Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 May 2;12:RP90996. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90996

The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA transiently interact

Marco van den Noort 1, Panagiotis Drougkas 1,2, Cristina Paulino 1,2, Bert Poolman 1,
Editors: Kenton J Swartz3, Kenton J Swartz4
PMCID: PMC11065425  PMID: 38695350

Abstract

Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

Research organism: Other

Introduction

All cells undergo passive fluxes of water into and out of the cell due to the semipermeable nature of biological membranes. This makes osmotic challenges a universal stress factor. Cells compensate the passive outward flux of water by accumulating compatible solutes and thereby rehydrate the cytoplasm during osmotic stress. Bacteria commonly accumulate zwitterionic compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, carnitine, TMAO and or proline (Bremer and Krämer, 2019; Hoffmann and Bremer, 2017). The import of compatible solutes induces an inflow of water that can compensate for an increase in external osmolality, thereby restoring turgor and physicochemical homeostasis of the cytoplasm (Stadmiller et al., 2017; Bounedjah et al., 2012). Compatible solute importers, sense physical properties like ionic strength or specific ion concentrations to regulate their import activity immediately in response to osmotic stress (van der Heide et al., 2001; Sikkema et al., 2020; Tantirimudalige et al., 2022). The import of compatible solutes must be tightly regulated since overaccumulation can be equally lethal, causing detrimental hydrostatic pressure leading to cell lysis (Commichau et al., 2018; Pham et al., 2018; Stülke and Krüger, 2020). Hence, additional regulatory mechanisms can be present to control the flux of osmolytes. The second messenger cyclic-di-AMP acts as a backstop to prevent overaccumulation of compatible solutes and K+ (Sikkema et al., 2020; Commichau et al., 2018; Pham et al., 2018; Stülke and Krüger, 2020; Schuster et al., 2016; Quintana et al., 2019; Corrigan et al., 2013; Gundlach et al., 2015). The importance of this regulatory mechanism is highlighted by the fact that cyclic-di-AMP is both essential and toxic at elevated concentrations (Stülke and Krüger, 2020; Gundlach et al., 2015). This property makes the protein network associated with cyclic-di-AMP sensing, synthesis and breakdown valuable for finding new antimicrobial therapeutics (Dey et al., 2017; Opoku-Temeng and Sintim, 2016; Neumann et al., 2023).

OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is one of the best-studied compatible solute importers. The activity and expression of OpuA are increased by ionic strength, and are inhibited by cyclic-di-AMP (van der Heide et al., 2001; Sikkema et al., 2020; Pham et al., 2018; Romeo et al., 2007; Mahmood et al., 2006). OpuA belongs to the type I subfamily of ABC-importers. It is a tetrameric protein complex consisting of two different types of subunits: two cytosolic OpuAA proteins consisting of a nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) and a cyclic-di-AMP-sensing (CBS) domain, and two OpuABC proteins, consisting of a transmembrane domain (TMD), a scaffold domain and an extracellular single substrate-binding domain (SBD; Figure 1A). The NBDs hydrolyze ATP to fuel transport and sense ionic strength through interactions of a cationic helix-turn-helix motif with the negatively charged membrane (Sikkema et al., 2020). The SBD is a two-lobed protein that binds glycine betaine with micromolar affinity and delivers it to the transporting unit. In contrast to the covalently linked SBDs found in OpuA, substrate binding units in many other ABC importers are expressed as an independent soluble or lipid-anchored protein, called then a substrate-binding protein (SBP; van der Heide and Poolman, 2002).

Figure 1. Experimental approach for measuring interdomain dynamics in the SBDs of OpuA.

(A) A cryo-EM structure of OpuA (PDB: 7AHH). Mutations K521C and N414C are highlighted as grey spheres. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography profiles of OpuA-nanodiscs that were purified according to the previously described protocol (Sikkema et al., 2020) (blue) or according to the new protocol that is described here (yellow). The Latin numbers refer to the four different nanodisc species as is described in the first paragraph of the Results section. The other numbers refer to the elution fractions that were loaded on an SDS-PAA gel. (C) SDS-PAA gel with the size exclusion fractions of the blue line in (B). (D) SDS-PAA gel with the size-exclusion fractions of the yellow line in (B). (E) A schematic representation of how confocal, solution-based smFRET was used to study different states of the SBDs. (F) A representation of a fluorescent burst time trace, displaying the photon counts in the donor (green) and acceptor (red) detection channel over time (left). The zoom-in is a representation of a photon time trace, in which single photons are represented as lines and the most likely state path from the Viterbi algorithm in mpH2MM as a blue line.

Figure 1—source data 1. Raw SDS-PAA gel images of Figure 1C and D.
Figure 1—source data 2. Labelled SDS-PAA gel images of Figure 1C and D.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Enzyme-coupled ATPase assay of wildtype OpuA (circles, grey shading), OpuA-K521C (squares, blue shading) and OpuA-N414C (triangles, yellow shading).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

A standard sample contains 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 450 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 600 μM NADH, 2.1–3.5 U of pyruvate kinase plus 3.2–4.9 U of lactate dehydrogenase. Standard deviation over at least two measurements with different protein purifications and membrane reconstitutions, each consisting of three technical replicates is represented as shaded areas.

There is much interest in understanding the transport mechanisms of ABC-transporters (ter Beek et al., 2014; Oldham et al., 2008). In the case of type I ABC-importers, pioneering studies have been performed on the maltose and histidine import systems, MalFGK2-E and HisQMP2, respectively. In both transporters, the soluble substrate-loaded SBP (MalE or HisQ) is needed to fully stimulate ATPase activity, although the SBP can also bind the TMDs and slightly stimulate ATPase activity in the absence of substrate (Mächtel et al., 2019; Chen, 2013; Heuveling et al., 2014; Sippach et al., 2014; Ames et al., 1996; Bao and Duong, 2012). The binding of MalE to the TMDs is tight in the presence of inhibiting nucleotides and goes through cycles of docking and release under transport conditions (Bao and Duong, 2012; Chen et al., 2001). There are no indications that either the MalE or HisQ proteins cooperate together. In fact, empty MalE SBPs and SBDs from the amino acid importer GlnPQ have been shown to compete with their substrate-bound equivalents for binding to the TMDs (Merino et al., 1995; Gouridis et al., 2015).

In contrast to MalE SBP and the SBDs of GlnPQ, the two SBDs in OpuA act cooperatively during transport. The cooperativity increases the import efficiency to overcome osmotic stress as quickly as possible (Biemans-Oldehinkel and Poolman, 2003). Despite the beauty of the cooperative mechanism, the molecular basis for the cooperativity in OpuA remains unresolved. On the contrary, MalE from E. coli, ProX from Synechococcus spp., ArtJ from Thermatoga maritima, and the SBPs TakP and TM0322 from the family of tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic (TRAP) transporters can form dimers in solution, but there is no data on the functional role of the dimeric states (Cuneo et al., 2008; Gonin et al., 2007; Richarme, 1983; Ford et al., 2022; Luchansky et al., 2010; Ruggiero et al., 2014). A substrate channel through a dimer of TakP SBPs is observed in the crystal structure of the proteins (Gonin et al., 2007), which provides a possibility for cooperativity between two TakP SBPs.

Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) is an indispensable biophysical tool to study transient interdomain interactions (Lerner et al., 2018). The time resolution of solution-based smFRET is generally limited by the time that the protein resides in the confocal volume of the laser, which is usually in the millisecond range. However, the new analysis tool multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling (mpH2MM) enables to study different states of the protein within a single burst (Harris et al., 2022; Pirchi et al., 2016). Furthermore, mpH2MM provides valuable insights into the transition rate constants between short-lived states.

We designed cysteine mutations in the SBD of OpuA to study interdomain dynamics in the full-length transporter (Sikkema and Poolman, 2021). The positions of the cysteines do not interfere with docking of the SBDs to the TMDs, and they do not affect the transport. We further improved the purification, nanodisc reconstitution and labeling of OpuA to obtain a sample suitable for single-molecule studies. Next, we studied the dynamics of the SBDs in OpuA with sub-millisecond time resolution. The observed dynamics were complemented by new structural data of OpuA obtained by cryo-EM.

Results

Optimization of OpuA purification and nanodisc reconstitution

Previously, a protocol for the purification of OpuA and subsequent reconstitution in MSP-based nanodiscs was used to obtain cryo-EM structures of the protein complex. This protocol was suitable for obtaining high-resolution 3D-images, but the size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) profile showed that the nanodisc sample consisted of protein complexes with different molecular weights (Figure 1B). The resolution of the Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 column is not high enough to fully separate the different macromolecular species. Based on SDS-PAGE and electron microscopy analyses, the first peak in the SEC profile corresponds to OpuA-containing lipid structures that are distinct from OpuA nanodiscs (second peak) (Karasawa et al., 2013). The second peak has both subunits of OpuA (OpuAA and OpuABC) in the nanodiscs. The third peak represents OpuA nanodiscs with one or two OpuAA subunits lost. The fourth peak consists of lipid nanodiscs lacking any OpuA components (Figure 1C). Because the first three peaks overlap, it was not possible to obtain monodisperse OpuA nanodiscs. This is acceptable for cryo-EM studies but complicates the analysis of protein dynamics by smFRET. Therefore, we optimized the purification and reconstitution on various aspects, and we were able to achieve monodisperse OpuA nanodiscs (see Materials and methods; Figure 1B and D). The new procedure yielded OpuA nanodiscs with similar glycine betaine-, KCl-, and ATP-dependent activity profiles as before (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Furthermore, the absolute activity was constant between different replicates and was not reduced after storage at –80 °C.

Purification and labeling of OpuA cysteine variants

smFRET is a powerful tool for studying membrane protein dynamics (Lerner et al., 2018; Bartels et al., 2021). In order to study single-molecule dynamics of OpuA, we made use of thiol-reactive, maleimide-based donor and acceptor fluorophores Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647, respectively, that were linked to engineered cysteines in natively cys-less OpuA. We record fluorescent bursts of a few milliseconds in duration, which come from single molecules that transit through the focal spot of a confocal microscope (Figure 1E and F). Every molecule gets excited by a pulsed laser that alternates between a donor and an acceptor excitation wavelength at a pulse rate of 40 MHz. Consequently, every molecule gets excited many times. The relative fluorescent intensity of the fluorophores after excitation of the donor is used to calculate an apparent FRET efficiency for each burst (E*). The real FRET efficiency (E) is obtained by applying the usual correction factors (see Materials and methods). The fluorescence after excitation of the acceptor is used together with the total fluorescence after donor excitation to calculate a stoichiometry (S) of fluorescence. The Python-based package FRETbursts was used to filter out molecules that were labeled with only donor (S≈1) or only acceptor (S≈0) fluorophores (Figure 2—figure supplement 1; Ingargiola et al., 2016b).

Several double-cysteine variants have been constructed in a soluble variant of the SBD (Sikkema and Poolman, 2021). The cysteines were designed at the back of the protein, such that the attached labels would not interfere with SBD docking onto the TMDs during the translocation process. Since full-length OpuA consists of two identical OpuABC and two OpuAA proteins, a single cysteine was introduced per SBD (OpuABC) (Figure 1A and E). We used the positions Lys-521 and Asn-414 to introduce single cysteine mutations in the full-length transporter. These variants are used to study inter-SBD dynamics in the FRET range of 3–10 nm (Figure 1E).

Both mutants purified very well and retained full ATPase activity in the presence of 1 mM DTT (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). They retained 70–80% of their original activity when labeled with the Alexa fluorophores (Table 1). The labeling efficiency varied between 60% and 90% across different purifications.

Table 1. ATPase activity of OpuA variants K521C and N414C before and after labeling with maleimide dyes*.

Activity unlabeled variant (min–1) Activity labeled variant (min–1)
K521C 342+/-71 263+/-52
N414C 332+/-25 246+/-55
*

Buffer conditions: 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 100 µM glycine betaine, 10 mM Mg-ATP plus 600 mM KCl.

The errors refer to the standard deviation over at least two measurements with different protein purifications and membrane reconstitutions, each consisting of three technical replicates.

SBD dynamics under high ionic strength conditions

An SBD of OpuA has limited space to diffuse because it is connected to the TMD via a transmembrane anchoring helix and a soluble linker of eleven amino acids long. Theoretically, the non-docked SBDs can sample inter-domain distances that would cover the entire FRET range from 3 to 10 nm, with low FRET values corresponding to long distances, whereas high FRET values are indicative of shorter distances. The mobility of the undocked SBDs will be higher than the diffusion of the whole complex, allowing the sampling of varying interdomain distances within a single burst. However, these dynamic variations are subsequently averaged to a singular FRET value during FRET calculations for each burst, and may appear as a single low FRET state in the FRET histograms.

Both OpuA-N414C and OpuA-K521C were first analyzed in a high salt condition without substrate or Mg-ATP (50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl). As expected, most FRET bursts fall within a low-FRET population when OpuA is in the apo state (Figure 2A and B; upper panels). However, the FRET distributions tail towards higher FRET values, especially in OpuA-K521C. We performed a burst variance analysis (BVA) to qualitatively assess if the broad FRET distribution represents different fixed states or a mixture of states that can alternate within a single burst (see Materials and methods; Torella et al., 2011). A large part of the FRET population exhibits within-burst dynamics, which was higher than expected from shot noise alone (Figure 2A and B; third panel). We then analyzed the data by multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling (mpH2MM; Harris et al., 2022). This new approach uses raw photon data from both donor and acceptor excitation periods to find the number of hidden Markov states that best describe the data. A Viterbi algorithm identifies the optimal state path within bursts. Each state within a burst is then considered separately as a dwell (Figure 1F).

Figure 2. The SBDs of OpuA sample two dynamic FRET states.

The proteins were analyzed in 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl with the following additions: (A) OpuA-N414C without further additions. (B) OpuA-K521C without further additions. (C) OpuA-E190Q-K521C with 20 mM Mg-ATP plus 100 µM glycine betaine. (D) OpuA-K521C with 20 mM Mg-ATP. From top to bottom: (i) FRET histogram showing the corrected bursts that were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. (ii) 2D E-S histogram showing the same data as in (i). Black dots represent the average value of each state after mpH2MM and after application of the correction factors. (iii) Burst variance analysis of the same burst data as in (i). The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares represent average values per FRET bin. The black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (iv) E-S scatter plot of the corrected dwells. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. Black dots represent the average value of each state and the numbers at the arrows show transition rate constants (s–1) between the two FRET states. (v) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the analysis is shown as a red star.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Typical 2D E-S histograms of FRET bursts after γ-correction and correction for leakage and crosstalk.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Graphs represent data of OpuA-K521C in 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl. Left graph shows the bursts after burst selection with a cut-off of minimally 35 photons per burst. Right graph shows the bursts after removal of donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. To filter out acceptor-only bursts, a threshold of minimally 15 photons after donor excitation was set. To filter out donor-only bursts, a threshold of minimally 15 photons was set. Similar graphs for all other OpuA variants and conditions can be found in the publicly available python notebooks (https://doi.org/10.34894/GSIEBW).

The FRET data of both OpuA variants is best explained by a four-state model (Figure 2A and B; fourth and fifth panel). Two of the four states represent donor-only (S≈1) or acceptor-only (S≈0) dwells. The full bursts belonging to donor-only and acceptor-only molecules were excluded prior to mpH2MM. This means that some molecules transit to a donor-only or acceptor-only state within the burst period, which most likely reflects blinking or bleaching of one of the fluorophores. These donor-only and acceptor-only states were also excluded during further analysis. The other two states reflect genuine FRET dwells that were analyzed by mpH2MM. They represent different conformations of the SBDs. In other words, the SBDs do not only freely diffuse in the absence of substrate and Mg-ATP (most likely represented by the low-FRET state with a high burst variance), but they also adopt a conformation where they move closer together. The transition rate constants from the high- to the low-FRET state was 193 s–1 for OpuA-N414C and 173 s–1 for OpuA-K521C. This is in the range of a burst size of 5–10ms and indicates that some proteins moved from one state to the other while being excited in the confocal volume. This also explains at least a part of the elevated burst variance in the BVA plots. Within-burst transitions from low- to high-FRET were less frequent than those from high- to low-FRET, making the estimated transition rate constants below 100 s–1 less accurate.

Assuming that the low-FRET state represents a situation where the SBDs diffuse freely, we note that the mean FRET efficiency for OpuA-K521C is higher (0.18) than for OpuA-N414C (0.10). Position 414 is located farther from the transmembrane helix that anchors the SBD to the transporter. Hence, N414C has a larger sampling space and the two dyes can move farther apart, which explains the difference in mean FRET efficiency between OpuA-K521C and OpuA-N414C.

SBD dynamics under turnover conditions

OpuA transports glycine betaine in the presence of Mg-ATP and at high ionic strength. The transport-competent docking of the SBD onto the TMDs has been resolved by cryo-EM in a pre-hydrolysis state by using Mg-ATP and glycine betaine in combination with the E190Q mutation, which prevents OpuA from hydrolyzing ATP (Sikkema et al., 2020). It is unknown whether SBD docking also occurs in other states of the transport cycle.

The SBD dynamics were tested in the presence of Mg-ATP, under turnover conditions (20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine), in a pre-hydrolysis inhibited state (20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, OpuA-E190Q) and in a post-hydrolysis inhibited state (20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, 500 µM ortho-vanadate). The mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET states in OpuA-K521C shifted by 0.1 FRET unit in all conditions (Figure 2C and D; Table 2). For OpuA-N414C, the high-FRET state got less populated but did not shift (Table 3). It was hard to estimate the mean FRET efficiency of this state because of the low number of dwells. Nonetheless, it is clear that the changes in the FRET state are not likely to reflect a change in docking, since the same effect is observed when Mg-ATP is present without glycine betaine (Figure 2D).

Table 2. The FRET (E) and Stoichiometry (S) of the FRET states of OpuA-K521C, their relative abundance and the transition rate constants between the states.

Table 2—source data 1. Burst variance analysis and mpH2MM of the FRET bursts of OpuA-K521C (variants) in different buffers.
(A) From top to bottom: (1) Burst variance analysis of the bursts which were corrected by the leakage, crosstalk, and γ-correction factors and which were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares show average values per FRET bin. Black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (2) 2D E-S histogram shows the same data as in (1), with on both sides a histogram that represents the same bursts. (B) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the downstream analysis and following figures is shown as a star. (C) Plot of the BIC’-values for each final model. The red line represents a 0.05 cut-off. The model used is shown as a star. (D) Burst-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Bursts are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. If a burst contains more than one state, it is assigned as being dynamic. (E) Dwell-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. The dwells were corrected for leakage, direct excitation and the γ-factor. Black dots in A, D and E represent the average value of each state.
Condition* Low-FRET state (L) High-FRET state (H) Transition rate (s–1) Number of FRET dwells
S E % dwells S E % dwells L-H H-L
50 mM BIS-TRIS pH 7.0, 0 mM KCl 0.537 0.250 64.1 0.521 0.749 35.9 118 153 16,788
0 mM KCl 0.531 0.248 66.9 0.519 0.742 33.1 123 175 27,047
0 mM KCl, 100 µM glycine betaine 0.532 0.245 68.3 0.517 0.781 31.7 120 166 17,364
50 mM KCl 0.526 0.225 68.0 0.516 0.735 32.0 88 153 14,708
100 mM KCl 0.525 0.202 74.6 0.513 0.691 25.4 78 178 13,532
200 mM KCl 0.519 0.183 81.4 0.518 0.663 18.6 41 153 16,454
400 mM KCl 0.516 0.168 82.0 0.518 0.620 18.0 28 120 15,946
600 mM KCl 0.497 0.180 82.6 0.490 0.628 17.4 42 173 38,604
600 mM KCl (V149Q) 0.495 0.164 81.9 0.492 0.608 18.1 31 112 11,034
1000 mM KCl 0.505 0.148 79.9 0.511 0.591 20.1 26 109 12,666
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP 0.524 0.157 81.5 0.527 0.510 18.5 16 121 12,061
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine 0.515 0.155 78.5 0.511 0.507 21.5 0 52 17,155
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine (E190Q) 0.540 0.141 81.4 0.547 0.505 18.6 7 38 10,832
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, 500 µM orthovanadate 0.517 0.154 78.9 0.513 0.529 21.5 17 87 21,052
600 mM KCl, 50 mM glutamate, 50 mM arginine 0.510 0.162 79.9 0.513 0.549 20.1 19 133 12,722
*

All conditions, except the first, contained 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0.

Table 3. The FRET (E) and Stoichiometry (S) of the FRET states of OpuA-N414C, their relative abundance, and the transition rate constants between the states.

Table 3—source data 1. Burst variance analysis and mpH2MM of the FRET bursts of OpuA-N414C (variants) in different buffers.
(A) From top to bottom: (1) Burst variance analysis of the bursts which were corrected by the leakage, crosstalk, and γ-correction factors and which were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares show average values per FRET bin. Black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (2) 2D E-S histogram shows the same data as in (1), with on both sides a histogram that represents the same bursts. (B) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the downstream analysis and following figures is shown as a star. (C) Plot of the BIC’-values for each final model. The red line represents a 0.05 cut-off. The model used is shown as a star. (D) Burst-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Bursts are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. If a burst contains more than one state, it is assigned as being dynamic. (E) Dwell-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. The dwells were corrected for leakage, direct excitation and the γ-factor. Black dots in A, D and E represent the average value of each state.
Condition* Low-FRET state (L) High-FRET state (H) Transition rate (s–1) Number of FRET dwells
S E % dwells S E % dwells L-H H-L
0 mM KCl 0.527 0.099 72.2 0.543 0.509 27.8 15 68 12,162
600 mM KCl 0.483 0.100 88.5 0.476 0.497 11.5 24 193 18,130
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP 0.548 0.090 94.4 0.536 0.456 5.6 2 141 10,447
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine 0.538 0.087 95.7 0.555 0.499 4.7 2 59 14,898
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine (E190Q) 0.479 0.106 94.8 0.464 0.540 5.2 25 317 8024
600 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, 500 µM orthovanadate 0.538 0.085 94.6 0.578 0.568 5.4 5 186 7236
*

All conditions contained 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0.

SBD dynamics in a mutant with reduced docking efficiency

To further corroborate the notion that neither the low- nor high-FRET states reflect a docked state, we designed OpuA-V149Q in the OpuA-K521C background to alter the docking interface between the SBD and TMDs (Figure 3A). Each valine-149 located on the TMD of the two OpuABC subunits interacts with a different lobe of a single docked SBD. V149Q was designed as a mild mutation that would reduce docking efficiency and thereby substrate loading, but leave the ionic strength sensing in the NBD and the binding of glycine betaine and ATP intact. Accordingly, a reduced docking efficiency should result in a lower absolute glycine betaine-dependent ATPase activity. At the same time the responsiveness of the system to varying KCl, glycine betaine, or Mg-ATP concentrations should not change. OpuA-V149Q-K521C exhibited a two- to three-fold reduction in glycine betaine-dependent ATPase activity, whereas the futile hydrolysis of ATP in the absence of substrate was unaffected (Figure 3B). The glycine betaine-dependent ATPase activities of wild type OpuA and OpuA-V149Q-K521C are comparable when they are plotted relative to their maximal activities (Figure 3C). The same holds for the dependencies on Mg-ATP and ionic strength (KCl concentration) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). This confirms that the V149Q mutation affects the docking interface but not any other property of OpuA.

Figure 3. Reduction in SBD docking efficiency does not affect the two dynamic FRET states.

(A) A cryo-EM structure of OpuA (PDB: 7AHH) highlighting Val-149 and the two most important residues in the vicinity of Val-149. Coloring of the domains is similar to that in Figure 1A. (B) Results of an enzyme-coupled ATPase assay for OpuA-WT (filled circles, grey) and OpuA-V149Q-K521C (open circles, yellow). Each sample contains 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 450 mM KCl, 10 mM Mg-ATP, 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 600 μM NADH, 2.1–3.5 U of pyruvate kinase, and 3.2–4.9 U of lactate dehydrogenase. Standard deviation over at least two measurements with different protein purifications and membrane reconstitutions, each consisting of three technical replicates is represented as shaded areas. (C) Results of (B) represented as activity relative to the activity at 100 µM glycine betaine. (D) smFRET results for OpuA-V149Q-K521C in 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl. From top to bottom: (i) FRET histogram showing the corrected bursts that were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. (ii) 2D E-S histogram showing the same data as in (i). Black dots depict the average value of each state after mpH2MM and after application of the correction factors. (iii) Burst variance analysis of the same burst data as in (i). The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares represent average values per FRET bin. Black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (iv) E-S scatter plot of the corrected dwells. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. Black dots represent the average value of each state and the numbers at the arrows show transition rate constants (s–1) between the two FRET states. (v) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the analysis is shown as a red star.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Enzyme-coupled ATPase assay for wildtype OpuA (squares, grey shading) and OpuA-V149Q-K521C (circles, yellow shading).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

A standard sample contains 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 450 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg-ATP, 100 µM glycine betaine, 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 600 μM NADH, 2.1–3.5 U of pyruvate kinase plus 3.2–4.9 U of lactate dehydrogenase. Standard deviation over at least two measurements with different protein purifications and membrane reconstitutions, each consisting of three technical replicates is represented as shaded areas.

We then studied OpuA-V149Q-K521C by smFRET at apo conditions, similarly as described above, in a high salt buffer (50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl) without glycine betaine or Mg-ATP. The FRET dwells of OpuA-V149Q-K521C also belong to two states with very similar transition rate constants and relative abundances compared to OpuA-K521C (Figure 3D; Table 2). Therefore, it is highly unlikely that any of the FRET states represents a conformation in which one SBD is docked.

KCl and glycine betaine-dependent changes in FRET states

Because the change in FRET in the presence of Mg-ATP does not reflect a change in docking dynamics, we tested whether the difference in ionic strength between a buffer with or without Mg-ATP was causing the shift. FRET bursts of OpuA-K521C were recorded in the presence of KCl concentrations, ranging from 0 to 1000 mM. Notably, the mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET state gradually shifted from 0.74 to 0.59 in the salt range of 0–1000 mM KCl (Figure 4A; Table 2). This is indicative of a structural change. Also the percentage of dwells that reside in the high-FRET state changed from 33% to 17% (Table 2). Interestingly, the transition rate constant from the high- to low-FRET population did not differ much between high and low KCl, whereas the transition rate constant from the low- to high-FRET population decreased from around 120 s–1 to 26 s–1 (Table 2). In other words, the increase in high-FRET dwells is caused by an increased tendency to go from low to high-FRET, while the tendency to go from high to low-FRET does not change.

Figure 4. Shifts in FRET states under different conditions.

(A, B) FRET (E) histograms of OpuA-K521C (A) and OpuA-N414C (B) corresponding to the corrected dwells of the two FRET states after mpH2MM. Black lines show the mean E of the two states. (C) A schematic representation of the diffusion freedom in 2D of the SBDs, shown as blue semicircles. The radius is defined as the sum of the radius of an SBD and the length of the linker region in a fully extended conformation. The sequence of the linker region was defined based on the occluded OpuA structure (PDB: 7AHD) and spans the N- and C-terminal end of the SBD and anchoring helix, respectively. (D) Lowpass-filtered cryo-EM density maps of OpuA-WT in three different ionic strength conditions (50 mM, 100 mM and 200 mM KCl). The top-views of each condition are horizontally aligned (left) and super-positioned (right) for better comparison. The densities corresponding to the SBDs are highlighted in teal, blue and brown ellipses, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Multiple sequence alignment of close homologs of OpuA from L.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

lactis. The alignment was made by the Clustal Omega webserver using the default settings. The alignment was visualized and the JPRED secondary structure prediction were performed in Jalview (version 2.11.2.6). The black box indicates the linker region, based on OpuA from L. lactis. Jnetpred shows the consensus prediction of the different predictions in JPRED; α-helices are shown as red tubes and β-sheets as dark green arrows. JNETCONF is a confidence estimate of the jnetpred prediction. NCBI reference sequence IDs are: L. lactis, WP_003130445.1; L. taiwanensis, WP_205272268.1; L. allomyrinae, WP_120771492.1; L. garvieae, WP_004257235.1; L. hircilactis, WP_153496572.1; W. confusa, WP_199402959.1; W. muntiaci, WP_187387617.1;, W. ceti, WP_213409458.1; W. soli, WP_147152447.1; L. citreum, WP_040177303.1; W. halotolerans, WP_022790870.1; W. paramesenteroides, WP_150189650.1; L. plantarum, WP_068161132.1; L. fallax, WP_010007192.1; W. bombi, WP_092461275.1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Image processing of OpuA wild-type in MSP1E3D1 nanodiscs in 20 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 50 mM KCl.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A) Representative elution profile from Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL size-exclusion column. The collected fraction for cryo-EM sample preparation is indicated by dashed lines. (B) Representative micrograph at 1.3 μm defocus followed by detailed overview of the image processing leading to the map used. Abbreviations: gmodel t=crYOLO general model and K=number of classes. Scale bar, 10 nm.
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Image processing of OpuA wild-type in MSP1E3D1 nanodiscs in 20 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 100 mM KCl.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

(A) Representative elution profile from Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL size-exclusion column. The collected fraction for cryo-EM sample preparation is indicated by dashed lines. (B) Representative micrograph of the sample at 1.3 μm defocus, followed by detailed overview of the image processing leading to the map used. Abbreviations: model03=in-house trained crYOLO model generated by Sikkema et al., 2020, K=number of classes and T=tau_fudge. Scale bar, 10 nm.

The high-FRET state of OpuA-N414C decreased from 28% to 12% when the KCl concentration was increased from 0 to 600 mM (Figure 4B; Table 3). However, this was not accompanied by a change in FRET or an increase in the transition rate constant from low- to high-FRET, but rather a decrease in the transition rate constant from high- to low-FRET (Table 3). Assuming that the high-FRET states in OpuA-K521C and OpuA-N414C are a result of the same conformation, this could mean that there is more conformational flexibility across different conditions between the two Cys-521 positions than between the Cys-414 positions.

Notably, in contrast to many other ABC transporters, the SBDs are covalently linked to the TMD. Thus, the movement of the SBDs in OpuA is constrained by a short linker consisting of only 11 amino acids and a hydrophobic transmembrane anchoring sequence. These sequences are not conserved among species within the same order of Lactobacillales, and the linker sequence is not predicted to form any secondary structure (Figure 4—figure supplement 1; Drozdetskiy et al., 2015). The backbone of a polypeptide in its extended conformation spans ~0.35 nm per amino acid and the radius of the SBD is around 2 nm (Schuurman-Wolters et al., 2018). Assuming that the position of the linker at the membrane is fixed, each SBD has a mere sampling space of half a sphere with a radius of about 5.9 nm. Hence, the apparent concentration of an SBD in this volume is 4 mM. With the sampling space overlapping, the two SBDs experience each other at millimolar concentrations (Figure 4C). Weak intermolecular interactions are sufficient for binding at millimolar concentration. The high-FRET state may thus reflect a dimeric state of the SBDs. A known procedure to overcome weak interactions at high protein concentrations is the addition of charged amino acids (Schneider et al., 2011; Golovanov et al., 2004). Therefore, we tested the dynamic behavior of OpuA-K521C in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 600 mM KCl supplemented with 50 mM arginine plus 50 mM glutamate. The amino acids changed the high-FRET state to a mean FRET efficiency of 0.55 but did not prevent the presence of this state (Figure 4A; Table 2). Also, the high-FRET state is observed not only in HEPES but also in BIS-TRIS buffer (Table 2).

smFRET was also performed in the absence of KCl and with a saturating concentration of glycine betaine (100 µM). The mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET state of OpuA-K521C increased to 0.78, which corresponds to an inter-dye distance of about 4 nm. This indicates that the dyes at the two SBDs move very close towards each other (Figure 4A; Table 2). It also shows that the high-FRET state can be sensitive to the conformation of the SBD. In high-salt conditions plus Mg-ATP, glycine betaine does not induce a significant FRET shift, indicating that the high-FRET state under high-salt conditions is not affected by SBD closing. Taken together, these data show that the high-FRET state is present in both the open-unliganded and closed-liganded states of the SBDs.

Direct interactions between SBDs observed by single particle cryo-EM

Recent advances in both hardware and software for single-particle cryo-EM have drastically improved the resolution of protein structures, and they also provided the capability to sample the dynamic conformational landscape of proteins at a given condition. More specifically, during image processing, single particles of various orientations are aligned and their signal is combined, resulting in a 3D density map that represents their average state. Depending on the degree of flexibility, the signal of individual domains can align (static) or be averaged out (inherently flexible). The latter is what we anticipated for the SBDs of OpuA, but such low-resolution data can still provide invaluable information and serve to complement smFRET data. While they might not allow to unambiguously model the atomic structure of a protein domain, they reveal its predominant relative localization relative to the rest of the protein complex.

To gain insight on the interaction between the SBDs, cryo-EM datasets of full-length wild type OpuA were collected in two low ionic strength conditions (20 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, supplemented with 50 mM or 100 mM KCl). After several rounds of classification (2D, 3D) and refinement, EM maps aligned at 6.2 and 7 Å, with particle stacks of 166,066 and 80,348, respectively (Figure 4—figure supplements 2 and 3). Due to the inherent flexibility of the SBDs, with respect to both the MSP protein of the nanodisc and the TMDs of OpuA, their resolution is limited. Furthermore, the cryo-EM reconstructions average all the particles in the final dataset, including those with a low and high FRET state. Nevertheless, in both conditions, the densities that correspond to the SBDs can be observed in close proximity (Figure 4D). The distance between the density centers is 6 nm and align with the dimensions of an SBD, providing further evidence for physical interactions between the SBDs.

In contrast, the density derived from single particle analysis of wild type OpuA in higher ionic strength (50 mM KPi pH 7.0, supplemented with 200 mM KCl), as described by Sikkema et al., 2020, reveals an overall more distant localization of the SBDs with respect to each other (Figure 4D, left). When super-positioned, the three maps reveal a significant difference in the localization of the SBDs (Figure 4D, right). Given the flexibility and limited resolution, the nature of their interaction cannot be structurally characterized, but the cryo-EM data corroborate with the smFRET data.

Discussion

The study of transient interdomain interactions in membrane-embedded proteins is challenging. Membrane proteins are unstable outside their native lipid environment and transient interactions are very hard to capture by cryo-EM or other biophysical techniques. We used smFRET to investigate the dynamics between the two SBDs of OpuA, which are covalently linked to the two TMDs in the transporter complex. The smFRET-compatible OpuA-K521C and OpuA-N414C are fully functional in ATP-, KCl-, and glycine betaine-dependent ATP hydrolysis when reconstituted into lipid nanodiscs. The majority of the recorded FRET bursts are present in a low-FRET state but exhibit within-burst dynamics according to a burst variance analysis (Figure 2; third panel). The bursts in the low-FRET state suggests that the protein has more than one FRET state, which are averaged out due to the limited temporal resolution of solution-based confocal microscopy. Further analysis of the data by a hidden Markov modeling approach (mpH2MM) indeed revealed a second state with a higher mean FRET efficiency and a lifetime of less than 10ms in most conditions. This is in the same range as the length of a single burst. Thus, the SBDs of OpuA not only reside in a freely diffusing low-FRET state but also in a high-FRET state where the SBDs are close to each other.

In many type I ABC importers, the SBD is expressed as a separate polypeptide, called SBP. SBPs diffuse in 3D in the bacterial periplasm or in 2D along the membrane surface, that is when they are membrane-anchored via a lipid moiety. It has been shown for several SBPs that they can dock onto the TMDs in the open-unliganded and closed-liganded states (Ames et al., 1996; Bao and Duong, 2012; Chen et al., 2001). Likewise, the high-FRET state could represent a state in which one of the two SBDs is docked and the other SBD is located close by. Therefore, OpuA-V149Q was designed to reduce the docking efficiency of the SBDs in OpuA (Figure 3). Because the relative distributions of the two FRET states are the same in OpuA-V149Q and wild type OpuA, we conclude that the high-FRET state does not represent a docked state (Figure 3D; Table 2).

Using the ATP-hydrolysis defective OpuA-E190Q, we have previously shown by cryo-EM that glycine betaine plus Mg-ATP stabilize a docked state of one of the SBDs (Sikkema et al., 2020). In smFRET measurements, glycine betaine plus Mg-ATP induced a shift in the mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET states of both OpuA-K521C and OpuA-E190Q-K521C (Figure 2C; Table 2). This could indicate that a docked state is induced, which has replaced the previous high-FRET state. However, for OpuA-N414C we do not observe a shift but a reduction in the amount of dwells in the high-FRET state. Moreover, the addition of Mg-ATP alone induces similar shifts or changes in the relative amounts of the states. Therefore, it is not likely that the shift in the high-FRET state of OpuA-K521C represents a docked state of an SBD. We conclude that the spatial resolution of smFRET is not sufficient to study docking by looking at SBD-SBD distance dynamics.

We have shown that the SBDs of OpuA come close together in a short-lived state, which is responsive to the addition of glycine betaine (Figure 4A). Although the occurrence of the state varies between different conditions, it was not possible to negate the high-FRET state completely, not even under very high or low KCl concentrations, or in the presence of 50 mM arginine plus 50 mM glutamate (Figure 4A and B). To evaluate possible scenarios of interdomain interactions we consider the following: (1) The SBDs of OpuA are connected to the TMDs with very short linkers of approximately 4 nm, which limit their movement and allow the receptor to sample a relatively small volume near its docking site. (2) in low ionic strength condition OpuA-K521C displays a high FRET state with mean FRET values of 0.7–0.8, which corresponds to inter-dye distances of approximately 4 nm. (3) The high FRET state is responsive to glycine betaine, which points toward direct communication between the two SBDs. (4) The distance between the density centers of the SBDs in the cryo-EM reconstructions (based on particles with a low and high FRET state) is 6 nm, which aligns with the dimensions of an SBD (length: ~6 nm, maximal width: ~4 nm). These findings collectively indicate that two SBDs interact but not necessarily in a singular conformation but possibly as an ensemble of weakly interacting states. Hence, we discuss three possible SBD-SBD interaction models to explain the high-FRET state:

Firstly, the SBDs do not physically interact but bind simultaneously to the TMDs (Figure 5A). Note that OpuA forms a homodimeric complex and one SBD could potentially bind to one half of the membrane-embedded transporter unit, while the other binds to the other half. This type of docking would be very different from the transport-competent state that we previously observed by cryo-EM. We find this possibility unlikely because transport-competent docking would reduce the presence of the high-FRET state, which is not what we find. Moreover, we do not observe any indication for such a state by cryo-EM in 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, 50 mM KCl, whereas the high-FRET state is prominent in this condition. More specifically, a transport-competent docking would drastically reduce the flexibility of the SBDs, increasing the local resolution in the cryo-EM maps.

Figure 5. Schematic of possible states of the SBDs of OpuA.

Figure 5.

(A) Both SBDs dock in a non-productive manner onto the TMDs. (B) The SBDs interact with each other in an upright orientation either back-to-back, front-to-front or front-to-back. (C) The SBDs interact sideways with each other.

Secondly, the SBDs interact with each other in an upright orientation, either back-to-back, front-to-front, back-to-front or something in between (Figure 5). For back-to-back and back-to-front conformations, the distance between the cysteines would be less than 4 nm in both OpuA-K521C and OpuA-N414C. This cannot explain the mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET state in both OpuA variants, which would correspond to 4.1 nm for OpuA-K521C and 4.9 nm for OpuA-N414C in the conditions with the highest mean FRET (assuming a Förster distance (R0) of 0.51) (Tables 2 and 3). Moreover, both situations would reduce the rotational freedom of the fluorophores on the back of the SBD and hence their steady-state anisotropy, especially in the absence of KCl when the high-FRET state is more populated. However, the steady-state anisotropy is not different for conditions with 0 mM and 300 mM KCl (Table 4). A front-to-front conformation could reflect the observed mean FRET efficiency and at the same time would not interfere with the rotational freedom of the fluorophores. However, this conformation would not be able to dock. Since the high-FRET state is short-lived, docking should reduce the prevalence of this state, which is not what we observe (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 4. Steady-state anisotropy values of free dyes and dyes which were attached to different proteins.

Condition* Alexa Fluor 555 Alexa Fluor 647
Free dye 50 mM KCl 0.21 0.16
Free dye 300 mM KCl 0.21 0.16
MalE-T36C-S352C 300 mM KCl 0.26 0.22
OpuA-K521C 50 mM KCl 0.30 0.28
OpuA-K521C 300 mM KCl 0.29 0.27
OpuA-N414C 50 mM KCl 0.28 0.24
OpuA-N414C 300 mM KCl 0.28 0.23
*

All conditions contained 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0.

Standard deviation between triplicates was less than 0.001.

Thirdly, the SBDs interact sideways (Figure 5C). In this scenario, the mean FRET efficiency of the high-FRET state can reflect the distance between the fluorophores, the fluorophores would not be restricted in their rotational freedom, and the SBDs would be able to dock onto the TMDs. Furthermore, this would be in line with our cryo-EM data which hint to two flexible SBDs that on average move closer toward each other in low ionic strength conditions. Therefore, we consider this state type to be the most plausible explanation. It is possible that the apparent high concentration of the SBDs induces transient and not very strong interactions, explaining why the FRET can shift between different experimental conditions.

In other words, the high FRET state may comprise an ensemble of weakly interacting states rather than a singular stable conformation, resembling the quinary structure of proteins. The quinary structure of proteins is typically revealed in highly crowded cellular environments and describes the weak interactions between protein surfaces that contribute to their stability, function, and spatial organization (Guin and Gruebele, 2019). Despite the current study being conducted under dilute conditions, the local concentration of SBDs (~4 mM) mimics a densely populated environment and reveal quinary structure.

SBDs or SBPs that use the same transporter for docking and substrate delivery compete for the same docking site. When different SBDs with varying substrate scopes compete, or when substrate-free docking is prevalent, transport rates can be significantly reduced (Merino et al., 1995; Gouridis et al., 2015). Interestingly, the SBDs of OpuA cooperate to enhance transport activity (Biemans-Oldehinkel and Poolman, 2003). The interdomain interactions between SBDs reduce their diffusional freedom and keep them very close to the TMDs. Therefore, we think that the data presented in this paper elegantly explain how the SBDs of OpuA cooperate. The weak interactions between SBDs keep the SBDs closer to the TMDs, which allows for more efficient delivery and transport of glycine betaine. As soon as one SBD has delivered its substrate and is released from the TMDs, the other SBD is in very close proximity to dock onto the TMDs for a second round of transport. The interactions also raise the apparent concentration of the SBDs near the TMDs, increasing the binding propensity of an SBD with the TMDs. This also explains why the Vmax of OpuA with one inactivated and one functional SBD is not different to wild type OpuA, whereas one missing SBD reduces the Vmax twofold (Biemans-Oldehinkel and Poolman, 2003).

In conclusion, the SBDs of OpuA transiently interact in a docking competent conformation, explaining the cooperativity between the SBDs during transport. The conformation of this interaction is not fixed but differs substantially between different conditions. Dimer formation of SBPs has been described for a variety of proteins from different structural clusters of SBPs (Cuneo et al., 2008; Gonin et al., 2007; Richarme, 1983; Ford et al., 2022; Luchansky et al., 2010; Ruggiero et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2009; Sippel et al., 2011). It could well be that cooperativity and transient interactions between SBDs is more common than previously anticipated, not only in covalently linked SBDs but also soluble SBPs. It is important to note that the concentration of SBPs in the periplasm of E. coli can be in the millimolar range (Manson et al., 1985; Silhavy et al., 1975), which is comparable to the concentration of SBDs in the OpuA transport complex. The transient and weak interactions between SBDs offer a new perspective on how transport efficiency of proteins can be regulated.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Gene (Lactococcus lactis IL1403) OpuAA NA Q9RQ05
Gene (Lactococcus lactis IL1403) OpuABC NA Q9KIF7
Strain, strain background (Lactococcus lactis) Opu401 10.1073/pnas.0603871103;
Biemans-Oldehinkel et al., 2006
Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 with OpuA gene deleted
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli) BL21(DE3) NA
Recombinant DNA reagent pNZopuAhis 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7102;
van der Heide and Poolman, 2000
Expression plasmid for OpuA
Recombinant DNA reagent pMSP1E3D1 Addgene CAT#:20066 Expression plasmid for MSP1E3D1
Commercial assay or kit Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit ThermoFisher Scientific Inc. CAT#:23225
Chemical compound, drug Alexa Fluor 555 ThermoFisher Scientific Inc. CAT#: A20346
Chemical compound, drug Alexa Fluor 647 ThermoFisher Scientific Inc. CAT#: A20347
Chemical compound, drug 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE) Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. CAT#: 850725 P
Chemical compound, drug 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. CAT#: 850375 P
Chemical compound, drug 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1'-rac-glycerol) (DOPG) Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. CAT#: 840475 P
Chemical compound, drug n-Dodecyl-β-d-maltoside (DDM) Glycon Biochemicals GmbH CAT#: D97002
Chemical compound, drug Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) Roche Holding AG CAT#: 10519987001
chemical compound, drug ß-Nicotine amide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) Carl Roth Gmbh CAT#: AE12.1
Chemical compound, drug Phosphoenolpyruvic acid (PEP) Carl Roth Gmbh CAT#: 8397.3
Chemical compound, drug Pyruvate Kinase/Lactic Dehydrogenase enzymes from rabbit muscle (PK/LDH) Sigma-Aldrich CAT#: P0294
Chemical compound, drug Glycine betaine Sigma-Aldrich CAT#: 61962
Chemical compound, drug L-glutamine Sigma-Aldrich CAT#: G3126
Chemical compound, drug L-arginine Sigma-Aldrich CAT#: A5006
Chemical compound, drug Orthovanadate Sigma-Aldrich CAT#: 450243
Software, algorithm FRETbursts 10.1371/journal.pone.0160716;
Ingargiola et al., 2016b
Version 0.7.1
Software, algorithm Bursth2m 10.1038/s41467-022-28632-x;
Harris et al., 2022
Version 0.1.6
Software, algorithm Phconvert phconvert.rtfd.io;
Ingargiola et al., 2016a
Version 0.9
Software, algorithm Ggplot2 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4;
Wickham, 2016
Version 3.3.5
Software, algorithm SymPhoTime 64 PicoQuant RRID:SCR_016263 Version 2.6
Software, algorithm SerialEM 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007;
Mastronarde, 2005
Version 4.0.10
Software, algorithm FOCUS 10.1016/J.JSB.2017.03.007;
Biyani et al., 2017
Version 1.0.0
Software, algorithm MotionCor2 10.1038/nmeth.4193;
Zheng et al., 2017
Software, algorithm CTFFIND4 10.1016/J.JSB.2015.08.008;
Rohou and Grigorieff, 2015
Software, algorithm crYOLO 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z;
Wagner et al., 2019
Version 1.8.4
Software, algorithm Relion 10.1042/BCJ20210708;
Kimanius et al., 2021
Version 4.0
Software, algorithm cryoSPARC 10.1038/nmeth.4169;
Punjani et al., 2017
Version 4.1.1
Software, algorithm UCSF ChimeraX 10.1002/pro.3235;
Goddard et al., 2018
Version 1.5

Materials

All the oligonucleotide primers are listed in Table 5. The OpuA mutations were introduced in pNZopuAhis by means of USER cloning (van der Heide and Poolman, 2000). This plasmid contains the opuA genes from L. lactis IL1403 with a C-terminal His6-tag on the opuABC gene. The ultracentrifuge rotors were from Beckman Coulter, Brea, California.

Table 5. Primers used in this study to generate mutations in OpuA.

Oligo nr. Oligo name Sequence (from 5' to 3') *
9053 UOpuAC-K521C fw aaaggttUgaagTGTgaaaatccagaagcttataaag
9054 UOpuAC-K521C rev aaaccttUacgaacaatgg
9511 UOpuAC-N414C fw aattgaagaUttaacaaatcaagc
9512 UOpuAC-N414C rev atcttcaatUgaattaacACAcatataacttggaac
9617 UOpuAA-E190Q fw aagctttcUctgctcttgac
9618 UOpuAA-E190Q rev agaaagcTUGatccatgagcaaaatc
9619 UOpuAC-V149Q fw atttgatUccagcgCAAgcattctttgg
9620 UOpuAC-V149Q rev aatcaaaUaaacgaaaccagg
*

Mutated triplets and introduced uracils are in capitals.

The general purification buffer for OpuA purification in detergent consisted of 50 mM KPi pH 7.0, 200 mM KCl, 20% glycerol (v/v) plus 0.04% DDM (w/w) (Buffer 1). The general purification buffer for OpuA purification in nanodiscs consisted of 20 mM K-HEPES pH 7.0 plus 300 mM KCl (Buffer 2). During the different purification steps, the buffers were supplemented with variable concentrations of imidazole pH 7.5 as described below. In case of the cysteine variants of OpuA, 1 mM DTT was added to each step of the protocol from the breaking of the cells and onwards.

A detailed purification and nanodisc reconstitution procedure for OpuA has been made publicly available at protocol.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l624pzgqe/v1). This protocol also encompasses details regarding the optimized parameters of the procedure.

Expression and purification of OpuA

OpuA variants were expressed as described before (Sikkema et al., 2020). The cells with an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of less than 200 were stored at –80 °C in 50 mM KPi pH 7.5 with 20% glycerol (v/v).

The cells were thawed and supplemented with 100 µg/mL DNAse, 2 mM MgSO4 and 1 mM PMSF while stirring, and broken at 30 kPsi, using a high pressure lyser HPL6 (Maximator GmbH, Nordhausen, Germany). Afterwards, 5 mM EDTA pH 8.0 was added and cell debris was removed by centrifugation (20 min, 15,000 x g 4 °C). Crude membrane vesicles (CMVs) were spun down by ultracentrifugation in a Type 45-Ti rotor (135 min, 138,000 x g, 4 °C), resuspended in half of the original volume in 50 mM KPi pH 7.5 with 20% glycerol (v/v) and spun down again in a Type 50.2-Ti rotor (75 min, 185,000 x g, 4 °C). The washed CMVs were resuspended in the same buffer to a concentration of 8–16 mg/mL of total protein, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. Total protein concentration was determined by a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts).

For solubilization the CMVs were thawed and incubated in an open MLA-80 centrifuge tube for 30 min at 4 °C in 6 mL Buffer 1, supplemented with 0.5% DDM (w/w), at a total protein concentration of 3 mg/mL. The sample was mixed once after 15 min by gently pipetting. Insolubilized material was spun down by ultracentrifugation (20 min, 337,000 x g, 4 °C) and 10 mM imidazole pH 7.5 was added to the supernatant. The supernatant was poured into a column with a closed outlet that was loaded with 0.5 mL Ni2+-Sepharose resin (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois), which was pre-washed two times with 6 column volumes of MQ and equilibrated with 4 column volumes of Buffer 1, supplemented with 10 mM imidazole pH 7.5. The solution was mixed by gently pipetting. After 10–20 min, the solution was mixed again by pipetting. Once a part of the resin was sedimented, the column outlet was opened to let the protein solution flow through. The resin was washed with two times 10 column volumes of Buffer 1, supplemented with 50 mM imidazole pH 7.5. OpuA was eluted with Buffer 1, supplemented with 200 mM imidazole pH 7.5, in a first fraction of 0.6 column volume and four subsequent fractions of 0.4 column volume. Purified OpuA was directly used for reconstitution in nanodiscs.

Expression and purification of MSP1E3D1 without His-tag

The expression and purification method of MSP1E3D1 was adapted from a previously described method (Ritchie et al., 2009). An E. coli BL21(DE3) colony, transformed with pMSP1E3D1, was grown during the day in 2 mL Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (1% bactotrypton, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl)+30 µg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C and 200 rpm. A total of 500 μL of the culture was used to make a dilution series of four samples for overnight growth at 37 °C and 200 rpm with 50 mL LB +30 µg/mL kanamycin, with dilution factors of 100 between the samples. The sample with the highest overall dilution and having visible growth was used as starter culture for 2 L of phosphate-buffered Terrific Broth medium, 200 μL antifoam 204 plus 10 μg/mL kanamycin. The bioreactor (2 L) temperature was set at 37 °C, and the mixing speed was set at 500 rpm with a linear increase to 1000 rpm in 4 hr. Aeration was provided by a filtered airflow of 40 L/min through the media. Expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG at an OD600 of 2. After 3 hr, the cells were harvested at 6000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C, washed in 50 mM KPi pH 7.8, and finally resuspended in 50 mM KPi pH 7.8 in less than 10% of the original volume, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. Cells from one bioreactor were enough for two separate purifications.

The cells were thawed and supplemented with 100 μg/mL DNase, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% (v/v) TritonX-100. MSP1E3D1 was released from the cytosol by sonication in an ice-ethanol bath for 72 cycles of 5 s with a 5 s interval and with an amplitude of 56 µm. Cell debris and whole cells were removed by centrifugation (30 min, 30,000 x g, 4 °C). 20 mM imidazole pH 7.5 was added to the supernatant.

For purification of MSP1E3D1, 7.5 mL of Ni2+-Sepharose resin was used, which was washed with 4 column volumes demi water and 4 column volumes 50 mM KPi pH 7.8. The supernatant was incubated with the resin plus 20 mM imidazole for 1 hr at 4 °C under gentle agitation. After flowthrough, the column was washed in three steps, using three different wash buffers of each five column volumes. Each wash buffer contained 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 plus 300 mM NaCl. The wash buffer was supplemented with 1% Triton X-100 (1), 50 mM Na-cholate plus 20 mM imidazole pH 8.0 (2), or 50 mM imidazole pH 8.0 (3). The protein was eluted in twelve 2 mL fractions of 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl plus 500 mM imidazole pH 8.0 and incubated under gentle agitation for 90 min at 4 °C with His-tagged TEV-protease (weight-based MSP:TEV ratio of 40:1) plus 5 mM EDTA to remove the His-tag of MSP1E3D1. The sample was dialyzed overnight against 20 mM tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT plus 0.5 mM EDTA at 4 °C while the dialysis buffer was gently stirred.

After dialysis, 2.5 mL of Ni2+-Sepharose resin was used to remove the TEV-protease and noncleaved MSP1E3D1. The resin was washed with 6 column volumes of demi water and 6 column volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl. The flow-through was reapplied twice to make sure all TEV-protease and noncleaved MSP1E3D1 was bound to the resin. The third time, the flowthrough was collected as a single fraction. Subsequently, the column was washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl plus 40 mM imidazole in nine 2 mL fraction. All MSP1E3D1 containing fractions were pooled and concentrated to 150–175 µM MSP1E3D1, using a Vivaspin 20 centrifugation filter (10 kDa cutoff). Aliquots were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C.

Preparation synthetic lipids stock

The three lipid species DOPE, DOPC, DOPG were separately dissolved in chloroform to a concentration of 25 mg/mL and mixed in a volume ratio of 50:12:38 (DOPE:DOPC:DOPG). The lipids were dried in a rotary evaporator at 40 °C and ~450 mbar for 20 min, followed by 30 min at full vacuum. The lipids were then resuspended in diethyl ether and subsequently dried in a rotary evaporator at 40 °C and ~900 mbar for 20 min, followed again by 30 min at full vacuum. Residual diethyl ether was removed by applying a gentle N2 flow to the lipid film for 5 min. The lipids were resuspended in 50 mM KPi pH 7.0 to a concentration of 25 mg/mL and sonicated in an ice-water bath for 16 cycles of 15 s with a 45 s interval and with an amplitude of 77 µm. Aliquots of the lipids were fast frozen in liquid nitrogen and slowly thawed at room temperature in three cycles. Subsequently, the aliquots were stored in liquid nitrogen.

Reconstitution of OpuA in nanodiscs

Lipids were thawed, diluted four times in 50 mM KPi pH 7.0 and sonicated in an ice-water bath for 8 cycles of 15 s with a 45 s interval at an amplitude of 77 µm. Afterwards, 1% DDM (w/w) was added from a 10% stock to fully solubilize the lipids at a concentration of 5.63 mg/mL lipids. The solution was left at RT for at least 2 hr before it was used.

For optimal reconstitution, 0.9 mM lipids, 45 µM MSP1E3D1 plus 4.5 µM OpuA (based on 218,162 Da molecular weight) were incubated in 50 mM KPi pH 7.0, and in a volume of 700–1000 µL. This was done in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes to minimize the hazardous air-water interface. The concentration of OpuA after IMAC was generally around 18 μM but always higher than 13 μM. This is necessary, because OpuA is eluted in the presence of 20% (v/v) glycerol. It was aimed to dilute OpuA enough in the reconstitution mixture to get the glycerol content during reconstitution below 7% (v/v) and hence minimize the negative effects of glycerol on the reconstitution efficiency. The lipids were diluted out more than 8 times to reach a concentration of 0.9 mM lipids. This also reduced the total DDM concentration in the reconstitution mixture to below 8 mM, which is necessary to prevent dissociation of OpuAA from the OpuA complex. After gentile agitation at 4 °C for 1 hr, the sample was incubated overnight with 500 mg SM-2 Bio-Beads (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) under the same conditions.

The next day, the nanodiscs were separated from the Bio-Beads by means of a syringe with a needle. Aggregates were removed by centrifugation (15 min, 20,000 x g, 4 °C). The sample was loaded to 0.2 mL Ni2+-Sepharose resin, which was washed two times with 5 column volumes of MQ and equilibrated with 5 column volumes of 50 mM KPi pH 7.0. The flowthrough was reapplied twice, before the resin was washed two times with 5 column volumes of Buffer 2, supplemented with 25 mM imidazole pH 7.5. OpuA was eluted with Buffer 2, supplemented with 200 mM imidazole pH 7.5, in a first fraction of 0.8 column volume and a second fraction of 2.5 column volumes. The second fraction was directly further purified by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column in Buffer 2. The purified protein was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C.

ATPase assays

The ATPase activity assays were performed as is described in Sikkema et al., 2020. In this coupled enzyme assay, the synthesis of ATP from ADP is coupled to oxidation of NADH to NAD+, which can be monitored over time by measuring NADH-based absorbance at 340 nm. In other words, for each ATP hydrolysis reaction, one NADH molecule gets dehydrogenated.

In short, each measured sample contained 50 mM K-HEPES pH 7.0, 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 600 μM NADH, 2.1–3.5 U of pyruvate kinase, 3.2–4.9 U of lactate dehydrogenase plus approximately 5 µg/mL OpuA in nanodiscs. The concentrations of glycine betaine, KCl, and Mg-ATP were varied as described in the Results section (Figure 1—figure supplement 1, Figure 3). Absolute activities in min–1 are based on a molecular weight of two MSP1E3D1 and one full-length OpuA complex (total mass 278,126 Da). The data was analyzed in R, using ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016).

Labeling of OpuA for smFRET experiments

For the stochastic labeling, only half of the reconstituted nanodisc sample was used (i.e. ~3 nmol of cysteines). Therefore, the sample was loaded to 0.1 mL Ni2+-Sepharose resin, which had been washed and equilibrated as described under ‘Reconstitution of OpuA in nanodiscs’. The flow through was reapplied twice, before the resin was washed twice with 5 column volumes of Buffer 2 to remove the DTT. Directly after the wash steps 4 column volumes of Buffer 2, supplemented with 50 nmol of Alexa Fluor 555 plus 50 nmol of Alexa Fluor 647, were added to the resin. The flow was stopped by closing the outlet when more than 2 column volumes were flown through, but before the column ran dry.

The column was wrapped with parafilm and aluminium foil, and incubated on ice for 3–4 hr. Afterwards, the resin was washed twice with 10 column volumes of Buffer 2, supplemented with 25 mM imidazole pH 7.5. OpuA was eluted with Buffer 2, supplemented with 300 mM imidazole pH 7.5, in a single fraction of 4 column volumes, which was directly further purified by size exclusion chromatography, using a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column in Buffer 2. The sample after size-exclusion chromatography was aliquoted, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C.

The efficiency of labeling with Alexa fluorophores was determined before aliquoting and storage, by means of an absorbance scan using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Cary 100 Bio; Varian Inc, Palo Alto, California).

smFRET measurements

Pulsed Interleaved Excitation (PIE) and solution-based smFRET experiments were performed on a MicroTime 200 confocal microscope (PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany). Prior to the recording, microscope slides (170 µm thickness, No. 1.5 H precision cover slides, VWR Marienfeld, Leicestershire, Great Britain; LH26.1) were coated for at least one min with 1 mg/mL filtered (0.2 µm) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 50 mM HEPES-K pH 7.0, after which the BSA solution was removed by pipetting and replaced by 150–200 µL of the sample.

The laser pulse rate was set at 40 MHz. Fluorophores were alternately excited, using a 532 nm (LDH-P-FA-530-B; PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany) and 638 nm (LDH-D-C-640; PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany) laser. The laser beam was focused 7 µm away from the glass-solution interface in the z-direction, by means of an oil-immersed objective lens (UPlanSApo 100x1.40 NA; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The emitted photons from the sample were coordinated through a 100 µm pinhole, separated through a laser beam-splitter (ZT640RDC; Chroma Technology, Bellows Falls, Vermont), filtered by either a HQ690/70 (Chroma Technology, Bellows Falls, Vermont) or a 582/75 (Semrock, Rochester, New York) emission filter, and recorded by two photon counting modules (donor photons: SPCM-AQRH-14-TR, acceptor photons: SPCM-CD-3516-H; Excelitas Technologies, Waltham, Massachusetts).

smFRET data analysis

Raw data were saved as.PTU file extensions by the SymPhoTime 64 software (PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany), but was converted to.HDF5 file extensions, using the Python package phconvert (Ingargiola et al., 2016a). Fluorescent bursts were identified by the all photon burst search (APBS) method, using the Python based software package FRETbursts (Ingargiola et al., 2016b). The Python codes for the downstream analysis were adapted from published codes (Harris et al., 2022). Burst cut-off settings were set to a minimum of m=10 consecutive photons per sliding window and at least F=6 times higher than the background signal. The background signal was calculated over each 30 s of the measurement. The initial burst selection considered all detected photons in the donor and acceptor channel during both the donor and acceptor excitation periods. This was done with a cut-off of minimally 35 photons per burst.

Three types of photon counts were extracted from each burst: donor-based donor emission (FDD), donor-based acceptor emission (FDA) and acceptor-based acceptor emission (FAA). These were used to calculate the apparent FRET efficiency E* and stoichiometry S of each burst. Apparent FRET efficiency was defined as:

E=FDAFDA+FDD (1)

The stoichiometry of a burst was defined as the ratio between overall donor-based fluorescence over the total fluorescence of the burst, that is:

S=FDA+FDDFDA+FDD+FAA (2)

For mpH2MM, the Python package bursth2mm was used and run with default parameters. All calculations can be found back in the supplemented Jupyter notebooks. The model optimization process for each model is based on the ICL criterion. This criterion takes into account the probability of the most likely state path through the bursts and penalizes for the number of states that is needed to explain the data (Harris et al., 2022). The model with lowest ICL was adopted for downstream analysis. For each calculation, also the BIC’ value was inspected, which was usually slightly above the 0.05 cut-off for the optimal model, based on the ICL criterion.

The γ-correction factor was calculated on the basis of the resulting two FRET states after mpH2MM modeling, and applying the leakage and crosstalk corrections to the dwells (Hohlbein et al., 2014). Subsequently, a third burst selection with the same cut-off settings was performed on the initial data, but now by applying the three correction factors. The bursts were further analyzed by mpH2MM, as described above. The resulting dwells were corrected by applying the three correction factors again.

The bursts were also analyzed by BVA (Torella et al., 2011). In a BVA, the mean FRET efficiency of each burst is plotted against its standard deviation (σ) from the mean during the burst. The data was binned with a bin size of 0.1 E and plotted in the same graph. The σ of the binned data was compared with what would be expected from theory. Deviation from the expected σ was considered as a qualitative indication for within-burst dynamics.

Steady-state fluorescence anisotropy measurements

To measure polarized fluorescence, a Jasco FP-8300 scanning spectrofluorometer (Jasco Inc, Easton, Maryland) with polarized filters was used. Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647 were excited at 535 nm and 635 nm, respectively (10 nm bandwidth). Emission was recorded at 580 nm and 660 nm (10 nm bandwidth). Anisotropy (r) was calculated by:

r=IVVGIVHIVV+2GIVH (3)

where IVV and IVH represent fluorescence intensities after vertical excitation in the vertical and horizontal plane, respectively. Parameter G is a correction factor to compensate for different sensitivity of the machine in the vertical versus the horizontal plane:

G=IHVIHH (4)

Sample preparation for single particle cryo-EM and data acquisition

Freshly purified wild type OpuA in MSP1E3D1 nanodiscs was concentrated to 1 mg/ml with a Vivaspin 500 (100 kDA). A concentrated sample (2.8 μl) was applied to holey carbon grids (Au R1.2/1.3, 300 mesh, Quantifoil, Jena, Germany) previously glow-discharged for 30 s at 5 mA. The grids were blotted for 3–5 s at 15–22°C and 100% humidity in a Vitrobot Mark IV (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts), subsequently plunge-frozen into a liquid ethane/propane mixture, and stored in liquid nitrogen for data collection.

Datasets for each condition were collected in-house using a 200 kV Talos Arctica microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts). Movies were recorded with a K2 summit (Gatan Inc, Pleasanton, California) with a post-column BioQuantum energy filter (Gatan Inc, Pleasanton, California) with a zero-loss slit width of 20 eV. Automatic data collection was performed using SerialEM ver 4.0.10 with a 100 μm objective aperture, a pixel size of 1.022 Å (calibrated magnification 48,924), a defocus range of –0.5 to –2.0 μm, a total exposure time of 9 s captured in 60 frames (150 ms subframe exposure) and total electron exposure of 50.9 e- per Å2 (Mastronarde, 2005; Schorb et al., 2019). Target holes for data acquisition were qualitatively screened and selected based on their ice thickness (20–50 nm) with an in-house-developed script (Rheinberger et al., 2021). Data quality was monitored on-the-fly using FOCUS version 1.0.0 (Biyani et al., 2017).

Cryo-EM image processing of wild type OpuA in 50 mM KCl

A total of 5462 movies were collected from five grids (containing samples from the same purification and frozen in the same session) and were gain corrected and pre-processed on-the-fly with FOCUS version 1.0.0 utilizing MotionCor2 and CTFFIND4 for motion correction (frame-dose weighting) and CTF estimation, respectively (Zheng et al., 2017; Rohou and Grigorieff, 2015). In total, 4482 images were selected for further processing after removing those of lower quality (visual inspection, poor CTF estimation and contamination). A total of 1,879,237 particles were picked utilizing the PhosaurusNet architecture of crYOLO version 1.8.4 with the general model and subsequently extracted in Relion 4.0 with a box size of 256 pixels and downscaled to 2.044 Å/pixel (Wagner et al., 2019; Kimanius et al., 2021). Extracted particles were processed in parallel both in Relion 4.0 and CryoSPARC 4.1.1.

In CryoSPARC, particles were subjected to two rounds of 2D classification using default settings with the exception of ‘Number of final full iterations’ set to 5 and an ‘Initial classification uncertainty factor’ of 1 and 2 for the first round and the second round, respectively. Selected particles (552,280) were subjected to ab initio reconstruction and subsequently to hetero refinement. The best class (166,066 particles) was further refined using non-uniform refinement which resulted in 6.21 Å resolution. The final map was low pass filtered to 15 Å for comparison. All processing was done without imposing any symmetry (C1).

Cryo-EM image processing of wild type OpuA in 100 mM KCl

A total of 1,474 movies were collected from a single grid and were gain corrected and pre-processed on-the-fly with FOCUS version 1.0.0 utilizing MotionCor2 and CTFFIND4 for motion correction (frame-dose weighting) and CTF estimation, respectively. In total, 1051 images were selected for further processing after removing those of lower quality (visual inspection, poor CTF estimation and contamination). A total of 559,491 particles were picked utilizing the PhosaurusNet architecture of crYOLO version 1.8.4 with a pretrained model as described in Sikkema et al., 2020 and subsequently extracted in Relion 4.0 with a box size of 256 pixels and downscaled to 2.044 Å/pixel. Extracted particles were subjected to a round of 2D classifications with a mask of 200 Å. Selected particles (264,267) were classified in 3D by limiting the E-step size to 7 Å, regularization parameter T=4 and a mask of 200 Å. The best three classes (97,369 particles) were selected and re-extracted with a box size of 256 pixels with no downscaling. These particles were subsequently imported into CryoSPARC and subjected to ab initio reconstruction and subsequently to hetero refinement. The best classes (80,348 particles) were further refined using non-uniform refinement which resulted in 7 Å resolution. The final map was low-pass filtered to 15 Å for comparison. All processing was done without imposing any symmetry (C1).

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the NWO Gravitation Program BaSyC. CP acknowledges funding from the Dutch Research Council: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) Veni Grant 722.017.001, NWO Start-Up Grant 40.018.016 and together with BP the NWO OCENW.KLEIN.526.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Bert Poolman, Email: b.poolman@rug.nl.

Kenton J Swartz, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, United States.

Kenton J Swartz, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Gravitation Program BaSyC to Bert Poolman.

  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 722.017.001 to Cristina Paulino.

  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 40.018.016 to Cristina Paulino.

  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek OCENW.KLEIN.526 to Cristina Paulino, Bert Poolman.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All raw single photon data together with the Python scripts to analyze the data, plus the cyro-EM maps are deposited in the online database DataverseNL.

The following dataset was generated:

Van den Noort M, Drougkas P, Paulino O, Poolman D. 2023. Raw smFRET data, analysis scripts and cryo-EM maps for: The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA physically interact. DataverseNL.

References

  1. Ames GFL, Liu CE, Joshi AK, Nikaido K. Liganded and unliganded receptors interact with equal affinity with the membrane complex of periplasmic permeases, a subfamily of traffic ATPases. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:14264–14270. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.24.14264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bao H, Duong F. Discovery of an auto-regulation mechanism for the maltose ABC transporter MalFGK2. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e34836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartels K, Lasitza-Male T, Hofmann H, Löw C. Single-molecule FRET of membrane transport proteins. Chembiochem. 2021;22:2657–2671. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202100106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biemans-Oldehinkel E, Poolman B. On the role of the two extracytoplasmic substrate-binding domains in the ABC transporter OpuA. The EMBO Journal. 2003;22:5983–5993. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biemans-Oldehinkel E, Mahmood NABN, Poolman B. A sensor for intracellular ionic strength. PNAS. 2006;103:10624–10629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603871103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biyani N, Righetto RD, McLeod R, Caujolle-Bert D, Castano-Diez D, Goldie KN, Stahlberg H. Focus: The interface between data collection and data processing in cryo-EM. Journal of Structural Biology. 2017;198:124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bounedjah O, Hamon L, Savarin P, Desforges B, Curmi PA, Pastré D. Macromolecular crowding regulates assembly of mRNA stress granules after osmotic stress: new role for compatible osmolytes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:2446–2458. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.292748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bremer E, Krämer R. Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2019;73:313–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen J, Sharma S, Quiocho FA, Davidson AL. Trapping the transition state of an ATP-binding cassette transporter: Evidence for a concerted mechanism of maltose transport. PNAS. 2001;98:1525–1530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen J. Molecular mechanism of the Escherichia coli maltose transporter. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2013;23:492–498. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Commichau FM, Gibhardt J, Halbedel S, Gundlach J, Stülke J. A delicate connection: c-di-AMP affects cell integrity by controlling osmolyte transport. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corrigan RM, Campeotto I, Jeganathan T, Roelofs KG, Lee VT, Gründling A. Systematic identification of conserved bacterial c-di-AMP receptor proteins. PNAS. 2013;110:9084–9089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300595110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cuneo MJ, Changela A, Miklos AE, Beese LS, Krueger JK, Hellinga HW. Structural analysis of a periplasmic binding protein in the tripartite ATP-independent transporter family reveals a tetrameric assembly that may have a role in ligand transport. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:32812–32820. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803595200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dey RJ, Dey B, Zheng Y, Cheung LS, Zhou J, Sayre D, Kumar P, Guo H, Lamichhane G, Sintim HO, Bishai WR. Inhibition of innate immune cytosolic surveillance by an M Tuberculosis Phosphodiesterase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:210–217. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drozdetskiy A, Cole C, Procter J, Barton GJ. JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43:W389–W394. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford BA, Ranjit P, Mabbutt BC, Paulsen IT, Shah BS. ProX from marine Synechococcus spp. show a sole preference for glycine-betaine with differential affinity between ecotypes. Environmental Microbiology. 2022;24:6071–6085. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, Pettersen EF, Couch GS, Morris JH, Ferrin TE. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Science. 2018;27:14–25. doi: 10.1002/pro.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Golovanov AP, Hautbergue GM, Wilson SA, Lian LY. A simple method for improving protein solubility and long-term stability. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126:8933–8939. doi: 10.1021/ja049297h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gonin S, Arnoux P, Pierru B, Lavergne J, Alonso B, Sabaty M, Pignol D. Crystal structures of an extracytoplasmic solute receptor from a TRAP transporter in its open and closed forms reveal a helix-swapped dimer requiring a cation for alpha-keto acid binding. BMC Structural Biology. 2007;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-7-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gouridis G, Schuurman-Wolters GK, Ploetz E, Husada F, Vietrov R, de Boer M, Cordes T, Poolman B. Conformational dynamics in substrate-binding domains influences transport in the ABC importer GlnPQ. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2015;22:57–64. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guin D, Gruebele M. Weak chemical interactions that drive protein evolution: crowding, sticking, and quinary structure in folding and function. Chemical Reviews. 2019;119:10691–10717. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gundlach J, Mehne FMP, Herzberg C, Kampf J, Valerius O, Kaever V, Stülke J. An essential poison: synthesis and degradation of cyclic Di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Bacteriology. 2015;197:3265–3274. doi: 10.1128/JB.00564-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris PD, Narducci A, Gebhardt C, Cordes T, Weiss S, Lerner E. Multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling. Nature Communications. 2022;13:1000. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28632-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Heuveling J, Frochaux V, Ziomkowska J, Wawrzinek R, Wessig P, Herrmann A, Schneider E. Conformational changes of the bacterial type I ATP-binding cassette importer HisQMP2 at distinct steps of the catalytic cycle. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2014;1838:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoffmann T, Bremer E. Guardians in a stressful world: the Opu family of compatible solute transporters from Bacillus subtilis. Biological Chemistry. 2017;398:193–214. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2016-0265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hohlbein J, Craggs TD, Cordes T. Alternating-laser excitation: single-molecule FRET and beyond. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43:1156–1171. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60233h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ingargiola A, Laurence T, Boutelle R, Weiss S, Michalet X. Photon-HDF5: an open file format for timestamp-based single-molecule fluorescence experiments. Biophysical Journal. 2016a;110:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ingargiola A, Lerner E, Chung S, Weiss S, Michalet X. FRETBursts: an open source toolkit for analysis of freely-diffusing single-molecule FRET. PLOS ONE. 2016b;11:e0160716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Karasawa A, Swier L, Stuart MCA, Brouwers J, Helms B, Poolman B. Physicochemical factors controlling the activity and energy coupling of an ionic strength-gated ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:29862–29871. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.499327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimanius D, Dong L, Sharov G, Nakane T, Scheres SHW. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. The Biochemical Journal. 2021;478:4169–4185. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lerner E, Cordes T, Ingargiola A, Alhadid Y, Chung S, Michalet X, Weiss S. Toward dynamic structural biology: Two decades of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. Science. 2018;359:eaan1133. doi: 10.1126/science.aan1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Luchansky MS, Der BS, D’Auria S, Pocsfalvi G, Iozzino L, Marasco D, Dattelbaum JD. Amino acid transport in thermophiles: characterization of an arginine-binding protein in Thermotoga maritima. Molecular bioSystems. 2010;6:142–151. doi: 10.1039/b908412f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mächtel R, Narducci A, Griffith DA, Cordes T, Orelle C. An integrated transport mechanism of the maltose ABC importer. Research in Microbiology. 2019;170:321–337. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mahmood N, Biemans-Oldehinkel E, Patzlaff JS, Schuurman-Wolters GK, Poolman B. Ion specificity and ionic strength dependence of the osmoregulatory ABC transporter OpuA. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:29830–29839. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604907200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Manson MD, Boos W, Bassford PJ, Rasmussen BA. Dependence of maltose transport and chemotaxis on the amount of maltose-binding protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1985;260:9727–9733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. Journal of Structural Biology. 2005;152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Merino G, Boos W, Shuman HA, Bohl E. The inhibition of maltose transport by the unliganded form of the maltose-binding protein of Escherichia coli experimental findings and mathematical treatment. J. Theor. Biol. 1995;177:171–179. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Neumann P, Kloskowski P, Ficner R. Computer-aided design of a cyclic di-AMP synthesizing enzyme CdaA inhibitor. microLife. 2023;4:uqad021. doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqad021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oldham ML, Davidson AL, Chen J. Structural insights into ABC transporter mechanism. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2008;18:726–733. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Opoku-Temeng C, Sintim HO. Inhibition of cyclic diadenylate cyclase, DisA, by polyphenols. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:25445. doi: 10.1038/srep25445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pham HT, Nhiep NTH, Vu TNM, Huynh TN, Zhu Y, Huynh ALD, Chakrabortti A, Marcellin E, Lo R, Howard CB, Bansal N, Woodward JJ, Liang ZX, Turner MS. Enhanced uptake of potassium or glycine betaine or export of cyclic-di-AMP restores osmoresistance in a high cyclic-di-AMP Lactococcus lactis mutant. PLOS Genetics. 2018;14:e1007574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pirchi M, Tsukanov R, Khamis R, Tomov TE, Berger Y, Khara DC, Volkov H, Haran G, Nir E. Photon-by-photon hidden markov model analysis for microsecond single-molecule FRET kinetics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2016;120:13065–13075. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker MA. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Methods. 2017;14:290–296. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Quintana IM, Gibhardt J, Turdiev A, Hammer E, Commichau FM, Lee VT, Magni C, Stülke J. The KupA and KupB Proteins of Lactococcus lactis IL1403 Are Novel c-di-AMP receptor proteins responsible for potassium uptake. Journal of Bacteriology. 2019;201:e00028-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00028-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rheinberger J, Oostergetel G, Resch GP, Paulino C. Optimized cryo-EM data-acquisition workflow by sample-thickness determination. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology. 2021;77:565–571. doi: 10.1107/S205979832100334X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Richarme G. Associative properties of the Escherichia coli galactose-binding protein and maltose-binding protein. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1983;748:99–108. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(83)90032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ritchie TK, Grinkova YV, Bayburt TH, Denisov IG, Zolnerciks JK, Atkins WM, Sligar SG. Chapter 11 - Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs. Methods in Enzymology. 2009;464:211–231. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64011-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rohou A, Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. Journal of Structural Biology. 2015;192:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Romeo Y, Bouvier J, Gutierrez C. Osmotic regulation of transcription in Lactococcus lactis: ionic strength-dependent binding of the BusR repressor to the busA promoter. FEBS Letters. 2007;581:3387–3390. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ruggiero A, Dattelbaum JD, Staiano M, Berisio R, D’Auria S, Vitagliano L. A loose domain swapping organization confers A remarkable stability to the dimeric structure of the arginine binding protein from Thermotoga maritima. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e96560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schneider CP, Shukla D, Trout BL. Arginine and the Hofmeister Series: the role of ion-ion interactions in protein aggregation suppression. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2011;115:7447–7458. doi: 10.1021/jp111920y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schorb M, Haberbosch I, Hagen WJH, Schwab Y, Mastronarde DN. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nature Methods. 2019;16:471–477. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0396-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schuster CF, Bellows LE, Tosi T, Campeotto I, Corrigan RM, Freemont P, Gründling A. The second messenger c-di-AMP inhibits the osmolyte uptake system OpuC in Staphylococcus aureus. Science Signaling. 2016;9:ra81. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaf7279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schuurman-Wolters GK, de Boer M, Pietrzyk MK, Poolman B. Protein linkers provide limits on the domain interactions in the ABC Importer GlnPQ and determine the rate of transport. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2018;430:1249–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Shi R, Proteau A, Wagner J, Cui Q, Purisima EO, Matte A, Cygler M. Trapping open and closed forms of FitE: a group III periplasmic binding protein. Proteins. 2009;75:598–609. doi: 10.1002/prot.22272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sikkema HR, van den Noort M, Rheinberger J, de Boer M, Krepel ST, Schuurman-Wolters GK, Paulino C, Poolman B. Gating by ionic strength and safety check by cyclic-di-AMP in the ABC transporter OpuA. Science Advances. 2020;6:eabd7697. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd7697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sikkema HR, Poolman B. In silico method for selecting residue pairs for single-molecule microscopy and spectroscopy. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:5756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85003-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Silhavy TJ, Szmelcman S, Boos W, Schwartz M. On the significance of the retention of ligand by protein. PNAS. 1975;72:2120–2124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sippach M, Weidlich D, Klose D, Abé C, Klare J, Schneider E, Steinhoff HJ. Conformational changes of the histidine ATP-binding cassette transporter studied by double electron–electron resonance spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2014;1838:1760–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sippel KH, Venkatakrishnan B, Boehlein SK, Sankaran B, Quirit JG, Govindasamy L, Agbandje-McKenna M, Goodison S, Rosser CJ, McKenna R. Insights into Mycoplasma genitalium metabolism revealed by the structure of MG289, an extracytoplasmic thiamine binding lipoprotein. Proteins. 2011;79:528–536. doi: 10.1002/prot.22900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stadmiller SS, Gorensek-Benitez AH, Guseman AJ, Pielak GJ. Osmotic shock induced protein destabilization in living cells and its reversal by glycine betaine. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2017;429:1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stülke J, Krüger L. Cyclic di-AMP signaling in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2020;74:159–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tantirimudalige S, Buckley TSC, Chandramohan A, Richter RM, Ziegler C, Anand GS. Hyperosmotic stress allosterically reconfigures betaine binding pocket in BetP. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2022;434:167747. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. ter Beek J, Guskov A, Slotboom DJ. Structural diversity of ABC transporters. The Journal of General Physiology. 2014;143:419–435. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201411164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Torella JP, Holden SJ, Santoso Y, Hohlbein J, Kapanidis AN. Identifying molecular dynamics in single-molecule FRET experiments with burst variance analysis. Biophysical Journal. 2011;100:1568–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. van der Heide T, Poolman B. Osmoregulated ABC-transport system of Lactococcus lactis senses water stress via changes in the physical state of the membrane. PNAS. 2000;97:7102–7106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. van der Heide T, Stuart MC, Poolman B. On the osmotic signal and osmosensing mechanism of an ABC transport system for glycine betaine. The EMBO Journal. 2001;20:7022–7032. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. van der Heide T, Poolman B. ABC transporters: one, two or four extracytoplasmic substrate-binding sites? EMBO Reports. 2002;3:938–943. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wagner T, Merino F, Stabrin M, Moriya T, Antoni C, Apelbaum A, Hagel P, Sitsel O, Raisch T, Prumbaum D, Quentin D, Roderer D, Tacke S, Siebolds B, Schubert E, Shaikh TR, Lill P, Gatsogiannis C, Raunser S. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Communications Biology. 2019;2:218. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wickham H. Ggplot2 - elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer International Publishing; 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zheng B, Zhang Q, Gao J, Han H, Li M, Zhang J, Qi J, Yan J, Gao GF. Insight into the interaction of metal ions with TroA from Streptococcus suis. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e19510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache JP, Verba KA, Cheng Y, Agard DA. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nature Methods. 2017;14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Kenton J Swartz 1

The OpuA Type I ABC importer uses two substrate binding domains to capture extracellular glycine betaine and present the substrate to the transmembrane domain for subsequent transport and correction of internal dehydration. This study presents valuable findings addressing the question of whether the two substrate binding domains of OpuA dock and physically interact in a salt-dependent manner. The single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer and cryogenic electron microscopy data that are presented provide convincing support for the existence of a transient interaction between the substrate binding domains that depends on ionic strength, laying a foundation for future studies exploring how this interaction is involved in the overall transport mechanism.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary: The type I ABC importer OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is the best studied transporter involved in osmoprotection. In contrast to most ABC import systems, the substrate binding protein is fused via a short linker to the transmembrane domain of the transporter. Consequently, this moiety is called the substrate binding domain (SBD). OpuA has been studied in the past in great detail and we have a very detailed knowledge about function, mechanisms of activation and deactivation as well as structure.

Strengths: Application of smFRET to unravel transient interactions of the SBDs. The method is applied at a superb quality and the data evaluation is excellent.

Weaknesses: The proposed model is not directly supported by experimental data. Rather alternative models are excluded as they do not fit to the obtained data. However, this is now clearly stated in the manuscript

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

In this report the authors used solution-based single-molecule FRET and low resolution cryo-EM to investigate the interactions between the substrate-binding domains of the ABC-importer OpuA from Lactococcus lactis. Based on their results, the authors suggest that the SBDs interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner.

Strengths:

The strength of this manuscript is the uniqueness and importance of the scientific question, the adequacy of the experimental system (OpuA), and the combination of two very powerful and demanding experimental approaches.

Weaknesses:

A demonstration that the SBDs physically interact with one another, and that this interaction is important for the transport mechanism will greatly strengthen the claims of the authors. The relation to cooperativity is also unclear.

eLife. 2024 May 2;12:RP90996. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90996.3.sa3

Author response

Marco van den Noort 1, Panagiotis Drougkas 2, Cristina Paulino 3, Bert Poolman 4

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Recommendations for the authors

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Below I summarize points that should be addressed in a revised version of the manuscript.

  • Page 6, first paragraph: I don't understand by the signals average out to a single state. If the distribution is indeed randomly distributed, a broad signal with low intensity should be present.

We agree that this statement may cause confusion. We changed the text (marked in bold) to clarify the statement: The mobility of the undocked SBDs will be higher than the diffusion of the whole complex, allowing the sampling of varying interdomain distances within a single burst. However, these dynamic variations are subsequently averaged to a singular FRET value during FRET calculations for each burst, and may appear as a single low FRET state in the histograms.

  • Page 6, third paragraph: how can the donor only be detected in the acceptor channel? Is this tailing out?

Donor only signal is not detected in the acceptor channel. As described in page 5 and in the Materials & Methods section, the dye stoichiometry value is defined for each burst/dwell using three types of photon counts: donor-based donor emission (FDD), donor-based acceptor emission (FDA) and acceptorbased acceptor emission (FAA).

S=FDA+FDDFDA+FDD+FAA

When no acceptor fluorophore is present FAA=0 and S=1.

Some donor photons bleed through into the acceptor channel, but we correct for this by calculating the leakage and crosstalk factors as described in the Materials and Methods (page 20).

We changed the text (marked in bold) in the manuscript to address the question: The FRET data of both OpuA variants is best explained by a four-state model (Figure 2A,B; fourth and fifth panel) (Supplementary File 3). Two of the four states represent donor-only (S≈1) or acceptor-only (S≈0) dwells. The full bursts belonging to donor-only and acceptor-only molecules were excluded prior to mpH2MM. This means that some molecules transit to a donor-only or acceptor-only state within the burst period, which most likely reflects blinking or bleaching of one of the fluorophores. These donoronly and acceptor-only states were also excluded during further analysis. The other two states reflect genuine FRET dwells that were analyzed by mpH2MM. They represent different conformations of the SBDs.

  • Page 7, "SBD dynamics ..": why was the V149Q mutant only analyzed in the K521C background and not also in the N414C background?

The two FRET states were best distinguished in OpuA-K521C. Therefore, we decided to focus on OpuA-K521C and not OpuA-N414C. OpuA-V149Q was used to show that reduced docking efficiency does not affect the transition rate constants and relative abundances of the two FRET states, and we regarded it sufficient to test the SBD dynamics in OpuA-K521C only.

  • Page 8, second paragraph: why was the N414C mutant analyzed only from 0 - 600 mM and not also up to 1000 mM?

In line with the previous answer, our main focus was on OpuA-K521C, since the two FRET states were best distinguished in OpuA-K521C. OpuA-N414C was used to prove that similar states are observed when measuring with fluorophores on the opposite site of the SBD. We studied how the FRET states change in response to different conditions that correspond to different stages of the transport cycle and how it changes in response to different ionic strengths. Initially, 600 mM KCl was used to study the dynamics of the SBD at high ionic strength. Later in this study, we tested a very wide range of different salt concentrations for OpuA-K521C to get detailed insights into the dynamics of the SBDs over a wide ionic strength range. Note that 1 M KCl is a very high, non-physiological ionic strength for the typical habitat of L. lactis and was only used to show that the high FRET state occurs even under very extreme conditions.

  • Page 8, third paragraph: why was the dimer (if it is the source of the FRET signal) only partially disrupted?

We acknowledge that this is a very good point. However, we purposely did not speculate on this point in the manuscript, because we have limited information on the molecular details of the interaction. As we highlight on page 8, the SBDs experience each other in a very high apparent concentration (millimolar range). This means that the interactions are most likely very weak (low affinity) and not very specific. Such interactions are in the literature referred to as the quinary structure of proteins and they occur at the high macromolecular crowding in the cell and in proteins with tethered domains, and thus at high local concentrations. Such interactions can be screened by high ionic strength. In the revised manuscript, we now present the partially disrupted dimer structure in the context of the quinary structure of a protein (page 11):

In other words, the high FRET state may comprise an ensemble of weakly interacting states rather than a singular stable conformation, resembling the quinary structure of proteins. The quinary structure of proteins is typically revealed in highly crowded cellular environments and describes the weak interactions between protein surfaces that contribute to their stability, function, and spatial organization (Guin & Gruebele, 2019). Despite the current study being conducted under dilute conditions, the local concentration of SBDs (~4 mM) mimics a densely populated environment and reveal quinary structure.

  • Page 9, second paragraph: according to the EM data processing, only 20% of the particles were used for 3D reconstruction. Why? Does it mean that the remaining 80% were physiologically not relevant? If so, why were the 20% used relevant?

We note that it is a fundamental part of image processing of single particle cryo-EM data to remove false positives or low-resolution particles throughout the processing workflow. In particular when using a very low and therefore generous threshold during automated particle picking, as we did (t=0.01 and t=0.05 for the 50 mM KCl and 100 mM KCl datasets, respectively), the initial set of particles includes a significant amount of false positives – a tradeoff to avoid excluding particles belonging to low populated classes/orientations. It is thus common that more than 50% of ‘particles’ are excluded in the first rounds of 2D classification. In our case, only 30% and 52% of particles were retained after such first clean-up steps. Subsequently, the particle set is further refined, and additional false positives and low-resolution particles are excluded during extensive rounds of 3D classification. We also note that during the final steps, most of the data excluded represents particles of lower quality that do not contribute to a high-resolution, or belong to low population protein conformations. This does not mean that such a population is not physiological relevant. In conclusion, having only 5-20% of the initial automated picked particles contributing to the reconstruction of the final cryo-EM map is common, with the vast majority of excluded particles being false positives.

  • Page 11, third paragraph: the way the proposed model is selected is also my main criticism. All alternative models do not fit the data. Therefore, the proposed model is suggested. However, I do not grasp any direct support for this model. Either I missed it or it is not presented.

Concerning the specific model in Figure 5, the reviewer is correct. We do not provide direct evidence for a side-ways interaction. However, we have evidence of transient interactions and our data rule out several scenarios of interaction, leaving 5C as the most likely model. This is also the main conclusion of this paper: In conclusion, the SBDs of OpuA transiently interact in a docking competent conformation, explaining the cooperativity between the SBDs during transport. The conformation of this interaction is not fixed but differs substantially between different conditions.

Because the interaction is very short-lived it was not possible to visualize molecular details of this interaction. We present Figure 5 to hypothesize the most likely type of interaction, since many possibilities can be excluded with the vast amount of presented data. To make our point more clear that we discuss models and rule out several possibilities but not demonstrate a specific interaction between the SBDs, we now write on page 10 (changes marked in bold): We have shown that the SBDs of OpuA come close together in a short-lived state, which is responsive to the addition of glycine betaine (Figure 4A). Although the occurrence of the state varies between different conditions, it was not possible to negate the high-FRET state completely, not even under very high or low KCl concentrations, or in the presence of 50 mM arginine plus 50 mM glutamate (Figure 4A,B). To evaluate possible interdomain interactions scenarios we consider the following: (1) The SBDs of OpuA are connected to the TMDs with very short linkers of approximately 4 nm, which limit their movement and allow the receptor to sample a relatively small volume near its docking site. (2) in low ionic strength condition OpuA-K521C displays a high FRET state with mean FRET values of 0.7-0.8, which correspond to inter-dye distances of approximately 4 nm. (3) The high FRET state is responsive to glycine betaine, which points toward direct communication between the two SBDs. (4) The distance between the density centers of the SBDs in the cryo-EM reconstructions (based on particles with a low and high FRET state) is 6 nm, which aligns with the dimensions of an SBD (length: ~6 nm, maximal width: ~4 nm). These findings collectively indicate that two SBDs interact but not necessarily in a singular conformation but possibly as an ensemble of weakly interacting states. Hence, we discuss three possible SBD-SBD interaction models to explain the highFRET state:

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

In the abstract and elsewhere the authors suggest that the SBDs physically interact with one another, and that this interaction is important for the transport mechanism, specifically for its cooperativity.

I feel that this main claim is not well established. The authors convincingly demonstrate that the SBDs largely occupy two states relative to one another and that in one of these states, they are closer than in the other. Unless I have missed (or failed to understand) some major details of the results, I did not find any evidence of a physical interaction. Have the authors established that the high FRET state indeed corresponds to the physical engagement of the SBDs? I feel that a direct demonstration of an interaction is much missing.

Along the same lines, in the low-salt cryo-EM structure, where the SBDs are relatively closer together, the SBDs are still separated and do not interact.

See also our response to the final comment of reviewer 1. Furthermore, please carefully consider the following: (1) FRET values of 0.7-0.8 correspond to inter-dye distances of approximately 4 nm. (2) The high FRET state is responsive to glycine betaine, which points toward direct communication between the two SBDs. (3) The cryo-EM reconstruction is the average of all the particles in the final dataset, including both the particles with a low and high FRET state. Further, the local resolution of the SBDs in the cryo-EM map is low, indicative of high degree of flexibility. Thus, a potential interaction is possible within the observed range of flexibility. (4) The distance between the density centers is 6 nm, aligning with the dimensions of an SBD (length: 6 nm, maximal width: 4 nm). These factors collectively indicate SBD interactions, and we present these points now more explicitly in Figure 4 and the last part of the results section (page 9).

Once the authors successfully demonstrate that direct physical interaction indeed occurs, they will need to provide data that places it in the context of the transport cycle. Do the SBDs swap ligand molecules between them? Do they bind the ligand and/or the transporter cooperatively? What is the role of this interaction?

We acknowledge the intriguing nature of the posed questions, but they extend beyond the scope of this study. It is extremely challenging to obtain high-resolution structures of highly dynamic multidomain proteins, like OpuA, and to probe transient interactions as we do here for the SBDs of OpuA. We therefore combined cryo-TEM with smFRET studies and perform the most advanced and state-of-theart analysis tools as acknowledged by reviewer 1. We link our observations on the structural dynamics and interactions of the SBDs to a previous study, where we showed that the two SBDs of OpuA interact cooperatively. We do not have further evidence that connect the physical interactions to the transport cycle. In our view, the collective datasets indicate that the here reported physical interactions between the SBDs increase the transport efficiency.

As far as I understand, the smFRET data have been interpreted on the basis of a negative observation, i.e., that it is "likely" that none of the FRET states corresponds to a docked SBD. To convincingly show this, a positive observation is required, i.e., observation of a docked state.

The aim of this study was to study interdomain dynamics and not specifically docking. We have previously shown that docking can be visualized via cryo-EM (Sikkema et al., 2020), however the SBDs of OpuA appear to only dock in specific turnover conditions. We now show that the high FRET state of OpuA cannot represent a docked state, but that the SBDs transiently interact (see our response to the first comment). Importantly, a docked state was also not found in the cryo-EM reconstructions at low ionic strength, representing the smFRET conditions where we observe the interactions between the SBDs. The high FRET state occupies 30% of the dwells in this condition, and such a high percentage of molecules would have become apparent during cryo-EM 3D classification in case they would form a docked state. Therefore, we conclude that docking does not occur in low ionic strength apo condition. We discuss this point and our reasoning on page 11 of the revised manuscript.

In this respect, I find it troubling that in none of the tested conditions, the authors observed a FRET state which corresponds to the docked state. Such a state, which must exist for transport to occur (as mentioned in the authors' previous publications), needs to be demonstrated. This brings me to my next question: why have the authors not measured FRET between the SBDs and the transporter? Isn't this a very important piece that is missing from their puzzle?

We agree that investigating docking behavior under varied turnover conditions requires focused experiments on FRET dynamics between the SBDs and the transporter. As noted on page 5, OpuA exists as a homodimer, implying that a single cysteine mutation introduces two cysteines in a single functional transporter. To specifically implement a cysteine mutation in only one SBD and one transmembrane domain, it is necessary to artificially construct a heterodimer. We recently published initial attempts in this direction, and this will be a subject for future research but still requires years of work.

Additionally, I feel that important controls are missing. For example, how will the data presented in Fig1 look if the transporter is labeled with acceptor or donor only? How do soluble SBDs behave?

In the employed labeling method, donor and acceptor dyes are mixed in a 1:1 ratio and randomly attached to the two cysteines in the transporter. This automatically yields significant fractions of donor only and acceptor only transporters which are always present during the smFRET recordings. We can visualize those molecules on the basis of the dye stoichiometry, which we calculate by using three types of photon counts: donor-based donor emission (FDD), donor-based acceptor emission (FDA) and acceptorbased acceptor emission (FAA).

S=FDA+FDDFDA+FDD+FAA

Unfiltered plots look as follows (a dataset of OpuA-K521C at 600 mM KCl):

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

Donor only and acceptor only molecules have a very well discernible stoichiometry of 1 and 0, respectively. The filtering procedure is described in the materials and methods section, and these plots can be found in the supplementary database. We did not add them to the main text or supplementary materials of the original manuscript, as this is a very common procedure in the field of smFRET. We now include such a dataset in the revised manuscript.

Soluble SBDs of OpuA have been studied previously (e.g. Wolters et al., 2010 & De Boer et al. 2019). For example, we have shown by SEC-MALLS that soluble SBDs do not form dimers, which is consistent with our notion that the SBDs interact with low affinity. It is not possible to study interdomain dynamics between soluble SBDs by smFRET, because the measurements are carried out at picomolar concentrations (monomeric conditions). We emphasize that smFRET measurements with native complexes, with SBDs near each other at apparent millimolar concentrations, is physiologically more relevant.

Additional comments:

(1) "It could well be that cooperativity and transient interactions between SBDs is more common than previously anticipated" and a similar statement in the abstract. What evidence is there to suggest that the transient interactions between SBDs are a common phenomenon?

On page 11, we write: Dimer formation of SBPs has been described for a variety of proteins from different structural clusters of substrate-binding proteins [33–38,51–53].We cite 9 papers that report SBD/SBP dimers. This suggest to us that the phenomenon of interacting substrate-binding proteins could be more common. Moreover, the concentration of maltose-binding protein and other SBPs in the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria can reach (sub)millimolar concentrations, and low-affinity interactions may play a role not only in membrane protein-tethered SBDs (like in OpuA) but also be important in soluble substrate-receptors. Such low-affinity interactions are rarely studied in biochemical experiments.

(2) I think that the data presented in 1B-C better suits the supplementary information.

Figure 1B-D is already a summary of the supplementary information that describes the optimization of OpuA purification. We think it is valuable to show this part of the figure in the main text. A very clean and highly pure OpuA sample is essential for smFRET experiments. Quality of protein preparations and data analysis are key for the type of measurements we report in this paper.

(3) "the first peak in the SEC profile corresponds...." The peaks should be numbered in the figure to facilitate their identification.

We have changed the figure as suggested.

(4) "smFRET is a powerful tool for studying protein dynamics, but it has only been used for a handful of membrane proteins". With the growing list of membrane proteins studied by smFRET I find this an overstatement.

We removed this sentence in the new version of the manuscript.

(5) "We rationalized that docking of one SBD could induce a distance shift between the two SBDs in the FRET range of 3-10 nm (Figure 1E)" How and why was this assumed?

We realize that this is one of the sentences that caused confusion about the aim of this study. In this part of the manuscript, we should not have used docking as an example and we apologize for that. We replaced the sentence by: These variants are used to study inter-SBD dynamics in the FRET range of 310 nm (Figure 1E).

Also Figure 1E was adjusted to prevent confusion:

Author response image 2.

Author response image 2.

In addition, to avoid any confusion we changed the following sentence on page 4 (changes marked in bold): We designed cysteine mutations in the SBD of OpuA to study interdomain dynamics in the full length transporter.

(6) "However, the FRET distributions are broader than would be expected from a single FRET state, especially for OpuA-K521C" Have the authors established how a single state FRET of OpuA looks? Is there a control that supports this claim?

Below we compare two datasets from OpuA-K521C in 600 mM KCl with a typical smFRET dataset from the well-studied substrate-binding protein MBP from E. coli, which resides in a single state. Left: OpuA-K521C; Right: MBP

Author response image 3.

Author response image 3.

We agree that this cannot be assumed from the presented data. Therefore we rewrote this sentence: However, the FRET distributions tail towards higher FRET values, especially OpuA-K521C.

(7) "V149Q was designed as a mild mutation that would reduce docking efficiency and thereby substrate loading, but leave the intrinsic transport and ATP hydrolysis efficiency intact." I find this statement confusing: How can a mutation reduce docking efficiency yet leave the transport activity unchanged?

We rewrote the sentences (changes marked in bold): V149Q was designed as a mild mutation that would reduce docking efficiency and thereby substrate loading, but leave the ionic strength sensing in the NBD and the binding of glycine betaine and ATP intact. Accordingly, a reduced docking efficiency should result in a lower absolute glycine betaine-dependent ATPase activity. At the same time the responsiveness of the system to varying KCl, glycine betaine, or Mg-ATP concentrations should not change.

(8) Along the same lines: "whereas the glycine betaine-, Mg-ATP-, or KCl-dependent activity profiles remain unchanged" vs. "OpuA-V149Q-K521C exhibited a 2- to 3-fold reduction in glycine betainedependent ATPase activity".

See comment at point 7.

(9) In general, I find the writing wanting at places, not on par with the high standards set by previous publications of this group.

We recognize the potential ambiguity in our phrasing. We hope that after incorporating the feedback provided by the reviewers our manuscript will convey our findings in a clearer manner.

Extra changes to the text:

(1) Title changed: The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA physically transiently interact

(2) Second part of the abstract changed: We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

(3) Page 6, third paragraph and Figure 2B: the wrong rate number was extracted from table 1. Changed this in the text and figure: 112 s-1 173 s-1. It did not affect any of the interpretations or conclusions.

(4) Page 8, last paragraph, changed: smFRET was also performed in the absence of KCl and with a saturating concentration of glycine betaine (100 µM). The mean FRET efficiency of the highFRET state of OpuA-K521C increased to 0.78, which corresponds to an inter-dye distance of about 4 nm. This indicates that the dyes at the two SBDs move very close towards each other (Figure 4A) (Table 1) (Supplementary File 34).

(5) Page 9, second paragraph changed: Due to the inherent flexibility of the SBDs, with respect to both the MSP protein of the nanodisc and the TMDs of OpuA, their resolution is limited. Furthermore, the cryo-EM reconstructions average all the particles in the final dataset, including those with a low and high FRET state. Nevertheless, in both conditions, the densities that correspond to the SBDs can be observed in close proximity (Figure 4D). The distance between the density centers is 6 nm and align with the dimensions of an SBD, providing further evidence for physical interactions between the SBDs.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Van den Noort M, Drougkas P, Paulino O, Poolman D. 2023. Raw smFRET data, analysis scripts and cryo-EM maps for: The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA physically interact. DataverseNL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Raw SDS-PAA gel images of Figure 1C and D.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Labelled SDS-PAA gel images of Figure 1C and D.
    Table 2—source data 1. Burst variance analysis and mpH2MM of the FRET bursts of OpuA-K521C (variants) in different buffers.

    (A) From top to bottom: (1) Burst variance analysis of the bursts which were corrected by the leakage, crosstalk, and γ-correction factors and which were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares show average values per FRET bin. Black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (2) 2D E-S histogram shows the same data as in (1), with on both sides a histogram that represents the same bursts. (B) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the downstream analysis and following figures is shown as a star. (C) Plot of the BIC’-values for each final model. The red line represents a 0.05 cut-off. The model used is shown as a star. (D) Burst-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Bursts are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. If a burst contains more than one state, it is assigned as being dynamic. (E) Dwell-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. The dwells were corrected for leakage, direct excitation and the γ-factor. Black dots in A, D and E represent the average value of each state.

    Table 3—source data 1. Burst variance analysis and mpH2MM of the FRET bursts of OpuA-N414C (variants) in different buffers.

    (A) From top to bottom: (1) Burst variance analysis of the bursts which were corrected by the leakage, crosstalk, and γ-correction factors and which were selected after removing donor-only and acceptor-only bursts. The standard deviation of FRET in each burst is plotted against its mean FRET. Black squares show average values per FRET bin. Black dotted line shows the expected standard deviation in the absence of within-burst dynamics. (2) 2D E-S histogram shows the same data as in (1), with on both sides a histogram that represents the same bursts. (B) Plot of the ICL-values for each final model. The model used in the downstream analysis and following figures is shown as a star. (C) Plot of the BIC’-values for each final model. The red line represents a 0.05 cut-off. The model used is shown as a star. (D) Burst-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Bursts are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. If a burst contains more than one state, it is assigned as being dynamic. (E) Dwell-based 2D E-S scatter plot. Dwells are colored on the basis of the assigned state of the chosen mpH2MM model. The dwells were corrected for leakage, direct excitation and the γ-factor. Black dots in A, D and E represent the average value of each state.

    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All raw single photon data together with the Python scripts to analyze the data, plus the cyro-EM maps are deposited in the online database DataverseNL.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Van den Noort M, Drougkas P, Paulino O, Poolman D. 2023. Raw smFRET data, analysis scripts and cryo-EM maps for: The substrate-binding domains of the osmoregulatory ABC importer OpuA physically interact. DataverseNL.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES