced more than eight times. Compared with the group of isolates with LFX MIC change less than two times, the transcription level of MAB_2355, MAB_1846, MAB_1560, MAB_2301, MAB_1134, MAB_2807, and MAB_0970 genes was significantly higher in the group with MIC change more than eight times (P < 0.05). The transcription of MAB_ 4382, MAB_ 3142, and MAB_ 1409 genes were relatively low in both groups (data not shown). These findings indicated that strains exhibiting more pronounced EPI effects displayed somewhat elevated transcription levels for efflux pump genes upon exposure to LFX (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Efflux pump gene expression in M. abscessus clinical isolates following exposure to LFX.

DISCUSSION

Limited drug options, high treatment side effects, long treatment courses, and high expenditure are common challenges in treating M. abscessus infections. LFX has been proven to be active, safe, and relatively cheap in TB treatment; however, its therapeutic efficacy against M. abscessus is poor. Thus, we investigated the mechanism of intrinsic LFX resistance in M. abscessus clinical isolates. Our present study showed that the efflux pump inhibitors could reverse the LFX resistance of most M. abscessus isolates in vitro. This work extends our understanding of the factors that affect the resistance of M. abscessus to LFX and sheds light on applying this efficacious reagent in M. abscessus infection treatment with a new strategy.

The main resistance mechanism of Mycobacterium to quinolones is DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV specific site mutation due to gyrA and gyrB gene mutations (26, 27). An alanine residue at position 83 (Ala-83) in the gyrA gene and Arg-447 and Asn-464 in gyrB was associated with intrinsic resistance to quinolones in M. abscessus (28). We also found that the QRDR region of gyrA and gyrB genes was almost identical in all M. abscessus clinical strains, and only two to three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) existed (Fig. S1 and S2). Still, no SNP in gyrA or gyrB genes could explain the relatively higher level of LFX resistance in M. abscessus. Therefore, alternate mechanisms need to be investigated (29, 30). Recently, efflux pump-mediated drug resistance has been considered to be a putative contributor to drug resistance in M. abscessus (31, 32).

Efflux transporters are transmembrane proteins that extrude harmful compounds and cellular metabolites from the cells into the external environment (33). They are involved in drug resistance by expelling antimicrobials, reducing their intracellular concentration. Sun et al. found that RSP, VP, and CCCP could reduce the MIC of quinolone in 55%, 74%, and 83% of drug-resistant strains of Mtb by more than two times, and the efflux pump activity is higher among the strains with high level of quinolone resistance (34). Recently, Machado et al. found a new EPI (3-phenyl quinolones) can significantly reduce the MIC value of LFX against sensitive and drug-resistant Mycobacterium avium strains (35) and showed better inhibitory activity than VP (36). It has been reported that EPIs reduced the clarithromycin MIC of M. abscessus (32, 37). However, the effect of EPIs on the activity of LFX against M. abscessus has not been verified in clinical isolates. In this study, we found that CCCP, DCC, VP, and RSP reduced the MIC of LFX in 63.3% (38/60), 58.3% (35/60), 43.3% (26/60), and 43.3% (26/60) of the clinical strains, and 21.7% (13/60), 13.3% (8/60), 10% (6/60), and 6.7% (4/60) LFX-resistant strains reversed to sensitive phenotype (MIC ≤1 µg/mL), supporting that efflux is also involved in conferring resistance against LFX in M. abscessus. We observed that VP and RSP exhibited minimal effects on LFX resistance in M. abscessus, but the specific reason is not yet clear. Similar phenomena have been found in some studies on the efflux pump inhibitors of Mycobacterium. Gumral and Yuri et al. found that VP and RSP have a less inhibitory effect on the efflux of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis than CCCP and other EPIs (38, 39). We speculated that the effect of specific efflux pump inhibitors may be related to the efflux pump gene and the type of drug, but more studies are needed to elucidate it.

To further analyze the contribution of efflux pumps in conferring LFX resistance in M. abscessus, the transcription of 10 efflux pump genes belonging to ABC superfamily, RND superfamily and MFS superfamily, were investigated in eight selected isolates exposed to 1/2 MIC of LFX determined for each isolate. We noted that the transcription levels of 7 out of 10 efflux pump genes increased significantly in isolates with high fold change of MIC after the LFX-EPI combination. Li et al. found that deleting the MFS superfamily transporter LfrA homologous gene (MAB_ 2807 in M.abscessus) can restore the sensitivity of Mycobacterium smegmatis against antibacterial drugs, including quinolones (4043). In addition, MFS superfamily transporter Rv1634 and ABC binding box superfamily transporter complex Rv2686c-Rv2627c-Rv2688c were found to be involved in quinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis (44, 45). Consistent with other findings, our study demonstrated that the efflux pump played an important role in the LFX resistance of M. abscessus and can be inhibited by EPIs to a certain extent.

This study has several limitations. First, all 60 M. abscessus clinical isolates were collected from one biobank, lacking other strains from diverse biobanks. Thus, the interpretation of the data may be biased. Second, the M. abscessus subsp. bolletii has rarely been isolated in China, and our center has not isolated this species so far, so it was impossible to study it in our present study. Third, we did not measure genes other than gyrA and gyrB; we would test genes such as parC. Finally, we did not test the transcription levels of efflux pump genes in all isolates. The specific mechanism of these genes needs to be explored further to identify whether they also mediate the resistance of M. abscessus against other antibiotics. The mechanism of the efflux pump gene in causing drug resistance of M. abscessus is the focus of our next exploration.

Conclusion

Efflux pump plays an important role in the resistance mechanism of M. abscessus to LFX, and EPIs could reverse the resistance of M. abscessus isolates to LFX in vitro. Combining LFX and EPIs in M. abscessus infection treatment is worthy of further investigation in animal models or clinical practice.

Contributor Information

Naihui Chu, Email: dongchu1994@sina.com.

Hairong Huang, Email: nclhuang@ccmu.edu.cn.

Sean Wasserman, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01348-23.

Figure S1. aac.01348-23-s0001.tif.

QRDR of gyrA.

aac.01348-23-s0001.tif (2.4MB, tif)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF1
Figure S2. aac.01348-23-s0002.tif.

QRDR of gyrB.

aac.01348-23-s0002.tif (985.8KB, tif)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF2
Supplemental legends. aac.01348-23-s0003.docx.

Legends for Table S2 and Fig. S1 and S2.

aac.01348-23-s0003.docx (12.6KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF3
Table S1. aac.01348-23-s0004.xlsx.

Raw data that include strain ID, morphotype, LFX, and each efflux pump inhibitor MIC values of each isolate.

aac.01348-23-s0004.xlsx (13.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF4

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tortoli E, Kohl TA, Brown-Elliott BA, Trovato A, Leão SC, Garcia MJ, Vasireddy S, Turenne CY, Griffith DE, Philley JV, Baldan R, Campana S, Cariani L, Colombo C, Taccetti G, Teri A, Niemann S, Wallace RJ, Cirillo DM. 2016. Emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus and Mycobacteriumabscessus subsp. Bolletii and designation of Mycobacteriumabscessus subsp. Massiliense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4471–4479. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kwak N, Dalcolmo M, Daley C. 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease: individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 54. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01991-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Boudehen Y-M, Kremer L. 2021. Mycobacterium abscessus. Trends Microbiol 29:951–952. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Griffith DE. 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus and antibiotic resistance: same as it ever was [J]. Clin Infect Dis 69:1687–1689. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jarlier V, Nikaido H. 1994. Mycobacterial cell wall: structure and role in natural resistance to antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 123:11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07194.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lambert PA. 2002. Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria. J Appl Microbiol 92:46S–54S. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.92.5s1.7.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Luthra S, Rominski A, Sander P. 2018. The role of antibiotic-target-modifying and antibiotic-modifying enzymes in Mycobacterium abscessus drug resistance. Front Microbiol 9:2179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Halloum I, Viljoen A, Khanna V, Craig D, Bouchier C, Brosch R, Coxon G, Kremer L. 2017. Resistance to thiacetazone derivatives active against Mycobacterium abscessus involves mutations in the Mmpl5 transcriptional repressor MAB_4384. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02509-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02509-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Viljoen AJ, Ghigo E, Blaise M, Kremer L. 2018. Mechanistic and structural insights into the unique TetR-dependent regulation of a drug efflux pump in Mycobacterium abscessus. Front Microbiol 9:649. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Oh TS, Kim YJ, Kang HY, Kim C-K, Cho SY, Lee HJ. 2017. RNA expression analysis of efflux pump genes in clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in South Korea. Infect Genet Evol 49:111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pule CM, Sampson SL, Warren RM, Black PA, van Helden PD, Victor TC, Louw GE. 2016. Efflux pump inhibitors: targeting mycobacterial efflux systems to enhance TB therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:17–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Viljoen A, Raynaud C, Johansen MD, Roquet-Banères F, Herrmann J-L, Daher W, Kremer L. 2019. Verapamil improves the activity of bedaquiline against Mycobacterium abscessus in vitro and in macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00705-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00705-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hurst-Hess KR, Phelps GA, Wilt LA, Lee RE, Ghosh P. 2023. Mab2780C, a TetV-like efflux pump, confers high-level spectinomycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 138:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Corona P, Ibba R, Piras S, Molicotti P, Bua A, Carta A. 2022. Quinoxaline-based efflux pump inhibitors restore drug susceptibility in drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria. Arch Pharm (Weinheim) 355:e2100492. doi: 10.1002/ardp.202100492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lungu I-A, Moldovan O-L, Biriș V, Rusu A. 2022. Fluoroquinolones hybrid molecules as promising antibacterial agents in the fight against antibacterial resistance. Pharmaceutics 14:1749. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Millanao AR, Mora AY, Villagra NA, Bucarey SA, Hidalgo AA. 2021. Biological effects of quinolones: a family of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Molecules 26:7153. doi: 10.3390/molecules26237153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fan Y-L, Wu J-B, Cheng X-W, Zhang F-Z, Feng L-S. 2018. Fluoroquinolone derivatives and their anti-tubercular activities. Eur J Med Chem 146:554–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chen S, Nie W, Shang Y, Liang Q, Fu Y, Ma Y, Chu N, Huang H. 2015. Detection of mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes associated with fluoroquinolone-resistance among clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus in China. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 38:507–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. CLSI . 2011. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard. In Clsi document M24-A2, 2nd ed. CLSI. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang H, Han X, Jin M, Wang L-Y, Diao Z-L, Guo W, Zhang P, Wang Z, Ding H-Y, Lv H, Zhang Z-Y, Zhao P-F, Li J, Yang Z-H, Liu W-H, Wang Z-C. 2020. Different iron deposition patterns in hemodialysis patients with and without restless legs syndrome: a quantitative susceptibility mapping study. Sleep Med 69:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Duan W, Li X, Ge Y, Yu Z, Li P, Li J, Qin L, Xie J. 2019. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv1473 is a novel macrolides ABC efflux pump regulated by WhiB7. Future Microbiol 14:47–59. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rindi L. 2020. Efflux pump inhibitors against nontuberculous mycobacteria. Int J Mol Sci 21:12. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Vianna JS, Machado D, Ramis IB, Silva FP, Bierhals DV, Abril MA, von Groll A, Ramos DF, Lourenço MCS, Viveiros M, da Silva PEA. 2019. The contribution of efflux pumps in Mycobacterium abscessus complex resistance to clarithromycin. Antibiotics 8:153. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Coelho T, Machado D, Couto I, Maschmann R, Ramos D, von Groll A, Rossetti ML, Silva PA, Viveiros M. 2015. Enhancement of antibiotic activity by efflux inhibitors against multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Brazil. Front Microbiol 6:330. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Guillemin I, Jarlier V, Cambau E. 1998. Correlation between quinolone susceptibility patterns and sequences in the A and B subunits of DNA gyrase in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2084–2088. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.8.2084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Malik S, Willby M, Sikes D, Tsodikov OV, Posey JE. 2012. New insights into fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: functional genetic analysis of gyrA and gyrB mutations. PLoS One 7:e39754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. de Moura VCN, da Silva MG, Gomes KM, Coelho FS, Sampaio JLM, Mello F de Q, Lourenço M da S, Amorim E de L, Duarte RS. 2012. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of quinolone resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii recovered from postsurgical infections. J Med Microbiol 61:115–125. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.034942-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lipworth S, Hough N, Leach L, Morgan M, Jeffery K, Andersson M, Robinson E, Smith EG, Crook D, Peto T, Walker T. 2019. Whole-genome sequencing for predicting clarithromycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01204-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01204-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zheng H, Liu D, Lu J, Song Y, Wang S, Zhao Y, Ni X. 2019. Genetic correlation of antibiotic susceptibility and resistance genotyping for the Mycobacterium abscessus group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01523-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01523-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Gutiérrez AV, Richard M, Roquet-Banères F, Viljoen A, Kremer L. 2019. The TetR family transcription factor MAB_2299c regulates the expression of two distinct MmpS-MmpL efflux pumps involved in cross-resistance to clofazimine and bedaquiline in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01000-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ramis IB, Vianna JS, Silva Junior L, von Groll A, Ramos DF, Lobo MM, Zanatta N, Viveiros M, Silva PEA da. 2019. In Silico and in vitro evaluation of tetrahydropyridine compounds as efflux inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 118:101853. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2019.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Guo Q, Chu H, Ye M, Zhang Z, Li B, Yang S, Ma W, Yu F. 2018. The clarithromycin susceptibility genotype affects the treatment outcome of patients with Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02360-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02360-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sun Z, Xu Y, Sun Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Huang H, Li C. 2014. Ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with efflux pump activity independent of resistance pattern and genotype. Microb Drug Resist 20:525–532. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2013.0171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Cannalire R, Machado D, Felicetti T, Santos Costa S, Massari S, Manfroni G, Barreca ML, Tabarrini O, Couto I, Viveiros M, Sabatini S, Cecchetti V. 2017. Natural isoflavone biochanin A as a template for the design of new and potent 3-phenylquinolone efflux inhibitors against Mycobacterium avium. Eur J Med Chem 140:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Menichini M, Lari N, Rindi L. 2020. Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on the susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium complex to clarithromycin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 73:128–132. doi: 10.1038/s41429-019-0245-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Vianna JS, Ramis IB, Bierhals D, von Groll A, Ramos DF, Zanatta N, Lourenço MC, Viveiros M, Almeida da Silva PE. 2019. Tetrahydropyridine derivative as efflux inhibitor in Mycobacterium abscessus. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 17:296–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Valıyeva G, Durupınar B, Coban AY. 2023. Efflux pump effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance. J Chemother 35:601–609. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2023.2173857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. van der Heijden YF, Maruri F, Blackman A, Morrison R, Guo Y, Sterling TR. 2023. Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene expression associated with fluoroquinolone resistance and efflux pump inhibition . J Infect Dis 228:469–478. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shahbaaz M, Maslov DA, Vatlin AA, Danilenko VN, Grishina M, Christoffels A. 2022. Repurposing based identification of novel inhibitors against MmpS5-MmpL5 efflux pump of Mycobacterium smegmatis: a combined In Silico and In Vitro Study. Biomedicines 10:333. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ghosh S, Cotta KB, Hande AA, Fernandes M, Mehra S. 2021. PNA-mediated efflux inhibition as a therapeutic strategy towards overcoming drug resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Microb Pathog 151:104737. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Liu J, Takiff HE, Nikaido H. 1996. Active efflux of fluoroquinolones in Mycobacterium smegmatis mediated by LfrA, a multidrug efflux pump. J Bacteriol 178:3791–3795. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.13.3791-3795.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sander P, De Rossi E, Böddinghaus B, Cantoni R, Branzoni M, Böttger EC, Takiff H, Rodriquez R, Lopez G, Riccardi G. 2000. Contribution of the multidrug efflux pump LfrA to innate mycobacterial drug resistance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193:19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09396.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cassio Barreto de Oliveira M, Balan A. 2020. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: structure, function, and possible targets for therapeutics. Biology 9:443. doi: 10.3390/biology9120443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cui Z, Li X, Shin J, Gamper H, Hou Y-M, Sacchettini JC, Zhang J. 2022. Interplay between an ATP-binding cassette F protein and the ribosome from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 13:432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28078-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. aac.01348-23-s0001.tif.

QRDR of gyrA.

aac.01348-23-s0001.tif (2.4MB, tif)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF1
Figure S2. aac.01348-23-s0002.tif.

QRDR of gyrB.

aac.01348-23-s0002.tif (985.8KB, tif)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF2
Supplemental legends. aac.01348-23-s0003.docx.

Legends for Table S2 and Fig. S1 and S2.

aac.01348-23-s0003.docx (12.6KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF3
Table S1. aac.01348-23-s0004.xlsx.

Raw data that include strain ID, morphotype, LFX, and each efflux pump inhibitor MIC values of each isolate.

aac.01348-23-s0004.xlsx (13.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01348-23.SuF4

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES