Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 May 2;14:10138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60678-3

Highly integrable planar-structured printed circularly polarized antenna for emerging wideband internet of things applications in the millimeter-wave band

Ubaid Ullah 1,✉, Slawomir Koziel 2,3, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska 3
PMCID: PMC11065865  PMID: 38698012

Abstract

This paper proposes a numerically and experimentally validated printed wideband antenna with a planar geometry for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. This design tackles the challenges associated with deploying IoT sensors in remote areas or across extensive geographical regions. The proposed design exploits a coplanar-waveguide-fed modified microstrip line monopole for excitation of circularly polarized waves radiating in the broadside direction. The primary design is based on perturbations of the microstrip line protracted from a grounded coplanar waveguide. The capacitively coupled short rectangular stubs are periodically inserted alternately and excited asymmetrically on each side of the microstrip line parallel to the direction of the electric field vector. The sequential phase excitation of the periodic stubs generates a rectangular-cascaded electric field, which suppresses the stop band at the open end. As a result, the antenna radiates in the broadside direction. The impedance bandwidth of the antenna exceeds 8 GHz in the 28 GHz mm-wave band, i.e., it ranged from 25 to 33.5 GHz. Additionally, an axial ratio below 3 dB is achieved within the operating band from 26 to 33.5 GHz with the alterations of the surface current using straightforward topological adjustments of the physical parameters. The average in-band realized gain of the antenna is 10 dBic when measured in the broadside direction. These results indicate that the proposed design has the potential to improve the connectivity between IoT devices and the constantly varying orientation of satellites by mitigating the polarization mismatch.

Keywords: Internet of things, IoT devices, Single-layer antenna, Millimeter-wave, IoT application, Wideband designs, Circular polarization

Subject terms: Engineering, Electrical and electronic engineering

Introduction

The forthcoming generation of wireless communication is in high demand for wide bandwidth catering to the needs of data rates in the range of gigabytes per second1. The mm-wave band has proven its potential to provide a balance between reasonable-sized circuits and wide impedance bandwidth ensuring high data rates2–4. Additionally, the scarce spectrum availability in the currently utilized band has paved the way for migration to higher frequencies, which is now utilized for the fifth-generation networks5. At the millimeter wave band, the data rates are expected to be very high due to the availability of larger bandwidths and higher spectral efficiency5,6. To achieve the full potential of this band, high-gain antennas/antenna arrays are required to maintain signal integrity and information reliability, mainly in IoT applications in remote areas7. The exponential growth in the number of devices connected to the internet demands further performance enhancement at the front end of the system.

In this regard, satellite communication could emerge as a crucial enabler for the worldwide expansion of IoT connectivity. To realize this concept, the antennas are required to exhibit sufficiently wide impedance bandwidth with a stable directional beam for maintaining a good connection between many devices8. In urban and modern metropolitan areas, the problem of signal attenuation and path loss is aggravated by the multipath effects, which pose a grave challenge, particularly in the mm-wave band. However, this can be mitigated at the system level by deploying circularly polarized (CP) antennas instead of linearly polarized devices9–11. CP waves are known to have high signal integrity due to their ability to counter the effects of multipath losses, signal attenuation, absorption losses, and signal interference12. Excitation of equal magnitude and orthogonal fields with 90-degree phase differences are required for antennas radiating CP waves. This is a challenging undertaking due to the involvement of a complex geometrical modification of the antenna radiator and/or the feeding network.

There exists a rich literature on the CP antenna designs for IoT applications in the conventional lower frequency spectrum below 6 GHz13–17. Nevertheless, for the mm-wave band, the antenna’s electrical characteristics are very sensitive to any geometrical parameter changes due to short wavelengths18,19. Therefore, it is highly desirable to reduce the geometrical and henceforth the electrical complexities of the antennas, particularly the feeding mechanism, to expedite the design and production process. To address this issue, geometrically simple designs were introduced by different research teams 3,12,16,17,20–23. In12, a microstrip line antenna excited by a coaxial feed through a hole from the ground plane is designed. Several other antennas were designed based on microstrip line radiators for different frequency bands. The shortcomings of these designs are their linear polarization, narrow impedance bandwidth, and complex circuitry, therefore, their applicability for IoT devices and applications is limited. Moreover, these designs are generally low profile and geometrically simple but operate in a very narrow impedance bandwidth. On the other hand, wideband antennas based on the microstrip radiator were also proposed in the literature. For instance, in13 a linear series-fed antenna array with a relatively broad band of ~ 20% has been reported. However, the structure is geometrically complex and involves additional phase shifters for achieving wideband performance. Another wideband design was proposed in14, which is based on the concept of multilayers with reflectors, thereby adding to the circuit complexity as well as production cost. For modern wireless communication systems, high data rates with reliable signal quality are required, which emphasizes the importance of wideband antennas with circular polarization24–26. Minimizing the complexity of the circuit while maintaining high performance is also vital for realizing an easy-to-implement design.

This paper presents a wideband, circularly polarized antenna printed on a single substrate. The proposed single-port antenna is excited using a grounded coplanar waveguide-fed microstrip line. The extended microstrip line is supplemented with capacitively coupled periodic stubs systematically placed in pairs on both sides of the line forming a series-fed array antenna. The asymmetrical position and a slight offset in the protruded stubs alter the fringing electromagnetic fields by canceling the out-of-phase current components resulting in radiation of the electromagnetic waves from the antenna. The narrow gap between the stubs and the feedline provides a path for the currents to flow on the opposite edges of the stubs resulting in current addition and cancellation with phase progression resulting in circular polarization. The proposed design is easy to realize due to the simple topology printed on a single substrate. The antenna features a wide impedance bandwidth of more than 8 GHz while maintaining axial ratio below 3 dB from 26 to 33.5 GHz, which corresponds to approximately 7.5 GHz bandwidth. Additionally, a stable radiation pattern in the broadside direction ensures almost a flat gain making the antenna suitable for multiple applications in the mm-wave band. The planar geometry and topological simplicity of the feeding circuit and the radiator enable conformability and easy integration of the antenna. The novelty and the methodological contributions of the work can be briefly summarized as follows: (i) development of a planar-structured, single-series-fed linear array antenna featuring simple geometry; (ii) excitation of orthogonal field required for circular polarization using a geometrically simple method; (iii) demonstrating wide impedance matching and axial ratio bandwidth with stable in-band realized gain in the broadside direction.

Single-port series array antenna design and analysis

In the following sub-sections, the proposed antenna is first explicated from the design viewpoint. Subsequently, a detailed analysis is presented, followed by an explanation of the radiation mechanism, and excitation of circularly polarized waves. The analysis is performed theoretically and validated with the help of numerically generated surface current distribution at different angular time instances.

Antenna design

The parametrized architecture of the proposed series-fed array antenna has been illustrated in Fig. 1. The antenna is excited using a coplanar waveguide feeding with the full ground plane at the bottom of the substrate. The design is implemented on a single 0.508-mm-thick RO4003C substrate (εr = 3.38). Figure 1a depicts the top view of the proposed antenna which is comprised of the two coplanar grounds and an extended microstrip feedline of length (Lm) loaded with stubs. The width (Wm) of the microstrip line is determined to achieve 50-Ω input impedance. The pair of stubs are placed in close proximity to the microstrip line ensuring strong magnetic coupling between the fields generated by the traveling wave and the stubs. Figure 1b shows the sketch of the rear view and physical dimensions of the fully metalized bottom of the substrate. Moreover, the enlarged pair of stubs is shown in Fig. 1c, which is labeled with the parameters characterizing the physical proportions of the stubs. The geometrical parameters of the antenna are adjusted using multi-stage optimization. In the first stage, the impedance bandwidth of the antenna is optimized followed by the axial ratio optimization. The list of the optimized geometrical parameters (in millimeters) is given in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Geometry of the proposed single-layer mm-wave antenna (white: substrate, dark gray: metal): (a) parameterized front view, (b) back view, (c) enlarged view of the capacitively coupled stubs.

Table 1.

Optimized parameter values.

Parameter Value (Millimeters) Parameter Value Parameter Value (Millimeters)
Wg1 5.652 d 2.5138 L1 2.932
Lg 34.476 d1 1.8610 W1 1.234
Wg 13.360 d2 3.3179 L2 3.265
Lm 30.163 d3 2.2796 W2 0.8293
Wm 1.050 Lg1 6.557 S 0.012
Open in a new tab

Radiating elements and antenna operation

To explain the radiation mechanism of the proposed antenna, it is imperative to recall the transmission line theory. In the grounded coplanar waveguide, the electromagnetic fields of the wave propagate along the length of the microstrip line. Contrary to the microstrip line feeding, the coplanar waveguide with the full ground plane at the bottom of the substrate concentrates the field between the microstrip extended from the coplanar grounds and the bottom ground plane. These symmetric electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields are periodic with equal magnitudes but opposite directions resulting in field cancellation along the length of the microstrip line as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The simulated surface current on the feedline is shown in Fig. 2c which clearly illustrates the 180-degree out of phase periodic fields. In this work, through a systematic topological alteration of the microstrip line, amplitude tapering is implemented that breaks the symmetry of the electromagnetic fields. The sketch of the equivalent E and H fields is shown in Fig. 2b. The capacitively coupled pair of stubs are positioned on the field maxima at every half (guided) wavelength at slightly different frequencies in the 28 GHz band. The solid blue arrows show the equivalent in-phase vector magnetic field, whereas the dashed arrows show the fields that are out-of-phase. The in-phase field components are constructively added resulting in the radiation of the antenna. The different physical sizes of the stubs on each side of the line ensure the wideband operation of the device. The polarization of the antenna is further elaborated in the next section based on the simulated surface currents.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Equivalent fringing field distribution of the microstrip line. Electric field (redInline graphic), magnetic fields (blueInline graphic): (a) left: normal field distribution, (b) right: amplitude tapered field distribution, (c) microstrip line surface current, (d) surface current with stubs.

Single element design

To understand the antenna operating behavior, the electrical characteristics of a single pair of stubs are first analyzed. As mentioned in the previous section, a pair of stubs is placed on each side of the microstrip line. The length of the stubs (patches) are approximated using the microstrip patch antenna calculator while its width is heuristically selected and later optimized simultaneously. The Four different configuration of the single element are studied which are shown in Fig. 3. In the first case, the symmetric single element (SSE) design with only CPW ground plane is analyzed which is depicted in Fig. 3a. Here, the pair of stubs are symmetrically placed on both sides of the microstrip line. In the second and third case, the electrical characteristics of the SSE with only bottom ground plane (Fig. 3b) and with both the ground planes (Fig. 3c) are analyzed. In the fourth case, the asymmetrical single element (ASE) design with both the ground planes as illustrated in Fig. 3d is analyzed. Furthermore, the S11 response of the single-element design is depicted in Fig. 5. It is observed that the impedance bandwidth of the single element closely resembles the final antenna design. The reflection coefficient (S11) and axial ratio of the SSE and ASE antenna are depicted in Fig. 3e and f. The impedance matching is poor when only coplanar ground planes were used with a weak resonance near 31 GHz. It should be noted that AR of the antenna for this case is well above 20 dB. The impedance matching with the bottom ground plane only shows resonance in the 28 GHz region which is attributed to the small size difference between the stubs that causes some constructive correlation of the currents. The AR for this configuration of the antenna also does not meet the requisites as seen in Fig. 3f. Similarly, the SSE with both the ground planes (legend: SE Sym) shows a very narrowband impedance matching and poor AR within the band of the interest. Finally, the ASE with both the ground planes is analyzed in terms of both the performance figures. The S11 response indicate a wideband response and improved impedance matching and AR compared to the symmetrical configuration of the single element design. The geometrical parameters of the design are later optimized simultaneously. The radiation pattern of the single element is also analyzed in Fig. 4 at multiple frequencies as shown. The radiation pattern of the single element shows a broadside radiation pattern throughout the operating bandwidth of the antenna in both the xz- and yz-plane which are illustrated in Fig. 4a and b, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The single element antenna design and its electrical characteristics; (a) SSE with CPW only, (b) SSE with bottom ground only, (c) SSE with both the grounds, (d) ASE with both the ground, (e) S11, (f) AR.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Simulated surface current distribution on the capacitively coupled stubs illustrating left-hand circular polarization: (a) 0 degrees, (b) 90 degrees, (c) 180 degrees, (d) 270 degrees.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Radiation pattern of the single element design (xz-plane) top and (yz-plane) bottom, (a) xz-plane, (b) yz-plane.

Circular polarization

To further illustrate the polarization mechanism of the antenna, the surface current is shown on the capacitively coupled pair of stubs near the CP center frequency at 29 GHz. The orientation of the field with phase progression clearly indicates the rotation of the vector field in the clockwise direction yielding left-hand circularly polarized (LHCP) in the broadside direction. Figure 5a and b indicate the position of the vertical fields at 0 degrees and 180 degrees in the y-direction and –y-direction, respectively. Similarly, Fig. 5b and d show the fields on the horizontal edges of the stubs in the x-direction and −x-direction at 90 degrees and 270 degrees. This clearly indicates that the field orientation changes with the change in the angular time, resulting in the excitation of circular polarization. It is important to note that no active circuit elements or polarization converters are used in the proposed design, which makes it a very cost-effective, and geometrically simple antenna with wide impedance and axial ratio bandwidth.

Design evolution

The design evolution stages are illustrated in Fig. 6. In the first stage, the CPW-to-microstrip line transition is designed and simulated. The geometry of the first stage is shown in Fig. 6a. The impedance matching of the antenna for this stage is shown in Fig. 6d. The S11 response indicates that the antenna at this stage is not radiating energy into the free space. Similarly, the AR response shown in Fig. 6e indicates linear polarization. In the second stage of the design, the stubs are placed periodically on both sides of the microstrip line as shown in Fig. 6b. With the introduction of the stubs, the field symmetry is broken resulting in the field constructive correlation. The S11 response of the second stage shown in Fig. 6d illustrates S11 below − 10 dB within the operating band of the antenna. It should be noted that the antenna parameters are not optimized at this stage. In the final design stage, a slight offset between the two stubs is introduced and all the geometrical parameters are simultaneously optimized using a full-wave multi-stage optimization. The impedance matching and the AR of the final design stage after optimization are also shown in Fig. 6d and e. Both the impedance bandwidth and AR bandwidth reflects wideband response of the antenna.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Design evolution stages and the electrical characteristics of the antenna design stages; (a) stage 1, (b) stage 2, and (c) stage 3, (d) S11, (e) AR.

It should be noted that the proposed design offers a versatile balance between gain and physical size. In scenarios with limited space, the antenna can be designed with fewer elements (E) to reduce its footprint, while for applications where circuit size is not a concern, more elements can be added. Figure 7 depicts the achieved gain of the antenna with varying numbers of elements from 2 to 6 elements. Each pair of stub is considered as a single element. The plots display realized gain corresponding to different numbers of elements. For a four-element array, the realized gain surpasses 10 dBic, while a six-element array can achieve close to 12 dBic. Further increasing the number of elements to seven shows trivial gain change due to input signal fading. Therefore, in this paper, four element design (with red color curve) is selected which has relatively high gain and a reasonably compact size. All the geometrical parameters for the four element design are fully optimized at the full-wave level of description.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Realized gain of the antenna with different number of elements.

Parametric analysis

In this sections, a thorough parametric analysis of the antenna is conducted to gain insights into its key performance metrics and to comprehend its behavior and electrical characteristics. Note that the optimized values of all the parameters are listed in Table 1. The effect of changing the value of the parameter d on S11 and AR is shown in Fig. 8a and b. Increasing d from it optimum value lowers the impedance matching as well as the AR value deviates from its reference range especially in the lower frequencies. Figure 8c and d shows the effect of changing d1 on S11 and AR. This parameter has almost similar effect on the electrical characteristics of the antenna as the preceding parameter. The results of changing the value of d2 are illustrated in Fig. 8e and f. As seen this parameter has little effect on S11 as the antenna still retain the value impedance matching below -10 dB in the whole operating bandwidth, but the AR is adversely affected in both the upper and lower frequencies of the antenna. Extending the discussion further, we look into the effect of d3 in Fig. 8g and h. As seen the change in d3 has a trivial effect on S11 value, but the AR at the lower end of the operating frequency is significantly impacted, underscoring the sensitivity of these parameters to changes in the AR. Finally, the geometrical parameters of the capacitively coupled stubs are analyzed in Fig. 8i, j, k and l. These parameters has a significant impact on the S11 as well as the AR of the antenna. These two parameters controls the amount of (out-of-phase) field cancellation and the constructive addition of the in-phase vector field components. Therefore, they both have noteworthy effect on both the performance figures of the antenna. The effect of the stubs widths (W1 and W2) is also studied in terms of reflection and axial ratio. Figure 8m and n shows that the width W1 has a minor effect on the impedance bandwidth. Changing this parameters slightly shifts the frequency upward or downward. When the W1 is decreased from its optimum value, the combined current length along the width of the stubs is reduced which adversely effect the AR at the lower operating band of the antenna. As these two parameters controls the width of the overall horizontal current, a similar effect of both the electrical characteristics is observed with the change in W2 as indicated in Fig. 8o and p. In the proposed work, all the parameters are optimized at the full-wave level of description to ensure optimum performance of the antenna in terms of impedance bandwidth and AR.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Parametric analysis of different geometrical parameters of the antenna (a) S11 variation with parameter d, (b) AR variation with parameter d, (c) S11 variation with parameter d1, (d) AR variation with parameter d1, (e) S11 variation with parameter d2, (f) AR variation with parameter d2, (g) S11 variation with parameter d3, (h) AR variation with parameter d3, (i) S11 variation with parameter L1, (j) AR variation with parameter L1, (k) S11 variation with parameter L2, (l) AR variation with parameter L2, (m) S11 variation with parameter W1, (n) AR variation with parameter W1, (o) S11 variation with parameter W2, (p) AR variation with parameter W2.

Experimental validation

The computational model of the proposed antenna has been numerically characterized at the full-wave level of description using CST Microwave Studio. Following an extensive numerical analysis, a prototype of the antenna has been fabricated and characterized experimentally. Photographs of the physical design are shown in Fig. 9, whereas the experimental setup in the anechoic chamber is shown in Fig. 10. The radiation pattern has been measured using the Pasternack horn antenna PE9850/2F-15 and Anritsu MS2644B 0–40 GHz vector network analyzer. The distance between measurement towers (or between the reference and the measured antennas) is about three meters, whereas the far field distance at 26 GHz is less than 10 cm.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Photographs of the fabricated prototype of the proposed antenna with end-launch Southwest connector: (a) front view, (b) back view.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Antenna in the anechoic chamber for experimental validation.

The antenna is fed with a Southwest end-launch connector (1092-03A-6), which is mounted on the antenna for experimental validation. The electrical and field performance figures of the antenna are characterized according to the IEEE antenna measurement standard (IEEE Std149-1979 (R2008)). In the following sub-sections, the proposed antenna's simulated and measured results are discussed in detail.

Impedance bandwidth axial ratio characterization

The impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna is shown in Fig. 11. The simulation data is depicted with a solid gray line while the measured data is in solid black to clearly differentiate between the two. It can be observed that the simulated reflection coefficient S11 is less than − 10 dB from 25 to approximately 33 GHz corresponding to 8 GHz impedance bandwidth. Likewise, the measured data closely matches the simulation results. The measured S11 is below − 10 dB from roughly 25 to 33.5 GHz reflecting the wide bandwidth of the antenna. Moreover, these results clearly indicate good impedance matching (achieved without any additional impedance matching circuit) from the input to the microstrip line radiator. As mentioned in the previous section, the proposed antenna is circularly polarized. The axial ratio of the antenna is numerically and experimentally characterized in the broadside direction and the results are illustrated in Fig. 12. Both the simulated and measured data show that the proposed antenna is circularly polarized for almost 95% of the impedance bandwidth of the antenna. As can be observed, the axial ratio is mostly below 3 dB from 26 to 33.5 GHz with minor discrepancies between EM simulations and measurements.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

EM-simulated (gray) and measured (black) reflection coefficient.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

EM-simulated (gray) and measured (black) axial ratio of the proposed planar antenna array.

Realized gain and radiation pattern analysis

The realized gain of the proposed antenna is analyzed numerically as well as experimentally in the broadside direction and the results are shown in Fig. 13. The average in-band realized gain is roughly 9.5 dBic. The simulated peak gain is 10.3 dBic, while the measured peak value of the peak gain is roughly 10.1 dBic. Both datasets are in close agreement and show a relatively flat gain with an average variation of 1.3 dB, in the entire operating band of the antenna. The radiation pattern of the antenna is another important performance figure, particularly in the mm-wave band, where propagation losses are relatively high compared to the lower frequency spectrum. The proposed antenna is characterized at several frequencies to ensure far-field stability. Figure 14 illustrates the radiation patterns of the antenna at multiple frequency points taken at 27 GHz, 29 GHz, and 31 GHz. The LHCP and RHCP fields are plotted for both the xy- and yz-planes. The radiation pattern is mainly pointed in the broadside direction with a minor beam tilt which is due to the size difference, and hence asymmetric current distribution on the capacitively coupled stubs. The LHCP fields are more than 10 dB stronger with respect to RHCP, indicating reliable radiation and high polarization purity of the antenna and acceptable level of in-band cross-pole discrimination27,28. Moreover, only a slight beam tilt is observed in the main beam with the change in frequency which ensures a highly stable radiation pattern across the operating bandwidth. The 3 dB AR beamwidth of the antenna is evaluated at different frequencies. The overall in-band AR beamwidth is ± 5° in the broadside direction which is greatly suitable for applications requiring focused coverage and high power efficiency29,30. At 30 GHz a broader beamwidth is observed where the AR is very low at the broadside, with a corresponding beamwidth of around ± 10 degrees.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Open in a new tab

EM-simulated (gray) and measured (black) realized gain (maximum gain in the zy-plane).

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Open in a new tab

Simulated (gray) and measured (black) xz- (left) and yz-plane (right) patterns for: (a) 27 GHz, (b) 29 GHz, (c) 31 GHz; LHCP (—), RHCP (-—-).

Comparison with the state-of-the-art designs

The performance of the proposed antenna has been compared with the recent state-of-the-art designs in Table 2. All major electrical features including the operating frequency, polarization, axial ratio and impedance bandwidth, peak realized gain, and the substrate used are considered in the comparison table. The quantitative analysis of all the performance figures clearly indicates the superiority of the proposed structure over the recently published designs. It is important to note here that several designs in the literature exhibit better performance, cf. 2,3,5,7,12,13,21,31,32. Nevertheless, these designs are realized using complex multilayer methods and/or utilizing expensive feeding mechanisms involving active circuit elements. Additionally, the majority of the designs mentioned earlier exhibit a limited bandwidth and operate using linear polarization. Reference10 proposes a single-element design with a wider impedance bandwidth, but this design not only has a smaller gain but also utilizes metallic vias, which adds to the complexity of the design. Similarly, references33 and34 feature complex geometrical configuration that encompasses waveguide excitation feeding, large aperture size, and the employment of multilayer structures. In contrast, the suggested design is implemented on a single substrate, features a simple geometry, and it does not require any active components to generate circularly polarized fields. On the other hand, the proposed design is realized on a single substrate featuring a simple geometry and does not involve any active elements for the excitation of circularly polarized fields. Additionally, a size comparison is done in terms of free space wavelength calculated at the center frequency. For a fair comparison, we evaluate the size of the single antenna, aligning with the reference antenna, which primarily features single antenna designs. It's worth noting that the antenna referenced in35 is considerably smaller in size, but its other electrical characteristics are not comparable to those of the proposed antenna.

Table 2.

Comparison with the state-of-the-art designs.

Refs. Operating frequency (GHz) No of elements % |S11| BW CP/LP Peak gain Substrate permittivity Size (L × W) (λo × λo)
10 28 1 46.4 CP 6.5 2.2 3.92 × 1.4
16 27 4 21.4 LP 12.8 2.2 2.70 × 0.90
17 24 26 3.3 LP 15 3.55 8.97 × 1.87
20 76 8 13.4 LP 10.4 3 –
21 28 1 16 CP 8.8 3.3 3.8 × 1.25
22 24 – 5 CP 8.5 3.3 7.59 × 1.09
35 28 1 8 CP 2.2 2.2 0.19 × 0.15
33 60 1 17.9 CP 14.2 2.2 30 × 20
34 30 16 40.21 CP 20.2 2.2 –
This work 28 4 28 CP 10.3 3.38 2.8 × 0.94
Open in a new tab

Conclusion

A single-layer series-fed array antenna operating with circular polarization is presented in this paper for IoT applications. The antenna is based on a modified microstrip line extended from a coplanar waveguide in the y-direction. The conventional microstrip lines have symmetric fields with equal magnitude but opposite directions resulting in field cancelation along the length of the line. In the paper, four pairs of stubs are capacitively coupled in the ± x-direction to the microstrip line at every half-guided wavelength with a slight offset in the y-direction. The addition of the stubs induces amplitude tapering resulting in the alteration of the symmetric fringing electric and magnetic fields. Moreover, the offset in the capacitively coupled stubs enables excitation of circularly polarized fields in the wide frequency spectrum yielding a wideband antenna that operates with circular polarization. The advantages of the proposed design include simple geometry, planar structure (which can be easily integrated), ease of excitation, and low fabrication complexity. Given the achieved performance in terms of electrical characteristics and the mentioned topological advantages, the proposed antenna can be considered a potential candidate for IoT devices and sensors in the mm-wave band.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dassault Systemes, France, for making CST Microwave Studio available.

Author contributions

U. U and S. K did the conceptualization and methodology and wrote the main text. S.K and A. P did the characterization, validation, and postprocessing of the data. All authors reviewed the paper.

Funding

Icelandic Centre for Research, 217771 and National Science Centre of Poland Grant 2022/47/B/ST7/00072.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study is included in this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wang Y, Li J, Huang L, Jing Y, Georgakopoulos A, Demestichas P. 5G mobile: Spectrum broadening to higher-frequency bands to support high data rates. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2014;9(3):39–46. doi: 10.1109/MVT.2014.2333694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pi Z, Khan F. An introduction to millimeter-wave mobile broadband systems. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011;49(6):101–107. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5783993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin W, Ziolkowski RW, Baum TC. 28 GHz compact omnidirectional circularly polarized antenna for device-to-device communications in the future 5G systems. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2017;65(12):6904–6914. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2759899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rappaport TS, et al. Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work. IEEE Access. 2013;1:335–349. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2260813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Asaadi M, Sebak A. High-gain low-profile circularly polarized slotted SIW cavity antenna for MMW applications. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2017;16:752–755. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2601900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deckmyn T, Cauwe M, Vande Ginste D, Rogier H, Agneessens S. Dual-band (28,38) GHz coupled quarter-mode substrate-integrated waveguide antenna array for next-generation wireless systems. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2019;67(4):2405–2412. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2894325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yashchyshyn Y, et al. 28 GHz switched-beam antenna based on S-PIN diodes for 5G mobile communications. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2018;17(2):225–228. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2017.2781262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hesari SS, Bornemann J. Wideband circularly polarized substrate integrated waveguide endfire antenna system with high gain. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2017;16:2262–2265. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2017.2713720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al-Saedi H, Abdel-Wahab WM, Gigoyan S, Mittra R, Safavi-Naeini S. Ka-band antenna with high circular polarization purity and wide AR beamwidth. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2018;17(9):1697–1701. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2018.2864172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen H, Shao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Zhang Z. A low-profile broadband circularly polarized mmwave antenna with special-shaped ring slot. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2019;18(7):1492–1496. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2920875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park S, Park S. LHCP and RHCP substrate integrated waveguide antenna arrays for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2017;16:601–604. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2594081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bai X, Qu S-W, Yang S, Hu J, Nie Z-P. Millimeter-wave circularly polarized tapered-elliptical cavity antenna with wide axial-ratio beamwidth. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2016;64(2):811–814. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2507171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Falkner BJ, Zhou H, Mehta A, Arampatzis T, Mirshekar-Syahkal D, Nakano H. A circularly polarized low-cost flat panel antenna array with a high impedance surface meta-substrate for satellite on-the-move medical IoT applications. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2021;69(9):6076–6081. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3070011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Birwal A, Singh S, Kanaujia BK, Kumar S. Broadband CPW fed circularly polarized antenna for IoT-based navigation system. Int. J. Microw. Wireless Technol. 2019;11(8):835–843. doi: 10.1017/S1759078719000461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mastrosimini, V., Santamaria, L., Grande, M., Ferrero, F., Staraj, R. & Lizzi, L. Miniaturized omnidirectional circularly polarized antenna for IoT applications, in Proc. 15th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propagat. (EuCAP), 2021, pp. 1–4.
  • 16.Zhu J, Liao S, Yang Y, Li F, Xue Q. 60 GHz dual-circularly polarized planar aperture antenna and array. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2018;66(2):1014–1019. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2784445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo YQ, Pan YM, Zheng SY. Design of series-fed, single-layer, and wideband millimeter-wave microstrip arrays. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2020;68(10):7017–7026. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3008668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Paola C, Zhang S, Zhao K, Ying Z, Bolin T, Pedersen GF. Wideband beam-switchable 28 GHz quasi-Yagi array for mobile devices. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2019;67(11):6870–6882. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2925189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cao Y, Chin K-S, Che W, Yang W, Li ES. A compact 38 GHz multibeam antenna array with multifolded butler matrix for 5G applications. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2017;16:2996–2999. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2017.2757045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yi H, Wang Z, Xia D, Liu H, Li L. Periodic asymmetric trapezoidal perturbation microstrip antenna for millimeter-wave automotive radar sensors. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2023;71(2):1369–1377. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2022.3227795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hilario Re PD, Comite D, Podilchak SK. Single-layer series-fed planar array with controlled aperture distribution for circularly polarized radiation. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2020;68(6):4973–4978. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2952001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yin Y, Wu K. Endfire circularly-polarized antipodal linearly tapered slot antenna fed by slotted width-tapered SIW. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2022;70(4):2411–2421. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3109159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu Q, Ng K-B, Chan CH. Printed circularly polarized spiral antenna array for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2017;65(2):636–643. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2016.2640019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cameron TR, Sutinjo AT, Okoniewski M. A circularly polarized broadside radiating “herringbone” array design with the leaky-wave approach. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2010;9:826–829. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2010.2066950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wei, K., Li, J.-Y., Xu, R., & Yang, G.-W. Circularly polarized omnidirectional microstrip antenna array, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag., pp. 2315–2316, San Diego, CA, USA, July 9–14, (2017)
  • 26.Chen SJ, Fumeaux C, Monnai Y, Withayachumnankul W. Dual circularly polarized series-fed microstrip patch array with coplanar proximity coupling. IEEEAnt. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2017;16:1500–1503. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2647227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu R, Cao S, Liu Y, Cai S. A wideband low-profile dual-polarized antenna based on a metasurface. Electronics. 2023;12(23):4739. doi: 10.3390/electronics12234739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wen L-H, et al. A wideband series-fed circularly polarized differential antenna by using crossed open slot-pairs. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020;68(4):2565–2574. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2951994. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Neophytou K, Steeg M, Stöhr A, Antoniades MA. compact folded leaky-wave antenna radiating a fixed beam at broadside for 5G mm-wave applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2022;21(2):292–296. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3128563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zuo L, Wang K, Li Y, Liang Z, Zheng SY, Long Y. The periodic leaky-wave antenna with different unit cells based on consistent fundamental mode. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020;68(12):7794–7802. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3000862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hamberger GF, Trummer S, Siart U, Eibert TF. A planar dual-polarized microstrip 1-D-beamforming antenna array for the 24-GHz band. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2017;65(1):142–149. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2016.2618847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang Y, Sun B, Guo J. A low-cost, single-layer, dual circularly polarized antenna for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Ant. Wireless Propag. Lett. 2019;18(4):651–655. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2900301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bisharat DJ, Liao S, Xue Q. Circularly polarized planar aperture antenna for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015;63(12):5316–5324. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2496116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng Y, Dong Y. Wideband circularly polarized planar antenna array for 5G millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021;69(5):2615–2627. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3028213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yin Y, Zarghooni B, Wu K. Single-layered circularly polarized substrate-integrated waveguide horn antenna array. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 2017;65(11):6161–6166. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2754472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study is included in this article.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES